Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1973 Nov;234(3):723–748.3. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010369

Physiological types and histochemical profiles in motor units of the cat gastrocnemius

R E Burke, D N Levine, P Tsairis, F E Zajac III
PMCID: PMC1350696  PMID: 4148752

Abstract

1. A variety of physiological properties of single motor units have been studied in the gastrocnemius muscle (primarily in the medial head) of pentobarbitone-anaesthetized cats. Intracellular stimulation of individual motoneurones ensured functional isolation of the muscle units innervated by them.

2. A system for muscle unit classification was developed using a combination of two physiological properties. Almost all of the units studied could be classified into one of three major types, including two groups with relatively short twitch contraction times (types FF and FR, which were differentiable from one another on the basis of sensitivity to fatigue) and one group with relatively long contraction times (type S, which were extremely resistant to fatigue and were differentiable from FF and FR units on the basis of the shape of unfused tetani). Post-tetanic potentiation of twitch responses was observed in all three muscle unit types. The distributions of axonal conduction velocities for motoneurones innervating FF and FR muscle units were essentially the same, while conduction velocities for motoneurones innervating type S units were, in general, slower.

3. Histochemical profiles of muscle units representative of each of the physiological classes present in the gastrocnemius pool were determined using a method of glycogen depletion for muscle unit identification. Each of the physiological categories of muscle units exhibited a corresponding unique set of muscle fibre staining reactions, or histochemical profile. Within each physiological type, all of the units examined had the same histochemical profile. The results generally support the hypothesis that the histochemical characteristics of muscle fibres are meaningfully related to the physiological properties of the same fibres. However, certain limitations in the detailed application of the hypothesis were also apparent.

4. Systematic assessment of the histochemical profiles of relatively large numbers of fibres belonging to single muscle units provided strong support for the hypothesis that all of the muscle fibres innervated by a single α-motoneurone are histochemically identical.

Full text

PDF
723

Images in this article

748-3Plate 3
on p.748-3
748-1Plate 1
on p.748-1
748-2Plate 2
on p.748-2

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BERGMANS J., MARECHAL G. [Relation between action potential and tension in straited muscle]. Arch Int Physiol Biochim. 1960 Mar;68:377–379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BRODY I. A. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE ISOZYMES IN ABNORMAL HUMAN SKELETAL MUSCLE. Neurology. 1964 Dec;14:1091–1100. doi: 10.1212/wnl.14.12.1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BROOKS V. B., THIES R. E. Reduction of quantum content during neuromuscular transmission. J Physiol. 1962 Jul;162:298–310. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barnard R. J., Edgerton V. R., Furukawa T., Peter J. B. Histochemical, biochemical, and contractile properties of red, white, and intermediate fibers. Am J Physiol. 1971 Feb;220(2):410–414. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1971.220.2.410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barnard R. J., Edgerton V. R., Peter J. B. Effect of exercise on skeletal muscle. I. Biochemical and histochemical properties. J Appl Physiol. 1970 Jun;28(6):762–766. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1970.28.6.762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brooke M. H., Kaiser K. K. Muscle fiber types: how many and what kind? Arch Neurol. 1970 Oct;23(4):369–379. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1970.00480280083010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burke R. E. Firing patterns of gastrocnemius motor units in the decerebrate cat. J Physiol. 1968 Jun;196(3):631–654. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burke R. E. Group Ia synaptic input to fast and slow twitch motor units of cat triceps surae. J Physiol. 1968 Jun;196(3):605–630. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Burke R. E., Jankowska E., ten Bruggencate G. A comparison of peripheral and rubrospinal synaptic input to slow and fast twitch motor units of triceps surae. J Physiol. 1970 May;207(3):709–732. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Burke R. E., Levine D. N., Zajac F. E., 3rd Mammalian motor units: physiological-histochemical correlation in three types in cat gastrocnemius. Science. 1971 Nov 12;174(4010):709–712. doi: 10.1126/science.174.4010.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Burke R. E. Motor unit types of cat triceps surae muscle. J Physiol. 1967 Nov;193(1):141–160. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Burke R. E., Nelson P. G. Accommodation to current ramps in motoneurons of fast and slow twitch motor units. Int J Neurosci. 1971 Jun;1(6):347–356. doi: 10.3109/00207457109146983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Burke R. E., Rudomin P., Zajac F. E., 3rd Catch property in single mammalian motor units. Science. 1970 Apr 3;168(3927):122–124. doi: 10.1126/science.168.3927.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Burke R. E., Tsairis P. Anatomy and innervation ratios in motor units of cat gastrocnemius. J Physiol. 1973 Nov;234(3):749–765. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bárány M. ATPase activity of myosin correlated with speed of muscle shortening. J Gen Physiol. 1967 Jul;50(6 Suppl):197–218. doi: 10.1085/jgp.50.6.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Close R. I. Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiol Rev. 1972 Jan;52(1):129–197. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1972.52.1.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Close R. Properties of motor units in fast and slow skeletal muscles of the rat. J Physiol. 1967 Nov;193(1):45–55. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cooper S. The isometric responses of mammalian muscles. J Physiol. 1930 Jun 27;69(4):377–385. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1930.sp002657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Edgerton V. R., Barnard R. J., Peter J. B., Simpson D. R., Gillespie C. A. Response of muscle glycogen and phosphorylase to electrical stimulation in trained and nontrained guinea pigs. Exp Neurol. 1970 Apr;27(1):46–56. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(70)90200-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Edström L., Kugelberg E. Histochemical composition, distribution of fibres and fatiguability of single motor units. Anterior tibial muscle of the rat. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1968 Oct;31(5):424–433. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.31.5.424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. FARBER E., STERNBERG W. H., DUNLAP C. E. Histochemical localization of specific oxidative enzymes. I. Tetrazolium stains for diphosphopyridine nucleotide diaphorase and triphosphopyridine nucleotide diaphorase. J Histochem Cytochem. 1956 May;4(3):254–265. doi: 10.1177/4.3.254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gauthier G. F. On the localization of sarcotubular ATPase activity in mammaliam skeletal muscle. Histochemie. 1967;11(2):97–111. doi: 10.1007/BF00571715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gauthier G. F. On the relationship of ultrastructural and cytochemical features of color in mammalian skeletal muscle. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1969;95(3):462–482. doi: 10.1007/BF00995217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Guth L., Samaha F. J. Erroneous interpretations which may result from application of the "myofibrillar ATPase" histochemical procedure to developing muscle. Exp Neurol. 1972 Mar;34(3):465–475. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(72)90042-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Guth L., Yellin H. The dynamic nature of the so-called "fiber types" of nammalian skeletal muscle. Exp Neurol. 1971 May;31(2):227–300. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(71)90196-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. HENNEMAN E., OLSON C. B. RELATIONS BETWEEN STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN THE DESIGN OF SKELETAL MUSCLES. J Neurophysiol. 1965 May;28:581–598. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hall-Craggs E. C. The contraction times and enzyme activity of two rabbit laryngeal muscles. J Anat. 1968 Jan;102(Pt 2):241–255. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. KRNJEVIC K., MILEDI R. Failure of neuromuscular propagation in rats. J Physiol. 1958 Mar 11;140(3):440–461. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. KRNJEVIC K., MILEDI R. Motor units in the rat diaphragm. J Physiol. 1958 Mar 11;140(3):427–439. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kugelberg E., Edström L. Differential histochemical effects of muscle contractions on phosphorylase and glycogen in various types of fibres: relation to fatigue. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1968 Oct;31(5):415–423. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.31.5.415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. MCPHEDRAN A. M., WUERKER R. B., HENNEMAN E. PROPERTIES OF MOTOR UNITS IN A HETEROGENEOUS PALE MUSCLE (M. GASTROCNEMIUS) OF THE CAT. J Neurophysiol. 1965 Jan;28:85–99. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.1.85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. NACHLAS M. M., TSOU K. C., DE SOUZA E., CHENG C. S., SELIGMAN A. M. Cytochemical demonstration of succinic dehydrogenase by the use of a new p-nitrophenyl substituted ditetrazole. J Histochem Cytochem. 1957 Jul;5(4):420–436. doi: 10.1177/5.4.420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. NOVIKOFF A. B., SHIN W. Y., DRUCKER J. Mitochondrial localization of oxidative enzymes: staining results with two tetrazolium salts. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1961 Jan;9:47–61. doi: 10.1083/jcb.9.1.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Olson C. B., Swett C. P., Jr Effect of prior activity on properties of different types of motor units. J Neurophysiol. 1971 Jan;34(1):1–16. doi: 10.1152/jn.1971.34.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. PADYKULA H. A., HERMAN E. The specificity of the histochemical method for adenosine triphosphatase. J Histochem Cytochem. 1955 May;3(3):170–195. doi: 10.1177/3.3.170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. ROMANUL F. C. CAPILLARY SUPPLY AND METABOLISM OF MUSCLE FIBERS. Arch Neurol. 1965 May;12:497–509. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1965.00460290053007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. STANDAERT F. G. THE MECHANISMS OF POST-TETANIC POTENTIATION IN CAT SOLEUS AND GASTROCNEMIUS MUSCLES. J Gen Physiol. 1964 May;47:987–1001. doi: 10.1085/jgp.47.5.987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. STEIN J. M., PADYKULA H. A. Histochemical classification of individual skeletal muscle fibers of the rat. Am J Anat. 1962 Mar;110:103–123. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001100203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Schiaffino S., Hanzlíková V., Pierobon S. Relations between structure and function in rat skeletal muscle fibers. J Cell Biol. 1970 Oct;47(1):107–119. doi: 10.1083/jcb.47.1.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yellin H., Guth L. The histochemical classification of muscle fibers. Exp Neurol. 1970 Feb;26(2):424–432. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(70)90137-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES