Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2026 Aug 6;18(8):e114046. doi: 10.7759/cureus.114046

Humanistic and Economic Burden of Spinal Muscular Atrophy in the Gulf Region

Baher Elezbawy 1,2,✉, Sherif Abaza 3, Amal Alnajjar 4, Hana Alabdulkarim 5,6, Hussain A Al-Omar 7, Sahar Fahmy 8, Sara Aldallal 9, Tamás Ágh 10, Ahmad Fasseeh 11
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC13545702  PMID: 42701666

Abstract

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a severe, fatal genetic disorder. This study aimed to quantify the humanistic and economic burden of SMA in four Gulf countries, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Oman, and Bahrain, to provide decision-makers with evidence-based strategies for burden mitigation.

Methods: A burden of disease model was developed to quantify SMA's humanistic burden via disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and its economic burden through direct healthcare costs and indirect productivity losses experienced by patients and caregivers.

Results: Type 1 SMA caused the highest burden across all countries, followed by types 2 and 3. Total DALYs were 274,008 in KSA, 35,877 in UAE, 33,459 in Oman, and 8,679 in Bahrain. National direct medical costs totaled 114.9 million USD, 25.0 million USD, 9.5 million USD, and 3.8 million USD in KSA, UAE, Oman, and Bahrain, respectively. Annual indirect costs, driven by productivity losses among patients and caregivers, were estimated at 28.1 million USD in KSA, 5.3 million USD in UAE, 3.9 million USD in Oman, and 0.99 million USD in Bahrain.

Conclusions: The burden of SMA is considerable, particularly in the more severe phenotypes, with a profound humanistic impact and high medical costs. While results vary by population size, the consistent patterns across countries underscore the disease's severity and the urgent need for effective mitigation strategies.

Keywords: disease burden, economic burden, humanistic burden, productivity lost, resource utilization, spinal muscular atrophy

Introduction

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare genetic neuromuscular disorder that severely affects patients’ survival and quality of life (QoL) [1]. The epidemiology of SMA is not well established based on the available evidence [1]; however, the most comprehensive study to date, conducted by Verhaart et al. in 2017, estimated the prevalence to be 1-2 patients per 100,000 persons and the incidence to be 1 in 10,000 live births [2]. Actual prevalence and incidence values might differ by country; however, the global estimates are expected to be close to this study’s estimates [2]. Although rare, SMA imposes a tremendous economic burden on patients, health systems, and society due to its high mortality, severe morbidity, and cost of care [3,4].

SMA is classified into five subtypes (0 to 4), based on onset and motor milestones [1]. Type 0 is an ultra-rare, prenatal-onset form that is typically fatal within months, while Type 1 involves symptom onset before six months with severe atrophy and a life expectancy often under two years. Type 2 onset occurs between 6 and 12 months, allowing for survival into adulthood despite significant support requirements. Type 3 is diagnosed after 18 months and Type 4 in adulthood; both phenotypes are characterized by milder motor impairment and a generally normal life expectancy [1].

SMA burden is disproportionately high due to its severe prognosis across the various subtypes [5]. Decision-makers in any country require data to make evidence-informed decisions on resource allocation and reimbursement, especially for high-burden diseases [6]. Burden of disease studies enable decision-makers to understand the impact of a disease and allocate their resources more efficiently [6]. They typically address three key domains: clinical burden, humanistic burden, and economic burden. The clinical burden focuses on the morbidity and mortality of the disease. The humanistic burden focuses on the negative impact of the disease on QoL. The economic burden considers the direct and indirect costs incurred by patients, caregivers, society, or health systems as a whole [7,8].

The clinical burden of SMA is well documented in the literature, showing the average survival associated with each type, as well as the clinical manifestations and comorbidities [1,4,9]. Clinical burden per patient generally does not vary significantly between countries, as patients worldwide experience similar manifestations and complications [10,11]. In contrast, the humanistic and economic burden components can vary significantly between countries due to differences in population size, economic status, healthcare services, service costs, and other contextual factors. SMA severely affects patients and caregivers’ QoL [12] and imposes a substantial financial burden on families and society for its medical costs as well as indirect costs [3].

While some studies have quantified the humanistic and economic aspects in certain countries [10,11], no such studies exist in some of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, particularly in Bahrain, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), leaving decision-makers in those countries without the necessary data to make evidence-informed decisions for resource allocation.

Limited data are available on the burden of SMA in the GCC countries. A recent study in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) reported the socioeconomic burden of SMA through the implementation of a caregiver questionnaire [13]. The findings showed that Type 1 was the most severe and resource-intensive form, whereas Type 3 patients had a better QoL, but incurred the highest out-of-pocket payments. The study also provided detailed QoL data for SMA Type 1-4 patients, emphasizing that QoL improves with later-onset types. Although SMA has been studied in some studies from Bahrain, Oman, and the UAE [14-17], none have quantified specific burden of disease components.

The aim of this study is to quantify the humanistic and economic burden of SMA in four major GCC countries, namely, KSA, UAE, Oman, and Bahrain. The study aims to estimate the number of SMA patients in each of these countries, assess how SMA affects QoL (humanistic burden), and quantify both direct and indirect costs associated with SMA in each country. The findings of this research are expected to support local decision-makers by providing a clearer understanding of the true burden of the disease, thereby enabling more informed and evidence-based resource allocation decisions.

Materials and methods

A burden of disease model was developed to quantify both the humanistic and economic burden of SMA, tailored to each country’s specific context. A bottom-up approach was applied, starting with detailed estimates of each burden component on a per-patient basis in each country. These per-patient values were then multiplied by the estimated patient population in each country, providing estimates for both burden per patient and burden per country.

The study followed a sequential process, starting with a literature search to understand the disease area, assess available data, and review similar studies to inform the model design. The model was then built and refined to capture all components and benefit from the available extracted data. Local data collection was undertaken to populate the model with inputs derived from multiple sources, including published literature, and relevant organizational websites from each country. Additionally, expert interviews were conducted in each country to estimate the resource utilization patterns for calculating the direct costs of the disease.

Once the initial models were constructed, their results were validated through meetings with local experts in each country. Expert feedback and recommendations were incorporated to refine the model, improve its robustness, and ensure its local relevance. The final models were then analyzed to generate detailed burden estimates for each country.

Because SMA patients’ prognosis, severity, and QoL vary significantly by type, all burden of disease estimates were calculated separately for each SMA type. Data inputs and calculated estimates were adjusted to reflect the year 2026. Due to their low prevalence and limited representation in the literature [18], Types 0 and 4 were considered to have a negligible burden compared to Types 1, 2, and 3. Accordingly, results are reported by type and as a combined estimate for Types 1-3, excluding Types 0 and 4 SMA.

Estimated number of patients

To estimate the number of patients in each country, we used a previously developed global prevalence model that estimated the number of patients in each country in 2026, reflecting the diseases' point prevalence by SMA subtype [19]. Table 1 shows the estimated number of patients in 2026 in each country.

Table 1. Estimated number of SMA patients in each country in 2026.

KSA: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; SMA: spinal muscular atrophy; UAE: United Arab Emirates.

SMA type KSA UAE Oman Bahrain
Type 1 861 134 114 29
Type 2 1,983 256 250 64
Type 3 1,278 146 159 41
Total 4,122 536 523 134

Humanistic burden

The humanistic burden of SMA was estimated through calculating disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). For each country, DALYs were calculated separately for each SMA type by adding the years of life lost (YLL) to the years lived with disability (YLD), as shown in the following formula:

Inline graphic

Years of Life Lost

To estimate YLL for each country, we subtracted the average survival of SMA patients from the average life expectancy of the general population in that country, thereby determining the average YLL due to the disease. YLL was calculated using the formula:

Inline graphic

For the general population life expectancy, we used the average life expectancy values for each country provided by the United Nations World Population Prospects for 2026 [20].

For the mean survival of SMA patients, we used data derived from a published survival model based on an individual patient data-enhanced methodology [21]. Using this model, restricted mean survival was calculated by integrating disease-specific mortality with background mortality from the general population. Mean survival, representing the life expectancy of SMA patients, was estimated by calculating the area under the curve of each SMA subtype. The resulting mean survival estimates were 7.39 years for patients with SMA Type 1 and 36.70 years for those with SMA Type 2. Evidence from a systematic literature review indicates that SMA does not appear to significantly affect survival among patients with Type 3 [12]. Therefore, these patients were assigned the life expectancy of the general population and were not assigned any YLL due to early mortality.

Years Lived With Disability

To estimate YLD per patient, we multiplied the loss in QoL (disutility) of each patient by the number of years they were expected to live with this disability (SMA survival). YLD was calculated using the formula:

Inline graphic

Disutility values for different SMA subtypes were not consistently or robustly reported in the literature. Therefore, a proxy approach was used to estimate the disutility. A systematic literature review on the humanistic and clinical burden of SMA reported average values from the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) questionnaire for each SMA subtype [12]. The HUI3 is a validated preference-based instrument that measures health-related QoL on a scale from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (perfect health), comparable to utility values commonly used in health economic evaluations [22]. The reported HUI3 values were used to estimate the disutility for each subtype using the formula:

Inline graphic

HUI3 values were selected rather than other QoL measures reported in the review because they were available for all relevant SMA subtypes. This approach was intended to provide an approximate estimate of the QoL loss associated with each SMA subtype. However, uncertainty remains because the systematic review reported substantial heterogeneity among the included studies.

To explore the potential impact of this uncertainty, two additional scenario analyses were conducted to capture a range of burden estimates and ensure that the true burden lies within these estimates. In Scenario 1, utility values for each subtype were increased by 50% relative to those reported in the systematic review, representing a lower burden scenario. In Scenario 2, utility values were reduced by 50%, representing a higher burden scenario. Finally, DALYs were calculated based on these utility values using the three scenarios. The reported utility values and the calculated scenarios are shown in Appendix A.

Economic burden

Indirect Costs

Indirect costs were calculated for patients and caregivers based on the time they lost due to the disease. The following formula was used to estimate the indirect costs:

Inline graphic

Indirect costs were assessed exclusively for patients aged 16 and older, as individuals younger than 16 years are generally not part of the productive workforce. Consequently, younger patients were excluded from the productivity loss analysis.

For caregiver-related productivity losses, it was assumed that each patient requires the support of one primary caregiver. Consequently, caregiver burden was estimated based on the total number of SMA patients, including both adults and children, as patients with SMA typically require continuous assistance regardless of age.

Indirect cost calculations were adjusted according to the labor force participation rate in each country to account for the proportion of the population that is not actively engaged in the workforce, thereby avoiding overestimation of productivity losses.

The number of hours lost for productivity by patients and their caregivers were derived from a systematic literature review that reported estimates of time lost due to SMA-related disability and caregiving responsibilities [12]. A summary of the identified estimates for productivity losses among patients and caregivers is presented in Appendix B. Country-specific hourly wage data were obtained from an online database reporting salaries in the included countries [23].

Direct Medical Costs

Direct medical costs were estimated using country-specific costing data for each of the four GCC countries included in the analysis. Resource utilization patterns were collected from local expert interviews, and unit costs of medications and healthcare services were collected from publicly available national databases and local hospital pricelists.

To estimate healthcare resource utilization, a structured questionnaire was developed and administered to clinical experts in each country during online interviews. To create the questionnaire, we searched published studies to identify relevant cost components associated with the management of SMA [3,18,24]. These components included, but were not limited to, diagnostic tests, routine monitoring procedures, management of complications, and types of medical visits. Experts were also encouraged to identify and report any additional cost components that might not have been captured in the initial questionnaire to ensure comprehensive coverage of all relevant healthcare resources.

Before starting the interviews, the questionnaire was reviewed and validated by a clinical expert specialized in the management of SMA to ensure that all clinically relevant aspects of the disease and its management were adequately captured. The questionnaire included three sections: (1) diagnostics costs, (2) monitoring costs, and (3) medical management costs.

Following questionnaire development and validation, expert interviews were conducted to estimate the frequency of resource utilization for each cost component (e.g., number of outpatient visits per year by SMA subtype, frequency of laboratory tests, and other medical services). In each country, two clinical experts actively involved in the treatment of SMA patients participated in the interviews. The average of their reported estimates was used in the analysis to minimize potential bias arising from individual clinical practice variations.

Given the rarity of SMA and the limited number of clinical experts specializing in its management, experts were recruited using convenience sampling. Clinical experts were eligible to participate if they were currently treating SMA patients within the respective country and had at least three years of continuous experience in managing SMA cases.

Unit costs were obtained from local sources, including published national drug lists [25-28], hospital price lists, and insurance price lists. Costs were adjusted to purchase prices to represent the actual economic burden paid by the payer or insurer.

The average annual direct medical cost per patient for each SMA subtype was calculated using the following formula:

Inline graphic

Pi = proportion of patients utilizing cost item i, Fi = annual frequency of utilization of cost item i, Ci = unit cost of cost item i.

The average cost per patient across all SMA subtypes was estimated as a weighted average based on the distribution of SMA subtypes in the population:

Inline graphic

Finally, the total direct medical cost at the population level was estimated by multiplying the number of patients in each subtype by the corresponding average cost:

Inline graphic

The full questionnaire used for data collection is provided in Appendix C.

Total estimated burden

To estimate the overall burden of SMA at the country level, all cost components were aggregated. The economic burden included both direct medical costs and indirect costs related to productivity losses. In addition, the humanistic burden of the disease was quantified. To express this burden in monetary values, DALYs lost at the population level were multiplied by the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of the respective country. Under this approach, each DALY lost, representing one year of healthy life lost due to premature mortality, disability, or both, was assigned a monetary value equivalent to one time the GDP per capita [29]. This valuation method does not represent actual financial losses but rather provides a hypothetical economic valuation of health loss, allowing the humanistic burden to be expressed in monetary terms and compared with the economic costs of the disease.

Finally, the total burden of SMA in each country was estimated by combining the three components; direct medical costs, indirect costs, and the monetized value of DALYs lost (representing the humanistic burden).

Data processing and analysis

Mean survival was used instead of median survival to better capture the full distribution of survival outcomes in SMA. Given the highly skewed survival patterns, particularly in Type 1 SMA, where a small proportion of patients survive substantially longer, mean survival provides a more comprehensive estimate for modelling disease burden.

To address the uncertainty in YLD estimation, minimum and maximum HUI values were calculated, and corresponding ranges were reported for YLDs and DALYs. Cost data were initially collected in local currencies for each country and subsequently converted to US dollars (USD) using 2026 exchange rates as reported by the World Bank [30]. No discounting was applied to costs because direct and indirect costs were estimated on an annual basis for the projected 2026 prevalent population.

All analyses were conducted using Microsoft Excel, version 2606 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Mean values for resource utilization were calculated for multiple experts’ inputs to minimize individual bias. In cases where substantial discrepancies were identified (defined as one estimate being at least double another), follow-up discussions were conducted with the experts to clarify assumptions and reach a consensus on the final values.

Results

The study findings present estimates of the humanistic and economic burden of SMA at both the individual and population levels across the included countries. Per-patient estimates represent the average burden experienced by an individual living with SMA within each country, while population-level estimates account for the projected number of patients based on the estimated point prevalence for 2026.

Humanistic burden

Patient Humanistic Burden

SMA imposes a humanistic burden on patients across all countries included in the study. For SMA Type 1, a patient loses approximately 72-76 years of life expectancy compared to the general population in his/her respective country. In addition, disability contributes to approximately 6 YLDs, ranging from six to seven years based on the base HUI-3 utility estimates and ±50% uncertainty adjustments. Consequently, the total burden for Type 1 patients ranges between 78 and 82 DALYs per patient.

For SMA Type 2 patients, the estimated YLL ranges from 43 to 47 years across the countries included in the analysis. However, these patients live longer with disease-related disability, resulting in substantial YLD estimated at 31 years, with a range of 28-34 years when applying HUI-3 base estimates and ±50% uncertainty adjustments. Combined, the overall burden for Type 2 patients reaches approximately 74-78 DALYs per patient.

For SMA Type 3, patients experience approximately 39 YLD, resulting in 39 DALYs per patient. The uncertainty range is wider (11-56 DALYs) due to greater variability in QoL estimates over the prolonged disease duration experienced by these patients. The detailed estimates of YLL, YLD, and DALYs per patient by SMA subtype and country are presented in Table 2.

Table 2. The humanistic burden of SMA per patient in each country.

YLL: years of life lost; YLD: years lived with disability; DALYs: disability-adjusted life years; KSA: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; SMA: spinal muscular atrophy; UAE: United Arab Emirates; HUI-3: Health Utilities Index Mark 3; QoL: quality of life.

*Values within brackets represent the range of uncertainty when using HUI-3 lower and upper estimates to estimate the effect of SMA on QoL.

SMA type  Humanistic burden component KSA UAE Oman Bahrain
Type 1 YLL 76 74 72 73
YLD* 6 (6-7) 6 (6-7) 6 (6-7) 6 (6-7)
DALYs (YLL + YLD)* 82 (82-83) 81 (80-81) 78 (78-79) 80 (79-80)
Type 2 YLL 47 45 43 44
YLD* 31 (28-34) 31 (28-34) 31 (28-34) 31 (28-34)
DALYs (YLL + YLD)* 78 (75-80) 76 (73-79) 74 (71-76) 75 (72-78)
Type 3 YLL 0 0 0 0
YLD* 39 (22-56) 39 (22-56) 39 (11-56) 39 (22-56)
DALYs (YLL + YLD)* 39 (22-56) 39 (22-56) 39 (11-56) 39 (22-56)

Population Humanistic Burden

For the overall SMA population in each country, DALYs reached 274,008 in KSA, 35,877 in UAE, 33,459 in Oman, and 8,679 in Bahrain. Uncertainty ranges represented by the lower and upper estimates derived from the HUI-3 utility analysis appear wider at the population level due to the amplified effect when uncertainty in a single patient is extended to the whole population. The population-level DALY estimates for each SMA subtype and country are presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1. DALYs lost per population in each country.

Figure 1

DALYs: Disability-adjusted Life Years, KSA: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, UAE: United Arab Emirates; SMA: spinal muscular atrophy; QoL: quality of life; HUI-3: Health Utilities Index Mark 3.

Values within brackets represent the range of uncertainty when using HUI-3 lower and upper estimates to estimate the effect of SMA on QoL.

Economic burden

The economic burden of SMA comprises two main components: indirect costs, represented by productivity losses experienced by patients and their caregivers, and direct medical costs of the disease representing the healthcare resources required for disease management.

Indirect Costs

The indirect costs across the included countries show a consistent trend, with caregiver burden being highest in Type 1 and decreasing toward Type 3, reflecting the natural progression and severity of the disease. Productivity losses among caregivers represent the major component of the indirect costs, especially in Type 1 and Type 2 SMA patients.

SMA Type 2 patients sometimes survive into adulthood, but caregiver involvement remains significant throughout the disease course. Consequently, caregiver productivity losses continue to represent the largest share of indirect costs, although some productivity losses among patients may also occur.

SMA Type 3 patients typically reach adulthood and may participate in the workforce. As a result, productivity losses among patients themselves become a more substantial component of indirect costs. While caregiver assistance is still required, a proportion of the productivity burden shifts from caregivers to patients compared with the more severe SMA subtypes.

Table 3 summarizes the estimated annual indirect costs of SMA across the countries included. The total indirect burden was estimated at 28.1 million USD in KSA, 5.3 million USD in UAE, 3.9 million USD in Oman, and 988 thousand USD in Bahrain.

Table 3. Annual indirect costs of SMA represented in productivity loss due to the disease.

KSA: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; SMA: spinal muscular atrophy; UAE: United Arab Emirates.

SMA type  Indirect cost component KSA (USD) UAE (USD) Oman (USD) Bahrain (USD)
Type 1 Patients  -    -    -    -  
Caregivers  5,875,058  1,297,961  763,301  197,992
Total cost (patients and caregivers)  5,875,058  1,297,961  763,301  197,992
Type 2 Patients  1,462,587  268,670  205,087  50,887
Caregivers  14,781,651  2,715,318  2,072,710  514,290
Total cost (patients and caregivers)  16,244,238  2,983,988  2,277,797  565,177
Type 3 Patients  2,393,558  399,729  347,109  89,400
Caregivers  3,630,906  606,369  526,546  135,615
Total cost (patients and caregivers)  6,024,465  1,006,098  873,655  225,014
All types combined Total cost (patients and caregivers)  28,143,761  5,288,047  3,914,752  988,183

Direct Medical Costs

Direct costs per patient: Annual direct medical costs per patient were highest for Type 1, followed by Type 2 and Type 3 SMA across all countries included in the analysis. This pattern reflects the greater clinical severity and healthcare needs associated with early-onset SMA.

For Type 1 patients, hospitalization costs represented the largest share of total direct medical costs, reflecting the intensive medical care and frequent hospital admissions required for disease management. As disease severity decreases across subtypes, the relative contribution of hospitalization costs declines. In Type 2 patients, hospitalization still represents a considerable portion of total costs but to a lesser extent than in Type 1. In Type 3 patients, hospitalization accounts for only a small proportion of the total direct cost, with most expenditures attributed to other healthcare resource utilization such as outpatient care, and supportive treatments. This pattern was consistently observed across all four countries.

Appendix D shows the detailed annual direct costs per patient by SMA subtype and country. In KSA, the annual direct cost per patient was estimated at 53,556 USD for Type 1, 25,955 USD for Type 2, and 13,536 USD for Type 3. In the UAE, the corresponding annual costs were 82,692 USD, 47,688 USD, and 11,443 USD for Types 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In Oman, the annual costs were estimated at 36,720 USD for Type 1, 21,168 USD for Type 2, and 5,886 USD for Type 3. Similarly, in Bahrain, annual direct medical costs per patient were 41,215 USD for Type 1, 33,710 USD for Type 2, and 11,362 USD for Type 3.

Direct cost for the population: When estimating the direct medical costs at the population level, the number of patients in each SMA subtype was incorporated into the calculations. As a result, the total costs associated with SMA Type 1 and Type 2 become relatively similar, despite the higher per-patient cost of Type 1, because Type 2 patients are more prevalent in the population. Consequently, the higher prevalence of Type 2 patients offsets the higher individual costs in Type 1. In contrast, SMA Type 3 contributes a smaller proportion of the overall direct medical burden.

Overall, the total annual direct medical cost of SMA at the national level was estimated at 114.9 million USD in KSA, 25.0 million USD in UAE, 9.5 million USD in Oman, and 3.8 million USD in Bahrain, as detailed in Table 4. The table summarizes direct costs, categorized into hospitalization and other resource utilization. The latter includes diagnostic procedures, routine monitoring (such as outpatient visits and laboratory tests), and outpatient care, as well as ongoing disease management costs, including symptomatic medications, physiotherapy, rehabilitation, medical aids, and respiratory care.

Table 4. Direct annual costs of the population in each country.

SMA: spinal muscular atrophy; KSA: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; UAE: United Arab Emirates.

SMA type  Direct cost component KSA (USD) UAE (USD) Oman (USD) Bahrain (USD)
Type 1 Hospitalization 23,953,788 9,045,119 3,365,743 1,051,481
Other resource utilization 22,157,663 2,035,669 820,385 143,766
Total cost 46,111,451 11,080,787 4,186,127 1,195,247
Type 2 Hospitalization 31,347,264 8,517,394 3,624,187 1,857,532
Other resource utilization 20,120,576 3,690,722 760,494 300,085
Total cost 51,467,840 12,208,115 4,384,681 2,157,617
Type 3 Hospitalization 4,977,810 682,036 552,055 360,713
Other resource utilization 12,320,772 988,586 383,337 105,226
Total cost 17,298,582 1,670,622 935,391 465,939
All types combined Total cost (patients and caregivers) 114,877,872 24,959,525 9,506,200 3,818,803

Total estimated burden

The overall burden of SMA, including both economic and humanistic components, is summarized in Table 5. The table presents the breakdown of the total burden by SMA subtype and country, separating the economic burden (comprising direct medical costs and indirect productivity losses) from the humanistic burden, represented by the monetized value of DALYs lost.

Table 5. Total burden of SMA in each country.

SMA: spinal muscular atrophy; KSA: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; UAE: United Arab Emirates.

SMA type Type of burden Burden component KSA (USD) UAE (USD) Oman (USD) Bahrain (USD)
Type 1 Economic burden Direct medical costs 46,111,451 11,080,787 4,186,127 1,195,247
Indirect costs 5,875,058 1,297,961 763,301 197,992
Humanistic burden Monetary value of DALYs 336,540,215 73,471,822 24,488,042 9,252,068
Total Type 1 burden Economic + humanistic burden 388,526,723 85,850,571 29,437,471 10,645,308
Type 2 Economic burden Direct medical costs 51,467,840 12,208,115 4,384,681 2,157,617
Indirect costs 16,244,238 2,983,988 2,277,797 565,177
Humanistic burden Monetary value of DALYs 147,111,206 26,607,238 10,160,528 3,867,147
Total Type 2 burden Economic + humanistic burden 214,823,284 41,799,341 16,823,007 6,589,942
Type 3 Economic burden Direct medical costs 17,298,582 1,670,622 935,391 465,939
Indirect costs 6,024,465 1,006,098 873,655 225,014
Humanistic burden Monetary value of DALYs 23,789,307 3,890,164 1,709,436 644,372
Total Type 3 burden Economic + humanistic burden 47,112,354 6,566,884 3,518,482 1,335,325
All types combined Economic burden Direct medical costs 114,877,872 24,959,525 9,506,200 3,818,803
Indirect costs 28,143,761 5,288,047 3,914,752 988,183
Humanistic burden Monetary value of DALYs 507,440,728 103,969,224 36,358,007 13,763,588
Total burden all types Economic + humanistic burden 650,462,361 134,216,796 49,778,959 18,570,574

Across all countries, the humanistic burden represents the largest share of the total burden, reflecting the significant loss of life expectancy and the substantial disability associated with SMA. This pattern is particularly evident in the more severe subtypes, where early disease onset leads to considerable years of life lost and prolonged periods lived with disability.

Overall, the total burden of SMA across all subtypes was estimated to reach approximately 650.5 million USD in KSA, 134.2 million USD in the UAE, 49.8 million USD in Oman, and 18.6 million USD in Bahrain. Within this total, the humanistic component accounted for the majority of the burden in each country, while the economic burden comprising direct medical costs and productivity losses represented a smaller but still substantial proportion.

Discussion

SMA is a fatal disease associated with humanistic and economic burdens. The humanistic burden is driven by early mortality and disability, reflected in high DALYs, along with deterioration in the QoL of both patients and caregivers. The economic burden is also considerable, including high direct medical costs and indirect costs due to productivity losses. Given the predominantly pediatric onset, these impacts are particularly pronounced among caregivers.

Type 1 is associated with severe complications like respiratory failure and gastrostomy dependence, leading to resource-intensive complications. Type 2 requires lower immediate intensity but incurs high longitudinal costs due to prolonged survival, requiring mobility aids and orthopedic care. Types 3 and 4 are comparatively less severe; however, their near-normal life expectancy results in substantial cumulative burdens from outpatient monitoring, chronic medication, and caregiver support [1,3,5].

All four Gulf countries included in this study demonstrated a high burden of SMA. However, the per-patient burden varies due to differences in national characteristics such as GDP per capita, wages, labor force participation, and baseline QoL. At the population level, total burden is strongly influenced by population size, limiting direct comparisons between countries. For example, the higher burden observed in KSA likely reflects its larger population rather than a higher burden per patient.

The humanistic burden was highest in Type 1 SMA, followed by Types 2 and 3, consistent with differences in disease severity. On a per-patient basis, the humanistic burden showed little variation across countries, reflecting similar life expectancy and disease progression patterns throughout the region.

DALYs were highest in KSA, followed by the UAE, Oman, and Bahrain, driven by differences in population size. Despite being a rare disease, SMA contributes disproportionately to DALYs due to early mortality and severe disability.

At the subtype level, SMA Type 2 contributed the largest share of the humanistic burden across all countries, primarily due to its higher prevalence compared to other subtypes and its associated substantial disability.

At the population level, DALYs were highest in KSA, followed by the UAE, Oman, and Bahrain, reflecting the larger number of patients in countries with bigger populations. These findings highlight the burden of the disease. Although SMA is a rare condition, the relatively small number of patients contributes disproportionately to total DALYs due to early mortality in many cases and severe disability among survivors.

Regarding indirect costs, these were highest in the UAE, likely due to higher wage levels and the resulting greater productivity losses compared to the other included countries. Productivity losses among Type 1 patients are minimal, few survive into adulthood; however, their need for intensive, continuous care leads to considerable productivity losses for caregivers. Across all countries, Type 1 SMA accounted for the highest indirect costs, mainly driven by caregiver burden due to patients' full dependency. However, indirect costs contributed less to the overall burden than DALYs.

Direct costs were substantial across all countries. In Type 1 SMA, hospitalization was the primary cost driver, accounting for the majority of costs, while in Types 2 and 3, other healthcare resources such as rehabilitation and symptomatic management become more prominent gradually.

The use of mean rather than median survival explains the higher survival estimates used in our study (e.g., >12 years for Type 1 and >46 years for Type 2), compared to commonly reported median values [31, 32]. This approach better captures long-term survivors and provides a more comprehensive estimate of disease burden.

Our findings are consistent with previous studies showing a high economic and caregiver burden in SMA, particularly in more severe types [3-5]. A cross-sectional study conducted in KSA [13] showed that Type 1 SMA is associated with significantly higher hospitalization needs and that the disease imposes a considerable socioeconomic burden across all SMA types. Likewise, a cross-sectional study from Canada [4] highlighted the high caregiver burden, particularly in terms of psychological impact, which increases with disease severity.

This study provides country-specific estimates of the burden of SMA to support local decision-making. By quantifying the economic and humanistic impact within each national context, the study facilitates better interpretation by policymakers and healthcare stakeholders, thereby supporting informed reimbursement and resource allocation decisions.

Limitations

This study is subject to several limitations. First, as SMA is a rare disease, the small sample sizes in the available literature may affect the precision of estimated averages. Some model inputs were not available for the included countries; therefore, global estimates were used and adjusted where possible, including HUI3 values for disutility and time lost for patients and caregivers. To balance these limitations, we used local key parameters whenever available, including the following key parameters: prevalence, wages, labor force participation, employment rates, population life expectancy, and survival.

Second, there was no clear evidence on the number of caregivers per patient; however, indirect costs were based on total caregiving hours reported in the literature, making this parameter unnecessary for the analysis. Finally, although YLD estimates may be uncertain due to the use of HUI3 values instead of direct utilities, this was addressed through scenario analyses using a ±50% variance, providing a plausible range for DALYs.

Because comprehensive national data were not available for each country, the number of patients was estimated using epidemiological modelling. Some inputs were also based on international evidence or expert opinion. The results should therefore be viewed as informed estimates and interpreted in light of these uncertainties.

The strength of our study lies in its quantification of the disease burden for each specific country using local estimates, providing decision-makers with the country-specific evidence necessary to develop targeted, evidence-based health policies and resource allocations.

Conclusions

SMA imposes a substantial impact on the QoL, survival, and financial stability of both patients and caregivers, driving a significant humanistic and economic burden. Effectively mitigating this burden through targeted interventions could improve patient survival, reduce the burden on healthcare budgets, and alleviate the overall societal impact of the disease.

Appendices

Appendix A

Table 6. HUI3 values used as a proxy for utility of SMA subtypes.

SMA: spinal muscular atrophy; HUI3: Health Utilities Index Mark 3.

SMA type SMA Type 1 utility SMA Type 2 utility SMA Type 3 utility
Scenario 1 (50% higher utilities) 0.23 0.24 0.71
HUI3 reported values 0.15 0.16 0.47
Scenario 1 (50% lower utilities) 0.08 0.08 0.24

Appendix B

Table 7. Annual productivity lost by patients and their caregivers due to SMA in hours.

SMA: spinal muscular atrophy.

  SMA Type 1 productivity lost annually (hours) SMA Type 2 productivity lost annually (hours) SMA Type 3 productivity lost annually (hours)
Patient 0 169 354
Caregiver 2,912 1,708 537

Appendix C

Table 8. Experts questionnaire: diagnostics.

Diagnostics SMA Type I SMA Type 2 SMA Type 3
Percentages            
  Proportion Frequency/ year Cost/ visit Total Proportion Frequency/ year Cost/ visit Total Proportion Frequency/ year Cost/ visit Total
EMG nerve conduction                        
Genetic testing                        

Table 9. Experts questionnaire: monitoring.

CHOP INTEND: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders; FEES: fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing; DXA: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Monitoring SMA Type I SMA Type 2 SMA Type 3
Proportion of patients monitored by SMA type: the percentage of patients being monitored at any point (what is the ratio of the patients you monitor?)      
  Proportion Frequency/ year Cost/ event Total Proportion Frequency/ year Cost/ event Total Proportion Frequency/ year Cost/ event Total
Respiratory care: Monitoring
Specialist visit (Pulmonologist)                        
Full pulmonary function testing                        
Respiratory Muscle Strength Study                        
Monitoring gas exchange                        
Respiratory Sleep Study (polysomnography)                        
Oximetry or blood gas studies                        
Hypoxic (Altitude) or Hyperoxic (Shunt) Assessment                        
Cough effectiveness                        
Lung volume studies                        
Airflow studies                        
Carbon monoxide transfer factor test                        
Chest X-ray                        
CT scan with contrast                        
CT scan without contrast                        
Echocardiogram                        
Electrocardiogram                        
Other 1                        
Gastrointestinal care: Monitoring
Evaluation of feeding and swallowing                        
Gastroesophageal reflux assessment                        
FEES                        
Abdominal ultrasound                        
Other 1                        
Nutritional care: Monitoring
Specialist visit (GIT)                        
Calcium state test                        
Vitamin D test                        
Pre-albumin levels test                        
Other 1                        
Orthopedic care: Monitoring
Specialist visit (orthopedist)                        
Spinal X-ray                        
MRI                        
Bone density scan (DXA)                        
X-ray hip                        
Other 1                        
Psychological: Monitoring
Specialist visit (psychologist)                        
Occupational therapy: Monitoring
Occupational therapist visit                        
Periodic musculoskeletal assessment (motor skills, CHOP INTEND)                        
Musculoskeletal
Visits                        

Table 10. Experts questionnaire: management.

SMA: spinal muscular atrophy; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure; BiPAP: bilevel positive airway pressure.

Management SMA Type I SMA Type 2 SMA Type 3
Proportion of patients treated by SMA type: the percentage of patients at treatment at any point (what is the ratio of the patients you treat?)            
  Proportion Frequency/ year Cost/ event Total Proportion Frequency/ year Cost/ event Total Proportion Frequency/ year Cost/ event Total
Respiratory care (chronic/acute): Management
Suction device                        
Suction device (spare parts/ maintenance/ tubes)                        
Cough assist device                        
Cough assist device maintenance                        
Antibiotics (courses)                        
BiPAP                        
CPAP                        
Other noninvasive ventilation                        
Tracheostomy                        
Mechanical ventilation                        
Vaccines                        
Other 1                        
Gastrointestinal care: Management
Nasogastric tube placement                        
Acid neutralizers                        
Prokinetic agents                        
Probiotics                        
Other medications                        
Laparoscopic anti-reflux procedure                        
Gastrostomy                        
Other procedures                        
Nutritional care: Management
Enteral/parenteral feeding                        
Oral supplements                        
Others                        
Orthopedic care: Management
Positioning and posture support                        
Scoliosis surgery                        
Others                        
Others                        
Musculoskeletal and Physiotherapy
Physiotherapy                        
AFO                        
Spinal brace                        
Seating devices                        
Walking aids                        
Wheelchair                        
Other 1                        

Appendix D

Figure 2. Direct annual costs per SMA patient.

Figure 2

SMA: Spinal Muscular Atrophy, KSA: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, UAE: United Arab Emirates

Funding Statement

This research was funded by Biogen Inc., which had no involvement in the study design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of the results. During the manuscript revision, Biogen was given the opportunity to review it; however, the authors had full editorial control of the manuscript and provided their final approval on all content.

Disclosures

Human subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve human participants or tissue.

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: This research was funded by Biogen Inc., which had no involvement in the study design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of the results. During the manuscript revision, Biogen was given the opportunity to review it; however, the authors had full editorial control of the manuscript and provided their final approval on all content.

Financial relationships: Baher Elezbawy, Sherif Abaza, Tamás Ágh, and Ahmad Fasseeh declare(s) funding for conducting the study from Biogen. BE, SAb, and AF are employees at Syreon Middle East and may hold company shares. TA is an employee at Syreon Research Institute and may hold company shares. Syreon received funding from Biogen Inc. for conducting the study. AA, HA, HAA, SF, and SAl declare no competing interests. The funders had no role in the design of the study; the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Baher Elezbawy, Sherif Abaza, Ahmad Fasseeh, Tamás Ágh

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Baher Elezbawy, Hussain A. Al-Omar, Hana Alabdulkarim, Sahar Fahmy, Amal Alnajjar, Sara Aldallal

Drafting of the manuscript:  Baher Elezbawy

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Sherif Abaza, Ahmad Fasseeh, Tamás Ágh, Hussain A. Al-Omar, Hana Alabdulkarim, Sahar Fahmy, Amal Alnajjar, Sara Aldallal

Supervision:  Sherif Abaza, Ahmad Fasseeh, Tamás Ágh, Amal Alnajjar

References


Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES