Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1977 Nov;272(2):217–246. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012042

Voltage noise observed in rods of the turtle retina

E A Schwartz
PMCID: PMC1353556  PMID: 592191

Abstract

1. Intracellular voltage was recorded from rods in isolated retinae of the snapping turtle, Chelydra serpentina. The voltage was observed during darkness or during uniform illumination of a large retinal area. During darkness the voltage fluctuated continuously about a mean level. The spontaneous fluctuation is termed `noise'. During illumination the amplitude of the noise was reduced.

2. The noise observed during darkness could also be reduced by injecting a hyperpolarizing current into the impaled rod. The noise could be increased by a depolarizing current. The component of the noise that could be altered by polarizing the rod is termed `voltage-sensitive noise'.

3. When voltage-sensitive noise was first minimized by a continuous hyperpolarizing current, bright light produced an additional decrease in the noise. The component of the noise that was eliminated by light, but not eliminated by the injection of current, is termed `light-sensitive noise'.

4. The power density spectrum of voltage-sensitive noise, Gv(f), could be described by an equation of the form [Formula: see text] τM was approximately 7 msec, which is in good agreement with an apparent membrane time constant of 5-8 msec. The largest value of αv was 2·1 × 10-9 V2 sec.

5. The power density spectrum of light-sensitive noise could be described by an equation of the form [Formula: see text] τL was approximately 200-300 msec. The largest value of αL was 8·0 × 10-9 V2 sec.

6. The potential maintained during darkness could be altered by superfusing a retina with artificial media of different compositions. Depolarizing the rods by changing the extracellular calcium concentration from 1 to 5 mM increased the voltage-sensitive noise. A similar effect was observed after adding 2 mM lanthanum.

7. In contrast, 5 mM cobalt produced a small hyperpolarization and suppressed the voltage-sensitive noise. Injecting a depolarizing current, after exposure to cobalt, re-initiated the voltage-sensitive noise. The ability to elicit voltage-sensitive noise in the presence of cobalt indicates that it was not of synaptic origin.

8. The results are consistent with the noise present during dark being produced by two types of channel in the rod membrane. One is controlled by the phototransduction process; each individual channel of this type may be described as having a mean open time of 200-300 msec and a conductance of approx. 6 × 10-13 Ω-1. The absorption of one photon closes approx. 100-300 of these channels. The other type of channel is controlled by membrane potential; each individual channel of this type has a mean open time which is less than the membrane time constant of 8 msec.

Full text

PDF
217

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baylor D. A., Fettiplace R. Transmission of signals from photoreceptors to ganglion cells in the eye of the turtle. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1976;40:529–536. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1976.040.01.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baylor D. A., Hodgkin A. L. Detection and resolution of visual stimuli by turtle photoreceptors. J Physiol. 1973 Oct;234(1):163–198. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown J. E., Pinto L. H. Ionic mechanism for the photoreceptor potential of the retina of Bufo marinus. J Physiol. 1974 Feb;236(3):575–591. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Copenhagen D. R., Owen W. G. Coupling between rod photoreceptors in a vertebrate retina. Nature. 1976 Mar 4;260(5546):57–59. doi: 10.1038/260057a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fain G. L., Gold G. H., Dowling J. E. Receptor coupling in the toad retina. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1976;40:547–561. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1976.040.01.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fain G. L. Quantum sensitivity of rods in the toad retina. Science. 1975 Mar 7;187(4179):838–841. doi: 10.1126/science.1114328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hagins W. A., Penn R. D., Yoshikami S. Dark current and photocurrent in retinal rods. Biophys J. 1970 May;10(5):380–412. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(70)86308-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hagins W. A. The visual process: Excitatory mechanisms in the primary receptor cells. Annu Rev Biophys Bioeng. 1972;1:131–158. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.01.060172.001023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaneko A., Shimazaki H. Effects of external ions on the synaptic transmission from photorecptors to horizontal cells in the carp retina. J Physiol. 1975 Nov;252(2):509–522. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp011155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaneko A., Shimazaki H. Synaptic transmission from photoreceptors to bipolar and horizontal cells in the carp retina. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1976;40:537–546. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1976.040.01.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Katz B., Miledi R. The statistical nature of the acetycholine potential and its molecular components. J Physiol. 1972 Aug;224(3):665–699. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Korenbrot J. I., Cone R. A. Dark ionic flux and the effects of light in isolated rod outer segments. J Gen Physiol. 1972 Jul;60(1):20–45. doi: 10.1085/jgp.60.1.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lamb T. D., Simon E. J. The relation between intercellular coupling and electrical noise in turtle photoreceptors. J Physiol. 1976 Dec;263(2):257–286. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Scholes J. H. Colour receptors, and their synaptic connexions, in the retina of a cyprinid fish. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1975 Feb 20;270(902):61–118. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1975.0004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schwartz E. A. Cones excite rods in the retina of the turtle. J Physiol. 1975 Apr;246(3):639–651. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schwartz E. A. Electrical properties of the rod syncytium in the retina of the turtle. J Physiol. 1976 May;257(2):379–406. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Schwartz E. A. Responses of single rods in the retina of the turtle. J Physiol. 1973 Aug;232(3):503–514. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Schwartz E. A. Rod-rod interaction in the retina of the turtle. J Physiol. 1975 Apr;246(3):617–638. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1975.sp010907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Simon E. J., Lamb T. D., Hodgkin A. L. Spontaneous voltage fluctuations in retinal cones and bipolar cells. Nature. 1975 Aug 21;256(5519):661–662. doi: 10.1038/256661a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Verveen A. A., DeFelice L. J. Membrane noise. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1974;28:189–265. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(74)90019-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES