Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2002 Nov;184(21):5926–5934. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.21.5926-5934.2002

DNA Inversion on Conjugative Plasmid pVT745

Jinbiao Chen 1, Donald J Leblanc 2,, Dominique M Galli 1,*
PMCID: PMC135377  PMID: 12374826

Abstract

Plasmid pVT745 from Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans strain VT745 can be transferred to other A. actinomycetemcomitans strains at a frequency of 10−6. Screening of transconjugants revealed that the DNA of pDMG21A, a pVT745 derivative containing a kanamycin resistance gene, displayed a structural rearrangement after transfer. A 9-kb segment on the plasmid had switched orientation. The inversion was independent of RecA and required the activity of the pVT745-encoded site-specific recombinase. This recombinase, termed Inv, was highly homologous to invertases of the Din family. Two recombination sites of 22 bp, which are arranged in opposite orientation and which function as DNA crossover sequences, were identified on pVT745. One of the sites was located adjacent to the 5′ end of the invertase gene, inv. Inversion of the 9-kb segment on pVT745 derivatives has been observed in all A. actinomycetemcomitans strains tested except for the original host, VT745. This would suggest that a host factor that is either inactive or absent in VT745 is required for efficient recombination. Inactivation of the invertase in the donor strain resulted in a 1,000-fold increase in the number of transconjugants upon plasmid transfer. It is proposed that an activated invertase causes the immediate loss of the plasmid in most recipient cells after mating. No biological role has been associated with the invertase as of yet.


Conservative site-specific recombination is an important class of genetic rearrangements distinct from general recombination, as it requires only a short region of sequence identity. Site-specific recombinases can be grouped into two families (reviewed in references 4, 19, and 25). The integrase family is characterized by its ability to catalyze inversions, deletions, and intermolecular reactions with nearly equal frequencies. The resolvase/invertase family promotes the resolution of cointegrate intermediates and inversions. The frequency of recombination between two different molecules is extremely low in the resolvase/invertase family. Members of this latter family can be divided into three subfamilies: resolvases (Tn3 family), resolvase-invertases, and invertases (Din family). Resolvases and invertases employ similar reaction mechanisms during recombination. However, whereas resolvases bind to two directly repeated sites, invertases require the presence of two inverted repeats (IR) and a host factor that binds to a cis-acting, enhancer-type DNA sequence.

Resolvases and invertases have been identified on a variety of bacterial plasmids of gram-positive and gram-negative origins. They have been shown to play a role in plasmid partition (reviewed in reference 17) and plasmid replication (3, 7). In addition, phase variation in prokaryotes has been associated with DNA inversions catalyzed by site-specific recombinases encoded on phage, chromosomal, or plasmid DNA (for reviews see references 14 and 19). Complex DNA rearrangements in which multiple DNA segments can invert independently or in groups have been described for p15B (16), as well as for IncI1 and IncI2 plasmids (for review see reference 19). One of the best-characterized multiple-DNA inversion systems is the shufflon of conjugative plasmid R64, which controls mating frequencies of the plasmid to different recipients by changing a component of the pilus (19).

Plasmid pVT745 is one of few plasmids isolated from the gram-negative periodontal pathogen Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (20). DNA nucleotide base sequence analysis revealed functions related to conjugation, replication, and replicon stability on the 25-kb size plasmid (12). Conjugative transfer of pVT745 from its host, VT745, to other A. actinomycetemcomitans strains or Escherichia coli was shown at a low frequency of 10−5 to 10−6 (12). Despite its conjugative properties, the plasmid has not been found in any clinical isolates of A. actinomycetemcomitans other than VT745. However, remnants of pVT745 DNA were detected on the chromosomes of various A. actinomycetemcomitans strains (22). Analysis of the DNA sequence of pVT745 identified the presence of a gene, AA01, which showed a high degree of similarity to the Din family of site-specific recombinases (12). The objective of this study was to determine the functional and biological role of the pVT745-specific recombinase.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions.

Strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. The A. actinomycetemcomitans recipient strain ATCC 700685Rif was isolated as a spontaneous rifampin (RIF)-resistant mutant of strain ATCC 700685. A. actinomycetemcomitans was grown in TSBYE (3% Trypticase soy broth, 0.6% yeast extract) at 37°C in 10% CO2. E. coli strain JM109 was grown in yeast-tryptone medium (21). Where appropriate, antimicrobial agents were used at the following concentrations: ampicillin (AMP), 100 μg/ml; kanamycin (KAN), 50 μg/ml, except for strain ATCC 700685 at 100 μg/ml; RIF, 100 μg/ml; spectinomycin (SPT), 100 μg/ml; and streptomycin (STR), 50 μg/ml.

TABLE 1.

Strains and plasmids used

Strain or plasmid Descriptiona Source or reference
Strains
    A. actinomycetemcomitans
        ATCC 29522Rif Rif This work
        ATCC 29522RifrecA Rif Sm recA This work
        ATCC 700685 JP2-like strain; plasmid free American Type Culture Collection
        ATCC 700685Rif Rif, JP2-like strain; plasmid free This work
        VT745 JP2-like strain; containing pVT745 or pVT745 derivatives 20
    E. coli
        JM109 recA1 supE44 endA1 hsdR17 gyrA96 relA1 thiΔ(lac-proAB) 26
Plasmids
    pDMG4 Sp; p15A-based cloning vector 10
    pDMG20 Km; Sp; derivative of pVT745; contains pGB2; the invertible segment is either in the orientation found on pVT745 (A) or in the opposite orientation (B) 12
    pDMG21 Km; derivative of pVT745; the invertible segment is either in the orientation found on pVT745 (A) or in the opposite orientation (B) 12
    pDMG27 Km Sm; same as pDMG21A but with mutated site-specific recombinase This work
    pDMG28 Km Sp; same as pDMG21A but with SPT cassette in Xba I site This work
    pDMG30 Km Sm Sp; same as pDMG27 but with SPT cassette in XbaI site This work
    pDMG32 Km Sp; same as pDMG21A but with SPT cassette in EcoRI site This work
    pGB2 Sp; low-copy-no. cloning vector based on pSC101; nonmobilizable 9
    pGEM7Zf(−)/spc Ap Sp 8
    pGEM-T Easy Ap; cloning vector for PCR products Promega
    pJC20 Ap; pNP3 derivative, expresses invertase under control of spc promoter This work
    pMK3 Sp Km; pDMG4 derivative 13
    pMK5 Sp Sm; pDMG4 derivative 13
    pNP3 Ap; pMMB67-based expression vector with spc promoter P. Permpanich
    pUC19 Ap; high-copy-no. cloning vector 26
a

Rif, RIF resistant; Sp, SPT resistant; Km, KAN resistant; Ap, AMP resistant; Sm, STR resistant.

DNA preparations and recombinant DNA techniques.

Plasmid DNA was isolated from A. actinomycetemcomitans and E. coli as described previously (11). Restriction endonucleases, Klenow polymerase I, and T4 DNA ligase were used in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions (Gibco-BRL). Standard recombinant DNA techniques were performed as described by Sambrook et al. (23). DNA-DNA hybridization conditions and transformation by electroporation have been described previously (11). Standard three-step PCR experiments were performed with Taq polymerase from Promega (Madison, Wis.). All PCR primers used are listed in Table 2. PCR amplification products were cloned into pGEM-T Easy (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

TABLE 2.

Primers used in PCR, RT-PCR, and sequencing reactions

Name Primer sequence Size (in bp) of PCR fragment
P1 5′-ATTCACCGCACACTTCCG-3′ NAa
P2 5′-CTAATTTCCATACTATGA-3′ NA
P3 5′-CCTTAGGCAACGCGAAAGAG-3′ NA
P4 5′-CAAGCCGCTAAAGAACTACG-3′ NA
P5 5′-TCAGGAAACTCCCTCGCTGG-3′ 4,203
P6 5′-CGAATCCGTGTTGCCTGTCG-3′
P7 5′-TGCGGTTCGAGAATTCGAAGGACAGCGCC CGAATCTCC-3′ 869
P8 5′-GCAACAATAAAAGCTTTACCTTTCTGCTAA CGCCCTGC-3′
P9 5′-GGTCAAGCGGAAGCTTCGAATCCAATAC-3′ 2,017
P10 5′-AATTGTGTCCGGATCCTAACGAGGACTC-3′
P11 5′-CCGTTCTAAAAAGTCCTCGAGAAATATTT TTTGGAAGTGATTG-3′ 815
P12 5′-AATTGAATATCAACGTGCGAGACGGTTA TCAAGCTTGAATGC-3′
P13 5′-ATCGATCCGGAGTAAATTAGTCTCC-3′ 883
P14 5′-ATCGATGTTGCCATAATCTATTCTCC-3′
a

NA, not applicable. These primers were used for sequencing.

RNA isolation and RT-PCR.

Total RNA was isolated from A. actinomycetemcomitans by use of the RNaqueous kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Residual DNA was removed by treatment with RNase-free DNase (Gibco-BRL) for 30 min at 37°C. Reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) was performed with the Qiagen OneStep RT-PCR kit (Qiagen) as described by the manufacturer. Reverse transcription was performed at 55°C with primers P11 and P12 (invertase gene) and at 65°C with primers P13 and P14 (leukotoxin gene) (Table 2). Amplification products were visualized after electrophoresis in 0.8% agarose gels.

DNA sequencing.

Nucleotide sequencing was performed with custom-made primers (P1, P2, P3, and P4) (Table 2) flanking the junctions of the invertible element on pDMG21B by use of the femtomole DNA Cycle sequencing system (Promega).

Construction of a recA-deficient ATCC 29522 strain.

The nucleotide sequence of the recA gene was retrieved from the genome of ATCC 700685 (http://www.genome.ou.edu/act.html) and was used to design two oligonucleotides flanking the gene on the 5′ (P5) and 3′ (P6) ends (Table 2). These primers were then used in a PCR experiment to amplify the corresponding gene in ATCC 29522. The amplification product of 4.2 kb was ligated to vector pGEM-T Easy (Promega) and was introduced into E. coli JM109. However, the intact gene recombined into the E. coli genome. Therefore, a 1.8-kb internal XhoII fragment of recA was removed from the 4.2-kb PCR product and was cloned into pUC19 linearized with BamHI. The new construct was purified from E. coli JM109 and was digested with MluI. The latter restriction site was unique and was located in the center of the 1.8-kb PCR insert. The linearized vector was then blunt ended with the large fragment of Klenow polymerase I (Gibco-BRL) and was ligated to a ca. 2-kb fragment excised from pMK3, which carried the gene for STR resistance. The latter, a ClaI fragment, was blunt ended as well. The resulting construct of 6.5 kb was purified from E. coli and was used to transform strain ATCC 29522Rif by electroporation. Since pUC19 does not replicate in A. actinomycetemcomitans, transformants resistant to RIF and STR indicated that all or part of the recA construct had inserted into the A. actinomycetemcomitans chromosome via homologous recombination.

Construction of pVT745 derivatives: pDMG27, pDMG28, pDMG30, and pDMG32.

All recombinant constructs used for allelic replacement were obtained in E. coli strain JM109. The following cloning strategy was used to construct pDMG27 in which the gene for the site-specific recombinase (inv) on pDMG21A is replaced with an STR resistance cassette via allelic exchange by homologous recombination (pDMG27). First, vector pUC19 was modified by eliminating its unique EcoRI and AvaI sites located in the multiple-cloning site. This was accomplished by digesting pUC19 with the corresponding restriction enzymes, treatment of the restriction sites with the large fragment of Klenow polymerase I (Gibco-BRL), and religation of the free ends of the vector. Subsequently the 2.9-kb BamHI-HincII fragment of pVT745, which carried the gene for the site-specific recombinase (12), was cloned into the modified pUC19 vector digested with the same restriction enzymes. The resulting construct was double digested with EcoRI-AvaI to remove an internal 400-bp fragment from the target gene. The linearized construct was then blunt ended with Klenow polymerase I and was ligated with a 2-kb blunt-ended fragment carrying the STR resistance cassette from pMK5. This final pUC19 derivative was purified from E. coli JM109 and was transferred into VT745:pDMG21A via electroporation. Since pUC19 does not replicate in this host, only transformants that had the stm gene integrated into the resident plasmid, pDMG21A, by homologous recombination were able to grow in the presence of SPT. The pUC19 construct allowed for a single- or a double-crossover event to occur. Plasmid DNA isolated from the transformants was analyzed by restriction enzyme digestion and Southern blot hybridizations using pUC19 or the STR resistance gene as probes. Results from these experiments confirmed that both, a single-crossover event and a double-crossover event, had occurred. One of the pDMG21A derivatives obtained by double crossover, pDMG27, was subsequently used in conjugation assays.

To construct pDMG28 and pDMG30, an additional selective marker, SPT (spc), was inserted into pDMG21A and pDMG27 at an XbaI site, which is located outside the invertible segment (Fig. 1A). This was accomplished as follows: primers were designed (P7 and P8 [Table 2]) and were used to amplify an 870-bp fragment of pVT745 by PCR. The target sequence corresponded to a region upstream of the putative oriV and contained the XbaI site into which spc was to be inserted (12). To one of the primers the restriction site for EcoRI and to the other primer the restriction site for HindIII were added to allow for cloning of the PCR amplification product into pUC19 digested with both of these enzymes. The resulting pUC19 construct was digested with XbaI; the free ends were treated with the large fragment of Klenow polymerase I (Gibco-BRL) and were ligated with a 1.1-kb spc cassette. The latter had been retrieved from pGEM7Zf(−)/spc (8) as a 1.1-kb XbaI-BamHI fragment and had been blunt ended as well. The final construct was purified from E. coli strain JM109 and used to transform strains VT745:pDMG21A and VT745:pDMG27 by electroporation. Plasmid DNA was isolated from SPT-resistant transformants and analyzed by restriction enzyme digest and Southern blot hybridization. Recombinant plasmids into which the spc gene had inserted into the target XbaI site via single crossover were labeled pDMG28 (for the pDMG21A construct) and pDMG29 (for the pDMG27 construct).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Physical and genetic map of pVT745 (A) and its invertible segment (B). XbaI and EcoRI are present more than once on the plasmid. (A) Map of pVT745 depicting the gene clusters magA and magB necessary for conjugative transfer of the plasmid (12) and the location of an invertible region flanked by IR22. Transcriptional orientation of genes or operons is indicated by an arrowhead. Small arrows point to target sites for the insertion of antibiotic resistance markers kan (KAN), spc (SPT), and stm (STR). The pVT745 derivatives resulting from the insertion of these markers are listed in brackets next to the appropriate resistance cassette. Note that all constructs carry more than one resistance gene. inv, invertase gene. (B) Genetic organization of the invertible region (isomeric form A). Genes and/or open reading frames are represented by boxes. For more specific information on the open reading frames shown, see Galli et al. (12). Hatched boxes indicate that the corresponding open reading frames are transcribed counterclockwise.

Construct pDMG32 was obtained similar to pDMG28 with the spc gene inserted into an EcoRI located 3′ of oriV (Fig. 1A). Again, the regions adjacent to the target EcoRI site were amplified by PCR (primers P9 and P10 [Table 2]) and the 2-kb amplification product was cloned into a pUC19 derivative from which the EcoRI site had been removed by treatment with the large fragment of Klenow polymerase I. The new construct was then digested with EcoRI to cleave this unique site located in the center of the PCR product, blunt ended, and ligated with the spc cassette. Again, the final product was purified from JM109 and introduced into VT745 via electroporation. Recombinant SPT-resistant transformants were obtained in which the spc gene had inserted into the target EcoRI site of pDMG21A via single and double crossover. One of the pDMG21A derivatives obtained by double crossover, pDMG32, was used subsequently in mating assays.

Construction of invertase expression vector pJC20.

The invertase gene was amplified from pVT745 by PCR with custom-made primers P11 and P12 (Table 2). The latter primer included a HindIII site. The amplification product of 815 bp was then cloned into pGEM-T Easy (Promega) and was subsequently retrieved as a SalI-HindIII fragment. The latter fragment was cloned into expression vector pNP3 (P. Permpanich, personal communication) cut with the same enzymes. The final construct, pJC20, was purified from E. coli JM109 and used to transform various strains of A. actinomycetemcomitans via electroporation.

Analysis of segregational stability of plasmids.

Plasmid stability was assessed as described by Galli et al. (10). In short, strains were grown in antibiotic-free TSBYE broth for 7 days (equivalent to 90 to 100 cell doublings) while being diluted 1:100 in fresh medium once a day to maintain the cultures in exponential growth phase. Thereafter, serial dilutions of each culture were spread on antibiotic-free TSBYE plates. Percentages of plasmid-containing cells were obtained by transfer of 100 colonies from these plates to selective and nonselective plates with sterile toothpicks. Experiments were performed at least twice.

Mating experiments.

Conjugative surface matings were performed between A. actinomycetemcomitans strains as described previously for 6 h unless noted otherwise (12). Transfer frequencies were expressed as the number of transconjugants per donor cell. At least 10 selected transconjugants were examined for the presence of plasmid DNA after each mating experiment. Spontaneous RIF mutations occurred at a frequency of less than 10−9 and did not interfere with low-frequency matings.

Characterization of RecA transformants.

Recombination-deficient mutants (RecA cells) were identified based on their sensitivity to UV light and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS). Parental ATCC 29522 cells and potential RecA transformants were grown in broth to late exponential phase and were then streaked in parallel onto TSBYE agar plates. Plates were irradiated with UV light with increasing doses (500, 1,000, 2,000 and 4,000 μJ) (UV Stratalinker 1800; Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.), and their contents were then incubated for 2 days.

The sensitivity of RecA cells to the chemical MMS was tested by adding MMS to TSBYE agar plates in various concentrations, and a comparison of cell growth on these plates to that of parental strain ATCC 29522 grown under the same conditions was made.

RESULTS

DNA rearrangement of pVT745 derivatives.

The conjugative transfer of pDMG20 and pDMG21, two KAN-resistant derivatives of pVT745, between different A. actinomycetemcomitans strains was reported previously (12). When ATCC 29522 and ATCC 700685 transconjugants were being screened for pDMG20 and pDMG21 content, it was observed that the plasmids showed restriction fragment length polymorphism for certain restriction enzymes such as EcoRI when compared to the original constructs (Fig. 2). Further analysis by restriction enzyme digestion confirmed that this polymorphism was due to the inversion of a DNA segment of approximately 9 kb. To distinguish both isomers of pDMG20 and pDMG21, the letter A was added to the pVT745 derivatives carrying the inverted segment in the same orientation as pVT745 in its original host, whereas plasmids harboring the inversion after conjugative transfer were assigned the letter B. Surprisingly, the 9-kb segment was always completely fixed in either the A or B orientation. Constructs pDMG20B and pDMG21B were never detected in the original host VT745, while pDMG20A and pDMG21A could not be retrieved from any of the transconjugants screened. Even when these transconjugants were used as donors in subsequent mating experiments (not shown), pDMG20B and pDMG21B did not appear to revert to the original structure. Also, DNA inversion had never been observed on pVT745 when residing in VT745.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Analysis of EcoRI-generated patterns of plasmid pDMG21 by agarose gel electrophoresis. Lane 1, pDMG21A, as isolated from host VT745; and lane 2, pDMG21B, as isolated from transconjugants after transfer. Asterisks indicate the bands that have shifted due to DNA rearrangement of the plasmid. The third band from the top in lanes 1 and 2 represents a triplet and a doublet, respectively. The 1-kb ladder from Gibco-BRL was used as a molecular size standard. MWM, molecular weight marker.

The DNA inversion is recA independent.

To determine if recA was involved in the structural rearrangement of pDMG21A, a recombination-deficient mutant of strain ATCC 29522Rif was constructed. Allelic replacement of recA via a double-crossover event with a mutated copy carrying an STR resistance cassette was confirmed by restriction enzyme analysis and Southern blot hybridization (not shown). Sensitivity to 0.001% MMS and UV light (2,000 μJ) confirmed the recA-deficient phenotype (not shown).

Strain ATCC 29522RifrecA was then used as a recipient in the conjugative transfer of pDMG20A and pDMG21A from VT745. Again, all transconjugants tested harbored the rearranged version of the transferred plasmids, indicating that the DNA inversion event was independent of the recA status of the recipient (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Rearrangement of pVT745 derivatives after conjugative transfer

Donor Plasmid Recipient Inversion
VT745 pDMG20A ATCC 29522Rif +
VT745 pDMG21A ATCC 29522Rif +
VT745 pDMG20A ATCC 29522RifrecA +
VT745 pDMG21A ATCC 29522RifrecA +
VT745 pDMG27 ATCC 29522Rif
VT745 pDMG20A ATCC 700685Rif +
VT745 pDMG21A ATCC 700685Rif +
ATCC 700685Rif pDMG21B VT745:pDMG4

The DNA inversion is caused by the pVT745-encoded site-specific recombinase.

Nucleotide sequence analysis of pVT745 revealed that the plasmid carried a gene, AA01, which showed strong homology to site-specific DNA recombinases (12). Indeed, the AA01 gene product was 45% identical to Min, a DNA inversion enzyme of plasmid p15B, which is a member of the Din family of site-specific recombinases (Fig. 3A) (16). Conserved regions included the N-terminal end with the active serine residue required for the formation of covalent intermediates with DNA at the crossover sites (Fig. 3A) (14). To elucidate the role of the pVT745-specific recombinase in the DNA inversion event, the gene was replaced with an STR resistance cassette as described in Materials and Methods. The resulting construct, a derivative of pDMG21A, was designated pDMG27. When pDMG27 was transferred from VT745 to ATCC 29522Rif via conjugation, rearrangements on the plasmid were no longer observed (Table 3). This was true for the recA+ and recA mutant recipient strain. This result clearly demonstrated that the site-specific recombinase was involved in the DNA inversion event. Therefore, it was decided to rename gene AA01 encoding the site-specific recombinase inv for DNA invertase.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Comparison of Inv of pVT745 and Min of p15B, a member of the Din family of invertases (16). (A) Sequence alignment of Inv and Min. Amino acids that are identical are boxed. The active serine residue (S) involved in the 5′ phosphoryl linkage is boldfaced. (B) Alignment of the recognition sites for Inv (IR22), Min (mix) (24), and dix, the consensus sequence for the recombination sites of all members of the Din family (14). Areas of dyad symmetry are indicated by arrows.

Comparison of restriction enzyme profiles of pDMG21A and pDMG21B located the junctions of the invertible segment to a region just upstream of the site-specific recombinase and between AA10 and AA11 (Fig. 1A) (12). Custom-made oligonucleotide primers were used to sequence the junction fragments. Analysis of the resulting DNA nucleotide sequence revealed the presence of a 22-bp repeat (IR22) with dyad symmetry in opposite orientation at the junctions (Fig. 1A and 3B). These two recombination sites (DNA crossover sequences) were similar but not identical to the conserved crossover sites of the Min and Din systems (Fig. 3B) (14, 24). The main difference was in the region containing the central asymmetric dinucleotide, where Min introduces a 2-bp staggered cut. The central nonsymmetric A-A dinucleotide is conserved in the family of Din invertases (14). Its absence in the Inv-specific crossover sites could indicate that, despite the high degree of homology, there is a difference in target specificity for Inv and Min. The inversion of the 9-kb segment did not result in the creation of new open reading frames or the connection or disconnection of parts of open reading frames (Fig. 1B) as described for other systems.

The DNA inversion is host dependent.

Since no rearrangement had ever been observed on pVT745 or one of its derivatives in the original host, VT745, it was possible that the inversion was triggered by the mating event. Therefore, pDMG20A was introduced into ATCC 29522Rif by electroporation. Again, DNA inversion took place. The transformants screened all harbored pDMG20B. This raised the possibility that a host-specific factor was involved in the inversion event. The following possibilities were postulated: (i) an accessory factor is required for inversion in addition to the site-specific recombinase, and such a factor is present in all A. actinomycetemcomitans strains but VT745. (ii) An accessory factor is required for inversion in addition to the site-specific recombinase, and such a factor is present in all A. actinomycetemcomitans strains but JP2, of which VT745 is a member (15). (iii) VT745 or any JP2 strain harbors a factor that is absent in all other A. actinomycetemcomitans strains and that maintains the plasmid in the preferred arrangement “A.” The second assumption could be eliminated when conjugative transfer of pDMG20A and pDMG21A to ATCC 700685Rif, a JP2-like strain, resulted in the inversion of the 9-kb segment (Table 3). To test the third assumption strain, ATCC 29522Rif was used as a donor to transfer pDMG21B to VT745 (Table 3). The latter harbored pDMG4 (10), an SPT-resistant replicon that is neither conjugative nor mobilizable, to allow for selection of transconjugants. No reversion of pDMG21B to pDMG21A was observed in VT745:pDMG4. Also, transformation of VT745 by electroporation with pDMG20B did not result in the reversion of the plasmid to pDMG20A. Therefore, it was concluded that a specific host factor other than RecA is necessary in addition to the site-specific recombinase to catalyze the inversion. Such a factor is either missing or inactive in VT745. However, the absence of this specific host factor is not a distinct feature of JP2-like strains to which VT745 belongs, since DNA inversion was observed in ATCC 700685Rif, another JP2-like strain.

The invertase does not contribute to the segregational stability of pVT745.

Strain VT745 carrying the various pVT745 derivatives was grown in the absence of selective pressure to determine if inversion of the 9-kb segment on pDMG21B or the loss of invertase activity on pDMG27 affected segregational stability of the plasmids. The percentage of cells within a given population that still harbored the plasmids after 100 and 200 generations, respectively, is shown in Table 4. Since pDMG27 was as stable as pDMG21A, it is unlikely that the site-specific recombinase is required for efficient partitioning of pVT745. However, the rearrangement of the invertible region seems to affect the segregational stability of the plasmid as demonstrated by the rapid loss of pDMG21B in the absence of selective pressure (Table 4). This was true for pDMG21B in VT745 as well as in ATCC 29522Rif.

TABLE 4.

Segregational stability of pVT745 derivatives

Strain:plasmid Stability (%) after:
100 generations 200 generations
VT745:pDMG21A 100a 100
VT745:pDMG21B 50 2
VT745:pDMG20B 48 9
VT745:pDMG27 100 100
ATCC 29522Rif:pDMG21B 27 NDb
a

Percentage of plasmid-containing cells.

b

ND, not determined.

The invertase affects pVT745 conjugation frequencies.

While the various mating experiments described above were being conducted, it was observed that significantly higher frequencies of transfer were obtained for pDMG27 than for pDMG21A. Therefore, actual conjugation frequencies per donor cell were determined using VT745 as a donor strain and the ATCC 29522Rif recA+ and recA mutant recipient strains (Table 5). Surprisingly, pDMG27 appeared to transfer at a frequency several orders of magnitude higher than did pDMG21A. However, it was unlikely that the plasmids were transferred at different rates, since they differed only in their invertase activity and since electroporation experiments had indicated that Inv was neither active in the host VT745 nor activated by conjugation alone. Therefore, the difference in number of selectable transconjugants had to be associated with an event that took place in the recipient cells after completion of the actual plasmid transfer. A possible explanation for the low number of detectable pDMG21 transconjugants was that the invertible segment and its associated KAN-resistant phenotype had been excised from the plasmid in recipient cells after the mating event. The resulting truncated pVT745 derivative would then only be detectable if a second marker located outside the invertible region was present. Therefore pDMG28 and pDMG32 were constructed, both derivatives of pDMG21A with an additional spc cassette inserted 5′ or 3′ to oriV (Fig. 1A) to allow for replication and selection of any potential deletion derivative. Insertion of spc was in a noncoding region. An spc marker was also inserted into pDMG27 to confirm that the addition of a new cassette and the target location for this marker did not affect the mating frequencies of the inv mutant derivative. This last construct was designated pDMG30.

TABLE 5.

Transfer frequencies of various pVT745 derivatives

Donor Plasmid Recipient No. of transconjugants/donora after:
0.5 h on:
6 h on:
RIF, KAN RIF, SPT RIF, KAN RIF, SPT
VT745 pDMG21A ATCC 29522Rif <10−7 NA 10−6 NA
VT745 pDGM21A ATCC 29522RifrecA ND NA 10−6 NA
ATCC 29522 pDGM21B ATCC 700685Rif ND NA 10−6 NA
VT745 pDMG27 ATCC 29522Rif 10−4 NA 10−3 NA
VT745 pDMG27 ATCC 29522RifrecA 10−4 NA 10−3 NA
VT745 pDMG28 ATCC 29522Rif <10−7 <10−7 10−6 NA
VT745 pDMG30 ATCC 29522Rif 10−4 10−4 10−3 10−3
VT745 pDMG32 ATCC 29522Rif 10−6 10−6 10−5 10−5
a

The number of transconjugants per donor (average of at least two independent experiments) is shown. Selection of transconjugants was with RIF for the recipient strain and either KAN or SPT for the incoming plasmid. NA, not applicable; ND, not determined.

Mating experiments were then carried out with all new constructs. Selection for transconjugants was on either KAN or SPT. Again, mating frequencies for both pDMG21A derivatives, pDMG28 and pDMG32, were several orders of magnitude lower than for pDMG30, which carried a mutated inv gene in addition to the spc cassette (Table 5). However, whereas the numbers of transconjugants obtained for pDMG28 were similar to the ones obtained for pDMG21A, mating frequencies were increased for pDMG32 (Table 5). Doubling times for A. actinomycetemcomitans range between 1.5 and 2 h. Therefore, mating experiments were performed for 6 h as described previously (13) and for 0.5 h to confirm that the decrease in number of transconjugants was not the result of segregational instability of the plasmid. The significant decrease in actual mating times had no effect on the outcome of the experiment. Also, all KAN-resistant transconjugants were resistant to SPT and vice versa, indicating that neither marker had been lost as was to be expected with a deletion derivative. Results of restriction enzyme analysis with plasmid DNA isolated from selected transconjugants confirmed the absence of any truncated version of either pDMG28 or pDMG32 (not shown). Surprisingly, up to 30% of the pDMG32 transconjugants screened carried the invertible 9-kb region in orientation A (not shown).

Expression of the invertase gene alone does not trigger the inversion event.

The fact that the invertible segment appeared to remain stable in orientation A or B once the pVT745 derivatives were established in the recipient cells suggested that the invertase gene was no longer expressed after the inversion event. Also, lack of inversion in VT745 could be explained by the absence of inv expression. To test these assumptions, the presence of inv-specific mRNA was determined in strains VT745:pDMG21A and -B, ATCC 29522Rif:pDMG21B, and ATCC 29522Rif:pDMG32A. Results of RT-PCR experiments confirmed the absence of an inv-specific transcript in all strains tested. In contrast, an RT-PCR product was detected in strain ATCC 29522Rif:pJC20, which expressed the invertase gene under the control of the spc promoter (not shown). Integrity of the RNA preparations was confirmed by the detection of the A. actinomycetemcomitans-specific leukotoxin transcript in VT745:pDMG21A and -B by RT-PCR (data not shown).

If indeed inversion was regulated by inv expression, the presence of a constitutively expressed invertase would result in the rearrangement of pVT745 derivatives during normal cell growth. Such an event could then be detected by the presence of pVT745 derivatives in the A and B orientation in the same plasmid preparation. To test this assumption, pJC20, a pMMB67 derivative that expresses the invertase, was transferred into VT745:pDMG21A and -B, ATCC 29522Rif:pDMG21B, and ATCC 29522Rif:pDMG32A by electroporation. Plasmid DNA isolated from selected transformants was then screened for the orientation of the invertible segment. In all cases, DNA inversion was not observed for any of the pVT745 derivatives, although expression of inv from pJC20 was confirmed by RT-PCR.

DISCUSSION

Conjugative plasmid pDMG21A, a derivative of pVT745, undergoes a structural rearrangement when transferred to recipient strains. The rearrangement is the result of site-specific recombination between two 22-bp indirect repeats present at the ends of a 9-kb element and requires the activity of the plasmid-expressed invertase gene inv. It was shown that inactivation of inv blocked rearrangement. The pVT745-encoded invertase resembles the recombinases of the Din family (14). Functionally important regions are highly conserved between Inv and Min, a member of the Din invertase subfamily (Fig. 3A). Members of the Din family are known to complement one another due to the conserved protein sequences and recombination sites. However, significant differences in the IR sequences of Inv and Min suggest a possible difference in DNA binding specificity for both enzymes.

Once a pVT745 derivative was established within the recipient cell, subsequent DNA inversion was never observed. The possibility that inversion occurred in response to the mating event itself was ruled out since the transfer of a pVT745 derivative into ATCC 29522Rif via electroporation also resulted in rearrangement of the invertible segment. However, it is conceivable that DNA entry into the cell, regardless of entry mechanism, triggers the inversion. Regulation of invertase expression alone did not appear to be sufficient to turn the inversion event on or off. Constitutive expression of inv in trans during normal cell growth did not result in the inversion of the 9-kb segment regardless of its orientation on the various pVT745 derivatives used. Therefore, one or more additional factors that are either plasmid or host encoded are required to activate the inversion event. It is likely that such a factor(s) is expressed transiently when new DNA enters the cell.

Also, inversion of the 9-kb fragment on pVT745 was never observed in VT745 regardless of the transfer mechanism used. Again, the likeliest explanation is that one or more specific host factor(s) is required to activate the inversion event and that such a factor(s) is absent in the native strain. The Din family of recombinases requires Fis (factor for inversion stimulation), which binds to specific cis-acting enhancer sequences for efficient inversion (18). These conserved Fis-binding sites are located in the 5′ end of the recombinase genes within the first 90 nucleotides of the coding frame. Consensus sequences for Fis host factor binding sites are present in the 5′ end of the pVT745-specific inv gene (J. Chen and D. M. Galli, unpublished data). Future work will include elucidation of the role of Fis or other host factors in the promotion of inversion on pVT745.

It is not yet known if Inv of pVT745 has a resolvase activity in addition to its function as an invertase. Such activity would play a role in plasmid partitioning by catalyzing the conversion of dimers and higher oligomers into monomers. It was shown in the present study that pDMG27, the pVT745 derivative with an inactivated inv, was still segregationally stable in the original host strain after 200 generations. This result is in line with the notion that recombination between two repeats in direct orientation, which would cause the deletion of the intervening DNA segment, is inefficient in the Din family of inversion systems (24).

In contrast to most other systems, at this point no biological function can be linked to the inversion event. Neither are new open reading frames created nor are existing open reading frames connected or disconnected. In future studies we will attempt to show if the transcriptional expression of the open reading frames flanking the two IR22 sites has been altered by the inversion of the 9-kb fragment. The only obvious consequence of invertase activity was a significant decrease in the number of selectable transconjugants upon transfer of the pVT745 derivatives. The reason for the loss of transconjugants in the presence of a functional invertase is not clear at this point. In two plasmid systems of Clostridium perfringens, the activity of a site-specific recombinase has been associated with the excision of a conjugative transposon, Tn4451, and associated resistance cassettes (1, 5, 6). The transposon was consequently lost in C. perfringens transconjugants or integrated into the chromosome of E. coli recipient cells at a low frequency (2). However, it is unlikely that a transposon or some other putative element present on pVT745 was excising after conjugative transfer. The insertion of a spc marker upstream (pDMG28) or downstream of oriV (pDMG32) would have permitted selection for deletion derivatives of either construct that might have lost the KAN cassette. However, the number of retrievable transconjugants did not increase when selection was for SPT. Also, the few SPT-resistant transconjugants obtained still carried the KAN resistance marker, suggesting that excision of only a defined fragment was not occurring. The loss of all resistance markers at a high frequency regardless of their location on the plasmids was an indication of the complete loss of the plasmid in recipient cells. Surprisingly, the transfer of pDMG32 increased numbers of transconjugants obtained by 1 order of magnitude when compared to that of pDMG21A and pDMG28, although all three constructs harbor an intact inv gene. Furthermore, during screening of selected transconjugants for plasmid content, pDMG32 was isolated with the invertible element in orientations A and B. Therefore, it appears that an additional plasmid-encoded element that acts either in cis or in trans affects inversion of the 9-kb segment. Such an element has to be located in the vicinity of the EcoRI site into which spc was inserted in the pDMG32 construct. Its interaction with the invertase gene or gene product appears to be associated with the plasmid loss observed in transconjugants. Likewise, this factor could be involved in regulating the inversion event when pVT745 DNA enters the cell as discussed above.

At this point the presence of the inv gene on pVT745 would appear to be a disadvantage for the effective dissemination of the plasmid via conjugation. In addition, the rearranged version is segregationally unstable, as shown with pDMG21B. It remains to be seen if a true biological role can be associated with inv or if the gene is the remnant of a functional element, which once was part of pVT745 but subsequently lost.

Acknowledgments

We thank Micah Kerr for technical assistance with DNA sequencing and construction of pDMG28 and Piyanuj Permpanich for the donation of pNP3.

This study was supported by NIH grant R01 DE12107 to D.J.L. and D.M.G.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abraham, L. J., A. J. Wales, and J. I. Rood. 1985. Worldwide distribution of the conjugative Clostridium perfringens tetracycline resistance plasmid, pCW3. Plasmid 14:37-46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abraham, L. J., and J. I. Rood. 1987. Identification of Tn4451 and Tn4452, chloramphenicol resistance transposons from Clostridium perfringens. J. Bacteriol. 169:1579-1584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Alonso, J. C., F. Weise, and F. Rojo. 1995. The Bacillus subtilis histone-like protein Hbsu is required for DNA resolution and DNA inversion mediated by the β recombinase of plasmid pSM19035. J. Biol. Chem. 270:2938-2945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Alonso, J. C., S. Ayora, I. Canosa, F. Weise, and F. Rojo. 1996. Site-specific recombination in Gram-positive theta-replicating plasmids. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 142:1-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bannam, T. L., P. K. Crellin, and J. I. Rood. 1995. Molecular genetics of the chloramphenicol-resistance transposon Tn4451 from Clostridium perfringens: the TnpX site-specific recombinase excises a circular transposon molecule. Mol. Microbiol. 16:535-551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bréfort, G., M. Magot, H. Ionesco, and M. Sebald. 1977. Characterization and transferability of Clostridium perfringens plasmids. Plasmid 1:52-66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bruant, C., S. D. Ehrlich, and L. Jannière. 1995. Primosome assembly site in Bacillus subtilis. EMBO J. 14:2642-2650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Buckley, N. D., L. N. Lee, and D. J. LeBlanc. 1995. Use of a novel mobilizable vector to inactivate the scrA gene of Streptococcus sobrinus by allelic replacement. J. Bacteriol. 177:5028-5034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Churchward, G., D. Belin, and Y. Nagamine. 1984. A pSC101-derived plasmid which shows no sequence homology to other commonly used cloning vectors. Gene 31:165-171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Galli, D. M., J. L. Polan-Curtain, and D. J. LeBlanc. 1996. Structural and segregational stability of various replicons in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Plasmid 36:42-48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Galli, D. M., and D. J. LeBlanc. 1997. Identification of a maintenance system on rolling circle replicating plasmid pVT736-1. Mol. Microbiol. 25:649-659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Galli, D. M., J. Chen, K. F. Novak, and D. J. LeBlanc. 2001. Nucleotide sequence and analysis of conjugative plasmid pVT745. J. Bacteriol. 183:1585-1594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Galli, D. M., M. S. Kerr, A. D. Fair, P. Permpanich, and D. J. LeBlanc. 2002. Parameters associated with cloning in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Plasmid 47:138-147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Glasgow, A. C., K. T. Hughes, and M. I. Simon. 1989. Bacterial DNA inversion systems, p. 637-659. In D. E. Berg and M. M. Howe (ed.), Mobile DNA. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  • 15.Haubek, D., K. Poulsen, J. Westergaard, G. Dahlen, and M. Kilian. 1996. Highly toxic clone of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans in geographically widespread cases of juvenile periodontitis in adolescents of African origin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1576-1578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Iida, S., H. Sandmeier, P. Hubner, R. Hiestand-Nauer, K. Schneitz, and W. Arber. 1990. The Min DNA inversion system of plasmid p15B of Escherichia coli 15T−: a new member of the Din family of site-specific recombinases. Mol. Microbiol. 4:991-997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jannière, L., A. Gruss, and S. D. Ehrlich. 1993. Plasmids, p. 625-644. In A. L. Sonenshein, J. A. Hoch, and R. Losick (ed.), Bacillus subtilis and other gram-positive bacteria. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  • 18.Johnson, R. C., and M. I. Simon. 1987. Enhancers of site-specific recombination in bacteria. Trends Genet. 3:262-267. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Komano, T. 1999. Shufflons: multiple inversion systems and integrons. Annu. Rev. Genet. 33:171-191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.LeBlanc, D. J., A. R. Abu-Al-Jaibat, P. K. Sreenivasan, and P. M. Fives-Taylor. 1993. Identification of plasmids in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and construction of intergeneric shuttle plasmids. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 8:94-99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Miller, J. H. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  • 22.Novak, K. F., and D. J. LeBlanc. 1994. Characterization of plasmid pVT745 isolated from Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. Plasmid 31:31-39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
  • 24.Sandmeier, H., S. Iida, J. Meyer, R. Hiestand-Nauer, and W. Arber. 1990. Site-specific DNA recombination system Min of plasmid p15B: a cluster of overlapping invertible DNA segments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:1109-1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.van de Putte, P., and N. Goosen. 1992. DNA inversions in phages and bacteria. Trends Genet. 8:457-462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yanisch-Perron, C., J. Vieira, and J. Messing. 1985. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene 33:103-119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES