Skip to main content
The Journal of Physiology logoLink to The Journal of Physiology
. 1977 Nov;272(2):399–414. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012051

Postural effects on muscle nerve sympathetic activity in man

David Burke, Göran Sundlöf, B Gunnar Wallin
PMCID: PMC1353565  PMID: 592197

Abstract

1. Pulse-synchronous bursts of multi-unit sympathetic activity (MSA) were recorded in peroneal muscle nerve fascicles in eight healthy subjects when lying, sitting and standing. The sympathetic activity was quantitated by counting the number of bursts in the mean voltage neurogram/min. Postural changes were analysed by considering the total activity to be a product of the number of bursts in relation to the number of heart beats (burst incidence) and the heart rate.

2. In lying there were large interindividual differences in total activity, but for all subjects the activity increased when going from lying to sitting and from sitting to standing. With a few exceptions the increase between the lying and sitting postures was associated with an increase in both burst incidence and heart rate whereas between the sitting and standing postures there was an increase in heart rate but on the average no change in burst incidence.

3. When going from lying to sitting or from sitting to standing the magnitude of the change in burst incidence was inversely related to the initial burst incidence so that subjects with low initial values usually showed greater increases in burst incidence than subjects with high initial values. Some subjects with high initial values decreased their burst incidence.

4. With changes in postures there was an inverse linear relationship between the fraction of the change in MSA associated with a change in burst incidence and the fraction associated with a change in heart rate. An increase in total activity could be obtained by changing only burst incidence, by increasing heart rate without changing burst incidence, or by appropriate changes in both parameters. The slope of the regression line was -0·53 indicating that for adequate postural compensation fewer additional bursts were required when the compensatory response involved an increase in heart rate rather than an increase in only burst incidence.

5. It is suggested that an impairment of the ability to regulate heart rate will make subjects with high burst incidence in the lying position orthostatically more vulnerable than those with low burst incidence.

6. Shortly after standing up one subject developed bradycardia and subsequently fainted. The nerve recording was maintained until the subject collapsed. During the initial bradycardia no sympathetic bursts occurred suggesting that the syncope was associated with an interruption of normal baroreflex feedback between blood pressure and sympathetic outflow.

Full text

PDF
399

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adrian E. D., Bronk D. W., Phillips G. Discharges in mammalian sympathetic nerves. J Physiol. 1932 Feb 8;74(2):115–133. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1932.sp002832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Delius W., Hagbarth K. E., Hongell A., Wallin B. G. Manoeuvres affecting sympathetic outflow in human muscle nerves. Acta Physiol Scand. 1972 Jan;84(1):82–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1972.tb05157.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eckberg D. L., Drabinsky M., Braunwald E. Defective cardiac parasympathetic control in patients with heart disease. N Engl J Med. 1971 Oct 14;285(16):877–883. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197110142851602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Green J. H., Heffron P. F. Studies upon the relationship between baroreceptor and sympathetic activity. Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci. 1968 Jan;53(1):23–32. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.1968.sp001942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gribbin B., Pickering T. G., Sleight P., Peto R. Effect of age and high blood pressure on baroreflex sensitivity in man. Circ Res. 1971 Oct;29(4):424–431. doi: 10.1161/01.res.29.4.424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Murray R. H., Thompson L. J., Bowers J. A., Albright C. D. Hemodynamic effects of graded hypovolemia and vasodepressor syncope induced by lower body negative pressure. Am Heart J. 1968 Dec;76(6):799–811. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(68)90266-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sundlöf G., Wallin B. G. The variability of muscle nerve sympathetic activity in resting recumbent man. J Physiol. 1977 Nov;272(2):383–397. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp012050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. WEIDINGER H., LESCHHORN V. SYMPATHISCHE TONISIERUNG UND RHYTHMISCHE BLUTDRUCKSCHWANKUNGEN. Z Kreislaufforsch. 1964 Oct;53:985–1002. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wallin B. G., Delius W., Sundlöf G. Human muscle nerve sympathetic activity in cardiac arrhythmias. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1974 Dec;34(4):293–300. doi: 10.3109/00365517409049883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wallin B. G., Sundlöf G., Delius W. The effect of carotid sinus nerve stimulation on muscle and skin nerve sympathetic activity in man. Pflugers Arch. 1975 Jul 21;358(2):101–110. doi: 10.1007/BF00583921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wolthuis R. A., Bergman S. A., Nicogossian A. E. Physiological effects of locally applied reduced pressure in man. Physiol Rev. 1974 Jul;54(3):566–595. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1974.54.3.566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

RESOURCES