Skip to main content
Biomarker Research logoLink to Biomarker Research
. 2026 Jun 15;14:98. doi: 10.1186/s40364-026-00954-8

The asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 (ASGR1): emerging new roles in health and disease

Demeke Geremew 1,2,3, Joanne T M Tan 1,2, Peter J Psaltis 1,2,4, Christina A Bursill 1,2,5,✉
PMCID: PMC13520182  PMID: 42298709

Abstract

The asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 (ASGR1) has an established role as a hepatic receptor that clears desialylated glycoproteins from the bloodstream. Recently, its role in health and disease has expanded beyond this from cardiovascular to cancer and viral infection. Circulating ASGR1 is associated with elevated risk of coronary artery disease. Preclinical studies have reinforced this, showing ASGR1 inhibition reduces atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. ASGR1 controls platelet lifespan and function, thereby regulating coagulation and thrombosis. It also facilitates entry of bacteria and viruses into host cells, causing immunomodulatory effects, and plays dual roles in cancer - promoting and suppressing tumorigenesis. This review provides an in-depth overview of the latest mechanistic insights underlying the roles of ASGR1 in health and disease and elaborates on the progress of ASGR1-targeted therapies.

Keywords: Asialoglycoprotein receptor, Liver, Atherosclerosis, Immunity, Cancer, Infection

Introduction

The asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) is a c-type lectin receptor predominantly expressed in the liver. It has a well-characterized role in the circulatory clearance of glycoproteins that have had their end terminal sialic acid groups removed [1]. The process that removes the sialic acid groups is called desialylation and is strongly related to human health and illness [2]. Sialylation, by contrast, involves the addition of terminal sialic acid residues on glycoproteins and glycolipids using glycosidic linkages and is essential for many physiological functions, including cell adhesion, signalling and immunomodulation [3]. ASGPR was discovered by Gilbert Ashwell and Anatol Morell in the 1960s and hence, named the Ashwell-Morell receptor. ASGPR comprises of two subunit proteins, asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 (ASGR1) and asialoglycoprotein receptor 2 (ASGR2), which are the major and minor subunits of ASGPR, respectively [1, 4]. In humans, the genes encoding ASGR1 and ASGR2 are found on the short arm of chromosome 17. The ASGR1 gene is approximately 6 kb long and contains 8 exons, whereas the ASGR2 gene comprises 9 exons and is 13.5 kb long. The expression of ASGR1 and ASGR2 are interdependent and ASGR1 is essential for the stabilization of ASGR2 [5].

ASGR1 and ASGR2 are type II-single pass transmembrane receptors encompassing an extracellular carbohydrate recognition domain, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic domain (Fig. 1). The carbohydrate recognition domains (CRDs) have three Ca2+ ion binding sites [6]. The CRD with two carbonyl-containing amino acids separated by a cis-proline, coordinates Ca²⁺ and forms hydrogen bonds with sugars to determine specificity. For example: a ‘QPD’ (Gln-Pro-Asp) motif is specific for galactose (Gal) or its derivative, N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc), whereas a ‘EPN’ (Glu-Pro-Asn) motif confers specificity for mannose-based ligands [7]. Many proteins with a C-type CRD fold lack the conserved Ca²⁺-binding site and therefore do not bind sugars. This distinguishes true sugar-binding CRDs from the broader family of C-type lectin-like domains [8].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

ASGPR function in healthy cells and its interaction with asialoglycoproteins. (A) Structure and physiological function of ASGPR in healthy hepatocytes [9]. (a) The asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) is composed of ASGR1 and ASGR2 hetero-oligomer subunits [1, 9]. The carbohydrate recognition domain, stalk, transmembrane and cytosolic domains are indicated by black arrows. Phosphorylation of ASGPR cytoplasmic domain causes the binding of specific molecular chaperones and regulates receptor trafficking [10]. (b) Glycoprotein loaded ASGPR dissociates from its ligand in the endosome [11], (c) and recycles back to the cell membrane rapidly [9, 11]. (d) The glycoprotein moves to lysosomes via vacuoles for enzymatic degradation. This applies to all cell types that ASGR1 is expressed in. (B) Interaction between the ASGPR and circulating desialylated glycoproteins with terminal Gal and GalNAc containing residues [12]

Among the Ca²⁺-dependent lectin receptors, two are especially noteworthy; ASGR1 (also known as CLEC4H1) and C-type lectin domain family 10 member A (CLEC10A), also known as the macrophage galactose-type lectin (MGL) receptor. Both receptors possess homologous CRDs that preferentially bind GalNAc over Gal [11]. ASGR1 is expressed predominantly in hepatic parenchymal cells [1], although recent studies showed its expression in immune cells such as monocytes and macrophages [13], whereas CLEC10A is expressed at multiple stages of human development, with the highest expression observed in oocytes [11]. ASGR1 primarily mediates clearance of circulating desialylated glycoproteins [9, 14], whereas CLEC10A is also expressed on immature DCs, monocyte-derived DCs as well as alternatively activated macrophages and mediate diverse immune responses such as the induction of TH1, TH2, and TH17 immune responses and promotes tolerance in naïve T cells [11].

ASGR1 and ASGR2 preferentially bind to desialylated glycoproteins containing GalNAc over Gal, with approximately 60-fold and 2-fold selectivity, respectively [11]. This, interaction between the CRD and its ligands, the desialylated glycoproteins with GalNAc and/or Gal terminal residues is calcium dependent [7, 8]. Calcium is not just supportive, it is part of the binding mechanism [9]. ASGR1 requires three bound Ca²⁺ ions for ligand binding and for the release of ligands from ASGR1 intracellularly in endosomes it depends on Ca²⁺ dissociation from ASGR1 [11]. Ca²⁺ is loaded during ER folding and recharged during receptor recycling at the cell surface [11]. In endosomes, acidification lowers Ca²⁺ levels, and once it drops below 330 µM, the ligand dissociates within minutes, likely coupled to Ca²⁺ transport into the cytosol [11]. In normal serum glycoproteins, terminal sialic acid often masks these sugars. However, when sialic acid is lost, the underlying galactose or GalNAc becomes accessible to ASGR1. This is why ASGR1 is described as a clearance receptor for asialoglycoproteins [9, 11]. Depending on glycan branching, glycoproteins display multiple terminal Gal/GalNAc residues per molecule (multivalency), enabling simultaneous binding to multiple CRDs and greatly increases overall avidity [11]. Ligand multivalency is a key feature in protein-glycan interactions, and enhances not only binding affinity but also selectivity [9]. For example, super-selective binding occurs when target ligand density surpasses a critical threshold, enabling cell discrimination based on differential glycan expression and underpinning the high liver-targeting specificity of GalNAc-conjugated therapeutics [9].

ASGR1 has a well-established role as a clearance pathway for unwanted circulating desialylated glycoproteins [9, 14]. Its role in downstream signalling pathways and alternate mechanisms of disease remains underexplored. Under physiological conditions, ASGR1 specifically binds to those glycoproteins with terminal galactose (Gal) or N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) residues on proteins, lipids and nucleic acids [14, 15]. These are then internalized through clathrin-mediated endocytosis, ASGR1 dissociates from the bound ligand in the endosome and rapidly recycles back to the cell membrane [11, 16].

Beyond its long-established physiological properties, the past decade has seen the emergence of new evidence linking ASGR1 to different disease states including cardiovascular disease, cancer, infectious diseases and autoimmune conditions. This review provides an in-depth overview of the latest insights on the increasing number of mechanisms underlying the functions of ASGR1 in health and disease.

ASGR1 and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

In 2016, a large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) found two infrequent loss-of-function mutations in ASGR1, explicitly a 12-base-pair deletion in intron 4 (del12) and a 4-base-pair insertion mutation (p.W158X), associated with a 34% decreased risk of coronary artery disease in humans [17]. In this study, both del12 and p.W158X were corelated with a reduction in non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and triglycerides. Interestingly, elevations in serum alkaline phosphatase and vitamin B12 were reported, both of which are desialylated glycoproteins and ligands of ASGR1. This provided evidence that functional changes in ASGR1 were present in carriers of these mutations [17]. In support of this study, monocyte ASGR1 mRNA levels were found to positively correlate with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and total cholesterol, and were lower in patients taking cholesterol-lowering therapy compared to those who were not [18].

Preclinical studies support these epidemiological findings. ASGR1 inhibition with a monoclonal antibody enhanced cholesterol excretion, reduced blood cholesterol and decreased atherosclerotic plaque size in atherosclerotic apolipoprotein E−/− (Apoe−/−) mice [19]. Heterozygous Asgr1+/− and homozygous Asgr1−/− genetically modified mice also had lower plasma and hepatic levels of total cholesterol and triglycerides, relative to their wild-type counterparts [19]. Delineation of the mechanisms revealed Asgr1 deletion activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) [19, 20], which increases liver X receptor alpha (LXRα) and liver X receptor beta (LXRβ) and in turn their target genes encoding ATP binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) and ATP binding cassette subfamily G members 5 and 8 (ABCG5, ABCG8) [19]. ABCA1, ABCG5 and ABCG8 all play an important role in mediating the efflux of cholesterol from cells. ABCG5 and ABCG8 form a heterodimer that specifically facilitates biliary secretion of cholesterol. Interestingly, deletion of Asgr1 increased biliary cholesterol levels. ASGR1 inhibition also suppressed mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1), which downregulates sterol regulatory element binding protein 1 (SREBP1), an important transcription factor for cholesterol handling mechanisms. Therefore, via synergistic activation of AMPK activation and suppression of mTORC1, ASGR1 inhibition or deletion reduces cholesterol biosynthesis and increases hepatobiliary cholesterol secretion, both of which provide an explanation for the reduction in plasma cholesterol levels [19, 21].

CRISPR-generated Asgr1−/+ and Asgr1−/− deficient pigs were found to have lower triglycerides, non-HDL-c and smaller atherosclerotic lesions compared to wildtype controls. Asgr1−/+ pigs were found to have reduced hepatic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR), the critical rate limiting enzyme in cholesterol synthesis [22, 23]. Liver transcriptome profiling identified that 12 genes involved in cholesterol metabolism pathways were downregulated in Asgr1−/− pig livers [22]. However, they also noted that Asgr1 deficiency was accompanied by increased levels of liver enzymes, particularly alkaline phosphatase (ALP), suggesting an increase in liver inflammation [22]. In summary, ASGR1 deficiency appears to engage a broadly conserved metabolic axis in which reduced ASGR1 signalling lowers circulating cholesterol via AMPK activation and mTORC1 inhibition in mice [19, 21], with similar reductions in triglycerides, non-HDL-c and atherosclerotic lesions observed in ASGR1 deficient large‑animal models such as pigs [22]. Interestingly, previous studies showed that mTORC1 is a conserved serine/threonine kinase that integrates nutrient and energy cues to regulate cellular metabolism, including lipid metabolism [24]. AMPK is also known as an evolutionarily conserved energy sensor that inhibits lipid metabolism by phosphorylating and suppressing acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) and HMGCR [25]. This indicates that ASGR1 deficiency-associated modulation of AMPK-mTORC1 signalling in atherosclerosis may be evolutionarily conserved across mammals and supports ASGR1 as a translational therapeutic target.

Apoe−/− x Asgr1−/− mice, placed on a high-fat atherogenic diet for 12 weeks, were found to develop smaller atherosclerotic plaques. Very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and LDL-c levels were also lower and there was a decrease in VLDL generation and increased fecal cholesterol relative to Apoe−/− control mice [26]. The reported mechanism of action was focussed on the reduction in VLDL production, mediated by reduced expression of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTTP), important for VLDL and chylomicron assembly [26]. There was also a reduction in angiopoietin-like protein 3/ angiopoietin-like protein 8 (ANGPTL3/8) and an increase in lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity, both part of VLDL metabolism [26]. As has been reported by other studies, ASGR1 deletion led to increased hepatic LDL receptor (LDLR) levels, suggesting enhanced LDL-c clearance [22, 26]. Increased biliary total cholesterol was also observed, supported by increases in LXRα, ABCA1 and ABCG5 [26]. This study also found Asgr1−/x Apoe−/− mice had elevated plasma ALT and AST levels [26].

In vitro studies have helped to elucidate the mechanisms of action of ASGR1 in relation to lipid metabolism. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), a SREBP1-targeted gene that mediates the ubiquitination and degradation of the LDLR, is found to be lower in ASGR1 deficient hepatocytes [27]. ASGR1 deficiency enhances retention of SREBPs in the endoplasmic reticulum by upregulating insulin-induced gene 1 (INSIG1/2). This hinders SREBP activation by anchoring SREBPs in the endoplasmic reticulum with SREBP-cleavage-activating protein (SCAP) and insulin-induced gene 1/2 (INSIG1/2)[27]. It was hypothesized that in the presence of ASGR1, the SCAP/SREBP complex dissociates from INSIG1/2 and is packaged into vesicles to travel into the Golgi apparatus. In the Golgi, SREBP is proteolytically cleaved to form active nuclear SREBPs that enter the nucleus and bind to the sterol response element to enhance lipogenesis. Consistent with this, ASGR1 inhibition increased LDL-c uptake from the circulation and clearance by hepatocytes [27].

Interestingly, these LDLR-related changes by ASGR1 deletion/inhibition appear to occur independently of PCSK9. Whilst overexpression of PCSK9 causes expected decreases in the LDLR, this does not impact ASGR1, yet ASGR1 overexpression still increases LDLR. ASGR1 is thought therefore to mediate its effects on the LDLR via its carbohydrate recognition domain in a carbohydrate dependent and/or independent manner [28]. Furthermore, heterobifunctional molecules that bind simultaneously to ASGR1 and PCSK9, increase PCSK9 clearance from the circulation, and in the absence of these heterobifunctional molecules ASGR1 had no effect on PCSK9 clearance [29]. Overall, this suggests ASGR1 deficiency regulates lipid homeostasis via LDLR upregulation, independent of changes in PCSK9 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Pathways influenced by ASGR1 with relevance to atherosclerosis. ASGR1 deletion activates AMPK, a cellular energy sensor that plays a key role in regulating metabolism [19, 20]. Activated AMPK triggers the activation of lipid metabolism regulating genes specifically LXRα and LXRβ followed by their target gene ABCG5/8 and ABCA1 upregulation [19]. ABCG5/8 promotes cholesterol excretion into the bile whereas ABCA1 enhances cholesterol efflux [21]. ASGR1 inhibition activates INSIG1/2 and downregulates mTORC1, both synergize in suppressing lipogenesis by downregulating SREBP [19]. Once the SREBPs anchored to the ER with SCAP and INSIG1/2, the complex prevents SREBP movement into Gologi and its’ proteolytic cleavage and activation [30]. ASGR1 deficiency suppresses cholesterol synthesis regulating enzyme, HMGCR, which in turn upregulates LDLR and LDL uptake, and hence, decreases circulatory LDL [19]. A deficit in ASGR1 inhibited MTTP followed by a decreased VLDL production and chylomicron assembly leading to a decreased bloodstream LDL and TG [26, 27]. ASGR1 deficiency increases VLDL and TG clearance by downregulating ANGPTL3/8 and upregulating LPL activity [26]. At the same time, ANGPTL3/8 suppression enhances HDL functionality [31]. ASGR1 deficiency supresses inflammation through downregulating Notch1 activation [32]. Notch1 suppression downregulates JACK2/STAT3 phosphorylation leading to reduced ROS production, and hence, impedes inflammation [33]. Likewise, inhibited Notch1 signalling downregulates ICAM-1 [34], important adhesion molecule for monocyte [35] and neutrophil [36] extravasation, ultimately impairing their recruitment and inflammation [35, 36]. Suppressed Notch1 signalling also favours T regs and other anti-athrogenic immune cells development while suppressing pro-athrogenic inflammatory macrophages, all of which are anti-inflammatory [37]. A heterobifunctional antibody that binds simultaneously to ASGR1 and PCSK9 enhanced PCSK9 degradation, which in turn increased LDL clearance via the LDLR pathway [29]. Abbreviations: AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; LXRα, Liver X receptor alpha; LXRβ, Liver X receptor beta, ABCG5/8, ATP-binding cassette transporters G5 and G8; ABCA1, ATP-binding cassette transporter A1; INSIG1/2, Insulin-induced genes 1 and 2; mTORC1, Mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1; SREBP, Sterol regulatory element-binding protein; ER, Endoplasmic reticulum; SCAP, SREBP cleavage-activating protein; HMGCR, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase; LDLR, Low-density lipoprotein receptor; LDL, Low-density lipoprotein; MTTP, Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein; VLDL, Very low-density lipoprotein; TG, Triglycerides; ANGPTL3/8, Angiopoietin-like proteins 3 and 8; LPL, Lipoprotein lipase; PCSK9, Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9; JACK2/STAT3, Janus kinase 2/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; ICAM-1, Intercellular adhesion molecule 1

Monocytes and macrophages are key cellular players in atherosclerosis. An in vitro study found inflammatory stimulation with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) increased ASGR1 protein expression in a human monocytic cell line (THP-1) [13]. Furthermore, ASGR1 mediated the differentiation of monocytes into macrophages through upregulation of NF-κB signalling and activation of transcription factor 5 (ATF5) in wildtype mice. Conversely, ASGR1 depleted mice had reduced monocyte to macrophage differentiation and fewer Ly6C+ inflammatory macrophages in the liver [13]. Suppression of macrophage differentiation represents an atheroprotective mechanism of ASGR1 deletion.

Another pathway of ASGR1 regulation was revealed in which Asgr1−/− mice had increased visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue relative to wildtype controls. This suggested lipids from the plasma were being redirected towards adipose tissues, with no change in glucose homeostasis [38]. Interestingly, Asgr1−/− mice had mitochondrial dysfunction in their visceral adipocytes which was linked to downregulation of oxidative phosphorylation [38]. Impaired mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation is known to decrease coronary atherosclerosis severity by reducing adiponectin in adipose tissue [39], This suggests ASGR1 deficiency may be atheroprotective by inhibiting adiponectin through downregulation of oxidative phosphorylation. Moreover, liver transcriptomic analysis in Asgr1−/− mice showed that 181 genes were dysregulated, 77 upregulated and 104 downregulated. These genes were enriched in metabolic pathways and 12 were linked to lipid metabolism. Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) was also lower in the serum and livers of the Asgr1−/− mice [27].

In another study, proteomic profiling of visceral adipose tissue showed that Asgr1 deficiency was accompanied by downregulation of proteins associated with lipogenesis and upregulation of those involved in lipoprotein uptake [38]. Of note, CD36 scavenger receptor, fatty acid synthase, and malate dehydrogenase were downregulated, while cytochrome P450 oxidases like CYP1A2, CYP2C8, and CYP2E1 were upregulated. Visceral adipose tissue analyses also found fatty acid synthase, acetyl-CoA carboxylase, stearoyl-Coenzyme A desaturase 1, lysosomal associated membrane protein, and sterol carrier protein 2 were downregulated [38], all changes associated with atheroprotection [40–42].

In vitro studies in mouse primary cells demonstrated that inhibition of hepatic ASGR1, using an anti-ASGR1 antibody or the ASGPR inhibitor Asialofetuin, which acts as a competitive ligand or agonist that blocks the binding of endogenous desialylated glycoproteins, decreased activation of Notch1 signalling and hepatic thrombopoietin production, regulators of thrombopoiesis [32]. Conversely, treatment of hepatocytes with desialylated platelets stimulated Notch1 signalling and thrombopoietin production. However, ASGR1 and ASGR2 protein levels were unchanged in Notch1 deficient hepatocytes [32], suggesting Notch1 deletion does not alter hepatocyte ASGR1 and ASGR2. In vivo macrophage specific Notch1 deletion (Notch1MAC−KO) supressed atherosclerosis by reducing inflammatory macrophages and increasing the activation and polarization of anti-atherogenic macrophage phenotypes in Apoe−/−Notch1MAC−KOmice, when compared to Apoe−/− control mice [43]. Suppression of Notch1 also reduces low shear stress-induced formation of atherosclerotic plaques [34] and the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), important for monocyte and neutrophil recruitment and atherosclerotic plaque development [34, 35]. Another consequence of ASGR1 deletion-induced Notch inhibition includes an increase in endothelial cell proliferation [44], an important function for re-endothelialisation. Taken together, ASGR1 inhibition may have atheroprotective and endothelial protective effects via suppression of Notch signalling.

Other studies have found ASGR1 inhibition suppresses signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) phosphorylation through Nemo-like kinase (NLK) which interacts with the Src Homology 2 domain of STAT3 [45]. STAT3 is associated with increased inflammation (IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, IκBα) and enhanced oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) uptake into macrophages [46]. Thus, ASGR1 inhibition, through its suppression of STAT3 phosphorylation may inhibit inflammation and ox-LDL uptake, both atheroprotective mechanisms.

In vitro treatment of Lewis lung carcinoma (3LL) cells with mouse recombinant ASGR1 was found to trigger the activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor - extracellular signal regulated kinase (EGFR-ERK) signalling pathway and the upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) transcription [47]. This is a mechanism that increases atherosclerotic plaque instability [48]. Consistent with this, elevated Egfr mRNA levels have been reported in atherosclerotic lesions and correlate significantly with plaque size [49]. EGFR inhibition reduces plaque macrophages, oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory cytokine production and SMC proliferation in high fat diet fed Apoe−/− mice [50]. Moreover, activation of the EGFR-ERK pathway upregulates Forkhead box M1 (FOXM1), that supresses reactive oxygen species (ROS) [51], nitric oxide synthase (NOS) [52], IL-6 [53], the C-C motif chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2) [54] and C-X3-C motif chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1) [55], all of which are involved in promoting atherosclerosis [56]. Collectively, there is interplay between the inhibition of ASGR1, reduced levels of oxidative stress and inflammation as well as an association with improved plaque stability.

Demina et al. found neuraminidases (NA) NA1 and NA3, which remove sialic acid from glycolipids and LDL-associated glycoproteins to enable interaction with ASGR1, promote atherosclerosis development [57]. Another study found higher Na1, Na3 and Na4 mRNA levels in atherosclerotic lesions of thoracic aorta relative to healthy tissue [58]. LDL desialylation also increases LDL accumulation in the intima by first enhancing LDL attachment to arterial proteoglycans [59] and improving LDL uptake by plaque macrophages via ASGR1 in Apoe−/− mice [57]. Overall, these studies show ASGR1 inhibition may reduce atherosclerosis via suppression of LDL uptake into macrophages.

In addition to its emerging atheroprotective effects, ASGR1 deficiency has also been linked with protection against type 2 diabetes mellitus, a common co-morbidity in cardiovascular disease patients. In Asgr1−/− mice fed high fat diet, there was increased hepatic insulin-triggered phosphorylation of insulin receptor β and protein kinase B, suggesting a role for ASGR1 in glucose homeostasis through insulin signalling [60]. The same study demonstrated decreased serum insulin levels in Asgr1−/− and Asgr1+/− mice relative to wildtype mice [60], indicating enhanced insulin sensitivity in the presence of high fat diet-induced metabolic stress [61]. Hepatic insulin resistance is the major driver of systemic insulin resistance [62].

In contrast to the growing body of evidence that ASGR1 deficiency is associated with a reduction in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [17, 19, 22, 23, 27, 63], an epidemiological study found a 2.4 fold reduction of ASGR1 mRNA expression in isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from Iranian patients with coronary artery disease, when compared to healthy controls. The same study also found that whilst PBMC ASGR1 mRNA expression was inversely associated with the incidence of coronary artery disease, it was not associated with its severity [64]. The findings of this study are contrary to another similarly designed study which found a positive correlation between soluble serum ASGR1 and LDL-C levels [65].

In summary, ASGR1 plays a role in lipid metabolism and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Loss-of-function variants and experimental ASGR1 inhibition reduce plasma cholesterol, triglycerides, VLDL production, and atherosclerotic plaque size, partly through enhanced LDL receptor activity, AMPK activation, and mTORC1 suppression. ASGR1 deficiency also modulates inflammation by reducing monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation, STAT3 and Notch1 signalling, and LDL uptake into plaque macrophages, all atheroprotective mechanisms.

ASGR1 and coagulopathy

Platelets control the coagulation pathway. Their activation markers include the sialylated glycoproteins: glycoprotein-Ib-alpha (GPIbα) subunit and P-selectin (CD62P) [66]. Desialylation of platelets triggers their hepatic clearance through an ASGR1-mediated pathway which, in turn, activates thrombopoietin production and new platelet synthesis [67]. Aging and some microbial infections can trigger desialylation of platelet glycoproteins and interrupt platelet synthesis and their removal cycle, which affects the coagulation pathway [66, 68]. Plasma von Willebrand factor (VWF) is a glycoprotein and the presence of a terminal sialic acid group is crucial for preventing VWF degradation and its plasma levels [69]. Loss of the terminal sialic acid group by genetic inactivation of ST3 beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 4 (ST3GAL4), a sialyltransferase, was associated with hyposialylation and increased VWF clearance through ASGR1 [70]. Consistent with this, VWF clearance was severely attenuated in ASGR1 deficient mice [71]. ASGR1 deficient mice also showed slower bleeding times compared to wildtype littermates [70, 72], whereas ASGR2 deficient mice exhibited no differences in bleeding times, demonstrating ASGPR subunit specificity [70]. ASGR1 and macrophage galactose-type lectin (MGL) are receptors with special binding preference to N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc), with both receptors being expressed on antigen presenting cells including macrophages and dendritic cells [9, 73]. In vivo macrophage depletion showed decreased clearance of hyposialylated VWF [71, 74]. VWF maintains hemostasis by controlling platelet adhesion to subendothelial collagen and also the intrinsic coagulation pathway through stabilizing factor VIII (FVIII) [75]. Overall, sialylation-controlled VWF clearance explains the mechanism by which ASGR1 regulates the coagulation and thrombosis pathway.

ASGR1 and liver injury

Some studies find ASGR1 deficient mice exhibit no apparent phenotypic changes, with normal body weight, life span [5, 60], liver mass and liver function, indicated by alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) [60]. An in vitro study using the human embryonic stem cell line WA01 found a normal karyotype and morphology, pluripotency and differentiation ability following ASGR1 knockdown [76].

In contrast, other studies have found increases in liver injury, ALT and AST with ASGR1 deficiency [22, 77–79]. Mice lacking ASGR1 exhibit more severe liver damage following carbon tetrachloride induced toxic liver injury [77]. The mechanism for this was purported to be via galactose, which exclusively binds to hepatic ASGR1 and upregulates anti-apoptotic hepatic genes (e.g. TNF alpha induced protein 3 and baculoviral IAP repeat containing 2), through NF-κB signalling. In the absence of ASGR1, this galactose-mediated anti-apoptotic pathway is therefore suppressed. Interaction between galactose and ASGR1 also downregulates caspase-3-mediated hepatocyte apoptosis in wildtype mice [80]. Likewise, a recent study revealed ASGR1 deficiency exacerbates hepatic injury in mice exposed to the liver toxin carbon tetrachloride, compared to wildtype controls. The same study found ASGR1 binds with golgi protein 73 (GP73), a mediator of endoplasmic reticulum stress, which enhances GP73 lysosomal degradation to prevent hepatic injury [78]. A deficiency in ASGR1 would therefore remove this protective mechanism and increase endoplasmic reticulum stress, a key driver of hepatic injury [81, 82].

Consistent with this, a study in pigs found ASGR1 deficiency was associated with increased hepatic endoplasmic reticulum stress [22]. Increased liver damage was also found in mice with ASGR1 deficiency, accompanied by an increased hepatic inflammatory cell infiltrate and higher mRNA levels of proinflammatory cytokines Tnfa, Il6, Ccl2, and Il1b [78]. There were increased plasma levels of biomarkers of liver dysfunction, ALT, AST, alkaline phosphatase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase [78]. Furthermore, a clinical study found hepatic ASGR1 protein and mRNA levels were lower in cirrhosis patients [78].

In non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, ASGR1 and cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily E member 1 (CYP2E1) protein levels were upregulated in mice fed chow and high cholesterol diet [83]. Interestingly, CYP2E1 is activated in carbon tetrachloride-induced liver damage [84]. However, a recent study demonstrated that the level of CYP2E1 was unaffected by ASGR1 deficiency following tetrachloride and acetaminophen treatment [78]. This suggests that enhanced liver injury in ASGR1 deficient mice occurs independently of the CYP2E1 pathway. The phenotypic effects of ASGR1 knockout in animal models of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Phenotypic effects of ASGR1 knockout across various animal models of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases

Animal model Lipid profile Liver function test Metabolic effects Disease outcomes References

Mouse

Asgr1−/− on HF/HC/BS

↓ Plasma and liver TC and TGs. ↑ Serum ALT and AST (mild increase)

↑ AMPK activation, LXRα protein and cholesterol efflux.

No change in blood glucose.

Reduced arterial lipid deposition and plaque formation and is cardioprotective. Wang et al. [19].
Apoe−/− x Asgr1−/−on WD ↓ Plasma VLDL and LDL-C. ↑ Serum ALT and AST (mild increase)

↑ LDLR and LPL.

Reduced VLDL production and increased faecal cholesterol.

Decreased arterial lipid deposition and plaque formation and is cardioprotective. Zhang et al. [26].
Asgr1−/+ on HF/HC/BS diet ↓ Plasma and liver TC and TGs. No change in serum ALT and AST No change in blood glucose. Cardioprotective via reduced arterial lipids and plaque formation. Wang et al. [19].

Pig

ASGR1−/−

↓ Plasma TC, non-HDL-C, TGs and LDL-C at 17 months of age. ↑ Plasma ALP, ALT and AST ↑ Plasma vitamin B12 ↓ Atherosclerotic lesions. Cardioprotective effect Xie et al. [22].
PigASGR1−/+ ↓ Plasma TC, LDL-C, TGs and HMGCR.

↓ Plasma ALT and

no change in AST

↓ Cholesterol synthesis and uptake genes mRNA expression Cardioprotective effect and no liver injury. Yin et al. [85].
Human ASGR1 LoF variants ↓ Plasma non-HDL-C and TGs. ↑ Serum ALP ↑ Serum vitamin B12

↓ Coronary artery disease risk.

Cardioprotective effect.

Nioi et al. [17].

ALP, Alkaline Phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; Apoe−/−, apolipoprotein E−/−; ASGR1, Asialoglycoprotein receptor 1; non-HDL-C, non- high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HF/HC/BS, High-fat/ high-cholesterol/bile salt diet; HMGCR, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase; LDL-C, Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDLR, Low-density lipoprotein receptor; LoF, Loss-of-Function; LPL, Lipoprotein lipase; LXRα, Liver X receptor alpha; mRNA, messenger Ribonucleic Acid; TC, Total cholesterol; TGs, Triglycerides; VLDL, Very-low-density lipoprotein; WD, Western diet

In summary, there is evidence that ASGR1 deficiency enhances liver injury and inflammation through suppression of key anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory pathways.

Balancing cardiovascular benefit and liver injury risk in ASGR1 deficiency

ASGR1 deficiency consistently improves cardiovascular outcomes in animal models primarily by lowering circulating lipids and attenuating atherosclerosis progression [19]. In Apoe−/− Western diet fed mice, ASGR1 deficiency reduces plasma cholesterol and triglycerides, including VLDL and LDL cholesterol as well as atherosclerotic plaque area compared to ASGR1 wild type littermates [26]. In humans, genetic studies show that ASGR1 loss-of-function variants are associated with lower non-HDL/LDL cholesterol and reduced risk of coronary artery disease [17], reinforcing the protective role of ASGR1 deficiency in atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.

Conversely, ASGR1 deficiency exacerbates liver injury as marked by increased plasma ALT and AST [22] and elevated hepatic ER stress [78], highlighting a key trade-off. ASGR1 deficient mice showed increased circulating GP73 and stronger GP73‑ immunoglobulin heavy-chain-binding protein (BIP) interaction, promoting ER stress driven hepatic injury [78]. In Apoe−/− ASGR1 deficient mice fed western diet for 16 weeks, decreased lipid profile, atherosclerosis plaque area and necrotic core are paralleled by increased plasma AST/ALT ratio [86]. These findings underscore that therapeutic ASGR1 targeting in animals must balance reduced cardiovascular risk against heightened hepatic vulnerability and ER stress. Targeting ASGR1 inhibition strategies to specific sites, such as atherosclerotic plaques, may help to bypass potential side effects elicited by pan-ASGR1 inhibition.

ASGR1 and the immune system

Plasma proteomic analyses in Asgr1−/− mice revealed there were 291 upregulated proteins related to coagulation, proteolysis and the immune system [87]. As a regulator of glycoprotein biosynthesis [88], ASGR1 has the ability to control the immune system through changes in glycosylation [89, 90]. For example, ASGR1 facilitates antigen uptake by dendritic cells, which in turn promotes the expansion of IL-10-producing CD4+ T cells. These T cells adopt an immunosuppressive/regulatory phenotype that contributes to immune tolerance [89, 91].

To maintain immune cell homeostasis, hepatocytes eliminate activated lymphocytes through perforin-dependent mechanisms and CD95 ligand-CD95 interactions [92]. This occurs via endocytosis and a process termed suicidal emperipolesis, in which T cells are engulfed and subsequently killed by hepatocytes [93, 94]. Importantly, hepatocyte cytotoxic effector function is modulated by surface glycoprotein desialylation of the target cells, the level of ASGR1 expression on hepatocytes, and the surrounding cytokine milieu [92] (Fig. 3). Consistent with this, neuraminidase treatment has been shown to induce desialylation of CD95-bearing P815 cells (a murine mastocytoma-derived mast cell line), as well as CD95-deficient K562 cells (a human erythroleukemia cell line), in vitro.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The role of ASGR1 in immune responses. (a) Under physiological conditions, tightly regulated cell-surface sialylation contributes to normal cell signalling and helps maintain the balance between apoptosis (programmed cell death) and cell proliferation, thereby supporting tissue homeostasis [95]. (b) However, alterations in sialylation dynamics are observed upon immune activation, with much heterogeneity. For instance, activated T cells expressing B220 epitope, a sialic acid depleted glycoform of CD45, exhibit markedly increased surface desialylation [92]. This activates ASGR1 to take place its effector function [92] and will target desialated cells including desialated B cells and T cells for endocytosis [96, 97], and hence, contributes to immunological hemostasis through contracting the immune system and maintaining a steady immunological environment [92]. Moreover, desialylation also enhances hepatocytes to kill activated cells through perforin-dependent and CD95 ligand-CD95 pathways [92]

In vitro, cultured WCM-260 hepatocytes and human HepG2 cells killed both CD95-bearing P815 and CD95-deficient K562 target cells in an ASGR1-mediated manner. This was further supported by reduced target cell killing observed in primary mouse hepatocytes following siRNA-mediated ASGR1 knockdown [92]. In the absence of CD95, activated CD4+ T lymphocytes expressing B220, a CD45 form with depleted sialic acid, were also cleared by hepatocytes via ASGR1 [92, 98]. Conversely, hepatocytes with ASGR1 knockdown displayed significantly diminished target cell killing [92], underscoring a critical role for ASGR1 in clearing desialylated lymphocytes, independent of CD95.

Sialic acids on B and T cell membranes are essential for their maturation, differentiation, migration and survival by counteracting apoptosis and other different death-inducing pathways [96, 97]. Mice deficient in B cell-specific cytidine monophosphate sialic acid synthase (CMAS), the enzyme that mediates sialoglycan synthesis, exhibited severe B-cell deficiency [96]. Likewise, mice deficient in T cell-specific CMAS displayed peripheral T cell deficiency accompanied by increased activated caspase-3, indicating an ongoing apoptosis and impaired T cell survival [99]. These findings highlight the critical role of sialylation in lymphocyte homeostasis and reinforce the function of ASGR1 in selectively clearing desialylated B [96] and T cells [99], thereby contributing to the regulation of adaptive immune cell populations.

ASGR1 is recognized as the major antigenic component of liver-specific proteins and has identified as a liver specific autoantigen in autoimmune hepatitis [100, 101]. Löhr et al. reported that 50% of patients with autoimmune hepatitis and 15% of those with primary biliary cirrhosis process autoantibodies against human hepatic ASGPR [102]. Beyond its role as an autoantigen, ASGR1 has been implicated in the clearance of apoptotic cells [15], removal of cellular fibronectin [103] and IgA clearance from the circulation [104, 105].

Deficiency in ASGR1 supresses endocytosis and lysosomal breakdown of glycoproteins [19]. Transient inhibition of endocytosis activates immune responses through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, by increasing target antigen availability to effector cells and thereby enhancing natural killer cell function [106]. In line with this, Asgr1−/− mice displayed increased numbers of innate immune cells, including monocytes, natural killer cells, and dendritic cells, in visceral adipose tissue, whereas neutrophils, macrophages, CD4⁺ T cells, CD8⁺ T cells, and B cells were unchanged. In contrast, liver immune profiling in Asgr1−/− mice revealed reduced natural killer cells and dendritic cells, while other immune cell subsets remained unaffected [38]. The expression of ASGR1 (also known as CLEC4H1) was negatively correlated with neutrophils, dendritic cells, macrophages, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, and B cells in hepatocellular carcinoma [107].

In transplantation immunology, in vitro hepatic xenograft transplantation models using pig donor and human recipient tissues demonstrated ASGR1 deletion is associated with reduced human platelet destruction compared with wildtype porcine livers during perfusion [108]. This shows a promising role for ASGR1 in hepatic transplantation tolerance induction. However, thrombocytopenia is a clinical barrier for liver xenograft transplantation [109]. Furthermore, ASGR1 inhibition can impede the elimination of outdated platelets and the production of fresh ones, impairing their physiological function [23].

In summary, ASGR1 has roles in immune regulation - clearing desialylated lymphocytes, facilitating IL-10–producing regulatory T cell induction, and modulating innate immune cell populations. Additionally, ASGR1 functions as a liver-specific autoantigen, contributes to apoptotic cell and IgA clearance, and influences platelet survival in transplantation settings. Collectively, these roles highlight ASGR1 as a central regulator of immune tolerance and systemic homeostasis.

ASGR1 and cancer

Increased ASGR1 mRNA levels have been identified in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines including HepG2 [107, 110], SMMC-7721 [74], C3A [110], and Hep3B [110] cells. The high abundance of the ASGR1 transcript in HepG2 cells was also identified by RNA-seq analysis, while Western blotting verified its high protein abundance [107]. Likewise, increased ASGR1 mRNA expression has been found in colon, stomach and rectum adenocarcinoma, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [111]. This was further corroborated by increased ASGR1 protein in hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma patients [112]. Overall, this presents ASGR1 as a novel tissue biomarker that associates with the presence and extent of tumor development in liver cancer patients [112]. Another study also showed higher ASGR1 mRNA levels in hepatocellular carcinoma, relative to normal tissue, but ASGR1 decreased with cancer progression in immune cells including neutrophils, dendritic cells, macrophages, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, and B cells [107]. An inverse correlation was also found between ASGR1 mRNA levels and the same immune cells in cholangiocarcinoma. Conversely, a positive association was found between ASGR1 and the same immune cells in kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients [111].

Asgr1−/− mice were found to have lower colon cancer metastasis relative to wildtype littermates [113]. This is consistent with the ability of ASGR1 to increase the adhesion and proliferation of colon cancer cell lines via cell membrane glycoconjugate interactions [113]. Gene regulatory network analysis identified ASGR1 and other genes including Notch1 and erythroblast transformation-specific related gene (ERG) as a hub gene involved in prostate cancer pathophysiology in humans [114]. ASGR1 was also found to be a hub gene in pancreatic-ductal adenocarcinoma, including its metastasis to the liver and negative effects on overall patient survival [115]. Interestingly, coculture of hepatocytes from wildtype mice with Lewis lung carcinoma 3LL cells induces MMP-9 protein release from 3LL cells, whereas this effect was absent when hepatocytes from Asgr1−/− mice were used. Moreover, treatment of 3LL cells with mouse recombinant ASGR1 activates the EGFR-ERK pathway, leading to increased MMP-9 transcription and its proteinase activity [47], all of which promote cancer development. ASGR1-induced MMP-9 production in 3LL cells was inhibited by small molecules such as PD98059 and AG1478, which inhibit ERK and EGFR phosphorylation, respectively [47]. Consistent with this, wildtype and Asgr1−/− mice intra-hepatically injected with 3LL cells containing the luciferase reporter gene (3LL-Luc2 cells) showed Asgr1−/− mice had decreased lung metastasis than wildtype littermates. Overall, ASGR1 promotes cancer propagation by increasing MMP-9 via the EGFR–ERK pathway. This is ameliorated by ASGR1 inhibition [47].

Variable ASGR1 mRNA expression levels have been reported among hepatocellular carcinoma patients. ASGR1 expression decreases with increasing carcinoma grade and is higher in cirrhotic specimens [116]. Lower ASGR1 mRNA levels were identified in cholangiocarcinoma [111], hepatocellular carcinoma [117] and in proliferative or metastatic tumours [116, 118]. Overexpression of ASGR1 inhibits the invasiveness and cell migration of hepatocellular carcinoma HCCLM3 cells in vitro. In vivo, male BALB/c nude mice, injected systemically with ASGR1-overexpressing HCCLM3 cells developed fewer metastatic lung nodules compared to mice receiving HCCLM3 cells with shRNA-mediated ASGR1 knockdown. The same study also found hepatocellular carcinoma patients with low ASGR1 protein levels have shorter survival, higher recurrence risk and advanced tumour-node-metastasis staging [117]. Another study found patients with higher circulating epithelial cells, that lack ASGR1 protein, associates with a higher incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. This demonstrates that increases in ASGR1 may be a prognostic biomarker for reduced cancer risk and metastasis [118]. Mechanistically, ASGR1 exerts antitumorigenic effects in hepatocellular carcinoma by suppressing ATP6L subunit of vacuolar H+-ATPase (V-ATPase) through direct interaction with and activation of longevity assurance homolog 2 (LASS2) [117] (Table 2). V-ATPase promotes cancer metastasis by enhancing the acidity of the microenvironment [119], which promotes drug resistant, metastatic and invasive cancer phenotypes [117]. In mice, LASS2 deletion is associated with liver tumorigenesis [120] and hence ASGR1-LASS2-induced suppression of V-ATPase is a mechanism to inhibit tumour metastasis [117].

Table 2.

The dual role of ASGR1 in cancer and its association with the tumour microenvironment and molecular switches

Tumor type ASGR1
status
Functional role Pathways
involved
Experimental evidence Effect on tumor microenvironment Proposed molecular switch References
HCC WT/high expression ASGR1 supress tumour LASS2 / V-ATPase inhibition ASGR1 reduced cancer invasion in HCCLM3 cells in vitro and tumour metastasis in BALB/c nude mice in vivo. Also, decreased ASGR1 in HCC patients was related to higher recurrence and poor survival rate ASGR1 suppress acidic TME by suppressing ATP6L subunit of V-ATPase ASGR1 reduced TME acidity by interacting with LASS2 and regulates lysosomal acidification and intracellular pH. Gu et al. [117].
Lewis lung carcinoma WT/KO ASGR1 promotes tumour development and metastasis EGFR-ERK pathway MMP-9 was elevated in ASGR1 WT 3LL cells via EGFR-ERK activation, but not in Asgr1−/− mice hepatocytes, indicating a pro-tumorigenic role for ASGR1. ASGR1 activates the EGFR-ERK pathway ASGR1 promotes pro-metastatic & growth factor rich TME. Inhibiting ERK-EGFR by AG1478 decreased ASGR1-induced MMP-9 production in 3LL cells. Ueno et al. [47].
Liver cancer WT/KO ASGR1 supress tumour JAK1/STAT3 through GP130/JAK1-mediated STAT3 activation ASGR1 interacts with NLK and inhibits STAT3 activation. Over expression of ASGR1 increased liver cancer cell apoptosis. ASGR1 knockdown HCCLM3 cells showed increased STAT3 expression. ASGR1 expression correlates with tumour size. ASGR1 overexpression inhibited IL6 induced STAT3 phosphorylation. ASGR1 CpG island hypermethylation silences ASGR1-NLK pathway. ASGR1 inhibits STAT3 phosphorylation by promoting the binding of NLK to STAT3. Zhu et al. [45].

ASGR1, Asialoglycoprotein receptor 1; Asgr1−/−, Asgr1 knockout; CpG, cytosine-phosphate-guanine; EGFR, Epidermal growth factor receptor; ERK, Extracellular signal regulated kinase; GP130, Glycoprotein 130; HCC, Hepatocellular carcinoma; IL6, Interleukin 6; JAK1, Janus kinase 1; KO, knockout; LASS2, longevity assurance homolog 2; 3LL, Lewis lung carcinoma; MMP-9, Matrix metalloproteinase-9; NLK, Nemo-like kinase; pH, potential of hydrogen; STAT3, Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3; TME, tumour microenvironment; V-ATPase, vacuolar H+-ATPase; WT, Wild type

ASGR1 can also supress cancer progression by upregulating Nemo-like kinase (NLK). NLK competes with glycoprotein, GP130, by binding to the Src homology 2 (SH2) domain of STAT3, thereby inhibiting GP130/JAK1-mediated STAT3 phosphorylation [45]. Conversely, hypermethylation of the CpG island of ASGR1, a region of short DNA sequences rich in cytosine-guanine dinucleotides in the promoter, silences the ASGR1–NLK pathway, causing STAT3 activation and liver tumour propagation [45]. Consistent with this, a strong association has been found between ASGR1 with DNA methyltransferases [111], reinforcing ASGR1 as a tumour suppressor gene that is regulated by DNA methylation [45].

Elevated sialyltransferase activity increases sialylation within the tumor microenvironment, which in turn suppresses sialidase expression [121, 122]. This alters the balance of sialic acid production and degradation which, in turn, affects ASGR1 function [121]. Siglecs are sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-type lectins and immune checkpoint inhibitor proteins [122]. Siglec-sialic acid interactions augment tumour sialylation which in turn downregulates immune cell responses and assist cancer cell evasion of immunological surveillance mechanisms [122]. Sialyltransferase overexpression not only contributes to cancer development but also promotes atherosclerosis by increasing inflammatory cell recruitment [123] and suppresses anti-atherogenic B1-cell function [124].

In summary, ASGR1 plays dual roles in cancer, promoting tumor adhesion and metastasis in some contexts while exerting tumor-suppressive effects through LASS2–V-ATPase inhibition and NLK-mediated blockade of STAT3 signalling. Its regulation by DNA methylation and tumor-associated sialyation highlights the importance of epigenetic and microenvironmental factors in its function. ASGR1 presents as both a prognostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target for cancer (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Dual roles of ASGR1 in cancer biology. (a) HCCLM3 cancer cells with ASGR1 overexpression demonstrated less HCC invasiveness and migration in vitro [117]. (b) Six-week-old male BALB/c nude mice tail vein injected with HCCLM3-ASGR1, ASGR1 protein overexpressing cells has fewer metastatic lung nodules [117]. (c) Six-week-old male BALB/c nude mice tail vein injected with HCCLM3-ASGR1, ASGR1 knockdown cells has advanced metastatic lung nodules [117]. (d) HCC clinical patients with low ASGR1 protein have higher risk of HCC recurrence, advanced tumour node metastasis and decreased overall survival rate [117]. (e) Delineated the mechanism by which ASGR1 supress HCC. Hypomethylation of the CpG island of ASGR1 promoter enhances cell cycle and high ASGR1 protein production [45]. ASGR1 protein directly interacts and activates LASS2, which in turn supresses the activity of V-ATPase followed by decreased acidic TME [117]. Suppressed acidic TME decreases HCC progression and metastasis [125]. On the other hand, ASGR1 enhances the binding of NLK to SH2 domain of STAT3 and prevents GP130/JAK1 mediated phosphorylation of STAT3 [45]. Inhibited STAT3 phosphorylation ultimately suppresses HCC progression and metastasis [45]. (f) The 3LL cells cocultured with hepatocytes isolated form Asgr1+/+ mice showed increased MMP-9 production in the cell culture supernatant [47]. (g) Treatment of 3LL cells with mouse rASGR1 increased the ERK and EGFR phosphorylation that ultimately activates MMP-9 transcription. As a result, increased MMP-9 protein and its activity favours cancer progression [47]. (h) The PD98059 and AG1478, small molecules which inhibits the ERK and EGFR phosphorylation, respectively suppressed rASGR1 induced MMP-9 production in 3LL cells [47]. (i) Intrahepatic injection of 3LL-Luc2 cells to Asgr1−/− mice showed decreased lung metastasis relative to Asgr1+/+ littermates [47]. Abbreviations: HCC, Hepatocellular carcinoma; LASS2, Longevity assurance homolog 2, V-ATPase, Vacuolar H⁺-ATPase; NLK, Nemo-like kinase; SH2, Src homology 2; STAT3, Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, GP130/JAK1, Glycoprotein 130/Janus kinase 1; MMP-9, Matrix metalloproteinase-9; ERK, Extracellular signal-regulated kinase; EGFR, Epidermal growth factor receptor; Luc, Luciferase

ASGR1 and infectious diseases

Bloodstream infection caused by sialidase (neuraminidase) expressing microbial agents induces rapid desialylation in pathological conditions and alters the balance of endogenous circulatory glycoproteins [70]. For example, during Streptococcus pneumoniae-induced sepsis, thrombocytopenia happens because of hepatic ASGR1 mediated platelet destruction in response to platelet desialylation caused by the bacterial ‘NanA’ sialidase enzyme [70].

Other respiratory pathogens, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Haemophilus influenzae, and influenza virus express different neuraminidases that target host glycoproteins for adherence to the mucosa or for cellular penetration of the target cell to establish the disease process [126, 127]. The presence of an increased variety of sialidases including NEU1, NEU2, and NEU4 in adipocytes and CD4+ T cells have been reported among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 positive patients on antiretroviral therapy [128]. Another study found desialylation of PBMCs from HIV-1 positive patients promotes viral growth through increased synthesis of reverse transcriptase and p24 antigen [129]. Consistent with this, ASGR1 transcriptome expression is upregulated in HIV-1 positive long-term non-progressor patients [130]. Network analysis of protein-protein interactions showed ASGR1 interacts with HIV-1 proteins directly [130]. This suggests ASGR1 acts as a receptor that either facilitates infection or mediates CD4+ T cell destruction, contributing to immunosuppression in the presence of elevated sialidase activity during HIV infection. Desialylation coupled with CD4+ T cell killing reinforces the notion that desialylated cells, such as B-cells, are tagged for ASGR1-mediated apoptosis [96].

Elevated ASGR1 mRNA levels are reported in SARS-CoV-2 infection [131, 132] and hepatotropic viral infections such as hepatitis C virus [133]. Elevated ASGR1 protein levels have been identified in hepatitis B [134] and hepatitis E virus infections [135]. Mechanistically, the binding and viral internalization of hepatitis C virus subtype 1 by HepG2 cells and primary human hepatocytes in vitro is impaired when ASGR1 is inhibited (e.g. by asialofetuin) [133]. ASGR1 knockout PLC/PRF/5 liver cells also displayed decreased hepatitis E virus binding to HeLa hepatocytes, as does inhibition with ASGR1 ligands (e.g. fibronectin, asialofetuin, asialoganglioside) [135]. Overall, these studies directly implicate ASGR1 in the binding and entry of hepatitis viruses (C and E) into human hepatocytes.

ASGR1 binds directly with preS1, a large envelop protein on hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg), both in vitro and in vivo, mediating its entry into hepatocytes [134]. Moreover, in vitro studies found 50% of HepG2 cells secreted HBVsAg after hepatitis B virus inoculation via ASGR1-hepatitis B virus interaction. In the presence of ASGR1 competitive inhibitor asialofetuin, this was reduced to 5% [136]. Another study found viral binding and entry into hepatocytes was enhanced in the presence of neuraminidase and viral preS1-desialylation, which increases interactions with ASGR1 [137]. This did not occur in the presence of acylated preS1-derived lipopeptides [138–140] and asialofetuin [137]. Consistent with this, the anti-ASGR1 antibody, ASGR3-10 M, inhibited epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and activated cell division control 42 (CDC42)-associated kinase 1 (Ack1) endocytosis, which is vital for hepatitis B viral infection [141]. ASGR1 mRNA is also expressed in Sertoli cells, Leydig cells, and seminiferous tubules stromal cells but rarely in spermatogonia cells. This suggests ASGR1 provides hepatitis B virus and other sexually transmitted microbes access to the human testis luminal compartment to invade germ cells and promote the spread of sexually transmitted infections [142].

Detailed host cell membrane protein receptome profiling uncovered the multi-organ tropism and pathogenicity of SARS‑CoV‑2. Twelve SARS-CoV-2 capsid spike protein binding membrane receptors were identified that included ASGR1 [143]. Hepatic ASGR1 mRNA levels are also higher following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, indicating ASGR1 binding to the SARS‑CoV‑2 spike protein is used to enhance viral entry into hepatocytes [131, 132]. This notion is in line with another study that revealed higher ASGR1 protein in lung alveolar macrophages [144], increased ASGR1 mRNA in alveolar organoids [145], and oral cavity following SARS‑CoV‑2 infection [146].

In general, cells or tissues with a higher expression of the SARS‑CoV‑2 primary receptor, angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), such as lung, testis, intestine, heart, liver and kidney are more severely affected by SARS‑CoV‑2 infection [131]. However, primary hepatic-parenchymal and epithelial cell lines with low ACE2 levels have efficient SARS‑CoV‑2 infection capacities, which are supressed by siRNA deletion of ASGR1 or anti-ASGR1 antibody inhibition. ASGR1 is found to bind to multiple spike proteins from different SARS-CoV-2 strains, implicating SARS-CoV-2 infection as an ASGR1-dependent process [132]. Consistent with this, ASGR1 was identified as a functional receptor for SARS-CoV-2, which can utilize a distinct combination of ACE2/ASGR1/KREMEN1 (the ASK complex) to enter host cells [143]. Neutralizing antibody cocktails targeting the ASK receptors more effectively blocked SARS-CoV-2 infection in human lung organoids compared to single-receptor antibodies [143].

In summary, ASGR1 facilitates bacterial and viral infections by recognizing desialylated glycoproteins, promoting platelet clearance, immune cell apoptosis, and viral entry. It serves as a receptor for hepatotropic viruses and SARS-CoV-2. These findings position ASGR1 as a key mediator of pathogen tropism and a potential target for therapeutic intervention (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

ASGR1 and infectious diseases. (a) different cell lines including PLC/PRF/5, HepG2 and primary human hepatocytes cocultured with different viruses such as HBV, HCV and HEV have decreased viral binding and entry into these individual cells in the presence of ASGR1 knockout/inhibition and/or asialofetuin [133, 135]. (b) SARS-CoV-2 infects host cells via ACE2, ASGR1 and KREMEN1 combination of receptors [143]. (c) ASGR1 inhibition showed decreased SARS-CoV-2 binding and entry into host cells [132]. (d) circulating HBV binds and enters to hepatocytes through the NTCP, EGFR [147] and ASGR1 [9, 134], left panel. ASGR1 inhibition decreased HBV binding and entry into these cells [136], right panel. ASGR1 binds with preS1 part of HBV surface protein and facilitates HBV entry into hepatocytes [134]. (e) microbial neuraminidase enhances microbial attachment to host cells and ultimately their entry [126, 127]. Thereafter, bacterial and/or viral neuraminidase induces host cell desialylation in a pathological way ultimately leading to increased ASGR1 mediated host cell destruction [70] including immune cells [96]. During bacterial infection, desialylation also enhances biofilm formation [126] and favours the development of antibiotic-resistant mutants [148]. (f) HIV infected CD4+T cells showed increased expression of several sialidases [128], which may promote desialylation in a pathogenic manner and ultimately encourage the virus to produce large amounts of reverse transcriptase and p24 antigen, which improves viral replication [129]. Likewise, increased desialylation promotes ASGR1 mediated CD4+T cells destruction, which results in cell death and immunodeficiency [130]. Abbreviations: HBV, Hepatitis B virus; HCV, Hepatitis C virus; HEV, Hepatitis E virus; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; ACE2, Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; KREMEN1, Kringle-containing transmembrane protein 1; NTCP, sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor

ASGR1 as a target for therapy and future directions

In vitro and in vivo murine studies found ASGR1 inhibition using an anti-ASGR1 monoclonal antibody blocked hepatitis B virus infection [141]. Furthermore, the fusogenic peptide 10 M-D42AN containing an anti-ASGR1 antibody prevented hepatitis B virus infection via inhibition of hepatocyte endocytosis [141]. This study presents ASGR1 as a promising strategy to reduce viral infections.

Injection of wild type mice, on a non-atherogenic high-fat/high-carbohydrate/butylated-sulfite diet, with the anti-ASGR1 neutralizing antibody, 4B9-IgG, every other day for 14 days, lead to alteration in lipid handling mechanisms [19]. These included decreases in proteins that promote cholesterol synthesis (SREBP1c, fatty acid synthase and SCD1) and increases in proteins that promote cholesterol efflux (ABCG5, ABCG8 ABCA1) [19]. Consistent with this, 4B9-IgG decreased total cholesterol and triglyceride levels in wildtype mice, regardless of whether they were on lipid lowering statin therapy (atorvastatin) or not. Treatment with 4B9-IgG also exhibited synergistic effects when used with intestinal cholesterol absorption inhibitor, ezetimibe [19]. ASGR1 inhibition using an anti-ASGR1 neutralizing antibody shows a therapeutic promise to prevent atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.

The expression of ASGR1 in different tumour types including liver, ovarian, breast, and colon cancers [149], raises the possibility that ASGR1 can be targeted for drug delivery. For example, a nanodrug combining the anticancer agent ursolic acid with ASGR1 and the near-infrared probe indocyanine green demonstrates efficient uptake into hepatocellular carcinoma cells, leveraging ASGR1’s to recognize lactobionic acid on the cancer cell surface [150]. In another study, ASGR1-mediated recognition improved nanomedicine internalization by cancerous HepG2 cells, inhibiting their proliferation [151]. Thus, the incorporation of ASGR1 into nanoparticle delivery systems, is a novel approach to prevent cancer growth [150, 152].

ASGR1 recognises galactose and GalNAc moieties, a property that has been exploited to deliver drugs specifically to ASGR1-expressing tissues, particularly the liver [16, 149]. GalNAc-conjugated antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and siRNA have been employed in preclinical and clinical settings to enhance hepatic uptake and therapeutic efficacy. For example, in diethylnitrosamine-induced hepatocellular carcinoma models, GalNAc-ASOs improve cellular uptake and antitumor activity [153]. GalNAc-siRNA conjugates are also in clinical trials for the treatment of different diseases [154]. For example, the GalNAc-siRNA conjugate, Olpasiran, which targets lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), attenuated Lp(a) assembly efficiently and safely in hepatocytes, leading to a significant reduction in Lp(a) in the circulation [155]. Likewise, a clinical trial using GalNAc-siRNA conjugate, VIR-2218, targeting chronic hepatitis B virus infection, silenced hepatitis B viral transcripts and demonstrated favourable pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers [156].

Other ASGR1-targetting GalNAc-siRNA conjugates that have been regulatory approved for clinical use include Inclisiran that targets PCSK9 and causes long-lasting reductions in total cholesterol levels. Givosiran is another that is designed to treat acute hepatic porphyria, a group of rare genetic disorders caused by deficiencies in enzymes of the heme biosynthesis pathway. Lumasiran targets primary hyperoxaluria type 1, a rare genetic disorder that causes kidney stones and kidney damage. Finally, Vutrisiran for hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis that causes polyneuropathy and cardiomyopathy [157]. The therapeutic advantages and limitations of ASGR1 targeting in cardiovascular disease, cancer, viral infections, and liver-directed RNA therapeutics are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3.

Benefits and limitations of ASGR1 as a therapeutic target in cardiovascular disease, cancer, viral infections and liver-directed RNA therapeutics

Disease conditions Therapeutic rationale of ASGR1 targeting Benefits (Pros) Limitations (Cons) Mechanisms or pathways References
Atherosclerosis and/or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease ASGR1 deficiency or inhibition lowers atherogenic lipoproteins and cardiovascular risk. Cardioprotective via reducing LDL-C, non-HDL-C, TGs, arterial lipid deposition and plaque formation. Potential hepatic stress or injury and impaired desialylated glycoprotein clearance. Enhanced cholesterol efflux, AMPK activation, mTORC1 inhibition, and reduced cholesterol biosynthesis Wang et al. [19], Xiao et al. [9].
Lewis lung carcinoma ASGR1 promotes pro-metastatic & growth factor rich TME such as MMP-9 Targeting ASGR1 suppresses MMP-9 via EGFR-ERK pathway inhibition and impedes cancer metastasis and growth. Tumour-specific contradictory effects of ASGR1. For example, in HCC, ASGR1 overexpression reduced TME acidity via LASS2/V-ATPase inhibition [117]. The ERK-EGFR inhibition by PD98059 and AG1478 reduced ASGR1-induced MMP-9 production in 3LL cells. Ueno et al. [47].
Viral infections involving hepatocytes ASGR1 binds HBV preS1 on HBVsAg [134] and SARS-CoV-2 capsid spike protein [143] to promote viral entry into hepatocytes. ASGR1 can be used to modulate viral hepatotropism and liver-specific delivery of antiviral therapeutics. ASGR1 inhibition might alter normal hepatic immune clearance mechanisms and glycoprotein clearance. ASGR1-mediated endocytosis of hepatotropic viruses and glycoprotein recognition Xiao et al. [9].
Liver-directed RNA therapeutics ASGR1 is highly expressed in hepatocytes and enables selective liver delivery through GalNAc conjugation [9]. Hepatocyte-specific efficient drug delivery with reduced systemic exposure. For example, Olpasiran, (GalNAc-siRNA conjugate) safely reduced hepatocyte Lp(a) assembly and decreased circulatory Lp(a) [155]. Therapeutic efficacy depends on intact ASGR1 expression, receptor recycling, and pH-sensitive GalNAc-ASGR1 interactions [158]. GalNAc-ASGR1 mediated endocytosis [158]. Zhang et al. [157].

AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; ASGR1, Asialoglycoprotein receptor 1; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; ERK, extracellular signal regulated kinase; GalNAc, N-acetylgalactosamine; HBV, Hepatitis B virus; HBVsAg, Hepatitis B surface antigen; HCC, Hepatocellular carcinoma; non-HDL-C, non- high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LASS2, longevity assurance homolog 2; LDL-C, Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; 3LL, Lewis lung carcinoma; Lp(a), Lipoprotein(a); MMP-9, Matrix metalloproteinase-9; mTORC1, Mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1; preS1, pre-surface 1; RNA, Ribonucleic acid; SARS-CoV-2, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; siRNA, Small interfering RNA; TGs, Triglycerides; TME, tumour microenvironment; V-ATPase, vacuolar H+-ATPase

Overall, ASGR1 presents not only as a therapeutic target but is also being increasingly utilized as a facilitator of drug delivery systems.

Conclusions

ASGR1 is a hepatic receptor that clears desialylated glycoproteins from the circulation. Its roles in health and disease are now known to extend to lipid modulating activities that regulate atherosclerosis, platelet regulation, immunomodulation, the promotion of cancer metastasis yet also suppression of tumorigenesis, and finally facilitation of hepatotropic viral entry into cells. Through its many and varied roles ASGR1 presents as an exciting target for disease prevention. ASGR1’s unique ability to recognize the GalNAc epitope has revolutionized liver-targeted drug delivery, enabling the development of highly efficient therapeutic approaches that are now in clinical use.

Acknowledgements

Figures were constructed with BioRender.com.

Abbreviations

ASGPR

Asialoglycoprotein receptor

ASGR1

Asialoglycoprotein receptor 1

ASGR2

Asialoglycoprotein receptor 2

AMPK

AMP-activated protein kinase

GalNAc

N-acetylgalactosamine

GWAS

Genome-wide association study

LXRα

Liver X receptor alpha

LXRβ

Liver X receptor beta

ABCG5/8

ATP-binding cassette transporters G5 and G8

ABCA1

ATP-binding cassette transporter A1

INSIG1/2

Insulin-induced genes 1 and 2

mTORC1

Mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1

SREBP

Sterol regulatory element-binding protein

ER

Endoplasmic reticulum

SCAP

SREBP cleavage-activating protein

HMGCR

3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase

LDLR

Low-density lipoprotein receptor

LDL

Low-density lipoprotein

LDL-C

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

HDL-C

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol

VLDL

Very low-density lipoprotein

TG

Triglycerides

ApoB

Apolipoprotein B

ANGPTL3/8

Angiopoietin-like proteins 3 and 8

LPL

Lipoprotein lipase

PCSK9

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9

MTTP

Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein

JACK2/STAT3

Janus kinase 2/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

ICAM-1

Intercellular adhesion molecule 1

HCC

Hepatocellular carcinoma

LASS2

Longevity assurance homolog 2

V-ATPase

Vacuolar H⁺-ATPase

NLK

Nemo-like kinase

SH2

Src homology 2

MMP-9

Matrix metalloproteinase-9

ERK

Extracellular signal-regulated kinase

EGFR

Epidermal growth factor receptor

SARS-CoV-2

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

ACE2

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2

KREMEN1

Kringle-containing transmembrane protein 1

NTCP

Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide

ALT

Alanine aminotransferase

AST

Aspartate aminotransferase

Author contributions

D.G. and C.A.B conceived the idea for the manuscript. D.G. wrote the manuscript and C.A.B was a major contributor to editing the manuscript. J.T.M.T. and P.J.P provided editing and oversight of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge funding from the National Health and Medical Research Centre to C.A.B (Ideas grant: APP2029117 and MRFF 2016053). C.A.B. is the recipient of the Lin Huddleston Heart Foundation Fellowship. D.G. received a University of Adelaide Research Training Program International Stipend. P.J.P. receives a Level 3 Future Leader Fellowship from the National Heart Foundation of Australia [FLF 106656].

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Harris RL, van den Berg CW, Bowen DJ. ASGR1 and ASGR2, the Genes that Encode the Asialoglycoprotein Receptor (Ashwell Receptor), Are Expressed in Peripheral Blood Monocytes and Show Interindividual Differences in Transcript Profile. Mol Biol Int. 2012;2012:283974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wei M, Wang PG. Desialylation in physiological and pathological processes: New target for diagnostic and therapeutic development. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2019;162:25–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhou X, Chi K, Zhang C, Liu Q, Yang G, Sialylation. A cloak for tumors to trick the immune system in the microenvironment. Biology (Basel). 2023;12(6). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 4.Bischoff J, Lodish HF. Two asialoglycoprotein receptor polypeptides in human hepatoma cells. J Biol Chem. 1987;262(24):11825–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tozawa R, Ishibashi S, Osuga J, Yamamoto K, Yagyu H, Ohashi K, et al. Asialoglycoprotein receptor deficiency in mice lacking the major receptor subunit. Its obligate requirement for the stable expression of oligomeric receptor. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(16):12624–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Weis WI, Drickamer K, Hendrickson WA. Structure of a C-type mannose-binding protein complexed with an oligosaccharide. Nature. 1992;360(6400):127–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sancho D, Reis e Sousa C. Signaling by myeloid C-type lectin receptors in immunity and homeostasis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2012;30:491–529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Drickamer K, Taylor ME. Recent insights into structures and functions of C-type lectins in the immune system. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2015;34:26–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xiao X, Nie Y, Leng Y. Asialoglycoprotein receptor 1: a multifaceted receptor in the liver and cardiovascular system. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025;12:1653452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Huang T, Deng H, Wolkoff AW, Stockert RJ. Phosphorylation-dependent interaction of the asialoglycoprotein receptor with molecular chaperones. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(40):37798–803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hoober JK. ASGR1 and its enigmatic relative, CLEC10A. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(14). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Maverakis E, Kim K, Shimoda M, Gershwin ME, Patel F, Wilken R, et al. Glycans in the immune system and The Altered Glycan Theory of Autoimmunity: a critical review. J Autoimmun. 2015;57:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shi R, Wang J, Zhang Z, Leng Y, Chen AF. ASGR1 promotes liver injury in sepsis by modulating monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation via NF-κB/ATF5 pathway. Life Sci. 2023;315:121339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Spiess M. The asialoglycoprotein receptor: a model for endocytic transport receptors. Biochemistry. 1990;29(43):10009–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stockert RJ. The asialoglycoprotein receptor: relationships between structure, function, and expression. Physiol Rev. 1995;75(3):591–609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ma Y, Chen H, Su S, Wang T, Zhang C, Fida G, et al. Galactose as Broad Ligand for Multiple Tumor Imaging and Therapy. J Cancer. 2015;6(7):658–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nioi P, Sigurdsson A, Thorleifsson G, Helgason H, Agustsdottir AB, Norddahl GL, et al. Variant ASGR1 Associated with a Reduced Risk of Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(22):2131–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhao X, Tang B, Shi ZH, Deng ZW, Deng Y, Tan LM, et al. Asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 gene expression in peripheral blood monocytes associates with serum total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020;133(12):1505–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang JQ, Li LL, Hu A, Deng G, Wei J, Li YF, et al. Inhibition of ASGR1 decreases lipid levels by promoting cholesterol excretion. Nature. 2022;608(7922):413–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gao S, Wang L, Bai F, Xu S. In silico discovery of food-derived phytochemicals against asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 for treatment of hypercholesterolemia: Pharmacophore modeling, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation approach. J Mol Graph Model. 2023;125:108614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yu L, Li-Hawkins J, Hammer RE, Berge KE, Horton JD, Cohen JC, et al. Overexpression of ABCG5 and ABCG8 promotes biliary cholesterol secretion and reduces fractional absorption of dietary cholesterol. J Clin Invest. 2002;110(5):671–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xie B, Shi X, Li Y, Xia B, Zhou J, Du M, et al. Deficiency of ASGR1 in pigs recapitulates reduced risk factor for cardiovascular disease in humans. PLoS Genet. 2021;17(11):e1009891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhao W, Xu S, Weng J. ASGR1: an emerging therapeutic target in hypercholesterolemia. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shin S, Han M-J, Patel I, Welsh AM, Sverdlov M, Cho W, et al. mTOR inhibition reprograms cellular lipid homeostasis by inducing alternative lipid uptake and promoting cholesterol transport. Mol Cell. 2025;85(18):3486–. – 504.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Foretz M, Viollet B. Activation of AMPK for a Break in Hepatic Lipid Accumulation and Circulating Cholesterol. EBioMedicine. 2018;31:15–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang Y, Jiang X, Wang W, Lei L, Sheng R, Li S, et al. ASGR1 Deficiency Inhibits Atherosclerosis in Western Diet-Fed ApoE(-/-) Mice by Regulating Lipoprotein Metabolism and Promoting Cholesterol Efflux. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2024;44(12):2428–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xu Y, Tao J, Yu X, Wu Y, Chen Y, You K, et al. Hypomorphic ASGR1 modulates lipid homeostasis via INSIG1-mediated SREBP signaling suppression. JCI Insight. 2021;6:19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Susan-Resiga D, Girard E, Essalmani R, Roubtsova A, Marcinkiewicz J, Derbali RM, et al. Asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 is a novel PCSK9-independent ligand of liver LDLR cleaved by furin. J Biol Chem. 2021;297(4):101177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Bagdanoff JT, Smith TM, Allan M, O’Donnell P, Nguyen Z, Moore EA, et al. Clearance of plasma PCSK9 via the asialoglycoprotein receptor mediated by heterobifunctional ligands. Cell Chem Biol. 2023;30(1):97–e1099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yabe D, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Insig-2, a second endoplasmic reticulum protein that binds SCAP and blocks export of sterol regulatory element-binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(20):12753–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang R. The Potential of ANGPTL8 Antagonism to Simultaneously Reduce Triglyceride and Increase HDL-Cholesterol Plasma Levels. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:795370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sun Y, Tong H, Chu X, Li Y, Zhang J, Ding Y, et al. Notch1 regulates hepatic thrombopoietin production. Blood. 2024;143(26):2778–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cai W, Yang X, Han S, Guo H, Zheng Z, Wang H, et al. Notch1 Pathway Protects against Burn-Induced Myocardial Injury by Repressing Reactive Oxygen Species Production through JAK2/STAT3 Signaling. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:5638943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Qin WD, Zhang F, Qin XJ, Wang J, Meng X, Wang H, et al. Notch1 inhibition reduces low shear stress-induced plaque formation. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016;72:63–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bourdillon MC, Poston RN, Covacho C, Chignier E, Bricca G, McGregor JL. ICAM-1 deficiency reduces atherosclerotic lesions in double-knockout mice (ApoE(-/-)/ICAM-1(-/-)) fed a fat or a chow diet. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20(12):2630–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Basit A, Reutershan J, Morris MA, Solga M, Rose CE Jr., Ley K. ICAM-1 and LFA-1 play critical roles in LPS-induced neutrophil recruitment into the alveolar space. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2006;291(2):L200–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vieceli Dalla Sega F, Fortini F, Aquila G, Campo G, Vaccarezza M, Rizzo P. Notch signaling regulates immune responses in atherosclerosis. Front Immunol. 2019;10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 38.Svecla M, Da Dalt L, Moregola A, Nour J, Baragetti A, Uboldi P, et al. ASGR1 deficiency diverts lipids toward adipose tissue but results in liver damage during obesity. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23(1):42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Nakajima T, Yokota T, Shingu Y, Yamada A, Iba Y, Ujihira K, et al. Impaired mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation capacity in epicardial adipose tissue is associated with decreased concentration of adiponectin and severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):3535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tian K, Xu Y, Sahebkar A, Xu S. CD36 in Atherosclerosis: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2020;22(10):59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bogan BJ, Williams HC, Holden CM, Patel V, Joseph G, Fierro C, et al. The role of fatty acid synthase in the vascular smooth muscle cell to foam cell transition. Cells. 2024;13(8). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42.Yeudall S, Upchurch CM, Seegren PV, Pavelec CM, Greulich J, Lemke MC, et al. Macrophage acetyl-CoA carboxylase regulates acute inflammation through control of glucose and lipid metabolism. Sci Adv. 2022;8(47):eabq1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhang M, Yue X, Zhao X, Lu Y, Liu H, Zhang Z, et al. Macrophage-specific deletion of Notch-1 induced M2 anti-inflammatory effect in atherosclerosis via activation of the PI3K-oxidative stress axis. Aging. 2023;15(24):15196–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Mack JJ, Mosqueiro TS, Archer BJ, Jones WM, Sunshine H, Faas GC, et al. NOTCH1 is a mechanosensor in adult arteries. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhu X, Song G, Zhang S, Chen J, Hu X, Zhu H, et al. Asialoglycoprotein Receptor 1 Functions as a Tumor Suppressor in Liver Cancer via Inhibition of STAT3. Cancer Res. 2022;82(21):3987–4000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wang R, Zhang Y, Xu L, Lin Y, Yang X, Bai L, et al. Protein Inhibitor of Activated STAT3 Suppresses Oxidized LDL-induced Cell Responses during Atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein E-deficient Mice. Sci Rep. 2016;6:36790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ueno S, Mojic M, Ohashi Y, Higashi N, Hayakawa Y, Irimura T. Asialoglycoprotein receptor promotes cancer metastasis by activating the EGFR-ERK pathway. Cancer Res. 2011;71(20):6419–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Li T, Li X, Feng Y, Dong G, Wang Y, Yang J. The Role of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 in Atherosclerotic Plaque Instability. Mediators Inflamm. 2020;2020:3872367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lamb DJ, Modjtahedi H, Plant NJ, Ferns GA. EGF mediates monocyte chemotaxis and macrophage proliferation and EGF receptor is expressed in atherosclerotic plaques. Atherosclerosis. 2004;176(1):21–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang L, Huang Z, Huang W, Chen X, Shan P, Zhong P, et al. Inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor attenuates atherosclerosis via decreasing inflammation and oxidative stress. Sci Rep. 2017;8:45917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Park HJ, Carr JR, Wang Z, Nogueira V, Hay N, Tyner AL, et al. FoxM1, a critical regulator of oxidative stress during oncogenesis. Embo j. 2009;28(19):2908–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Li H, Horke S, Förstermann U. Vascular oxidative stress, nitric oxide and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2014;237(1):208–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Eltoft A, Arntzen KA, Wilsgaard T, Mathiesen EB, Johnsen SH. Interleukin-6 is an independent predictor of progressive atherosclerosis in the carotid artery: The Tromsø Study. Atherosclerosis. 2018;271:1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Nahrendorf M, Swirski FK, Cholesterol. CCR2, and monocyte phenotypes in atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(20):1594–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Liu H, Jiang D. Fractalkine/CX3CR1 and atherosclerosis. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412(13–14):1180–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jebari-Benslaiman S, Galicia-García U, Larrea-Sebal A, Olaetxea JR, Alloza I, Vandenbroeck K, et al. Pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(6). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 57.Demina EP, Smutova V, Pan X, Fougerat A, Guo T, Zou C, et al. Neuraminidases 1 and 3 Trigger Atherosclerosis by Desialylating Low-Density Lipoproteins and Increasing Their Uptake by Macrophages. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(4):e018756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kashirskikh DA, Markin AM, Sobenin IA, Orekhov AN. Study of the role of human endogenous neuraminidases in atherosclerotic lesions of the thoracic aorta. Atherosclerosis. 2020;315:e114–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lindbohm N, Gylling H, Miettinen TA. Sialic acid content of low density lipoprotein and its relation to lipid concentrations and metabolism of low density lipoprotein and cholesterol. J Lipid Res. 2000;41(7):1110–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yu X, Tao J, Wu Y, Chen Y, Li P, Yang F, et al. Deficiency of ASGR1 alleviates diet-induced systemic insulin resistance via improved hepatic insulin sensitivity. Diabetes Metab J. 2024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 61.Rewers M, Zaccaro D, D’Agostino R, Haffner S, Saad MF, Selby JV, et al. Insulin sensitivity, insulinemia, and coronary artery disease: the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(3):781–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Santoleri D, Titchenell PM. Resolving the Paradox of Hepatic Insulin Resistance. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;7(2):447–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hassan M, Wagdy K. ASGR1 - a new target for lowering non-HDL cholesterol. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2016;2016(2):e201614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hamledari H, Sajjadi SF, Alikhah A, Boroumand MA, Behmanesh M. ASGR1 but not FOXM1 expression decreases in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of diabetic atherosclerotic patients. J Diabetes Complications. 2019;33(8):539–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Luo Q, Chen J, Su Y, Wu P, Wang J, Fang Z, et al. Correlation between serum soluble ASGR1 concentration and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels: a cross-sectional study. Lipids Health Dis. 2023;22(1):142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ali L, Cupido AJ, Rijkers M, Hovingh GK, Holleboom AG, Dallinga-Thie GM, et al. Common gene variants in ASGR1 gene locus associate with reduced cardiovascular risk in absence of pleiotropic effects. Atherosclerosis. 2020;306:15–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Grozovsky R, Begonja AJ, Liu K, Visner G, Hartwig JH, Falet H, et al. The Ashwell-Morell receptor regulates hepatic thrombopoietin production via JAK2-STAT3 signaling. Nat Med. 2015;21(1):47–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Yang A, Gyulay G, Mitchell M, White E, Trigatti BL, Igdoura SA. Hypomorphic sialidase expression decreases serum cholesterol by downregulation of VLDL production in mice. J Lipid Res. 2012;53(12):2573–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.van Schooten CJ, Denis CV, Lisman T, Eikenboom JC, Leebeek FW, Goudemand J, et al. Variations in glycosylation of von Willebrand factor with O-linked sialylated T antigen are associated with its plasma levels. Blood. 2007;109(6):2430–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Grewal PK, Uchiyama S, Ditto D, Varki N, Le DT, Nizet V, et al. The Ashwell receptor mitigates the lethal coagulopathy of sepsis. Nat Med. 2008;14(6):648–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ward SE, O’Sullivan JM, Drakeford C, Aguila S, Jondle CN, Sharma J, et al. A novel role for the macrophage galactose-type lectin receptor in mediating von Willebrand factor clearance. Blood J Am Soc Hematol. 2018;131(8):911–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Mi Y, Coonce M, Fiete D, Steirer L, Dveksler G, Townsend RR, et al. Functional Consequences of Mannose and Asialoglycoprotein Receptor Ablation. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(36):18700–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Tumoglu B, Keelaghan A, Avci FY. Tn antigen interactions of macrophage galactose-type lectin (MGL) in immune function and disease. Glycobiology. 2023;33(11):879–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Zhao R, Li T, Zheng G, Jiang K, Fan L, Shao J. Simultaneous inhibition of growth and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by co-delivery of ursolic acid and sorafenib using lactobionic acid modified and pH-sensitive chitosan-conjugated mesoporous silica nanocomplex. Biomaterials. 2017;143:1–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Cortes GA, Moore MJ, El-Nakeep S. Physiology, Von Willebrand Factor. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL). StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2024. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32644488/. Accessed19 May 2024. [PubMed]
  • 76.Xu Y, Wu Y, Guo D, Gao G, Lai K, Yang F, et al. Generation of an ASGR1 homozygous mutant human embryonic stem cell line WAe001-A-6 using CRISPR/Cas9. Stem Cell Res. 2017;22:29–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Dalton SR, Lee SM, King RN, Nanji AA, Kharbanda KK, Casey CA, et al. Carbon tetrachloride-induced liver damage in asialoglycoprotein receptor-deficient mice. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009;77(7):1283–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zhang Z, Leng XK, Zhai YY, Zhang X, Sun ZW, Xiao JY, et al. Deficiency of ASGR1 promotes liver injury by increasing GP73-mediated hepatic endoplasmic reticulum stress. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):1908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Rasineni K, Lee SML, McVicker BL, Osna NA, Casey CA, Kharbanda KK. Susceptibility of asialoglycoprotein receptor-deficient mice to Lps/galactosamine liver injury and protection by betaine administration. Biology (Basel). 2020;10(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 80.Liu Y, Zhu L, Liang S, Yao S, Li R, Liu S, et al. Galactose protects hepatocytes against TNF-α-induced apoptosis by promoting activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway in acute liver failure. Lab Invest. 2015;95(5):504–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Lebeau PF, Wassef H, Byun JH, Platko K, Ason B, Jackson S, et al. The loss-of-function PCSK9Q152H variant increases ER chaperones GRP78 and GRP94 and protects against liver injury. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 82.Han CY, Lim SW, Koo JH, Kim W, Kim SG. PHLDA3 overexpression in hepatocytes by endoplasmic reticulum stress via IRE1-Xbp1s pathway expedites liver injury. Gut. 2016;65(8):1377–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Li J, Liu H, Mauer AS, Lucien F, Raiter A, Bandla H, et al. Characterization of Cellular Sources and Circulating Levels of Extracellular Vesicles in a Dietary Murine Model of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. Hepatol Commun. 2019;3(9):1235–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Lee SS, Buters JT, Pineau T, Fernandez-Salguero P, Gonzalez FJ. Role of CYP2E1 in the hepatotoxicity of acetaminophen. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(20):12063–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yin Y, Liu J, Yu J, Dong D, Gao F, Yu L, et al. ASGR1 is a promising target for lipid reduction in pigs with PON2 as its inhibitor. iScience. 2024;27(7):110288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Svecla M, Moregola A, Dalt LD, Nour J, Baragetti A, Uboldi P, et al. ASGR1 deficiency improves atherosclerosis but alters liver metabolism in ApoE(-/-) mice. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024;23(1):428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Svecla M, Nour J, Bladergroen MR, Nicolardi S, Zhang T, Beretta G, et al. Impact of Asialoglycoprotein Receptor and Mannose Receptor Deficiency on Murine Plasma N-glycome Profiles. Mol Cell Proteom. 2023;22(9):100615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Chambers JC, Zhang W, Sehmi J, Li X, Wass MN, Van der Harst P, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies loci influencing concentrations of liver enzymes in plasma. Nat Genet. 2011;43(11):1131–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Marth JD, Grewal PK. Mammalian glycosylation in immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(11):874–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Rudd PM, Elliott T, Cresswell P, Wilson IA, Dwek RA. Glycosylation and the immune system. Science. 2001;291(5512):2370–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Li D, Romain G, Flamar AL, Duluc D, Dullaers M, Li XH, et al. Targeting self- and foreign antigens to dendritic cells via DC-ASGPR generates IL-10-producing suppressive CD4 + T cells. J Exp Med. 2012;209(1):109–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Guy CS, Rankin SL, Michalak TI. Hepatocyte cytotoxicity is facilitated by asialoglycoprotein receptor. Hepatology. 2011;54(3):1043–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Crispe IN. Hepatocytes as Immunological Agents. J Immunol. 2016;196(1):17–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Sierro F, Tay SS, Warren A, Le Couteur DG, McCaughan GW, Bowen DG, et al. Suicidal emperipolesis: a process leading to cell-in-cell structures, T cell clearance and immune homeostasis. Curr Mol Med. 2015;15(9):819–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.O’Brien LE. Tissue Homeostasis and Non-Homeostasis: From Cell Life Cycles to Organ States. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2022;38:395–418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Linder AT, Schmidt M, Hitschfel J, Abeln M, Schneider P, Gerardy-Schahn R, et al. Sialic acids on B cells are crucial for their survival and provide protection against apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(25):e2201129119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Bi S, Baum LG. Sialic acids in T cell development and function. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1790(12):1599–610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Huang L, Soldevila G, Leeker M, Flavell R, Crispe IN. The liver eliminates T cells undergoing antigen-triggered apoptosis in vivo. Immunity. 1994;1(9):741–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Schmidt M, Linder AT, Korn M, Schellenberg N, Meyer SJ, Nimmerjahn F, et al. Sialic acids on T cells are crucial for their maintenance and survival. Front Immunol. 2024;15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 100.Rigopoulou EI, Roggenbuck D, Smyk DS, Liaskos C, Mytilinaiou MG, Feist E, et al. Asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) as target autoantigen in liver autoimmunity: lost and found. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;12(2):260–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.McFarlane IG, McFarlane BM, Major GN, Tolley P, Williams R. Identification of the hepatic asialo-glycoprotein receptor (hepatic lectin) as a component of liver specific membrane lipoprotein (LSP). Clin Exp Immunol. 1984;55(2):347–54. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Löhr H, Treichel U, Poralla T, Manns M, Meyer zum Büschenfelde KH, Fleischer B. The human hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor is a target antigen for liver-infiltrating T cells in autoimmune chronic active hepatitis and primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1990;12(6):1314–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Rotundo RF, Vincent PA, McKeown-Longo PJ, Blumenstock FA, Saba TM. Hepatic fibronectin matrix turnover in rats: involvement of the asialoglycoprotein receptor. Am J Physiol. 1999;277(6):G1189–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Stockert RJ, Kressner MS, Collins JC, Sternlieb I, Morell AG. IgA interaction with the asialoglycoprotein receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982;79(20):6229–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Rifai A, Fadden K, Morrison SL, Chintalacharuvu KR. The N-glycans determine the differential blood clearance and hepatic uptake of human immunoglobulin (Ig)A1 and IgA2 isotypes. J Exp Med. 2000;191(12):2171–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Chew HY, De Lima PO, Gonzalez Cruz JL, Banushi B, Echejoh G, Hu L, et al. Endocytosis Inhibition in Humans to Improve Responses to ADCC-Mediating Antibodies. Cell. 2020;180(5):895–e91427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Zhang Y, Wei H, Fan L, Fang M, He X, Lu B, et al. CLEC4s as Potential Therapeutic Targets in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Microenvironment. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:681372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Paris LL, Estrada JL, Li P, Blankenship RL, Sidner RA, Reyes LM, et al. Reduced human platelet uptake by pig livers deficient in the asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 protein. Xenotransplantation. 2015;22(3):203–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Ekser B, Gridelli B, Veroux M, Cooper DK. Clinical pig liver xenotransplantation: how far do we have to go? Xenotransplantation. 2011;18(3):158–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Hou B, Qin L, Huang L. Liver cancer cells as the model for developing liver-targeted RNAi therapeutics. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2023;644:85–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Huang T. SARS-CoV-2-correlated ASGR1 is a novel potential marker for the treatment and identification of multiple human cancers. Am J Transl Res. 2022;14(12):8862–78. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Julich-Haertel H, Urban SK, Krawczyk M, Willms A, Jankowski K, Patkowski W, et al. Cancer-associated circulating large extracellular vesicles in cholangiocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2017;67(2):282–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Fang J, Izawa R, Gomez-Santos L, Ueno S, Sawaguchi T, Usami K, et al. Potentiation of proliferation of some but not all human colon carcinoma cell lines by immobilized hepatic asialoglycoprotein receptor 1. Oncol Res. 2009;17(10):437–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Lee SR, Choi YD, Cho NH. Association between pathologic factors and ERG expression in prostate cancer: finding pivotal networking. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144(9):1665–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Liu T, Chen J, Liu AA, Chen L, Liang X, Peng JF, et al. Identifying Liver Metastasis-Related Genes Through a Coexpression Network to Construct a 5-Gene Model for Predicting Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patient Prognosis. Pancreas. 2023;52(2):e151–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Witzigmann D, Quagliata L, Schenk SH, Quintavalle C, Terracciano LM, Huwyler J. Variable asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 expression in liver disease: Implications for therapeutic intervention. Hepatol Res. 2016;46(7):686–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Gu D, Jin H, Jin G, Wang C, Wang N, Hu F, et al. The asialoglycoprotein receptor suppresses the metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma via LASS2-mediated inhibition of V-ATPase activity. Cancer Lett. 2016;379(1):107–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Roa-Colomo A, López Garrido M, Molina-Vallejo P, Rojas A, Sanchez MG, Aranda-García V, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma risk-stratification based on ASGR1 in circulating epithelial cells for cancer interception. Front Mol Biosci. 2022;9:1074277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Hendrix A, Sormunen R, Westbroek W, Lambein K, Denys H, Sys G, et al. Vacuolar H+ ATPase expression and activity is required for Rab27B-dependent invasive growth and metastasis of breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2013;133(4):843–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Chen L, Lu X, Zeng T, Chen Y, Chen Q, Wu W, et al. Enhancement of DEN-induced liver tumourigenesis in hepatocyte-specific Lass2-knockout mice coincident with upregulation of the TGF-β1-Smad4-PAI-1 axis. Oncol Rep. 2014;31(2):885–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Miyagi T, Takahashi K, Hata K, Shiozaki K, Yamaguchi K. Sialidase significance for cancer progression. Glycoconj J. 2012;29(8–9):567–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Pietrobono S, Stecca B. Aberrant sialylation in cancer: biomarker and potential target for therapeutic intervention? Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(9). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 123.Poznyak AV, Kashirskikh DA, Postnov AY, Popov MA, Sukhorukov VN, Orekhov AN. Sialic acid as the potential link between lipid metabolism and inflammation in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2023;56:e12972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Gruber S, Hendrikx T, Tsiantoulas D, Ozsvar-Kozma M, Göderle L, Mallat Z, et al. Sialic Acid-Binding Immunoglobulin-like Lectin G Promotes Atherosclerosis and Liver Inflammation by Suppressing the Protective Functions of B-1 Cells. Cell Rep. 2016;14(10):2348–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Jin C, Wang B-S, Liu Y-Y. Mechanisms of Hepatocarcinogenesis Development in an Acidic Microenvironment. In: Feitelson MA, Arzumanyan A, editors. Liver Cancer - Genesis, Progression and Metastasis. London: IntechOpen; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Soong G, Muir A, Gomez MI, Waks J, Reddy B, Planet P, et al. Bacterial neuraminidase facilitates mucosal infection by participating in biofilm production. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(8):2297–305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Suzuki Y. Sialobiology of influenza: molecular mechanism of host range variation of influenza viruses. Biol Pharm Bull. 2005;28(3):399–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Giron LB, Liu Q, Adeniji OS, Yin X, Kannan T, Ding J, et al. Immunoglobulin G N-glycan markers of accelerated biological aging during chronic HIV infection. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):3035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Stamatos NM, Gomatos PJ, Cox J, Fowler A, Dow N, Wohlhieter JA, et al. Desialylation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells promotes growth of HIV-1. Virology. 1997;228(2):123–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Lee D, Yoon CH, Choi SY, Kim JE, Cho YK, Choi BS, et al. Transcriptome Analysis Identifies Altered Biological Processes and Novel Markers in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Long-Term Non-Progressors. Infect Chemother. 2021;53(3):489–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Achom A, Das R, Pakray P. An improved Fuzzy based GWO algorithm for predicting the potential host receptor of COVID-19 infection. Comput Biol Med. 2022;151:106050. Pt A). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Yang X, Zheng X, Zhu Y, Zhao X, Liu J, Xun J, et al. Asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 promotes SARS-CoV-2 infection of human normal hepatocytes. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9(1):42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Saunier B, Triyatni M, Ulianich L, Maruvada P, Yen P, Kohn LD. Role of the asialoglycoprotein receptor in binding and entry of hepatitis C virus structural proteins in cultured human hepatocytes. J Virol. 2003;77(1):546–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Zhang X, Lin SM, Chen TY, Liu M, Ye F, Chen YR, et al. Asialoglycoprotein receptor interacts with the preS1 domain of hepatitis B virus in vivo and in vitro. Arch Virol. 2011;156(4):637–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Zhang L, Tian Y, Wen Z, Zhang F, Qi Y, Huang W, et al. Asialoglycoprotein receptor facilitates infection of PLC/PRF/5 cells by HEV through interaction with ORF2. J Med Virol. 2016;88(12):2186–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Treichel U, Meyer zum Büschenfelde KH, Dienes HP, Gerken G. Receptor-mediated entry of hepatitis B virus particles into liver cells. Arch Virol. 1997;142(3):493–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Owada T, Matsubayashi K, Sakata H, Ihara H, Sato S, Ikebuchi K, et al. Interaction between desialylated hepatitis B virus and asialoglycoprotein receptor on hepatocytes may be indispensable for viral binding and entry. J Viral Hepat. 2006;13(1):11–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Gripon P, Cannie I, Urban S. Efficient inhibition of hepatitis B virus infection by acylated peptides derived from the large viral surface protein. J Virol. 2005;79(3):1613–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Glebe D, Urban S, Knoop EV, Cag N, Krass P, Grün S, et al. Mapping of the hepatitis B virus attachment site by use of infection-inhibiting preS1 lipopeptides and tupaia hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(1):234–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Xie Y, Zhai J, Deng Q, Tiollais P, Wang Y, Zhao M. Entry of hepatitis B virus: mechanism and new therapeutic target. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2010;58(4):301–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Ide M, Tabata N, Yonemura Y, Shirasaki T, Murai K, Wang Y, et al. Guanine nucleotide exchange factor DOCK11-binding peptide fused with a single chain antibody inhibits hepatitis B virus infection and replication. J Biol Chem. 2022;298(7):102097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Sun P, Zheng J, She G, Wei X, Zhang X, Shi H, et al. Expression pattern of asialoglycoprotein receptor in human testis. Cell Tissue Res. 2013;352(3):761–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Gu Y, Cao J, Zhang X, Gao H, Wang Y, Wang J, et al. Receptome profiling identifies KREMEN1 and ASGR1 as alternative functional receptors of SARS-CoV-2. Cell Res. 2022;32(1):24–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Bräutigam K, Reinhard S, Wartenberg M, Forster S, Greif K, Granai M, et al. Comprehensive analysis of SARS-CoV-2 receptor proteins in human respiratory tissues identifies alveolar macrophages as potential virus entry site. Histopathology. 2023;82(6):846–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Gandikota C, Vaddadi K, Sivasami P, Huang C, Liang Y, Pushparaj S, et al. The use of human iPSC-derived alveolar organoids to explore SARS-CoV-2 variant infections and host responses. J Med Virol. 2024;96(4):e29579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Gao F, Lin W, Wang X, Liao M, Zhang M, Qin N, et al. Identification of receptors and factors associated with human coronaviruses in the oral cavity using single-cell RNA sequencing. Heliyon. 2024;10(7):e28280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Iwamoto M, Saso W, Sugiyama R, Ishii K, Ohki M, Nagamori S, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor is a host-entry cofactor triggering hepatitis B virus internalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(17):8487–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Ezzariga N, Zouhari O, Rhars A, Lemkhente Z, Aghrouch M. Biofilm and Antibiotic Resistance Study of Bacteria Involved in Nosocomial Infections. Cureus. 2025;17(2):e78673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Cheng B, Xu P. Redox-sensitive nanocomplex for targeted delivery of melittin. Toxins (Basel). 2020;12(9). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 150.Zhao R, Zheng G, Fan L, Shen Z, Jiang K, Guo Y, et al. Carrier-free nanodrug by co-assembly of chemotherapeutic agent and photosensitizer for cancer imaging and chemo-photo combination therapy. Acta Biomater. 2018;70:197–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Wu Y, Xu Z, Sun W, Yang Y, Jin H, Qiu L, et al. Co-responsive smart cyclodextrin-gated mesoporous silica nanoparticles with ligand-receptor engagement for anti-cancer treatment. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;103:109831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Bansal D, Yadav K, Pandey V, Ganeshpurkar A, Agnihotri A, Dubey N. Lactobionic acid coupled liposomes: an innovative strategy for targeting hepatocellular carcinoma. Drug Deliv. 2016;23(1):140–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Kim Y, Jo M, Schmidt J, Luo X, Prakash TP, Zhou T, et al. Enhanced Potency of GalNAc-Conjugated Antisense Oligonucleotides in Hepatocellular Cancer Models. Mol Ther. 2019;27(9):1547–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Debacker AJ, Voutila J, Catley M, Blakey D, Habib N. Delivery of Oligonucleotides to the Liver with GalNAc: From Research to Registered Therapeutic Drug. Mol Ther. 2020;28(8):1759–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.O’Donoghue ML, JA GL, Knusel B, Gencer B, Wang H, Wu Y, et al. Study design and rationale for the Olpasiran trials of Cardiovascular Events And lipoproteiN(a) reduction-DOSE finding study (OCEAN(a)-DOSE). Am Heart J. 2022;251:61–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Gupta SV, Fanget MC, MacLauchlin C, Clausen VA, Li J, Cloutier D, et al. Clinical and Preclinical Single-Dose Pharmacokinetics of VIR-2218, an RNAi Therapeutic Targeting HBV Infection. Drugs R D. 2021;21(4):455–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Zhang L, Liang Y, Liang G, Tian Z, Zhang Y, Liu Z, et al. The therapeutic prospects of N-acetylgalactosamine-siRNA conjugates. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1090237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Tanowitz M, Hettrick L, Revenko A, Kinberger GA, Prakash TP, Seth PP. Asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 mediates productive uptake of N-acetylgalactosamine-conjugated and unconjugated phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotides into liver hepatocytes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(21):12388–400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Biomarker Research are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES