Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1969 Oct;204(2):475–491. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008925

Isotonic lengthening and shortening movements of cat soleus muscle

G C Joyce, P M H Rack
PMCID: PMC1351565  PMID: 5824648

Abstract

1. By supplying pulses to different subdivisions of the ventral nerve roots in rotation it was possible to obtain smooth contractions of cat soleus with low rates of stimulation.

2. After contracting isometrically the muscle was subjected to `step' changes in tension after which it lengthened or shortened isotonically.

3. Isotonic lengthening movements usually began relatively slowly but proceeded with increasing velocity; this acceleration was most conspicuous when low rates of stimulation were used.

4. At low rates of stimulation the isotonic lengthening movement often continued beyond the length at which the muscle could have generated that tension in an isometric contraction. The muscle then shortened slowly back toward that length.

5. Isotonic shortening movements began relatively rapidly, but as shortening continued the movement became slower, and often had an irregular oscillatory course.

6. The isotonic movements are discussed in relation to the sliding filament theory of muscle contraction.

7. The compliance of the series elastic elements was calculated from the relative amplitudes of the `step' changes in tension and length. The stiffness of this component increased with increasing muscle tension.

Full text

PDF
475

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ABBOTT B. C., WILKIE D. R. The relation between velocity of shortening and the tension-length curve of skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1953 Apr 28;120(1-2):214–223. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp004886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aidley D. J. Transient changes in isotonic shortening velocity of frog rectus abdominis muscles in potassium contracture. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1965 Oct 12;163(991):215–223. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1965.0068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bahler A. S. Series elastic component of mammalian skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol. 1967 Dec;213(6):1560–1564. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1967.213.6.1560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bouckaert J. P., Capellen L., de Blende J. The visco-elastic properties of frog's muscles. J Physiol. 1930 Jun 27;69(4):473–492. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1930.sp002664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Civan M. M., Podolsky R. J. Contraction kinetics of striated muscle fibres following quick changes in load. J Physiol. 1966 Jun;184(3):511–534. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HILL A. V. The series elastic component of muscle. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1950 Jul 24;137(887):273–280. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1950.0035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. HUXLEY A. F., NIEDERGERKE R. Structural changes in muscle during contraction; interference microscopy of living muscle fibres. Nature. 1954 May 22;173(4412):971–973. doi: 10.1038/173971a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. HUXLEY H., HANSON J. Changes in the cross-striations of muscle during contraction and stretch and their structural interpretation. Nature. 1954 May 22;173(4412):973–976. doi: 10.1038/173973a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. JEWELL B. R., WILKIE D. R. An analysis of the mechanical components in frog's striated muscle. J Physiol. 1958 Oct 31;143(3):515–540. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jansen J. K., Rack P. M. The reflex response to sinusoidal stretching of soleus in the decerebrate cat. J Physiol. 1966 Mar;183(1):15–36. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp007849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Joyce G. C., Rack P. M., Westbury D. R. The mechanical properties of cat soleus muscle during controlled lengthening and shortening movements. J Physiol. 1969 Oct;204(2):461–474. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Matthews P. B., Stein R. B. The sensitivity of muscle spindle afferents to small sinusoidal changes of length. J Physiol. 1969 Feb;200(3):723–743. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. PODOLSKY R. J. Kinetics of muscular contraction: the approach to the steady state. Nature. 1960 Nov 19;188:666–668. doi: 10.1038/188666a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rack P. M., Westbury D. R. The effects of length and stimulus rate on tension in the isometric cat soleus muscle. J Physiol. 1969 Oct;204(2):443–460. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. VRBOVA G. Changes in the motor reflexes produced by tenotomy. J Physiol. 1963 Apr;166:241–250. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. WELLS J. B. COMPARISON OF MECHANICAL PROPERTIES BETWEEN SLOW AND FAST MAMMALIAN MUSCLES. J Physiol. 1965 May;178:252–269. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES