Skip to main content
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
. 2026 Aug 14;16:1871289. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2026.1871289

Simian iPS-derived hepatocytes support Plasmodium cynomolgi infection and hypnozoite formation

Mélanie Pellisson 1,2,3, Anne-Marie Zeeman 4, Thierry Doll 3, Lucy Kirchhofer-Allan 5, Sven Schuierer 3, Guglielmo Roma 3, Erika L Flannery 5, Sebastian Mikolajczak 5, Clemens H M Kocken 4, Pascal Mäser 1,2,*, Matthias Rottmann 1,2, Matthias Müller 3,*
PMCID: PMC13522909  PMID: 42666476

Abstract

Introduction

Plasmodium cynomolgi is one of the few malaria parasite species that forms dormant liver stages known as hypnozoites and is therefore a suitable model for Plasmodium vivax, the causative agent of recurrent malaria. Very little is known about the biology and pharmacology of liver stage dormancy, which hampers the search for compounds with anti-hypnozoite activity.

Methods

We present the development of a P. cynomolgi in vitro infection model using stem cell-derived hepatocyte-like cells from Macaca fascicularis. iPS cells were established on feeder free condition and differentiated into hepatocyte-like cells via inducible overexpression of key transcription factors.

Results

The generated cells were infected with P. cynomolgi sporozoites, and hypnozoite formation as well as schizont development were confirmed by immunofluorescence microscopy.

Discussion

This simian iPS-derived model is a promising alternative to current P. vivax in vitro infection systems to study the mechanisms underlying liver stage dormancy.

Keywords: hypnozoite, iPS-derived hepatocytes, malaria, Plasmodium cynomolgi, Plasmodium vivax

1. Introduction

In 2024, malaria had an estimated global incidence of 282 million and a death toll of 610 000 (WHO, 2025). Thus, despite the recent successes in the fight against malaria (Rabinovich et al., 2017), the disease remains a main killer. The majority of deaths are due to Plasmodium falciparum, the causative agent of malaria tropica. Plasmodium vivax has a wider global distribution and causes relapsing malaria, which is less fatal than malaria tropica but nevertheless imposes a substantial disease burden, particularly in Asia and South-America (Angrisano and Robinson, 2022; Weiss et al., 2025). Malaria being anthroponotic, elimination and even eradication are theoretically possible. However, in addition to drug-resistant Plasmodium parasites and insecticide-resistant Anopheles mosquitoes (Poespoprodjo et al., 2023), there is an ultimate hindrance to malaria eradication: the hypnozoites of P. vivax (Adekunle et al., 2015; Robinson et al., 2015; Commons et al., 2020; Angrisano and Robinson, 2022). Hypnozoites are small, uninucleated, intracellular stages that stay dormant for months or even years in the liver of infected carriers (Krotoski et al., 1980, 1982; Dembele et al., 2014), building a hidden reservoir of parasites that, upon reactivation, causes relapsing malaria. Primaquine and tafenoquine are the only drugs that eliminate hypnozoites (Llanos-Cuentas et al., 2019), but their use is limited due to severe side effects in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient patients (a common genetic trait in malaria endemic countries) (Alving et al., 1960; Chu et al., 2017; Rueangweerayut et al., 2017). Therefore, new molecules with anti-hypnozoite activity are needed.

Although recent transcriptomic analyses at single cell level have provided some hints on the mechanisms by which Plasmodium alters the host cell machinery to survive (Voorberg-van der Wel et al., 2017; Bertschi et al., 2018; Mancio-Silva et al., 2022; Ruberto et al., 2022), the hypnozoite biology and the mechanisms underlying dormancy and reactivation are still poorly understood. This lack of knowledge can be explained by the difficulties linked to both the cellular system used for infection assays and the in vitro work with Plasmodium vivax. Most studies on P. vivax hypnozoites have been conducted with human primary hepatocytes as host cells (Mazier et al., 1984; Gural et al., 2018; Roth et al., 2018; Chua et al., 2019a; Vantaux et al., 2022). These, however, present problems regarding in vitro maintenance, donor-to-donor variability, and ethical considerations. To overcome these challenges, hepatocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells have been used as an alternative in both 2D and 3D systems and were shown to be permissive to P. vivax and P. falciparum (Ng et al., 2015; Subramani et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2023; Nitaramorn et al., 2024). Additional hurdles encountered when working with P. vivax is the absence of long-term in vitro culture system and the restricted sporozoite sourcing to endemic areas (Gunalan et al., 2020). The best surrogate organism for P. vivax is P. cynomolgi, a closely related and more accessible malaria parasite of non-human primates whose blood-stages can be cultured (Chua et al., 2019b) and which also produces hypnozoites (Krotoski et al., 1980). Here we present for the first time a solution that overcomes the limitations of both P. vivax in vitro work and primary host cell usage by establishing an in vitro system for P. cynomolgi hypnozoites that uses cynomolgus monkey hepatocyte-like cells generated by iPS cell technology.

2. Methods

2.1. Primary cells

Cynomolgus monkey fibroblasts used for iPS cell generation were obtained from ZenBio (monkey PDF091812) and Novartis (monkey 5501). Cynomolgus monkey primary hepatocytes were purchased from Biopredic. Human dermal fibroblasts used for iPS and hepatocyte generation were purchased from Invitrogen and human primary hepatocytes from KaLy-Cell. The donors provided written informed consents.

2.2. Cynomolgus monkey iPS cell generation

Primary cynomolgus monkey dermal fibroblasts were reprogrammed using Sendai viruses of CytoTune-iPS 2.0 Sendai Reprogramming Kit (Life Technologies, A16517) according to the standard protocol. Cells and viruses were plated on irradiated mouse embryonic fibroblasts (Merck Millipore, PMEF-CF1) and cultivated with human embryonic stem cell (hESC) medium [KnockOut DMEM; 4.5 g/L glucose, 0.11 g/L sodium pyruvate, without glutamine (Gibco, 10829018), 20% KnockOut Serum Replacement (Gibco, 10828028), 1% glutaMAX (Gibco, 35050038), 1% MEM Non-Essential Amino Acids (NEAA) (Gibco, 11140035), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, 15140-122), 10 ng/mL human basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) (Invitrogen, 13256029), and 0.1% β-mercaptoethanol (Gibco, 31350010)]. Colonies with hallmark of pluripotent morphology were readily visible between 2–3 weeks after transduction. These pluripotent colonies were picked and subcloned multiple times either on feeder cells or on Matrigel (BD Biosciences, 354277) coated plates in hESC or mTeSR1 medium (Stem Cell Technologies, 05850). This serial subcloning was performed until remnants of Sendai virus RNA were no longer detected and the morphology looked stable. As constant bFGF activity is essential for cynIPS maintenance, mTeSR1 medium was progressively replaced by StemFlex medium (Gibco, A3349401) which allows maintenance of bFGF levels over time. Pluripotency was assessed by immunofluorescence staining, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis, and differentiation potential in all three germ layers (see sections below). Karyotype of each selected line was checked by array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH method) (Cell Line Genetics) and all showed a normal karyotype.

2.3. Flow cytometry analysis for bFGF experiment and iPS characterization

CynIPS cells were dissociated with TryplE (Invitrogen, 12604), followed by fixation and permeabilization using Cytofix/Cytoperm reagent (BD Biosciences, 554655 and 51-20S1KZ) according to the manufacturer. Cells were stained with Nanog-PE (BD Biosciences, 560589a), Oct3/4-PerCP (BD Biosciences, 560794) and Sox2-A647 (BD Biosciences, 562139) intracellular primary antibodies for 45 min at 4 °C, washed twice by sedimentation at 1000 rpm followed by resuspension in ice cold Cytoperm reagent, and finally resuspended in 1% fetal calf serum (FCS) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Invitrogen, 14190). Cells were subsequently analyzed on a CyAn flow cytometer (Beckmann Coulter).

2.4. Karyotyping

For each tested cell line, 1.5E05 cells were seeded onto a T25 Matrigel coated flask in StemFlex medium supplemented with 10 µM rock inhibitor (Merck Millipore, Y-27632). Medium was refreshed the following day without rock inhibitor and lived cells were sent over to Cell Line Genetics when 20-30% confluence was reached. Karyotype of each selected line was checked by aCGH method.

2.5. Differentiation potential

2.5.1. Endoderm differentiation

Endodermal cells were induced from cynIPS cells using STEMdiff Definitive Endoderm (DE) Kit (Stem Cell Technologies, 05110). CynIPS cells were seeded onto a 24-well plate (TPP, 92024) coated with Matrigel and cultivated with StemFlex medium until culture reached 95-100% confluence. Cells were washed by sedimentation at 1000 rpm followed by resuspension in PBS, and medium was switched to STEMdiff medium with 1% DE supplements A and B. The next day, medium was switched to STEMdiff medium with 1% DE supplement B. Medium was changed every day. Cells were fixed after 5 days of differentiation with 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, 15714) in PBS and immunofluorescence staining was performed with forkhead box A2 (FoxA2) (1:50 dilution, Abcam, ab60721) and Oct4 (1:1,000 dilution, Stemgent, 09-0023) primary antibodies.

2.5.2. Ectoderm differentiation

Neuronal precursors were differentiated from cynIPS cells using a modified dual Smad inhibition protocol. 6E04 undifferentiated iPS cells were seeded onto a 96-well ultra-low attachment (ULA) plate (Costar, 7007) in 0.1 mL StemFlex medium with 10 ng/mL penicillin/streptomycin and 10 μM rock inhibitor to prevent apoptosis. 24 hours after seeding, Embryoid Bodies (EBs) were formed and 0.1 mL fresh StemFlex medium were added to the wells. The next day, 30 EBs were transferred to a 4-well Matrigel coated plate with StemFlex medium (7 or 8 EBs seeded per well). 6 hours later, StemFlex medium was replaced by neural induction medium (20% KnockOut™ Serum Replacement, 0.1 mM MEM NEAA, 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 75% DMEM/F12/glutaMAX; 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 10 ng/mL human bFGF, 10 μM SB431542 (Tocris, 1614), and 1 μM LDN193189 (Stemgent, 04-0074). Medium was changed every other day until day 13. Cells were fixed after 14 days of differentiation with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min at room temperature and immunofluorescence staining was performed with βIII-tubulin (1:5,000 dilution, Sigma, T8660), 200 kDa neurofilament (NF200) (1:6,000 dilution, Abcam, ab72996), neuronal nuclei (NeuN) (1:500 dilution, Merck Millipore, ABN78), and Oct4 (1:1,000 dilution, Stemgent, 09-0023) primary antibodies.

2.5.3. Mesoderm differentiation

6E04 undifferentiated cynIPS cells were seeded onto a 96-well ULA plate in 0.1 mL StemFlex medium with 10 ng/mL penicillin/streptomycin and 10 μM rock inhibitor to prevent apoptosis. 24 hours after seeding, EBs were formed and 0.1 mL fresh StemFlex medium were added to the wells. The next day, medium was replaced by STEMdiff Mesoderm Induction Medium (Stem Cell Technologies, 05220). Medium was refreshed daily until spontaneous EB contraction was observed after 10 days of differentiation.

2.6. Generation of cynomolgus monkey hepatocyte-like cells

CynIPS cells were harvested and seeded (1.1E05 cells/well) onto a 96-well plate (Greiner, 655090) coated with Laminin 521 (Biolamina, LN521) in StemFlex medium supplemented with 100 µg/mL geneticin (G418) (Gibco, 10131035), and 10 µM rock inhibitor. The next day, cells were washed by sedimentation at 1000 rpm followed by resuspension in PBS, and differentiation was started (day 0) in Chemically Defined Medium (CDM) [50% IMDM (Invitrogen, 31980030), 50% DMEM/F12 (HAM) (Invitrogen, A14625DJ), 1% Insulin-Transferrin-Selenium (ITS) (Invitrogen, 51500056), 0.1% CD Lipid Concentrate (Invitrogen, 11905031) and 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma, A7979)] supplemented with 1 µg/mL doxycycline (Dox). The next day, medium was changed with CDM supplemented with 1 µg/mL Dox. On day 2, medium was switched to William’s E medium (no phenol red, Gibco, A1217601) with Primary Hepatocyte Maintenance Supplements (Gibco, CM4000) and 1 µg/mL Dox. Medium was refreshed the next day. On day 4, Dox induction was stopped and William’s E medium containing Primary Hepatocyte Maintenance Supplements was supplemented with 5 µM of a combination of compounds (doramapimod, dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) inhibitor, and rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (Raf) inhibitor) to maintain cynHLCs until 17 days of differentiation. Medium was refreshed daily.

2.7. Generation of human hepatocyte-like cells

Human iPS cells were harvested and seeded onto a 96-well Laminin 521 coated plate (8E04 cells/well) in mTeSR1 medium supplemented with 100 µg/mL G418 and 10 µM rock inhibitor. The next day (day 0), cells were washed by sedimentation at 1000 rpm followed by resuspension in PBS, and differentiated for 3 days in CDM supplemented with 1 µg/mL Dox (medium was refreshed daily). On day 3, medium was switched to William’s E medium with Primary Hepatocyte Maintenance Supplements and 1 µg/mL Dox. Medium was refreshed on day 4 and 5. On day 6, Dox induction was stopped, and cells were further differentiated in William’s E medium containing Primary Hepatocyte Maintenance Supplements until day 25. Medium was refreshed every other day.

2.8. Immunofluorescence analysis

Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, permeabilized with Triton X-100 (Sigma, T8787) in PBS and stained with primary antibodies visualized with appropriate fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor®). Cultures were counterstained with the nuclear marker Hoechst (Invitrogen, 33342) and immunostained samples were imaged using a Zeiss LSM 700 microscope. Primary and secondary antibodies references can be found in Supplementary Table 1.

2.9. Periodic acid schiff staining (Sigma, 395-1KT)

Fixed samples were rinsed with deionized water and then placed in 0.5% periodic acid aqueous solution for 5 min at room temperature. Samples were then rinsed with running tap water for 3 min and quickly rinsed with deionized water before being placed in Schiff reagent solution for 15 min. The same rinsing steps as described above were used and samples were then counterstained with hematoxylin for 2 min. Samples were rinsed with deionized water for 3 min. Samples were rinsed twice with 70% ethanol, twice with 96% ethanol and twice with 100% ethanol for 1 min each. Samples were covered with PBS before imaging.

2.10. Oil red O staining

Fixed samples on microscope slides were gently rinsed twice with deionized water and placed in 60% isopropanol for 5 min. 30 mL Oil Red O stock solution (60 mg Oil Red O (BioVision, K580-24-3) in 20 mL 100% isopropanol) was mixed with 20 mL deionized water and filtered using a 0.2 µm syringe filter to make Oil Red O working solution. Samples were incubated with working solution for 15 min and then rinsed two to five times with deionized water until excess stain was no longer apparent. Samples were counterstained with hematoxylin (BioVision, K580-24-2) for 1 min. Samples were rinsed two to five times with deionized water before imaging.

2.11. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

To assess albumin secretion capacity of hepatocytes, cynIPS cells were harvested and seeded onto a 24-well Laminin 521 coated plate (7.5E05 cells/well) and differentiated as previously described. Culture medium was collected every 24 hours before the next medium change. ELISA assay was performed with the collected supernatants according to the provider standard protocol (Immunology Consultants Laboratory, E-80AL).

2.12. Hepatocyte survival screen

CynIPS cells were harvested and 2.5E04 cells/well were seeded using a multidrop dispenser onto 384-well Laminin 521 coated plates (Corning, 3712) in StemFlex medium supplemented with 100 µg/mL G418, and 10 µM rock inhibitor. Cells were differentiated as described above until day 4. At day 4, Dox induction was stopped, medium was replaced by William’s E medium with Primary Hepatocyte Maintenance Supplements and cells were treated with the Novartis compound library in the Echo® Liquid Handling platform (Labcyte Inc.). Cells were returned to overnight incubation at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Cells were treated with the Novartis compound library every other day after medium change. At day 13, bright field images of all plates were acquired with a high-throughput high-content imaging system (Operetta, PerkinElmer) and CellTiter-Glo luminescent cell viability assay (Promega, G7570) was performed. Luminescent readings were obtained using an EnVision multilabel plate reader (PerkinElmer) after 10 min incubation at room temperature. Generated data were analyzed in TIBCO Spotfire® (TIBCO Software Inc.).

2.13. RNA sequencing

Total RNA was isolated using the Direct-zol RNA MiniPrep Kit (Zymo Research, R2071) including on-column deoxyribonuclease (DNase) digestion according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA sequencing libraries were prepared using the Illumina TruSeq RNA Sample Prep kit v2 (Illumina, RS-122-2001) and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq2500 platform. Samples were sequenced to a length of 2 × 76 base pairs. Read pairs from cynomolgus iPS cells, HLCs, and primary hepatocytes were mapped to the Macaca fascicularis genome and the cynomolgus gene transcripts from Refseq by using an in-house gene quantification pipeline (Schuierer and Roma, 2016). The human genome (hg38) was used for the mapping of human HLCs, primary hepatocytes, and liver related cancer cell lines. Genome and transcript alignments were used to calculate gene counts based on Ensembl gene IDs. The corresponding BAM (Binary Alignment Map) files are available via the European Nucleotide Archive.

2.14. Generation of P. cynomolgi sporozoites

The Biomedical Primate Research Centre (BPRC) is an AAALAC-certified institute. All rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) used in this study were captive bred for research purposes and were housed at the BPRC facilities in compliance with the Dutch law on animal experiments, European directive 2010/63/EU, and with the Standard for Human Care and Use of Laboratory Animals by Foreign institutions, identification number A5539-01, provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Prior to the start of experiments, all protocols were approved by the local independent ethical committee, according to Dutch law. For each batch of infected mosquitoes, one rhesus macaque was infected with 1E06 P. cynomolgi M strain blood stage parasites and bled at peak parasitemia, after which the monkey was cured from the malaria infection by intramuscular injection of 7.5 mg/kg chloroquine on three consecutive days. Approximately 1,200 female Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes strain Sind-Kasur Nijmegen (Nijmegen University Medical Centre St. Radboud, Department of Medical Microbiology) were fed with this blood using an ex vivo glass feeder system.

2.15. Sporozoite inoculation of cynHLCs

Sporozoite inoculation of cynHLCs was performed at Novartis according to (Dembele et al., 2014). P. cynomolgi sporozoites were isolated at the BPRC and shipped to Novartis in Leibovitz L15 medium (Invitrogen, 11415-056) with 3% FCS and 2% penicillin/streptomycin at 4 °C to ensure good sporozoite infectiousness. Upon arrival, 4-days differentiated cynHLCs were infected with different sporozoite densities in 96-well plates. Cultures were kept at 37 °C in 5% CO2 with daily medium changes. To evaluate the development of P. cynomolgi liver stages, cultures were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at the indicated time points.

2.16. Immunofluorescence staining of liver stage parasites

Infected hepatocytes were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C with rabbit primary antibodies against P. cynomolgi 70 kilodalton heat shock proteins (Hsp70) and rat primary antibodies against P. cynomolgi upregulated in infective sporozoites gene 4 protein (UIS4) both diluted in 1% BSA and 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS solution. Subsequently, donkey secondary immunoglobulin G (IgG) Alexa Fluor® 555-conjugated anti-rabbit antibodies (1:1,000 dilution, Invitrogen, A31572), chicken secondary IgG Alexa Fluor® 594-conjugated anti-rat antibodies (1:1,000 dilution, Invitrogen, A21471) were added for three hours at room temperature. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst for 10 min at room temperature, samples were finally covered with PBS and viewed under an inverted microscope (Leica DMI6000 or Zeiss LSM 700). Image acquisition and post processing were performed with proprietary Leica or Zeiss software, LAS X or Zen 2012 respectively. Primary and secondary antibodies references can be found in Supplementary Table 1.

2.17. Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (Stdev). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (ns, not significant (P > 0.05); ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗P < 0.01; ∗∗∗P < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001). GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software) was used for statistical analyses. In Figure 1C, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the groups followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test.

Figure 1.

Panel A shows a horizontal experimental timeline for iPS cell differentiation, dox induction, and hepatic maturation from day 0 to day 12, annotated with compound treatment and cell fixation points. Panel B displays immunofluorescence microscopy images at day 6 and day 12, comparing triple combination and DMSO controls, stained for nuclei (Hoechst, blue), ALB (green), HNF4A (red), and merged channels, with higher signal and cell density visible in the triple combination condition. Panel C presents a bar graph quantifying nuclei counts per well for various treatments, showing the highest count with the triple combination and significant differences indicated by asterisks.

Survival screen allows identification of compounds that improve cynHLCs longevity. (A) Schematic representation of the experiment conducted to assess the effect of hit compounds identified to promote cynHLCs survival. Cells were treated daily from day 4 (D4) to day 12 (D12). (B) Immunofluorescence at day 6 and 12 of treated (triple combination) and untreated (DMSO control) cynHLCs with antibodies to ALB (green) and HNF4A (red). Nuclei were visualized with Hoechst (blue). Scale bars, 50 μm. (C) Bar chart representing the nuclei counts of treated and untreated cynHLCs at day 12. Error bars represent standard deviation. n=3 *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001).

3. Results

3.1. Generation and maintenance of iPS cells from Macaca fascicularis

CynIPS cells were generated from dermal skin fibroblasts of two different cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) by reprogramming, using Sendai viruses bearing the transcription factors Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (Takahashi and Yamanaka, 2006). Pluripotent colonies appeared two to three weeks after infection and were kept on irradiated mouse embryonic fibroblasts. After several passages, the iPS cells were transferred on Matrigel, but spontaneous differentiation occurred on this feeder-less system (Figure 2A). Further investigations showed that a higher concentration of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) was essential to maintain these cynomolgus cells in an undifferentiated state (Figure 2B).

Figure 2.

Panel A shows phase-contrast images of human and cynomolgus induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPS and cynIPS) cultured on mTeSR1/Matrigel and then StemFlex/Matrigel, illustrating colony morphology changes. Panel B is a line graph showing that the percentage of Oct4+/Sox2+ cells remains high across three passages with bFGF supplementation, but decreases without bFGF, with data for both hiPS and cynIPS.

Cynomolgus vs. human iPS cell maintenance after generation. (A) Brightfield images of human (h) and cynomolgus (cyn) iPS cells. CynIPS spontaneously differentiated when cultivated with mTeSR1 medium. Switching to StemFlex medium with stabilized bFGF at 10 ng/mL was essential for cynIPS cell maintenance. Scale bar, 200 µm. (B) FACS analysis of human and cynomolgus iPS cells (cultivation +/- bFGF) with Oct4 and Sox2 pluripotent markers.

3.2. Characterization of the iPS cells from Macaca fascicularis

Following the clonal expansion phase, clones exhibiting typical human embryonic stem cell-like morphology (flat and tightly packed colonies of round cells with large nuclei) were selected and fully characterized by immunofluorescence (Figures 3, 4). Based on these results, one clone (#13) was selected and checked for karyotype (Figure 5), and differentiation potential into the three germ layers (Figure 6).

Figure 3.

Fluorescence microscopy panel displaying three rows and four columns of cell samples stained with different markers: Hoechst in blue, Oct4 in red, SSEA-1 and SSEA-3 showing minimal staining, SSEA-4 in green, and merged images combining these channels. Scale bars provided.

Selected clone #13 from monkey PDF091812. Immunofluorescence analysis of Oct4 (red), and stage-specific embryonic antigens (SSEA-1, SSEA-3, and SSEA-4) (green) in cynIPS cells. Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst (blue). Scale bars, 50 µm.

Figure 4.

Fluorescence microscopy panel showing human cell colonies stained for Hoechst (blue, nuclei), Oct4 (red, pluripotency marker), SSEA-1, SSEA-3, and SSEA-4 (green, stem cell markers), along with merged images combining these channels for each sample.

Example of a clone not selected based on SSEA-1 expression. Immunofluorescence analysis of an iPS clone from monkey 5501 of Oct4 (red), SSEA-1, SSEA-3, and SSEA-4 (green). Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst (blue). Scale bars, 50 µm.

Figure 5.

Karyotype image showing 20 numbered pairs of Macaca fascicularis chromsomes arranged in order, plus two X chromsomes, indicating a normal female chromosomal pattern with a total of 42 chromosomes.

Karyotype analysis of cynIPS cells from clone #13 by array Comparative Genomic Hybridization method.

Figure 6.

Three-panel scientific figure shows fluorescent micrographs and a brightfield image demonstrating differentiation into the three germ layers: left panel displays ectoderm with green neural fibers, blue nuclei, and red Oct4; middle panel shows endoderm cells with green FOXA2, blue nuclei, and red Oct4; right panel presents a grayscale embryoid body contraction representing mesoderm.

Differentiation potential of cynIPS cells from clone #13. Upon stimulation, cells expressed βIII-tubulin (green, ectoderm marker), FOXA2 (green, endoderm marker) and contracted spontaneously after EB formation (mesoderm). Non-responsive cells remained pluripotent and expressed Oct4 (red). Nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst (blue). Scale bars, 100 µm.

3.3. Generation of hepatocyte-like cells from cynomolgus iPS cells

The generation of human hepatocytes from stem cells is a well-known process and diverse protocols have been developed (Si-Tayeb et al., 2010; Chen et al., 2012; Gao et al., 2017; Kotaka et al., 2017; Takeishi et al., 2020; Tomaz et al., 2022), but the translation of this process to cynomolgus cells required extensive tailoring. The stepwise approach, which consists of adding growth factors mimicking liver embryogenesis, was not robust and reproducible enough (data not shown). Therefore, we used a direct differentiation approach to generate cynomolgus monkey hepatocyte-like cells (cynHLCs) by overexpressing essential transcription factors for hepatic lineage formation (Huang et al., 2014). Using an inducible construct based on a tetracycline ON/OFF system (Figure 7), hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 homeobox A (HNF4A) and forkhead box protein A3 (FOXA3) were overexpressed in cynIPS cells to drive endoderm formation and hepatocyte maturation (Kang et al., 2018; Yoon et al., 2018).

Figure 7.

Schematic diagram of a genetic construct showing the order of elements from left to right: 5' PiggyBac terminal repeat, pTRE-tight promoter, HNF4A gene, T2A self-cleaving peptide, FOXA3 gene, HSVtk promoter, NeoR resistance gene, CAG promoter, rtTA gene, and 3' PiggyBac terminal repeat.

Schematic representation of the Dox-inducible construct. PB, PiggyBac DNA transposon; TRE, TET responsive element; HNF4A, Coding sequence of hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha; FOXA3, Coding sequence forkhead box protein A3); T2A, self-cleavage peptides from Thosea asigna virus; HSVtk, Minimal promoter fragment from the HSV thymidine kinase promoter; NeoR, neomycin resistance gene; CAG, chicken β-actin promoter; rtTA, TET transactivator protein gene.

Briefly, a confluent pluripotent cell population was induced for 4 days with doxycycline (Dox), and hepatic progenitor cells were further matured for 2 days to generate cynHLCs (Figure 8). CynHLCs produced from clone HNF4A/FOXA3-#13.5 displayed the best hepatic characteristics, such as expression of the genes for albumin (ALB), hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 homeobox A (HNF1A), HNF4A, α1-antitrypsin (A1AT), cytokeratin 18 (KRT18), α-fetoprotein (AFP), and forkhead box A2 (FOXA2) (Figures 9A, B) and increasing levels of albumin secretion (Figure 10A). Additional characterization methods revealed accumulation of lipid droplets (Oil Red O staining) and glycogen storage (Periodic Acid Schiff staining), which are attributes of hepatocytes (Figure 10B).

Figure 8.

Diagram illustrates the process and timeline for differentiating induced pluripotent stem cells into hepatocyte-like cells, showing distinct phases, culture conditions, and representative microscopic images of cells from day zero to day six.

CynHLCs generation from iPS cells. Schematic representation of the differentiation protocol and brightfield images of differentiating cynIPS cells at the indicated time points. G418: geneticin; Dox: doxycycline. Scale bars, 100 µm.

Figure 9.

Panel A and panel B each display immunofluorescence microscopy images organized in three rows and seven columns. The first row in both panels shows Hoechst-stained cell nuclei in blue. The second row shows staining for specific liver markers: ALB, HNF1A, HNF4A, A1AT, KRT18, AFP, and FOXA2, using green or red fluorescence. The third row presents merged images combining each marker with Hoechst nuclear stain, demonstrating co-localization and marker expression in the cells. Scale bars are visible in each panel for size reference.

Immunofluorescence of cynHLCs at day 6 of selected clone #13.5 (A) and clone #13.6 (B) with antibodies to HNF1A, HNF4A, AFP, A1AT (red), ALB, KRT18, and FOXA2 (green). Nuclei were visualized with Hoechst (blue). Scale bars, 50 μm.

Figure 10.

Panel A displays a bar graph showing increasing albumin production over six days of differentiation, with values rising sharply by day six. Panel B presents two microscopy images: the left stained with PAS showing purple-stained cells, and the right stained with Oil Red O showing cells with lipid droplets.

(A) Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for ALB in the supernatants at indicated time points. n=3. (B) Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) and Oil Red O staining of cynHLCs after 10 days of differentiation. Scale bar, 100 μm.

3.4. Characterization of the cynomolgus hepatocyte-like cells

RNA-seq analysis of cynHLCs confirmed the hepatic signature of the generated cells (Figure 11). Comparison with human HLCs as well as liver cancer cell lines (HepG2 and Huh7) showed a very high similarity on the gene expression profile. While differentiating, the obtained cynHLCs lost expression of pluripotent markers and expressed typical hepatic progenitor genes and mature hepatic genes including efflux transporters at day 7. We also assessed the expression of known Plasmodium host entry receptors such as cluster of differentiation 81 (CD81) and scavenger receptor class B type 1 (SRB1) (Rodrigues et al., 2008; Yalaoui et al., 2008a, b; Manzoni et al., 2017) in the generated cynHLCs. Expression of SRB1 and CD81 was confirmed in cynHLCs at the mRNA level during the differentiation process (Figure 12A). CD81 was gradually expressed in iPS (day 0) and differentiating cells. In contrast, SRB1 was weakly expressed in iPS cells, but highly and constantly after day 3, suggesting that cynHLCs become permissive to Plasmodium only when they acquire a hepatic signature (Ng et al., 2015). CynHLCs were infected after 4 days of differentiation, when they expressed hallmark hepatic markers like ALB, HNF4A, and AFP in addition to the host entry receptors SRB1 and CD81 (Figure 12B). Although SRB1 was already highly expressed at day 3, P. cynomolgi sporozoite inoculation was performed at day 4 to avoid potential parasite inhibition due to doxycycline (Pang et al., 1988; Gaillard et al., 2015).

Figure 11.

Heatmap visualizing expression levels of genes across various cell types and timepoints, including CynIPS, CynHLCs, human HLCs, human liver cancer cell lines, and primary hepatocytes. Red intensity indicates gene expression from minimum (lightest) to maximum (darkest).

Heatmap of the RNA-seq based mean expression of cynIPS cells (Day_0), cynHLCs (Day_3 to Day_7), human HLCs, human liver cancer cell lines (HepG2 and Huh7), and primary hepatocytes for selected genes indicative of cell types (pluripotency, hepatic progenitors, and hepatocytes) or cellular processes (efflux transporters and CYP metabolism). Expression values in transcripts per million (tpm) are colored relative to the maximum (red) and minimum (white) expression value for each gene.

Figure 12.

Panel A shows a line graph with two curves for CD81 (blue) and SCARB1 (red), illustrating average RPM expression levels across days zero to six of differentiation, with SCARB1 consistently higher. Panel B presents fluorescence microscopy images grouped by host entry receptors (SRB1 in red, CD81 in green) and hepatic markers (ALB in green, HNF4A and AFP in red), each with Hoechst-stained nuclei in blue and merged channels demonstrating co-localization.

Hepatic signature and expression of host entry receptors indicate permissiveness of cynHLCs to Plasmodium parasite. (A) Bar charts representing mRNA levels in tpm of SRB1 (SCARB1) and CD81 at day 0, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Error bars represent standard deviation. n=3. (B) Immunofluorescence of cynHLCs at day 4 with antibodies to the hepatic markers ALB (green), HNF4A (red), and AFP (red) and to the host entry receptors SRB1 (red) and CD81 (green). Nuclei were visualized with Hoechst (blue). Scale bars, 50 μm.

3.5. Maintenance of the cynomolgus hepatocyte-like cells

While the differentiation process was extremely fast with the cynomolgus cells, the maintenance of the hepatic stage was challenging. After 8 days of differentiation, cynHLCs started to detach and died. In order to improve cell survival, we conducted a screen against an in-house chemical library of well-characterized compounds. Three hit compounds that improved cell viability were identified: a stress-activated protein kinase 2/p38β (SAPK2/p38β) inhibitor named doramapimod, a dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) inhibitor, and a rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (Raf) inhibitor (Figure 13).

Figure 13.

Three chemical structure diagrams labeled Doramapimod, DHODH inhibitor, and Raf inhibitor are shown above a table listing their compound names, corresponding IUPAC names, and canonical SMILES representations.

Chemical structures of the hit compounds identified in survival screen (doramapimod, DHODH inhibitor, and Raf inhibitor) and table displaying the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) names and the canonical smiles of each compound.

Daily treatment with a mix containing the three hits prolonged hepatocyte survival up to 17 days of differentiation (Figure 1A) and maintained ALB and HNF4 expression (Figure 1B). With the triple combination, cell viability remained constant from day 6 to day 12 whereas it dramatically decreased when cells were not treated (DMSO control) or treated with only one hit compound (Figure 1C). Although the treated cynHLCs showed a more precursor-like mRNA signature than untreated cynHLCs (Figure 14), the triple combination finally allowed to study liver stage parasite development for at least 12 days, a timeframe necessary to investigate the dormant stage of malaria.

Figure 14.

Heatmap visualization comparing gene expression profiles for pluripotency, hepatic progenitors, hepatocytes, efflux transporters, and CYP metabolism across developmental stages, treatment groups, cell lines, and primary hepatocytes, showing intensity from minimum to maximum expression.

Heatmap of the RNA-seq based mean expression of cynIPS cells (Day_0), cynHLCs (Day_7 untreated and Day_10 triple combination), and human HLCs for selected genes indicative of cell types (pluripotency, hepatic progenitors, and hepatocytes) or cellular processes (efflux transporters and CYP metabolism). Expression values in transcripts per million (tpm) are colored relative to the maximum (red) and minimum (white) expression value for each gene.

3.6. Infection of the cynomolgus hepatocyte-like cells with Plasmodium cynomolgi

Infection of 4-days differentiated cynHLCs was performed with freshly isolated P. cynomolgi sporozoites from Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes. We detected the first liver stage parasites at 2 days post-infection (dpi) after fixation and staining with P. cynomolgi anti-Hsp70 (70 kilodalton heat shock proteins) antibodies. An additional staining with antibodies against UIS4 (up regulated in infective sporozoites gene 4) confirmed that the parasitophorous vacuole membrane (PVM) of the liver stage parasites had been formed (Bertschi et al., 2018). At 2 dpi, we observed a uniform population of uninucleated parasites with a size of 3 µm (Figure 15A). Despite the low infection rate of less than 10 parasites per well in a 96-well plate, two populations of liver stage parasites were clearly distinguishable by 4 dpi. The first (Figure 15B) was composed of stationary parasites that stayed uninucleated over time (Dembele et al., 2014). The second population (Figure 15C) was composed of growing and multinucleated forms, which would lead to the formation of liver schizonts. It is currently unclear if a PVM prominence detected by anti-UIS4 antibodies would be a reliable hypnozoite-specific marker (Mikolajczak et al., 2015; Gural et al., 2018; Schafer et al., 2018). In our system, PVM prominence was found in a subset of developing liver stage parasites (Figure 16), which would suggest that PVM prominence is not sufficient to discriminate between dormant and developing liver stage parasites. Therefore, in the absence of a P. cynomolgi hypnozoite-specific marker, we defined a hypnozoite as a small, round liver stage parasite (diameter <8 µm) containing a single nucleus. In comparison, a developing schizont is bigger in size and contains at least two nuclei. Small and uninucleated forms were observed until 12 dpi. As previously described (Mikolajczak et al., 2015), the dormant parasites were slightly increasing in size (from 3 µm at 4 dpi to 5 µm at 12 dpi), but the single nucleus observed by Hoechst staining confirmed the dormant state of these liver stage parasites. The current assay conditions did not allow us to visualize hypnozoite reactivation and subsequent development into mature liver schizonts as described for P. cynomolgi in primary cynomolgus monkey hepatocytes (Dembele et al., 2014).

Figure 15.

Fluorescence microscopy panels labeled A, B, and C show parasite development at different days post-infection (dpi). Hoechst stains nuclei blue, Hsp70 stains parasites green, and UIS4 stains the parasitophorous vacuole membrane red. Images display individual channels and the merged overlays for each time point, highlighting parasite growth and membrane integrity. Scale bars are present in merged images for reference.

Infection of cynHLCs with P. cynomolgi sporozoites. Immunofluorescence of liver stage parasites with antibodies specific for P. cynomolgi-Hsp70 (green) and P. cynomolgi-UIS4 (red) at 2 dpi (A), 4–12 dpi small forms (B) and 4–12 dpi large forms (C). Cell nuclei and parasite DNA were visualized with Hoechst (blue). Scale bars, 20 µm.

Figure 16.

Panel A and panel B show immunofluorescence microscopy images of cells stained with Hoechst (blue, left), Hsp70 (green, center left), UIS4 (red, center right), and a merged image (right). In panel A, a large form is observed with intense green Hsp70 staining, red UIS4 outline, and PVM prominence indicated by a white arrow. Panel B shows a smaller form with Hsp70 and UIS4 signals

Immunofluorescence of liver-stage parasites (A) large form and (B) small form. Prominence (white arrow) observed in a subset of schizonts. All liver stage parasites were visualized with antibodies specific for P. cynomolgi Hsp70 (green) and UIS4 (red). Host cell nuclei and parasite DNA content were visualized with Hoechst (blue). Scale bars, 20 µm.

4. Discussion

We report here for the first time the generation of cynHLCs from M. fascicularis, the natural host of P. cynomolgi. These cynHLCs can be generated in vitro at high numbers, and they exhibit the hallmarks of hepatocytes in terms of morphology, protein production, and gene expression. Thus, they provide a useful alternative to primary human or simian hepatocytes for research purposes, and they are preferable to primary cells in terms of reproducibility and ethics. Furthermore, the cynHLCs are genetically amenable at the iPS stage, i.e. before differentiation to hepatocyte-like cells. As host cells for malaria parasites, the cynHLCs provide a new system to study host-pathogen interaction and the biology of Plasmodium liver stages. These include the most elusive form of the malaria parasites, the hypnozoite, which is produced by species such as P. vivax or P. cynomolgi. A better understanding of the hypnozoites will be necessary for the successful elimination of malaria (Radha et al., 2025).

Several hurdles had to be overcome to develop the cynHLC in vitro system. Key to the cultivation of M. fascicularis iPS cells was the finding that basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) needs to be present throughout in vitro culture to maintain the iPS cells in an undifferentiated state. We used commercially available human bFGF; the human and cynomolgus bFGF orthologs (GenBank entries NP_001348594 and XP_045247784, respectively) are 100% identical at the amino acid level. The differentiation of the cynIPS cells to cynHLCs was challenging as well, as the simple addition of growth factors for liver embryogenesis to the medium did not yield the desired result. The successful differentiation of cynIPS cells towards hepatocytes was achieved with a genetic approach, by inducible expression of the transcription factors HNF4A and FOXA3. The final obstacle was the short lifespan of the generated cynHLCs in culture. This problem was solved with a phenotypic screen for small molecules that improve cynHLC viability, which returned three hits: a MAPK inhibitor, Raf inhibitor, and DHODH inhibitor. This is in agreement with the concept that the inhibition of the MAPK pathway slows down cell proliferation and differentiation, and that the pathway is linked to pyrimidine de novo synthesis (Koundinya et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019). A cocktail of the three identified inhibitors prolonged the lifespan of the cynHLC, which allowed to proceed and infect them with malaria parasites.

Proof-of-concept was obtained for the successful infection of the generated cynHLC with P. cynomolgi sporozoites isolated from the salivary glands of infected female A. stephensi mosquitoes. By day 2 after infection, a uniform population of intracellular parasites residing in a parasitophorous vacuole had established, which by day 4 further developed into two distinct populations: large multinuclear vs. small mononuclear forms, representing P. cynomolgi liver schizonts and hypnozoites, respectively. Although we are lacking formal proof of hypnozoites in the sense that they can be woken up and transformed to schizonts, the fact that the small forms stayed mononuclear for the remaining observation time, i.e. until day 12, supports the notion that they can serve as models for hypnozoites. Thus, we think that the results achieved with this new infection model warrant further development. It will be critical to improve the infection rate, in particular for drug efficacy testing against hypnozoites. Furthermore, combining the iPS technology with in vitro cultured P. cynomolgi erythrocytic stages (Chua et al., 2019a) would make the P. cynomolgi system more accessible and more importantly, largely independent of primates. In conclusion, this simian iPS-based in vitro system provides a promising alternative to P. vivax in vitro work to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of relapsing malaria.

Acknowledgments

We thank Isabelle Fruh, Bettina Leonhard, Carole Manneville, and Annick Werner for continuous support with iPS technology; Nicole van der Werff, Ivonne Nieuwenhuis, and Lars Vermaat for mosquito dissection and sporozoite preparation; Annemarie Voorberg-van der Wel for helpful discussions regarding infection assay and critical reading of the manuscript; Isabelle Claerr for technical assistance with high content imaging; Olaf Galuba for support in conducting the survival screen; Dominic Trojer for help in microscopy; Volker Heussler for insightful discussions; Benoit Fischer and Marianne Uteng for providing RNA samples from cynomolgus monkey primary hepatocytes; Judith Knehr and Walter Carbone for RNA-sequencing; and the Walter Fischli-Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Medicines for Malaria Venture for financial support.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Walter Fischli-Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1141292), and the Medicines for Malaria Venture.

Footnotes

Edited by: Sudhir Kumar, Iowa State University, United States

Reviewed by: Bright Adu, University of Ghana, Ghana

Adeyemi Olumide, University of Lagos, Nigeria

Data availability statement

The transcriptomics data are available from the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/) under accession number SRP256529.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was not required for the studies on humans in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements because only commercially available established cell lines were used. The animal study was approved by Animal Experiments Committee (DEC), Biomedical Primate Research Centre. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

MP: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Project administration, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. A-MZ: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing. TD: Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. LK-A: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. SS: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Software, Validation, Writing – review & editing. GR: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Validation, Writing – review & editing. EF: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. SM: Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing. CK: Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. PM: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MR: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

EF, GR, LK-A, MM, SM, SS, and TD are employed by and/or shareholders of Novartis Pharma AG.

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2026.1871289/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary Table 1

Primary and secondary antibodies used for immunofluorescence analysis.

DataSheet1.pdf (174.2KB, pdf)

References

  1. Adekunle A. I., Pinkevych M., McGready R., Luxemburger C., White L. J., Nosten F., et al. (2015). Modeling the dynamics of Plasmodium vivax infection and hypnozoite reactivation in vivo. PloS Negl.Trop. Dis. 9, e0003595. doi:  10.1371/journal.pntd.0003595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alving A. S., Johnson C. F., Tarlov A. R., Brewer G. J., Kellermeyer R. W., Carson P. E. (1960). Mitigation of the haemolytic effect of primaquine and enhancement of its action against exoerythrocytic forms of the Chesson strain of Piasmodium vivax by intermittent regimens of drug administration: a preliminary report. Bull. World Health Organ. 22, 621–631. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Angrisano F., Robinson L. J. (2022). Plasmodium vivax - How hidden reservoirs hinder global malaria elimination. Parasitol. Int. 87, 102526. doi:  10.1016/j.parint.2021.102526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bertschi N. L., Voorberg-van der Wel A., Zeeman A. M., Schuierer S., Nigsch F., Carbone W., et al. (2018). Transcriptomic analysis reveals reduced transcriptional activity in the malaria parasite Plasmodium cynomolgi during progression into dormancy. Elife 7. doi:  10.7554/elife.41081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen Y. F., Tseng C. Y., Wang H. W., Kuo H. C., Yang V. W., Lee O. K. (2012). Rapid generation of mature hepatocyte-like cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells by an efficient three-step protocol. Hepatology 55, 1193–1203. doi:  10.1002/hep.24790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chu C. S., Bancone G., Moore K. A., Win H. H., Thitipanawan N., Po C., et al. (2017). Haemolysis in G6PD heterozygous females treated with primaquine for plasmodium vivax malaria: A nested cohort in a trial of radical curative regimens. PloS Med. 14, e1002224. doi:  10.1371/journal.pmed.1002224 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chua A. C. Y., Ananthanarayanan A., Ong J. J. Y., Wong J. Y., Yip A., Singh N. H., et al. (2019. a). Hepatic spheroids used as an in vitro model to study malaria relapse. Biomaterials 216, 119221. doi:  10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.05.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chua A. C. Y., Ong J. J. Y., Malleret B., Suwanarusk R., Kosaisavee V., Zeeman A. M., et al. (2019. b). Robust continuous in vitro culture of the Plasmodium cynomolgi erythrocytic stages. Nat. Commun. 10, 3635. doi:  10.1038/s41467-019-11332-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Commons R. J., Simpson J. A., Watson J., White N. J., Price R. N. (2020). Estimating the proportion of plasmodium vivax recurrences caused by relapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 103, 1094–1099. doi:  10.4269/ajtmh.20-0186 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dembele L., Franetich J. F., Lorthiois A., Gego A., Zeeman A. M., Kocken C. H., et al. (2014). Persistence and activation of malaria hypnozoites in long-term primary hepatocyte cultures. Nat. Med. 20, 307–312. doi:  10.1038/nm.3461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gaillard T., Madamet M., Pradines B. (2015). Tetracyclines in malaria. Malar. J. 14, 445. doi:  10.1186/s12936-015-0980-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gao Y., Zhang X., Zhang L., Cen J., Ni X., Liao X., et al. (2017). Distinct gene expression and epigenetic signatures in hepatocyte-like cells produced by different strategies from the same donor. Stem Cell Rep. 9, 1813–1824. doi:  10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.10.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gunalan K., Rowley E. H., Miller L. H. (2020). A way forward for culturing plasmodium vivax. Trends Parasitol. 36, 512–519. doi:  10.1016/j.pt.2020.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gural N., Mancio-Silva L., Miller A. B., Galstian A., Butty V. L., Levine S. S., et al. (2018). In vitro culture, drug sensitivity, and transcriptome of plasmodium vivax hypnozoites. Cell Host Microbe 23, 395–406, e394. doi:  10.1016/j.chom.2018.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang P., Zhang L., Gao Y., He Z., Yao D., Wu Z., et al. (2014). Direct reprogramming of human fibroblasts to functional and expandable hepatocytes. Cell Stem Cell 14, 370–384. doi:  10.1016/j.stem.2014.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kang K., Kim Y., Jeon H., Lee S. B., Kim J. S., Park S. A., et al. (2018). Three-dimensional bioprinting of hepatic structures with directly converted hepatocyte-like cells. Tissue Eng. Part A 24, 576–583. doi:  10.1089/ten.tea.2017.0161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kotaka M., Toyoda T., Yasuda K., Kitano Y., Okada C., Ohta A., et al. (2017). Adrenergic receptor agonists induce the differentiation of pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatoblasts into hepatocyte-like cells. Sci. Rep. 7, 16734. doi:  10.1038/s41598-017-16858-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Koundinya M., Sudhalter J., Courjaud A., Lionne B., Touyer G., Bonnet L., et al. (2018). Dependence on the pyrimidine biosynthetic enzyme DHODH is a synthetic lethal vulnerability in mutant KRAS-driven cancers. Cell Chem. Biol. 25, 705–717, e711. doi:  10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Krotoski W. A., Garnham P. C., Bray R. S., Krotoski D. M., Killick-Kendrick R., Draper C. C., et al. (1982). Observations on early and late post-sporozoite tissue stages in primate malaria. I. Discovery of a new latent form of Plasmodium cynomolgi (the hypnozoite), and failure to detect hepatic forms within the first 24 hours after infection. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 31, 24–35. doi:  10.4269/ajtmh.1982.31.24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Krotoski W. A., Krotoski D. M., Garnham P. C., Bray R. S., Killick-Kendrick R., Draper C. C., et al. (1980). Relapses in primate malaria: discovery of two populations of exoerythrocytic stages. Preliminary note. Br. Med. J. 280, 153–154. doi:  10.1136/bmj.280.6208.153-a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Llanos-Cuentas A., Lacerda M. V. G., Hien T. T., Velez I. D., Namaik-Larp C., Chu C. S., et al. (2019). Tafenoquine versus Primaquine to Prevent Relapse of Plasmodium vivax Malaria. N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 229–241. doi:  10.1056/nejmoa1802537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mancio-Silva L., Gural N., Real E., Wadsworth M. H., Butty V. L., March S., et al. (2022). A single-cell liver atlas of Plasmodium vivax infection. Cell Host Microbe 30, 1048–1060, e1045. doi:  10.1016/j.chom.2022.03.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Manzoni G., Marinach C., Topcu S., Briquet S., Grand M., Tolle M., et al. (2017). Plasmodium P36 determines host cell receptor usage during sporozoite invasion. Elife 6. doi:  10.7554/elife.25903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mazier D., Landau I., Druilhe P., Miltgen F., Guguen-Guillouzo C., Baccam D., et al. (1984). Cultivation of the liver forms of Plasmodium vivax in human hepatocytes. Nature 307, 367–369. doi:  10.1038/307367a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mikolajczak S. A., Vaughan A. M., Kangwanrangsan N., Roobsoong W., Fishbaugher M., Yimamnuaychok N., et al. (2015). Plasmodium vivax liver stage development and hypnozoite persistence in human liver-chimeric mice. Cell Host Microbe 17, 526–535. doi:  10.1016/j.chom.2015.03.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ng S., Schwartz R. E., March S., Galstian A., Gural N., Shan J., et al. (2015). Human iPSC-derived hepatocyte-like cells support Plasmodium liver-stage infection in vitro. Stem Cell Rep. 4, 348–359. doi:  10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nitaramorn N., Kobpornchai P., Tongkrajang N., Chaisri U., Imwong M., Kulkeaw K. (2024). Human liver organoids are susceptible to Plasmodium vivax infection. Malar. J. 23, 368. doi:  10.1186/s12936-024-05202-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pang L., Limsomwong N., Singharaj P. (1988). Prophylactic treatment of vivax and falciparum malaria with low-dose doxycycline. J. Infect. Dis. 158, 1124–1127. doi:  10.1093/infdis/158.5.1124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Poespoprodjo J. R., Douglas N. M., Ansong D., Kho S., Anstey N. M. (2023). Malaria. Lancet 402, 2328–2345. doi:  10.1016/s2352-4642(20)30127-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rabinovich R. N., Drakeley C., Djimde A. A., Hall B. F., Hay S. I., Hemingway J., et al. (2017). malERA: An updated research agenda for malaria elimination and eradication. PloS Med. 14, e1002456. doi:  10.1371/journal.pmed.1002456 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Radha B., Bharti P. K., Rahi M., Baharia R. K. (2025). Recent trends and perspectives on malaria relapse: A mini review. J. Vector Borne Dis. 62, 261–273. doi:  10.4103/jvbd.jvbd_66_24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Robinson L. J., Wampfler R., Betuela I., Karl S., White M. T., Li Wai Suen C. S., et al. (2015). Strategies for understanding and reducing the Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium ovale hypnozoite reservoir in Papua New Guinean children: a randomised placebo-controlled trial and mathematical model. PloS Med. 12, e1001891. doi:  10.1371/journal.pmed.1001891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rodrigues C. D., Hannus M., Prudencio M., Martin C., Goncalves L. A., Portugal S., et al. (2008). Host scavenger receptor SR-BI plays a dual role in the establishment of malaria parasite liver infection. Cell Host Microbe 4, 271–282. doi:  10.1016/j.chom.2008.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Roth A., Maher S. P., Conway A. J., Ubalee R., Chaumeau V., Andolina C., et al. (2018). A comprehensive model for assessment of liver stage therapies targeting Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum. Nat. Commun. 9, 1837. doi:  10.1038/s41467-018-04221-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ruberto A. A., Bourke C., Vantaux A., Maher S. P., Jex A., Witkowski B., et al. (2022). Single-cell RNA sequencing of Plasmodium vivax sporozoites reveals stage- and species-specific transcriptomic signatures. PloS Negl.Trop. Dis. 16, e0010633. doi:  10.1371/journal.pntd.0010633 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rueangweerayut R., Bancone G., Harrell E. J., Beelen A. P., Kongpatanakul S., Mohrle J. J., et al. (2017). Hemolytic potential of tafenoquine in female volunteers heterozygous for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency (G6PD mahidol variant) versus G6PD-normal volunteers. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 97, 702–711. doi:  10.4269/ajtmh.16-0779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schafer C., Dambrauskas N., Steel R. W., Carbonetti S., Chuenchob V., Flannery E. L., et al. (2018). A recombinant antibody against Plasmodium vivax UIS4 for distinguishing replicating from dormant liver stages. Malar. J. 17, 370. doi:  10.1186/s12936-018-2519-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Schuierer S., Roma G. (2016). The exon quantification pipeline (EQP): a comprehensive approach to the quantification of gene, exon and junction expression from RNA-seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e132. doi:  10.1093/nar/gkw538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Si-Tayeb K., Noto F. K., Nagaoka M., Li J., Battle M. A., Duris C., et al. (2010). Highly efficient generation of human hepatocyte-like cells from induced pluripotent stem cells. Hepatology 51, 297–305. doi:  10.1002/hep.23354 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Subramani P. A., Vartak-Sharma N., Sreekumar S., Mathur P., Nayer B., Dakhore S., et al. (2020). Plasmodium vivax liver stage assay platforms using Indian clinical isolates. Malar. J. 19, 214. doi:  10.1186/s12936-020-03284-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Takahashi K., Yamanaka S. (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676. doi:  10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Takeishi K., Collin de l'Hortet A., Wang Y., Handa K., Guzman-Lepe J., Matsubara K., et al. (2020). Assembly and function of a bioengineered human liver for transplantation generated solely from induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Rep. 31, 107711. doi:  10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107711 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tomaz R. A., Zacharis E. D., Bachinger F., Wurmser A., Yamamoto D., Petrus-Reurer S., et al. (2022). Generation of functional hepatocytes by forward programming with nuclear receptors. Elife 11. doi:  10.7554/elife.71591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Vantaux A., Peneau J., Cooper C. A., Kyle D. E., Witkowski B., Maher S. P. (2022). Liver-stage fate determination in Plasmodium vivax parasites: Characterization of schizont growth and hypnozoite fating from patient isolates. Front. Microbiol. 13, 976606. doi:  10.3389/fmicb.2022.976606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Voorberg-van der Wel A., Roma G., Gupta D. K., Schuierer S., Nigsch F., Carbone W., et al. (2017). A comparative transcriptomic analysis of replicating and dormant liver stages of the relapsing malaria parasite Plasmodium cynomolgi. Elife 6. doi:  10.7554/elife.29605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang X., Yang K., Wu Q., Kim L. J. Y., Morton A. R., Gimple R. C., et al. (2019). Targeting pyrimidine synthesis accentuates molecular therapy response in glioblastoma stem cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 11. doi:  10.1126/scitranslmed.aau4972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Weiss D. J., Dzianach P. A., Saddler A., Lubinda J., Browne A., McPhail M., et al. (2025). Mapping the global prevalence, incidence, and mortality of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax malaria 2000-22: a spatial and temporal modelling study. Lancet 405, 979–990. doi:  10.1016/s0140-6736(25)00038-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. WHO (2025). World Malaria Report (Geneva Switzerland: WHO; ). [Google Scholar]
  49. Yalaoui S., Huby T., Franetich J. F., Gego A., Rametti A., Moreau M., et al. (2008. a). Scavenger receptor BI boosts hepatocyte permissiveness to Plasmodium infection. Cell Host Microbe 4, 283–292. doi:  10.1016/j.chom.2008.07.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yalaoui S., Zougbede S., Charrin S., Silvie O., Arduise C., Farhati K., et al. (2008. b). Hepatocyte permissiveness to Plasmodium infection is conveyed by a short and structurally conserved region of the CD81 large extracellular domain. PloS Pathog. 4, e1000010. doi:  10.1371/journal.ppat.1000010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yang A. S. P., Dutta D., Kretzschmar K., Hendriks D., Puschhof J., Hu H., et al. (2023). Development of Plasmodium falciparum liver-stages in hepatocytes derived from human fetal liver organoid cultures. Nat. Commun. 14, 4631. doi:  10.1038/s41467-023-40298-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Yoon S., Kang K., Cho Y. D., Kim Y., Buisson E. M., Yim J. H., et al. (2018). Nonintegrating direct conversion using mRNA into hepatocyte-like cells. BioMed. Res. Int. 2018, 8240567. doi:  10.1155/2018/8240567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1

Primary and secondary antibodies used for immunofluorescence analysis.

DataSheet1.pdf (174.2KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The transcriptomics data are available from the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/) under accession number SRP256529.


Articles from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES