Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1974 Jan;236(2):363–371. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010439

Stochastic properties of spontaneous transmitter release at the crayfish neuromuscular junction

Ira Cohen, Hiroshi Kita, William Van Der Kloot
PMCID: PMC1350806  PMID: 16992439

Abstract

1. Miniature excitatory junctional potentials (min.e.j.p.s) were recorded with an intracellular electrode from the adductor muscle of the dactyl of the first or second walking leg of the crayfish, Orconectes virilis.

2. The intervals between the min.e.j.p.s were compared to the exponential prediction by five goodness of fit tests. The results indicate that the intervals are not exponentially distributed.

3. The autocorrelogram of intervals shows that the intervals are unlikely to be independent.

4. A stochastic analysis that includes the power spectrum of intervals, the variance—time curve, and the ln-survivor curve suggest that there is a clustering of min.e.j.p.s. The results are similar to those on the frog neuromuscular junction.

5. An autocorrelogram of the min.e.j.p. amplitudes suggests that sizes are not independently distributed.

6. These results, which are similar to those previously reported from the frog neuromuscular junction, support the use of the branching Poisson process as a theoretical model for the stochastic properties of spontaneous quantal release of transmitter.

Full text

PDF
363

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cohen I., Kita H., Van Der Kloot W. The intervals between miniature end-plate potentials in the frog are unlikely to be independently or exponentially distributed. J Physiol. 1974 Jan;236(2):327–339. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cohen I., Kita H., Van Der Kloot W. The stochastic properties of spontaneous quantal release of transmitter at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1974 Jan;236(2):341–361. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cohen I., Kita H., Van der Kloot W. Miniature end-plate potentials: evidence that the intervals are not fit by a Poisson distribution. Brain Res. 1973 May 17;54:318–323. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90054-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. DUDEL J., KUFFLER S. W. The quantal nature of transmission and spontaneous miniature potentials at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1961 Mar;155:514–529. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. FATT P., KATZ B. Spontaneous subthreshold activity at motor nerve endings. J Physiol. 1952 May;117(1):109–128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES