Skip to main content
Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources logoLink to Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources
. 2026 Aug 24;11(9):1064–1068. doi: 10.1080/23802359.2026.2722723

The complete mitochondrial genome and phylogenetic position of Orthaga aenescens Moore, 1888 (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)

Laiyou Wang a, Jiali Liu b, Shuyu Hui b, Hua Rong b,✉, Yu Wang a,b,✉
PMCID: PMC13508489  PMID: 42657267

Abstract

The genus Orthaga includes several agricultural and forestry pests. However, only a few complete mitogenomes have been reported for Orthaga. To address this gap, we sequenced and characterized the complete mitogenome of Orthaga aenescens Moore, 1888. The circular mitogenome of O. aenescens is 15,160 bp in length and comprises 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNA genes (tRNAs), 2 ribosomal RNA genes (rRNAs), and a control region. The base composition shows a strong bias toward adenine and thymine, with 80.7% of the bases being A or T, while the AT-skew is slightly negative at −0.031. Phylogenetic analysis suggests that among the sequenced Pyralidae mitochondrial genomes, O. aenescens is most closely related to O. euadrusalis and Locastra muscosalis, supporting its placement within the subfamily Epipaschiinae.

Keywords: Orthaga aenescens, Pyralidae, mitochondrial genome, phylogenetic position

1. Introduction

The genus Orthaga (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) is widely distributed across the Oriental, Palearctic, and Australian regions, and includes numerous economically significant pests of agricultural and forestry crops. Among them, O. olivacea, O. achatina, and O. euadrusalis are notorious for causing severe defoliation and yield losses in plantations of Lauraceae (e.g. Cinnamomum camphora, C. cassia, Lindera glauca), Fagaceae (e.g. Castanea mollissima, Lithocarpus glaber), and Anacardiaceae (e.g. Rhus chinensis, Mangifera indica) (Yang et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2021a, 2021b). Despite their economic importance, accurate species identification within Orthaga remains challenging due to morphological similarity among adults and overlapping larval host plant ranges. For example, the common name ‘camphor webworm’ has been applied inconsistently in the literature, sometimes referring to O. olivacea and other times to O. achatina (Yang et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2021a), leading to confusion in pest management and biological control programs.

Traditional taxonomy based on external morphology and genitalia often fails to reliably distinguish closely related Orthaga species, especially when only immature stages are available (Mutanen et al. 2010). Molecular markers, particularly mitochondrial DNA sequences, have proven effective for species delimitation and phylogenetic reconstruction in Lepidoptera. Its maternal inheritance, lack of recombination, relatively rapid evolutionary rate, and conserved gene content make it an ideal tool for resolving taxonomic ambiguities and inferring evolutionary relationships at various taxonomic levels (Dong et al. 2021). To date, complete mitogenomes have been reported for several pyralid species (Yang et al. 2023; Wang et al. 2024), but representatives of the genus Orthaga remain scarce, limiting our understanding of their phylogenetic positions and genetic diversity.

In this study, we sequenced and characterized the complete mitochondrial genome of Orthaga aenescens Moore, 1888, a species with limited genomic information despite its ecological significance. Additionally, a maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analysis based on the 13 protein‑coding genes was performed to clarify the phylogenetic position of O. aenescens within Pyralidae. This work expands the mitochondrial genomic resources for the genus Orthaga and provides essential molecular data for species identification and future phylogenetic studies of pyralid pests.

2. Materials and methods

An adult of O. aenescens was collected using a light trap in August 2022 from Datangwan (26°21′N, 108°09′E), Leishan County, Guizhou Province, China. The specimen was deposited in the Entomological Museum of the College of Bioscience and Engineering, Jiangxi Agricultural University, under the voucher number MT007 (contact person: Hua Rong, email: ronghua@jxau.edu.cn).

The species O. aenescens can be clearly distinguished from other species of the genus Orthaga by the following combination of characters. The forewing is predominantly green, with a black inverted triangular spot at the base of the costa (Figure 1A). The male antenna bears a short scape extension (Figure 1B), and the aedeagus bears a bundle of spiny cornuti (Figure 1C).

Figure 1.

Three panels of a moth: dorsal view (A), close-up of head (B), and reproductive structures (C). Panel A shows a moth in a dorsal view, with green and brown patterned forewings and a grayish body, measuring approximately 4 mm. Panel B features a close-up of the moth's head, highlighting its short scape extension, around 1 mm in size. Panel C presents the moth's reproductive structures in semi-transparent red, detailing two large lobes and an elongated component, also about 1 mm. All panels have a white background for contrast.

Morphological features of O. aenescens. (A) Adult male in dorsal view. (B) Male antenna showing a short scape extension. (C) Aedeagus showing a bundle of spiny cornuti. Photographs by Hua Rong.

The entire specimen was preserved in absolute ethanol and stored at −20 °C for subsequent DNA extraction. Total DNA was extracted from thoracic muscle tissue of a single adult using the HiPure Insect DNA Kit (Magen, China) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Approximately 0.2 μg of total DNA was subjected to random fragmentation by sonication to an average size of 350 bp, after which the DNA fragments were end-polished, A-tailed, and ligated to Illumina adapters. The ligated products were subsequently PCR-amplified and purified using the AMPure XP system (Beverly, USA). Library quality was assessed on an Agilent 5400 system (Agilent, USA) and quantified using qPCR, after which qualified libraries were pooled and sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform with a PE150 strategy at Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). Finally, a total of 6.71 Gb raw data were generated, and clean paired-end reads were obtained using fastp v0.23.2 (Chen 2023). Subsequently, the mitogenome was assembled using SPAdes v3.14 (Bankevich et al. 2012), annotated with MITOS2 (Donath et al. 2019), and then manually adjusted. The circular genome map was drawn with the program Proksee v6.0.2 (Grant et al. 2023). Nucleotide composition was calculated using PhyloSuite v1.2.2 (Zhang et al. 2020). Strand asymmetry was computed using the following equations: AT-skew = [A−T]/[A + T] and GC-skew = [G−C]/[G + C] (Perna & Kocher 1995).

To investigate the phylogenetic position of O. aenescens, 23 mitogenomes of the closest published species were downloaded based on the blasting results in GenBank. Spodoptera litura and Spodoptera frugiperda were selected as the outgroups. The nucleotide sequences of the 13 PCGs were each translated into amino acid sequences, individually aligned using MAFFT as implemented in PhyloSuite v1.2.2 (Zhang et al. 2020), and then converted back to nucleotide alignments to prevent the influence of AT bias in the mitogenome nucleotide sequence data. Gaps and ambiguous sites were removed using Gblocks v0.91b (Castresana 2000), and individual alignments were concatenated using PhyloSuite v1.2.2 (Zhang et al. 2020). The ML tree was reconstructed using IQ-TREE v2.4.0 (Minh et al. 2020) as implemented in PhyloSuite v1.2.2. The concatenated alignment was analyzed under a single-partition framework. The optimal nucleotide substitution model was automatically selected using ModelFinder based on the Bayesian information criterion (BIC), which identified GTR+F + R4 as the best-fitting model. Branch support was assessed using 1,000 bootstrap replicates. The final molecular phylogenetic tree was visualized using iTOL (Letunic and Bork 2021).

3. Results

The complete mitogenome of O. aenescens was a circular molecule of 15,160 bp (GenBank accession number: OR881393), with an average coverage depth of 1956.92× (Figure S1). The O. aenescens mitogenome contained 37 typical mitochondrial genes, which were identical in gene arrangement to those of other pyraloid species, including 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNA genes (tRNAs), and 2 ribosomal RNA genes (rRNAs), as well as a control region (Figure 2). Of the 37 genes, 23 genes (9 PCGs and 14 tRNAs) were located on the majority strand, while the remaining 14 genes (4 PCGs, 8 tRNAs, and 2 rRNAs) were located on the minority strand. The base composition was strongly biased toward adenine and thymine, with an A + T content of 80.7%. The AT‑skew was slightly negative (−0.031), and the GC‑skew was also negative (−0.183).

Figure 2.

Circular diagram of the mitochondrial genome of Orthaga aenescens, displaying gene features and GC content. This figure represents the mitochondrial genome of Orthaga aenescens as a circular diagram, measuring 15,160 base pairs. It comprises multiple concentric rings: gene coding sequences (CDS) are shown in dark purple, transfer RNA (tRNA) is in light purple, ribosomal RNA (rRNA) is in green, and the D-loop is highlighted in orange. The inner rings depict GC content variability and GC skew, with positive and negative values represented in green and black. The diagram includes labels for specific genes like COX1, ND1, and various tRNA genes, along with a radial scale marked at 2 kbp intervals.

Circular map of the complete mitochondrial genome of O. aenescens. Genes drawn outside the outer circle were transcribed clockwise, and those drawn inside were transcribed counter-clockwise. The differently colored legend in the bottom left corner represented genes with different functions. The black inner circle displayed the GC content of the mitochondrial genome, and the innermost ring showed the GC-skew across the mitochondrial genome. The Central scale bar indicates the absolute physical length in base pairs. GC content was calculated using a sliding window of 1,000 bp with a step size of 1 bp, whereas GC skew was calculated using a sliding window of 500 bp with a step size of 1 bp.

The total length of the 13 PCGs was 11,181 bp, representing 73.8% of the entire mitogenome. Except for COX1, which used CGA as the start codon, all other PCGs began with typical ATN initiation codons. Canonical stop codons TAA and TAG were found in nine PCGs: TAA in ATP8, ATP6, COX3, CYTB, ND1, ND2, ND4L, and ND6, and TAG in ND3, while the remaining PCGs ended with an incomplete stop codon (a single T). In total, 28 bp of gene overlap was distributed across 9 positions, with the maximum overlap of 7 bp occurring between ATP8 and ATP6. The intergenic spacers together measured 106 bp, varying in length from 1 to 46 bp. Among them, the longest spacer was situated between the trnQ(ttg) and ND2 genes.

The phylogenetic relationships among the subfamilies within Pyralidae were resolved as follows: (Galleriinae+(Phycitinae +(Epipaschiinae + Pyralinae))) (Figure 3). The newly sequenced species O. aenescens belonged to the subfamily Epipaschiinae, which formed a well-supported clade with high bootstrap support values (BSV = 100). Furthermore, O. aenescens was found to be closely related to O. euadrusalis and Locastra muscosalis.

Figure 3.

Phylogenetic tree showing evolutionary relationships among multiple moth species, with bootstrap values and subfamily classifications. The figure depicts a phylogenetic tree organizing 26 moth species from the Pyralidae family across five subfamilies: Pyralinae, Epipaschiinae, Phycitinae, Gallerinae, and Amphipyriinae. Horizontal branches illustrate species relationships, with labeled species names and accession numbers at the tips. Bootstrap values, ranging from 49 to 100, are displayed at various nodes, indicating the support of these relationships. Notably, Spodoptera frugiperda and Spodoptera litura serve as reference outgroups, with the tree's scale marked at 0.1.

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree inferred from the concatenated nucleotide alignments of 13 mitochondrial PCGs. The values at the nodes indicate bootstrap support values. The scale bar indicates substitutions per site. Long basal and outgroup branches are truncated, as shown by the diagonal break marks. Alphanumeric terms indicate GenBank accession numbers. Orthaga aenescens OR881393 is highlighted in red. The subfamily Epipaschiinae is labeled in blue, and all branches within this clade are shown in the same color. The following sequences were used to infer the tree: Aglossa dimidiata MW542312 (Hu et al. 2021), Orthopygia glaucinalis MN461479 (Mao et al. 2019), Pyralis farinalis MN442120 (Mao et al. 2019), Hypsopygia regina KP327714 (Zhu et al. 2018), Endotricha consocia MF568544 (Zhu et al. 2018), Endotricha olivacealis MZ823344 (Liu et al. 2021b), Locastra muscosalis OR881395 (Wang et al. 2024), Orthaga euadrusalis MZ823349 (Liu et al. 2021b), Lista haraldusalis KF709449 (Ye et al. 2015), Ephestia elutella MG748858 (Liu et al. 2018), Ephestia kuehniella KF305832 (Traut et al. 2013), Plodia interpunctella KP729178 (Liu et al. 2016), Amyelois transitella KT692987 (Chang and Shen 2016), Euzophera pyriella KY825744 (Yang et al. 2017), Dioryctria rubella MZ823345 (Liu et al. 2021b), Dioryctria yiai MN658208 (Wu et al. 2020), Meroptera pravella MF073207 (Living Prairie Mitogenomics Consortium 2017), Dusungwua basinigra MZ902334 (Liu et al. 2021b), Achroia grisella OM203125 (Liu et al. 2022), Galleria mellonella KT750964 (Park et al. 2017), Cathayia obliquella MK550620 (Roh et al. 2020), Corcyra cephalonica HQ897685 (Wu et al. 2012), Paralipsa gularis MW135332 (Guo et al. 2021), Spodoptera frugiperda MN385596 (Seo et al. 2019) (outgroup), Spodoptera litura KF701043 (Li et al. 2015) (outgroup).

4. Discussion and conclusion

The mitogenome of O. aenescens contained 37 mitochondrial genes typical of insects, and its gene organization was identical to that of other reported Orthaga mitogenomes. The base composition revealed that T was the most prevalent base (39.1%), while G was the least common (7.9%), resulting in a highly biased A + T content of 80.7%. This A + T content was slightly higher than that of other reported Orthaga species, such as O. olivacea at 79.0% and O. euadrusalis at 80.2% (Yang et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2021b), and equal to that of O. achatina (Liu et al. 2021a).

All PCGs in the mitogenome started with typical ATN codons, with the exception of COX1, which used CGA as the start codon. The canonical termination codons (TAA or TAG) were observed in nine PCGs (TAA for ATP8, ATP6, COX3, CYTB, ND1, ND2, ND4L, and ND6, TAG for ND3), while the remaining PCGs terminated with a single T. The longest overlapping region, consisting of 7 bp, was located between ATP8 and ATP6, containing the motif ‘ATGATAA,’ which had been reported in several sequenced lepidopteran species (Pan et al. 2008; Zhu et al. 2013).

Phylogenetic analysis confirmed that O. aenescens belonged to the subfamily Epipaschiinae, showing the closest genetic relationship with O. euadrusalis and L. muscosalis in the present dataset. The newly characterized mitogenome provides a useful genetic resource for future molecular and taxonomic studies of Epipaschiinae.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Material.docx
TMDN_A_2722723_SM2698.docx (319.8KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank Chen Yang for the bioinformatics support. During the manuscript refinement period, we judiciously utilized DeepSeek-R1 to improve the language and readability. All authors participated in editing and finalizing the manuscript, and approved the final version for publication.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the General Program of the Henan Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 262300420118), and the Youth Science Fund Program of the Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. 20224BAB215007).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Data availability statement

The genome sequence data that support the findings of this study are openly available in GenBank of NCBI at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ under the accession number OR881393. The associated BioProject, BioSample, and Sequence Read Archive (SRA) numbers are PRJNA1045995, SAMN38468359, and SRR27050911, respectively.

References

  1. Bankevich A, et al. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 19(5):455–477. 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol. 17(4):540–552. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chang Z, Shen QQ.. 2016. The complete mitochondrial genome of the navel orangeworm Amyelois transitella (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 27(6):4561–4562. 10.3109/19401736.2015.1101564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen SF. 2023. Ultrafast one-pass FASTQ data preprocessing, quality control, and deduplication using fastp. Imeta. 2(2):e107. 10.1002/imt2.107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Donath A, et al. 2019. Improved annotation of protein-coding genes boundaries in metazoan mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 47(20):10543–10552. 10.1093/nar/gkz833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dong ZK, Wang YZ, Li C, Li LL, Men XY.. 2021. Mitochondrial DNA as a molecular marker in insect ecology: current status and future prospects. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 114(4):470–476. 10.1093/aesa/saab020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Grant JR, et al. 2023. Proksee: in-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 51(W1):W484–W492. 10.1093/nar/gkad326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Guo P, Yu H, Xu J, Li YH.. 2021. Next-generation sequencing yields the complete mitogenome of the stored nut moth, Paralipsa gularis Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 6(9):2626–2627. 10.1080/23802359.2021.1915204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hu ZW, et al. 2021. The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Aglossa dimidiata (Haworth, 1809) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 6(10):2967–2968. 10.1080/23802359.2021.1974965 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Letunic I, Bork P.. 2021. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 49(W1):W293–W296. 10.1093/nar/gkab301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Li FB, et al. 2015. Complete mitochondrial genome of the common cutworm Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Mitochondrial DNA. 26(6):838–839. 10.3109/19401736.2013.855918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu B, Sun H, Zhan QB, Gai YP.. 2021a. The complete mitochondrial genome of Orthaga achatina (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 6(3):821–823. 10.1080/23802359.2021.1884016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu QN, Chai XY, Bian DD, Zhou CL, Tang BP.. 2016. The complete mitochondrial genome of Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and comparison with other Pyraloidea insects. Genome. 59(1):37–49. 10.1139/gen-2015-0079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Liu QY, Jiang XH, Hou XH, Yang H, Chen WL.. 2018. The mitochondrial genome of Ephestia elutella (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 3(1):189–190. 10.1080/23802359.2018.1436993 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu XM, et al. 2021b. Nine mitochondrial genomes of the Pyraloidea and their phylogenetic implications (Lepidoptera). Insects. 12(11):1039. 10.3390/insects12111039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu YY, Li GY, Long JK.. 2022. The complete mitochondrial genome of small wax moth, Achroia grisella (Pyralidae: Galleriinae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 7(5):738–740. 10.1080/23802359.2022.2068984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Living Prairie Mitogenomics Consortium . 2017. The complete mitochondrial genome of the lesser aspen webworm moth Meroptera pravella (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2(1):344–346. 10.1080/23802359.2017.1334525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mao X, Li HX, Yang MF.. 2019. The complete mitochondrial genome sequences of two insect-tea producers in Pyralidae (Lepidoptera) from South China: Pyralis farinalis and Orthopygia glaucinalis. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 4(2):3850–3851. 10.1080/23802359.2019.1687030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Minh BQ, et al. 2020. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol. 37(5):1530–1534. 10.1093/molbev/msaa015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mutanen M, Wahlberg N, Kaila L.. 2010. Comprehensive gene and taxon coverage elucidates radiation patterns in moths and butterflies. Proc R Soc B. 277(1695):2839–2848. 10.1098/rspb.2010.0392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pan MH, et al. 2008. Characterization of mitochondrial genome of Chinese wild mulberry silkworm, Bomyx mandarina (Lepidoptera: bombycidae). Sci China C Life Sci. 51(8):693–701. 10.1007/s11427-008-0097-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Park YJ, et al. 2017. The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the greater wax moth Galleria mellonella (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Pyralidae): sequence and phylogenetic analysis comparison based on whole mitogenome. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2(2):714–715. 10.1080/23802359.2017.1390418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Perna NT, Kocher TD.. 1995. Patterns of nucleotide composition at fourfold degenerate sites of animal mitochondrial genomes. J Mol Evol. 41(3):353–358. 10.1007/BF01215182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Roh SJ, Jeon JH, Kim DS, Byun BK.. 2020. The complete mitochondrial genome of unique snout moth, Cathayia obliquella (Pyralidae: Galleriinae) with its phylogenetic implications and a redescription of external morphology. J Asia-Pac Biodivers. 13(4):613–624. 10.1016/j.japb.2020.09.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Seo BY, et al. 2019. The complete mitochondrial genome of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda Smith, 1797 (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae), firstly collected in Korea. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 4(2):3918–3920. 10.1080/23802359.2019.1688119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Traut W, Vogel H, Glöckner G, Hartmann E, Heckel DG.. 2013. High-throughput sequencing of a single chromosome: a moth W chromosome. Chromosome Res. 21(5):491–505. 10.1007/s10577-013-9376-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang LY, Liu JL, Liu HS, Wang Y, Rong H.. 2024. The complete mitochondrial genome analysis of Locastra muscosalis (Walker, 1866) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and phylogenetic implications. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 9(8):995–999. 10.1080/23802359.2024.2387259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wu YP, et al. 2012. The complete mitochondrial genome of the rice moth, Corcyra cephalonica. J Insect Sci. 12(72):72–14. 10.1673/031.012.7201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wu YP, Lu JJ, Yang J, Fan RJ.. 2020. Complete mitochondrial genome of Dioryctria yiai (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 5(1):1062–1064. 10.1080/23802359.2020.1721352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yang LD, Wang RH, Zhang YY, Wang Y, Rong H.. 2023. The complete mitochondrial genome and phylogenetic analysis of Polythlipta liquidalis Leech, 1889 (Crambidae: Spilomelinae). Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 8(10):1063–1066. 10.1080/23802359.2023.2264548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yang LL, et al. 2020. Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Orthaga olivacea Warre (Lepidoptera Pyralidae) and comparison with other Lepidopteran insects. PLoS One. 15(3):e0227831. 10.1371/journal.pone.0227831 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yang ML, et al. 2017. The complete mitochondrial genome of the pear pyralid moth, Euzophera pyriella Yang. Mitochondrial DNA B Resour. 2(1):275–276. 10.1080/23802359.2017.1325338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ye F, Yu HL, Li PF, You P.. 2015. The complete mitochondrial genome of Lista haraldusalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Mitochondrial DNA. 26(6):853–854. 10.3109/19401736.2013.861427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang D, et al. 2020. PhyloSuite: an integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Mol Ecol Resour. 20(1):348–355. 10.1111/1755-0998.13096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhu BJ, et al. 2013. Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Diaphania pyloalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralididae). Gene. 527(1):283–291. 10.1016/j.gene.2013.06.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhu WB, Yan J, Song JR, You P.. 2018. The first mitochondrial genomes for Pyralinae (Pyralidae) and Glaphyriinae (Crambidae), with phylogenetic implications of Pyraloidea. PLoS One. 13(3):e0194672. 10.1371/journal.pone.0194672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material.docx
TMDN_A_2722723_SM2698.docx (319.8KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequence data that support the findings of this study are openly available in GenBank of NCBI at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ under the accession number OR881393. The associated BioProject, BioSample, and Sequence Read Archive (SRA) numbers are PRJNA1045995, SAMN38468359, and SRR27050911, respectively.


Articles from Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES