Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1969 Feb;200(2):529–538. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008705

A study of the mechanism of water transfer across frog skin by a comparison of the permeability of the skin to deuterated and tritiated water

Venetia King
PMCID: PMC1350479  PMID: 5764409

Abstract

1. Frog abdominal skins were placed between the two half-cells of a modified version of Ussing's frog skin apparatus.

2. The rate of equilibration of deuterated and tritiated water across the skin was followed at pH 5·0, 6·9, and 8·0 with Ringer solution bathing both surfaces of the skin; and at pH 7·0 with sulphate Ringer solution bathing both surfaces of the skin.

3. The ratio of the permeability coefficients for the influx of deuterated and tritiated water had a mean value over all the experiments of 0·9954 ± 0·0207, n = 27, indicating that no isotope effect was observable within the limits of accuracy of the experimental method.

4. The thickness of the unstirred layers associated with the frog skin was measured, and, from the data obtained, values of the true permeability coefficients for each isotope were calculated.

Full text

PDF
529

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. CAPRARO V., MARRO F. THE NET PASSAGE OF WATER THROUGH THE ISOLATED SKIN OF "RANA ESCULENTA" IN THE ABSENCE OF APPARENT OSMOTIC GRADIENT. Arch Ital Biol. 1963 Apr 2;101:161–173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dainty J., House C. R. An examination of the evidence for membrane pores in frog skin. J Physiol. 1966 Jul;185(1):172–184. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dainty J., House C. R. Unstirred layers in frog skin. J Physiol. 1966 Jan;182(1):66–78. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FUHRMAN F. A., USSING H. H. A characteristic response of the isolated frog skin potential to neurohypophysial principles and its relation to the transport of sodium and water. J Cell Physiol. 1951 Aug;38(1):109–130. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1030380109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GARBY L., LINDERHOLM H. The permeability of frog skin to heavy water and to ions, with special reference to the effect of some diuretics. Acta Physiol Scand. 1953;28(4):336–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1953.tb00985.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. SCHOFFENIELS E., TERCAFS R. R. Potential difference and net flux of water in the isolated amphibian skin. Biochem Pharmacol. 1962 Aug;11:769–778. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(62)90045-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES