Skip to main content
Frontiers in Transplantation logoLink to Frontiers in Transplantation
. 2026 Aug 19;5:1899960. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2026.1899960

Prolonged ex vivo lung perfusion with corrected perfusate: functional and structural benefits in swine

Justin Issard 1,2,*, Julia Mercier 2, Jean-Baptiste Ménager 1,2, Guillaume Fadel 1,2, Yuya Nobori 2, Melwan Izem 2, Maria-Rosa Ghigna 3, Elie Fadel 1,2, Fabrice Antigny 2, Pierre Mordant 4, Olaf Mercier 1,2
PMCID: PMC13533982  PMID: 42688299

Abstract

Background

During ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP), perfusate pH, electrolyte, and glucose concentrations often deviate from physiological ranges. We evaluated the effect of a corrective solution on maintaining these parameters within physiological limits during 12 h of EVLP in a porcine model.

Methods

Twelve porcine lung blocks were harvested and cold-preserved before undergoing 12 h of normothermic EVLP. Lung blocks were randomly assigned to two groups based on the perfusate replacement strategy. All lungs were perfused with Steen solution, mean priming volume was 1,525 ± 340 and 1,325 ± 232 mL, with 100 mL (5%–9%) replaced every two hours by either fresh Steen solution (standard group, n = 6) or a modified solution designed to restore physiological composition (corrected group, n = 6). Perfusate electrolytes, glucose, cytokines, pH, partial oxygen pressure (PO₂), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), and compliance were measured. After EVLP, left lungs were transplanted during 4 h into donor-related pigs, while right lungs were analyzed by histology and electron microscopy.

Results

Perfusate correction successfully maintained electrolyte, pH, and glucose levels within target ranges during EVLP. The corrected group demonstrated higher lung compliance and oxygenation, reduced edema, more hyaline membranes, and a greater density of Kohn's pores after EVLP. PVR was similar between groups, and no significant difference in ΔPO₂ was observed post-transplantation.

Conclusion

Maintaining physiological perfusate composition improved lung function during 12-hour EVLP in swine; however, no post-transplant benefit was observed. Further studies are warranted to assess the impact of this strategy during prolonged EVLP and to compare it with alternative approaches.

Keywords: EVLP, EVLP duration, lung transplant (LTx), pig model, preclinical (in vivo) studies, prolonged EVLP

Graphical Abstract

Diagram compares two pig lung perfusion groups: control with standard STEEN solution (Steen N) and test with corrected STEEN solution (Steen+), each with six samples, illustrating perfusion setups and solution containers. Electron microscope images show differing alveolar structures for each group. Timeline tracks perfusion over twelve hours. Line graph below displays ΔPO2 values over time, showing higher oxygenation for Steen+ group (red) compared to Steen N (black dashed), with error bars indicating variability.

Created in BioRender. Mercier, J. (2026) https://BioRender.com/c6gjmtr.

Highlights

  • In swine, perfusate electrolytes, pH, and glucose were corrected during EVLP.

  • This correction over a 12-hour period was feasible and safe.

  • Lung compliance and oxygenation were better with vs. without correction.

  • Outcomes of transplantation after EVLP were similar with vs. without correction.

1. Introduction

The shortage of lung grafts has led to the widespread acceptance of marginal grafts from donors after circulatory death (DCDD) for transplantation (1). Although this approach increases graft availability, these lungs are susceptible to hypoxia-related injury and require functional assessment prior to transplantation. Normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) enables evaluation of high-risk lungs and, when applied to DCDD lungs, has achieved outcomes comparable to those from donors after neurological determination of death (DNDD) (2–5). EVLP appears to improve lung oxygenation (3, 6) and clinical outcomes, including reduced severity of primary graft dysfunction (5), shorter mechanical ventilation, and decreased hospital stay compared with static cold storage (7). Extending EVLP duration could allow lung reconditioning interventions such as antibiotic therapy, gene transfer via adenoviral vectors, immunomodulation, or mesenchymal stem cell administration (8–11), making it a major research focus (12, 13). However, EVLP has been associated with inflammatory responses and cellular injury (14) and is typically limited to 4–6 h in clinical practice (15, 16). Progressive deterioration of lung function remains the main barrier to prolonged EVLP (8, 12, 17). Interestingly, intermittent EVLP strategies, in which normothermic perfusion is alternated with periods of cold preservation, have emerged as a promising approach to extend total preservation time while limiting continuous perfusion-related injury (18). Under these conditions, acellular perfusate has been linked to stable lung function and favorable post-transplant outcomes in both swine and humans (19). Such strategies may reduce cumulative endothelial stress, metabolic exhaustion, and edema formation compared with uninterrupted EVLP. The longest successful EVLP reported in a porcine model achieved lung preservation for up to three days (20). Currently, EVLP is most commonly performed using the Toronto protocol (5), which employs Steen solution (Perfadex®, XVIVO, Gothenburg, Sweden) as the perfusate. Steen solution contains electrolytes at extracellular concentrations, human albumin for oncotic pressure, and dextran 40 for endothelial protection (21). It can be mixed with donor blood to create a cellular perfusate with a hematocrit of 15%, which has been evaluated for prolonged EVLP (12, 22). Whole donor blood has maintained stable lung function for 24-hour EVLP in swine (12, 18), although cellular perfusate has been associated with increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) during EVLP (7). Other perfusion solutions, such as OCS™ solution (TransMedics, Andover, MA), are also available (12). Despite these advances, EVLP duration in humans remains limited. One strategy to extend EVLP is to optimize the perfusate composition (13). During prolonged EVLP, electrolyte concentrations deviate from physiological ranges (23), pH decreases due to lactate accumulation and membrane-induced deoxygenation, and glucose depletion is associated with edema and impaired cellular function (24). To counter these changes, the Toronto protocol replaces 100 mL of Steen solution with fresh solution every two hours during 12-hour EVLP (19). We hypothesized that replacing Steen solution with a corrective solution designed to maintain electrolyte, pH, and glucose levels within physiological ranges would be more effective. Therefore, we conducted a porcine study to determine whether such a solution improves functional and structural lung parameters during 12-hour EVLP.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study design

The study design is shown in Figure 1. Twelve lung blocks from donor pigs were harvested and subjected to 12-hour EVLP according to the Toronto protocol. Six lungs were perfused with Steen solution (standard group), and six with a corrective solution formulated to maintain pH, electrolytes, and glucose within physiological ranges (corrected group). At the end of EVLP, right lungs were analyzed by optical and electron microscopy. Ten left lungs were deemed suitable for transplantation into donor-related pigs. In total, 22 female piglets (32–55 kg) were included. All animals received humane care in compliance with French and European regulations. Animal experiments were approved by the institutional ethics committee (C2EA-26/SBEA; APAFiS #2016111716212529) and conducted in full compliance with European Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes.

Figure 1.

Flowchart illustrating the experimental design for recovery of swine lung blocks, with twelve lung blocks divided into two groups: standard solution (Steen N) and corrected solution (Steen+), each starting with six lung blocks. One block per group is excluded, leaving five per group, which are separated into right and left lungs. Right lungs undergo biopsies for histology and electron microscopy analysis, while left lungs are transplanted into related pigs for four hours. Both groups are assessed for lung and perfusate parameters including PVR, compliance, ΔPO2, PaO2/FiO2, pH, Na+, K+, Ca++, Cl−, glucose, lactate, and cytokines.

Study design of 12-hours EVLP in a porcine model, comparing standard steen solution with a corrected perfusate. 12 swine lung blocks were recovered and allocated equally into two groups. Both groups were perfused with Steen solution the first two hours: then perfusate was exchanged every 2 h. Standard group: 100 mL of perfusate was exchanged for 100 mL of Steen solution: according to the Toronto protocol Corrected group: 100 mL of perfusate was replaced by 100 mL of a solution composed of one-third Steen solution, one-third 2.5% glucose solution: and one-third sodium bicarbonate solution; all other components of EVLP were according to the Toronto protocol.

2.2. Lung procurement and perfusion technique

Animals underwent general anesthesia, and the heart–lung block was retrieved and stored in a sterile organ bag at 4 °C filled with Steen solution until EVLP initiation (Table 1). EVLP was performed following the Toronto EVLP protocol (Cypel et al., J Heart Lung Transplant 2008) (19), with the only difference being the perfusate replacement strategy. In the standard group, 100 mL of Steen solution (5%–10% of total priming volume; Table 1) was exchanged every 2 h. In the corrected group, 100 mL of a mixture consisting of one-third Steen solution, one-third 2.5% glucose solution (Glucose B Braun 2.5%, 250 mL), and one-third sodium bicarbonate solution (14 mg/mL; Bicarbonate de Sodium Baxter 1.4%, 0.14 g/10 mL) was added every 2 h to maintain physiological levels of sodium, potassium, calcium, chloride, pH, and glucose (25). The corrective solution was designed to address electrolyte and metabolic imbalances, specifically abnormalities in potassium (K⁺), chloride (Cl⁻), and glucose levels, while maintaining physiological pH and oncotic pressure. Target values were defined as follows: pH 7.3–7.5, potassium 3.8–4.2 mmol/L, chloride <120 mmol/L, and glucose >10 mmol/L. After 12 h of EVLP, lungs were cooled to 10 °C and stored at 4 °C until transplantation. First and second cold ischemia times are reported in Table 1.

Table 1.

Features of the animals, grafts, and graft preservation in the groups with vs. without perfusate composition correction.

Variables, mean ± SD Standarda
n = 5
Correctionb
n = 5
P-value
Lung recovery
Weight of the donor animal, kg 38 ± 5 41 ± 9 0.57
Warm ischemia time, min 23 ± 6 20 ± 5 0.56
Anterograde pneumoplegia, mL 1,667 ± 289 1,475 ± 61 0.37
Retrograde pneumoplegia, mL 600 ± 173 542 ± 102 0.63
Cold ischemia time before EVLP, min 89 ± 20 81 ± 20 0.59
Lung weight, g 483 ± 126 557 ± 151 0.47
EVLP
Priming volume, mL 1,525 ± 340 1,325 ± 232 0.35
Perfusate volume replaced during EVLP, mL 725 ± 154 790 ± 152 0.83
EVLP duration, min 695 ± 57 694 ± 30 0.81
Lung weight at the end of EVLP, g 883 ± 293 835 ± 287 0.82
Cold ischemia time after EVLP, min 331 ± 63 352 ± 64 0.68

EVLP, ex-vivo lung perfusion.

a

Steen solution with exchange of 100 mL every 2 h.

b

Steen solution with replacement of 100 mL every 2 h by a solution composed of one-third Steen solution, one-third 2.5% glucose solution, and one-third sodium bicarbonate (1.4%) solution.

2.3. Data collection during EVLP

Variables recorded before, hourly during, and after EVLP included:

  • Functional parameters: pulmonary vascular resistance [PVR=(mPAP – LAP)/CO], dynamic compliance (ventilator-derived), ΔPO₂ between pulmonary artery (PA) and left atrium (LA), and PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio.

  • Perfusate composition: pH, glucose, lactate, Na⁺, K⁺, Cl⁻, and Ca2⁺ concentrations.

Perfusate samples were collected from the LA, except for pH and blood gas analysis, which were performed in both PA and LA. Lungs were weighed before and after EVLP. Cytokine levels (IL-6, IL-18, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-10, IL-1α, IL-2, IL-8, IL-12) were measured every 2 h using the Milliplex MAP Porcine Cytokine/Chemokine Magnetic Bead Panel (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA) according to manufacturer instructions. Results are expressed in pg/mL.

2.4. Electron microscopy, histology, elastometry, and endothelial & mitochondrial protein expression

After EVLP, biopsies were taken from two lobes of the right lung (upper/middle and lower). Upper or middle lobe samples were used for electron microscopy to minimize edema. Samples were inflated with 2% glutathione and 0.1 M sodium cacodylate, stored at 4 °C for 48 h, then processed for transmission and scanning electron microscopy. Images were analyzed using ImageJ (https://imagej.net/ij/). The number of alveolar pores (pores of Kohn) was quantified on scanning electron microscopy slides. Lower lobe samples were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned (5 µm), and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. A semi-quantitative histological score (0–12) was applied for interstitial edema, alveolar edema, cellular infiltration, and hyaline membrane formation (12, 19, 20). Histological analysis was performed on five sections from three animals per group due to tissue availability constraints at the time of analysis (samples from two animals were consumed by electron microscopy preparation). Sample selection was not randomized but was based on tissue quality and availability. Pulmonary pathologist (MG) was blinded to group allocation during scoring. Pulmonary artery elastometry was performed on the first branch of the right lung after EVLP and compared with control arteries from the explanted left lung. Contractility and relaxation were assessed using thromboxane A₂ mimetic, KCl, sildenafil, and acetylcholine. Western blot analyses were performed on tissue samples from control lungs and from lungs perfused for 12 h with either standard Steen solution (Steen N, n = 5) or corrected Steen solution (Steen+, n = 5). Membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against phosphorylated endothelial nitric oxide synthase (phospho-eNOS), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (NOS3), Twist, vascular endothelial cadherin (VE-cadherin), mitochondrial transcription termination factor (MTERF), and cytochrome c oxidase subunit 15 (COX15). β-actin was used as the loading control. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence and imaged using a digital detection system. Band intensities were quantified by densitometric analysis and normalized to β-actin expression.

2.5. Single-lung transplantation

In recipients, a left thoracotomy was performed in the fourth intercostal space, and the left lung was removed. Donor lungs were separated after pulmonary hilum dissection and ligation of the left azygos vein. Anastomoses were performed using running polypropylene sutures (Prolene, Ethicon Inc., Raritan, NJ): 4-0 for bronchus, 5-0 for LA, and 6-0 for PA. The graft was de-aired through the LA anastomosis. Recipients were ventilated through a single endotracheal tube without selective intubation. Post-transplant respiratory parameters (PVR, compliance, ΔPO₂, PaO₂/FiO₂) were compared between groups. To obtain graft-specific data blood samples were collected from the left pulmonary artery and the upper left pulmonary vein intraoperatively.

2.6. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). Quantitative variables are expressed as median ± SD and compared using Student's t-test. Categorical variables are expressed as n (%) and compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. Time-course data were analyzed using a two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with group and time as factors, allowing for the assessment of longitudinal changes while accounting for within-animal repeated measurements. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Lung procurement and EVLP

Of the 12 heart–lung blocks, six were perfused using the standard Toronto protocol (100 mL exchanges every 2 h) and six using the corrected perfusate strategy (100 mL replacement every 2 h). Data from two animals (one per group) were excluded due to severe lung edema and logistical issues. Consequently, ten pigs underwent left-lung transplantation after 12-hour EVLP (Figure 1). The volume of perfusate exchanged during EVLP did not differ significantly between groups (P = 0.14). Baseline characteristics of animals, grafts, and EVLP procedures were comparable between groups (Table 1).

3.2. Physiological and biochemical findings during EVLP

Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) did not change in both group (p = 0.55) neither over time (p = 0.49) nor group×time interaction (p = 1). PaO₂/FiO₂ ratios increased over time in both groups (time effect: p = 0.01) and was overall higher in the Steen + group (group effect: p < 0.001), with no significant group×time interaction (p = 0.69), indicating similar temporal patterns between groups (Figure 2). Compliance stayed significantly higher in the Steen + group (p < 0.001) whereas neither time (p = 0.46) nor interaction group×time (p = 1) reached statistical significance. For the perfusate pH: in the PA, 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA demonstrated a significant effect of group (p < 0.001) and a significant group×time interaction (p = 0.04), whereas the overall effect of time was not significant (p = 0.06). These findings indicate that differences between groups varied over the course of the study, despite the absence of a significant overall temporal trend. Similarly in the LA: 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA demonstrated a significant effect of group (p < 0.001) and a significant group×time interaction (p = 0.002), whereas the overall effect of time was not significant (p = 0.11). These findings indicate that differences between groups varied over the course of the study, despite the absence of a significant overall temporal trend (Figure 3). For lactate and electrolyte concentrations (Cl⁻, K⁺, Na⁺) 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA demonstrated in each measure a significant effect of group (p < 0.001 for each), time (p < 0.001 for each), and a significant group×time interaction (Lactate p = 0.01, Na⁺p = 0.01, Cl⁻: p < 0.001 and K⁺: p < 0.001). For glucose and calcium: 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA demonstrated a significant effect of group (p < 0.001) and a significant group×time interaction (p < 0.001), whereas the overall effect of time was not significant (Glucose: p = 0.9, Ca2+: p = 0.8).

Figure 2.

Three line graphs display compliance, ΔPO2, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) over a twelve-hour period, comparing two groups labeled Steen plus (red solid line) and Steen N (black dashed line), with error bars representing variability.

Evolution of compliance, APOL2 and FIR in standard (steen N, n=5) and corrected (steen n=5) groups along 12-hour EVIP (Mean ± SD).

Figure 3.

Grouped scientific line charts showing time-based measurements for chloride, potassium, lactate, calcium, pH (PA and LA), sodium, and glycemia in millimoles per liter, comparing two sample groups labeled Steen plus (red line) and Steen N (black dashed line), with error bars and green reference rectangles. Each panel presents a distinct parameter over a twelve-hour period with trends and variations visually distinguished between the groups.

Evolution of electrolyte, lactate pH, Na+ and glucose levels in standard (steen N, n=5) and corrected (steen+n=5) perfusates along 12-hour EVLF. (Mean ± SD).

3.3. Histology, electron microscopy, cytokines, elastometry, and protein expression

The semi-quantitative histological score was similar between groups (median 5 vs. 5; P = 0.96) (Figure 4). However, alveolar edema was lower in the corrected group (0.7 vs. 1.9; P < 0.001), while hyaline membrane formation was higher (1.9 vs. 0.7; P < 0.001). Transmission electron microscopy revealed endothelial hypertrophy, subendothelial edema, and intercellular junction abnormalities in the corrected group, whereas the standard group showed no such alterations (Figures 5, 7). Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated a significantly higher alveolar pore density in the corrected group compared with the standard group (711 ± 307 vs. 529 ± 210 pores/mm3; P = 0.02). Pore density did not differ significantly between the standard group and control lungs (529 ± 210 vs. 390 ± 173; P = 0.08). Perfusate cytokine levels (IL-6, IL-18, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-10, IL-1α, IL-2, IL-8, IL-12) were analyzed over time, 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA demonstrated that no interactions were significant in any of the cytokine. For IL-6, IL-12 and IL-18 the group and the evolution over time differed significantly. For IL-1β, IL-2, IL-8 and TNF-α the level change over time, regardless of the treatment group (Steen N vs. Steen +). For IL-10 and IL-1α the groups differed overall, but their temporal evolution was similar (Figure 6). Pulmonary artery contractility and relaxation were assessed by myography. Maximal contraction with KCl was similar across groups. However, U46619-induced contractility was higher in the standard group compared with both corrected and control groups (Figure 7A), suggesting altered thromboxane-dependent contraction in the standard group. Sildenafil-induced relaxation (smooth muscle-dependent) was similar across groups, whereas acetylcholine-induced relaxation (endothelium-dependent) was significantly impaired in perfused lungs compared with controls, with greater impairment in the corrected group (Figure 7A). Western blot analysis revealed decreased NOS3 and phospho-eNOS expression in both perfused groups compared with controls, with further reductions in Twist and VE-cadherin, particularly in the standard group. Mitochondrial proteins MTERF and COX15 were upregulated in perfused lungs, significantly in the corrected group (Figures 7B,C). Electron microscopy confirmed endothelial structural alterations, including hypertrophy, subendothelial edema, and disrupted junctions (Figure 7D).

Figure 4.

Panel A presents a bar graph comparing lung injury scores between Steen+ and Steen N groups, showing similar mean values with no significant difference. Panel B displays a bar graph illustrating differences in interstitial edema, alveolar edema, cellular infiltration, and hyaline membrane formation, with asterisks indicating statistical significance (p<0.05) for alveolar edema and hyaline membrane formation. Panels C and D provide histological images of lung tissue stained with hematoxylin and eosin for Steen N (left, magnifications 100 and 200 micrometers) and Steen+ (right, magnifications 50 and 200 micrometers), depicting structural comparisons and differences in alveolar and interstitial morphology.

Pathology assessment of the right lung after 12 h of ex-vivo lung perfusion. (A) Total histological scores in the two groups (Steen N, n=5 and. Steen +, n=5), (Mean ± SD), (t-test comparaison); (B) Histological sub-scores in the two groups, (Mean ± SD), (t-test conaparaison); (C) Lung parenchyma after 12 h of ex-vivo lung perfusion in the standard. group (Steen N); (D) Lung parenchyma after 12 h of ex-vivo lung perfusion in the modified steer group (Steen +).

Figure 5.

Panel A shows three scanning electron microscopy images labeled Control, Steen N, and Steen Plus, each displaying the porous microstructure of biomaterial samples with varying pore sizes. Panel B presents a bar graph comparing pore density among the three groups, with Steen Plus exhibiting the highest average number of pores per square millimeter, statistically significant compared to Control and Steen N as indicated by p-values.

Electron microscopy assessment of the right lung after 12 h of ex-vivo lung perfusion. (A) Scanning electron microscopy of standard (Steen N, n=5) and corrected (Steen +, n=5) lungs after EVLP. The recipient pig left lung was used as a control. (B) Alveolar (Kohn) pore density (N/mm2) determined by scanning electron microscopy (Mean ± SD) (t-test comparaison).

Figure 7.

Figure composed of four panels shows experimental results comparing control, Steen N, and Steen plus groups. Panel A features four line graphs of vascular contraction; Panel B presents six Western blot images for protein expression levels; Panel C displays six corresponding bar graphs quantifying protein expression with some significant p-values marked; Panel D contains three transmission electron microscopy images, each demonstrating different endothelial alterations labeled as hypertrophy, subendothelial edema, and intercellular junction defect.

Consequences of 12-hour EVLP on endothelial and mitochondrial function. (A) Comparison of arterial contraction-relaxation capabilities in standard (Steen N, n=5) and corrected (Steen +, n=5) group after 12-hour EVLP. A non-perfused artery is used as control. U46619 (thromboxane A2 mimetic) dose-response curve, normalized to K90 (left) KCL dose-response curve, normalized to K90 (middle left); Sildenafil dose-response curve, reflecting smooth muscle cells-dependant relaxation after PA precontraction with U46619 (middle right); Acetylcholine dose-response curve, reflecting endothelium-dependant relaxation after PA precontraction with U46619 (right). (B) Western blots and (C) quantifications of endothelial and mitochondrial proteins expression in control and perfused. groups (D) Abnormalities observed in Steen+group by electron microscopy assessment of the right lung.

Figure 6.

Nine line graphs compare cytokine levels (IL-6, IL-18, TNF-alpha, IL-1b, IL-10, IL-1a, IL-2, IL-8, IL-12) over time in two groups, Steen+ (red) and Steen N (black), with error bars indicating variability.

Evolution of cytokines levels in standard (steen N, n=5) and corrected (steen +. n=5) perfusates along 12-hour EVLP (Mean ± SD).

3.4. Outcomes after single-lung transplantation

Post-transplantation, ΔPO₂ and PaO₂/FiO₂ ratios did not differ significantly between groups. Glucose, lactate, and pH values in PA and pulmonary vein samples were similar, as were electrolyte concentrations (Figure 8).

Figure 8.

Six line graphs compare physiological measures between two groups, Steen+ (solid red) and Steen N (black dashed), across time points labeled as Clamping, Unclamping H0, and H1 to H4. Measures include ΔPO2 (mmHg), T-pH LA (pH), Glycemia (mmol/L), Lactates (mmol/L), and T-Ca++ (mmol/L), each with error bars. Legends identify the groups, and y-axes and x-axes are clearly labeled for each graph.

Evolution of ΔPO2, pH, Ca2+, glucose and lactate levels in standard (steen N, n=5) and corrected (steen +, n=5) groups after transplantation in recipient swines.

4. Discussion

In this study, we successfully maintained perfusate electrolyte and pH levels within physiological ranges throughout 12-hour EVLP in a porcine model. Perfusate correction appeared to play a meaningful role in stabilizing the EVLP environment, as electrolyte, pH, and glucose levels remained within their intended physiological ranges throughout perfusion. This more controlled biochemical milieu was associated with several indicators of improved lung quality, including enhanced compliance and oxygenation, reduced edema formation, and fewer hyaline membranes, along with a greater density of Kohn's pores after EVLP. Interestingly, despite these favorable trends, pulmonary vascular resistance did not differ between groups, and the absence of a significant post-transplant ΔPO₂ difference suggests that these structural and functional improvements during EVLP may not immediately translate into early post-implantation gas-exchange advantages. These findings highlight both the potential benefits and the current limitations of perfusate correction strategies. Our findings indicate that maintaining physiological perfusate composition during EVLP is feasible and may improve oxygenation and compliance without increasing PVR, supporting the safety of this approach. Glucose supplementation likely enhanced cellular metabolism, as suggested by higher lactate levels in the corrected group. However, hyperglycemia can lead to lung injury though oxidative stress and pulmonary vascular permeability, it also shapes the immune system facilitating infection (26, 27). Previous studies have shown that adding parenteral nutrition to the perfusate can prolong EVLP to 24 h and improve lung viability compared with glucose-only supplementation (28). Parenteral nutrition is associated with kidney and liver toxicity which is avoided in EVLP because the lung are isolated, unfortunately parenteral nutrition lead also to hyperglycemia (29–32). Thus, Steen solution, even with periodic replacement, may not provide sufficient metabolic support for extended EVLP. Adding glucose while avoiding hyperglycemia seems to be a valid option to investigate. Another factor of cell stability is a controlled pH (33, 34). In our study bicarbonate was added to successfully counteract pH decline associated with lactate accumulation. However it was associated with hypernatremia and we struggled to maintain a good sodium level during perfusion, other pH buffer may be investigated to maintain pH without ionic disorders (35). In clinical EVLP, elevated lactate or lactate/pyruvate ratios have not been linked to poor outcomes (36), however elevated lactate concentrations are not unequivocally indicative of enhanced aerobic metabolism and may equally reflect impaired lactate clearance, mitochondrial dysfunction, or cellular injury under metabolic stress. The higher lactate in the Steen + group can be either caused by enhanced glycolytic activity (supported by higher glucose availability) and/or the possibility of metabolic stress, particularly in light of the observed mitochondrial protein upregulation (MTERF, COX15). Oncotic pressure decreases during EVLP and may contribute to edema formation (14, 17, 37). Although Steen solution contains albumin to maintain oncotic pressure, we did not measure this parameter. The lower edema score in the corrected group suggests a potential benefit, but continuous monitoring or interventions such as hemofiltration may be necessary, as previously shown to reduce lung weight and improve compliance (14). Although correction of pH, electrolytes, and glucose allowed stable lung function over 12 h, our results suggest that Steen solution, even when periodically corrected, may not be sufficient as a standalone perfusate for truly prolonged EVLP. While pH and glucose homeostasis were achievable, important limitations persisted, particularly regarding edema control and endothelial preservation. Endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation remained significantly impaired, and ultrastructural analysis revealed persistent endothelial alterations, indicating that endothelial protection remains a critical unmet need. Perfusate cytokine levels typically rise during EVLP due to lung injury. In our study, cytokine concentrations were unaffected by correction. Adsorbent membrane filtration has been reported to reduce TNF-α and IL-8 levels without improving oxygenation or PVR (38), although other studies suggest additional benefits, including reduced edema and electrolyte imbalance (28). The higher hyaline membrane score and endothelial activation observed in the corrected group may reflect an inflammatory response to increased glucose availability. This could explain the impaired endothelial-dependent relaxation observed in elastometry testing. The pathological findings appear paradoxical, with reduced alveolar edema but increased hyaline membrane formation. In this context, hyaline membranes may reflect a reparative or inflammatory response to alveolar injury rather than ongoing edema. This process could be enhanced by greater glucose availability, which may promote a pro-inflammatory alveolar microenvironment. Alternatively, restoration of a more physiological metabolic milieu may have altered the protein composition of the perfusate, thereby favoring fibrin deposition and hyaline membrane formation. We hypothesize that macroscopic functional improvements and ultrastructural endothelial injury evolve on different timescales and are mediated through distinct biological pathways, which warrant further investigation. Greater alveolar pore density in the corrected group may enhance collateral ventilation and contribute to improved compliance and oxygenation (39–41). However, while increased alveolar pore density has been associated with enhanced collateral ventilation and may contribute to improved compliance, it has also been described in the context of emphysematous remodeling and structural lung injury. In our setting, the increase may reflect a combination of enhanced alveolar recruitment and tissue stress secondary to 12 h of normothermic perfusion, potentially exacerbated by the metabolic changes induced by glucose and bicarbonate supplementation. Finally, post-transplant outcomes were similar between groups, likely due to the presence of the native right lung, which limits interpretation of gas exchange data. Selective ventilation or bilateral transplantation would be required to fully assess graft function. The 4 h post-transplant follow-up and the confounding contribution of the native right lung are key limitations that preclude conclusions about long-term graft benefit. Another limitation is that the recipients were ventilated without selective intubation; therefore, post-transplant ventilatory indices reflect the combined contributions of the transplanted left lung and the native right lung, rather than the function of the graft alone. Selective right pulmonary artery clamping or bilateral transplantation would be required to isolate the contribution of the transplanted graft to post-operative gas exchange. This choice was dictated by ethical constraints and the survival design of the model The main limitation of our study is the relatively short EVLP duration (12 h), which may have been insufficient to reveal differences in long-term graft viability or reconditioning potential. Longer EVLP times could allow more extensive interventions, such as antibiotic therapy or gene transfer. Additional limitations include the fixed composition of the corrective solution and the lack of individualized adjustment. The small sample size constraint statistical power and limit the interpretation of the results. Nonetheless, minimizing animal use aligns with the 3Rs principle. These findings suggest that future protocols should move beyond simple biochemical correction and integrate targeted strategies aimed at maintaining endothelial integrity and capillary barrier function. Potential approaches include improved oncotic pressure management, modulation of glucose delivery to avoid hyperglycemic endothelial stress, and adjunctive techniques such as hemofiltration or adsorption to control metabolites and inflammatory mediators. In this context, deeper investigation of endothelial preservation mechanisms appears essential. Expertise in endothelial biology and vascular barrier regulation will be critical to refine perfusate composition and adjunctive interventions. Ongoing collaborative efforts within our group will specifically focus on endothelial metabolism, junctional stability, and mechano-transduction during prolonged EVLP, with the goal of limiting edema formation and preserving endothelium-dependent function The preservation of lung function observed in our study over 12 h supports the hypothesis that lungs can tolerate extended normothermic perfusion when physiological conditions are controlled. This strategy may support prolonged EVLP and facilitate lung reconditioning. Future studies should evaluate 24-hour EVLP protocols and explore adjunctive measures such as parenteral nutrition, complete normalization of biological parameters during EVLP, adsorbent membrane filtration, and devices replicating renal or hepatic function to optimize graft preservation. However, continuous EVLP may expose the endothelium to sustained metabolic and mechanical stress, contributing to endothelial dysfunction and edema (42). Intermittent EVLP, alternating perfusion and cold storage phases, may mitigate these effects by allowing metabolic recovery and limiting cumulative injury. At present, it remains unclear whether meaningful differences exist between 4-hour vs. 6-hour EVLP cycles using distinct perfusate strategies. Nevertheless, experimental and clinical data suggest that lungs preserved using intermittent EVLP maintain better functional stability over time. In our settings, we demonstrate an absence of early differences after transplant for lungs who underwent 12-hours corrected EVLP. In this context, it is conceivable that a strategy combining corrected perfusate composition with intermittent EVLP cycles could enable lung preservation for several days, potentially up to four days, while preserving functional and structural integrity (20). This hypothesis warrants dedicated experimental evaluation. Future studies should assess whether combining corrected perfusate composition with intermittent EVLP further improves endothelial preservation and limits edema formation during prolonged lung preservation. Optimization of glucose delivery within strict physiological ranges, alternative buffering strategies to stabilize pH without inducing hypernatremia, and active management of oncotic pressure represent key areas for refinement. Extending EVLP duration beyond 12 h, potentially over several days using intermittent strategies, may ultimately allow more effective lung reconditioning and expand graft availability for transplantation.

Acknowledgments

The conception and writing of the manuscript were performed by Justin Issard (JI) and Julia Mercier (JM). Data collection was carried out by JI, JM. All other co-authors contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the Questions d'Intérêt Majeur (QIM) program of the Région Île-de-France, which funds research addressing major societal challenges with substantial operational and equipment support. It was also supported by the Inserm Programmes d'Impulsion, which provide significant funding to interdisciplinary consortia conducting high-innovation, high-impact research.

Footnotes

Edited by: Sebastian Michel, LMU Munich University Hospital, Germany

Reviewed by: Franziska Olm, Lund University, Sweden

Linar Faizov, University Medical Center, Kazakhstan

Abbreviations EVLP, ex vivo Lung Perfusion; DCDD, Donors after Circulatory Determination of Death; DNDD, Donors after Neurological Determination of Death; PVR, Pulmonary Vascular Resistance; mPAP, Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure; PAWP, Pulmonary Artery Wedge Pressure; CO, Cardiac Output; PA, Pulmonary Artery; LA, Left Atrium; ΔPO₂, Difference in Partial Oxygen Pressure; PaO₂/FiO₂, Ratio of Arterial Oxygen Pressure to Fraction of Inspired Oxygen; IL, Interleukin (e.g., IL-6, IL-18, IL-1β, etc.); TNF-α, Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha; SMC, Smooth Muscle Cells; EC, Endothelial Cells; NOS3, Nitric Oxide Synthase 3; Phospho-eNOS, Phosphorylated Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase; VE-cadherin, Vascular Endothelial Cadherin; MTERF, Mitochondrial Transcription Termination Factor; COX15, Cytochrome c Oxidase Assembly Factor 15; KCl, Potassium Chloride; U46619, Thromboxane A₂ Mimetic; SD, Standard Deviation; APAFiS, Autorisation de Projet Utilisant des Animaux à des Fins Scientifiques.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The protocole was approved by the institutional animal ethics committee and welfare agency (C2EA/SBEA; APAFiS #2016111716212529. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements).

Author contributions

JI: Investigation, Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. JM: Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Data curation, Formal analysis. J-BM: Validation, Writing – review & editing, Resources, Visualization. GF: Validation, Writing – review & editing, Resources, Visualization. YN: Validation, Data curation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing, Resources. MI: Resources, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Data curation, Validation. M-RG: Formal analysis, Visualization, Methodology, Resources, Investigation, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. EF: Funding acquisition, Visualization, Validation, Writing – review & editing, Supervision. FA: Supervision, Validation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Resources, Visualization, Project administration. PM: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Methodology, Project administration, Visualization, Resources. OM: Visualization, Methodology, Validation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. The authors acknowledge the use of generative AI tools (e.g., Microsoft Copilot) to assist in language editing, grammar correction, and improvement of scientific clarity during the preparation of this manuscript. All intellectual content, data interpretation, and scientific conclusions were developed and validated by the authors. The AI tools were not used to generate original data, figures, or analysis.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.Erasmus ME, Van Raemdonck D, Akhtar MZ, Neyrinck A, De Antonio DG, Varela A, et al. DCD Lung donation: donor criteria, procedural criteria, pulmonary graft function validation, and preservation. Transpl Int Off J Eur Soc Organ Transplant. (2016) 29(7):790–7. 10.1111/tri.12738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Steen S, Liao Q, Wierup PN, Bolys R, Pierre L, Sjöberg T. Transplantation of lungs from non–heart-beating donors after functional assessment ex vivo. Ann Thorac Surg. (2003) 76(1):244–52. 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)00191-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wierup P, Haraldsson Å, Nilsson F, Pierre L, Scherstén H, Silverborn M, et al. Ex Vivo evaluation of nonacceptable donor lungs. Ann Thorac Surg. (2006) 81(2):460–6. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.08.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Egan TM, Haithcock JA, Nicotra WA, Koukoulis G, Inokawa H, Sevala M, et al. Ex vivo evaluation of human lungs for transplant suitability. Ann Thorac Surg. (2006) 81(4):1205–13. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.09.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cypel M, Yeung JC, Liu M, Anraku M, Chen F, Karolak W, et al. Normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion in clinical lung transplantation. N Engl J Med. (2011) 364(15):1431–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cypel M, Rubacha M, Yeung J, Hirayama S, Torbicki K, Madonik M, et al. Normothermic Ex Vivo perfusion prevents lung injury compared to extended cold preservation for transplantation. Am J Transplant. (2009) 9(10):2262–9. 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02775.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Becker S, Steinmeyer J, Avsar M, Höffler K, Salman J, Haverich A, et al. Evaluating acellular versus cellular perfusate composition during prolonged ex vivo lung perfusion after initial cold ischaemia for 24 h. Transpl Int Off J Eur Soc Organ Transplant. (2016) 29(1):88–97. 10.1111/tri.12649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mordant P, Nakajima D, Kalaf R, Iskender I, Maahs L, Behrens P, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell treatment is associated with decreased perfusate concentration of interleukin-8 during ex vivo perfusion of donor lungs after 18-hour preservation. J Heart Lung Transplant. (2016) 35(10):1245–54. 10.1016/j.healun.2016.04.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Machuca TN, Cypel M, Bonato R, Yeung JC, Chun Y-M, Juvet S, et al. Safety and efficacy of Ex Vivo donor lung adenoviral IL-10 gene therapy in a large animal lung transplant survival model. Hum Gene Ther. (2017) 28(9):757–65. 10.1089/hum.2016.070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yeung JC, Wagnetz D, Cypel M, Rubacha M, Koike T, Chun Y-M, et al. Ex vivo adenoviral vector gene delivery results in decreased vector-associated inflammation pre- and post-lung transplantation in the pig. Mol Ther J Am Soc Gene Ther. (2012) 20(6):1204–11. 10.1038/mt.2012.57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nakajima D, Cypel M, Bonato R, Machuca TN, Iskender I, Hashimoto K, et al. Ex Vivo perfusion treatment of infection in human donor lungs. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transpl Surg. (2016) 16(4):1229–37. 10.1111/ajt.13562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Loor G, Howard BT, Spratt JR, Mattison LM, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, Brown RZ, et al. Prolonged EVLP using OCS lung: cellular and acellular perfusates. Transplantation. (2017) 101(10):2303–11. 10.1097/TP.0000000000001616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sommer W, Salman J, Avsar M, Hoeffler K, Jansson K, Siemeni TN, et al. Prediction of transplant outcome after 24-hour ex vivo lung perfusion using the organ care system in a porcine lung transplantation model. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transpl Surg. (2019) 19(2):345–55. 10.1111/ajt.15075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nilsson T, Hansson C, Wallinder A, Malm C-J, Silverborn M, Ricksten S-E, et al. Hemofiltration in ex vivo lung perfusion—a study in experimentally induced pulmonary edema. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2016) 151(2):570–575.e1. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cypel M, Yeung JC, Machuca T, Chen M, Singer LG, Yasufuku K, et al. Experience with the first 50 ex vivo lung perfusions in clinical transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2012) 144(5):1200–6. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.08.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wallinder A, Ricksten S-E, Hansson C, Riise GC, Silverborn M, Liden H, et al. Transplantation of initially rejected donor lungs after ex vivo lung perfusion. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2012) 144(5):1222–8. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nilsson T, Gielis JF, Slama A, Hansson C, Wallinder A, Ricksten S-E, et al. Comparison of two strategies for ex vivo lung perfusion. J Heart Lung Transplant. (2018) 37(2):292–8. 10.1016/j.healun.2017.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yeung JC, Krueger T, Yasufuku K, De Perrot M, Pierre AF, Waddell TK, et al. Outcomes after transplantation of lungs preserved for more than 12 h: a retrospective study. Lancet Respir Med. (2017) 5(2):119–24. 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)30323-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cypel M, Yeung JC, Hirayama S, Rubacha M, Fischer S, Anraku M, et al. Technique for prolonged normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion. J Heart Lung Transplant. (2008) 27(12):1319–25. 10.1016/j.healun.2008.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ali A, Nykanen AI, Beroncal E, Brambate E, Mariscal A, Michaelsen V, et al. Successful 3-day lung preservation using a cyclic normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion strategy. EBioMedicine. (2022) 83:104210. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Watanabe T, Cypel M, Keshavjee S. Ex vivo lung perfusion. J Thorac Dis. (2021) 13(11):6602–17. 10.21037/jtd-2021-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Spratt JR, Mattison LM, Iaizzo PA, Meyer C, Brown RZ, Iles T, et al. Lung transplant after prolonged ex vivo lung perfusion: predictors of allograft function in swine. Transpl Int. (2018) 31(12):1405–17. 10.1111/tri.13315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kao CC, Parulekar AD. Is perfusate exchange during ex vivo lung perfusion beneficial? Ann Transl Med. (2020) 8(3):3. 10.21037/atm.2019.12.127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Valenza F, Rosso L, Pizzocri M, Salice V, Umbrello M, Conte G, et al. The consumption of glucose during ex vivo lung perfusion correlates with lung edema. Transplant Proc. (2011) 43(4):993–6. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wu CP, Huang KL, Peng CK, Lan CC. Acute hyperglycemia aggravates lung injury via activation of the SGK1–NKCC1 pathway. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21(13):4803. 10.3390/ijms21134803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Clemmer JS, Xiang L, Lu S, Mittwede PN, Hester RL. Hyperglycemia-Mediated oxidative stress increases pulmonary vascular permeability. Microcirculation. (2016) 23(3):221–9. 10.1111/micc.12267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Herder C, Roden M, Venteclef N. Diabetes and pulmonary infection: how hyperglycaemia shapes the immune system. Signal Transduct Target Ther. (2024) 9(1):67. 10.1038/s41392-024-01784-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Iskender I, Cosgun T, Arni S, Trinkwitz M, Fehlings S, Yamada Y, et al. Cytokine filtration modulates pulmonary metabolism and edema formation during ex vivo lung perfusion. J Heart Lung Transplant. (2018) 37(2):283–91. 10.1016/j.healun.2017.05.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schönenberger KA, Reber E, Dürig C, Baumgartner A, Efthymiou A, Huwiler VV, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients receiving parenteral nutrition. Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. (2022) 3:829412. 10.3389/fcdhc.2022.829412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mihajlovic M, Rosseel Z, De Waele E, Vinken M. Parenteral nutrition-associated liver injury: clinical relevance and mechanistic insights. Toxicol Sci. (2024) 199(1):1–11. 10.1093/toxsci/kfae020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Laesser CI, Cumming P, Reber E, Stanga Z, Muka T, Bally L. Management of glucose control in noncritically ill, hospitalized patients receiving parenteral and/or enteral nutrition: a systematic review. J Clin Med. (2019) 8(7):935. 10.3390/jcm8070935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Brett EM, Mechanick JI. Parenteral nutrition—the sweet and sour truth. Endocr Pract. (2015) 21(1):5–6. 10.4158/endp.21.1.g770706037146863 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Michl J, Park KC, Swietach P. Evidence-based guidelines for controlling pH in mammalian live-cell culture systems. Commun Biol. (2019) 2(1):144. 10.1038/s42003-019-0393-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Souza A, Parnell M, Rodriguez BJ, Reynaud EG. Role of pH and crosslinking ions on cell viability and metabolic activity in alginate–gelatin 3D prints. Gels. (2023) 9(11):853. 10.3390/gels9110853 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Prakash O, Waghmare U, Chauhan A, Patil Y. Optimizing experimental conditions: the role of buffered environments in microbial isolation, physiological studies, and taxonomic characterization. Appl Environ Microbiol. (2025) 91(6):e01728–24. 10.1128/aem.01728-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Koike T, Yeung JC, Cypel M, Rubacha M, Matsuda Y, Sato M, et al. Kinetics of lactate metabolism during acellular normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion. J Heart Lung Transplant. (2011) 30(12):1312–9. 10.1016/j.healun.2011.07.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Takahashi M, Andrew Cheung HY, Watanabe T, Zamel R, Cypel M, Liu M, et al. Strategies to prolong homeostasis of ex vivo perfused lungs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (2021) 161(6):1963–73. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.07.104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kakishita T, Oto T, Hori S, Miyoshi K, Otani S, Yamamoto S, et al. Suppression of inflammatory cytokines during ex vivo lung perfusion with an adsorbent membrane. Ann Thorac Surg. Juin. (2010) 89(6):1773–9. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Namati E, Thiesse J, De Ryk J, McLennan G. Alveolar dynamics during respiration: are the pores of kohn a pathway to recruitment? Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. (2008) 38(5):572–8. 10.1165/rcmb.2007-0120OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fukuoka J, Yoshikawa A, Sato S, Tanaka T, Hashisako M, Kashima Y, et al. Breakdown of lung framework and an increase in pores of Kohn as initial events of emphysema and a cause of reduction in diffusing capacity. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. (2016) 11(1):2287–94. 10.2147/COPD.S114281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kaka A, Merchant F. The pores of kohn, an overlooked pulmonary structure: a review. J Pulmonol Respir Res. (2024) 8(2):063–8. 10.29328/journal.jprr.1001063 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Parapanov R, Debonneville A, Allouche M, Lugrin J, Rodriguez-Caro H, Liaudet L, et al. Transient heat stress protects from severe endothelial damage and dysfunction during prolonged experimental ex-vivo lung perfusion. Front Immunol. (2024) 15:1390026. 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1390026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Frontiers in Transplantation are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES