Skip to main content
Surgical Case Reports logoLink to Surgical Case Reports
. 2026 Aug 22;12(1):26-0232. doi: 10.70352/scrj.cr.26-0232

Torsion and Rupture of a Wandering Pelvic Accessory Spleen Associated with Essential Thrombocythemia: A Case Report

Aoi Suzuki 1,2, Taku Sato 1,✉, Fumi Hasegawa 1, Megumu Enjoji 1
PMCID: PMC13503049  PMID: 42639322

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION

The pelvic accessory spleen is a rare anomaly, and its diagnosis is challenging. Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm that can cause secondary myelofibrosis and splenomegaly. We report a case of torsion and rupture of a large wandering pelvic accessory spleen associated with ET.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 62-year-old man with a history of ET presented with acute abdominal pain. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed a 9-cm pelvic mass with surrounding high-density fluid consistent with a hematoma, indicating its rupture. He was diagnosed with ET 8 years earlier, and disease control had gradually worsened. Splenomegaly and an 8-cm pelvic mass were detected 2 months before onset using CT and MRI. The signal-intensity pattern of the pelvic mass and the spleen on MRI was identical. Therefore, the mass was considered an accessory spleen rather than a tumor. Emergency laparotomy was performed. The pelvic mass was a wandering accessory spleen. There was no supportive tissue, except for a cord-like vascular pedicle. The mass was easily resected by ligating the pedicle. Splenomegaly was observed in the left lateral abdomen. In this case, both the native and pelvic accessory spleens were enlarged because of the progression of ET. The patient was discharged on POD 16.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness of pelvic accessory spleen and its torsion is important in the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses and acute abdominal pain. When a large pelvic accessory spleen is identified, elective resection should be considered to prevent torsion or rupture. Although secondary enlargement of an accessory spleen after splenectomy has been reported, simultaneous enlargement of both the native and accessory spleens is exceptionally rare. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the pathophysiology of simultaneous enlargement of the native and accessory spleens in association with a hematological disease.

KEYWORDS: pelvic accessory spleen, wandering accessory spleen, essential thrombocythemia

Abbreviations

ADC

apparent diffusion coefficient

AIHA

autoimmune hemolytic anemia

DWI

diffusion-weighted imaging

ET

essential thrombocythemia

GIST

gastrointestinal stromal tumor

HCV

hepatitis C virus

HDRBC

heat-damaged red blood cell

ITP

immune thrombocytopenic purpura

JAK2

Janus kinase 2

SC

sulfur colloid

Tc-99m

Technetium-99m

US

ultrasonography

INTRODUCTION

Accessory spleens are ectopic splenic tissues identified in approximately 10%–30% of autopsy cases.1) Clinically, accessory spleens are often detected incidentally on radiographic imaging studies, including US and CT.2,3) Most accessory spleens were asymptomatic and <4-cm in diameter.3) The risk of torsion is high in patients with accessory spleens >6-cm; therefore, prophylactic surgical resection of large accessory spleens is recommended.4)

An accessory spleen is typically located in the left upper abdomen. In approximately 75% of cases, the accessory spleen is located at the splenic hilum, and in approximately 20% of cases, it is located at the pancreatic tail. Furthermore, it is found in the greater omentum, the mesocolon, and the pancreas. Reportedly its locations include the retroperitoneum, the mediastinum, the pelvis, and the scrotum.5) Pelvic accessory spleens have been reported in only 18 cases, including this one.6–22)

Feeding vessels for pelvic accessory spleens arise from gastroepiploic vessels or splenic hilum arterial branches.18) In some cases, an elongation of the vascular pedicle and a lack of suspensory ligaments are observed, resulting in excessive mobility. These accessory spleens are “wandering accessory spleens.”4,5) The risk of torsion is high in pelvic wandering spleens.14)

ET is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal hematopoietic stem cell abnormalities, marked thrombocytosis, megakaryocytic hyperplasia, and symptoms including bleeding and thrombosis.23) The diagnostic criteria include a platelet count >450 × 109/L. Generally, its prognosis is favorable24); however, approximately 12% of cases progress to secondary myelofibrosis.23) Extramedullary hematopoiesis frequently occurs in the spleen, leading to splenomegaly.25,26) To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report describing the pathophysiology of simultaneous enlargement of an accessory spleen and splenomegaly associated with ET.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 62-year-old man with a history of ET presented with acute abdominal pain and was referred by the hematology department of Japan Agricultural Co-operatives Toride Medical Center. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed a 9-cm pelvic mass with poor enhancement and surrounding high-attenuation fluid, indicating its rupture (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Preoperative contrast-enhanced CT findings. (A) Axial image showing a 9-cm pelvic mass with poor enhancement. (B) Axial image demonstrating focal wall disruption of the pelvic mass with surrounding hyperdense hematoma. (C) Coronal image indicating rupture of the pelvic mass, surrounded by hyperdense hematoma (arrowheads) and hemoperitoneum.

Fig. 1

A routine health checkup conducted 8 years ago revealed an elevated platelet count of approximately 500 × 109/L. The patient was referred to our hospital’s Hematology Department by his family doctor. Genetic testing revealed a JAK2 V617F mutation, and the patient was subsequently diagnosed with ET. He was treated with hydroxyurea, a DNA synthesis inhibitor, and anagrelide, a megakaryocyte proliferation suppressor; however, the disease was uncontrolled and gradually deteriorated. CT revealed splenomegaly and an 8-cm pelvic mass 2 months prior. Splenomegaly was considered a result of secondary myelofibrosis; however, a pelvic mass was not diagnosed. The pelvic mass was round and well-defined, and the feeding vessels arose from the left gastroepiploic vessels. MRI was also performed 2 months prior, and the signal characteristics of the pelvic mass were identical to those of the native spleen on T1- and T2-weighted images, DWI, and ADC maps, suggesting an accessory spleen rather than a neoplasm (Fig. 2). The other previous imaging study was an abdominal US performed 8 years prior. This examination demonstrated mild splenomegaly and a well-defined, round 4.8-cm mass adjacent to the native spleen. In retrospect, this mass was considered consistent with an accessory spleen (Fig. 3). These findings indicate that both splenomegaly and enlargement of the accessory spleen had already been present 8 years before the current presentation. No other prior imaging studies were available.

Fig. 2. MRI findings at X–2 months. Each panel showed the spleen (upper row) and the pelvic mass (lower row), which demonstrated identical signal characteristics across all sequences (isointense on T1-weighted images, slightly hypointense on T2-weighted images, hyperintense on DWI, and low ADC values). (A) Axial T1-weighted image of the spleen (arrowheads). (B) Axial T1-weighted image of the pelvic mass (arrows). (C) Axial T2-weighted image of the spleen (arrowheads). (D) Axial T2-weighted image of the pelvic mass (arrows). (E) Axial DWI of the spleen (arrowheads). (F) Axial DWI of the pelvic mass (arrows). (G) Axial ADC map of the spleen (arrowheads). (H) Axial ADC map of the pelvic mass (arrows).

Fig. 2

ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; DWI, diffusion-weighted imaging

Fig. 3. US findings at X–8 years. (A) Mild splenomegaly was detected in the left upper abdomen (arrowheads) at the time of the initial diagnosis of ET. (B) A 4.8-cm well-defined round mass was detected (arrow) adjacent to the native spleen (arrowheads). The mass was considered as an accessory spleen.

Fig. 3

ET, essential thrombocythemia; US, ultrasonography

His medical history and previous radiological studies were not shared between the hematology department and our department until the onset of the acute abdominal pain; therefore, we had no opportunity to perform prophylactic resection of the wandering pelvic accessory spleen. However, the previously available clinical and imaging information enabled a prompt diagnosis of torsion and rupture of the pelvic accessory spleen at presentation. During the emergency laparotomy, a ruptured 9-cm wandering accessory spleen surrounded by a large hematoma was observed in the pelvis (Fig. 4). A cord-like vascular pedicle was the only supporting tissue, and its torsion was identified. The accessory spleen was easily resected by ligating the pedicle. Splenomegaly was observed in the left lateral abdomen.

Fig. 4. Intraoperative findings. A 9-cm ruptured accessory spleen was only attached to a cord-like vascular pedicle (arrowhead). There was no supportive tissue, except for this vascular pedicle.

Fig. 4

Histopathological examination of the resected accessory spleen revealed extensive necrosis, whereas the non-necrotic area contained megakaryocytes, indicating extramedullary hematopoiesis (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5. Pathological findings of the resected accessory spleen. (A) Macroscopically, the ligated stump of the vascular pedicle was observed (arrow). (B) The macroscopic cut surface showed a hematoma within the accessory spleen. (C) Microscopically, approximately 90% of the field consisted of necrotic tissue. (D) Microscopically, megakaryocytes (circles) and a necrotic megakaryocyte (dotted circle) were identified in the non-necrotic area, indicating extramedullary hematopoiesis in the accessory spleen.

Fig. 5

The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on POD 16. After discharge, his treatment was changed to the JAK2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib. At the 1-year follow-up, his general condition remained good, with platelet counts maintained at approximately 200 × 109/L.

DISCUSSION

Accessory spleens are ectopic splenic tissues frequently identified in clinical practice.1) Most accessory spleens are asymptomatic3); however, torsion may occur, leading to acute abdominal pain. This pain occurs mostly in children and young adults.27) The event is relatively rare in older patients, with only 3 cases previously reported in patients aged 60 and over, including this case.18,28,29)

The risk of torsion is high in large4) and wandering accessory spleens.14) A wandering accessory spleen has few supportive connective ligaments or lacks supportive tissue, except for an elongated vascular pedicle.5,21) The vascular pedicle forms a cord-like tissue, and its torsion subsequently leads to venous congestion, ischemia, and infarction of the accessory spleen, eventually resulting in hemorrhage or rupture.4)

Pelvic accessory spleens have been previously reported in 18 cases, including this case (Table 1).6–22) Torsion occurred in 50% of the cases. Overall, 13 (72%) of the 18 reported cases of pelvic accessory spleen were described as wandering accessory spleen. It is difficult to diagnose a pelvic accessory spleen preoperatively. Most patients were diagnosed intraoperatively or by postoperative pathological examination (67%). Other differential diagnoses of a pelvic mass are rectal GIST, omental GIST, uterine adnexal mass, malignant lymphoma, and splenosis.21,22)

Table 1. Eighteen cases of pelvic accessory spleen.

No. Reference Year Age Sex Preoperative diagnosis Size (cm) Torsion Vascular pedicle Past medical history
1 6) 1987 38 M Unknown 6.0 N/A N/A N/A
2 7) 1993 44 F Left ovarian tumor 7.0 N/A Yes N/A
3 8) 1993 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
4 9) 1999 26 F Accessory spleen, adnexal mass 4.5 Yes Yes N/A
5 10) 2001 17 F Right ovarian tumor 13.0 Yes Yes None
6 11) 2001 58 F Accessory spleen 4.0 N/A Yes N/A
7 12) 2001 26 F N/A N/A Yes N/A Splenectomy due to trauma
8 13) 2007 18 M Accessory spleen 5.0 N/A Yes N/A
9 14) 2014 17 F Accessory spleen 6.0 No Yes None
10 15) 2015 43 F Ovarian tumor 5.5 No No Uterine myoma
11 16) 2015 38 F Pelvic neoplasms 3.1 (multiple) No No Splenectomy due to trauma
12 17) 2015 67 F Accessory spleen 3.0 No Yes None
13 18) 2016 60 M GIST, malignant lymphoma in the rectum 4.7 No Yes HCV, cirrhosis
14 19) 2017 N/A N/A Adnexal mass N/A Yes N/A N/A
15 20) 2017 18 M Benign abdominal tumors 6.8 Yes Yes None
16 21) 2018 39 F Pelvic neoplasm, GIST 8.0 (multiple) No Yes None
17 22) 2020 51 M Accessory spleen 6.7 No Yes None
18 Our Case 2026 62 M Accessory spleen 9.0 Yes Yes ET

ET, essential thrombocythemia; F, female; GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumor; HCV, hepatitis C virus; M, male; N/A, not available

Useful diagnostic modalities for accessory spleens include US, CT, MRI, and nuclear medicine studies, including Tc-99m SC and Tc-99m HDRBC scintigraphy.30) Accessory spleens are detected as well-defined, homogeneous, round masses using all modalities. Dynamic CT typically shows the same enhancement patterns as the native spleen in the arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases. However, in torsion cases, hemodynamic changes occur; therefore, the enhancement patterns of accessory spleens differ from those of the native spleen. The native and accessory spleens show a similar signal pattern in all MRI sequences.15,30) In this case, the native and accessory spleens were isointense on T1-weighted images, slightly hypointense on T2-weighted images, hyperintense on DWI, and low ADC values. In wandering accessory spleen cases, Doppler US, CT angiography, and MRI are useful for detecting the vascular pedicle.17,18) Nuclear medicine studies such as Tc-99m SC and Tc-99m HDRBC specifically accumulate in the splenic tissue. Tc-99m HDRBC is the most useful modality for identifying accessory spleens.30) PET-CT is another useful diagnostic modality.18) Abnormal accumulation of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose is not observed in accessory spleens but in most malignant tumors.

ET is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal hematopoietic stem cell abnormalities, marked thrombocytosis, megakaryocytic hyperplasia, and symptoms, including bleeding and thrombosis. Approximately 12% of cases progress to secondary myelofibrosis.23) Extramedullary hematopoiesis occurs in the spleen, resulting in splenomegaly.25,26) In this case, both splenomegaly and accessory spleen enlargement were already evident at the time of the initial diagnosis of ET. As the disease progressed, both the native spleen and the accessory spleen increased in size. Comparison with prior ultrasonographic findings suggested that the accessory spleen had gradually migrated from the vicinity of the native spleen to the pelvic cavity over an 8-year period. Simultaneous splenomegaly and accessory splenic enlargement are rare. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report describing this pathophysiology in association with hematologic disease. Other hematopoietic diseases, including leukemia and polycythemia vera, can also cause myelofibrosis, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and splenomegaly.23) Patients with these diseases may also be at risk of developing large accessory spleens; however, our literature review identified no previously reported cases describing simultaneous enlargement of both native and accessory spleens in patients with these hematopoietic diseases.

Simultaneous enlargement of both native and accessory spleens has been previously reported in a male patient with cirrhosis associated with HCV.18) In this case, mild splenomegaly and a mildly enlarged wandering pelvic accessory spleen (4.5 cm) were observed. The feeding vessel of the pelvic accessory spleen arises from the gastroepiploic artery and vein. The hemodynamics of the pelvic accessory spleen may be similar to those of the native spleen. These spleens were enlarged owing to portal hypertension associated with cirrhosis.

Conversely, asynchronous compensatory enlargement of the accessory spleen after splenectomy has been frequently reported in patients with AIHA and ITP.31,32) Asynchronous compensatory enlargement of a remnant accessory spleen can lead to recurrence after splenectomy and remains a significant clinical issue in these cases.3,32)

Patients with ET are at an increased risk of thrombosis; therefore, careful perioperative anticoagulation management is essential.24) Patients with splenomegaly have a higher risk of thrombosis than those without splenomegaly.24) No standardized perioperative management has been established; however, Tefferi et al. recommended using low-molecular-weight heparin and maintaining perioperative platelet counts below 450 × 109/L.23) In this case, no anticoagulants were administered to prevent potential postoperative bleeding. The postoperative course of the patient was uneventful.

Awareness of the pelvic accessory spleen and its torsion is important for the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses and acute abdominal pain. In the present case, prophylactic resection of the pelvic accessory spleen was not considered because the patient’s clinical history and prior imaging findings had not been shared between the hematology department and our department. Effective sharing of clinical information among surgeons, physicians, and radiologists may facilitate the identification of accessory spleens at risk of torsion and provide an opportunity for prophylactic intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a rare case of torsion and rupture of a wandering pelvic accessory spleen associated with ET. Awareness of the pelvic accessory spleen and its torsion is important for the differential diagnosis of pelvic masses and acute abdominal pain. Elective resection should be considered to prevent torsion or rupture when a large pelvic accessory spleen is diagnosed. Simultaneous enlargement of both native and accessory spleens is exceptionally rare. Further accumulation of case reports describing this pathophysiology is warranted.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.jp) for the English language editing.

DECLARATIONS

Funding

None.

Authors’ contributions

AS was the primary contributor to data collection, interpretation, and writing.

TS was the secondary contributor to data collection, interpretation, and writing.

AS and TS were involved in surgical considerations, patient management, and critical review of the manuscript.

FH and ME were involved in patient management and critical review of the manuscript.

All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Japan Agricultural Cooperatives, Toride Medical Center.

Consent for publication

Informed consent for publication was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1).Valls C, Monés L, Gumà A, et al. Torsion of a wandering accessory spleen: CT findings. Abdom Imaging 1998; 23: 194–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2).Haidari M, Malakzai HA, Haidary AM, et al. Huge accessory spleen with torsion, mimicking splenic lymphangioma: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 2023; 109: 108597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3).Palumbo V, Mannino M, Teodoro M, et al. An extremely rare case of an oversized accessory spleen: case report and review of the literature. BMC Surg 2019; 19: 45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4).Termos S, Redha A, Zbibo R, et al. Torsion of huge wandering accessory spleen. Case report and review of literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 2017; 38: 131–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5).Impellizzeri P, Montalto AS, Borruto FA, et al. Accessory spleen torsion: rare cause of acute abdomen in children and review of literature. J Pediatr Surg 2009; 44: e15–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6).Wood TW, Mangelson N. Urological accessory splenic tissue. J Urol 1987; 137: 1219–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7).Azar GB, Awwad JT, Mufarrij IK. Accessory spleen presenting as adnexal mass. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1993; 72: 587–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8).Chen JS, Lin CL, Tsai CC, et al. Giant ectopic pelvic spleen: report of a case and review of the literature. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi 1993; 9: 54–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9).Vural M, Kacar S, Koşar U, et al. Symptomatic wandering accessory spleen in the pelvis: sonographic findings. J Clin Ultrasound 1999; 27: 534–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10).Hsiao SM, Lee LC, Chang MH. Large pelvic accessory spleen mimicking an adnexal malignancy in a teenage girl. J Formos Med Assoc 2001; 100: 565–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11).Nishiguchi S, Habu D, Ishizu H, et al. Accessory spleen in the pelvis diagnosed by Tc-99m phytate scintigraphy. Ann Nucl Med 2001; 15: 263–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12).d’Halluin G, Menard J, Dessard P, et al. Torsion of the accessory spleen: an atypical etiology for acute abdomen. Gynécol Obstét Fertil 2001; 29: 821–3. (in French) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13).Cowles RA, Lazar EL. Symptomatic pelvic accessory spleen. Am J Surg 2007; 194: 225–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14).Perin A, Cola R, Favretti F. Accessory wandering spleen: report of a case of laparoscopic approach in an asymptomatic patient. Int J Surg Case Rep 2014; 5: 887–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15).Taskin MI, Baser BG, Adali E, et al. Accessory spleen in the pelvis: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2015; 12: 23–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16).Zhou JS, Chen X, Zhu T, et al. Pelvic accessory spleen caused dysmenorrhea. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 54: 445–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17).Iorio F, Frantellizzi V, Drudi FM, et al. Locally vascularized pelvic accessory spleen. J Ultrasound 2015; 19: 141–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18).Ota H, Ojima Y, Sumitani D, et al. Dynamic computed tomography findings of an accessory spleen in the pelvis: a case report. Surg Case Rep 2016; 2: 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19).Tendler R, Farah RK, Kais M, et al. Symptomatic pelvic accessory spleen in a female adolescent: case report. J Clin Ultrasound 2017; 45: 600–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20).Obuchi T, Takagane A, Sato K, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic excision of symptomatic accessory spleen in the pelvis: an initial report. J Minim Access Surg 2017; 13: 321–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21).Feng Y, Shi Y, Wang B, et al. Multiple pelvic accessory spleen: rare case report with review of literature. Exp Ther Med 2018; 15: 4001–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22).Zhang X, Liu B, Zhu X, et al. The real cause of right lower abdominal pain: an analysis of ultrasonographic findings. J Int Med Res 2020; 48: 300060520946185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23).Tefferi A, Vannucchi AM, Barbui T. Essential thrombocythemia: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management. Am J Hematol 2024; 99: 697–718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24).Andriani A, Latagliata R, Anaclerico B, et al. Spleen enlargement is a risk factor for thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia: evaluation on 1,297 patients. Am J Hematol 2016; 91: 318–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25).Barbui T, Thiele J, Passamonti F, et al. Survival and disease progression in essential thrombocythemia are significantly influenced by accurate morphologic diagnosis: an international study. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 3179–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26).Song MK, Park BB, Uhm JE. Understanding splenomegaly in myelofibrosis: association with molecular pathogenesis. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19: 898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27).Sadro CT, Lehnert BE. Torsion of an accessory spleen: case report and review of the literature. Radiol Case Rep 2015; 8: 802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28).Hems TE, Bellringer JF. Torsion of an accessory spleen in an elderly patient. Postgrad Med J 1990; 66: 838–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29).Lhuaire M, Sommacale D, Piardi T, et al. A rare cause of chronic abdominal pain: recurrent sub-torsions of an accessory spleen. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17: 1893–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30).Spencer LA, Spizarny DL, Williams TR. Imaging features of intrapancreatic accessory spleen. Br J Radiol 2010; 83: 668–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31).Kashiwagi R, Ishida M, Onodera K, et al. Laparoscopic excision of accessory spleen for recurrent autoimmune hemolytic anemia after splenectomy: a case report. Surg Case Rep 2024; 10: 110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32).Pizzi M, Vianello F, Lorenzi L, et al. Accessory spleens recapitulate the immune microenvironment of the main spleen in immune thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol 2023; 202: 147–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Surgical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Japan Surgical Society

RESOURCES