Skip to main content
Aging Cell logoLink to Aging Cell
. 2026 Sep 7;25(9):e70708. doi: 10.1111/acel.70708

Muscle‐Specific Upregulation of Timeless Mediates Exercise‐Induced Amelioration of Age‐Related Circadian Rhythm Disruption and Cardiac Dysfunction in Drosophila

Deng‐tai Wen 1,✉, Shouzhi Lv 1, Jing‐yao Sun 1, Ying‐qi Chen 1, Ying Lin 1, Zhong‐rui Du 1, Gang‐bin Sun 2, Tian‐shuo Yuan 1, Deyu Shu 1, Wen‐qi Hou 1
PMCID: PMC13550010  PMID: 42706483

ABSTRACT

The core genes of the circadian pathway, such as Timeless(Tim), not only participate in the regulation of biological rhythms, but also play significant roles in DNA damage repair, chronic inflammation, and cellular metabolism. However, it remains unclear whether exercise can delay the age‐related phenotypic degeneration by regulating the muscle Tim gene. In here, we first carried out the expression regulation of the muscle Tim gene in the Drosophila by constructing the Mhc‐gal4/Tim‐UAS system, and then subjected the flies to a 4‐week endurance exercise intervention. The results showed that the knockdown of the muscle Tim gene accelerated aging‐related phenotypic deterioration in Drosophila, manifesting as increased nighttime activity, decreased climbing speed, elevated heart rate and reduced stroke volume, shortened time to hypoxic heart failure, and shortened lifespan. This is accompanied by reductions in muscle tissue levels of the Clk gene, Sir2 gene, PGC‐1α gene, Mhc gene, MRCC‐I protein, and SOD protein, along with a significant increase in ROS. Conversely, overexpression of the muscle Tim gene delayed aging‐related phenotypic changes in aged Drosophila. Exercise not only effectively counteracts the acceleration of aging‐related phenotypic deterioration caused by muscle Tim gene knockdown but also further delayed aging‐related phenotypic changes in aged Drosophila on the basis of muscle Tim gene overexpression. In summary, this study highlights the role of the muscle Tim gene in the aging of skeletal muscles and the heart, as well as the relationship between exercise and the muscle Tim gene, providing strategies for the prevention and treatment of age‐related diseases.

Keywords: aging, circadian rhythm, exercise, mitochondrial, oxidative stress, Timeless


The muscle Timeless gene critically influences skeletal muscle, heart, and circadian rhythm aging by regulating the Timeless/Clock and Timeless/Sir2/PGC‐1α pathways, with exercise acting as an upstream modulator.

graphic file with name ACEL-25-e70708-g005.webp

1. Introduction

Regardless of China or the entire world, population aging is becoming increasingly severe. According to UN data, in 2023, the global population aged 65 and over was approximately 800 million. It is projected that the global elderly population will exceed 1 billion for the first time in the 2030s. Global aging is accelerating, with currently about 10% of the world's population being over 65 (Mafra et al. 2025). In China, the population aged 60 and over is 310.31 million (approximately 310 million), accounting for 22.0% of the national population. China has already entered the stage of moderate aging and is progressing toward deep aging (Zhang, Yu, et al. 2025). With aging, both animals and humans experience a decline in tissue and organ function, as well as the occurrence of age‐related diseases such as sarcopenia, insomnia, and coronary heart disease (Hu et al. 2021). These diseases not only severely reduce the quality of life of the elderly but also impose a heavy economic burden on families and society (Cao et al. 2025). Therefore, it is particularly important for humanity to continuously delve into the molecular mechanisms of aging and then implement precise interventions to delay aging and reduce the incidence of age‐related diseases.

The Tim gene is a crucial regulatory gene in organisms, highly conserved from flies to humans. It plays a dual role in organisms, primarily acting as a regulator of the core circadian clock and a maintainer of DNA damage repair. In model organisms such as Drosophila, the core of the circadian clock consists of molecular feedback loops. The CLK/CYC heterodimer activates the transcription of Per and Tim genes, while the PER and TIM repressor proteins accumulate in the cytoplasm. Upon entering the nucleus, PER and TIM inhibit transcription by directly binding to the CLK/CYC heterodimer. This repression persists until the PER and TIM proteins are degraded, thereby allowing a new round of transcription. Light exposure causes rapid degradation of the TIM protein, resetting the circadian clock and enabling the organism to adapt to the day‐night cycle (Rakshit et al. 2012; Li et al. 2016). In mammals (including humans), although the Tim homolog is also involved in circadian clock regulation, its core role has shifted during evolution, becoming more focused on the cell cycle and DNA repair, while its circadian function is partially undertaken by other genes (such as Cry genes). When encountering DNA damage or replication stress, TIM stabilizes the replication fork, preventing its collapse (Mazzoccoli et al. 2016; Zhou et al. 2020). Furthermore, TIM interacts with proteins such as Tipin and participates in activating the S‐phase checkpoint. This means that if DNA is damaged, TIM helps send signals to pause the cell cycle, providing the cell with sufficient time to repair the damaged DNA, thereby preventing the transmission of mutations to daughter cells (Holzer et al. 2017; Leman et al. 2010). Consequently, by regulating the circadian clock, TIM indirectly influences the expression of downstream metabolism‐related genes, thereby affecting glucose metabolism and energy balance (Chen et al. 2024). However, the role of the muscle Tim gene in aging and aging‐related diseases remains unclear.

Numerous studies have confirmed that aerobic exercise is an effective means to delay aging and mitigate many aging‐related diseases, including coronary heart disease, Alzheimer's disease, circadian rhythm disorders, and sarcopenia (Li, Zhai, et al. 2024; Wen et al. 2020; Lefferts et al. 2022; Cools et al. 2025). However, the interactive relationship between exercise and the muscle Tim gene in the context of aging and aging‐related diseases remains unclear. This study leverages the advantages of Drosophila transgenic technology, their relatively short lifespan, and the conservation of exercise‐related mechanisms. By constructing an Mhc/UAS‐Tim system to achieve specific regulation (upregulation, normal expression, and downregulation) of Tim gene expression in Drosophila muscles, we will employ classic gain‐of‐function and loss‐of‐function approaches to investigate the effects of the muscle Tim gene on aging‐related circadian rhythms, exercise capacity, cardiac function, and the time to heart failure under hypoxia. Furthermore, we will analyze the underlying molecular mechanisms from the perspectives of muscle mitochondria, oxidative stress, and contractile proteins. Subsequently, we will verify the effects of exercise intervention under different conditions of muscle Tim expression, aiming to provide new strategies for delaying aging and preventing aging‐related diseases.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fly Stocks, Husbandry, Grouping, Diet, and Exercise Training Protocols

The Tim‐UAS‐overexpression (Tim‐UAS‐OE) flies (stock ID: 80686; FlyBase Genotype: w*; P{UAS‐Tim.Y}2–1/CyO), and the Mhc‐gal4 (stock ID: 55133; FlyBase Genotype: w*; P{Mhc‐GAL4.K}2/TM3, Sb1) flies were obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center. The Tim‐UAS‐RNAi flies (stock ID: v2885; FlyBase Genotype: w1118; P{GD1267}v2885) were obtained from the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center. Female Mhc‐gal4 flies were crossed with male Tim‐UAS‐OE and Tim‐UAS‐RNAi flies. The F1 generation male offspring from these crosses were collected, and age‐matched male flies were divided into the following groups: Tim‐UAS‐OE>Mhc‐gal4(OE), Tim‐UAS‐OE>Mhc‐gal4 + Exercise (OE‐E), Tim‐UAS‐RNAi>Mhc‐gal4 (RNAi), and Tim‐UAS‐RNAi>Mhc‐gal4 + Exercise (RNAi‐E). Additionally, age‐matched male Tim‐UAS‐OE(UAS), Tim‐UAS‐OE + Exercise (UAS‐E), Tim‐UAS‐RNAi(UAS), Tim‐UAS‐RNAi + Exercise (UAS‐E), and Mhc‐gal4 (Gal4) flies were used as control groups to account for genetic background.

All Drosophila were maintained and experimentally manipulated under controlled conditions (25°C, 50% humidity), with food replacement performed every other day. The food consisted of 2.0% yeast, 6.7% cornmeal, 0.7% agar, 1.6% soybean powder, 4.8% sucrose, 4.8% maltose, and 0.3% propionic acid (Wen et al. 2020).

Flies were exercised in vials with an 8‐cm length. The vials were rotated at 60 rad/s. After each up‐and‐down turn, the vials were held stationary for 10 s to allow the flies to climb. Flies were exercised for 60 or 65 min per day (Table 1). The exercise regimen consisted of 2 days of training followed by 1 day off, and then 2 days of training followed by 2 days off. All exercise groups began training at 2 weeks of age and underwent a 4‐week‐long exercise program (Mendez et al. 2016).

TABLE 1.

Training protocols.

Day Exercise Rest Exercise Rest Exercise Rest Exercise Rest
Monday 15 min 5 min 15 min 5 min 15 min 5 min 15 min 5 min
Tuesday 20 min 5 min 15 min 5 min 15 min 5 min 15 min 5 min
Wednesday Rest
Thursday 15 min 5 min 15 min 5 min 15 min 5 min 15 min 5 min
Friday 20 min 5 min 20 min 5 min 15 min 5 min 15 min 5 min
Saturday Rest
Sunday Rest

2.2. Circadian Rhythm Measurement

The circadian rhythm of the flies was measured at the end of 1 and 5 weeks of age. Ten flies from each group were placed in a culture tube and recorded for 24 h using a digital camera (infrared camera mode at night, Sony, 56 mega pixels). The video was analyzed using QQ video software (version: 4.6.3.1104). Each fly in the video was labeled “1” if it changed position within a 1‐min interval and “0” if it remained stationary (Figure 1). Using these labels, the following parameters were calculated: average activity rate per minute, average activity rate per hour (Average activity rate with 60 min), average activity rate during 12 h of daytime, Average activity rate during 12 h of night, and average activity rate over 24 h, and the 24‐h average activity rate curve of flies. These metrics provided a comprehensive assessment of the flies' circadian activity patterns.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Method for analyzing locomotor activity rhythm of Drosophila. A 24‐h video recording was conducted on fruit flies in culture tubes. During analysis, the positions of the fruit flies in the video were analyzed at one‐minute intervals. If the position remained unchanged, it was scored as “0”; if the position changed, it was scored as “1.” The average activity rate per tube was then calculated (number of fruit flies with position changes divided by total number of fruit flies). As shown in the figure, during the time period from 10:20 to 10:21, six fruit flies exhibited position changes, resulting in an average activity rate of 0.4.

2.3. Climbing Ability, Cardiac Function and Heart Failure, and Lifespan Assay

The climbing speed of Drosophila was used to reflect their motor performance. Specifically, the measurement procedure was as follows: the test vials containing flies were placed on a Power Tower platform, and the Power Tower mechanically tapped the vials every 10 s to knock the flies to the bottom (Tinkerhess et al. 2012). A video camera was then activated to record three consecutive climbing trials. The recordings were subsequently analyzed by AVS software, and screenshots were taken to capture the climbing height achieved within 3 s after each mechanical tap. The highest climbing height from each vial was recorded for analysis. Each group consisted of 20 flies, and the test was repeated five times per group (Yin et al. 2025).

Cardiac function assay: after the fruit flies were anesthetized in ether for 3 min, the head, ventral thorax, and ventral abdominal cuticle of anesthetized flies were removed, and the hearts were exposed. Oxygenated artificial hemolymph could maintain the normal function of the heart in Drosophila. High‐speed cameras captured video of a fruit fly's heart beating, and the video was recorded for 30 s. The video of heart rate and stroke volume was analyzed using AVS software (Ocorr et al. 2014). Stroke volume = (Square of dilation radius − Square of contraction radius) × π × 1 μm.

Heart failure assay: after the fruit flies completed the video analysis of their heart functions, the hemolymph from the fruit flies was removed using a pipette, and 5 μL of new hemolymph was then re‐introduced into the abdomen of the fruit flies. The time it took for the fruit fly's heart to go from normal beating to stopping beating was observed every 5 min. The time of fruit fly heart failure was analyzed by plotting the curve based on the duration of heart stoppage.

Dead flies were recorded daily to monitor mortality. The lifespan of each fly was calculated as the number of days from eclosion (emergence as an adult) until death. Survival curves were generated to characterize the lifespan distribution for each group. The sample sizes ranged from 200 to 210 flies per group to ensure robust statistical analysis (He and Jasper 2014).

2.4. Transmission Electron Microscopy of Skeletal Muscle

For electron microscopic observation, muscle tissues were meticulously dissected in an ice‐cold fixative solution containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 mol/L PIPES buffer (pH 7.4). After fixation at 4°C for 10 h, the samples were rinsed with 0.1 mol/L PIPES buffer. Post‐fixation was then carried out with 1% OsO4 for 30 min, followed by staining with 2% uranyl acetate for 1 h. Dehydration was performed through a graded ethanol series (50%, 70%, and 100%), after which the samples were embedded in epoxy resin. Ultrathin sections were prepared and examined using an HT‐7700 transmission electron microscope, and images were acquired for subsequent analysis (Lin et al. 2026).

2.5. ELISA Assay

The levels of MRCC‐I, SOD, and ROS were quantified using commercial ELISA kits (Insect MRCC‐I, SOD ELISA Kits, and ROS Kits, MLBIO, Shanghai, China). Muscles from 30 flies were homogenized in PBS (pH 7.2–7.4). The homogenates were snap‐frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at 2°C–8°C after thawing. Samples were further homogenized using mechanical grinders and centrifuged at 2000–3000 rpm for 20 min, after which the supernatant was collected. For the assay, absorbance was measured at 450 nm within 15 min after adding the Stop Solution, using the blank well as the zero reference (Yin et al. 2025).

2.6. qRT‐PCR

At the end of the 5th week, skeletal muscle (thorax) samples from 30 Drosophila were collected per group and immersed in 1000 μL of Trizol reagent for subsequent analysis of relevant pathway gene expression (sample collection was repeated three times per group for experimental replicates). Each cDNA sample was prepared in triplicate for PCR amplification. Quantitative analysis was performed using the CT method (Lin et al. 2026). The primer sequences of PGC‐1α were as follows: F: 5′‐TGTTGCTGCTACTGCTGCTT‐3′; R: 5′‐GCCTCTGCATCACCTACACA‐3′. Primer sequences of Tim were as follows: F: 5′‐TAACACGAAGCCACGGAATAAA‐3′, R: 5′‐CTCGATGGTGTTCTCGGTGA‐3′. Primer sequences of Clk were as follows: F: 5′‐TCGGATTCAACGTCCATGTC‐3′, R: 5′‐GCTGTAACCCTTGAGGAGGAAAT‐3′. Primer sequences of Mhc were as follows: F: 5′‐3′:GACCGTGCGTAACGATAACTCC, R: 5′‐3′:GACTGCTGGGAGATGACACGA; Primer sequences of Sir2 were as follows: F: 5′‐CAGCTCCTGTGGTATCCTGA‐3′; R: 5′‐GTGGAGAT GCTGTTGCTGTC‐3′. Primer sequences of Rp49 were as follows: F: 5‐CTAAGCTGTCGCACAAATGG‐3′, R: 5′‐AACTTCTTGAATCCGGTGGG‐3′.

2.7. Statistical Analyses

The differences in various indicators among the Gal4 group, UAS group, and RNAi group or OE group were compared using one‐way ANOVA. The differences in various indicators between 1‐week‐old and 5‐week‐old Drosophila, as well as between the exercise and non‐exercise groups, were analyzed using an independent samples t‐test. The p‐values for the survival curves and heart failure time curves were determined using the log‐rank test. Experimental data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), with statistical significance defined as α = 0.05 (or 0.01 where specified).

3. Results

3.1. The Muscle Tim Gene Is Involved in Regulating Age‐Related Phenotypic Changes in Drosophila

From fruit flies to humans, aging‐related phenotypic changes are highly conserved, manifested as decreased locomotor capacity, disrupted circadian rhythms, and weakened cardiac function (Chu et al. 2025; Li, Tan, and Zhao 2024; Chen et al. 2025). Among these, aging‐related lifespan is the most direct and ultimate phenotype (Kornadt et al. 2020). Both genetic predisposition and environmental factors can lead to differential susceptibility to aging among individuals, resulting in healthy aging versus pathological aging, and even the emergence of premature aging phenotypes. For instance, mutations in the Sirt1 gene or long‐term high‐fat dietary intake can induce premature aging phenotypes (Wang et al. 2022; Yi et al. 2024). Alterations in circadian rhythms are among the earliest emerging phenotypes of aging and are closely associated with abnormal changes in the neuronal circadian pathway (Chandwaney et al. 1998). However, it remains unclear whether the circadian pathway in muscle participates in the regulation of the aging process.

In this study, we established a Tim‐UAS‐RNAi/Mhc‐Gal4 system in F1‐generation Drosophila through genetic crosses to achieve muscle‐specific knockdown of Tim gene expression. By assessing aging‐related phenotypes and investigating the underlying mechanisms of muscle aging, we aimed to elucidate the role of muscle Tim in systemic aging, as well as in skeletal and cardiac muscle aging (Figure 2A). Our results showed that muscle‐specific knockdown of Tim had no significant effects on 24‐h activity, 12‐h daytime activity, 12‐h nighttime activity, climbing speed, heart rate, stroke volume, or time to hypoxic cardiac failure in 1‐week‐old young flies (Figure 2B–I, p > 0.05). In 5‐week‐old aged flies, however, although muscle Tim RNAi did not significantly affect 24‐h or daytime activity (Figure 2J,K, p > 0.05), it led to a significant increase in nighttime activity (Figure 2L,M, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01), a marked decline in climbing speed (Figure 2N, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01), a significant elevation in heart rate (Figure 2O, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01), and significant reductions in stroke volume (Figure 2P, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01), time to hypoxic cardiac failure (Figure 2Q, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01), and lifespan (Figure 2R,S, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Effects of muscle‐specific Tim knockdown on aging‐related phenotypes in Drosophila. (A) Generation of Drosophila UAS/Mhc‐GAL4 system through genetic cross. (B) Average 24‐h locomotor activity of 1‐week‐old flies. (C) Average 12‐h daytime locomotor activity of 1‐week‐old flies. (D) Average 12‐h nighttime locomotor activity of 1‐week‐old flies. (E) Locomotor activity profile over 24 h of 1‐week‐old flies. (F) Climbing speed of 1‐week‐old flies. (G) Heart rate of 1‐week‐old flies. (H) Stroke volume of 1‐week‐old flies. (I) Time to hypoxic heart failure in 1‐week‐old flies. (J) Average 24‐h locomotor activity of 5‐week‐old flies. (K) Average 12‐h daytime locomotor activity of 5‐week‐old flies. (L) Average 12‐h nighttime locomotor activity of 5‐week‐old flies. (M) Locomotor activity profile over 24 h of 5‐week‐old flies. The locomotor activity of 5‐week‐old flies was significantly higher than that of UAS and GAL4 flies during the period from 20:01 to 04:00, suggesting that this may cause severe fragmentation of nighttime sleep in aged flies. (N) Climbing speed of 5‐week‐old flies. (O) Heart rate of 5‐week‐old flies. (P) Stroke volume of 5‐week‐old flies. (Q) Time to hypoxic heart failure in 5‐week‐old flies. (R) Survival curve of flies. (S) Average lifespan of flies. For comparisons among multiple groups (Gal4, UAS, and RNAi), one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by least significant difference (LSD) post hoc tests was conducted. The log‐rank test was used to calculate p‐values for lifespan curve and time to hypoxic heart failure comparisons. Data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ns means no significant difference.

In addition, the results showed that in flies with different genetic backgrounds (UAS, Gal4, RNAi), there were no significant differences in 24‐h activity or 12‐h daytime activity between 5‐week‐old aged flies and 1‐week‐old young flies (Figure 3A,B, p > 0.05). However, the 12‐h nighttime activity of 5‐week‐old aged flies was significantly increased compared to that of 1‐week‐old young flies (Figure 3C–F, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). Furthermore, compared to 1‐week‐old young flies, the 5‐week‐old aged flies exhibited significantly reduced climbing speed and heart rate (Figure 3G,H, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01), a significantly increased stroke volume (Figure 3I, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01), and a significantly shortened time to hypoxic cardiac failure (Figure 3K,L, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). These results suggest that muscle‐specific Timeless gene RNAi accelerated the deterioration of aging‐related behavioral phenotypes (Figure 3M).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Effects of aging on locomotor activity rhythms, climbing speed, and cardiac function in RNAi flies. (A) Comparison of average 24‐h locomotor activity between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old RNAi flies. (B) Comparison of average 12‐h daytime locomotor activity between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old RNAi flies. (C) Comparison of average 12‐h nighttime locomotor activity between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old RNAi flies. (D) Comparative analysis of 24‐h average locomotor activity profiles between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old GAL4 flies. (E) Comparative analysis of 24‐h average locomotor activity profiles between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old UAS flies. (F) Comparative analysis of 24‐h average locomotor activity profiles between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old RNAi flies. Regardless of whether it is GAL4 flies, UAS flies, or RNAi flies, aging significantly increases their nighttime activity rate, suggesting that aging may lead to increased fragmentation of nighttime sleep in Drosophila. However, RNAi may exacerbate this aging‐related nighttime sleep fragmentation. (G) Comparison of climbing speed between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old RNAi flies. (H) Comparison of heart rate between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old RNAi flies. (I) Comparison of cardiac stroke volume between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old RNAi flies. (J) Comparison of time to hypoxic heart failure between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old Gal4 flies. (K) Comparison of time to hypoxic heart failure between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old UAS flies. (L) Comparison of time to hypoxic heart failure between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old RNAi flies. (M) Muscle‐specific Timeless gene RNAi accelerated the deterioration of aging‐related behavioral phenotypes. Independent‐sample t‐tests were used to compare the 1‐ and 5‐week‐old flies. The log‐rank test was used to calculate p‐values for time to hypoxic heart failure comparisons. Data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). A significance threshold set at p < 0.05, and ns means no significant difference. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ns means no significant difference.

To further confirm the role of the muscle‐specific Tim gene in aging, we generated a Tim‐UAS‐Overexpression (OE)/Mhc‐Gal4 system in F1‐generation Drosophila through genetic crosses to achieve Tim overexpression (OE) specifically in muscle tissue. The results showed that muscle‐specific overexpression of Tim had no significant effects on the 24‐h activity rate, 12‐h daytime activity rate, 12‐h nighttime activity rate, climbing speed, heart rate, stroke volume, or time to hypoxic cardiac failure in 1‐week‐old young flies (Figure 4A–H, p > 0.05). In 5‐week‐old aged flies, however, although muscle‐specific overexpression of Tim did not significantly affect their 24‐h or 12‐h daytime activity rates (Figure 4I,J, p > 0.05), it significantly reduced their nighttime activity rate (Figure 4K,L, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01), significantly increased their climbing speed (Figure 4M, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01), significantly decreased their heart rate (Figure 4N, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01), and significantly enhanced their stroke volume (Figure 4O, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01), time to hypoxic cardiac failure (Figure 4P, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01), and lifespan (Figure 4Q,R, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Effects of muscle‐specific Tim overexpression (OE) on aging‐related phenotypes in Drosophila. (A) Average 24‐h locomotor activity of 1‐week‐old OE flies. (B) Average 12‐h daytime locomotor activity of 1‐week‐old OE flies. (C) Average 12‐h nighttime locomotor activity of 1‐week‐old OE flies. (D) Locomotor activity profile over 24 h of 1‐week‐old OE flies. (E) Climbing speed of 1‐week‐old OE flies. (F) Heart rate of 1‐week‐old OE flies. (G) Stroke volume of 1‐week‐old OE flies. (H) Time to hypoxic heart failure in 1‐week‐old OE flies. (I) Average 24‐h locomotor activity of 5‐week‐old OE flies. (J) Average 12‐h daytime locomotor activity of 5‐week‐old OE flies. (K) Average 12‐h nighttime locomotor activity of 5‐week‐old OE flies. (L) Locomotor activity profile over 24 h of 5‐week‐old OE flies. The nighttime locomotor activity of 5‐week‐old OE flies was significantly lower than that of UAS and GAL4 flies, suggesting that OE may alleviate the fragmentation of nighttime sleep in aged flies. (M) Climbing speed of 5‐week‐old OE flies. (N) Heart rate of 5‐week‐old OE flies. (O) Stroke volume of 5‐week‐old OE flies. (P) Time to hypoxic heart failure in 5‐week‐old OE flies. (Q) Survival curve of OE flies. (R) Average lifespan of OE flies. For comparisons among multiple groups (Gal4, UAS, and OE), one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by least significant difference (LSD) post hoc tests was conducted. The log‐rank test was used to calculate p‐values for lifespan curve and time to hypoxic heart failure comparisons. Data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ns means no significant difference.

In addition, the results showed that in flies with different genetic backgrounds (UAS, Gal4, OE), there were no significant differences in 24‐h activity or 12‐h daytime activity between 5‐week‐old aged flies and 1‐week‐old young flies (Figure 5A,B, p > 0.05). However, the 12‐h nighttime activity of 5‐week‐old aged flies was significantly increased compared to that of 1‐week‐old young flies (Figure 5C–F, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). Furthermore, compared to 1‐week‐old young flies, the 5‐week‐old aged flies exhibited significantly reduced climbing speed and heart rate (Figure 5G,H, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01), a significantly increased stroke volume (Figure 5I, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01), and a significantly shortened time to hypoxic cardiac failure (Figure 5J,K, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). These results suggest that muscle‐specific Timeless gene overexpression delayed the deterioration of aging‐related behavioral phenotypes.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Effects of aging on locomotor activity rhythms, climbing speed, and cardiac function in OE flies. (A) Comparison of average 24‐h locomotor activity between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old OE flies. (B) Comparison of average 12‐h daytime locomotor activity between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old OE flies. (C) Comparison of average 12‐h nighttime locomotor activity between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old OE flies. (D) Comparative analysis of 24‐h average locomotor activity profiles between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old GAL4 flies. (E) Comparative analysis of 24‐h average locomotor activity profiles between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old UAS flies. (F) Comparative analysis of 24‐h average locomotor activity profiles between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old OE flies. Regardless of whether it is GAL4 flies, UAS flies, or RNAi flies, aging significantly increases their nighttime activity rate, suggesting that aging may lead to increased nighttime sleep fragmentation in Drosophila. However, this phenomenon was not observed in OE flies, indicating that OE may reduce nighttime sleep fragmentation in aged flies. (G) Comparison of climbing speed between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old OE flies. (H) Comparison of heart rate between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old OE flies. (I) Comparison of cardiac stroke volume between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old RNAi flies. (J) Comparison of time to hypoxic heart failure between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old UAS flies. (K) Comparison of time to hypoxic heart failure between 1‐ and 5‐week‐old OE flies. Independent‐sample t‐tests were used to compare the 1‐ and 5‐week‐old flies. The log‐rank test was used to calculate p‐values for time to hypoxic heart failure comparisons. Data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). A significance threshold is set at p < 0.05, and ns means no significant difference. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ns means no significant difference.

3.2. Physiological Mechanisms of the Impact of Muscular Tim Gene on the Aging of Skeletal Muscle and Heart

Skeletal muscle and cardiac aging are accompanied by a series of changes in intrinsic physiological mechanisms, such as increased oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and loss of contractile proteins (Tang et al. 2019; Wang, Gan, et al. 2025; Semel et al. 2025). Although studies have shown that the Tim gene is closely associated with cellular rhythms and DNA damage repair (Dheekollu et al. 2013), its impact on the physiological mechanisms of cellular aging requires further investigation.

In this study, we first employed real‐time quantitative PCR to detect the mRNA expression levels of the muscular Tim gene and others, in order to verify the successful construction of the Mhc‐Gal4/Tim‐UAS structure in the F1 generation of Drosophila. The results showed that the Mhc‐Gal4/Tim‐UAS‐RNAi structure significantly reduced the relative expression of the muscular Tim gene (Figure 6A, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). Furthermore, knockdown of the muscular Tim gene significantly downregulated the expression of muscle Clk gene, Sir2 gene, and PGC‐1α gene, as well as the protein level of MRCC‐I and Mhc gene expression, and the activity level of SOD, while significantly increasing the level of muscle ROS (Figure 6B–H, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). Results from Mhc protein immunofluorescence histochemistry indicated that knockdown of the muscular Tim gene significantly reduced Mhc protein expression. Transmission electron microscopy images of skeletal muscle tissue suggested that knockdown of the muscular Tim gene significantly decreased mitochondrial number and myofibril integrity (Figure 6I).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Effects of muscle‐specific Tim RNAi and overexpression (OE) on physiological and biochemical indicators related to Drosophila musculature. (A) Relative expression of Tim gene in muscles of RNAi flies. (B) Relative expression of Clk gene in muscles of RNAi flies. (C) Relative expression of Sir2 gene in muscles of RNAi flies. (D) Relative expression of PGC‐1α gene in muscles of RNAi flies. (E) Mitochondrial MRCC‐I protein levels in muscles of RNAi flies. (F) Relative expression of Mhc gene in muscles of RNAi flies. (G) SOD activity levels in muscles of RNAi flies. (H) ROS levels in muscles of RNAi flies. (I) Immunofluorescence of Mhc protein and transmission electron microscopy images of muscles in RNAi flies. (J) Relative expression of Tim gene in muscles of OE flies. (K) Relative expression of Clk gene in muscles of OE flies. (L) Relative expression of Sir2 gene in muscles of OE flies. (M) Relative expression of PGC‐1α gene in muscles of OE flies. (N) Mitochondrial MRCC‐I protein levels in muscles of OE flies. (O) Relative expression of Mhc gene in muscles of OE flies. (P) SOD activity levels in muscles of OE flies. (Q) ROS levels in muscles of OE flies. (R) Immunofluorescence of Mhc protein and transmission electron microscopy images of muscles in OE flies. The immunofluorescence and TEM images of the I‐Gal4 group are identical to those of the R‐Gal4 group, as both were obtained from the same Mhc‐Gal4 driver flies. The first appearance of these images serves to highlight the effect of Tim gene knockdown on skeletal muscle, while the second appearance serves to highlight the effect of Tim gene overexpression on skeletal muscle. The reuse of these identical images from the same batch of Mhc‐Gal4 flies allows for direct visual comparison of skeletal muscle phenotypes across different experimental conditions, thereby facilitating the assessment of genotype‐specific effects while minimizing inter‐individual variability. For comparisons among multiple groups (Gal4, UAS, and RNAi or OE), one‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by least significant difference (LSD) post hoc tests was conducted. Data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ns means no significant difference.

In contrast, the results showed that the Mhc‐Gla4/Tim‐UAS‐overexpression structure significantly up regulated the relative expression of the muscular Tim gene (Figure 6J, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). Furthermore, overexpression of the muscular Tim gene significantly up regulated the expression of muscle Clk gene, Sir2 gene, and PGC‐1α gene, as well as the protein level of MRCC‐I and Mhc gene expression, and the activity level of SOD, while significantly decreasing the level of muscle ROS (Figure 6K–Q, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). Results from Mhc protein immunofluorescence histochemistry indicated that overexpression of the muscular Tim gene significantly increased Mhc protein expression. Transmission electron microscopy images of skeletal muscle tissue suggested that overexpression of the muscular Tim gene significantly increased mitochondrial number and myofibril integrity (Figure 6R).

It should be noted that the immunofluorescence and TEM images of the Figure 6‐I‐Gal4 group and the Figure 6‐R‐Gal4 group are identical, as both were derived from the same Mhc‐Gal4 driver flies. These images are presented separately in Figure 6I to illustrate the Tim knockdown effect and in Figure 6R to illustrate the Tim overexpression effect, serving distinct comparative purposes in different genetic contexts. The reuse of these identical images from the same batch of Mhc‐Gal4 flies allows for direct visual comparison of skeletal muscle phenotypes across different experimental conditions, thereby facilitating the assessment of genotype‐specific effects while minimizing inter‐individual variability (Figure 6I,R).

These results indicated that the Timeless gene in muscle played an important role in the aging of skeletal muscle, heart, and circadian rhythm, and its mechanism was closely related to its ability to regulate the activity status of the muscle Timeless/Clock pathway and the Timeless/Sir2/PGC‐1α pathway.

3.3. Exercise Attenuates Aging in Skeletal Muscle and the Heart via the Upregulation of Muscle Tim Gene

Accumulating evidence suggests that regular aerobic exercise helps delay aging‐related phenotypic changes, including improved locomotor activity, enhanced circadian rhythms, and a reduced incidence of cardiovascular diseases in aged individuals (Bruns et al. 2020; Cao et al. 2023; Distefano and Goodpaster 2018). These benefits are associated with the ability of exercise to ameliorate aging‐related physiological changes, such as enhanced antioxidant capacity, reduced oxidative stress, and the preservation of mitochondrial function. However, it remains unclear whether these effects are mechanistically linked to the Tim gene in muscle.

The results of this study showed that exercise significantly reduced the 24‐h activity rate and the 12‐h nocturnal activity rate in flies with muscle‐specific Tim gene RNA interference (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01), while no significant effect was observed on their diurnal activity rate (p > 0.05) (Figure 7A–E). Moreover, exercise significantly improved the climbing speed of flies with muscle‐specific Tim gene RNAi, significantly reduced their heart rate, and markedly enhanced their stroke volume, and it also significantly prolonged the time to heart failure under hypoxia and extended their lifespan (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01) (Figure 7F–M). Furthermore, exercise significantly increased the mRNA expression of Tim, Clk, Sir2, PGC‐1α, and Mhc, elevated MRCC‐I protein levels, and transmission electron microscopy images revealed a notable increase in mitochondrial number and a reduction in mitochondrial damage (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01) (Figure 7N–T). Finally, exercise significantly increased SOD activity and markedly reduced ROS levels in the muscles of muscle‐specific Tim RNAi flies (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01) (Figure 7U,V).

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Effects of exercise on muscle‐specific Tim RNAi Drosophila. (A) Average 24‐h activity rate of flies. (B) Average 12‐h daytime activity rate of flies. (C) Average 12‐h nighttime activity rate of flies. (D) 24‐h average activity rate curve of UAS flies. (E) 24‐h average activity rate curve of RNAi flies. (F) Climbing speed of flies. (G) Heart rate of flies. (H) Stroke volume of flies. (I) Time to hypoxic heart failure in UAS flies. (J) Time to hypoxic heart failure in RNAi flies. (K) Survival curve of UAS flies. (L) Survival curve of RNAi flies. (M) Lifespan of flies. (N) Relative expression of Tim gene in muscles. (O) Relative expression of Clk gene in muscles. (P) Relative expression of Sir2 gene in muscles. (Q) Relative expression of PGC‐1α gene in muscles. (R) Mitochondrial MRCC‐I protein levels in muscles. (S) Relative expression of Mhc gene in muscles of RNAi flies. (T) Immunofluorescence of Mhc protein and transmission electron microscopy images of muscles in RNAi flies. The immunofluorescence and TEM images of the UAS and RNAi groups in T are identical to those of the UAS and RNAi groups in Figure 6I. In Figure 6I, these images serve to compare the UAS‐RNAi group with the Tim RNAi group, highlighting the effect of Tim gene knockdown on skeletal muscle, with the primary focus on demonstrating the RNAi effect. In T, the same images are used to compare the UAS group with the UAS‐Exercise group and the RNAi group with the RNAi‐Exercise group, highlighting the effect of exercise on skeletal muscle under conditions of both normal Tim expression and Tim knockdown, with the primary focus on demonstrating the exercise effect. The reused images are derived from the same cohorts of flies, and the purpose of this reuse is to enable direct visual comparison under different experimental conditions. (U) SOD activity levels in muscles. (V) ROS levels in muscles. Data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). A significance threshold is set at p < 0.05, and ns means no significant difference. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ns means no significant difference.

Similarly, muscle‐specific Tim gene overexpression flies, the results of this study showed that exercise also significantly reduced the 24‐h activity rate and the 12‐h nocturnal activity rate in flies with muscle‐specific Tim gene overexpression (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01), while no significant effect was observed on their diurnal activity rate (p > 0.05) (Figure 8A–E). Moreover, exercise significantly improved the climbing speed of flies with muscle‐specific Tim gene overexpression, significantly reduced their heart rate, and markedly enhanced their stroke volume, and it also significantly prolonged the time to heart failure under hypoxia and extended their lifespan (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01) (Figure 8F–M). Furthermore, exercise significantly increased the mRNA expression of Tim, Clk, Sir2, PGC‐1α, and Mhc, elevated MRCC‐I protein levels, and transmission electron microscopy images revealed a notable increase in mitochondrial number and a reduction in mitochondrial damage (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01) (Figure 8N–T). Finally, exercise significantly increased SOD activity and markedly reduced ROS levels in the muscles of muscle‐specific Tim overexpression flies (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01) (Figure 8U,V).

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Effects of exercise on muscle‐specific Tim overexpression Drosophila. (A) Average 24‐h activity rate of flies. (B) Average 12‐h daytime activity rate of flies. (C) Average 12‐h nighttime activity rate of flies. (D) 24‐h average activity rate curve of UAS flies. (E) 24‐h average activity rate curve of overexpression flies. (F) Climbing speed of flies. (G) Heart rate of flies. (H) Stroke volume of flies. (I) Time to hypoxic heart failure in UAS flies. (J) Time to hypoxic heart failure in overexpression flies. (K) Survival curve of UAS flies. (L) Survival curve of overexpression flies. (M) Lifespan of flies. (N) Relative expression of Tim gene in muscles. (O) Relative expression of Clk gene in muscles. (P) Relative expression of Sir2 gene in muscles. (Q) Relative expression of PGC‐1α gene in muscles. (R) Mitochondrial MRCC‐I protein levels in muscles. (S) Relative expression of Mhc gene in muscles. (T) Immunofluorescence of Mhc protein and transmission electron microscopy images of muscles in overexpression flies. The immunofluorescence and TEM images of the UAS and OE groups in T are identical to those of the UAS and RNAi groups in Figure 6R. In Figure 6R, these images serve to compare the UAS‐Overexpression group with the Tim overexpression group, highlighting the effect of Tim gene overexpression on skeletal muscle, with the primary focus on demonstrating the overexpression effect. In T, the same images are used to compare the UAS group with the UAS‐Exercise group and the OE group with the OE‐Exercise group, highlighting the effect of exercise on skeletal muscle under conditions of both normal Tim expression and Tim overexpression, with the primary focus on demonstrating the exercise effect. The reused images are derived from the same cohorts of flies, and the purpose of this reuse is to enable direct visual comparison under different experimental conditions. (U) SOD activity levels in muscles. (V) ROS levels in muscles. Data are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). A significance threshold is set at p < 0.05, and ns means no significant difference. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ns means no significant difference.

The immunofluorescence and TEM images of the Figure 7‐T‐UAS and Figure 7‐T‐RNAi groups are identical to those of the Figure 6‐I‐UAS and Figure 6‐I‐RNAi groups, respectively, and the immunofluorescence and TEM images of the Figure 8‐T‐UAS and Figure 8‐T‐OE groups are identical to those of the Figure 6‐R‐UAS and Figure 6‐R‐RNAi groups, respectively. In Figure 6I, the immunofluorescence and TEM images are used to compare the UAS‐RNAi group with the Tim RNAi group, highlighting the effect of Tim gene knockdown on skeletal muscle, with the primary focus on demonstrating the RNAi effect. In Figure 7T, the immunofluorescence and TEM images are used to compare the UAS group with the UAS‐Exercise group and the RNAi group with the RNAi‐Exercise group, highlighting the effect of exercise on skeletal muscle under conditions of both normal Tim expression and Tim knockdown, with the primary focus on demonstrating the exercise effect. In Figure 6R, the immunofluorescence and TEM images are used to compare the UAS‐Overexpression group with the Tim overexpression group, highlighting the effect of Tim gene overexpression on skeletal muscle, with the primary focus on demonstrating the overexpression effect. In Figure 8T, the immunofluorescence and TEM images are used to compare the UAS group with the UAS‐Exercise group and the OE group with the OE‐Exercise group, highlighting the effect of exercise on skeletal muscle under conditions of both normal Tim expression and Tim overexpression, with the primary focus on demonstrating the exercise effect. The reused images are derived from the same cohorts of flies, and the purpose of this reuse is to enable direct visual comparison under different experimental conditions (Figures 6I,R, 7T, and 8).

These findings suggested that exercise acted as an upstream regulator of the muscle Timeless gene, delaying aging‐related deterioration in skeletal muscle, heart, and circadian rhythms by activating the Timeless/Clock and Timeless/Sir2/PGC‐1α pathways.

4. Discussion

Aging is an intrinsic process that occurs in nearly all living organisms, characterized by the progressive decline or loss of function across cellular, tissue, and organ systems over time, ultimately leading to the end of life. In humans, the central nervous system is among the most vulnerable to aging, making disruptions in sleep–wake rhythms—such as phase advancement and sleep fragmentation—some of the earliest indicators of the aging process (Brown et al. 2011). These alterations have also been observed in Drosophila (Kawasaki et al. 2025), suggesting that age‐related changes in circadian rhythms are evolutionarily conserved.

In mammals, the molecular clock typically exhibits reduced activity during aging, as reflected by decreased amplitude in core clock genes such as Clock, Bmal1, and Per2, while the expression of Per1, Cry1, and Cry2 remains relatively stable. TIM protein directly interacts with the cell cycle checkpoint proteins ATR and CHK1 (Koh et al. 2006). Consequently, the age‐related decline in circadian TIM expression may compromise the function of the CHK1: ATR3 complex in DNA damage checkpoint responses (Gadaleta et al. 2016). In mammals, the Tim gene produces two alternatively spliced transcripts, enabling TIM to serve as a molecular link between the cell cycle checkpoint machinery and the circadian clock (Cabral 2025). In Drosophila, aging suppresses Tim expression, which may contribute to circadian disruption (Umezaki et al. 2012). Collectively, growing evidence implicates Tim, a core circadian regulator, in the aging process. However, its specific role in aging skeletal muscle and cardiac tissue remains to be elucidated.

This study employed Drosophila genetic crosses to establish a UAS‐Tim/Mhc‐Gal4 system in F1 progeny, enabling muscle‐specific knockdown and overexpression of the Tim gene to investigate its role in circadian rhythm aging, skeletal muscle aging, and cardiac aging. The results showed that muscle‐specific Tim knockdown or overexpression had no significant effect on the average daily locomotor activity in 1‐week‐old young flies. However, in 5‐week‐old aged flies, Tim knockdown led to a significant increase in average nighttime activity, whereas Tim overexpression significantly reduced nighttime activity. These findings suggest that muscle‐specific Tim knockdown accelerates age‐related nighttime sleep fragmentation in Drosophila, while Tim overexpression helps preserve healthy sleep patterns during aging. These findings are consistent with previously reported studies on circadian rhythms and aging, both in Drosophila and mammalian models.

In both mammals and Drosophila, skeletal muscle and heart—as vital organs—undergo structural and functional decline with aging, accompanied by an increased incidence of age‐related diseases such as sarcopenia and heart failure. Age‐related sarcopenia is a major cause of reduced locomotor activity and diminished motor capacity in aged individuals, with underlying mechanisms involving loss of contractile proteins in skeletal muscle cells, decreased mitochondrial function, and elevated oxidative stress damage (Fukada and Kajiya 2020; Ji et al. 2025; Scudese et al. 2025). Similarly, age‐associated heart failure is characterized by reduced cardiac contractility, decreased stroke volume and ejection fraction, and increased incidence of arrhythmias, with physiological mechanisms analogous to those observed in skeletal muscle aging (Sato et al. 2025; Liberale et al. 2025). During aging, the reduction in cardiomyocyte number due to apoptosis and necrosis leads to hypertrophy of the remaining cardiomyocytes in an attempt to maintain pump function. However, this hypertrophy increases cardiac stiffness and oxygen consumption (Wang et al. 2024). The myocardium is one of the most oxygen‐consuming tissues in the human body. Hypoxia impairs aerobic oxidation (the most efficient energy production pathway) in cardiomyocytes, forcing a shift toward inefficient anaerobic glycolysis. This results in insufficient energy supply in cardiomyocytes, further deteriorating their systolic and diastolic functions (Lee et al. 2025). Additionally, hypoxia induces mitochondrial dysfunction, generating excessive reactive oxygen species (free radicals) and triggering oxidative stress responses. This damages DNA and proteins within cardiomyocytes while activating inflammatory pathways, thereby accelerating cardiomyocyte death and fibrosis (Klumpe et al. 2016). Hypoxia can also alter the electrophysiological stability of cardiomyocytes, increasing the risk of arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation, which in turn exacerbates heart failure (Li et al. 2025). Therefore, aging reduces the heart's tolerance to hypoxia and increases the incidence of hypoxic heart failure (Wei et al. 2022). In this study, muscle‐specific knockdown or overexpression of the Tim gene had no significant effect on climbing speed or cardiac function in 1‐week‐old young flies. However, in 5‐week‐old aged flies, Tim knockdown significantly impaired climbing speed and cardiac function, and shortened the time to heart failure under hypoxic conditions, while Tim overexpression produced the opposite effects. These findings suggest that the muscle Tim gene plays a critical role in skeletal muscle and cardiac aging.

Sirt1/Sir2, as key NAD+‐dependent deacetylases, play a core protective role in skeletal muscle and cardiac aging through multi‐level regulation of mitochondrial function. For instance, in the heart and skeletal muscle, Sirt1/Sir2 activate PGC‐1α via deacetylation, enhancing its transcriptional activity and promoting the expression of NRF1, TFAM, and other factors, thereby facilitating mitochondrial biogenesis and maintaining mitochondrial network stability (Wen et al. 2019; Mu et al. 2014; Ma et al. 2025). Additionally, Sirt1/Sir2 activate the FOXO pathway, upregulating antioxidant enzymes such as SOD2 and catalase to scavenge excess ROS and mitigate oxidative damage in both cardiac and skeletal muscle (Zhang, Zhang, et al. 2025). Conversely, studies have shown that aging is accompanied by a decline in SIRT1/SIRT3 levels, leading to impaired mitochondrial fusion and respiratory function in cardiomyocytes, which subsequently results in defective cardiac contractility (Zhang et al. 2021). SIRT1 deficiency renders the hearts of young mice susceptible to an aging‐like phenotype in response to ischemia/reperfusion injury (Hsu et al. 2017). Although Sirt1/Sir2 are core regulators of skeletal muscle and cardiac aging, the interactive relationship between the Tim gene and Sirt1/Sir2 in these tissues remains unclear. This study provides the first evidence in Drosophila that muscle Tim gene activates the Sir2/PGC‐1α/MRCC‐I pathway and the Tim‐Clk pathway, enhances antioxidant capacity (SOD activity), and reduces oxidative stress (ROS), thereby protecting skeletal and cardiac myocytes from age‐related decline and attenuating the loss of contractile proteins during aging.

Accumulating evidence suggests that exercise plays an indispensable and beneficial role in delaying aging. For instance, regular exercise effectively ameliorates age‐related sleep disturbances in the elderly, reduces sleep fragmentation, and enhances circadian rhythm stability in aged individuals (Leise et al. 2013; McHill and Wright 2017). Moreover, both resistance and aerobic exercise attenuate the age‐related loss of skeletal muscle mass, thereby counteracting the decline in physical and locomotor capacity associated with aging (Wang, He, et al. 2025; Bao et al. 2024). Exercise also delays cardiac aging by improving cardiac function and reducing the incidence of age‐related cardiac diseases and heart failure (Kelley et al. 2026). These beneficial effects of exercise on circadian rhythms, skeletal muscle function, and cardiac function are evolutionarily conserved across mammals, humans, and even Drosophila (Zheng et al. 2017; Nishimura et al. 2011). However, whether these anti‐aging benefits of exercise are linked to the function of the muscle Tim gene remains unclear. The results of this study demonstrate that, regardless of whether the muscle Tim gene is knocked down, expressed at normal levels, or overexpressed, exercise improves circadian rhythms (as evidenced by reduced nighttime activity), enhances locomotor capacity and cardiac function, and prolongs the time to hypoxic heart failure in aged Drosophila. These findings suggest that exercise may act as an upstream regulator of the muscle Tim gene to modulate skeletal muscle and cardiac aging, although the underlying molecular mechanisms remain to be elucidated.

The molecular mechanisms by which exercise delays skeletal muscle and cardiac aging also involve the regulation of Sirt1/Sir2 and its associated pathways. Studies have shown that exercise enhances Sirt1/Sir2 activity by upregulating NAD+ levels, thereby activating downstream targets such as PGC‐1α and FOXO. In skeletal muscle, exercise‐induced activation of the Sirt1/PGC‐1α signaling axis promotes mitochondrial biogenesis, enhances oxidative metabolism, and upregulates antioxidant enzyme expression, thereby mitigating age‐related oxidative damage and protein loss (Gao et al. 2024; Zhang, Chen, and wan 2025; Yang et al. 2024). Similarly, in the heart, exercise improves mitochondrial function in cardiomyocytes, enhances contractility, and reduces the incidence of age‐related cardiac lipotoxicity and heart failure through Sirt1‐dependent mechanisms, including the activation of downstream targets such as PGC‐1α and FOXO (Zhang, Chen, and wan 2025; Chen et al. 2023; Wang et al. 2023).

Notably, this study found that the muscle Tim gene activates the Sir2/PGC‐1α/MRCC‐I pathway, and exercise also regulates this same pathway, suggesting a potential interaction between Tim and Sirt1/Sir2 in mediating the anti‐aging effects of exercise. To further elucidate the relationship between exercise and the muscle Tim gene, we examined the relative mRNA expression of Tim in the muscle tissue of aged Drosophila. The results showed that exercise significantly upregulated Tim mRNA expression in the muscle tissue of Tim‐knockdown, normal‐expression, and overexpression flies, accompanied by an increase in muscle Clk gene expression. These findings suggest that in aging muscle, exercise acts as an important upstream regulator of the Tim gene, positively modulating the muscle Tim/Clk pathway, the Sir2/PGC‐1α/MRCC‐I pathway, and antioxidant capacity, thereby reducing oxidative stress damage and contractile protein loss associated with skeletal muscle and cardiac aging, ultimately enhancing tissue function.

Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, although the Drosophila model offers significant advantages for genetic manipulation and aging research, the evolutionary divergence between flies and mammals may limit the direct translational applicability of our findings to human biology. Second, our exercise intervention was performed using a mechanical rotational paradigm, which, while well‐established in fly research, may not fully recapitulate the physiological characteristics of voluntary aerobic exercise in higher organisms. Third, our molecular analyses were primarily confined to the mRNA and protein levels of key pathway components; further mechanistic studies—such as tissue‐specific rescue experiments or direct measurements of NAD+/NADH ratios—would be valuable to solidify the causal relationships between Tim gene regulation, Sir2/PGC‐1α signaling, and the observed anti‐aging effects. Fourth, we focused exclusively on male flies to avoid confounding effects of the estrous cycle, and therefore the potential sex‐specific differences in the role of muscle Tim in aging remain unexplored. Finally, while our results demonstrate that exercise upregulates muscle Tim expression, the precise upstream molecular signals through which exercise exerts this effect (e.g., mechanical, metabolic, or redox‐sensitive pathways) warrant further investigation. Addressing these limitations in future studies will help to further validate and extend our current findings.

5. Conclusion

Based on the current findings, the Timeless gene in muscle played an important role in the aging of skeletal muscle, heart, and circadian rhythm, and its mechanism was closely related to its ability to regulate the activity status of the muscle Timeless/Clock pathway and the Timeless/Sir2/PGC‐1α pathway. Exercise acted as an upstream regulator of the muscle Timeless gene, delaying aging‐related deterioration in skeletal muscle, heart, and circadian rhythms by activating the Timeless/Clock and Timeless/Sir2/PGC‐1α pathways. This study provides potential molecular targets for the prevention and treatment of age‐related diseases affecting skeletal muscle and the heart.

Author Contributions

Research idea and study design: Deng‐tai Wen. Data acquisition: Deng‐tai Wen, Ying Lin, Jing‐yao Sun. Data Analysis/Interpretation: Ying‐qi Chen, Gang‐bin Sun, Tian‐shuo Yuan, Deyu Shu. Statistical analysis: Deng‐tai Wen. Supervision: Wen‐qi Hou. Each author contributed during manuscript drafting or revision and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the College Youth Innovation Team Program of Shandong Province (no. 2023RW057) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 32000832).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Core Facility of Drosophila Resource and Technology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences for providing fly stocks and reagents.

Data Availability Statement

All the generated data and the analysis developed in this study are included in this article.

References

  1. Bao, F. , Zhao X., You J., et al. 2024. “Aerobic Exercise Alleviates Skeletal Muscle Aging in Male Rats by Inhibiting Apoptosis via Regulation of the Trx System.” Experimental Gerontology 194: 112523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown, S. , Schmitt K., and Eckert A.. 2011. “Aging and Circadian Disruption: Causes and Effects.” Aging 3, no. 8: 813–817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bruns, D. R. , Yusifova M., Marcello N. A., Green C. J., Walker W. J., and Schmitt E. E.. 2020. “The Peripheral Circadian Clock and Exercise: Lessons From Young and Old Mice.” Journal of Circadian Rhythms 18: 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cabral, S. 2025. “Revisiting a Timeless Skill: The Physical Examination in the Age of Technology‐Driven Medicine.” Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia 122, no. 2: e20250124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cao, W. , Xu J., Xu P., et al. 2025. “Trends of Overweight and Obesity Among Chinese Rural Children and Adolescents Aged 6 to 15 Years—The Central and Western Regions, China, 2012–2023.” China CDC Weekly 7, no. 1: 10–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cao, Y. , He S., Ding M., et al. 2023. “Regular Exercise in Drosophila Prevents Age‐Related Cardiac Dysfunction Caused by High Fat and Heart‐Specific Knockdown of Skd.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 2: 1216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chandwaney, R. , Leichtweis S., Leeuwenburgh C., and Ji L. L.. 1998. “Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Function in Skeletal Muscle: Effects of Aging and Exercise Training.” Age 21, no. 3: 109–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, S. , Xu H., Li X., et al. 2025. “SIRT1‐Mediated Mitochondrial Homeostasis in Cardiac Aging: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.” Aging and Disease 17, no. 6: 1–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Y. , Han Z., Zhang L., et al. 2024. “TIMELESS Promotes Reprogramming of Glucose Metabolism in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.” Journal of Translational Medicine 22, no. 1: 21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Y. , Huang Q., and Feng Y.. 2023. “Exercise Improves Cardiac Function in the Aged Rats With Myocardial Infarction.” Physiological Research 72, no. 1: 27–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chu, S. P. , Wu C. Y., Lai H. Y., et al. 2025. “Age‐Specific Associations Between Intrinsic Capacity Impairments and Self‐Rated Health in Community‐Dwelling Adults: Insights From Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging.” Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging 29, no. 11: 100688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cools, C. , Cools C. I., Kotz S. A., Bloem B. R., Duits A. A., and Vries N. M.. 2025. “Motivation Matters: Elucidating Factors Driving Exercise in People With Parkinson Disease.” Physical Therapy 105, no. 6: pzaf048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dheekollu, J. , Chen H. S., Kaye K. M., and Lieberman P. M.. 2013. “Timeless‐Dependent DNA Replication‐Coupled Recombination Promotes Kaposi's Sarcoma‐Associated Herpesvirus Episome Maintenance and Terminal Repeat Stability.” Journal of Virology 87, no. 7: 3699–3709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Distefano, G. , and Goodpaster B.. 2018. “Effects of Exercise and Aging on Skeletal Muscle.” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 8: a029785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fukada, K. , and Kajiya K.. 2020. “Age‐Related Structural Alterations of Skeletal Muscles and Associated Capillaries.” Angiogenesis 23, no. 2: 79–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gadaleta, M. , González‐Medina A., and Noguchi E.. 2016. “Timeless Protection of Telomeres.” Current Genetics 62, no. 4: 725–730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gao, Y. , Wen D. T., du Z. R., Wang J. F., and Wang S. J.. 2024. “Muscle Psn Gene Combined With Exercise Contribute to Healthy Aging of Skeletal Muscle and Lifespan by Adaptively Regulating Sirt1/PGC‐1α and Arm Pathway.” PLoS One 19, no. 5: e0300787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. He, Y. , and Jasper H.. 2014. “Studying Aging in Drosophila .” Methods 68, no. 1: 129–133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Holzer, S. , Degliesposti G., Kilkenny M. L., et al. 2017. “Crystal Structure of the N‐Terminal Domain of Human Timeless and Its Interaction With Tipin.” Nucleic Acids Research 45, no. 9: 5555–5563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hsu, Y. , Hsu Y. J., Hsu S. C., et al. 2017. “Sirtuin 1 Protects the Aging Heart From Contractile Dysfunction Mediated Through the Inhibition of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress‐Mediated Apoptosis in Cardiac‐Specific Sirtuin 1 Knockout Mouse Model.” International Journal of Cardiology 228: 543–552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hu, D. , Yan W., Zhu J., Zhu Y., and Chen J.. 2021. “Age‐Related Disease Burden in China, 1997–2017: Findings From the Global Burden of Disease Study.” Frontiers in Public Health 9: 638704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ji, W. X. , JL L., and YG Z.. 2025. “The Role of Skeletal Muscle Satellite Cells‐Mediated Muscle Regeneration in The Treatment of Age‐related Sarcopenia.” Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics 52, no. 8: 2033–2050. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kawasaki, H. , Sato T., and Ishida N.. 2025. “Effects of Cannabidiol to Circadian Period, Sleep, Life Span, Close‐Proximity Rhythm, Egg Reproduction and Motor Function in Drosophila melanogaster .” Biogerontology 26, no. 5: 160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kelley, G. , Kelley K., and Stauffer B.. 2026. “Representation of Heart Failure Patients According to Age, Sex, and Race in US‐Based Exercise Trials: A Systematic Review With Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials.” American Journal of Cardiology 258: 35–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Klumpe, I. , Savvatis K., Westermann D., et al. 2016. “Transgenic Overexpression of Adenine Nucleotide Translocase 1 Protects Ischemic Hearts Against Oxidative Stress.” Journal of Molecular Medicine 94, no. 6: 645–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Koh, K. , Zheng X., and Sehgal A.. 2006. “JETLAG Resets the Drosophila Circadian Clock by Promoting Light‐Induced Degradation of TIMELESS.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 312, no. 5781: 1809–1812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kornadt, A. , Kornadt A. E., Kessler E. M., et al. 2020. “Views on Ageing: A Lifespan Perspective.” European Journal of Ageing 17, no. 4: 387–401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee, D. , Yamazaki Y., Kuwamizu R., Okamoto M., and Soya H.. 2025. “Prefrontal Executive Function Enhanced by Prior Acute Inhalation of Low‐Dose Hypoxic Gas: Modulation via Cardiac Vagal Activity.” NeuroImage 310: 121139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lefferts, W. , Davis M., and Valentine R.. 2022. “Exercise as an Aging Mimetic: A New Perspective on the Mechanisms Behind Exercise as Preventive Medicine Against Age‐Related Chronic Disease.” Frontiers in Physiology 13: 866792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Leise, T. , Leise T. L., Harrington M. E., et al. 2013. “Voluntary Exercise Can Strengthen the Circadian System in Aged Mice.” Age 35: 2137–2152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Leman, A. , Leman A. R., Noguchi C., Lee C. Y., and Noguchi E.. 2010. “Human Timeless and Tipin Stabilize Replication Forks and Facilitate Sister‐Chromatid Cohesion.” Journal of Cell Science 123, no. 5: 660–670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Li, D. , Su Y., Tu J., et al. 2016. “Evolutionary Conservation of the Circadian Gene Timeout in Metazoa.” Animal Biology 66, no. 1: 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  33. Li, T. , Liu X., Yang B., et al. 2025. “Selenium‐Loaded Porous Silica Nanospheres Improve Cardiac Repair After Myocardial Infarction by Enhancing Antioxidant Activity and Mitophagy.” Free Radical Biology and Medicine 232: 292–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Li, Y. , Tan Y., and Zhao Z.. 2024. “Impacts of Aging on Circadian Rhythm and Related Sleep Disorders.” Biosystems 236: 105111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, Y. , Zhai Q., Li G., and Peng W.. 2024. “Effects of Different Aerobic Exercises on Blood Lipid Levels in Middle‐Aged and Elderly People: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta‐Analysis Based on Randomized Controlled Trials.” Health 12, no. 13: 1309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Liberale, L. , Tual‐Chalot S., Sedej S., et al. 2025. “Roadmap for Alleviating the Manifestations of Ageing in the Cardiovascular System.” Nature Reviews Cardiology 22, no. 8: 577–605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lin, Y. , Wen D. T., Sun Q. Y., Lv S. Z., Wang J. Y., and Ma X. F.. 2026. “Exercise Alleviates the Obesity‐Related Dysfunction of Skeletal Muscle and Heart Caused by Akh Gene Knockdown in Drosophila .” Life Sciences 389: 124237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ma, Y. , Zheng J., Liu Y., Zheng Z., Yang F., and Yu M.. 2025. “Irisin Ameliorates Age‐Associated Skeletal Muscle Atrophy in Mice: Potential Involvement of Iron Overload and SIRT1/p53 Pathway.” Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry 81, no. 4: 1199–1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Mafra, A. , Laversanne M., Marcos‐Gragera R., et al. 2025. “The Global Multiple Myeloma Incidence and Mortality Burden in 2022 and Predictions for 2045.” JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 117, no. 5: 907–914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mazzoccoli, G. , Laukkanen M. O., Vinciguerra M., Colangelo T., and Colantuoni V.. 2016. “A Timeless Link Between Circadian Patterns and Disease.” Trends in Molecular Medicine 22, no. 1: 68–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. McHill, A. , and Wright K.. 2017. “Role of Sleep and Circadian Disruption on Energy Expenditure and in Metabolic Predisposition to Human Obesity and Metabolic Disease.” Obesity Reviews 18: 15–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Mendez, S. , Watanabe L., Hill R., et al. 2016. “The TreadWheel: A Novel Apparatus to Measure Genetic Variation in Response to Gently Induced Exercise for Drosophila .” PLoS One 11, no. 10: e0164706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Mu, W. , Zhang Q. J., Tang X. Q., et al. 2014. “Overexpression of a Dominant‐Negative Mutant of SIRT1 in Mouse Heart Causes Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis and Early‐Onset Heart Failure.” Science China. Life Sciences 57, no. 9: 915–924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nishimura, M. , Ocorr K., Bodmer R., and Cartry J.. 2011. “ Drosophila as a Model to Study Cardiac Aging.” Experimental Gerontology 46, no. 5: 326–330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ocorr, K. , Vogler G., and Bodmer R.. 2014. “Methods to Assess Drosophila Heart Development, Function and Aging.” Methods 68, no. 1: 265–272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rakshit, K. , Krishnan N., Guzik E. M., Pyza E., and Giebultowicz J. M.. 2012. “Effects of Aging on the Molecular Circadian Oscillations in Drosophila .” Chronobiology International 29, no. 1: 5–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Sato, M. , Kadomatsu T., Morinaga J., et al. 2025. “HINT1 Suppression Protects Against Age‐Related Cardiac Dysfunction by Enhancing Mitochondrial Biogenesis.” Molecular Metabolism 93: 102107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Scudese, E. , Marshall A. G., Vue Z., et al. 2025. “3D Mitochondrial Structure in Aging Human Skeletal Muscle: Insights Into MFN‐2‐Mediated Changes.” Aging Cell 24, no. 7: e70054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Semel, M. , Lukasiewicz C., and Hepple R.. 2025. “Novel Insights to Mitochondrial Impact in Aging Skeletal Muscle.” Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews 53, no. 3: 101–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tang, H. , Inoki K., Brooks S. V., et al. 2019. “mTORC1 Underlies Age‐Related Muscle Fiber Damage and Loss by Inducing Oxidative Stress and Catabolism.” Aging Cell 18, no. 3: e12943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tinkerhess, M. J. , Ginzberg S., Piazza N., and Wessells R. J.. 2012. “Endurance Training Protocol and Longitudinal Performance Assays for Drosophila melanogaster .” Journal of Visualized Experiments 61: 3786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Umezaki, Y. , Yoshii T., Kawaguchi T., Helfrich‐Förster C., and Tomioka K.. 2012. “Pigment‐Dispersing Factor Is Involved in Age‐Dependent Rhythm Changes in Drosophila melanogaster .” Journal of Biological Rhythms 27: 423–432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang, H. , He W., Chen P., et al. 2025. “Exerkines and Myokines in Aging Sarcopenia.” Frontiers in Endocrinology 16: 1592491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang, J. , Wen D. T., Wang S. J., Gao Y. H., and Yin X. Y.. 2023. “Muscle‐Specific Overexpression of Atg2 Gene and Endurance Exercise Delay Age‐Related Deteriorations of Skeletal Muscle and Heart Function via Activating the AMPK/Sirt1/PGC‐1α Pathway in Male Drosophila .” FASEB Journal 37: e23214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wang, K. , Gan M., Lei Y., et al. 2025. “Perspectives on Mitochondrial Dysfunction in the Regeneration of Aging Skeletal Muscle.” Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters 30, no. 1: 94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wang, Z. , Yang S., Ping Z., et al. 2024. “Age‐Induced Accumulation of Succinate Promotes Cardiac Fibrogenesis.” Circulation Research 134: 1–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang, Z. , Zhang C., Warden C. D., et al. 2022. “Loss of SIRT1 Inhibits Hematopoietic Stem Cell Aging and Age‐Dependent Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia.” Communications Biology 5, no. 1: 396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wei, Y. , Giunta S., and Xia S.. 2022. “Hypoxia in Aging and Aging‐Related Diseases: Mechanism and Therapeutic Strategies.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 15: 8165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wen, D. , Wen D. T., Zheng L., et al. 2019. “Endurance Exercise Resistance to Lipotoxic Cardiomyopathy Is Associated With Cardiac NAD+/dSIR2/PGC‐1α Pathway Activation in Old Drosophila .” Biology Open 8, no. 10: bio044719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wen, D.‐T. , Wang W. Q., Hou W. Q., Cai S. X., and Zhai S. S.. 2020. “Endurance Exercise Protects Aging Drosophila From High‐Salt Diet (HSD)‐Induced Climbing Capacity Decline and Lifespan Decrease by Enhancing Antioxidant Capacity.” Biology Open 9, no. 5: bio.045260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Yang, L. , Liu D., Jiang S., et al. 2024. “SIRT1 Signaling Pathways in Sarcopenia: Novel Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutic Targets.” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 177: 116917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Yi, W. , Chen F., Yuan M., et al. 2024. “High‐Fat Diet Induces Cognitive Impairment Through Repression of SIRT1/ AMPK‐Mediated Autophagy.” Experimental Neurology 371: 114591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Yin, X. Y. , Wen D. T., Li H. Y., Gao Z. Q., Gao Y., and Hao W.. 2025. “Endurance Exercise Attenuates Gαq‐RNAi Induced Hereditary Obesity and Skeletal Muscle Dysfunction via Improving Skeletal Muscle Srl/MRCC‐I Pathway in Drosophila .” Scientific Reports 14, no. 1: 28207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhang, J. , Chen X., and wan C.. 2025. “Aerobic Exercise Rehabilitation Training Alleviates Skeletal Muscle Atrophy Caused by Heart Failure in Mice Through the SIRT1/PGC‐1α Pathway.” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology 86, no. 3: 291–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhang, J. , He Z., Fedorova J., et al. 2021. “Alterations in Mitochondrial Dynamics With Age‐Related Sirtuin1/Sirtuin3 Deficiency Impair Cardiomyocyte Contractility.” Aging Cell 20, no. 7: e13419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhang, J. , Yu S., Hu Y., Hu X., and Zhang W.. 2025. “Impact of China's Renewable Energy Product Exports on Host Countries' Energy Transition R&D: The Role of Population Aging.” Energy Economics 144: 108310. [Google Scholar]
  67. Zhang, X. , Zhang B., Qin X., Tang L., and Wang C.. 2025. “Electroacupuncture Ameliorates Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress via the SIRT1/FOXO1 Autophagy Pathway: An Animal Study.” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 29, no. 4: e70436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Zheng, L. , Li Q. F., Ni L., Wang H., Ruan X. C., and Wu X. S.. 2017. “Lifetime Regular Exercise Affects the Incident of Different Arrhythmias and Improves Organismal Health in Aging Female Drosophila melanogaster .” Biogerontology 18, no. 1: 97–108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhou, J. , Zhang Y., Zou X., et al. 2020. “Aberrantly Expressed Timeless Regulates Cell Proliferation and Cisplatin Efficacy in Cervical Cancer.” Human Gene Therapy 31: 385–395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All the generated data and the analysis developed in this study are included in this article.


Articles from Aging Cell are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES