Abstract
We carried out DNA microarray-based global transcript profiling of Escherichia coli in response to 4,5-dihydroxy-2-cyclopenten-1-one to explore the manifestation of its antibacterial activity. We show that it has widespread effects in E. coli affecting genes encoding proteins involved in cell metabolism and membrane synthesis and functions. Genes belonging to the regulon involved in synthesis of Cys are upregulated. In addition, rpoS and RpoS-regulated genes responding to various stresses and a number of genes responding to oxidative stress are upregulated.
A number of antibiotics are available against a variety of bacteria; however, in recent years, the emergence of multiple-drug-resistant bacteria has been a primary concern. This has provided an incentive to search for newer and more effective antibacterial compounds. Previously we described one such compound, 4,5-dihydroxy-2-cyclopenten-1-one (DHCP), having antibacterial activity against a variety of gram-negative and -positive bacteria, such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella, Bacillus, and Staphylococcus spp., etc. DHCP is prepared by the heat treatment of uronic acid or its derivatives (12). It is also produced from roasted or parched vegetables, fruits, cereals, mushrooms, sea algae, cortex, or cartilage. It has been shown elsewhere to have potential applications as a therapeutic or preventive agent against cancer and also as an antibacterial agent in antiseptics, dentifrices, cosmetics, and bathing agents (12). We isolated a multicopy suppressor of DHCP toxicity from an E. coli genomic library. The gene encoding this suppressor was designated dep, and the putative protein encoded by this gene was designated Dep. The Dep protein showed high homology to known efflux proteins conferring resistance to a number of antibiotics including chloramphenicol, bicyclomycin, and tetracycline. However, it did not confer cross-resistance to any of the antibiotics tested (15). The exact mechanism of action of DHCP is not known.
In the present study, we analyzed the global transcriptional pattern of E. coli in response to DHCP by DNA microarray-based technology to explore the manifestation of the antibacterial activity of DHCP. We show that DHCP has widespread effects in E. coli affecting genes encoding proteins involved in cell metabolism and membrane synthesis and functions.
DNA microarray-based global transcription profiling of E. coli in response to DHCP treatment.
Previously we showed that the growth of E. coli strain JM83 [F− araΔ(lac-proAB) rpsL(Strr)] (22) was impaired in the presence of DHCP (250 μM) after 3 h of incubation and that cells stopped growing after 5 h (15). Our main objective in the present study was to identify all of the E. coli open reading frames that exhibited a significant increase or decrease in mRNA abundance caused by the DHCP treatment. The cells were grown in the presence of 250 μM DHCP as described previously (15). In brief, cells grown overnight in Luria-Bertani medium were diluted into fresh Luria-Bertani medium. After the growth reached 50 Klett units, DHCP was added at 250 μM and growth was further monitored. After growth reached 90 to 100 Klett units, the culture was diluted 10-fold into medium containing the same concentration of DHCP. The cells were harvested after a total of 8 h of incubation with DHCP. Control cells were grown in a similar manner without DHCP and harvested at an optical density at 600 nm comparable to the final optical density at 600 nm of the DHCP-treated cells. The total RNA was extracted by the hot phenol method described previously (16). It was further purified with an RNeasy Minikit (Qiagen) and was then treated with DNase I followed by phenol-chloroform treatment and ethanol precipitation. It was quantified by measuring absorbance at 260 nm. The purity of RNA was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The mRNAs were converted to cDNAs with coincident labeling with Cy3-dUTP or Cy5-dUTP (Amersham Pharmacia). Random hexamer pd(N)6 (Amersham Pharmacia) was used as a primer. We used the IntelliGene E. coli chip, version 1 (Takara Shuzo Co., Ltd., Shiga, Japan). This represents the entire set of E. coli K-12 W3110 open reading frames. The analysis of the density of each spot and calculation of the expression ratio for each spot were carried out by using the analysis software Imagine, version 4 (Takara catalog no. BD001). For adjustment of signals between Cy3 and Cy5, the DNA chip includes internal controls. We carried out the DNA microarray experiment three times and with label swaps to ensure consistency. Calculation of the expression ratios of the corresponding spots allowed pairwise comparisons of the relative transcript levels for each E. coli gene under the two growth conditions. The cell density of the control (untreated) and DHCP-treated cells used was the same; thus, the changes seen in the microarray were not substantially influenced by the difference in cell densities. Only those genes whose expression levels differed by a ratio of at least 4 were evaluated. In some cases, genes belonging to the same operon or category were evaluated even if the ratios differed by a factor of only 3 or a little less than 3. Ratios above 0 indicate induction and below 0 indicate repression by DHCP treatment. Selected results seen with DNA microarray analysis were confirmed by primer extension with deoxyoligonucleotides corresponding to some of the genes significantly affected. The primer extension and the deoxyoligonucleotides used for detection of osmY, dps, rpoS, katG, and ompF were described previously (14). The deoxyoligonucleotides used for detection of cysK, tehA, and zipA were primer 3969805 (5′-CAGGCGAACCAGCGGCGTGTGACC-3′), which corresponds to the region from codons 20 to 13 of cysK (4); primer 3969806 (5′-GTAGCCTGCCGGCAAATTGAGCAC-3′), which corresponds to the region from codons 13 to 6 of tehA (21); and primer 3969807 (5′-GATTAATATCAGACGCAAATCCTG-3′), which corresponds to the region from codons 10 to 3 of zipA (10). The results are shown in Fig. 1 and summarized in Table 1. The results of the two methods are in agreement.
TABLE 1.
Gene | Ratio bya:
|
|
---|---|---|
Microarray | Primer extension | |
osmY | 12.00 | 15.00 |
dps | 13.00 | 12.00 |
rpoS | 4.00 | 4.00 |
katG | 9.00 | 9.00 |
cysK | 20.00 | 18.00 |
tehA | 5.00 | 5.00 |
zipA | 5.00 | 5.00 |
ompF | 0.06 | 0.06 |
Ratios of the respective mRNA levels in the DHCP-treated and control (untreated) cells in each case are shown. Values shown are means of three independent experiments.
Genes encoding ribosomal proteins are affected by DHCP treatment.
As the concentration of DHCP and time period of exposure chosen for the present experiment severely impaired growth, one would expect significant secondary effects due to growth inhibition, and these changes do not necessarily reflect the site of action of DHCP. One manifestation of lower growth rate is that the translational machinery of the cell is affected, as evidenced by lower levels of ribosomal proteins. Most of the genes encoding ribosomal L proteins showed reduced levels, although in most cases the effect was not severe (approximately two- to threefold).
Effect of DHCP on membrane-associated functions.
As seen from Tables 2 and 3, a number of genes encoding proteins related to cell membrane were significantly affected. Predominantly the cellular transport systems were affected, especially those involving transport of iron, spermidine, and putrescine. The most prominent difference (47-fold increase) was seen in the case of creD, encoding CreD. Since the exact function of CreD is not known (3), it is difficult to judge the physiological significance of this observation. One interesting point is that creD is regulated by CreBC, a member of the cre regulon and a presumed global regulator (3). Another gene regulated by CreBC is talA (3), whose expression was also increased eightfold in the present study (Table 2). talA encodes an enzyme involved in the mobilization of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate into the pentose phosphate pathway. The expression of other CreBC-regulated genes such as yidS and yieI, the products of which have not been assigned any function yet, also increased fourfold. However, more genes known to be regulated by CreBC, such as ackA, pta, radC, malE, and trgB, were not induced by DHCP. In fact, ackA expression decreased fourfold (Table 3). Some additional factors may be involved in the regulation of expression of these genes.
TABLE 2.
Gene | Gene product and/or function | Ratio (DHCP treated/control) |
---|---|---|
Genes involved in membrane synthesis and function | ||
atzN | Zinc-transporting ATPase | 11 |
cpxP | Periplasmic protein precursor | 5 |
creD | Inner-membrane protein CreD | 47 |
czcD | Cation efflux protein CzcD | 4 |
fliY | FliY protein precursor | 9 |
msyB | Membrane protein | 4 |
tehA | Tellurite resistance protein TehA | 5 |
rpoS and RpoS- regulated genes | ||
dps | DNA-binding protein Dps | 13 |
hdeB | 10k-1 protein precursor | 6 |
katG | Catalase hydroperoxidase I | 9 |
osmY | Hyperosmotically induced protein | 12 |
otsA | Trehalose-6-phosphate synthase | 11 |
poxB | Pyruvate oxidase | 15 |
rpoS | RNP polymerase sigma factor RpoS | 4 |
wrbA | Trp repressor binding protein | 14 |
Genes involved in cell metabolism | ||
aldH | Aldehyde dehydrogenase homolog | 7 |
cysA | Sulfate/thiosulfate transport protein | 3 |
cysD | Sulfate adenylyltransferase | 6 |
cysH | Adenylsulfate reductase | 7 |
cysI | Sulfite reductase (NADPH) alpha subunit | 7 |
cysJ | Sulfite reductase (NADPH) beta subunit | 5 |
cysK | Cysteine synthase | 20 |
cysM | O-Acetylserine (thiol)-lyase B | 3 |
cysN | Sulfate adenylyltransferase | 5 |
cysP | Thiosulfate-binding protein CysP precursor | 4 |
cysQ | Ammonium transport protein CysQ | 3 |
cysU | Sulfate transport system permease | 5 |
cysW | Sulfate-thiosulfate transport protein CysW | 15 |
fbp | Fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase | 4 |
galE | UDP-glucose 4-epimerase | 5 |
galM | Aldose 1-epimerase | 4 |
galP | Galactose proton symport | 5 |
galT | Galactose-1-phosphate uridylyl transferase | 7 |
glnH | Glutamine-binding protein precursor | 5 |
gltB | Glutamate synthase (NADPH) large chain | 4 |
gsp | Glutathionylspermidine synthase-amidase | 4 |
hmpA | Flavohemoprotein | 4 |
hyfG | Hydrogenase-4 component G | 10 |
ilvB | Acetolactate synthase | 4 |
lysU | Lysine-tRNA ligase | 4 |
moaA | Molybdenum cofactor biosynthesis protein | 4 |
moaB | MoaB protein | 4 |
moaC | MoaC protein | 3 |
moaD | Molybdopterin (Mpt) converting factor | 4 |
pfkB | 6-Phosphofructokinase isoenzyme | 5 |
Genes encoding proteins with diverse functions | ||
ahpF | Alkyl hydroperoxide reductase | 4 |
bfr | Bacterioferritin | 5 |
marA | Multiple antibiotic resistance protein MarA | 5 |
mdaB | Modulator of drug activity | 10 |
nemA | N-Ethylmaleimide reductase | 8 |
nrdH | Glutaredoxin-like protein | 21 |
nrdI | NrdI protein | 10 |
soxS | SoxS protein | 4 |
talA | Patatire transaldolase | 8 |
tehB | Tellurite resistance protein TehB | 5 |
zipA | Cell division protein | 5 |
TABLE 3.
Gene | Gene product and/or function | Ratio (DHCP treated/control) |
---|---|---|
Genes involved in membrane synthesis and function | ||
ansP | l-Asparagine permease | 0.29 |
atoE | Short-chain fatty acids | 0.17 |
cheA | Chemotaxis protein CheA | 0.25 |
fadL | Long-chain fatty acid transport protein | 0.10 |
fecA | Iron(III) dicitrate transport protein FecA | 0.16 |
fecB | Iron(III) dicitrate-binding protein | 0.15 |
fecC | FecC protein | 0.21 |
fecD | Iron(III) dicitrate transport system protein | 0.15 |
fecE | Iron(III) dicitrate transport protein | 0.11 |
fepA | Ferrienterochelin receptor precursor | 0.25 |
fepC | Ferric enterobactin transport protein FepC | 0.40 |
flhC | Flagellar transcriptional activator FlhC | 0.29 |
flhD | Flagellar transcriptional activator FlhD | 0.11 |
fliC | Flagellin | 0.30 |
glf | UDP-galactopyranose mutase | 0.20 |
lysP | Lysin-specific permease | 0.16 |
motA | Chemotaxis protein MotA | 0.18 |
motB | Chemotaxis protein MotB | 0.40 |
nmpC | Outer membrane porin protein precursor | 0.01 |
ompA | Outer membrane protein A precursor | 0.23 |
ompC | Outer membrane protein C precursor | 0.20 |
ompF | Outer membrane protein F precursor | 0.06 |
ompT | Proteinase VII | 0.11 |
pheP | Phenylalanine transport protein PheP | 0.13 |
plsX | PlsX protein | 0.28 |
potA | Spermidine and putrescine transport protein A | 0.13 |
potB | Spermidine and putrescine transport system | 0.13 |
potC | Spermidine and putrescine transport system | 0.20 |
potD | Spermidine and putrescine transport protein D | 0.19 |
rfc | Probably O-antigen polymerase | 0.23 |
sdaC | Probable serine transport protein | 0.25 |
secF | Secretion protein SecF | 0.26 |
secG | P12 cytoplasmic membrane protein | 0.30 |
secY | SecY protein | 0.40 |
tsr | Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein 1 (MCP-1) | 0.22 |
tsx | Nucleoside-specific channel-forming protein | 0.22 |
znu | High-affinity zinc uptake system protein | 0.13 |
Genes involved in cell metabolism | ||
ackA | Acetate kinase | 0.28 |
entA | 2,3-Dihydro-2,3-dihydroxybenzoate | 0.44 |
entB | Isochorismatase | 0.23 |
entC | Isochorismate synthase | 0.45 |
entE | Enterochelin synthetase | 0.32 |
fruB | Phosphotransferase system | 0.12 |
fruK | I-Phosphofructokinase | 0.03 |
ndk | Nucleoside-diphosphate kinase | 0.20 |
pheS | Phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase α subunit | 0.25 |
pheT | Phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase β subunit | 0.25 |
ptfB | Phosphotransferase system enzyme II | 0.08 |
pyrD | Dihydroorotate oxidase | 0.22 |
rfbC | dTDP-6-deoxy-d-glucose-3,5 epimerase | 0.21 |
rfbD | dTDP-6-deoxy-l-mannose-dehydrogenase | 0.27 |
Genes encoding proteins with diverse functions | ||
cirA | Colicin I receptor precursor | 0.16 |
cspA | Cold shock protein | 0.38 |
cspB | Cold shock protein | 0.38 |
cspF | Cold shock protein | 0.14 |
cspL | Cold shock protein | 0.19 |
dnaJ | DnaJ protein | 0.28 |
hns | DNA-binding protein H-NS | 0.30 |
hsdS | Type I restriction enzyme | 0.21 |
mcrB | 5-Methylcytosine-specific restriction enzyme B | 0.10 |
mcrC | McrC protein | 0.11 |
mrdA | Penicillin binding protein | 0.25 |
mrdB | Rod-shaped determining protein MrdB | 0.24 |
sapA | Peptide transport periplasmic protein SapA | 0.28 |
sapC | Peptide transport system permease protein | 0.28 |
sapD | Peptide transport-ATP-binding protein | 0.17 |
sapF | Peptide transport-ATP-binding protein | 0.24 |
sfa | Sfa protein | 0.24 |
speD | Adenosylmethionine decarboxylase | 0.23 |
spoT | SpoT protein | 0.22 |
suhB | Extragenic suppressor protein SuhB | 0.23 |
The fivefold increase in the level of tehA, encoding a protein that confers resistance to tellurite, seems to be significant. Tellurite causes toxicity in a number of gram-negative bacteria. The exact mechanism of this toxicity is not known; however, it has been shown elsewhere to cause oxidative stress and may replace sulfur in various proteins, rendering them nonfunctional (9, 18). Overexpression of tehA also confers resistance to compounds such as tetraphenylarsonium Cl, ethidium bromide, crystal violet, and proflavin, similar to that inferred from multidrug resistance pumps (19).
DHCP induces RpoS and proteins regulated by RpoS.
RpoS is a global stress response regulator and is also known to be involved in quorum sensing in E. coli (11, 17). Next we examined the effect of DHCP on rpoS levels and found that rpoS was induced fourfold after the treatment with DHCP. The RpoS level also increased four times (data not shown). The gene dps is regulated by RpoS and encodes Dps, a protein induced by oxidative and osmotic stress (2, 13). This gene was induced 13-fold (Table 2). Other genes such as osmY and katG, encoding RpoS-regulated stress proteins OsmY and KatG, respectively (11, 23), were also significantly induced. Interestingly, genes encoding some of the other RpoS-regulated proteins that are not involved in the stress response were also induced, probably as a manifestation of higher levels of RpoS itself or gene-to-gene inconsistencies in the data. Examples of these include hdeB, otsA, poxB, and wrbA (Table 2).
Effect of DHCP on the genes involved in the cell metabolism.
Similarly to the effect on membrane genes, DHCP treatment affected a number of processes involved in metabolism of the cell, some of these probably being secondary effects of the treatment. The most prominent genes affected by the DHCP treatment were the ones encoding proteins involved in cysteine synthesis. A remarkable increase was observed in expression of the genes belonging to the regulon involved in synthesis of Cys, such as cysA, cysD, cysH, cysI, cysJ, cysK, cysM, cysN, cysP, cysQ, cysU, and cysW (3- to 20-fold [Table 2]). Among these, cysK expression showed the maximum increase of 20-fold. Interestingly, cysG and cysS, which do not belong to this regulon, were not affected by the DHCP treatment. Genes belonging to other operons induced by the DHCP treatment were those belonging to the gal operon and the moa operon, involved in galactose and molybdenum metabolism, respectively (Table 2). On the other hand, the expression of genes belonging to the ent operon decreased. The fru (fruB and fruK) system was also severely inhibited (8- and 33-fold, respectively) (Table 3).
DHCP affects a number of proteins with diverse functions.
Interestingly, tehB, encoding TehB, involved in tellurite resistance, was induced fivefold, similarly to tehA (Table 2). ahpF, bfr, and soxS, encoding alkyl hydroperoxide reductase, bacterioferritin, and SoxS protein, respectively, which respond to oxidative stress (1, 5, 7), were also induced about fourfold. A gene (mdaB) encoding MdaB (modulator of drug activity) was also induced 10-fold. Overproduction of MdaB imparts resistance to two topoisomerase inhibitors, adriamycin and etoposide, and presumably acts by modulating topoisomerase IV activity (6). However, in the present study, levels of parC and parE, the genes encoding two subunits of topoisomerase IV, did not change upon DHCP treatment. The gene marA, encoding multiple antibiotic resistance protein MarA, was also induced fivefold. The genes nrdH and nrdI, encoding glutaredoxin proteins, were also significantly induced by DHCP. Interestingly, genes involved in virulence such as the sap (sensitivity to antimicrobial peptides) operon genes were repressed by the DHCP treatment (Table 3).
In addition, the expression of a number of genes such as yafB, ybgS, ydiC, yeeU, yedD, yggG, yhbW, yhcN, yhhQ, yhjX, yidS, yieI, yjbJ, ymgA, ynhA, ynhC, ynhD, and ynhE, the products of which have not been assigned any functions yet, increased significantly.
Antibacterial activity of DHCP.
The present study shows that DHCP has global effects in E. coli, affecting many genes encoding proteins that are involved in general metabolism and membrane synthesis and function. Interestingly, a number of genes responding to oxidative and osmotic stress were upregulated. In addition, tehA, tehB, and cysK, which confer resistance to tellurite, were upregulated significantly. The modes of resistance to tellurite and the mechanism of its toxicity have been of great interest to researchers and have not been fully understood. It has been shown elsewhere that cysK mediates tellurite resistance in E. coli and TehA and TehB confer resistance to tellurite; Cys residues in these proteins are involved in binding to tellurite, and TehB needs S-adenosylmethionine to bind tellurite. It is a dimer that can bind both of these compounds in mediating resistance to tellurite. Tellurite generates oxidative stress and may replace sulfur in various proteins, rendering them nonfunctional (8, 9, 18, 20). In the present study, in addition to cysK, tehA, and tehB, the genes encoding proteins such as AhpF, Dps, KatG, SoxS, and Bfr, which respond to oxidative stress, were upregulated. This suggests that DHCP may be generating stress inside the cell, and its manifestations are apparent in a number of secondary effects observed in the present study. Since genes belonging to the regulon involved in synthesis of Cys were significantly upregulated by the DHCP treatment, it will also be interesting to see if DHCP is involved in Cys biosynthesis.
Acknowledgments
We are thankful to K. V. Chin from the Cancer Research Institute for his useful suggestions in scanning of the DNA arrays.
This work was supported partially by Takara Shuzo Co., Ltd., Japan.
REFERENCES
- 1.Agnez-Lima, L. F., P. Di Mascio, B. Demple, and C. F. Menck. 2001. Singlet molecular oxygen triggers the soxRS regulon of Escherichia coli. Biol. Chem. 382:1071-1075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Altuvia, S., M. Almiron, G. Huisman, R. Kolter, and G. Storz. 1994. The dps promoter is activated by OxyR during growth and by IHF and sigma S in stationary phase. Mol. Microbiol. 13:265-272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Avison, M. B., R. E. Horton, T. R. Walsh, and P. M. Bennett. 2001. Escherichia coli CreBC is a global regulator of gene expression that responds to growth in minimal media. J. Biol. Chem. 276:26955-26961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Byrne, C. R., R. S. Monroe, K. A. Ward, and N. M. Kredich. 1988. DNA sequences of the cysK regions of Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli and linkage of the cysK regions to ptsH. J. Bacteriol. 170:3150-3157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cha, M. K., H. K. Kim, and I. H. Kim. 1995. Thioredoxin-linked “thiol peroxidase” from periplasmic space of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 270:28635-28641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chatterjee, P. K., and N. L. Sternberg. 1995. A general genetic approach in Escherichia coli for determining the mechanism(s) of action of tumoricidal agents: application to DMP 840, a tumoricidal agent. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:8950-8954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen, C. Y., and S. A. Morse. 1999. Neisseria gonorrhoeae bacterioferritin: structural heterogeneity, involvement in iron storage and protection against oxidative stress. Microbiology 145:2967-2975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dyllick-Brenzinger, M., M. Liu, T. L. Winstone, D. E. Taylor, and R. J. Turner. 2000. The role of cysteine residues in tellurite resistance mediated by the TehAB determinant. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 277:394-400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Garberg, P., L. Engman, V. Tolmachev, H. Lundqvist, R. G. Gerdes, and I. A. Cotgreave. 1999. Binding of tellurium to hepatocellular selenoproteins during incubation with inorganic tellurite: consequences for the activity of selenium-dependent glutathione peroxidase. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 31:291-301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hale, C. A., and P. A. de Boer. 1997. Direct binding of FtsZ to ZipA, an essential component of the septal ring structure that mediates cell division in E. coli. Cell 88:175-185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hengge-Aronis, R. 2000. Bacterial stress responses. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
- 12.Koyama, N. E. A. 1999. Cyclopentanones, process for preparing the same, and the use thereof. European patent (EP 0941 981 A1). Date of publication 15 September 1999.
- 13.Martinez, A., and R. Kolter. 1997. Protection of DNA during oxidative stress by the nonspecific DNA-binding protein Dps. J. Bacteriol. 179:5188-5194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Phadtare, S., and M. Inouye. 2001. Role of CspC and CspE in regulation of expression of RpoS and UspA, the stress response proteins in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 183:1205-1214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Phadtare, S., K. Yamanaka, I. Kato, and M. Inouye. 2001. Antibacterial activity of 4,5-dihydroxy-2-cyclopentan-1-one (DHCP) and cloning of a gene conferring DHCP resistance in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 3:461-465. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sarmientos, P., J. E. Sylvester, S. Contente, and M. Cashel. 1983. Differential stringent control of the tandem E. coli ribosomal RNA promoters from the rrnA operon expressed in vivo in multicopy plasmids. Cell 32:1337-1346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sitnikov, D. M., J. B. Schineller, and T. O. Baldwin. 1996. Control of cell division in Escherichia coli: regulation of transcription of ftsQA involves both rpoS and SdiA-mediated autoinduction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:336-341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Summers, A. O., and G. A. Jacoby. 1977. Plasmid-determined resistance to tellurium compounds. J. Bacteriol. 129:276-281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Turner, R. J., D. E. Taylor, and J. H. Weiner. 1997. Expression of Escherichia coli TehA gives resistance to antiseptics and disinfectants similar to that conferred by multidrug resistance efflux pumps. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41:440-444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vasquez, C. C., C. P. Saavedra, C. A. Loyola, M. A. Araya, and S. Pichuantes. 2001. The product of the cysK gene of Bacillus stearothermophilus V mediates potassium tellurite resistance in Escherichia coli. Curr. Microbiol. 43:418-423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Walter, E. G., J. H. Weiner, and D. E. Taylor. 1991. Nucleotide sequence and overexpression of the tellurite-resistance determinant from the IncHII plasmid pHH1508a. Gene 101:1-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yanisch-Perron, C., J. Vieira, and J. Messing. 1985. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene 33:103-119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yim, H. H., R. L. Brems, and M. Villarejo. 1994. Molecular characterization of the promoter of osmY, an rpoS-dependent gene. J. Bacteriol. 176:100-107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]