Abstract
Notch signaling is essential for maintenance of neural stem cells (NSCs) and proper brain function. To investigate the functional consequences of sustained Notch activation, we generated a spatiotemporally controlled, tetracycline-inducible transgenic mouse model Nestin-CreER, ROSA26-rtTA, TRE-loxP-DsRed2-loxP-c-Myc-NICD. In this model, sustained NICD overexpression promotes rapid consuming cell division that drives NSCs to terminally differentiate rather than undergo self-renewal. This mechanism led to severe depletion of the NSC pool in both the subependymal zone (SEZ) and subgranular zone of the hippocampal dentate gyrus. In the SEZ, NSC depletion was paradoxically accompanied by an increased supply of newborn neurons to the olfactory bulb, but these cells did not contribute to better function. NICD overexpression mice showed significant impairments in spatial and emotional memory, and social discrimination. Collectively, sustained Notch activation in Nestin-lineage cells induces an imbalance in NSC maintenance, resulting in exhaustion of NSC pools and integration of non-functional cells, ultimately altering both olfactory and hippocampal-dependent behaviors.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-56980-x.
Keywords: Notch signaling, Adult neurogenesis, Self-renewal, Olfactory bulb, Dentate gyrus
Subject terms: Developmental biology, Neuroscience, Stem cells
Introduction
Notch signaling regulates multiple physiological functions, including stem cell self-renewal, cell fate specification, proliferation, and apoptosis. Four Notch receptors are present in mammals, but Notch1 is the primary mediator of stem cell maintenance. The canonical transduction cascade is strictly regulated through ligand-induced proteolytic cleavage of Notch receptors that promotes release of the Notch intracellular domain (NICD). This active fragment translocates into the nucleus to form a complex with RBP-J and drives expression of downstream target genes like those in the Hes and Hey families1,2. This pathway involving NICD is reported to be essential for preventing premature differentiation in the pancreas where it controls multiple lineage steps3, but aberrant “gain-of-function” activities are frequently associated with distinct pathologies. For example, sustained Notch activation can be a potent driver of tumorigenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma4 and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia5. In the central nervous system, Notch signaling acts as a master regulator of adult neurogenesis6. Precise regulation is critical for maintaining neural stem cell (NSC) pools as evidenced by the finding that forced upregulation of Notch signaling through genetic deletion of the Notch inhibitor Rnd3 promotes aberrant NSC proliferation and hydrocephalus7. These diverse findings underscore the critical, context-dependent need to investigate sustained Notch activity in adult neural precursors.
In the adult mammalian brain, NSCs persist primarily in two neurogenic niches: the subependymal zone (SEZ) of tissue surrounding the lateral ventricles and the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG)8. Maintaining a proper balance between NSC quiescence, self-renewal, and differentiation is essential not only for niche homeostasis but also for olfactory discrimination and hippocampal-dependent spatial learning. Notch signaling acts as a gatekeeper in these niches. High levels of NICD activity are generally required to maintain NSCs in a quiescent, undifferentiated state through the suppression of proneural genes9. Conversely, downregulation of Notch signaling is a prerequisite for the transition of quiescent NSCs to vigorously proliferating transit amplifying cells (TACs), and then to their subsequent neuron progeny10,11. The function of Notch in the adult brain extends beyond structural plasticity as accumulating evidence implicates the pathway in higher-order brain functions. Active Notch signaling has been shown to modulate synaptic plasticity and long-term potentiation (LTP), suggesting that it plays a significant role in cognitive processes12,13.
Despite these previous findings, the specific functional consequences of sustained Notch activation on adult NSC dynamics and behavior remain poorly defined. Previous studies predominantly investigated embryonic stages or involved Notch loss-of-function models9,14. In this study, we used an inducible Cre-loxP system that allows specific and targeted Notch1 overexpression in the brain of adult mice. Using this mouse model with inducible NICD overexpression, we explored the underlying cellular mechanisms with a neurosphere assay and lineage tracing of quiescent NSCs. We also characterized behavioral outcomes to determine whether sustained Notch activation disrupts learning and memory processes.
Results
Generation of mice with neural precursor cell-specific NICD overexpression
DsRed2 cDNA (Clontech, #6973–1) with a SV40 polyadenylation sequence flanked by two loxP sequences and followed by c-Myc-tagged Notch1 intracellular domain (NICD) cDNA15 was inserted into the pTRE-Tight vector multiple cloning site (Clontech, #6263–1). The plasmid was linearized, and the vector sequence was removed. Then the entire transgene was injected into the pronuclei of fertilized one-cell eggs from C57BL/6 mice. Potential founder mice were screened by PCR, using a set of primers described in Table S1. Among the three lines we established and validated by crossing with Nestin-Cre, αCamKII-tTA tg mice, we selected line #54 (hereafter termed TRE-loxP-DsRed2-loxP-NICD), which showed no apparent leaky transgene expression (Fig. S1).
We crossed TRE-loxP-DsRed2-loxP-NICD mice with Nestin-CreER tg and R26-rtTA KI mice to generate Nestin-CreER, R26-rtTA, TRE -loxP-DsRed2-loxP-NICD (hereafter termed NICD OE mice) (Fig. 1A and S2). We examined transgene expression by first making serial intraperitoneal injections with 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (4-OHT) into dams at E13.5 to excise DsRed2 cDNA between the two loxP sequences, followed by intraperitoneal injection with 9-tert-butyl doxycycline (9-TB Dox) at E14.5 (Fig. S2). We analyzed E15.5 embryos and found c-Myc immunoreactivity in the ganglionic eminence of NICD OE embryos (Fig. S2). We next determined transgene expression in adult brains. Mice were given 10 mg tamoxifen p.o. twice at 6 weeks, followed by ad libitum access to chow supplemented with doxycycline to induce transgene expression (Fig. 1B). We detected c-Myc+ cells in two neurogenic niches, the SEZ and the DG of the hippocampus, in NICD OE mice (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, prominent c-Myc expression was observed in the olfactory bulb (OB) (Fig. 1D), confirming the accumulation of progeny of SEZ-resident c-Myc-NICD-expressing NSCs. Collectively, these results validate the efficacy of the inducible NICD OE system.
Fig. 1.

Generation of NICD overexpression mice. (A) Mice with NICD overexpression (NICD OE) were generated by mating Nestin-CreER transgenic, R26-rtTA knockin, and TRE-loxP-DsRed2-loxP-NICD transgenic mice. After Cre excision from the transgene, the reverse tetracycline transactivator (rtTA) binds to the tetracycline responsive element (TRE) in the presence of doxycycline (Dox) to drive NICD expression. (B) Schematic diagram of the study protocol. c-Myc-NICD was induced by consumption of chow supplemented with Dox. (C) Coronal cryosections of brains from NICD OE and control Nestin-CreER mice taken at the level of the lateral ventricle (top) and dentate gyrus (bottom) were immunostained for c-Myc. Dashed red boxes in the illustrations at the left highlight areas shown at higher magnification in the panels on the right. White arrows indicate representative c-Myc+ cells. Scale bar, 100 μm (top panels in the subependymal zone and dentate gyrus) and 50 μm (bottom panels in the subependymal zone). (D) Coronal cryosections of the olfactory bulb from NICD OE and control mice immunostained for c-Myc. Dashed white boxes in the lower magnification images (left) highlight areas shown at higher magnification in the panels on the right. Scale bars, 500 μm (lower magnification) and 100 μm (higher magnification).
NICD overexpression enhances NSC self-renewal in vitro
Based on loss-of-function studies of Notch pathway molecules6,14,16,17 that show varying degrees of depletion of NSC self-renewal, activation of Notch signaling is generally thought to enhance NSC self-renewal. We first tested this possibility in in vitro experiments. Cells isolated from the SEZ of NICD OE mice were cultured in the neurosphere-forming cultures (Fig. 2A). Treatment of these cultures with both 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (4-OHT) and doxycycline significantly increased expression of NICD (P = 0.0021 by Kruskal–Wallis test; No Tx vs. 4-OHT/Dox, P = 0.0064 by Dunn’s post hoc multiple comparisons test) and its target gene, Hes1 (P = 0.0312 by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test), in primary neurospheres (Fig. 2B). The self-renewal capability of NSCs was evaluated by passaging, since the number of secondary neurospheres derived from single primary neurospheres reflects the extent to which symmetric expansive divisions of NSCs occur during formation of primary neurospheres. We observed comparable numbers of primary neurospheres between NICD OE and littermate control mice regardless of treatment, but the number of secondary neurospheres formed was significantly increased in the cultures with 4-OHT/Dox treatment of NICD OE mouse-derived primary neurospheres (t(12) = 4.205, P = 0.0012 by paired t-test) (Fig. 2C, D respectively). These results suggest that activation of Notch signaling enhances symmetric expansive division of NSCs in vitro.
Fig. 2.

NICD overexpression enhances NSC self-renewal in vitro. (A) Schematic diagram of a floating colony-forming neurosphere assay. (B) Expression levels of NICD and Hes1 determined by RT-qPCR in secondary neurospheres derived from the same primary neurospheres with and without doxycycline (Dox) treatment. Values were normalized to those of β-actin. (C) Number of primary neurospheres generated from 2,500 cells in the subependymal zone (SEZ) of NICD OE and wild-type mice. (D) The number of secondary neurospheres generated from single primary neurospheres derived from the same mice cultured in the absence and presence of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) and Dox. (E) Diameters of primary neurospheres derived from NICD OE mice cultured in the absence or presence of 4-OHT/Dox treatment were measured. Vertical bars mean SD. (F) Primary neurospheres were induced to differentiate for 6 days and immunolabeled for astrocytes (GFAP), neurons (βIII tubulin), and oligodendrocytes (O4, arrowheads). Scale bars, 50 μm. (G) Marker-positive cells were counted in three random optical areas at the periphery of individual neurospheres. The left axis represents percentages for GFAP+ cells, and the right axis represents percentages for βIII tubulin+ or O4+ cells. Data represent the mean ± SEM (B–D, G) or the mean ± SD (E). *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 by one-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test or by paired t-test.
Increase of symmetric expansive division of NSCs can result in decrease of the production of vigorously dividing neural progenitor cells. We tested this possibility by measuring diameters of primary neurospheres and found that NICD OE mouse-derived primary neurospheres cultured in the presence of 4-OHT/Dox treatment were significantly smaller than those cultured without treatment (t(2) = 6.274, P = 0.0245 by paired t-test) (Fig. 2E). We further examined if NICD overexpression suppressed the differentiation of NSCs. Single primary neurospheres were plated onto cover glasses coated with polyethyleneimine and Matrigel basement membrane matrix and were induced to differentiate in 1% fetal bovine serum (FBS)/serum-free media (SFM) (Fig. 2F). We observed significant decrease of GFAP+ and βIII tubulin+ cells differentiated from NICD OE mouse-derived primary neurospheres cultured with 4-OHT/Dox than those from wild-type neurospheres [F(2, 6) = 12.39, P = 0.0074; NICD OE 4-OHT/Dox vs. wild-type No Tx, P = 0.0070 for GFAP; F(2, 6) = 6.556, P = 0.0309; NICD OE 4-OHT/Dox vs. wild-type No Tx, P = 0.0312 for βIII tubulin by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test]. This decrease was abolished over passaging (Fig. S3). These results suggest that NICD overexpression suppresses the differentiation of NSCs to neural progenitor cells and subsequently into neurons and glia.
NICD overexpression reduces the NSC pool size in vivo
We next investigated if NICD overexpression affected maintenance of neurosphere-forming NSCs in the brain and if it expanded the NSC population. We first examined effects of genotypes and tamoxifen treatment. We performed the neurosphere assay when the mice were 10 weeks old. We found no significant differences in the total numbers of NSCs in the brains of wild-type, TRE-loxP-DsRed2-loxP-NICD, or Nestin-CreER mice or Nestin-CreER mice that had been given two 10 mg doses of tamoxifen at 6-week-old (Fig. S4A). Therefore, we used Nestin-CreER and NICD OE mice in this experiment and administered two 10 mg doses of tamoxifen to all of them at 6-week-old. We next tested if chronic Dox treatment affects NSC pool size using Nestin-CreER mice that consumed normal or Dox-containing chow between 6 and 18 weeks of age. No apparent effects were observed (Fig. S4B). Then, we provided chow containing Dox for 4–20 weeks before carrying out the neurosphere assay (Fig. 3A–D). Unexpectedly, NICD OE mice consuming Dox showed significantly smaller NSC pool size compared to NICD OE mice consuming normal chow or Nestin-CreER mice when the mice were 26 weeks old [F(2, 13) = 8.947, P = 0.0224, Nestin-CreER Dox (–) vs NICD OE Dox ( +), P = 0.0469 and NICD OE Dox (–) vs NICD OE Dox ( +), P = 0.0304 using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test] (Fig. 3D). The number of NSCs in NICD OE consuming Dox mice decreased at a faster rate relative to Nestin-CreER control mice such that the number of NSCs was significantly reduced in 18-, and 26-week-old NICD OE mice compared to control mice (t(9) = 2.378, P = 0.0414 for 18-week-old by unpaired t-test) (Fig. 3B–D). We previously reported that the number of NSCs in wild-type mice decreases at relatively constant rates: the probability of NSC consumption per week Ptotal NSC was 0.0189 in CD1 mice and 0.01907 in C57 BL/6 mice18,19. In this study, the Ptotal NSC in control mice during the 10–26 week period was calculated as 0.01836 (slope value: − 0.008049 ± 0.001477, 10^− 0.008049 = 0.981637). Meanwhile, for NICD OE mice the Ptotal NSC during the same period was calculated as 0.02911 (slope value: − 0.01283 ± 0.001477, 10^− 0.01283 = 0.970890), suggesting a 1.6-fold faster NSC consumption rate. Taken together, the in vitro data indicate that NICD overexpression increases the likelihood of symmetric expansive division in in vitro neurosphere cultures, but in vivo there appears to be a progressive consumption of NSCs in the brain.
Fig. 3.

Reduced NSC pool size and neurogenesis in brains of adult mice with NICD overexpression. (A) Schematic diagram of the study protocol. (B–D) Total numbers of neurosphere-forming NSCs in brains from Nestin-CreER and NICD overexpression (OE) mice with and without doxycycline (Dox) treatment as indicated were determined when the mice were 10 (B), 18 (C), and 26 (D) weeks old. The total NSC numbers shown as Nestin-CreER Dox (–) mice at 10 and 18 weeks old are re-used from the same data sets shown in Figs S4A and B, respectively. (E–J) Mice received five intraperitoneal injections of 5-bromo-2’-deoxyuridine (BrdU) (50 mg/kg) at 3-h intervals and tissues were analyzed by histochemistry 4 weeks after the last injection. (E, G, I) Coronal cryosections taken at the level of the lateral ventricles (E) and the dentate gyrus (DG) (G, I) were immunostained for BrdU and cell markers as indicated. The areas within the dashed box are shown to the right at higher magnification (E). The merged images are shown as confocal orthogonal images (E, G). White arrowheads indicate BrdU+ cells in the DG (G, I). Scale bars are 200 μm (E, lower magnification), 20 μm (E, higher magnification), and 50 μm (G, I). (F, H, J) The total number of BrdU+ cells in the SEZ (F) and the SGZ (H) and BrdU+NeuN+ cells in the DG (J) were counted. Data represent the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05 by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test or unpaired t-test.
We also determined if NICD overexpression altered multipotential capability of NSCs. Primary neurospheres generated from NICD OE mice consuming Dox or Nestin-CreER mice were evaluated by a differentiation assay (Fig. S4C). We observed that neuronal differentiation was decreased in primary neurospheres generated from NICD OE mice as compared to those from Nestin-CreER mice (t(4) = 4.522, P = 0.0106 by unpaired t-test) (Fig. S4D). We next performed a TUNEL assay to examine whether cell death was the cause of NSC depletion. We observed no significant increase in apoptosis in the OB, SEZ and DG of NICD OE mice compared to controls (Fig. S5). These results suggest that NSCs in the NICD OE brain were suppressed for their differentiation potential and that the accelerated loss of NSCs is not due to apoptosis but likely instead stems from increased consumption (i.e., activation and differentiation) of quiescent NSCs.
If NICD overexpression indeed drives premature consumption of the quiescent NSC pool, the number of label-retaining cells should be reduced. To test this possibility, we used long-term BrdU incorporation to observe neural precursor cells. BrdU was administered to 15-week-old animals, and the number of BrdU-positive cells in the SEZ and DG was quantified 1 month later when the mice were 19 weeks old. During this interval, BrdU-labeled TACs in the SEZ vigorously proliferated, resulting in dilution of the label and reflecting either cellular differentiation or migration to the OB or undergoing apoptosis, leading to a decline in detectable BrdU signal20. Consequently, BrdU⁺ cells persisting in the SEZ beyond four weeks are typically interpreted as quiescent NSCs. In the DG, BrdU-labeled quiescent NSCs are retained in the SGZ, while their progeny typically migrate radially to the GCL and differentiate into mature neurons. Consistent with the neurosphere assay results, NICD OE mice showed a significant reduction in label-retaining BrdU+ cells in both the SEZ and SGZ of the DG compared to controls (t(4) = 2.860, P = 0.0459 for the SEZ; t(4) = 0.9244, P = 0.4076 for the SGZ by unpaired t-test) (Fig. 3E–H). These BrdU+ cells were positive for GFAP but negative for S100β (Fig. 3E, G), consistent with quiescent NSCs (type B cells) in the adult brain21.
To examine proliferative activity, BrdU was administered using the same injection protocol, but the brains were collected 1 h after the last injection (total labeling time = 13 h) (Fig. S6A and C). The total numbers of BrdU+ cells in both the SEZ and SGZ were comparable between NICD OE and control mice (Fig. S6B and D). Most BrdU+ cells labeled during this short interval are likely rapidly dividing TACs originating from NSCs as NSCs generally remain in a relatively quiescent state and exhibit much longer cell cycle durations than TACs22. Thus, the reserve pool of quiescent NSCs is likely being reduced, such that the overall output of dividing progenitors remains temporarily stable at this point. Consistent with this observation, the number of label-retaining BrdU+ cells in the dentate gyrus of NICD OE mice that differentiated and expressed a mature neuron marker, NeuN, were comparable to those in Nestin-CreER mice (Fig. 3I, J).
NICD overexpression impairs spatial memory retention and flexibility
To evaluate the functional consequences of NICD overexpression on behavior, we subjected mice to a battery of tests carried out at one-week intervals (Fig. 4A). To ensure that the cognitive task would not be confounded by motor deficits or anxiety-like behaviors, we first assessed locomotor activity using an open field test (Fig. 4B). No significant difference was observed between NICD OE and control mice in the total distance travelled or the time spent in the center region, indicating that NICD OE mice had normal locomotor functions and anxiety levels.
Fig. 4.

Impairment of spatial memory in NICD OE mice. (A) Behavioral tests were performed with a one-week interval between each paradigm. (B) Locomotor activity and anxiety levels were assessed with an Open field test. Representative trace trajectories for NICD OE and Control mice are shown on the left. There was no difference between NICD OE and Control mice for the total distance traveled and time spent in the center region. Circles represent results for individual mice. (C) Spatial memory assessed with the Barnes Maze. Escape latency was defined as the time taken to locate and enter the target hole, and was used as an index of spatial learning performance across the training. In the probe test, the time spent around each hole was measured in relation to angle of the target goal. n = 26 (15 males and 11 females) and 17 (8 males and 9 females) for Control and NICD OE mice, respectively. Data represent the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 by 2-way ANOVA.
We next assessed hippocampus-dependent spatial learning and memory using the Barnes maze test (Fig. 4C). All mice underwent nine consecutive training sessions, with two sessions per day. The target goal was placed at 0°. All groups of mice learned to locate the target hole during training, as indicated by gradual reductions in the escape latency (F(1,25) = 1.598; P = 0.2178). However, in the probe test, NICD OE mice spent significantly less time at the target goal (F(15,656) = 10.25; P < 0.001), suggesting deficits in hippocampus-mediated spatial memory retention. To further assess cognitive flexibility and the ability to update spatial memory, we conducted a reverse training session in which the target was moved to a position opposite of the original target. We found no significant differences in escape latency to the reversed target goal (F(1,25) = 2.873; P = 0.1025). Similar to the probe test, NICD OE mice did not remember the new target goal in the reversal probe test, suggesting that these animals had difficulty in updating and retaining novel spatial memory (F(15,656) = 17.00; P < 0.05). Collectively, these results suggest that NICD OE mice retain the ability to learn a task but exhibit significant impairments in the retention and updating of precise spatial memory.
NICD overexpression reduces emotional memory and social novelty discrimination
We assessed sensorimotor gating and auditory processing using the prepulse inhibition (PPI) test (Fig. S5). We found no significant differences between NICD OE and control mice, confirming that the sensorimotor gating and auditory acuity of NICD OE mice are intact.
Based on the observed spatial memory deficit in the Barnes maze, we further investigated whether NICD overexpression affects associative fear learning that involves environmental context and aversive cues in contextual fear conditioning. During the conditioning phase, mice learned to associate a specific environment with a mild foot shock (Fig. 5A). Both NICD OE and control mice exhibited comparable freezing responses to the paired unconditioned stimulus (F(1,40) = 0.467; P = 0.4980), indicating that fear acquisition was intact. Mice then underwent a contextual test to assess retention of the environment at 1 day and 1 month after fear memory acquisition. When tested 24 h post-conditioning, NICD OE mice had a lower percentage of freezing compared to controls (Fig. 5B), which marked significantly low total freezing percentage (P = 0.040 by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc multiple comparisons) (Fig. 5D), which together suggest a potential deficit in short-term contextual fear memory. Over time, as memory transitions to cortical regions, the remote memory becomes more stable, and hippocampus-independent23,24, resulting in a non-significant difference in freezing responses (F(1,40) = 0.496; P = 0.4855) (Fig. 5C). Taken together with the Barnes maze data, these results suggest that NICD overexpression disrupts hippocampus-dependent memory processes.
Fig. 5.

Reduced emotional memory and social discrimination in NICD OE mice. (A) Emotional memory was evaluated with a fear conditioning test involving an electrical foot shock (unconditioned stimulus). (B, C) The percentage of mice that froze (freezing percentage) was analyzed as an index of fear memory during contextual testing after 24 h (B) and 1 month (C) as recent and remote memory, respectively. (D) Total freezing time during the conditioning and recent and remote memory sessions was calculated. Circles indicate results for individual mice. n = 26 (15 males and 11 females) and 17 (8 males and 9 females) for Control and NICD OE mice, respectively. (E) Three-chamber social interaction test began when the mice were 12 weeks old. Mice were first habituated to the chamber (left), followed by social interaction (middle) and social novelty testing (right). The time spent in each chamber was recorded over a 5-min period. n = 25 (14 males and 11 females) and 17 (8 males and 9 females) for Control and NICD OE mice, respectively. Data represent the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001 by 2-way ANOVA. Outliers were omitted using Grubs’ test.
We also examined the social ability of mice in a three-chamber social interaction test (Fig. 5E). In the sociability phase, both groups displayed a significant preference to spend more interaction time with stranger mice (P < 0.0001). Interestingly, in a subsequent social novelty phase, control mice showed a significant preference for a newly introduced, novel stranger mouse relative to the familiar mouse (P = 0.0016), whereas NICD OE mice failed to discriminate between the novel stranger and familiar mice, and showed no significant preference between the animals. This deficit could be related to the involvement of hippocampal and olfactory bulb circuits that might be affected by altered NSC dynamics and neuronal integration25,26 although further study is needed to prove a causative link between them.
Lineage-tracing of quiescent NSCs by lentiviral integration sites
To explore why quiescent NSCs were depleted in adult NICD OE mice over time and how the accelerated reduction of the NSC pool affected its output to the OB through the rostral migration stream (RMS), we performed a lineage-tracing study of NSCs with a lentivirus-mediated clonal labeling technique. We injected 1.0 × 105 TU of GFP-2LoxP lentivirus (Fig. 6A) into the right ventricle of postnatal day (P) 0 NICD OE or control mouse neonates as described previously18,19. The mice were administered with tamoxifen, followed by Dox treatment to induce expression of the transgene. The 18–26-week-old mice were then used for the neurosphere assay to generate primary neurospheres. GFP+ primary neurospheres were individually selected under a fluorescent microscope and amplified in passaging cultures. We could isolate 101 GFP+ neurospheres from five NICD OE mice and 102 GFP+ neurospheres from five littermate control mice. The DNA from these neurospheres was clonally extracted and subjected to inverse PCR to determine clone-specific lentiviral genome-integration sites. DNA was also extracted from the OB and frontal cortex including the RMS on the injected side of each mouse, from which GFP+ neurospheres were isolated. Using the LV-A26 and LTR-B1 primers (Fig. 6A), we first examined the integrated lentiviral genome and found that 287/296 clones (overall clones including the neurospheres mentioned above) had the lentiviral genome without the sequence between the loxP sites, suggesting that the Cre-mediated recombination efficiency of our protocol was ~ 97%.
Fig. 6.

Lineage-tracing analysis of NSCs by identification of lentiviral genome integration sites. (A) Schematic diagram of lentiviral infection in neonatal mouse brains and analysis of adult brains. (B) DNA from each neurosphere clone, the olfactory bulb (OB), the frontal cortex containing the rostral migratory stream (RMS), and the remaining cortex (Ctx) derived from the same brain were subjected to integration site-specific nested PCR. Representative PCR results from a Negative NSC (Clone #19-14-21), OBonly NSC (Clone #19-14-28), RMS/OB NSC (Clone #19-14-26), and Duplicate NSC (Clones #21-5-8 and #21-5-19) that also sent cells to the OB from the brains of NICD OE mice (#19-14 and #21-5) are shown. Φ, ΦX174/HaeIII DNA marker, genomic DNA of the ΦX174 bacteriophage digested with the HaeIII restriction enzyme. (C) Analysis of 68 and 64 independent GFP+ neural stem cell clones derived from Nestin-CreER and NICD OE mice (n = 5–6 for each group), respectively, is shown. (D) Schematic diagram of our model for NSC lineages. Negative NSCs that distribute no cells to regions other than the subependymal zone (SEZ) undergo symmetric division to produce two daughter NSCs, which can be detected as Duplicate NSCs until one or both progeny cells either differentiate into transit amplifying cells (TACs) or die. After one daughter cell is consumed to provide OB neurons through the RMS, the other NSC can be detected as an RMSonly, RMS/OB, or OBonly NSC until it is ultimately lost. (E, F) Percentage of Duplicate NSCs (E) and OBtotal NSCs (F) over the animal’s lifespan. (G) Lentiviral DNA copy numbers in the olfactory bulb were determined by quantitative PCR using clone-specific primers. (H) Amount of DNA in the right OB was measured, and the results were converted to cell numbers based on one cell containing 6 pg DNA. Data represent the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, by unpaired t-test.
Among the 101 GFP+ neurosphere clones derived from NICD OE mice and 102 GFP+ clones from control mice, the integration site of the lentiviral genome was identified in 64 and 68 clones, respectively. Among the 64 clones derived from the NICD OE mice, 29 clones contributed progeny cells to the OB (OBtotal NSCs, 45.31%), and of these, 6 clones also contributed cells to the RMS (RMS/OB NSCs) (representative examples are shown in Fig. 6B, Clone #19-14-28 was OBonly NSC and Clone #19-14-26 was RMS/OB NSC). In addition, cells from one clone were present only in the RMS (RMS NSCs). Among the 68 clones derived from control mice, 19 clones were OBtotal NSCs (27.94%), and of these, 4 clones were RMS/OB NSCs (Fig. 6C). Our analysis indicated that NSCs in the SEZ of NICD OE mice provided new neurons to the OB significantly more frequently than did those of control mice (P = 0.047 by Fisher’s exact test).
We found that 5 pairs of clones in the NICD OE brain (15.63%) (for example, Clones #21–5-8/19 in Fig. 6B) and 3 pairs of clones in brains from control mice (8.82%) shared the same integration site (Duplicate NSCs). Although not statistically significant (P = 0.290 by Fisher’s exact test), this increase in the frequency of Duplicate NSCs in NICD OE mice could be explained in at least two ways. First, NICD overexpression could enhance symmetric expansive divisions of NSCs. However, we think that this possibility is unlikely given that the number of NSCs in NICD OE mice was significantly lower than that in control mice (Fig. 3A), and that 4 or more clones, resulting from at least two symmetric divisions, never shared the same integration site in the over 300 neurosphere clones analyzed in previous and current studies18,19. Alternatively, NICD-overexpressing NSCs could undergo asymmetric division more frequently than control NSCs. After asymmetric division, both daughter cells can still form neurospheres in vitro for a while (hence, Duplicate NSCs). Then, one daughter cell remains undifferentiated as a neurosphere-forming NSC, while the other differentiated via TACs and provides progeny cells to the RMS only (RMSonly NSCs at this stage), and then, to the OB (RMS/OB NSCs) (Fig. 6D). After cessation of the cell supply to the RMS/OB, the daughter NSCs were labeled as OBonly NSCs. We found that the percentages of Duplicate and OB NSCs were relatively constant over time (Fig. 6E, F). Accordingly, the latter possibility is more likely because the percentages of Duplicate NSCs, RMStotal NSCs, and OBtotal NSCs in the brains of NICD OE mice were 1.77-fold, 1.86-fold and 1.62-fold, respectively, higher than those in the control brains (Fig. 6C).
The above results suggest that the cell supply to the OB is enhanced in NICD OE mice. To test this possibility, we first estimated cell numbers provided by each NSC clone using quantitative nested PCR with primers targeting the clone integration site18. NICD-overexpressing OB NSCs and control OB NSCs provided 2,461 ± 959 and 725 ± 307 (mean ± SEM) progeny cells, respectively, to the OB (P = 0.1833 by unpaired Student’s t-test) (Fig. 6G). We next measured DNA content and calculated the number of cells in each OB. The OB in NICD OE mice contained significantly more cells than did OB from control mice (P = 0.0243 by unpaired Student’s t-test) (Fig. 6H). This lineage tracing data support a model in which NICD overexpression drives NSC cell division and differentiation more actively towards the OB lineage, thus increasing OB neuronal output at the expense of accelerated NSC depletion.
Altered olfactory function of NICD OE mice
To determine whether NICD overexpression affects basic olfactory function, we conducted a hidden cookie test (Fig. 7A). Both NICD OE and control mice demonstrated comparable latencies in locating and consuming a hidden butter cookie (P = 0.5833 by Mann–Whitney test). We next examined sensitivity to non-social odorants (vanilla extract with vanillin as the primary ingredient and banana extract with isoamyl acetate) in a cotton-tip olfactory threshold test (Fig. 7B). We compared sniffing time in each trial of each concentration session (Fig. 7C, D). Both NICD OE and control mice showed significant sniffing response to vanilla and banana at the dilution range of 1:2,500 and 1:500 (Fig. 7C, D). Based on these results, we performed a habituation/dishabituation assay using two non-social odors (vanilla and banana at 1:1,000 dilution) and two social odors (urine from the opposite and same genders) (Fig. 7E–G). Habituation is olfactory adaptation defined by a progressive decrease in olfactory investigation towards a repeated presentation of the same odor stimuli, whereas dishabituation is olfactory discrimination defined by a reinstatement of investigation when a novel odor is presented27. For the non-social odors, NICD OE and control mice exhibited effective habituation across all odor sessions (Fig. 7F, G). In the dishabituation session of non-social odors, control mice showed significant increase of sniffing time to odor transitions (Fig. 7F) (water T3 vs vanilla T1, P = 0.0022; vanilla T3 vs banana T1, P < 0.0001 by one-way RM-ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test). Contrary to this observation, NICD OE mice showed little difference only in the transition from water T3 to vanilla T1 (P = 0.1040 by one-way RM-ANOVA). For the social odors, both mice showed significant dishabituation (Fig. 7G), indicating that the response to the social smell was preserved in NICD OE mice. Thus, these results suggest that NICD OE mice showed no apparent deficit as for the sensitivity to non-social and social odors but that NICD OE mice exhibited less dishabituation response than control mice.
Fig. 7.

Altered odor behavior in NICD OE mice. (A) Schematic representation of the hidden cookie test. Mice were assessed for latency in locating and consuming a butter cookie hidden under 4 cm of bedding. n = 14 (6 males and 8 females) and 8 (3 males and 5 females) for Control and NICD OE mice, respectively. (B) Schematic representation of a cotton-tip olfactory threshold test. The test was conducted at one concentration per day over 5 consecutive days, in order of increasing concentration (i.e., decreasing dilutions: 1:50,000, 1:10,000, 1:5,000, 1:2,500, and 1:500). Odor presentation in each session consisted of three trials (T1–T3). (C, D) Sniffing time during each trial across different dilutions for vanilla (C) and banana (D) in the cotton-tip olfactory threshold test. Data were analyzed by one-way repeated ANOVA between trials or two-way ANOVA between groups, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. n = 8 per group, except at 1:50,000 dilution (n = 5 per group). (E) Experimental setup for the habituation and dishabituation test. Mice were sequentially presented with water (baseline), non-social odors (vanilla and banana at 1:1,000 dilution), and social odors (urine from opposite and same gender). Each odor was presented for 2 min over three trials (T1, T2, and T3). (F, G) Sniffing time of each trial and total sniffing time for non-social (F) and social (G) odors were measured. Data were analyzed by one-way repeated ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison test. Data represent the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001. ns, not statistical.
Discussion
Consistent with results of previous studies regarding Notch signaling in neural precursor cells, our in vitro experiments suggest that activation of Notch signaling enhances NSC self-renewal in the adult brain. On the other hand, our in vivo analysis indicates that the number of quiescent NSCs in the SEZ of NICD OE mice decreases more rapidly over the animal’s lifespan than that of control mice. This apparent inconsistency could be explained by the ability of NICD overexpression to induce a transition of NSCs from a dormant/quiescent state to an active state while suppressing further differentiation supposing the consumption of most, if not all, active NSCs after divisions. Indeed, our lentiviral integration site-mediated clonal analysis showing the 1.77-fold and 1.86-fold increase of transient Duplicate NSC and RMStotal NSC populations, respectively, support this idea. Activation of Notch signaling drives neural precursor cell proliferation in culture and in the mouse postnatal brain28,29, further supporting the former possibility. The fate of active NSCs is not well understood. After divisions (hence, active NSCs), daughter cells may have one of at least three fates: (i) two or more quiescent NSCs, (ii) one quiescent NSC and one or more TACs, and (iii) two or more TACs. The lentivirus-mediated lineage-tracing studies suggest that the first scenario is unlikely because clonal expansion of NSCs in the adult brain is extremely rare, and perhaps non-existent18,19. We think that the second scenario is also unlikely because the number of OB-NSCs is relatively stable, suggesting that quiescent NSCs that provide neurons to the OB do not accumulate over the lifespan of the animal. Our previous study suggests that most, if not all, NSCs that had undergone asymmetric division were destined to be consumed within ~ 7 weeks19. We therefore speculate that sustained NICD OE forces quiescent NSCs into an active state without replenishing the dormant pool. Such accelerated activation would transiently increase precursor output but progressively reduce the long-term neurogenic reservoir. This model aligns with studies demonstrating that excessive stem cell activation can lead to premature exhaustion in multiple tissues30. It is also possible that NICD overexpression alters differentiation potential of NSCs as suggested by the in vitro and in vivo differentiation assay. Whether or not NICD-overexpressing NSCs contribute not only to the classical neurogenic regions but also to other brain regions remains to be investigated.
Adult-born neurons in the hippocampal DG are thought to contribute to pattern separation, cognitive flexibility, and memory updating, particularly during their immature, hyperexcitable phase31–33. Our behavioral analyses suggest that hippocampus-dependent spatial and emotional memories are impaired in NICD OE mice. We observed preservation of remote memory expression but reduction of recent hippocampus-dependent memory expression, suggesting the involvement of differential circuits. As a recent memory relies heavily on hippocampal function34, it may seem counterintuitive that remote memory appears to be more stable than recent memory. However, over time, the process of systems consolidation wherein information is transferred from the hippocampus to the prefrontal cortex24,35 may allow the NICD OE mice to reach a performance ceiling that is similar to that of the controls, albeit via a less efficient pathway. This suggests that Notch signaling specifically modulates the early, highly plastic stages of memory formation rather than the long-term cortical storage, although this interpretation should be directly tested.
As the neural precursor cell population in the SGZ was significantly reduced in NICD OE mice, it is possible that the functional impact may stem from an impairment in the maturation of these newborn neurons. In this context, exhaustion of the NSC reservoir could compromise cognitive flexibility and the ability to update contextual representations. However, our findings should be interpreted with caution because chronic Dox treatment affects neurogenesis and function of the adult hippocampus36. Moreover, NICD overexpression in other cell types than new-born neurons may contribute to the altered spatial and emotional memories. Astrocytes and oligodendrocyte precursor cells in the cortex and other regions respond to external stimuli and express Nestin37,38. Our study cannot exclude a possibility that those cells transiently upregulated Nestin when the mice received tamoxifen injection and that their function was affected by the NICD overexpression. In addition, activation of Notch signaling could affect dendritic arborization and synaptic plasticity of mature neurons29,39,40. These possibilities are not mutually exclusive, and distinguishing among them will require additional approaches.
On the other hand, the OB of NICD OE mice contains more than double the number of cells as the control OB, possibly due to the accumulation of an enhanced cell supply from the NSCs in the SEZ. Although NICD OE mice exhibited impaired discrimination between familiar and novel conspecifics supported by our three-chamber social interaction data, their normal sniffing duration toward conspecific urine indicates that their basic olfactory detection remained intact. This apparent discrepancy suggests that the deficit does not arise from a primary sensory impairment, but rather from altered higher-order processing within the olfactory bulb circuitry41. Adult-born neurons in the OB have been implicated in fine odor discrimination and pattern separation, which are critical processes for distinguishing between similar social odours42,43. While the observed attenuation in non-social odor dishabituation was moderate and characteristic common in dishabituation assays it remains highly consistent with previous literature linking altered OB neurogenesis to subtle habituation/dishabituation deficits41,44. Therefore, NICD overexpression may impair the maturation or functional integration of these neurons, leading to reduced discrimination, specifically in social interaction and non-social odor dishabituation, despite preserved odor detection. Alternatively, NICD overexpression in other cell types than OB neurons may contribute to the altered olfaction because NSCs in the SEZ of postnatal brains provide a few astrocytes to the cortex45. While our findings are in accordance with a model in which NSC depletion is associated with the observed behavioral phenotypes, the possibility that these phenotypes arise in parallel from broader effects of sustained Notch activation cannot be excluded. Furthermore, the behavioral phenotype may additionally reflect changes in social memory or associative learning rather than purely olfactory dysfunction, as social recognition requires the integration of both odor encoding and memory retrieval46–48. Further investigation is necessary to clarify how prolonged Notch activity alters the fate and functional integration of adult-born neurons, to evaluate the dendrite and axon structures and synaptic formation of adult-born neurons in the OB and GCL of NICD OE mice, and to determine whether restoring normal Notch dynamics can rescue the observed behavioral alterations.
Conclusion
Collectively, these findings reveal that sustained activation of the Notch signaling pathway profoundly disrupts the finely tuned balance between quiescent and activated states of adult NSCs. Persistent NICD overexpression initially drives aberrant NSC activation but ultimately exhausts the stem cell reservoir, leading to impaired adult neurogenesis in both the SEZ and DG of the hippocampus. The results highlight the critical importance of appropriate regulation of Notch signaling rather than its sustained activation for maintaining long-term NSC homeostasis and supporting the continual neuronal turnover that is essential for cognitive and social functions. Chronic Notch activation in Nestin-lineage cells also results in selective deficits in hippocampal-dependent spatial and contextual memory, as well as compromised social recognition.
Methods
Animals and transgenic models
The Animal Care and Use Committee of Shiga University of Medical Science approved the use and care of the animals in this study (permission No. 2020–1-3, 2022–1-1, and 2023–12-2), which was performed in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines. All animals were maintained at 24 °C with a 12-h light–dark cycle and free access to water and food. The animals were housed in cages lined with wood bedding with a maximum of 5 animals per cage. Nestin-Cre transgenic (tg) mice49, Nestin-CreER tg mice50, R26-rtTA knockin (KI) mice (R26-M2rtTA; TetOP-H2B-GFP, #016,836, Jackson Lab), αCamKII-tTA tg mice51 (#007,004, Jackson Lab), and TRE-loxP-DsRed2-loxP-c-Myc-NICD tg mice on a C57BL/6 J genetic background were maintained by mating with C57BL/6 J mice (Japan SLC, Japan). To induce recombination, 6-week-old mice received two 10 mg doses, administered via oral gavage every other day, of 50 mg/mL tamoxifen (T006000, Nacalai Tesque, Japan) dissolved in sesame oil (25,620–65, Nacalai Tesque). Subsequently, for NICD induction, mice were given normal chow supplemented with doxycycline [2 g doxycycline/kg chow (2000 ppm), 5ST2-5001, TestDiet] continuously until sacrifice. DNA was obtained from the tip of the tail and Nestin-CreER tg mice were genotyped by PCR as previously described49. Genotypes of αCamKII-tTA tg and R26-rtTA KI mice were determined according to the manufacturer’s protocol. TRE-loxP-DsRed2-loxP-c-Myc-NICD tg mice were genotyped by PCR using TRE-A1 and DsRed-B1 primers. Primers used for genotyping are summarized in Table S1. Littermate mice were used in this study unless otherwise described.
Immunohistochemistry
Mice were deeply anesthetized with 100 mg/kg ketamine (1119400A2038, Daiichisankyo, 10 mg/mL in PBS) and 10 mg/kg xylazine (80,504,001, Bayer, 1 mg/mL in PBS) in PBS i.p. and then perfused transcardially before fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde (162–16,065, FUJIFILM Wako). Brains were post-fixed with the same fixative solution overnight followed by 15% and 30% sucrose in PBS at 4 °C. Coronal cryosections (20 μm thick) of adult brains made using a Leica cryostat (CM3050S) were used for immunochemistry analyses. Briefly, cryosections were boiled in 10 mM citrate buffer, pH 6.0 for 5 min. Brain sections were permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 (25,987–85, Nacalai) for 5 min at room temperature and then blocked with Blocking-One (25,987–85, Nacalai) for 1 h. The primary antibodies used were anti-BrdU rat polyclonal antibody (1:1000, OBT0030CX, Bio-Rad), anti-NeuN mouse monoclonal antibody (1:500, Clone A60, MAB377, Millipore), anti-GFAP rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:1000, 16,825–1, Proteintech), anti-c-Myc mouse monoclonal antibody (1:500, Clone 9E10, SC-40, Santa Cruz) and anti-S100β rabbit polyclonal antibody (1:500, ab41548, Abcam) that were incubated with the sections overnight at 4 °C. On the next day, after extensive washing with PBS and PBS-T, the sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-, 594-, or 647-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen), followed by counterstaining of cell nuclei with Hoechst 33,342 (1 µg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich). Apoptotic cell death was assessed by TUNEL assay (G3250, Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. TUNEL+ cells were identified based on nuclear-localized fluorescence. As TUNEL+ cells were rarely observed, we manually counted in defined regions (olfactory bulb, lateral ventricle, and dentate gyrus). Data are presented as the number of TUNEL-positive cells per section. Images were obtained with an Olympus microscope (Olympus BX51; Olympus) and digital camera system (Olympus DP70; Olympus) or a confocal laser-scanning microscope (TCS SP-8; Leica) with 10x, 20 × or 40 × objective lenses.
RT-qPCR
Total RNA (0.5–1.0 µg) isolated using a RNeasy Mini kit (74,104, QIAGEN) was reverse-transcribed with an oligo(dT) primer (18,418,012, Invitrogen) and ReverTra Ace (TRT-101, Toyobo) to synthesize cDNA. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis using a Light-Cycler system (Roche) was carried out according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The primers used in this study are summarized in Table S1.
Neurosphere assay
The detailed protocol for generating neurospheres in vitro from adult mouse brains was described previously52,53. Briefly, mice were deeply anesthetized with 100 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine i.p., followed by cervical dislocation. Brains were aseptically excised and each brain was placed into oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid. The lateral and medial portion of the SEZ surrounding the lateral ventricles was dissected and the tissue was treated with an enzyme solution [1.33 mg/mL trypsin, 0.67 mg/mL hyaluronidase and 0.2 mg/mL kynurenic acid (all from Sigma)] for 1 h at 37 °C to facilitate tissue dissociation. The tissue was then triturated in SFM containing trypsin inhibitor (Roche) with a fire-polished Pasteur pipette. Single cells were cultured in 24-well and 6-well plates at a density of 5 cells/μL in SFM containing 10 ng/mL fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), 2 μg/mL heparin, and 20 ng/mL epidermal growth factor (EGF) (all from Sigma-Aldrich). After culturing for 6 days in vitro, the number of floating spherical colonies (neurospheres) having a diameter greater than 0.1 mm as measured with a scale equipped in the eyepiece lens was counted. The total number of neurosphere-forming NSCs in the adult brain was calculated using the formula [number of resultant neurospheres in the 24-well plate culture] x [volume in which SEZ cells were suspended (usually 600 μL)] / [volume applied in the culture]54.
To assess self-renewal, primary single neurospheres were mechanically dissociated into single cells in 0.2 mL of SFM containing FGF2, EGF and heparin, and then subcloned in 96-well (0.2 mL/well) plates (Falcon). NSC self-renewal in vitro was assessed by identifying new neurospheres after further culture for 7 days. For lentiviral infectants, primary single neurospheres expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP) were picked up under a fluorescent microscope, mechanically dissociated into single cells, and then subcloned in 48-well (0.3 mL/well) plates (Falcon). The resulting GFP+ neurospheres were serially passaged and amplified in larger dishes until a sufficient number of neurospheres was obtained (usually 3 passages). Genomic DNA was extracted by proteinase K treatment.
To assess multipotential capability, single neurospheres were transferred to individual cover slips, which had been serially coated with 0.1% polyethyleneimine (Sigma) in borate buffer (pH 8.4) and then with Matrigel basement membrane matrix (0.6 mg/ml in SFM; BD Biosciences), and cultured in SFM containing 1% FBS (Life Technologies). Cells were processed 6 days later using immunocytochemistry as described previously14. We used anti-βIII tubulin mouse monoclonal (IgG) (1:1000; T8660, Sigma), anti-GFAP rabbit polyclonal (IgG), and O4 mouse monoclonal (IgM) (1:10; a kind gift of Dr. K. Ono) antibodies as primary, then followed by appropriate Alexa-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen). Cultures were counter labeled with the nuclear stain Hoechst 33,258 (1 μg/ml; 94,403, Sigma).
Here quiescent NSCs were defined as cells in the SEZ that respond to FGF-2 and EGF and proliferate to form neurospheres in vitro. Dormant NSCs were defined as cells that retained the potential to convert to quiescent NSCs but cannot be detected in the neurosphere assay.
5-Bromo-2′-deoxyuridine short-term and long-term labeling
Mice were given 50 mg/kg 5-bromo-2’-deoxyuridine (BrdU; 05,650–24, Nacalai Tesque ) dissolved in PBS and delivered i.p. A total of five injections were delivered at 3 h intervals. For long term labelling, mice received injections beginning at 15 weeks of age and were sacrificed 4 weeks later. For short term labelling, mice received injections at 19 weeks of age and were sacrificed 1 h later. All animals were sacrificed at 19 weeks old. The total number of BrdU+ cells in the SEZ and DG was estimated using the optical dissector method55. We determined the total number of BrdU+ cells in the rostro-caudal axis of SEZ within an area encompassing from the genu of corpus callosum and extending caudally to the rostral tip of the crossing of the anterior commissure. For the DG, the number of BrdU⁺ cells in the subgranular zone (SGZ) and granule cell layer (GCL) ranging from the first emergence of DG to the corpus callosum separation, was determined and corresponds to 5–7 sections of positive cells within the regions of interest.
Behavioral assessments
Behavioral tests began when the mice were 10 weeks old. The open field, startle response and prepulse inhibition response, three-chamber social interaction, Barnes maze, and contextual fear conditioning tests were performed sequentially with a one-week interval between each test56. These routine behavioral batteries were performed across 8 independent littermate groups. All apparatus and software were set up and the tests conducted in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (O’Hara & Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Tests were conducted during the daytime in a soundproof behavioral room. All behavioral testing including the subsequent olfactory bulb behavior assessments utilized a control group consisting of wild-type, Nestin-CreER, and TRE-loxP-DsRed2-loxP-NICD mice and NICD OE mice without doxycycline treatment. Both male (n = 48) and female (n = 25) mice were used to ensure generalizability of findings. Preliminary analysis revealed no significant sex-dependent variation in behavioral performance. Therefore, data from both sexes were pooled for statistical analyses. This approach is supported by previous studies reporting minimal or no significant sex differences in these behavioral assays57–60. To ensure consistency in animal handling, the same investigators performed all tasks including husbandry, group allocation, and execution of behavioral assays. Consequently, the investigators were not blinded to the treatment groups during the experimental phase.
Open field test
The open field apparatus comprised a 40 cm-square gray arena enclosed by 30 cm-high walls housed in a soundproof chamber. The center of the floor was illuminated at 70 lx. Ten-week-old mice were individually placed in the center of the arena and allowed to explore freely for 10 min. Their behavior was recorded using a video tracking system and infrared photobeam sensors. Horizontal activity (total distance), vertical activity (number of rearing behaviors measured by counting the number of photobeam interruptions), and time spent in the central region were analyzed. Total distance was used as an index of locomotor activity in a novel environment, and the percentage of time spent in the central area was used as an index of anxiety.
Three-chamber social interaction
Sociability and social novelty preferences assessments were conducted in a gray experimental cage that was divided into a three-chambered box (61 × 40 × 22 cm). Each chamber was 20 × 40 × 22 cm, and the dividing walls were transparent Plexiglas with small square openings (5 × 3 cm) that allowed access into each chamber. Before the actual test, the mice were placed in the center chamber and allowed to habituate freely in all three empty chambers for 10 min. To assess sociability, an unfamiliar C57BL/67 mouse (Stranger 1) that had had no prior contact with the subject mouse was enclosed in a wire cage that was placed in the left chamber, while the chamber on the right side remained empty. In the next test session representing the social novelty phase, a second unfamiliar mouse (Stranger 2) of the same strain was placed in the chamber on the right side. Each test session was performed by placing the subject mouse in the center chamber and then allowing it to explore and choose between the now familiar mouse (Stranger 1) and the newly introduced unfamiliar mouse (Stranger 2). To focus on social affiliation rather than mating behavior, mice of the same sex and similar age were used as strangers in both sessions. Time spent in proximity to each cage over a 5-min session was recorded and used as an indicator of sociability and social preference. The location of the stranger was exchanged between trials.
Startle response and prepulse inhibition response
To measure sensorimotor gating, startle response and prepulse inhibition tests were conducted. An individual mouse was placed into a plexiglass cylinder chamber and put on an acceleration sensor inside a sound attenuating box. The experiment began with 1-min acclimation period with a background white noise of 60 dB. After acclimation, mice were exposed to two blocks of trials. Block 1 was a startle-pulse alone (115 dB) and Block 2 involved PPI trials consisting of randomized prepulse intensities (70 dB, 74 dB, 78 dB and 82 dB) and with/without a startle pulse alone for 20 ms. The prepulse inhibition percentage (%PPI) was calculated as %PPI = (mean startle of pulse alone mean startle of prepulse / mean startle of pulse alone) × 100.
Barnes maze
To assess spatial learning and memory, a Barnes maze test was conducted over a two-week period. The test was begun when mice were 13 weeks old and conducted before the fear conditioning test. The apparatus consisted of a white circular platform (1 m in diameter) with 16 holes equally distributed around the perimeter; one hole was equipped with an escape box. Mice underwent habituation with a maximum escape latency of 15 min to familiarize themselves with the apparatus. Following habituation, each mouse was placed at the center of the platform, and the latency time to find and enter the escape box was recorded. The acquisition phase included nine training sessions conducted twice daily (with a 2 h inter-session interval), in which each training session comprised three trials. To evaluate spatial memory using distal environmental room cues, a 3-min probe trial without the escape box was performed exactly 4 h after the final training session. Two days after completion of the previous training, the reversal learning task was conducted to assess cognitive flexibility. The target escape box was relocated to a new position opposite the original target hole. This was followed by another nine training sessions and a subsequent probe trial, conducted according to the same procedures as the previous paradigm.
Contextual fear conditioning test
The chamber used for the conditioning training and contextual test was a rectangular transparent Plexiglas chamber (width × depth × height: 34 × 26 × 29 cm, 200 lx). The chamber floor consisted of 46 stainless steel rods with a diameter of 2 mm that were placed 4 mm apart and equipped with a ceiling-mounted CCD camera connected to a video monitor. A shock generator was connected to the rods via a cable harness. The training (conditioning) session consisted of three tone-shock pairings. Fifteen-week-old mice were placed into the bright rectangular chamber and allowed to explore freely for 2 min. A tone stimulus (auditory cue; 55 dB white noise) was presented as the conditioned stimulus (CS) for 30 s, and was followed by a mild foot shock (aversive stimulus, 2 s, 0.5 mA) as the unconditioned stimulus (US). Two subsequent CS–US pairings were administered at 2-min intervals. The contextual fear conditioning test was evaluated at 1 day (recent memory) and 28 days (remote memory) after the training. During the contextual test, the same mice were re-exposed to the same conditioning chamber for 5 min in the absence of CS-US. Freezing behavior was defined as a lack of movement for > 2 s as measured by video tracking software. The percentage of time spent freezing was used as an index of fear memory during all sessions.
Olfactory behavior—hidden cookie test
Distinct from the previous order of behavioral paradigms, the olfactory behavior battery comprising hidden cookie, threshold olfactory cotton tip tests and habituation/dishabituation tests was conducted when the mice were between 10 and 14 weeks of age. These additional tests were prompted by the observation of substantial cellular accumulation in the olfactory bulb after lineage tracing analysis, resulting in a different sample size from the other tasks. Experiments were performed with two independent littermate groups. During the hidden cookie test, mice were first habituated to butter cookies in the home cage overnight. The next day, the mice were deprived of food for 18–24 h. The test was conducted in a new cage. A piece of butter cookie (0.8 g) was placed in a random corner of the cage, and then the entire cage floor was covered with wood chip bedding to a depth of 4 cm. The subject mouse was then placed into the cage, and the latency to find the cookie was recorded with a maximum time limit of 10 min. We defined finding the cookie as when the mouse ate the cookie.
Olfactory behavior—cotton-tip olfactory threshold test
This test was performed with varying concentrations of non-social odors (vanilla and banana). Odorants were freshly diluted with Milli-Q water to 1:500, 1:2,500, 1:5,000, 1:10,000, and 1:50,000. The assessment was conducted over consecutive days, with a 24-h interval between each concentration, as adapted from a previous protocol61. The daily testing procedure followed the described habituation/dishabituation paradigm, in which the mice were exposed to a cotton swab saturated with 50 μL of a specific odor dilution for three consecutive trials, separated by an inter-session interval of 1–2 min.
Olfactory behavior—habituation/dishabituation test
The protocols were adapted from previously published studies27,62. Prior to the test, mice were acclimated to a new cage containing cotton tips for 30 min. Mice were then tested with five olfactory cues: Milli Q water as a baseline; two non-social odors (vanilla and banana); and two social odors (urine from the opposite and same gender). For non-social odors, banana and vanilla extract from McCormick & Company Inc., Hunt Valley and Home Made, Kyoritsu Foods, respectively, were used. The solutions were kept at room temperature and were freshly diluted 1:1000 with Milli Q. Mice were exposed to a cotton swab soaked with 50 μL water or an odor solution for three trials (T1, T2 and T3) with 2 min per trial. Sniffing behavior was defined as the mouse orienting its nose within approximately 1 cm of the cotton-tip. For each course of an odor exposure, the mouse was given a 2 min inter-session period that was an adequate amount of time to change to a subsequent odor. New clean cotton swabs were used for each trial and each session. For social odors, urine from male and female mice was used. Urine samples were collected twice in the early morning and evening from 10 different mice of each gender. A mixture of fresh urine was collected with a sterile Pasteur pipette into the sterile tube. The collected urine was diluted 1:3 with Milli Q and frozen until further use. Each experimental group was first exposed to urine from the opposite sex (e.g., males exposed to female urine and females exposed to male urine), and then urine from the same sex group was presented.
Preparation of GFP‐expressing lentivirus and lentivirus infection
Generation of the lentiviral plasmid vector pCL20c‐MSCV‐GFP-2LoxP and vesicular stomatitis virus‐G protein pseudotyped lentivirus production has been previously described18,19. Newborn NICD OE pups and littermate control mice were anesthetized by brief inhalation of isoflurane (FUJIFILM Wako) using the open-drop method and hypothermia, typically 1 min on ice until no spontaneous movement was observed. Lentivirus solution (1 µL) containing 1.0 × 105 TU virus and 0.1% Fast Green was injected stereotactically into the right lateral ventricle using a Hamilton syringe with a 30G needle. The pups were gently warmed to restore normal body temperature and returned to the dam. No analgesics or antibiotics were used because only minimal needle holes were made using a 27G needle to the skin and cranium and a 30G needle to the cortex, and neither hemorrhage nor infection was observed during or after the surgery. We monitored the pups daily to assess general movements and body weight gain.
Inverse PCR
The protocol for inverse PCR has been previously described19. Briefly, genomic DNA from clonally amplified GFP+ neurospheres was digested with 4-base cutter restriction enzymes. DNA fragments were self-ligated with T4 DNA ligase (Takara Bio) and the resulting DNA mixture was subjected to nested PCR. We used a pair of primers, LTR-A1 and LTR-B2, for the first amplification and another pair of primers, LTR-A2 and LTR-B1, for the second PCR (Table S1). Amplified DNA fragments were sequenced to determine the lentiviral integration site. Two integration site-specific primers from the mouse genome were synthesized, and nested PCR was carried out with the appropriate primers within the lentiviral DNA to detect the presence of lentiviral DNA at the integration site. Deletion of DsRed2 from the TRE-loxP-DsRed2-loxP-NICD transgene were determined by PCR using TRE-A1 and NICD-B4 primers.
Calculation of NSC consumption probability by age
Means of total numbers of neurosphere-forming NSCs in hemispheres from 10-week- to 26-week-old mice were converted to common logarithm numbers. Subsequently, a reduction rate per week was calculated by a simple linear regression model (Prism 8 for Mac OS, ver. 8.4.3). The slope value was converted to a probability of the reduction in NSC numbers per week.
Data analysis
Statistical analysis was performed in GraphPad Prism 10 using one-way or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s, Bonferroni’s, or Dunn’s post hoc comparisons. If applicable, we used an unpaired two-tailed Mann–Whitney test, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test, Student’s t-test or Fisher’s exact test. Normality of the data was analyzed by Shapiro–Wilk test. Data represent mean ± SEM. The level of significance was set at *P < 0.05.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Ryoichiro Kageyama (Kyoto University) for Nestin-Cre and Nestin-CreER mice, Dr. Katsuhiko Ono (Kyoto Prefectual University of Medicine) for O4 antibody, Dr. Natsu Koyama for her advice on behavioral experiments and all the staff of the Research Center for Animal Life Science and Central Research Laboratory at Shiga University of Medical Science for their technical support.
Abbreviations
- ANOVA
Analysis of variance
- BrdU
5-Bromo-2′-deoxyuridine
- Dox
Doxycycline
- EGF
Epidermal growth factor
- FGF-2
Fibroblast growth factor-2
- GFAP
Glial fibrillary acidic protein
- GFP
Green fluorescent protein
- KI
Knockin
- LTR
Long terminal repeat
- NICD
Notch1 intracellular domain
- NSCs
Neural stem cells
- OB
Olfactory bulb
- 4-OHT
4-Hydroxytamoxifen
- RMS
Rostral migratory stream
- rtTA
Reverse tetracycline transactivator
- SEZ
Subependymal zone
- SFM
Serum-free media
- SGZ
Subgranular zone
- TAC
Transit amplifying cell
- tg
Transgenic
- TU
Titer unit
Author contributions
SH designed the research. NAFMA, NM, KD and SH performed the research. NAFMA, NM and SH analyzed the data and prepared the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) (16H04671) and Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (22K19359) (S. H.) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan and a Grant from SENSHIN Medical Research Foundation (S.H.).
Data availability
This study did not generate new unique reagents. Further information and requests for resources, analysis and methodology should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the corresponding author.
Code availability
All data reported in this paper will be shared by the corresponding author upon request. This paper does not report original code. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the corresponding author upon request this paper is available from the corresponding author upon request.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Lasky, J. L. & Wu, H. Notch signaling, brain development, and human disease. Pediatr. Res.57, 104R-109R (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gonzalez, R. & Reinberg, D. The Notch pathway: A guardian of cell fate during neurogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.95, 102543 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Murtaugh, L. C., Stanger, B. Z., Kwan, K. M. & Melton, D. A. Notch signaling controls multiple steps of pancreatic differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA100, 14920–14925 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Villanueva, A. et al. Notch signaling is activated in human hepatocellular carcinoma and induces tumor formation in mice. Gastroenterology143, 1660–1669 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tardivon, D. et al. Notch signaling promotes disease initiation and progression in murine chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood137, 3079–3092 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lampada, A. & Taylor, V. Notch signaling as a master regulator of adult neurogenesis. Front. Neurosci.17, 1179011 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dong, H. et al. Genetic deletion of Rnd3 in neural stem cells promotes proliferation via upregulation of Notch signaling. Oncotarget8, 91112–91122 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gage, F. H. Mammalian neural stem cells. Science287, 1433–1438 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Imayoshi, I., Sakamoto, M., Yamaguchi, M., Mori, K. & Kageyama, R. Essential roles of Notch signaling in maintenance of neural stem cells in developing and adult brains. J. Neurosci.30, 3489–3498 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mizutani, K., Yoon, K., Dang, L., Tokunaga, A. & Gaiano, N. Differential Notch signalling distinguishes neural stem cells from intermediate progenitors. Nature449, 351–355 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ables, J. L., Breunig, J. J., Eisch, A. J. & Rakic, P. Not(ch) just development: Notch signalling in the adult brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.12, 269–283 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Costa, R. M., Honjo, T. & Silva, A. J. Involvement of Notch signaling in hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA100, 6734–6739 (2003). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Alberi, L. et al. Activity-induced Notch signaling in neurons requires Arc/Arg3.1 and is essential for synaptic plasticity in hippocampal networks. Neuron444, 437–444 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hitoshi, S. et al. Notch pathway molecules are essential for the maintenance, but not for the generation, of mammalian neural stem cells. Genes Dev.16, 846–858 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nye, J. S., Kopan, R. & Axel, R. An activated Notch suppresses neurogenesis and myogenesis but not gliogenesis in mammalian cells. Development120, 2421–2430 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nakamura, Y. et al. The bHLH gene Hes1 as a repressor of the neuronal commitment of CNS stem cells. J. Neurosci.20, 283–293 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hatakeyama, J. et al. Hes genes regulate size, shape and histogenesis of the nervous system by control of the timing of neural stem cell differentiation. Development131, 5539–5550 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tanaka, A. et al. Life-long neural stem cells are fate-specified at an early developmental stage. Cereb. Cortex30, 6415–6425 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zaki, Z. M. M., Kuroda, A., Morimura, N., Hayashi, Y. & Hitoshi, S. Depletion of transit amplifying cells in the adult brain does not affect quiescent neural stem cell pool size. J. Physiol. Sci.73, 19 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Higashi, M., Maruta, N., Bernstein, A., Ikenaka, K. & Hitoshi, S. Mood stabilizing drugs expand the neural stem cell pool in the adult brain through activation of Notch signaling. Stem Cells26, 1758–1767 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ihrie, R. A. & Alvarez-Buylla, A. Lake-front property: A unique germinal niche by the lateral ventricles of the adult brain. Neuron70, 674–686 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Morshead, C. M. & van der Kooy, D. Postmitotic death is the fate of constitutively proliferating cells in the subependymal layer of the adult mouse brain. J. Neurosci.12, 249–256 (1992). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Frankland, P. W., Bontempi, B., Talton, L. E., Kogan, L. & Silva, A. J. The involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex in remote contextual fear memory. Science304, 881–883 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kitamura, T. et al. Engrams and circuits crucial for systems consolidation of a memory. Science356, 73–78 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Feierstein, C. E. Linking adult olfactory neurogenesis to social behavior. Front. Neurosci6, 173 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Konefal, S., Elliot, M. & Crescenzi, R. The adaptive significance of adult neurogenesis: An integrative approach. Front. Neuroanat.7, 21 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yang, M., & Crawley, J. N. Simple behavioral assessment of mouse olfaction. Curr. Protoc. Neurosci.48, 8.24.1–8.24.12 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 28.Guentchev, M. & McKay, R. D. Notch signalling regulates stem cell numbers in vitro and in vivo. Nature442, 823–826 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Breunig, J. J., Silbereis, J., Vaccarino, F. M., Sestan, N. & Rakic, P. Notch regulates cell fate and dendrite morphology of newborn neurons in the postnatal dentate gyrus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA104, 20558–20563 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Urbán, N. et al. Return to quiescence of mouse neural stem cells by degradation of Ascl1 with Huwe1. Science353, 272–275 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Clelland, C. D. et al. A functional role for adult hippocampal neurogenesis in spatial pattern separation. Science325, 210–213 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sahay, A. et al. Increasing adult hippocampal neurogenesis is sufficient to improve pattern separation. Nature472, 466–470 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Anacker, C. & Hen,. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis and cognitive flexibility linking memory and mood. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.346, 335–346 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kim, J. J. & Fanselow, M. S. Modality-specific retrograde amnesia of fear. Science256, 675–677 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Frankland, P. W. & Bontempi, B. The organization of recent and remote memories. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.6, 119–130 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sultan, S., Gebara, E. & Toni, N. Doxycycline increases neurogenesis and reduces microglia in the adult hippocampus. Front. Neurosci.7, 131 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shimada, I. S., LeComte, M. D., Granger, J. C., Quinlan, N. J. & Spees, J. L. Self-renewal and differentiation of reactive astrocyte-derived neural stem/progenitor cells isolated from the cortical peri-infarct area after stroke. J. Neurosci.32, 7926–7940 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hayashi, Y. et al. Glial cells missing 1 triggers gliosis and angiogenesis after neonatal brain injury. iScience113860, 113860 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Berezovska, O. et al. Notch1 inhibits neurite outgrowth in postmitotic primary neurons. Neuroscience93, 433–439 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Alberi, L., Hoey, S. E., Brai, E., Scotti, A. L. & Marathe, S. Notch signaling in the brain: In good and bad times. Ageing Res. Rev.12, 801–814 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gheusi, G. et al. Importance of newly generated neurons in the adult olfactory bulb for odor discrimination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA97, 1823–1828 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lazarini, F. & Lledo, P. M. Is adult neurogenesis essential for olfaction?. Trends Neurosc.34, 20–30 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Alonso, M. et al. Activation of adult-born neurons facilitates learning and memory formation. Nat. Neurosci.15, 897–904 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Mouret, A., Lepousez, G., Gras, J., Gabellec, M. M. & Lledo, P. M. Turnover of newborn olfactory bulb neurons optimizes olfaction. J. Neurosci.29, 12302–12314 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Naruse, M. et al. The dorsoventral boundary of the germinal zone is a specialized niche for the generation of cortical oligodendrocytes during a restricted temporal window. Cereb. Cortex26, 2800–2810 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kogan, J. H. et al. Spaced training induces normal long-term memory in CREB mutant mice. Curr. Biol.10, 47–50 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sánchez-Andrade, G. & Kendrick, K. M. The main olfactory system and social recognition in mammals. Behav. Brain Res.200, 323–335 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Okuyama, T., Kitamura, T., Roy, D. S., Itohara, S. & Tonegawa, S. Ventral CA1 neurons store social memory. Science353, 1536–1541 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Isaka, F. et al. Ectopic expression of the bHLH gene Math1 disturbs neural development. Eur. J. Neurosci.11, 2582–2588 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Imayoshi, I., Ohtsuka, T., Metzger, D., Chambon, P. & Kageyama, R. Temporal regulation of Cre recombinase activity in neural stem cells. Genesis44, 233–238 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mayford, M. et al. Control of memory formation through regulated expression of a CaMKII transgene. Science274, 1678–2168 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Reynolds, B. A. & Weiss, S. Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science255, 1707–1710 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hitoshi, S., Kippin, T. & van der Kooy, Culturing adult neural stem cells: Application to the study of neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric pathology. In Neurogenesis in the Adult Brain II: Clinical Implications (eds Seki, T. et al.) 187–207 (Springer, 2011). [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hitoshi, S. et al. Primitive neural stem cells from the mammalian epiblast differentiate to definitive neural stem cells under the control of Notch signaling. Genes. Dev.18, 1806–1811 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Coggeshall, R. E. & Lekan, H. A. Methods for determining numbers of cells and synapses: A case for more uniform standards of review. J. Comp. Neurol.364, 6–15 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Daun, K. A. et al. Early maternal and social deprivation expands neural stem cell population size and reduces hippocampus/amygdala-dependent fear memory. Front. Neurosci.14, 22 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Faraday, M. M. Rat sex and strain differences in responses to stress. Physiol. Behav.75, 507–522 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Moy, S. S. et al. Sociability and preference for social novelty in five inbred strains: An approach to assess autistic-like behavior in mice. Genes Brain Behav.3, 287–302 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Millstein, R. A. & Holmes, A. Effects of repeated psychostimulant administration on behavioral sensitization and social interaction in mice. Neuropsychopharmacol.32, 633–644 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 60.Harrison, F. E., Hosseini, A. H. & McDonald, M. P. Endogenous anxiety and stress responses in water maze and Barnes maze spatial memory tasks. Behav. Brain Res.198, 247–251 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pan, Y.-W., Kuo, C.-T., Storm, D. R. & Xia, Z. Inducible and targeted deletion of the ERK5 MAP kinase in adult neurogenic regions impairs adult neurogenesis in the olfactory bulb and several forms of olfactory behavior. PLoS ONE7, e49622 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Tuma, J., Rana, A.-N., Philip, T., Park, J. B. & Lee, H. Y. Altered olfactory responses in Fmr1 KO mice. Sci. Rep.15, 2952 (2025). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
This study did not generate new unique reagents. Further information and requests for resources, analysis and methodology should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the corresponding author.
All data reported in this paper will be shared by the corresponding author upon request. This paper does not report original code. Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the corresponding author upon request this paper is available from the corresponding author upon request.
