Abstract
The effect of interpregnancy interval on the birthweight of the subsequent child was investigated in a cohort of 5,938 women who registered for two consecutive pregnancies in the Collaborative Perinatal Project. Mean birthweight increased from 3,101 grams for intervals of less than 3 months to 3,193 grams for intervals of 15-17.9 months and remained stable thereafter (p for trend = 0.006). However, women with shorter intervals were younger, lighter weight, and less educated at the beginning of the first pregnancy than were women with longer intervals; the birthweight of their previous child was lower, and they were of marginally lower socioeconomic status. Adjustment for confounders reduced the maximum difference in mean birthweight by interval length from 92 to 39 grams, and blunted the trend for lower birthweights with shorter intervals (p = 0.45). Similarly, adjustment reduced the increased risk of low birthweight among women with the shortest intervals from 52 per cent to 12 per cent. We conclude that a short interpregnancy interval is primarily a marker for a woman who is otherwise at high risk, and that modification of this interval alone may be unlikely to have a major impact on low birthweight.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Brody D. J., Bracken M. B. Short interpregnancy interval: a risk factor for low birthweight. Am J Perinatol. 1987 Jan;4(1):50–54. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-999736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Creasy R. K., Gummer B. A., Liggins G. C. System for predicting spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Jun;55(6):692–695. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erickson J. D., Bjerkedal T. Interpregnancy interval. Association with birth weight, stillbirth, and neonatal death. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1978 Jun;32(2):124–130. doi: 10.1136/jech.32.2.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kotelchuck M., Schwartz J. B., Anderka M. T., Finison K. S. WIC participation and pregnancy outcomes: Massachusetts Statewide Evaluation Project. Am J Public Health. 1984 Oct;74(10):1086–1092. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.10.1086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MORTON N. E. The inheritance of human birth weight. Ann Hum Genet. 1955 Oct;20(2):125–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1955.tb01362.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Myrianthopoulos N. C., French K. S. An application of the U.S. Bureau of the Census socioeconomic index to a large, diversified patient population. Soc Sci Med. 1968 Sep;2(3):283–299. doi: 10.1016/0037-7856(68)90004-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- WOOLF B. On estimating the relation between blood group and disease. Ann Hum Genet. 1955 Jun;19(4):251–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1955.tb01348.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams R. L., Creasy R. K., Cunningham G. C., Hawes W. E., Norris F. D., Tashiro M. Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 May;59(5):624–632. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]