Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1973 Nov;234(3):665–688. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010366

The amplitude, time course and charge of unitary excitatory post-synaptic potentials evoked in spinal motoneurone dendrites

R Iansek, S J Redman
PMCID: PMC1350693  PMID: 4764434

Abstract

1. Group Ia e.p.s.p.s were recorded from lumbosacral motoneurones in anaesthetized cats after almost complete section of the appropriate dorsal roots. The cable parameters of these same motoneurones were obtained from the voltage response to a brief intracellular current pulse, as described in Iansek & Redman (1973).

2. A total of thirty-three e.p.s.p.s, recorded in thirty different motoneurones, were analysed. E.p.s.p.s which were recorded in motoneurones which were not studied using an intracellular current pulse, or in which the resting membrane potential fell below 50 mV, were not considered. Also, e.p.s.p.s whose time course indicated more than one synaptic site of origin were not analysed. The selected e.p.s.p.s were plotted on a semilogarithmic amplitude scale, and their 10-90% rise time, half-width and peak amplitudes were measured.

3. Using the previously determined values of the cable parameters L, ρ and τm, the rise time and half-width of each e.p.s.p. were used to determine the synaptic location (X), and the synaptic current time course (α). Twenty-seven e.p.s.p.s had time courses which allowed a value of X and α to be determined within the constraints of the measured cable parameters. The remaining six e.p.s.p.s either required an extension of the dendritic cable to be localized, or their time course was not compatible with a brief synaptic current.

4. The synaptic locations lie in the range 0 (soma) to 1·25 space constants. When expressed as a fraction of the length of the dendritic cable, all but four of the twenty-seven e.p.s.p.s were located on the proximal half of the dendrites.

5. The time to peak of synaptic current for each e.p.s.p. ranged from 30 to 390 μsec, although a majority (70%) lay in the range 50 to 200 μsec. There was no significant correlation between time to peak of synaptic current and synaptic location.

6. The peak amplitude of e.p.s.p.s at the soma showed no significant correlation with synaptic location.

7. The peak amplitude, and the cable parameters for each e.p.s.p. were used to compute the time course and amplitude of each e.p.s.p. at its point of generation on various fractions of the total dendritic cable, using the results derived in Redman (1973). These calculations showed the greatly increased rate of decay of e.p.s.p.s at their point of generation. Assuming that the synaptic input was restricted to one tenth of the total dendritic tree, the range of peak amplitudes at the synaptic site was from less than 100 μV (soma) to 20 mV.

8. The net inward positive charge crossing the synaptic junction was calculated from the voltage-time integral of the e.p.s.p., as was the net outward positive charge crossing the soma membrane. These calculations showed that dendritic synapses caused up to ten times more net charge to be displaced across the synaptic junction than did synapses on or near to the soma, for similar durations of synaptic current. Similarly, dendritic synapses were generally more effective than somatic synapses in displacing charge across the soma membrane. It was concluded that the average quantal content in the conductance change at dendritic synapses is significantly greater than for somatic synapses.

9. Some implications of the results for general integrative mechanisms in dendrites are discussed.

Full text

PDF
665

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barrett J. N., Crill W. E. Specific membrane resistivity of dye-injected cat motoneurons. Brain Res. 1971 May 21;28(3):556–561. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(71)90066-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gage P. W., Armstrong C. M. Miniature end-plate currents in voltage-clamped muscle fibre. Nature. 1968 Apr 27;218(5139):363–365. doi: 10.1038/218363b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Iansek R., Redman S. J. An analysis of the cable properties of spinal motoneurones using a brief intracellular current pulse. J Physiol. 1973 Nov;234(3):613–636. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Illis L. The relative densities of monosynaptic pathways to the cell bodies and dendrites of the cat ventral horn. J Neurol Sci. 1967 Mar-Apr;4(2):259–270. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(67)90104-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ito M., Oshima T. Electrical behaviour of the motoneurone membrane during intracellularly applied current steps. J Physiol. 1965 Oct;180(3):607–635. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jack J. J., Miller S., Porter R., Redman S. J. The time course of minimal excitory post-synaptic potentials evoked in spinal motoneurones by group Ia afferent fibres. J Physiol. 1971 Jun;215(2):353–380. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jack J. J., Redman S. J. The propagation of transient potentials in some linear cable structures. J Physiol. 1971 Jun;215(2):283–320. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. KATZ B., MILEDI R. A STUDY OF SPONTANEOUS MINIATURE POTENTIALS IN SPINAL MOTONEURONES. J Physiol. 1963 Sep;168:389–422. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kuno M., Miyahara J. T. Analysis of synaptic efficacy in spinal motoneurones from 'quantum' aspects. J Physiol. 1969 Apr;201(2):479–493. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kuno M., Miyahara J. T. Non-linear summation of unit synaptic potentials in spinal motoneurones of the cat. J Physiol. 1969 Apr;201(2):465–477. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kuno M., Muñoz-Martinez E. J., Randić M. Synaptic action on Clarke's column neurones in relation to afferent terminal size. J Physiol. 1973 Jan;228(2):343–360. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MacGregor R. J. A model for responses to activation by axodendritic synapses. Biophys J. 1968 Mar;8(3):305–318. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(68)86489-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mendell L. M., Henneman E. Terminals of single Ia fibers: distribution within a pool of 300 homonymous motor neurons. Science. 1968 Apr 5;160(3823):96–98. doi: 10.1126/science.160.3823.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nelson P. G., Lux H. D. Some electrical measurements of motoneuron parameters. Biophys J. 1970 Jan;10(1):55–73. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(70)86285-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. RALL W. Branching dendritic trees and motoneuron membrane resistivity. Exp Neurol. 1959 Nov;1:491–527. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(59)90046-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. RALL W. Membrane potential transients and membrane time constant of motoneurons. Exp Neurol. 1960 Oct;2:503–532. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(60)90029-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rall W. Distinguishing theoretical synaptic potentials computed for different soma-dendritic distributions of synaptic input. J Neurophysiol. 1967 Sep;30(5):1138–1168. doi: 10.1152/jn.1967.30.5.1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rall W. Time constants and electrotonic length of membrane cylinders and neurons. Biophys J. 1969 Dec;9(12):1483–1508. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(69)86467-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Redman S. J. The attenuation of passively propagating dendritic potentials in a motoneurone cable model. J Physiol. 1973 Nov;234(3):637–664. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Réthelyi M. Ultrastructural synaptology of Clarke's column. Exp Brain Res. 1970;11(2):159–174. doi: 10.1007/BF00234320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Scheibel M. E., Scheibel A. B. Terminal patterns in cat spinal cord. 3. Primary afferent collaterals. Brain Res. 1969 May;13(3):417–443. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(69)90258-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sterling P., Kuypers H. G. Anatomical organization of the brachial spinal cord of the cat. I. The distribution of dorsal root fibers. Brain Res. 1967 Feb;4(1):1–15. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(67)90144-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sterling P., Kuypers H. G. Anatomical organization of the brachial spinal cord of the cat. II. The motoneuron plexus. Brain Res. 1967 Feb;4(1):16–32. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(67)90145-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES