Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1968 May;196(2):273–281. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1968.sp008506

Studies on the longitudinal muscle of the anterior mesenteric artery of the domestic fowl

T B Bolton
PMCID: PMC1351711  PMID: 5652876

Abstract

1. A simple, isolated preparation is described in which the activity of the longitudinal muscle of the anterior mesenteric artery of the domestic fowl is recorded isotonically.

2. The longitudinal muscle of the anterior mesenteric artery exhibited tone and marked spontaneous activity. Maximal shortening of this muscle was equal to about 60% of its resting length.

3. Acetylcholine in low concentrations produced powerful contractions of the muscle, whereas low concentrations of catecholamines produced relaxation by an action on β-receptors; much larger concentrations of adrenaline or noradrenaline contracted the muscle. A pharmacological analysis of the responses to electrical stimulation and to agonist drugs indicated that the muscle was supplied by excitatory, cholinergic nerves and by inhibitory, adrenergic nerves.

Full text

PDF
273

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BALL R. A., SAUTTER J. H., KATTER M. S. MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ANTERIOR MESENTERIC ARTERY OF FOWL. Anat Rec. 1963 Jul;146:251–255. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091460311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. De la Lande I. S., Rand M. J. A simple isolated nerve-blood vessel preparation. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1965 Oct;43(5):639–656. doi: 10.1038/icb.1965.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FURCHGOTT R. F., BHADRAKOM S. Reactions of strips of rabbit aorta to epinephrine, isopropylarterenol, sodium nitrite and other drugs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1953 Jun;108(2):129–143. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FURCHGOTT R. F. The pharmacology of vascular smooth muscle. Pharmacol Rev. 1955 Jun;7(2):183–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Keatinge W. R. Electrical and mechanical response of arteries to stimulation of sympathetic nerves. J Physiol. 1966 Aug;185(3):701–715. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1966.sp008011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MCGREGOR D. D. THE EFFECT OF SYMPATHETIC NERVE STIMULATION OF VASOCONSTRICTOR RESPONSES IN PERFUSED MESENTERIC BLOOD VESSELS OF THE RAT. J Physiol. 1965 Mar;177:21–30. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rogers L. A., Atkinson R. A., Long J. P. Effects of various autonomic drugs on isolated, perfused mesenteric arteries. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1966 Feb;151(2):313–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SCHUELER F. W. The mechanism of action of the hemicholiniums. Int Rev Neurobiol. 1960;2:77–97. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7742(08)60120-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. SUTTER M. C. THE PHARMACOLOGY OF ISOLATED VEINS. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1965 Jun;24:742–751. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1965.tb01630.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES