Abstract
Background
Colorectal cancer (CRC) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression and RAS mutations is often associated with poor response to conventional treatments, presenting substantial therapeutic challenges. This report describes a remarkable response in a patient with HER2-amplified, KRAS-mutated metastatic rectal cancer, who was treated with a zanidatamab-based combination regimen.
Case presentation
A 54-year-old male was admitted to our hospital complaining of hematochezia and was diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma via biopsy. Baseline imaging revealed extensive, unresectable liver metastases. Next-generation sequencing identified a KRAS G12D mutation alongside HER2 amplification. Although the combination of chemotherapy and bevacizumab yielded promising efficacy, but tumor markers still remained high. When the anti-HER2 bispecific antibody zanidatamab was added, after three cycles of this triplet therapy, the liver metastases exhibited radiographic regression, and tumor markers showed substantial decline. The patient achieved sufficient downstaging and subsequently underwent successful hepatic resection. Pathological examination confirmed negative surgical margins.
Conclusion
This case underscores the potential of HER2 inhibition as an effective therapeutic strategy in KRAS-mutated CRC. It also highlights zanidatamab’s promise as part of a conversion therapy approach in patients with historically refractory disease.
Keywords: biomarker-guided treatment, colorectal cancer, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, KRAS mutation, zanidatamab
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks as the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy globally, with persistently high incidence and mortality rates (1). Despite significant advancements in early screening and multimodal therapies, the prognosis for patients with advanced CRC remains poor, particularly in subsets harboring specific molecular alterations (2, 3).
CRC is characterized by profound molecular heterogeneity, with HER2 amplification/overexpression (observed in 3–5% of cases) correlating with aggressive clinicopathological features (2). Robust evidence indicates that HER2-positive CRC is associated with deeper tumor invasion, higher rates of lymph node metastases, and earlier distant dissemination, collectively contributing to inferior clinical outcomes (4). Moreover, these patients exhibit diminished responses to standard chemotherapy regimens and intrinsic resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies, likely due to cross-activation between HER2 and EGFR signaling pathways (5).
While anti-HER2 targeted therapies have demonstrated modest efficacy in later-line treatment of HER2-positive CRC, their utility in RAS-mutant cohorts remains strikingly limited. The MyPathway trial evaluated dual HER2 blockade in CRC, reporting an overall response rate (ORR) of 32%, with median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 2.9 and 11.5 months, respectively. Notably, subgroup analyses revealed marked disparities. Only 1 of 13 KRAS-mutant patients responded (ORR, 7.7%), compared to 17 of 43 KRAS-wildtype patients (ORR, 40%). These findings underscore the critical unmet need for novel strategies in this refractory population (6).
Zanidatamab is a novel humanized bispecific HER2-targeted monoclonal antibody that promotes HER2 clustering and internalization, suppresses HER2 signaling, and activates immune-mediated anti-tumour responses, leading to potent activity across diverse HER2 expression levels. The HERIZON-BTC-01 study led to its approval for HER2-high (IHC 3+) unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer (7). Promising activity has also been demonstrated in HER2-positive advanced gastroesophageal cancer, with a phase III trial (NCT05152147) demonstrating an ORR of 70.7% and robust survival improvement when zanidatamab combined with immunotherapy and chemotherapy as first-line treatment (8). However, no clinical data currently exist regarding the efficacy of zanidatamab in HER2-amplified, RAS-mutant CRC.
Herein, we present a case of metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma with concurrent KRAS G12D mutation and HER2 amplification that achieved significant liver metastasis regression following zanidatamab combined with FOLFOX and bevacizumab. This report contextualizes therapeutic advances for HER2-driven CRC while highlighting a potential paradigm for overcoming RAS-mediated resistance.
Case presentation
In June 2025, a 54-year-old male visited our hospital complaining of intermittent hematochezia and tenesmus. Colonoscopy revealed a circumferential ulcerative mass located 5 cm from the anal verge, causing luminal stenosis that precluded endoscopic advancement (Figure 1). Histopathological examination of biopsy specimens demonstrated adenocarcinoma with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) showed MLH1 (+), MSH2 (+), MSH6 (+), PMS2 (+) and HER2 (3+). Next-generation sequencing (NGS) identified a KRAS p.G12D mutation (variant allele frequency: 1.16%) and ERBB2 amplification (copy number: 28.7).
Figure 1.

Colonoscopy of rectal. At 5 cm proximal to the anal verge, a circumferential ulcerated mass with heaped-up margins is noted, causing complete luminal obstruction. The tumor exhibits characteristic friability upon contact, suggesting high-grade malignancy.
Enhanced computer tomography (CT) of the abdomen demonstrated advanced rectal cancer with mesorectal, left iliac nodal involvement, and multiple liver metastases (Figure 2). As complete resection could not be obtained due to the extensive metastasis, systemic therapy was recommended by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). First-line therapy with CAPOX plus bevacizumab (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² on day 1+bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg on day 1+capecitabine 1000 mg/m² bid on days 1-14, q3w) was administrated. After six cycles of treatment, local imaging assessment indicated a partial response (PR) (according to RECIST version 1.1) (Figure 2), but tumor markers still remained high (Figure 3).
Figure 2.

Imaging examination of liver mass and primary lesion. Abdominal CT showing the radiological response to therapy. (A–C) advanced rectal cancer with liver and lymph nodes metastases at the initial diagnosis. (D–F) partial response was achieved after six cycles of CAPOX+Bevacizumab treatment. (G–I) continued partial response after four cycles of FOLFOX+Bevacizumab+Zanidatamab treatment.
Figure 3.

The trend of serum CEA and CA19-9.
Reassessment by the MDT concluded unresectability due to persistent multifocal liver metastases. The MDT recommended intensifying the chemotherapy backbone to FOLFOXIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) as a conversion strategy, while the addition of concurrent targeted therapy was to be decided later, contingent on the patient’s tolerance. Ultimately, the patient declined FOLFOXIRI due to concerns about toxicity. After further discussion, the patient opted for a combination of FOLFOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² on day 1, leucovorin 400 mg/m² on day 1, fluorouracil 400 mg/m² bolus followed by 2400 mg/m² continuous infusion over 46 hours) with bevacizumab (5 mg/kg on day 1) and zanidatamab (20 mg/kg on day 1) every 2 weeks. Treatment-related grade 3 diarrhea (according to CTCAE version 5.0), requiring loperamide intervention, resolved without therapy discontinuation. By March 2026, serial imaging revealed continued PR with increased necrotic components (Figure 2), accompanied by a substantial decrease in carcinoembryonic antigen levels (Figure 3).
Following six cycles of FOLFOX combined with bevacizumab and zanidatamab (last administration on April 28, 2026), FAPI PET-CT was performed on May 18, 2026 (Figure 4). The imaging findings indicated a favorable response and prompted reassessment of surgical candidacy. The MDT discussion was subsequently convened, and liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was recommended to provide complementary anatomical information regarding the hepatic lesions, including precise number, location, and spatial relationship with critical vascular structures. Accordingly, liver MRI was performed on June 2, 2026 (Figure 5). The detailed anatomical mapping obtained from MRI was then integrated into the surgical decision-making process, facilitating individualized operative planning. Based on these findings, the patient underwent hepatic tumor resection on June 23, 2026. Postoperative pathological diagnosis revealed adenocarcinoma with treatment response (tumor regression grade 2). Combined with the clinical history and morphological features, the findings were consistent with rectal cancer metastasis. Surgical margins were negative.
Figure 4.

FAPI PET-CT.
Figure 5.

Liver magnetic resonance imaging before surgery.
Discussion
This study reports the first case of a metastatic rectal cancer patient with concurrent HER2 amplification and KRAS G12D mutation, who achieved significant tumor shrinkage and successful conversion to a resectable state after treatment with zanidatamab combined with FOLFOX chemotherapy and bevacizumab. This finding offers a groundbreaking therapeutic approach for KRAS-mutant mCRC patients, traditionally considered resistant to HER2-targeted therapies, and provides important insights for the broader field of solid tumor treatment.
Traditional views suggest that KRAS mutations lead to acquired resistance to HER2-targeted therapies by continuously activating downstream signaling pathways, a phenomenon confirmed across various cancer types. In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, Barzi et al. demonstrated that acquired KRAS mutations, accompanied by loss of ERBB2 amplification, are key mechanisms of resistance to HER2-targeted treatment (9). Similarly, in breast cancer, KRAS mutations are a major cause of primary resistance to trastuzumab (10), and studies in upper gastrointestinal cancers also suggest poor outcomes for HER2-positive patients with KRAS mutations treated with trastuzumab (11, 12).
HER2 amplification occurs in approximately 3-5% of colorectal cancers, mostly in RAS wild-type tumors (2). Reviewing the development of HER2-targeted therapy in mCRC, Bertotti et al. found that HER2-positive patients were sensitive to combination therapy with trastuzumab and lapatinib but not to single-agent treatment. The HERACLES trial, a multicenter phase II study, evaluated the efficacy of trastuzumab and lapatinib in KRAS wild-type and HER2-overexpressing mCRC patients who were resistant to standard therapies. The study showed an objective response rate (ORR) of 30%, a mPFS of 5.0 months, and a mOS of 11.5 months, respectively (13). In the HERACLES-B study, patients treated with a combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab showed an ORR of 9.7%, with a low toxicity profile and similar mPFS to other HER2-targeted regimens (14). The MyPathway trial revealed a significant difference in efficacy between KRAS-mutant and wild-type groups, reinforcing the recognition of KRAS mutations as resistance markers (6). As a result, current treatment guidelines recommend HER2-targeted therapy primarily for RAS wild-type mCRC patients (15).
The observed response to anti-HER2 therapy in this KRAS G12D-mutated patient may be attributed to the low mutant allele frequency. Variant allele frequency (VAF) reflects the proportion of tumor cells harboring a specific mutation, and a low VAF suggests that the KRAS G12D mutation likely exists only in a small subclonal population, while the majority of tumor cells retain wild-type KRAS status. This molecular characteristic aligns with multiple clinical observations. Previous study indicated that in EGFR-targeted therapy, patients with KRAS mutation VAF below 30% achieved a disease control rate of 44.4%, significantly higher than those with higher VAF (P = 0.038) (16). Similarly, a phase II trial demonstrated that RAS mutations with VAF <5% did not significantly impair response to EGFR inhibitors (17). Furthermore, the basket trial of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) showed therapeutic responses in KRAS-mutant CRC patients (18), collectively suggesting that low VAF KRAS mutations may not completely abrogate the efficacy of targeted therapies. Potential underlying mechanisms include predominant expression of wild-type KRAS, interclonal regulatory interactions, or insufficient downstream pathway activation by mutant KRAS. These findings not only provide a plausible explanation for this case but also underscore the importance of incorporating mutational burden assessments into therapeutic decision-making for precision oncology.
Zanidatamab is the first approved HER2-targeted bispecific antibody. Unlike traditional therapies like trastuzumab or pertuzumab, zanidatamab targets two non-overlapping epitopes of the HER2 protein, forming a unique ‘cap’ conformation that not only more effectively blocks signaling pathways but also enhances complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) (19, 20). This mechanism could explain the efficacy of zanidatamab in KRAS-mutant mCRC patients. Clinical studies strongly support its superior efficacy. A phase I trial of zanidatamab in HER2-positive mCRC patients, previously treated with standard therapies, showed a PFS of 6.8 months, with an ORR of 38%, even in 25% of patients who had failed prior HER2-targeted therapies. These results outperformed the trastuzumab/pertuzumab (dual-HER2) combination (21). Additionally, a phase II study of zanidatamab combined with FOLFOX ± bevacizumab in HER2-positive mCRC patients demonstrated an ORR of 100%, with all eleven evaluable patients achieving partial response (22). In terms of safety, zanidatamab exhibited favorable tolerability, with only 1% of patients experiencing grade 3 or higher adverse events. Although the case presented here involved a grade 3 diarrhea, it was manageable with symptomatic treatment, and the patient tolerated the therapy well.
Despite these encouraging results, the inherent limitations of this single-case analysis must be acknowledged. Going forward, several critical research priorities emerge. First, the development of refined predictive biomarker algorithms is essential to accurately identify responsive patient subsets. Second, systematic investigation into optimal combination regimens warrants dedicated study. Finally, delineating the precise molecular mechanisms by which bispecific antibodies circumvent KRAS-mediated resistance is of paramount importance. Encouragingly, DESTINY-PanTumor02 trial indicated that next-generation antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), such as deruxtecan, show promise for some KRAS-mutant patients, offering a potential redefinition of the patient population suitable for HER2-targeted therapy (23).
In conclusion, this case provides preliminary clinical evidence supporting the potential therapeutic value of HER2-targeted therapy in HER2-amplified, KRAS-mutated metastatic CRC. Although limited to a single case, these findings generate a clinically relevant hypothesis and support further investigation of zanidatamab-based regimens in this challenging molecular subtype.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the patient and their family for their assistance in providing information. We would also like to thank the radiologists for their support in offering imaging data and the pathologists for their constructive contributions.
Funding Statement
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Footnotes
Edited by: Matthew P. DeLisa, Cornell University, United States
Reviewed by: Harpreet Kaur, Panjab University, India
Tao Shen, Kunming Medical University, China
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Institutional Ethics Review Board of West China Hospital, Sichuan University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author contributions
KZ: Writing – original draft. YY: Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2024) 74:229–63. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Richman SD, Southward K, Chambers P, Cross D, Barrett J, Hemmings G, et al. HER2 overexpression and amplification as a potential therapeutic target in colorectal cancer: analysis of 3256 patients enrolled in the QUASAR, FOCUS and PICCOLO colorectal cancer trials. J Pathol. (2016) 238:562–70. doi: 10.1002/path.4679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lee SM, Oh H. RAS/RAF mutations and microsatellite instability status in primary colorectal cancers according to HER2 amplification. Sci Rep. (2024) 14:11432. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62096-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Luo H, Cui L, Shen K, Li R, Wang Z, Xie Z. HER2 overexpression and mismatch repair deficiency are correlated with Malignancy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Manag Res. (2021) 13:3443–54. doi: 10.2147/cmar.s297596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bekaii-Saab TS, Lach K, Hsu LI, Siadak M, Stecher M, Ward J, et al. Impact of anti-EGFR therapies on HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes. Oncologist. (2023) 28:885–93. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Meric-Bernstam F, Hurwitz H, Raghav KPS, McWilliams RR, Fakih M, VanderWalde A, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab for HER2-amplified metastatic colorectal cancer (MyPathway): an updated report from a multicentre, open-label, phase 2a, multiple basket study. Lancet Oncol. (2019) 20:518–30. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30904-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Harding JJ, Fan J, Oh DY, Choi HJ, Kim JW, Chang HM, et al. Zanidatamab for HER2-amplified, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer (HERIZON-BTC-01): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2b study. Lancet Oncol. (2023) 24:772–82. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00242-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Shitara K, Elimova E, Liu T, Tabernero J, Lee KW, Schenker M, et al. Zanidatamab with and without Tislelizumab in HER2-positive gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. (2026) 394:2002–14. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa2517729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Barzi A, Weipert CM, Espenschied CR, Raymond VM, Wang-Gillam A, Nezami MA, et al. ERBB2 (HER2) amplifications and co-occurring KRAS alterations in the circulating cell-free DNA of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients and response to HER2 inhibition. Front Oncol. (2024) 14:1339302. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1339302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Patra S, Young V, Llewellyn L, Senapati JN, Mathew J. BRAF, KRAS and PIK3CA mutation and sensitivity to trastuzumab in breast cancer cell line model. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. (2017) 18:2209–13. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.8.2209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Shimozaki K, Shinozaki E, Yamamoto N, Imamura Y, Osumi H, Nakayama I, et al. KRAS mutation as a predictor of insufficient trastuzumab efficacy and poor prognosis in HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. (2023) 149:1273–83. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-03966-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Pan M, Dang A, Huang T, Stover J, Tong MM, Jiang C, et al. Association of HER2 amplification or overexpression with overall survival in advanced upper gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas. BJC Rep. (2025) 3:31. doi: 10.1038/s44276-025-00148-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Sartore-Bianchi A, Trusolino L, Martino C, Bencardino K, Lonardi S, Bergamo F, et al. Dual-targeted therapy with trastuzumab and lapatinib in treatment-refractory, KRAS codon 12/13 wild-type, HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer (HERACLES): a proof-of-concept, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. (2016) 17:738–46. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(16)00150-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Sartore-Bianchi A, Lonardi S, Martino C, Fenocchio E, Tosi F, Ghezzi S, et al. Pertuzumab and trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-amplified metastatic colorectal cancer: the phase II HERACLES-B trial. ESMO Open. (2020) 5:e000911. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. National Comprehensive Cancer Network . NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Rectal Cancer (Version 1. 2026). Available online at: http://www.nccn.org (Accessed June 3, 2026).
- 16. Yu S, Xiao X, Lu J, Qian X, Liu B, Feng J. Colorectal cancer patients with low abundance of KRAS mutation may benefit from EGFR antibody therapy. PloS One. (2013) 8:e68022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Santos C, Azuara D, Viéitez JM, Páez D, Falcó E, Élez E, et al. Phase II study of high-sensitivity genotyping of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA to ultra-select metastatic colorectal cancer patients for panitumumab plus FOLFIRI: the ULTRA trial. Ann Oncol. (2019) 30:796–803. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Yagisawa M, Taniguchi H, Satoh T, Kadowaki S, Sunakawa Y, Nishina T, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in advanced solid tumors with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 amplification identified by plasma cell-free DNA testing: a multicenter, single-arm, phase II basket trial. J Clin Oncol. (2024) 42:3817–25. doi: 10.1200/jco.23.02626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Weisser NE, Sanches M, Escobar-Cabrera E, O'Toole J, Whalen E, Chan PWY, et al. An anti-HER2 biparatopic antibody that induces unique HER2 clustering and complement-dependent cytotoxicity. Nat Commun. (2023) 14:1394. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37029-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. DiPeri TP, Evans KW, Wang B, Zhao M, Akcakanat A, Raso MG, et al. Co-clinical trial of novel bispecific anti-HER2 antibody zanidatamab in patient-derived xenografts. Cancer Discov. (2024) 14:828–45. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-0838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Meric-Bernstam F, Beeram M, Hamilton E, Oh DY, Hanna DL, Kang YK, et al. Zanidatamab, a novel bispecific antibody, for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic HER2-expressing or HER2-amplified cancers: a phase 1, dose-escalation and expansion study. Lancet Oncol. (2022) 23:1558–70. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00621-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Rha SY, Lee K-W, Lee S, Kang Y-K, Chandana S, Escalante A, et al. 746P A 2-year follow-up of zanidatamab (Zani) + mFOLFOX6 ± bevacizumab (Bev) in first-line (1L) treatment of patients (Pts) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Ann Oncol. (2025) 36:S521–2. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2025.08.1320 38826717 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Shitara K, Bang Y, Iwasa S, Sugimoto N, Ryu M, Sakai D, et al. O-14 Exploratory biomarker analysis of trastuzumab deruxtecan in DESTINY-Gastric01, a randomized, phase 2, multicenter, open-label study in patients with HER2-positive or -low advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol. (2021) 32:S224. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.05.018 38826717 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
