Skip to main content
PMC home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1969 Jul;203(1):237–260.1. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008862

On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images

C Blakemore, F W Campbell
PMCID: PMC1351526  PMID: 5821879

Abstract

1. It was found that an occipital evoked potential can be elicited in the human by moving a grating pattern without changing the mean light flux entering the eye. Prolonged viewing of a high contrast grating reduces the amplitude of the potential evoked by a low contrast grating.

2. This adaptation to a grating was studied psychophysically by determining the contrast threshold before and after adaptation. There is a temporary fivefold rise in contrast threshold after exposure to a high contrast grating of the same orientation and spatial frequency.

3. By determining the rise of threshold over a range of spatial frequency for a number of adapting frequencies it was found that the threshold elevation is limited to a spectrum of frequencies with a bandwidth of just over an octave at half amplitude, centred on the adapting frequency.

4. The amplitude of the effect and its bandwidth are very similar for adapting spatial frequencies between 3 c/deg. and 14 c/deg. At higher frequencies the bandwidth is slightly narrower. For lower adapting frequencies the peak of the effect stays at 3 c/deg.

5. These and other findings suggest that the human visual system may possess neurones selectively sensitive to spatial frequency and size. The orientational selectivity and the interocular transfer of the adaptation effect implicate the visual cortex as the site of these neurones.

6. This neural system may play an essential preliminary role in the recognition of complex images and generalization for magnification.

Full text

PDF
237

Images in this article

260-1Plate 1
on p.260-1

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BARLOW H. B., HILL R. M. EVIDENCE FOR A PHYSIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION OF THE WATERFALL PHENOMENON AND FIGURAL AFTER-EFFECTS. Nature. 1963 Dec 28;200:1345–1347. doi: 10.1038/2001345a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blakemore C., Campbell F. W. Adaptation to spatial stimuli. J Physiol. 1969 Jan;200(1):11P–13P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Campbell F. W., Cleland B. G., Cooper G. F., Enroth-Cugell C. The angular selectivity of visual cortical cells to moving gratings. J Physiol. 1968 Sep;198(1):237–250. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell F. W., Cooper G. F., Enroth-Cugell C. The spatial selectivity of the visual cells of the cat. J Physiol. 1969 Jul;203(1):223–235. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Campbell F. W., Green D. G. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol. 1965 Dec;181(3):576–593. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Campbell F. W., Kulikowski J. J., Levinson J. The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings. J Physiol. 1966 Nov;187(2):427–436. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Campbell F. W., Kulikowski J. J. Orientational selectivity of the human visual system. J Physiol. 1966 Nov;187(2):437–445. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Campbell F. W., Robson J. G. Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. J Physiol. 1968 Aug;197(3):551–566. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cobb W. A., Ettlinger G., Morton H. B. Cerebral potentials evoked in man by pattern reversal and their suppresion in visual rivalry. J Physiol. 1968 Mar;195(2):33P–34P. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gilinsky A. S. Orientation-specific effects of patterns of adapting light on visual acuity. J Opt Soc Am. 1968 Jan;58(1):13–18. doi: 10.1364/josa.58.000013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. HUBEL D. H., WIESEL T. N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol. 1962 Jan;160:106–154. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hubel D. H., Wiesel T. N. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol. 1968 Mar;195(1):215–243. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pantle A., Sekuler R. Size-detecting mechanisms in human vision. Science. 1968 Dec 6;162(3858):1146–1148. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3858.1146-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Patel A. S. Spatial resolution by the human visual system. The effect of mean retinal illuminance. J Opt Soc Am. 1966 May;56(5):689–694. doi: 10.1364/josa.56.000689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sutherland N. S. Outlines of a theory of visual pattern recognition in animals and man. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1968 Dec 31;171(1024):297–317. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1968.0072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES