Abstract
Gold quantum rods (QRs) of Au60, Au78, Au96, and Au114 (protected by thiolate ligands) exhibit exclusive fluorescence, which is different from the shorter Au42 QR with dual emission (fluorescence + phosphorescence). Herein, we report the excitation wavelength-dependent near-infrared-II photoluminescence (PL) and exciton dynamics of this series of QRs. Interestingly, the fluorescence quantum yield (QY) of the QRs is much higher (2–10×) when the lowest singlet excited state (S1) is excited compared to the excitation of high-lying states (Sn). A metastable intermediate singlet state (denoted S′) is identified by transient absorption spectroscopy when Sn is excited, and this S′ state leads to fast “skybridge” intersystem crossing (ISC), which contributes primarily (>60%) to the total triplet population. With increasing aspect ratio (AR) of QRs (from 6.3 to 18.7), nonradiative processes accelerate, leading to fast decay of the S1 state (hence, less QY) and of the T1 state (barely phosphorescent). A detailed energy flow mechanism is determined for the QRs after photoexcitation, which offers a design principle for manipulation of exciton dynamics toward potential utilization of higher excited states in applications.


Introduction
Photoluminescence (PL) in the second near-infrared (NIR-II) region (1000–2500 nm, also called shortwave infrared, SWIR) is of particular importance in a wide range of applications, such as deep-tissue biological imaging, cancer surgery and therapy, solar energy utilization, , quantum computing, and telecommunications. With respect to the materials’ development for such applications, atomically precise nanoclusters (APNCs) of metals and alloys have emerged as a new class of NIR-II materials with several advantages, including tunable optical properties by precise structural control, high stability, low toxicity, and ease of preparation via wet chemistry. − Generally, the structure of APNCs consists of a metal core and a shell of metal-containing complex-like staple motifs, e.g., the monomeric RS–Au–SR (where −SR = thiolate). Such APNCs possess a quantized electronic structure and thus show single-electron transitions and molecule-like exciton dynamics. − In recent years, APNCs have been increasingly recognized as promising NIR-II luminescent materials with highly efficient triplet population; they exhibit room-temperature phosphorescence (PH) and thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF). ,− The intersystem crossing (ISC) process from the lowest singlet excited state (S1) to the lowest triplet excited state (T1) can be manipulated by the structure/size, surface ligands, heterometal doping, and the surrounding environments of APNCs. − The high triplet yield has inspired exploration of APNCs as triplet sensitizers for photon upconversion via triplet–triplet annihilation , and also as photocatalysts. − The observed rapid ISC process (e.g., picoseconds (ps)) suppresses the prompt fluorescence in APNCs compared to other emission processes such as PH and TADF. , For instance, in a recent study on Au52(SR)32, the ISC from the S1 state was determined to be ∼11 ps, followed by triplet decay in ∼100 ns. , In some cases, time-resolved PL measurements revealed three components, including prompt fluorescence (FL), TADF, and PH. , Doping or alloying has been reported to be an effective strategy for PL enhancement. ,,−
Recently, a periodic series of gold quantum nanorods (QRs), including Au42, Au60, Au78, Au96, and Au114 (periodicity: 18 Au atoms) has been developed, which extends the absorption and emission into the NIR-II region by increasing the aspect ratio (AR) while retaining the same diameter. These QRs possess a constant diameter of 3.15 Å for the kernel but exhibit increasing lengths from 19.76 to 58.79 Å (i.e., AR from 6.3 to 18.7). Interestingly, the ISC process from S1 to T1 benefits from a small reorganization energy but is suppressed due to small spin–orbit coupling. Among the QRs, Au42 exhibits NIR dual emission with FL at 875 nm and PH at 1040 nm under either S1 excitation (808 nm) or higher singlet excited-state Sn excitation (e.g., 400 nm), which was also theoretically simulated by a three-state model (S0, S1, and T1). , Experimentally, the PL quantum yield (QY) was determined to be up to 20.9% for Au60, with its lifetime of 0.90 ns, hence, fluorescence in nature. The longer QRs also show single emission, i.e., 1145 nm for Au60, 1400 nm for Au78, 1620 nm for Au96, and 1870 nm for Au114. , Theoretical analysis shows that the relevant Au24(SR)20 (as “seeds” of QRs) should exhibit dual fluorescence, while the elongated ones (Au42 and Au60) should show FL/PH dual emission. However, the elongated Au QRs (Au60, Au78, Au96, and Au114) show single fluorescence emission experimentally, even though the triplet population was predicted in theoretical calculations.
In this work, by combining photoluminescence studies with transient absorption measurements, we determine the exciton dynamics in the QRs of Au60, Au78, Au96, and Au114, including the internal conversion (IC), ISC, radiative, and nonradiative decays of singlet and triplet states. Our results indicate anti-Kasha–Vavilov behavior in QRs, which explains the excitation wavelength-dependent QY and exciton dynamics. An intermediate singlet state (S′) is identified, which contributes to fast ISC to a high triplet state (Tn) and thus explains the observed interesting photophysical behavior. The excited-state absorption “signature” is observed by transient absorption upon Sn excitation. With increasing length of QRs, the normal ISC process (S1 → T1) is increasingly suppressed; indeed, no triplet state population is observed for Au96 and Au114 under S1 excitation; even for shorter Au60 and Au78 QRs, their triplet yield is less than 10% under S1 excitation. In contrast, under Sn excitation, the triplet yield is more than 60%. The nonradiative decays of S1 and T1 states increase drastically, leading to a drop in QY and the disappearance of PH. A detailed Jablonski diagram is put forth to interpret the complex exciton dynamics for this unique series of QRs.
Results and Discussion
Steady-State Optical Properties
The Au QRs were synthesized in solution and purified by thin-layer chromatography according to previous reports. ,,, Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) analyses of these four QRs confirmed the purity of the samples (Figure S1). All QRs exhibit a common absorption peak (Figure a) at ∼400 nm (nearly constant) and an AR-dependent intense NIR absorption peak. The ∼400 nm absorption band is insensitive to AR, which involves an isotropic exciton according to previous calculations on the Au42 QR (which also showed such a peak). Compared to the absorption peak of 806 nm for Au42, the increase in AR dramatically shifts the absorption peak to 1078 nm for Au60, 1320 nm for Au78, 1540 nm for Au96, and 1732 nm for Au114. The NIR peak of each QR arises from the strongly polarized HOMO–LUMO transition, with its dipole moment component primarily in the longitudinal direction. ,
1.

Steady-state absorption of QRs (a) and excitation wavelength-dependent PL spectra of Au60 (b), Au78 (c), Au96 (d), and Au114 (e). Solvent: toluene-d 8 (to avoid interference from overtone vibrational peaks of regular toluene).
The small optical gap (E g) of Au QRs led to photoluminescence in the NIR-II range, with a PL peak at 1145 nm for Au60, 1400 nm for Au78, 1620 nm for Au96, and 1870 nm for Au114 (Figure b–e). The QRs longer than Au42 exhibit sole fluorescence with no obvious phosphorescence, which is different from the dual emission of Au42 (FL at 875 nm and PH at 1040 nm). ,, We note that, for Au60, very weak phosphorescence (1400–1600 nm) was observed when excited by higher-energy photons (e.g., 400 and 500 nm, Figure S2a and inset); however, no phosphorescence peak can be identified under S1 excitation (Figure S2b and inset). The fluorescence spectra are identical (except for the absorbance-normalized peak intensity) regardless of the excitation wavelength, indicating no additional emissive species. The excitation spectrum of Au60 (probed at 1145 nm emission) shows a weaker 400 nm peak compared to the absorption spectrum (Figure S3), indicating that the fluorescence of Au60 is less contributed by Sn excitation than S1 excitation. We rationalize that the different excitation wavelengths may have modulated the S1 and T1 exciton populations in the QRs via anti-Kasha–Vavilov processes; − see more discussions below.
The QY of Au60 is 20.9% under S1 excitation (1078 nm), while it decreases to 9.5% under Sn excitation (400 nm), indicating that about half of excitons are lost (Figure b). Similarly, for longer QRs, we observe significant exciton loss under Sn excitation compared to S1 excitation (Figure c–e), that is, ∼87% loss for Au78, ∼79% for Au96, and ∼89% for Au114. Correspondingly, a lower QY was observed with increasing length of QRs because of the increasing nonradiative processes of the S1 state with a shrinking HOMO–LUMO gap.
Exciton Dynamics of Au60 QRs
To determine the exciton dynamics of QRs, we performed excitation wavelength-dependent femtosecond (fs) and nanosecond (ns) transient absorption (TA) measurements. Considering the absorption and emission extended into NIR-II, we performed TA probing from 850 to 1550 nm to distinguish the signatures of different excited states. Taking Au60 as an example, its TA spectra by selective excitation of S1 (at 1100 nm, Figure a) exhibit a ground-state bleaching (GSB, negative) peak at 1070 nm and a broad excited-state absorption (ESA, positive) beyond 1150 nm. The transient spectra at early delay times consist of a main ESA peak at 1210 nm, which is attributed to the S1 population generated immediately upon excitation. The broad ESA (1150–1400 nm, peak at 1270 nm) increases simultaneously with the decay of S1. The long-lived lifetime of the final state is ∼320 ns by fitting the ESA from ns-TA, which can be attributed to a triplet state. To better describe the predecessor-successor pair of the ISC process (S1 → T1), the kinetics at 1210 and 1365 nm were extracted (Figure S4), and they show obvious differences beyond hundreds of ps. Considering the significant overlap of singlet and triplet excited-state spectra, we deduce the triplet state kinetics by scaling the kinetics of 1210 and 1365 nm, which shows a slow rise of ∼1 ns (Figure S4). Thus, we attribute this to the ISC process from S1, which is slow and comparable to the fluorescence lifetime (0.90 ns). The transient spectra of S1 and T1 states (Figure d) are extracted by using a target model, including parallel decay pathways of S1: a) directly to the ground state with radiative and nonradiative processes (S1 → S0), and b) ISC process (S1 → T1), along with triplet decay (T1 → S0). Consistent with the analysis of the raw TA map (Figure a), along with GSB at 1070 nm, the broad ESA was extracted beyond 1150 nm, with peaks at 1210 nm (assigned to S1) and 1270 nm (assigned to T1).
2.

Combined ns and fs transient absorption data map of Au60 with selected excitation wavelengths, i.e., 1100 nm for S1 excitation (a), 810 nm for the broad range between S1 and Sn (b), and 380 nm for Sn excitation (c). The species-associated spectra of S′, S1, and T1 (d–f) are extracted by target analysis. Note: the white boxes for ns TA in (a), (b), and (c) are the removal of residual pump-laser peaks of the probe.
The aforementioned PL analysis indicates that the exciton dynamics should differ under S1 and Sn excitation. Different from S1 excitation (Figure a), Sn excitation (380 nm) gives rise to a new ESA peak at 1150 nm (Figure c), which decays in ∼16.9 ps with the rise of S1 and T1 state populations simultaneously. We attribute this intermediate state to S′, which may contribute to a fast ISC process (high-lying ISC like a “skybridge”) that leads to higher triplet yield and reduced FL due to the dark nature of T1. Compared to the S1 and Sn states observed in the absorption spectra, the S′ state (located between S1 and Sn) possesses a much smaller oscillator strength, leading to weak absorption observed in the steady-state spectra. The kinetics of selected wavelengths (1150, 1250, and 1365 nm) indicate the state evolution (Figure S5). The rise of extracted triplet state kinetics indicates a fast process (∼16.9 ps) followed by a slow process (∼1 ns). Importantly, the exciton dynamics upon Sn excitation converge to the same excited-state manifold as that of S1 excitation, providing direct evidence that there is no additional emissive species upon Sn excitation.
For the 500 to 900 nm weak absorption of Au60 (Figure a), we selected a series of excitation wavelengths (500, 730, and 810 nm) besides the direct S1 excitation (1000 and 1100 nm) and the Sn excitation (380 nm) to check the excitation wavelength-dependent properties of Au QRs (Figure b and Figures S6–S8). The transient spectra show clearly the S′ peak when excited at high energy (<810 nm), which is ∼0.3 eV higher than the S1 state. For long delay times, the excited-state evolution is quite similar to that of direct S1 excitation.
For Au60, a distinguished GSB signal (∼1070 nm) can be observed in the NIR probe region. Generally, the efficient and unity transition from the singlet to triplet state will not result in the bleaching signal recovering. The kinetics at 1060 nm (blue side of GSB to avoid overlap with ESA) is extracted to indicate the exciton loss during the transition of states (Figure ). Since the triplet generation occurs in ∼1 ns, we can safely assign that the triplet population contributes to the GSB signal by the tail delay time of fs-TA (∼7 ns). Thus, we can extract the triplet yield by estimating the GSB at 7 ns relative to the initial population of the singlet state. The triplet population related to the ISC process can then be determined. Especially, there is no serious overlap of GSB and ESA for the S1 and T1 states, since there is no shift of GSB during the normal ISC process (Figure ). For direct S1 excitations (1000 and 1100 nm), the triplet population with normal ISC (S1 → T1) is ∼ 10%. The dynamics upon excitation at high vibronic states of S1 is demonstrated to be the same as that of S1 peak excitation (Figure and Figure S9). While for higher energy excitation (excitation wavelength ≤900 nm), the triplet yield is up to ∼60% with both the fast ISC (S′ → Tn(T1)) and normal ISC (S1 → T1). The triplet yield of Sn excitation was calculated by the difference of PL QY, which is consistent with the GSB residual from TA measurements. The triplet lifetime is determined to be ∼320 ns (Figure b) with nonradiative processes (weak PH observed for Au60). The PH is still weak even though a ∼60% yield of the triplet population results under Sn excitation. The intensity of FL is 50× higher than that of PH (i.e., the FL/PH peak area ratio, Figure S2a) when excited by high-energy photons. Thus, we build the dynamics model (see the section on Target Analysis of Au60 to Au114 QRs) to perform the target global analysis. The same species-associated spectra (SAS, generated by target analysis) of S1 and T1 were also obtained upon excitation at 810 and 380 nm (Figure e, f) with the normal ISC process being ∼920 ps. In addition, the peak of S′ is located at 1150 nm, partially overlapping with the GSB signal.
3.

Bleach signals (∼1060 nm) extracted from fs-TA (a) and ns-TA (b) of Au60 with different excitation wavelengths.
Exciton Dynamics of Longer QRs
TA measurements on Au78, Au96, and Au114 were also performed under their corresponding S1 and common Sn (380 nm) excitation (Figure ). Upon S1 excitation (1300 nm) of Au78 (Figure a), the GSB and ESA of the S1 state decay in 520 ps, with a tiny long-lived triplet population (∼5%), which indicates inefficient ISC from S1 to T1. However, the S′ state (located at 1450 nm) can be observed when excited at 380 nm (Figure b). We can observe the state evolution despite the serious overlap of these two states from ESA peaks close to 1500 nm. The SAS of different excited states are shown in Figure S10. We also performed TA measurements by high vibronic S1 excitation (1200 nm) to confirm similar dynamics to that of S1 peak excitation (Figure S11). The lifetime of the final state is up to 83 ns with higher yield when excited at 380 nm, which is attributed to the triplet state (Figure S12). The decay kinetics of GSB (Figure S13) show a fast decay in several ns with exciton loss of more than 80% upon S1 excitation, which is induced by (S1 → S0) via radiative and nonradiative processes. We did not observe fast decay upon Sn excitation because of the fast ISC process, which is limited by the instrument response function (IRF, ∼1 ns of our ns-TA setup). Limited by the probe light range (up to ∼1600 nm only), we cannot observe the distinguishing ESA signatures of S′, S1, and T1 on the red side of the bleaching peak (>1600 nm) for Au96 and Au114 (Figure c–f and Figure S14). However, the exciton lifetime under Sn excitation is much longer than that of S1 excitation, indicating triplet formation via S′. The triplet lifetime was determined to be 21 ns for Au96 and 13 ns for Au114, which are consistent with previous TA results probed in the visible region. In contrast, the exciton lifetime under S1 excitation is only 76.1 ps for Au96 and 61.2 ps for Au114, which indicates fast nonradiative decay to the ground state (S1 → S0) without populating the triplet state. From the GSB kinetics, one sees a faster decay and higher exciton loss with increasing length of QRs upon S1 excitation (Figure g). However, a much higher yield and shorter lifetime of the triplet state are observed when excited at 380 nm (Figure h and Figure S15).
4.

Transient absorption spectra of Au78 (a, b), Au96 (c, d), and Au114 (e, f) with Sn excitation (380 nm) and S1 excitation (1300 nm for Au78, 1550 nm for Au96 and Au114; note 1550 nm is the maximum available wavelength in our setup). The bleach signal decay (g, h) of these four QRs indicates more triplet populations under the Sn excitation.
Target Analysis of Au60 to Au114 QRs
The lifetimes of excited states can be extracted by target analysis based on the complicated model comprising the “skybridge” ISC from the intermediate state (S′) to a high triplet state and the normal ISC from S1 to T1 (Scheme ). By combining the results of PL and TA measurements, we put forth a full Jablonski diagram to describe the dynamics of QRs, in particular, the decay of S′ includes the fast IC process (S′ → S1) and the fast ISC process (S′ → T n≥2 → T1). Given the fast process, we ignore the nonradiative process directly to the ground state; thus, we have the following equation,
1. Kinetic Model for the Au QRs of Au60 to Au114 .

Different from the decay of S′ state, we should include the nonradiative processes for the S1 or T1 state, considering the exciton loss during the state transition process. Thus, the kinetics equations for S1 or T1 are as follows:
Since no obvious phosphorescence is observed for the long QRs, we attribute that the dark triplet formation is the main reason for QY loss when high-lying Sn is excited. Meanwhile, the bleaching signals from TA indicate that the exciton population decays during the excited-state transition. Taking Au60 as an example, the QY can be up to 20.9% based on 100% population of S1 under direct S1 excitation. As shown in Figure g, the triplet population is only ∼10% (estimated from the bleach signal residual up to 5 ns) under S1 excitation, indicating that the normal ISC process (S1 → T1) is ∼ 10% of the S1 decay. Thus, the nonradiative process is ∼69.1%. Considering Sn excitation, the QY decreases to 9.5%. Thus, we assume that 45% (i.e., the QY ratio of 9.5/20.9) of the indirect population of S1 is from S′ decay via an IC process (∼16.9 ps). In other words, 55% of the population of T1 can be obtained via the skybridge ISC process (S′ → Tn≥2 → T1). Based on this mechanism, we can calculate the triplet population to be ∼60%, that is, 0.55 + 0.45 × 0.10 = 0.60, which is consistent with the GSB signal under Sn excitation (Figure h). On a note, we have to sum the nonradiative and radiative processes together for the target analysis. The target fitting parameters for different decay pathways are summarized in Table S1 for Au60. The corresponding populations of excited states are shown in Figure S16, indicating the state evolution with exciton loss; the rate constants are compiled in Table .
1. Summary of the Rate Constants (k IC, k ISC, k r, and k nr) of the QRs.
| High-lying intermediate, S′ |
Lowest singlet, S1
|
Lowest triplet, T1
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (×1010 s–1) | (×1010 s–1) | (×108 s–1) | (×108 s–1) | (×108 s–1) | (×104 s–1) | (×106 s–1) | |
| Au60 | 2.7 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 7.5 | ∼0 | 3.1 |
| Au78 | 1.7 | 11.4 | 3.1 | 0.96 | 15.2 | ∼0 | 12 |
| Au96 | 1.1 | 4.0 | 2.5 | ∼0 | 128 | ∼0 | 48 |
| Au114 | 0.5 | 4.1 | 1.6 | ∼0 | 162 | ∼0 | 77 |
We performed the same analysis for Au78, Au96, and Au114. The corresponding rates and yields are determined (Tables and , and Table S2). For the QRs with large AR, the radiative process of T1 triplet state is ignored since no PH was observed, except for the weak PH from Au60.
2. Relative Ratio of Decay Pathways of Each Excited State for Au60 to Au114 QRs.
| S′ |
S1
|
T1
|
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Triplet yield at S1 excitation | Triplet yield at Sn excitation | ||||||||
| Au60 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.69 | 0 | 1 | 0.10 | 0.60 | |||||||
| Au78 | 0.13 | 0.87 | 0.16 | 0.05 | 0.79 | 0 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.88 | |||||||
| Au96 | 0.21 | 0.79 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.98 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.79 | |||||||
| Au114 | 0.11 | 0.89 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.99 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.89 | |||||||
Under Sn excitation, triplet yield .
From the experimental FL and PH peaks, the energy gap between S1 and T1 (ΔEST ) is ∼ 0.22 eV for both Au42 and Au60 (see Figure S2a, estimated by peak to peak separation). In theoretical work, the ΔEST gap was calculated to be 0.39 eV for Au42 and 0.57 eV for Au60, and the ISC rates were calculated to be 1.23 × 108 s–1 and 8.68 × 108 s–1, respectively. The theoretical simulations ignored the nonradiative process from S1, but our experimental work includes the nonradiative process as a process of exciton loss, which competes with the radiative and ISC processes of S1. For the long QRs (Au60, Au78, Au96, Au114), even though is ∼108 s–1 (Table ), the increasing results in fast decay to the ground state; thus, the normal ISC process (S1 to T1) is significantly suppressed by the nonradiative process (up to tens of ps) with increasing length of QRs.
Based on the PL and TA measurements, we have identified two separate ISC processes upon Sn excitation for the QRs, in which the fast ISC from the S′ state is high-lying (“skybridge”), which is 2 orders of magnitude faster than the normal ISC (S1 to T1) process. Therefore, under Sn excitation, QRs show much more complicated exciton dynamics than previous APNCs. , Comparable to the fast IC process within the singlet manifold (of order 1010 s–1), the skybridge ISC (of order 1010 s–1) from the S′ state contributes to most of the triplet population upon Sn excitation. For Au60, the total triplet yield is ∼60%, in which the triplet yield of up to 55% (absolute) is populated via the fast ISC. For the longer QRs, the fast ISC process contributes to ∼90% for Au60, ∼99% for Au78, and 100% for Au96 and Au114, whereas the normal ISC is essentially suppressed by faster k nr of the S1 state. While one would expect to see stronger triplet emission due to the higher yield via the fast ISC, the relatively large nonradiative process from the T1 state overwhelms the PH emission even with a higher triplet population; thus, no PH is observed.
The above results of excitation wavelength-dependent exciton dynamics and QY for the QRs clearly show anti-Kasha–Vavilov behavior, − that is, unlike the typical process of Sn → S1 → T1 (the Kasha–Vavilov behavior), a branching process (Sn → S′ → T n≥2 → T1) is discovered in the QRs, which may follow the El-Sayed rule with higher spin–orbit coupling (SOC) between the S′ state and the triplet manifold, , and another factor is the possibility of a smaller gap between S′ and T n ≥2 than that between S1 and T1 (∼0.2 eV gap). These two factors can accelerate the high-lying ISC. Although the emission still comes from the lowest excited states, the identified metastable excited state (S′) holds potential for future exploration of new photochemistry that requires more energy input and higher electrochemical potential. ,, In addition, the effective modulation of the triplet T1 population will benefit photoexcited electron and energy transfer, ,,, as well as other optoelectronic and photonic applications.
Finally, it is worth noting that the S1 exciton is strongly anisotropic, in that the transition dipole’s component along the longitudinal direction (d z ) is significantly larger than the d x and d y components. , In contrast, the Sn exciton is isotropic, and given its nature of being nearly constant (at ∼400 nm regardless of the QR geometry), this exciton is tentatively assigned to a transition from gold d-states (forming a quasi-d-band with many gold atoms in the QR) to sulfur p-states, because these two groups of states are relatively stationary and do not shift with the QR size/geometry. The excitation wavelength-dependent TA measurements revealed that excitation at S1 or Sn converges to the same excited state manifolds after 10s of ps. No additional excited states beyond S′ were observed at Sn excitation. After the initial fast relaxation (several 10s of ps), the dynamics of both excitation scenarios exhibit identical transient spectral signatures (consisting of S1 and T1 states only), see Figure S17 for TA spectral comparison of S1 and T1. Furthermore, the fluorescence peak wavelength and width are identical under S1 and Sn excitation, indicating the same emissive S1 state (Figure S18). In the case of Au60, the weak phosphorescence observed upon Sn excitation is attributed to the S′-mediated fast ISC process, which largely increases the triplet yield but does not introduce a different emissive state. Both PL and TA spectral comparisons upon respective S1 and Sn excitation provide evidence for the same emissive state and confirm efficient coupling between the two excitonic modes.
Conclusion
In summary, the excitation wavelength-dependent photoluminescence and exciton dynamics of the periodic QRs of Au60, Au78, Au96, and Au114 are investigated. Unlike other APNCs, the exciton dynamics of the QRs can be modulated by the excitation wavelength, in which S1 excitation gives rise to a much higher QY (about 2 to 10 times) than that of Sn (400 nm) excitation for the investigated QRs. On the other hand, much higher triplet yields result upon Sn excitation, which holds potential for T1 utilization such as energy and electron transfer applications, as well as potential hot-state utilization in new photochemistry. With respect to emission, the QRs show fluorescence only, even with higher triplet populations at Sn excitation. Mechanistically, a metastable intermediate energy state (S′) with signature peaks in transient absorption is observed. This S′ state leads to anti-Kasha–Vavilov behavior, that is, a branching of the Sn to S1 process (the regular relaxation) with unusual relaxation of Sn to S′ to T n≥2, which is first observed in APNCs due to the anisotropic shape of QRs. Our study reveals a design principle (i.e., by the rod length or aspect ratio) for QRs with anti-Kasha–Vavilov properties. Although the photoluminescence is still from the lowest energy states, the metastable intermediate S′ state can be harnessed for potential applications in energy/electron transfer, electrochemistry, and photocatalysis. Overall, such QRs provide an efficient way to manipulate the triplet population, which may contribute to NIR-II photon upconversion, NIR-II photocatalysis, and biorelated applications.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
R.J. acknowledges financial support from NSF (DMR-2419539). This research used resources of the Advanced Optical Facility of the Center for Functional Nanomaterials (CFN), which is a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility at Brookhaven National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-SC0012704.
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.6c10470.
Experimental section, including the chemicals, synthesis of QRs, steady-state and time-resolved PL spectroscopy, fs and ns transient absorption, target analysis, supporting figures S1–S18, and tables S1–S2 (PDF)
#.
G.H. and L.L. contributed equally to this work.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Chen Y., Wang S., Zhang F.. Near-Infrared Luminescence High-Contrast in Vivo Biomedical Imaging. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2023;1(1):60–78. doi: 10.1038/s44222-022-00002-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ma H., Ma D., Liu P., Wang H., Zhang X.-D.. Atomically Precise Metal Clusters for NIR-II Imaging. Acc. Chem. Res. 2026;59(4):599–614. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5c00837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stamplecoskie K. G., Aminfar P.. Nanocluster Chemistry and the Role of in Situ Fluorescence as an Analytical Tool. Chem. Mater. 2024;36(19):9003–9012. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c00574. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Huang H.-Y., Cai K.-B., Chen P.-W., Lin C.-A. J., Chang S.-H., Yuan C.-T.. Engineering Ligand–Metal Charge Transfer States in Cross-Linked Gold Nanoclusters for Greener Luminescent Solar Concentrators with Solid-State Quantum Yields Exceeding 50% and Low Reabsorption Losses. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2018;122(34):20019–20026. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b06212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhong T., Kindem J. M., Bartholomew J. G., Rochman J., Craiciu I., Miyazono E., Bettinelli M., Cavalli E., Verma V., Nam S. W., Marsili F., Shaw M. D., Beyer A. D., Faraon A.. Nanophotonic Rare-Earth Quantum Memory with Optically Controlled Retrieval. Science. 2017;357(6358):1392–1395. doi: 10.1126/science.aan5959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jin R., Zeng C., Zhou M., Chen Y.. Atomically Precise Colloidal Metal Nanoclusters and Nanoparticles: Fundamentals and Opportunities. Chem. Rev. 2016;116(18):10346–10413. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pei Y., Wang P., Ma Z., Xiong L.. Growth-Rule-Guided Structural Exploration of Thiolate-Protected Gold Nanoclusters. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019;52(1):23–33. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Takano S., Hamasaki Y., Tsukuda T.. X-Ray Crystallographic Visualization of a Nucleation and Anisotropic Growth in Thiolate-Protected Gold Clusters: Toward Targeted Synthesis of Gold Quantum Needles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(37):33953–33962. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c11089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li D., Liu Q., Qi Q., Shi H., Hsu E.-C., Chen W., Yuan W., Wu Y., Lin S., Zeng Y.. et al. Gold Nanoclusters for NIR-II Fluorescence Imaging of Bones. Small. 2020;16(43):2003851. doi: 10.1002/smll.202003851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo L., Liu Z., Du X., Jin R.. Near-Infrared Dual Emission from the Au42(SR)32 Nanocluster and Tailoring of Intersystem Crossing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144(42):19243–19247. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c09107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Sardar A., Liu Z., Gianopoulos C. G., He G., Liu X., Chen S., Kirschbaum K., Mazumder A., Cotlet M., Jiang D., Jin R.. Au76(SC6H4-p-CH3)42 Square Quantum Platelet: One-Dimensional Growth of Quantum Rods Turns 90 Degrees. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(46):42752–42757. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c14654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X., Cai X., Zhu Y.. Catalysis Synergism by Atomically Precise Bimetallic Nanoclusters Doped with Heteroatoms. Acc. Chem. Res. 2023;56(12):1528–1538. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin H., Song X., Chai O. J. H., Yao Q., Yang H., Xie J.. Photoluminescent Characterization of Metal Nanoclusters: Basic Parameters, Methods, and Applications. Adv. Mater. 2024;36(25):2401002. doi: 10.1002/adma.202401002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou M., Jin R.. Optical Properties and Excited-State Dynamics of Atomically Precise Gold Nanoclusters. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2021;72:121–142. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-090419-104921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou M., Higaki T., Hu G., Sfeir M. Y., Chen Y., Jiang D., Jin R.. Three-Orders-of-Magnitude Variation of Carrier Lifetimes with Crystal Phase of Gold Nanoclusters. Science. 2019;364(6437):279–282. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw8007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao R., Zeng L., Kong J., Zhang W., Zhou M.. Photoluminescence and Excited-State Dynamics of Gold–Copper Nanoclusters. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2025;16(51):13170–13181. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c03332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo Y., Wang S., Zheng T., Deng G., Zeng C., Fu J., Liu X., Wang Z., Xia A.. Engineering Triplet Formation versus Symmetry-Breaking Charge Separation in Shape-Persistent Perylene Diimide Macrocycles. JACS Au. 2026;6(5):2979–2987. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.6c00317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Liu Z., Mazumder A., Gianopoulos C. G., Kirschbaum K., Peteanu L. A., Jin R.. Tailoring Carbon Tails of Ligands on Au52(SR)32 Nanoclusters Enhances the Near-Infrared Photoluminescence Quantum Yield from 3.8 to 18.3% J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145(48):26328–26338. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c09846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo L., Liu Z., Du X., Jin R.. Photoluminescence of the Au38(SR)26 Nanocluster Comprises Three Radiative Processes. Commun. Chem. 2023;6(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s42004-023-00819-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi W.-Q., Zeng L., Long Z.-C., Guan Z.-J., Han X.-S., Hu F., Zhou M., Wang Q.-M.. Ligand Effects on Luminescence of Atomically Precise Gold Nanoclusters. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2025;16:2204–2211. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c03544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maity S., Kolay S., Chakraborty S., Devi A., Rashi, Patra A.. A Comprehensive Review of Atomically Precise Metal Nanoclusters with Emergent Photophysical Properties towards Diverse Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2025;54(4):1785–1844. doi: 10.1039/D4CS00962B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He G., Chen S., Jin R.. Manipulating the Intersystem Crossing Process in Atomically Precise Gold Nanoclusters. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2025;16(51):13118–13131. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c03349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta R. K., Mohan B., Wang Z., Yang Y., Sun D.. Atomically Precise Metal Nanoclusters: Emerging Materials for Near-Infrared II Photoluminescence. Acc. Chem. Res. 2026;59(3):476–486. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5c00788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Z.-Y., Nie Q.-B., Han B.-L., Gupta R. K., Dong G.-L., Luo G.-G., Yang Z.-L., Sun D.. Atom-Precise Coinage Metal Nanoclusters for near-Infrared Emission: Excited-State Dynamics and Mechanisms. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2025;54(19):9092–9115. doi: 10.1039/D5CS00383K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Z., Sardar A., Chen S., Wang Y., Jin R.. Atomically Precise Metal Nanoclusters for Near-Infrared-II Photonics. Acc. Chem. Res. 2026;59(3):451–463. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5c00782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Z., Luo L., Jin R.. Visible to NIR-II Photoluminescence of Atomically Precise Gold Nanoclusters. Adv. Mater. 2024;36(8):2309073. doi: 10.1002/adma.202309073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith N. L., Herbert P. J., Tofanelli M. A., Knappenberger J. A., Ackerson C. J., Knappenberger K. L. Jr.. The Influence of Passivating Ligand Identity on Au25(SR)18 Spin-Polarized Emission. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2025;16:5168–5172. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Z., Hu X., Luo L., He G., Mazumder A., Gunay E., Wang Y., Dickey E. C., Peteanu L. A., Matyjaszewski K., Jin R.. Near-Infrared to Visible Photon Upconversion with Gold Quantum Rods and Aqueous Photo-Driven Polymerization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(31):28241–28250. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c08826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeng L., Shi W.-Q., Kong J., Zhang W., Wang Q.-M., Luo Y., Zhou M.. Triplet Energy Transfer and Photon Upconversion from Metal Nanocluster with Near-Unity NIR Emission Quantum Yield. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2025;13(11):2402991. doi: 10.1002/adom.202402991. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng Z.-H., Xiao F.-X., Xu Y.-J.. Atomically Precise Alloy Nanoclusters Steering Photocatalysis. Small. 2025;21(34):2505282. doi: 10.1002/smll.202505282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan X., Zheng B.-X., Zhu J.-R., Li Y.-B., Xiao F.-X.. Spatially Confining Atomically Precise Metal Nanoclusters Steers Photoredox Organic Transformation. Inorg. Chem. 2025;64(7):3572–3581. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c05401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu C., Chen Z.-L., Li H., Lu L., Kang X., Xuan J., Zhu M.. Rational Design of Highly Phosphorescent Nanoclusters for Efficient Photocatalytic Oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146(33):23212–23220. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c05530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu L.-J., He J.. Atomically Precise Coinage Metal Nanocluster Photocatalysts: Recent Advances in Organic Synthesis. Aggregate. 2025;6(12):e70226. doi: 10.1002/agt2.70226. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zeng L., Wang Y., Tan J., Pei Q., Kong J., Zhang W., Ye S., Jin R., Luo Y., Zhou M.. Accelerated Intersystem Crossing Enhances NIR Emission in Au52(SR)32 Nanoclusters by Surface Ligand Engineering. Chem. Sci. 2025;16(40):18844–18851. doi: 10.1039/D5SC03898G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He G., Liu Z., Wang Y., Sfeir M. Y., Jin R.. Surface Ligand Networking Promotes Intersystem Crossing in the Au18(SR)14 Nanocluster. Nanoscale Horiz. 2025;10(10):2374–2380. doi: 10.1039/D5NH00358J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Z., Zhou M., Luo L., Wang Y., Kahng E., Jin R.. Elucidating the Near-Infrared Photoluminescence Mechanism of Homometal and Doped M25(SR)18 Nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145(36):19969–19981. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c06543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jia W.-W., Dai Y., Zeng L.-L., Long Z.-C., Shi W.-Q., Zhou M., Qiao J., Wang Q.-M.. The Doping Effects on the NIR Emission Enhancement of Gold Nanoclusters and the Application in Efficient NIR-OLED. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64(32):e202508578. doi: 10.1002/anie.202508578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu C., Xin J., Li J., Li H., Kang X., Pei Y., Zhu M.. Fluorescence or Phosphorescence? The Metallic Composition of the Nanocluster Kernel Does Matter. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022;61(31):e202205947. doi: 10.1002/anie.202205947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sardar A., Wang Y., He G., Gianopoulos C. G., Samarasinghe D. S. N. D., Liu Z., Kirschbaum K., Aikens C. M., Jin R.. Au20Ag32 Nanocluster Emitting Bright Near-Infrared-II Photoluminescence with Quantum Yield of 30% in Aerated Solution. ACS Nano. 2026;20(10):8827–8837. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5c22362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo L., Liu Z., Kong J., Gianopoulos C. G., Coburn I., Kirschbaum K., Zhou M., Jin R.. Three-Atom-Wide Gold Quantum Rods with Periodic Elongation and Strongly Polarized Excitons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2024;121(10):e2318537121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2318537121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo L., He G., Liu Z., Sardar A., Ji W., Mazumder A., Chen S., Li Q., Jin R.. Gold Quantum Rods Emit in the Shortwave Infrared (1000–2200 nm) with 104–5 M–1 cm–1 Ultrabrightness. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026;148(12):12520–12525. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6c02971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie X.-Y., Cheng K.-Q., Chen W.-K., Li W., Li Q., Han J., Fang W.-H., Cui G.. Near-Infrared Dual-Emission of a Thiolate-Protected Au42 Nanocluster: Excited States, Nonradiative Rates, and Mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2023;14(44):10025–10031. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c02683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo Y., Li K., Wang P., Pei Y.. Structural Flexibility-Driven Dual Emission Switching in Ultrathin Gold Nanorod Clusters. JACS Au. 2025;5(9):4593–4603. doi: 10.1021/jacsau.5c00898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamasaki Y., Jonoue R., Takano S., Tsukuda T.. Gold Quantum Needles Synthesized by Thermal-Induced, One-Dimensional Oligomerization of Au24(SC2H4Ph)20 . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(49):44680–44685. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c14201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li Y., Song Y., Zhang X., Liu T., Xu T., Wang H., Jiang D., Jin R.. Atomically Precise Au42 Nanorods with Longitudinal Excitons for an Intense Photothermal Effect. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144(27):12381–12389. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c03948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo L., Liu Z., Mazumder A., Jin R.. Raising Near-Infrared Photoluminescence Quantum Yield of Au42 Quantum Rod to 50% in Solutions and 75% in Films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146(41):27993–27997. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c11703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Demchenko A. P., Tomin V. I., Chou P.-T.. Breaking the Kasha Rule for More Efficient Photochemistry. Chem. Rev. 2017;117(21):13353–13381. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang H., Wang J., Zhang T., Xie Z., Zhang X., Sun H., Xiao Y., Yu T., Huang W.. Breaching Kasha’s Rule for Dual Emission: Mechanisms, Materials and Applications. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2021;9(32):10154–10172. doi: 10.1039/D1TC01970H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pfund B., Wenger O. S.. Breaking Kasha’s Rule to Enable Higher Reactivity in Photoredox Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147(30):26477–26485. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c06115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yoshida K., Arima D., Mitsui M.. Dissecting the Triplet-State Properties and Intersystem Crossing Mechanism of the Ligand-Protected Au13 Superatom. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2023;14(49):10967–10973. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c02977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mitsui M., Wada Y., Kishii R., Arima D., Niihori Y.. Evidence for Triplet-State-Dominated Luminescence in Biicosahedral Superatomic Molecular Au25 Clusters. Nanoscale. 2022;14(22):7974–7979. doi: 10.1039/D2NR00813K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang K.-Y., Yao Q., Deng H.-H., Chen W., Xie J.. Molecular-Level Decoding of Electron Transfer Dynamics in Metal Nanoclusters. Acc. Chem. Res. 2026;59(6):902–914. doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5c00864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yousefalizadeh G., Stamplecoskie K. G.. A Single Model for the Excited-State Dynamics of Au18(SR)14 and Au25(SR)18 Clusters. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2018;122(35):7014–7022. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b07072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
