Abstract
The egg production cycle of broiler breeder hens is comparatively shorter than that of laying hens, and as they age, their egg productivity and eggshell quality decline. Eggshell formation occurs in the shell gland, which is influenced by several factors, including aging. The objectives of this study were to 1) determine the age-associated changes in eggshell quality and mineral compositions, and 2) identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and biological pathways in the shell glands (young vs aged). The shell gland tissues were collected from broiler breeder hens at peak-lay (35 weeks of age; termed as “young”) and late-lay phases (50 weeks of age; termed as “aged”) at 10–15 h post-ovulation (uncalcified egg present in the shell glands). To delineate the genes and biological pathways associated with eggshell biomineralization, total RNAs extracted from the shell glands of young and aged hens (n = 6/group) were analyzed using RNA sequencing and validated using quantitative PCR. The ultrastructure quality of eggshells (n = 10 eggs/group) was analyzed using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), and the elemental composition of eggshells was measured using SEM-Energy Dispersive Spectrometry. The strength, thickness, and palisade layer of the eggshells were significantly greater in younger hens, while the mammillary knobs were wider in older hens. Additionally, the levels of sulfur and potassium in the eggshells were higher in the younger hens compared to the older ones. Although the young hens exhibited a higher concentration of calcium in their eggshells, the difference was not statistically significant. RNA-Seq data identified highly up-regulated genes in young hens specific to eggshell biomineralization, such as SPP1 (binds to hydroxyapatite), OTOP2 (maintains high concentration of cytosolic Ca2+), PKD2 (helps in releasing Ca2+), SLC22A15 (transports organic ions), and STAB2 (binds to gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria), which are downregulated in aged hens. The DEGs showed significant enrichment for biological pathways associated with the transport of monoatomic and inorganic cations across the cell membrane (SLC6A6, KCNK7, UCP3, SCNN1A, PKD2, OTOP2), molecular functions related to the transport of potassium ions and the activity of monoatomic cation channels (KCNK7, PKD2, OTOP2), and the cellular components involved in the luminal side of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane (CALR, PKD2). These findings suggest that aging downregulates the shell gland transcriptomes involved in eggshell biomineralization, reducing ion transport required for eggshell formation and resulting in poor eggshell quality.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12864-026-12801-z.
Keywords: Biomineralization, Broiler breeders, Eggshells, Genes, Ultrastructure
Introduction
The increasing global population is driving up the demand for animal-sourced proteins. By 2050, poultry meat is projected to experience the highest demand [1]. Broiler breeder hens play a crucial role in supplying fertile eggs for day-old broiler chicks. Selective breeding has enhanced both the growth rates and hyperphagic tendencies of broiler chickens, and breeder hens similarly exhibit overeating, which can result in increased fat deposition and endocrine dysfunctions in an ad libitum feeding system [2]. Breeder hens often develop multiple ovarian follicles per day, leading to double ovulation and a rapid decline in ovarian reserves [2]. The production cycle of broiler breeder hens is relatively shorter than that of commercial egg layers, with egg-laying commencing around 25 weeks of age, peak production occurring between 30 and 35 weeks, and a decline starting after 50 to 55 weeks [3, 4]. The number of day-old chicks produced is the primary indicator of broiler breeders’ reproductive efficiency. As reported by the USDA (2024), approximately 12 billion eggs are incubated each year. A modest 1% decrease in hatchability can result in the loss of approximately 120 million day-old chicks, leading to substantial economic repercussions. This ongoing trend of declining hatchability may further exacerbate these economic losses [5]. Hatchability rates were 85% in January 2012, 81.75% in January 2018, and dropped to a low of 79.7% in January 2024 [6, 7]. This declining trend highlights the urgent need to address hatchability issues, which are significantly affected by egg quality and the age of broiler breeder hens [8, 9].
Egg quality is assessed through external factors, such as the eggshell, and internal factors, such as the albumen and yolk. Eggshell quality is crucial for structural strength, providing nutrients for embryo development and hatchability. Their complex structure controls water loss and gas exchange, which enhances hatchability. Furthermore, eggshells act as a mineral reservoir for the developing embryo [10]; therefore, their appropriate composition could be instrumental in hatchability. Thinner eggshells heat up faster than thicker ones, leading to uneven hatching times. Weaker-shelled eggs need careful handling, transport, and storage to reach the incubator safely [7–9].
The egg formation in hens starts in the ovary (yolk), and as it descends through the oviduct, it receives the rest of the egg components. The segments of the oviduct, the infundibulum (receives the ova), magnum (synthesizes and secretes albumin), isthmus (secretes eggshell membrane), shell gland (deposits eggshell), and vagina (that holds the egg before oviposition), make a complete egg at the end of 24–26 h [11]. Eggshell biomineralization in the shell gland combines minerals with organic matter, molding them into mineral-rich eggshells. A study focused on layer hens has revealed that minerals are actively transported to the shell gland through circulation. This process is facilitated by specific genes, including OTOP2, CALCB, STC, and ATP2C2, as well as various pathways [12]. The minerals are primarily transported in ionic form through the apical membrane of uterine cells into the uterine fluid. After the formation of amorphous calcium carbonate in the extracellular intrauterine milieu, their transport to the point of eggshell deposition has been theorized to occur via vesicles [13]. Calcium is transported from the intestine and bones into the blood, then to the uterine tissues, which are also regulated by various hormones [14–16]. The mechanisms of eggshell biomineralization in the uterus of broiler breeder hens are not well understood. Additionally, the age-related variations in uterine gene expression and their effects on eggshell quality and ultrastructure remain unclear. We hypothesized that analyzing the uterine transcriptome and the ultrastructure of eggshells from young and older hens would provide insights into the genetic and structural factors that influence egg quality, which could help identify breeder hens that produce higher-quality eggs.
Methodology
Experimental design and tissue collection
All animal experimentations were carried out in accordance with the guidelines approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Hawaii. Sixty Cobb-500 broiler breeder hens were raised in a broiler breeder facility following the guidelines set out by the Cobb rearing system. Hens were selected from two different age groups. The breeders at their peak production (30–35 weeks) were designated as the “Young” (n = 30) group, while those in a declining phase (50–55 weeks) were considered as the “Aged” (n = 30) group. Hens were euthanized by cervical dislocation using the Koechner Euthanizing Device (KED) [17, 18]. Sixty uterine samples were collected for analysis. Out of these, 18 young breeder hens and 12 aged breeder hens were estimated to have eggs under biomineralization in their uteri based on the presence of a calcifying egg (10–15 h post-ovulation) [12]. Six samples from each group were randomly selected for RNA sequencing. The collected samples were immediately submerged in an RNA-later solution (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for safe transport and handling, and remained submerged at room temperature for three days. After discarding the RNA later solution, the samples were stored at −80 °C until analysis. Twelve fresh eggs were collected from each group to evaluate eggshell quality, ultramicroscopic properties, and biomineralization.
Measurement of eggshell strength
Shell-egg samples were collected as freshly laid and then stored at 4 °C for 48 h before assessing the shell strength. The assessment involved a static compression test using a texture analyzer (TA-XTplus; Texture Technologies, Hamilton, MA). The instrument was equipped with a 7.6 mm-diameter aluminum compression disc (TA-30, Texture Technologies) and a 5 kg load cell. The egg was placed on its side in an egg holder to measure compression strength, and a test speed of 2 mm/s and a trigger force of 0.001 kg were applied to break the eggshell [19]. Egg weight and eggshell weight were measured to evaluate their gross changes.
Evaluation of ultrastructure visualization and minerals measurement
The equator part of the eggshells was broken into smaller square pieces measuring 0.5 × 0.5 mm. Each piece, with a straight edge, was boiled in a 2% sodium hydroxide solution for 10 min. After boiling, the pieces were dried at room temperature on a desiccant for 24 h. The dried pieces were then mounted vertically on aluminum stubs using carbon paint. Finally, a gold–palladium sputter coater was used to coat the mounted eggshells. An angled stub holder was used to visualize the inner (mammillary) and outer (cuticular) layers in cross-section. A Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) scale was used to measure the thickness of the eggshell and underlying layers.
An Energy-Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) system mounted on an SEM was used to estimate mineral concentrations across different layers of the eggshells. Three different regions in the eggshell thickness were used to determine mineral concentration. The method followed for eggshell preparation and visualization was developed by Mahato et al. (2024).
RNA isolation and quality assessment for RNA-Sequencing
Total RNA was isolated from the frozen tissues (100 mg) using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The isolated RNA concentration and integrity were measured using NanoDrop One Microvolume UV–Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and Agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5%). An Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Massy, France) was used to determine RNA quality. Samples with RIN > 7 (RNA integrity number) were chosen for RNA sequencing and quantitative real-time PCR.
Library preparation
RNA samples were processed and sequenced at the University of Hawaii Cancer Center Genomics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource. The library preparation process follows a similar method used by Sah et al. (2018), where mRNA NGS libraries were prepared with NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs), cDNA was adenylated at its 3’ ends, followed by ligation of indexing adapters specific for each sample. The DNA fragments were enriched using 12 PCR cycles. Libraries were pooled and denatured in freshly prepared 0.2N NaOH, then diluted with HT1 buffer to a final concentration of 1.8 pM. As a sequencing control, the library pool was spiked with 1% (v/v) of 1.8 pM denatured PhiX library and loaded onto the reagent cartridge. The sequencing run was performed on NextSeq 500 (Illumina) in paired-end mode with a read length of 76 bp. FASTQ files generated via Illumina BaseSpace were used for downstream analysis.
RNA-sequencing data analysis
Quality control of paired-end RNA-seq raw reads was performed using FastQC in a Linux environment to assess sequence quality, base composition, and adapter contamination. Adapter sequences and low-quality based (Phred score < 30) were trimmed using Trimmomatic [20], and reads with low average quality (Phred score < 30) or short length (< 20) after trimming were discarded. The resulting high-quality clean reads were aligned to the Gallus gallus reference genome (assembly bGalGal.mat.broiler.GRCg7b) using the splice-aware aligner HISAT2 [21]. Gene-level read counts were generated using HTseq-count [22] with the corresponding genome annotation file. Differential expression analysis comparing young and aged broiler breeder hens was conducted using DESeq2 [23] in RStudio. Genes with |log2FoldChange|> 1 and padj ≤ 0.05 were considered differentially expressed Genes (DEGs). Further, filtering was performed on the raw data using a threshold of ≥ 20 read counts to define individual and group expression. Genes expressed exclusively in either the Young or Aged groups were classified as differentially expressed, while genes with ≥ 20 read counts in both groups were considered commonly expressed. The number of uniquely expressed genes may vary depending on the threshold used.
Gene Ontology and pathway analysis
DEGs were then used for Gene Ontology (GO) and pathway analysis in open data sources in DAVID [24] and Enrichr [25] where the Gallus gallus gene set served as the background. DEGs were uploaded in Enrichr to annotate three GO aspects: biological processes (BP), cellular components (CC), and molecular functions (MF). A - P-value <0.05 and a gene count > 2 were used as criteria. The networks were generated using IPA (QIAGEN Inc., https://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com/products/ingenuity-pathway-analysis).
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qPCR)
The most significantly up-regulated and down-regulated genes predicted to be involved in eggshell biomineralization were selected for qPCR validation. Gene-specific primers were designed using NCBI's primer blast tool (primer sequences are shown in Supplementary Table 1).
The first strand cDNA was synthesized by reverse transcription of 1 μg total RNA (20 μL reaction of RT mixture) using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). cDNAs were further diluted with nuclease-free water (1:10), and 3μL per qPCR reaction was used. Gene expression was analyzed using PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) on a QuantStudio 3 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Each 10 μL of PCR reaction mixture consists of 5 μL of PowerUp SYBR Green Mastermix, 1 μL of each forward and reverse primers, and 3 μL of cDNA. PCR reactions were carried out following the standard cycling mode. A melting curve was also generated to confirm the sequence-specific PCR product. Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), beta-actin (B-actin), and TATA-Box Binding Protein (TBP) were evaluated as candidate reference genes; based on their stability, TBP was used as the reference gene. All candidate genes were analyzed in duplicate, and expression levels were determined using normalized cycle threshold (Ct) values. The relative fold change for each gene was calculated using a 2-ΔΔCt method and presented as the mean ± standard error.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using R-studio. Data normality was tested using a Shapiro–Wilk test, and a log transformation was used to transform the data. A Student's t-test or a Welch two-sample t-test was performed, depending on the variability of the two groups (young and aged) being compared, as determined by the Levene test. Alternatively, a non-parametric, one-sided Mann–Whitney U test was performed. Eggshell elemental concentrations were compared across eggshell thickness regions (UP, LP, and M) (three groups) using One-way ANOVA; alternatively, the Kruskal–Wallis Test was used for non-normally distributed data.
Results
Eggshell quality
The eggshell characteristics indicate the external quality of the egg. This study conducted a thorough analysis and comparison of eggshell parameters between the young and aged groups. Young birds produced lighter eggs (P < 0.001) (Fig. 1A), while the eggshell weight remained constant at both time points (Fig. 1B). The eggshell strength significantly decreased (P < 0.001) in the older group (Fig. 1C), indicating a 30% loss in strength (5014g vs 3479 g). The evaluation of eggshells using a scanning electron microscope revealed that the inner mammillary layer and the outer effective thickness (comprising the cuticle and palisade) constituted the overall thickness of the eggshell (Fig. 2A). Overall thickness and palisade thickness were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the aged (3.6% & 3.9%) (Figs. 2B and C). Age doesn’t affect mammillary thickness (P > 0.05), while the mammillary width was considerably higher (12%) (P = 0.02) in the aged breeder group. The knobs at the innermost layer of the eggshells were divided into two categories: normal knobs (Type-A) and B-type knobs. Knobs that are conical in shape, with rough surfaces and extend to the palisade are type-A, while those spherical-shaped, with smooth surfaces, and without extension to the palisade are B-type knobs. The representative mammillary knob count is presented in Figs. 3A and C. The normal type (Fig. 3B) and B-type knob (Fig. 3D) numbers (knob count/0.5mm2) were not affected by the age groups (P > 0.05).
Fig. 1.

Comparison of eggshell quality between young and aged. A egg weight, B Shell weight, and C shell strength. The X-axis represents experimental groups, and the Y-axis represents weight in grams; the error bar represents standard error (* indicates a significant value at the level of 0.05)
Fig. 2.

Comparison of eggshell ultrastructure between young and aged. A Ultramicroscopic structure of an eggshell thickness showing various regions, B Overall thickness, C Palisade thickness, D Mammillary thickness, and E Mammillary width. X-axis showing experimental groups, and Y-axis represents thickness measured in µm; the error bar represents standard error (* indicates significant value at the level of 0.05)
Fig. 3.

Ultramicroscopic view of innermost eggshell layer and knob counts; A Normal knob counting (type-A) (purple circles); B bar graphs showing normal-type knob count young vs aged; C B-type knob counting (purple circles); D bar graph showing B-type knob count young vs aged. The X-axis represents experimental groups, while the Y-axis represents knob count numbers (Knob number/0.5mm2); the error bar represents standard error
Eggshell elemental analysis
The eggshell elements were classified into three categories, namely, macro-minerals (Na, Mg, P, S, K, and Ca), micro-minerals (Mn, Fe, Cu, and Zn), and non-mineral elementals (Al, Si, V, and Ni). Among these, the average eggshell calcium composition was the highest (> 95% w/w), and V (Vanadium) was the lowest in concentration (< 0.05% w/w). In the comparison between young and aged groups, only Sulfur and potassium were significantly higher in young breeder hens (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.

Eggshell composition of macro, micro, and non-mineral elements. The X-axis represents various eggshell elements divided into three groups, and the Y-axis represents the percentage (weight/weight). The superscripts a and b indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05 and are used for multiple comparisons; the error bar represents the standard error
The concentration of elements was compared among different regions (Upper Palisade (UP), Lower Palisade (LP), and Mammillary layer (M)) of the eggshell thickness (Table 1), showing that the calcium was significantly higher in the lower palisade. Phosphorus levels were highest in the upper palisade region for both young and aged hens, indicating a consistent deposition pattern. In contrast, potassium levels were higher in both the upper and lower palisade regions for young hens, while in aged hens, elevated potassium concentrations were observed only in the upper palisade. This suggests that the deposition patterns of potassium differ between young and aged hens. Magnesium concentrations varied between the young and aged groups in different eggshell layer level. In the aged group, the higher concentration was found in the M region, followed by the UP and LP regions. In contrast, the young group had a lower concentration in the LP region of the eggshells. Elemental concentrations of micro- and non-mineral components are shown in Tables 2 and 3, and their concentrations were low compared to macro minerals.
Table 1.
Macro mineral concentration (Na- Sodium, Mg- Magnesium, P- Phosphorus, S- Sulfur, K- Potassium, Ca- Calcium) of eggshell compared between three regions (UP-Upper palisade, LP-Lower palisade, and M- Mammillary region). One-way ANOVA was used to identify significant differences (* indicates p < 0.05). The superscript a, b, and c indicate a significant difference through column in each group (young and aged) and are used for multiple testing
| Group | Na | Mg | P | S | K | Ca | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young | UP | 1.39 ± 0.21 | 1.40 ± 0.10a | 0.330 ± 0.032a | 0.041 ± 0.015 | 0.124 ± 0.008a | 95.03 ± 0.37b |
| LP | 0.93 ± 0.24 | 0.71 ± 0.04b | 0.103 ± 0.021b | 0.044 ± 0.015 | 0.095 ± 0.015a | 96.61 ± 0.39a | |
| M | 1.07 ± 0.15 | 1.40 ± 0.18a | 0.053 ± 0.021b | 0.041 ± 0.013 | 0.044 ± 0.015b | 95.37 ± 0.47b | |
| Avg | 1.13 ± 0.12 | 1.17 ± 0.09 | 0.162 ± 0.029 | 0.042 ± 0.008 | 0.088 ± 0.01 | 95.67 ± 0.27 | |
| UP/LP/M | P value | 0.11 | 0.0005* | 0.0003* | 0.9 | 0.001* | 0.03* |
| Aged | UP | 1.27 ± 0.19a | 1.43 ± 0.12b | 0.28 ± 0.05a | 0.043 ± 0.01 | 0.129 ± 0.009a | 95.16 ± 0.49b |
| LP | 0.73 ± 0.15b | 0.78 ± 0.07c | 0.09 ± 0.01b | 0.035 ± 0.012 | 0.066 ± 0.014b | 96.82 ± 0.43a | |
| M | 1.07 ± 0.17ab | 1.95 ± 0.21a | 0.16 ± 0.1b | 0.026 ± 0.009 | 0.041 ± 0.016b | 94.55 ± 0.69b | |
| Avg | 1.02 ± 0.11 | 1.380.13 | 0.18 ± 0.04 | 0.035 ± 0.006 | 0.079 ± 0.011 | 95.51 ± 0.36 | |
| UP/LP/M | P value | 0.04* | 0.00007* | 0.02* | 0.55 | 0.0005* | 0.021* |
Table 2.
Micro mineral concentration (Mn- Manganese, Fe- iron, Cu- Copper, and Zn- Zinc) of eggshell was compared between three regions (UP-Upper palisade, LP-Lower palisade, and M- Mammillary region) One way ANOVA was used to identify the significant variation
| Group | Mn | Fe | Cu | Zn | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young | UP | 0.015 ± 0.01 | 0.030 ± 0.014 | 0.026 ± 0.013 | 0.021 ± 0.007 |
| LP | 0.028 ± 0.015 | 0.038 ± 0.012 | 0.006 ± 0.006 | 0.021 ± 0.006 | |
| M | 0.034 ± 0.013 | 0.014 ± 0.007 | 0.044 ± 0.019 | 0.019 ± 0.010 | |
| Avg | 0.026 ± 0.007 | 0.027 ± 0.007 | 0.025 ± 0.008 | 0.020 ± 0.004 | |
| UP/LP/M | p value | 0.52 | 0.31 | 0.185 | 0.71 |
| Aged | UP | 0.039 ± 0.015 | 0.038 ± 0.019 | 0.02 ± 0.014 | 0.015 ± 0.01 |
| LP | 0.019 ± 0.009 | 0.016 ± 0.006 | 0.028 ± 0.01 | 0.028 ± 0.011 | |
| M | 0.021 ± 0.012 | 0.029 ± 0.009 | 0.014 ± 0.011 | 0.038 ± 0.016 | |
| Avg | 0.026 ± 0.007 | 0.028 ± 0.007 | 0.020 ± 0.007 | 0.027 ± 0.007 | |
| UP/LP/M | p value | 0.66 | 0.56 | 0.204 | 0.38 |
Table 3.
Micro mineral concentration (Al- Aluminum, Si- Silicon, V- Vanadium, and Ni- Nickel) of eggshell was compared between three regions (UP-Upper palisade, LP-Lower palisade, and M- Mammillary region) One way ANOVA was used to identify the significant variation
| Group | Al | Si | V | Ni | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Young | UP | 0.87 ± 0.1 | 0.59 ± 0.22 | 0.030 ± 0.013 | 0.091 ± 0.020 |
| LP | 0.83 ± 0.11 | 0.52 ± 0.26 | 0.010 ± 0.007 | 0.048 ± 0.020 | |
| M | 1.17 ± 0.27 | 0.66 ± 0.28 | 0.024 ± 0.011 | 0.058 ± 0.023 | |
| Avg | 0.96 ± 0.1 | 0.59 ± 0.14 | 0.021 ± 0.006 | 0.066 ± 0.012 | |
| UP/LP/M | P value | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.634 | 0.185 |
| Aged | UP | 0.77 ± 0.09 | 0.7 ± 0.26 | 0.016 ± 0.008 | 0.093 ± 0.027 |
| LP | 0.75 ± 0.09 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 0.009 ± 0.005 | 0.039 ± 0.023 | |
| M | 0.97 ± 0.26 | 1.05 ± 0.42 | 0.005 ± 0.005 | 0.081 ± 0.022 | |
| Avg | 0.83 ± 0.1 | 0.78 ± 0.19 | 0.010 ± 0.004 | 0.071 ± 0.014 | |
| UP/LP/M | P value | 0.59 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.21 |
DEGs in young broiler breeder uterine tissue
RNA-seq data were analyzed to find the transcriptomic variation among young (35 weeks) broiler breeder hens when they are in peak production and aged (50 weeks) when they are in declining production. Raw FASTQ reads were filtered using FastQC, and an Ensemble alignment for avian genome assembly was used to annotate, resulting in the annotation of 29,558 gene transcripts. From the DESeq2 analysis of young versus aged samples, 75 up-regulated and 43 down-regulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, as illustrated in a volcano plot (Fig. 5A). The top differentially expressed genes of the individual samples are shown in the Heat Map (Fig. 5B). The number of uniquely expressed genes in young and aged hens is shown in the supplementary file, represented by a Venn diagram in sheet 4.
Fig. 5.

A Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) Young vs Aged (Selection based on Padj < 0.05 and log2FoldChange> |1|) and Volcano plot showing up-regulated (red), down-regulated (blue), and insignificant genes (black) B Heatmap of the top highly up-regulated and down-regulated genes expressed in individual samples
The most up-regulated and the most down-regulated genes that are predicted to be involved in eggshell biomineralization are listed in Tables 4 and 5, respectively. Among them, TM4SF19 is the most highly up-regulated gene in young broiler hens, followed by KAT2B, SPP1, SEPTIN3, NDUFAF5, ARVCF, SMIM45, NPTN, OTOP2, PKD, DMRTB1, USH1G, MLLT1, SLC22A15, etc. Similarly, XIRP1 is the most highly down-regulated gene followed by NXNL2, ETNK2, PLA2G15, NELFA, HS3ST3B1, TAPBPL, CLP1, SCNN1A, CLNS1A, GFRA1, SLC43A2, HPRT1, MMS22L, CDC5L, LAMB4, CNTRL, USHBp1, RPL9.
Table 4.
The top 30 most upregulated genes in the uterus of young broiler breeders in comparison to aged hens. The p adj < 0.05 and log2fold change >|1| were considered significant
| Gene Name | Description | log2FC |
|---|---|---|
| TM4SF19 | Transmembrane 4 L six family member 19 | 7.22 |
| KAT2B | Lysine acetyltransferase 2B | 5.23 |
| SPP1 | Secreted phosphoprotein 1 | 4.96 |
| SEPTIN3 | Septin 3 | 4.44 |
| NDUFAF5 | NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase complex assembly factor 5 | 4.09 |
| ARVCF | Armadillo repeat deleted in velocardiofacial syndrome | 3.92 |
| SMIM45 | Small integral membrane protein 45 | 3.73 |
| NPTN | Neuroplastin | 3.44 |
| OTOP2 | Otopetrin 2 | 3.32 |
| PKD2 | Polycystin 2, transient receptor potential cation channel | 3.31 |
| DMRTB1 | DMRT like family B with proline rich C-terminal 1 | 3.12 |
| USH1G | USH1 protein network component sans | 3.06 |
| MLLT1 | MLLT1 super elongation complex subunit | 3.04 |
| SLC22A15 | Solute carrier family 22 member 15 | 3.03 |
| DCBLD2 | Discoidin, CUB and LCCL domain containing 2 | 3.02 |
| TFCP2L1 | Transcription factor CP2 like 1 | 2.97 |
| ELOVL | ELOVL fatty acid elongase 5 | 2.82 |
| CLIP1 | CAP-Gly domain containing linker protein 1 | 2.79 |
| DERA | Deoxyribose-phosphate aldolase | 2.68 |
| ST3GAL3 | ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 3 | 2.66 |
| CMKLR1 | Chemerin chemokine-like receptor 1 | 2.57 |
| STAB2 | Stabilin 2 | 2.53 |
| LTN1 | Listerin E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 1 | 2.46 |
| SLA | Src like adaptor | 2.41 |
| VGLL2 | Vestigial like family member 2 | 2.39 |
| ELL | Elongation factor for RNA polymerase II | 2.39 |
| KANK4 | KN motif and ankyrin repeat domains 4 | 2.24 |
| TSKU | Tsukushi, small leucine rich proteoglycan | 2.22 |
| PDHA2 | Pyruvate dehydrogenase (lipoamide) alpha 2 | 2.18 |
| ALDH1L2 | Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 family member L2 | 2.12 |
Table 5.
The top 30 most down-regulated genes in the uterus of young broiler breeder hens in comparison to aged hens. The p adj < 0.05 and log2fold change >|1| were considered significant
| Gene Name | Gene description | log2FC |
|---|---|---|
| XIRP1 | Xin actin binding repeat containing 1 | −4.21 |
| NXNL2 | Nucleoredoxin like 2 | −3.48 |
| ETNK2 | Ethanolamine kinase 2 | −3.47 |
| PLA2G15 | Phospholipase A2 group XV | −3.09 |
| NELFA | Negative elongation factor complex member A | −2.62 |
| HS3ST3B1 | Heparan sulfate-glucosamine 3-sulfotransferase 3A1 | −2.49 |
| TAPBPL | TAP binding protein like | −2.32 |
| CLP1 | Cleavage and polyadenylation factor I subunit 1 | −2.14 |
| SCNN1A | Sodium channel epithelial 1 alpha subunit | −2.12 |
| CLNS1A | Chloride nucleotide-sensitive channel 1A | −2.08 |
| GFRA1 | GDNF family receptor alpha 1 | −2.03 |
| SLC43A2 | Solute carrier family 43 member 2 | −2.03 |
| HPRT1 | Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1 | −2.03 |
| MMS22L | MMS22 like, DNA repair protein | −2.00 |
| CDC5L | Cell division cycle 5 like | −1.98 |
| LAMB4 | Laminin subunit beta 4 | −1.91 |
| CNTRL | Centriolin | −1.82 |
| KCNK7 | Potassium two pore domain channel subfamily K member 1 | −1.80 |
| USHBP1 | USH1 protein network component harmonin binding protein 1 | −1.79 |
| RPL9 | Ribosomal protein L9 | −1.79 |
| RAB11A | RAB11A, member RAS onco family | −1.63 |
| TSSC4 | Tumor suppressing subtransferable candidate 4 | −1.62 |
| HNF1A | HNF1 homeobox A | −1.61 |
| MGME1 | Mitochondrial genome maintenance exonuclease 1 | −1.55 |
| PSMD10 | Proteasome 26S subunit, non-ATPase 10 | −1.55 |
| TMEM62 | Transmembrane protein 62 | −1.55 |
| DALRD3 | DALR anticodon binding domain containing 3 | −1.52 |
| MMP11 | Matrix metallopeptidase 11 | −1.41 |
| NCEH1 | Neutral cholesterol ester hydrolase 1 | −1.41 |
| TIE1 | Tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin like and EGF like domains 1 | −1.41 |
Functional annotation and pathways enrichment analysis of DEGs
The GO terms Monoatomic cation transmembrane transport, Inorganic cation transmembrane transport, Organic cation transport, Sodium ion transport, and Carboxylic acid transport are enriched as BP, which are related to genes SLC6A6, KCNK7, UCP3, SCNN1A, PKD, OTOP2, and SLC43A2 (Table 6). Similarly, Cellular Component terms involve the luminal side of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane and the cation channel complex and are governed by genes CALR, PKD2, and SCNN1A. The genes SLC6A6, SLC43A2, SLC19A2, KCNK7, PKD2, SCNN1A, OTOP2, and UCP3 are closely associated with MF GO terms carboxylic acid transmembrane transporter activity, Potassium ion transmembrane transporter activity, Sodium channel activity, monoatomic cation channel activity, and proton transmembrane transporter activity (Table 6). IPA top canonical pathways show that the BEX2 Signaling Pathway (HNF1A, LEF1, SPP1) is the most enriched pathway with equal chances of activation and inhibition. The HOTAIR regulatory Pathway (HNF1A, LEF1, SPP1, STK38) is the second most enriched pathway and is predicted to be activated. These pathways are followed by Guanine and Guanosine Salvage I (HPRT1) and the role of OCT4 in Mammalian Embryonic Stem Cell Pluripotency (MEF2A, SPP1) (Table 7) with an equal chance of activation or inhibition.
Table 6.
Gene Ontology enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes in the uterus of young and aged broiler breeder hens. 118 differentially expressed genes were subjected to Enrichr database for Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis. All GO terms with a modified Fisher Exact P-value < 0.05 and the threshold gene count of 2, and the odd ratio > 2 were considered enriched
| Gene Ontological term: Biological Processes | Genes involved | Odd ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Monoatomic Cation Transmembrane Transport (GO:0098655) | SLC6A6; KCNK7; UCP3; SCNN1A; PKD2; OTOP2 | 3.9 |
| Inorganic Cation Transmembrane Transport (GO:0098662) | SLC6A6; KCNK7; UCP3; SCNN1A; PKD2; OTOP2 | 3.8 |
| Sodium Ion Transmembrane Transport (GO:0035725) | SLC6A6; SCNN1A; PKD2 | 6.6 |
| Organic Cation Transport (GO:0015695) | SLC22A18; SLC19A2 | 11.9 |
| Sodium Ion Transport (GO:0006814) | SLC6A6; SCNN1A; PKD2 | 6.1 |
| Gene Ontological term: Cellular Components | Gene involved | Odd ratio |
| Lumenal Side Of Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane (GO:0098553) | CALR; PKD2 | 13.8 |
| Cation Channel Complex (GO:0034703) | SCNN1A; PKD2 | 6.8 |
| Gene Ontological term: Molecular Function | Gene involved | Odd ratio |
| Carboxylic Acid Transmembrane Transporter Activity (G:0046943) | SLC6A6; SLC43A2; SLC19A2 | 9.3 |
| Potassium Ion Transmembrane Transporter Activity (GO:0015079) | KCNK7; PKD2 | 11.9 |
| Sodium Channel Activity (GO:0005272) | SCNN1A; PKD2 | 9.9 |
| Monoatomic Cation Channel Activity (GO:0005261) | KCNK7; PKD2; OTOP2 | 5.1 |
| Proton Transmembrane Transporter Activity (GO:0015078) | UCP3; OTOP2 | 8.0 |
Table 7.
Significant canonical pathways involved in the eggshell formation in the broiler breeder hen uterus. All differentially expressed genes were used in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis, and significant canonical pathways based on IPA scores were identified
| Ingenuity Canonical Pathways | Molecules | -log10(p-value) | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| BEX2 Signaling Pathway | HNF1A,LEF1,SPP1 | 2.15 | 3.66E-02 |
| HOTAIR Regulatory Pathway | HNF1A,LEF1,SPP1,STK38 | 2.11 | 2.45E-02 |
| Guanine and Guanosine Salvage I | HPRT1 | 1.85 | 3.33E-01 |
| Role of OCT4 in Mammalian Embryonic Stem Cell Pluripotency | MEF2A,SPP1 | 1.69 | 4.35E-02 |
| Phototransduction Pathway | GNGT2,GUCY2F | 1.56 | 3.70E-02 |
| NAD Biosynthesis III, NAD Salvage Pathway III | NMNAT1 | 1.55 | 1.67E-01 |
| MSP-RON Signaling In Cancer Cells Pathway | ELK3,HNF1A,LEF1 | 1.53 | 2.14E-02 |
| Acetyl-CoA Biosynthesis I (Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex) | PDHA1 | 1.48 | 1.43E-01 |
| Colorectal Cancer Metastasis Signaling | HNF1A,LEF1,RHOT1,STAT1 | 1.39 | 1.48E-02 |
| Insulin Secretion Signaling Pathway | HNF1A,PDHA1,SCNN1A,STAT1 | 1.39 | 1.47E-02 |
| Phosphatidylethanolamine Biosynthesis II | ETNK2 | 1.38 | 1.11E-01 |
| Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Signaling | HNF1A,LEF1,MECOM,SPP1 | 1.36 | 1.44E-02 |
| Basal Cell Carcinoma Signaling | HNF1A,LEF1 | 1.33 | 2.78E-02 |
In the IPA gene network named Auditory disease, Neurological disease, organismal injury, and abnormalities include significantly enriched molecules ACTR1A, ASPSCR1, CALR, CDC5L, CNTRL, DMRTB1, GMCL1, GNGT2, GUCY2F, HNF1A, HPRT1, KAT2B, MECOM, NDUFAF5, NMNAT1, PPIL2, RAB11A, RBM14, SCNN1A, STAB2, STK38, TFCP2L1, TRMT6, TSSC4, USH1G, and USHBP1 (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.

Gene networks highlighting candidate genes and their interactions in broiler breeder hens, potentially regulating calcium ion transport during eggshell biomineralization, derived from QIAGEN’s Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Gene Network: Hematological system development and function, hematopoiesis, tissue morphology. Differentially expressed genes in breeder broiler hens were used in IPA, and significant gene networks based on IPA scores were identified
The enriched pathways for the differentially expressed genes in a young broiler breeder’s uterus were analyzed using the open-source, open-access, manually curated, and peer-reviewed pathway database “Reactome” [26]. Differentially expressed genes were uploaded to the Enrichr system, with chicken genes as the background. A threshold gene count of 2 and a Fisher's Exact P-value < 0.05 were the criteria for the enriched pathways. “Organic Cation Transport,” “Organic Cation/Anion/Zwitterion Transport,” “Transport of Small Molecules,” “Transport of Bile Salts and Organic Acids, Metal Ions and Amine Compounds,” and “Ca2 + Pathway” are related to mineral and ion transport (Table 8).
Table 8.
Significant Reactome pathways involved in the eggshell formation in the broiler breeder hen uterus. 118 differentially expressed genes were used in Enrichr, and significant Reactome pathways based on modified Fisher Exact P-value < 0.05, and gene count of ≥ 2 were considered enriched
| Term | Genes | Odds Ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Organic Cation Transport R-HSA-549127 | SLC22A15;SLC22A18 | 43.2 |
| Organic Cation/Anion/Zwitterion Transport R-HSA-549132 | SLC22A15;SLC22A18 | 26.6 |
| Transport Of Small Molecules R-HSA-382551 |
PSMD10;TRPC;SLC6A6;NCEH1;SLC22A15;GNGT2; SLC43A2;SLC22A18;SCNN1A;RAB11A |
2.6 |
| Transport Of Bile Salts and Organic Acids, Metal Ions and Amine Compounds R-HSA-425366 | SLC6A6;SLC22A15;SLC22A18 | 6.2 |
| Ca2 + Pathway R-HSA-4086398 | GNGT2;LEF1 | 5.8 |
Validation of DEGs using qPCR
Analysis of RNA-Seq data identified differentially expressed genes in the uterus of broiler breeder hens. To determine their unique expression in young broiler breeder uterine tissue, twenty-three candidate genes predicted to be involved in eggshell biomineralization were selected for qPCR validation. Housekeeping genes GAPDH, Beta-actin, and TBP were analyzed; among them, TBP was the most stable and therefore used for normalization. 2−ΔΔCt values were calculated and analyzed, and eight genes were identified as significantly altered due to age (Fig. 7). The RNA-seq results followed a similar trend to the qPCR fold-change data (Supplementary Excel file 2: DEGs and qPCR values).
Fig. 7.

Validation of gene expression in young and aged breeder broiler hens using qPCR. Data represented as the mean ± SE. The X-axis represents the experimental groups (Young, Aged), and the Y-axis shows the relative fold change in gene expression, normalized to TBP, a housekeeping gene. The error bar represents standard error, and asterisk indicates significant change of gene expression due to the age
Discussion
Eggshell quality (Thickness and strength)
The integrity of an eggshell is crucial for withstanding the challenges of handling and storage. Even a minor crack can render the egg unsuitable for hatchery use, underscoring the need for stronger shells to ensure the production of high-quality chicks. While egg weight increases with age, shell weight remains relatively constant, which is in line with a previous study [27]. The results of this study indicate that eggshell thickness and strength are significantly greater in eggs from younger hens compared to those from older hens. This observation may be attributed to the notably higher palisade thickness and reduced mammillary width in the younger eggshell group. Furthermore, a positive correlation has been established between eggshell thickness and strength, suggesting that an increase in thickness, potentially resulting from enhanced palisade development, contributes to improved structural integrity [28, 29].
Mammillary knobs are essential components of the eggshell, as they directly contact the inner membrane and contribute to its strength. Keratan sulfate plays a crucial role in eggshell formation and significantly influences knob density [30]. Calcite crystals initially form around the keratan sulfate, leading to knob development, and as they grow, adjacent knobs merge, promoting upward growth. Narrower knobs are linked to greater density and more interstitial space, enhancing the eggshell's structural integrity [31]. Wider knobs typically have fewer connections to the shell membrane, but the older and younger groups in this study did not show a significant difference in the number of knobs, yet the younger group maintained their strength. These knobs are primarily elliptical shaped; breaking the eggshell can reveal either axis of the knob. A lower concentration of Sulphur might be affecting the calcite crystal orientation and the breaking axis, exposing the wider axis of the elliptical knobs in aged hens. Cracks in the eggshell start at the mammillary layer [32], varying Sulphur might be affecting the breaking strength by changing the breaking axis. While normal knobs contribute to shell strength, the function of B-type knobs is still unclear. These knobs are exposed to shell membranes, which may provide essential minerals for the developing embryo, potentially leading to higher-quality day-old chicks from younger hens. Further research is needed to confirm this. In contrast, a higher count of B-type knobs in older commercial layer hens may indicate aging [33].
The eggshell elements are essential for maintaining the integrity [34, 35]. Calcium makes up more than 95% of minerals. Despite the variation in strength, Calcium concentration in young and aged breeder hens’ eggshells was similar, indicating the involvement of various factors in eggshell strength [36]. Breeders might have been using all available calcium sources to prevent shell calcium deficiency. As bone is the richest source of calcium, osteoporosis is observed in aged laying hens. Despite attempts to balance all minerals during eggshell formation, breeder hens may lack adequate sources of other minerals, leading to deficiencies in the aged group.
This study found that while eggshell thickness varied, shell weight remained consistent, suggesting that both groups contained equal amounts of eggshell material. Thus, calcium concentration alone may not determine eggshell strength. Phosphorus serves as a crystallization inhibitor [37]. Its highest concentration in the outer layer of the eggshell was found in both young and aged birds, indicating the completion of biomineralization. A critical level of phosphorus is necessary for this process to terminate [38]. In this study, both Young and aged birds showed an increase in phosphorus at the end of biomineralization, indicating termination of crystallization.
Eggshells contain sulfur in two main proteoglycans: keratan sulfate, which initiates eggshell formation, and dermatan sulfate, which aids in growth and calcite crystal orientation [39]. In vitro studies have shown that varying sulfur concentrations in the calcite mixture can affect crystal orientation [40]. Stronger eggshells in younger groups may be due to higher sulfur concentrations affecting this orientation. Potassium is involved in the Na+/K+ ATPase pump, which facilitates calcium secretion into the extracellular intrauterine lumen, which is essential for calcium carbonate formation and is supported by the sodium-calcium exchanger (NCX) [41]. The Na +/K + ATPase pump expels sodium ions that are imported into the cell. Higher potassium levels in younger individuals may indicate more efficient calcium secretion in the shell gland. Additionally, potassium supplementation improves acid–base balance in laying hens, enhancing eggshell quality [42]. Dietary supplements containing trace minerals such as manganese, copper, and zinc enhance fracture toughness and eggshell-breaking strength [43]. In hens, higher manganese supplementation enhances genetic expression related to glycosylation and glycan metabolism (MGAT5, FMOD, GALNT2, GALNT18, and GCNT3), thereby contributing to the formation of mammillary nucleation points and increasing the number of mammillary knobs. The non-mineral elements are present in trace amounts (< 1%) and have unknown functions. This study found that as breeders transition from peak to declining production, eggshell thickness decreases by 3%, and mammillary width increases by 12%. In addition, the decrease in sulfur and potassium concentrations could potentially lead to a 30% decline in eggshell strength. Further research is needed to investigate how variations in sulfur concentration influence crystal orientation, width, and the angles between crystal clusters.
Genes and pathways associated with calcium mobilization and deposition (TM4SF19, SPP1, NPTN, OTOP2, CMKLR1)
To delineate the mechanism of eggshell biomineralization, we analyzed the genes and pathways associated with calcium transport, biomineralization, and deposition around the egg. Calcium necessary for eggshell formation is transported and secreted in the intrauterine lumen. Birds demonstrate efficient biomineralization, absorbing calcium from the small intestine and bones. Osteoclasts, bone macrophages, resorb calcium, making it available in the bloodstream. The TM4SF19 gene encodes a protein that regulates osteoclast differentiation, influencing calcium reabsorption and bone resorption [44]. Higher TM4SF19 expression in young breeder hens indicates increased calcium handling compared to older breeders, whose lower expression may be a protective response to osteoporosis in longer production cycles.
The SPP1 (Secreted Phosphoprotein 1) gene in chickens is exclusively expressed in uterine tissues and is linked to the formation of bone and eggshell organic matrices. It has a high affinity for hydroxyapatite, contributing to eggshell strength. Upregulation of SPP1 in younger ducks correlates with increased eggshell strength [45], making it a key indicator of durability. The gene encodes a sulfur-containing protein that contains cysteine and threonine. The higher sulfur concentration in younger eggshells further supports the gene’s role in enhancing strength. NPTN, a neuroplastin involved in the expression of the Plasma Membrane Calcium ATPase (PMCA) gene, plays a crucial role in hearing and the function of hair cells. Lower NPTN levels reduce PMCA expression, raising intracellular calcium levels [46]. In contrast, higher NPTN expression in young breeder eggshell glands increases PMCA expression, thereby facilitating the secretion of extracellular calcium into the uterus [47]. Additionally, NPTN has an immunoglobulin-like domain that may provide antimicrobial protection for the egg contents [48].
Mechanoreceptors and calcium secretion (PKD2, USH1G)
PKD2 is a non-selective cation channel with high calcium (Ca + +) permeability found in human term syncytiotrophoblasts [49]. It has been suggested that, along with PKD1, PKD2 acts as a mechanosensory receptor in mouse embryonic kidneys, triggering calcium release from the endoplasmic reticulum through calcium-induced calcium release (CICR) [50]. In young breeders, upregulation of PKD2 in uterine tissue may enhance calcium sequestration. Additionally, layer hens show upregulation of the CALCB gene, which is involved in calcium release [12]. In developing chicken embryos, it is hypothesized that the PKD2 expression decreases due to increased intracellular calcium levels [10]. USH1G is linked to hearing and vision disorders [51] and is regulated by SANS, a scaffold protein that maintains the mechanotransduction complex in the ear [52]. The displacement of hair cells by sound waves activates calcium and potassium channels [53]. USH1G expression in uterine tissue may facilitate calcium influx during egg development. Its upregulation in young breeders’ eggshell glands compared to older ones may indicate greater calcium movement, which positively impacts eggshell quality.
The OTOP2 domain proteins include OTOP1, OTOP2, and OTOP3, which are essential for intracellular calcium trafficking [54]. OTOP2 has been suggested to increase calcium levels in the laying hen uterus, aiding in eggshell biomineralization [12]. Upregulation of OTOP2 in young uterine RNA sequencing might enhance intracellular calcium translocation, benefiting the biomineralization process. Further study is needed to validate this hypothesis and elucidate the role of OTOP2 in regulating eggshell biomineralization in the shell gland. Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells found in various tissues that can differentiate into adipose tissue, osteoblasts, and connective tissue [55]. The CMKLR1 gene has been linked to directing MSCs towards osteoblasts in humans [56]. Research shows that CMKLR1 knockout mice have lower bone mineral density (BMD) than wild-type mice, which is associated with higher testosterone levels [57]. In older hens, decreased CMKLR1 expression in the shell gland may disrupt calcium uptake and transport, resulting in compromised eggshell formation and reduced shell quality. Further study is needed to understand the mechanism by which CMKLR1 mediates eggshell biomineralization.
Energy production and transcription regulation (ELL and MLLT1)
Transcription and translation are essential processes in gene expression, in which DNA is transcribed into RNA with the help of components such as RNA polymerase II. The genes ELL and MLLT1, which are integral to the Super Elongation Complex (SEC), play a significant role in RNA transcription [58]. Increased expression of ELL and MLLT1 indicates a more active SEC, leading to faster genetic responses to stress, hormones, or mechanical stretch. In eggshells, phosphorus concentration is higher in the upper palisade layer, with a notable increase in young eggs compared to older ones [38]. This rise could be linked to the rapid activation of phosphorus-secreting genes. The upregulation of ELL and MLLT1 in young breeders suggests enhanced control of phosphorus pathways, contributing to eggshell biomineralization.
Defense and antioxidation (ARVCF, SLC22A15)
ARVCF is a protein from the p120ctn (p120 catenin) family that interacts with cadherin proteins, specifically zona occludens (ZO-1 and ZO-2) and E-cadherins, forming complexes at cell–cell contact sites [59]. ZO proteins help bind actin filaments and signaling molecules, promoting cell–cell adhesion [60]. Cadherin proteins are crucial for embryo implantation, and deficiencies in CHD6 can lead to infertility [61]. ARVCF’s collaboration with catenins and cadherins suggests it plays a role in retaining eggs in the uterus, allowing calcium secretion before descent to the cloaca. As an egg swells in the uterus, higher ARVCF expression may enhance the adhesion between the uterine wall and eggshell membrane. This connection might support calcite crystal formation around the egg and improve the efficiency of eggshell biomineralization, resulting in thicker shells in young breeders. Stronger cell–cell adhesion also protects the shell gland from microbial infiltration and reduces energy expenditure on defensive chemicals. Additionally, this adhesion is linked to the domestication of animals and the plumage coloration of hens [62]. The aged animals have higher reactive oxygen species than antioxidants. The SLC22A15 gene encodes for the Organic Cation Transporter 2 (OCTN2), which transports carnitine into cells [63]. Carnitine is an antioxidant that enhances energy supply to uterine cells and has positive effects on human implantation, thereby improving fertility [64, 65]. In laying hens, carnitine supplementation mitigates the adverse effects of high stocking density [66]. Increased SLC22A15 expression in young breeders suggests efficient free-radical removal, which may increase energy and improve eggshell quality.
Conclusion
The eggshells of young breeders have thicker palisades, narrower mammillary regions, and higher sulfur and potassium concentrations, which support their strength, while micro minerals and non-minerals did not differ between shell regions. Uterine tissue RNA sequencing revealed DEGs and associated pathways; the putative functions have been divided into four categories: 1) Calcium mobilization and deposition (TM4SF19, SPP1, NPTN, OTOP2); 2) mechanoreceptors and calcium secretion (PKD2, USH1G); and 3) energy production and transcription regulation (ELL and MLLT1) 4) defense, and antioxidation (ARVCF, SLC22A15). Organic cation/anion/zwitterion transport (SLC22A15, SLC22A18) was the most enriched Reactome pathway obtained using Enrichr. The summary Fig. 8, shows the model that identified genes and predicted biological pathways involved in eggshell biomineralization and calcium transport in the broiler breeder hen shell gland. The TM4SF19 increases calcium release, while CMKLR1 might decrease the calcium erosion. PKD2 may activate Calcium-Induced Calcium Release (CICR), thereby releasing calcium from the endoplasmic reticulum into the cytosol. USH1G may act as a mechanoreceptor, increasing calcium influx upon stretching of the uterine tissue. ARVCF acts as an adherent junction protein, maintaining the tonic state of uterine tissue and reducing bacterial invasion. The SLC22A15 gene facilitates the intracellular transport of carnitine, thereby reducing the accumulation of free oxidative reagents. The PMCA might facilitate the transport of intracellular calcium into the extracellular intrauterine milieu for biomineralization (Created in BioRender. https://BioRender.com/4kk5ci8). The study identified ultramicroscopic characteristics of eggshells, differentially expressed genes (DEGs), and associated biological pathways that may serve as markers for selecting high-quality egg-producing breeder hens. The investigation into eggshell thickness and elemental composition yields novel findings that warrant further exploration to elucidate how various elements affect the orientation and strength of calcite crystals.
Fig. 8.

The proposed hypothetical model indicates identified genes and predicted biological pathways involved in eggshell biomineralization and calcium transport in the broiler breeder hen shell gland. (Created in BioRender. https://BioRender.com/4kk5ci8)
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Material 1: Sheet 1 Ensemble IDs, Gene names, calculation of differentially expressed genes; Sheet 2) DEGs and qPCR listed side by side; Sheet 3) Primers and gene sequences used for the qPCR validation; Sheet 3) Venn diagram showing numbers of uniquely and commonly expressed genes in young and aged breeder hens (for a particular gene, in a group collective read counts of ≥20 were taken as expressed, and genes with ≥20 read counts in both groups were considered commonly expressed, while with only in one group (either your or aged) are considered uniquely expressed genes
Acknowledgements
We thank Tina Witherby, Kristen Ewell, and Orion Rivers for their assistance in the analysis of the eggshell under the SEM-EDS system. We also thank Hari Marasini, Liticia Orellana, and Cesar Escobar for their help in sample collection.
Abbreviations
- ACTR1A
Actin Related Protein 1A
- Al
Aluminium
- ANOVA
Analysis of Varience
- ARVCF
Armadillo Repeat Protein Deleted In Velo-Cardio-Facial Syndrome
- ASPSCR1
Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma Chromosomal Region Candidate Gene 1 Protein
- ATP2C2
ATPase Secretory Pathway Ca2 + Transporting 2
- B-actin
Beta-actin
- BEX2
Brain Expressed X-Linked 2
- BMD
Bone mineral density
- BP
Biological pathways
- CA
California
- Ca
Calcium
- CALCB
Calcitonin Related Polypeptide Beta
- CALR
Calreticulin
- CC
Cellular components
- CDC5L
Cell Division Cycle 5 Like
- cDNA
Complementary deoxyribo nucleic acid
- CHD6
Chromodomain Helicase DNA Binding Protein 6
- CICR
Calcium-induced calcium release
- CLNS1A
Chloride Nucleotide-Sensitive Channel 1A
- CLP1
Cleavage Factor Polyribonucleotide Kinase Subunit 1
- CMKLR1
Chemerin Chemokine-Like Receptor 1
- CNTRL
Centriolin
- Ct
Cycle threshold
- Cu
Copper
- DAVID
Database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery
- DEGs
Differentially Expressed Genes
- DMRTB1
DMRT Like Family B With Proline Rich C-Terminal 1
- ELL
Elongation Factor For RNA Polymerase II
- ETNK2
Ethanolamine Kinase 2
- Fe
Iron
- FMOD
Fibromodulin
- GALNT18
Polypeptide N-Acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 18
- GALNT2
Polypeptide N-Acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 2
- GAPDH
Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase
- GCNT3
Glucosaminyl (N-Acetyl) Transferase 3, Mucin Type
- GFRA1
Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Receptor Alpha 1
- GMCL1
Germ Cell-Less 1, spermatogenesis associated
- GNGT2
G Protein Subunit Gamma Transducin 2
- GO
Gene ontology
- GUCY2F
Guanylate Cyclase 2F, Retinal
- HNF1A
Hepatic Nuclear Factor 1 homeobox A
- HOTAIR
HOX Transcript Antisense RNA
- HPRT1
Hypoxanthine Phosphoribosyltransferase 1
- HS3ST3B1
Heparan Sulfate-Glucosamine 3-Sulfotransferase 3B1
- IPA
Ingenuity pathway analysis
- K
Potassium
- KAT2B
K(Lysine) Acetyltransferase 2B
- KAT2B
Lysine Acetyltransferase 2B
- KCNK7
Potassium Two Pore Domain Channel Subfamily K Member 7
- KED
Koechner euthanizing device
- LAMB4
Laminin Subunit Beta 4
- LEF1
Lymphoid Enhancer Binding Factor 1
- LP
Lower palisade
- M
Mammillary
- MECOM
MDS1 And EVI1 Complex Locus
- MEF2A
Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2A
- MF
Molecular function
- Mg
Magnesium
- MGAT5
Alpha-1,6-Mannosylglycoprotein 6-Beta-N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase
- MLLT1
MLLT1 Super Elongation Complex Subunit
- MMS22L
Methyl Methanesulfonate-Sensitivity Protein 22-Like, DNA repair protein
- Mn
Manganese
- MSCs
Mesenchymal Stem Cells
- Na
Sodium
- NASS
National agricultural stastitics services
- NCX
Sodium calcium exchanger
- NDUFAF5
NADH:Ubiquinone Oxidoreductase Complex Assembly Factor 5
- NELFA
Negative Elongation Factor Complex Member A
- NGS
Next generation sequencing
- Ni
Nickel
- NMNAT1
Nicotinamide Nucleotide Adenylyltransferase 1
- NPTN
Neuroplastin
- NXNL2
Nucleoredoxin Like 2
- OCT4
POU class 5 homeobox 1
- OCTN2
Organic Cation/Carnitine Transporter 2
- OTOP2
Otopetrin 2
- P
Phosphorus
- PCR
Polymerase chain reaction
- PKD2
Polycystic kidney Disease 2
- PLA2G15
Phospholipase A2 Group XV
- PPIL2
Peptidylprolyl Isomerase Like 2
- RAB11A
Ras-Related Protein Rab-11A
- RBM14
RNA Binding Motif Protein 14
- RIN
RNA integrity number
- RNA-seq
Ribonucleic acid sequencing
- RPL9
Ribosomal Protein L9
- S
Sulphur
- SCNN1A
Sodium Channel Epithelial 1 Subunit Alpha
- SEC
Super elongation complex
- SEM
Scanning Electron Microscope
- SEM-EDS
SEM-Energy Dispersive Spectrometry
- SEPTIN3
Septin 3
- Si
Silicon
- SLC19A2
Solute Carrier Family 19 Member 2
- SLC22A15
Solute carrier family 22 member 15
- SLC43A2
Solute Carrier Family 43 Member 2
- SLC6A6
Solute carrier family 6 member 6
- SMIM45
Small Integral Membrane Protein 45
- SPP1
Secreted Phosphoprotein 1
- STAB2
Stabilin 2
- STC
Stanniocalcin
- STK38
Serine/Threonine Kinase 38
- TAPBPL
TAP Binding Protein Like
- TBP
TATA-box binding protein
- TFCP2L1
Transcription Factor CP2 Like 1
- TM4SF19
Transmembrane 4 L Six Family Member 19
- TRMT6
TRNA Methyltransferase 6 Non-Catalytic Subunit
- TSSC4
Tumor Suppressing Subtransferable Candidate 4
- UCP3
Uncoupling Protein 3
- UP
Upper palisade
- USDA
United states department of agriculture
- USH1G
USH1 Protein Network Component Sans
- USHBP1
USH1 Protein Network Component Harmonin Binding Protein 1
- UV
Ultra violate
- V
Vanadium
- Zn
Zinc
- ZO
Zona occldin
Authors’ contributions
PM conducted the experiments, collected samples, analyzed samples, and Drafted the manuscript. VK helped in primary RNA-seq data analysis (quality check, trimming, annotation, counts, and DEGs). KM helped in animal experimentation and sample collection. PR helped in eggshell strength analysis. RJ helped with experiment design and manuscript reviewing. BM designed the experiment, assisted with sample collection, data interpretation, and manuscript review. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by NIFA/USDA (2022–67016-36373) to Birendra Mishra.
Data availability
The dataset generated and analyzed in the current study is available in the NCBI database (accession no.: [GSE296109]( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE296109 )).
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All the animal experimentation was carried out following the guidelines approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Hawaii at Manoa (Approval No 17–2605-6).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. 6. (ESA Working Papers 12–03). Available from: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/288998, Cited 2025 Dec 15.
- 2.Ramachandran R. Current and future reproductive technologies for avian species. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;752:23–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Aviagen. Ross708-ParentStock-PerformanceObjectives-2021-EN. www.aviagen.com; 2021. Available from: https://aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_PS/Ross708-ParentStock-PerformanceObjectives-2021-EN.pdf. Cited 2025 May 20.
- 4.Cobb-Vantress. Cobb500 Fast Feather Breeder (Management Supplement). 2020. Available from: https://www.cobb-vantress.com/assets/Cobb-Files/8c46601377/Cobb500-Fast-Feather-Breeder-Management-Supplement.pdf. Cited 2023 Feb 10.
- 5.NASS. Broiler Hatchery. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture; 2024. Available from: https://esmis.nal.usda.gov/sites/default/release-files/gm80hv35d/rf561017b/6d571r15v/brls3524.pdf.
- 6.USDA, NASS. Publication | Chickens and Eggs | ID: fb494842n | USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System. 2024. Available from: https://usda.library.cornell.edu/concern/publications/fb494842n?locale=en. Cited 2024 Oct 11.
- 7.Romero-Sanchez H. What can be done about the broiler breeder hatchability challange- industry perspectives. 27/02/2024. 2024; Available from: https://www.feedinfo.com/perspectives/what-can-be-done-about-the-broiler-breeder-hatchability-challenge-industry-perspectives/372015. Cited 2024 Aug 29.
- 8.Grochowska E, Kinal A, Sobek Z, Siatkowski I, Bednarczyk M. Field study on the factors affecting egg weight loss, early embryonic mortality, hatchability, and chick mortality with the use of classification tree technique. Poult Sci. 2019;98(9):3626–36. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003257911930656X. Cited 2024 Sep 4. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 9.King’ori A. Review of the factors that influence egg fertility and hatchabilty in poultry. Int J Poult Sci. 2011 Jan 1;10:483–92.
- 10.Halgrain M, Bernardet N, Crepeau M, Même N, Narcy A, Hincke M, et al. Eggshell decalcification and skeletal mineralization during chicken embryonic development: defining candidate genes in the chorioallantoic membrane. Poult Sci. 2021;101(2):101622. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8717587/. Cited 2024 Jun 21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Mishra B, Sah N, Wasti S. Genetic and Hormonal Regulation of Egg Formation in the Oviduct of Laying Hens. Poultry - An Advanced Learning. IntechOpen; 2019. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/undefined/state.item.id. Cited 2022 Jun 7.
- 12.Sah N, Kuehu DL, Khadka VS, Deng Y, Peplowska K, Jha R, et al. RNA sequencing-based analysis of the laying hen uterus revealed the novel genes and biological pathways involved in the eggshell biomineralization. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):16853. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-35203-y. Cited 2024 Jun 21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Gautron J, Stapane L, Le Roy N, Nys Y, Rodriguez-Navarro AB, Hincke MT. Avian eggshell biomineralization: an update on its structure, mineralogy and protein tool kit. BMC Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(1):11. Available from: 10.1186/s12860-021-00350-0. Cited 2025 Dec 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 14.Gao S, Qiu K, Zheng J, Zhang H, Wang J, Qi X, et al. Dietary 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol Supplementation as a Vitamin D3 Substitute Improves Performance, Egg Quality, Blood Indexes, Jejunal Morphology, and Tibia Quality in Late-Phase Laying Hens. Animals. 2024;14(6):878. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/14/6/878. Cited 2025 Dec 14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Singh R, Joyner CJ, Peddie MJ, Taylor TG. Changes in the concentrations of parathyroid hormone and ionic calcium in the plasma of laying hens during the egg cycle in relation to dietary deficiencies of calcium and vitamin D. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1986;61(1):20–8. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0016648086902455. Cited 2025 Dec 14. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 16.Bar A. Calcium transport in strongly calcifying laying birds: Mechanisms and regulation. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2009;152(4):447–69. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1095643308012294. Cited 2025 Dec 14. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 17.Boyal RS, Buhr RJ, Harris CE, Jacobs L, Bourassa DV. Equipment and methods for poultry euthanasia by a single operator. J Appl Poult Res. 2020;29(4):1020–32. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056617120300921. Cited 2024 Oct 17.
- 18.Jacobs L, Bourassa DV, Harris CE, Buhr RJ. Euthanasia: Manual versus Mechanical Cervical Dislocation for Broilers. Animals. 2019;9(2):47. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/9/2/47. Cited 2024 Oct 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Jones DR, Karcher DM, Regmi P, Robison CO, Gast RK. Hen genetic strain and extended cold storage influence on physical egg quality from cage-free aviary housing system. Poult Sci. 2018;97(7):2347–55. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579119303475. Cited 2024 Sep 8. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 20.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4103590/. Cited 2025 May 21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21.Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(8):907–15. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-019-0201-4. Cited 2025 May 21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 22.Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(2):166–9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4287950/. Cited 2025 May 21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sherman BT, Hao M, Qiu J, Jiao X, Baseler MW, Lane HC, et al. DAVID: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and functional annotation of gene lists (2021 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(W1):W216–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chen EY, Tan CM, Kou Y, Duan Q, Wang Z, Meirelles GV, et al. Enrichr: interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;15(14):128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Milacic M, Beavers D, Conley P, Gong C, Gillespie M, Griss J, et al. The Reactome pathway knowledgebase 2024. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024;52(D1):D672-8. 10.1093/nar/gkad1025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Crosara FSG, Pereira VJ, Lellis CG, Barra KC, Santos SKA, Souza L, et al. Is the Eggshell Quality Influenced by the Egg Weight or the Breeder Age? Braz J Poult Sci. 2019 Aug 19;21. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/j/rbca/a/6Pcd9XSS8FKDBCNhmPRJRHL/?lang=en. Cited 2022 Mar 15.
- 28.Lund W, Heiman V, Wilhelm L. The relationship between egg shell thickness and strength. Poult Sci. 1938;17(5):372–6. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sun CJ, Chen SR, Xu GY, Liu XM, Yang N. Global variation and uniformity of eggshell thickness for chicken eggs. Poult Sci. 2012;91(10):2718–21. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579119397810. Cited 2024 May 30. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 30.Zhang YN, Zhang HJ, Wu SG, Wang J, Qi GH. Dietary manganese supplementation affects mammillary knobs of eggshell ultrastructure in laying hens. Poult Sci. 2018 Apr 1;97(4):1253–62. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579119309915. Cited 2023 Apr 9. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 31.Simons PCM. Ultrastructure of the Hen Eggshell and Its Physiological Interpretation [Ph.D.]. [Netherlands]: Wageningen University and Research; 1971. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/docview/2572247316/abstract/AF4B5F6417AA45C5PQ/1. Cited 2023 Jan 16.
- 32.Bain MM. Eggshell strength: a relationship between the mechanism of failure and the ultrastructural organisation of the mammillary layer. Br Poult Sci. 1992;33(2):303–19. 10.1080/00071669208417469. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ja P, Sh S. The Influence of Hen Aging on Eggshell Ultrastructure and Shell Mineral Components. Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2018;38(5). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30479513/. Cited 2022 Sep 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 34.Mahato PL, Weatherby T, Ewell K, Jha R, Mishra B. Scanning electron microscope-based evaluation of eggshell quality. Poult Sci. 2024;103(3):103428. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579124000075. Cited 2024 May 30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 35.Damaziak K, Marzec A. Analysis of ultrastructure and microstructure of blackbird (Turdus merula) and song thrush (Turdus philomelos) eggshell by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray computed microtomography. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):11857. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-16033-5. Cited 2024 Aug 30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.Ajayan N, S KP, A AU, Soman S. Quantitative Variation in Calcium Carbonate Content in Shell of Different Chicken and Duck Varieties. Adv Zool Bot. 2020;8(1):1–5 ( [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dennis JE, Xiao S, Agarwal M, Fink DJ, Heuer AH, Caplan AI. Microstructure of matrix and mineral components of eggshells from White Leghorn chickens ( Gallusgallus ). J Morphol. 1996;228(3):287–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cusack M, Fraser AC, Stachel T. Magnesium and phosphorus distribution in the avian eggshell. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;134(1):63–9. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096495902001859. Cited 2024 Jun 3. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 39.Nys Y, Hincke M, Arias JL, Garcia-Ruiz J, Solomon S. Avian eggshell mineralization. Avian Poult Biol Rev. 1999;10:143–66. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Arias JI, Jure C, Wiff JP, Fernández MS, Fuenzalida V, Arias JL. Effect of Sulfate Content of Biomacromolecules on the Crystallization of Calcium Carbonate. MRS Online Proc Libr OPL. 2001;711:HH1.7.1. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/mrs-online-proceedings-library-archive/article/abs/effect-of-sulfate-content-of-biomacromolecules-on-the-crystallization-of-calcium-carbonate/73567309AC615416B3F5803392509C62. Cited 2024 May 30.
- 41.Zhang Q, Zhu F, Liu L, Zheng CW, Wang DH, Hou ZC, et al. Integrating transcriptome and genome re-sequencing data to identify key genes and mutations affecting chicken eggshell qualities. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0125890. 10.1371/journal.pone.0125890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.de Moraes MTT, da Rocha C, Moreno TB, Surek D, Borges SA, Maiorka A. Effect of different dietary electrolyte balance values at high temperature peaks on performance and egg quality of Japanese Quail (Coturnixcoturnixjaponica). J Appl Poult Res. 2019;28(4):1234–9. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mabe I, Rapp C, Bain M, Nys Y. Supplementation of a corn-soybean meal diet with manganese, copper, and zinc from organic or inorganic sources improves eggshell quality in aged laying hens. Poult Sci. 2003;82(12):1903–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Park S, Heo JS, Mizuno S, Kim M, An H, Hong E, et al. Tm4sf19 deficiency inhibits osteoclast multinucleation and prevents bone loss. Metabolism. 2024;151:155746 (Available from: . Cited 2024 May 7.). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhang Y, Deng Y, Jin Y, Wang S, Huang X, Li K, et al. Age-related changes in eggshell physical properties, ultrastructure, calcium metabolism-related serum indices, and gene expression in eggshell gland during eggshell formation in commercial laying ducks. Poult Sci. 2022;101(2):101573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lin X, Brunk MGK, Yuanxiang P, Curran AW, Zhang E, Stöber F, et al. Neuroplastin expression is essential for hearing and hair cell PMCA expression. Brain Struct Funct. 2021;226(5):1533–51. 10.1007/s00429-021-02269-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Coty WA, Mc Conkey CL. A high-affinity calcium-stimulated ATPase activity in the hen oviduct shell gland. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1982;219(2):444–53. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/000398618290176X. Cited 2024 Jun 20. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 48.Jonchère V, Réhault-Godbert S, Hennequet-Antier C, Cabau C, Sibut V, Cogburn LA, et al. Gene expression profiling to identify eggshell proteins involved in physical defense of the chicken egg. BMC Genomics. 2010;11(1):57. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.González-Perrett S, Kim K, Ibarra C, Damiano AE, Zotta E, Batelli M, et al. Polycystin-2, the protein mutated in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), is a Ca2+-permeable nonselective cation channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2001;98(3):1182–7. Available from: https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.98.3.1182. Cited 2024 Jun 21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 50.Nauli SM, Alenghat FJ, Luo Y, Williams E, Vassilev P, Li X, et al. Polycystins 1 and 2 mediate mechanosensation in the primary cilium of kidney cells. Nat Genet. 2003;33(2):129–37. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/ng1076z. Cited 2024 Jun 21. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 51.Weil D, El-Amraoui A, Masmoudi S, Mustapha M, Kikkawa Y, Lainé S. Usher syndrome type I G (USH1G) is caused by mutations in the gene encoding SANS, a protein that associates with the USH1C protein, harmonin. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12(5):463–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zou J, Chen Q, Almishaal A, Mathur PD, Zheng T, Tian C, et al. The roles of USH1 proteins and PDZ domain-containing USH proteins in USH2 complex integrity in cochlear hair cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26(3):624–36. Available from: 10.1093/hmg/ddw421. Cited 2024 Jun 25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 53.Powers RE, Gaudet R, Sotomayor M. A partial calcium-free linker confers flexibility to inner-ear protocadherin-15. Structure. 2017;25(3):482–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hughes I, Binkley J, Hurle B, Green ED, Sidow A, Ornitz DM. Identification of the otopetrin domain, a conserved domain in vertebrate otopetrins and invertebrate otopetrin-like family members. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8(1):41. 10.1186/1471-2148-8-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ding DC, Shyu WC, Lin SZ. Mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Transplant. 2011;20(1):5–14. 10.3727/096368910X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Xie Z, Yu W, Ye G, Li J, Zheng G, Liu W, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and functional subpopulation identification. Exp Mol Med. 2022;54(4):483–92. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s12276-022-00749-5. Cited 2024 Oct 31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 57.Zhao H, Yan D, Xiang L, Huang C, Li J, Yu X, et al. Chemokine-like receptor 1 deficiency leads to lower bone mass in male mice. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS. 2018;76(2):355. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11105338/. Cited 2024 Oct 31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 58.Luo Z, Lin C, Shilatifard A. The super elongation complex (SEC) family in transcriptional control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13(9):543–7. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/nrm3417. Cited 2024 Jun 26. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 59.Kausalya PJ, Phua DCY, Hunziker W. Association of ARVCF with Zonula Occludens (ZO)-1 and ZO-2: Binding to PDZ-Domain Proteins and Cell-Cell Adhesion Regulate Plasma Membrane and Nuclear Localization of ARVCF. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15(12):5503–15. 10.1091/mbc.e04-04-0350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zahraoui A, Louvard D, Galli T. Tight junction, a platform for trafficking and signaling protein complexes. J Cell Biol. 2000;151(5):F31-6. 10.1083/jcb.151.5.f31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zhou W, Santos L, Dimitriadis E. Characterization of the role for cadherin 6 in the regulation of human endometrial receptivity. Reprod Biol Endocrinol RBE. 2020 Jun 29;18:66. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7322878/. Cited 2024 Jun 20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 62.Fogelholm J. Genomics and Transcriptomics of Behaviour and Plumage Colouration. Linköping University Electronic Press; 2020. 49 p.
- 63.Yee SW, Giacomini KM. Emerging Roles of the Human Solute Carrier 22 Family. Drug Metab Dispos. 2022;50(9):1193–210. Available from: https://dmd.aspetjournals.org/content/50/9/1193. Cited 2024 Jun 27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 64.Agarwal A, Sengupta P, Durairajanayagam D. Role of L-carnitine in female infertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2018;16(1):5. 10.1186/s12958-018-0323-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Edris Y, Barakat E. Supplementation with L-Carnitine improves uterine receptivity in women with prior implantation failure during frozen embryos transfer: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Evid Based Womens Health J. 2018; Available from: https://journals.ekb.eg/article_15659.html. Cited 2024 Jun 27.
- 66.E Ç, Bk G. Effect of dietary l-carnitine supplementation and energy level on oxidant/antioxidant balance in laying hens subjected to high stocking density. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2020;104(1). Available from: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.eres.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/31544992/. Cited 2024 Jun 27. [DOI] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary Material 1: Sheet 1 Ensemble IDs, Gene names, calculation of differentially expressed genes; Sheet 2) DEGs and qPCR listed side by side; Sheet 3) Primers and gene sequences used for the qPCR validation; Sheet 3) Venn diagram showing numbers of uniquely and commonly expressed genes in young and aged breeder hens (for a particular gene, in a group collective read counts of ≥20 were taken as expressed, and genes with ≥20 read counts in both groups were considered commonly expressed, while with only in one group (either your or aged) are considered uniquely expressed genes
Data Availability Statement
The dataset generated and analyzed in the current study is available in the NCBI database (accession no.: [GSE296109]( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE296109 )).
