Abstract
Cobalt catalysts have been widely studied for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, yet they gradually deactivate under water-rich reaction conditions. Current stabilization strategies rely on complex catalyst compositions or even use noble-metal promoters. Here, we demonstrate that cobalt deactivation can be effectively hindered by physically regulating water diffusion. By physical mixing of a classical Co/SiO2 catalyst with hydrophobic polydivinylbenzene, a microenvironment is created that promotes directional water transport away from the cobalt. As a result, stable Fischer-Tropsch operation is achieved for 1200 hours, maintaining high activity with 88-90% selectivity toward C5+ hydrocarbons, minimal methane and CO2 production. Mechanistic investigations suggest that the combination of hydrophobic polymer could promote directional water removal from the catalyst surface. These findings demonstrate a practical strategy for stabilizing highly water-sensitive catalysts.
Subject terms: Heterogeneous catalysis, Catalyst synthesis, Catalytic mechanisms
Cobalt catalysts are widely used for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis but gradually deactivate under water-rich reaction conditions. Here, the authors demonstrate a practical strategy to stabilize these water-sensitive catalysts by regulating water diffusion.
Introduction
Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS) provides a versatile route for converting syngas derived from coal, biomass, and natural gas into fuels and chemicals1–7. Among the various catalytic systems, supported cobalt nanoparticles have been widely used in industrial FTS since the pioneering work of Fischer and Tropsch, owing to their high activity and selectivity toward long-chain hydrocarbons1,2,4,5,8–13. Despite these advantages, cobalt catalysts remain fundamentally limited by deactivation during operation1,11–16, which is closely associated with the accumulation of oxygen-containing species under FTS conditions. CO dissociation on cobalt generates adsorbed oxygen species (*O). If these oxygen species are not efficiently removed by hydrogen, they can accumulate on the cobalt surface and promote cobalt oxidation14–18. Conversely, hydrogen reacts with these oxygen species to form water, thereby regenerating metallic cobalt sites19,20. The generated water may subsequently reabsorb and dissociate on cobalt, further contributing to cobalt oxidation18,21,22. In addition, elevated water concentrations shift the local reaction environment toward oxidation and inhibit the hydrogen-assisted removal of surface oxygen species16,19,23. Consequently, the state of cobalt under FTS conditions is dynamically governed by the balance between reducing (e.g., H2) and oxidizing (e.g., H2O) capabilities of the reaction environment14,16,19,23.
Considerable effort has been devoted to mitigating the deactivation by strengthening metal-support interactions using reducible oxides, such as Al2O3, TiO2, and CeO224,25. However, under hydrothermal FTS conditions, these approaches may lead to the formation of irreversibly inactive mixed oxides (e.g., CoAl2O4)1,4,26–29. A variety of strategies have been developed to improve cobalt catalyst stability, including the incorporation of noble-metal (e.g., Ir12, Pt30,31, Rh32, Ru4,31,33) or non-noble-metal promoters (e.g., Zr and Mn34), which can facilitate oxygen removal and/or stabilize the hexagonal close-packed cobalt phase12. While effective, this approach substantially increases catalyst cost and complexity. An alternative approach involves modifying the catalyst with hydrophobic organosilane layers, which can partially mitigate the detrimental effects of water35–37. Chemical modification often introduces phyllosilicate species or alters surface chemistry, thereby reducing catalytic performance. Physical incorporation of hydrophobic modifiers has been shown to enhance the activity of carbide catalysts in syngas-to-olefin conversion38. However, whether hydrophobic domains that are spatially separated from the catalyst surface can effectively influence the local water environment and even the chemical state of metallic cobalt catalysts remain unclear39,40.
Here we demonstrate that physical regulation of water diffusion offers an effective and scalable route to stabilizing cobalt catalysts in FTS. By physically mixing a classical silica-supported cobalt catalyst (Co/SiO2) with a low content of hydrophobic polydivinylbenzene (e.g., 5 wt%), cobalt deactivation is completely suppressed under FTS conditions. The resulting catalyst exhibits stable performance over 1200 h of continuous operation, maintaining high CO conversion and 88-90% selectivity toward C5+ hydrocarbons with low methane formation, whereas the unmodified Co/SiO2 catalyst rapidly deactivates. Mechanistic investigations suggest that the coexistence of hydrophilic catalytic domains and hydrophobic polymer domains facilitates water transport away from the catalyst surface, thereby reducing water accumulation within the catalyst granules. This mitigates water-induced oxidation and structural evolution during operation, contributing to the exceptional catalyst stability observed under FTS conditions. These results demonstrate that regulating local water transport provides an effective strategy for improving the durability of cobalt FTS catalysts without catalyst redesign.
Results and discussion
Catalysis in FTS
The cobalt-based catalyst supported on silica was prepared by conventional deposition, yielding a Co/SiO2 catalyst with a cobalt loading of 13.2 wt% (Supplementary Fig. 1). Under FTS conditions at 220 °C and a syngas pressure of 2.0 MPa, the catalyst (diluted with quartz sand) initially exhibited a CO conversion of 67.9% and a C5+ selectivity of 88.2% (Fig. 1a). However, significant deactivation was observed over the Co/SiO2 catalyst: after 80, 201, and 592 h of reaction, CO conversion declined to 44.3%, 30.2%, and 7.4%, while C₅₊ selectivity also decreased to 87.2%, 83.6%, and 59.4%, respectively. These findings align with previous observations of cobalt catalyst deactivation during FTS12,16. Such deactivation has been widely associated with multiple processes, including cobalt oxidation, structural evolution, and sintering under water-rich reaction environments17.
Fig. 1. Catalytic data.

a Data showing the durability of Co/SiO2 and Co/SiO2-Pmix catalysts in FTS. Reaction conditions: 0.5 g of Co/SiO2 catalyst, or a mixture of 0.5 g of Co/SiO2 and 0.025 g of PDVB in a granule mixing manner, granule size at 40–60 mesh, 2.0 MPa of syngas (H2/CO ratio at 2), 2400 mL gcat−1 h−1, 220 °C. b Product distribution of the FTS over Co/SiO2-Pmix catalyst. c Data showing the performance of Co/SiO2 catalyst mixed with PDVB with different mixing manners. The reaction conditions are the same as those in Fig. 1a, except for changing the mixing manners of 0.5 g of Co/SiO2 and 1.0 g of PDVB. More PDVB was used to facilitate experimental operation and comparison. d Data showing the deactivation rates of various catalysts with different mixing manners. The error bounds for CO conversion and product selectivity were ±2%.
The catalyst, denoted as Co/SiO2-Pmix, was prepared by mechanically mixing Co/SiO2 granules with hydrophobic polydivinylbenzene granules, both having sizes of 40–60 mesh (PDVB, water-droplet contact angle 144.9°, irregular morphology, surface area <3 m2/g; Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3). Under the FTS conditions, PDVB was chemically inert and stable and did not melt or flow, which might otherwise encapsulate or block the catalyst surface (Supplementary Figs. 4–7). The catalyst bed volume of Co/SiO2-Pmix was kept consistent with that in the test over the Co/SiO2 catalyst diluted with quartz sand. The Co/SiO2-Pmix catalyst, having a weight ratio of PDVB to Co/SiO2 at 1/20, demonstrated an initial CO conversion of 44.1% and a C5+ selectivity of about 90.0% (Fig. 1a). This performance remained stable over a 1200-h time-on-stream test with undetectable deactivation, suggesting the potential for an even longer lifetime. Throughout the reaction, methane and CO2 selectivities were consistently maintained at about 5.7% and <1.0%, respectively (Fig. 1a, b). This result underscores the critical role of PDVB in enhancing the durability of the Co/SiO2 catalyst. Generally supported cobalt catalysts exhibit limited durability and rapid deactivation in FTS (Supplementary Table 1).
The optimal PDVB contents within the catalyst system were determined by adjusting the PDVB-to-Co/SiO2 weight ratio (Supplementary Table 2). All these tests were performed by mixing Co/SiO2 granules with hydrophobic polydivinylbenzene granules at 40–60 mesh. A ratio of 1/20 was initially identified as effective in stabilizing performance. To further probe the minimum requirement, the PDVB content was reduced to a 1/50 ratio; this catalyst exhibited deactivation, declining from an initial conversion of 69.0% to 54.1% after 50 h (Supplementary Fig. 8). Nevertheless, this deactivation rate was slower than that observed for the bare Co/SiO2 catalyst, indicating a beneficial but insufficient effect of PDVB. Increasing the PDVB content to ratios between 1/15 and 1/0.5 effectively suppressed deactivation, maintaining stable CO conversion with undetectable activity loss over time (Supplementary Fig. 9). These results confirm that sufficient PDVB content is critical for stabilizing catalytic performance. However, exceeding this threshold of 1/20 inversely reduced the initial CO conversions, although the C5+ selectivity remained unaffected.
Different manners for mixing the Co/SiO2 catalyst with PDVB for FTS were studied (Fig. 1c, d and Supplementary Table 3). In a dual-bed manner, where Co/SiO2 and PDVB granules were segregated into upper and lower beds with an intervening quartz sand layer, the catalytic performance was comparable to that of the unmodified Co/SiO2. This setup proved ineffective, as an initial CO conversion of 75.9% was followed by a decline to 36.5% within 94 h (Supplementary Fig. 10). Alternatively, in the granule mixing manner, we varied the granule size to control the proximity between the two components (Supplementary Table 4). A mixture of 40–60 mesh granules sustained a stable CO conversion of 32.7% over the catalyst with PDVB-to-Co/SiO2 weight ratio of 1/0.5, and 44.1% over the catalyst with PDVB-to-Co/SiO2 weight ratio of 1/20. In contrast, mixtures with larger granules (10–20 mesh and 20–40 mesh) exhibited gradual deactivation. In the powder mixing manner with the closest proximity, where the Co/SiO2 powder was mixed with PDVB powder and then made into 40–60 mesh granules but having adjusted PDVB-to-Co/SiO2 weight ratio at 1/20 and 1/0.5 (Supplementary Fig. 11 and Fig. 1c, d), the CO conversion was 32.4% and 27.2%, with C5+ selectivity of 86.9% and 87.5%, respectively, which are lower than that over Co/SiO2-Pmix catalyst with 40–60 mesh granule mixture. Importantly, these performances were also stable with undetectable deactivation in the continuous test (Supplementary Fig. 12). A control experiment, mixing the Co/SiO2 powder with inert quartz powder, resulted in even more severe deactivation (CO conversion of 18.5% after 49 h of reaction, Supplementary Fig. 13) than the bare Co/SiO2 catalyst.
All the aforementioned results confirm the effect of PDVB in inhibiting cobalt deactivation during FTS, where proximity between PDVB and Co/SiO2 is necessary to achieve this goal, as in powder or small-size granule mixtures. Notably, the PDVB and quartz sand were non-porous, with negligible porosity, as confirmed by N2 sorption measurements (Supplementary Figs. 2 and 14), thereby excluding the effects of porosity and particle packing on the catalytic performance. Regarding the influence of heat transfer to catalysis, we performed control experiments using silicon carbide (SiC) granules as a diluent for the Co/SiO2 catalyst. SiC exhibits negligible porosity (Supplementary Fig. 15), similar to quartz sand and PDVB, thereby minimizing differences arising from pore-related transport effects. In terms of surface properties, SiC is hydrophilic, which is similar to quartz sand but distinctly different from hydrophobic PDVB (Supplementary Figs. 3 and 16). Importantly, SiC possesses a significantly higher thermal conductivity (>50 W m−1 K−1) than both quartz sand (<2 W m−1 K−1) and PDVB (<0.3 W m−1 K−1)41. Therefore, employing SiC as a reference enables decoupling heat dissipation from other factors. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 17, the Co/SiO2 catalyst diluted with SiC exhibits a continuous decline in conversion over time, similar to the behavior observed with quartz sand. We even conducted control experiments at a slightly elevated reaction temperature (225 °C). As shown in Supplementary Fig. 18 and Supplementary Table 5, the Co/SiO2 catalyst diluted with either SiC or SiO2 still exhibits obvious deactivation, whereas the Co/SiO2-PDVB system maintains stable performance. Furthermore, we physically mixed Co/SiO2 with other hydrophobic materials, including hydrophobic graphite, methyl-modified silica (SiO2-Me), and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) (Supplementary Fig. 19). In all cases, we observed a similar enhancement in catalytic stability compared to the unmodified Co/SiO2 catalyst (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. 20, and Supplementary Table 6). These results indicate that the improved performance is not specific to PDVB, but instead arises from the introduction of hydrophobic domains into the catalyst bed.
Oxidation state of cobalt during catalysis
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the spent Co/SiO2 showed cobalt nanoparticles with an average size of 28.5 nm, which is obviously larger than 13.1 nm of the as-reduced catalyst before reaction (Supplementary Figs. 21 and 22). This phenomenon is generally observed on supported cobalt nanoparticle catalysts, due to the redox cycle during CO cleavage and water production, which leads to dynamic changes in cobalt15,17,42. Further high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) characterization revealed a distinct oxide layer surrounding the cobalt metal particles in the Co/SiO2 catalyst (Fig. 2a, b). The corresponding inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) images showed that the oxide shell has a characteristic lattice spacing of the CoO(111) plane (Fig. 2e, green region), which is consistent with the general phenomena observed in cobalt catalysts in FTS17. The internal nanoparticle region has a characteristic lattice spacing of the metallic Co(111) plane (red region), which is unaffected by surface oxidation. In contrast, the surface CoOx layers were minimized in the HRTEM images of the spent Co/SiO2-Pmix catalyst (Fig. 2c, d). The corresponding IFFT images show some oxide regions on the cobalt surface (Fig. 2f, green region), but they are much less than those on the spent Co/SiO2 without PDVB. Multiple regions on each sample were examined to ensure a representative assessment of the cobalt state, where similar results were obtained (Supplementary Figs. 23 and 24). This indicates that the PDVB-containing catalyst exhibits a lower extent of cobalt oxidation than Co/SiO2. Furthermore, we investigated the evolution of cobalt oxidation states by H2-TPR analysis of the spent catalysts, using hydrogen consumption as an indicator of reducible cobalt oxide species (Supplementary Fig. 25). The spent Co/SiO2-Pmix catalyst shows a hydrogen consumption comparable to that of the fresh Co/SiO2 catalyst, while the spent Co/SiO2 catalyst exhibits a significantly higher hydrogen consumption. These results are consistent with the HRTEM observations and further support that PDVB could suppress cobalt oxidation under reaction conditions. During the FTS, the Co nanoparticles on the Co/SiO2-Pmix catalyst have an average size of 20.7 nm (Supplementary Fig. 26)43,44. Previous studies have shown that cobalt activity becomes much less sensitive to particle size once the cobalt crystallites exceed approximately 6–8 nm44,45. The observed increase in particle size may contribute to some loss of activity. Indeed, a slight decrease in CO conversion was observed during the initial stage of the reaction (Supplementary Fig. 27). Although the spent Co/SiO2 and Co/SiO2-Pmix catalysts exhibited different average cobalt particle sizes (28.5 and 20.7 nm, respectively), such a difference in cobalt particle size alone cannot account for their substantial performance difference45,46, where the spent Co/SiO2 and Co/SiO2-Pmix catalysts showed CO conversions of 7.4% (after 592 h) and 44.1% (after 1200 h), respectively.
Fig. 2. Characterization of spent cobalt catalysts.

HRTEM images of the spent (a, b) Co/SiO2 and (c, d) Co/SiO2-Pmix catalysts. e, f HRTEM images characterizing the spent Co/SiO2 and Co/SiO2-Pmix catalysts, and the corresponding IFFT images with colored images showing the distribution of CoO (green) and Co (red) in real space. g Normalized Co K-edge XANES spectra of spent catalysts after THF extraction and vacuum drying. h H2-TPR profiles of Co/SiO2 and Co/SiO2-Pmix catalysts after a pre-treatment in ambient-pressure syngas for 100 h. i XRD patterns of as-synthesized Co/SiO2, spent Co/SiO2, and spent Co/SiO2-Pmix catalysts, which show the hcp-to-fcc ratio through refinement via a full Rietveld analysis.
Figure 2g shows the X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra of the spent Co/SiO2 and Co/SiO2-Pmix catalysts, showing the curve falling between that of the CoO and Co foil. The spectrum of the spent Co/SiO2-Pmix catalyst is close to the cobalt foil, while the spectrum of the spent Co/SiO2 catalyst is located nearer to CoO. These data also confirm the maximized metallic state of cobalt on the spent Co/SiO2-Pmix catalyst, while the cobalt on the Co/SiO2 catalyst was more oxidized. To gain further insight into the effect of PDVB on cobalt oxidation by syngas, the cobalt catalysts were pretreated with atmospheric-pressure syngas for 100 h, then switched to hydrogen to collect the temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) signals47. Although this condition differs from the high-pressure syngas in FTS reactions, it allows a direct comparison of the cobalt oxidation with and without PDVB. The syngas pretreated Co/SiO2 showed a water signal (m/z of 18) at 248 °C assigned to the reduction of active lattice oxygen48, while it is extremely weak on the syngas pretreated Co/SiO2-Pmix (Fig. 2h). This result confirms efficient hindrance of the oxidation of metallic cobalt upon the addition of PDVB, in good agreement with TEM and XANES results.
Under FTS conditions, the redox cycle of cobalt can induce a phase transition from close-packed (hcp) to face-centered cubic (fcc), which in turn contributes to a decline in catalyst activity16,49–52. We find that suppressing the detrimental effects of water markedly stabilizes the hcp cobalt phase. XRD analysis of the as-synthesized Co/SiO2 catalyst shows an initial hcp-to-fcc ratio of 1.15, which decreases to 0.40 after 592 h of FTS reaction, reflecting pronounced hcp-to-fcc transformation (Fig. 2i and Supplementary Fig. 28). In contrast, the spent Co/SiO2-Pmix catalyst retains an hcp-to-fcc ratio of 0.97 after reaction for 1200 h, indicating effective preservation of the hcp cobalt phase by mixing the hydrophobic promoter (Supplementary Fig. 29).
Rapid water escape
Previous studies employed the ratio of the partial pressures of water and hydrogen (pH2O/pH2) as an important indicator of the oxidation tendency of cobalt catalysts under FTS conditions53,54. Under FTS with CO conversion of about 44%, the Co/SiO2 catalyst gradually deactivated at a pH2O/pH2 ratio of about 0.40, whereas physical mixing with PDVB substantially mitigated this deactivation (Supplementary Figs. 30 and 31). To further probe the effect of water, additional water was introduced into the syngas feed to increase the pH2O/pH2 ratio to 0.52. Under these more water-rich conditions, the Co/SiO2-Pmix catalyst exhibited remarkable water tolerance, maintaining a stable CO conversion of 34.7% (Fig. 3a). In contrast, the reference Co/SiO2 catalyst under the same conditions underwent pronounced deactivation, with the CO conversion decreasing from 52.8% to 23.8% after water addition.
Fig. 3. Study on PDVB effect.

a Data showing the performances of Co/SiO2 and Co/SiO2-Pmix catalysts with artificially induced additional water in the syngas feed. Reaction conditions: catalyst granule at 40–60 mesh, 2.0 MPa of syngas (H2/CO ratio at 2), 2400 mL gcat−1 h−1, 220 °C. The water feed rate was ~78 mg gcat−1 h−1. b H2-TPR profiles of CoOx/SiO2 and a mixture of CoOx/SiO2 and PDVB. The humid hydrogen (H2/H2O/Ar of 9.7/3.1/87.2) was used. c Temperature-programmed water desorption profiles of Co/SiO2 and Co/SiO2-Pmix samples. d Normalized water responses after switching the feed gas from syngas to argon in the TKA test over Co/SiO2 and Co/SiO2-Pmix catalysts at 220 °C. e Water adsorption profiles of Co/SiO2 and Co/SiO2-Pmix catalysts. f, g In situ XANES spectra at Co K-edge showing the change of Co/SiO2 and Co/SiO2-Pmix catalysts in syngas containing water (H2/CO/H2O/Ar of 62/31/3.1/3.9) at 220 °C.
Cobalt oxidation arises not only from reaction with water but also from the accumulation of surface *O atoms after CO cleavage, if they are not promptly removed by hydrogen39,55. To explore the role of PDVB in this process, H2-TPR was performed under humid conditions to examine the reduction behavior of cobalt oxide on silica (CoOx/SiO2). The pristine CoOx/SiO2 catalyst exhibited hydrogen consumption starting at 319 °C, with a principal reduction peak at 379 °C (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 32). Conversely, the mixed sample containing PDVB demonstrated a markedly lower onset temperature of 283 °C and a main peak at 340 °C. This shift toward lower temperatures indicates that PDVB promotes the reductive removal of reactive oxygen species from cobalt oxide.
During FTS, water forms on the cobalt and then desorbs into the reaction atmosphere15,56. We evaluate the effect of hydrophobic PDVB on water removal through water desorption experiments on water-saturated Co/SiO2 (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 33). While both Co/SiO2 and Co/SiO2-Pmix catalysts behaved similarly at low temperatures (<60 °C), the full water desorption was achieved for Co/SiO2-Pmix at 133 °C, at which temperature desorption on Co/SiO2 was only 80%, requiring 160 °C for full desorption.
The kinetics of water escape were quantified via transient kinetic analysis (TKA)57,58. Following catalyst pretreatment with syngas at 220 °C, which generated a detectable water signal confirming catalytic activity, the feed was switched to argon to collect water-escape signals. The subsequent decay of the water signal was monitored to determine the parameter τ, representing the water residence time. As shown in Fig. 3d, the signal decayed more rapidly for the Co/SiO2-Pmix catalyst, yielding residence times of about 80 and 175 s for Co/SiO2-Pmix and Co/SiO2, respectively. The spatial proximity of PDVB to Co/SiO2 was critical, with more intimate mixing within the granule mixture accelerating water diffusion (Supplementary Figs. 34 and 35). PDVB-promoted water desorption was directly visualized in a model dehydration experiment with CuSO4·5H2O, which undergoes a distinct color change from blue to white upon removal of crystallization water. When a small amount of PDVB (3.3 wt%) was physically mixed with CuSO4·5H2O, the dehydration‑induced color change was significantly accelerated under nitrogen purging at 100 °C (Supplementary Fig. 36a). In parallel, it was examined using a CoCl2 color‑change experiment, in which CoCl2 turns from blue to pink upon hydration by water vapor. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 36b, when CoCl2 was placed at the same position, replacing quartz sand with PDVB resulted in a faster color change, indicating decreased average water accumulation in the presence of PDVB. Based on these results, the slightly lower initial activity of Co/SiO2-Pmix may originate from the reduced local water concentration around the catalyst, because moderate amounts of water have previously been reported to promote FTS on silica-supported cobalt catalysts59. Therefore, while enhanced water removal improves long-term catalyst stability, it may simultaneously reduce the beneficial contribution of water during the initial stage of the reaction.
Beyond facilitating rapid water removal from the catalyst, the PDVB also effectively suppresses the re-adsorption of ambient water onto the catalyst. This is suggested by markedly slower water-adsorption kinetics for the Co/SiO2-Pmix compared to the Co/SiO2 (Fig. 3e and Supplementary Fig. 37). In situ water-adsorption Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were collected by introducing water vapor to the pre-dehydrated catalysts (Supplementary Fig. 38). Characteristic bands at 1615 and 3500–3000 cm−1 were enhanced on the Co/SiO2 sample, corresponding to adsorbed water molecules and increased O-H stretching vibrations, respectively60,61. In contrast, these spectral features were negligible on the Co/SiO2-Pmix catalyst under equivalent conditions. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) studies further supported these observations. We performed a steam treatment on the Co/SiO2 and Co/SiO2-Pmix catalysts in an ambient-pressure gas (9.7H2/3.1H2O/87.2Ar) at 220 °C for 10 min. As evidenced by the Co 2p XPS spectra (Supplementary Fig. 39a), steam treatment led to the disappearance of the Co0 signal for the Co/SiO2 catalyst, while XRD still clearly showed reflections characteristic of metallic Co and CoOx (Supplementary Fig. 39b). In contrast, the Co0 signal remained detectable in the water-treated Co/SiO2-Pmix catalyst, suggesting that the presence of PDVB minimizes cobalt oxidation.
To further probe changes in cobalt, the catalysts were exposed to a syngas-water vapor mixture, simulating the oxidation/reduction characteristics of the reaction atmosphere in the in situ XAS (Fig. 3f, g). Linear combination fitting (LCF) of the Co K-edge XANES spectra (Supplementary Figs. 40 and 41) was applied to quantify the fractions of metallic cobalt and cobalt oxides. The analysis indicated that the freshly reduced Co/SiO2 catalyst contained about 71% metallic cobalt, which transiently decreased to about 33% after 12 min upon exposure to humid syngas. This initial change reflects the dynamic evolution of cobalt species during catalyst startup rather than a thermodynamic oxidation boundary. Upon extended testing, partial re-reduction by syngas was observed, restoring the metallic cobalt fraction to about 56% after 60 min. In contrast, the Co/SiO2-Pmix showed a high fraction of metallic cobalt at about 71% with negligible change during the equivalent test.
Mechanism study
Previous studies have established that chemical grafting hydrophobic groups onto solid surfaces facilitates water desorption, which can be attributed to direct contact between the hydrophobic groups and the active sites5,62. However, for physically mixed Co/SiO2 and PDVB, a spatial distance exists between the hydrophilic catalyst and the hydrophobic polymer. It remains unclear how a hydrophobic surface, spatially separated from the hydrophilic Co/SiO2, can optimize water diffusion across the hydrophilic domain.
The internal architecture of catalyst granules (40–60 mesh) comprising PDVB and Co/SiO2 before and after reaction was examined using X-ray computed tomography (CT) with a monochromatic beam (Fig. 4a). This technique allows non-destructive visualization of the granule internal structure63. Owing to their differing densities, PDVB and silica exhibit distinct contrast in the CT images, permitting clear identification of each component. Figure 4b, c reveal a random distribution of PDVB and Co/SiO2 within the granule (Supplementary Movie 1), separated by interstitial channels with an average diameter of 4.0 ± 1.2 μm. A three-dimensional reconstruction of the pore network unveiled a highly interconnected channel system across the granule (Fig. 4d). After reaction, the internal structure of the spent catalyst remains essentially unchanged compared to the fresh sample (Supplementary Fig. 42). The channel walls consist of a combination of hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces. The hydrophilic surface, which has a higher surface free energy, creates regions with elevated local water vapor pressure (high-concentration region with higher chemical potential). Conversely, the hydrophobic surface, with its lower free energy, sustains areas of reduced water vapor pressure (low-concentration region with relatively lower chemical potential) (Fig. 4e). This disparity forms a spatial vapor pressure gradient, accelerating the diffusion of water from high chemical potential regions toward low chemical potential regions according to Fick’s first law64.
Fig. 4. Water diffusion in a catalyst granule.

a Schematic diagram of X-ray CT experiments. b Schematic of the imaging plane at the middle-cross section in one Co/SiO2-Pmix granule with powder mixture of Co/SiO2 and PDVB. c Image of the two-dimensional slice showing the distribution of Co/SiO2 (white) and PDVB (black). d Three-dimensional rendering of Co/SiO2-Pmix granule. Co/SiO2 (yellow) and PDVB (blue). e Scheme showing the water sorption equilibrium on the hydrophilic catalyst surface, water concentration gradient in the free region, and rapid water escape close to the hydrophobic surface. f Enhanced water transport model showing the water concentration map without and with a hydrophobic promoter. The pink dashed rectangle highlights the hydrophobic channel region (in the case of a hydrophobic promoter). The black circles indicate the concentration fronts, with relative concentrations of 67.8% (C1) and 35.7% (C2) of the injection concentration (C0). The models were obtained using OpenPNM.
Moreover, the adsorption-desorption equilibrium of water on hydrophilic surfaces is influenced by local water vapor pressure, according to Langmuir equation65; therefore, facilitating water escape from high-concentration region promotes a shift in this equilibrium on the hydrophilic surface (Fig. 4e). These observations suggest that hydrophilic-hydrophobic contrasts within the catalyst granules facilitate water transport and reduce water accumulation around cobalt particles, which is in good agreement with our experimental observations. Concurrently, water diffusion on hydrophobic surfaces is superfast compared with that in the general system, because of the extremely low effective viscosity of these water molecules66,67. This feature significantly enhances overall water-diffusion efficiency in the catalyst granules within the continuous-flow reactor. Indeed, similar phenomena are commonly observed in nature, where hydrophilic-hydrophobic surface contrasts facilitate molecular transport and promote the removal of water from hydrophobic regions68,69.
We developed a directional water diffusion model through a widely used pore network modeling package (OpenPNM)70 to study the influence of hydrophobic granules on the water diffusion in the reactor. As shown in Fig. 4f, the water molecules were injected from the left side, diffused through the model in the parallel channels, and escaped from the right side. In some of the channels, part of the walls was made hydrophobic (pink dashed rectangle), simulating the presence of hydrophobic catalyst granules. This model can visually represent the apparent water diffusion efficiency with hydrophobic regions in the reactor. In the model without hydrophobic regions, water diffusion is equivalent across all channels, resulting in a water concentration gradient from left to right. With the presence of hydrophobic regions, the water concentration in both the hydrophobic region and the surrounding areas is significantly reduced. To facilitate comparison of concentration distributions, two concentration fronts (C1/C0 at 67.8% and C2/C0 at 35.7%) are indicated by black circles. Upon inducing hydrophobic channel walls, both concentration fronts evolve from straight to curved profiles and exhibit a pronounced leftward shift. This phenomenon is attributed to accelerated water transport in the hydrophobic region, thereby reducing water concentration.
In summary, this work resolves a long-standing challenge in cobalt-based Fischer-Tropsch synthesis by demonstrating that cobalt catalyst deactivation can be effectively suppressed through engineering control of water transport. The PDVB-mixed cobalt catalyst exhibits fully stable performance over 1200 h of continuous operation, maintaining 88–90% selectivity toward C5+ hydrocarbons. These results establish that even highly water-sensitive metallic cobalt catalysts can be durably stabilized by regulating local water diffusion, rather than by modifying catalyst composition.
Compared with conventional stabilization strategies that rely on noble metals, this approach employs a low-cost, practically available hydrophobic material and is readily compatible with existing catalyst formulations, offering clear advantages for potentially practical use. In addition, the results suggest that hydrophilic-hydrophobic contrasts within catalyst granules facilitate water transport and reduce water accumulation around cobalt particles, thereby mitigating water-induced deactivation. More broadly, this study highlights local water transport as an important and tunable factor in stabilizing catalysts operating in water-rich reaction environments.
Methods
Materials
Co(NO3)2⋅6H2O (99%), divinylbenzene, azobis isobutyronitrile, and fumed nanosilica were obtained from Shanghai Aladdin Co., Ltd. The gases were supplied by Hangzhou Jingong Special Gas Co., Ltd.
Synthesis of Co/SiO2
1.0 g of fumed nanosilica was dispersed in 5 mL aqueous cobalt (Ⅱ) nitrate solution (0.68 mol/L), then the liquor was dried at 120 °C under milling to evaporate the water. The obtained solid powder was calcined in air at 400 °C for 4 h (temperature ramping rate of 2 °C/min). The obtained sample was noted as CoOx/SiO2. After reducing in flowing hydrogen at 400 °C for 6 h (temperature ramping rate of 1 °C/min) and passivating in 1% O2/N2 at 50 °C for 30 min, the sample of Co/SiO2 was finally obtained. The cobalt loading was 13.2 wt% by an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) analysis.
Synthesis of PDVB
Five hundred milligrams of azobis isobutyronitrile was added to 10 g of divinylbenzene under stirring at room temperature for 1.0 h, then the liquor was transferred to an autoclave and thermally treated at 100 °C for 24 h. The obtained solid was washed with ethanol and dried at 100 °C overnight to obtain non-porous polydivinylbenzene (PDVB).
Catalyst characterization
Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) profiles were collected on a Rigaku D/MAX 2550 and Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å). Nitrogen sorption isotherms were measured using a High-Performance Microporous Analyzer (UtraSorb 4802 system). The specific surface area (SBET) was calculated using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were recorded on a JEM-2100F electron microscope (JEOL, Japan) operated at 200 kV. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images were obtained using an FEI Titan G2 80-200 ChemiSTEM microscope equipped with a spherical aberration corrector, operated at 200 kV. The probe convergence angle was set to about 21 mrad, and the annular detection angle of BF images was about 0–20 mrad. The low-order aberrations were adjusted to an acceptable level, e.g., Cs < 0.5 μm, A1 < 2 nm, A2 < 20 nm, B2 < 20 nm. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) characterizations were performed with Hitachi SU-8010 electron microscopes. Metal loadings of the catalysts were determined by an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES, PerkinElmer AvioTM 200). Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) characterization was performed with the Thermo Nicolet NEXUS 470 FT-IR system. Water droplet contact angles were measured with a video-based contact angle measuring device (OCA 20, Dataphysics Co. Ltd). The water vapor adsorption and desorption measurement was performed by a gravimetric vapor adsorption analyzer (3H-2000PW, BeiShiDe Instrument Co. Ltd., China). Thermogravimetric curves (TG) were performed on a NETZSCH STA 449 F5 Jupiter® simultaneous TG-DSC in flowing air with a heating rate of 10 °C/min. The X-ray photoelectron spectra of the catalysts were recorded on a Kratos Amicus spectrometer using Al Kα radiation (1486.6 eV). The measurement was conducted on the ThermoFisher ESCALAB Qxi spectrometer under a high vacuum at ambient temperature. To obtain the XPS spectra, the pressure of the analysis chamber was maintained at 1 × 10−6 Pa.
Temperature-programmed reduction with hydrogen (H2-TPR) was performed using a fixed-bed glass reactor connected to a mass spectrometer (SRD200M, TILON GRP TECHNOLOGY LIMITED). 0.05 g of CoOx/SiO2 was localized in the middle of the reactor tube (40–60 mesh) and pre-treated under a pure Ar flow at 400 °C for 30 min (flow rate at 30 mL/min). Then, the temperature cooled down to 50 °C. The hydrogen and water signals (m/z at 2 and 18) were collected in flowing 10% H2/Ar (flow rate 10 mL/min, humidified with water at room temperature) by raising the temperature from 50 to 700 °C at a ramping rate of 10 °C/min.
Water-adsorption Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) were collected using an FTIR spectrometer with an in situ cell (Thermo, Nicolet 6700). In a typical run, 16 mg of catalyst was pre-treated under 10% H2/Ar at 300 °C for 30 min. The system was cooled down in flowing Ar, and the background spectra were recorded at different temperatures. Then, the syngas was introduced to the catalyst at 220 °C for 1.0 h with a flow rate of 20 mL/min under atmospheric pressure, and the spectra were recorded every 3 min. Water vapor was introduced into the system by controlling the feed gas flowing through water at room temperature.
In situ X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectra at Co K-edge were obtained on the 1W1B beamline of Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility (BSRF) operated at 2.5 GeV and 250 mA. The measurement was performed at 300 °C in a 10% H2/Ar flow or at 220 °C in a syngas flow (H2/CO = 2). The Linear Combination Fitting (LCF) range was from −20 to 30 eV, based on E0, to calculate the component fraction content. Ex situ XAFS spectra at Co K-edge (E0 = 7709 eV) were collected at the TableXAFS-500. The XAFS data were recorded in transmission mode using a standard Lytle ion chamber. The energy was calibrated according to the absorption edge of pure Co foil. The data were extracted, and the profiles were fitted according to the Athena and Artemis codes. X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) experiments were performed at station BL13HB of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF) using a monochromatic X-ray beam (energy = 15 KeV). Throughout, the catalysts were supported in the pipette tip. For characterizing the spent catalysts after FTS, the wax was removed, followed by vacuum drying, then the samples were handled in a nitrogen-filled glovebox and loaded into the XANES sample holder. The sample was sealed with a Kapton film during transfer and measurement, thereby minimizing exposure to air.
Transient kinetic analysis (TKA) was performed on a tubular reactor connected to an online mass spectrometer. Typically, the catalysts were reduced in a hydrogen flow (50 mL/min) at 300 °C for 0.5 h. Then the samples were treated at 220 °C in syngas flow (20 mL/min) for reaction until the water signal (m/z of 18) is constant. Ar flow (20 mL/min) was then introduced to replace syngas by quickly switching through a 4-way valve. Signals characterizing the water desorption from the catalyst granules were collected.
Catalytic tests in FTS
The feed gas conversion was performed in a fixed-bed flow reactor with an inner diameter of 8 mm. Typically, 0.5 g of Co/SiO2 catalyst (40–60 mesh) and 0.025 g of PDVB (40–60 mesh) were mixed and localized in the middle of the reactor unless otherwise stated. Additional quartz sand was placed in the reactor to maintain the catalyst bed. The reactor was heated to 220 °C, and the feed gas (H2/CO/Ar molar ratio at 64/32/4) was introduced into the reactor under a pressure of 2 MPa. The gaseous products from the reactor were analyzed using two online gas chromatographs (Fu Li-9790). One is equipped with a TDX-01 column (3 m × 3 mm) and a thermal conductivity detector (TCD), and the other is equipped with a capillary PLOT-Al2O3 column (50 m × 0.53 mm × 0.25 μm) and a flame ionization detector (FID). Argon was used as an internal standard for calculating CO conversion and product selectivity (CO2 and CH4) in TCD-GC. The liquid-phase products collected by the cold and hot traps were analyzed using an offline Shimadzu GC-14C gas chromatograph equipped with an HP-5 column (60 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm) and FID. Product selectivity was calculated based on the number of carbon atoms, and the total carbon balance was typically greater than 95%. To study the effect of water on catalysts, water vapor was introduced into the system by switching the valve to flow through the bubble bottle.
After the FTS reaction, the reactor was cooled to room temperature under an inert gas flow. The spent catalyst granules were collected and transferred into a vacuum bag. The wax products were removed by washing the spent catalyst with THF at room temperature for 30 min. The washing procedure was followed by vacuum drying at room temperature for 3 h.
Computational Methods
Pore network modelling (PNM) was conducted to elucidate the water transport behavior on the mixed PDVB and Co/SiO2 catalyst granule. The corresponding pore-network information is derived from CT image analysis. The simulation was performed using an open-source PNM package (OpenPNM)1. The pore network was configured with the following parameters: pore spacing of 200 nm, throat length of 100 nm, pore diameter of 100 nm, throat diameter of 25 nm, and a total of 50 × 50 pores. For reaction-diffusion settings, water enters the network at the left boundary via a reaction with a rate of Ri = 10−4Ci , while the right boundary maintains a concentration of 0.1 mol/m³. The diffusion coefficient of water in the pore network is 2.2 e−7m2/s. No reactions occur in other pores, and throats are diffusion-only. Sixteen interparticle pores, with a pore diameter of 5 μm, a throat length of 20 μm, and a throat diameter of 25 μm, are randomly distributed. The diffusion coefficient of water in the interparticle pores is 4.7 e−7m2/s. The diffusion coefficient was set based on previous studies2. Mass transfer follows Fick’s law: , ensuring equal inflow and outflow rates under the same concentration difference.
Supplementary information
Description of Additional Supplementary Files
Source data
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge beamtime at Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility (BSRF, beamline 1W1B) and Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF, beamline BL13HB). We thank Fang Chen for kindly assisting with SEM characterization and Qingyuan Zheng for assistance with NMR characterization.
Author contributions
W.F. performed the catalyst preparation, characterization, and catalytic tests. Y.H., C.Z., and Z.L. performed the diffusion simulation and wrote the corresponding part. S.C. performed the XANES and EXAFS characterization and analyzed the data. Y.C. and Y.J. performed the HRTEM characterization and wrote the corresponding part. Z.W. and Y.Z. performed the TKA characterization and analyzed the data. H.J.L. participated in the characterization, catalysis, and discussion. Y.D., G.-H.D., and L.L. processed the X-ray CT characterization. L.B. and P.M. participated in catalysis to reconfirm the PDVB effect and provided helpful discussions. S.Y., W.Y., and P.H. provided helpful discussions on the catalyst structure and reaction process. J.D., S.Z., and W.T. provided helpful discussion. L.W. designed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. All the authors discussed the results and improved the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Amol P. Amrute and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFA1503502), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22525204, 22521204, 22401275), the National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents (BX20240303), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2025M770945), the Key R&D Program of Zhejiang (2024SSYS0067) and the Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Provincial Energy Group Co., Ltd. (ZNKJ-2023-118).
Data availability
All data that led us to understand the results presented here are available in the paper or from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare that there is no competing interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Wei Fang, Yu Hui, Yuhui Chen.
Contributor Information
Zuwei Liao, Email: liaozw@zju.edu.cn.
Ying Jiang, Email: yjiang0209@zju.edu.cn.
Peng He, Email: hepeng@sxicc.ac.cn.
Liang Wang, Email: liangwang@zju.edu.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-76571-8.
References
- 1.Khodakov, A. Y., Chu, W. & Fongarland, P. Advances in the development of novel cobalt Fischer-Tropsch catalysts for synthesis of long-chain hydrocarbons and clean fuels. Chem. Rev.107, 1692–1744 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Li, J. et al. Integrated tuneable synthesis of liquid fuels via Fischer-Tropsch technology. Nat. Catal.1, 787–793 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang, P. et al. Efficient conversion of syngas to linear α-olefins by phase-pure χ-Fe5C2. Nature635, 102–107 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ellis, P. R., Enache, D. I., James, D. W., Jones, D. S. & Kelly, G. J. A robust and precious metal-free high performance cobalt Fischer-Tropsch catalyst. Nat. Catal.2, 623–631 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Xu, Y. et al. A hydrophobic FeMn@Si catalyst increases olefins from syngas by suppressing C1 by-products. Science371, 610–613 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cai, Y. et al. Trace-level halogen blocks CO2 emission in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis for olefins production. Science390, 516–520 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gao, C. et al. Conversion of syngas into olefins with high hydrogen atom economy. Science390, eaea0774 (2025). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hernández Mejía, C., van Deelen, T. W. & de Jong, K. P. Activity enhancement of cobalt catalysts by tuning metal-support interactions. Nat. Commun.9, 4459 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Riva, R., Miessner, H., Vitali, R. & Del Piero, G. Metal-support interaction in Co/SiO2 and Co/TiO2. Appl. Catal. A Gen.196, 111–123 (2000). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ernst, B., Libs, S., Chaumette, P. & Kiennemann, A. Preparation and characterization of Fischer-Tropsch active Co/SiO2 catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen.186, 145–168 (1999). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhou, W., Chen, J.-G., Fang, K.-G. & Sun, Y.-H. The deactivation of Co/SiO2 catalyst for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis at different ratios of H2 to CO. Fuel Process. Technol.87, 609–616 (2006). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kang, J. et al. Iridium boosts the selectivity and stability of cobalt catalysts for syngas to liquid fuels. Chem8, 1050–1066 (2022). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Anders Blekkan, E., Borg, Ø., Frøseth, V. & Holmen, A. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis on cobalt catalysts: the effect of water. in Catalysis (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2007).
- 14.Van de Loosdrecht, J. et al. Cobalt Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: Deactivation by oxidation? Catal. Today123, 293–302 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tsakoumis, N. E., Rønning, M., Borg, Ø, Rytter, E. & Holmen, A. Deactivation of cobalt based Fischer-Tropsch catalysts: a review. Catal. Today154, 162–182 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wolf, M., Fischer, N. & Claeys, M. Water-induced deactivation of cobalt-based Fischer-Tropsch catalysts. Nat. Catal.3, 962–965 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lancelot, C. et al. Direct evidence of surface oxidation of cobalt nanoparticles in alumina-supported catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. ACS Catal.4, 4510–4515 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bartholomew, C. H. Mechanisms of catalyst deactivation. Appl. Catal. A Gen.212, 17–60 (2001). [Google Scholar]
- 19.van Steen, E. et al. Stability of nanocrystals: thermodynamic analysis of oxidation and re-reduction of cobalt in water/hydrogen mixtures. J. Phys. Chem. B109, 3575–3577 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rytter, E. & Holmen, A. Perspectives on the effect of water in cobalt Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. ACS Catal.7, 5321–5328 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Saib, A. M., Borgna, A., van de Loosdrecht, J., van Berge, P. J. & Niemantsverdriet, J. W. In situ surface oxidation study of a planar Co/SiO2/Si(100) model catalyst with nanosized cobalt crystallites under model Fischer-Tropsch synthesis conditions. J. Phys. Chem. B110, 8657–8664 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wolf, M. et al. Water-induced formation of cobalt-support compounds under simulated high conversion Fischer-Tropsch environment. ACS Catal.9, 4902–4918 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wolf, M., Fischer, N. & Claeys, M. Capturing the interconnectivity of water-induced oxidation and sintering of cobalt nanoparticles during the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis in situ. J. Catal.374, 199–207 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Amrute, A. P., Jeske, K., Łodziana, Z., Prieto, G. & Schüth, F. Hydrothermal stability of high-surface-area α-Al2O3 and its use as a support for hydrothermally stable Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalysts. Chem. Mater.32, 4369–4374 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 25.Abi Aad, J. et al. Inhibition by inorganic dopants of γ-alumina chemical weathering under hydrothermal conditions: identification of reactive sites and their influence in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. ChemCatChem9, 2106–2117 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tsakoumis, N. E. et al. Evaluation of reoxidation thresholds for γ-Al2O3-supported cobalt catalysts under Fischer-Tropsch synthesis conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc.139, 3706–3715 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Eschemann, T. O. & de Jong, K. P. Deactivation behavior of Co/TiO2 catalysts during Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. ACS Catal.5, 3181–3188 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schanke, D. et al. Study of the deactivation mechanism of Al2O3-supported cobalt Fischer-Tropsch catalysts. Catal. Lett.34, 269–284 (1995). [Google Scholar]
- 29.Spadaro, L. Metal-support interactions and reactivity of Co/CeO2 catalysts in the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis reaction. J. Catal.234, 451–462 (2005). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Crajé, M. W. J., van der Kraan, A. M., van de Loosdrecht, J. & van Berge, P. J. The application of Mössbauer emission spectroscopy to industrial cobalt based Fischer-Tropsch catalysts. Catal. Today71, 369–379 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tsubaki, N., Sun, S. & Fujimoto, K. Different functions of the noble metals added to cobalt catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. J. Catal.199, 236–246 (2001). [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yan, Z., Bukur, D. B. & Goodman, D. W. Silica-supported rhodium-cobalt catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Catal. Today160, 39–43 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bertella, F. et al. Insights into the promotion with Ru of Co/TiO2 Fischer-Tropsch catalysts: an in situ spectroscopic study. ACS Catal.10, 6042–6057 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 34.van de Loosdrecht, J. et al. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: catalysts and chemistry. In Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry II: From Elements to Applications, 525–557 (Elsevier, 2013).
- 35.Wang, M. et al. Understanding and tuning the effects of H2O on catalytic CO and CO2 hydrogenation. Chem. Rev.124, 12006–12085 (2024). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Xu, Y. et al. Effects of surface hydrophobization on the phase evolution behavior of iron-based catalyst during Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Nat. Commun.15, 7099 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shi, L., Li, D., Hou, B. & Sun, Y. Organic modification of SiO2 and its influence on the properties of Co-based catalysts for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Chin. J. Catal.28, 999–1002 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fang, W. et al. Physical mixing of a catalyst and a hydrophobic polymer promotes CO hydrogenation through dehydration. Science377, 406–410 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cheng, J. et al. Density functional theory study of iron and cobalt carbides for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. J. Phys. Chem. C.114, 1085–1093 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hazemann, P. et al. Selectivity loss in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: the effect of cobalt carbide formation. J. Catal.397, 1–12 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 41.Aurud, P. et al. The improvement of heat transfer using Co/SiO2 spiral structured catalyst for green diesel production by Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Sci. Rep.14, 19782 (2024). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wolf, M., Mutuma, B. K., Coville, N. J., Fischer, N. & Claeys, M. Role of CO in the water-induced formation of cobalt oxide in a high conversion Fischer-Tropsch environment. ACS Catal.8, 3985–3989 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fischer, N., Clapham, B., Feltes, T. & Claeys, M. Cobalt-based Fischer-Tropsch activity and selectivity as a function of crystallite size and water partial pressure. ACS Catal.5, 113–121 (2015). [Google Scholar]
- 44.Senecal, P. et al. Real-time scattering-contrast imaging of a supported cobalt-based catalyst body during activation and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis revealing spatial dependence of particle size and phase on catalytic properties. ACS Catal.7, 2284–2293 (2017). [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bezemer, G. L. et al. Cobalt particle size effects in the Fischer-Tropsch reaction studied with carbon nanofiber supported catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc.128, 3956–3964 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fang, X. et al. Particle-size-dependent methane selectivity evolution in cobalt-based Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. ACS Catal.10, 2799–2816 (2020). [Google Scholar]
- 47.Tavasoli, A., Malek Abbaslou, R. M. & Dalai, A. K. Deactivation behavior of ruthenium promoted Co/γ-Al2O3 catalysts in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Appl. Catal. A Gen.346, 58–64 (2008). [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cheng, Q. et al. Confined small-sized cobalt catalysts stimulate carbon-chain growth reversely by modifying ASF law of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Nat. Commun.9, 3250 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Liu, J.-X., Su, H.-Y., Sun, D.-P., Zhang, B.-Y. & Li, W.-X. Crystallographic dependence of CO activation on cobalt catalysts: HCP versus FCC. J. Am. Chem. Soc.135, 16284–16287 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lyu, S. et al. Role of active phase in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: experimental evidence of CO activation over single-phase cobalt catalysts. ACS Catal.8, 7787–7798 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gnanamani, M. K., Jacobs, G., Shafer, W. D. & Davis, B. H. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: activity of metallic phases of cobalt supported on silica. Catal. Today215, 13–17 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ducreux, O., Rebours, B., Lynch, J., Roy-Auberger, M. & Bazin, D. Microstructure of supported cobalt Fischer-Tropsch catalysts. Oil Gas. Sci. Technol.64, 49–62 (2009). [Google Scholar]
- 53.van Berge, P. J., van de Loosdrecht, J., Barradas, S. & van der Kraan, A. M. Oxidation of cobalt based Fischer-Tropsch catalysts as a deactivation mechanism. Catal. Today58, 321–334 (2000). [Google Scholar]
- 54.Moodley, D. J. et al. The impact of cobalt aluminate formation on the deactivation of cobalt-based Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalysts. Catal. Today171, 192–200 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 55.Dry, M.E. FT catalysts in. Fischer-Tropsch Technology (eds Steynberg, A. P. & Dry, M. E.) 152, 533–600 (Elsevier, 2004).
- 56.Zheng, Q. et al. Operando magnetic resonance imaging of product distributions within the pores of catalyst pellets during Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Nat. Catal.6, 185–195 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 57.Biloen, P., Helle, J. N. & Sachtler, W. M. H. Incorporation of surface carbon into hydrocarbons during Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: mechanistic implications. J. Catal.58, 95–107 (1979). [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chen, W., Zijlstra, B., Filot, I. A. W., Pestman, R. & Hensen, E. J. M. Mechanism of carbon monoxide dissociation on a cobalt Fischer-Tropsch catalyst. ChemCatChem10, 136–140 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Storsæter, S., Borg, Ø, Blekkan, E. A. & Holmen, A. Study of the effect of water on Fischer-Tropsch synthesis over supported cobalt catalysts. J. Catal.231, 405–419 (2005). [Google Scholar]
- 60.Benesi, H. A. & Jones, A. C. An infrared study of the water-silica gel system. J. Phys. Chem.63, 179–182 (1959). [Google Scholar]
- 61.Krishnamoorthy, S., Tu, M., Ojeda, M. P., Pinna, D. & Iglesia, E. An investigation of the effects of water on rate and selectivity for the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis on cobalt-based catalysts. J. Catal.211, 422–433 (2002). [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yu, X. et al. Fischer-Tropsch synthesis over methyl modified Fe2O3@SiO2 catalysts with low CO2 selectivity. Appl. Catal. B Environ.232, 420–428 (2018). [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ji, J.-F. et al. The new X-ray imaging and biomedical application beamline BL13HB at SSRF. Nucl. Sci. Tech.34, 197 (2023). [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kärger, J. & Ruthven, M. D. Diffusion in nanoporous materials: fundamental principles, insights and challenges. N. J. Chem.40, 4027–4048 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 65.O’koye, I. P., Benham, M. & Thomas, K. M. Adsorption of gases and vapors on carbon molecular sieves. Langmuir13, 4054–4059 (1997). [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sendner, C., Horinek, D., Bocquet, L. & Netz, R. R. Interfacial water at hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces: slip, viscosity, and diffusion. Langmuir25, 10768–10781 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Tian, Y., Su, B. & Jiang, L. Interfacial material system exhibiting superwettability. Adv. Mater.26, 6872–6897 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Parker, A. R. & Lawrence, C. R. Water capture by a desert beetle. Nature414, 33–34 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Zhu, H. et al. Recent advances in photocatalysis based on bioinspired superwettabilities. ACS Catal.11, 14751–14771 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 70.Gostick, J. et al. OpenPNM: a pore network modeling package. Comput. Sci. Eng.18, 60–74 (2016). [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Description of Additional Supplementary Files
Data Availability Statement
All data that led us to understand the results presented here are available in the paper or from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
