Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Aug 26.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Urol. 2026 Jan 7;23(5):319–332. doi: 10.1038/s41585-025-01112-9

SRD5A2 and emerging therapies in androgen-driven disorders

Zongwei Wang 1,*, Boqing Gu 1, Christina Sharkey 1, Rongbin Ge 2, Aria F Olumi 1
PMCID: PMC13505641  NIHMSID: NIHMS2193826  PMID: 41501168

Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the most prevalent urological disorders in aging men. Althoughmedical therapies are widely used, truly effective long-term treatments remain limited. Among the most commonly prescribed drugs are 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARIs), which alleviate symptoms and slow disease progression by inhibiting steroid 5-alpha reductase (SRD5A) enzymes, particularly the SRD5A1 and SRD5A2 isoforms. SRD5A2, the dominant isoform in the prostate, plays a pivotal role in androgen metabolism by converting testosterone to dihydrotestosterone (DHT), a potent driver of prostate growth. Proper regulation of SRD5A2 is essential for maintaining the balance between androgenic and estrogenic signaling, thereby supporting normal prostate physiology. Emerging evidence links SRD5A2 alterations, such as genetic polymorphisms, epigenetic silencing, and inflammation-induced changes to disease risk and progression, positioning these factors as promising biomarkers for personalized therapy.. Beyond BPH, SRD5A2 has also been implicated asa potential therapeutic target in prostate cancer and androgenic alopecia. This translational reviewsynthesizes recent advances in SRD5A2 biology, emphasizing its clinical relevance in BPH, prostate cancer, and other androgen-mediated conditions. We also discuss current limitations of SRD5A2-targeted therapies and propose future strategies to enhance the efficacy of 5ARI-based treatments.

Introduction

The prostate is the only glandular organ in the human body that continues to grow throughout life1. Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a nonmalignant enlargement of the prostate, characterized by stromal and epithelial proliferation within the transition zone2. It is the most common prostate disorder in men over 50, with prevalence increasing alongside life expectancy3,4, affecting approximately 5–6% of men aged 40–64 and 29–33% of those 65 and older5. BPH is a major cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and can lead to bladder outlet obstruction, urinary tract infections, and acute urinary retention6,7. Current first-line treatments include α1-adrenergic receptor antagonists (α-blockers), alone or in combination with 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs). 5ARIs act by inhibiting steroid 5α-reductase (SRD5A), thereby lowering intraprostatic dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels and reducing prostate volume. While effective for some,, 5ARIs slow LUTS progression by only about 34%, leaving a substantial proportion of patients unresponsive and ultimately requiring surgical intervention8–10. The biological basis for this variability remains poorly understood, representing a major gap in effective BPH management. In this review, we adopt a translational research perspective, integrating recent mechanistic insights into SRD5A2 biology with their potential clinical implications. While SRD5A2 is also implicated in prostate cancer and other androgen-related disorders, BPH remains our primary clinical focus. We discuss how genetic, epigenetic, and inflammation-associated regulation of SRD5A2 may influence treatment response, evaluate the limitations of current SRD5A2-targeted therapies, and outline future strategies for more personalized and effective interventions. By explicitly bridging basic mechanisms with clinical applications, we aim to clarify how SRD5A2 biology informs patient care and where new opportunities for therapeutic development may lie.

Importance of SRD5A2 in prostate

Prostate homeostasis and growth are critically dependent on androgen signaling. Testosterone, the primary androgen, is secreted by the testes and subsequently reaches prostatic tissue, where it is converted to DHT by three steroid 5α-reductase isozymes: SRD5A1, SRD5A2, and SRD5A3. Among these, SRD5A2 is the dominant isozyme in the prostate. DHT binds to the androgen receptor (AR) with two- to five-fold higher affinity than testosterone and amplifies AR signaling up to ten-fold11,12. The activated androgen–AR complex translocates to the nucleus of both epithelial and stromal cells, promoting the expression of growth factors such as keratinocyte growth factor, epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factors (IGFs). These growth factors play a key role in maintaining the delicate balance between cell proliferation and apoptosis, which is essential for normal prostate development and homeostasis11.

SRD5A2 in Prostate Development

Prostate is derived from the urogenital sinus, DHT is essential for the development of the prostate and virilization during fetal growth, and mediates sexual maturation during puberty13. SRD5A2 is constitutively expressed in male accessory reproductive tissues and genital skin throughout lifespan14. During puberty, rising testosterone levels stimulate further prostate growth, with SRD5A2 ensuring adequate DHT production to support the final stages of glandular maturation15. This process includes epithelial branching morphogenesis, stromal differentiation, and the establishment of the prostate's functional zones (peripheral, central, and transition zones)16,17. Disruptions in SRD5A2 expression due to genetic mutation or polymorphism at birth is associated with an autosomal recessive disorder named SRD5A2 deficiency, which is associated with incomplete prostate formation and ambiguous genitalia, underscoring the enzyme’s fundamental developmental role18,19. In adult men, SRD5A2 continues to maintain tissue homeostasis by balancing cell proliferation, apoptosis, and secretory functions within the prostate2. Through its role in modulating DHT levels, SRD5A2 ensures that androgen-dependent signaling pathways remain properly controlled, thus preserving normal tissue architecture and preventing excessive cellular growth.

SRD5A2 in BPH

SRD5A2 is critical in the pathogenesis of BPH. The enzyme is predominately expressed in stromal and part of epithelial compartments that undergo hyperplastic changes12,20. By locally generating high levels of DHT, this enzyme influences cell proliferation, tissue remodeling, and the overall androgenic environment that drives prostatic enlargement21. DHT binds to AR with a higher affinity than testosterone, ensuring a more robust and prolonged activation of androgenic signaling pathways22. Once bound, the DHT–AR complex translocates to the nucleus, where it modulates the expression of multiple genes involved in cell cycle progression, proliferation, and survival23. This robust androgenic drive not only stimulates the replication of prostate cells but also alters the local tissue microenvironment by influencing the production of growth factors and cytokines. For example, fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) and IGFs can be upregulated, further fueling the hyperplastic process by enhancing both stromal and epithelial proliferation24. Additionally, DHT signaling may increase the expression of certain extracellular matrix components, contributing to a structural framework that favors continued nodular expansion25. Prolonged or excessive SRD5A2 activity amplifies these processes, intensifying the hormonal and growth factor milieu within the prostate, ultimately driving progressive enlargement in BPH. Beyond its direct androgenic drive, SRD5A2’s function in BPH may be further influenced by age-related changes in hormone levels and shifts in paracrine and autocrine signaling within the prostate microenvironmen26,27. These changes can alter the balance between proliferation and apoptosis, favoring continued growth. In sum, SRD5A2 is central to the local generation of DHT in the prostate and is thereby a critical mediator of the hyperplastic changes that characterize BPH.

SRD5A2 Targeting Within the Multifactorial Treatment Landscape of BPH

While SRD5A2 is critical in the pathogenesis of BPH, it is well accepted that BPH and LUTS are multifactorial conditions influenced by smooth muscle tone, detrusor and neurological function, inflammation, and systemic metabolic factors (PMID: 19002119). Symptom severity correlates only modestly with prostate size, and bothersome symptoms such as nocturia or urgency often persist despite prostate volume reduction (PMID: 16530611). These complexities underscore the need for diverse therapies tailored to patient heterogeneity. Within this broader context, 5ARIs reduce intraprostatic DHT, decrease prostate volume, and lower long-term risks of progression (PMID: 9475762). Thus, SRD5A2 inhibition should be viewed as a disease-modifying therapy, complementing α-blockers (rapid symptom relief via smooth muscle relaxation and other strategies addressing inflammatory or metabolic drivers (PMID: 18036719, 16608892). This highlights opportunities for precision approaches by using molecular or clinical markers to identify patients most likely to benefit, and for combination regimens (e.g., α-blockers plus 5ARIs) that address multiple mechanisms simultaneously (PMID: 14681504). In general, while BPH/LUTS is inherently multifactorial, SRD5A2 targeting remains a clinically relevant and well-defined component of the treatment landscape, particularly in patients with enlarged prostates and androgen-driven disease biology.

SRD5A2 in Prostate Inflammation

The prostate is considered an immune-competent organ, characterized by the presence of a complex intraglandular immune system, a urinary/genital microbiome and the prevention of autoimmune reactions towards self-antigens(citations)28. Chronic inflammation in the prostate is associated with altered SRD5A2 expression, leading to imbalanced androgen metabolism and dysregulated DHT synthesis29. In a prostate with BPH, there is increased collagen deposition and infiltration of inflammatory mediators, such as T cells and macrophages, resulting in a chronic inflammatory status within the prostate. Elevated inflammation results in NF-kB activation, which has been demonstrated to stimulate expression of SRD5A2, AR, and AR-V7.11 Chronic prostatic inflammation has been linked to alterations in androgen metabolism, including dysregulation of SRD5A2 expression29. Increased expression of a network of pro-inflammatory activating protein-1 transcription factor/chemokine, including c-JUN, c-FOS, FOSB, cyclin D1, c-Myc, HB-EGF, MMP1, IL-6, and IL-8 is associated with symptomatic BPH30. Chronic inflammation in the prostate also activates the NF-κB signaling, which can paradoxically upregulate SRD5A2 expression, leading to increased DHT production and AR signaling31. In retrospective cohort studies, taking TNF-α inhibitors were found having a shrinking effect on the prostate, suggest that TNF-α inhibitors may impede prostate growth32,33.

Patients with chronic prostatic inflammation could be considered at risk of BPH development and progression. One of the key mechanisms driving these changes is obesity-associated inflammation, which has been shown to induce DNA methylation of the SRD5A2 promoter, effectively silencing its expression34. Clinical studies have observed that higher body mass index (BMI) is correlated with increased SRD5A2 methylation and reduced protein expression, explaining why obese individuals with BPH often experience more severe urinary symptoms and show a diminished response to 5ARIs35. The presence of prostatic inflammation might even alter 5-ARIs activity. In particular, increasing age and rising levels of inflammatory mediators (TNFα, nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), and IL-6) can modify the activity of the enzyme DNA methyltransferase 1, which in turn regulates the expression of SRD5A2, the target of these medications36. This various pattern of SRD5A2 regulation—being upregulated in some inflammatory conditions and epigenetically silenced in others—may be associated with heterogenous inflammatory microenvironment and contributes to treatment resistance to 5ARIs.

Structure, expression, and distribution of SRD5A2

Size, domain, and structure

Human SRD5A2 gene locates on chromosome 2, band p23, consists of five exons and four introns and its full-length protein SRD5A2 encodes 254 amino acids with a molecular weight of approximately 29.5 KD14,26,37 (Fig. 1A). SRD5A2 functions as an integral membrane protein, highly expressed on the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. There are seven transmembrane helices in SRD5A2 interconnected with six loops. These alpha-helix transmembrane domains in SRD5A2 provide a large internal cavity to support substrate binding38. X-ray crystallography study reported a dual-steric ligand NADP-dihydrofinasteride that occupies two distinct substrate binding pockets within the internal activity during SRD5A2 catalysis38 (Fig. 1B). Two key amino acid residues, E57TM2 and Y91TM3 in SRD5A2, were identified for testosterone catalysis and finasteride and dutasteride inhibition38 (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 1. The gene, structure, and distribution of SRD5A2.

Fig. 1.

(A) Genomic structure of SRD5A2. The horizontal line represents its genomic entire length; exons and UTRs are indicated by purple and orange boxes, respectively. The distribution of three genetic polymorphisms is indicated, respectively. Silencing methylation on the CpG island of the SRD5A2 promoter is schematically represented. (B) Crystal structure of SRD5A2 from PDM entry 7BW1 colored variably by domains38. Seven transmembrane domains and NADPH binding pocket are labeled, respectively. (C) The expression profile of SRD5A2 in human tissues. The top fifteen organs with the highest SRD5A2 expression are indicated in the bar figure. The results are based on the analysis of GTEx Consortium46 (available at https://www.gtexportal.org/home/gene/SRD5A2). (D) The expression profile of SRD5A2 in the single cell type clusters were visualized by a UMAP plot. The results are based on the single cell RNA sequencing resource of the Human Protein Atlas (available at https://www.proteinatlas.org/search/srd5a2 ). LE: luminal epithelial cell, HE: Hillock epithelial cell, CE: Club epithelial cell, BE: basal epithelial cell, SM: smooth muscle cell, Leu: leucocyte, Fib: fibroblast, Endo: endothelial cell.

Fig. 2. The enzymatic function of SRD5A2.

Fig. 2.

(A) Schematic model of SRD5A2 enzymatic reaction of converting testosterone (T) to dihydrotestosterone (DHT) with the hydrolysis of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH). Key residues on SRD5A2 for the formation of hydrogen bonds (drawn as dash lines) are also indicated. (B) The role of SRD5A2 in various androgen biosynthesis pathways. In some steps SRD5A2 may convert the same substrates as SRD5A1, but two 5α reductases differ in kinetic properties and are expressed in a tissue-specific fashion. Thus, some substrates are preferred by either SRD5A1 or SRD5A2 depending on specific situations.

Genetics: mutations and polymorphisms

More than 100 somatic mutations and polymorphisms have been reported in SRD5A2 gene, and many of which have a significant impact in SRD5A2 protein stability and enzymatic activity. Study identified 451 cases of 5α-reductase type 2 deficiency in the literature from 48 countries, which carrying 121 different allelic variants in the SRD5A2 gene, and most are missense mutations37. 46 variants in SRD5A2 have been functionally investigated, and 42 out of 46 are non-synonymous allelic variants within exons 1–537. Somatic gene polymorphisms in SRD5A2 are also commonly studied. The three most reported polymorphisms in BPH patients are V89L (rs523349), A49T (rs9282858), and various length of thymine-adenine (TA) repeats39. T allele in rs9282858 and shorter TA repeats are associated with higher SRD5A2 enzymatic activity and increased risk of BPH21. Such genetic variants may influence individual responsiveness to 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs). For example, patients carrying high-activity alleles may achieve greater prostate volume reduction with therapy, whereas those with low-activity alleles may derive minimal benefit. Incorporating genetic screening into clinical decision-making could help identify patients most likely to respond to SRD5A2-targeted interventions. In addition, although the promising progress, limited number of patients. Therefore, more studies with larger cohorts are needed to further validate .

Epigenetics

Epigenetic modulation, specifically DNA hypermethylation at the promoter region of the SRD5A2 gene, leads to gene silencing and downregulation of SRD5A2 protein expression40,41. This promoter region contains a heavily populated CpG dinucleotide that can potentially be methylated (Fig. 1A). Approximately 30% of BPH specimens exhibit promoter methylation, corresponding with low intraprostatic SRD5A2 levels40. Decreased SRD5A2 expression in BPH tissues may contribute to the reduced efficacy of 5-ARI therapy in certain patient populations, yet the mechanism underlying SRD5A2 downregulation remained unelucidated. The study utilizing a comprehensive molecular investigation of BPH defined a methylation signature for BPH that included 696 differentially methylated CpGs in promoter regions, found negative correlation between promoter methylation and gene expression, and hypermethylation is the dominant signal across all genomic regions42. Furthermore, a multivariate logistic regression analysis on 96 prostate samples derived from transurethral resection prostatectomy (TURP) samples suggests that BMI and age are two factors with significant association with DNA methylation at the SRD5A2 promoter region, thus leading to reduced SRD5A2 protein expression35. Besides BMI and age, inflammatory mediators can also affect methylation status in the SRD5A2 promoter. In human prostatic stromal cells cultured with macrophage-conditioned media, SRD5A2 promoter methylation was significantly elevated, suggesting that proinflammatory mediators are associated with the SRD5A2 hypermethylation at the promoter region43. For instance, TNF-α and IL-6 regulate the SRD5A2 promoter methylation by activating DNA methyltransferase I (DNMT1) in vitro and in BPH tissue samples26. DNMT1 is abundantly expressed in the developing prostate, and its expression is upregulated in castrated mice treated with testosterone44. Elevated DNMT1 activity is reported to promote SRD5A2 promoter methylation, which leads to SRD5A2 gene silencing and SRD5A2 protein downregulation36. Together, these interdisciplinary studies collectively support that hypermethylation at the SRD5A2 promoter region is strongly associated with downregulation of SRD5A2 expression, and multiple factors including BMI, age, and inflammation can contribute to this epigenetic regulation on SRD5A2. Patients with methylation-induced SRD5A2 loss are less likely to benefit from 5ARI therapy, as androgen conversion to DHT is already diminished. In these cases, alternative or adjunctive approaches, such as selective estrogen receptor modulators to counteract estrogenic pathway activation, may provide greater symptomatic and structural benefit.

Distribution of SRD5A2

Human SRD5A2 gene is predominantly expressed in sex hormone-sensitive tissues including prostate, testis, and seminal vesicles in men, vagina, fallopian tube in women, and other organs like liver, bladder, and hair follicle (Fig. 1C)14,26,45. As an androgen-dependent tissue with remarkable experimental properties, prostate has the highest SRD5A2 mRNA expression according to tissue-specific transcriptomic datasets from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Consortium46 (Fig. 1C). While SRD5A2 is the predominant, if not exclusive, isozyme in the healthy human prostate, SRD5A1 is undetectable, suggestive of the sole responsibility of SRD5A2 to supply DHT for prostate growth and maintenance47. Single-cell RNA sequencing data showed that SRD5A2 expression is enriched in stromal cells, with lower expression in epithelial and immune cells (Fig. 1D).

SRD5A2 activity and expression display significant population variance due to differences in genetic polymorphisms, hormonal factors, and environmental influences. Hispanic, African and African American populations exhibit a higher frequency of the V allele in V89L polymorphism, which may contribute to a higher prevalence of prostate cancer48,49, while the East Asian population predominantly carries the L allele that displays a lower enzymatic activity and potentially contributes to a reduced risk of50,51. The T allele in A49T and the V allele in V89L polymorphism are known to be associated with increased enzymatic activity and higher DHT production in vitro48. These two polymorphisms contribute to the majority of observed ethnicity differences in SRD5A2 activity, as well as risk of developing BPH and prostate21.

Function of SRD5A2

Enzymatic function of SRD5A2

SRD5A2 in prostate irreversibly converts testosterone into DHT to supply intraprostatic androgen in a β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide 2´-phosphate (NADPH)-dependent manner52. SRD5A2 reduces the Δ4,5 carbon-carbon double bond in testosterone to carbon-carbon single bond in DHT with the hydride donor NADPH as shown in the Fig. 1B. X-ray crystallography-based study proposed an in silico docking structure of SRD5A2 with NADPH and testosterone where the A ring in testosterone is positioned in parallel to the nicotinamide ring in NADPH with an estimated distance of 2.5 Å between the Δ4,5 double bond of testosterone and the 4-pro-(R)-hydride of NADPH38. Specifically, Glu57 and Tyr91 residues of SRD5A2 formed hydrogen bonds with the C-3 carbonyl group in testosterone, and this proposed configuration favors the hydride transfer from NADPH and enolization of Δ4,5 double bond38.

Role of SRD5A2 in AR signaling pathway

Androgens constitute an indispensable component of the pathophysiology of BPH. While both can readily bind to AR, DHT and testosterone are believed to exert different physiological functions. SRD5A2 is an essential upstream regulator of AR signaling by producing the primary binding ligand DHT to activate AR in prostate. AR belongs to the type-I class nuclear hormone transcription factor family, which is typically held at the inactivated form in the cytoplasm where it binds to heat shock proteins (HSPs). HSPs function as molecular chaperones to maintain the AR protein structure and prevent misfolding53. Excessive activation of AR signaling can overstimulate the differentiation and proliferation of prostate cells and lead to male urinary system diseases11,54. When SRD5A2 functions in conjunction with HSD17B6 in the backdoor pathway which also produces DHT, AR signaling pathway is overactivated and leads to multiple androgen-related diseases, such as acne, androgenetic alopecia, prostate cancer, etc.55. In addition, AR signaling exerts a reciprocal effect on its upstream regulators, SRD5A1 and SRD5A2. Intriguingly, while both SRD5A1 and SRD5A2 are direct AR target genes56, they are differentially regulated by AR signaling pathway in the context of prostate cancer: activated AR induces SRD5A1 expression while repressing SRD5A2 expression57. Developing a comprehensive understanding of the AR signaling pathway and its differential feedback mechanisms on SRD5A1 and SRD5A2 will be informative to advance clinical treatments for androgen-related diseases.

Alternative signaling pathway

Increasing evidence supports a role for estrogens in the pathogenesis of BPH. Estrogen receptor (ER) and AR share a similar design of structural and functional domains. ERα and ERβ are encoded by two distinct genes located on different chromosomes. The two ER subtypes have the same arrangement of functional domains with the most conserved region being the DNA binding domain (97% identity), consistent with the receptors binding to similar DNA response elements13. While the localization of ER remains controversial in literature, it is generally accepted that ERα is generally expressed in the stroma compartment, and ERβ is expressed in the basal and luminal cells of the epithelium58,59. Estrogens exert their effects on target gene expression via binding to specific intracellular ERs, which function as hormone inducible transcription factors. In the 30% of BPH patients with low SRD5A2 expression, the estrogenic pathway is activated via the upregulation of aromatase and phosphorylated ERα (pERα)60. In addition, TNF-α upregulates both aromatase and pERα. Aromatase is a key enzyme involved in the conversion of testosterone to estradiol and plays a crucial role in the elevation of androgen/ estrogen (testosterone/estradiol: T/E) ratio as men age61. Once testosterone is converted to estradiol, the ER signaling pathways regulate prostate growth upon binding to estradiol58.

Development of 5ARIs

Structure and Mechanism of Action of 5ARIs

Both finasteride and dutasteride are 4-azasteroids, characterized by a nitrogen atom replacing the carbon at position 4 of the steroid nucleus (Fig. 3A)14. The steroid ring of finasteride includes a lactam (cyclic amide) group at position 3 and a tert-butyl carbamate substituent at position 17β relatively smaller than the bulky side chain of dutasteride, which contributes to its binding to the hydrophobic cavity of SRD5A2, forming a stable NADP-DHF adduct that blocks substrate access and thus selectively inhibit SRD5A2 and reduce serum DHT level (Fig. 3B)38. In addition, the 2,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl group at position 17β of dutasteride, significantly increasing its bulkiness and hydrophobicity by creating strong van der Waals interactions with the enzyme’s active site, which contributes to enhancing its reversible binding to both SRD5A1 and SRD5A262. Furthermore, the hydrophobic trifluoromethyl groups on the phenyl ring of dutasteride’s side chain also improve dutasteride’s membrane permeability and possibly contribute to different metabolisms thus prolonging its half-life compared to finasteride. The structural differences lead the distinct pharmacological profiles and isoenzyme selectivity: Dutasteride exhibits broader affinity for SRD5A isoenzymes, achieving near-complete DHT suppression (up to 94%) compared to finasteride’s 70% reduction in serum DHT, and reduces PSA level as well63.

Fig. 3. The structure and Mechanism of Action of 5ARIs.

Fig. 3.

(A) The chemical structure of testosterone, finasteride, and dutasteride. (B) Mechanism of Finasteride inhibition of 5α-reductase with NADPH-DHF intermediate38,100.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of 5ARIs

Both finasteride and dutasteride are administered orally with a mean bioavailability of approximately 60–80% from a 5 mg dosage of finasteride and a 0.5 mg dosage of dutasteride, which are widely distributed into peripheral tissues, including the prostate gland, and cross the blood-brain barrier, potentially altering neurosteroid synthesis64,65. 5-ARIs undergo two phase metabolisms. In phase I, both finasteride and dutasteride are extensively metabolized by the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes. The biotransformation during this step majorly involves CYP3A4-mediated hydroxylation and oxidation66. Finasteride is converted to ω-hydroxyfinasteride and dutasteride is converted to 6-β-hydroxy-dutasteride. These major metabolites have comparable activity to that of finasteride and dutasteride. Phase II metabolism of 5ARIs involves glucuronidation catalyzed by the enzyme superfamily uridine diphosphoglucuronosyltransferase (UGT). Similar to steroid hormones, this step of metabolism renders the lipophilic 5ARI metabolites more water-soluble and thus promotes inactivation and elimination via urine or feces67. 32–46% of the finasteride is excreted in the urine, with the remaining 51–64% excreted in feces within a seven-day period. The elimination of dutasteride is also in similar ratios. The half-life of finasteride is 4.7 to 7.1 hours in healthy young male volunteers and is independent of dose68. The half-life of dutasteride is up to 5 weeks, significantly longer than finasteride, allowing for sustained suppression of DHT even after discontinuation of administration64. Finasteride and dutasteride exert their therapeutic effects by inhibiting the enzyme 5α-reductase. Finasteride selectively inhibits SRD5A2, reducing intraprostatic DHT by ~70%, while dutasteride inhibit both SRD5A1 and SRD5A2, and achieves >90% suppression of DHT, leading to more pronounced prostate volume reduction and symptom relief in BPH69.

Adverse effects

5ARIs are considered well-tolerated medications, with the most adverse effects reported as mild and transient. However, the adverse effects have led to debate around their use owing to the possible onset of post-finasteride syndrome (PFS)70. PFS is defined as the persistence of common adverse effects: emotional, psychological, physical and sexual. Symptoms include sexual effects (ED, decreased libido, chronic testicular pain and penis shrinkage), physical effects (gynaecomastia, penis shrinkage, penile curvature, testicular reduction, muscle atrophy and dry skin) and psychiatric symptoms (depression, anxiety, suicidal thoughts and insomnia). The definition of PFS extends to patients in whom the symptoms persist months or even years after treatment discontinuation70,71. Clinical trials report a 5–9% incidence of de novo erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients on 5ARIs, with meta-analyses confirming a 1.5- to 2.6-fold increased risk compared to placebo72. Meanwhile, in a recent pooled data analysis composed of over 2 million patients taking 5ARIs, no evidence of an association between 5-ARI use and the risk of depression or suicide was found73.

Clinical Significance of Targeting SRD5A2

Implications for BPH Therapy

Targeting SRD5A2 with 5ARIs finasteride and dutasteride has been a cornerstone of BPH therapy, reducing prostate volume and improving lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)23. In the Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms (MTOPS) study, long-term monotherapy of either 5ARI or alpha-blockers leads to significant LUTS improvement, with a reduction in total prostate size by 25%74. The combination of 5ARI and alpha-blockers reduced the risk of overall LUTS progression by 66% compared to doxazosin or finasteride monotherapy10. Additionally, not only does the general growth rate of the total prostate may depend on the expression of SRD5A2, but the growth rate of different prostate zones also varies and affected differently by 5ARI therapy. Utilizing MRI data for accurate prostate measurement, it has been shown that the 5ARI treatment significantly reduces the growth rate of the transition zone of the prostate75. The transition zone located in the anterior and central part of the gland is made up of majorly compressed fibromuscular tissue and is the source of about 20% prostate cancer and only part of the prostate where BPH occurs76,77. The difference in 5ARI effect on growth rate of transition zone may have a regulatory underpinning, as some subgroups of the prostate cells are more SRD5A2 expressing or more affected by other factors such as BMI, inflammation, and non-androgenic pathways than others12,34. Understanding the distribution of SRD5A2 provides valuable insights into its physiological functions under the normal and diseased conditions.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) in clinical trials

Epigenetic silencing or genetic variations of SRD5A2 have been shown to shift prostate metabolism toward increased ER signaling​12. This shift in hormonal regulation implies that SERMs, such as raloxifene, could provide therapeutic benefits in men who are resistant to 5ARIs therapy. Preclinical data show that patients with SRD5A2 methylation have higher ERα expression, making them more likely to benefit from dual therapy with finasteride and raloxifene compared to 5ARI monotherapy12​. Clinical trials have explored the combination of 5ARIs with SERMs to target both androgenic and estrogenic signaling in BPH and prostate cancer78​. Ongoing trials are assessing whether biomarker-driven selection of BPH patients with SRD5A2 deficiency improves treatment response to combination therapy79. The rationale behind this approach is based on findings that SRD5A2-deficient prostate tissues exhibit increased aromatase activity, leading to higher estradiol levels and enhanced estrogenic signaling, which contributes to prostate cell survival and proliferation12. Targeting both androgenic and estrogenic pathways might provide superior clinical benefits in men who fail to respond to traditional androgen-targeted therapies​.

Applications in Prostate Cancer

As a potential anti-prostate cancer target, the effects of SRD5A2 on prostate cancer susceptibility, and the use of 5ARIs finasteride and dutasteride is drawing increasing attention80. Prostate cancer resistance to castration occurs because tumors acquire the metabolic capability of converting precursor steroids to DHT, promoting signaling by the AR and the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)52. Despite androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which aims to lower systemic androgen levels, prostate cancers adapt by increasing intratumoral androgen synthesis, allowing cancer cells to bypass androgen depletion and continue proliferating81. Adrenal-derived androstenedione (AD) is the preferred substrate over testosterone (T) for 5α-reductase expressed in metastatic CRPC, bypassing T as an obligate precursor to DHT82. Essential for resistance, DHT synthesis requires enzymatic reactions by SRD5A and other isoenzymes83. SRD5A2 plays a crucial role in prostate cancer progression, particularly in the development of CRPC. By catalyzing the conversion of testosterone into DHT, SRD5A2 sustains AR signaling, which is essential for prostate cancer cell growth and survival84. Progression to CRPC is accompanied by increased expression of SRD5A1 over SRD5A2, and the increased expression of SRD5A1 is thought to reflect its role in converting testosterone to DHT85. On the other hand, ADT induces the upregulation of SRD5A3 within as little as three months, leading to therapy resistance and CRPC86. These findings highlight the limitations of single-enzyme inhibition strategies and suggest that future therapeutic approaches should target multiple steroidogenic pathways to effectively suppress AR-driven tumor progression and improve prostate cancer treatment outcomes.

Used as a chemopreventive strategy to reduce the risk of prostate cancer, two large randomized controlled trials observed a 23–25% lower incidence of prostate cancer compared with placebo. The overall reduction was driven mostly by lower-grade tumors, while an unexpected increase in high-grade cancers appeared in the 5ARI groups87–89. However, another study with long-term follow-up found no significant association between 5ARI use and either high-grade (HR 0.97; 95% CI, 0.64–1.46) or lethal prostate cancer (HR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.58–1.69) after multivariate adjustment80. In a clinical trial of abiraterone, 3-keto-5α-abiraterone and downstream metabolites were depleted by the addition of dutasteride, while Δ(4)-abiraterone (D4A) concentrations rose, which has greater anti-tumor activity, showing that dutasteride effectively blocks production of a tumor-promoting metabolite and permits D4A accumulation. Furthermore, dutasteride did not deplete the three 5β-reduced metabolites, which were also clinically detectable, demonstrating the specific biochemical effects of pharmacological 5α-reductase inhibition on abiraterone metabolism90. An ongoing Phase 3 study named The Finasteride in Active Surveillance (AS) for Men with Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer (FINESSE) is utilizing a contemporary cohort, seeks to assess whether the addition of finasteride to AS improves adherence in men with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, evaluate the tolerability and compliance of finasteride within an AS regimen, determine whether finasteride reduces disease progression, ultimately lowering the need for radical treatment91.

Since genetic polymorphisms of SRD5A2 can alter SRD5A2 catalytic activity or affect an individual’s response to 5ARIs inhibitors, variations in SRD5A2 function and inhibitor pharmacodynamics have also been investigated across different populations with diverse racial backgrounds39. Study showed that an increased risk of prostate cancer in African American and Hispanic men who carried the high SRD5A2 activity A49T variant, others demonstrated that SRD5A2 rs9282858 and rs523349 polymorphism may be a susceptible factor to prostate cancer92,93. In addition, studies found that differentiated methylated SRD5A2 strongly correlated to prostate cancer94,95. Specifically, CRPC patient demonstrated higher SRD5A2 methylation in the whole promoter region compared with normal benign prostatic tissue, and methylation in the CpG island of SRD5A2 promoter region is tightly associated with better survival for CRPC patients treated with ADT95. Utilizing methylation pyrosequencing of 86 prostate cancer patients’ plasma cell-free DNA samples, another study found that increased DNA methylation of SRD5A2 and CYP11A1 may play a role in biochemical recurrence after patients’ prostatectomy96. Overall, targeting SRD5A2 via epigenetic manipulations may be a promising strategy to treat BPH, CRPC, and other androgen-related diseases.

Applications in Other Androgen-Related Diseases

The use of 5ARIs has been extended to androgen-driven dermatological conditions such as androgenic alopecia (AGA), hirsutism, and acne93. Finasteride is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of male AGA. There is no clear evidence to support the use of dutasteride in male AGA. In female AGA, the effectiveness of dutasteride and finasteride is still under debate97. In androgenic alopecia, SRD5A2 activity in scalp hair follicles leads to excess DHT production, causing hair follicle miniaturization, shortened anagen (growth) phase, and eventual hair loss. Clinical studies have demonstrated that finasteride reduces scalp DHT levels by approximately 60% and significantly slows hair loss progression, with some patients even experiencing hair regrowth98. However, treatment discontinuation often results in DHT rebound and hair loss recurrence, emphasizing the need for long-term therapy for sustained benefits. On the other hand, 5ARIs have been effective in reducing excessive hair growth by lowering DHT production98, and reducing sebum production to potentially treat androgen-related skin conditions84,99.

Future perspectives

Despite their widespread use, 5ARIs have shown only partial success in improving long-term outcomes for BPH. Several limitations are well recognized: (i) the delayed onset of action compared to α-blockers, leading to slower symptom relief; (ii) only modest correlation between prostate volume reduction and patient-reported LUTS improvement; (iii) persistence of bothersome symptoms such as nocturia or urgency despite effective prostate shrinkage; and (iv) significant interpatient variability in response. This variability is influenced by genetic polymorphisms in SRD5A2, epigenetic silencing through promoter methylation, and metabolic dysfunction. Together, these factors highlight why previous attempts to optimize 5ARI therapy have produced only incremental gains in clinical practice.

Studies of BPH samples from both the MTOPS trial and institutional cohorts suggest that SRD5A2 may serve as a valuable predictive marker for finasteride response. Prior to initiating therapy, assessing SRD5A2 methylation in peripheral white blood cells (WBCs) or using ferumoxytol-enhanced prostate MRI to evaluate inflammation could provide non-invasive approaches to predict treatment response. Developing non-invasive biomarkers to stratify patients who are likely to exhibit 5ARI resistance is critical for advancing our understanding of the clinical implications and for guiding more personalized treatment strategies.

SRD5A2 expression is influenced by inflammation, being upregulated in some inflammatory conditions while epigenetically silenced in others, contributing to heterogeneous treatment responses in patients with BPH and prostate cancer. As inflammation and androgen metabolism are closely interconnected, future therapies should aim to simultaneously target inflammatory pathways and androgen signaling. Combining anti-inflammatory agents with androgen-targeted therapies could enhance treatment efficacy, especially in patients resistant to 5ARIs.

Despite their ability to reduce prostate size and alleviate LUTS, 5ARIs have shown limited long-term success in some patients, with resistance and treatment failures being particularly common in inflamed prostates. Several factors explain these limitations, including SRD5A2 genetic polymorphisms, epigenetic silencing through methylation, chronic inflammation sustaining local androgen production, and an androgen-to-estrogen shift, often worsened by obesity and metabolic dysfunction. Clinically, these mechanisms manifest as delayed onset of symptom relief, persistence of bothersome LUTS such as nocturia despite effective prostate shrinkage, and highly variable patient responses. Emerging evidence also highlights ER activation and epigenetic regulation of SRD5A2 as contributors to treatment resistance. Incorporating SERMs into treatment could offer a more tailored approach, especially for patients with epigenetically silenced SRD5A2. This combination strategy, including SERMs (such as raloxifene), 5ARIs, and anti-inflammatory agents, may become a future standard for patients with SRD5A2-deficient prostate disease, pending results from ongoing clinical trials.

Taking together, these proposed biomarker-driven and combination strategies are intended to directly address these historical limitations. For example, profiling SRD5A2 genetic variants and promoter methylation could enable stratification of patients most likely to respond to 5ARI therapy, providing a precision medicine framework rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. In parallel, combination regimens, such as 5ARIs with α-blockers, SERMs, or anti-inflammatory agents, are designed to overcome non-androgenic mechanisms of LUTS, including smooth muscle hyperactivity, estrogen-driven remodeling, and chronic inflammation. In this way, these strategies go beyond incremental extensions of existing therapy, instead representing targeted solutions to the multifactorial biology of BPH. By integrating molecular profiling with mechanism-based treatment combinations, SRD5A2-targeted therapy could achieve greater clinical relevance and more durable improvements in patient outcomes.

Beyond BPH, SRD5A2 has also been implicated in prostate cancer and androgenic alopecia, although the therapeutic goals and patient populations differ substantially. In BPH, the primary objective is relief of LUTS and prevention of progression. In prostate cancer, particularly castration-resistant disease, SRD5A2 inhibition aims to limit intratumoral DHT synthesis to suppress tumor growth. In androgenic alopecia, the goal is preservation of hair follicles by reducing scalp DHT levels. These differences underscore the importance of context-specific application of SRD5A2-targeted strategies rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.

In summary, SRD5A2 remains a key therapeutic target in prostate cancer management, particularly in early-stage tumors and select cases of CRPC. While 5ARIs alone have shown limited efficacy in advanced disease, combination therapies that target multiple steroidogenic pathways alongside AR signaling offer promising avenues for improving treatment outcomes. Future research should prioritize identifying patient subgroups most likely to benefit from SRD5A2 inhibition, as well as developing more potent inhibitors capable of overcoming intratumoral androgen synthesis adaptations. With continued advancements in precision oncology and combination therapy approaches, targeting SRD5A2 and related steroidogenic enzymes could lead to more effective and durable therapies for prostate cancer, including CRPC.

Conclusions

SRD5A2 plays a central role in androgen metabolism and prostate health, making it a critical target for managing BPH and prostate cancer. However, its expression is influenced by genetic polymorphisms, epigenetic silencing, and inflammation, contributing to variable responses to 5ARIs. Personalized approaches, such as assessing SRD5A2 methylation or imaging prostate inflammation, could help predict treatment response and guide therapy selection. Combining 5ARIs with anti-inflammatory agents or SERMs may further improve outcomes, particularly for patients with inflammation-driven metabolic shifts. In prostate cancer, targeting SRD5A2 alongside other steroidogenic enzymes could enhance treatment efficacy, especially in CRPC. Overall, integrating genetic, epigenetic, and metabolic profiling into SRD5A2-targeted strategies holds promise for more personalized and effective therapies in prostate-related diseases.

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by the NIH/NIDDK (R01 DK124502, R01 DK140473, R01 DK142211, X01 DK131477).

Footnotes

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Brennen WN & Isaacs JT Mesenchymal stem cells and the embryonic reawakening theory of BPH. Nat Rev Urol 15, 703–715, doi: 10.1038/s41585-018-0087-9 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Roehrborn CG Pathology of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Int J Impot Res 20 Suppl 3, S11–18, doi: 10.1038/ijir.2008.55 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Langan RC Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Prim Care 46, 223–232, doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2019.02.003 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bushman W Etiology, epidemiology, and natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol Clin North Am 36, 403–415, v, doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2009.07.003 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.NIDDK. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Associated Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, < www.niddk.nih.gov/about-niddk/strategic-plans-reports/urologic-diseases-in-america > (2024). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Bitaraf M, Ramasamy R, Punnen S & Sharifi N Elevated periprostatic androgens, sneaky testosterone and its implications. Nat Rev Urol 21, 754–760, doi: 10.1038/s41585-024-00878-8 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chughtai B et al. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2, 16031, doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.31 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bautista OM et al. Study design of the Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms (MTOPS) trial. Control Clin Trials 24, 224–243 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kaplan SA, Lee JY, Meehan AG, Kusek JW & Group MR Long-term treatment with finasteride improves clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia in men with an enlarged versus a smaller prostate: data from the MTOPS trial. J Urol 185, 1369–1373, doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.11.060 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McConnell JD et al. The long-term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 349, 2387–2398, doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030656 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vickman RE et al. The role of the androgen receptor in prostate development and benign prostatic hyperplasia: A review. Asian J Urol 7, 191–202, doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.10.003 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang Z et al. Androgenic to oestrogenic switch in the human adult prostate gland is regulated by epigenetic silencing of steroid 5α-reductase 2. J Pathol 243, 457–467, doi: 10.1002/path.4985 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ho CK & Habib FK Estrogen and androgen signaling in the pathogenesis of BPH. Nat Rev Urol 8, 29–41, doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2010.207 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Traish AM 5α-reductases in human physiology: an unfolding story. Endocr Pract 18, 965–975, doi: 10.4158/ep12108.Ra (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bartsch G, Rittmaster RS & Klocker H Dihydrotestosterone and the concept of 5alpha-reductase inhibition in human benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 37, 367–380, doi: 10.1159/000020181 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.McNeal JE The zonal anatomy of the prostate. Prostate 2, 35–49, doi: 10.1002/pros.2990020105 (1981). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Andersson S, Berman DM, Jenkins EP & Russell DW Deletion of steroid 5 alpha-reductase 2 gene in male pseudohermaphroditism. Nature 354, 159–161, doi: 10.1038/354159a0 (1991). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Imperato-McGinley J, Guerrero L, Gautier T & Peterson RE Steroid 5alpha-reductase deficiency in man: an inherited form of male pseudohermaphroditism. Science 186, 1213–1215, doi: 10.1126/science.186.4170.1213 (1974). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Imperato-McGinley J, Peterson RE, Gautier T & Sturla E Androgens and the evolution of male-gender identity among male pseudohermaphrodites with 5alpha-reductase deficiency. N Engl J Med 300, 1233–1237, doi: 10.1056/NEJM197905313002201 (1979). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Isaacs JT Lessons learned about prostatic transformation from the age-related methylation of 5α-reductase type 2 gene. Am J Pathol 185, 614–616, doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.01.001 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zeng XT et al. Association between SRD5A2 rs523349 and rs9282858 Polymorphisms and Risk of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Meta-Analysis. Front Physiol 8, 688, doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00688 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xiao Q et al. Structure of human steroid 5α-reductase 2 with the anti-androgen drug finasteride. Nat Commun 11, 5430, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19249-z (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gu X et al. SRD5A1 and SRD5A2 are associated with treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia with the combination of 5α-reductase inhibitors and α-adrenergic receptor antagonists. J Urol 190, 615–619, doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.024 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang Z & Olumi AF Diabetes, growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor pathways and association to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Differentiation 82, 261–271, doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2011.04.004 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Murphy BC, Pienta KJ & Coffey DS Effects of extracellular matrix components and dihydrotestosterone on the structure and function of human prostate cancer cells. Prostate 20, 29–41, doi: 10.1002/pros.2990200105 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Uhlén M et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science 347, 1260419, doi: 10.1126/science.1260419 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Risbridger GP, Ellem SJ & McPherson SJ Estrogen action on the prostate gland: a critical mix of endocrine and paracrine signaling. J Mol Endocrinol 39, 183–188, doi: 10.1677/jme-07-0053 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.De Nunzio C, Presicce F & Tubaro A Inflammatory mediators in the development and progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Nat Rev Urol 13, 613–626, doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.168 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Cao D et al. Immune Cell Proinflammatory Microenvironment and Androgen-Related Metabolic Regulation During Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Aging. Front Immunol 13, 842008, doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.842008 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lin-Tsai O et al. Surgical intervention for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia is correlated with expression of the AP-1 transcription factor network. Prostate 74, 669–679, doi: 10.1002/pros.22785 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Austin DC et al. NF-κB and androgen receptor variant 7 induce expression of SRD5A isoforms and confer 5ARI resistance. Prostate 76, 1004–1018, doi: 10.1002/pros.23195 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Al-Faouri R et al. Effect of TNF-α Inhibitor Therapy on Growth of the Prostate Gland. Eur Urol Focus 10, 641–647, doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.10.015 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vickman RE et al. TNF is a potential therapeutic target to suppress prostatic inflammation and hyperplasia in autoimmune disease. Nat Commun 13, 2133, doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29719-1 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Xue B et al. Obesity-associated inflammation induces androgenic to estrogenic switch in the prostate gland. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 23, 465–474, doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-0208-4 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bechis SK et al. Age and Obesity Promote Methylation and Suppression of 5alpha-Reductase 2: Implications for Personalized Therapy of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J Urol 194, 1031–1037, doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.079 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ge R et al. DNA methyl transferase 1 reduces expression of SRD5A2 in the aging adult prostate. Am J Pathol 185, 870–882, doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.11.020 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Batista RL & Mendonca BB The Molecular Basis of 5alpha-Reductase Type 2 Deficiency. Sex Dev 16, 171–183, doi: 10.1159/000525119 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Xiao Q et al. Structure of human steroid 5α-reductase 2 with the anti-androgen drug finasteride. Nature Communications 11, 5430, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19249-z (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hsing AW et al. Polymorphic markers in the SRD5A2 gene and prostate cancer risk: a population-based case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10, 1077–1082 (2001). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Niu Y et al. Reduced levels of 5-alpha reductase 2 in adult prostate tissue and implications for BPH therapy. Prostate 71, 1317–1324, doi: 10.1002/pros.21348 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kang PM et al. Correlation between 5-alpha reductase type 2 protein expression and methylation of 5-alpha reductase type 2 promotor gene of benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J Urol 37, 709–718, doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2422-4 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liu D et al. Integrative multiplatform molecular profiling of benign prostatic hyperplasia identifies distinct subtypes. Nat Commun 11, 1987, doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15913-6 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Xue B et al. Obesity-associated inflammation induces androgenic to estrogenic switch in the prostate gland. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-0208-4 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Joseph DB, Strand DW & Vezina CM DNA methylation in development and disease: an overview for prostate researchers. Am J Clin Exp Urol 6, 197–218 (2018). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Atlas THP SRD5A2 tissue expression, <https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000277893-SRD5A2/tissue> (2025).
  • 46.The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues. Science 369, 1318–1330, doi: 10.1126/science.aaz1776 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Russell DW & Wilson JD STEROID 5α-REDUCTASE: TWO GENES/TWO ENZYMES. Annual Review of Biochemistry 63, 25–61, doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.63.070194.000325 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Makridakis NM et al. Association of mis-sense substitution in SRD5A2 gene with prostate cancer in African-American and Hispanic men in Los Angeles, USA. Lancet 354, 975–978, doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)11282-5 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Reichardt JK et al. Genetic variability of the human SRD5A2 gene: implications for prostate cancer risk. Cancer Res 55, 3973–3975 (1995). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Li Z et al. Association of V89L SRD5A2 polymorphism with prostate cancer development in a Japanese population. J Urol 169, 2378–2381, doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000056152.57018.31 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhang LL et al. Associations of SRD5A2/CYP17/CYP19/VDR gene polymorphisms with the development and clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a case-control study in northern Chinese population. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 10, 8660–8676 (2017). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Freitas PFS, Abdshah A, McKay RR & Sharifi N HSD3B1, prostate cancer mortality and modifiable outcomes. Nat Rev Urol, doi: 10.1038/s41585-024-00953-0 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fang Y, Fliss AE, Robins DM & Caplan AJ Hsp90 Regulates Androgen Receptor Hormone Binding Affinity in Vivo*. Journal of Biological Chemistry 271, 28697–28702, doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.45.28697 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Singh M et al. Stromal androgen receptor in prostate development and cancer. Am J Pathol 184, 2598–2607, doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.06.022 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Schiffer L, Arlt W & Storbeck KH Intracrine androgen biosynthesis, metabolism and action revisited. Mol Cell Endocrinol 465, 4–26, doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.08.016 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Li J et al. Androgen Regulation of 5α-Reductase Isoenzymes in Prostate Cancer: Implications for Prostate Cancer Prevention. PLOS ONE 6, e28840, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028840 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Audet-Walsh É, Yee T, Tam IS & Giguère V Inverse Regulation of DHT Synthesis Enzymes 5α-Reductase Types 1 and 2 by the Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer. Endocrinology 158, 1015–1021, doi: 10.1210/en.2016-1926 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nicholson TM & Ricke WA Androgens and estrogens in benign prostatic hyperplasia: past, present and future. Differentiation 82, 184–199, doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2011.04.006 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nicholson TM, Sehgal PD, Drew SA, Huang W & Ricke WA Sex steroid receptor expression and localization in benign prostatic hyperplasia varies with tissue compartment. Differentiation 85, 140–149, doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2013.02.006 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wang Z et al. Androgenic to oestrogenic switch in the human adult prostate gland is regulated by epigenetic silencing of steroid 5alpha-reductase 2. J Pathol 243, 457–467, doi: 10.1002/path.4985 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ellem SJ & Risbridger GP Aromatase and regulating the estrogen:androgen ratio in the prostate gland. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 118, 246–251, doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2009.10.015 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Roehrborn CG et al. Efficacy and safety of a dual inhibitor of 5-alpha-reductase types 1 and 2 (dutasteride) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 60, 434–441, doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01905-2 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sarkar RR et al. Association of Treatment With 5alpha-Reductase Inhibitors With Time to Diagnosis and Mortality in Prostate Cancer. JAMA Intern Med 179, 812–819, doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0280 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gisleskog PO, Hermann D, Hammarlund-Udenaes M & Karlsson MO The pharmacokinetic modelling of GI198745 (dutasteride), a compound with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination. Br J Clin Pharmacol 47, 53–58, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1999.00843.x (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Laanani M, Weill A, Jollant F, Zureik M & Dray-Spira R Suicidal risk associated with finasteride versus dutasteride among men treated for benign prostatic hyperplasia: nationwide cohort study. Sci Rep 13, 5308, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32356-3 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Andriole GL & Kirby R Safety and tolerability of the dual 5alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 44, 82–88, doi: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00198-2 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lundahl A, Lennernas H, Knutson L, Bondesson U & Hedeland M Identification of finasteride metabolites in human bile and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Drug Metab Dispos 37, 2008–2017, doi: 10.1124/dmd.109.027870 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Steiner JF Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of finasteride. Clin Pharmacokinet 30, 16–27, doi: 10.2165/00003088-199630010-00002 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Nickel JC Comparison of clinical trials with finasteride and dutasteride. Rev Urol 6 Suppl 9, S31–39 (2004). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Gul M et al. A clinical guide to rare male sexual disorders. Nat Rev Urol 21, 35–49, doi: 10.1038/s41585-023-00803-5 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Traish AM Post-finasteride syndrome: a surmountable challenge for clinicians. Fertil Steril 113, 21–50, doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.030 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Gur S, Kadowitz PJ & Hellstrom WJ Effects of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors on erectile function, sexual desire and ejaculation. Expert Opin Drug Saf 12, 81–90, doi: 10.1517/14740338.2013.742885 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Uleri A et al. Association of 5alpha-Reductase Inhibitors with Depression and Suicide: A Mini Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus 10, 751–753, doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.04.009 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kaplan SA et al. Long-term treatment with finasteride results in a clinically significant reduction in total prostate volume compared to placebo over the full range of baseline prostate sizes in men enrolled in the MTOPS trial. J Urol 180, 1030–1032; discussion 1032–1033, doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.004 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sharkey C et al. Zonal Growth Pattern of the Prostate Is Affected by Age and Body Mass Index. J Urol 207, 876–884, doi: 10.1097/ju.0000000000002332 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Grignon DJ & Sakr WA Zonal origin of prostatic adenocarcinoma: are there biologic differences between transition zone and peripheral zone adenocarcinomas of the prostate gland? J Cell Biochem Suppl 19, 267–269 (1994). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kaplan SA, Te AE, Pressler LB & Olsson CA Transition Zone Index as a Method of Assessing Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Correlation with Symptoms, Urine Flow and Detrusor Pressure. The Journal of Urology 154, 1764–1769, doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66779-X (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Gupta S, Gupta G & Sharma VL Evolving Novel Chemical Entities for Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Mini Rev Med Chem 17, 593–602, doi: 10.2174/1389557516666160630115819 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Medicine U. N. L. o. 5-Alpha Reductase 2 as a Marker of Resistance to 5ARI Therapy, <https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04288427?locStr=Boston,%20MA&country=United%20States&state=Massachusetts&city=Boston&cond=BPH&page=1&rank=10> (2020).
  • 80.Preston MA et al. 5α-Reductase inhibitors and risk of high-grade or lethal prostate cancer. JAMA Intern Med 174, 1301–1307, doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1600 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Mitsiades N et al. Distinct patterns of dysregulated expression of enzymes involved in androgen synthesis and metabolism in metastatic prostate cancer tumors. Cancer Res 72, 6142–6152, doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.Can-12-1335 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Dai C et al. Direct Metabolic Interrogation of Dihydrotestosterone Biosynthesis from Adrenal Precursors in Primary Prostatectomy Tissues. Clin Cancer Res 23, 6351–6362, doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1313 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Li Z et al. Conversion of abiraterone to D4A drives anti-tumour activity in prostate cancer. Nature 523, 347–351, doi: 10.1038/nature14406 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Shiota M et al. SRD5A gene polymorphism in Japanese men predicts prognosis of metastatic prostate cancer with androgen-deprivation therapy. Eur J Cancer 51, 1962–1969, doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.06.122 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Chang KH et al. Dihydrotestosterone synthesis bypasses testosterone to drive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108, 13728–13733, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107898108 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Hamid A et al. Early upregulation of AR and steroidogenesis enzyme expression after 3 months of androgen-deprivation therapy. BMC Urol 20, 71, doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00627-0 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Theoret MR et al. The risks and benefits of 5α-reductase inhibitors for prostate-cancer prevention. N Engl J Med 365, 97–99, doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1106783 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Andriole GL et al. Effect of dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 362, 1192–1202, doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908127 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Thompson IM et al. The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 349, 215–224, doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030660 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Li Z et al. Redirecting abiraterone metabolism to fine-tune prostate cancer anti-androgen therapy. Nature 533, 547–551, doi: 10.1038/nature17954 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Cumberbatch M et al. Protocol for a randomised phase 3 trial evaluating the role of Finasteride in Active Surveillance for men with low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer: the FINESSE Study. BMJ Open 15, e096431, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096431 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Cussenot O et al. Low-activity V89L variant in SRD5A2 is associated with aggressive prostate cancer risk: an explanation for the adverse effects observed in chemoprevention trials using 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors. Eur Urol 52, 1082–1087, doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.008 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Hayes VM et al. 5alpha-Reductase type 2 gene variant associations with prostate cancer risk, circulating hormone levels and androgenetic alopecia. Int J Cancer 120, 776–780, doi: 10.1002/ijc.22408 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Ge R et al. Epigenetic modulations and lineage plasticity in advanced prostate cancer. Annals of Oncology 31, 470–479, doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.02.002 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wang Z et al. Methylation of SRD5A2 promoter predicts a better outcome for castration-resistant prostate cancer patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy. PLoS One 15, e0229754, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229754 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Horning AM et al. DNA methylation screening of primary prostate tumors identifies SRD5A2 and CYP11A1 as candidate markers for assessing risk of biochemical recurrence. Prostate 75, 1790–1801, doi: 10.1002/pros.23052 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Almudimeegh A, AlMutairi H, AlTassan F, AlQuraishi Y & Nagshabandi KN Comparison between dutasteride and finasteride in hair regrowth and reversal of miniaturization in male and female androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review. Dermatol Reports 16, 9909, doi: 10.4081/dr.2024.9909 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Uemura M et al. Novel 5 alpha-steroid reductase (SRD5A3, type-3) is overexpressed in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer Sci 99, 81–86, doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00656.x (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Azzouni F, Zeitouni N & Mohler J Role of 5α-reductase inhibitors in androgen-stimulated skin disorders. J Drugs Dermatol 12, e30–35 (2013). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Bull HG et al. Mechanism-Based Inhibition of Human Steroid 5α-Reductase by Finasteride: Enzyme-Catalyzed Formation of NADP−Dihydrofinasteride, a Potent Bisubstrate Analog Inhibitor. Journal of the American Chemical Society 118, 2359–2365, doi: 10.1021/ja953069t (1996). [DOI] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES