Abstract
Bacterial biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) encode secondary metabolites with diverse biological activities; however, most BGC products remain uncharacterized. One approach to identifying products and their metabolism is to use reverse genetics to identify metabolite-associated phenotypes. CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) offers a promising approach to disrupt BGC functions in high-GC genomes, typical of Streptomyces species. In many of these organisms, single-guide RNA (sgRNA)-mediated CRISPRi often results in incomplete product suppression, resulting in partial phenotypes that are unsuitable for functional studies. Using Streptomyces sp. Mg1, we found that a tandem-sgRNA configuration for CRISPRi improved the efficiency of target metabolite suppression. We engineered strains to express two sgRNAs to target the same promoter region within a BGC, resulting in greater than 80% metabolite suppression across diverse secondary metabolite classes. We used tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi to identify phenotypes associated with the loss of polyketide linearmycins, the siderophore desferrioxamine, the terpene β-carotene, and an uncharacterized nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS). This approach revealed that β-carotene depletion substantially reduced intrinsic cellular autofluorescence. Targeting the unknown NRPS produced developmental phenotypes and enabled the identification of the biosynthetic genes for the antibiotic lavendomycin, revealing a noncollinear organization of genes in the BGC. We suggest that tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi provides an efficient reverse genetics platform for the functional characterization of Streptomyces BGCs, enabling the correlation of metabolites with the gene function, identification of associated phenotypes, and prioritization of cryptic BGCs for natural product discovery.
Keywords: Streptomyces, secondary metabolism, CRISPR interference, biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC), antibiotics, carotenoids


Introduction
Bacterial secondary metabolites support environmental and interspecies interactions. − Many of these small molecules are bioactive and have clinical or therapeutic benefits, including antibiotics, antivirals, anticancer drugs, and immunosuppressants. − The enzymes for secondary metabolites are commonly encoded in large biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) within bacterial genomes. − This gene organization enables powerful computational and experimental approaches for natural product discovery. Bioinformatic predictions have revealed that some bacteria encode an extensive secondary metabolome of 30 or more BGCs, most of which have yet to be explored. − Therefore, a key goal for understanding the functions embedded in secondary metabolism is to identify new chemical structures and their associated biological activities from the genomes of diverse microbial species. , These efforts benefit from experimental tools that facilitate the researcher’s ability to connect each BGC to its corresponding product metabolites and their activities, especially when the gene content fails to inform product prediction.
Streptomyces species are rich sources of specialized metabolites. Using bioinformatic tools, it is possible to estimate the secondary metabolome of an individual species by identifying its BGCs for known and unknown products. Two major challenges are to identify new metabolites and to determine the biological functions associated with the secondary metabolome of a given genome. One approach is to engineer genetic systems that force the expression of BGCs, either in situ or in heterologous hosts. − A complementary but lesser-used approach is to genetically disrupt BGCs to identify loss-of-function phenotypes. In this reverse genetic approach, an efficient means to disrupt the targeted BGCs from Streptomyces would promote the discovery of new biological activities and phenotypes. However, genome manipulation of many Streptomyces species, particularly nonstandard model organisms, is challenging and inefficient, primarily due to their high-GC (commonly ≥ 70%) genomes, mycelial growth, low transformability, and intrinsic genetic instability.
CRISPR-based genetic approaches have the potential to accelerate BGC-directed discovery of specialized metabolites. CRISPR-Cas9 from Streptococcus pyogenes and other CRISPR systems have been developed for Streptomyces genetics to delete, activate, or reversibly knockdown genes and BGCs. − A selection of different configurations for CRISPR toolkits provides improved efficiency in strain engineering, but limitations persist. For example, CRISPR-Cas9 systems deliver targeted double-strand breaks (DSBs) in DNA, which are repaired by either homologous recombination or error-prone nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). , Both DSB repair pathways may lead to chromosomal deletions and rearrangements. , Additionally, Cas9 expression can be toxic to bacteria, primarily due to off-target effects. , An alternative to gene disruption is CRISPR interference (CRISPRi), which employs an enzymatically dead Cas9 (dCas9) enzyme as a roadblock to transcription. , The CRISPRi approach has been successful in many studies on Streptomyces gene function. , However, we found that CRISPRi in our model strain, Streptomyces sp. Mg1 (S. Mg1), resulted in minimal reductions of proteins and metabolites from the targeted genes and BGCs. A partial or minimal reduction in products is poorly suited for a reverse genetic approach, particularly when the product of the BGC is unknown.
Typical of Streptomyces, most S. Mg1 secondary metabolites have yet to be isolated or characterized. Analysis of the complete genome sequence using antiSMASH (antibiotics and secondary metabolite analysis shell) predicted 28 chromosomal BGCs and one plasmid-encoded BGC, including nonribosomal peptides (NRPs), polyketides (PKs), terpenes, and ribosomally encoded, post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs) (Table S1). Two known S. Mg1 metabolites, chalcomycins/algdamycins and linearmycins, have been reported using chemical and genetic approaches, while a few others have been predicted based on conserved BGC sequences. Although the explicit metabolic products of most candidate BGCs are unknown, bioinformatic predictions indicate that many BGCs encode the synthesis of molecules with new structures to be identified.
We hypothesize that many of these yet uncharacterized secondary metabolites function either to support the growth and development of the producer population directly or to interfere with the growth of competitor species. Therefore, the goal of this study was to identify an efficient CRISPR-based approach to disrupt BGCs in S. Mg1 and reveal the phenotypes associated with the loss of the corresponding BGC products. Where relevant, strains with visible phenotypes may then be prioritized for the identification of the uncharacterized products and exploration of their functions. In this study, we focused on CRISPRi as an approach to generate loss-of-function phenotypes. We examined different configurations of single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) to enhance CRISPRi metabolite depletion from the targeted Streptomyces BGCs. Our results demonstrated that targeting a single promoter with two tandemly directed sgRNAs for CRISPRi reliably yielded ≥80% reduction in product metabolite accumulation relative to controls. The improved repression from tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi provides loss-of-function phenotypes and detectable depletion of metabolites. We describe the application of tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi to multiple BGCs in S. Mg1 with known and unknown product metabolites. We selected four targets from the S. Mg1 genome that represent different biosynthetic classes. The targets include the polyketide linearmycins, the siderophore desferrioxamine, the terpene β-carotene, and a nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) with an uncharacterized product. Using this approach, we found that β-carotene depletion is associated with a substantial decrease of the intrinsic fluorescence in S. Mg1. The identification of a phenotype for the uncharacterized NRPS (BGC 28) led to the identification of a lavendomycin-like metabolite and its biosynthetic pathway. Our data suggests that tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi provides an efficient reverse genetics approach to reveal biological activities from BGCs in a Streptomyces genome, correlate metabolite masses with the loss of BGC function, and prioritize BGCs for further genetic and biochemical studies.
Results
Integrating CRISPRi Vector for the Disruption of Streptomyces Genes
Our initial attempts to use CRISPR in S. Mg1 resulted in variable and low efficiency of gene deletions (Table S2); therefore, we sought to use CRISPRi as a primary screening tool for BGC disruption phenotypes. To improve the stability of CRISPRi over temperature-sensitive replicating vectors, we first engineered a vector to stably integrate CRISPR genes into the chromosome. Using components of the pCRISPomyces-2 plasmid, we constructed a pSET152-based CRISPRi plasmid (pCZ2) that expressed a catalytically inactive dCas9 with point mutations D10A and H840A from the constitutive promoter PrpsL (XC). The construct, pCZ2, expresses a single-guide RNA (sgRNA) cassette from a constitutive Pgapdh (EL) promoter (Figure ). The pCZ2 plasmid also carries an integrase and the ϕ-C31attP sequence for insertion into the host attB locus. To test the function of pCZ2, we designed sgRNAs to target two BGCs in Streptomyces coelicolor, actinorhodin (ACT), and undecylprodigiosin (RED), for which previous reports demonstrated efficient CRISPRi. S. coelicolor carrying pCZ2 with 20-nucleotide sgRNAs targeting either the redD (activator of RED cluster) promoter, the gene actI-ORF1 (biosynthetic gene of ACT cluster), or the gene actII-4 (activator of ACT cluster), visibly reduced the production of their corresponding pigmented products (Figure ). The process to generate, cure, and verify the engineered strains took 2 weeks, which is favorable for use as a genome-wide approach. Having demonstrated the use of pCZ2 for CRISPRi in S. coelicolor, we next sought to determine its functionality using multiple targets in the S. Mg1 genome.
1.

Diagrams of pCZ2 CRISPRi plasmids. Diagrams of the pCZ2 CRISPRi plasmids that constitutively express dCas9 and one (pCZ2) or two tandem (pCZ2-2) guide RNAs, each controlled by the Pgapdh promoter. A sketch of the 5′UTR of a targeted gene using pCZ2-2 to illustrate the tandem arrangement of guide RNAs and dCas9 binding sites.
2.

CRISPRi disruption of S. coelicolor-pigmented antibiotics. (A) CRISPRi using pCZ2 to target the RED BGC. The red bar indicates a template-stranded sgRNA, while the blue bar indicates nontemplate-stranded sgRNAs. Cell patches on agar media reveal phenotypes. The template-stranded sgRNA redD_sg1, targeting near the redD promoter, abolished RED production. The nontemplate-stranded sgRNA redD_sg2, targeting within redD ORF, partially reduced RED. The photo was taken after 48 h of incubation on R2YE agar. A ΔredD strain served as a control. (B) CRISPRi using pCZ2 to target the ACT BGC. The actI-ORF1 sgRNAs targeted the biosynthetic gene actI-ORF1, and the actII-4_sg1 sgRNA targeted the pathway-specific regulator actII-ORF4. A ΔactII-ORF4 strain served as a control. The actI-ORF1 sgRNA strain showed dramatically reduced ACT production, while the actII-ORF4 sgRNA showed a reduced effect. The photo was taken after 72 h of incubation on R2YE agar.
To determine the efficacy of pCZ2 in S. Mg1, we initially targeted the surfactin hydrolase gene, sfhA, for which a phenotypic assay is available to identify mutants. On agar plates where both species are present, surfactin hydrolase protects the development of S. Mg1 aerial hyphae from the disruptive effects of B. subtilis surfactin (Figure ). In the absence of sfhA, S. Mg1 cannot produce aerial hyphae due to the inhibition by surfactin from B. subtilis. The complete deletion strain (ΔsfhA) showed a circular region without aerial hyphae, measuring 9.8 ± 0.05 mm in diameter. Using a pCZ2-generated sfhA-targeting CRISPRi strain, we found that the affected region of S. Mg1 diminished to 3.7 ± 0.05 mm in diameter (Figure ). The results indicated that the CRISPRi reduced surfactin hydrolase production, but the intermediate phenotype relative to the controls suggested only partial repression of sfhA expression.
3.

CRISPRi partially reduced surfactin hydrolase production in S. Mg1. When cocultured on MYM agar, surfactin produced by wild-type B. subtilis (center) is hydrolyzed by surfactin hydrolase produced by S. Mg1 (periphery) spread on the agar surface. The presence of the SfhA enzyme enables wild-type S. Mg1 to develop aerial hyphae (white surface) (WT S. Mg1). Deletion of sfhA leads to the blockage of S. Mg1 development by surfactin, resulting in a bald zone with a 9.8 ± 0.05 mm diameter (ΔsfhA). Targeting surfactin hydrolase with CRISPRi resulted in an intermediate phenotype, with a bald region of 3.7 ± 0.05 mm in diameter (sfhA CRISPRi). The yellow lines mark the length of the measured bald regions. Bar is 1 cm.
Tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi knockdown of linearmycins production in S. Mg1
We selected a second target for CRISPRi, the BGC encoding the biosynthesis of the linearmycin secondary metabolites by S. Mg1. Linearmycin synthesis is encoded by a ∼180-kilobase polyketide synthase (PKS) BGC , (Figure A) (Table S1). The large multimodular biosynthetic ORFs are transcribed downstream of the lnyHA promoter in one giant operon (151 kilobases). The oppositely oriented lnyI gene encodes an acyltransferase that loads the first substrate in the linearmycin biosynthetic pathway. Our initial step was to select sgRNAs that targeted the functions necessary for linearmycin biosynthesis. Ideally, a single transcriptional unit should be targeted for a complete CRISPRi-mediated shutdown of BGC expression and product biosynthesis. The lnyI gene is essential for linearmycin production, thus prioritizing it for CRISPRi. We also selected the lnyHA promoter as the transcriptional regulator for the primary operon. We designed three sgRNAs to target 1) lnyI, 2) the lnyHA-predicted promoter region (lnyHA-sg1), and 3) near the lnyHA translation start site (lnyHA-sg2) (Figure B).
4.

CRISPRi disruption of linearmycin production by S. Mg1. (A) Structure of linearmycin B and a sketch of the ∼180kb linearmycin BGC. (B) Relative positions of sgRNAs directed toward linearmycin genes. The blue lines indicate the nontemplate-strand sgRNAs. One strain expressed dual-sgRNAs to target the promoters of lnyI and lnyHA (left). One strain expressed tandem sgRNAs to target the promoter of lnyHA (right). (C) Biological assay of linearmycin activity using B. subtilis (upper) and S. Mg1 (lower) colonies. The edge of the B. subtilis colony proximal to S. Mg1 is lysed by linearmycins, resulting in a clear zone (yellow arrows). Mutations that disrupt linearmycin production prevent lysis and clearing zones (white arrows). (D) Magnified images from (C) for WT, ΔlnyI, and lnyHA-sg1 + 2 to enhance the visibility of the lysed B. subtilis region. (E) Quantitation of linearmycins from HPLC analysis of culture extracts. Area under the curve for each sample relative to the wild-type extracts. Three replicate extracts were used for each strain. Peaks were detected using UV at 333 nm.
We compared and quantified the production of linearmycins between the control strains and different configurations of the CRISPRi strains using a B. subtilis cell lysis assay and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Using the cell lysis assay, only a minor reduction in B. subtilis lysis was observed compared to wild-type S. Mg1 for strains with sgRNAs lnyI-sg1, lnyHA-sg1, or lnyHA-sg2, indicating minimal suppression of the linearmycins by CRISPRi (Figure C). Accordingly, we detected only a modest reduction in linearmycins by HPLC in all three CRISPRi-targeted strains compared to the controls (Figure E). Like sfhA, sgRNA-directed CRISPRi of linearmycins results in partial knockdown phenotypes with moderately reduced product formation. Using qRT-PCR, we found no significant reduction in lnyHI or lnyHA transcript abundance with a single-guide RNA (Table S5). We concluded that a single sgRNA-directed CRISPRi is insufficient as a roadblock to transcription for providing reliable depletion phenotypes. Thus, we sought an approach to improve the efficacy of CRISPRi.
Multiplex-sgRNA CRISPRi was used to target multiple BGCs in a Streptomyces genome. We hypothesized that adding a second guide RNA within a BGC may have an additive effect on reducing product formation. A dual-sgRNA approach in eukaryotic cells has been reported to improve the CRISPRi of target genes. We engineered a plasmid, pCZ2-2, to simultaneously express two sgRNAs, each controlled by the gapdh (EL) promoter element (Figure ). We engineered the plasmid to express either dual-sgRNA (two different transcriptional units) or tandem-sgRNA (the same transcriptional unit) configurations (Figure B). The dual sgRNAs targeted two independent promoters, lnyI and lnyHA. The tandem sgRNAs both targeted the upstream region of lnyHA (lnyHA-sg1 and lnyHA-sg2), with sg1 targeting the predicted promoter sequence and sg2 targeting nearer to the translation start site (RBS) (Figure S6). Using the cell lysis assay against B. subtilis, we found that the dual-sgRNA strains (lnyHA-sg1 and lnyI) targeting different promoters retained lytic activity and that linearmycins were still produced (Figure C). However, using the tandem lnyHA-targeting strain (lnyHA-sg1 and lnyHA-sg2), we observed a nearly complete disruption of linearmycin production by both bioassay (lysis of B. subtilis) and HPLC (Figure C–E). The results revealed that two sgRNAs operating in tandem to target a single promoter improved the repression of BGC expression and prevented the subsequent formation of the corresponding product metabolite. Using quantitative RT-PCR to assess the impact of tandem sgRNAs on targeted transcript abundance, we observed significant transcript repression for both lnyHA and lnyHI transcripts relative to the vector and single-sgRNA controls (Table S5). Thus, we conclude that the primary impact of tandem-sgRNA is to improve the suppression of target gene transcription. To determine whether tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi functions effectively for multiple BGCs, we selected three additional targets based on their different biosynthetic mechanisms: desferrioxamines, isorenieratene, and an NRPS with an uncharacterized product (Table S1, clusters 11, 2, and 28).
CRISPRi Knockdown of Desferrioxamine Production in S. Mg1
We next targeted the desferrioxamine BGC (Table S2, Cluster 11). Desferrioxamines are specialized metabolites that function as iron-scavenging siderophores produced by many Streptomyces species. We designed single and tandem sgRNAs (desA-sg1 and desA-sg2) targeting the upstream region of the desA gene in the desferrioxamine BGC and monitored product accumulation by HPLC (Figure and S6). In a pattern similar to that observed for the linearmycins, the tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi strain substantially reduced desferrioxamines (≥90%), but the single-sgRNA CRISPRi controls had a relatively minor influence (Figure and S1). An observable phenotype for the loss of desferrioxamines is the use of chrome azurol S in agar media. , Using this assay, we observed the CRISPRi depletion phenotype for desferrioxamines (Figure S1). Collectively, the phenotypic and quantitative data suggest that the tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi may be useful for the knockdown of many targeted BGCs within a single genome. In both linearmycins and desferrioxamines, one of the sgRNAs, desA-sg1, targeted dCas9 near the −10 box in the promoter. The second sgRNA, desA-sg2, was located near the translation start site for the proximal gene or BGCs. To examine the effects of CRISPRi on other BGC targets, we used a similar configuration of tandem sgRNAs.
5.

Tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi disrupts desferroxamine production in S. Mg1. (A) Structure of desferrioxamine B and a sketch of the BGC from S. Mg1. The blue lines indicate the relative position of tandem sgRNAs to target the promoter of desA, the first gene in the desA-D operon. (B) Quantification of desferrioxamine production by HPLC. Each column represents the average amount of desferrioxamine in triplicate samples, relative to that in wild-type S. Mg1. The detection wavelength was UV 430 nm.
Tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi Depletion of β-Carotene Reduces the Background Fluorescence in S. Mg1 Cells
Many species of bacteria produce carotenoids like β-carotene and isorenieratene, although the physiological functions of these pigments are unclear. S. Mg1 encodes a carotenoid BGC (crt) (Table S1, cluster 2) similar to those in green sulfur bacteria and other Streptomyces species. − The cluster, like the S. griseus crt BGC, encodes 7 biosynthetic enzymes in two oppositely directed transcriptional units (Figure A). The antiSMASH product predicted is isorenieratene (Figure B). We targeted the crt BGC for tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi. We selected the promoter region (142797–143032) that controls the transcription of three genes: crtYlycopene cyclase, crtTmethyltransferase, and crtUisorenieratene synthase, which are essential enzymes for the conversion of lycopene to β-carotene and isorenieratene. We designed two sgRNAs, crtY-sg1 and crtY-sg2, for CRISPRi, targeting the promoter region of the lycopene cyclase gene, crtY, and engineered strains that possessed either single or tandem sgRNAs targeting the promoter (Figure S6).
6.

Tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi disrupts carotenoid biosynthesis to reveal background fluorescence signals. (A) Schematic representation of the carotenoid BGC from S. Mg1. The blue lines indicate the relative position of the tandem sgRNAs targeting the promoter of crtY. (B) Structural diagrams of β-carotene and isorenieratene, the predicted products of the carotenoid BGC. (C) LC/MS intensity of β-carotene (536.44) extracted from S. Mg1 strains: pVect, vector control; crtY-sg1, single-sgRNA CRISPRi; crtY-sg1+sg2, tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi. (D) Quantitative comparison of β-carotene production by S. Mg1 strains. The β-carotene content in the extracts was determined by comparing it to a standard curve of pure β-carotene by LC-MS. (E) Comparative fluorescence from imaging of S. Mg1 mycelia (brightfield) and autofluorescence (greenEx: 469 nm; Em: 525 nm; red Ex:531; Em: 647 nm) in control and CRISPRi strains.
We compared the effects of tandem-sgRNA versus individual sgRNA CRISPRi on growth defects and carotenoid production. The targeted CRISPRi strains showed a mild delay in colony development and sporulation relative to both vector and single-sgRNA controls, which we speculated may have been due to the loss of β-carotene. We analyzed crude extracts from wild-type cultures using LC-MS/MS and detected β-carotene ([M]+• 536.44) as the predominant product of the crt cluster under the culture conditions used (Figure S2). We confirmed its identity using LC-MS/MS analysis of the parent ion and by comparing it with fragments of a pure β-carotene sample. We used pure β-carotene to generate a standard curve and quantified β-carotene from wild-type and CRISPRi samples (Figures C, D and S2), revealing a complete disruption of β-carotene in strains containing the tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi. Despite the loss of β-carotene production, the LC-MS chromatogram of the tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi strain showed an elevated baseline in the extracted ion chromatogram (Figure C). We suspected that targeting crtYTU genes for CRISPRi may lead to the accumulation of the β-carotene precursor, lycopene, which has the same mass as β-carotene (536.89 g/mol). Tandem LC-MS/MS of fragments from the residual mass confirmed its identity as a lycopene (Figure S2). Thus, our data indicate that tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi effectively blocks the conversion of lycopene to β-carotene in S. Mg1.
Although the phenotype was mild, we observed a slight delay in growth with the tandem-sgRNA of crtYTU compared to the vector-only control strain. This phenotype suggested that the loss of β-carotene may directly impact growth, as opposed to an issue related to dCas9 expression or off-target effects. β-Carotene is weakly fluorescent (green-yellow, 500–580 nm), and lycopene exhibits orange-red fluorescence (570–610 nm). , We hypothesized that the depletion of β-carotene by tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi may be visible from changes in the cellular fluorescence of carotenoids. We imaged wild-type and tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi crtYTU cells at a higher resolution using light and fluorescence microscopy to detect any changes in the cell morphology or fluorescence following β-carotene depletion. The CRISPRi crt depletion strain showed no discernible differences in the cell size or morphology (Figure E). However, we observed changes in the fluorescence in both green (Ex 469/35 nm, Em 525/39 nm) and red (Ex 531/40 nm Em 647/57 nm) when comparing tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi mycelia to the control mycelia (Figure E). Although the single-sgRNA CRISPRi strain (crtY-sg1) had moderately reduced red fluorescence relative to the control, the strain containing tandem sgRNAs (crtY-sg1 + sg2) imaged under identical conditions had a minimal fluorescence signal. Because carotenoids have weak green fluorescence, the results suggest that the reduction in intrinsic green and red fluorescence is a secondary consequence of β-carotene depletion. The identity of the fluorescent compounds is yet to be determined, but other possible sources include redox cofactors. , Our data support the conclusion that tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi effectively blocks β-carotene production by S. Mg1, producing an observable phenotype from a mild growth delay and a substantial reduction in intrinsic cellular fluorescence.
Identification of a Lavendomycin-Like BGC Using Tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi
Our next goal was to target a BGC with an uncharacterized metabolite as the product. We selected an NRPS (Table S1, BGC 28) and engineered tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi targeting constructs using the predicted promoter region for the first ORF in the BGC (ORF-A) (Figure and S6). We screened the CRISPRi-targeted strains for visible differences in growth, colony morphology, pigmentation, and sporulation by comparing the wild-type and vector control strains when cultured on agar media. After 2–4 days of incubation, we observed a moderate deficiency in growth and spore development using the tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi strain, ORF-A sg1 + sg2, while the controls and other sgRNA CRISPRi configuration strains showed minimal or no visible phenotypes (Figure ). On the basis of the phenotypic results for the ORF-A sg1 + sg2 tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi strain, we hypothesized that the peptide product may function in coordinating growth, development of aerial hyphae, and spore formation.
7.

Tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi of NRPS reveals colony developmental defects in S. Mg1. (A) Schematic representation of the cluster 28 BGC from S. Mg1 and the upstream region of ORF-A, where tandem-sgRNA targets gene expression. The blue lines indicate the relative positions of nontemplate-strand sgRNAs. The red lines indicate the relative position of the template-strand sgRNA. (B) Comparison of colony morphology on day 2 (D2), day 3(D3), and day 4(D4), during which the development of aerial hyphae is observed as a white surface on the colony. The sgRNA 1 + 2 tandem-sgRNA strain shows aberrant development of aerial hyphae and colony outgrowth. The vector control and sgRNA 2 + 3 strains show normal development. A frameshift deletion of the ORF-H gene results in a colony defect similar to that of the sgRNA 1 + 2 tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi strain.
Since we observed a phenotype with tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi, we next sought to identify the corresponding metabolite product. Using pCRISPomyces-2, we engineered a deletion in ORF-H, which is predicted to encode the initiating adenylation domain required for the NRPS. The ORF-H deletion generates a frameshift in the downstream coding sequence and should abolish product formation, providing a control for the loss of NRPS function. The deletion of ORF-H produced a morphological phenotype similar to that of the ORF-A tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi strain (Figure ). To identify the product metabolite, we performed comparative mass spectrometry on extracts from wild-type and BGC-disrupted strains. Using LC-MS and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, we identified an ion, m/z 667.4 (M+H)+, that was minimal or absent in the disruption strain (Figure S3), absent in the ORF-H deletion strain, and present in the control strains (Figure ). We generated tandem MS spectra for the candidate ions. The primary mass and fragment ions from the NRPS BGC product matched those of the peptide antibiotic lavendomycin (666.78 g/mol) (Figures and S4). Therefore, we provisionally designated the genes in the BGC lvdA-P based on their proposed functions in the synthesis of a metabolite related to lavendomycin. We compared the tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi strains with control strains to measure relative metabolite production using LC-MS. We observed that the ORF-A(lvdA) sg1 + sg2 configuration of sgRNAs targeting the promoter diminished the product metabolite by 80–90% (Figure ). As previously done for linearmycins, we assessed the impact of tandem sgRNAs on lvdA transcript abundance to determine whether improved repression of transcription was the likely cause of the observed phenotypes. We observed a several-fold reduction in transcript abundance in the tandem-sgRNA strain, while the control strain exhibited a minor elevation in the transcript abundance relative to the vector control (Table S6). This level of product suppression from tandem sgRNAs resulted in a phenotype similar to that of the deletion mutant, despite some residual peptide production in the CRISPRi strain.
8.

Diminished production of lavendomycin-like metabolites by tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi. (A) MALDI-TOF MS spectra of WT and ΔORF-H S. Mg1. The peak at 667.467 [M + H]+ is absent in the extracts of the mutant strain. (B) Structure of lavendomycin. (C) Intensity of the lavendomycin-like metabolite (area under peak) was measured for the ΔorfH mutant, CRISPRi strains, and vector control (pVect) strain, and plotted relative to the wild-type strain. The data are presented in the extracted ion chromatogram (Figure S4).
Following its discovery, lavendomycin was synthesized in vitro, but no biosynthetic mechanism has been reported. Using the BGC sequence and annotation from antiSMASH, we proposed a biosynthetic scheme for lavendomycin NRP (Table , Figure ). The BGC encodes three multimodular NRPS genes (lvdJ, lvdM, lvdO) in addition to lvdH, which selects the starter unit, β-methylarginine, in the metabolite. Domain analysis using antiSMASH did not return a predicted substrate for the assembly line starter unit. Using PARAS, arginine was predicted to be the substrate. The lavendomycin-like BGC encodes conserved enzyme functions for a ketoarginine methyltransferase (lvdA) and a β-methylarginine biosynthesis bifunctional aminotransferase (lvdG) (Figure ). A mechanism for β-methylarginine biosynthesis by Streptomyces arginensis has been reported involving the function of an aminotransferase and a SAM-dependent ketoarginine methyltransferase. , Therefore, we hypothesized that the starter unit loads a β-methylarginine monomer. In addition, lvdC (argininosuccinate lyase) and lvdE (cysteine synthase/DABA synthase) were postulated to be involved in 2,3-diaminobutyric acid (DABA) biosynthesis through a modification of threonine. , The DABA substrate is selected and incorporated by the first elongation module encoded by lvdJ. The downstream NRPS gene lvdM encodes two elongation modules. The first is selective for threonine, which is converted into dehydrobutyrine. The second selects serine. The lvdM gene also contains the only thioesterase (TE) domain associated with this cluster (Figure ). The module organization indicates that LvdM carries out the final biosynthetic steps and terminates the biosynthesis despite its intermediate position in the operon. The lvdO gene encodes two modules that incorporate pipecolic acid and proline, with LvdL and LvdN supplying the substrates for the product biosynthesis (Table ). The conversion of threonine into dehydrobutyrine and the function of lvdD, which encodes a kinase, remain to be determined.
1. Deduced Functions of ORFs in the NRP Biosynthetic Gene Cluster.
| genes | proteins, corresponding to sequence similarity | proposed functions |
|---|---|---|
| A | Ketoarginine methyltransferase | Methylarginine synthesis |
| B | Transporter: Major Facilitator Superfamily | Transporter |
| C | Argininosuccinate lyase | 2,3-Diaminobutyric acid synthesis |
| D | Protein kinase | 2,3-Diaminobutyric acid synthesis |
| E | Cysteine synthase/DABA synthase | 2,3-Diaminobutyric acid synthesis |
| F | MbtH-like protein | NRPS |
| G | β-methylarginine biosynthesis bifunctional aminotransferase | Methylarginine synthesis |
| H | NRPS | NRPS |
| I | MbtH-like protein | NRPS |
| J | NRPS | NRPS |
| K | MbtH-like protein | NRPS |
| L | Ornithine cyclodeaminase | Pipecolic acid synthesis |
| M | NRPS | NRPS |
| N | β-eliminating lyase | Dhb synthesis |
| O | NRPS | NRPS |
| P | Metallo-β-lactamase superfamily | Resistance |
9.

Proposed model for the biosynthesis of lavendomycin family of metabolites. Top: Schematic of the lvd BGC. Bottom: Substrate selectivity for individual enzymes and assembly line modules. LvdH selects β-methylarginine, a product of LvdA and LvdG methylation of arginine. LvdJ selects threonine or 2,3-diaminobutyric acid produced by LvdC–E. LvdO contains two modules. The first is pipecolic acid, produced by ornithine cyclodeaminase (LvdL). The second is proline. LvdM contains two modules and the only thioesterase encoded in the BGC. The first module selects threonine, which is converted to dehydrobutyrine (Dhb) by LvdN. The second module selects serine. The multimodular protein LvdM is proposed to function last in assembly with the TE domain, releasing the linear peptide. Table shows the lvd gene-annotated gene functions.
The order of genes in the lvd BGC is an uncommon example of a terminating thioesterase encoded in an upstream NRPS-encoding multimodular gene. To assess whether this gene order is conserved, we used Gator-GC to identify lavendomycin-like BGCs in the publicly available sequence databases. The output identified numerous examples of related BGCs that shared the same gene order and position of the TE domain as the S. Mg1 lavendomycin-like BGC (Figure S5). Therefore, we conclude that many actinomycetes encode the production of a family of peptides related to lavendomycin and that the organization of genes in the BGC is conserved. A detailed analysis of the biosynthetic mechanism and product structure is required to determine whether the final product is lavendomycin or whether the biosynthetic enzymes produce a variant form(s) of the NRP. These results demonstrate the utility of tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi as a reverse genetic approach to connect a BGC to a candidate metabolite.
Discussion
In this study, we developed and used tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi as an efficient method to reveal loss-of-function phenotypes for S. Mg1 BGCs and their product metabolites. Initially, we found that CRISPRi, mediated by a single-guide RNA, only partially inhibited both the SfhA enzyme and linearmycins. We modified the pCZ2 vector to express two sgRNAs and found that this tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi provided substantial and stable knockdown of linearmycins. For each targeted BGC, we found that tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi produced substantially greater depletion than a single sgRNA for the product metabolite. Because a similar sgRNA configuration was effective for each BGC targeted in this study, we propose that tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi is an efficient method to disrupt secondary metabolite synthesis from many of the BGCs encoded in a selected Streptomyces genome. Loss of function frequently reveals developmental and competitive phenotypes of secondary metabolites. Thus, the resulting data provide a gateway to discover secondary metabolite functions and aid in prioritizing BGCs of unknown function for the identification of new secondary metabolites.
Although we have not determined a precise mechanism for tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi, the measurement of targeted transcripts for the lnyHA and lvdA genes indicates improved repression of transcription. The binding of dCas9 generally provides a roadblock to transcription, leading to the knockdown of targeted transcripts using CRISPRi. , However, the impact of CRISPRi on a selected target can be incomplete, leading to partial or no discernible phenotypic changes. Some evidence indicates that the dCas9 complex may interfere with gene expression beyond providing a functional roadblock. Using HELA cells, CRISPRi decreased the concentrations of targeted proteins with no evident change in the corresponding mRNA levels. Thus, while a single sgRNA may suppress some targeted BGCs, our qPCR data for lnyHA and lvdA suggests that using two sgRNAs for a single promoter significantly improves transcriptional repression (Tables S5 and S6). Nevertheless, a precise mechanism for tandem sgRNAs will require further study. In yeast, rather than acting only as a roadblock, sgRNA/dCas9 binding creates an environment that is permissive for transcription initiation or termination, generating novel sense and antisense transcripts that ultimately interfere with successful transcription and translation of the target. Consistent with the previous results of CRISPRi in Streptomyces and other microbes, for S. Mg1, sgRNA(s) targeting the 5′ end of the transcript on the nontemplate strand resulted in the most reliable and effective repression. In each case, the tandem sgRNAs targeted dCas9 to sites near the −10 region of the 5′-UTR and near the translation start site (RBS) (Figure and S6). Other configurations tested provided either partial or negligible knockdown. We propose that the two sgRNAs targeting the same 5′-UTR and RBS provide an effective block to transcription and possibly to translation initiation, culminating in a substantial reduction in the secondary metabolite biosynthesis. A distance greater than 30bp between each sgRNA is consistent with a model for the additive effects of two dCas9 complexes bound simultaneously, as opposed to sequential binding; however, the molecular mechanisms have yet to be investigated. , We suggest that tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi may be effective for many BGCs and Streptomyces species, although some limitations remain. For example, in cases where the BGC is silent under the experimental conditions used, this approach may have limited utility. Also, we engineered the pCZ2-2 plasmid to insert into the genome for stable expression, necessitating a compatible phage attachment site for insertion. However, the plasmid can be engineered for insertional compatibility with many organisms or possibly maintained as a plasmid for the application of CRISPRi.
10.

Summary of tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi targeting for BGC product knockdown. Among the sgRNA configurations tested, the most effective was two nontemplate strand, tandem sgRNAs that target a promoter within a selected BGC. For each of the four BGCs targeted in this study, the location of the tandem sgRNAs is depicted. An upstream sgRNA generally overlaps the −10 region of the promoter, and a downstream sgRNA is located near the ribosome-binding site (RBS) or start site for translation. The proximity of the tandem sgRNAs is variable, with ∼50 bases being the minimum distance tested that provided effective CRISPRi. The target gene clusters are as follows: lnyHA, linearmycins; desA, desferrioxamine; lvdA, lavendomycin; crtY, β-carotene.
We used the tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi in this study to illustrate its applicability to the secondary metabolome of a Streptomyces species. Many Streptomyces species produce carotenoids, but their physiological functions remain unclear. We applied tandem-sgRNA CRISPRi to identify the primary carotenoid product of the crt BGC as β-carotene. The CRISPRi strain enabled us to identify a phenotype associated with the loss of β-carotene. Intense fluorescence in both red and green channels was substantially depleted in the CRISPRi knockdown strain, while control strains using a single sgRNA did not sufficiently deplete the metabolite. This result highlights the utility of a facile method for engineering mutants in BGCs for diverse metabolites. Most secondary metabolites have no known function, primarily because they have not yet been identified and characterized. The ability to generate reliable disruptions is key to unveiling secondary metabolic functions and building knowledge of the physiological relevance of diverse metabolites.
The secondary metabolites of primary interest are those with antibiotic activity. In this study, we were able to disrupt an NRPS without a known product and observe a phenotype, leading to the identification of a lavendomycin-like metabolite and the assignment of its BGC. Although the antibiotic lavendomycin has been identified previously, a relevant BGC has not yet been identified. We suspect that the primary challenges in identifying its BGC are the incorporation of modified amino acids and the noncanonical arrangement of NRPS-encoding genes. Notably, the upstream gene, lvdM, encodes the only TE domain in NRPS and likely functions last in the assembly line biosynthesis of the lavendomycin-like metabolite. The downstream gene, lvdO, encodes intermediate assembly line enzymes for the incorporation of cyclized amino acid substrates. Therefore, our proposed biosynthetic order for enzyme function is based on the metabolite structure, reversing the order of LvdM and LvdO (Figure ). Analysis using GATOR-GC revealed that this gene organization is conserved in species encoding BGC. It is unclear what the functional significance may be for this gene organization relative to the linear assembly line biosynthetic model. Nonetheless, the identification of a candidate lavendomycin BGC now opens the door to the analysis of its biosynthetic mechanism, candidate docking motifs, and order of enzymes in the biosynthetic complex, as well as for engineering variants of the antibiotic.
Methods
Strains and Growth Conditions
Strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S3. We cultured E. coli strains at 37 °C in lysogeny broth (LB) [1% tryptone (Bacto), 0.5% yeast extract (BBL), 0.5% sodium chloride (Sigma)], or on LB agar plates [1.5% Agar (Bacto)]. Streptomyces strains were propagated in MYM [0.4% malt extract (Bacto), 0.4% yeast extract (BBL), and 0.4% D-(+)-maltose monohydrate (Sigma)] medium at 30 °C, unless otherwise indicated. Spore preparations were performed, as described by Keiser and Bibb. A lawn of Streptomyces was plated or streaked on agar plates containing MYM for S. Mg1 and R2YE for S. coelicolor, and incubated at 30 °C until thick spores were formed. Spores were collected from plates using 5 mm cell scrapers, resuspended in 1 mL sterile water, and stored at 4 °C. A typical spore prep contains around 108∼1010 spores per milliliter, as determined by serial dilution plating and calculation based on CFU. To observe morphological differences between mutant strains and wild-type, we spotted 10 μL of 106 or 107 spores/mL of Streptomyces on MYM plates.
Bioinformatic Platforms and Tools
We submitted the S. Mg1 (NZ_CP011664.1) genome sequence to antiSMASH to identify, annotate, and analyze secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters in a genome-wide manner. Data were downloaded and further analyzed. NCBI databases were utilized to blast search for nucleotides or protein sequences. The BPROM online prediction tool (softberry.com) was used to predict −10 and −35 sequences for the 5′UTRs of the targeted BGCs. The downstream sgRNA was selected based on its relative proximity to the transcription start site and was thus designated as the RBS.
Construction of CRISPRi Shuttle Plasmids
All DNA manipulations were carried out using Escherichia coli DH5α. The primers and protospacers (sgRNAs) used in this study are listed in Table S4. The rpsL promoter, Cas9, and protospacer cassette (including gapdH promoter, lacZ, tracrRNA, and terminator) were adopted from pCRISPomyces-2 plasmids. Two nonsynonymous mutations, D10A and H840A, were incorporated to deactivate the Cas9 cleavage activity. The DNA fragment was synthesized by IDT Synthetic gBlocks, comprising the rpsL promoter sequence minus the BsaI restriction site and point mutation D10A (GAC→GCC). We assembled the synthesized DNA fragment, amplified dCas9 with point mutation H840A (CAC→GCC), and protospacer cassette from pCRISPomyces-2, with an integration plasmid backbone pSET152. The finalized CRISPRi integration plasmid, pCZ2, carried a φC31 attP site and a gene that encoded for integrase. The protospacer of a target cluster was first inserted via BsaI-mediated golden gate assembly, as previously described. The second protospacer cassette was subsequently inserted by Gibson assembly using an XbaI linearized construct containing the first protospacer cassette.
Construction of CRISPRi Strains
The 20-nucleotide protospacer of a target cluster was first inserted into the pCZ2 vector via BsaI-mediated golden gate assembly and selected on LB plates containing 50 μg/mL apramycin, 0.8 mM IPTG, and 40 μg/mL β-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal). The second protospacer cassette, including the gapdh promoter, sgRNA, tracrRNA, and terminator, was subsequently inserted by Gibson assembly using an XbaI linearized construct containing the first protospacer cassette. The constructs were verified by PCR amplification with primers listed in Table S4 and sequencing alignments.
Interspecies Conjugation
Confirmed recombinant constructs containing either single-guide RNA or double-guide RNAs were transformed into E. coli ET12567. A single colony was propagated in liquid LB media containing apramycin (30 μg/mL) and chloramphenicol (5 μg/mL) to an OD600 of ∼0.4. The cells were pelleted and washed with LB without antibiotics. Equal volumes of E. coli (OD600 ∼ 0.4) cells were mixed with 106, 107, and 108 per milliliter of Streptomyces spores and spotted on AS1 [0.1% yeast extract, 0.5% soluble starch, 0.25% NaCl, 1% Na2SO4, pH adjusted to 7.5 with KOH, supplemented with 0.02% l-alanine, 0.02% l-arginine, 0.05% l-asparagine, and MgCl2 after autoclave] agar plates. A negative control with only Streptomyces spores was also spotted on the plates. After 16 h of incubation at 30 °C, each plate was flooded with 1.5 mL of antibiotic solution to obtain final concentrations of 50 μg/mL apramycin and 30 μg/mL nalidixic acid. After drying, the plates were incubated at 30 °C for 2–4 days with continuous monitoring.
Extraction and Detection of Linearmycins from S. Mg1 Strains
Buffered MYM liquid media (50 mL in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks) were inoculated with 105 spores of S. Mg1 from a freshly prepared spore suspension. The cultures were incubated at 30 °C in the dark and shaken at 250 rpm for 2 days. All linearmycin extraction and purification procedures were carried out in the dark as described previously. S. Mg1 mycelia were collected by centrifugation. The mycelial pellet of each sample was extracted sequentially with 50 mL of methanol and 50 mL of ethanol at room temperature and shaken at 200 rpm for 30 min. The extracts were then combined and dried in a rotary evaporator. The residues were dissolved in 200 μL of 85% methanol. Insoluble precipitates were removed by centrifugation. The supernatants were transferred to screw-cap vials for storage at −20 °C until use.
Linearmycin analysis was performed using an Agilent 1200 HPLC system. A 10 μL volume of each sample was injected onto a Luna C18(2) column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm; Phenomenex). The run was performed at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min at 30 °C. The samples were eluted with mobile phases A (acetonitrile) and B (0.1% (v/v) formic acid). The elution gradient was initiated with 40% A and 60% B and reached 50% A and 50% B over 10 min. A 5 min step with 75% A and 25% B was maintained for linearmycin elution. The column was equilibrated with 40% A and 60% B for 5 min. Linearmycin peaks were detected at 333 nm as previously reported. We confirmed the specificity of linearmycin by comparing the HPLC peaks from S. Mg1 wild-type and the ΔlnyI strain (abolished linearmycin biosynthesis) and by MALDI-TOF.
Extraction and Detection of Desferrioxamine from S. Mg1 Strains
50 mL of semisynthetic GG1 liquid media, supplemented with 200 μM of 2′,2′-dipyridyl for iron deficiency, was inoculated with 105 spores of S. Mg1 strains from a freshly prepared spore suspension. The cultures were incubated at 30 °C for 4 days while shaking at 250 rpm. S. Mg1 mycelia were removed by centrifugation. The supernatants were lyophilized to dryness and redissolved in 200 μL of 50% methanol. A 40 μL sample of each was mixed with 1 μL of 200 mM ferric chloride for the chelation of desferrioxamine before HPLC detection. For quantitative analysis, samples (10 μL) were eluted with a gradient of 10% acetonitrile (A) and 90% 0.1% (v/v) formic acid (B), which reached 40% A and 60% B after 5 min. A 2 min 90% A, 10% B step was used for washing the crude extracts. The column was equilibrated with 10% A and 90% B for 3 min. The desferrioxamine peak was monitored at a 430 nm wavelength. The quantification for each sample was performed by integrating the area under the relevant peaks on the elution chromatography.
Extraction and Detection of Carotenoids
Carotenoid extraction was carried out using the protocol described by Myronovskyi et al. 50 mL of MYM7 media was inoculated with spores of different strains of S. Mg1 (107 spores/mL) and cultivated under aeration at 30̊C for 3 days. After centrifugation, carotenoids were extracted from the supernatant using chloroform and from the mycelium using chloroform:methanol (1:1). The chloroform extracts were evaporated and resuspended in chloroform for LC-MS analysis. The crude extracts of carotenoids were loaded onto a ProntoSIL 200–5-C30 column for HPLC analysis. Chromatographic separation was carried out on Ultimate 3000 HPLC (Thermo Fisher) using mobile phase B (10 mM ammonium formate in 9:1 v/v isopropanol:acetonitrile) with 0.1% formic acid and mobile phase A (10 mM ammonium formate in 6:4 v/v acetonitrile:water) with 0.1% formic acid. The gradient was set from 70% to 100% mobile phase B with a 0.8 mL/min flow rate. Carotenoids were monitored using a Diode Array Detector (DAD) signal at 430 nm. Pure β-carotene (SIGMA, USA) was used as the control for LC-MS. The carotenoids were identified by mass spectrometry (Thermo Scientific QE Focus). Ionization method: ESI, Sheath gas flow: 60, Aux gas flow: 20, Spray voltage: 3.5 kV, Capillary temp: 38 °C, S-lens RF level: 50, Aux gas heater temp: 300 °C. ,
Imaging of Carotenoid-Producing and Mutant Strains
Two-day-old cultures (1 mL) of vector control, single sgRNA, and dual-sgRNA S. Mg1 strains were centrifuged, and the pellets were resuspended in 100 mL of water. 3 mL of the resuspended culture was spotted and spread using a coverslip. Imaging of the intrinsic fluorescence from S. Mg1 strains was carried out using a Lionheart FX automated microscope (Agilent) with a 100× oil immersion lens. Brightfield images were acquired with a 50 ms (ms) exposure, while fluorescence images were captured using a GFP filter (Ex: 469 nm; Em: 525 nm) and propidium iodide filter (Ex:531; Em: 647 nm) acquired with a 500 ms exposure. Multiple images from different areas of the slides were acquired at random. Upon acquisition, the intensities of all of the images were normalized to the intensity of the vector control S. Mg1 strain using the Fiji-ImageJ software.
Extraction and Detection of Lavendomycin
Buffered MYM7 liquid media (50 mL in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks) was inoculated with 105 spores of S. Mg1 from a freshly prepared spore suspension. The cultures were incubated at 30 °C with shaking at 250 rpm for 5 days with around 20 glass beads to prevent aggregation. We removed S. Mg1 mycelia by centrifugation. The supernatants were cleaned with equal volumes of ethyl acetate in separatory funnels. The aqueous phases were collected and lyophilized. The residues were redissolved in 200 μL of 50% methanol, and insoluble precipitates were removed by centrifugation. The supernatants were transferred to screw-cap vials for storage or experiments.
To identify the NRP and measure the metabolic differences between the mutant strains and the wild-type, we spotted 1 μL of diluted crude extracts from Streptomyces (10-fold dilution with 50% acetonitrile and 50% methanol) in a well of MALDI plates. The samples were air-dried after overlaying with 1 μL of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid MALDI matrix. Spectra were collected using a Bruker Ultraflextreme MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometer in the positive mode for detection and analysis.
For quantification, buffered MYM7 agar plates (25 mL per plate; four plates per strain) were inoculated with 100 μL of freshly prepared S. Mg1 spore suspension (106 spores/mL) and incubated at 30 °C for 48 h. The agar was cut into 0.5 cm cubes, frozen at −80 °C until solid, and then thawed prior to extraction. Mycelial debris and agar were removed through centrifugation. The resulting supernatants were extracted with an equal volume of ethyl acetate using separatory funnels. The aqueous phases were collected, lyophilized, and resuspended in 200 μL of 50% methanol. Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation, and the supernatants were transferred to screw-cap vials for storage or downstream analysis.
Untargeted Liquid Chromatography High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (LC-HRMS)
Untargeted liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) analysis was performed on a Q Exactive Plus Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) coupled to a binary pump HPLC (UltiMate 3000, Thermo Scientific). Full MS was obtained at a 70,000 resolution (200 m/z) with a scan range of 133–2000 m/z. Full MS followed by ddMS2 spectra were obtained at 35,000 and 17,500 resolutions (200 m/z) with a 1.5 m/z isolation window and stepped NCE (20, 40, 60). The samples were maintained at 4 °C before injection. The injection volume was 10 μL. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Synergi Fusion 4 μm, 150 mm × 2 mm reverse phase column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) maintained at 30 °C using a solvent gradient method. Solvent A was water (0.1% formic acid). Solvent B was methanol (0.1% formic acid). The gradient method used was 0–5 min (10% B to 40% B), 5–7 min (40% B to 95% B), 7–9 min (95% B), 9–9.1 min (95% B to 10% B), and 9.1–13 min (10% B). The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min. Sample acquisition was performed with Xcalibur (Thermo Scientific). To analyze the data generated from LC-MS, we used the R statistical programming language. Raw data containing both MS and MS/MS spectra was converted into mzXML format before being imported for a pairwise comparison. After peak detection, retention time correction, and peak grouping across samples using “xcms” and “faahKO” packages from Bioconductor, the output was processed and visualized using “dplyr” and “ggplot2” packages.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01GM141700.
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssynbio.6c00274.
HPLC and biological assays, mass spectrometry, and output of genome analyses and sequence (Figures S1–S6); predicted BGCs, standard CRISPR outcomes, strains, and primers used (Tables S1–S4); qRT-PCR results (Tables S5–S6) (PDF)
The study was conceptualized by P.D.S. and C.Z. The experiments were carried out by C.Z., N.K.J., I.C.C., and B.W. Data analysis was done by C.Z., N.K.J., J.B.-C., and P.D.S. The manuscript was written by C.Z., N.K.J., and P.D.S. with editorial inputs from T.D. and M.C.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Chevrette M. G., Thomas C. S., Hurley A., Rosario-Melendez N., Sankaran K., Tu Y., Hall A., Magesh S., Handelsman J.. Microbiome Composition Modulates Secondary Metabolism in a Multispecies Bacterial Community. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2022;119(42):e2212930119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212930119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stubbendieck R. M., Straight P. D.. Specialized Metabolites for Bacterial Communication. Comprehensive Nat. Products III. 2020:66–96. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-409547-2.14803-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang C., Straight P. D.. Antibiotic Discovery through Microbial Interactions. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2019;51:64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2019.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harvey A. L.. Natural Products in Drug Discovery. Drug discovery today. 2008;13(19–20):894–901. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beutler J. A.. Natural Products as a Foundation for Drug Discovery. Curr. Protoc. Pharmacol. 2009;46(1):9.11.1–9.11.21. doi: 10.1002/0471141755.ph0911s46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harvey A. L., Edrada-Ebel R., Quinn R. J.. The Re-Emergence of Natural Products for Drug Discovery in the Genomics Era. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery. 2015;14(2):111–129. doi: 10.1038/nrd4510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischbach M. A., Walsh C. T.. Assembly-Line Enzymology for Polyketide and Nonribosomal Peptide Antibiotics: Logic, Machinery, and Mechanisms. Chem. Rev. 2006;106(8):3468–3496. doi: 10.1021/cr0503097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fischbach M. A., Walsh C. T., Clardy J.. The Evolution of Gene Collectives: How Natural Selection Drives Chemical Innovation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008;105(12):4601–4608. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709132105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Flatt P. M., Mahmud T.. Biosynthesis of Aminocyclitol-Aminoglycoside Antibiotics and Related Compounds. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2007;24(2):358–392. doi: 10.1039/B603816F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baltz R. H.. Strain Improvement in Actinomycetes in the Postgenomic Era. Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology. 2011;38(6):657–666. doi: 10.1007/s10295-010-0934-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nett M., Ikeda H., Moore B. S.. Genomic Basis for Natural Product Biosynthetic Diversity in the Actinomycetes. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009;26(11):1362–1384. doi: 10.1039/b817069j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Medema M. H., Fischbach M. A.. Computational Approaches to Natural Product Discovery. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2015;11(9):639–648. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ziemert N., Alanjary M., Weber T.. The Evolution of Genome Mining in Microbes - a Review. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2016;33(8):988–1005. doi: 10.1039/C6NP00025H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choi S. S., Katsuyama Y., Bai L., Deng Z., Ohnishi Y., Kim E. S.. Genome Engineering for Microbial Natural Product Discovery. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2018;45:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2018.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palaniappan K., Chen I. M. A., Chu K., Ratner A., Seshadri R., Kyrpides N. C., Ivanova N. N., Mouncey N. J.. IMG-ABC v.5.0: An Update to the IMG/Atlas of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters Knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;48(D1):D422–D430. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Montiel D., Kang H.-S., Chang F.-Y., Charlop-Powers Z., Brady S. F.. Yeast Homologous Recombination-Based Promoter Engineering for the Activation of Silent Natural Product Biosynthetic Gene Clusters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015;112(29):8953–8958. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1507606112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamanaka K., Reynolds K. A., Kersten R. D., Ryan K. S., Gonzalez D. J., Nizet V., Dorrestein P. C., Moore B. S.. Direct Cloning and Refactoring of a Silent Lipopeptide Biosynthetic Gene Cluster Yields the Antibiotic Taromycin A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014;111(5):1957–1962. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319584111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bilyk O., Sekurova O. N., Zotchev S. B., Luzhetskyy A.. Cloning and Heterologous Expression of the Grecocycline Biosynthetic Gene Cluster. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0158682. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kieser, T. ; Bibb, M. J. ; Buttner, M. J. ; Chater, K. F. ; Hopwood, D. A. . Practical Streptomyces Genetics; Norwich, England, 2000. 10.2436/im.v3i4.9291. [DOI]
- Cobb R. E., Wang Y., Zhao H.. High-Efficiency Multiplex Genome Editing of Streptomyces Species Using an Engineered CRISPR/Cas System. ACS Synth. Biol. 2015;4(6):723–728. doi: 10.1021/sb500351f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang M. M., Wong F. T., Wang Y., Luo S., Lim Y. H., Heng E., Yeo W. L., Cobb R. E., Enghiad B., Ang E. L., Zhao H.. CRISPR-Cas9 Strategy for Activation of Silent Streptomyces Biosynthetic Gene Clusters. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2017;13(6):607–609. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tong Y., Charusanti P., Zhang L., Weber T., Lee S. Y.. CRISPR-Cas9 Based Engineering of Actinomycetal Genomes. ACS Synth. Biol. 2015;4(9):1020–1029. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.5b00038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao Y., Li L., Zheng G., Jiang W., Deng Z., Wang Z., Lu Y.. CRISPR/dCas9-Mediated Multiplex Gene Repression in Streptomyces. Biotechnol. J. 2018;13(9):1800121. doi: 10.1002/biot.201800121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bai C., van Wezel G. P.. CUBIC: A Versatile Cumate-Based Inducible CRISPRi System in Streptomyces. ACS Synth. Biol. 2023;12(10):3143–3147. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Culp E. J., Yim G., Waglechner N., Wang W., Pawlowski A. C., Wright G. D.. Hidden Antibiotics in Actinomycetes Can Be Identified by Inactivation of Gene Clusters for Common Antibiotics. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37(10):1149–1154. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0241-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Volff J.-N., Altenbuchner J.. Genetic Instability of the Streptomyces Chromosome. Mol. Microbiol. 1998;27(2):239–246. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00652.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoff G., Bertrand C., Piotrowski E., Thibessard A., Leblond P.. Genome Plasticity Is Governed by Double Strand Break DNA Repair in Streptomyces. Sci. Rep. 2018;8(1):5272. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23622-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tong Y., Whitford C. M., Robertsen H. L., Blin K., Jørgensen T. S., Klitgaard A. K., Gren T., Jiang X., Weber T., Lee S. Y.. Highly Efficient DSB-Free Base Editing for Streptomycetes with CRISPR-BEST. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2019;116(41):20366–20375. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1913493116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qi L. S., Larson M. H., Gilbert L. A., Doudna J. A., Weissman J. S., Arkin A. P., Lim W. A.. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-Guided Platform for Sequence-Specific Control of Gene Expression. Cell. 2013;152(5):1173–1183. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peters J. M., Colavin A., Shi H., Czarny T. L., Larson M. H., Wong S., Hawkins J. S., Lu C. H. S., Koo B. M., Marta E., Shiver A. L., Whitehead E. H., Weissman J. S., Brown E. D., Qi L. S., Huang K. C., Gross C. A.. A Comprehensive, CRISPR-Based Functional Analysis of Essential Genes in Bacteria. Cell. 2016;165(6):1493–1506. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blin K., Shaw S., Steinke K., Villebro R., Ziemert N., Lee S. Y., Medema M. H., Weber T.. antiSMASH 5.0: Updates to the Secondary Metabolite Genome Mining Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W81–W87. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barger S. R., Hoefler B. C., Cubillos-Ruiz A., Russell W. K., Russell D. H., Straight P. D.. Imaging Secondary Metabolism of Streptomyces Sp. Mg1 during Cellular Lysis and Colony Degradation of Competing Bacillus Subtilis. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2012;102(3):435–445. doi: 10.1007/s10482-012-9769-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stubbendieck R. M., Straight P. D.. Escape from Lethal Bacterial Competition through Coupled Activation of Antibiotic Resistance and a Mobilized Subpopulation. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(12):1–27. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Komori T., Ezaki M., Kino E., Kohsaka M., Aoki H., Imanaka H.. Lavendomycin, a New Antibiotic. I. Taxonomy, Isolation and Characterization. J. Antibiot. 1985;38(6):691–698. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.38.691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thorpe H. M., Smith M. C. M.. In Vitro Site-Specific Integration of Bacteriophage DNA Catalyzed by a Recombinase of the Resolvase/Invertase Family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998;95(10):5505–5510. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.10.5505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao Y., Li L., Zheng G., Jiang W., Deng Z., Wang Z., Lu Y.. CRISPR/dCas9-Mediated Multiplex Gene Repression in Streptomyces. Biotechnol. J. 2018;13(9):1800121. doi: 10.1002/biot.201800121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoefler B. C., Gorzelnik K. V., Yang J. Y., Hendricks N., Dorrestein P. C., Straight P. D.. Enzymatic Resistance to the Lipopeptide Surfactin as Identified through Imaging Mass Spectrometry of Bacterial Competition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012;109(32):13082–13087. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205586109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoefler B. C., Stubbendieck R. M., Josyula N. K., Moisan S. M., Schulze E. M., Straight P. D.. A Link between Linearmycin Biosynthesis and Extracellular Vesicle Genesis Connects Specialized Metabolism and Bacterial Membrane Physiology. Cell Chem. Biol. 2017;24(10):1238–1249.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McAlpine J. B., Bachmann B. O., Piraee M., Tremblay S., Alarco A.-M., Zazopoulos E., Farnet C. M.. Microbial Genomics as a Guide to Drug Discovery and Structural Elucidation: ECO-02301, a Novel Antifungal Agent, as an Example. J. Nat. Prod. 2005;68(4):493–496. doi: 10.1021/np0401664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Replogle J. M., Bonnar J. L., Pogson A. N., Liem C. R., Maier N. K., Ding Y., Russell B. J., Wang X., Leng K., Guna A., Norman T. M., Pak R. A., Ramos D. M., Ward M. E., Gilbert L. A., Kampmann M., Weissman J. S., Jost M.. Maximizing CRISPRi Efficacy and Accessibility with Dual-sgRNA Libraries and Optimal Effectors. eLife. 2022;11:1867. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Traxler M. F., Watrous J. D., Alexandrov T., Dorrestein P. C., Kolter R.. Interspecies Interactions Stimulate Diversification of the Streptomyces Coelicolor Secreted Metabolome. mBio. 2013;4(4):1–12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00459-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwyn B., Neilands J. B.. Universal Chemical Assay for the Detection and Determination of Siderophores. Anal. Biochem. 1987;160(1):47–56. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weaver V. B. B., Kolter R.. Burkholderia Spp. Alter Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Physiology through Iron Sequestration. J. Bacteriol. 2004;186(8):2376–2384. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.8.2376-2384.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maresca J. A., Romberger S. P., Bryant D. A.. Isorenieratene Biosynthesis in Green Sulfur Bacteria Requires the Cooperative Actions of Two Carotenoid Cyclases. J. Bacteriol. 2008;190(19):6384. doi: 10.1128/JB.00758-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krügel H., Krubasik P., Weber K., Saluz H. P., Sandmann G.. Functional Analysis of Genes from Streptomyces Griseus Involved in the Synthesis of Isorenieratene, a Carotenoid with Aromatic End Groups, Revealed a Novel Type of Carotenoid Desaturase. Biochimica Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Biology of Lipids. 1999;1439(1):57–64. doi: 10.1016/S1388-1981(99)00075-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takano H., Obitsu S., Beppu T., Ueda K.. Light-Induced Carotenogenesis in Streptomyces Coelicolor A3(2): Identification of an Extracytoplasmic Function Sigma Factor That Directs Photodependent Transcription of the Carotenoid Biosynthesis Gene Cluster. J. Bacteriol. 2005;187(5):1825. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.5.1825-1832.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Myronovskyi M., Tokovenko B., Brötz E., Rückert C., Kalinowski J., Luzhetskyy A.. Genome Rearrangements of Streptomyces Albus J1074 Lead to the Carotenoid Gene Cluster Activation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014;98(2):795–806. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5440-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Becerril A., Álvarez S., Braña A. F., Rico S., Díaz M., Santamaría R. I., Salas J. A., Méndez C.. Uncovering Production of Specialized Metabolites by Streptomyces Argillaceus: Activation of Cryptic Biosynthesis Gene Clusters Using Nutritional and Genetic Approaches. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0198145. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0198145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krügel H., Krubasik P., Weber K., Saluz H. P., Sandmann G.. Functional Analysis of Genes from Streptomyces Griseus Involved in the Synthesis of Isorenieratene, a Carotenoid with Aromatic End Groups, Revealed a Novel Type of Carotenoid Desaturase. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids. 1999;1439(1):57–64. doi: 10.1016/S1388-1981(99)00075-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bondarev S. L., Knyukshto V. N., Bachilo S. M.. Polarized Fluorescence of β-Carotene and Related Polyenes. J. Appl. Spectrosc. 2000;67(1):88–94. doi: 10.1007/BF02681426. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Andersson P. O., Bachilo S. M., Chen R.-L., Gillbro T.. Solvent and Temperature Effects on Dual Fluorescence in a Series of Carotenes. Energy Gap Dependence of the Internal Conversion Rate. J. Phys. Chem. A. 1995;99(44):16199–16209. doi: 10.1021/j100044a002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Iliasov D., Gualdron R. S., Lörzing P., Maaß S., Cinar B., Wollenhaupt B., Kohlheyer D., Becher D., Loderer C., Tschowri N., Schlierf M., Zaburdaev V., Mascher T.. Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the Dihydrolipoyl Dehydrogenase LpdA Determine the Intrinsic Autofluorescence in Filamentous Actinobacteria. Microbiology. 2025:459. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.03.640617. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Mavi P. S., Flärdh K.. Deletion of fbiC in Streptomyces Venezuelae Removes Autofluorescence in the Excitation-Emission Range of Cyan Fluorescent Protein. Microbiology. 2025;171(4):001552. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.001552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt U., Mundinger K., Mangold R., Lieberknecht A.. Lavendomycin: Total Synthesis and Assignment of Configuration. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1990;18:1216–1219. doi: 10.1039/c39900001216. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Terlouw, B. R. ; Huang, C. ; Meijer, D. ; Cediel-Becerra, J. D. D. ; He, R. ; Rothe, M. L. ; Jenner, M. ; Zhou, S. ; Zhang, Y. ; Fage, C. D. ; Tsunematsu, Y. ; van Wezel, G. P. ; Robinson, S. L. ; Alberti, F. ; Alkhalaf, L. M. ; Chevrette, M. G. ; Challis, G. L. ; Medema, M. H. . PARAS: High-Accuracy Machine Learning of Substrate Specificities in Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetases bioRxiv 2025. 10.1101/2025.01.08.631717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Braun S. D., Völksch B., Nüske J., Spiteller D.. 3-Methylarginine from Pseudomonas Syringae Pv. Syringae 22d/93 Suppresses the Bacterial Blight Caused by Its Close Relative Pseudomonas Syringae Pv. Glycinea. ChemBioChem. 2008;9(12):1913–1920. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200800080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feng J., Wu J., Gao J., Xia Z., Deng Z., He X.. Biosynthesis of the β-Methylarginine Residue of Peptidyl Nucleoside Arginomycin in Streptomyces Arginensis NRRL 15941. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014;80(16):5021–5027. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01172-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lam W. H., Rychli K., Bugg T. D. H.. Identification of a Novel β-Replacement Reaction in the Biosynthesis of 2,3-Diaminobutyric Acid in Peptidylnucleoside Mureidomycin A. Organic Biomolecular Chem. 2008;6(11):1912–1917. doi: 10.1039/b802585a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang W., Ostash B., Walsh C. T.. Identification of the Biosynthetic Gene Cluster for the Pacidamycin Group of Peptidyl Nucleoside Antibiotics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010;107(39):16828–16833. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011557107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cediel-Becerra, J. D. D. ; Cumsille, A. ; Guerra, S. ; Ding, Y. ; de Crécy-Lagard, V. ; Chevrette, M. G. . Targeted Genome Mining with GATOR-GC Maps the Evolutionary Landscape of Biosynthetic Diversity bioRxiv 2025. 10.1101/2025.02.24.639861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Ameruoso A., Kcam M. C. V., Cohen K. P., Chappell J.. Activating Natural Product Synthesis Using CRISPR Interference and Activation Systems in Streptomyces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(13):7751. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y., Chen Z., He A., Zhan Y., Li J., Liu L., Wu H., Zhuang C., Lin J., Zhang Q., Huang W.. Targeting Cellular mRNAs Translation by CRISPR-Cas9. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:568. doi: 10.1038/srep29652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown T., Nair A., Howe F. S., Russell A., El-Sagheer A., Lamstaes A. R., Mellor J.. CRISPRi Is Not Strand-Specific at All Loci and Redefines the Transcriptional Landscape. eLife. 2017;6:1–15. doi: 10.7554/eLife.29878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones D., Unoson C., Leroy P., Curic V., Elf J.. Kinetics of dCas9 Target Search in Escherichia Coli . Biophys. J. 2017;112(3):314a. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.11.1700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson D. A., Voigt C. A.. Competitive dCas9 Binding as a Mechanism for Transcriptional Control. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2021;17(11):MSB202110512. doi: 10.15252/msb.202110512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kieser, T. ; Foundation, J. I. . Practical Streptomyces Genetics; John Innes Foundation, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Engler C., Kandzia R., Marillonnet S.. A One Pot, One Step, Precision Cloning Method with High Throughput Capability. PLoS One. 2008;3(11):e3647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Myronovskyi M., Tokovenko B., Brötz E., Rückert C., Kalinowski J., Luzhetskyy A.. Genome Rearrangements of Streptomyces Albus J1074 Lead to the Carotenoid Gene Cluster Activation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014;98(2):795–806. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5440-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoefler B. C., Konganti K., Straight P. D.. De Novo Assembly of the Streptomyces Sp. Strain Mg1 Genome Using PacBio Single-Molecule Sequencing. Genome Announcements. 2013;1(4):1–2. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00535-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cobb R. E., Wang Y., Zhao H.. High-Efficiency Multiplex Genome Editing of Streptomyces Species Using an Engineered CRISPR/Cas System. ACS Synthetic Biol. 2015;4(6):723–728. doi: 10.1021/sb500351f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
