Skip to main content
JACC Asia logoLink to JACC Asia
. 2026 Aug 1;6(9):2137–2139. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2026.06.023

Survival and Health Status Outcomes Following IVUS-Guided Stent Optimization

A Real-World Registry

Vu Hoang Vu a,b, Van Hoang c,∗, Thai Quoc Nguyen d, Hoa Tran a,b, Khoi Minh Le a,b, Quang Ngoc Nguyen e, Giang Tra Tran c, Tan Van Nguyen f,g,h, Duc Huu Nguyen i, Khang Duong Nguyen a, Quang Dang Duy Pham a, Bao Thien Duong a, Vinh Xuan Nguyen a, Trung Duc Tran a, Trung Ich Ly j, Hung Phi Truong b,j, Sy Van Hoang b,j, Binh Quang Truong a,b
PMCID: PMC13554752  PMID: 42541502

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes are significantly enhanced by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance.1,2 While contemporary guidelines grant IVUS a class I recommendation,3,4 real-world validation of absolute stent optimization targets remains underreported. We systematically evaluated the prognostic value of a predefined poststenting minimal stent area (MSA) cutoff in a large-scale, all-comers Vietnamese registry, investigating its relationship with long-term survival and longitudinal patient-reported health status (Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 [SAQ-7]).5

Methods

Approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City (no. 75/GCN-HĐĐĐ), this retrospective registry consecutively enrolled all eligible patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI at the University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City between February 2023 and October 2024. To prevent misclassification bias, the primary endpoint was 1-year all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was longitudinal SAQ-7 score trajectories (baseline and 1, 3, and 12 months).

Two independent interventional cardiologists analyzed all IVUS pullbacks. Literature-derived MSA cutoffs were evaluated as time-to-event predictors for 1-year mortality using iterative multivariable Cox regression. Unlike the 5.0 mm2 threshold (P = 0.225), a 5.5 mm2 cutoff maintained robust predictive value, becoming our definitive optimal expansion criterion. Survival was analyzed via multivariable Cox proportional hazards models (adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, clinical presentation, baseline proximal reference vessel diameter). SAQ-7 trajectories were evaluated using an adjusted linear mixed-effects model utilizing random intercepts per participant to account for repeated measures and incorporating a multiplicative group × time interaction term to assess differing response trajectories.

Continuous variables are presented as mean ± SD or median (Q1-Q3) and compared using Student’s t test or Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables are expressed as count and percentage and evaluated via chi-square or Fisher exact tests. Statistical significance was defined as a 2-tailed P < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 17.0 (StataCorp).

Results

The cohort (N = 2,218) was stratified into optimal (MSA ≥5.5 mm2, n = 1,386) and suboptimal (MSA <5.5 mm2, n = 832) expansion groups. The suboptimal group was older, having more diabetes/hypertension, inherently smaller vessels, and longer lesions (all P < 0.05).

At baseline, suboptimal patients reported a heavier symptom burden (SAQ-7: 59.8 ± 17.3 vs 61.5 ± 16.7; P = 0.021). Post-PCI, both groups demonstrated dramatic, sustained improvements. Adjusted linear mixed-effects model estimates revealed comparable SAQ-7 scores at 1 month, becoming virtually identical by 3 months (75.5 [95% CI: 74.1-76.9] vs 75.4 [95% CI: 74.5-76.2]). At 1 year, the MSA <5.5 mm2 cohort exhibited a steeper trajectory of symptomatic relief (group × time interaction P = 0.014), indicating robust angina relief regardless of the anatomical constraints (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The Clinical Paradox of Intravascular Ultrasound–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

This large-scale, real-world registry (N = 2,218) stratified patients based on a minimal stent area (MSA) cutoff of ≥5.5 mm2. (A) Over a 12-month follow-up, both the optimal (MSA ≥5.5 mm2) and suboptimal (MSA <5.5 mm2) expansion cohorts achieved comparable and profound symptom relief, as measured by adjusted Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 (SAQ-7) trajectories. (B) However, despite this universal angina relief, achieving an MSA ≥5.5 mm2 was robustly and independently associated with lower 1-year all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.22-0.98; P = 0.046).

Despite uniform symptom relief, 35 all-cause deaths occurred at 1 year (MSA <5.5 mm2: 21; MSA ≥5.5 mm2: 14). Multivariable Cox regression identified MSA ≥5.5 mm2 as robustly and independently associated with lower 1-year all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.22-0.98; P = 0.046). Age independently increased mortality risk; diabetes, acute presentation, and baseline vessel size did not. Subgroup analyses yielded consistent protective point estimates favoring optimal expansion (HR: ∼0.4-0.5) across major clinical and anatomical strata; however, absolute event numbers within these subgroups were small (eg, 22 in males, 13 in females).

Discussion

This real-world registry reveals a clinical paradox: while IVUS-guided PCI confers profound, universal angina relief (SAQ-7) irrespective of final stent dimensions, achieving an MSA ≥5.5 mm2 is strongly associated with a significant reduction in 1-year all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.22-0.98). Our findings align with landmark clinical trials establishing the absolute MSA >5.5 mm2 as a superior prognostic indicator.6,7

However, forcefully pursuing an absolute 5.5 mm2 target in small vessels inherently risks barotrauma and medial edge dissections. Therefore, safely actualizing this anatomical threshold requires meticulous prestenting lesion preparation utilizing advanced calcium-modifying technologies, not solely aggressive high-pressure postdilation.

Limitations include, first, the observational design precluding absolute causality. Second, the low overall event rate (35 deaths [1.6%]) limits statistical precision. Consequently, wide CIs in female patients (typically possessing smaller vessel)8 and those with chronic coronary syndromes necessitate cautious interpretation. Finally, 1-year follow-up cannot confirm the permanence of the symptomatic “catch-up” effect. Furthermore, this steeper trajectory may partially reflect a ceiling effect, given lower baseline scores and 12-month clustering near 100 in both cohorts. Future studies with 3- to 5-year follow-ups, integrating relative expansion indices alongside absolute targets, are required to safely refine optimization algorithms.

Funding Support and author Disclosures

The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Footnotes

The authors attest they are in compliance with human studies committees and animal welfare regulations of the authors’ institutions and Food and Drug Administration guidelines, including patient consent where appropriate. For more information, visit the Author Center.

References

  • 1.Sreenivasan J., Reddy R.K., Jamil Y., et al. Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13 doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alqawasmi M., Blankenship J.C. Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: transforming precision and outcomes in contemporary practice. J Clin Med. 2025;14:8883. doi: 10.3390/jcm14248883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vrints C., Andreotti F., Koskinas K.C., et al. 2024 ESC guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2024;45:3415–3537. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Writing Committee Members. Thompson A., Fleischmann K.E., Smilowitz N.R., et al. 2024 AHA/ACC/ACS/ASNC/HRS/SCA/SCCT/SCMR/SVM Guideline for perioperative cardiovascular management for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;84:1869–1969. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chan P.S., Jones P.G., Arnold S.A., Spertus J.A. Development and validation of a short version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014;7:640–647. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.000967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang J., Gao X., Kan J., et al. Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: the ULTIMATE trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:3126–3137. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hong S.-J., Kim B.-K., Shin D.-H., et al. Effect of intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided everolimus-eluting stent implantation: the IVUS-XPL randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314:2155–2163. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hiteshi A.K., Li D., Gao Y., et al. Gender differences in coronary artery diameter are not related to body habitus or left ventricular mass. Clin Cardiol. 2014;37:605–609. doi: 10.1002/clc.22310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JACC Asia are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES