Abstract
Amino acids available for bacteria within the small intestine of pigs are originating mainly from the dietary and endogenous proteins. These amino acids, in addition to those synthesized by the intestinal bacteria, are used in different metabolic pathways. The amino acids that cannot be synthesized by the intestinal bacteria can be considered as indispensable for them and must thus be obtained from the surrounding luminal fluid. In the pig large intestine, the amino acids used by bacteria originate presumably mainly from proteins not fully digested in the small intestine. In this narrative review, we present the current knowledge concerning the metabolism of amino acids by bacteria found in the pig gut and the effects of the different amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites on the metabolism and physiology of the intestinal microbes. The effects of some among these compounds, either beneficial or deleterious, on the intestinal epithelial cells are then recapitulated. Next, the adverse impact of the emission of two bacterial metabolites derived from amino acids, namely ammonia and hydrogen sulfide, on the environment is described. Future directions in the field of the control of the metabolism of amino acids by the intestinal bacteria for the maintenance of pig intestinal health, as well as for the reduction of the emission of polluting substances are proposed.
Keywords: Amino acids, Bacterial metabolism, Dietary proteins, Green transition, Intestinal epithelium, Intestinal health, Intestinal microbiota, Pig, Pollutant substances
Introduction
The intestinal microbiota, which gathers bacteria, archaea, viruses, and fungi, has been studied in pigs, mainly in terms of composition and, to a lesser extent, in terms of metabolic capacity towards the different substrates [1–4]. The protozoans, although not included as part of the intestinal microbiota, are important members of the pig gut ecosystem [5].
At birth, piglets are suddenly faced with a complex microbial environment that includes bacteria from the maternal vagina and feces, as well as from the rearing environment. The bacterial concentration and diversity in piglet feces increase from birth to weaning [6]. Various dietary components in pig feed have been shown to affect the intestinal microbiota composition [7].
Briefly, the intestinal immune system is continually exposed to antigens and immunomodulatory compounds which are derived from both the diet and the commensal bacteria [8]. The intestine is a major port of entry for many bacterial pathogens, and the intestinal microbiota plays a primary role in the induction, training, and function of the host immune system [9, 10], as well as in protection against colonization by bacterial pathogens [11]. Several metabolites of different chemical structures which are produced by intestinal bacteria have been shown to mediate communication between the commensal bacteria and the host’s immune system [12]. Specific disturbances in the piglet intestinal microbiota composition and/or metabolic activity have been associated with diarrhea and inflammatory processes [13–18].
Several aspects of amino acid metabolism by the intestinal microbiota and their relationships with pig intestinal health have been reviewed in recent years, with emphasis on the effects of amino acid metabolism on microbiota composition in pigs and on the associated growth performance [19–21]. However, these reviews did not include the roles of the amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites for growth and physiology of the intestinal bacteria and of other microorganisms. In addition, the production of polluting compounds from specific amino acids by intestinal bacteria and the adverse roles of these compounds on environment were not considered in these manuscripts.
In this narrative review, we present the sources of amino acids used by the bacteria present in the small and the large intestine of pigs. We detailed the metabolism of amino acids in these intestinal bacteria and relate this metabolism to the physiology and growth of these cells as well as to communication between intestinal microorganisms. Then, we recapitulate how the metabolism of amino acids by the intestinal bacteria can affect the pig intestinal epithelium in terms of physiological functions. Finally, we describe how the metabolic activity of the pig intestinal microbiota can affect the concentration of amino acid-derived polluting substances in the large intestine luminal content and feces.
The search strategy and the literature selection criteria were based on the publications available on PubMed and Google Scholar using several keywords either individually or in combination with no restriction on the time frame. These keywords are the names of the 20 common proteinogenic amino acids, pig, piglet, swine, dietary proteins, amino acid metabolism, intestinal health, intestinal epithelium, intestinal microbiota, bacterial metabolism, amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites, amino acid-derived pollutant substances, ammonia, and hydrogen sulfide. The present review is designed to consider the pig both in terms of its obvious agronomic interest to feed billions of individuals worldwide, and in terms of its utilization as an important experimental model for the study of intestinal physiology.
The last section of this review integrates and synthesizes the different available data, outlines limitations of the studies performed, and proposes future research directions for the study of pig intestinal microbiota in the different areas covered by this review.
The pig intestinal microbiota composition and global metabolic activity depend on numerous parameters
The composition of bacteria in the luminal fluid of the pig gut during development appears to be influenced by numerous parameters including the gestational stages [22, 23], intrauterine growth status [24], mode of piglet delivery [25], early dietary conditions [26], age of animals, and weaning time [27, 28]. The numbers of microorganisms expand from the small to the large intestine of pigs with microbiota composition differing in the different segments of the intestine [29]. The relatively rapid transit of the luminal fluid in the proximal parts of the small intestine does not allow the development of large concentration of bacteria. In contrast, the concentration of bacteria greatly increases in the distal part of the ileum and increases even further in the large intestine of pigs [30, 31]. The gut microbiota characteristics in pig fecal samples have been determined [32] and the results reveal a total of 7.7 million non-redundant genes representing more than 700 metagenomic species. The meta-analysis of 16S rRNA amplicon sequence data and metagenome-assembled genomes indicate prevalent species within the Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Clostridium, Desulfovibrio, Enterococcus, and Fusobacterium genera [33].
Part of the bacteria present in the pig intestine is associated with the mucosa, playing an active role against the growth of pathogens [34]. These adherent bacteria are in proximity to the intestinal epithelium [35, 36]. However, quantitatively, most bacteria present in the large intestine luminal content are excreted in feces. This implies a constant and active renewal of the bacterial population in the pig luminal fluid. Such microbial renewal requires presumably intense ATP-dependent anabolic metabolism [37].
Amino acids originating from alimentary and endogenous host’s proteins are used by the intestinal bacteria
In the small intestine of pigs, the alimentary and endogenous proteins are degraded by the proteases originating from the exocrine pancreas, thus releasing peptides and amino acids [38]. Several amino acids released from proteins, such as glutamine, glutamate, and arginine, are largely catabolized within pig enterocytes during transfer from the luminal fluid to the portal circulation [39]. The endogenous proteins found in the intestinal luminal fluid include the proteins originating from the exocrine secretions as well as from the exfoliated epithelial cells and mucins released from the epithelium [40, 41]. A minor part of amino acids in the small intestine is believed to be used by the intestinal bacteria, while the bulk of oligopeptides and amino acids released from proteins is efficiently absorbed by the enterocytes and released into the portal vein for utilization in host’s tissues [42] (Fig. 1). Indeed, in pigs, dietary and endogenous host’s proteins are contributors for microbial protein synthesis in the distal ileum [43].
Fig. 1.

Amino acid metabolism by the bacteria in the small and large intestine. This schematic view represents the digestion of the alimentary and endogenous proteins in the small intestine by the exocrine pancreas proteolytic enzymes. The released amino acids are massively absorbed through the intestinal epithelium in the portal vein while a presumably minor part of amino acids is used by bacteria for their nitrogenous metabolism. Different bacterial species can release amino acids in the luminal fluid after amino acid de novo synthesis. A part of these amino acids can be absorbed through the small intestine epithelium, but the quantity of amino acids supplied by the bacteria to the host remains unknown. A minor part of the undigested alimentary and endogenous proteins is transferred to the large intestine through the ileocecal junction. In the large intestine, these proteins are degraded by the bacterial proteases and peptidases. The amino acids released from this process are not absorbed to any significant extent by the pig large intestine epithelium but can be used by bacteria for nitrogenous metabolism
However, the exchange of amino acids between the host and the microbiota in the small intestine may be bidirectional. In fact, some arguments suggest that part of the amino acids synthesized by the small intestine bacteria is released in the luminal fluid and then absorbed through the enterocytes for utilization in the body tissues. For instance, a study determined the incorporation of 15N from 15NH4Cl given orally into lysine in tissues of germ-free rats (without microbes) and in conventional rats (with microbes). These experiments were designed to determine if the 15N enrichment found in lysine is compatible with the absorption of lysine synthesized by the intestinal bacteria [44]. The results obtained indicate that the 15N-lysine measured in the host tissues is originating from the microbiota metabolic activity. Although no equivalent data were obtained with germ-free pigs, it has been shown that lysine produced by the pig gut microbiota is mainly used for protein synthesis in the pig intestine and liver [45]. Thus, the concept that indispensable amino acids are provided to the host by some bacterial species living within the pig small intestine has been proposed. However, from a quantitative point of view, the amounts of amino acids synthesized by the small intestine bacteria (either anecdotal or significant) which are absorbed and available for the pig tissues remain to be determined, and the relative importance of such a supply for pig growth is still to be documented.
In the large intestine, the situation is quite different since the amino acids available for bacterial metabolism are originating mainly from alimentary and endogenous proteins which have not been fully digested in the small intestine [46]. Although protein digestion in the pig small intestine is an efficacious process, a significant part of undigested proteins (notably those which are more resistant to digestion) moves from the small to the large intestine luminal content through the ileocecal junction [47, 48]. Proteins are degraded into peptides and amino acids by the population of bacteria living in the large intestine, and amino acids are then metabolized by bacteria [49–52]. Amino acids present in the large intestine luminal fluid are presumably mostly used by microorganisms because these molecules are not absorbed to any significant extent by the pig colonic epithelium [53, 54]. However, it is only fair to mention that, to the best of our knowledge, no quantitative studies have estimated the amounts of amino acids provided by the host to the bacteria living within the pig large intestine.
Based on the published data, it is not possible to exclude that some tiny amounts of amino acids are absorbed through the pig large intestine epithelium. In fact, amino acid absorption from microbial origin through the pig large intestine epithelium is measurable based on the appearance of 15N-labeled amino acids in the venous blood after infusion of 15N-labeled bacteria into the pig cecum [55]. Furthermore, it has been shown that the pig colonic epithelium shows some capacity for amino acid absorption during the neonatal period [56, 57], but this capacity appears transient, being almost lost after this period.
Numerous bacterial species living within the small and large intestine display no metabolic capacity for the synthesis of the 20 common amino acids (and the 2 uncommon amino acids selenocysteine and pyrrolysine) required for protein synthesis and utilization in other metabolic pathways [58–60]. These amino acids have been identified as “bacterially indispensable” for the bacteria concerned, thus implying that they must be supplied from the intestinal luminal fluid to the intestinal bacteria to cover their metabolic and physiological requirements [61]. However, it is important to underline here that most studies aiming at deciphering the metabolism and physiology of the bacteria found in the intestine of pigs have been performed in vitro but not in vivo.
Of note, the amino acids present in the small intestine luminal fluid are, as presented above, mainly originating from alimentary proteins and host’s endogenous proteins, but the supply of amino acids by specific bacterial species for utilization by other bacteria species, even modest, can be envisaged. In fact, some intestinal bacteria like Escherichia coli and Corynebacterium glutamicum can export their de novo synthesized amino acids into the extracellular medium [62]. These last two bacterial species are members of the pig intestinal microbiota [63, 64]. This can be viewed both as a process of control of amino acid concentration in the producing bacteria and as a process of potential metabolic cooperation between different intestinal bacterial species among the microbial community [65].
Briefly, the studies of amino acid anabolism in intestinal bacteria have been historically focused on a few bacteria species and genera such as Escherichia coli, enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), Salmonella, and Bacillus subtilis. ETEC can trigger pronounced diarrhea in piglets [66], while EHEC is well known to provoke severe infection in the large intestine of pigs [67]. Concerning Salmonella species, they are pathogens known to provoke enterocolitis in pigs [68].
The description of the different metabolic pathways responsible for the synthesis of the 22 amino acids in bacteria is outside the scope of this review but can be found in recent books and reviews focusing on this subject [58, 60]. Briefly, the diversity of the metabolic capacities to synthesize amino acids in intestinal bacteria can be illustrated by several examples. For instance, Clostridium perfringens, known to provoke severe enteritis in newborn piglets [69], lacks genes involved in the synthesis of threonine, serine, glutamate, arginine, histidine, lysine, methionine, as well as aromatic and branched-chain amino acids [70]. Concerning Lactobacillus johnsonii, a pig gut commensal [71, 72], this bacterial species is unable to synthesize almost all the amino acids [73]. Other resident intestinal bacteria such as Campylobacter jejuni and Enterococcus faecalis are not equipped with the whole biosynthetic pathways needed for the synthesis of all amino acids [74]. Campylobacter jejuni is a common inhabitant of the pig intestinal tract [75], while Enterococcus faecalis is a pig commensal bacterium [76] with reported potential beneficial effects on intestinal villus morphology [77].
Incidentally, it is important to keep in mind that the sole presence of genes involved in amino acid synthesis within the genome of a given bacterial species is insufficient to prove the functionality of the corresponding anabolic pathways. For instance, the genes responsible for the biosynthesis of all the common amino acids have been identified in Lactococcus lactis, but still, 6 amino acids, namely glutamate, methionine, isoleucine, valine, leucine, and histidine, need to be supplied from the extracellular medium to allow bacterial growth. Lactococcus lactis is a non-invasive and non-pathogenic bacterium in mammals [78] which have recently shown some protective effects in the piglet diarrhea [79]. In addition, Lactococcus lactis exerts antimicrobial activity against swine pathogens [80]. In Lactococcus lactis, point mutations in genes coding for several enzymes involved in amino acid biosynthesis have been identified, leading to the inability of this bacterium to synthesize several amino acids [81, 82]. Another interesting example of a bacterium unable to synthesize several amino acids (namely cysteine, proline, arginine, valine, and leucine) is Staphylococcus aureus [83]. This bacterium is considered as pathogenic in mammals and notably in pigs [84, 85]. Accordingly, this bacterium exhibits an absolute requirement for the five amino acids cited above, despite the presence of genes involved in the different metabolic pathways responsible for the synthesis of these amino acids.
Amino acids are used by the intestinal bacteria for the synthesis of macromolecules, ATP, and bioactive metabolites
Amino acids are utilized by the intestinal bacteria for the synthesis of macromolecules. These macromolecules include not only proteins but also RNAs and DNA (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.

Metabolism of amino acids by the intestinal bacteria. This schematic view represents amino acid metabolism by intestinal bacterium (Bacterium 1). Amino acids are synthesized de novo within bacterium 1 and imported from the intestinal luminal fluid. Amino acids are used within bacterium 1 for the synthesis of proteins, RNAs, and DNA, as well as for ATP production. Amino acid catabolism within bacterium 1 leads to the synthesis of bioactive metabolites. Bioactive metabolites can exert effects on the producing bacteria (Bacterium 1) or/and can be released in the extracellular medium before acting on a given target bacterium (Bacterium 2)
Amino acids and macromolecule synthesis in intestinal bacteria
Regarding proteins, to face a changing environment within the intestinal luminal fluid (including changes in the nutrient concentration), intestinal bacteria have developed a coordinated protein homeostasis network. Such network includes control processes which modulate both protein synthesis and degradation [86]. These modulation processes have been notably studied in Escherichia coli [87, 88]. Regarding the aspect of intracellular protein homeostasis, bacteria can finely tune the translation rate at the 3 major steps, namely initiation, elongation, and termination, thus allowing to maintain a generally stable level of intracellular protein concentration within bacteria even in a changing environment [89].
Regarding RNA and DNA synthesis, 3 specific amino acids, namely glycine, glutamine, and aspartate are precursors for the synthesis of the purine and pyrimidine rings of nucleotides. The proportion of the 3 amino acids devoted to RNA and DNA synthesis in bacteria living in the pig large intestine luminal fluid is likely significant but to the best of our knowledge has not been quantified. Indeed, the number of bacteria within the colonic fluid has been estimated to represent 1010 to 1011 cells per gram of luminal content [90]. Pyrimidine biosynthesis from amino acids has been studied in bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Proteus mirabilis which are members of the pig intestinal microbiota [91, 92]. The synthesis of pyrimidines needs carbamyl phosphate as one of the required precursors. Carbamyl phosphate is synthesized from glutamine and bicarbonate. Then, carbamyl phosphate and aspartate are precursors for the synthesis of carbamyl aspartate. Carbamyl aspartate is then used for the synthesis in several steps of uridine triphosphate and cytidine triphosphate [93]. The pool of intracellular nucleotides in bacteria is an important parameter which regulates protein synthesis [94], thus indicating complex metabolic relationships to set the rate of protein synthesis in these prokaryotic cells.
Amino acids and ATP synthesis in intestinal bacteria
Amino acids can be used by bacteria present in the intestinal tract of pigs for ATP synthesis. In growing pigs, only the luminal fluid present in the proximal small intestine is characterized by a higher oxygen concentration when compared with oxygen concentration measured in other parts of the small and large intestine [95]. In fact, these last parts of pig intestine are mostly anaerobic. In such anaerobic conditions, or in the absence of any suitable electron acceptor, strict or facultative anaerobic bacteria found in the pig intestine, such as Clostridia and Fusobacteria [33], can use amino acids as precursors for ATP synthesis. This allows ATP synthesis with a low yield when compared to the yield generally measured in bacteria under aerobic conditions [96]. In Clostridium species, including Clostridium difficile (found in the pig intestinal tract [97]), typical metabolic pathways, gathered under the name of Stickland reactions, appear notable for ATP production. Stickland reactions are characterized by coupled amino acid oxidation and reduction. One amino acid is acting as an electron donor while another one is acting as an electron acceptor [98]. Electron donors include amino acids such as alanine, leucine, isoleucine, and valine, while electron acceptors include amino acids such as glycine and proline [99]. Stickland reactions in intestinal bacteria equipped for such metabolism allow for the provision of ATP to support bacterial growth notably in situations of short supply of other energy substrates such as carbohydrates [100]. Of note, amino acid utilization for ATP production in bacteria of the pig intestine may be operative in a preferential way when compared to the utilization of other ATP-producing substrates in other metabolic pathways. For instance, Clostridium stricklandii is considered as a typical bacterium which preferentially utilizes amino acids such as serine, glycine, arginine, threonine, and cysteine for ATP synthesis [101].
Amino acids-derived bioactive metabolite synthesis in intestinal bacteria
Numerous intermediary and end products generated during amino acid catabolism in both commensal and pathogenic bacteria present within the pig intestinal luminal fluid have been shown to be active on the metabolism and physiology not only of the producing bacteria but also of other bacteria considered as “receptive bacteria” towards these molecules. Furthermore, emerging data suggest that the synthesis of different metabolites from specific amino acids are involved in communication between some intestinal bacteria and other microorganisms such as intestinal fungi and parasites. In this paragraph, we give typical examples of the individual effects of amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites on the growth, metabolism, and physiology of intestinal microorganisms known to live within the pig gut.
Amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites and intestinal bacteria metabolism and growth
The main polyamines synthesized by bacteria are putrescine, spermidine, agmatine, and cadaverine, while numerous minor polyamine derivatives are synthesized from these main polyamines. For several of these polyamine derivatives, the biochemical pathways involved in their synthesis are generally not operative in eukaryotic cells [102, 103]. The amino acid precursors for polyamine synthesis are arginine, methionine, and lysine as well as the non-proteinogenic amino acid ornithine (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.

Metabolism of polyamines by the intestinal bacteria. This schematic view represents the synthesis of the different polyamines from the amino acid precursors arginine, methionine, and lysine, as well as from the non-proteinogenic amino acid ornithine. The polyamines can be either degraded or released in the luminal fluid. The concentrations of polyamines within a given bacterium (Bacterium 1) are the net result of endogenous synthesis, import and export from the extracellular medium, and depend also on degradation within bacterium 1. The polyamines released in the intestinal luminal fluid can be captured by another given bacterium (Bacterium 2)
However, it is worth noting that not all intestinal bacterial species living within the pig gut are equipped with the metabolic machinery necessary for the synthesis of polyamines, thus depending on the import of polyamines present in the intestinal luminal fluid for supply and physiological effects [104]. These polyamines presumably originate from the polyamines present in feed and/or synthesized by other competent bacteria present in the pig intestines which release these molecules in the luminal fluid [105]. Endogenous synthesis of polyamines within pig intestinal bacteria, together with polyamine import and export, as well as degradation in catabolic pathways are the parameters which collectively determine polyamine concentrations in these prokaryotic cells [106]. Putrescine and spermidine are commonly the polyamines found at the highest concentrations in bacteria, followed by agmatine and cadaverine which are found at lower concentrations, and finally by spermine which is rarely detected in most bacterial species where it has been studied [107]. A part of the polyamines present in bacteria is associated with RNA, and such association is related to the important effects of these compounds on the transcriptional and translational processes [104, 108, 109].
Polyamines are involved in intestinal bacteria metabolism. Notably, these compounds can modulate bacterial toxin production and activity. For instance, spermidine increases the production of the bacterial toxin colibactin by colibactin-producing Escherichia coli [110]. The other polyamine cadaverine reduces enterotoxin activity by the enterotoxin-producing intestinal bacteria Shigella spp. [111]. Among the physiological effects of polyamines, these compounds are well-known to display a generally stimulating effect on the proliferation of the intestinal bacteria, even if this effect is variable depending on the species considered. For instance, Escherichia coli made deficient for polyamine synthesis can still grow in media without polyamines, although at a markedly reduced rate, when compared with the wild-type counterpart [112]. This last result indicates that, although not indispensable for the growth of this bacterium, polyamines are required for its optimal growth. Similarly, in the intestinal bacterium Salmonella enterica, polyamine depletion reduces but does not abolish the bacterial growth [102]. In contrast, spermidine is critical for Campylobacter jejuni growth [113] since the growth of this bacterium is almost suppressed in the absence of this polyamine.
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) can be synthesized from cysteine by the enzyme cysteine desulfhydrase in pig intestinal bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus [114–117]. In addition to this catabolic pathway, H2S can be synthesized in bacteria from cysteine through the catalytic action of cystathionine-ɣ-lyase and cystathionine-β-synthase [114] (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.

Metabolism of hydrogen sulfide by the intestinal bacteria. This schematic view represents the synthesis of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from cysteine in a producing bacterium (Bacterium 1). H2S can diffuse from the producing bacterium to the user bacterium (Bacterium 2). Bacterium 2 can use H2S as a precursor for the synthesis of the S-containing amino acids cysteine and methionine. Note that the synthesis of H2S from sulfate by the sulfate-reducing bacteria is not indicated in this scheme
Incidentally, cysteine is not the sole precursor for H2S production in intestinal bacteria. Indeed, several bacterial species gathered under the name of sulfate-reducing bacteria found in the pig intestine (such as Desulfovibrio) can produce H2S from sulfate [33]. H2S is a precursor for the synthesis of the S-containing amino acids cysteine and methionine by the intestinal bacteria [60].
H2S inhibits the terminal oxidase of the respiratory chain of Escherichia coli [118]. However, Escherichia coli is equipped with an alternative bd-type oxidase which is not inhibited by H2S. The presence of this isoenzyme enables respiration and growth of this bacterium in a H2S-rich environment [119].
Nitric oxide (NO) is produced from arginine by nitric oxide synthases present in numerous bacteria including those which inhabit the intestine of pigs such as Lactobacillus fermentum [120–122]. Of note, it is important to keep in mind that synthesis of NO from arginine is not the exclusive way for the synthesis of this gasomediator in intestinal bacteria. In fact, intestinal bacteria such as Campylobacter jejuni can produce NO through the reduction of nitrite (NO2−) catalysed by nitrite reductase [123]. NO has been demonstrated to interfere with bacterial growth, notably in intestinal bacteria such as Salmonella enterica [124]. The bacteriostatic effect of NO appears to involve the inhibition of enzymatic activities related to bacterial energy metabolism [125], thus suggesting that NO inhibits bacterial growth at least partly through reduction of ATP synthesis.
Indole is produced from the precursor tryptophan by numerous bacterial species including those found in the intestine of pigs like Escherichia coli [126]. Indole is efficiently produced by mixed bacterial populations found in pig feces [127]. Indole modulates toxin production by Klebsiella oxytoca [128], a bacterium which is a normal resident of the intestine, but which may become pathogenic in specific contexts [129]. In addition to these characteristics, indole has been shown to exert a bacteriostatic effect on intestinal lactic acid bacteria [130].
Dopamine is produced from tyrosine by many bacterial species found in the intestinal luminal fluid such as Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus vulgaris, and Klebsiella pneumoniae [131]. The bacterial tyrosinases catalyse the conversion of tyrosine to the intermediate dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA), this compound being finally converted to dopamine [132].
Dopamine, which is primarily well known to be a neurotransmitter in animals, has been surprisingly shown to stimulate the growth of some intestinal bacteria such as the commensal Klebsiella pneumoniae [133]. Such results, as well as those described below, suggest molecular recycling of ancestral compounds active in prokaryotic cells for new functions in eukaryotic organisms [60]. Interestingly, dopamine has been demonstrated to be a siderophore-like iron chelator involved in the optimal growth of Salmonella enterica [134]. Salmonella enterica is considered as an important zoonotic pathogen which infects the swine intestinal tract [135].
Noradrenaline (norepinephrine) is produced from tyrosine by several intestinal bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, and Proteus vulgaris. Noradrenaline, which acts as a neurotransmitter and hormone in animals, can stimulate the growth of different anaerobic bacteria found in the mammalian intestine such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Enterobacter cloacae, Shigella sonnei, and Staphylococcus aureus [136, 137]. Of note, transferrin, an iron-sequestering molecule, is involved in the effect of noradrenaline on bacterial growth [137].
Amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites and intestinal bacteria physiology
Several metabolites produced from amino acids by different intestinal bacterial species living in the pig gut are bioactive not only on the metabolism of bacteria but also on different important aspects of bacterial physiology.
Polyamines are involved in biofilm formation by bacterial species living in the pig gut. Briefly, biofilms are complex structures made by a mixture of bacterial communities embedded in a protective matrix made mainly of bacterial polysaccharides, nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids [138, 139]. Such structures are linked with the modulation of bacterial growth in a changing environment, like the one described in the intestines of mammals [140]. Research on biofilms is urged by the fact that the intestinal pathogens contained within these structures are generally more resistant to antimicrobial agents than same pathogens not protected by biofilms [141].
Potential links between the capacity of pathogenic Enterococci, isolated from the pig intestine and rearing environment, to form biofilm and antibiotic resistance have been documented [142, 143]. Recently, biofilm formation has been shown to contribute to the pathogenicity of Streptococcus suis, a bacterial species found in the piglet alimentary tract [144–146].
Polyamines have been recently found to be implicated in biofilm formation. For instance, agmatine is implicated in biofilm formation in the bacterium Bacillus subtilis [147] found in the intestine of mammals [148].
Hydrogen sulfide is involved in the regulation of biofilm formation. The role of H2S in the formation of colonic intestinal bacteria biofilm formation in relationship with antibiotic resistance has been recently described. Of major importance, the scavenging of H2S in several producing bacterial species (including Escherichia coli) potentiates both the bactericidal effects of several compounds and disrupts the formation of the bacterial biofilm [149]. This indicates that the endogenous synthesis of H2S by these bacterial species is one among important elements for biofilm formation. Further works performed in vivo are necessary to document the relevance of H2S binding as a potential strategy for the reduction of antibiotic resistance by some pathogenic intestinal bacteria in pigs.
Beyond the recently discovered stimulating effects of H2S on biofilm formation, H2S has emerged as a modulator of virulence and susceptibility to antibiotics in the intestinal bacteria Fusobacterium nucleatum [150]. Indeed, Fusobacterium nucleatum, through its own endogenous production of H2S, can modulate its own susceptibility to different antibiotics [150]. In addition, H2S appears to act as a protective compound against the action of different antibiotics in the bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus [151, 152] which are both found in the intestine. Although the precise mechanisms of action which allow H2S to exert its protective effect on bacteria against the action of several antibiotics are not known, some mechanistic elements, using Escherichia coli as a bacterial model, have been discovered. In this last bacterium, it has been shown that the sequestration of Fe2+ ions by H2S, which counteracts the oxidative stress provoked by some specific antibiotics, is presumably involved in the effects of this bacterial metabolite [153]. In the same line of idea, H2S is involved in the maintenance of the bacterial redox state in pathogenic Escherichia coli strains, an effect which is related to the protection of these bacteria against the oxidative stress provoked by the antibiotic ampicillin [154]. Interestingly, the inhibition of cystathionine-ɣ-lyase, the main enzymatic activity which allows H2S synthesis from cysteine in the gut bacteria Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, potentiates the efficiency of antibiotics against both bacterial species in different models of infection [155]. These results reinforce the view that H2S takes part in the antibiotic resistance described in some intestinal bacterial species. However, the situation is not generalizable to all intestinal bacteria since in Acinetobacter baumannii (which can colonize the mammalian gut [156], but which does not produce H2S), H2S can potentiate the effects of several classes of antibiotics [157]. Thus, the effects of H2S, either positive or negative towards the effects of different antibiotics, appear to depend both on the bacterial species examined and on the structure of the antibiotics used making the situation somewhat complicated, notably in the context of pig farming.
Nitric oxide used at low non-toxic concentrations has been shown to increase the dispersal of biofilm macrostructure made by different pathogenic intestinal bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The mechanisms at the basis of these effects involve notably NO-sensory proteins [158, 159]. Several NO donors have been tested on different intestinal bacterial species such as Fusobacterium nucleatum [160], and anti-biofilm effects of these compounds have been reported [161].
Indole synthesized from tryptophan diminishes the capacity of bacterial cells such as Listeria monocytogenes (a bacterium which is occasionally found in the intestine) for motility and aggregation [162]. Of note, this bacterial metabolite diminishes the virulence of intestinal bacterial species such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella enterica [163, 164].
Skatole (3-methylindole), is produced from tryptophan notably by bacterial species among the Lactobacillus, Clostridium, and Bacteroides genera [165]. Skatole is produced by mixed bacterial populations present in the pig feces [127]. Skatole displays an efficient capacity for the inhibition of biofilm formation by the enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli [166]. Incidentally, from an agronomic perspective, skatole produced in large quantity by the pig intestinal microbiota is well known to be responsible for low organoleptic properties of pork meat [167].
Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine), a compound with a function of neurotransmitter in animals, is produced from tryptophan in numerous intestinal bacterial species including Propionibacterium, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Bifidobacterium, Streptococcus, Bacteroides, and Escherichia coli [136]. Serotonin can regulate the virulence of different bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa in models of rodent infection [168]. However, to the best of our knowledge, serotonin has not been tested in models of pig infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa [169].
Noradrenaline derived from tyrosine increases the virulence of several anaerobic bacteria, notably of the gut bacterium Clostridium perfringens [170, 171].
Amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites and protection against adverse conditions
The polyamine cadaverine, which, as previously said, is synthesized from lysine, provides a mechanism of resistance against increased acidity to Escherichia coli and the foodborne pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus which can be recovered in the intestine [172, 173].
Betaine, which is derived from glycine, has been shown to act as an osmo protectant for the intestinal bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa [174].
Gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA), which is produced from glutamate, is known as the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in animals. GABA is synthesized by simple decarboxylation of glutamate by several bacterial species, including notably intestinal bacteria such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium [175, 176]. GABA is involved in the tolerance to acidic media of intestinal bacteria such as Bacteroides spp. via its participation in the maintenance of the intracellular pH [177, 178].
Amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites and competition between intestinal bacteria
The bacterial metabolite p-cresol (4-methylphenol), which is synthesized by Clostridium difficile from tyrosine, has been shown to give a competitive advantage to this bacterium over other gut bacteria [179]. This result is of major importance when considering that Clostridium difficile represents a major cause of colitis and diarrhea in mammals. In fact, this bacterium can cause enteritis and diarrhea in both humans and piglets treated with antibiotics [180–182]. Clostridium difficile, which belongs to the cohort of early colonizers in the intestinal tract of piglets, infects these animals in a multifactorial way. The severity of the pathophysiological signs of intestinal infection and the characteristics of disease development is presumably related to several general parameters such as the composition of the maternal milk, the individual intestinal microbiota composition/metabolic activity, and co-infections [183].
The metabolite p-cresol can be produced by strict and facultative anaerobes, notably those living in the mammalian intestine [184]. Among these intestinal bacteria, bacterial families and genera like Fusobacteriaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, Clostridium, and Coriobacteriaceae, are producing p-cresol [185, 186]. As introduced above, the capacity of Clostridium difficile to convert tyrosine into p-cresol is one central element which gives competitive advantages to this pathogenic bacterium over other gut bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron [179]. By using an experimental rodent model of Clostridium difficile infection, it has been demonstrated that by removing the metabolic capacity of Clostridium difficile to produce p-cresol, this bacterium was less able to recolonize the intestinal tract after an initial episode of infection. As expected, Clostridium difficile can tolerate p-cresol concentration in the extracellular medium as high as 10 mmol/L [187, 188]. As a matter of comparison, the p-cresol concentration measured usually in the pig large intestine averages approximately 1.0 mmol/L [189]. Of note, high-protein diet in piglets increases the p-cresol production in the colonic luminal fluid [190].
Succinate is produced as an intermediary or terminal metabolites not only during the catabolism of amino acids within bacteria [191, 192], but also from other substrates such as carbohydrates [193, 194]. Succinate produced by the gut microbiota promotes Clostridium difficile growth in a rodent model of infection by this opportunistic pathogen [195]. Interestingly, Clostridium butyricum, an intestinal bacterium which produces (among other compounds) the short-chain fatty acid butyrate, is found in the intestine of mammals including pigs [196]. This bacterium diminishes the growth of Clostridium difficile in a rodent model infected by this intestinal pathogen [197]. The effect of Clostridium butyricum is associated with a decreased concentration of succinate in the large intestine luminal fluid. However, no direct causal relationships between the diminution of succinate concentration and the diminution of Clostridium difficile proliferation have been demonstrated. Whatever the mechanisms at the basis of the effects of succinate, the decreased concentration of this metabolite is apparently the net result of the overall metabolic activity of the intestinal microbiota. Of note, Clostridium butyricum, independently from its inhibiting effect on the growth of Clostridium difficile, has been recently suggested to exert beneficial effects on the pig gut. In fact, when Clostridium butyricum is used as a feed additive given to sows, it reduces diarrhea incidence in piglets [198]. Furthermore, dietary supplementation with Clostridium butyricum in weaned piglets apparently exerts positive effects on intestinal morphology and barrier function [199, 200].
Amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites and communication with other intestinal microorganisms
The emerging field of research devoted to the communication between intestinal bacteria and other intestinal microorganisms is of peculiar importance. This is because it can presumably provide a better understanding of the mechanisms which regulate the heterogeneous composition of the microbial community within the mammalian intestine.
Indole synthesized by intestinal bacteria from tryptophan diminishes the virulence and growth of the fungal species Candida albicans [201]. This indicates a potential means of communication between intestinal bacteria and a common fungus in the mammalian intestine.
Oxaloacetate is synthesized in bacteria as an intermediate in the tricarboxylic acid cycle during the catabolism of amino acids and carbohydrates. The production of oxaloacetate by Escherichia coli increases the survival of the amoeba parasite Entamoeba histolytica in the large intestine luminal fluid [202], thus indicating potential bacteria-parasite communication within the mammalian intestine. Although pigs are generally not host for Entamoeba histolytica [203], low occurrence of this parasite in the pig gut has been reported [204].
Amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites are involved in the metabolism and physiology of the intestinal epithelial cells
As presented in the previous paragraphs, the synthesis of bacterial metabolites from different amino acid precursors in intestinal bacteria has consequences on the metabolism, growth and physiology not only of the producing bacteria, but also on other bacteria, either commensal or pathogenic.
In addition to these effects, experimental arguments have been reported which indicate that some among the amino acid-derived metabolites exert bioactive effects on the cells that make up the pig intestinal epithelium. Although the studies on this topic are limited, several interesting data have been recently published. In the present paragraphs, we will i. Summarize how the dietary supply given to pigs can modify the production of amino acid-derived metabolites by the intestinal bacteria, ii. Recapitulate the effects, either beneficial or deleterious, of these metabolites on the pig intestinal epithelial cell metabolism and functions, and iii. Present the potential consequences of such effects in terms of intestinal physiology in pigs.
Branched-chain fatty acids which are detected in the pig intestine are produced by bacteria from specific amino acids. The precursors for branched-chain fatty acids are valine, leucine, and isoleucine which give rise to isobutyrate, isovalerate, and 2-methylbutyrate, respectively [205]. Branched-chain fatty acid production within the intestinal luminal fluid can be modified by nutritional intervention. For instance, supplementation with fermented soybean meal reduces isovalerate in the large intestine of piglets [206], while supplementation with chitooligosaccharide or soybean oligosaccharide in mini piglets reduces the isobutyrate and isovalerate concentrations in the colon [207, 208]. Interestingly, supplementation with isobutyrate alleviates diarrhea in weaned piglets [209]. This can be connected to the capacity of isobutyrate to increase the absorption of electrolytes and water through the colonic epithelium [210–212]. Then, these data suggest that compounds present in the pig feed that decrease markedly the luminal concentration of isobutyrate in the pig large intestine may exert counterproductive effects on intestinal water absorption.
Ammonia (considered as the sum of NH4+ and NH3), is produced by the mammalian intestinal microbiota from amino acid deamination and hydrolysis of urea produced by the host metabolism that moves from blood to the intestinal lumen. Urea hydrolysis is performed by the bacterial ureases [213]. Briefly, ammonia can be both produced and utilized by the community of intestinal bacteria [214]. Regarding ammonia utilization by the intestinal bacteria, this compound is a main source of nitrogen for the synthesis of amino acids such as glutamate, glutamine, arginine, alanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, asparagine, and tryptophan, as well as other nitrogenous compounds [60]. The concentration of ammonia in the distal part of the large intestine, and thus in pig fecal material, results from bacterial production from nitrogenous precursors, bacterial utilization for amino acids and other nitrogenous compounds, and absorption from the luminal fluid to the portal blood [215–217] (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.

Metabolism of ammonia by the intestinal bacteria. This schematic view represents the production of ammonia (considered as the sum of NH3 and NH4+) by the intestinal bacteria via amino acid deamination and urea degradation. Ammonia is a precursor for the synthesis in bacteria of nine amino acids which can be used for protein synthesis and for other metabolic pathways. Ammonia is efficiently absorbed through the intestinal epithelium into the portal vein. Ammonia is detoxified in the liver urea cycle and is incorporated into glutamate (allowing glutamine synthesis). Although most of the urea produced is excreted into urine, a minor part of urea moves from the blood to the intestinal luminal fluid. Ammonia which is not used by bacteria for amino acid synthesis, and which is not absorbed through the intestinal epithelium, is released in the fecal material
The ammonia which is not absorbed and not utilized by the intestinal microbiota is excreted in the feces. Ammonia concentration in the distal colon of pigs fed a high-protein diet is in the 12.1 to 21.0 mmol/L range [218, 219]. Ammonia concentration can be reduced in the colon and caecum of pigs by diminishing the amount of protein in the pig diet, or by replacing part of the dietary proteins with indispensable amino acids in the pig feed [220–222]. By supplementing mini piglets with chitooligosaccharide or soybean oligosaccharide, decreased ammonia concentration in the pig colon is observed [207, 208]. Similarly, dietary supplementation of pigs with wheat arabinoxylan (a soluble fibre) diminishes ammonia concentration in the large intestine [223].
Ammonium chloride, used at a 10 mmol/L concentration, markedly reduces butyrate but not acetate oxidation in pig colonocytes [224]. This result suggests that ammonia in excess adversely affects butyrate oxidation at the steps of activation and/or of beta oxidation. This result is of interest since butyrate is an oxidative substrate, and an ATP-generating substrate, in pig colonocytes [225].
The polyamines spermidine and spermine are components of the sow’s colostrum and milk [226]. Dietary supplementation of piglets with spermine increases the intestinal villus height at weaning [227]. Supplementation with another polyamine (i.e., putrescine) increases the expression of the tight junction protein components ZO-1 and claudin-3 and of the tight junction regulator occludin in the piglet jejunum [228]. Putrescine supplementation in the weaning piglet diet decreases the diarrhea index, and thus the water content in the intestinal luminal fluid [229]. This effect is associated with an increased butyrate concentration in the colonic luminal fluid. Thus, overall, the available data suggest beneficial effects of putrescine and spermine on piglet intestinal physiology.
Indole-related metabolites derived from tryptophan have begun to emerge as bioactive compounds towards the pig intestinal mucosa. Indeed, dietary supplementation with indole-3-carboxaldehyde promotes intestinal epithelial proliferation in weaned piglets, with concomitant upregulation of AhR-related signaling markers, although the effect of this metabolite on barrier function appears limited [230].
While branched-chain fatty acids, ammonia, polyamines and tryptophan-derived metabolites have received most attention, the data regarding the effects of other amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites on the pig intestinal epithelium (namely hydrogen sulfide, nitric oxide, dopamine, noradrenaline, serotonin, gamma-amino butyric acid, p-cresol, skatole, betaine, succinate, and oxaloacetate) are scarce. The hydrogen sulfide rapid donor sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), although being known as an inhibitor of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase activity and of the mitochondrial oxygen consumption in colonocytes [231], does not affect the viability of isolated pig colonic crypt when tested for 4 h at millimolar concentrations [232]. This suggests that an exposure to hydrogen sulfide is not associated with rapid loss of cell viability, maybe because of an efficient H2S detoxification system in pig colonic epithelial cells [233]. However, this enzymatic system has not been specifically studied in pig colonocytes.
In the absence of available data from experiments in pigs with the metabolites listed above, we can only refer to data originating from experiments performed with human cells and from experiments performed in rodents. These data, reported below, might be of interest for individuals involved in the pig industry.
Administration of dopamine in the colonic lumen of mice increases water absorption [234]. In addition, dopamine increases mucus secretion in the rat distal colon [235]. Concerning p-cresol, it has been demonstrated that this bacterial metabolite diminishes mitochondrial oxygen consumption in human colonocytes, an effect which was paralleled by a decreased proliferation of colonocytes [236]. Furthermore, by using monolayers of human colonocytes, it has been shown that p-cresol dose-dependently increases the paracellular transport between colonocytes [237]. This last result suggests alteration of the intestinal barrier function. The effects of succinate on the intestinal epithelial cells are also of interest. In fact, this bacterially derived compound provokes hyperplasia and hypertrophy of goblet cells in the distal small intestine of rodents [238]. Moreover, succinate produced by the intestinal microbiota promotes the expansion of Tuft cells [239]. These cells are secretory cells involved in the production of compounds linked to intestinal immunity. The expansion of Tuft cells is associated with signs of decreased inflammation in the mice model [239].
The results presented in the previous paragraph aim at motivating additional studies in pigs to document the effects (either beneficial or deleterious) of these amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites on the pig small and large intestine epithelium metabolism and physiology.
Amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites have negative environmental impact: the case of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide
Large-scale pig farming emits numerous pollutants to the local and regional environment including gaseous and particulate matter emissions [240, 241]. Among these polluting substances, the effects of ammonia and H2S, synthesized by the pig intestinal bacteria from specific amino acids, have been evaluated from various perspectives. These perspectives include the health of farm workers and neighbouring populations, as well as animal health and agronomic production.
Regarding ammonia, the median emission of NH3 in the atmosphere of swine facilities in North America is estimated to be approximately 2.8 kg ammonia per pig and per year [242]. Mitigating ammonia emission from swine manure thus represents a worldwide challenge [243–245].
The ammonia emitted from pig facilities originates primarily from nitrogen excreted by the animals. In pigs slaughtered at 110 kg body weight, it has been assessed that approximately 80% of the excreted nitrogen is present in urine in the form of urea while the remainder is mainly present in the form of NH3/NH4+ in the fecal material [246]. Urea is degraded into NH3/NH4+ by the bacterial urease activities present in the pig feces when urine and feces are mixed. Once released into the environment, ammonia contributes to several detrimental effects. NH3 plays a significant role with other pollutants in the formation of atmospheric particles [247]. These particles can exacerbate respiratory issues, notably in agricultural workers [248]. Furthermore, when deposited in water, ammonia in excess can lead to eutrophication thus causing algal bloom and oxygen depletion. Such events are deleterious for different forms of aquatic life [249]. Ammonia in excess in the atmosphere of swine facilities (50 ppm) can exert deleterious effects on the respiratory tract of pigs, inducing signs of lung inflammation, and causing anorexia. These events are associated with alteration of growth performance and economic losses in pig farming [250, 251].
Concerning H2S, the median emission from swine facilities represents 0.09 kg/pig/year [242]. The toxicity of H2S is mainly related, as previously mentioned, to the capacity of this gas to inhibit the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase with an affinity close to that of cyanide [252]. At low levels in the atmosphere, H2S acts as a respiratory irritant, while at higher levels, this gas acts as a chemical asphyxiant in both humans and pigs [253, 254]. Thus, H2S represents a serious biological hazard for agricultural workers [255].
Conclusions, limits, and perspectives
The present review recapitulates experimental data which suggest that amino acids derived from alimentary and endogenous proteins play a major role in the renewal of the bacteria present within the intestinal luminal fluid. Such renewal is believed to be necessary to ensure the repletion of the bacteria which are excreted in large quantity in the pig feces every day. This renewal is most likely dependent on intense anabolism with notably active protein synthesis from amino acids synthesized within the different bacterial species and amino acids available from the luminal fluid. All the amino acids that intestinal bacteria cannot synthesize can be considered as indispensable and must then be imported from the luminal fluid for ensuring protein synthesis inside the bacterium. The proteins are not the only macromolecules synthesized from amino acids by the intestinal bacteria, and the purine and pyrimidine rings in DNA and RNAs in growing bacteria are dependent on 3 specific amino acids (glutamine, aspartate, and glycine) for their synthesis. The synthesis of proteins, DNA, and RNAs in intestinal bacteria is dependent on ATP supply. Part of this ATP is produced through amino acid catabolism in bacteria equipped for such amino acid utilization. Finally, amino acids during their catabolism within bacteria produce numerous intermediary and terminal metabolic products, and several of them, when accumulated in significant quantities, have proven to be bioactive in terms of bacterial growth, as well as in terms of bacterial metabolism and physiology (Table 1).
Table 1.
Bioactive effects of amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites on intestinal bacteria growth, metabolism and physiology
| Bacterial metabolites | Amino acid precursors | Modified bacterial parameters |
|---|---|---|
| Polyamines | Arg, Met, Lys, Orn | Growth, biofilm formation, toxin production |
| H2S | Cys | Biofilm formation, energy metabolism |
| NO | Arg | Biofilm formation, energy metabolism |
| Indole | Trp | Growth, toxin production, virulence |
| p-cresol | Tyr | Competitive advantage |
| Skatole | Trp | Biofilm formation |
| Dopamine | Tyr | Growth |
| Noradrenaline | Tyr | Growth, virulence |
| Serotonin | Trp | Virulence |
| Succinate | Several amino acids | Growth |
From Table 1, it appears clearly that important aspects of bacterial growth, metabolism and physiology are affected by several bacterial metabolites, thus suggesting complex regulation of these parameters by these compounds. In addition, some amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites such as polyamines, betaine, and gamma-amino butyric acid are involved in the protection of intestinal bacteria against adverse conditions in terms of lower pH and higher osmolarity [172–174, 177, 178]. However, it remains to be demonstrated if such effect is relevant to the changes of pH and osmolarity which can be recorded in the pig intestine in the breeding conditions.
In the field of intestinal bacteria physiology, as presented in this review, important discoveries have been made regarding the implication of amino acid-derived metabolites such as polyamines, H2S, NO, and skatole on the modulation of protective biofilm formation [147, 149, 159, 161, 166]. This represents an important field of investigation since biofilm formation and quorum sensing are intimately interconnected [256, 257]. Briefly, quorum sensing is related to the capacity of bacteria to collectively modify their behavior in response to changes in the cell density and species composition within changing local environment [258]. Such changing environment can be clearly documented for bacteria living within the mammalian intestine notably in situation of modified nutritional characteristic [140].
Several studies indicate that metabolites synthesized from amino acids by a producing intestinal bacterium can act both on the producing bacterium itself, but also on other bacterial species, thus suggesting that such communication may represent an important determinant of the bacterial composition within the mammalian intestine. For instance, as detailed in this review, the production of p-cresol from tyrosine by the pathogenic bacterium Clostridium difficile gives a competitive advantage to this bacterium over other intestinal bacteria [179]. Further works are obviously needed to document in a more thorough manner how the production of active metabolites can influence the respective growth of commensal and pathogenic bacteria within the small and large intestines of pigs.
Emerging data suggest that some bacterial metabolites synthesized from amino acids by some bacterial species within the mammalian intestine are active not only on the producing and target bacteria, but also on other intestinal microorganisms, such as fungi and parasite [201, 202], thus revealing participation of these compounds in the overall composition of the intestinal ecosystem. This aspect remains in its infancy and needs to be further explored and documented because of significant potential applications for pig intestinal health.
However, it is important to underline that the in vivo and in vitro experiments that have been made regarding the effects of bacterial metabolites on bacterial metabolism and physiology have been generally made by using individual compounds. Such experimental situation is not the situation of real life where these compounds are present at the same time in the pig luminal fluid. The situation is complicated by the fact that the amino acid-derived bacterial metabolite concentration in the pig gut may fluctuate according to the nutritional situations [259]. Furthermore, it remains to verify for some bacterial metabolites that the concentrations tested in in vitro and in vivo experiments are within the range of concentrations measured in the intestinal luminal fluid in different situations. From that point of view, it is important to keep in mind that the concentrations of metabolites produced by the intestinal microbiota have been generally measured in the pig feces, and in some cases in the luminal fluid present in the pig large intestine. The fecal concentrations of metabolites represent the concentrations present in the very distal part of the large intestine (i.e., the rectum). Thus, unfortunately, few data are available regarding the concentrations of bacterial metabolites within the different segments of the small and large intestine in pigs. Regarding these last points, porcine intestinal organoid-derived monolayers represent a promising experimental model for testing the direct effects of individual bacterial metabolites and of mixtures of these compounds on the pig intestinal epithelial cells recovered from the different intestinal segments in different situations such as stages of development and alimentary conditions [260].
Apart from the implication of the amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites on the interactions between the intestinal bacteria, some information reported in this review indicate effects of some of them on the pig intestinal epithelium in relationship with its metabolism and physiology. This is the case for instance for ammonia which decreases butyrate oxidation in pig colonocytes [224] and for putrescine which increases the expression of tight junction proteins [228]. Still somewhat little studied, this subject is critical because presumably connected with episodes of diarrhea and inflammation that may occur in piglets [261–263]. Nevertheless, as indicated in the previous paragraph, most of the bacterial metabolites derived from amino acids have been tested individually while increased protein putrefaction within the large intestine of pigs leads to modifications of the concentrations of numerous amino acid-derived metabolites.
Lastly, although having been the subjects of only recent studies, experimental arguments have been presented which suggest that the emission of polluting substances derived from amino acid utilization by the pig intestinal bacteria, such as ammonia and hydrogen sulfide, can be reduced by different means. This is a new and important field of research because these compounds exert obvious adverse effects on the aquatic environment (for ammonia) as well as on human and animal health (for ammonia and H2S) [249–255]. Together, ammonia and H2S represent two major amino acid-derived gaseous pollutants from pig production, with documented effects on human health, animal welfare, and the broader environment.
Different options can be proposed for a reduction of the emission of these compounds in the environment in a perspective of green transition [264, 265]. First, in pig facilities, as we saw earlier, excretion of ammonia can be decreased by reducing the quantity of crude proteins in the pig feed and/or substituting a part of crude proteins by individual amino acids. For instance, reducing the crude protein level in the pig feed from 20% to 17% and then to 14% results in a decrease of ammonia in all intestinal segments [220], while reduction of crude proteins from 24% to 20% in the pig diet decreased ammonia in the cecum by one third [221]. New studies on that aspect will allow to get additional data on the precise protein requirements for optimal growth and physiology at all stages of piglet development with limited production of polluting substances.
Second, specific indigestible carbohydrates can be adjusted in the pig feed to decrease ammonia production within the intestinal luminal fluid and then in the fecal material. For instance, supplementation of pig feed with different saccharides such as chitooligosaccharide, soybean oligosaccharide or arabinoxylan reduces ammonia in the pig large intestine [207, 208, 223].
Third, there are some reasons to consider that modifications of the pig microbiota composition and/or metabolic activity can reduce the bacterial synthesis of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide. Importantly, ammonia and H2S concentrations in the luminal fluid is dependent on their utilization as precursors for the synthesis in intestinal bacteria of different amino acids. Indeed, ammonia is used in bacteria for the synthesis of nine amino acids, while H2S is used in bacteria for the synthesis of cysteine and methionine [60]. In other words, it is desirable that ammonia and H2S are produced by the bacteria in sufficient quantities to allow sufficient de novo synthesis of amino acids. Such production then participates in the anabolism and renewal of the remaining bacterial population after excretion of bacteria in the fecal material. Nevertheless, such ammonia and H2S production should not exceed by much the requirements of these precursors for amino acid synthesis to avoid accumulation of these polluting substances in the intestinal luminal content, and finally in the feces. Last, regarding the emission of H2S, such gaseous emission can be reduced by the binding of this compound in the pig intestine and manure with inorganic and organic molecules [266–269].
Integrated studies linking intestinal, fecal, and manure metabolomics with on-farm gaseous emission measurements should be encouraged. Because environmentally relevant pollutants such as ammonia and H2S ultimately arise from excreta and manure handling, parallel profiling of amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites in intestinal contents, feces, and manure, together with determination of the microbiota composition and measurements of gaseous emissions in pig production facilities, should help identify signatures associated with higher or lower pollutant output. Such integrative approaches will surely contribute to the development of precision feeding strategies designed at reducing the environmental footprint of pig production while promoting the pork industry.
Finally, progress in the field of pig nutrition, intestinal health, and production performance, as well as in the field of the protection of the environment, is dependent on a constant flow of information originating from additional in vitro and in vivo experiments with amino acid-derived bacterial metabolites. We recommend performing these experiments with bacterial metabolites, tested at their physiological concentrations in media mimicking the intestinal luminal fluid composition, for their effects on the intestinal commensal and pathogenic bacteria found in the pig gut, as well as on the pig intestinal epithelial cells. The effects of nutritional and microbiological interventions on the pig microbiota composition and metabolic activity, and the consequences of such interventions for the defence of the environment and the pig intestinal health in both medium-term and long-term perspective are worth being explored further.
Acknowledgements
The three authors wish to express their gratitude to their respective French and Chinese Institutions for their constant support.
Abbreviations
- ATP
Adenosine triphosphate
- H2S
Hydrogen sulfide
- NH4Cl
Ammonium chloride
- NO
Nitric oxide
Authors’ contributions
FB wrote the original draft that was revised and edited by MT and TW. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
- 1.Hu J, Chen J, Ma L, Hou Q, Zhang Y, Kong X, et al. Characterizing core microbiota and regulatory functions of the pig gut microbiome. ISME J. 2024;18:wrad037. 10.1093/ismejo/wrad037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Deng F, Li Y, Peng Y, Wei X, Wang X, Howe S, et al. The diversity, composition, and metabolic pathways of archaea in pigs. Animals. 2021;11:2139. 10.3390/ani11072139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lin F, Zhang H, Li L, Yang Y, Zou X, Chen J, et al. PEDV: insights and advances into types, function, structure, and receptor recognition. Viruses. 2022;14:1744. 10.3390/v14081744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wei G. Insights into gut fungi in pigs: a comprehensive review. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2025;109:96–112. 10.1111/jpn.14036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Solaymani-Mohammadi S, Petri WA Jr. Zoonotic implications of the swine-transmitted protozoal infections. Vet Parasitol. 2006;140:189–203. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chen X, Xu J, Ren E, Su Y, Zhu W. Co-occurrence of early gut colonization in neonatal piglets with microbiota in the maternal and surrounding delivery environments. Anaerobe. 2018;49:30–40. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang X, Tsai T, Deng F, Wei X, Chai J, Knapp J, et al. Longitudinal investigation of the swine gut microbiome from birth to market reveals stage and growth performance associated bacteria. Microbiome. 2019;7:109. 10.1186/s40168-019-0721-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mowat AM, Agace WW. Regional specialization within the intestinal immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14:667–85. 10.1038/nri3738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Belkaid Y, Hand TW. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell. 2014;157:121–41. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kabat AM, Srinivasan N, Maloy KJ. Modulation of immune development and function by intestinal microbiota. Trends Immunol. 2014;35:507–17. 10.1016/j.it.2014.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Horvathova K, Modrackova N, Splichal I, Splichalova A, Amin A, Ingribelli E, et al. Defined pig microbiota with a potential protective effect against infection with Salmonella Typhimurium. Microorganisms. 2023;11:1007. 10.3390/microorganisms11041007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Arpaia N, Campbell C, Fan X, Dikiy S, van der Veeken J, deRoos P, et al. Metabolites produced by commensal bacteria promote peripheral regulatory T-cell generation. Nature. 2013;504:451–5. 10.1038/nature12726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu T, Lv Y, Li X, Zhao D, Yi D, Wang L, et al. Establishment of a recombinant Escherichia coli-induced piglet diarrhea model. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2018;23:1517–34. 10.2741/4658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gresse R, Chaucheyras-Durand F, Fleury MA, Van de Wiele T, Forano E, Blanquet-Diot S. Gut microbiota dysbiosis in postweaning piglets: understanding the keys to health. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25:851–73. 10.1016/j.tim.2017.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhou H, Yu B, Sun J, Chen H, Liu Z, Ge L, et al. Gut microbiota absence and transplantation affect diarrhea: an investigation in the germ-free piglet model. Anim Biotechnol. 2023;34:3971–7. 10.1080/10495398.2023.2248200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bin P, Tang Z, Liu S, Chen S, Xia Y, Liu J, et al. Intestinal microbiota mediates Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli-induced diarrhea in piglets. BMC Vet Res. 2018;14:385. 10.1186/s12917-018-1704-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wei YH, Ma X, Zhao JC, Wang XQ, Gao CQ. Succinate metabolism and its regulation of host-microbe interactions. Gut Microbes. 2023;15:2190300. 10.1080/19490976.2023.2190300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li C, Wang Y, Zhao X, Li J, Wang H, Ren Y, et al. Comparative analysis of intestinal inflammation and microbiota dysbiosis of LPS-challenged piglets between different breeds. Animals (Basel). 2024;14:665. 10.3390/ani14050665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ma Y, Han X, Fang J, Jiang H. Role of dietary amino acids and microbial metabolites in the regulation of pig intestinal health. Anim Nutr. 2021;9:1–6. 10.1016/j.aninu.2021.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liao SF, Ji F, Fan P, Denryter K. Swine gastrointestinal microbiota and the effects of dietary amino acids on its composition and metabolism. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:1237. 10.3390/ijms25021237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vasquez R, Oh JK, Song JH, Kang DK. Gut microbiome-produced metabolites in pigs: a review on their biological functions and the influence of probiotics. J Anim Sci Technol. 2022;64:671–95. 10.5187/jast.2022.e58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kong XF, Ji YJ, Li HW, Zhu Q, Blachier F, Geng MM, et al. Colonic luminal microbiota and bacterial metabolite composition in pregnant Huanjiang mini-pigs: effects of food composition at different times of pregnancy. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37224. 10.1038/srep37224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ji YJ, Li H, Xie PF, Li ZH, Li HW, Yin YL, et al. Stages of pregnancy and weaning influence the gut microbiota diversity and function in sows. J Appl Microbiol. 2019;127:867–79. 10.1111/jam.14344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Xiong L, You J, Zhang W, Zhu Q, Blachier F, Yin Y, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction alters growth performance, plasma hormones, and small intestinal microbial communities in growing-finishing pigs. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2020;11:86. 10.1186/s40104-020-00490-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Wang M, Radlowski EC, Monaco MH, Fahey GC Jr., Gaskins HR, Donovan SM. Mode of delivery and early nutrition modulate microbial colonization and fermentation products in neonatal piglets. J Nutr. 2013;143:795–803. 10.3945/jn.112.173096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Poulsen AR, de Jonge N, Sugiharto S, Nielsen JL, Lauridsen C, Canibe N. The microbial community of the gut differs between piglets fed sow milk, milk replacer or bovine colostrum. Br J Nutr. 2017;117:964–78. 10.1017/S0007114517000216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Konstantinov SR, Zhu WY, Williams BA, Tamminga S, Vos WM, Akkermans AD. Effect of fermentable carbohydrates on piglet faecal bacterial communities as revealed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of 16S ribosomal DNA. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2003;43:225–35. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2003.tb01062.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Inoue R, Tsukahara T, Nakanishi N, Ushida K. Development of the intestinal microbiota in the piglet. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2005;51:257–65. 10.2323/jgam.51.257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Patil Y, Gooneratne R, Ju XH. Interactions between host and gut microbiota in domestic pigs: a review. Gut Microbes. 2020;11:310–34. 10.1080/19490976.2019.1690363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nowland TL, Kirkwood RN, Pluske JR. Review: Can early-life establishment of the piglet intestinal microbiota influence production outcomes? Animal. 2022;16:100368. 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Isaacson R, Kim HB. The intestinal microbiome of the pig. Anim Health Res Rev. 2012;13:100–9. 10.1017/S1466252312000084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xiao L, Estellé J, Kiilerich P, Ramayo-Caldas Y, Xia Z, Feng Q, et al. A reference gene catalogue of the pig gut microbiome. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16161. 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wylensek D, Hitch TCA, Riedel T, Afrizal A, Kumar N, Wortmann E, et al. A collection of bacterial isolates from the pig intestine reveals functional and taxonomic diversity. Nat Commun. 2020;11:6389. 10.1038/s41467-020-19929-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Brandtzaeg P. Induction of secretory immunity and memory at mucosal surfaces. Vaccine. 2007;25:5467–84. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.12.001. Epub 2006 Dec 15. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 35.Yin X, Feng Y, Wheatcroft R, Chambers J, Gong J, Gyles CL. Adherence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to epithelial cells in vitro and in pig gut loops is affected by bacterial culture conditions. Can J Vet Res. 2011;75:81–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rojas M, Conway PL. Colonization by lactobacilli of piglet small intestinal mucus. J Appl Bacteriol. 1996;81:474–80. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1996.tb03535.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Blachier F. Metabolism of dietary substrates by intestinal bacteria and consequences for the host intestine. In: Metabolism of alimentary compounds by the intestinal microbiota and health. Cham: Springer; 2023. p. 45–144. 10.1007/978-3-031-26322-4_3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Freeman HJ, Kim YS, Sleisenger MH. Protein digestion and absorption in man. Normal mechanisms and protein-energy malnutrition. Am J Med. 1979;67:1030–1036. 10.1016/0002-9343(79)90645-4. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 39.Blachier F, Wu G, Yin Y, Hou Y, Andriamihaja M. Developmental amino acid metabolism in the pig small and large intestine epithelial cells. In: Blachier F, Wu G, Yin Y, editors. Nutritional and physiological functions of amino acids in pigs. Vienna: Springer; 2013. p. 59–74. 10.1007/978-3-7091-1328-8_5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Moran ET, Bedford MR. Endogenous mucin conveyed to the mucosa with microbes can assure lumen fermentation and large intestinal security-swine versus fowl. Anim Nutr. 2023;2023(14):403–10. 10.1016/j.aninu.2023.06.010. eCollection 2023 Sep. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 41.Vereecke L, Beyaert R, van Loo G. Enterocyte death and intestinal barrier maintenance in homeostasis and disease. Trends Mol Med. 2011;17:584–93. 10.1016/j.molmed.2011.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bröer S. Intestinal amino acid transport and metabolic health. Annu Rev Nutr. 2023;43:73–99. 10.1146/annurev-nutr-061121-094344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Libao-Mercado AJ, Zhu CL, Cant JP, Lapierre H, Thibault JN, Sève B, et al. Dietary and endogenous amino acids are the main contributors to microbial protein in the upper gut of normally nourished pigs. J Nutr. 2009;139:1088–94. 10.3945/jn.108.103267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Torrallardona D, Harris CI, Coates ME, Fuller MF. Microbial amino acid synthesis and utilization in rats: incorporation of 15N from 15NH4Cl into lysine in the tissues of germ-free and conventional rats. Br J Nutr. 1996;76:689–700. 10.1079/bjn19960076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Backes G, Hennig U, Petzke KJ, Elsner A, Junghans P, Nürnberg G, et al. Contribution of intestinal microbial lysine to lysine homeostasis is reduced in minipigs fed a wheat gluten-based diet. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76:1317–25. 10.1093/ajcn/76.6.1317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Blachier F, Andriamihaja M, Kong XF. Fate of undigested proteins in the pig large intestine: what impact on the colon epithelium? Anim Nutr. 2021;9:110–8. 10.1016/j.aninu.2021.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Moughan PJ. Determination of protein digestibility in the growing pig. In: Blachier F, Wu G, Yin Y, editors. Nutritional and physiological functions of amino acids in pigs. Vienna: Springer; 2013. p. 251–71. 10.1007/978-3-7091-1328-8_17. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Stein HH, Sève B, Fuller MF, Moughan PJ, de Lange CF, Committee on Terminology to Report AA Bioavailability and Digestibility. Invited review: amino acid bioavailability and digestibility in pig feed ingredients: terminology and application. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:172–80. 10.2527/jas.2005-742. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 49.Kaman WE, Hays JP, Endtz HP, Bikker FJ. Bacterial proteases: targets for diagnostics and therapy. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33:1081–7. 10.1007/s10096-014-2075-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Saier MH Jr. Families of transmembrane transporters selective for amino acids and their derivatives. Microbiology (Reading). 2000;146:1775–95. 10.1099/00221287-146-8-1775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tanaka KJ, Song S, Mason K, Pinkett HW. Selective substrate uptake: the role of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) importers in pathogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2018;1860:868–77. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2017.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hosie AH, Poole PS. Bacterial ABC transporters of amino acids. Res Microbiol. 2001;152:259–70. 10.1016/s0923-2508(01)01197-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.van der Wielen N, Moughan PJ, Mensink M. Amino acid absorption in the large intestine of humans and porcine models. J Nutr. 2017;147:1493–8. 10.3945/jn.117.248187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Darragh AJ, Cranwell PD, Moughan PJ. Absorption of lysine and methionine from the proximal colon of the piglet. Br J Nutr. 1994;71:739–52. 10.1079/bjn19940181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Niiyama M, Deguchi E, Kagota K, Namioka S. Appearance of 15N-labeled intestinal microbial amino acids in the venous blood of the pig colon. Am J Vet Res. 1979;40:716–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.James PS, Smith MW. Methionine transport by pig colonic mucosa measured during early post-natal development. J Physiol. 1976;262:151–68. 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sepúlveda FV, Smith MW. Different mechanisms for neutral amino acid uptake by new-born pig colon. J Physiol. 1979;286:479–90. 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Portune KJ, Beaumont M, Davila AM, Tomé D, Blachier F, Sanz Y. Gut microbiota role in dietary protein metabolism and health-related outcomes : the two sides of the coin. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2016;57:213–32. 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.08.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Pessione E. Lactic acid bacteria contribution to gut microbiota complexity: lights and shadows. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012;2:86. 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Blachier F. Amino acid metabolism for bacterial physiology. In: The evolutionary journey of amino acids. Springer Nature Switzerland; 2025. p. 63–105. [Google Scholar]
- 61.Blachier F, Kong X. Recycling of undigested proteins provided by the host to the large intestine microbiota: implication for intestinal bacterial anabolism, growth, and physiology. Microorganisms. 2025;13:2690. 10.3390/microorganisms13122690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Eggeling L, Sahm H. New ubiquitous translocators: amino acid export by Corynebacterium glutamicum and Escherichia coli. Arch Microbiol. 2003;180:155–60. 10.1007/s00203-003-0581-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Fairbrother JM, Nadeau E, Gyles CL. Escherichia coli in postweaning diarrhea in pigs: an update on bacterial types, pathogenesis, and prevention strategies. Anim Health Res Rev. 2005;6:17–39. 10.1079/ahr2005105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Bourque D, Bisaillon JG, Ackermann HW, Berthiaume L, Alain R, Beaudet R. A new bacteriophage of Corynebacterium glutamicum isolated from swine waste. Am J Vet Res. 1989;50:1952–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Jones CM, Hernández Lozada NJ, Pfleger BF. Efflux systems in bacteria and their metabolic engineering applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:9381–93. 10.1007/s00253-015-6963-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Castro J, Barros MM, Araújo D, Campos AM, Oliveira R, Silva S, et al. Swine enteric colibacillosis: current treatment avenues and future directions. Front Vet Sci. 2022;9:981207. 10.3389/fvets.2022.981207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Wang S, Zhang S, Liu Z, Liu P, Shi Z, Wei J, et al. Molecular characterization of enterohemorrhagic E. coli O157 isolated from animal fecal and food samples in Eastern China. ScientificWorldJ. 2014;2014:946394. 10.1155/2014/946394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Soliani L, Rugna G, Prosperi A, Chiapponi C, Luppi A. Salmonella infection in pigs: disease, prevalence, and a link between swine and human health. Pathogens. 2023;12:1267. 10.3390/pathogens12101267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Posthaus H, Kittl S, Tarek B, Bruggisser J. Clostridium perfringens type C necrotic enteritis in pigs: diagnosis, pathogenesis, and prevention. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2020;32:203–12. 10.1177/1040638719900180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Shimizu T, Ohtani K, Hirakawa H, Ohshima K, Yamashita A, Shiba T, et al. Complete genome sequence of Clostridium perfringens, an anaerobic flesh-eater. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:996–1001. 10.1073/pnas.022493799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Tao S, Fan J, Li J, Wu Z, Yao Y, Wang Z, et al. Extracellular vesicles derived from Lactobacillus johnsonii promote gut barrier homeostasis by enhancing M2 macrophage polarization. J Adv Res. 2025;69:545–63. 10.1016/j.jare.2024.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Xin J, Zeng D, Wang H, Sun N, Zhao Y, Dan Y, et al. Probiotic Lactobacillus johnsonii BS15 promotes growth performance, intestinal immunity, and gut microbiota in piglets. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2020;12:184–93. 10.1007/s12602-018-9511-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Pridmore RD, Berger B, Desiere F, Vilanova D, Barretto C, Pittet AC, et al. The genome sequence of the probiotic intestinal bacterium Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC 533. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:2512–7. 10.1073/pnas.0307327101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yu XJ, Walker DH, Liu Y, Zhang L. Amino acid biosynthesis deficiency in bacteria associated with human and animal hosts. Infect Genet Evol. 2009;9:514–7. 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Harvey RB, Young CR, Ziprin RL, Hume ME, Genovese KJ, Anderson RC, et al. Prevalence of Campylobacter spp isolated from the intestinal tract of pigs raised in an integrated swine production system. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1999;215:1601–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Gião J, Leão C, Albuquerque T, Clemente L, Amaro A. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus isolates from cattle and pigs in Portugal: linezolid resistance genes optrA and poxtA. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022;11:615. 10.3390/antibiotics11050615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Wang K, Cao G, Zhang H, Li Q, Yang C. Effects of Clostridium butyricum and Enterococcus faecalis on growth performance, immune function, intestinal morphology, volatile fatty acids, and intestinal flora in a piglet model. Food Funct. 2019;10:7844–54. 10.1039/c9fo01650c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Gomes-Santos AC, de Oliveira RP, Moreira TG, Castro-Junior AB, Horta BC, Lemos L, et al. Hsp65-producing Lactococcus lactis prevents inflammatory intestinal disease in mice by IL-10- and TLR2-dependent pathways. Front Immunol. 2017;8:30. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Jaramillo-Jaramillo AS, Blanvillain-Rivera V, Coulson TJD, Farzan V, Friendship R, Labbe A. Effect of a Lactococcus lactis culture supernatant on diarrhea and performance parameters of piglets in the post-weaning period and on expression of the faeG gene in vitro. Can Vet J. 2024;65(3):259–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sanca FMM, Blanco IR, Dias M, Moreno AM, Martins SMMK, Stephano MA, et al. Antimicrobial activity of peptides produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis on swine pathogens. Animals (Basel). 2023;13:2442. 10.3390/ani13152442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Bolotin A, Wincker P, Mauger S, Jaillon O, Malarme K, Weissenbach J, et al. The complete genome sequence of the lactic acid bacterium Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis IL1403. Genome Res. 2001;11:731–53. 10.1101/gr.gr-1697r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Godon JJ, Delorme C, Bardowski J, Chopin MC, Ehrlich SD, Renault P. Gene inactivation in Lactococcus lactis: branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:4383–90. 10.1128/jb.175.14.4383-4390.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Kuroda M, Ohta T, Uchiyama I, Baba T, Yuzawa H, Kobayashi I, et al. Whole genome sequencing of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2001;357:1225–40. 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04403-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Algammal AM, Hetta HF, Elkelish A, Alkhalifah DHH, Hozzein WN, Batiha GE, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): one health perspective approach to the bacterium epidemiology, virulence factors, antibiotic-resistance, and zoonotic impact. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:3255–65. 10.2147/IDR.S272733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Khairullah AR, Kurniawan SC, Effendi MH, Sudjarwo SA, Ramandinianto SC, Widodo A, et al. A review of new emerging livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from pig farms. Vet World. 2023;16:46–58. 10.14202/vetworld.2023.46-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Njenga R, Boele J, Öztürk Y, Koch HG. Coping with stress: how bacteria fine-tune protein synthesis and protein transport. J Biol Chem. 2023;299:105163. 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Powers ET, Powers DL, Gierasch LM. FoldEco: a model for proteostasis in E. coli. Cell Rep. 2012;1:265–76. 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Bittner LM, Arends J, Narberhaus F. When, how and why? Regulated proteolysis by the essential FtsH protease in Escherichia coli. Biol Chem. 2017;398:625–35. 10.1515/hsz-2016-0302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Tollerson R 2nd, Ibba M. Translational regulation of environmental adaptation in bacteria. J Biol Chem. 2020;295:10434–45. 10.1074/jbc.REV120.012742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Guevarra RB, Lee JH, Lee SH, Seok MJ, Kim DW, Kang BN, et al. Piglet gut microbial shifts early in life: causes and effects. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2019;10:1. 10.1186/s40104-018-0308-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Van Damme I, Mattheus W, Bertrand S, De Zutter L. Quantification of hygiene indicators and Salmonella in the tonsils, oral cavity and rectal content samples of pigs during slaughter. Food Microbiol. 2018;71:120–8. 10.1016/j.fm.2017.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Chinnam BK, Nelapati S, Tumati SR, Bobbadi S, Chaitanya Peddada V, Bodempudi B. Detection of β-lactamase-producing Proteus mirabilis strains of animal origin in Andhra Pradesh, India and their genetic diversity. J Food Prot. 2021;84:1374–9. 10.4315/JFP-20-399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Charlier D, Nguyen Le Minh P, Roovers M. Regulation of carbamoylphosphate synthesis in Escherichia coli: an amazing metabolite at the crossroad of arginine and pyrimidine biosynthesis. Amino Acids. 2018;50:1647–61. 10.1007/s00726-018-2654-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Leiva LE, Zegarra V, Bange G, Ibba M. At the crossroad of nucleotide dynamics and protein synthesis in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2023;87:e0004422. 10.1128/mmbr.00044-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Montoya CA, Maier E, Banic M, McNabb WC, Moughan PJ. Oxygen concentration of gut luminal contents varies post-prandially in growing pigs. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2022;106:545–51. 10.1111/jpn.13598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Buckel W. Energy conservation in fermentations of anaerobic bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:703525. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.703525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Andrés-Lasheras S, Bolea R, Mainar-Jaime RC, Kuijper E, Sevilla E, Martín-Burriel I, et al. Presence of Clostridium difficile in pig faecal samples and wild animal species associated with pig farms. J Appl Microbiol. 2017;122:462–72. 10.1111/jam.13343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Stickland LH. Studies in the metabolism of the strict anaerobes (genus Clostridium): the oxidation of alanine by Cl. sporogenes. IV. The reduction of glycine by Cl. sporogenes. Biochem J. 1935;29:889–898. 10.1042/bj029088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 99.Marshall A, McGrath JW, Graham R, McMullan G. Food for thought-The link between Clostridioides difficile metabolism and pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog. 2023;19:e1011034. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Pavao A, Graham M, Arrieta-Ortiz ML, Immanuel SRC, Baliga NS, Bry L. Reconsidering the in vivo functions of Clostridial Stickland amino acid fermentations. Anaerobe. 2022;76:102600. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2022.102600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Fonknechten N, Chaussonnerie S, Tricot S, Lajus A, Andreesen JR, Perchat N, et al. Clostridium sticklandii, a specialist in amino acid degradation:revisiting its metabolism through its genome sequence. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:555. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Michael AJ. Polyamines in eukaryotes, bacteria, and archaea. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:14896–903. 10.1074/jbc.R116.734780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Li B, Baniasadi HR, Liang J, Phillips MA, Michael AJ. New routes for spermine biosynthesis. J Biol Chem. 2025;301:108390. 10.1016/j.jbc.2025.108390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Igarashi K, Kashiwagi K. Polyamine transport in bacteria and yeast. Biochem J. 1999;344:633–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Driessen AJ, Smid EJ, Konings WN. Transport of diamines by Enterococcus faecalis is mediated by an agmatine-putrescine antiporter. J Bacteriol. 1988;170:4522–7. 10.1128/jb.170.10.4522-4527.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Large PJ. Enzymes and pathways of polyamine breakdown in microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1992;8:249–62. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1992.tb04991.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Shah P, Swiatlo E. A multifaceted role for polyamines in bacterial pathogens. Mol Microbiol. 2008;68:4–16. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06126.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Yoshida M, Kashiwagi K, Shigemasa A, Taniguchi S, Yamamoto K, Makinoshima H, et al. A unifying model for the role of polyamines in bacterial cell growth, the polyamine modulon. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:46008–13. 10.1074/jbc.M404393200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Chattopadhyay MK, Keembiyehetty CN, Chen W, Tabor H. Polyamines stimulate the level of the σ38 subunit (RpoS) of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase, resulting in the induction of the glutamate decarboxylase-dependent acid response system via the gadE regulon. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:17809–21. 10.1074/jbc.M115.655688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Chagneau CV, Garcie C, Bossuet-Greif N, Tronnet S, Brachmann AO, Piel J, et al. The polyamine spermidine modulates the production of the bacterial genotoxin colibactin. mSphere. 2019;4:e00414-19. 10.1128/mSphere.00414-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Day WA Jr, Fernández RE, Maurelli AT. Pathoadaptive mutations that enhance virulence: genetic organization of the cadA regions of Shigella spp. Infect Immun. 2001;69:7471–80. 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7471-7480.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Chattopadhyay MK, Tabor CW, Tabor H. Polyamines are not required for aerobic growth of Escherichia coli: preparation of a strain with deletions in all of the genes for polyamine biosynthesis. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:5549–52. 10.1128/JB.00381-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Hanfrey CC, Pearson BM, Hazeldine S, Lee J, Gaskin DJ, Woster PM, et al. Alternative spermidine biosynthetic route is critical for growth of Campylobacter jejuni and is the dominant polyamine pathway in human gut microbiota. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:43301–12. 10.1074/jbc.M111.307835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Carbonero F, Benefiel AC, Alizadeh-Ghamsari AH, Gaskins HR. Microbial pathways in colonic sulfur metabolism and links with health and disease. Front Physiol. 2012;3:448. 10.3389/fphys.2012.00448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Birg A, Lin HC. The role of bacteria-derived hydrogen sulfide in multiple axes of disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(7):3340. 10.3390/ijms26073340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Kredich NM, Keenan BS, Foote LJ. The purification and subunit structure of cysteine desulfhydrase from Salmonella typhimurium. J Biol Chem. 1972;247(22):7157–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Lee D, Lee H, Byun K, Park ES, Ha NC. Functional importance of Ser323 in cysteine desulfhydrase and cystathionine gamma-lyase MccB of Staphylococcus aureus. J Microbiol. 2025;63:e2411026. 10.71150/jm.2411026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Borisov VB, Forte E. Impact of hydrogen sulfide on mitochondrial and bacterial bioenergetics. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:12688. 10.3390/ijms222312688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Forte E, Borisov VB, Falabella M, Colaço HG, Tinajero-Trejo M, Poole RK, et al. The terminal oxidase cytochrome bd promotes sulfide-resistant bacterial respiration and growth. Sci Rep. 2016;6:23788. 10.1038/srep23788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Adak S, Aulak KS, Stuehr DJ. Direct evidence for nitric oxide production by a nitric-oxide synthase-like protein from Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:16167–71. 10.1074/jbc.M201136200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Morita H, Yoshikawa H, Sakata R, Nagata Y, Tanaka H. Synthesis of nitric oxide from the two equivalent guanidino nitrogens of L-arginine by Lactobacillus fermentum. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:7812–5. 10.1128/jb.179.24.7812-7815.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Aluthge ND, Van Sambeek DM, Carney-Hinkle EE, Li YS, Fernando SC, Burkey TE. Board Invited Review: the pig microbiota and the potential for harnessing the power of the microbiome to improve growth and health. J Anim Sci. 2019;97(9):3741–57. 10.1093/jas/skz208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Silvestrini MC, Falcinelli S, Ciabatti I, Cutruzzolà F, Brunori M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa nitrite reductase (or cytochrome oxidase): an overview. Biochimie. 1994;76:641–54. 10.1016/0300-9084(94)90141-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Richardson AR, Payne EC, Younger N, Karlinsey JE, Thomas VC, Becker LA, et al. Multiple targets of nitric oxide in the tricarboxylic acid cycle of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;10:33–43. 10.1016/j.chom.2011.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Stern AM, Zhu J. An introduction to nitric oxide sensing and response in bacteria. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2014;87:187–220. 10.1016/B978-0-12-800261-2.00005-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Roager HM, Licht TR. Microbial tryptophan catabolites in health and disease. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3294. 10.1038/s41467-018-05470-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Jensen MT, Cox RP, Jensen BB. 3-Methylindole (skatole) and indole production by mixed populations of pig fecal bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:3180–4. 10.1128/aem.61.8.3180-3184.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Ledala N, Malik M, Rezaul K, Paveglio S, Provatas A, Kiel A, et al. Bacterial indole as a multifunctional regulator of Klebsiella oxytoca complex enterotoxicity. mBio. 2022;13:e0375221. 10.1128/mbio.03752-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Högenauer C, Langner C, Beubler E, Lippe IT, Schicho R, Gorkiewicz G, et al. Klebsiella oxytoca as a causative organism of antibiotic-associated hemorrhagic colitis. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2418–26. 10.1056/NEJMoa054765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Nowak A, Libudzisz Z. Influence of phenol, p-cresol and indole on growth and survival of intestinal lactic acid bacteria. Anaerobe. 2006;12:80–4. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2005.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Strandwitz P. Neurotransmitter modulation by the gut microbiota. Brain Res. 2018;1693:128–33. 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Claus H, Decker H. Bacterial tyrosinases. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2006;29:3–14. 10.1016/j.syapm.2005.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Belay T, Sonnenfeld G. Differential effects of catecholamines on in vitro growth of pathogenic bacteria. Life Sci. 2002;71:447–56. 10.1016/s0024-3205(02)01683-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Dichtl S, Demetz E, Haschka D, Tymoszuk P, Petzer V, Nairz M, et al. Dopamine is a siderophore-like iron chelator that promotes Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium virulence in mice. mBio. 2019;10:e02624-18. 10.1128/mBio.02624-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Bescucci DM, Moote PE, Ortega Polo R, Uwiera RRE, Inglis GD. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium temporally modulates the enteric microbiota and host responses to overcome colonization resistance in swine. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;86:e01569-20. 10.1128/AEM.01569-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Dicks LMT. Gut bacteria and neurotransmitters. Microorganisms. 2022;10:1838. 10.3390/microorganisms10091838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.O’Donnell PM, Aviles H, Lyte M, Sonnenfeld G. Enhancement of in vitro growth of pathogenic bacteria by norepinephrine: importance of inoculum density and role of transferrin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5097–9. 10.1128/AEM.00075-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:95–108. 10.1038/nrmicro821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:623–33. 10.1038/nrmicro2415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Blachier F, Beaumont M, Andriamihaja M, Davila AM, Lan A, Grauso M, et al. Changes in the luminal environment of the colonic epithelial cells and physiopathological consequences. Am J Pathol. 2017;187:476–86. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Roy R, Tiwari M, Donelli G, Tiwari V. Strategies for combating bacterial biofilms: a focus on anti-biofilm agents and their mechanisms of action. Virulence. 2018;9:522–54. 10.1080/21505594.2017.1313372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Grudlewska-Buda K, Skowron K, Bauza-Kaszewska J, Budzyńska A, Wiktorczyk-Kapischke N, Wilk M, et al. Assessment of antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation of Enterococcus species isolated from different pig farm environments in Poland. BMC Microbiol. 2023;23:89. 10.1186/s12866-023-02834-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Skowron K, Jeleńska A, Paluszak Z, Szala B. Prevalence and distribution of VRE (vancomycin resistant enterococci) and VSE (vancomycin susceptible enterococci) strains in the breeding environment. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2016;23:231–6. 10.5604/12321966.1203882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Yu F, Dong C, Zhang Y, Che R, Xie C, Liu Y, et al. GrpE and ComD contribute to the adherence, biofilm formation, and pathogenicity of Streptococcus suis. Arch Microbiol. 2023;205:159. 10.1007/s00203-023-03503-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Wang Y, Wang Y, Sun L, Grenier D, Yi L. Streptococcus suis biofilm: regulation, drug-resistance mechanisms, and disinfection strategies. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:9121–9. 10.1007/s00253-018-9356-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Feng Y, Zhang H, Wu Z, Wang S, Cao M, Hu D, et al. Streptococcus suis infection: an emerging/reemerging challenge of bacterial infectious diseases? Virulence. 2014;5:477–97. 10.4161/viru.28595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Burrell M, Hanfrey CC, Murray EJ, Stanley-Wall NR, Michael AJ. Evolution and multiplicity of arginine decarboxylases in polyamine biosynthesis and essential role in Bacillus subtilis biofilm formation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:39224–38. 10.1074/jbc.M110.163154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Earl AM, Losick R, Kolter R. Ecology and genomics of Bacillus subtilis. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16:269–75. 10.1016/j.tim.2008.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Sun J, Wang X, Gao Y, Li S, Hu Z, Huang Y, et al. H2S scavenger as a broad-spectrum strategy to deplete bacteria-derived H2S for antibacterial sensitization. Nat Commun. 2024;15:9422. 10.1038/s41467-024-53764-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Chen YW, Camacho MI, Chen Y, Bhat AH, Chang C, Peluso EA, et al. Genetic determinants of hydrogen sulfide biosynthesis in Fusobacterium nucleatum are required for bacterial fitness, antibiotic sensitivity, and virulence. mBio. 2022;13:e0193622. 10.1128/mbio.01936-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Shatalin K, Shatalina E, Mironov A, Nudler E. H2S: a universal defense against antibiotics in bacteria. Science. 2011;334:986–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Pal VK, Bandyopadhyay P, Singh A. Hydrogen sulfide in physiology and pathogenesis of bacteria and viruses. IUBMB Life. 2018;70:393–410. 10.1002/iub.1740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Mironov A, Seregina T, Nagornykh M, Luhachack LG, Korolkova N, Lopes LE, et al. Mechanism of H2S-mediated protection against oxidative stress in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(23):6022–7. 10.1073/pnas.1703576114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Shukla P, Khodade VS, SharathChandra M, Chauhan P, Mishra S, Siddaramappa S, et al. "On demand" redox buffering by H2S contributes to antibiotic resistance revealed by a bacteria-specific H2S donor. Chem Sci. 2017;8(7):4967–72. 10.1039/c7sc00873b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Shatalin K, Nuthanakanti A, Kaushik A, Shishov D, Peselis A, Shamovsky I, et al. Inhibitors of bacterial H2S biogenesis targeting antibiotic resistance and tolerance. Science. 2021;372(6547):1169–75. 10.1126/science.abd8377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Donskey CJ. Antibiotic regimens and intestinal colonization with antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:S62–9. 10.1086/504481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Ng SY, Ong KX, Surendran ST, Sinha A, Lai JJH, Chen J, et al. Hydrogen sulfide sensitizes Acinetobacter baumannii to killing by antibiotics. Front Microbiol. 1875;2020(11):2020. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 158.Barraud N, Hassett DJ, Hwang SH, Rice SA, Kjelleberg S, Webb JS. Involvement of nitric oxide in biofilm dispersal of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(21):7344–53. 10.1128/JB.00779-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Barraud N, Schleheck D, Klebensberger J, Webb JS, Hassett DJ, Rice SA, et al. Nitric oxide signaling in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms mediates phosphodiesterase activity, decreased cyclic di-GMP levels, and enhanced dispersal. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:7333–42. 10.1128/JB.00975-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Brennan CA, Garrett WS. Fusobacterium nucleatum - symbiont, opportunist and oncobacterium. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17:156–66. 10.1038/s41579-018-0129-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Poh WH, Rice SA. Recent developments in nitric oxide donors and delivery for antimicrobial and anti-biofilm applications. Molecules. 2022;27:674. 10.3390/molecules27030674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Rattanaphan P, Mittraparp-Arthorn P, Srinoun K, Vuddhakul V, Tansila N. Indole signaling decreases biofilm formation and related virulence of Listeria monocytogenes. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2020;367:fnaa116. 10.1093/femsle/fnaa116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Lee J, Attila C, Cirillo SL, Cirillo JD, Wood TK. Indole and 7-hydroxyindole diminish Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence. Microb Biotechnol. 2009;2:75–90. 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2008.00061.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Nikaido E, Giraud E, Baucheron S, Yamasaki S, Wiedemann A, Okamoto K, et al. Effects of indole on drug resistance and virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium revealed by genome-wide analyses. Gut Pathog. 2012;4:5. 10.1186/1757-4749-4-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Whitehead TR, Price NP, Drake HL, Cotta MA. Catabolic pathway for the production of skatole and indoleacetic acid by the acetogen Clostridium drakei, Clostridium scatologenes, and swine manure. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(6):1950–3. 10.1128/AEM.02458-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Choi SH, Kim Y, Oh S, Oh S, Chun T, Kim SH. Inhibitory effect of skatole (3-methylindole) on enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 ATCC 43894 biofilm formation mediated by elevated endogenous oxidative stress. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2014;58:454–61. 10.1111/lam.12212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Aaslyng MD, Broge EH, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RH. The effect of skatole and androstenone on consumer response towards fresh pork from m. longissimus thoracis et lumborum and m. semimembranosus. Meat Sci. 2016;116:174–85. 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Knecht LD, O’Connor G, Mittal R, Liu XZ, Daftarian P, Deo SK, et al. Serotonin activates bacterial quorum sensing and enhances the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the host. EBioMedicine. 2016;9:161–9. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.05.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Morse R, Ten Have GAM, Thaden JJ, Engelen MPKJ, Rice S, Hagve M, et al. The role of adipose and muscle tissue breakdown on interorgan energy substrate fluxes in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa induced sepsis model in female pigs. Physiol Rep. 2025;13:e70129. 10.14814/phy2.70129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Boyanova L. Stress hormone epinephrine (adrenaline) and norepinephrine (noradrenaline) effects on the anaerobic bacteria. Anaerobe. 2017;44:13–9. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2017.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Lustri BC, Sperandio V, Moreira CG. Bacterial chat: intestinal metabolites and signals in host-microbiota-pathogen interactions. Infect Immun. 2017;85:e00476-e517. 10.1128/IAI.00476-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Samartzidou H, Mehrazin M, Xu Z, Benedik MJ, Delcour AH. Cadaverine inhibition of porin plays a role in cell survival at acidic pH. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:13–9. 10.1128/JB.185.1.13-19.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Tanaka Y, Kimura B, Takahashi H, Watanabe T, Obata H, Kai A, et al. Lysine decarboxylase of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: kinetics of transcription and role in acid resistance. J Appl Microbiol. 2008;104:1283–93. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03652.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Wargo MJ. Homeostasis and catabolism of choline and glycine betaine: lessons from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:2112–20. 10.1128/AEM.03565-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Kim J, Lee MH, Kim MS, Kim GH, Yoon SS. Probiotic properties and optimization of gamma-aminobutyric acid production by Lactiplantibacillus plantarum FBT215. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;32:783–91. 10.4014/jmb.2204.04029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Barrett E, Ross RP, O’Toole PW, Fitzgerald GF, Stanton C. gamma-Aminobutyric acid production by culturable bacteria from the human intestine. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;113:411–7. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05344.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Otaru N, Ye K, Mujezinovic D, Berchtold L, Constancias F, Cornejo FA, et al. GABA production by human intestinal Bacteroides spp.: prevalence, regulation, and role in acid stress tolerance. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:656895. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.656895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Feehily C, Karatzas KA. Role of glutamate metabolism in bacterial responses towards acid and other stresses. J Appl Microbiol. 2013;114:11–24. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05434.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Passmore IJ, Letertre MPM, Preston MD, Bianconi I, Harrison MA, Nasher F, et al. Para-cresol production by Clostridium difficile affects microbial diversity and membrane integrity of Gram-negative bacteria. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1007191. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Abt MC, McKenney PT, Pamer EG. Clostridium difficile colitis: pathogenesis and host defence. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14:609–20. 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Moono P, Foster NF, Hampson DJ, Knight DR, Bloomfield LE, Riley TV. Clostridium difficile infection in production animals and avian species: a review. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2016;13(12):647–55. 10.1089/fpd.2016.2181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Keessen EC, Gaastra W, Lipman LJ. Clostridium difficile infection in humans and animals, differences and similarities. Vet Microbiol. 2011;153:205–17. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Grześkowiak ŁM, Pieper R, Huynh HA, Cutting SM, Vahjen W, Zentek J. Impact of early-life events on the susceptibility to Clostridium difficile colonisation and infection in the offspring of the pig. Gut Microbes. 2019;10:251–9. 10.1080/19490976.2018.1518554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Bone E, Tamm A, Hill M. The production of urinary phenols by gut bacteria and their possible role in the causation of large bowel cancer. Am J Clin Nutr. 1976;29:1448–54. 10.1093/ajcn/29.12.1448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Saito Y, Sato T, Nomoto K, Tsuji H. Identification of phenol- and p-cresol-producing intestinal bacteria by using media supplemented with tyrosine and its metabolites. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018;94:fiy125. 10.1093/femsec/fiy125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Harrison MA, Kaur H, Wren BW, Dawson LF. Production of p-cresol by decarboxylation of p-HPA by all five lineages of Clostridioides difficile provides a growth advantage. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:757599. 10.3389/fcimb.2021.757599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Hafiz S, Oakley CL. Clostridium difficile: isolation and characteristics. J Med Microbiol. 1976;9:129–36. 10.1099/00222615-9-2-129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Dawson LF, Donahue EH, Cartman ST, Barton RH, Bundy J, McNerney R, et al. The analysis of para-cresol production and tolerance in Clostridium difficile 027 and 012 strains. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11:86. 10.1186/1471-2180-11-86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Taciak M, Barszcz M, Święch E, Tuśnio A, Bachanek I. Interactive effects of protein and carbohydrates on production of microbial metabolites in the large intestine of growing pigs. Arch Anim Nutr. 2017;71:192–209. 10.1080/1745039X.2017.1291202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.James D, Batool M, Poveda C, Hayirli Z, Callow C, Abbas M, et al. High-protein diets increase microbiota associated p-cresol production in the colon and reduce gut barrier function in a sex-dependent manner. Eur J Nutr. 2026;65:41. 10.1007/s00394-025-03885-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Macfarlane GT, Cummings JH. The colonic flora, fermentation, and large bowel digestive function. In: Phillips SE, Pemberton JH, Shorter RG, editors. The large intestine. Raven Press; 1991. p. 51–92. [Google Scholar]
- 192.Dai ZL, Wu G, Zhu WY. Amino acid metabolism in intestinal bacteria: links between gut ecology and host health. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2011;16:1768–86. 10.2741/3820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Endo A, Nakamura S, Konishi K, Nakagawa J, Tochio T. Variations in prebiotic oligosaccharide fermentation by intestinal lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2016;67:125–32. 10.3109/09637486.2016.1147019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Liong MT, Shah NP. Production of organic acids from fermentation of mannitol, fructooligosaccharide and inulin by a cholesterol removing Lactobacillus acidophilus strain. J Appl Microbiol. 2005;99:783–93. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02677.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Ferreyra JA, Wu KJ, Hryckowian AJ, Bouley DM, Weimer BC, Sonnenburg JL. Gut microbiota-produced succinate promotes C. difficile infection after antibiotic treatment or motility disturbance. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;16:770–7. 10.1016/j.chom.2014.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Tang X. Probiotic roles of Clostridium butyricum in piglets: considering aspects of intestinal barrier function. Animals (Basel). 2024;14:1069. 10.3390/ani14071069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Hagihara M, Ariyoshi T, Kuroki Y, Eguchi S, Higashi S, Mori T, et al. Clostridium butyricum enhances colonization resistance against Clostridioides difficile by metabolic and immune modulation. Sci Rep. 2021;11:15007. 10.1038/s41598-021-94572-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Ruampatana J, Suwimonteerabutr J, Homyog K, Mekboonsonglarp W, Kanjanavaikoon K, der Veken WV, et al. Clostridium butyricum probiotic feed additive: modulation of sow milk metabolomics and mitigation of pre-weaning piglet diarrhea. Animals (Basel). 2024;14:2098. 10.3390/ani14142098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Cao G, Tao F, Hu Y, Li Z, Zhang Y, Deng B, et al. Positive effects of a Clostridium butyricum-based compound probiotic on growth performance, immune responses, intestinal morphology, hypothalamic neurotransmitters, and colonic microbiota in weaned piglets. Food Funct. 2019;10:2926–34. 10.1039/c8fo02370k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Fu J, Wang T, Xiao X, Cheng Y, Wang F, Jin M, et al. Clostridium Butyricum ZJU-F1 benefits the intestinal barrier function and immune response associated with Its modulation of gut microbiota in weaned piglets. Cells. 2021;10:527. 10.3390/cells10030527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Oh S, Go GW, Mylonakis E, Kim Y. The bacterial signalling molecule indole attenuates the virulence of the fungal pathogen Candida albicans. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;113(3):622–8. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05372.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Shaulov Y, Shimokawa C, Trebicz-Geffen M, Nagaraja S, Methling K, Lalk M, et al. Escherichia coli mediated resistance of Entamoeba histolytica to oxidative stress is triggered by oxaloacetate. PLoS Pathog. 2018;14:e1007295. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Girard-Misguich F, Cognie J, Delgado-Ortega M, Berthon P, Rossignol C, Larcher T, et al. Towards the establishment of a porcine model to study human amebiasis. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e28795. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Li WC, Geng JZ, Chen C, Qian L, Zhang T, Liu JL, et al. First report on the occurance of intestinal Entamoeba spp. in pigs in China. Acta Trop. 2018;185:385–90. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Blachier F, Mariotti F, Huneau JF, Tomé D. Effects of amino acid-derived luminal metabolites on the colonic epithelium and physiopathological consequences. Amino Acids. 2007;33:547–62. 10.1007/s00726-006-0477-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Zhang YT, Lu DD, Chen JY, Yu B, Liang JB, Mi JD, et al. Effects of fermented soybean meal on carbon and nitrogen metabolisms in large intestine of piglets. Animal. 2018;12:2056–64. 10.1017/S1751731118000058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Kong XF, Zhou XL, Lian GQ, Blachier F, Liu G, Tan B, et al. Dietary supplementation with chitooligosaccharides alters gut microbiota and modifies luminal metabolites in weaned Huanjiang mini-piglets. Livest Sci. 2014;160:97–101. 10.1016/j.livsci.2013.11.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Zhou XL, Kong XF, Lian GQ, Blachier F, Geng MM, Yin YL. Dietary supplementation with soybean oligosaccharides increases short-chain fatty acids but decreases protein-derived catabolites in the intestinal luminal content of weaned Huanjiang mini-piglets. Nutr Res. 2014;34:780–8. 10.1016/j.nutres.2014.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Fang X, Wang Z, Chen Q, Du Y, Sun H, Liu H, et al. Protective effect of the branched short-chain fatty acid isobutyrate on intestinal damage in weaned piglets through intestinal microbiota remodeling. J Sci Food Agric. 2025;105:1556–68. 10.1002/jsfa.13930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Musch MW, Bookstein C, Xie Y, Sellin JH, Chang EB. SCFA increase intestinal Na absorption by induction of NHE3 in rat colon and human intestinal C2/bbe cells. Am J Physiol. 2001;280:G687–93. 10.1152/ajpgi.2001.280.4.G687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Diener M, Helmle-Kolb C, Murer H, Scharrer E. Effect of short-chain fatty acids on cell volume and intracellular pH in rat distal colon. Pflugers Arch. 1993;424:216–23. 10.1007/BF00384345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Zaharia V, Varzescu M, Djavadi I, Newman E, Egnor RW, Alexander-Chacko J, et al. Effects of short chain fatty acids on colonic Na+ absorption and enzyme activity. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2001;128:335–47. 10.1016/s1095-6433(00)00318-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Bergen WG, Wu G. Intestinal nitrogen recycling and utilization in health and disease. J Nutr. 2009;139:821–5. 10.3945/jn.109.104497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Yao CK, Muir JG, Gibson PR. Review article: insights into colonic protein fermentation, its modulation and potential health implications. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;43:181–96. 10.1111/apt.13456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Eklou-Lawson M, Bernard F, Neveux N, Chaumontet C, Bos C, Davila-Gay AM, et al. Colonic luminal ammonia and portal blood L-glutamine and L-arginine concentrations: a possible link between colon mucosa and liver ureagenesis. Amino Acids. 2009;37:751–60. 10.1007/s00726-008-0218-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Hall MC, Koch MO, McDougal WS. Mechanism of ammonium transport by intestinal segments following urinary diversion: evidence for ionized NH4+ transport via K+-pathways. J Urol. 1992;148(2 Pt 1):453–7. 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36627-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Handlogten ME, Hong SP, Zhang L, Vander AW, Steinbaum ML, Campbell-Thompson M, et al. Expression of the ammonia transporter proteins Rh B glycoprotein and Rh C glycoprotein in the intestinal tract. Am J Physiol. 2005;288:G1036–47. 10.1152/ajpgi.00418.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Pieper R, Boudry C, Bindelle J, Vahjen W, Zentek J. Interaction between dietary protein content and the source of carbohydrates along the gastrointestinal tract of weaned piglets. Arch Anim Nutr. 2014;68:263–80. 10.1080/1745039X.2014.932962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Bikker P, Dirkzwager A, Fledderus J, Trevisi P, le Huërou-Luron I, Lallès JP, et al. The effect of dietary protein and fermentable carbohydrates levels on growth performance and intestinal characteristics in newly weaned piglets. J Anim Sci. 2006;84:3337–45. 10.2527/jas.2006-076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Peng Y, Yu K, Mu C, Hang S, Che L, Zhu W. Progressive response of large intestinal bacterial community and fermentation to the stepwise decrease of dietary crude protein level in growing pigs. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101:5415–26. 10.1007/s00253-017-8285-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Htoo JK, Araiza BA, Sauer WC, Rademacher M, Zhang Y, Cervantes M, et al. Effect of dietary protein content on ileal amino acid digestibility, growth performance, and formation of microbial metabolites in ileal and cecal digesta of early-weaned pigs. J Anim Sci. 2007;85:3303–12. 10.2527/jas.2007-0105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Zhang C, Yu M, Yang Y, Mu C, Su Y, Zhu W. Effect of early antibiotic administration on cecal bacterial communities and their metabolic profiles in pigs fed diets with different protein levels. Anaerobe. 2016;42:188–96. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Williams BA, Zhang D, Lisle AT, Mikkelsen D, McSweeney CS, Kang S, et al. Soluble arabinoxylan enhances large intestinal microbial health biomarkers in pigs fed a red meat-containing diet. Nutrition. 2016;32:491–7. 10.1016/j.nut.2015.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Darcy-Vrillon B, Cherbuy C, Morel MT, Durand M, Duée PH. Short chain fatty acid and glucose metabolism in isolated pig colonocytes: modulation by NH4+. Mol Cell Biochem. 1996;156:145–51. 10.1007/BF00426337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Darcy-Vrillon B, Morel MT, Cherbuy C, Bernard F, Posho L, Blachier F, et al. Metabolic characteristics of pig colonocytes after adaptation to a high fiber diet. J Nutr. 1993;123:234–43. 10.1093/jn/123.2.234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Motyl T, Płoszaj T, Wojtasik A, Kukulska W, Podgurniak M. Polyamines in cow’s and sow’s milk. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 1995;111:427–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.van Wettere WH, Willson NL, Pain SJ, Forder RE. Effect of oral polyamine supplementation pre-weaning on piglet growth and intestinal characteristics. Animal. 2016;10:1655–9. 10.1017/S1751731116000446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Wang J, Li GR, Tan BE, Xiong X, Kong XF, Xiao DF, et al. Oral administration of putrescine and proline during the suckling period improves epithelial restitution after early weaning in piglets. J Anim Sci. 2015;93:1679–88. 10.2527/jas.2014-8230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Liu G, Zheng J, Wu X, Xu X, Jia G, Zhao H, et al. Putrescine enhances intestinal immune function and regulates intestinal bacteria in weaning piglets. Food Funct. 2019;10:4134–42. 10.1039/c9fo00842j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Zhang R, Huang G, Ren Y, Wang H, Ye Y, Guo J, et al. Effects of dietary indole-3-carboxaldehyde supplementation on growth performance, intestinal epithelial function, and intestinal microbial composition in weaned piglets. Front Nutr. 2022;9:896815. 10.3389/fnut.2022.896815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Leschelle X, Goubern M, Andriamihaja M, Blottière HM, Couplan E, Gonzalez-Barroso MD, et al. Adaptative metabolic response of human colonic epithelial cells to the adverse effects of the luminal compound sulfide. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1725:201–12. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Leschelle X, Robert V, Delpal S, Mouillé B, Mayeur C, Martel P, et al. Isolation of pig colonic crypts for cytotoxic assay of luminal compounds: effects of hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, and deoxycholic acid. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2002;18:193–203. 10.1023/a:1015515821390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Blachier F, Andriamihaja M, Larraufie P, Ahn E, Lan A, Kim E. Production of hydrogen sulfide by the intestinal microbiota and epithelial cells and consequences for the colonic and rectal mucosa. Am J Physiol. 2021;320:G125–35. 10.1152/ajpgi.00261.2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Asano Y, Hiramoto T, Nishino R, Aiba Y, Kimura T, Yoshihara K, et al. Critical role of gut microbiota in the production of biologically active, free catecholamines in the gut lumen of mice. Am J Physiol. 2012;303:G1288–95. 10.1152/ajpgi.00341.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Li Y, Zhang Y, Zhang XL, Feng XY, Liu CZ, Zhang XN, et al. Dopamine promotes colonic mucus secretion through dopamine D5 receptor in rats. Am J Physiol. 2019;316:C393–403. 10.1152/ajpcell.00261.2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Andriamihaja M, Lan A, Beaumont M, Audebert M, Wong X, Yamada K, et al. The deleterious metabolic and genotoxic effects of the bacterial metabolite p-cresol on colonic epithelial cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;85:219–27. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Wong X, Carrasco-Pozo C, Escobar E, Navarrete P, Blachier F, Andriamihaja M, et al. Deleterious effect of p-Cresol on human colonic epithelial cells prevented by proanthocyanidin-containing polyphenol extracts from fruits and proanthocyanidin bacterial metabolites. J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64:3574–83. 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Nadjsombati MS, McGinty JW, Lyons-Cohen MR, Jaffe JB, DiPeso L, Schneider C, et al. Detection of succinate by intestinal tuft cells triggers a type 2 innate immune circuit. Immunity. 2018;49:33-41.e7. 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Banerjee A, Herring CA, Chen B, Kim H, Simmons AJ, Southard-Smith AN, et al. Succinate produced by intestinal microbes promotes specification of tuft cells to suppress ileal inflammation. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:2101-2115.e5. 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Xu J, Xie G, Li X, Wen X, Cao Z, Ma B, et al. Sodium butyrate reduces ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions by regulating bacterial community balance in swine cecal content in vitro. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;226:112827. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Hamon L, Andrès Y, Dumont E. Aerial pollutants in swine buildings: a review of their characterization and methods to reduce them. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:12287–301. 10.1021/es3025758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Liu Z, Powers W, Murphy J, Maghirang R. Ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions from swine production facilities in North America: a meta-analysis. J Anim Sci. 2014;92:1656–65. 10.2527/jas.2013-7160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Wang Y, Dong H, Zhu Z, Gerber PJ, Xin H, Smith P, et al. Mitigating greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from swine manure management: a system analysis. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51:4503–11. 10.1021/acs.est.6b06430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Ni JQ, Erasmus MA, Croney CC, Li C, Li Y. A critical review of advancement in scientific research on food animal welfare-related air pollution. J Hazard Mater. 2021;408:124468. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Zhuang M, Shan N, Wang Y, Caro D, Fleming RM, Wang L. Different characteristics of greenhouse gases and ammonia emissions from conventional stored dairy cattle and swine manure in China. Sci Total Environ. 2020;722:137693. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Rossi R, Buoio E, Mainardi E, Costa A. Nitrogen excretion, ammonia, and greenhouse gases emission in italian heavy pigs: the role of feed in environmental impact mitigation. Animals (Basel). 2026;16:520. 10.3390/ani16030520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Behera SN, Sharma M, Aneja VP, Balasubramanian R. Ammonia in the atmosphere: a review on emission sources, atmospheric chemistry and deposition on terrestrial bodies. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013;20:8092–131. 10.1007/s11356-013-2051-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Kirkhorn SR, Garry VF. Agricultural lung diseases. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108:705–12. 10.1289/ehp.00108s4705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Chen CY, Chang YH, Leong YK, Chang JS. Application of algae-bacteria symbiosis system for ammonia nitrogen wastewater treatment. J Biosci Bioeng. 2025;140:181–92. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2025.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Oh B, Park J, Kim E, Seo S, Kim B, Oh SI. Alteration of growth performance and characterization of pathological lesions in long-term ammonia-exposed pigs. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2024;287:117318. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Qin W, Shen L, Wang Q, Gao Y, She M, Li X, et al. Chronic exposure to ammonia induces oxidative stress and enhanced glycolysis in lung of piglets. Environ Toxicol. 2022;37:179–91. 10.1002/tox.23382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Jiang J, Chan A, Ali S, Saha A, Haushalter KJ, Lam WL, et al. Hydrogen sulfide. mechanisms of toxicity and development of an antidote. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20831. 10.1038/srep20831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Quist AJL, Johnston JE. Respiratory and nervous system effects of a hydrogen sulfide crisis in Carson. California Sci Total Environ. 2024;906:167480. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Santana CM, Gauger P, Vetger A, Magstadt D, Kim DS, Shrestha D, et al. Ambient hydrogen sulfide exposure increases the severity of influenza A virus infection in swine. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2021;76:526–38. 10.1080/19338244.2021.1896986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Mooyaart EAQ, Gelderman ELG, Nijsten MW, de Vos R, Hirner JM, de Lange DW, et al. Outcome after hydrogen sulphide intoxication. Resuscitation. 2016;103:1–6. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Solano C, Echeverz M, Lasa I. Biofilm dispersion and quorum sensing. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2014;18:96–104. 10.1016/j.mib.2014.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Mukherjee S, Bassler BL. Bacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17:371–82. 10.1038/s41579-019-0186-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Banerji R, Kanojiya P, Saroj SD. Role of interspecies bacterial communication in the virulence of pathogenic bacteria. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2020;46:136–46. 10.1080/1040841X.2020.1735991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Rist VT, Weiss E, Eklund M, Mosenthin R. Impact of dietary protein on microbiota composition and activity in the gastrointestinal tract of piglets in relation to gut health: a review. Animal. 2013;7:1067–78. 10.1017/S1751731113000062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Beaumont M, Vicente CM, Plata-Calzado C, Lencina C, Jones E, Lecuelle S, et al. The gut microbiota metabolite isovalerate enhances the epithelial barrier function in cell monolayers derived from porcine ileum organoids. Am J Physiol. 2026;330:G459–77. 10.1152/ajpgi.00193.2025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Han X, Hu X, Jin W, Liu G. Dietary nutrition, intestinal microbiota dysbiosis and post-weaning diarrhea in piglets. Anim Nutr. 2024;17:188–207. 10.1016/j.aninu.2023.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Tang X, Xiong K, Fang R, Li M. Weaning stress and intestinal health of piglets: a review. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1042778. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1042778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Zhao X, Pang J, Zhang W, Peng X, Yang Z, Bai G, et al. Tryptophan metabolism and piglet diarrhea: where we stand and the challenges ahead. Anim Nutr. 2024;17:123–33. 10.1016/j.aninu.2024.03.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Webb J, Broomfield M, Jones S, Donovan B. Ammonia and odour emissions from UK pig farms and nitrogen leaching from outdoor pig production. A review. Sci Total Environ. 2014;470–471:865–75. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Jha R, Leterme P. Feed ingredients differing in fermentable fibre and indigestible protein content affect fermentation metabolites and faecal nitrogen excretion in growing pigs. Animal. 2012;6(4):603–11. 10.1017/S1751731111001844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Yokoyama MT, Spence C, Hengemuehle SM, Whitehead TR, von Bernuth R, Cotta M. Sodium tetraborate decahydrate treatment reduces hydrogen sulfide and the sulfate-reducing bacteria population of swine manure. J Environ Qual. 2016;45:1838–46. 10.2134/jeq2016.06.0219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Whitehead TR, Spence C, Cotta MA. Inhibition of hydrogen sulfide, methane, and total gas production and sulfate-reducing bacteria in in vitro swine manure by tannins, with focus on condensed quebracho tannins. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:8403–9. 10.1007/s00253-012-4562-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Andriamihaja M, Lan A, Beaumont M, Grauso M, Gotteland M, Pastene E, et al. Proanthocyanidin-containing polyphenol extracts from fruits prevent the inhibitory effect of hydrogen sulfide on human colonocyte oxygen consumption. Amino Acids. 2018;50:755–63. 10.1007/s00726-018-2558-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Mimoun S, Andriamihaja M, Chaumontet C, Atanasiu C, Benamouzig R, Blouin JM, et al. Detoxification of H2S by differentiated colonic epithelial cells: implication of the sulfide oxidizing unit and of the cell respiratory capacity. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012;17:1–10. 10.1089/ars.2011.4186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
