Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1973 May;231(1):61–69. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010219

Contrast perception and electrophysiological correlates

Adriana Fiorentini, L Maffei
PMCID: PMC1350436  PMID: 4715369

Abstract

1. Previous findings show that the amplitude of the human visual potentials evoked by gratings alternating in phase at several c/s is linearly related to the logarithm of the grating contrast.

2. Similar previous experiments on the cat have shown that both the amplitude of evoked potentials and the amplitude of the response of simple cortical cells to alternating gratings increase linearly with the logarithm of the contrast. No such relation is found for single neurones in the retina or in the lateral geniculate body.

3. In this work the contrast of a grating is evaluated psychophysically by human subjects in a range of more than 10 times above threshold, using a binocular matching technique.

4. The apparent contrast is found to increase linearly with the logarithm of the stimulus contrast.

5. The conclusion is drawn that the linear relation between apparent contrast and the logarithm of the objective contrast might be the outcome of a process of elaboration that is carried out at the simple cell level.

Full text

PDF
61

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bryngdahl O. Characteristics of the visual system. Psychophysical measurements of the response to spatial sine-wave stimuli in the photopic region. J Opt Soc Am. 1966 Jun;56(6):811–821. doi: 10.1364/josa.56.000811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Campbell F. W., Maffei L. Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of orientation and size detectors in the human visual system. J Physiol. 1970 May;207(3):635–652. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell F. W., Maffei L., Piccolino M. The contrast sensitivity of the cat. J Physiol. 1973 Mar;229(3):719–731. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DIAMOND A. L. Foveal simultaneous brightness contrast as a function of inducing-and test-field luminances. J Exp Psychol. 1953 May;45(5):304–314. doi: 10.1037/h0060230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davidson M. Perturbation approach to spatial brightness interaction in human vision. J Opt Soc Am. 1968 Sep;58(9):1300–1308. doi: 10.1364/josa.58.001300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kohayakawa Y. Contrast-difference thresholds with sinusoidal gratings. J Opt Soc Am. 1972 Apr;62(4):584–587. doi: 10.1364/josa.62.000584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Watanabe A., Mori T., Nagata S., Hiwatashi K. Spatial sine-wave responses of the human visual system. Vision Res. 1968 Sep;8(9):1245–1263. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(68)90031-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Westheimer G. Spatial interaction in human cone vision. J Physiol. 1967 May;190(1):139–154. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES