Madden, K. S., Boehm, G. W., Lee, S. C., Grota, L. J., Cohen, N., and Ader, R. (2001). One-trial conditioning of the antibody response to hen egg lysozyme in rats. J. Neuroimmunol. 113, 236–239. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5728(00)00448-3
and
Madden, K. S., Boehm, G. W., Lee, S. C., Grota, L. J., Cohen, N., and Ader, R. (2000). One-trial conditioning of the primary antibody response to hen egg lysozyme in rats. Brain Behav. Immunity 14, 113–114.
were not cited in the article.
The citations have now been inserted in the Section Extension beyond NK cells, paragraph 3, and should read:
“Conditioned enhancement of antibody responses provides a further extension. Additional one-trial conditioning work by Madden and colleagues showed conditioned enhancement of the antibody response to hen egg lysozyme in rats, further supporting antibody production as an immune-effector domain in which conditioned enhancement can be observed (Madden et al., 2000; Madden et al., 2001). Antigen-paired taste or odor cues can enhance later antibody production, and lesion studies indicate that insular cortex and amygdala lesions disrupt conditioned antibody enhancement, whereas hippocampal lesions do not show the same effect (Alvarez-Borda et al., 1995; Alvarez-Borda et al., 1999). These data pointed toward central acquisition and representation structures long before modern engram and circuit tools became available (Alvarez-Borda et al., 1995; Alvarez-Borda et al., 1999; Kayyal et al., 2025; Koren et al., 2021).”
The original version of this article has been updated.
Footnotes
Edited and reviewed by: Javier Cuitavi, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.