Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1974 Jan;236(1):113–127. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010425

Electrophysiological investigation of GABA-mediated inhibition at the hermit crab neuromuscular junction

Janet Earl, W A Large
PMCID: PMC1350829  PMID: 4150451

Abstract

1. The inhibitory neuromuscular junction of the abductor muscle of the large claw of the hermit crab (Eupagurus bernhardus) was investigated using electrophysiological intracellular techniques in order to elucidate further the relative contributions of the pre- and post-synaptic mechanisms of action of GABA and of neural inhibition.

2. The electrical constants of the post-synaptic membrane, calculated using the equations for a `short cable' model, were characteristic of a poorly developed electrical excitability; the specific membrane resistance was usually < 1000 Ω cm2 and the specific membrane capacitance was > 40 μF/cm2.

3. Stimulation of the excitatory axon to the abductor muscle of the large claw at a frequency of 20 Hz evoked highly facilitating excitatory junction potentials (e.j.p.s); stimulation of the inhibitory axon (60-220 Hz) during the excitatory train elicited inhibition which was manifest as an attenuation of the e.j.p.s.

4. The addition of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) to the bathing solution produced a dose-dependent reduction of e.j.p. amplitude and membrane resistance. The inhibitory effect of concentrations (5 × 10-5 and 1 × 10-4 M) which caused a 40-75% e.j.p. attenuation could largely be accounted for by a post-synaptic action on membrane conductance.

5. Experiments with picrotoxin suggest that presynaptic inhibitory mechanisms have an important role in neurally evoked inhibition.

6. Picrotoxin (1-5 × 10-5 M) effectively blocked neural inhibition and the actions of GABA in this preparation, whereas bicuculline proved to be considerably less potent and therefore less useful as a physiological tool for studying GABA-mediated inhibition in crustacea.

Full text

PDF
113

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BOISTEL J., FATT P. Membrane permeability change during inhibitory transmitter action in crustacean muscle. J Physiol. 1958 Nov 10;144(1):176–191. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DUDEL J., KUFFLER S. W. Presynaptic inhibition at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1961 Mar;155:543–562. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. DUDEL J. PRESYNAPTIC AND POSTSYNAPTIC EFFECTS OF INHIBITORY DRUGS ON THE CRAYFISH NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION. Pflugers Arch Gesamte Physiol Menschen Tiere. 1965 Mar 18;283:104–118. doi: 10.1007/BF00363182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FATT P., KATZ B. The electrical properties of crustacean muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1953 Apr 28;120(1-2):171–204. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Feltz A. Competitive interaction of beta-guanidino propionic acid and gamma-aminobutyric acid on the muscle fibre of the crayfish. J Physiol. 1971 Jul;216(2):391–401. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GRUNDFEST H., REUBEN J. P., RICKLES W. H., Jr The electrophysiology and pharmacology of lobster neuromuscular synapses. J Gen Physiol. 1959 Jul 20;42(6):1301–1323. doi: 10.1085/jgp.42.6.1301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gerschenfeld H. M. Chemical transmission in invertebrate central nervous systems and neuromuscular junctions. Physiol Rev. 1973 Jan;53(1):1–119. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1973.53.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Keynes R. D., Rojas E., Taylor R. E., Vergara J. Calcium and potassium systems of a giant barnacle muscle fibre under membrane potential control. J Physiol. 1973 Mar;229(2):409–455. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McLennan H. Bicuculline and inhibition of crayfish stretch receptor neurons. Nature. 1970 Nov 14;228(5272):674–675. doi: 10.1038/228674a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. ROBBINS J., VAN DER KLOOT W. G. The effect of picrotoxin on peripheral inhibition in the crayfish. J Physiol. 1958 Oct 31;143(3):541–552. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stefani E., Steinbach A. B. Resting potential and electrical properties of frog slow muscle fibres. Effect of different external solutions. J Physiol. 1969 Aug;203(2):383–401. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Takeuchi A., Onodera K. Effect of bicuculline on the GABA receptor of the crayfish neuromuscular junction. Nat New Biol. 1972 Mar 15;236(63):55–56. doi: 10.1038/newbio236055a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Takeuchi A., Takeuchi N. A study of the action of picrotoxin on the inhibitory neuromuscular junction of the crayfish. J Physiol. 1969 Nov;205(2):377–391. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Takeuchi A., Takeuchi N. Anion permeability of the inhibitory post-synaptic membrane of the crayfish neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1967 Aug;191(3):575–590. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. WEIDMANN S. The electrical constants of Purkinje fibres. J Physiol. 1952 Nov;118(3):348–360. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES