Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1974 Jan;236(1):171–191. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010429

Light-induced resistance changes in retinal rods and cones of the tiger Salamander

A Lasansky, P L Marchiafava
PMCID: PMC1350833  PMID: 4818491

Abstract

1. The electrical properties of retinal rods and cones of the larval tiger salamander were investigated with intracellular electrodes, and the cells identified by means of dye injections.

2. Both types of photoreceptors are hyperpolarized by illumination. Following stimulation with brief flashes of dim light, rod responses show a slower time course than cone responses; with bright flashes, rod responses can be recognized because of their long recovery time.

3. Values of input resistance were derived from the voltage displacement induced by constant current pulses in darkness or at the peak of the photoresponse. The input resistance following illumination was also calculated from the effect of steady polarizing currents on the amplitude of the photoresponse.

4. In darkness, the input resistance of the rod cells is time- and voltage-dependent, but the voltage—current relations of most cells have a linear region which includes the physiological limits of membrane potential. At the peak of the photoresponse, the input resistance (slope of the linear region of the v—i relations) is decreased.

5. Cone cells show approximately linear v—i relations. As reported by previous authors, illumination increases the input resistance.

6. These results support the current view that the cone photoresponse is the consequence of a reduction in the permeability of channels which in darkness shunt the membrane. In rods, however, it appears that the main effect of illumination is to increase the permeability of the membrane to ions for which the equilibrium potential is more negative than the membrane potential in darkness.

Full text

PDF
171

Images in this article

190-1Fig. 1
on p.190-1
190-2Fig. 2
on p.190-2
190-2Fig. 3
on p.190-2
190-2Fig. 4
on p.190-2
190-2Fig. 5
on p.190-2

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ADRIAN R. H., FREYGANG W. H. Potassium conductance of frog muscle membrane under controlled voltage. J Physiol. 1962 Aug;163:104–114. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adrian R. H., Freygang W. H. The potassium and chloride conductance of frog muscle membrane. J Physiol. 1962 Aug;163(1):61–103. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arden G. B., Ernst W. The effect of ions on the photoresponses of pigeon cones. J Physiol. 1970 Dec;211(2):311–339. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baylor D. A., Fuortes M. G. Electrical responses of single cones in the retina of the turtle. J Physiol. 1970 Mar;207(1):77–92. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baylor D. A., Fuortes M. G., O'Bryan P. M. Receptive fields of cones in the retina of the turtle. J Physiol. 1971 Apr;214(2):265–294. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown J. E., Muller K. J., Murray G. Reversal potential for an electrophysiological event generated by conductance changes: mathematical analysis. Science. 1971 Oct 15;174(4006):318–318. doi: 10.1126/science.174.4006.318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Colburn T. R., Schwartz E. A. Linear voltage control of current passed through a micropipette with variable resistance. Med Biol Eng. 1972 Jul;10(4):504–509. doi: 10.1007/BF02474198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. FRANK K., FUORTES M. G. Stimulation of spinal motoneurones with intracellular electrodes. J Physiol. 1956 Nov 28;134(2):451–470. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Falk G., Fatt P. An analysis of light-induced admittance changes in rod outer segments. J Physiol. 1973 Feb;229(1):185–220. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fioravanti R., Fuortes M. G. Analysis of responses in visual cells of the leech. J Physiol. 1972 Dec;227(1):173–194. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp010025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hagins W. A., Penn R. D., Yoshikami S. Dark current and photocurrent in retinal rods. Biophys J. 1970 May;10(5):380–412. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(70)86308-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kandel E. R., Tauc L. Anomalous rectification in the metacerebral giant cells and its consequences for synaptic transmission. J Physiol. 1966 Mar;183(2):287–304. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kaneko A. Physiological and morphological identification of horizontal, bipolar and amacrine cells in goldfish retina. J Physiol. 1970 May;207(3):623–633. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Korenbrot J. I., Cone R. A. Dark ionic flux and the effects of light in isolated rod outer segments. J Gen Physiol. 1972 Jul;60(1):20–45. doi: 10.1085/jgp.60.1.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lasansky A. Organization of the outer synaptic layer in the retina of the larval tiger salamander. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1973;265(872):471–489. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1973.0033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nelson P. G., Frank K. Anomalous rectification in cat spinal motoneurons and effect of polarizing currents on excitatory postsynaptic potential. J Neurophysiol. 1967 Sep;30(5):1097–1113. doi: 10.1152/jn.1967.30.5.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sillman A. J., Ito H., Tomita T. Studies on the mass receptor potential of the isolated frog retina. II. On the basis of the ionic mechanism. Vision Res. 1969 Dec;9(12):1443–1451. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(69)90060-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Stretton A. O., Kravitz E. A. Neuronal geometry: determination with a technique of intracellular dye injection. Science. 1968 Oct 4;162(3849):132–134. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3849.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tansley K. The gecko retina. Vision Res. 1964 May;4(1):33–37. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(64)90029-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tomita T. Electrophysiological study of the mechanisms subserving color coding in the fish retina. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1965;30:559–566. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1965.030.01.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tomita T., Kaneko A., Murakami M., Pautler E. L. Spectral response curves of single cones in the carp. Vision Res. 1967 Jul;7(7):519–531. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(67)90061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Toyoda J., Nosaki H., Tomita T. Light-induced resistance changes in single photoreceptors of Necturus and Gekko. Vision Res. 1969 Apr;9(4):453–463. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(69)90134-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Werblin F. S., Dowling J. E. Organization of the retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. II. Intracellular recording. J Neurophysiol. 1969 May;32(3):339–355. doi: 10.1152/jn.1969.32.3.339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES