Skip to main content
Polymers logoLink to Polymers
. 2026 Aug 7;18(16):1933. doi: 10.3390/polym18161933

Recent Advances in α-Diimine Nickel Complexes for the Synthesis of Polyethylene Elastomers via Chain Walking

Tian Liu 1,*, Rong Gao 1, Qingqiang Gou 1, Randi Zhang 1, Jingshuang Yang 1, Jingjing Lai 1, Qiang Yue 1, Ying Wang 1
PMCID: PMC13516639  PMID: 42655215

Abstract

Polyolefin elastomers (POEs) produced by ethylene/α-olefin copolymerization are indispensable for high-end applications such as photovoltaic encapsulation, precision microelectronic protection, advanced foamed footwear, and automotive lightweight components. α-Diimine nickel catalysts that operate through a chain-walking mechanism convert ethylene as the sole feedstock into highly branched polyethylene elastomers, eliminating the need for expensive comonomers. This review systematically analyzes α-diimine nickel complexes developed in recent years via modulation of ligand steric hindrance, electronic effects, and backbone rigidity, and provides a quantitative comparison of their catalytic performance. The compiled data reveal that the catalytic activities span 104–107 g PE (mol Ni)−1 h−1, the molecular weights range from 104 to 106 g mol−1, and the polydispersity indices (PDIs) can be tuned between 1.2 and 29.3, affording polyethylenes with branching densities from 2 to over 186 branches per 1000 carbons. These structural parameters directly govern the mechanical flexibility, elastic recovery, thermal properties, and processability in injection molding, foam extrusion, and film blowing, thus dictating the materials’ suitability for the aforementioned high-value applications. By establishing clear structure–performance relationships, this review offers forward-looking guidance for the industrial scale-up and catalyst design of polyethylene elastomers produced exclusively from ethylene.

Keywords: α-diimine nickel(II) complex, ethylene polymerization, chain-walking mechanism, the electronic and steric effects, performance adjustment

1. Introduction

Polyolefin materials, primarily manufactured from ethylene, propylene, and long-chain α-olefins via coordination or free-radical polymerization, have been extensively utilized across consumer packaging, medical devices, and industrial equipment, serving as critical alternatives to metals, wood, and glass [1]. Among them, thermoplastic polyolefin elastomers (POEs) produced by ethylene/α-olefin copolymerization have emerged as technology-intensive, high-value-added materials owing to their outstanding flexibility, aging resistance, and elastic recovery, making them indispensable for photovoltaic encapsulation, precision microelectronic protection, advanced foamed footwear, and automotive lightweight components [2,3]. However, the global supply of long-chain α-olefins such as 1-hexene and 1-octene remains structurally constrained, and major petrochemical corporations have established formidable patent and process barriers around high-temperature solution polymerization [4], severely limiting the large-scale independent industrialization of POEs for the vast majority of R&D entities.

To reduce dependence on costly α-olefin comonomers and circumvent existing intellectual property barriers, late transition metal catalysts that convert ethylene as the sole feedstock into branched polyethylene elastomers have attracted intense interest. Nickel-catalyzed ethylene oligomerization and polymerization date back to the Shell Higher Olefin Process (SHOP) [5], while the field was revolutionized by Brookhart’s discovery of α-diimine nickel and palladium complexes, which operate via a unique “chain-walking” mechanism and generate highly branched to hyperbranched polyethylene topologies from ethylene alone [6,7]. Since that seminal work, a wide array of nickel and palladium catalysts bearing various bidentate ligands—including phosphine-sulfonate, phosphine-phenolate, salicylaldimine, and N-heterocyclic carbene-based systems—have been developed and shown to produce polyolefin elastomers with diverse branching architectures [8,9]. Although palladium catalysts exhibit remarkable functional group tolerance, nickel-based systems are far more attractive for industrial application because of their higher catalytic activity, substantially lower metal cost, and the ability to achieve a broader range of polymer molecular weights. Within the nickel family, α-diimine nickel(II) complexes stand out for their exceptional structural tunability: the steric and electronic properties of the diimine ligand can be precisely modulated to control the relative rates of chain walking versus monomer insertion, thereby providing comprehensive regulation over molecular weight, polydispersity, branching density, and branch-type distribution [10,11]. This full-spectrum regulatory capability—spanning from lubricant base oil additives to film resins and ultrahigh-molecular-weight engineering plastics—has established a solid theoretical and experimental foundation for the direct production of commercially viable polyethylene elastomers from ethylene as the sole monomer.

Given the unparalleled versatility and the rapid recent advances in ligand design for α-diimine nickel catalysts, the present review focuses exclusively on these systems. We systematically analyze novel α-diimine nickel complexes developed in recent years through strategies including modulation of ligand steric hindrance, fine-tuning of electronic effects, and expansion of backbone rigidity, and we thoroughly explore the intrinsic relationship between catalyst molecular structure and polyethylene elastomer performance. By establishing clear structure–performance correlations and comparative performance data, this review aims to provide forward-looking guidance for the industrial scale-up and formulation design of ethylene-based polyethylene elastomers.

2. In-Depth Analysis of the Chain-Walking Mechanism

The fundamental reason α-diimine nickel complexes can transform ethylene into elastomers possessing complex network architectures-in sharp contrast to other transition-metal-catalyzed polymerization systems-lies in their unique “chain-walking” microscopic polymerization kinetics. The generally accepted chain-walking mechanism is supported by extensive experimental and computational studies [7,12,13,14,15]. During chain propagation, the electrophilic nickel center engages in subtle interactions with hydrogen atoms located at different positions along the growing polymer chain, such as β-H, γ-H, ω-H, and even higher-order interactions involving more remote hydrogen atoms; subsequently, the polymer chain rotates 180° about the M-η2-olefin bond, and the hydrogen atom ultimately reattaches to the terminal carbon of the chain [16,17,18]. These interactions can give rise to methyl, ethyl, propyl, or even longer branches, depending on which hydrogen atom is initially abstracted (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

The “Chain Walking” mechanism of the branched polyethylene formation with α-diimine nickel(II) complex.

Furthermore, to rationalize the peculiar observation that only methyl branches and long-chain branches are detected in certain catalytic systems, Pei et al. proposed a more in-depth mechanistic explanation based on experimental results and further computational studies [19]. They argued that the N-aryl substituents construct a significantly sterically hindered environment around the nickel center, which restricts ethylene insertion exclusively to primary or secondary alkyl nickel active species located at the α-position of a methyl branch. This stringent steric constraint completely blocks the formation of medium-length branches such as ethyl, propyl, and butyl through the conventional chain-walking pathway; nevertheless, the nickel center, by virtue of its high migratory aptitude, can still undergo multiple successive hopping walks along the polymer backbone already bearing methyl branches. Once the metal center migrates back to the methyl terminus, the active species reverts to a primary alkyl nickel species, thereby re-satisfying the steric requirement for ethylene insertion and facilitating the initiation and further growth of new long-chain branches.

Beyond explaining the chain walking mechanism, theoretical calculations have played an important role in understanding monomer insertion and chain transfer. DFT calculations have consistently identified ethylene insertion into the nickel–alkyl bond as the rate-determining step in the catalytic cycle. They quantify how the free-energy barrier for insertion is modulated by ligand architecture: bulky ortho substituents create a congested axial site that destabilizes the resting state and lowers the insertion barrier, while strongly electron-withdrawing substituents enhance the electrophilicity of the metal center, thereby facilitating ethylene coordination and subsequent migratory insertion. Regarding chain transfer, DFT analyses have identified β-hydride transfer to monomer as the dominant chain-transfer pathway and have determined its free-energy barrier relative to that of insertion. The difference between these two barriers effectively governs the polymer molecular weight. Calculations show that increasing ligand steric bulk raises the transfer barrier more substantially than the insertion barrier, thereby suppressing chain transfer and yielding higher molecular weights. Some studies have also examined chain transfer to alkylaluminum cocatalysts, providing a more complete picture of termination events [7].

Based on the above findings, we hypothesize that both the ligand backbone architecture and the type of N-aryl substituents can modulate the electronic [20,21] and steric [22,23] effects exerted by the ligand framework, thereby altering the coordination environment of the metal center, tuning the chain-walking process accordingly, and ultimately influencing the polymer microstructure [7]. In particular, the incorporation of electron-withdrawing substituents into the complex significantly enhances the electrophilicity of the metal center, which favors chain propagation and promotes the formation of high-molecular-weight polyethylene [20]. In addition, polymerization conditions-including temperature, ethylene feed pressure, and cocatalyst concentration-can also directly affect the chain-walking process and therefore the topological architecture of the resulting polymer, enabling the synthesis of products spanning from hyperbranched amorphous segments to linear semicrystalline segments from ethylene as the sole monomer [7,24,25]. For instance, ethylene pressure directly governs the rate at which the metal center captures ethylene monomer. Under high ethylene pressure, the monomer capture rate by the nickel center is rapid; consequently, the average walking distance of the nickel center along the growing chain is relatively short, yielding topologies that are predominantly relatively linear with moderate branching. In contrast, under low ethylene pressure, monomer capture is slow relative to the chain-walking process, allowing the nickel center to undergo long-distance migration along the polyethylene chain prior to ethylene insertion. This promotes repeated branching on existing branches and results in hyperbranched topologies [7].

3. Structural Evolution of α-Diimine Nickel(II) Complexes

Building upon the classic Brookhart-type complex backbone (Figure 1), researchers have undertaken further innovative structural designs of α-diimine nickel(II) complexes. It has been found that altering the ligand backbone, introducing different N-aryl substituents, or constructing bimetallic cooperative systems can each significantly influence catalytic activity and polymer properties. To systematically elucidate these structure-property relationships, this review presents an in-depth discussion from three perspectives: steric effects, electronic effects, and bimetallic synergistic effects.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Brookhart’s proposed α-diimine nickel(II) complex 1.

3.1. Steric and Electronic Modulation by N-Aryl Substituents

Within the molecular architecture of α-diimine nickel(II) complexes, the substituents on the N-aryl rings-particularly those at the ortho positions-impose a pronounced steric shielding effect around the active metal center, thereby directly influencing the energy barrier for monomer insertion and the propensity for chain transfer reactions.

3.1.1. Exploration of Fluorine-Substituted Nickel Complex Structures

Among various substituents, the fluorine atom, by virtue of its exceedingly small van der Waals radius and distinctly weak electron-withdrawing character, constitutes an ideal probe for tuning the electronic properties of the central metal. Researchers have speculated that weak interactions may readily develop between β-H atoms of the growing polymer chain and ortho-fluorine atoms on the N-aryl rings, thereby effectively suppressing β-H elimination [26]. For instance, complex 2 (Figure 2), designed and synthesized by Ahmadjo et al. [27], incorporates fluorine atoms at the ortho positions of the N-aryl rings; while retaining an open coordination environment, this complex sustains a moderate catalytic activity of 1.40 × 104 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 (30 °C, 30 min). Moreover, the resulting polyethylene attains a number-average molecular weight (Mn) of 2.48 × 105 g·mol−1 and a crystallinity as high as 58%, exhibiting the hallmarks of a semicrystalline polymer. Nevertheless, not all fluorine-containing modifications prove effective: complexes 3 and 4 [28], which bear polyfluoro substituents or trifluoromethyl groups, catalyze only the formation of oily oligomers with degrees of polymerization ranging from 6 to 9.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Fluorine-substituted α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 2–4.

Hu et al. [29] conducted a systematic investigation into the effect of fluorine substitution position (complex 5 series, Figure 3) and revealed the decisive role of positional effects: when the fluorine atoms are situated at the ortho positions (e.g., complexes 5e and 5f), the synergistic combination of steric hindrance and electronic effects effectively suppresses β-H elimination, yielding highly linear high-density polyethylene with a branching density as low as 1 branch per 1000 carbon atoms and a molecular weight (Mw) of 8.70 × 103 g·mol−1. In contrast, relocating the fluorine atoms to the meta or para positions (e.g., 5b, 5c, 5d) removes the proximate shielding of the metal center, markedly enhancing chain walking and resulting in products with Mw values in the range of (20–50) × 103 g·mol−1 and a branching density up to 80 branches per 1000 carbon atoms, thereby reducing the crystallinity of the resulting polymer and endowing it with soft, elastomeric characteristics. It is worth noting that, although the fully fluorinated complex 5f contains five fluorine atoms, both its catalytic activity and the molecular weight of the resulting polymer are inferior to those of 5e, which bears only ortho-fluorine substitution, indicating that an excessively strong electron-withdrawing effect may adversely affect catalytic performance.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Fluorine-substituted α-diimine nickel(II) complex 5.

3.1.2. Exploration of Nickel Complexes Bearing Flexible Cycloalkyl Ortho-Substituents

To probe the protective mechanism exerted by dynamic steric hindrance on the metal center, researchers introduced sterically tunable flexible cycloalkyl groups at the ortho positions of the N-aryl rings. Among these efforts, Zhai et al. synthesized a family of complexes 6 (Figure 4) bearing ortho-menthyl substituents [30]; these complexes exhibit pronounced syn/anti isomerism, and the two isomers display drastically different catalytic behaviors in ethylene polymerization. Upon activation with Et2AlCl, complex 6a, which favors a syn conformation, exhibited exceptionally high catalytic activity, reaching (2.5–6.6) × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 (22 °C, 15 min, 0.1 MPa). In contrast, the anti-configured complex 6b not only showed lower activity, but also produced a polymer with significantly lower branching density and molecular weight than its syn counterpart, thus suggesting the superiority of the syn conformation in promoting the chain-walking process. Furthermore, Li et al. introduced nitrogen-containing heterocycles as ortho-substituents on the N-aryl rings in complexes 7 (7a and 7b) [31]; in these systems, a direct secondary coordination interaction was established between the heterocyclic nitrogen atom and the nickel center. It has been experimentally demonstrated that the thus-constructed “second coordination sphere” effectively modulated the catalytic behavior, drastically suppressing the branching density to less than 1 branch per 1000 carbon atoms and elevating the melting point to above 130 °C, thereby affording nearly linear polymer materials.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Ortho-menthyl and nitrogen heterocyclic group-modified α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 6–7.

3.1.3. Exploration of Nickel Complexes Bearing Bulky Benzhydryl and Derivative Substituents

To further enhance catalyst thermal stability, sterically bulky benzhydryl groups and their derivatives have been extensively introduced into catalytic systems. In 2013, Rhinehart et al. first reported complex 8 (Figure 5), which incorporates ortho-benzhydryl substituents on the N-aryl rings and exhibits outstanding performance [32,33,34]. When the backbone substituent R is methyl, this complex displays remarkable thermal stability, retaining a catalytic activity of up to 2.85 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 even at 100 °C (10 min, 100 psi), and yields polyethylene with high molecular weight (Mn up to 6.25 × 105 g⋅mol−1), a narrow molecular weight distribution (PDI ≤ 1.46), and a moderate branching density (63–75 branches per 1000 carbon atoms) [32]. Upon further replacement of the backbone with a more rigid acenaphthyl group (R = An), both the thermal stability of the catalyst and the molecular weight of the resulting polymer are significantly improved [34].

Figure 5.

Figure 5

2,6-Diphenylmethyl substituted symmetric α-diimine nickel(II) complex 8.

Subsequently, complexes 9, 10, and 11 (Figure 6), which feature fully flanked bis-ortho-benzhydryl substitution, were developed to further enhance steric protection of the metal center and to systematically investigate the influence of electronic effects imparted by para-substituents on the N-aryl rings and by remote substituents on the benzhydryl groups on catalytic performance [35,36,37,38,39,40]. Among them, both complexes 9 and 10 displayed excellent catalytic activity and outstanding thermal stability. For instance, complex 9a reaches a maximum activity of 6.18 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 (100 °C, 30 min, 0.9 MPa), yielding semicrystalline polyethylene with high molecular weight (Mn up to 1.64 × 106 g⋅mol−1) and narrow molecular weight distribution (PDI = 1.1–2.1). Notably, complex 10, which incorporates trifluoromethyl (CF3) groups for electronic tuning, retained extremely high catalytic activity even at elevated polymerization temperatures. On the other hand, Muhammad et al. reported complex 11, in which multiple methoxy or fluorine substituents were simultaneously introduced at the meta and para positions of the N-aryl rings [40]; only the methoxy-substituted analogue proved catalytically active (5.00 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1) (100 °C, 30 min, 0.9 MPa) and capable of producing polymers with ultrahigh molecular weight (Mn up to 25.6 × 105 g⋅mol−1), a high melting point (Tm = 100.6 °C), and a low branching density (28–62/1000C). However, the catalyst bearing six fluorine atoms at analogous positions completely lost catalytic activity owing to its facile structural decomposition.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

2,6-Diphenylmethyl substituted symmetric α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 9–11.

To further expand the boundaries of the mechanical properties of the resulting polymers, Guo et al. reported a family of complexes 9b bearing remote substituents (H, OMe, Me, tBu, Ph) at the para positions of the benzhydryl phenyl rings [36], and demonstrated that these complexes exhibit catalytic activities as high as 2.77 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 (100 °C, 30 min, 0.7 MPa) and outstanding thermal stability, affording ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (Mw up to 45.1 × 105 g⋅mol−1) with moderate-to-high branching densities (26–71/1000C). Among them, the complex containing a distal tert-butyl substituent yielded polyethylene with a strain recovery (SR) of up to 62%. The introduction of the tert-butyl group not only enhanced the mechanical properties of the polymer but also markedly improved the solubility of the catalyst in nonpolar aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents at the molecular level. Building on these findings, Zhu et al. and Li et al. further designed and synthesized complexes 9c [37] and 9e [38], each bearing multiple tert-butyl groups. Complex 9c displayed high thermal stability and high catalytic activity, achieving a maximum activity of 7.04 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 (120 °C, 30 min, 3 MPa), and produced ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene elastomers (Mn up to 33.3 × 105 g⋅mol−1) with good mechanical properties (SR up to 75%). In contrast, 9e exhibited slightly lower catalytic activity than 9c but still possessed good thermal stability and generated polyethylene elastomers with high molecular weight (Mn up to 5.60 × 105 g⋅mol−1), high branching density (74–83/1000C), and an SR of up to 84%. Furthermore, complex 9d, obtained by introducing a tert-butyl group at the para position of the N-aryl ring, showed stable high activity over a broad temperature window of 30–100 °C, with catalytic activity consistently remaining on the order of 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1. Based on the above experimental results, the authors propose that this excellent thermal stability is primarily attributed to the π-π stacking interactions between the acenaphthyl backbone and the phenyl rings of the benzhydryl groups, which effectively suppress rotation of the N-aryl moieties, thereby protecting the metal center through axial steric hindrance and enhancing the thermal stability of this series of complexes.

To further explore the influence of the type and position of remote substituents on the benzhydryl groups of α-diimine nickel(II) complexes on catalytic performance, researchers have successively developed nickel complexes 12–17 (Figure 7) modified with diverse remote substituents [41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. Upon introducing a sterically demanding n-butyl group at the para position of the N-aryl ring, the electronic effects of the remote substituents (e.g., hydrogen, methyl, methoxy, and fluorine) begin to exert a remote regulatory influence on the performance of complexes 12 and 13. Complex 12 generally exhibits high catalytic activity on the order of 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1, with the activity reaching a maximum at 80 °C; the resulting polymer attains a molecular weight (Mn) as high as 8.45 × 105 g⋅mol−1, a branching density ranging from 40 to 78 branches per 1000 carbon atoms, and a strain recovery (SR) of up to 80%. Notably, the incorporation of electron-withdrawing remote substituents significantly promotes chain propagation while effectively suppressing chain transfer [41]. The corresponding complex 13, although displaying catalytic activity comparable to that of 12, yields polymers with a reduced branching density of 17–53 and a correspondingly increased melting point of 67–127 °C [42].

Figure 7.

Figure 7

α-diimine nickel (II) complexes 12–17 containing remote substituent groups.

After breaking the symmetry of the catalyst structure, the unsymmetrical complex 14 bearing a remote methyl group was successfully synthesized [43]. By tuning the substituent type on the other, less sterically encumbered N-aryl ring, the catalytic activity could be modulated over a wide range of (2.8–131.5) × 104 g·mol−1·h−1, and the resulting polymers exhibited branching densities between 28 and 81 and melting points ranging from −4.7 to 122.9 °C. Among the remote-methyl-substituted complexes 15 featuring different ligand backbones, the acenaphthyl α-diimine nickel(II) complex (R = An) displayed the highest catalytic activity and afforded the highest-molecular-weight polymer, whereas the H-substituted analogue showed low or even no catalytic activity [44]. In complex 16, which was designed by deliberately attenuating the steric bulk of one N-aryl substituent, the catalyst still maintained outstanding activity on the order of 106 g·mol−1·h−1 [45]; the resulting polymers attained a molecular weight (Mn) of (0.76–3.52) × 104 g·mol−1, a moderate branching density (55–77/1000C), and remarkably superior tensile mechanical properties-elongation at break as high as 704–1097%, tensile strength of 7–25 MPa, and strain recovery (SR) retained at a commendable level of 48–80%. In stark contrast, upon introducing a distal methoxy group into an analogue of complex 16, the catalytic efficiency declined substantially, and the molecular weight, branching density, and mechanical properties of the resulting polymer all deteriorated comprehensively. Complex 17, featuring further reduced ortho steric hindrance, upon activation with MAO persistently maintained an exceptional catalytic activity at the level of 106–107 g·mol−1·h−1 and exhibited distinct temperature-responsive behavior [46]: at low temperatures it tended to generate highly linear polyethylene, whereas at elevated temperatures it switched rapidly to producing highly branched oligomers.

By systematically modulating the number and positions of benzhydryl groups on the N-aryl rings and incorporating various substituents with distinct electronic or steric effects, a series of structurally elaborate catalysts, complexes 18–25 (Figure 8), were designed and synthesized. For complex 18, in which a benzhydryl group is introduced at only one ortho position of the N-aryl ring, studies demonstrated that as the steric hindrance around the active center increases, the branching density of the resulting polyethylene exhibits a decreasing trend [47]. Building on this, researchers introduced a range of cycloalkyl groups of varying ring sizes (from cyclopentyl to cyclododecyl) at the ortho positions of the N-aryl rings to obtain complex 19 [48,49]. Complex 19a reached the highest activity, 13.2 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 (40 °C, 30 min, 1 MPa), yielding polyethylene elastomers with high molecular weight (Mw = 9.68 × 105 g⋅mol−1), narrow molecular weight distribution, and high branching density (73–104/1000C). Notably, the complex 19a series exhibited exceptionally high selectivity for the formation of short-chain methyl branches, endowing the materials with outstanding elongation at break (353–861%) and favorable strain recovery (SR, 47.4–71.2%). With the introduction of the acenaphthenequinone backbone, the activity of complex 19b was further enhanced, reaching a maximum of 24.4 × 106 g mol−1 h−1 (30 °C, 30 min, 1 MPa), albeit with a decrease in the molecular weight of the resulting polyethylene (Mw =6.0 × 105 g⋅mol−1) [49].

Figure 8.

Figure 8

2,6-diphenylmethyl substituted asymmetric α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 18–19.

A series of complexes 20, incorporating diverse para-substituents on the N-aryl rings-including methyl, tert-butyl, methoxy, trifluoromethoxy, chloro, fluoro, and nitro groups-were investigated to probe their electronic effects [50,51,52,53,54,55]. These complexes displayed markedly different catalytic activities in toluene. Among them, the methoxy-substituted catalyst exhibited the optimal performance, achieving an activity as high as 17.1 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 (20 °C, 5 min, 1 MPa) [52]. Overall, the presence of electron-donating groups proved more beneficial than electron-withdrawing groups in enhancing the catalytic activity and thermal stability of the complexes, owing to the ability of the electron-donating groups’ positive electronic effect to stabilize the electrophilic metal center. In determining the polymer molecular weight, however, electron-withdrawing groups exhibited a more pronounced advantage: the nitro-substituted complex 20 (Figure 9) yielded the highest molecular weight, and the molecular weight order followed the clear trend nitro > tert-butyl > methoxy > fluoro. Notably, the branching density of the products followed an exactly opposite trend, further highlighting the delicate modulation of the chain-walking process by electronic effects. In addition, the catalytic performance of the trifluoromethoxy-substituted complex 20 was examined in different solvents. Its catalytic activity in hexane was found to be substantially higher than that in toluene, reaching a maximum of 21.0 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 (30 °C, 30 min, 1 MPa) [56], and the resulting polymer exhibited a higher branching density (186/1000C) than that obtained in toluene, ultimately affording a polymer with favorable mechanical properties-elongation at break (ε) up to 984% and strain recovery (SR) up to 71%.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

2,6-diphenylmethyl substituted asymmetric α-diimine nickel(II) complex 20.

Upon further increasing the number of benzhydryl substituents on the N-aryl ring, complex 21a (Figure 10), which bears a 2,4,6-tris(benzhydryl)phenyl moiety, exhibits outstanding catalytic activity (up to 10.7 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1; 30 °C, 30 min, 1 MPa), good thermal stability (retaining an activity of 2.97 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 at 90 °C), and yields hyperbranched polyethylene (179/1000C) with a strain recovery of up to 84%, an elongation at break of up to 731% [57]. In contrast, the steric effect exerted by multiple benzhydryl groups is even more pronounced in complex 21b, which displays high thermal stability over a broad temperature range of 30–100 °C and still achieves a catalytic activity of 1.7 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 at 100 °C [58].

Figure 10.

Figure 10

2,6-diphenylmethyl substituted asymmetric α-diimine nickel(II) complex 21.

To further elucidate the role of remote fluorine atoms, the Sun group prepared a series of unsymmetrical complexes 22 (Figure 11) [59,60,61,62,63]. Among these, complex 22 (R1 = NO2), which contains both nitro and fluorine electron-withdrawing groups, exhibits far higher catalytic activity (6.01 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1; 80 °C, 30 min, 1 MPa) and thermal stability than the analogous complex 22 (R1 = NO2) that lacks the bis(4-fluorophenyl)methyl substituent [54]. Furthermore, the highly active complex 23, which incorporates the bis(4-fluorophenyl)methyl group, achieves a catalytic activity up to 10.0 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 and tends to afford high-performance polymers richly populated with short-chain branches (methyl branching fraction exceeding 87%), a molecular weight (Mw) of 15.19 × 105 g⋅mol−1, and a branching density in the range of 86–102 branches per 1000 carbon atoms [64]. Specifically, the presence of abundant short-chain branches (e.g., methyl, ethyl) disrupts crystallinity, while the residual crystallites can still function as physical crosslinking points. A higher proportion of long-chain branching promotes chain entanglements and enhances strain-induced crystallization, thereby imparting excellent elastic recovery. Furthermore, the presence of long-chain branches significantly enhances shear thinning and melt strength, which are critical for film blowing and foam extrusion processes.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

2,6-diphenylmethyl derivatives substituted asymmetric α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 22–23.

Electron-donating groups likewise impart outstanding performance when deployed as remote substituents. Complex 24a (Figure 12), which bears a remote methoxy group, is highly sensitive to the choice of cocatalyst: with Et2AlCl, the branching density of the product sharply increases to 115 branches per 1000 carbon atoms, the elongation at break reaches 553.5%, and the strain recovery (SR) attains a value as high as 84%; switching to MAO causes the branching density to drop abruptly to 29 [65]. Upon introduction of a meta-tert-butyl group, complex 24b experiences a concurrent increase in both steric hindrance and electron density, which markedly improves its solubility in aliphatic hydrocarbons and, in turn, significantly enhances the thermal stability and the molecular weight of the resulting polymer [66]. In the complex 25 system, which combines benzhydryl groups with various cycloalkyl substituents, the catalytic activity reaches up to 17.5 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 (30 °C, 30 min, 1 MPa), and the molecular weight (Mn) of the resulting branched polyethylene elastomers can be regulated within the range of (2.14–6.68) × 105 g⋅mol−1. Among these, the bulkiest cyclooctyl group imparts the highest catalytic activity, further confirming the principle that tighter axial shielding of the metal center accelerates the chain propagation rate [67].

Figure 12.

Figure 12

2,6-diphenylmethyl derivatives substituted asymmetric α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 24–25.

Complex 26 (Figure 13), featuring an unsymmetrical architecture with a para-hydroxy group on the N-aryl ring and a highly imbalanced steric environment, effectively modulates the microscopic competition between monomer insertion and metal chain walking, ultimately delivering a remarkable catalytic activity of 29.1 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 and yielding an ultrahigh-molecular-weight polymer with a molecular weight (Mw) of 1.81 × 106 g⋅mol−1 [68]. Notably, the terminal free hydroxyl group, far from poisoning the metal center, provides a convenient handle for subsequent covalent grafting of the catalyst onto solid support surfaces. Complex 27, which bears a difluoro modification, also exhibits good catalytic activity (5.90 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1; 30 °C, 30 min, 1 MPa), and the resulting elastomer achieves an elongation at break as high as 2592% under a tensile stress of 0.97 MPa [69]. The presence of flexible cycloalkyl groups in complex 28 facilitates chain propagation, endowing it with high catalytic activity (13.6 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1; 50 °C, 10 min, 0.6 MPa) and the capability to produce polyethylene elastomers with high molecular weight (Mn up to 9.67 × 105 g⋅mol−1), high branching density (70–92/1000C), and a strain recovery (SR) of up to 83% [70]. Complex 29, in which one rigid N-aryl ring is replaced by a highly flexible alkyl chain, significantly reduces the steric hindrance on the opposite side of the active center. As a result, it exhibits high catalytic activity (substantially exceeding 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1) and generates low-molecular-weight polyethylene (Mn = 1–10 kg·mol−1) with high branching density (66–95/1000C) [71].

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Stereoscopically or electronically modified asymmetric α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 26–29.

Researchers applied the same steric-hindrance-reducing strategy to the acenaphthene backbone system and, by substantially lowering the ortho steric bulk on one N-aryl side while retaining only a single benzhydryl group, designed and synthesized complexes 30–34 (Figure 14). Among these, complex 30 exhibited a high activity of 8.80 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 (30 °C, 30 min, 0.8 MPa); although the molecular weight (Mn) of the resulting polyethylene dropped to 5.78 × 104 g⋅mol−1, its branching density increased considerably [72]. Complexes 31 and 32, which bear a single ortho-bis(4-fluorophenyl)methyl group, both displayed activities exceeding 1 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 when activated with MAO or EASC; notably, complex 32b retained an activity of 1.12 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1even under the demanding condition of 100 °C [73,74]. Complex 33, which carries a single ortho-benzhydryl derivative, effectively suppressed chain transfer owing to the “restricted rotation” effect, achieving a high activity of 5.32 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 at 80 °C and affording polyethylene that combines high molecular weight with a tunable branching density (15–77/1000C) and a strain recovery (SR) of up to 76% [75]. Complex 34a, bearing an ortho-methyl substituent, reached a maximum activity of 8.95 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 at 20 °C (20 °C, 30 min, 1 MPa) and, at 80 °C, produced a polymer with a branching density as high as 166 [76]; its ortho-chloro substituted analogue 34b exhibited even higher catalytic activity and thermal stability, attaining 10.9 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 (50 °C, 30 min, 1 MPa) [76].

Figure 14.

Figure 14

Single ortho-diphenylmethyl and its derivatives substituted acenaphthyl α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 30–34.

To achieve higher polymer molecular weights, researchers introduced bulky rigid groups-such as dibenzocyclopentyl and dibenzocycloheptyl moieties-into the catalyst backbone, leading to the design and synthesis of complexes 35–38 (Figure 15). Complex 35, which carries only one rigid group on a single side, showed a decline in catalytic activity as the steric hindrance on the opposite side increased; however, the molecular weight of the resulting polymer was substantially enhanced [77]. Complex 36, bearing dibenzocycloheptyl groups on both sides, exhibited high catalytic activity for ethylene polymerization, reaching up to 10.56 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 (30 °C, 30 min, 1 Mpa, Table 1) and affording a polymer with a weight-average molecular weight (Mw) as high as 5.9 × 105 g⋅mol−1 and melting points consistently above 95 °C [78]. In complex 37, where rigid groups are mounted along both axial directions to create a “sandwich” geometry, the rotational freedom is almost entirely suppressed; this effectively inhibits chain transfer and brings about a dramatic increase in polymer molecular weight, albeit at the cost of a sharply reduced catalytic activity [79]. Complex 38a achieves a favorable balance between activity and molecular weight: it maintains catalytic activity at the 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 level and yields high-performance polyethylene with a molecular weight (Mn) up to 5.86 × 105 g⋅mol−1 and a branching density in the range of 80–93 branches per 1000 carbon atoms [80]. By further increasing the rigidity of the ligand backbone, the thermal stability of complex 38b was significantly enhanced, allowing it to retain excellent polymerization activity even at a polymerization temperature of 100 °C. The molecular weight of the resulting polyethylene decreased slightly as the polymerization temperature increased [81].

Figure 15.

Figure 15

Acenaphthyl α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 35–38 containing dibenzocyclopentyl and dibenzocycloheptyl groups.

Table 1.

Mechanical properties of selected PEE samples obtained under varying conditions using nickel precatalysts 35–38.

Entry Cat. Cocat. T (°C) a Act. (106) b Mw (105) c Tm (°C) d BD e σb (MPa) f ɛ (%) g SR (%) h Ref.
1 35 EASC 20 8.41 1.64 124.1 - - - - [77]
2 36 MAO 30 10.56 5.90 113.3 63 - - - [78]
3 37 MMAO 70 0.83 9.05 - 89 - - - [79]
4 38a Et2AlCl 30 13.92 0.07 25 68 - - - [80]
5 38b Et2AlCl 30 10.9 2.9 57.9 57 4.2 1526 40 [81]

a Reaction temperature, b catalytic activity, unit g mol−1 h−1, c polymer molecular weight (Mw or Mn), unit: g mol−1, d polymer melting temperature, e branching density: per 1000 carbon, f Stress at break, g Strain at break, h strain recovery.

Over the past two years, to further fine-tune the catalytic performance of α-diimine nickel catalysts through electronic effects, researchers have introduced various substituents at different positions of the imine aryl rings, designing and synthesizing complexes 39–44. Complex 39 (Figure 16), which bears benzhydryl and chlorine substituents simultaneously at the ortho positions of the N-aryl ring while varying the para substituent as chlorine (39a) or fluorine (39b), displayed good thermal stability during ethylene polymerization. Among them, 39a maintained a remarkable activity up to 12.2 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 at a polymerization temperature of 50 °C (Table 2) [82]. Although the fluorine-containing 39b showed a slightly decreased activity, the resulting polyethylene exhibited improvements in molecular weight (Mw = 1.52 × 105 g·mol−1), melting point (Tm = 114.7 °C), branching density (62/1000C), and elastic recovery (SR = 55%), indicating that the introduction of fluorine substituents is beneficial for enhancing the overall performance of the elastomeric material [83]. Complex 40, featuring bulky substituents on both ortho positions together with a strong electron-withdrawing nitro group at the para position, achieved a maximum activity of 11.7 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 (30 °C, 30 min, 1 MPa) and produced highly branched polyethylene (121/1000C) [84]. The incorporation of trifluoromethoxy substituents in complex 41 significantly enhanced both catalytic activity and the molecular weight of the resulting polyethylene. For instance, 41b bearing a remote fluoro substituent displayed an activity up to 21.4 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 (40 °C, 30 min, 1 MPa), affording moderately branched (90/1000C) polyethylene with a high molecular weight (Mw = 6.41 × 105 g·mol−1) [85]. The introduction of a remote methoxy group in 41a maintained the high activity and further improved the molecular weight (Mw = 6.41 × 105 g·mol−1) and elastic recovery (SR = 68%) [86]. However, the molecular weights of these elastomers are markedly higher than those of commercial POEs, which also gives rise to processing difficulties. Complex 42, with multiple fluorine substituents introduced at both the meta and para positions of the N-aryl ring, enhanced the chain-walking ability of the catalyst and yielded polyethylene elastomers with high branching (134/1000C) and an outstanding strain-at-break (ɛ = 1797%) [87]. Further incorporating a remote fluoro substituent led to complex 43, which maintained high activity (up to 10.3 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1) while producing polyethylene with moderate branching (87/1000C) and good elastic recovery (SR = 52%) [88]. Complex 44, bearing electron-donating methoxy groups at the meta and para positions, increased the molecular weight of the resulting polyethylene (Mw = 3.20 × 105 g·mol−1), and the obtained elastomer retained a good strain-at-break (ɛ = 1251%) [89].

Figure 16.

Figure 16

Multiple electronic effects modified asymmetric α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 39–44.

Table 2.

Mechanical properties of selected PEE samples obtained under varying conditions using nickel precatalysts 39–44.

Entry Cat. Cocat. T (°C) a Act. (106) b Mw (105) c Tm (°C) d BD e σb (MPa) f ɛ (%) g SR (%) h Ref.
1 39a EASC 50 12.2 0.60 102.7 57 12.2 787 55 [82]
2 39b Et2AlCl 55 8.8 1.52 114.7 62 14.1 1635 62 [83]
3 40 Me2AlCl 30 11.7 2.60 109.3 121 11.0 1044 46 [84]
4 41a Et2AlCl 30 19.9 7.46 77.8 101 11.1 700 68 [86]
5 41b EASC 40 21.4 6.41 58.7 90 15.3 482 - [85]
6 42 Me2AlCl 30 7.4 1.57 81.7 134 8.6 1797 40 [87]
7 43 EASC 40 10.3 1.90 58.0 87 3.2 1589 52 [88]
8 44 Et2AlCl 30 7.5 3.20 79.1 56 8.9 1251 42 [89]

a Reaction temperature, b catalytic activity, unit g mol−1 h−1, c polymer molecular weight (Mw or Mn), unit: g mol−1, d polymer melting temperature, e branching density: per 1000 carbon, f Stress at break, g Strain at break, h strain recovery.

3.1.4. Exploration of Fused-Ring Systems and Sandwich Effects on Nickel Complexes

Extending their vision from simple benzene rings to the more sterically demanding naphthyl and phenanthryl frameworks (complexes 45–60, Figure 17), researchers sought new breakthroughs by enlarging the aromatic conjugated system. Two families of N-naphthyl complexes, 45 and 46, which bear different substituents at the ortho positions, both exhibited catalytic activities as high as 2.81 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 (40 °C, 10 min, 0.12 MPa) and produced polyethylene with high branching density (86–117/1000C) [90]. Complex 47a, featuring an ortho-benzhydryl substituent, maintained activity on the order of 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 while the branching density dropped to 12–61/1000C, and the polymer melting point exceeded 100 °C [91]. In contrast, complex 47b, which carries two bis(4-fluorophenyl)methyl groups, showed unremarkable activity yet produced highly uniform polymeric material with an extremely narrow molecular weight distribution (PDI = 1.22–1.99) and a molecular weight (Mn) as high as 7.12 × 105 g⋅mol−1 [92]. Complex 48, which is elaborately decorated with benzhydryl groups and their derivatives, delivered outstanding catalytic activity (13.0 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1; 30 °C, 10 min, 0.6 MPa) and, relative to complex 45, yielded polyethylene with higher molecular weight (Mn = (4.46–8.54) × 105 g⋅mol−1) and lower branching density (16–40/1000C) [93]. Complexes 49 (containing 8-halonaphthyl groups) and 50 (bearing phenanthryl groups) display catalytic performance that is largely dictated by the interconversion of syn/anti diastereomers [94,95]. Among them, complex 50b, which exists exclusively as the anti isomer, exhibits a single kinetic regime in polymerization, affording monomodal high-molecular-weight linear polyethylene with a turnover frequency (TOF) of 5.16 × 106 h−1 (40 °C, 15 min, 2.72 MPa).

Figure 17.

Figure 17

Symmetric and asymmetric α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 45–50 containing naphthyl group.

The so-called “sandwich” or “half-sandwich” type steric modification strategy (complexes 51–55, Figure 18) essentially operates by imposing significant steric hindrance above and below the axial positions to shield the metal center. Complex 51, which possesses only a single naphthyl substituent, exhibits a moderate activity on the order of 105–106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 yet is capable of yielding soft elastomers with a molecular weight (Mn) as high as 473.2 kg·mol−1 and an ultrahigh branching density (146–168/1000C) [96]. Complex 52, which bears a flexible N-alkyl chain, displays an activity in the 105 range, and both its branching density (74–81/1000C) and molecular weight (Mn up to 207.9 kg·mol−1) are slightly lower [70]. Sandwich-type complex 53, bearing tolyl, alkyl, and cycloalkyl groups at the 8-positions of the two N-naphthyl rings, shows high catalytic activity (3.37 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1; 30 °C, 30 min, 0.6 MPa) and produces branched polyethylene (branching density 41–121/1000C) with a broad molecular weight distribution (PDI = 4.6–29.3) [97,98,99]. The “poly(ethylene glycol) sandwich” complex 54 represents a highly creative design: as the PEG segment is lengthened, the activities of complexes 54b, 54c, and 54d increase roughly 9-fold relative to the parent 54a, and the product can be modulated from a highly branched amorphous state (106/1000C) to a lightly branched semicrystalline state (19/1000C) [100]. A family of sandwich-type complexes 55, containing electron-withdrawing fluorine groups, displays a unique ability to precisely control the microstructure, opening a new avenue for the synthesis of multi-block copolymers that integrate rigid linear segments with soft branched segments [101].

Figure 18.

Figure 18

“Half Sandwich” and “Sandwich” type α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 51–55 containing naphthyl groups.

To achieve a more comprehensive, three-dimensional steric shielding, researchers designed and synthesized complex 56 (Figure 19), which incorporates a bulky xanthene group [102]. This complex retains a high catalytic activity of 3.51 × 106 g⋅mol−1⋅h−1 at 80 °C and yields polymers with a molecular weight (Mn) up to 1.53 × 106 g⋅mol−1 and a branching density in the range of 28–101/1000C. Notably, when the substituent X is a phenyl group, the elastic properties of the resulting material are already fully comparable to those of commercially established thermoplastic elastomer products.

Figure 19.

Figure 19

Xanthene-bridged acenaphthyl α-diimine nickel (II) complex 56.

3.1.5. Exploration of Multidirectional Steric Modification of Nickel Complex Structures

Based on the concept of a synergistic double-layer steric strategy, Xia et al. designed and synthesized complex 57 (Figure 20) [103]. In this complex, the bulky diphenylamine group not only forms a first steric shielding in the inner sphere adjacent to the metal center, but also constructs a peripheral steric barrier that effectively blocks chain transfer reactions. This catalytic system maintains an activity of 2.00 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 even at a high temperature of 150 °C, and at 30 °C it exhibits an ultra-high activity of up to 1.03 × 109 g·mol−1·h−1 (30 °C, 1 min, 3.2 MPa); the resulting polyethylene reaches a molecular weight (Mw) of up to 4.67 × 106 g·mol−1, and its branching degree can be finely tuned over the range of 2–32/1000C. Complex 58a, which bears flexible long-chain alkyl groups, can adopt different conformations and generate dynamic steric hindrance around the metal center, thereby increasing the ethylene insertion barrier in certain cases and consequently lowering the catalytic activity, with the highest activity reaching only 2.14 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 (20 °C, 30 min, 0.6 MPa) [104]. This system ultimately produces highly branched polyethylene (branching degree up to 112/1000C) possessing good elasticity (strain recovery, SR, up to 88%). In contrast, complex 58b containing flexible cycloalkyl groups exhibits slightly improved activity, attaining 4.89 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 (50 °C, 30 min, 0.6 MPa), and the resulting polymer similarly displays a high branching density (112/1000C) and a high molecular weight (Mn = 5.44 × 105 g·mol−1) [105].

Figure 20.

Figure 20

Stereoscopic modified symmetrical α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 57–58.

Complexes 59a and 59b (Figure 21), which bear extremely bulky bowl-shaped bis(pentenyl) ligands, confine the metal center within an extremely congested cavity constructed by two hemispherical ligands. Both catalysts exhibit outstanding catalytic activities: the former achieves a maximum activity of 34.0 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 (60 °C, 30 min, 0.7 MPa). The polyethylenes obtained from both complexes possess low branching densities (<40/1000C), and the maximum number-average molecular weight (Mn) reaches 1.49 × 105 g·mol−1; the melting points are both around 130 °C [106]. Complexes 59c–59f with similar structures exhibit activities in the range of 0.64–3.74 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1, afford polymers with Mn up to 1.05 × 106 g·mol−1, and give branching densities between 6 and 56/1000C [107]. The unsymmetrical complex 60, which combines a pentenyl group and a benzhydryl group, shows an activity of up to 26.5 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 (50 °C, 5 min, 0.8 MPa) and yields ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (Mw > 106 g·mol−1) [17]. When fine-tuning the electronic effects in the analogous complex 61, it was found that introducing chlorine substituents slightly increases the activity to 29.2 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 (50 °C, 5 min, 0.8 MPa) and tends to produce polyethylene with a high branching density (128/1000C); introducing methyl groups favors the formation of polymer with the highest molecular weight (Mw = 2.57 × 106 g·mol−1); whereas the presence of fluorine atoms, although it raises the branching density, lowers both the activity and the molecular weight to different extents [108]. To fundamentally overcome the thermal decomposition problem, complexes 61a and 61b, which possess rigid cyclophane backbones that completely restrict the free rotation of the C-N bonds, were developed [109,110]. The fluorine-free 62a exhibits excellent high-temperature catalytic performance at 90 °C (TOF up to 1.07 × 106 h−1) and yields a polymer with Mn = 4.62 × 105 g·mol−1; the fluorine-substituted analogue 62b not only shows further enhanced thermal stability but also catalytically generates a specialty polymer characterized by a distinct bimodal molecular weight distribution.

Figure 21.

Figure 21

Stereoscopic modified symmetrical α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 59–62.

The development of “long-arm” complexes 63 and 64 (Figure 22) transcends the conventional design paradigm that relies solely on short-range steric hindrance. Complex 63, bearing a long-arm substituent, features a unique axial environment; under atmospheric pressure, it efficiently drives polymerization by virtue of an extremely low monomer insertion barrier (43.68 kJ·mol−1) and affords a polymer with a number-average molecular weight (Mn) as high as 3.61 × 105 g·mol−1 [111]. Complex 64f, which combines both lateral and axial steric confinement strategies, maintains thermal stability while boosting the catalytic activity to the 107 g·mol−1·h−1 level, and successfully yields a highly linear polymer with a weight-average molecular weight (Mw) of up to 5.19 × 106 g·mol−1 and a very low branching density (2–28/1000C) [112].

Figure 22.

Figure 22

“Long arm type” α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 63–64.

In the exploration of photoisomerizable catalysts (complexes 65–67, Figure 23), light serves as an intangible “switch” for modulating polymerization behavior. Inspired by the trans-cis photoisomerization of azobenzene groups upon UV irradiation, it was found that light can precisely regulate the steric crowding around the active center. For complex 65, photoinduction leads to a decreasing trend in both catalytic activity and branching density, while the molecular weight increases [113]. In the case of complex 66, light can trigger a trans-to-cis transformation, thereby effectively modulating the electronic effect of the ligand, which substantially enhances the activity and branching density, accompanied by a decrease in molecular weight [113]. Complex 67, bearing four azobenzene groups, has its metal center fully shielded in the absence of light, exhibiting higher catalytic activity than under illumination, and stably affords polyethylene with higher molecular weight and lower branching density [114]. This demonstrates a highly promising prospect for utilizing external physical fields to intervene in catalytic polymerization processes in a real-time and dynamic manner.

Figure 23.

Figure 23

α-Diimine nickel(II) complexes 65–67 containing azobenzene unit.

3.2. Modification of the α-Diimine Backbone Structure

In contrast to N-aryl modification, which tunes steric and electronic effects through substituents, modification of the α-diimine backbone structure is primarily centered on changes in structural rigidity. In general, the more rigid the α-diimine backbone, the better the catalytic performance of the corresponding complex. Summarized below are α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 68–86 (Figure 24, Figure 25, Figure 26, Figure 27 and Figure 28), which are derived from the classic complex 1 (Figure 1) and feature different backbone structures.

3.2.1. Exploration of Different α-Diimine Backbone Structures

Wu et al. introduced complexes 68a and 68b (Figure 24), which bear a naturally chiral camphor-derived backbone, to investigate the influence of a chiral environment on polymerization behavior. Notably, the chiral preference did not lead to any significant difference in catalytic outcomes; both complexes exhibited moderate ethylene polymerization activity of up to 5.20 × 105 g·mol−1·h−1 (−10 °C, 30 min, 0.12 MPa) and produced polyethylene with high molecular weight (Mn up to 3.90 × 105 g·mol−1), narrow dispersity (PDI < 1.60), and moderate branching (40–71/1000C) [115]. Complex 68c, which incorporates a substituted phenyl group to reinforce the backbone, shows markedly improved thermal stability, and its electron-withdrawing groups enhance the activity while significantly lowering the molecular weight of the polymer [23]. Complexes 69a and 69b, featuring a 9,10-phenanthrene-based backbone, both display high catalytic activity (up to 2.28 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1; −15 °C, 60 min, 0.12 MPa), with 69a capable of producing ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (Mn up to 2.14 × 106 g·mol−1) at low temperature [116]. Complex 70, built on a large conjugated 4,5-pyrenyl system, efficiently catalyzes ethylene polymerization with only a trace amount of cocatalyst (4.41 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1; 40 °C, 30 min, 1 MPa), affording polyethylene with a high branching density (130/1000C) and narrow distribution (PDI < 2.5) [117]. Complex 71, which combines a camphor-based backbone with bulky N-aryl substituents, demonstrates outstanding activity of up to 11.2 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 under high-temperature polymerization conditions (80 °C) and yields polyethylene with high molecular weight (Mw up to 2.37 × 106 g·mol−1), narrow dispersity (PDI = 1.6–2.6), and low branching density (19/1000C) [118]. The aforementioned studies further confirm that electron-withdrawing groups on the backbone play an irreplaceable and critical role in activating the catalyst [119].

Figure 24.

Figure 24

Skeleton-modified α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 68–71.

3.2.2. Modification and Exploration of the Acenaphthene-Based Backbone

As a typical representative of catalyst backbones, the acenaphthene-derived complex series 72 (Figure 25) exhibits excellent catalytic activity after the introduction of various substituents. The highest activity reaches 16.2 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 (20 °C, 10 min, 0.9 MPa); the resulting polyethylene has a weight-average molecular weight (Mw) of 4.18 × 105 g·mol−1 and a branching density ranging from 52 to 108/1000C [120]. In the methoxy-containing complex 72e, strong steric repulsion generated within the structure significantly increases the molecular weight of the polymer while reducing its branching density. Complex 73, modified with two methyl groups, not only exhibits markedly enhanced thermal stability compared to its precursor but also a greatly prolonged catalytic lifetime [121]. Complex 74, which adopts a strategy of backbone rigidification, shows a catalytic activity at 80 °C that is up to five times that of the classic Brookhart catalyst [122,123,124]. Building on this, complex 75, featuring a highly extended conjugated backbone, possesses a main-chain conjugated system that strongly withdraws π-electron density from the imine groups, creating a highly electron-deficient nickel center. This effect significantly accelerates the chain-walking process, ultimately producing a high-performance elastomer with a branching density as high as 135/1000C and an Mw of 5.10 × 105 g·mol−1. This elastomer exhibits outstanding mechanical properties, with a stress at break of 12.08 MPa and an elongation at break reaching 1148% [125]. Complex 76b, which incorporates a hydroxyethylphenoxy side chain for greater practical applicability, retains an activity of 8.20 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 at 70 °C, and the hydroxyl group on the side chain provides a favorable foundation for subsequent heterogenization and industrial application [126].

Figure 25.

Figure 25

α-diimine nickel (II) complexes 72–76 with modified acenaphthene skeleton.

3.2.3. Exploration of Dibenzobarrelene- and Dinaphthobarrelene-Based Backbone Structures

Constructing intricate three-dimensional cage-like architectures on the backbone (complexes 77–82, Figure 26) represents an effective physical strategy for suppressing chain transfer. For the dibenzobarrelene-bridged complex 77, the introduction of a methoxy group locks the conformation through intramolecular hydrogen bonding, thereby markedly improving catalyst stability. The electron-withdrawing effect of halogen atoms is negatively correlated with catalytic activity; consequently, the iodine-containing complex 77e not only displays the highest catalytic activity (5.60 × 105 g·mol−1·h−1; 50 °C, 30 min, 0.12 MPa) but also yields the polymer with the highest molecular weight in this series, with a number-average molecular weight (Mn) of up to 3.08 × 105 g·mol−1 [127]. Complex 78, which is modified with bulky 2,6-di-tert-butyl groups, maintains the stable existence of active species within its highly congested cage-like environment even at 80 °C [128]. Complex 79, built on a dinaphthobarrelene backbone, provides stringent steric shielding that protects both the axial and rear faces of the active center in all directions, which contributes to enhanced catalytic activity and thermal stability in ethylene polymerization (highest activity: 6.96 × 105 g·mol−1·h−1; 100 °C, 30 min, 0.12 MPa) and ultimately affords polyethylene with a narrow molecular weight distribution (PDI = 1.04–1.45) [129].

Figure 26.

Figure 26

α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 77–82 containing dibenzobarrelene(dinaphthobarrelene) skeleton.

Through fine unilateral tuning at the orthoposition of the N-aryl ring, complex 80 significantly retards the chain-walking process, ultimately yielding nearly perfectly linear polyethylene (branching density < 1/1000C) with a weight-average molecular weight (Mw) as high as 7.12 × 105 g·mol−1 and a polydispersity index (PDI) of 1.18–1.70 [130]. Complexes 81a and 81b, which contain a bulky N-8-phenylnaphthyl group, exploit weak nickel–phenyl interactions within the ligand to induce rapid chain propagation and effectively suppress chain walking; both exhibit markedly enhanced thermal stability and catalytic activity (1.39 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1; 80 °C, 30 min, 2 MPa) and produce semi-crystalline polymers with low branching density (<50/1000C) [131]. Complex 82, bearing a bulky terphenyl group, features an unsymmetrical backbone structure that simultaneously ensures smooth monomer insertion and effectively blocks chain transfer. When the polymerization temperature is raised to 80 °C, the catalytic activity remains at a high level on the order of 106 g·mol−1·h−1 by virtue of an intramolecular H···F hydrogen-bonding network, and the resulting polymer attains an Mw of up to 1.74 × 106 g·mol−1 [132].

Complexes 83–86 (Figure 27), which integrate bulky benzhydryl derivatives with a dibenzobarrelene backbone, vividly demonstrate the pronounced advantages of this structural design. The symmetric complex 83 exhibits high catalytic activity in ethylene polymerization (up to 6.98 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1; 50 °C, 20 min, 0.6 MPa) and, even at 90 °C, yields semi-crystalline polyethylene with high molecular weight (Mn = 7.89 × 105 g·mol−1), a high melting point (Tm = 100 °C), and low branching density (11–34/1000C) [133]. Complex 84 which bears extreme steric congestion on one side, retains an activity of 1.35 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 at 90 °C and successfully produces a high-performance elastomer with a branching density exceeding 100/1000C and a weight-average molecular weight (Mw) of up to 1.27 × 106 g·mol−1; moreover, the product maintains its highly branched character under different temperature and pressure conditions [134]. A direct comparison between complexes 85 and 86 was carried out to examine the influence of structural symmetry on catalytic performance. Both complexes are catalytically active over a broad temperature range up to 120 °C, and among them, complex 86, which features greater steric hindrance, not only displays superior activity but also comprehensively surpasses complex 85 in terms of both polymer molecular weight and branching density [135,136].

Figure 27.

Figure 27

Structure strengthening α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 83–86 based on dibenzobarrelene skeleton.

3.3. Exploration of Dinuclear α-Diimine Nickel Complex Structures

In addition to investigating the influence of N-aryl substituents and ligand backbones on the catalytic performance of nickel complexes, researchers have incorporated the concept of metal-metal cooperativity into catalyst design and have conducted extensive explorations in late-transition-metal-catalyzed olefin polymerization [137,138]. In bimetallic complexes, the intermetallic distance is a critical factor that governs the metal-metal cooperativity during ethylene polymerization and exerts a pronounced influence on both the polymer microstructure and the chain-walking process.

Dinuclear nickel complex 87 (Figure 28), which is bridged by a diazine unit, catalyzes ethylene oligomerization with an activity of up to 1.12 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 (30 °C, 30 min, 0.13 MPa) [139]. Complex 88a, constructed by tightly bridging two acenaphthene-based catalytic centers through a methylene linker, displays high catalytic activity in ethylene polymerization (7.86 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1; 50 °C, 30 min, 1 MPa) and yields polyethylene with a high melting point (Tm = 130.9 °C) and a high branching density (151/1000C) [140]. More revealingly, the activity of this dinuclear structure far exceeds that of the mononuclear complex obtained by its dissection, offering rare and compelling evidence for a “positive bimetallic synergistic effect”. The subsequent complex 88b system further discloses that the close proximity of the two active centers can substantially alter the electronic arrangement in the environment surrounding the metal centers [141].

Figure 28.

Figure 28

N,N-alkyl and aryl bridging binuclear α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 87–88.

Among the dinuclear catalyst systems bridged by a 1,4-phenylene unit, complex 89d (Figure 29), which contains isopropyl substituents, exhibits the highest catalytic activity, reaching 1.07 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 (42 °C, 20 min, 0.15 MPa), and produces polyethylene with a broad molecular weight distribution [142]. Complex 90, in which a bulky benzhydryl group is further introduced onto the dinuclear backbone, displays superior activity relative to its mononuclear counterpart, with an optimal activity of approximately 1.51 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 (30 °C, 30 min, 0.6 MPa), and yields polyethylene with high molecular weight (Mn up to 4.46 × 105 g·mol−1), high branching density (79–92/1000C), and outstanding mechanical properties (strain recovery, SR, up to 84%) [143]. Complex 91, featuring an o-phenylene linker, not only significantly outperforms the corresponding mononuclear analogue in activity, but also enables the synthesis of customized elastomeric materials with strain recovery tunable over the range of 29–86% through precise modulation of reaction conditions [144].

Figure 29.

Figure 29

Aryl bridging binuclear α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 89–91.

When the bridging framework is highly conjugated (complex 92, Figure 30), the catalyst not only achieves an activity of 1.05 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 under ambient conditions (22 °C, 0.5 MPa, 30 min), but the bulky borate anions added to the polymerization system can also effectively stabilize the active centers at elevated temperatures [145]. Dinuclear complexes 93a and 93b, designed and synthesized on the basis of a bulky 4,5,9,10-tetrapyrenyl framework, display comparable activities; the former exhibits an activity of 1.50 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 (30 °C, 30 min, 1 MPa) and yields linear polyethylene resin with low branching density (7–14/1000C) and a high melting point (132 °C) [146,147]. The key discovery concerning the mechanism by which bimetallic synergistic effects suppress chain transfer originates from dinuclear complexes 94 and 95, which are bridged by large conjugated structures such as xanthene, naphthalene, and biphenyl. Taking complex 88 as an example, its catalytic activity reaches up to 5.00 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 (20 °C, 30 min, 0.9 MPa), producing polyethylene with a maximum molecular weight (Mn) of 2.39 × 105 g·mol−1. Notably, under identical conditions, its mononuclear analogue displays an activity of only 4.60 × 106 g·mol−1·h−1 and an Mn of 1.49 × 105 g·mol−1; when the reaction temperature is raised to 80 °C, both the catalytic activity and the product molecular weight of complex 96 reach nearly twice those of the corresponding mononuclear analogue. Thorough physicochemical analyses confirm that this phenomenon is attributed to a strong Ni-Ni through-space cooperativity arising between the two adjacent nickel centers; this intermetallic electronic interaction can effectively suppress β-hydride elimination, thereby significantly retarding the chain-walking process [18]. The similarly excellent results exhibited by complex 95 further provide solid experimental evidence for the theory of dinuclear cooperative catalysis with late transition metals [148].

Figure 30.

Figure 30

Binuclear α-diimine nickel(II) complexes 92–95 containing conjugated skeleton.

4. Summary and Outlook

Brookhart-type α-diimine nickel(II) complexes have been extensively investigated owing to their unique chain-walking capability. The polymerization activity of these catalysts and the microstructural features of the resulting polymers can be finely regulated by tailoring the ligand structure and polymerization conditions. This review has summarized the main achievements in this field. The chain-walking mechanism and the principles governing the formation of various branched polymer architectures have been elucidated. Systematic ligand-modification strategies—including steric, electronic, configurational, and bimetallic effects—have been demonstrated to alter the electron density at the metal center and the steric shielding at the axial coordination sites, thereby effectively intervening in chain propagation and chain transfer. These advances have provided viable routes to high-activity, thermally robust catalytic systems and have enabled the synthesis of high-value-added polyethylene topologies, such as polyethylene elastomers, ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene, and low-molecular-weight branched polyethylene, all from ethylene as the sole monomer. Of particular note, hyperbranched polyethylene with thermoplastic elastomer properties holds great promise as a substitute for traditional elastic ethylene copolymers.

Despite these remarkable advances, the rational design of advanced catalytic systems still faces several critical challenges, and addressing these will present significant opportunities for future investigators. First, improving catalyst stability at elevated temperatures without compromising polymerization activity remains a primary hurdle. Future designs must explore more robust ligand frameworks to prevent catalyst deactivation and chain transfer under harsh industrial conditions. Second, achieving precise branching control—specifically regulating branch type, length, and distribution along the polymer backbone—is essential for tailoring polymer architectures to specific needs. Third, deeper insights into structure–property relationships are urgently required to accurately map how specific microstructural topological features dictate macroscopic mechanical and rheological properties, thereby guiding the customized design of novel resins. Furthermore, evaluating the industrial scalability of these catalysts is imperative; bridging the gap between laboratory-scale synthesis and large-scale, cost-effective production will be a critical next step. Finally, the integration of emerging computational approaches, such as density functional theory (DFT) combined with machine learning (ML), offers a powerful toolset. These computational methods can accelerate the discovery of next-generation α-diimine nickel(II) complexes by predicting catalyst behavior and simulating polymer microstructures prior to empirical synthesis.

By overcoming these challenges, it is anticipated that the quality of branched polyethylene resins can be precisely modulated, facilitating the large-scale application of advanced polyethylene elastomers in high-demand industries, including microelectronic packaging, vehicle manufacturing, and footwear production.

Author Contributions

Literature review and writing, T.L.; resources and editing, T.L., R.Z., J.Y., J.L., Q.Y., and Y.W.; funding acquisition, Q.G. and R.G.; supervision, Q.G. and R.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Tian Liu, Rong Gao, Qingqiang Gou, Randi Zhang, Jingshuang Yang, Jingjing Lai, Qiang Yue and Ying Wang were employed by the company SINOPEC (Beijing) Research Institute of Chemical Industry Co. Ltd. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U23B6011).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Sauter D.W., Taoufik M., Boisson C. Polyolefins, a Success Story. Polymers. 2017;9:185. doi: 10.3390/polym9060185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hustad P.D. Frontiers in olefin polymerization: Reinventing the world’s Most common synthetic polymers. Science. 2009;325:704–707. doi: 10.1126/science.1174927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Patel K., Chikkali S.H., Sivaram S. Ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene: Catalysis, structure, properties, processing and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2020;109:101290. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Braunschweig H., Breitling F.M. Constrained geometry complexes-synthesis and applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006;250:2691–2720. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.10.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Keim W. Oligomerization of Ethylene to α-Olefins: Discovery and Development of the Shell Higher Olefin Process (SHOP) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013;52:12492–12496. doi: 10.1002/anie.201305308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Johnson L.K., Killian C.M., Brookhart M. New Pd(II)- and Ni(II)-based catalysts for polymerization of ethylene and alpha-olefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995;117:6414–6415. doi: 10.1021/ja00128a054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Guan Z., Cotts P.M., McCord E.F., McLain S.J. Chain walking: A new strategy to control polymer topology. Science. 1999;283:2059–2062. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5410.2059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Birajdar S.R., Gonnade G.R., Samir H., Chikkali H.S. Regulating the polyethylene microstructure by increasing steric crowding in naphthoxy imine-ligated Ni(ii) complexes. Polym. Chem. 2024;15:292–302. doi: 10.1039/d3py01010d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mu H., Pan L., Song D., Li Y. Nickel and Palladium Catalysts for Ethylene (Co)Polymerization: Challenges and Opportunities. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:10142–10218. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kaulage S.H., Jadhav H.S., Chikkali S.H. Iron, cobalt, and nickel catalysed ethylene oligomerization: Recent advances and mechanistic insights. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Part A. 2026:1–33. doi: 10.1080/10601325.2026.2686270. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mahmood Q., Hu Z., Ren G., Sun W.-H. Recent advances in nickel Catalysis for thermoplastic polyethylene elastomers: Synthesis strategies, properties, and future perspectives. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2025;541:216833. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2025.216833. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Svejda S.A., Johnson L.K., Brookhart M. Low-temperature spectroscopic observation of chain growth and migratory insertion barriers in (α-Diimine)Ni(II) olefin polymerization catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:10634–10635. doi: 10.1021/ja991931h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tempel D.J., Johnson L.K., Huff R.L., White P.S., Brookhart M. Mechanistic studies of Pd(II)-α-Diimine-catalyzed olefin polymerizations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:6686–6700. doi: 10.1021/ja000893v. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shultz L.H., Tempel D.J., Brookhart M. Palladium(II) β-Agostic alkyl cations and alkyl ethylene complexes: Investigation of polymer chain isomerization mechanisms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001;123:11539–11555. doi: 10.1021/ja011055j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Allen K.E., Campos J., Daugulis O., Brookhart M. Living polymerization of ethylene and copolymerization of ethylene/methyl acrylate using “Sandwich” Diimine palladium catalysts. ACS Catal. 2015;5:456–464. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.5b01490. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Leatherman M.D., Svejda S.A., Johnson L.K., Brookhart M. Mechanistic studies of nickel(II) alkyl Agostic cations and alkyl ethylene complexes: Investigations of chain propagation and isomerization in (α-diimine)Ni(II)-catalyzed ethylene polymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:3068–3081. doi: 10.1021/ja021071w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hu X., Zhang Y., Zhang Y., Jian Z. Unsymmetrical strategy makes significant differences in α-Diimine nickel and palladium catalyzed ethylene (co)polymerizations. ChemCatChem. 2020;12:2497–2505. doi: 10.1002/cctc.202000141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang R., Sui X., Pang W., Chen C. Ethylene polymerization by xanthene-bridged Dinuclear α-Diimine NiII complexes. ChemCatChem. 2016;8:37. doi: 10.3390/polym8020037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pei L., Liu F., Liao H., Gao J., Zhong L., Gao H., Wu Q. Synthesis of Polyethylenes with controlled branching with α-Diimine nickel catalysts and revisiting formation of Long-chain branching. ACS Catal. 2018;8:1104–1113. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.7b03282. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Popeney C., Guan Z. Ligand electronic effects on late transition metal polymerization catalysts. Organometallics. 2005;24:1145–1155. doi: 10.1021/om048988j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Liu J., Li Y., Li Y., Hu N. Ethylene polymerization by (α-diimine)nickel(II) complexes bearing different substituents on para-position of imines activated with MMAO. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008;109:700–707. doi: 10.1002/app.28134. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gates D.P., Svejda S.A., Onate E., Killian C.M., Johnson L.K., White P.S., Brookhart M. Synthesis of branched polyethylene using (α-diimine)nickel(II) catalysts:  Influence of temperature, ethylene pressure, and ligand structure on polymer properties. Macromolecules. 2000;33:2320–2334. doi: 10.1021/ma991234+. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu F.S., Hu H.B., Xu Y., Guo L.-H., Zai S.-B., Song K.-M., Gao H.-Y., Zhang L., Zhu F.-M., Wu Q. Thermostable α-diimine nickel(II) catalyst for ethylene polymerization: Effects of the substituted backbone structure on catalytic properties and branching structure of polyethylene. Macromolecules. 2009;42:7789–7796. doi: 10.1021/ma9013466. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang Z., Liu Q., Solan G.A., Sun W.-H. Recent advances in Ni-mediated ethylene chain growth: Nimine-donor ligand effects on catalytic activity, thermal stability and oligo-/polymer structure. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017;350:68–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.06.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Guan Z.B. Control of polymer topology through late-transition-metal catalysis. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2003;41:3680–3692. doi: 10.1002/pola.10969. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Makio H., Terao H., Iwashita A., Fujita T. FI catalysts for olefin polymerization-a comprehensive treatment. Chem. Rev. 2011;111:2363–2449. doi: 10.1021/cr100294r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ahmadjo S., Damavandi S., Zohuri G.H., Farhadipour A., Samadieh N., Etemadinia Z. Synthesis and application of fluorinated α-diimine nickel catalyst for ethylene polymerization: Deactivation mechanism. Polym. Bull. 2017;74:3819–3832. doi: 10.1007/s00289-017-1924-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rishina L.A., Kissin Y.V., Lalayan S.S., Gagieva S.C., Kurmaev D.A., Tuskaev V.A., Bulychev B.M. New α-diimine nickel complexes-Synthesis and catalysis of alkene oligomerization reactions. J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem. 2016;423:495–502. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2016.07.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hu X.Q., Zhang Y., Li B., Jian Z. Fluorinated α-diimine nickel mediated ethylene (co)polymerization. Chem. Eur. J. 2021;27:11935–11942. doi: 10.1002/chem.202101521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhai F., Jordan R.F. (α-Diimine)nickel complexes that contain menthyl substituents: Synthesis, conformational behavior, and olefin polymerization catalysis. Organometallics. 2017;36:2784–2799. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00283. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Li M., Wang X., Luo Y., Chen C. A second-coordination-sphere strategy to modulate nickel- and palladium-catalyzed olefin polymerization and copolymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017;56:11604–11609. doi: 10.1002/anie.201706249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rhinehart J.L., Brown L.A., Long B.K. A robust Ni(II) α-diimine catalyst for high temperature ethylene polymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013;135:16316–16319. doi: 10.1021/ja408905t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rhinehart J.L., Mitchell N.E., Long B.K. Enhancing α-diimine catalysts for high-temperature ethylene polymerization. ACS Catal. 2014;4:2501–2504. doi: 10.1021/cs500694m. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Brown L.A., Anderson W.C., Mitchell N.E., Gmernicki K.R., Long B.K. High temperature, living polymerization of ethylene by a sterically-demanding nickel(II) α-diimine catalyst. Polymers. 2018;10:41. doi: 10.3390/polym10010041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Guo L., Dai S., Chen C. Investigations of the ligand electronic effects on α-diimine nickel(II) catalyzed ethylene polymerization. Polymers. 2016;8:37. doi: 10.3390/polym8020037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Guo L.H., Lian K.B., Kong W.Y., Xu S., Jiang G., Dai S. Synthesis of various branched ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylenes using sterically hindered acenaphthene-based α-diimine Ni(II) catalysts. Organometallics. 2018;37:2442–2449. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.8b00275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhu N.N., Khan M.A., Pang W., Behzadi S., Qasim M. Synthesis of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene elastomers by para-tert-butyl dibenzhydryl functionalized α-diimine nickel catalysts at elevated temperature. Eur. Polym. J. 2022;178:111497. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111497. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li S., Zhao Y., Dai S. Synthesis of polyethylene thermoplastic elastomer by using robust α-diimine Ni(II) catalysts with abundant tBu substituents. J. Polym. Sci. 2021;59:638–645. doi: 10.1002/pol.20210017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang L., Liu M., Mahmood Q., Yuan S., Li X., Qin L., Zou S., Liang T., Sun W.-H. Enhancing the thermal stability of α-diimine Ni(II) catalysts for ethylene polymerization via symmetrical axial shielding strategy. Eur. Polym. J. 2023;194:112112. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112112. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Muhammad Q., Tan C., Chen C. Concerted steric and electronic effects on α-diimine nickel- and palladium-catalyzed ethylene polymerization and copolymerization. Sci. Bull. 2020;65:300–307. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2019.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li S., Xu G., Dai S. A remote nonconjugated electron effect in insertion polymerization with α-diimine nickel and palladium species. Polym. Chem. 2020;11:2692–2699. doi: 10.1039/d0py00218f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhao Y., Li S., Fan W., Dai S. Reversion of the chain walking ability of α-diimine nickel and palladium catalysts with bulky diarylmethyl substituents. J. Organomet. Chem. 2021;932:121649. doi: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2020.121649. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Schnitte M., Lipinski S., Schiebel E., Mecking S. Pentafluorophenyl groups as remote substituents in Ni(II) polymerization catalysis. Organometallics. 2019;39:13–17. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.9b00784. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gong Y., Li S., Gong Q., Zhang S., Liu B., Dai S. Systematic investigations of ligand steric effects on α-diimine nickel catalyzed olefin polymerization and copolymerization. Organometallics. 2019;38:2919–2926. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.9b00267. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Guo L., Hu X., Lu W., Liu Q., Dai S. Investigations of ligand backbone effects on bulky diarylmethyl-based nickel(II) and palladium(II) catalyzed ethylene polymerization and copolymerization. J. Organomet. Chem. 2021;952:122046. doi: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2021.122046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wang H., Lu W., Zou M., Dai S. Direct synthesis of polyethylene thermoplastic elastomers using hybrid bulky acenaphthene-based α-diimine Ni(II) catalysts. Molecules. 2023;28:2266. doi: 10.3390/molecules28052266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ma X., Hu X., Zhang Y., Mu H., Cui L., Jian Z. Preparation and in situ chain-end-functionalization of branched ethylene oligomers by monosubstituted α-diimine nickel catalysts. Polym. Chem. 2019;10:2596–2607. doi: 10.1039/c9py00433e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jiang S., Zheng Y., Oleynik I.V., Yu Z., Solan G.A., Oleynik I.I., Liu M., Ma Y., Liang T., Sun W.-H. N,N-bis(2,4-dibenzhydryl-6-cycloalkylphenyl)butane-2,3-diimine-nickel complexes as tunable and effective catalysts for high-molecular-weight PE elastomers. Molecules. 2023;28:4852. doi: 10.3390/molecules28124852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Saeed H., Mahmood Q., Yuan R., Wang Y., Zou S., Tahir F.K., Ma Y., Liang T., Sun W.-H. High-performance polyethylene elastomers using a hybrid steric approach in α-diimine nickel precatalysts. Polym. Chem. 2024;15:1437–1452. doi: 10.1039/d4py00061g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Liu H., Zhao W., Hao X., Redshaw C., Huang W., Sun W.-H. 2,6-Dibenzhydryl-N-(2-phenyliminoacenaphthylenylidene)-4-methylbenzenamine nickel dibromides: Synthesis, characterization, and ethylene polymerization. Organometallics. 2011;30:2418–2424. doi: 10.1021/om200154a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Mahnood Q., Zeng Y., Yue E., Solan G.A., Liang T., Sun W.-H. Ultra-high molecular weight elastomeric polyethylene using an electronically and sterically enhanced nickel catalyst. Polym. Chem. 2017;8:6416–6430. doi: 10.1039/c7py01606a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wu R., Wang Y., Zhang R., Guo C.-Y., Flisak Z., Sun Y., Sun W.-H. Finely tuned nickel complexes as highly active catalysts affording branched polyethylene of high molecular weight: 1-(2,6-Dibenzhydryl-4-methoxyphenylimino)-2-(arylimino)acenaphthylenenickel halides. Polymer. 2018;153:574–586. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2018.08.056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fan L., Du S., Guo C., Hao X., Sun W.-H. 1-(2,6-Dibenzhydryl-4-fluorophenylimino)-2-aryliminoacenaphthylylnickel halides highly polymerizing ethylene for the polyethylenes with high branches and molecular weights. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2015;53:1369–1378. doi: 10.1002/pola.27572. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mahnood Q., Zeng Y., Wang X., Sun Y., Sun W.-H. Advancing polyethylene properties by incorporating NO2 moiety in 1,2-bis(arylimino)acenaphthylnickel precatalysts: Synthesis, characterization and ethylene polymerization. Dalton Trans. 2017;46:6934–6947. doi: 10.1039/c7dt01295k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kong S., Guo C., Yang W., Wang L., Sun W.-H., Glaser R. 2,6-Dibenzhydryl-N-(2-phenyliminoacenaphthylenylidene)-4-chloro-aniline nickel dihalides: Synthesis, characterization and ethylene polymerization for polyethylenes with high molecular weights. J. Organomet. Chem. 2013;725:37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2012.12.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Liu M., Zhang R., Ma Y., Han M., Solan G.A., Yang W., Liang T., Sun W.-H. Trifluoromethoxy-substituted nickel catalysts for producing highly branched polyethylenes: Impact of solvent, activator and N,N′-ligand on polymer properties. Polym. Chem. 2022;13:1040–1058. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang X., Fan L., Ma Y., Guo C.-Y., Solan G.A., Sun Y., Sun W.-H. Elastomeric polyethylenes accessible via ethylene homo-polymerization using an unsymmetrical α-diimino-nickel catalyst. Polym. Chem. 2017;8:2785–2795. doi: 10.1039/c7py00434f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Li X., Qin L., Mahmood Q., Yu Z., Zou S., Wang Y., Liang T., Sun W.-H. Thermally stable unsymmetrical 2,3-diiminobutane-nickel pre-catalysts for synthesis of high molecular weight polyethylene elastomers. Eur. Polym. J. 2023;200:112520. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112520. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Du S., Kong S., Shi Q., Mao J., Guo C., Yi J., Liang T., Sun W.-H. Enhancing the activity and thermal stability of nickel complex precatalysts using 1-[2,6-bis(bis(4-fluorophenyl)methyl)-4-methyl phenylimino]-2-aryliminoacenaphthylene derivatives. Organometallics. 2015;34:582–590. doi: 10.1021/om500943u. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zhang Q., Zhang R., Ma Y., Solan G.A., Liang T., Sun W.-H. Branched polyethylenes attainable using thermally enhanced bis(imino)acenaphthene-nickel catalysts: Exploring the effects of temperature and pressure. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2019;573:73–86. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2019.01.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wang X., Fan L., Yuan Y., Du S., Sun Y., Solan G.A., Guo C.-Y., Sun W.-H. Raising the N-aryl fluoride content in unsymmetrical diaryliminoacenaphthylenes as a route to highly active nickel(II) catalysts in ethylene polymerization. Dalton Trans. 2016;45:18313–18323. doi: 10.1039/c6dt03817d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhang R., Wang Z., Ma Y., Solan G.A., Sun Y., Sun W.-H. Plastomeric-like polyethylenes achievable using thermally robust N,N′-nickel catalysts appended with electron withdrawing difluorobenzhydryl and nitro groups. Dalton Trans. 2019;48:1878–1891. doi: 10.1039/c8dt04427a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wang Y., Vignesh A., Qu M., Wang Z., Sun Y., Sun W.-H. Access to polyethylene elastomers via ethylene homo-polymerization using N,N′-nickel(II) catalysts appended with electron withdrawing difluorobenzhydryl group. Eur. Polym. J. 2019;117:254–271. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.05.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zheng Y., Jiang S., Liu M., Yu Z., Ma Y., Solan G.A., Zhang W., Liang T., Sun W.-H. High molecular weight PE elastomers through 4,4-difluorobenzhydryl substitution in symmetrical α-diimino-nickel ethylene polymerization catalysts. RSC Adv. 2022;12:24037–24049. doi: 10.1039/d2ra04321a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yuan S., Duan T., Zhang R., Solan G.A., Ma Y., Sun W.-H. Alkylaluminum activator effects on polyethylene branching using a N,N′-nickel precatalyst appended with bulky 4,4′-dimethoxybenzhydryl groups. Appl. Organometal. Chem. 2019;33:e4785. doi: 10.1002/aoc.4785. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Chen A., Liao D., Chen C. Promoting ethylene (co)polymerization in aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents using tert-butyl substituted nickel catalysts. Chin. J. Chem. 2022;40:215–222. doi: 10.1007/s10118-022-2650-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Suo H., Oleynik I.V., Huang C., Oleynik I.I., Solan G.A., Ma Y., Liang T., Sun W.-H. Ortho-cycloalkyl substituted N,N′-diaryliminoacenaphthene-Ni(II) catalysts for polyethylene elastomers; exploring ring size and temperature effects. Dalton Trans. 2017;46:15684–15697. doi: 10.1039/c7dt03362a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wu R., Stieglitz L., Lehner S., Jovic M., Rentsch D., Neels A., Gaan S., Rieger B., Heuberger M. Fluorine and hydroxyl containing unsymmetrical α-diimine Ni(II) dichlorides with improved catalytic performance for ethylene polymerization. Eur. Polym. J. 2023;186:111830. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.111830. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Vignesh A., Zhang Q., Ma Y., Liang T., Sun W.-H. Attaining highly branched polyethylene elastomers by employing modified α-diiminonickel(II) catalysts: Probing the effects of enhancing fluorine atom on the ligand framework towards mechanical properties of polyethylene. Polymer. 2020;187:122089. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.122089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hai Z., Lu Z., Li S., Cao Z.-Y., Dai S. The synergistic effect of rigid and flexible substituents on insertion polymerization with α-diimine nickel and palladium catalysts. Polym. Chem. 2021;12:4643–4653. doi: 10.1039/d1py00812a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Li S., Dai S. 8-Arylnaphthyl substituent retarding chain transfer in insertion polymerization with unsymmetrical α-diimine systems. Polym. Chem. 2020;11:7199–7206. doi: 10.1039/d0py01231a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Fang J., Sui X., Li Y., Chen C. Synthesis of polyolefin elastomers from unsymmetrical α-diimine nickel catalyzed olefin polymerization. Polym. Chem. 2018;9:4143–4149. doi: 10.1039/c8py00725j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Du S., Xing Q., Flisak Z., Yue E., Sun Y., Sun W.-H. Ethylene polymerization by the thermally unique 1-[2-(bis(4-fluoro phenyl)methyl)-4,6-dimethylphenylimino]-2-aryliminoacenaphthylnickel precursors. Dalton Trans. 2015;44:12282–12291. doi: 10.1039/c5dt00052a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Chen Y., Du S., Huang C., Solan G.A., Hao X., Sun W.-H. Balancing high thermal stability with high activity in diaryliminoacenaphthene-nickel(II) catalysts for ethylene polymerization. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2017;55:1971–1983. doi: 10.1002/pola.28562. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Dai S., Li G., Lu W., Liao Y., Fan W. Suppression of chain transfer via a restricted rotation effect of dibenzosuberyl substituents in polymerization catalysis. Polym. Chem. 2021;12:3240–3249. doi: 10.1039/d1py00333j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Fan L., Yue E., Du S., Guo C.-Y., Hao X., Sun W.-H. Enhancing thermo-stability to ethylene polymerization: Synthesis, characterization and the catalytic behavior of 1-(2,4-dibenzhydryl-6-chlorophenylimino)-2-aryliminoacenaphthylnickel halides. RSC Adv. 2015;5:93274–93282. doi: 10.1039/c5ra18257c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Katla V., Yue E., Rajendran N.M., Liang T., Sun W.-H. Synthesis, characterization and ethylene polymerization of 1-(2,6-dimethyl-4-fluorenylphenylimino)-2-aryliminoacenaphthylnickel bromides. Comptes Rendus Chim. 2016;19:604–613. doi: 10.1016/j.crci.2016.01.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zada M., Guo L., Zhang R., Zhang W., Ma Y., Solan G.A., Sun Y., Sun W.-H. Moderately branched ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene by using N,N′-nickel catalysts adorned with sterically hindered dibenzocycloheptyl groups. Appl. Organometal. Chem. 2019;33:e4749. doi: 10.1002/aoc.4749. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Wang Y.-Y., Wang C.-Q., Hu X.-Q., Xia Y., Chi Y., Zhang Y.-X., Jian Z.-B. Benzosuberyl substituents as a “sandwich-like” function in olefin polymerization catalysis. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2021;39:984–993. doi: 10.1007/s10118-021-2562-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lu Z., Liao Y., Fan W., Dai S. Efficient suppression of the chain transfer reaction in ethylene coordination polymerization with dibenzosuberyl substituents. Polym. Chem. 2022;13:4090–4099. doi: 10.1039/d2py00282e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Khalid A., Hu Z., Ma Y., Mahmood Q., Ren G., Razzaq A., Wang Y., Liang T., Sun W.-H. Benzosuberyl-congested asymmetrical α-diiminonickel halides for achieving methyl-branched polyethylenes with tunable plastic to elastomeric properties. Eur. Polym. J. 2025;223:113635. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2024.113635. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Xi A., Zhang Q., Zeng Y., Wang Y., Wang Q., Ma Y., Hao X., Sun W.-H. ortho/para-Chlorinated α-Diimine Nickel Precatalysts Resulting Polyethylenes with Improved Mechanical Properties and Controlled Crystallinity. ACS Omega. 2025;10:33689–33703. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c04553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ashfaq A.M., Zhang Q., Wang Y., Ma Y., Xing Q., Sun M., Liang T., Sun W.-H. Thermostable Polyhalogen-Substituted α-Diimine Nickel Precatalysts Towards High Performance Polyethylene Elastomer. J. Mol. Struct. 2025;1334:141892. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2025.141892. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Qin L., Mahmood Q., Wang Y., Ma Y., Liang T., Sun W.-H. Bis(Tolyl)methyl- and Nitro-Functionalized Unsymmetrical α-Diimine Nickel Precatalysts for Polyethylene Elastomer: Enhanced Activity and Thermal Stability. J. Polym. Sci. 2025;63:4724–4739. doi: 10.1002/pol.20250591. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Liu M., Sun M., Ma Y., Wang Y., Li M., Sun W.-H. Trifluoromethoxy- and Fluorobenzhydryl-Tuned Nickel Catalysts for Polyethylene Elastomers. Molecules. 2025;30:2706. doi: 10.3390/molecules30132706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Zheng Y., Wang Q., Che Y., Jiang S., Yu Z., Wang Y., Ma Y., Solan A.G., Liang T., Sun W.-H. High molecular weight bimodal polyethylene elastomers using N,N′-nickel catalysts appended with methoxy and trifluoromethoxy functionality. Eur. Polym. J. 2024;203:112649. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2023.112649. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ren G., Yuan R., Mahmood Q., Zeng Y., Wang Y., Hu Z., Zou S., Liang T., Sun W.-H. Congestion of steric and electronic factors in α-diimine nickel precatalysts for high-temperature ethylene polymerization in accessing direct PE elastomer. J. Mol. Struct. 2024;1316:139037. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.139037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ren G., Mahmood Q., Liu S., Wang Y., Li Q., Xi A., Liang T., Sun W.-H. Fluoro-Enriched α-Diimine Nickel Precatalysts for Enhanced Thermostability in Synthesis of Polyethylene Elastomer. Eur. Polym. J. 2025;223:114004. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2025.114004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Hu Z., Ren G., Mahmood Q., Yu Z., Wang Y., Tahir F.K., Zou S., Liang T., Sun W.-H. Thermostability promotion of α-diimine nickel precatalysts tailored with 2,6-bis(bis(4-fluorophenyl)methyl)-3,4,5-trimethoxyaniline for PE elastomer synthesis. New J. Chem. 2024;48:12174–12187. doi: 10.1039/d4nj02360a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Yuan J., Wang F., Xu W., Mei T., Yuan B., Song F., Jia Z. Chiral naphthyl-α-diimine nickel(II) catalysts bearing sec-phenethyl groups: Chain-walking polymerization of ethylene at high temperature and stereoselective polymerization of methyl methacrylate at low temperature. Organometallics. 2013;32:3960–3968. doi: 10.1021/om400433t. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Wen C., Yuan S., Shi Q., Yue E., Liu D., Sun W.-H. Tailoring polyethylenes by nickel complexes bearing modified 1-(2-benzhydrylnaphthylimino)-2-phenyliminoacenaphthylene derivatives. Organometallics. 2014;33:7223–7231. doi: 10.1021/om5010226. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Yuan S., Yue E., Wen C., Sun W.-H. Synthesis, characterization, and ethylene polymerization of 1-[2,4-bis(bis(4-fluorophenyl)methyl)naphthylimino]-2-aryliminoacenaphthylnickel bromides: Influences of polymerization parameters on polyethylenes. RSC Adv. 2016;6:7431–7438. doi: 10.1039/c5ra23644d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Ding B., Jiang L., Kang X., Dai S. Enhancing suppression of chain transfer via catalyst structural evolution in ethylene (co)polymerization. Chin. J. Chem. 2023;41:1509–1516. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.202200842. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Wang B., Daugulis O., Brookhart M. Ethylene polymerization with Ni(II) diimine complexes generated from 8-halo-1-naphthylamines: The role of equilibrating syn/anti diastereomers in determining polymer properties. Organometallics. 2019;38:4658–4668. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.9b00649. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Tran Q.H., Wang X., Brookhart M., Daugulis O. Cationic α-diimine nickel and palladium complexes incorporating phenanthrene substituents: Highly active ethylene polymerization catalysts and mechanistic studies of syn/anti isomerization. Organometallics. 2020;39:4704–4716. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.0c00696. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Lu W., Liao Y., Dai S. Facile access to ultra-highly branched polyethylenes using hybrid “sandwich” Ni(II) and Pd(II) catalysts. J. Catal. 2022;411:54–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2022.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Zhang D., Nadres E.T., Brookhart M., Daugulis O. Synthesis of highly branched polyethylene using “sandwich” (8-p-tolyl naphthyl α-diimine)nickel(II) catalysts. Organometallics. 2013;32:5136–5143. doi: 10.1021/om400704h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Lu Z., Ge Y., Dai S. Flexible axial shielding strategy for improving ethylene (co)polymerization with 8-cycloalkylnaphthyl α-diimine catalysts. Inorg. Chem. 2023;62:14888–14895. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c01568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Ge Y., Li S., Fan W., Dai S. Flexible “sandwich” (8-alkylnaphthyl α-diimine) catalysts in insertion polymerization. Inorg. Chem. 2021;60:5673–5681. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c03715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Ma X., Zhang Y., Jian Z. Tunable branching and living character in ethylene polymerization using “polyethylene glycol sandwich” α-diimine nickel catalysts. Polym. Chem. 2021;12:1236–1243. doi: 10.1039/d0py01689f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Padilla-Velez O., O’Connor K.S., LaPointe A.M., MacMillan S., Coates G.W. Switchable living nickel(II) α-diimine catalyst for ethylene polymerisation. Chem. Commun. 2019;55:7607–7610. doi: 10.1039/c9cc03154e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Lian K., Zhu Y., Li W., Dai S., Chen C. Direct synthesis of thermoplastic polyolefin elastomers from nickel-catalyzed ethylene polymerization. Macromolecules. 2017;50:6074–6080. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b01087. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Xia J., Zhang Y., Kou S., Jian Z. A concerted double-layer steric strategy enables an ultra-highly active nickel catalyst to access ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylenes. J. Catal. 2020;390:30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2020.07.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Guo L., Sun W., Li S., Xu G., Dai S. Bulky yet flexible substituents in insertion polymerization with α-diimine nickel and palladium systems. Polym. Chem. 2019;10:4866–4871. doi: 10.1039/c9py00857h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Dai S., Li S., Xu G., Wu C., Liao Y., Guo L. Flexible cycloalkyl substituents in insertion polymerization with α-diimine nickel and palladium species. Polym. Chem. 2020;11:1393–1400. doi: 10.1039/c9py01901d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Kanai Y., Foro S., Plenio H. Bispentiptycenyl-diimine-nickel complexes for ethene polymerization and copolymerization with polar monomers. Organometallics. 2019;38:544–551. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.8b00836. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Liao Y., Zhang Y., Cui L., Mu H., Jian Z. Pentiptycenyl substituents in insertion polymerization with α-diimine nickel and palladium species. Organometallics. 2019;38:2075–2083. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.9b00106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Hu X., Wang C., Jian Z. Comprehensive studies of the ligand electronic effect on unsymmetrical α-diimine nickel(II) promoted ethylene (co)polymerizations. Polym. Chem. 2020;11:4005–4012. doi: 10.1039/d0py00536c. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Camacho D.H., Salo E.V., Ziller J.W., Guan Z. Cyclophane-based highly active late-transition-metal catalysts for ethylene polymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004;43:1821–1825. doi: 10.1002/anie.200353226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Popeney C.S., Rheing A.L., Guan Z. Nickel(II) and palladium(II) polymerization catalysts bearing a fluorinated cyclophane ligand: Stabilization of the reactive intermediate. Organometallics. 2009;28:4452–4463. doi: 10.1021/om900302r. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Hu X., Kang X., Zhang Y., Jian Z. Facile access to polar-functionalized ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene at ambient conditions. CCS Chem. 2022;4:1680–1694. doi: 10.31635/ccschem.021.202100895. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Hu X., Zhang Y., Li B., Jian Z. Horizontally and vertically concerted steric strategy in α-diimine nickel promoted ethylene (co)polymerization. Chin. J. Chem. 2021;39:2829–2836. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.202100312. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Peng D., Chen C. Photoresponsive palladium and nickel catalysts for ethylene polymerization and copolymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021;60:22195–22200. doi: 10.1002/anie.202107883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Yang J., Hu X., Jian Z. Photoresponsive α-diimine nickel modulated ethylene (co)polymerization. Chin. J. Chem. 2022;40:2919–2926. doi: 10.1002/cjoc.202200480. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Liu J., Chen D., Wu H., Xiao Z., Gao H., Zhu F., Wu Q. Polymerization of α-olefins using a camphyl α-diimine nickel catalyst at elevated temperature. Macromolecules. 2014;47:3325–3331. doi: 10.1021/ma5004634. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Li L., Jeon M., Kim S.Y. Synthesis, characterization and ethylene polymerisation of 9,10-phenanthrenequinone-based nickel(II)-α-diimine complexes. J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem. 2009;303:110–116. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2009.01.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Song K., Yang W., Li B., Liu Q., Redshaw C., Li Y., Sun W.-H. Nickel(II) complexes bearing 4,5-bis(arylimino)pyrenylidenes: Synthesis, characterization, and ethylenepolymerization behaviour. Dalton Trans. 2013;42:9166–9175. doi: 10.1039/c2dt32343e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Zhang Q., Liu M., Ma Y., Ye Z., Liang T., Sun W.-H. Highly active and thermostable camphyl α-diimine-nickel(II) catalysts for ethylene polymerization: Effects of N-aryl substituting groups on catalytic properties and branching structures of polyethylene. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2022;36:e6606. doi: 10.1002/aoc.6606. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Issaabadi Z., Arabi H., Karimi M. Investigations of aryl substituents electronic effects in the catalytic behavior of thermostable α-diimine nickel (II) catalyst on ethylene polymerization. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2023;34:3085–3096. doi: 10.1002/pat.6129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Zou W., Chen C. Influence of backbone substituents on the ethylene (co)polymerization properties of α-diimine Pd(II) and Ni(II) catalysts. Organometallics. 2016;35:1794–1801. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.6b00202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.He F., Wang D., Jiang B., Zhang Z., Cheng Z., Fu Z., Zhang Q., Fan Z. Introducing electron-donating substituents on ligand backbone of α-diimine nickel complex and the effects on catalyst thermal stability in ethylene polymerization. Inorganica Chim. Acta. 2019;486:704–710. doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2018.08.048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Zhu L., Zhang D., Wang Y., Guo Y., Jiang B., He F., Fu Z., Fan Z., Hickner M.A., Liu Z.-K., et al. Insight into the mechanism of thermal stability of α-diimine nickel complex in catalyzing ethylene polymerization. Organometallics. 2017;36:1196–1203. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Wang C., Wang D., Fu Z., Qin Y., Zhang Q., Fan Z. Combining 1,2-diketopyracene with bulky benzhydryl-substituted anilines to obtain highly active α-diimine nickel catalysts at elevated temperature. J. Catal. 2022;413:311–320. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2022.06.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Wang C., Wang D., Xu T., Zhang Q., Fu Z. Effect of N-aryl para-benzhydryl substituent on the thermal stability of α-diimine nickel catalyst. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2023;44:2300221. doi: 10.1002/marc.202300221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.He F., Wang D., Wu A., Jiang B., Zhang Z., Cheng Z., Fu Z., Zhang Q., Fan Z. Highly resilient polyethylene elastomers prepared using α-diimine nickel catalyst with highly conjugated backbone. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2018;32:e4566. doi: 10.1002/aoc.4566. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Zhang R.-F., Hou Y.-H., Wei X.-L., Zhao D.-D., Cui M.-M., Zhai F.-F., Li X.-L., Liu B.-Y., Yang M. Thermostable α-diimine nickel complexes with substituents on acenaphthequinone-backbone for ethylene polymerization. Chin. J. Polym. Sci. 2020;38:1214–1220. doi: 10.1007/s10118-020-2430-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Zhong L., Du C., Liao G., Lian H., Zheng H., Wu Q., Gao H. Effects of backbone substituent and intra-ligand hydrogen bonding interaction on ethylene polymerizations with α-diimine nickel catalysts. J. Catal. 2019;375:113–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2019.05.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Zhong L., Li G., Liang G., Gao H., Wu Q. Enhancing thermal stability and living fashion in α-diimine-nickel-catalyzed (co)polymerization of ethylene and polar monomer by increasing the steric bulk of ligand backbone. Macromolecules. 2017;50:2675–2682. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b00121. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Zhong L., Zheng H., Du C., Du W., Liao G., Cheung S.C., Gao H. Thermally robust α-diimine nickel and palladium catalysts with constrained space for ethylene (co)polymerizations. J. Catal. 2020;384:208–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2020.02.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Long B.K., Eagan J.M., Mulzer M., Coates G.W. Semi-crystalline polar polyethylene: Ester-functionalized linear polyolefins enabled by a functional-group-tolerant, cationic nickel catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55:7106–7110. doi: 10.1002/anie.201601703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Zheng H., Li Y., Du W., Cheung S.C., Li D., Gao H., Deng H., Gao H. Unprecedented square-planar α-diimine dibromonickel complexes and their ethylene polymerizations modulated by Ni-phenyl interactions. Macromolecules. 2022;55:3533–3540. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.2c00360. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Wang X., Dong B., Yang Q., Liu H., Zhang C., Zhang X. α-Diimine nickel complexes bearing axially bulky terphenyl and equatorially bulky dibenzobarrelene groups: Synthesis, characterization and olefin polymerization studies. Polym. Chem. 2020;11:6783–6793. doi: 10.1039/d0py01152e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Lu Z., Xu X., Luo Y., He S., Fan W., Dai S. Unexpected effect of catalyst’s structural symmetry on the branching microstructure of polyethylene in late transition metal polymerization catalysis. ACS Catal. 2023;13:725–734. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.2c04525. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Lu Z., Chang G., Wang H., Jing K., Dai S. A dual steric enhancement strategy in α-diimine nickel and palladium catalysts for ethylene polymerization and copolymerization. Organometallics. 2022;41:124–132. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.1c00568. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Zhang Y., Kang X., Jian Z. Selective branch formation in ethylene polymerization to access precise ethylene-propylene copolymers. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:725. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28282-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Ma X., Zhang Y., Jian Z. Unsymmetrical strategy on α-diimine nickel and palladium mediated ethylene (co)polymerizations. Molecules. 2022;27:8942. doi: 10.3390/molecules27248942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Delferro M., Marks T.J. Multinuclear olefin polymerization catalysts. Chem. Rev. 2011;111:2450–2485. doi: 10.1021/cr1003634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Chen Z., Yao E., Wang J., Gong X., Ma Y. Ethylene (co)polymerization by binuclear nickel phenoxyiminato catalysts with cofacial orientation. Macromolecules. 2016;49:8848–8854. doi: 10.1021/acs.macromol.6b02078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Netalkar S.P., Netalkar P.P., Sathisha M.P., Budagumpi S., Revankar V.K. Synthesis, characterization and ethylene oligomerization studies of nickel complexes bearing novel bis-α-diimine ligands. Catal. Lett. 2014;144:181–191. doi: 10.1007/s10562-013-1123-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Kong S., Song K., Liang T., Guo C.-Y., Sun W.-H., Redshaw C. Methylene-bridged bimetallic α-diimino nickel(II) complexes: Synthesis and high efficiency in ethylene polymerization. Dalton Trans. 2013;42:9176–9187. doi: 10.1039/c3dt00023k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Luo H.-K., Schumann H. New bi-nuclear and multi-nuclear α-diimine/nickel catalysts for ethylene polymerization. J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem. 2005;227:153–161. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2004.10.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Khoshsefat M., Zohuri G.H., Ramezanian N., Ahmadjo S., Haghpanah M. Polymerization of ethylene using a series of binuclear and a mononuclear Ni (II)-based catalysts. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2016;54:3000–3011. doi: 10.1002/pola.28186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Yan Z., Xu G., Wang H., Dai S. Synthesis of thermoplastic polyethylene elastomers and ethylene-methyl acrylate copolymers using methylene-bridged binuclear bulky dibenzhydryl α-diimine Ni(II) and Pd(II) catalysts. Eur. Polym. J. 2022;168:111105. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Chen S.-Y., Pan R.-C., Liu Y., Lu X.-B. Bulky o-phenylene-bridged bimetallic α-diimine Ni(II) and Pd(II) catalysts in ethylene (co)polymerization. Organometallics. 2021;40:3703–3711. doi: 10.1021/acs.organomet.1c00374. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Zhu L., Fu Z.-S., Pan H.-J., Feng W., Chen C., Fan Z.-Q. Synthesis and application of binuclear α-diimine nickel/palladium catalysts with a conjugated backbone. Dalton Trans. 2014;43:2900–2906. doi: 10.1039/c3dt51782a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Wang X., Feng Z., Guo W., Zhong W., Liu X., Wang C., Fu Z., Fan Z. Improvement of catalytic activity for α-diimine nickel complex with active sites stabilized by bulky boron counterions at elevated temperature. Appl. Organometal. Chem. 2022;36:e6599. doi: 10.1002/aoc.6599. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Xing Q., Song K., Liang T., Liu Q., Sun W.-H., Redshaw C. Synthesis, characterization and ethylene polymerization behaviour of binuclear nickel halides bearing 4,5,9,10-tetra(arylimino)pyrenylidenes. Dalton Trans. 2014;43:7830–7837. doi: 10.1039/c4dt00503a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Na Y., Wang X., Lian K., Zhu Y., Li W., Luo Y., Chen C. Dinuclear α-diimine NiII and PdII complexes that catalyze ethylene polymerization and copolymerization. ChemCatChem. 2017;9:1062–1066. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201601500. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.


Articles from Polymers are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES