Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Jul 1;21(9):1063–1066. doi: 10.1002/jhm.70386

Supporting graduate medical trainees through parental leave: Best practices for program success

Jessica E Zimo 1, Sarah E Yentz 2, Maria E Theodorou 3,✉
PMCID: PMC13534962  PMID: 42387982

Abstract

Becoming a parent during medical training poses unique challenges. Programs and institutions vary widely in the time away from training and support offered in the peripartum period. Here, we offer four key strategies to support graduate medical trainees through parental leave and upon return to work: program specific policy development, transparent dissemination of policies, flexible peripartum elective offerings, and support of workplace lactation if desired by the trainee. Proactive support from program leadership before, during, and after parental leave can greatly improve trainee wellbeing and help establish a physician workforce well‐equipped to balance the competing priorities experienced by practicing physicians.

INTRODUCTION

Becoming a parent during medical training poses unique challenges. Trainee health and wellbeing are paramount yet must be balanced with meeting institutional and accreditation body training requirements. Parental leave policies for medical trainees are primarily governed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). As of 2022, ACGME Institutional Requirements mandate that all programs offer at least 6 weeks of paid medical, parental, or caregiver leave. 1 The American Medical Association (AMA) recommends a more generous policy of 12 weeks. 2 The ACGME Common Program Requirements for Residency mandate that resident and fellow parents be offered “an appropriate length of absence” for parental leave and that “policies must be implemented without fear of negative consequences for the resident. 3 ” The spirit of these recommendations may, however, conflict with rigid specifications for cumulative time away from training permitted to remain board‐eligible in each medical specialty.

Disparities exist among specialties and by trainee gender. A 2020 analysis showed that plastic surgery and obstetrics/gynecology programs offered longer leaves up to 12 weeks′ duration, whereas the national median was only 5 weeks. 4 In a 2024 study of over 5000 surgical residents, male residents reported pregnancies twice as often as female residents (22.3% vs. 10.2%). 5 This gender disparity is alarming; despite facing equal clinical demands, the decision to have children is unequal.

Evidence suggests this is driven more by training environment culture than by trainee preference. In a cross‐sectional, observational survey of nearly 900 physician mothers across specialties, 32.3% delayed childbearing to complete training. 6 In another survey, 61% of partnered female residents reported delaying childbearing during residency due to a lack of supportive parental leave policies. Only 38% were satisfied with their decision to delay parenting. 7 As medical school admissions grow increasingly competitive, a rising number of applicants take gap years—58% in 2012 up to 65% in 2020. 8 This has led to older medical school matriculants, with 57.4% aged 23–25 in 2024 compared to 51.9% in 2020. 9 This has substantial implications, as rates of both infertility 10 and adverse pregnancy outcomes 11 rise with age.

While work‐life integration in training has improved over the past decade, it remains an intense and demanding period. As the average age of trainees rises, more individuals may choose to have children during training. To support trainees in making this choice, training programs must plan for parental leaves and facilitate smooth transitions back to clinical duties. Here, we highlight the benefits, barriers, and strategies to facilitate successful parental leaves in medical training programs.

Benefits

At the program level, the duration of parental leave represents a critical opportunity to support trainee parents. In a study of over 200 female residents, when compared with residents with shorter maternity leaves, residents with ≥8 weeks of leave experienced less postpartum depression, breastfed longer, and were more satisfied with resident parenthood. 12 Postpartum depression causes maternal suffering and diminished functioning and increases risk of impaired emotional, social, and cognitive development in children. 7 Female residents are already at relatively increased risk for postpartum depression with reported rates ranging from 15% to 50% 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 compared to 13% in the general population. 16

Prolonged breastfeeding has substantial health benefits. Infants that are exclusively breastfed for 6 months have a reduced risk of lower respiratory tract infections, severe diarrhea, otitis media, and childhood obesity. For mothers, breastfeeding beyond 12 months has been linked to lower rates of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer. 17 Despite this, 37% of residents 18 and 58% of trainee surgeons 19 report being unable to meet their lactation goals.

Barriers

A major barrier for trainee parents is inconsistent visibility and comprehensiveness of program leave policies. A 2025 survey of residents across four specialties showed substantial differences in policy and perception of pregnancy during training that impacted resident quality of life. 20 Variable policies can lead to inconsistent implementation and utilization of trainee benefits. Furthermore, inadequate explanation of the interplay between parental leave policy and specialty‐specific allowances for time away from training may limit resident understanding of the potential implication (or lack thereof) of taking parental leave of a given duration on board eligibility.

Limited transparency around parental leave policies perpetuates a taboo which may dissuade trainees from childbearing during training. A 2024 study of orthopedic surgery residencies found that only 6% of programs had publicly accessible parental leave policies; many required residents to directly request policy details, a barrier which could perpetuate gender disparity. 21 In internal medicine residency programs, 86% of program directors reported having a written parental leave policy, but only 43% had program‐specific policies. Program‐level policies are considerably more likely than institutional policies to address scheduling, peer coverage, and training extension requirements. 22

Barriers to standardized parental leave policies exist at the program and trainee level. In a survey of neurology residency program directors, limiting factors included concerns about staffing, equity, and perceived clinical training disruptions. 23 Despite the health benefits of parental leaves ≥8 weeks, financial constraints and fear of extending training deter many trainees from accepting the full duration of leave available. 12

Upon returning to work, trainees face challenges of sleep disruptions and the logistical challenges of integrating childcare with clinical responsibilities. A national survey found that 63% of surgical trainees face difficulties arranging childcare, with the burden falling disproportionately on women. 18 In a multispecialty survey, 72% of trainee parents reported childcare was “at least quite stressful,” and 68.6% reported it contributed to burnout. 24 If lactation is desired, a lack of protected time, colleague support, and private, convenient locations to pump and store breastmilk hinder trainee success 17 , 25

Suggested strategies

Creating standardized program‐specific policies can enhance the transparency and accessibility of parental leave and reduce the mental load of trainee parents (Figure 1). Programs should implement uniform policies meeting a standard of at least 8 weeks of leave for birthing parents and tailored to their own training requirements and staffing needs. Preemptively establishing strategies to address program‐specific staffing issues enables thoughtful and dynamic responses to parental leaves. Express inclusion of specialty‐specific requirements for board eligibility in parental leave policies and allows for shared decision making around the potential implications of parental leave on a trainee′s professional timeline. Specialty requirements change over time and are not uniform across all specialties. Some trainees may accept extension of training or delayed board certification to accommodate longer parental leave if permitted, while others may prioritize completion of training and board certification so as not to delay subspecialty training or entrance into the physician workforce.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Key strategies to support graduate medical trainees through parental leave.

Making policies readily available to prospective and current trainees can inform trainee decisions about childbearing and establish clear coverage expectations, alleviating tension amongst trainees. Creating standard practices and utilizing proactive schedule adjustments over sole reliance on backup call systems facilitate predictable and equitable coverage plans. Publicizing policies that are implemented by designated program leaders may reduce the potential guilt of trainee parents and encourage them to take adequate parental leave. 26

Educational resources for new parents and peer mentorship can help trainees navigate returning to work. Birthing parents‐to‐be should be educated about the benefits of taking at least 8 weeks of parental leave. Hearing the experience of a peer who recently experienced pregnancy during training can normalize parent needs and encourage adequate durations of leave.

Dedicated curriculum can also promote a smooth return to work. Self‐directed remote “Parenting Electives” are widespread among pediatric residencies. 27 Despite the broad clinical relevance of childbearing, similar offerings are uncommon in other specialties. At our internal medicine programs, we developed “Postpartum Electives” addressing reproductive health topics for internists. These rotations utilize a hybrid structure wherein residents learn about peri‐partum healthcare while spending time with their new child.

When residents return to work, program leaders should proactively reduce barriers to lactation. Examples include modifying clinical schedules, offering to communicate with supervisors, and ensuring access to lactation spaces. We recommend that trainee lactation spaces be located close to the clinical work environment and include a workstation. While working during a lactation break should not be required, trainees may feel more comfortable if they have the option to remain connected to patient care during these times.

CONCLUSION

Medical training is a pivotal phase in a physician′s career, and the lack of program‐specific parental leave policies imposes unnecessary burdens on trainees. It is essential that training programs implement standardized, accessible, and supportive leave policies and plans for return to work that allow trainees to thrive professionally and personally. Proactive support from program leadership before, during, and after parental leave can greatly improve trainee wellbeing. Training programs must prioritize parental leave as a necessary step toward a sustainable, equitable future in medicine.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

During the preparation of this work, the authors used Microsoft Copilot to generate clip art for the article′s figure. After using this tool/service, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education . ACGME institutional requirements. 2022. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/800_institutionalrequirements2022.pdf
  • 2.AMA parental leave policy. 2022. https://policysearch.ama-assn.org/policyfinder/detail/H-405.954?uri=%2FAMADoc%2FHOD-405.954.xml
  • 3. ACGME . Common program requirements (residency). 2026. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/2026-prs/cprresidency_2026_feb_revision.pdf
  • 4. Kasemodel K, Hemal K, Chen W, Wallace C, Bourne DA. Evolution in parental leave policies: plastic surgery and obstetrics/gynecology lead the way. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;150(5):1160‐1168. 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Li RD, Janczewski LM, Eng JS, et al. Pregnancy and parenthood among US surgical residents. JAMA Surg. 2024;159(10):1127‐1137. 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.2399 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Judge‐Golden PC, Dotters‐Katz KS, Weber JM, Pieper CF, Gray BA. Parenthood and medical training: challenges and experiences of physician moms in the US. Teach Learn Med. 2024;36(1):43‐52. 10.1080/10401334.2022.2141750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Stack SW, Jagsi R, Biermann JS, et al. Childbearing decisions in residency: a multicenter survey of female residents. Acad Med. 2020;95(10):1550‐1557. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Brass LF, Fitzsimonds RM, Akabas MH. Gaps between college and starting an MD‐PhD program are adding years to physician‐scientist training time. JCI Insight. 2022;7(6):e156168. 10.1172/jci.insight.156168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/students-residents/report/matriculating-student-questionnaire-msq.
  • 10. Nugent CN, Chandra A. Infertility and impaired fecundity in women and men in the United States, 2015‐2019. Natl Health Stat Rep. 2024;(202). https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/147886 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Saccone G, Gragnano E, Ilardi B, et al. Maternal and perinatal complications according to maternal age: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2022;159(1):43‐55. 10.1002/ijgo.14100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Stack SW, McKinney CM, Spiekerman C, Best JA. Childbearing and maternity leave in residency: determinants and well‐being outcomes. Postgrad Med J. 2018;94(1118):694‐699. 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-135960 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Dundon KM, Powell WT, Wilder JL, et al. Parenthood and parental leave decisions in pediatric residency. Pediatrics. 2021;148(4):e2021050107. 10.1542/peds.2021-050107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Bye E, Leval R, Sayles H, Doyle M, Mathes M, Cudzilo‐Kelsey L. Parental postpartum depression among medical residents. Arch Women′s Mental Health. 2022;25(6):1129‐1135. 10.1007/s00737-022-01271-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Stack SW, Jagsi R, Biermann JS, et al. Maternity leave in residency: a multicenter study of determinants and wellness outcomes. Acad Med. 2019;94(11):1738‐1745. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Bauman BL, Ko JY, Cox S, et al. Vital signs: postpartum depressive symptoms and provider discussions about perinatal depression ‐ United States, 2018. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(19):575‐581. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6919a2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Meek JY, Noble L. Policy statement: breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics. 2022;150(1):e2022057988. 10.1542/peds.2022-057988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Peters GW, Kuczmarska‐Haas A, Holliday EB, Puckett L. Lactation challenges of resident physicians‐ results of a national survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):762. 10.1186/s12884-020-03436-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Johnson HM, Torres MB, Möller MG, et al. Association of women surgeons′ comprehensive initiative for healthy surgical families during residency and fellowship training. JAMA Surg. 2023;158(3):310‐315. 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.6334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Morgan JC, Owens T, Carmack MC, Braverman A, Class QA. Policy and perceptions of pregnancy during training among residents of various subspecialties. Postgrad Med J. 2025;101(1195):441‐446. 10.1093/postmj/qgae164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Mercurio AM, Lynch OL, Shubin Stein BE, et al. Very few ACGME‐accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs have web‐accessible leave policies dedicated to parental leave for residents, despite ACGME requirements. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2024;482(10):1779‐1785. 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Stack SW, Finn KM, Kisielewski M, Law KL, Milne CK, Best JA. Parental leave policies in residency: a national survey of internal medicine program directors. Acad Med. 2022;97(7):1021‐1028. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Conway SE, Wang W, Prasad S. Barriers to increasing paid parental leave in U.S. neurology residencies: a survey of program directors. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24:387. 10.1186/s12909-024-05333-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Spruce MW, Gingrich AA, Phares A, et al. Child‐rearing during postgraduate medical training and its relation to stress and burnout: results from a single‐institution multispecialty survey. Mil Med. 2022;187(3‐4):e518‐e526. 10.1093/milmed/usab029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Jain S, Neaves S, Royston A, Huang I, Juengst SB. Breastmilk pumping experiences of physician mothers: quantitative and qualitative findings from a nationwide survey study. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(13):3411‐3418. 10.1007/s11606-021-07388-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Drumm CM, Martin PC, Schulz EV, Wyatt TR. I thought everyone was going to hate me for being pregnant”: the enduring influence of the ideal worker image in GME. Teach Learn Med. 2025;37(4):457‐467. 10.1080/10401334.2024.2386986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ben‐Zion S, Lehmann A, Price L, Burnett HQ, Michelson CD. The use of parenting electives in pediatric residency. Acad Pediatr. 2022;22(4):513‐517. 10.1016/j.acap.2021.11.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.


Articles from Journal of Hospital Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES