Skip to main content
Iranian Biomedical Journal logoLink to Iranian Biomedical Journal
. 2025 Dec 8;30(1):1–15. doi: 10.22034/IBJ.30.1.1

Extracellular Vesicles-Derived MicroRNAs: Emerging Game Changers in Cancer Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Response

Faezeh Maroufi 1,2, Amirali Ebrahimpour 3, Fatemeh Davami 2,*
PMCID: PMC13535871  PMID: 41721511

Abstract

Effective communication between cells is a fundamental feature of multicellular organisms, occurring through direct contact or the transfer of secreted molecules. Among these mediators, extracellular vesicles (EVs) function as biological messengers that transport bioactive molecules among cells. EVs are secreted by nearly all cell types. The interaction between tumor cells and EV components has been shown to influence various cancer-related processes, including proliferation, metastasis, stemness, chemoresistance, and immune modulation. Among the bioactive cargos of EVs, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), particularly microRNAs (miRNAs), play a significant role in shaping the tumor microenvironment. These EV-derived ncRNAs have emerged as promising tools for non-invasive diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic intervention across multiple cancer types. This review summarizes the current understanding of the functional roles of EV-derived miRNAs in cancer and highlights their potential clinical applications as novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets in cancer management.

Key Words: Extracellular vesicles, MicroRNAs, Neoplasms, Tumor microenvironment

1. INTRODUCTION

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nano-sized, membrane-bound structures initially considered cellular waste, but are now recognized as key mediators of intercellular communication in health and disease1. According to the updated guidelines of the International Society for EVs (MISEV2023), these vesicles, as intercellular communicators, carry diverse biomolecules that reflect the physiological or pathological state of their cells of origin2,3. These guidelines provide standardized recommendations for EV production, isolation, characterization, and functional studies to enhance reproducibility and rigor in EV research3.

EVs possess unique characteristics, including stability, low immunogenicity, efficient biodistribution, and targeted accumulation, making them ideal vehicles for molecular transport4. EVs are secreted by both normal and cancerous cells and can influence the transcriptional and functional behavior of recipient cells by transferring components from the parent cells5. Within the tumor microenvironment (TME), a complex network comprising tumor cells, lymphocytes, dendritic cells (DCs), fibroblasts, macrophages, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), adipocytes, and tumor vasculature, each cellular component plays a key role in tumor progression and survival6. Intercellular trafficking of EVs among tumor cells can alter multiple tumor characteristics, such as proliferation, metastasis, stemness, chemoresistance, and immune evasion7. Importantly, tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (tEVs) can also originate from stromal cells in the TME and contribute to tumor progression by modulating stress responses and promoting an immunosuppressive environment8. Additionally, EVs can prepare pre-metastatic niches at distant sites, facilitating early stages of metastasis9. However, their function is not exclusively tumor-promoting. Research has shown that EVs derived from cytotoxic lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells can enhance anti-tumor immunity10.

Genetically engineered cells capable of releasing EVs loaded with therapeutic molecules have demonstrated potential in suppressing tumor growth and increasing chemosensitivity11. In addition, the presence of EVs in body fluids and their elevated concentration in tumor tissues compared to normal tissues support their potential as non-invasive biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and prognosis12. Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), including microRNAs (miRNAs), small interfering RNAs, circular RNAs, and long ncRNAs are enriched in EVs and play major roles in cancer progression through direct or indirect regulation of gene expression13,14. These molecules regulate transcription, post-transcriptional modifications, and signaling, influencing angiogenesis, immunity, and extracellular matrix remodeling. EV-derived miRNAs have emerged as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in oncology. This review highlights recent insights into their roles in cancer and clinical potential15,16.

2. Characteristics of EVs

1.2 Origin and biogenesis of exosomes

EVs are often broadly classified into apoptotic bodies, microvesicles, and exosomes, according to their proposed biogenesis and physical characteristics17. The biogenesis, transport, and release of exosomes involve a multistep process. During exosome formation, internal proteins from the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and cell surface proteins, such as activated growth factor receptors, are internalized. Some of these proteins undergo ubiquitylation on their cytosolic domains, a process essential for their sorting and incorporation into intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) within multivesicular bodies (MVBs)18. Early endosomes are formed via inward budding of the plasma membrane. These endosomes then mature, during which ILVs accumulate inside them through continued inward budding of the endosomal membrane, forming MVBs (Fig. 1). MVBs can follow three fates: degradation via lysosomal fusion, recycling back to the trans-TGN, or fusion with the plasma membrane to release ILVs as exosomes19. The uptake of exosomes by recipient cells occurs through direct membrane fusion, receptor-ligand interactions, or receptor-mediated endocytosis20. The biogenesis and secretion of ILVs are tightly linked to the sorting of cargo molecules. One primary mechanism responsible for ILV formation is the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT), though ceramide can also initiate ILV formation independently of ESCRT21,22. The five core ESCRT components, ESCRT-0, -I, -II, -III, and VPS4 (vacuolar protein sorting-related protein 4), work sequentially in this process23. ESCRT-0 identifies and retains ubiquitinated proteins at the endosomal membrane. ESCRT-I and -II promote membrane budding into the MVB lumen, while ESCRT-III forms constriction structures, facilitating scission with the help of the ATPase VPS424. Additionally, cargo sorting can occur via alternative mechanisms independent of ubiquitination25. Fusion of MVBs with the plasma membrane is mediated by SNARE proteins (v-SNAREs on vesicles and t-SNAREs on target membranes), Rab GTPases, tethering factors, and other accessory proteins. Once secreted, exosomes interact with target cells through various mechanisms, including surface receptor engagement, direct membrane fusion, or uptake via phagocytosis, micropinocytosis, and lipid raft-, clathrin-, or caveolin-mediated endocytosis, subsequently entering the endosomal system26. Nevertheless, the specific mechanisms underlying cargo sorting and MVB formation require further elucidation.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Biogenesis and content of EVs. Exosome biogenesis is a complex process that involves the formation of ILVs within MVBs. These ILVs are then sorted into exosomes, which are small, secreted vesicles that carry various molecules, including proteins, nucleic acids (mRNA, miRNA, and DNA), and lipids. EVs are a crucial part of the cell intercellular communication and play a role in various biological processes, including cancer progression.

2.2 Content of EVs

EV cargos vary depending on the cell of origin and can function in autocrine or paracrine signaling, influencing both proximal and distal target cells. EVs can carry different types of nucleic acids, like DNAs and RNAs, proteins, lipids, and other complex components in the cell (Fig. 1)27. EVs' mRNAs can be translated into proteins within recipient cells, altering their transcriptomic and proteomic profiles28. For instance, Zomer et al. have demonstrated that EVs derived from aggressive tumor cells can transfer metastatic potential to less aggressive cells through RNA-mediated mechanisms29. EVs also contain various ncRNAs30. MiRNAs, which are approximately 19–22 nucleotides in length, are abundant endogenous ncRNAs that play key roles in regulating protein biosynthesis31. In terms of miRNAs biogenesis, most miRNAs are transcribed as pri-miRNAs, processed by Drosha and Dicer, and incorporated into RISC to regulate gene expression32. Interestingly, the packaging of the miRNAs into EVs can occur selectively and then be transferred to target cells, where they influence gene expression and cellular pathways. These miRNAs may be asymmetrically distributed relative to the expression levels in the source cells33. miRNAs from EVs can thus dynamically regulate the transcriptome of recipient cells, with either beneficial or detrimental effects depending on the physiological or pathological context34. Notably, EVs provide strong protection for their RNA cargo, contributing to the remarkable stability of miRNAs during transport and delivery35. Furthermore, EVs carry different types of proteins such as integrin, heat shock protein tetraspanins (CD9, CD63, CD81, and CD82), cytokines, MHC molecules, and others12. Lipids such as cholesterol, sphingomyelin, and phosphatidylcholine serve as anchoring platforms for membrane proteins in EVs, facilitating membrane fusion, separation, and uptake processes36.

3. Functional roles of EV-derived miRNAs in cancer

Tumor-associated EVs contain more specific proteins and RNAs than normal EVs, making them promising non-invasive biomarkers for the detection, monitoring, and prognosis of various cancers. In addition to their diagnostic potential, tEVs influence a wide range of cell types within the TME and exert multiple effects, including (i) promoting tumor angiogenesis by modulating endothelial cells and increasing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression37; (ii) enhancing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), as well as initiating pro-/pre-metastatic niche formation and metastasis38; (iii) augmenting the immunosuppressive functions of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs)39; (iv) protecting tumor cells from apoptosis while inducing apoptosis in DCs, cytotoxic T cells, and impairing natural killer cell function40-42; (v) reprogramming the differentiation or polarization of various cell types toward pro-tumorigenic, immunosuppressive, anti-inflammatory, and chemoresistant phenotypes, such as the transformation of fibroblasts into CAFs43, macrophages into M2-polarized tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs)44, and neutrophils into N2-polarized neutrophils45. Overall, EV-derived miRNAs carried by tEVs play crucial roles in shaping the TME by inducing chemoresistance, immunotherapy resistance, dormancy, stemness, and EMT (Fig. 2). Remarkably, EV-derived miRNAs can convert "hot tumors" (inflamed and immunologically active) into "cold tumors" (non-inflamed and immunologically inactive), which are less responsive or entirely unresponsive to immunotherapy. In the following sections, we review recent research on the functional roles of EV-derived miRNAs across different cancer types and explore their potential clinical applications, while the preceding text highlights the general oncogenic behaviors, such as metastasis, chemoresistance, and immune evasion, that are commonly influenced by tEVs in a wide range of malignancies.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Key roles of EV-derived miRNAs in cancer. EV-derived miRNAs are involved in various aspects of cancer development, including cell proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. From left to right, EV-derived miRNAs play a role in the EMT, a process that allows cancer cells to invade surrounding tissues and metastasize to other parts of the body. In terms of tumor proliferation, EV-derived miRNAs can influence the growth of malignant cells by modulating the expression of genes involved in the cell cycle. Also, they stimulate angiogenesis by increasing related gene expression, like VEGF, to facilitate tumor proliferation. In TME, EV-derived miRNAs can influence the interaction between cancer cells and the surrounding cells, including cancer cells and immune cell and potentially influence the immune response to the tumor. Moreover, they can contribute to drug resistance by altering the sensitivity of cancer cells to chemotherapy and other treatments. ER: endoplasmic reticulum

3.1 EV-derived miRNAs: orchestrators of tumor cell proliferation and growth

Uncontrolled cellular proliferation is a defining hallmark of cancer and a prerequisite for tumor progression, which is driven by both intrinsic alterations and extrinsic signals from the TME. EV-derived miRNAs are key mediators in this process, regulating cell cycle progression, apoptosis, metabolism, angiogenesis, and immune responses. They act by suppressing tumor suppressors and activating oncogenic pathways such as JAK/STAT, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, along with transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β). For instance, Song et al. have shown that EVs derived from renal cancer cells are enriched with miR-9-5p, downregulating suppressor of cytokine signaling 4 (SOCS4), activating JAK/STAT signaling, which in turn enhances proliferation and invasion while inhibiting apoptosis. They have also proposed that EV-derived miR-9-5p could serve as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in renal carcinoma46. EV-derived miRNAs can reprogram stromal cells, including CAFs, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and TAMs, to promote tumor proliferation. Jiang et al. have demonstrated that the upregulation of miR-181b-3p in EVs derived from CAFs promotes proliferation and migration while reducing the apoptosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) cells by targeting SNX247. Moreover, EV-derived mir-10b-5p downregulates KLF11 in fibroblasts and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) in gastric cancer (GC) cells, leading to the activation of TGFβR1 and PI3K/AKT/mTORC1 signaling pathways, respectively. Thus, miR-10b-5p mediates interactions between GC cells and fibroblasts within the TME to enhance proliferation48. Beyond the primary tumor, EV-derived miRNAs exert systemic effects, preparing metastatic niches and contributing to therapy resistance. For example, Zhou et al. have demonstrated that EV-derived miR-21-5p from Schwann cells promotes proliferation, migration, and lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma by targeting the metalloproteinase inhibitor RECK49. Collectively, EV-derived miRNAs induce tumor proliferation by modulating oncogenic signaling and stromal interactions. Their central roles make them both biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in cancer.

3.2 EV-derived miRNAs as drivers of tumor metastasis and invasion

Metastasis is the major cause of cancer mortality, involving sequential steps of cell detachment, invasion, intravasation, circulation, extravasation, and colonization. These processes depend on interactions between tumor and stromal cells that regulate plasticity, motility, and organotropism50. EV-derived miRNAs are key mediators of this cascade, as they transfer regulatory signals that drive EMT, matrix remodeling, angiogenesis, immune evasion, and pre-metastatic niche formation51. Mechanistically, EV-derived miRNAs induce EMT, a phenotypic switch characterized by loss of epithelial markers (e.g., E-cadherin) and gain of mesenchymal traits (e.g., vimentin and N-cadherin), via the direct suppression of EMT repressors such as PTEN, SOCS3, or through the activation of canonical pathways, including Wnt/β-catenin, TGF-β/Smad, IL6/STAT3, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR52. By promoting EMT, these miRNAs endow tumor cells with enhanced motility and invasiveness (Table 1). For example, CRC-derived EVs from CAPS1-overexpressing cells stimulate the migration of normal colonic epithelial cells53, while CAF-derived EV-associated mir-92a-3p activates Wnt/β-catenin to enhance stemness, EMT, and chemoresistance54. In breast cancer (BC), EV-derived mir-92b-5p regulates the migration, adhesion, and spreading of mammary epithelial cells via the downregulation of MTSS1L and has been proposed as a non-invasive biomarker for metastatic detection55. In addition, EV-derived miRNAs modulate stromal cell behavior, as they can polarize macrophages to an M2-like immunosuppressive phenotype56, activate hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and fibroblasts into tumor-promoting CAFs57, and compromise endothelial cell junction integrity, thus facilitating intravasation, vascular permeability, and pre-metastatic niche formation58. Notably, hypoxia within the primary TMV enhances the selective packaging of certain miRNAs into EVs (e.g., miR-301a-3p and miR-4299), which further stabilizes transcriptional regulators like hypoxia inducible factor 1 subunit alpha (HIF-1α), which creates a feedback loop that sustains metastatic competency59. Functionally, EV-derived miRNAs regulate multiple steps of metastasis, making them both effectors and biomarkers of disease progression60. Zhao et al. have demonstrated that miR-181a-5p-enriched EVs from highly metastatic CRC cells activate HSCs by targeting SOCS3 and activating the IL6/STAT3 pathway, thus contributing to colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). In turn, activated HSCs release CCL20 causes establishing a CCL20/CCR6/ERK1/2/Elk-1/miR-181a-5p axis that remodels the liver microenvironment and facilitates pre-metastatic niche formation61. Similarly, EV-derived mir-934 from CRC cells induces M2 macrophage polarization through PTEN downregulation and PI3K/AKT activation, thereby promoting CRLM44. Lung cancer EV-derived mir-193a-3p, miR-210-3p, and miR-5100 activate STAT3, promoting EMT and invasion62; however, CAF-derived miR-345-5p carried by EVs, targets CDKN1A to accelerate CRC metastasis63. In GC, hypoxia-induced EV-derived miR-301a-3p, stabilizes HIF-1α by inhibiting PHD3, driving proliferation, EMT, and dissemination64. EV-derived mir-16-5p from BMSCs inhibits EMT and tumor growth via the erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular A1/nuclear factor-κB (EPHA1/NF-κB) axis, highlighting its tumor-suppressive role65. Additionally, adipose-derived EV-associated mir-421 downregulates Chromobox protein homolog 7 (CBX7) and induces epigenetic changes to enhance metastasis66. At distant sites, miRNAs carried by EVs establish a favorable microenvironment for colonization by suppressing tumor-suppressive signals and reprogramming local immunity. For instance, EV-derived miR-21 has been linked to brain metastasis in lung cancer through ERK/STAT3 signaling67. Given EV-derived miRNAs significant contribution to metastatic progression and their detectability in body fluids, they hold promise as prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers, as well as potential therapeutic targets in metastatic cancers.

Table 1.

Role of EV-derived miRNAs in tumor metastasis

EVs-derived miRNA and source Cancer type Target Effect on metastasis Reference
miR-92a-3p (CAFs) CRC Wnt/β-catenin Enhances cancer stemness and EMT, as well as promotes chemoresistance 54
miR-92b-5p (tumor cells) BC MTSS1L Regulates the migration, adhesion, and spreading of mammary epithelial cells 55
miR-181a-5p (highly metastatic CRC cells) CRC SOCS3 CRLM 61
miR-934 (CRC cells) CRC PTEN Induces M2 macrophage polarization 44
miR-1247-3p (HCC cells) HCC B4GALT3 Promotes lung metastasis 73
miR-194/215 (pulmonary metastatic sites) Osteosarcoma MARCKS Promotes lung metastasis 74
miR-17-5p and miR-21 (lung tumor cells) Lung cancer PTEN, PDCD4 Enhance bone metastasis by promoting osteoclastogenesis 75,76
miR-193a-3p, miR-210-3p, and miR-5100 (lung cancer cells) Lung cancer STAT3 Promote EMT and invasion 62
miR-345-5p (CAFs) CRC CDKN1A Promotes metastasis 63
miR-301a-3p (tumor cells) GC PHD3 Promotes EMT 64
miR-16-5p (BMSC) BC EPHA1/NF-κB Inhibits EMT and tumor growth 65
miR-421 (adipose-derived) Not available CBX7 Induces epigenetic changes to enhance metastasis 66

3.3 EVs-derived miRNAs as inducers of tumor angiogenesis

Angiogenesis, the sprouting of new vessels from pre-existing vasculature, is essential for tumor growth and metastasis. As tumors grow beyond the capacity of their existing blood supply, they induce angiogenesis. This process not only is primarily driven by VEGF but also involved additional signaling pathways, including fibroblast growth factor (FGF), platelet-derived growth factor, epidermal growth factor, and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) signaling68. In TME, EVs-mediated delivery of oncogenic miRNAs plays a pivotal role in reprogramming endothelial and stromal cells toward pro-angiogenic phenotypes (Table 2). Mechanistically, EV-derived miRNAs modulate multiple signaling cascades that govern angiogenesis. They frequently enhance the VEGF/VEGFR axis, stimulate the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and ERK/MAPK pathways, and inhibit tumor-suppressive regulators of angiogenesis such as PTEN and PHDs. These actions collectively result in the increased endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and capillary-like tube formation37. Moreover, EV-derived miRNAs can compromise endothelial junction integrity, thereby enhancing vascular permeability and facilitating tumor cell intravasation. For instance, Liang et al. have shown that EV-derived miR-423-5p from BC cells promotes angiogenesis via EFNA3/Akt signaling69. Conversely, BMSC-derived miR-126-3p carried by EVs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), inhibits VEGF-A/VEGFR-2/ERK signaling and targets PTPN9, reducing invasion and inducing apoptosis70. EV-derived mir-3174 from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells enhances vascular permeability and angiogenesis by targeting HIPK3 and inhibiting Fas/p53 signaling71. Hypoxia intensifies this effect; i.e., HIFs not only increase angiogenic cytokines but also regulate miRNA packaging, reinforcing angiogenic loops71. In addition, Yang et al. have reported that nasopharyngeal carcinoma EV-derived mir-205-5p targets the 3′ UTR of desmocollin-2 (DSC2) to activate EGFR/ERK signaling and MMP2/MMP9 expression, correlating with poor survival and metastasis72. Other examples include tumor-derived miR-1247-3p carried by EVs, which suppresses forkhead box protein O1 (FOXO1) and increases VEGF in bladder cancer73. Also, EV-derived miR-155 from melanoma cells reprograms fibroblasts into CAFs, driving VEGFA, FGF2, and MMP9 via SOCS1/JAK2/STAT3 signaling74. In oral squamous cell carcinoma, tEVs enriched with miRNA-210-3p promote cancer progression and trigger angiogenesis by targeting ephrin A3 (EFNA3) through the activation of the PI3K/Akt axis75. It has also been shown that EVs derived from oxidative stress-induced MSCs promote tumor progression and angiogenesis76. Hypoxia-regulated mir-23a, carried by EVs, suppresses prolyl hydroxylases 1 and 2 (PHD1/2), stabilizes HIF-1α, and reduces ZO-1, thereby increasing vascular permeability and angiogenesis in lung cancer77. EV-derived mir-522-3p from CAFs downregulates bone morphogenetic protein 5 (BMP5), leading to enhanced tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis in CRC78. In CRC, circulating EV-derived miR-21-5p suppresses Krev interaction trapped protein 1 (KRIT1) and activates β-catenin signaling, elevating VEGFA and vascular permeability79. Additionally, EV-derived mir-92a-3p secreted by retinoblastoma cells contributes to angiogenesis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) by targeting Krüppel-like factor 2 (KLF2) and plays an important role in retinoblastoma development80. Given their ability to simultaneously regulate multiple targets and pathways, miRNAs carried by EVs serve as master regulators of the tumor vasculature or neovascularization. Their stability in circulation and specificity in cellular targeting render them attractive candidates for biomarker development and therapeutic intervention81. Targeting EV communication or modulating the function of angiogenesis-related miRNAs holds promise for disrupting the vascular supply essential to tumor survival and spread.

Table 2.

EV-derived miRNAs involve in tumor angiogenesis

EVs-derived miRNA and source Cancer type Target Effect on angiogenesis Reference
miR-423-5p (BC) BC EFNA3 Activates the Akt pathway and promotes angiogenesis 69
miR-126-3p (BMSC) NSCLC PTPN9 Suppresses VEGF-A/VEGFR-2/ERK and induces apoptosis 70
miR-3174 (HCC) Hepatocellular carcinoma HIPK3 Inhibits Fas/p53 and promotes angiogenesis 71
miR-205-5p (NPC) Nasopharyngeal carcinoma DSC2 Activates EGFR/ERK, MMP2/9, and promotes angiogenesis 72
miR-1247-3p (tumor cells) Bladder cancer FOXO1 Increases VEGF and promotes angiogenesis 73
miR-155 (melanoma) Melanoma SOCS1 Activates JAK2/STAT3 and increases VEGFA, FGF2, MMP9 74
miR-210-3p (oral squamous cell carcinoma) Oral squamous cell carcinoma EFNA3 Activates PI3K/Akt and promotes angiogenesis 75
Unknown (oxidative stress-induced MSC) Various tumors Not specified Promotes angiogenesis 76
miR-23a (lung cancer) Lung cancer PHD1, PHD2, ZO-1 Increases HIF-1α and vascular permeability 77
miR-522-3p (CAFs) CRC BMP5 Enhances angiogenesis and metastasis 78
miR-21-5p (circulating EVs) CRC KRIT1 Activates β-catenin and increases VEGFA 79
miR-92a-3p (retinoblastoma) Retinoblastoma KLF2 Promotes angiogenesis in HUVECs 80

3.4 Role of EV-derived miRNAs in shaping tumor-suppressive TME

EV-derived miRNAs play a critical role in TME. They can enhance immune evasion, the polarization of TAMs toward the immunosuppressive M2 phenotype, the MDSC function, and the establishment of pre-metastatic niches. Through the suppression of tumor suppressor genes and activation of oncogenic pathways such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR, JAK/STAT, and Wnt/β-catenin, EV-derived miRNAs help tumors manipulate their microenvironment to facilitate growth, metastasis, and therapy resistance (Table 3). For example, Otmani et al. have found that EV-derived miR-24-3p decreases AML T-cell survival by directly targeting DENN/MADD and indirectly altering NF-κB, p-JAK/STAT, and p-ERK pathways. It also promotes Treg development, suggesting a potential therapeutic target to restore antitumor T-cell function against AML blasts41. Given the significant role of MDSCs in the TME, Ren et al. have revealed that EV-associated mir-107 derived from GC cells is internalized by HLA-DR-CD33+ MDSCs, inhibiting DICER1 and PTEN expression and activating the PI3K pathway, thereby facilitating MDSC expansion and activation82. TAMs, particularly the M2 subtype, exert immunosuppressive effects by releasing IL-10, TGF-β, and Arg-1, thus facilitating tumor progression. MiRNAs carried by EVs promote this polarization83. In this regard, miR-6794-5p suppresses SOCS1 and activates JAK1/STAT3, reducing M1/CD8+ T cells and enhancing tumor migration, invasion, and stemness84. Moreover, EV-derived mir-519a-3p from GC cells accumulates in the liver, targeting dual specificity phosphatase 2 (DUSP2) in intrahepatic macrophages, activating MAPK/ERK signaling, promoting M2 polarization, and establishing a pre-metastatic niche85. Similarly, EV-derived mir-222-3p from epithelial ovarian cancer cells promotes M2 polarization via SOCS3/STAT3 activation86. In HCC, Hu et al. have demonstrated that EV-associated miR-21-5p derived from HCC cells promotes tumor progression by inducing specific protein 1 (SP1) expression and inhibiting X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1), facilitating M2 polarization, and correlating with advanced disease stages87. EV-derived mir-221-3p from M2-TAMs promotes osteosarcoma progression by modulating the SOCS3/JAK2/STAT3 axis88. In BC, EV-derived mir-148b-3p induces M2 polarization via targeting the TSC2/mTORC1 signaling pathway and thus, correlates with lymph node metastasis, late tumor stage, and worse prognosis of BC89. Additionally, miR-138-5p can also be delivered from BC cells to TAMs via EVs to downregulate lysine demethylase 6B (KDM6B) expression and inhibit M1 polarization, resulting in M2 polarization; these macrophages promote lung metastasis90. EV-derived mir-217 from human normal bladder stromal cells enhances bladder cancer proliferation and migration by targeting the Hippo-YAP pathway91. In terms of immunomodulation, EV-mediated PD-1/PD-L1 immunosuppression is pivotal for immune evasion. BC-derived EV-associated mir-27a-3p enhances PD-L1 expression in M2 macrophages via PTEN inhibition92, while EV-derived mir-200a and miR-21-5p from CRC cells activate the STAT1 pathway to increase PD-L1 expression93. Understanding these regulatory mechanisms is essential for developing novel therapeutic strategies aimed at reprogramming the TME and restoring antitumor immunity.

Table 3.

EV-derived miRNAs in TME remodeling

Mechanism miRNA Function/Target Reference
Proliferation and metastasis miR-519a-3p Targets DUSP2; activates MAPK/ERK 85
miR-221-3p Targets SOCS3; activates JAK2/STAT3 88
miR-107 Inhibits DICER1/PTEN, activates PI3K 82
M2 polarization and immunosuppression miR-6794-5p Inhibits SOCS1, activates JAK1/STAT3 84
miR-222-3p Targets SOCS3; activates STAT3 86
miR-21-5p Targets SP1; inhibits XBP1 87
miR-148b-3p Targets TSC2; activates mTORC1 89
miR-138-5p Targets KDM6B; inhibits M1, promotes M2 90
Immune evasion miR-27a-3p Enhances PD-L1 via PTEN inhibition 92
miR-200a/miR-21-5p Activates STAT1; increases PD-L1 93
miR-24-3p Targets DENN/MADD; alters NF-κB, p-JAK/STAT, p-ERK; promotes Treg 41

3.5 Role of EV-derived miRNAs in shaping tumor chemoresistance within the TME

Drug resistance is a major challenge in cancer therapy, leading to relapse and poor outcomes. EV-derived miRNAs, secreted by tumor and stromal cells, play a central role in this process by reprogramming recipient cells through gene regulation and signaling modulation. EV-derived miRNAs can drive chemoresistance through different pathways, which we will survey in the following. EV-derived miRNAs inhibit apoptosis and protect cancer cells from drug-induced cell death through the downregulation of pro-apoptotic regulators such as BAX, Bak1, and CASP9. For example, CAF-derived miR-103a-3p carried by EVs reduces Bak1 and mediates cisplatin resistance in lung cancer94, while EV-derived mir-210 from cancer stem cells (CSCs) promotes gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer by activating mTOR signaling95. In addition, Zhao et al. have reported that doxorubicin-resistant BC cells exhibit upregulated EV-derived mir-181b-5p, which transfers a drug-resistant phenotype by downregulating p53/p21 levels, inhibiting doxorubicin-induced G1 arrest, and decreasing Bcl-2-associated transcription factor 1 (BCLAF1) expression96. Additionally, Fang et al. have shown that CAF-derived EV-associated mir-106b plays a crucial role in inducing gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer by directly targeting tumor protein p53 inducible nuclear protein 1 (TP53INP1)97; and activating survival pathways such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR, JAK2/STAT3, and Wnt/β-catenin, often through targeting tumor suppressors like PTEN, SOCS5/6, or programmed cell death factor 4 (PDCD4). These pathways enhance cell proliferation, survival, and resistance to chemotherapy-induced stress98. Moreover, Deng et al. have found that EV-derived mir-424-5p, derived from Cisplatin (DDP)-resistant cells, significantly contributes to NSCLC development and DDP resistance by downregulating SOCS5 and SOCS6, thereby activating the JAK2/STAT3 and PI3K/AKT pathways99. EV-derived miRNAs promote cancer stemness by upregulating stemness-related pathways (e.g., NOTCH, EZH2/STAT3, YAP/Hippo) and downregulating inhibitors such as NUMB endocytic adaptor protein (NUMB) and Dickkopf 3 (DKK3), thereby helping maintain a population of drug-tolerant persister cells100. Yang et al. have shown that in BC, chemotherapy with doxorubicin101 and paclitaxel induces release of miR-378a-3p/miR-378d, which activate WNT and NOTCH pathways via targeting DKK3 and NUMB, thereby sustaining stemness and resistance101. In addition, EV-derived miRNAs remodel the immune microenvironment by promoting M2 macrophage polarization, increasing Treg expansion, and suppressing CD8⁺ T-cell function, ultimately contributing to immunotherapy resistance and the establishment of an immunosuppressive niche. For instance, tumor-secreted miR-208b has been shown to drive oxaliplatin resistance and Treg expansion in CRC by targeting PDCD4102. Similarly, miR-588 promotes M2 macrophage polarization in DDP-resistant GC through partial targeting of cylindromatosis (CYLD)103, while miR-221/222 reshape the TME and induce tamoxifen resistance in BC by targeting P27 and ERα104. Furthermore, EV-derived miRNAs enhance metabolic rewiring in cancer cells by both promoting glycolysis through the regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 subunit alpha 1 (PDHA1) and reducing ferroptosis sensitivity via the suppression of ACSL4, thereby enabling the cells to adapt metabolically under drug pressure. For example, EV-derived miR-21-5p enhances cisplatin resistance and promotes glycolysis in ovarian cancer by regulating PDHA1105, while EV-derived mir-214-3p from GC cells suppresses Acyl-CoA synthetase long chain family member 4 (ACSL4) to inhibit ferroptosis, reducing sensitivity to Apatinib as an angiogenesis inhibitor34. Also, EV-derived miRNAs alter drug metabolism by regulating key enzymes, including cytidine deaminase and deoxycytidine kinase (DCK), which are essential for the bioactivation and degradation of chemotherapeutic agents. For instance, macrophage-derived EVs containing miRNA-365 promote gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) by stimulating cytidine deaminase activity106. Collectively, EV-derived miRNAs from tumor cells, CAFs, CSCs, and immune cells can transform drug-sensitive cells into resistant phenotypes. Beyond being mediators of resistance, they hold strong potential as predictive biomarkers and therapeutic targets to overcome treatment failure across cancer types.

4. Therapeutic strategies and effects of EV-derived miRNAs in cancer treatment

EV-derived miRNAs have emerged as crucial modulators in cancer therapy, offering strategies to reverse tumor progression by regulating oncogenic signaling pathways. Currently, two main therapeutic approaches exist to modulate key signaling pathways driving cancer progression: (1) depleting oncogenic miRNAs or inhibiting their function in tumor cells, and (2) delivering tumor-suppressor miRNAs via engineered EVs to restore antitumor activity or trigger immune response. In the first approach, several strategies have been described: (i) anti-miRNA oligonucleotides, (ii) miRNA sponges, (iii) small molecule inhibitors, (iv) miRNA masking, and (v) blocking EVs transfer and sorting. These strategies prevent miRNA-mediated suppression of tumor suppressors. For example, miR-221/222 sponges restore ERα and PTEN expression in tamoxifen-resistant BC, reducing cell proliferation and migration107. Circular miRNA decoys, such as CM21D targeting miR-21, induce apoptosis and inhibit proliferation in glioblastoma and CHO-engineered cells108,109. Small molecule inhibitors, like fluoroquinolone derivatives, suppress miR-21 activity110, while miRNA-masking antisense oligonucleotides protect target mRNAs from oncogenic miRNAs111. Blocking EV secretion (for example, by knockdown of Rab27a) retains onco-miRNAs intracellular, promoting apoptosis and suppressing tumor growth112. In the second approach, EV-mediated delivery of tumor-suppressor miRNAs restores antitumor signaling, inhibits proliferation, invasion, and metastasis, and modulates the immune microenvironment. Similarly, miRNA mimic technologies and gene therapy strategies, whether via transient expression or stable integration, have demonstrated significant efficacy in restoring tumor-suppressor functions and modulating antitumor pathways. Recently, Yuen et al. have developed a therapeutic strategy for treating PDAC, using tumor suppressors miR-15a and miR-194 mimics combined with gemcitabine. These modified miRNA-mimics induce cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, and inhibit PDAC growth32. EV-derived mir-101 and miR-22 inhibit proliferation and metastasis in osteosarcoma by targeting BCL6 and Twist1113,114. miR-122-3p, miR-181c, and miR-665 suppress growth and metastasis in BC, CRC, and osteosarcoma, respectively115-117. miR-92b-3p inhibits angiogenesis and invasion by targeting SOX4 in ovarian cancer118. Human BMSC overexpressing miR-16-5p suppresses proliferation, migration, and invasion in CRC while enhancing apoptosis by downregulating integrin α2 (ITGA2)119. EV-derived mir-99b-5p from MSCs inhibits tumor proliferation in CRC120. Similarly, in liver cancer, miR-99b re-educates TAMs toward an antitumor M1 phenotype, enhancing immune surveillance and inhibiting M2 polarization by targeting κB-Ras2 and/or mTOR121. Moreover, EV-associated miR-375 derived from human umbilical cord MSCs targets enabled homolog and suppresses proliferation, invasion, migration, and tumor sphere formation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma122. EV-derived mir-124a acts as an anti-glioma agent by silencing Forkhead box A2, causing intracellular lipid accumulation and increasing overall survival in glioma models123. EV-derived mir-433, by targeting TMED5 and the WNT/β-catenin pathway, promotes apoptosis, suppresses tumor growth, enhances CD4/CD8 T-cell infiltration into the TME, and reduces DDP resistance in NSCLC124. Also, EV-derived miR-145-3p enhances autophagy by targeting the histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4), leading to the upregulation of BCL2L11 and inhibition of mTORC1, thereby restoring bortezomib sensitivity in myeloma cells125. In the context of T-cell immune responses, Li et al. have reported that EV-derived miR-16-5p from M1 macrophages inhibits GC progression by regulating PD-L1126. Similarly, EV-derived mir-16-5p inhibits lung adenocarcinoma development by downregulating PD-L1127. Overall, EV-derived miRNAs represent versatile tools for cancer therapy. Depletion of oncogenic miRNAs or delivery of tumor-suppressor miRNAs can inhibit tumor growth, metastasis, angiogenesis, and chemoresistance. Engineering EVs to carry specific miRNAs, combined with small molecule inhibitors, provides promising avenues for personalized cancer treatment. Continued optimization and clinical translation of these strategies may enhance the efficacy of current therapies and offer novel options for refractory cancers.

5. CONCLUSION

miRNAs from EVs are pivotal regulators in cancer biology. These small ncRNAs encapsulated within EVs mediate communication between tumor cells and the TME, including endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and immune cells. By modulating signaling pathways, EV-derived miRNAs influence tumor growth, angiogenesis, metastasis, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, immune evasion, and therapy resistance. They reprogram gene expression in recipient cells, fostering a microenvironment that supports tumor progression. EV-derived miRNAs also have dual roles: tEVs typically promote malignancy, whereas those from stromal or immune cells suppress or regulate tumors, underscoring their context-dependent function. Their stability in body fluids and selective packaging make EVs promising biomarkers for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring. Furthermore, their functional significance offers therapeutic potential, either by disrupting their biogenesis/secretion or modulating activity in recipient cells, paving the way for RNA-based strategies in precision oncology.

DECLARATION

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Generative AI and AI-assisted technologies

In this manuscript, AI tools (ChatGPT, GPT-5 mini) were used exclusively to enhance the clarity, grammar, and overall readability of the text. All scientific content, figures, and conclusions were generated by the authors. Oversight of AI usage was maintained by the authors throughout the writing process to ensure accuracy and integrity.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Authors' contributions

FM: conceptualization, writing--review, editing, AE: visualization; FD: supervision.

Data availability

All relevant data can be found within the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Supplementary information

The online version does not contain supplementary material.

References

  • 1.Camussi G, Deregibus MC, Bruno S, Cantaluppi V, Biancone L. Exosomes/microvesicles as a mechanism of cell-to-cell communication. Kidney Int. 2010;78(9):838–48. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jung MK, Mun JY. Sample preparation and imaging of exosomes by transmission electron microscopy. J Vis Exp. 2018;131:56482. doi: 10.3791/56482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Welsh JA, Goberdhan DCI, O'Driscoll L, Buzas EI, Blenkiron C, Bussolati B, et al. Minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles (MISEV2023): From basic to advanced approaches. J Extracell Vesicles. 2024;13(2):e12404. doi: 10.1002/jev2.12404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Li J, Zhang Y, Dong PY, Yang GM, Gurunathan S. A comprehensive review on the composition, biogenesis, purification, and multifunctional role of exosome as delivery vehicles for cancer therapy. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;165:115087. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang X, Tian L, Lu J, Ng IO-L. Exosomes and cancer - diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic vehicle. Oncogenesis. 2022;11(1):54. doi: 10.1038/s41389-022-00431-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Quail DF, Joyce JA. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med. 2013;19(11):1423–37. doi: 10.1038/nm.3394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tai YL, Chen KC, Hsieh JT, Shen TL. Exosomes in cancer development and clinical applications. Cancer Sci. 2018;109(8):2364–74. doi: 10.1111/cas.13697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yang N, Li S, Li G, Zhang S, Tang X, Ni S, et al. The role of extracellular vesicles in mediating progression, metastasis and potential treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8(2):3683–95. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dai J, Su Y, Zhong S, Cong L, Liu B, Yang J, et al. Exosomes: Key players in cancer and potential therapeutic strategy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5(1):145. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00261-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Seo N, Shirakura Y, Tahara Y, Momose F, Harada N, Ikeda H, et al. Activated CD8+ T cell extracellular vesicles prevent tumour progression by targeting of lesional mesenchymal cells. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):435. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-02865-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liang G, Zhu Y, Ali DJ, Tian T, Xu H, Si K, et al. Engineered exosomes for targeted co-delivery of miR-21 inhibitor and chemotherapeutics to reverse drug resistance in colon cancer. J Nanobiotechnol. 2020;18(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12951-019-0563-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kalluri R, LeBleu VS. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science. 2020;367(6478):6977. doi: 10.1126/science.aau6977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang M, Zhou L, Yu F, Zhang Y, Li P, Wang K. The functional roles of exosomal long non-coding RNAs in cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2019;76(11):2059–76. doi: 10.1007/s00018-019-03018-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yan H, Bu P. Non-coding RNA in cancer. Essays Biochem. 2021;65(4):625–39. doi: 10.1042/EBC20200032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Anastasiadou E, Jacob LS, Slack FJ. Non-coding RNA networks in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18(1):5–18. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wu S, Mu C, Sun JJ, Hu XR, Yao YH. Role of exosomal non-coding RNA in the tumour microenvironment of genitourinary system tumours. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023;22:15330338231198348. doi: 10.1177/15330338231198348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sheta M, Taha EA, Lu Y, Eguchi T. Extracellular vesicles: New classification and tumor immunosuppression. Biology. 2023;12(1):110. doi: 10.3390/biology12010110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lakkaraju A, Rodriguez-Boulan E. Itinerant exosomes: Emerging roles in cell and tissue polarity. Trends Cell Biol. 2008;18(5):199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Colombo M, Moita C, van Niel G, Kowal J, Vigneron J, Benaroch P, et al. Analysis of ESCRT functions in exosome biogenesis, composition and secretion highlights the heterogeneity of extracellular vesicles. J Cell Sci. 2013;126(Pt 24):5553–65. doi: 10.1242/jcs.128868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang X, Yuan X, Shi H, Wu L, Qian H, Xu W. Exosomes in cancer: Small particle, big player. J Hematol Oncol. 2015;8(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13045-015-0181-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Boura E, Ivanov V, Carlson LA, Mizuuchi K, Hurley JH. Endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) complexes induce phase-separated microdomains in supported lipid bilayers. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(33):28144–51. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.378646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Trajkovic K, Hsu C, Chiantia S, Rajendran L, Wenzel D, Wieland F, et al. Ceramide triggers budding of exosome vesicles into multivesicular endosomes. Science. 2008;319(5867):1244–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1153124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schmidt O, Teis D. The ESCRT machinery. Curr Biol. 2012;22(4):116–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Christ L, Raiborg C, Wenzel EM, Campsteijn C, Stenmark H. Cellular functions and molecular mechanisms of the ESCRT membrane-scission machinery. Trends Biochem Sci. 2017;42(1):42–56. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Baietti MF, Zhang Z, Mortier E, Melchior A, Degeest G, Geeraerts A, et al. Syndecan--syntenin--ALIX regulates the biogenesis of exosomes. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14(7):677–85. doi: 10.1038/ncb2502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Krylova SV, Feng D. The machinery of exosomes: Biogenesis, release, and uptake. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(2):1337. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xie F, Zhou X, Fang M, Li H, Su P, Tu Y, et al. Extracellular vesicles in cancer immune microenvironment and cancer immunotherapy. Adv Sci. 2019;6(24):1901779. doi: 10.1002/advs.201901779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Valadi H, Ekström K, Bossios A, Sjöstrand M, Lee JJ, Lötvall JO. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9(6):654–9. doi: 10.1038/ncb1596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zomer A, Maynard C, Verweij FJ, Kamermans A, Schäfer R, Beerling E, et al. In vivo imaging reveals extracellular vesicle-mediated phenocopying of metastatic behavior. Cell. 2015;161(5):1046–57. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Li S, Li Y, Chen B, Zhao J, Yu S, Tang Y, et al. exoRBase: A database of circRNA, lncRNA and mRNA in human blood exosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(1):106–12. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zheng D, Huo M, Li B, Wang W, Piao H, Wang Y, et al. The role of exosomes and exosomal microRNA in cardiovascular disease. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;8:616161. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.616161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yuen JG, Hwang G-R, Fesler A, Intriago E, Pal A, Ojha A, et al. Development of gemcitabine-modified miRNA mimics as cancer therapeutics for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Mol Ther Oncol. 2024;32(1):200769. doi: 10.1016/j.omton.2024.200769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pegtel DM, Cosmopoulos K, Thorley-Lawson DA, van Eijndhoven MA, Hopmans ES, Lindenberg JL, et al. Functional delivery of viral miRNAs via exosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107(14):6328–33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914843107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang W, Wang T, Zhang Y, Deng T, Zhang H, Ba YI. Gastric cancer secreted miR-214-3p inhibits the anti-angiogenesis effect of apatinib by suppressing ferroptosis in vascular endothelial cells. Oncol Res. 2024;32(3):489–502. doi: 10.32604/or.2023.046676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Dilsiz N. Role of exosomes and exosomal microRNAs in cancer. Future Sci OA. 2020;6(4):465. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2019-0116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Donoso-Quezada J, Ayala-Mar S, González-Valdez J. The role of lipids in exosome biology and intercellular communication: Function, analytics and applications. Traffic. 2021;22(7):204–20. doi: 10.1111/tra.12803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kumar VBS, Anjali K. Tumour generated exosomal miRNAs: A major player in tumour angiogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2022;1868(6):166383. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2022.166383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Si G, Chen X, Li Y, Yuan X. Exosomes promote pre-metastatic niche formation in colorectal cancer. Heliyon. 2024;10(6):27572. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tian X, Shen H, Li Z, Wang T, Wang S. Tumor-derived exosomes, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and tumor microenvironment. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0772-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kumar S, Gomez EC, Chalabi-Dchar M, Rong C, Das S, Ugrinova I, et al. Integrated analysis of mRNA and miRNA expression in HeLa cells expressing low levels of nucleolin. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):9017. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09353-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Otmani K, Rouas R, Lagneaux L, Krayem M, Duvillier H, Berehab M, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia-derived exosomes deliver miR-24-3p to hinder the T-cell immune response through DENN/MADD targeting in the NF-κB signaling pathways. Cell Commun Signal. 2023;21(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12964-023-01259-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 42.Wang L, Zhao F, Xiao Z, Yao L. Exosomal microRNA-205 is involved in proliferation, migration, invasion, and apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells via regulating VEGFA. Cancer Cell Int. 2019;19(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12935-019-0990-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yang F, Ning Z, Ma L, Liu W, Shao C, Shu Y, et al. Exosomal miRNAs and miRNA dysregulation in cancer-associated fibroblasts. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0718-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhao S, Mi Y, Guan B, Zheng B, Wei P, Gu Y, et al. Tumor-derived exosomal miR-934 induces macrophage M2 polarization to promote liver metastasis of colorectal cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00991-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang X, Shi H, Yuan X, Jiang P, Qian H, Xu W. Tumor-derived exosomes induce N2 polarization of neutrophils to promote gastric cancer cell migration. Mol Cancer. 2018;17(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0898-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Song W, Chen Y, Zhu G, Xie H, Yang Z, Li L. Exosome-mediated miR-9-5p promotes proliferation and migration of renal cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo by targeting SOCS4. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;529(4):1216–24. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.06.114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jiang Y, Qiu Q, Jing X, Song Z, Zhang Y, Wang C, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblast-derived exosome miR-181b-3p promotes the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer by regulating SNX2 expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2023;641:177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yan T, Wang X, Wei G, Li H, Hao L, Liu Y, et al. Exosomal miR-10b-5p mediates cell communication of gastric cancer cells and fibroblasts and facilitates cell proliferation. J Cancer. 2021;12(7):2140–50. doi: 10.7150/jca.47817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Xu J, Wang Y, Yang Y, Wang W, et al. Schwann cell-derived exosomes promote lung cancer progression via miRNA-21-5p. Glia. 2024;72(4):692–707. doi: 10.1002/glia.24497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Fares J, Fares MY, Khachfe HH, Salhab HA, Fares Y. Molecular principles of metastasis: A hallmark of cancer revisited. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5(1):28. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0134-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jiang Q, Tan X-P, Zhang C-H, Li Z-Y, Li D, Xu Y, et al. Non-coding RNAs of extracellular vesicles: Key players in organ-specific metastasis and clinical implications. Cancers. 2022;14(22):5693. doi: 10.3390/cancers14225693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Allgayer H, Mahapatra S, Mishra B, Swain B, Saha S, Khanra S, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and cancer metastasis: The status quo of methods and experimental models 2025. Mol Cancer. 2025;24(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12943-025-02338-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wu B, Sun D, Ma L, Deng Y, Zhang S, Dong L, et al. Exosomes isolated from CAPS1-overexpressing colorectal cancer cells promote cell migration. Oncol Rep. 2019;42(6):2528–36. doi: 10.3892/or.2019.7361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hu JL, Wang W, Lan XL, Zeng ZC, Liang YS, Yan YR, et al. CAFs secreted exosomes promote metastasis and chemotherapy resistance by enhancing cell stemness and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1019-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kan JY, Shih SL, Yang SF, Chu Y, Chen FM, Li CL, et al. Exosomal microRNA-92b is a diagnostic biomarker in breast cancer and targets survival-related MTSS1L to promote tumorigenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(2):1295. doi: 10.3390/ijms25021295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yu My, Jia Hj, Zhang J, Ran Gh, Liu Y, Yang Xh. Exosomal miRNAs-mediated macrophage polarization and its potential clinical application. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;117:109905. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.109905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gou Z, Li J, Liu J, Yang N. The hidden messengers: Cancer associated fibroblasts-derived exosomal miRNAs as key regulators of cancer malignancy. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024;12:1378302. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1378302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bayat M, Sadri Nahand J. Exosomal miRNAs: The tumor's trojan horse in selective metastasis. Mol Cancer. 2024;23(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12943-024-02081-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Mu Y, Yang M, Liu J, Yao Y, Sun H, Zhuang J. Exosomes in hypoxia: Generation, secretion, and physiological roles in cancer progression. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1537313. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1537313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tan S, Xia L, Yi P, Han Y, Tang L, Pan Q, et al. Exosomal miRNAs in tumor microenvironment. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020;39(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01570-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhao S, Mi Y, Zheng B, Wei P, Gu Y, Zhang Z, et al. Highly-metastatic colorectal cancer cell released miR-181a-5p-rich extracellular vesicles promote liver metastasis by activating hepatic stellate cells and remodelling the tumour microenvironment. J Extracell Vesicles. 2022;11(1):12186. doi: 10.1002/jev2.12186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zhang X, Sai B, Wang F, Wang L, Wang Y, Zheng L, et al. Hypoxic BMSC-derived exosomal miRNAs promote metastasis of lung cancer cells via STAT3-induced EMT. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-0959-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Shi W, Liu Y, Qiu X, Yang L, Lin G. Cancer-associated fibroblasts-derived exosome-mediated transfer of miR-345-5p promotes the progression of colorectal cancer by targeting CDKN1A. Carcinogenesis. 2023;44(4):317–27. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgad014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Xia X, Wang S, Ni B, Xing S, Cao H, Zhang Z, et al. Hypoxic gastric cancer-derived exosomes promote progression and metastasis via MiR-301a-3p/PHD3/HIF-1α positive feedback loop. Oncogene. 2020;39(39):6231–44. doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-01425-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhang Y, Lai X, Yue Q, Cao F, Zhang Y, Sun Y, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomal microRNA-16-5p restrains epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer cells via EPHA1/NF-κB signaling axis. Genomics. 2022;114(3):110341. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Zhang Y, Tedja R, Millman M, Wong T, Fox A, Chehade H, et al. Adipose-derived exosomal miR-421 targets CBX7 and promotes metastatic potential in ovarian cancer cells. J Ovarian Res. 2023;16(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s13048-023-01312-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tiong TY, Chan ML, Wang CH, Yadav VK, Pikatan NW, Fong I-H, et al. Exosomal miR-21 determines lung-to-brain metastasis specificity through the DGKB/ERK axis within the tumor microenvironment. Life Sci. 2023;329:121945. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Liu ZL, Chen H-H, Zheng LL, Sun LP, Shi L. Angiogenic signaling pathways and anti-angiogenic therapy for cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):198. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01460-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Liang Z, Zhang Y, Huang C, Yan Z, Miao H. Tumor-derived exosomes promote the angiogenic function of vascular endothelial cells by activating the miR-423-5p/EFNA3 signaling pathway. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2024;20(5):887–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Chen J, Ding C, Yang X, Zhao J. BMSCs-derived exosomal MiR-126-3p inhibits the viability of NSCLC cells by targeting PTPN9. J Buon. 2021;26(5):1832–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yang X, Wu M, Kong X, Wang Y, Hu C, Zhu D, et al. Exosomal miR-3174 induced by hypoxia promotes angiogenesis and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma by inhibiting HIPK3. iScience. 2024;27(2):108955. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Yang W, Tan S, Yang L, Chen X, Yang R, Oyang L, et al. Exosomal miR-205-5p enhances angiogenesis and nasopharyngeal carcinoma metastasis by targeting desmocollin-2. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2022;24:612–23. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2022.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Liu Z, Du D, Zhang S. Tumor-derived exosomal miR-1247-3p promotes angiogenesis in bladder cancer by targeting FOXO1. Cancer Biol Ther. 2024;25(1):2290033. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2023.2290033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Zhou X, Yan T, Huang C, Xu Z, Wang L, Jiang E, et al. Melanoma cell-secreted exosomal miR-155-5p induce proangiogenic switch of cancer-associated fibroblasts via SOCS1/JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0911-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wang H, Wang L, Zhou X, Luo X, Liu K, Jiang E, et al. OSCC exosomes regulate miR-210-3p targeting EFNA3 to promote oral cancer angiogenesis through the PI3K/AKT pathway. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:2125656. doi: 10.1155/2020/2125656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Almouh M, Pakravan K, Ghazimoradi MH, Motamed R, Bakhshinejad B, Hassan ZM, et al. Exosomes released by oxidative stress-induced mesenchymal stem cells promote murine mammary tumor progression through activating the STAT3 signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biochem. 2024;479(12):3375–91. doi: 10.1007/s11010-024-04934-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hsu YL, Hung JY, Chang W-A, Lin YS, Pan YC, Tsai PH, et al. Hypoxic lung cancer-secreted exosomal miR-23a increased angiogenesis and vascular permeability by targeting prolyl hydroxylase and tight junction protein ZO-1. Oncogene. 2017;36(34):4929–42. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Zhang J, Pan Y, Jin L, Yang H, Cao P. Exosomal-miR-522-3p derived from cancer-associated fibroblasts accelerates tumor metastasis and angiogenesis via repression bone morphogenetic protein 5 in colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;39(1):107–20. doi: 10.1111/jgh.16345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.He Q, Ye A, Ye W, Liao X, Qin G, Xu Y, et al. Cancer-secreted exosomal miR-21-5p induces angiogenesis and vascular permeability by targeting KRIT1. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(6):576. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-03803-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Chen S, Chen X, Luo Q, Liu X, Wang X, Cui Z, et al. Retinoblastoma cell-derived exosomes promote angiogenesis of human vesicle endothelial cells through microRNA-92a-3p. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(7):695. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-03986-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Balaraman AK, Arockia Babu M, Afzal M, Sanghvi G, M MR, Gupta S, et al. Exosome-based miRNA delivery: Transforming cancer treatment with mesenchymal stem cells. Regen Ther. 2025;28:558–72. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2025.01.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ren W, Zhang X, Li W, Feng Q, Feng H, Tong Y, et al. Exosomal miRNA-107 induces myeloid-derived suppressor cell expansion in gastric cancer. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:4023–40. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S198886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wang B, Cheng D, Ma D, Chen R, Li D, Zhao W, et al. Mutual regulation of PD-L1 immunosuppression between tumor-associated macrophages and tumor cells: A critical role for exosomes. Cell Commun Signal. 2024;22(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12964-024-01473-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Choi JY, Seok HJ, Lee DH, Lee E, Kim T-J, Bae S, et al. Tumor-derived miR-6794-5p enhances cancer growth by promoting M2 macrophage polarization. Cell Commun Signal. 2024;22(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12964-024-01570-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Qiu S, Xie L, Lu C, Gu C, Xia Y, Lv J, et al. Gastric cancer-derived exosomal miR-519a-3p promotes liver metastasis by inducing intrahepatic M2-like macrophage-mediated angiogenesis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022;41(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s13046-022-02499-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ying X, Wu Q, Wu X, Zhu Q, Wang X, Jiang L, et al. Epithelial ovarian cancer-secreted exosomal miR-222-3p induces polarization of tumor-associated macrophages. Oncotarget. 2016;7(28):43076–87. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hu Z, You L, Hu S, Yu L, Gao Y, Li L, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma cell-derived exosomal miR-21-5p promotes the polarization of tumor-related macrophages (TAMs) through SP1/XBP1 and affects the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Int Immunopharmacol. 2024;126:111149. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.111149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Liu W, Long Q, Zhang W, Zeng D, Hu B, Liu S, et al. miRNA-221-3p derived from M2-polarized tumor-associated macrophage exosomes aggravates the growth and metastasis of osteosarcoma through SOCS3/JAK2/STAT3 axis. Aging. 2021;13(15):19760–75. doi: 10.18632/aging.203388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Hao C, Sheng Z, Wang W, Feng R, Zheng Y, Xiao Q, et al. Tumor-derived exosomal miR-148b-3p mediates M2 macrophage polarization via TSC2/mTORC1 to promote breast cancer migration and invasion. Thorac Cancer. 2023;14(16):1477–91. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Xun J, Du L, Gao R, Shen L, Wang D, Kang L, et al. Cancer-derived exosomal miR-138-5p modulates polarization of tumor-associated macrophages through inhibition of KDM6B. Theranostics. 2021;11(14):6847–59. doi: 10.7150/thno.51864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Huang ZM, Wang H, Ji ZG. Bladder mesenchymal stromal cell-derived exosomal miRNA-217 modulates bladder cancer cell survival through Hippo-YAP pathway. Inflamm Res. 2021;70(9):959–69. doi: 10.1007/s00011-021-01494-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Yao X, Tu Y, Xu Y, Guo Y, Yao F, Zhang X. Endoplasmic reticulum stress‐induced exosomal miR‐27a‐3p promotes immune escape in breast cancer via regulating PD‐L1 expression in macrophages. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24(17):9560–73. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Yin Y, Liu B, Cao Y, Yao S, Liu Y, Jin G, et al. Colorectal cancer‐derived small extracellular vesicles promote tumor immune evasion by upregulating PD‐L1 expression in tumor‐associated macrophages. Adv Sci. 2022;9(9):2102620. doi: 10.1002/advs.202102620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Wang H, Huang H, Wang L, Liu Y, Wang M, Zhao S, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts secreted miR-103a-3p suppresses apoptosis and promotes cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Aging. 2021;13(10):14456–68. doi: 10.18632/aging.103556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Yang Z, Zhao N, Cui J, Wu H, Xiong J, Peng T. Exosomes derived from cancer stem cells of gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells enhance drug resistance by delivering miR-210. Cell Oncol. 2020;43(1):123–36. doi: 10.1007/s13402-019-00476-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Zhao S, Pan T, Deng J, Cao L, Vicencio JM, Liu J, et al. Exosomal transfer of miR-181b-5p confers senescence-mediated doxorubicin resistance via modulating BCLAF1 in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2023;128(4):665–77. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-02077-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Fang Y, Zhou W, Rong Y, Kuang T, Xu X, Wu W, et al. Exosomal miRNA-106b from cancer-associated fibroblast promotes gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer. Exp Cell Res. 2019;383(1):111543. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.You M, Xie Z, Zhang N, Zhang Y, Xiao D, Liu S, et al. Signaling pathways in cancer metabolism: Mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):196. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01442-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Deng Y, Ding H, Zhang Y, Feng X, Ye Q, Tian R, et al. TP53 mitigates cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer by mediating the effects of resistant cell-derived exosome mir-424-5p. Heliyon. 2024;10(5):26853. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Mao X, Peng S, Lu Y, Song L. Regulatory functions of microRNAs in cancer stem cells: Mechanism, facts, and perspectives. Cells. 2025;14(14):1073. doi: 10.3390/cells14141073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Yang Q, Zhao S, Shi Z, Cao L, Liu J, Pan T, et al. Chemotherapy-elicited exosomal miR-378a-3p and miR-378d promote breast cancer stemness and chemoresistance via the activation of EZH2/STAT3 signaling. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-01901-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ning T, Li J, He Y, Zhang H, Wang X, Deng T, et al. Exosomal miR-208b related with oxaliplatin resistance promotes Treg expansion in colorectal cancer. Mol Ther. 2021;29(9):2723–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.04.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Cui HY, Rong JS, Chen J, Guo J, Zhu JQ, Ruan M, et al. Exosomal microRNA-588 from M2 polarized macrophages contributes to cisplatin resistance of gastric cancer cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(36):6079–92. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i36.6079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Wei Y, Lai X, Yu S, Chen S, Ma Y, Zhang Y, et al. Exosomal miR-221/222 enhances tamoxifen resistance in recipient ER-positive breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;147(2):423–31. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3037-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Zhuang L, Zhang B, Liu X, Lin L, Wang L, Hong Z, et al. Exosomal miR-21-5p derived from cisplatin-resistant SKOV3 ovarian cancer cells promotes glycolysis and inhibits chemosensitivity of its progenitor SKOV3 cells by targeting PDHA1. Cell Biol Int. 2021;45(10):2140–9. doi: 10.1002/cbin.11671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Binenbaum Y, Fridman E, Yaari Z, Milman N, Schroeder A, Ben David G, et al. Transfer of miRNA in macrophage-derived exosomes induces drug resistance in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2018;78(18):5287–99. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Ouyang YX, Feng J, Wang Z, Zhang GJ, Chen M. miR-221/222 sponge abrogates tamoxifen resistance in ER-positive breast cancer cells through restoring the expression of ERα. Mol Biomed. 2021;2(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s43556-021-00045-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Bayat H, Pourgholami MH, Rahmani S, Pournajaf S, Mowla SJ. Synthetic miR-21 decoy circularized by tRNA splicing mechanism inhibited tumorigenesis in glioblastoma in vitro and in vivo models. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2023;32:432–44. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2023.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Adibzadeh S, Amiri S, Barkhordari F, Mowla SJ, Bayat H, Ghanbari S, et al. CHO cell engineering via targeted integration of circular miR-21 decoy using CRISPR/RMCE hybrid system. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024;108(1):434. doi: 10.1007/s00253-024-13266-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Hei YY, Wang S, Xi XX, Wang HP, Guo Y, Xin M, et al. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of fluoroquinolone derivatives as microRNA-21 small-molecule inhibitors. J Pharm Anal. 2022;12(4):653–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2021.12.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Menon A, Abd-Aziz N, Khalid K, Poh CL, Naidu R. miRNA: A promising therapeutic target in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(19):11502. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Li J, Chen J, Wang S, Li P, Zheng C, Zhou X, et al. Blockage of transferred exosome-shuttled miR-494 inhibits melanoma growth and metastasis. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(9):15763–74. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Zhang K, Dong C, Chen M, Yang T, Wang X, Gao Y, et al. Extracellular vesicle-mediated delivery of miR-101 inhibits lung metastasis in osteosarcoma. Theranostics. 2020;10(1):411–25. doi: 10.7150/thno.33482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Ruan Q, Wang C, Wu Y, Zhu Q. Exosome microRNA-22 inhibiting proliferation, migration and invasion through regulating Twist1/CADM1 axis in osteosarcoma. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):761. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50612-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Song B, Hou G, Xu M, Chen M. Exosomal miR-122-3p represses the growth and metastasis of MCF-7/ADR cells by targeting GRK4-mediated activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Cell Signal. 2024;117:111101. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2024.111101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Zhang B, Yang Y, Tao R, Yao C, Zhou Z, Zhang Y. Exosomes loaded with miR-665 inhibit the progression of osteosarcoma in vivo and in vitro. Am J Transl Res. 2022;14(10):7012–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Han B, Huang J, Han Y, Hao J, Wu X, Song H, et al. The microRNA miR-181c enhances chemosensitivity and reduces chemoresistance in breast cancer cells via down-regulating osteopontin. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;125:544–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Wang J, Wang C, Li Y, Li M, Zhu T, Shen Z, et al. Potential of peptide-engineered exosomes with overexpressed miR-92b-3p in anti-angiogenic therapy of ovarian cancer. Clin Transl Med. 2021;11(5):425. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Xu Y, Shen L, Li F, Yang J, Wan X, Ouyang M. microRNA-16-5p-containing exosomes derived from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells inhibit proliferation, migration, and invasion, while promoting apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells by downregulating ITGA2. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(11):21380–94. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Ning S, Chen Y, Li S, Liu M, Liu H, Ye M, et al. Exosomal miR-99b-5p secreted from mesenchymal stem cells can retard the progression of colorectal cancer by targeting FGFR3. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2023;19(8):2901–17. doi: 10.1007/s12015-023-10606-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Wang L, Hu YY, Zhao JL, Huang F, Liang SQ, Dong L, et al. Targeted delivery of miR-99b reprograms tumor-associated macrophage phenotype leading to tumor regression. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(2):517. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.He Z, Li W, Zheng T, Liu D, Zhao S. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes deliver microRNA-375 to downregulate ENAH and thus retard esophageal squamous cell carcinoma progression. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020;39(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01631-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Lang FM, Hossain A, Gumin J, Momin EN, Shimizu Y, Ledbetter D, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells as natural biofactories for exosomes carrying miR-124a in the treatment of gliomas. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20(3):380–90. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Liu B, Zhang R, Zhu Y, Hao R. Exosome-derived microRNA-433 inhibits tumorigenesis through incremental infiltration of CD4 and CD8 cells in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol Lett. 2021;22(2):607. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.12868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Wu H, Liu C, Yang Q, Xin C, Du J, Sun F, et al. MIR145-3p promotes autophagy and enhances bortezomib sensitivity in multiple myeloma by targeting HDAC4. Autophagy. 2020;16(4):683–97. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1635380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Li Z, Suo B, Long G, Gao Y, Song J, Zhang M, et al. Exosomal miRNA-16-5p derived from M1 macrophages enhances T cell-dependent immune response by regulating PD-L1 in gastric cancer. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:572689. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.572689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Chen H-L, Luo YP, Lin MW, Peng XX, Liu ML, Wang YC, et al. Serum exosomal miR-16-5p functions as a tumor inhibitor and a new biomarker for PD-L1 inhibitor-dependent immunotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma by regulating PD-L1 expression. Cancer Med. 2022;11(13):2627–43. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data can be found within the manuscript.


Articles from Iranian Biomedical Journal are provided here courtesy of Pasteur Institute of Iran

RESOURCES