Abstract
Background
Weekend catch-up sleep (WCS) has emerged as a new research focus in the field of sleep. Earlier research has shown that sleep and overactive bladder (OAB) are closely related; however, the connection between WCS and OAB has yet to be reported.
Methods
Data from the 2017 to 2018 cycle of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database were utilized in this research. The regression analysis was performed by constructing three models with progressively adjusted covariates to assess the association between WCS and the distribution and severity of OAB. A dose-response relationship between WCS duration and OAB risk was further examined by applying restricted cubic splines (RCS) and threshold effect models. Subgroup and interaction analyses were also performed to assess effect stability.
Results
The study involved 4,195 participants, of whom 997 were diagnosed with OAB. Both the distribution and severity of OAB were negatively correlated with WCS, in accordance to the multivariate regression models. RCS model revealed a U-shaped relationship between WCS duration and the distribution of OAB, with an initial decrease followed by an increase. Subsequent threshold effect analysis suggested that the turning point occurred at 1.5 h. Finally, subgroup analyses were conducted, and although interactions were observed, the results remained robust.
Conclusion
WCS may be associated with a reduction in OAB risk and symptom severity. Restricting WCS duration to within 1.5 h may be linked to a lower prevalence of OAB. The simple and feasible approach of moderate WCS holds promise in alleviating the public health burden associated with OAB.
Keywords: NHANES, overactive bladder, public health, urology, weekend catch-up sleep
Introduction
OAB is a symptom complex primarily marked by urinary urgency, frequency, and nocturia, which may or may not be accompanied by urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) [1,2]. According to statistical data, the prevalence of OAB in the United States reached 16% [3]. The symptoms of OAB often cause patients embarrassment, but they have a significant impact on their quality of life, leading to decreased work productivity and an increased risk of depression, among other consequences [4]. Given the large patient population and the profound effects on daily living, OAB represents a major public health concern [5].
The American Academy of Sleep Medicine and the Sleep Research Society jointly recommend that adults should aim for at least 7 h of sleep per night [6]. However, with the accelerating pace of society and increasing pressures from work and daily life, sleep deprivation has become increasingly common. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), approximately 35% of adults in the United States experience insufficient sleep [7]. The most recent consensus from the National Sleep Foundation (NSF) suggests that WCS can help mitigate the sleep debt accumulated during the workweek [8]. This has made WCS a new area of research focus. As research progresses, findings indicate that WCS may reduce the risk of depression, lower the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, and decrease systemic inflammation, among other potential health benefits [9–13].
Previous research has demonstrated a strong correlation between sleep and OAB [14]; however, the connection between WCS and OAB has not yet been explored. This study aims to investigate whether WCS, a simple and easily implementable intervention, is associated with a lower prevalence of OAB, which could potentially reduce the burden on public health.
Methods
Study population
This cross-sectional study utilized data from the NHANES database, a research initiative designed to evaluate the health status of the U.S. population. The data collected through this survey are utilized in epidemiological and health sciences research to inform the design and development of health programs and services, as well as to support the establishment of evidence-based public health policies. The research program was validated by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Ethics Review Committee, and each participant provided written informed permission(https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/about/erb.html). This study analyzed data from the NHANES 2017–2018 cycle. Following the removal of samples that lacked relevant covariates, data on weekend and weekday sleep hours, or the measurement of OAB symptoms, 4,195 participants were ultimately included in this study. The specific details regarding participant selection are outlined in the flowchart Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Flowchart in selecting the studying participants.
Definition of WCS and WCS duration
For this study, participants’ weekdays and weekends sleep duration were acquired from questions in the sleep disorders section of the questionnaire: 1)’Number of hours usually sleep on weekdays or workdays’ and 2)’Number of hours usually sleep on weekends or non-workdays’. In this study, WCS and WCS duration were defined in accordance with Chen et al. [15]. The WCS duration is calculated by deducting the weekdays sleep time from the weekends sleep time. The concept of WCS is characterized by a longer duration of sleep on weekends compared to weekdays, which is determined when the WCS duration exceeds 0 h.
Assessment of OAB
UUI and nocturia are OAB’s essential features. In the NHANES 2017–2018 survey, the following two inquiries were employed to measure UUI symptoms: 1)’During the last 12 months, have you leaked or lost control of even a small amount of urine with an urge or pressure to urinate and you could not get to the toilet fast enough’ and 2)’How frequently does this occur?’ The assessment of nocturia severity was derived from the question’ During the last 30 days, how many times per night did you most typically get up to urinate, from the time you went to bed at night until the time you got up in the morning?’. The Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) was subsequently applied to evaluate the degree of overactive bladder symptoms [16]. Patients were regarded to be suffering from the overactive bladder if their OABSS was three or greater [17,18]. More details are provided in Supplementary Figure 1.
Covariates
This paper examined several covariates that may affect the connection between OAB and WCS, drawing on prior research and practical experience. The covariates included gender (Male or Female); age (20–39, 40–59, or 60+); ethnicity (Mexican American, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic White, and other races); educational level (College graduate or above, High school or equivalent, Less than high school, or Some college or AA degree); poverty income ratio (PIR) (<1.3, 1.3–3.5, or >3.5); marital status (Married or Living with partner, Divorced, widowed, or separated, or Never married); smoking status (Never smoker, Former smoker, or Current smoker); drinking status (Non-drinker, Former drinker, or Current drinker); and presence of hypertension, diabetes, and somnipathy. Somnipathy was derived from the NHANES questionnaire item: ‘Have you ever told a doctor or other health professional that you have trouble sleeping?’ Participants who responded ‘Yes’ to this question were classified as having somnipathy, while those who answered ‘No’ were considered not to have somnipathy.
Statistical analyses
This study intends to explore the connection between WCS and OAB. Considering that the NHANES database utilized a complex multistage stratified sampling design, data weighting was applied with the ‘WTMEC2YR’ weight from the 2017–2018 cycle to calculate descriptive statistics. Continuous and categorical variables were analyzed using t tests and chi-square tests, respectively. Three models were subsequently constructed to perform univariate and multivariate regression analyses to explore the correlation between WCS and the risk of OAB: Model 1 (crude model); Model 2 (adjusted for gender, age, ethnicity, educational level, PIR, and marital status); and Model 3 (adjusted for gender, age, ethnicity, educational level, PIR, marital status, smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes, and somnipathy). Further, the association between WCS and WCS duration with OAB severity, as measured by OABSS, was also explored. Additionally, a dose-response relationship between WCS duration and OAB risk was examined using restricted cubic splines and threshold effect analysis. Finally, subgroup and interaction analyses were conducted to evaluate the presence of heterogeneity. All statistical analyses in this article were conducted using R version 4.2.2. The threshold for statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
Baseline characteristics of participants
The study included 4,195 participants in total, with 997 diagnosed with OAB (approximately 23.8% of participants), after applying the specified inclusion criteria. Table 1 divided the participants into two distinct categories according to the existence of OAB and presented descriptive statistics of the baseline characteristics for both groups. OAB patients were more likely to be female (p < 0.001), older adults (p < 0.001), Non-Hispanic Black (p < 0.001), PIR < 1.3 (p < 0.001), be divorced, widowed, or separated (p < 0.001), former drinkers (p < 0.001), have hypertension (p < 0.001), have diabetes (p < 0.001), and suffer from insomnia (p < 0.001). Notably, the WCS duration was significantly shorter in participants with OAB compared to those without OAB (p < 0.001).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the selected participants.
| Overall (N = 4195) | Non-OAB (N = 3198) | OAB (N = 997) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | <0.001 | |||
| Male | 2,050 (49%) | 1,641 (51%) | 409 (37%) | |
| Female | 2,145 (51%) | 1,557 (49%) | 588 (63%) | |
| Age | <0.001 | |||
| 20–39 | 1,269 (36%) | 1,155 (40%) | 114 (17%) | |
| 40–59 | 1,340 (35%) | 1,049 (35%) | 291 (33%) | |
| 60+ | 1,586 (29%) | 994 (25%) | 592 (50%) | |
| Ethnicity | <0.001 | |||
| Mexican American | 534 (8.3%) | 427 (8.7%) | 107 (6.5%) | |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 946 (11%) | 652 (9.5%) | 294 (16%) | |
| Non-Hispanic White | 1,572 (65%) | 1,180 (65%) | 392 (65%) | |
| Others | 1,143 (16%) | 939 (17%) | 204 (13%) | |
| Education | <0.001 | |||
| College graduate or above | 1,035 (31%) | 872 (33%) | 163 (23%) | |
| High school or equivalent | 1,018 (27%) | 747 (27%) | 271 (29%) | |
| Less than high school | 743 (10%) | 496 (8.8%) | 247 (16%) | |
| Some college or AA degree | 1,399 (31%) | 1,083 (31%) | 316 (32%) | |
| PIR | <0.001 | |||
| <1.3 | 1,156 (19%) | 808 (18%) | 348 (27%) | |
| 1.3–3.5 | 1,740 (36%) | 1,313 (36%) | 427 (38%) | |
| >3.5 | 1,299 (45%) | 1,077 (47%) | 222 (34%) | |
| Marital | <0.001 | |||
| Married or Living with partner | 2,496 (63%) | 1,979 (64%) | 517 (60%) | |
| Divorced, widowed, or separated | 968 (19%) | 618 (16%) | 350 (29%) | |
| Never married | 731 (18%) | 601 (20%) | 130 (12%) | |
| Smoking | 0.074 | |||
| Never smoker | 2,387 (57%) | 1,910 (59%) | 477 (51%) | |
| Former smoker | 1,045 (25%) | 716 (24%) | 329 (31%) | |
| Current smoker | 763 (17%) | 572 (17%) | 191 (19%) | |
| Drinking | <0.001 | |||
| Non-drinker | 398 (6.7%) | 300 (6.3%) | 98 (8.6%) | |
| Former drinker | 888 (17%) | 579 (15%) | 309 (27%) | |
| Current drinker | 2,909 (76%) | 2,319 (79%) | 590 (64%) | |
| Hypertension | 1,598 (33%) | 1,016 (29%) | 582 (51%) | <0.001 |
| Diabetes | 660 (11%) | 384 (9.0%) | 276 (23%) | <0.001 |
| Somnipathy | 1,226 (32%) | 815 (29%) | 411 (43%) | <0.001 |
| WCS duration | 0.70 ± (1.47) | 0.74 ± (1.46) | 0.53 ± (1.49) | <0.001 |
Association of WCS with distribution of OAB
To explore the correlation between WCS and OAB distribution, three regression models were developed with progressively adjusted covariates. In both Model 1 and Model 2, which examined the link between WCS and OAB distribution, a significant negative correlation was observed, as shown in Table 2. In the completely adjusted Model 3, this association remained statistically significant (OR (95% CI) = 0.79 (0.67, 0.93), p = 0.005), suggesting that WCS is associated with a significant reduction in the distribution of OAB.
Table 2.
Regression analyses for associations between WCS and the distribution of OAB.
| Variables | Model 1 |
Model 2 |
Model 3 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR(95%CI) | p value | OR(95%CI) | p value | OR(95%CI) | p value | |
| WCS | ||||||
| No | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||
| Yes | 0.55(0.47, 0.64) | <0.001 | 0.76(0.65, 0.90) | 0.001 | 0.79(0.67, 0.93) | 0.005 |
| WCS duration | 0.88(0.83, 0.92) | <0.001 | 0.94(0.89, 0.99) | 0.020 | 0.95(0.90, 1.00) | 0.073 |
Model 1: Crude model.
Model 2: Adjusted for gender, age, ethnicity, educational level, PIR, and marital status.
Model 3: Adjusted for gender, age, ethnicity, educational level, PIR, marital status, smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes, and somnipathy.
In the analysis of WCS duration and OAB distribution, a significant negative correlation was found in both Model 1 and Model 2. However, in the fully adjusted Model 3, while a negative trend persisted, it was no longer statistically significant (OR (95% CI) = 0.95 (0.90, 1.00), p = 0.073). This suggests that WCS duration does not exhibit a significant linear relationship with the distribution of OAB.
Association between WCS and the severity of OAB
Next, we utilized the three models mentioned above to further explore the correlation between WCS and the severity of OAB. The details are presented in Table 3. In the completely adjusted Model 3, WCS was significantly negatively correlated with OAB severity (β (95% CI) = −0.097 (−0.178, −0.015), p = 0.02).
Table 3.
Regression analyses for associations between WCS and the severity of OAB.
| Variables | Model 1 |
Model 2 |
Model 3 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β(95%CI) | p value | β(95%CI) | p value | β(95%CI) | p value | |
| WCS | ||||||
| No | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||
| Yes | −0.376(–0.462, −0.290) | <0.001 | −0.117(–0.200,−0.035) | 0.005 | −0.097(–0.178,−0.015) | 0.020 |
| WCS duration | −0.079(–0.106,−0.052) | <0.001 | −0.026 (−0.052,−0.001) | 0.045 | −0.019 (−0.044,0.006) | 0.135 |
Model 1: Crude model.
Model 2: Adjusted for gender, age, ethnicity, educational level, PIR, and marital status.
Model 3: Adjusted for gender, age, ethnicity, educational level, PIR, marital status, smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes, and somnipathy.
In Models 1 and 2, which were based on WCS duration and OAB severity, the analyses showed a statistically significant negative correlation between WCS duration and OAB severity. However, in the fully adjusted Model 3, the negative correlation between WCS duration and OAB severity was no longer statistically significant (β (95% CI) = −0.019 (−0.044,0.006), p = 0.135). Despite the lack of statistical significance in Model 3, the effect direction remained consistent with that observed in Models 1 and 2, suggesting that the association may still exist.
Dose–response relationship and threshold effect analysis between WCS duration and OAB distribution
This study employed RCS to assess the dose–response relationship between WCS duration and the distribution of OAB (Figure 2). After adjusting for gender, age, ethnicity, educational level, PIR, marital status, smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes, and somnipathy, we found an association between WCS duration and OAB distribution. Specifically, as WCS duration increased, the distribution of OAB initially decreased before rising again.
Figure 2.

Restr icted cubic spl ine pl ot of the associ ation bet ween WCS durat ion and distribut ion of OAB. RCS regression was adjusted for gender, age, ethnicity, educational level, PIR, marital status, smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes, and somnipathy. Solid lines indicate ORs, and shadow shape indicate 95% CIs. OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval.
Although the non-linear test did not achieve statistical significance (p for non-linear = 0.053), a clear U-shaped trend was observed in the graphical representation. Consequently, we performed a further threshold effect analysis. As shown in Table 4, the threshold effect analysis indicates that the turning point occurs at 1.5 h. The distribution of OAB is seen to decrease by 11.3% with each extra unit in WCS duration when it is less than 1.5 h (OR (95% CI)=0.887(0.812, 0.969), p = 0.007). However, when the WCS duration exceeds 1.5 h, the correlation between the two variables becomes statistically insignificant.
Table 4.
Threshold effect analysis of the association between WCS duration and the distribution of OAB.
| OAB | OR(95%) | p value |
|---|---|---|
| Fitting by standard linear regression | 0.953(0.903,1.005) | 0.073 |
| Fitting by two-piecewise linear regression | ||
| Inflection point | 1.5 | |
| <1.5 | 0.887(0.812,0.969) | 0.007 |
| >1.5 | 1.049(0.942,1.164) | 0.370 |
| p for likelihood ratio test | 0.046 |
Gender, age, ethnicity, educational level, PIR, marital status, smoking, drinking, hypertension, diabetes, and somnipathy were adjusted.
Subgroup analysis for the association between WCS and OAB
Finally, this research conducted subgroup analyses and interaction tests to evaluate the stability of the relationship between WCS and both the distribution and severity of OAB across different demographic characteristics and health conditions. The results demonstrated significant interaction influence between WCS and OAB distribution with respect to ethnicity, PIR and drinking status (p for interaction < 0.05) (Figure 3). Additionally, ethnicity also demonstrated a notable interaction effect in the association between WCS and the severity of OAB (p for interaction = 0.018) (Figure 4). The other variables showed insignificant interactions.
Figure 3.

Effect of weekend catch-up sleep on the distribution of OAB in different subgroups. Except the stratification variables themselves, each stratification factor was adjusted for other variables.
Figure 4.

Effect of weekend catch-up sleep on the severity of OAB in different subgroups. Except the stratification variables themselves, each stratification factor was adjusted for other variables.
Discussion
This study employed the NHANES database to explore the association between WCS and the prevalence and severity of OAB in the U.S. The findings demonstrate that WCS might be linked to a decrease in the risk and severity of OAB. This effect remained consistent in subsequent subgroup analyses. Additionally, through RCS and threshold effect analyses, we identified that limiting the duration of WCS to no more than 1.5 h could be associated with a reduced prevalence of OAB.
The relationship between sleep and OAB is closely interconnected. An earlier cross-sectional study indicated that OAB is more common in individuals who had poor sleep habits. After adjusting for all covariates, poor sleep patterns were associated with a 38% increased prevalence of OAB compared to healthy sleep patterns. Moreover, unhealthy sleep patterns may be associated with more severe symptoms of OAB [14]. Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) frequently have comorbid sleep disorders [19]. A single-center prospective study found that the overall prevalence of OAB in male OSAS patients was 39%, a figure significantly higher than the OAB prevalence in European males. Moderate to severe OSAS is strongly associated with male OAB, and these patients also exhibit notably higher OABSS [20].
Although earlier research has illuminated the link between sleep and OAB, the connection between WCS and OAB has not been investigated. This study suggests that WCS may be associated with a reduction in the risk and severity of OAB symptoms. We hypothesize that the relationship between the two may involve several mechanisms. A prior prospective study suggested that depression could be a risk element for OAB [21]. Serotonin depletion is considered one of the pathophysiological mechanisms of depression. Previous animal studies have shown that a reduction in serotonin levels in the central nervous system can lead to overactivity of the detrusor muscle [22]. Furthermore, research has indicated that moderate WCS can reduce both the prevalence and severity of depression symptoms. Additionally, systemic inflammation is closely associated with an increased risk of OAB [23]. Research has demonstrated that individuals with OAB have elevated levels of nerve growth factor (NGF) in their urine [24]. NGF may exacerbate neurogenic inflammation by promoting the activation and degranulation of mast cells [25]. Dorsal root ganglia neurons may enlarge as a result of repeated inflammatory stimulation, lowering the activation threshold of bladder afferent nerves [26]. Previous research also suggests that moderate WCS may be associated with lower levels of inflammation [11]. A prospective interventional clinical study has shown that catch-up sleep can improve insulin sensitivity [27]. Enhanced insulin sensitivity, in turn, activates smooth muscle insulin receptors, which can reverse urinary dysfunction, improve nerve control, and enhance bladder contraction, ultimately leading to improvements in OAB [28].
In the subsequent analysis of nonlinear regression and threshold effects in this study, it was found that the prevalence of OAB decreases with each additional unit increase in WCS duration when the duration is below 1.5 h. However, when the WCS duration exceeds 1.5 h, the relationship between the two variables becomes statistically insignificant. This is an intriguing phenomenon: excessive catch-up sleep appears to have an adverse effect. This result is consistent with previous studies, which concluded that moderate weekend catch-up sleep may be associated with improved glucose regulation and a reduced prevalence of depression, while excessive WCS duration do not provide the same benefit [9,29]. This paradox may be related to several factors. Both cohort studies from Cleveland and Taiwan had demonstrated that extended sleep durations actually lead to an increase in inflammatory markers, and elevated levels of inflammation are associated with a higher prevalence of OAB [30,31]. Excessive WCS duration might also disrupt circadian rhythms, which can severely impact health, increasing the risks of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancer, and more [32,33]. A prior retrospective study from NHANES also demonstrated a favorable connection between circadian rhythm disorders and the prevalence of OAB [34].
This study also conducted further subgroup analyses and explored interaction effects. The results indicated a significant interaction between WCS and the incidence of OAB with respect to ethnicity, PIR, and drinking status. Additionally, ethnicity was found to have a significant interaction effect on the relationship between WCS and OAB severity. Although the p values for interaction were less than 0.05, these findings may have limited clinical significance, as the observed effects were consistent with the expected directions.
Although the NHANES database selected for this study is authoritative and of high data quality, some limitations are inevitably present. First, as this study is cross-sectional, causal inferences cannot be drawn. Second, although this study controlled for many common confounding factors, it is still impossible to account for all potential variables. Due to the inherent limitations of the NHANES database, some unmeasured or residual confounders, such as metabolic syndrome and ischemic heart disease, may still remain. Third, due to the limitations of the NHANES database, it was not possible to derive the indicator of urinary urgency. However, the method used in this study to define OAB has been widely accepted in previous research. Finally, sleep duration and frequency of nocturia were self-reported by participants, which may introduce recall and reporting biases. However, the NHANES data collection team is well-trained and utilizes computer-assisted personal interviews to ensure participant confidentiality, thereby maximizing accuracy.
The prevalence of OAB in the United States has been climbing annually, and it is anticipated that this trend will continue as the population ages [35,36]. Professor Penny Reeves and colleagues developed a health economic model to predict the prevalence of OAB in the European region and the economic burden it places on healthcare systems. Even when confined solely to direct medical costs, the economic burden of OAB on healthcare systems remains substantial. Reported annual per-patient expenditures range between €269 and €706, reflecting only the financial impact of diagnosing, treating, and managing the long-term consequences of OAB. The study further predicted that the burden of OAB would lead to an increased strain on government healthcare budgets in the future [37]. A systematic literature review of U.S. studies found that few studies have examined the indirect costs associated with OAB, while the annual cost for OAB patients is 1.4 to 2 times higher compared to age- and sex-matched individuals without OAB [38]. Given the significant economic and public health burden OAB imposes on society, it is imperative to take preventive and therapeutic measures. This study identifies a strong correlation between WCS and OAB, and it is hoped that further prospective studies will explore this relationship in greater depth to help alleviate the societal burden caused by OAB.
Conclusion
This study provides evidence suggesting that moderate WCS duration is associated with a lower prevalence of OAB. Given the growing burden of OAB on public health, characterized by its impact on quality of life and healthcare systems, incorporating strategies that adequate weekend catch-up sleep may offer a cost-effective approach to reduce its prevalence. Future research should concentrate on the inherent physiological mechanisms connecting WCS and OAB, aiming to refine sleep-based interventions and assess their long-term efficacy in diverse demographic groups.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the invaluable contribution of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data in supporting our research. Zehao Li: Data curation, Conceptualization, Visualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing; Xiangliang Liu: Data curation, Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing–original draff, Writing–review and editing; Xinqiao Chen: Visualization, Writing–review and editing; Fangqi Li: Visualization, Writing–review and editing; Weiwei Xing: Visualization, Writing–review and editing; Huimin Tian: Supervision, Conceptualization, Project administration; Wei Song: Supervision, Conceptualization, Project administration; Jiuwei Cui: Writing–review and editing, Supervision, Conceptualization, Project administration; all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethical statement
This study was performed in accordance with the 1964 declaration of HELSINKI and later amendments. The data used in this study is from the NHANES database, in which all raw data has been ethically reviewed by the National Center for Health Statistics Ethics Review Board. The data is anonymized and does not contain any personal identifying information, so the Ethics Committee of the First Hospital of Jilin University has exempted this study from ethical review.
Disclosure statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Data availability statement
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. These data can be found at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/.
References
- 1.Drake MJ. Do we need a new definition of the overactive bladder syndrome? ICI-RS 2013. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33(5):622–624. doi: 10.1002/nau.22609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wein AJ, Rovner ES.. Definition and epidemiology of overactive bladder. Urology. 2002;60(5 Suppl 1):7–12; discussion. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01784-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stewart WF, Van Rooyen JB, Cundiff GW, et al. Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States. World J Urol. 2003;20(6):327–336. doi: 10.1007/s00345-002-0301-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Milsom I, Kaplan SA, Coyne KS, et al. Effect of bothersome overactive bladder symptoms on health-related quality of life, anxiety, depression, and treatment seeking in the United States: results from EpiLUTS. Urology. 2012;80(1):90–96. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hu TW, Wagner TH.. Health-related consequences of overactive bladder: an economic perspective. BJU Int. 2005;96 Suppl 1:43–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05654.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Watson NF, Badr MS, Belenky G, et al. Recommended Amount of Sleep for a Healthy Adult: a Joint Consensus Statement of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and Sleep Research Society. Sleep. 2015;38(6):843–844. doi: 10.5665/sleep.4716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.CDC . FastStats: Sleep in Adults. https://www.cdc.gov/sleep/data-research/facts-stats/adults-sleep-facts-and-stats.html,2024 (accessed 26 March 2025).
- 8.Sletten TL, Weaver MD, Foster RG, et al. The importance of sleep regularity: a consensus statement of the National Sleep Foundation sleep timing and variability panel. Sleep Health. 2023;9(6):801–820. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2023.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Le L, Lan Z, Chen C.. Association between weekend catch-up sleep and depression in US adults. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21551-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhu H, Qin S, Wu M.. Association between weekend catch-up sleep and cardiovascular disease: evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2017–2018. Sleep Health. 2024;10(1):98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2023.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yang Z, Luo Y, He J, et al. Association between weekend catch-up sleep and the systemic immune-inflammation index in adults: evidence from the NHANES 2017–2020. J Psychosom Res. 2025;191:112070. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Seo Y, Sung GH, Lee S, et al. Weekend catch-up sleep is associated with the alleviation of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Ann Hepatol. 2022;27(3):100690. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2022.100690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Koo DL, Yang KI, Kim JH, et al. Association between morningness–eveningness, sleep duration, weekend catch-up sleep and depression among Korean high-school students. J Sleep Res. 2021;30(1):e13063. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lu Z, Zhang J, Lin S, et al. Associations between overactive bladder and sleep patterns: a cross-sectional study based on 2007–2014 NHANES. BMC Urol. 2023;23(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01329-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Luo Z, Wang T, Wu W, et al. Association between weekend catch-up sleep and depressive symptoms in American adults: finding from NHANES 2017–2020. J Affect Disord. 2024;354:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Blaivas JG, Panagopoulos G, Weiss JP, et al. Validation of the overactive bladder symptom score. J Urol. 2007;178(2):543–547; discussion 547. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gao F, Lu Y, Cheng Q, et al. Blood cadmium levels and overactive bladder in middle-aged and older adults in the United States: insights from NHANES 2007–2020 data. Environ Pollut. 2024;363(Pt 2):125148. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang Y, Song J, Li B, et al. Association between body roundness index and overactive bladder: results from the NHANES 2005–2018. Lipids Health Dis. 2024;23(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12944-024-02174-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Krishnan S, Chai-Coetzer CL, Grivell N, et al. Comorbidities and quality of life in Australian men and women with diagnosed and undiagnosed high-risk obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(7):1757–1767. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kemmer H, Mathes AM, Dilk O, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome is associated with overactive bladder and urgency incontinence in men. Sleep. 2009;32(2):271–275. doi: 10.1093/sleep/32.2.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Coyne KS, Sexton CC, Kopp ZS, et al. The impact of overactive bladder on mental health, work productivity and health-related quality of life in the UK and Sweden: results from EpiLUTS. BJU Int. 2011;108(9):1459–1471. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10013.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vrijens D, Drossaerts J, van Koeveringe G, et al. Affective symptoms and the overactive bladder – a systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2015;78(2):95–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wei B, Zhao Y, Lin P, et al. The association between overactive bladder and systemic immunity-inflammation index: a cross-sectional study of NHANES 2005 to 2018. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):12579. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63448-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wang LW, Han XM, Chen CH, et al. Urinary brain-derived neurotrophic factor: a potential biomarker for objective diagnosis of overactive bladder. Int Urol Nephrol. 2014;46(2):341–347. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0540-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liu HT, Chancellor MB, Kuo HC.. Urinary nerve growth factor levels are elevated in patients with detrusor overactivity and decreased in responders to detrusor botulinum toxin-A injection. Eur Urol. 2009;56(4):700–706. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhang NZ, Ma L, Jun C, et al. Changes in mast cell infiltration: a possible mechanism in detrusor overactivity induced by visceral hypersensitivity. Int Braz J Urol. 2016;42(2):373–382. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Broussard JL, Wroblewski K, Kilkus JM, et al. Two nights of recovery sleep reverses the effects of short-term sleep restriction on diabetes risk. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(3):e40-1–e41. doi: 10.2337/dc15-2214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chen H, Wu A, Zeidel ML, et al. Smooth muscle insulin receptor deletion causes voiding dysfunction: a mechanism for diabetic bladder dysfunction. Diabetes. 2022;71(10):2197–2208. doi: 10.2337/db22-0233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kim Y-C, Um YJ, Yoon SH, et al. Association between weekend catch-up sleep and the risk of prediabetes and diabetes: a cross-sectional study using KNHANES. J Psychosom Res. 2024;179:111618. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Patel SR, Zhu X, Storfer-Isser A, et al. Sleep duration and biomarkers of inflammation. Sleep. 2009;32(2):200–204. doi: 10.1093/sleep/32.2.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dowd JB, Goldman N, Weinstein M.. Sleep duration, sleep quality, and biomarkers of inflammation in a Taiwanese population. Ann Epidemiol. 2011;21(11):799–806. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Baron KG, Reid KJ.. Circadian misalignment and health. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014;26(2):139–154. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2014.911149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Windred DP, Burns AC, Lane JM, et al. Sleep regularity is a stronger predictor of mortality risk than sleep duration: a prospective cohort study. Sleep. 2024;47(1):zsad253. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsad253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xiao Y, Yin S, Wang J, et al. A positive association between the prevalence of circadian syndrome and overactive bladder in United States adults. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1137191. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1137191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cheng Y, Chen T, Zheng G, et al. Prevalence and trends in overactive bladder among men in the United States, 2005–2020. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):16284. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66758-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Henderson E, Drake M.. Overactive bladder. Maturitas. 2010;66(3):257–262. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Reeves P, Irwin D, Kelleher C, et al. The current and future burden and cost of overactive bladder in five European countries. Eur Urol. 2006;50(5):1050–1057. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Powell LC, Szabo SM, Walker D, et al. The economic burden of overactive bladder in the United States: a systematic literature review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(4):1241–1249. doi: 10.1002/nau.23477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. These data can be found at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/.
