Skip to main content
Journal of Lifestyle Medicine logoLink to Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
. 2026 Aug 31;16(2):56–62. doi: 10.15280/jlm.2026.16.2.56

Eyes on Screens: Exploring the Ocular Health Consequences of Smartphone Use in Medical Students

Sadia Nazir 1,*, Shahir Muhammad Ibne Rasa 1, Minahil Munir 1, Insha Noor Al Majid 1, Minahil Khan 1, Mahnoor Azam 1, Maryam Umer 1
PMCID: PMC13554669  PMID: 42719443

Abstract

Background

Smartphones have become essential tools in education, particularly in medical studies. However, their prolonged use has been associated with digital eye strain (DES) and various ocular health problems. The present study aimed to measure the duration and pattern of smartphone use and assess the effects of smartphone use on ocular health among medical students.

Methods

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 345 medical students (first to final year) from private medical and dental colleges using nonprobability convenience sampling. The sociodemographics, usage patterns, and ocular symptoms were evaluated using a validated questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26 (IBM Co.); the chi-square test was used to assess associations (p < 0.05).

Results

All study participants reported smartphone use, with 53.9% initiating between the ages of 12 and 18 years. Excessive usage was perceived by 79.4%, and 41.2% reported > 8 hours/day. Academic and recreational use was common (91.9%). Reduced blinking (< 15-20/min) was reported by 75.9%, and 40.6% never rested their eyes. The frequency of ocular symptoms was high [itching (82.0%), dryness (81.7%), redness (79.7%), photophobia (79.1%), and lacrimation (73.9%)]; eye fatigue occurred in 63.5%. A screen time of > 8 hours was significantly associated with dryness (p = 0.02), lacrimation (p = 0.04), and itching (p = 0.03). Infrequent rest was correlated with dryness (p < 0.001) and itching (p = 0.05). The symptoms occurred irrespective of refractive status.

Conclusion

Smartphone use is universal among medical students, with substantial daily screen exposure and poor digital health resulting in a high prevalence of DES. Awareness campaigns promoting the “20-20-20 rule,” regular blinking, and ergonomic practices are essential.

Keywords: Digital eye strain, Medical students, Ocular health, Screen time, Smartphone use

INTRODUCTION

Smartphones have become an essential part of our lives. It can run multiple applications, beyond the traditional use of phones for calling, taking photos, or texting, thus becoming an integral part of our community. Beyond serving as a communication device, it also acts as a social companion and technological asset that improves our personal and professional quality of life by enhancing communication, accommodating multiple tasks, enabling faster interaction with the world, providing better and easier access to information, and integrating into various aspects of daily routine [1].

Various studies worldwide have shown that smartphone use is increasing among young children and adolescents [2]. Study conducted in 2023 in Hong Kong showed that 81.3% of school children 10-14 years of age have smartphones [3]. The same was observed in the UK (91%) and the USA (95%) [4]. According to the American Optometric Association, children aged 0 to 8 years spent 48 minutes/day on smartphones, compared to schoolchildren who spent 3 hours/day on smartphones [5]. In Hong Kong, children aged 10 years and above spend 30 hours per week on smartphones, specifically on the Internet [3].

Pakistan is the fifth most populous country in the world, with more than 220 million people, and a median age of 23. The smartphone penetration has gone from 10% in 2014 to 51% by 2020, and 77% are between 21 and 30 years of age [6].

Smartphones are indispensable tools in modern education, especially in medical studies, where they are used as a powerful tool for learning and communication. Medical students use smartphones to access medical resources, the latest medical research, educational apps, and clinical tools; manage academic tasks and drug references; and learn clinical skills [7]. Although smartphones can make medical students’ lives easier, they can also have adverse effects on their physical and psychological well-being, specifically leading to ocular and neurological health problems [8].

Digital eye strain (DES) causes multiple ocular and vision-related problems, such as diplopia, blurred vision, lacrimation, itching, and redness, and can affect anyone, especially smartphone users who spend much of their time on the device, whether for studies or enjoyment. Duration and pattern of smartphone use are closely associated with the development of ocular problems [9]. A study conducted in Jordan in 2021 showed that smartphone use for more than 6 hours caused vision problems, including eye strain, excessive lacrimation, and photophobia, in 93.9% of students [10]. Various studies have concluded that time spent using smartphones is associated with refractive errors [11,12]. Another study conducted in Korea concluded that a reduced blink rate while using a smartphone is associated with dry eye disease [13].

Better knowledge and insight into the prevalence, patterns, and impact of smartphone use on ocular health among medical college students are essential for planning and implementing prevention programs. There is limited literature on the effects of smartphone use on ocular health among medical students. Therefore, this study aims to determine the frequency and pattern of use of smartphones and to assess their impact on ocular health among medical students at a private medical and dental college.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at a private medical college. Nonprobability convenience sampling was used. Study participants included 345 registered first- to final-year the Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery students who provided informed consent. The relatively lower participation of first-year students was due to their limited availability during the data collection period, as they were engaged in orientation activities and adjusting to academic schedules. The study was approved by the institutional review board.

A structured, previously validated questionnaire designed by Issa et al. [14] was used as the study tool. The questionnaire consisted of the following three parts: Section I included questions on socio-demographic data. Section II included questions (1-10) on the pattern of smartphone use. Section III included questions (11-14) on the ocular problems. Data were entered and analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 26 (IBM Co.). Data was presented as tables and graphs. Descriptive statistics were used in terms of numbers and percentages. A chi-square test of significance was applied to examine associations between background variables and smartphone use, as well as between background variables and the presence or severity of ocular symptoms. The cut-off point for significance was p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The current study included a total of 345 MBBS students of all five years (n = 345).

1. Demographic data of students and consideration about smartphone use

Of the total 345 students, 131 (38%) were male, and 214 (62%) were female. The sex pattern in our study reflected institutional enrollment patterns, with the majority of students being female. The majority of students were from the third year of MBBS. A total of 200 (58%) are day scholars. The majority of students were between 20 and 23 years old (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic data of students and considerations about smartphone use

Variables Categories Frequency (%)
Sex Male 131 (38.0)
Female 214 (62.0)
Current academic year First 27 (7.8)
Second 69 (20.0)
Third 97 (28.0)
Fourth 66 (19.0)
Final 86 (24.9)
Residential status Day scholar 200 (58.0)
Boarder 145 (42.0)
High school qualification Faculty of Science 287 (83.2)
A-Level 50 (14.5)
American Board 8 (2.3)

2. Pattern of smartphone use

A total of 100% (345) of students used smartphones, of whom 186 (53.9%) started using them at ages 13-18. The majority of them (53.9%) began using smartphones between the ages of 12 and 18 years, and 79.4% used smartphones more than expected. 41.2% used more than 8 hours a day. In 75.9% of students, the blinking rate was less than 15-20 times per minute (Table 2).

Table 2.

Pattern of smartphone use

Variables Categories Frequency (%)
Smartphone use Yes 345 (100)
No 0 (0.0)
Age of start using smartphone Less than 6 years old 20 (5.8)
6-12 years old 104 (30.1)
12-18 years old 186 (53.9)
More than 18 years old 35 (10.1)
Using a smartphone more than expected Yes 274 (79.4)
No 71 (20.6)
Average screen time per day Less than 2 hours 26 (7.5)
2-4 hours 29 (8.4)
5-6 hours 36 (10.4)
7-8 hours 112 (32.5)
More than 8 hours 142 (41.2)
Purpose of smartphone use Study 5 (1.4)
Recreational 23 (6.7)
Both 317 (91.9)
Desired brightness of the smartphone Equal to the surrounding light 162 (47.0)
More than surrounding light 46 (13.3)
Less than surrounding light 137 (39.7)
Distance of using a smartphone Between 16-20 inches 203 (58.8)
More 25 (7.2)
Less 117 (33.9)
Usage of smartphone increased in recent years Yes 298 (86.4)
No 47 (13.6)
The interval at which you rest your eyes while using a smartphone? After every 20 minutes 29 (8.4)
After more than 20 minutes 176 (51.0)
I do not give my eyes rest at all 140 (40.6)
Average blinking rate while using smartphone 15-20 times per minute 67 (19.4)
More 16 (4.6)
Less 262 (75.9)

3. Ocular problems and smartphone use

The medical students who experienced dry eyes were 81.7%, 73.9% experienced lacrimation, and 82.0% experienced itching with smartphone use. Other ocular problems, such as eye fatigue, were experienced by 63.5% of the medical students. The majority of students (73.3%) reported that their ocular problems increased with smartphone use. Students with no family history of ocular problems were 57.1% (Table 3).

Table 3.

Ocular problems and smartphone use

Variables Categories Frequency (%)
Dryness Yes 282 (81.7)
No 63 (18.3)
Lacrimation Yes 255 (73.9)
No 90 (26.1)
Itching Yes 283 (82.0)
No 62 (18.0)
Redness Yes 275 (79.7)
No 70 (20.3)
Blurred vision Yes 269 (78.0)
No 76 (22.0)
Photophobia Yes 273 (79.1)
No 72 (20.9)
Other ocular problems Eye pain 1 (0.3)
Eye fatigue 219 (63.5)
No other problem 125 (36.2)
What are the vision problems you suffer from? Myopia 130 (37.7)
Hypermetropia 26 (7.5)
Astigmatism 18 (5.2)
None 171 (49.6)
Increase in ocular problems with the use of smartphones Yes 253 (73.3)
No 92 (26.7)
Family history of ocular problems Yes 148 (42.9)
No 197 (57.1)

4. Ocular problems and pattern of smartphone use

Table 4 illustrates the association between ocular problems and smartphone use patterns. A total of 122 students with an average screen time of more than 8 hours experienced dry eyes (p = 0.02), 114 students with the same average screen time experienced lacrimation (p = 0.04), and 112 students with more than 8 hours of average screen time felt itching in the eyes after using the smartphone (p = 0.03). A total of 144 with dryness (p < 0.001), 122 with itching (p = 0.05), and 120 with blurred vision (p = 0.08) rest their eyes after more than 20 minutes of smartphone use (Table 4).

Table 4.

Ocular problems and pattern of smartphone use

Variables Categories Ocular problems (n = 345)
Dryness Lacrimation Itching Blurred vision
Yes No x2 Yes No x2 Yes No x2 Yes No x2
Using a smartphone more than expected Yes 227 55 0.29 206 68 0.3 227 56 0.43 218 51 0.16
No 47 16 49 22 47 15 56 20
Average screen time per day (hr) < 2 23 3 0.02 19 7 0.04 28 11 0.03 16 10 0.18
2-4 23 6 20 9 31 33 21 8
5-6 33 3 20 16 26 11 31 5
7-8 81 31 82 30 86 3 89 23
> 8 122 20 114 28 112 4 112 30
Distance of using a smartphone Between 16-20” 170 33 0.39 154 49 0.23 169 34 0.64 159 44 0.36
More 21 4 15 10 19 6 22 3
Less 91 26 86 31 95 22 88 29
The interval at which you rest your eyes while using smartphone? After every 20 minutes 29 52 0.00 63 18 0.34 64 26 0.05 56 25 0.08
After > 20 minutes 140 10 105 45 122 32 120 30
I don’t give my eyes rest 113 1 87 27 97 4 93 21
Average blinking rate while using smartphone 15-20 times/min 59 14 0.00 55 18 0.54 60 28 0.02 62 11 0.07
More 14 39 42 11 46 30 36 17
Less 209 10 158 61 177 4 171 48

Fig. 1A showed no statistically significant association between increased ocular problems and the feeling of using a smartphone more than expected (p < 0.001). There is a statistically significant association between an increase in ocular problems and average screen time per day (p = 0.12) as depicted in Fig. 1B. Fig. 1C showed a statistically significant association between an increase in ocular problems and age of smartphone use (p < 0.001).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Association between an increase in ocular problems and smartphone use. (A) Association between average screen time/day and increase in ocular problems. (B) Association between more than expected smartphone use and increase in ocular problems. (C) Association between age of start using smartphone and increase in ocular problems. *p < 0.001.

DISCUSSION

The study investigated patterns of smartphone use and their impact on ocular health among medical students. The results showed that all 345 respondents (100%) reported using smartphones, with the majority (53.9%) having started using smartphones between the ages of 12 and 18 years, and 317 (91.9%) respondents stated their primary purpose for smartphones was both study and recreational use. These results were fairly consistent with a study conducted in Iraq, which reported that 90.8% of the general university students used smartphones regularly, with most beginning their use between the ages of 12 and 18 years [11]. Of the 345 study participants, 142 (41.2%) reported using their smartphones for more than 8 hours a day, and another 112 (32.5%) reported using them for 7-8 hours a day. These results are substantially higher than those reported by Elsheikh et al. [15] where the most common daily usage was between 4-6 hours (30.2%) whereas another study conducted by Chidi-Egboka et al. [16] among school-aged children and adolescents in Hong Kong noted that 50.8% of the study participants used their smartphones for more than 4 hours a day.

In this study, ocular symptoms were widely reported, with itching (82.0%), dryness (81.7%), and redness (79.7%) being the most common. These symptoms were notably higher than those reported in previous global studies among general university students and school-aged children [17,18]. One possible explanation for this disparity may be due to the intense academic demands placed on medical students which results in longer and more frequent screen exposure which in turn leads to a higher burden of ocular symptoms, a phenomenon also observed in this study in which a statistically significant association between increased screen time and the occurrence of ocular symptoms such as itching, dryness and lacrimation. Furthermore, the study by Sharma et al. [19] and Wang et al. [20] supports these associations in which they observed that students with ≥241 min/day of smartphone use had the highest baseline scores of DES while also noting a significant increase in DES scores at a 1-year follow up among students with 181-240 min/day of smartphone use.

One of the most striking findings was that 274 (79.4%) students felt that they were using their phones more than they should, and 298 (86.4%) stated that their phone usage had increased over the past years, a finding consistent with previously conducted global studies [21,22]. Despite this, only 8.4% of participants followed basic eye care practices, such as the “20-20-20 rule” for resting eyes, and 75.9% reported lower-than-normal blinking rates while using their smartphones, both of which are known contributors to DES. These findings support the literature of Datta et al. [23] that links poor digital hygiene, such as inadequate blinking and prolonged uninterrupted screen time, to symptoms of DES. Interestingly, despite the high prevalence of DES symptoms, 49.6% of the study population reported having no refractive error. This suggests that symptoms of DES can occur in individuals without underlying vision problems and highlights the importance of distinguishing between symptoms of functional eye strain and those of structural refractive errors. Especially since a study conducted in Pakistan found that patients with pre-existing refractive errors reported more symptoms of DES, with 78.1% of spectacle users and 96.4% of contact lens users reporting symptoms suggestive of DES [24]. Moreover, significantly severe DES symptoms have been reported in several studies in patients with uncorrected refractive errors [25,26]. The study findings demonstrated that increased smartphone use leads to ocular consequences, including worsening eye problems. Therefore, the application and awareness of preventive strategies at the institutional and government levels may help reduce the severity of symptoms and thus improve the prognosis. These strategies are: encouraging practice of the 20-20-20 rule, which is that every 20 minutes, look 20 feet away for 20 seconds, encouraging regular blinking and screen breaks; adjusting screen brightness; awareness and education seminars about digital eye hygiene.

1. Conclusion

Smartphone use is universal among medical students, with substantial daily screen exposure and inadequate digital hygiene practices. The prevalence of DES symptoms is alarmingly high, particularly among those with prolonged screen time and infrequent eye rest. These findings highlight an urgent need for awareness campaigns and preventive strategies such as adherence to the “20-20-20 rule,” regular blinking, time management training, and optimal screen ergonomics.

2. Limitations

The study relies on self-reported data, which may be subject to recall bias or over- or under-reporting, particularly regarding symptom severity and screen time estimates. Secondly, the lack of objective clinical ophthalmologic evaluations (e.g., the Schirmer test for dry eyes, slit lamp examinations) limits the ability to confirm the questionnaire-reported symptoms. Furthermore, due to financial constraints, the study population included students from only a single medical institution, which, coupled with the relatively small sample size, may limit the generalizability of the results. Lastly, confounding factors such as the use of spectacles, corrective contact lenses, and blue light filters were not controlled for, which may affect the frequency and severity of reported symptoms.

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding Statement

• Funding: None.

NOTES

• Authors’ contributions: S.N. participated in conceptualization and in supervision of the study. S.M.I.R. participated in data curation and data analysis. M.M. and I.N.A.M. participated in writing – original draft. M.K., M.A., and M.U. participated in writing – review & editing.

• Conflicts of Interest: No conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sela A, Rozenboim N, Ben-Gal HC. Smartphone use behavior and quality of life: What is the role of awareness? PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0260637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ricoy MC, Martínez-Carrera S, Martínez-Carrera I. Social overview of smartphone use by teenagers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(22):15068. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chu GCH, Chan LYL, Do CW, Tse ACY, Cheung T, Szeto GPY, et al. Association between time spent on smartphones and digital eye strain: A 1-year prospective observational study among Hong Kong children and adolescents. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023;30(20):58428–35. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26258-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hsu M, Martin B, Ahmed S, Torous J, Suzuki J. Smartphone ownership, smartphone utilization, and interest in using mental health apps to address substance use disorders: Literature review and cross-sectional survey study across two sites. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(7):e38684. doi: 10.2196/38684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liwan MA, Akib M, Muhiddin HS, Kasim MF, Syamsu N, Amalius AA. Relationship between smartphone usage in changes of ocular biometry components and refraction among elementary school children. Minerva Ophthalmol. 2023;65:65–72. doi: 10.23736/S2785-1265.23.01878-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aijaz Ali S, Marshall P, Bashir S. Investigating the smartphone addiction among undergraduate nursing students: Smartphone addiction and nursing students. Pakistan BioMed J. 2024;7(4):2–6. doi: 10.54393/pbmj.v7i04.1069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nemati-Anaraki L, Mousavi SS, AliBeyk M, Mahami-Oskouei M. Medical students knowledge and use of smartphone-based applications. J Health Adm. 2022;24(4):84–94. doi: 10.52547/jha.24.4.84. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Solunke M, Bodkhe SA, Seitova A, Abdraev G, Azhibaeva G, Dinara A, et al. Study of mobile usage and health issues faced by medical students of OSH State University. Int Res J Mod Eng Technol Sci. 2023;5(2):279–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Utlu ES, Bayraktar M, Utlu B. Dry eye in primary care: The relationship between digital display device usage and dry eye syndrome (DES) in medical students. Fam Pract. 2024;41(3):246–54. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmac155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Abu-Ismail L, Abuawwad MT, Taha MJ, Khamees A, Abu Ismail DY, Sanwar M, et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease among medical students and its association with sleep habits, use of electronic devices and caffeine consumption: A cross-sectional questionnaire. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023;17:1013–23. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S397022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ismael DS. Smartphone overuse and vision problems among university students. Zanco J Pure Appl Sci. 2022;34(3):32–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alqudah AA, Bauer AJ, Aleshawi A. Refractive errors among medical students in Jordan: Prevalence, types and possible risk factors. Future Sci OA. 2023;9(2):FSO839. doi: 10.2144/fsoa-2022-0075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Seo BG, Moon JW, Lee D. Subjective eye health status by extent of internet and smartphone use by Korean adolescents. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2023;64(7):613–9. doi: 10.3341/jkos.2023.64.7.613. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Issa LF, Alqurashi KA, Althomali T, Alzahrani TA, Aljuaid AS, Alharthi TM. Smartphone use and its impact on ocular health among university students in Saudi Arabia. Int J Prev Med. 2021;12:149. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_382_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Elsheikh AA, Elsharkawy SA, Ahmed DS. Impact of smartphone use at bedtime on sleep quality and academic activities among medical students at Al -Azhar University at Cairo. J Public Health (Berl) 2024;32(11):2091–100. doi: 10.1007/s10389-023-01964-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chidi-Egboka NC, Jalbert I, Golebiowski B. Smartphone gaming induces dry eye symptoms and reduces blinking in school-aged children. Eye (Lond) 2023;37(7):1342–9. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02122-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kaur K, Gurnani B, Nayak S, Deori N, Kaur S, Jethani J, et al. Digital eye strain- a comprehensive review. Ophthalmol Ther. 2022;11(5):1655–80. doi: 10.1007/s40123-022-00540-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chellapan T, Mat Daud N, Narayanasamy S. Smartphone use patterns and the impact on accommodation and convergence system of the eyes among Malaysian teenagers. Int J Ophthalmol. 2024;17(11):2093–9. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.11.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sharma S, Singh A, Agrawal A, Kumari R, Kumar B. Association of smartphones use, ocular symptoms and binocular dysfunctions in adolescents: A hospital-based cross-sectional study. Strabismus. 2024;32(4):279–86. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2024.2382289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang JC, Hsieh CY, Kung SH. The impact of smartphone use on learning effectiveness: A case study of primary school students. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr) 2023;28(6):6287–320. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11430-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.El Mansouri A, El Hessni A, Aboussaleh Y, Bikri S, Mohamed W. Smartphone overuse as habit of pleasure seeking in Moroccan adults. Acta Neuropsychol. 2023;21(2):139–46. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0053.4736. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Song CE, Sela A. Phone and self: How smartphone use increases preference for uniqueness. J Mark Res. 2023;60(3):473–88. doi: 10.1177/00222437221120404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Datta S, Sehgal S, Bhattacharya B, Satgunam PN. The 20/20/20 rule: Practicing pattern and associations with asthenopic symptoms. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023;71(5):2071–5. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2056_22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nasir K, Shafiq U, Zarin K, Tahir S, Ambreen F. Effect of smartphone usage on refractive errors and ocular health in teenagers. Insights J Health Rehabil. 2024;2(3):303–8. doi: 10.71000/ijhr144. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Redondo B, Jiménez R, Vera J, Rosenfield M. The impact of break schedules on digital eye strain symptoms and ocular accommodation during prolonged near work. Exp Eye Res. 2025;258:110463. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2025.110463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mataftsi A, Seliniotaki AK, Moutzouri S, Prousali E, Darusman KR, Adio AO, et al. Digital eye strain in young screen users: A systematic review. Prev Med. 2023;170:107493. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Lifestyle Medicine are provided here courtesy of Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine

RESOURCES