Skip to main content
PMC home page
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Mar 29;358(1431):491–500. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1261

What imitation tells us about social cognition: a rapprochement between developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience.

Andrew N Meltzoff 1, Jean Decety 1
PMCID: PMC1351349  NIHMSID: NIHMS3074  PMID: 12689375

Abstract

Both developmental and neurophysiological research suggest a common coding between perceived and generated actions. This shared representational network is innately wired in humans. We review psychological evidence concerning the imitative behaviour of newborn human infants. We suggest that the mechanisms involved in infant imitation provide the foundation for understanding that others are 'like me' and underlie the development of theory of mind and empathy for others. We also analyse functional neuroimaging studies that explore the neurophysiological substrate of imitation in adults. We marshal evidence that imitation recruits not only shared neural representations between the self and the other but also cortical regions in the parietal cortex that are crucial for distinguishing between the perspective of self and other. Imitation is doubly revealing: it is used by infants to learn about adults, and by scientists to understand the organization and functioning of the brain.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (388.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Allison T, Puce A, McCarthy G. Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jul;4(7):267–278. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01501-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bekkering H., Wohlschläger A., Gattis M. Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2000 Feb;53(1):153–164. doi: 10.1080/713755872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berlucchi G., Aglioti S. The body in the brain: neural bases of corporeal awareness. Trends Neurosci. 1997 Dec;20(12):560–564. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01136-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blakemore S. J., Decety J. From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Aug;2(8):561–567. doi: 10.1038/35086023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brooks Rechele, Meltzoff Andrew N. The importance of eyes: how infants interpret adult looking behavior. Dev Psychol. 2002 Nov;38(6):958–966. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.38.6.958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Buccino G., Binkofski F., Fink G. R., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V., Seitz R. J., Zilles K., Rizzolatti G., Freund H. J. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci. 2001 Jan;13(2):400–404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chaminade Thierry, Decety Jean. Leader or follower? Involvement of the inferior parietal lobule in agency. Neuroreport. 2002 Oct 28;13(15):1975–1978. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200210280-00029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chaminade Thierry, Meltzoff Andrew N., Decety Jean. Does the end justify the means? A PET exploration of the mechanisms involved in human imitation. Neuroimage. 2002 Feb;15(2):318–328. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cochin S., Barthelemy C., Roux S., Martineau J. Observation and execution of movement: similarities demonstrated by quantified electroencephalography. Eur J Neurosci. 1999 May;11(5):1839–1842. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00598.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Csibra Gergely. Teleological and referential understanding of action in infancy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 29;358(1431):447–458. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Decety J., Chaminade T., Grèzes J., Meltzoff A. N. A PET exploration of the neural mechanisms involved in reciprocal imitation. Neuroimage. 2002 Jan;15(1):265–272. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Decety J., Grèzes J., Costes N., Perani D., Jeannerod M., Procyk E., Grassi F., Fazio F. Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject's strategy. Brain. 1997 Oct;120(Pt 10):1763–1777. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.10.1763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Decety J., Perani D., Jeannerod M., Bettinardi V., Tadary B., Woods R., Mazziotta J. C., Fazio F. Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature. 1994 Oct 13;371(6498):600–602. doi: 10.1038/371600a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Decety J, Grèzes J. Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 May;3(5):172–178. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01312-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Eidelberg D., Galaburda A. M. Inferior parietal lobule. Divergent architectonic asymmetries in the human brain. Arch Neurol. 1984 Aug;41(8):843–852. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1984.04050190049013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Pavesi G., Rizzolatti G. Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol. 1995 Jun;73(6):2608–2611. doi: 10.1152/jn.1995.73.6.2608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Farrer C., Frith C. D. Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: the neural correlates of the experience of agency. Neuroimage. 2002 Mar;15(3):596–603. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Flavell J. H. Cognitive development: children's knowledge about the mind. Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:21–45. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Frith C. D., Frith U. Interacting minds--a biological basis. Science. 1999 Nov 26;286(5445):1692–1695. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5445.1692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gallese Vittorio. The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: the quest for a common mechanism. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 29;358(1431):517–528. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gergely G., Nádasdy Z., Csibra G., Bíró S. Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition. 1995 Aug;56(2):165–193. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00661-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Griffiths T. D., Rees G., Rees A., Green G. G., Witton C., Rowe D., Büchel C., Turner R., Frackowiak R. S. Right parietal cortex is involved in the perception of sound movement in humans. Nat Neurosci. 1998 May;1(1):74–79. doi: 10.1038/276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gross C. G. Representation of visual stimuli in inferior temporal cortex. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Jan 29;335(1273):3–10. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gross C. G., Sergent J. Face recognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1992 Apr;2(2):156–161. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(92)90004-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Grossman E., Donnelly M., Price R., Pickens D., Morgan V., Neighbor G., Blake R. Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Sep;12(5):711–720. doi: 10.1162/089892900562417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Grèzes J., Costes N., Decety J. The effects of learning and intention on the neural network involved in the perception of meaningless actions. Brain. 1999 Oct;122(Pt 10):1875–1887. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.10.1875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Grèzes J., Fonlupt P., Bertenthal B., Delon-Martin C., Segebarth C., Decety J. Does perception of biological motion rely on specific brain regions? Neuroimage. 2001 May;13(5):775–785. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Iacoboni M., Woods R. P., Brass M., Bekkering H., Mazziotta J. C., Rizzolatti G. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science. 1999 Dec 24;286(5449):2526–2528. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5449.2526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Meltzoff A. N., Moore M. K. Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science. 1977 Oct 7;198(4312):75–78. doi: 10.1126/science.198.4312.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Meltzoff A. N., Moore M. K. Newborn infants imitate adult facial gestures. Child Dev. 1983 Jun;54(3):702–709. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Meltzoff A. N. Origins of theory of mind, cognition and communication. J Commun Disord. 1999 Jul-Aug;32(4):251–269. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9924(99)00009-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Perani D., Fazio F., Borghese N. A., Tettamanti M., Ferrari S., Decety J., Gilardi M. C. Different brain correlates for watching real and virtual hand actions. Neuroimage. 2001 Sep;14(3):749–758. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Perrett D. I., Harries M. H., Bevan R., Thomas S., Benson P. J., Mistlin A. J., Chitty A. J., Hietanen J. K., Ortega J. E. Frameworks of analysis for the neural representation of animate objects and actions. J Exp Biol. 1989 Sep;146:87–113. doi: 10.1242/jeb.146.1.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Perrett D. I., Hietanen J. K., Oram M. W., Benson P. J. Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Jan 29;335(1273):23–30. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Pochon J. B., Levy R., Poline J. B., Crozier S., Lehéricy S., Pillon B., Deweer B., Le Bihan D., Dubois B. The role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the preparation of forthcoming actions: an fMRI study. Cereb Cortex. 2001 Mar;11(3):260–266. doi: 10.1093/cercor/11.3.260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ramachandran V. S., Rogers-Ramachandran D. Denial of disabilities in anosognosia. Nature. 1996 Aug 8;382(6591):501–501. doi: 10.1038/382501a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Gallese V., Fogassi L. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996 Mar;3(2):131–141. doi: 10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Matelli M., Bettinardi V., Paulesu E., Perani D., Fazio F. Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution. Exp Brain Res. 1996 Sep;111(2):246–252. doi: 10.1007/BF00227301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rolls E. T. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying face processing within and beyond the temporal cortical visual areas. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1992 Jan 29;335(1273):11–21. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ruby P., Decety J. Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency. Nat Neurosci. 2001 May;4(5):546–550. doi: 10.1038/87510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Siegal Michael, Varley Rosemary. Neural systems involved in "theory of mind". Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Jun;3(6):463–471. doi: 10.1038/nrn844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Spence S. A., Brooks D. J., Hirsch S. R., Liddle P. F., Meehan J., Grasby P. M. A PET study of voluntary movement in schizophrenic patients experiencing passivity phenomena (delusions of alien control). Brain. 1997 Nov;120(Pt 11):1997–2011. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.11.1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES