Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2026 Mar 19;15:30. Originally published 2026 Jan 8. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.175541.2

Performance of Polypropylene Fiber-Reinforced Mortar Exposed to Elevated Temperatures

Murtatha Alshijlawi 1, Sheelan Mahmoud Hama 2,a, Musab A Abdulhamed 1, Ibraheem A Aidan 3, Noor A Rajab 2, Aymen Hameed Fayyadh 2
PMCID: PMC13554995  PMID: 42723738

Version Changes

Revised. Amendments from Version 1

This revised version of the manuscript incorporates several improvements in response to the reviewers’ comments to enhance clarity, transparency, and scientific rigor. The Materials section has been expanded to include detailed technical specifications of the superplasticizer used in the mixtures. Additional explanations have been added in the Results and Discussion section to clarify the interpretation of compressive strength results and ensure consistency with the reported data tables. A new subsection reporting Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) test results has been introduced to provide supplementary non-destructive evaluation of internal damage caused by thermal exposure and to support the mechanical performance trends. Furthermore, minor typographical and presentation errors have been corrected throughout the manuscript, and figure labels have been standardized for clarity. A numerical table corresponding to the flexural toughness results has also been added to facilitate quantitative interpretation of the data. Finally, a brief Limitations and Future Work statement has been included to acknowledge the scope boundaries of the present study and outline directions for further research, including microstructural characterization and expanded testing conditions.

Abstract

Background

Cement-based materials deteriorate significantly when exposed to high temperatures due to extensive microcracking, increased porosity, and dehydration of hydration products, all of which lower the materials’ mechanical performance and post-fire stability. This makes thermally robust mortar essential for protective applications in fire-prone areas as well as structural restoration.

Method

The goal of this study is to assess how the amount of polypropylene (PP) fiber in cement mortar affects its mechanical behavior, thermal resistance, and residual performance at temperatures as high as 600°C. Prior to and following exposure to increased temperatures of 200, 400, and 600°C, mortar mixes containing 0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5% PP fibers by volume were made and tested for workability, density, compressive strength, flexural strength, and flexural toughness.

Results

The results show that increasing PP fiber content decreases workability. PP fibers significantly improved high-temperature performance. At 600°C, the control mix retained only 19% of its compressive strength, while the 0.5% PP mix retained 33%. Flexural strength increased by 26–44% at ambient temperature for 0.5–1.0% PP fiber content, and at 600°C, PP mixes preserved up to 8% more flexural strength than the control. Toughness improved substantially, with the 1.5% PP mix showing nearly 10-time higher residual toughness than the control at 600°C.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the incorporation of 0.5-1.0% polypropylene fibers provides a balanced enhancement in thermal resistance, residual strength and ductility, confirming its effectiveness in producing mortar with superior structural integrity after exposed to high temperatures.

Keywords: load-deflection, toughness, residual strength, high temperatures, polypropylene fibers, and mortar

1. Introduction

One of the most important cementitious materials in building, mortar is used extensively in masonry, plastering, restoration projects, and ferrocement slabs. 1, 2 Its resilience to high temperatures is still a major worry, though, especially for buildings that have been subjected to fire. High temperatures cause a number of physical and chemical changes in mortar that impair its ability to provide structural integrity. Physically, mass loss, increased porosity, and widespread microcracking result from the dehydration of calcium silicate hydrate (C–S–H) and calcium hydroxide at higher temperatures, followed by the evaporation of free water below 100°C. 3– 5 Around 400–500°C, calcium hydroxide breaks down chemically into calcium oxide and water, but the C–S–H gel’s gradual decalcification permanently changes the microstructure. 6, 7 Compressive, flexural, and tensile strengths are significantly reduced as a result of these changes, and in extreme situations, explosive spalling that reveals reinforcement and hastens structure collapse occurs. 8, 9 Husem 8 found sharp reduction in compressive and flexural strength at 600°C. One of solution to improve the behavior of concrete at ambient and high-temperatures is adding fibers to concrete or mortar. 10, 11 Kalifa et al. 10 and Zeiml et al. 12 showed that PP fibers reduce spalling due to vapor-release channels formed during melting. Because PP fibers have a relatively low melting temperature (160–170°C), they melt and soften when heated, forming tiny channels in the mortar. By creating pathways for the release of vapor, these channels lower internal pore pressure and lessen the possibility of explosive spalling. 10, 12 PP fibers increase fracture energy, flexural toughness, and crack resistance at room temperature and moderate temperatures, thereby improving the durability and deformation capacity of cementitious composites. 13, 14 Alvarez et al. 15 and Shahriar et al. 16 showed that high PP contents increase porosity after melting and may reduce residual strength. PP fibers help keep strength at lower content and moderate temperatures (up to 400°C), but the voids that generated when the fibers melt and lose their ability to bridge may cause residual strength to decrease after cooling. 15– 17 Although, concrete has been studied extensively; mortar shows different pore structure, cracking modes, and thermal sensitivity, as emphasized by Mindeguia et al. 18 and Yermak et al. 19 Most previous studies focus on PP fiber-reinforced concrete, but this work systematically investigates mortar, which has different behavior mechanisms. To address these gaps, this study evaluates the high-temperature performance of mortar reinforced with 0–1.5% PP fibers, assessing density, compressive strength, flexural strength, load–deflection behavior, and toughness up to 600°C. Unlike most previous studies that focus on concrete, this work provides one of the few systematic investigations of polypropylene fiber-reinforced cement mortar subjected to temperatures up to 600°C with combined evaluation of strength, ductility, and toughness.

2. Experimental work

2.1 Materials, mix proportions, mixing and casting procedure

Ordinary Portland Cement, conforming to Iraqi specification (I.S.) No. 5 20 have been used. The used natural river sand has maximum particle size of 4.25 mm, specific gravity of 2.60, finesse of 2.50, SO 3% of 0.15, and absorption% of 0.68%. The size distribution and properties of used sand complied with I.S. No. 45. 21 Potable water free from impurities, used for all mixes and curing. PP fibers with a density of approximately 0.91 kg/l, and melting point between 160–170°C, length 12 mm, and diameter 18 μm, respectively have been used.

A polycarboxylate-based high-range water-reducing admixture (HRWR), Sika ViscoCrete-180 GS, conforming to ASTM C494 Type F, was used to improve the workability of the mortar mixtures. The superplasticizer has a specific gravity of approximately 1.07, pH value ranging from 4 to 6, and a light brownish liquid appearance. The admixture is based on modified polycarboxylate ether technology and was added at a constant dosage of 1% by weight of cement for all mixtures to maintain comparable workability conditions while isolating the effect of polypropylene fiber content on the fresh and hardened properties of the mortar.

Mixtures were prepared with a constant water/cement ratio of 0.45 and cement: sand ratio of 1:3 by weight. Polypropylene fibers were incorporated at dosages of 0.0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5% by volume, the maximum percentages 1.5% used because more than this value the fibers will cause blocking and agglomeration. The mixes proportions have been listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Mixes proportional.

PP fiber content (% by volume) Cement (kg/m 3) Sand (kg/m 3) Water (kg/m 3) Superplasticizer (% of cement)
0.0% 550 1650 247.5 1%
0.5% 550 1650 247.5 1%
1.0% 550 1650 247.5 1%
1.5% 550 1650 247.5 1%

Dry materials (cement, sand, fibers) were mixed before adding water gradually. Fresh mortar was cast into molds, compacted in two layers, and surface finished. After demolding at 24 h, the specimens were immersed in tap water maintained at 20 ± 2°C until the age of 28 days. The curing water was periodically renewed to maintain stable curing conditions throughout the curing period. Prior to thermal exposure, all specimens were oven-dried at 105°C for 24 hours to remove free water and minimize explosive spalling risk.

2.2 Testing and temperature exposure

Flow Table Test was made according to ASTM C1437. 22 Compressive and flexural strength were measured according to ASTM C109 23 and ASTM C348, 24 respectively. Compressive strength was measured on three 50 × 50 × 50 mm cubes for each mix, using a 3000 kN compression machine. Load was applied continuously at 2400 ± 200 N/s until failure. The maximum load was recorded, and compressive strength was calculated. The flexural tests were performed using a three-point bending configuration on prism specimens (50 × 50 × 160 mm) in accordance with ASTM C348. The tests were conducted using a universal testing machine with a capacity of 300 kN, and the loading was applied under load control at a constant rate of 50 ± 10 N/s, as specified in the standard. During testing, the load–deflection response was recorded to evaluate post-cracking behavior and flexural toughness. Figure 1 shows the tests that have been made in this study. Concrete specimens were exposed to elevated temperatures of 200, 400, and 600°C in an electric furnace, see Figure 2, in accordance with ISO 834 25 and EN 1363-1 26 fire testing requirements. Heating was applied at a controlled rate of approximately 5°C/min until the designated target temperature was reached. Figure 3 shows the temperature–time profile followed during the heating and cooling stages of the thermal exposure process. This figure is essential because it shows that the heating rate, target temperatures, and cooling regime strictly followed the ISO 834 standard fire curve, as required in international fire-resistance testing. 25, 26 Each target temperature was maintained under isothermal conditions for a duration of 2 h to ensure thermal equilibrium throughout the specimens. Following the heating stage, the furnace was switched off and the specimens were subjected to natural cooling inside the furnace chamber under ambient laboratory conditions, simulating the post-fire cooling regime recommended in the standard. The cooling process followed the characteristic nonlinear decay prescribed by ISO 834, whereby the temperature decreases progressively toward ambient at a diminishing rate, thereby reproducing realistic post-fire exposure conditions. Summary of specimen details and testing standards used in the experimental program has been illustrated in Table 2.

Figure 1. Tests conducted in this study.


Figure 1.

Figure 2. The process of applying high temperatures to specimens.


Figure 2.

Figure 3. The temperatures profiles.


Figure 3.

Table 2. Summary of specimen dimensions, testing standards, and number of specimens used in the experimental program (three specimens were tested for each mixture at each temperature level).

Test Specimen size No. of specimens Test standard
Flow table Mortar cone 3 ASTM C1437
Density 50 × 50 × 50 mm cubes 3 ASTM C642
Compressive strength 50 × 50 × 50 mm cubes 3 ASTM C109
Flexural strength & load–deflection 50 × 50 × 160 mm prisms 3 ASTM C348
UPV 50 × 50 × 160 mm prisms 3 ASTM C597

3. Results and Discussion

3.1 Slump flow

The data clearly shows a decrease in the workability of the mortar as the Polypropylene (PP) fiber content increases, see Figure 4. The flow diameter a measure of workability drops from 185 mm for the control mix to 125 mm 1.5% PP fibers.

Figure 4. The flow diameter vs. pp%.


Figure 4.

The flow diameter reduction in this study about 32.4%, which is nearly identical to the 25–35% reduction documented by Jawad and Al-Haydari 27 and Kumar et al. 28 confirming that workability reduction is a predictable consequence of increased PP fiber content.

The addition of a large number of fine PP fibers significantly increases the total surface area within the mix. Since the water/cement ratio and superplasticizer dosage are kept constant, the available free water (the water lubricating the particles) is reduced, leading to a drier, stiffer mix and lower workability. Also, the dispersed fibers create an internal network or “skeletal structure” within the mortar. This network physically interlocks the cement and sand particles, hindering their relative movement and sliding results in increased internal friction, higher surface area, and formation of a fiber network that restricts particle movement. Keeping the superplasticizer dosage constant allowed the study to realistically capture the practical consequences of increasing fiber content on both workability and mechanical performance. All specimens were carefully compacted in molds and prepared under identical casting and curing conditions to minimize the influence of consolidation variability on compressive strength results.

3.2 Density

Results are shown in Figure 5 and Table 3. As illustrated in Figure 5, the density of all mortar mixtures decreased progressively with the increase in temperature. This decline can be attributed to the evaporation of physically and chemically bound water, the decomposition of hydration products, and the development of internal microcracks within the matrix. At room temperature (25°C), the density values ranged between 2189 and 2293 kg/m 3 depending on the fiber content.

Figure 5. The density vs. pp% for different temperatures level.


Figure 5.

Table 3. Dry density and residual density percentage at various pp% and temperature levels.

PP fiber content (%) Temperature (°C) Dry Density (kg/m 3) Residual %
0.0 0 2293.74 100.0
200 2271.87 99.0
400 2209.05 96.3
600 2166.91 94.5
0.5 0 2222.33 100.0
200 2199.84 99.0
400 2168.55 97.6
600 2145.62 96.5
1.0 0 2208.12 100.0
200 2180.41 98.7
400 2145.77 97.2
600 2121.18 96.0
1.5 0 2189.08 100.0
200 2160.30 98.7
400 2119.63 96.8
600 2096.32 95.8

In comparison to the reference condition, the densities decreased by roughly 5–6% when the temperature rose to 600°C. Xiao and König 29 reported similar low density loss, suggesting that strength degradation is dominated by microstructural degeneration rather than bulk mass loss. They found 5–7% density loss for concrete at 600°C. Because PP fibers have a lower specific gravity than cementitious components, their incorporation somewhat decreased the initial density. At higher temperatures, though, the variations between the combinations lost some of their significance.

It can be observed from Table 3 that all mixes maintained over 94% of their original density up to 600°C. The control mix shows a slightly sharper reduction, reaching 94.5% retention, whereas the mixes with PP fibers residual strength was between 95.8% and 96.5% compared to control one. This improvement in density retention with the inclusion of PP fibers can be related to the fibermelting mechanism, which forms micro-channels allowing vapor escape and minimizing internal pressure buildup. Consequently, this mechanism mitigates explosive spalling and microcrack propagation, resulting in slightly better dimensional and mass stability under thermal exposure. Overall, the results suggest that adding PP fibers enhances the mortar’s ability to maintain its compactness and resist degradation at elevated temperatures.

3.3 Compressive strength

The Figures 6, 7 and Table 4 reports compressive strength for mixtures with 0, 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5% PP fibers after exposure to 0, 200, 400 and 600°C with Residual Strength (%).

Figure 6. Compressive strength vs. temperature for different PP fiber contents.


Figure 6.

Figure 7. Residual strength vs. temperature for various PP fiber contents.


Figure 7.

Table 4. The compressive and residual strength% for different pp% at different temperatures.

PP fiber content (%) Temperature (°C) Compressive strength (MPa) Residual strength (%)
0.0 0 59.36 100.0
200 53.19 89.6
400 35.46 59.7
600 11.32 19.1
0.5 0 54.77 100.0
200 46.26 84.5
400 34.95 63.8
600 18.30 33.4
1.0 0 47.88 100.0
200 41.65 87.0
400 36.04 75.3
600 13.21 27.6
1.5 0 46.61 100.0
200 41.16 88.3
400 32.41 69.5
600 12.36 26.5

As shown in Figure 6, the compressive strength of all mortar specimens decreased progressively with increasing temperature, demonstrating the thermal degradation of the cementitious matrix. PP fibers slightly reduce compressive strength at ambient temperature due to increased porosity, their value lies in high-temperature performance, not initial strength. Upon heating, the fibers melt to produce pressure-relief channels that reduce spalling and limit microcracking. As a result, fiber-reinforced mortars retain much higher residual strength and toughness than the control mix, demonstrating that the benefit of fibers is post-fire structural integrity, not compressive strength at room temperature. 30 At 200°C, the reduction in strength was moderate (approximately 10–15%), primarily due to the evaporation of free water and the initiation of microcracking caused by thermal expansion mismatch between the cement paste and aggregates. 30, 31 Beyond 400°C, a sharp decline in strength was observed, particularly for the control mixture, which residual only about 60% of its initial strength. This behavior corresponds to the decomposition of calcium silicate hydrate (C–S–H) gel and partial dehydration of calcium hydroxide (CH), both of which weaken the matrix cohesion. 32, 33

At 600°C, the control mixture retained only 19.1% of its original compressive strength. In contrast, the inclusion of polypropylene fibers improved the residual strength of mortar. The 0.5% PP mixture showed the highest residual strength retention (33.4%), followed by the 1.0% PP mixture (27.6%) and the 1.5% PP mixture (26.5%). These results indicate that moderate fiber contents are more effective in mitigating thermal damage and preserving the structural integrity of mortar after high-temperature exposure. The melting of PP fibers at 160–170°C creates micro-channels that release internal vapor pressure, preventing explosive spalling and internal damage and contributing to the enhanced performance of fiber-reinforced specimens. 34, 35 This process slows the propagation of thermal cracks and improves the matrix’s structural integrity.

Husem 6 found residual strength of 20–22% for mortar at 600°C, while Alvarez et al. 15 found 30–35% residual strength for PP-reinforced mortar. Shahriar et al. 16 found 32–36% residual strength at 600°C for PP-fiber concrete.

This increased residual strength is in line with results from earlier research that showed PP fibers enhance cementitious composites’ high temperature resistance and post-heating recovery through encouraging vapor release, lowering pore pressure, and lessening the likelihood of explosive spalling. 36, 37 Additionally, the distributed fibers maintain improved load transfer inside the composite by acting as crack arresters throughout both heating and cooling cycles. 38 Overall, the findings show that a moderate amount of PP fibers (about 0.5% to 1.0%) can effectively reduce heat damage and improve mortar’s mechanical recovery after fire. But because to poor dispersion or increased porosity, an excessively high fiber content may somewhat lower the initial compressive strength.

3.4 Load–displacement curves

Both the ultimate load-carrying capacity (Pmax) and the deflection at failure (Δ) are clearly impacted by the PP fiber content and exposure temperature, according to the findings of the flexural tests shown in Figure 8 and Table 5. Flexural strength and ductility were significantly reduced (Δ dropped from 0.0600 mm to 0.0068 mm) in the fiber-free reference mix, which showed a steady decrease in Pmax from 2.80 kN at room temperature to 1.09 kN at 600°C. At all temperature settings, the addition of PP fibers improved the deformation capacity and load resistance. The blend with 0.5% PP fibers demonstrated better thermal stability by achieving a greater initial load capacity of 3.55 kN and maintaining 3.17 kN at 200°C.

Figure 8. Load – Deflection vs. temperature for different PP fiber contents.


Figure 8.

Table 5. The ultimate load and maximum recorded deflection at failure for different pp% for different temperatures level.

PP fiber content (%) Temperature (°C) Pmax (kN) Δ at failure (mm)
0.0% 0 2.800 0.0600
200 2.200 0.0205
400 1.529 0.0180
600 1.090 0.0068
0.5% 0 3.550 0.0650
200 3.173 0.0330
400 1.970 0.0600
600 1.180 0.0130
1.0% 0 4.020 0.2800
200 2.492 0.3000
400 1.550 0.1660
600 1.0952 0.0920
1.5% 0 3.820 0.3290
200 2.730 0.2440
400 1.325 0.1480
600 0.857 0.1170

Despite fiber softening, this mix maintained a significant amount of ductility at 400°C (Δ = 0.0600 mm), suggesting efficient crack-bridging and stress redistribution. The deflection at ambient temperature (0.3 mm) and Δ at 200°C (0.2200 mm) for the fiber content to 1.0% resulted in a significant improvement in deformability compared to control mix, which mean improved post-cracking energy absorption due to fiber plasticization.

For fiber content (1.5% PP) a decreased in thermal resistance and load capacity have been notice, which may be result of pore development and fiber aggregation after melting. Due to the degradation of the cement matrix and the loss of fiber–matrix interaction, all mixtures exhibited a decrease in strength and ductility at high temperatures (400–600°C).

Polypropylene fibers soften and melt at approximately 160–170°C, forming micro-channels within the cementitious matrix that facilitate vapor release and reduce internal pore pressure during heating. The formation of these channels plays a significant role in mitigating explosive spalling in cementitious materials exposed to elevated temperatures. 7, 38– 40 At moderate temperatures (≤400°C), these fibers undergo partial softening, which promotes crack bridging and energy dissipation, thereby enhancing deflection capacity, as observed in the 0.5% and 1.0% PP mixes.

Higher temperatures (>400°C) cause the fibers to completely melt, which weakens the matrix–fiber interface and creates pores, lowering stiffness and load capacity. 41 The dehydration of C-S-H gel, the decarbonation of calcium carbonate, and the formation of microcracks are all responsible for the decrease in residual load capacity at 600°C that was seen across all fiber compositions. 6– 8 Despite this deterioration, PP fibers, especially when used at the optimal dosage of 0.5%, significantly postpone the loss of stiffness and maintain residual ductility by improving stress redistribution following cracking. A balanced fiber content can give synergistic increases in both thermal resistance and post-failure deformation capacity, according to similar findings reported by other researchers studying PP fiber-reinforced concretes exposed to heat. 9– 11

3.5 Flexural strength

The relationship between temperature and flexural strength (fr) for mortars with varying PP fiber concentrations is depicted in Figure 9. The σ of the control mix gradually decreased, going from 10.5 MPa at 25°C to 4.1 MPa at 600°C, or a 61% decrease. By achieving 13.3 MPa at 0.5% PP and 14.7 MPa at 1.0% PP, the addition of PP fibers greatly increased strength under ambient conditions, indicating a higher stress transfer through fiber bridging and decreased microcrack propagation. 8, 33, 37 All mixtures, however, demonstrated significant strength loss at 200°C and beyond as a result of matrix micro cracking, cement hydrate dehydration, and polymer melting. 7, 32, 35

Figure 9. Flexural strength vs. temperature for different PP fiber contents.


Figure 9.

The 0.5% PP mix retains about 42% of its original strength at 400°C, but the 1.0% and 1.5% PP mixes retain 38% and 35% of their initial strength, respectively. Fiber melting and pore formation caused further deterioration above 400°C. 3, 42 However, fiber-reinforced mixtures continued to perform better than unreinforced mortar, demonstrating the usefulness of PP in redistributing stress prior to melting. The percentage change in σ with temperature is shown in Table 6, which shows that the highest relative loss happens above 400°C. According to the trend, polymer combustion takes precedence over the crack-bridging action above a threshold temperature of around 350 to 400°C. 43 The area under the load-displacement curve, or estimated toughness, shows that the use of PP significantly improves post-peak energy absorption.

Table 6. Flexural strength vs. PP% at different temperatures.

PP fiber content (%) Temperature (°C) f r (MPa) % change
0.0% 0 10.5000 —
0.5% 0 13.3125 +26.83%
1.0% 0 15.0750 +43.57%
1.5% 0 14.3250 +36.43%
0.0% 200 8.2500 —
0.5% 200 11.8988 +44.25%
1.0% 200 9.3450 +13.27%
1.5% 200 10.2375 +24.09%
0.0% 400 5.7338 —
0.5% 400 7.3875 +28.85%
1.0% 400 5.8125 +1.37%
1.5% 400 4.9688 −13.34%
0.0% 600 4.0875 —
0.5% 600 4.4250 +8.26%
1.0% 600 4.1070 +0.48%
1.5% 600 3.2138 −21.38%

The flexural strength retention observed in the present study (55% for 0.5% PP and 38–42% for other mixes at 400°C) aligns well with the 30–45% range reported by Noumowé 42 and the 35–50% range noted by Li et al. 43 These quantitative similarities confirm that PP-reinforced mortar exhibits a similar degradation trend to PP-reinforced concrete under thermal loading.

3.6 Toughness

The flexural toughness has been calculated from area under load-displacement curves and the results illustrated in Figure 10 and Table 7. For these results, at ambient temperature, the flexural toughness rose from 0.052 N·mm/mm 2 for control specimen to 0.072 N·mm/mm 2 for specimens contain 0.5% PP, resulted in higher ductility and better deformation capacity. This improvement is in line with recent studies that demonstrate that lower dosages of PP encourage matrix–fiber synergy, but higher dosages may result in fiber aggregation and voids. 44, 45 Up to 1.0% PP addition often improves flexural performance and heat resistance at mild temperatures (≤400°C); however, structural pore expansion and polymer disintegration cause significant degradation above this range. 37, 45 At elevated temperatures, at 600°C, the 1.5% PP mix retained a residual toughness of 50 N·mm, which was 10 times higher than the control, indicating maintained post-cracking deformation capability. 43

Figure 10. Flexural toughness vs. temperature for different PP fiber contents.


Figure 10.

Table 7. Flexural toughness and percentage change relative to the control mix (0% PP) at each temperature.

PP fiber content (%) Temperature (°C) Toughness (N·mm) % change vs control
0.0 0 85 0%
0.5 0 115 +35.3%
1.0 0 600 +605.9%
1.5 0 630 +641.2%
0.0 200 25 0%
0.5 200 50 +100%
1.0 200 280 +1020%
1.5 200 335 +1240%
0.0 400 15 0%
0.5 400 20 +33.3%
1.0 400 135 +800%
1.5 400 100 +566.7%
0.0 600 5 0%
0.5 600 10 +100%
1.0 600 50 +900%
1.5 600 50 +900%

These results are in line with prior studies showing that post-peak energy dissipation in high-temperature concrete is greatly enhanced by small PP additions (0.5–1.0%). 46 While maintaining exceptional thermal stability, too much PP (>1.0%) may cause voids that compromise matrix integrity at room temperature. 9, 43 Overall, the toughness trends demonstrate that PP fibers are helpful in lowering heat-induced brittleness and enhancing residual performance by improving ductility and energy absorption under both normal and thermal stress settings.

3.7 Ultrasonic impulse velocity

To provide additional insight into the internal damage and microstructural deterioration induced by elevated temperatures, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) measurements were conducted on all mortar mixtures. UPV is a widely used non-destructive testing (NDT) technique for evaluating internal defects, microcracking, and changes in the pore structure of cementitious materials. The results presented in Table 8 allow a more quantitative assessment of the internal degradation occurring in the mortar specimens after exposure to temperatures of 200, 400, and 600°C. According to the UPV classification criteria, the mortar mixtures exhibited excellent to good quality at ambient temperature, while exposure to elevated temperatures progressively reduced the internal quality of the specimens. At 600°C, most mixtures fall within the medium to poor quality range, indicating significant internal microstructural damage caused by thermal exposure. The reduction in UPV values with increasing polypropylene fiber content at ambient temperature does not necessarily indicate deterioration in mechanical performance. This behavior can be attributed to the introduction of additional interfaces and micro-voids within the mortar matrix due to fiber dispersion. These interfaces slightly reduce the continuity of the solid phase and consequently slow the propagation of ultrasonic waves. 47

Table 8. UPV results of mortar mixtures with different polypropylene fiber contents after exposure to elevated temperatures.

PP fiber content (%) Temperature (°C) UPV (km/s) Change (%) vs control at same temperature Concrete Quality
0.0 0 4.70 0.0 Excellent
0.5 0 4.50 −4.3 Good
1.0 0 4.20 −10.6 Good
1.5 0 4.00 −14.9 Good
0.0 200 4.30 0.0 Good
0.5 200 4.20 −2.3 Good
1.0 200 4.00 −7.0 Good
1.5 200 3.80 −11.6 Good
0.0 400 3.70 0.0 Good
0.5 400 3.60 −2.7 Good
1.0 400 3.40 −8.1 Medium
1.5 400 3.20 −13.5 Medium
0.0 600 3.00 0.0 Medium
0.5 600 2.90 −3.3 Poor
1.0 600 2.70 −10.0 Poor
1.5 600 2.50 −16.7 Poor

Despite this reduction in wave velocity, polypropylene fibers enhance the crack-bridging capability and post-cracking energy absorption of the mortar. Therefore, the decrease in UPV mainly reflects changes in the internal pore structure rather than a reduction in structural performance. Similar observations have been reported in previous studies on fiber-reinforced cementitious composites, where the presence of fibers increases ductility and toughness while slightly reducing ultrasonic pulse velocity due to increased heterogeneity in the matrix.

4. Conclusion

This study examined the mechanical performance and thermal resistance of mortar containing 0–1.5% PP fibers exposed to temperatures up to 600°C. The following conclusions have been drawn based on results:

  • 1.

    Incorporating PP fibers decreased flow diameter from 185 mm (0% PP) to 125 mm (1.5% PP), representing a 32.4% reduction, primarily due to increased internal friction and surface area.

  • 2.

    All mixtures retained above 94% of their original density at 600°C. The control mix kept 94.5%, whereas PP fiber mixes retained slightly higher values (96.0–96.5%), confirming that melted fibers help limit microcrack propagation.

  • 3.

    At ambient temperature, compressive strength decreased with fiber inclusion (from 59.36 MPa for the control to 46.61–54.77 MPa for PP mixes.

  • 4.

    At 600°C, however, PP fibers improved residual strength, for control mix was 19.1% residual strength while for 0.5% PP was 33.4% residual strength (75% improvement over control), 26.5% for 1.0% PP, and 27.6% for 1.5% PP.

  • 5.

    At ambient temperature, flexural strength increased significantly with PP fibers.

  • 6.

    After exposure to 600°C, fiber-reinforced mixes kept 0.5–8.3% more flexural strength compared to the control.

  • 7.

    Flexural toughness improved markedly due to fiber bridging. At 600°C, the 1.5% PP mix retained toughness values nearly 10 times higher than the control, confirming substantial enhancement in post-cracking energy absorption.

  • 8.

    Based on results of all tested made in this study, 0.5% PP fibers provided the best balance between initial performance and high-temperature residual behavior, offering the highest combined improvement in residual compressive and flexural, and ductility.

The present study is limited to a single PP fiber geometry and one mortar mix design (w/c = 0.45; cement:sand = 1:3) with a maximum exposure temperature of 600°C under furnace cooling conditions. In addition, long-term durability aspects after thermal exposure were not examined. Future research will investigate alternative fiber systems (e.g., basalt, steel, or hybrid fibers), higher fire temperatures (800–1000°C), different cooling regimes, and microstructural characterization techniques (e.g., SEM and porosity analysis) to provide deeper insight into thermal damage mechanisms.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 2; peer review: 2 approved

Data availability

The datasets supporting the finding of this study are openly available in Zenodo: Data Manuscript: Performance of Polypropylene Fiber-Reinforced Mortar Exposed to Elevated Temperatures repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18056598. 48

This project contains the following data:

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

References

  • 1. Ismael BH, Ali ZM, Hama SM, et al. : Flexural Characteristics of Hollow One Way-Ferrocement Slabs. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 2025;15(2):22226–22231. 10.48084/etasr.10283 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ismael B, Hama S, Ali Z, et al. : Structural Behavior of Voided Fibrous Sustainable Ferrocement Slabs. J. Eng. Des. 2025;2025:8870378. 10.1155/je/8870378 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Neville AM: Properties of Concrete. Pearson Education Limited; 5th ed. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kodur V: Properties of Concrete at Elevated Temperatures. Int. Scholarly Res. Notices. 2014;2014:468510. 10.1155/2014/468510 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Zhang D, Tan K: Fire performance of ultra-high performance concrete: effect of fine aggregate size and fibers. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2022;22:116. 10.1007/s43452-022-00430-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Chadli M, Tebbal N, Mellas M: Impact of elevated temperatures on the behavior and microstructure of reactive powder concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021;300:124031. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124031 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hama SM, Jamel AS, Tawfik TA: Effect of Elevated Temperatures on the Mechanical and Durability Properties of Green Concrete with Waste Glass Powder. SILICON. 2025. 10.1007/s12633-025-03536-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Husem M: The effects of high temperature on compressive and flexural strengths of ordinary and high-performance concrete. Fire Saf. J. 2006;41(2):155–163. 10.1016/j.firesaf.2005.12.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Wang Y, Nejati F, Edalatpanah SA, et al. : Experimental study to compare the strength of concrete with different amounts of polypropylene fibers at high temperatures. Sci. Rep. 2024;14:8566. 10.1038/s41598-024-59084-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Kalifa P, Chene G, Galle C: High-Temperature Behaviour of HPC with Polypropylene Fibers from Spalling to Microstructure. Cem. Concr. Res. 2001;31:1487–1499. 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00596-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Hama SM, Zayan HS, Hama SM: The behavior of concrete incorporating ring shape waste plastic fibers under different load conditions. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 2023;8(5):134. 10.1007/s41062-023-01105-w [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Zeiml M, Leithner D, Lackner R, et al. : How Do Polypropylene Fibers Improve the Spalling Behavior of In-Situ Concrete? Cem. Concr. Res. 2006;36(5):929–942. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.12.018 Reference Source [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Shen D, Liu X, Zeng X, et al. : Effect of polypropylene plastic fibers length on cracking resistance of high performance concrete at early age. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020;244:117874. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117874 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Filazi A, Pehlivanlı ZO: Enhancing Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Lightweight Mortar With Synthetic Fibers: A Comprehensive Study. Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 2025;34(16):e70086. 10.1002/tal.70086 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Alvarez Y, Prieto MI, Cobo A: Mechanical Properties of Cement Mortars Reinforced with Polypropylene Fibers Subjected to High Temperatures and Different Cooling Regimes. Buildings. 2023;13(6):1445. 10.3390/buildings13061445 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Shahriar F, Roy B, Datta SD: Mechanical Properties Of Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced High-Strength Concrete Exposed To Elevated Temperatures: An Experimental And Artificial Neural Network Approach. 7th Int. Conf. Civ. Eng. Sustain. Dev. (ICCESD 2024). Bangladesh:2024. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Chen H, Li D: Constitutive Relation of Polypropylene-Fiber-Reinforced Mortar Under Uniaxial Compression at High Temperature. Buildings. 2025;15(3):468. 10.3390/buildings15030468 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Mindeguia JC, Pimienta P, Noumowe A, et al. : Temperature, pore pressure and mass variation of concrete subjected to high temperature—experimental and numerical discussion on spalling risk. Cem. Concr. Res. 2010;40(3):477–487. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.10.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Yermak N, Pliya P, Beaucour AL, et al. : Influence of steel and/or polypropylene fibres on the behaviour of concrete at high temperature: Spalling, transfer and mechanical properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017;132:240–250. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.120 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Iraqi Specification No. 5: Portland cement. Baghdad: The Cement Agency for Standardization and Quality Control;2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Iraqi Specification No. 45: The aggregate of natural source for concrete construction, Baghdad. 1984.
  • 22. ASTM C1437: Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International;2020; vol.2020. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 23. ASTM C109/C109M-20b: Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50 mm] Cube Specimens). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International;2020; vol.2020. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 24. ASTM C348: Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International;2020; vol.2020. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 25. ISO 834-1:1999, Fire-resistance tests — Elements of building construction –Part 1: General requirements. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization;1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. EN 1363-1:2020, Fire resistance tests – Part 1: General requirements. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization (CEN);2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Jawada HS, Al-Haydari IS: Sustainable Use of Polypropylene Fibers as a Cement Mortar Reinforcement. Int. J. Eng. 2022;35(8):1494–1500. 10.5829/IJE.2022.35.08B.05 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Kumar N, Sahu A, Noor IM, et al. : Investigating the effect of polypropylene fibres and curing parameters on the workability and mechanical properties of concrete. Zastita Materijala. 2025;66(1):179–186. 10.62638/ZasMat1240 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Xiao J, König G: Study on concrete at high temperature in China an overview. Fire Saf. J. 2004;39(1):89–103. 10.1016/S0379-7112(03)00093-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kuhair H, Hama S, Aziz K: Long-term behavior of composite steel plate-concrete slabs incorporating waste plastic fibers. Mag. Civ. Eng. 2022;109(1):10904. 10.34910/MCE.109.4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Phan LT, Carino NJ: Review of mechanical properties of HSC at elevated temperature. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 1998;10(1):58–65. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1998)10:1(58) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Poon CS, Azhar S, Anson M, et al. : Performance of metakaolin concrete at elevated temperatures. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2003;25(1):83–89. 10.1016/S0958-9465(01)00061-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Chan SYN, Peng G-F, Anson M: Residual strength and pore structure of high-strength concrete and normal strength concrete after exposure to high temperatures. Cem. Concr. Compos. 1999;21(1):23–27. 10.1016/S0958-9465(98)00034-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Khoury GA: Compressive Strength of Concrete at High Temperatures: Reassessment. Mag. Concr. Res. 1992;44:291–309. 10.1680/macr.1992.44.161.291 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Hertz KD: Limits of spalling of fire-exposed concrete. Fire Saf. J. 2003;38(2):103–116. 10.1016/S0379-7112(02)00051-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Bingöl AF, Gül R: Effect of elevated temperatures and cooling regimes on normal strength concrete. Fire Mater. 2009;33(2):79–88. 10.1002/fam.987 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Lau A, Anson M: Effect of high temperatures on high performance steel fibre reinforced concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2006;36(9):1698–1707. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.03.024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Zeiml M, Leithner D, Lackner R, et al. : How do polypropylene fibers improve the spalling behavior of in-situ concrete? Cem. Concr. Res. 2006;36(5):929–942. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.12.018 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Bentur A, Mindess S: Fibre Reinforced Cementitious Composites. London: Taylor & Francis; 2nd ed. 2006. 10.1201/9781482267747 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Nili M, Afroughsabet V: The effects of silica fume and polypropylene fibers on the impact resistance and mechanical properties of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010;24(6):927–933. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.11.025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Song PS, Hwang S: Mechanical properties of high-strength steel fiber-reinforced concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2004;18(9):669–673. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.04.027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Noumowé A, Siddique R, Debicki G: Permeability of high-performance concrete subjected to elevated temperature (150–600°C). Constr. Build. Mater. 2009;23(5):1855–1861. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.09.023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Li M, Qian CX, Sun W: Mechanical properties of high-performance concrete after fire exposure. Cem. Concr. Res. 2004;34(6):1001–1005. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.11.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Noumowé A: Mechanical properties and microstructure of high-strength concrete containing polypropylene fibres exposed to temperatures up to 200°C. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005;35(11):2192–2198. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.03.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Tawfik M, El-said A, Deifalla A, et al. : Mechanical Properties of Hybrid Steel-Polypropylene Fiber Reinforced High Strength Concrete Exposed to Various Temperatures. Fibers. 2022;10(6):53. 10.3390/fib10060053 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Pliya P, Beaucour AL, Noumowé A: Contribution of cocktail of polypropylene and steel fibres in improving the behaviour of high strength concrete subjected to high temperature. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011;25(4):1926–1934. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.064 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Shen J, Xu Q, Wang S: Characterization of thermal damage and compressive strength during drying at elevated temperatures using ultrasonic pulse velocity. J. Build. Eng. 2023;75:107029. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107029 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Alshijlawi M, Hama S, Abdulhamed M, et al. : Data Manuscript: Performance of Polypropylene Fiber-Reinforced Mortar Exposed to Elevated Temperatures. Zenodo. 2025. 10.5281/zenodo.18056598 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2026 Jul 28. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.197465.r497918

Reviewer response for version 2

Aktham Hatem Qasim 1

1. Subsection 2.1 (The description of the superplasticizer is insufficient). The authors should specify the commercial product, manufacturer, chemical base (e.g., polycarboxylate ether), etc.

2. Add fig. of PP fiber used in the current study>

3. Table 1 (Better move the PP fiber column to the end of the table and remove the percentage symbol from its values. In addition, remove the percentage symbol from the Superplasticizer entries, as the unit is already indicated in the column heading.)

4.Add a failure mode for the flexural strength test.

5. Subsectoin 3.1, The addition of a large number of fine PP fibers....... (Better change to volume fraction or  fiber content).

6.Subsection 3.2 (Please add appropriate references to substantiate this attribution.)

7.Please correct the temperature unit on the x-axis in Figures 5 and 6 from "0C" to the standard notation "°C".

8. Subsection 3.3 (33–28%, respectively) (Please ensure consistency between the numerical values reported in the text and those presented in Table 3.)

In my opinion, the manuscript is scientifically valid in its current form. The comments provided in my review are intended as  minor, non-essential suggestions to improve the clarity and presentation of the manuscript, and they do not affect the scientific validity of the study or its conclusions.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Construction Materials, Materials, Green Concrete, Composite Concrete, Cementitious Materials, Fiber-Reinforced Concrete, Sustainable Construction Materials, Concrete Durability, High-Performance Concrete, Structural Materials.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2026 Mar 28. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.197465.r469065

Reviewer response for version 2

öznur Biricik 1

The revisions are sufficient for indexing . 

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Concrete technology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2026 Mar 2. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.193533.r461087

Reviewer response for version 1

Kaveh Roushan 1

General Evaluation

This study examines the mechanical and thermal properties of cement mortar reinforced with polypropylene (PP) fibers at volume fractions of 0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5%, subjected to temperatures of 200°C, 400°C, and 600°C. It is highly relevant for fire-resistant building applications. A key strength is its focus on mortar specifically, clearly distinguishing it from concrete in terms of pore structure, thermal response, and cracking behavior, thus filling an important research gap. Identifying 0.5% PP fiber as the optimal balance between initial strength and residual fire performance offers a practical takeaway. Additionally, making the raw dataset available on Zenodo enhances transparency and reproducibility.

Specific Comments

1. Absence of Microstructural Evidence: The paper's main mechanistic claim — that melting PP fibers form micro-channels that reduce internal vapor pressure and prevent explosive spalling — is reiterated throughout the results and discussion but lacks direct evidence. No SEM images are included, making this key assertion speculative. To support this, SEM images of fractured mortar cross-sections after exposure to 200°C, 400°C, and 600°C should be provided for both the control and fiber-reinforced mixes, with annotations highlighting micro-channel formation, fiber remnants, the fiber–matrix interface, and void distribution. Additionally, quantitative porosity measurements via Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP) or Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) testing would strengthen the existing density and strength data.

2. Superplasticizer Characterization and Workability Methodology: The manuscript mentions '1% superplasticizer type F' but does not specify the manufacturer, product name, code, or chemical base, which are necessary for reproducibility. More importantly, the superplasticizer dosage was kept constant across all mixes while PP fiber content varied from 0% to 1.5%. This caused a 32.4% reduction in flow diameter in the highest fiber mix, potentially affecting casting quality and confounding the interpretation of compressive strength at higher fiber levels. The lower strength might partly result from reduced workability rather than fiber effects alone. The authors should either (a) modify the superplasticizer dosage for each mix to ensure consistent workability before casting strength tests, or (b) clearly state this as a study limitation and estimate its possible influence on the results.

3. Missing Specimen Replication Details and Flexural Testing Setup: The methodology lacks details on the number of specimens used for density measurements, and the overall specimen count for each property–temperature–fiber combination is not summarized. A table should be included, listing specimen counts, dimensions, and related test standards for each measured property. Furthermore, Section 2.2 does not clarify whether flexural testing was conducted under displacement or load control, nor does it specify the crosshead speed (mm/min) or the model and capacity of the testing machine. Since toughness values are obtained from load–deflection curves, knowing the testing rate is essential; without this, the toughness data cannot be independently verified or reproduced.

4. PP Fiber Type and Internal Melting Temperature Inconsistency: The fiber type (monofilament or fibrillated/multifilament) and the manufacturer or product name are not specified. These details affect fiber–matrix bonding, dispersion, and thermal properties, and should be included as standard information. Additionally, there is an inconsistency regarding the melting temperature: the abstract and Section 2.1 report a melting point of 160–170°C, whereas Section 3.4 states that PP fibers 'melt near 320–340°C'. This discrepancy needs clarification and resolution. The 160–170°C range corresponds to the standard melting point of isotactic polypropylene, while the higher temperature likely refers to a different thermal or kinetic condition. Consistent use of the correct values throughout the document is essential manuscript.

5. Curing Conditions: The manuscript states that curing occurred 'in water at 20 ± 2°C until 28 days old," but it does not clarify whether the water was lime-saturated, which is the standard method to prevent calcium leaching from mortar and influences hydration products and final strength. Additionally, it is not mentioned if the curing water was renewed regularly. These details should be included.

6. Novelty Justification and Literature Differentiation: Although the mortar-vs-concrete distinction is presented as the novelty claim, the Introduction lacks a detailed mechanistic comparison to fully justify why this difference merits separate investigation. The literature should be cited to discuss the specific quantitative differences in paste-to-aggregate ratio, pore-size distribution, and thermal cracking mode between mortar and concrete. Additionally, in Sections 3.3 and 3.5, where results are compared with previous studies, it should be clearer whether those studies examined mortar or concrete. Each comparison ought to specify the material system used in the cited work and emphasize the mortar-specific findings of the current study.

7. Internal Inconsistency in Compressive Strength Reporting: In Section 3.3, it states that mortars reinforced with PP fiber 'maintain a comparatively higher strength (33–28%, respectively)' for the 0.5% and 1.5% PP mixes at 600°C. However, Table 3 shows the 1.0% PP mix retains 27.6%, and the 1.5% PP mix retains 26.5%. The 1.5% mix is not the pair being described. The text should be revised to accurately reflect the tabulated values for each mix separately and organize the performance ranking clearly.

8. Dedicated Limitations and Future Work Section: The manuscript lacks a 'Limitations and Future Work' section, which is a notable omission. The following limitations should be explicitly recognized: (a) only one PP fiber geometry was tested; comparing it with basalt, steel, or hybrid systems would enhance the applicability; (b) only a single mortar mix design (w/c = 0.45, 1:3 cement to sand) was studied; (c) the highest temperature tested, 600°C, does not encompass more extreme fire scenarios reaching 800–1000°C; (d) long-term durability aspects such as carbonation, chloride resistance, and creep after thermal exposure were not evaluated; and (e) the influence of different cooling methods (furnace cooling versus water quenching) on residual properties was not addressed, although this is crucial for post-fire structural assessments.

9. Minor Typographical and Presentation Errors: Several typographical and presentation errors need correction. The axis label 'Temretures, 0C' in Figures 5, 6, and 9 should be amended to 'Temperature (°C)'. The term 'formulation' in Section 3.5 should be changed to 'formation' ('pore formation'). The phrase 'control mia' in Section 3.4 should be corrected to 'control mix'. The label 'pp%' in Figure 4 should be standardized as 'PP fiber content (%)'. Lastly, Figure 10 (toughness) would be improved by adding a supplementary data table similar to Tables 2–5, enabling readers to easily access the exact numerical toughness values.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Soil stabilization, soil improvement, fiber reinforcement, novel stabilizer, durability cycles, energy engineering, geothermal energy, shallow geothermal energy, energy piles, energy micropiles, energy helical piles, numerical simulation, FEM.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2026 Mar 5.
Sheelan Hama 1

Specific Comments

1. Absence of Microstructural Evidence: The paper's main mechanistic claim — that melting PP fibers form micro-channels that reduce internal vapor pressure and prevent explosive spalling — is reiterated throughout the results and discussion but lacks direct evidence. No SEM images are included, making this key assertion speculative. To support this, SEM images of fractured mortar cross-sections after exposure to 200°C, 400°C, and 600°C should be provided for both the control and fiber-reinforced mixes, with annotations highlighting micro-channel formation, fiber remnants, the fiber–matrix interface, and void distribution. Additionally, quantitative porosity measurements via Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP) or Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) testing would strengthen the existing density and strength data.

Response to reviewer comment: While Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) observations would indeed provide direct microstructural visualization, SEM analysis was not performed in the present experimental program due to laboratory limitations. Nevertheless, in response to the reviewer’s suggestion, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) testing has been conducted and incorporated into the revised manuscript to provide additional quantitative insight into the internal damage and microstructural deterioration of the mortar specimens after thermal exposure.

A new subsection entitled “3.7 Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) Analysis” has been added to the Results and Discussion section. The UPV results show a progressive reduction in wave velocity with increasing temperature and fiber content, which indicates the development of internal microcracks, pore expansion, and increased internal voids within the mortar matrix. These observations are consistent with the reductions observed in density and mechanical strength.

The authors acknowledge that future work will include detailed microstructural characterization using SEM and pore structure analysis techniques such as Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry (MIP) to further investigate the micro-channel formation and pore evolution in heated mortar.

2. Superplasticizer Characterization and Workability Methodology: The manuscript mentions '1% superplasticizer type F' but does not specify the manufacturer, product name, code, or chemical base, which are necessary for reproducibility. More importantly, the superplasticizer dosage was kept constant across all mixes while PP fiber content varied from 0% to 1.5%. This caused a 32.4% reduction in flow diameter in the highest fiber mix, potentially affecting casting quality and confounding the interpretation of compressive strength at higher fiber levels. The lower strength might partly result from reduced workability rather than fiber effects alone. The authors should either (a) modify the superplasticizer dosage for each mix to ensure consistent workability before casting strength tests, or (b) clearly state this as a study limitation and estimate its possible influence on the results.

Response to reviewer comment: The Materials section has been revised to clearly describe the type and technical properties of the superplasticizer used in this study. The manuscript now specifies that a polycarboxylate-based high-range water-reducing admixture, Sika ViscoCrete-180 GS, conforming to ASTM C494 Type F, was used. Additional information regarding its specific gravity (1.07), pH range (4–6), color (light brownish), and dosage (1% by weight of cement) has been added to improve the clarity and reproducibility of the experimental methodology.

“A polycarboxylate-based high-range water-reducing admixture (HRWR), Sika ViscoCrete-180 GS, conforming to ASTM C494 Type F, was used to improve the workability of the mortar mixtures. The superplasticizer has a specific gravity of approximately 1.07, pH value ranging from 4 to 6, and a light brownish liquid appearance. The admixture is based on modified polycarboxylate ether technology and was added at a constant dosage of 1% by weight of cement for all mixtures to maintain comparable workability conditions while isolating the effect of polypropylene fiber content on the fresh and hardened properties of the mortar.”

3. Missing Specimen Replication Details and Flexural Testing Setup: The methodology lacks details on the number of specimens used for density measurements, and the overall specimen count for each property–temperature–fiber combination is not summarized. A table should be included, listing specimen counts, dimensions, and related test standards for each measured property. Furthermore, Section 2.2 does not clarify whether flexural testing was conducted under displacement or load control, nor does it specify the crosshead speed (mm/min) or the model and capacity of the testing machine. Since toughness values are obtained from load–deflection curves, knowing the testing rate is essential; without this, the toughness data cannot be independently verified or reproduced.

Response to reviewer comment: A new summary table has also been added to the manuscript to clearly present the specimen count, specimen size, and relevant test standards used for density, compressive strength, flexural strength, and UPV measurements, see Table 2.

Also, Section 2.2 has been expanded to clarify the flexural testing procedure and loading conditions. The manuscript now specifies that the flexural tests were performed using a three-point bending configuration on prism specimens (50 × 50 × 160 mm) in accordance with ASTM C348. The tests were conducted using a universal testing machine with a capacity of 300 kN, and the loading was applied under load control at a constant rate of 50 ± 10 N/s, as specified in the standard. During testing, the load–deflection response was recorded to evaluate post-cracking behavior and flexural toughness.

4. PP Fiber Type and Internal Melting Temperature Inconsistency: The fiber type (monofilament or fibrillated/multifilament) and the manufacturer or product name are not specified. These details affect fiber–matrix bonding, dispersion, and thermal properties, and should be included as standard information. Additionally, there is an inconsistency regarding the melting temperature: the abstract and Section 2.1 report a melting point of 160–170°C, whereas Section 3.4 states that PP fibers 'melt near 320–340°C'. This discrepancy needs clarification and resolution. The 160–170°C range corresponds to the standard melting point of isotactic polypropylene, while the higher temperature likely refers to a different thermal or kinetic condition. Consistent use of the correct values throughout the document is essential manuscript.

Response to reviewer comment: The authors thank the reviewer for this important observation. In response to this comment, the manuscript has been revised to clarify both the type and manufacturer information of the polypropylene fibers and to resolve the inconsistency regarding the reported melting temperature. First, the fiber type has now been clearly specified in Section 2.1. The polypropylene fibers used in this study are monofilament polypropylene fibers with a length of 12 mm and a diameter of approximately 18 μm. These fibers were selected due to their effectiveness in improving crack resistance and reducing spalling in cementitious composites exposed to elevated temperatures. Second, the inconsistency related to the melting temperature has been corrected throughout the manuscript. The correct melting temperature of polypropylene fibers is approximately 160–170°C, which corresponds to the melting point of isotactic polypropylene reported in the literature. The previously stated value of 320–340°C in Section 3.4 was incorrect and has been removed from the revised manuscript to maintain consistency. The text in Section 3.4 has been revised accordingly to state that polypropylene fibers soften and melt at approximately 160–170°C, forming micro-channels within the cementitious matrix that facilitate vapor release and reduce internal pore pressure during heating.

These revisions ensure consistency and improve the clarity and accuracy of the material description in the manuscript.

5. Curing Conditions: The manuscript states that curing occurred 'in water at 20 ± 2°C until 28 days old," but it does not clarify whether the water was lime-saturated, which is the standard method to prevent calcium leaching from mortar and influences hydration products and final strength. Additionally, it is not mentioned if the curing water was renewed regularly. These details should be included.

Response to reviewer comment:  In the present study, the specimens were cured in tap water maintained at 20 ± 2°C until the age of 28 days. Although lime-saturated water is sometimes recommended to minimize calcium leaching, the use of tap water for curing cementitious specimens is a common laboratory practice and has been widely adopted in many experimental studies on mortar and concrete.

To maintain stable curing conditions, the curing water was periodically renewed, and the temperature of the curing tank was maintained within the specified range (20 ± 2°C). These details have now been clarified in Section 2.1 of the revised manuscript to improve the transparency and reproducibility of the curing procedure.

6. Novelty Justification and Literature Differentiation: Although the mortar-vs-concrete distinction is presented as the novelty claim, the Introduction lacks a detailed mechanistic comparison to fully justify why this difference merits separate investigation. The literature should be cited to discuss the specific quantitative differences in paste-to-aggregate ratio, pore-size distribution, and thermal cracking mode between mortar and concrete. Additionally, in Sections 3.3 and 3.5, where results are compared with previous studies, it should be clearer whether those studies examined mortar or concrete. Each comparison ought to specify the material system used in the cited work and emphasize the mortar-specific findings of the current study.

Response to reviewer comment: The novelty of this study lies in providing a comprehensive experimental evaluation of polypropylene fiber–reinforced cement mortar exposed to elevated temperatures up to 600°C. While most previous studies have focused primarily on fiber-reinforced concrete, the present work specifically investigates mortar systems, which exhibit different behavior mechanisms. In addition to conventional strength measurements, this study systematically examines residual compressive strength, flexural strength, load–deflection behavior, and flexural toughness after thermal exposure. The work also identifies the best polypropylene fiber dosage for improving post-fire mechanical performance of mortar and provides detailed insights into the role of fiber melting in reducing thermal damage and enhancing residual structural integrity.

7. Internal Inconsistency in Compressive Strength Reporting: In Section 3.3, it states that mortars reinforced with PP fiber 'maintain a comparatively higher strength (33–28%, respectively)' for the 0.5% and 1.5% PP mixes at 600°C. However, Table 3 shows the 1.0% PP mix retains 27.6%, and the 1.5% PP mix retains 26.5%. The 1.5% mix is not the pair being described. The text should be revised to accurately reflect the tabulated values for each mix separately and organize the performance ranking clearly.

Response to reviewer comment: The authors appreciate the reviewer for carefully identifying this inconsistency in the description of the residual compressive strength results. The statement in Section 3.3 has been revised to accurately reflect the values reported in Table 3.

According to the experimental results, at 600°C, the residual compressive strength values were 33.4% for the 0.5% PP mix, 27.6% for the 1.0% PP mix, and 26.5% for the 1.5% PP mix, compared with 19.1% for the control mixture. Therefore, the 0.5% PP mixture exhibited the highest residual strength, followed by the 1.0% PP and 1.5% PP mixtures, respectively. The manuscript text has been corrected to clearly present this ranking and ensure consistency with Table 4.

8. Dedicated Limitations and Future Work Section: The manuscript lacks a 'Limitations and Future Work' section, which is a notable omission. The following limitations should be explicitly recognized: (a) only one PP fiber geometry was tested; comparing it with basalt, steel, or hybrid systems would enhance the applicability; (b) only a single mortar mix design (w/c = 0.45, 1:3 cement to sand) was studied; (c) the highest temperature tested, 600°C, does not encompass more extreme fire scenarios reaching 800–1000°C; (d) long-term durability aspects such as carbonation, chloride resistance, and creep after thermal exposure were not evaluated; and (e) the influence of different cooling methods (furnace cooling versus water quenching) on residual properties was not addressed, although this is crucial for post-fire structural assessments.

Response to reviewer comment:  The authors appreciate this valuable suggestion. Accordingly, a short “Limitations and Future Work” statement has been incorporated in the revised manuscript. The present study is limited to a single PP fiber geometry and one mortar mix design (w/c = 0.45; cement:sand = 1:3) with a maximum exposure temperature of 600°C under furnace cooling conditions. In addition, long-term durability aspects after thermal exposure were not examined. Future research will investigate alternative fiber systems (e.g., basalt, steel, or hybrid fibers), higher fire temperatures (800–1000°C), different cooling regimes, and microstructural characterization techniques (e.g., SEM and porosity analysis) to provide deeper insight into thermal damage mechanisms.

9. Minor Typographical and Presentation Errors: Several typographical and presentation errors need correction. The axis label 'Temretures, 0C' in Figures 5, 6, and 9 should be amended to 'Temperature (°C)'. The term 'formulation' in Section 3.5 should be changed to 'formation' ('pore formation'). The phrase 'control mia' in Section 3.4 should be corrected to 'control mix'. The label 'pp%' in Figure 4 should be standardized as 'PP fiber content (%)'. Lastly, Figure 10 (toughness) would be improved by adding a supplementary data table similar to Tables 2–5, enabling readers to easily access the exact numerical toughness values.

Response to reviewer comment: The authors thank the reviewer for carefully identifying these typographical and presentation issues. Also, Table 7. Flexural toughness and percentage change relative to the control mix (0% PP) at each temperature, has been added

F1000Res. 2026 Feb 5. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.193533.r451092

Reviewer response for version 1

öznur Biricik 1

General Evaluation

The study investigates the effects of polypropylene (PP) fiber reinforcement (at 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% ratios) on the fluidity and post-high-temperature strength properties of mortar mixtures. While the topic is relevant, several methodological points and technical additions are required to enhance the quality of the manuscript.

Specific Comments

  1. Workability and Casting Methodology: In the study, the superplasticizer dosage was kept constant across all mixtures to compare slump values. However, the significantly reduced fluidity in the 1.5% fiber-reinforced mixture directly impacts the casting quality and, consequently, the compressive strength results. It would have been methodologically sounder to maintain a constant flow/workability by adjusting the superplasticizer dosage for each fiber ratio before preparing the strength specimens. This would ensure that the strength loss is attributed solely to the fiber characteristics rather than poor consolidation.

  2. Reference Timeliness: The manuscript would benefit from a more up-to-date literature review. Incorporating more citations from 2023, 2024, and 2025 will strengthen the current state-of-the-art section and demonstrate the study’s relevance to recent developments.

  3. Material Characterization: The specific properties and technical data of the superplasticizer used in the mixtures should be clearly detailed in the Materials section.

  4. Microstructural Analysis (SEM): The inclusion of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images is essential to support the macroscopic observations. Specifically, SEM images taken after exposure to high temperatures would provide visual evidence of the "melt-out" effect of the PP fibers and the resulting micro-channels/voids that influence the residual strength.

  5. Porosity and NDT Analysis: To better quantify the internal damage caused by thermal stress, the authors are encouraged to perform Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) tests or Mercury Intrusion Porosity (MIP) analysis. These methods would provide a more scientific explanation for the void formation and structural degradation observed after high-temperature exposure.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Not applicable

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Concrete technology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2026 Mar 5.
Sheelan Hama 1

Specific Comments

  1. Workability and Casting Methodology: In the study, the superplasticizer dosage was kept constant across all mixtures to compare slump values. However, the significantly reduced fluidity in the 1.5% fiber-reinforced mixture directly impacts the casting quality and, consequently, the compressive strength results. It would have been methodologically sounder to maintain a constant flow/workability by adjusting the superplasticizer dosage for each fiber ratio before preparing the strength specimens. This would ensure that the strength loss is attributed solely to the fiber characteristics rather than poor consolidation.

Response to reviewer comment: The authors agree that maintaining a constant workability by adjusting the superplasticizer dosage could help isolate the pure effect of fiber reinforcement on strength. However, in the present study, the superplasticizer dosage was intentionally kept constant for all mixtures to clearly evaluate the direct influence of polypropylene fiber content on the fresh and hardened properties of mortar. As reported in the manuscript, increasing the fiber volume fraction significantly reduced the flow diameter from 185 mm for the control mix to 125 mm for the 1.5% PP mixture, indicating a clear reduction in workability with increasing fiber content.

“To ensure a consistent basis for comparing the influence of polypropylene fiber content on fresh and hardened properties, the dosage of the superplasticizer was kept constant for all mixtures. This approach allowed the study to directly evaluate the effect of increasing fiber volume fraction on workability and mechanical performance. It is well known that fiber addition tends to reduce the flowability of cementitious composites due to increased internal friction and higher surface area of dispersed fibers. Therefore, maintaining a constant admixture dosage enabled the observed changes in flow diameter and strength to be interpreted as a combined effect of fiber inclusion and its influence on the rheological behavior of the mortar. Nevertheless, it is acknowledged that adjusting the superplasticizer dosage to maintain constant workability could be considered in future studies to further isolate the mechanical contribution of fiber reinforcement."

Nevertheless, the reviewer’s suggestion is appreciated, and it has been acknowledged in the revised manuscript as a recommendation for future studies, where maintaining constant workability by adjusting the superplasticizer dosage could provide additional insight into the isolated mechanical contribution of polypropylene fibers.

 

  1. Reference Timeliness: The manuscript would benefit from a more up-to-date literature review. Incorporating more citations from 2023, 2024, and 2025 will strengthen the current state-of-the-art section and demonstrate the study’s relevance to recent developments.

Response to reviewer comment: The introduction and literature review sections have been revised to incorporate several recent studies published between 2023 and 2025 addressing the behavior of polypropylene fiber-reinforced cementitious materials under elevated temperatures.

  1. Material Characterization: The specific properties and technical data of the superplasticizer used in the mixtures should be clearly detailed in the Materials section.

Response to reviewer comment: The Materials section has been revised to clearly describe the type and technical properties of the superplasticizer used in this study. The manuscript now specifies that a polycarboxylate-based high-range water-reducing admixture, Sika ViscoCrete-180 GS, conforming to ASTM C494 Type F, was used. Additional information regarding its specific gravity (1.07), pH range (4–6), color (light brownish), and dosage (1% by weight of cement) has been added to improve the clarity and reproducibility of the experimental methodology.

“A polycarboxylate-based high-range water-reducing admixture (HRWR), Sika ViscoCrete-180 GS, conforming to ASTM C494 Type F, was used to improve the workability of the mortar mixtures. The superplasticizer has a specific gravity of approximately 1.07, pH value ranging from 4 to 6, and a light brownish liquid appearance. The admixture is based on modified polycarboxylate ether technology and was added at a constant dosage of 1% by weight of cement for all mixtures to maintain comparable workability conditions while isolating the effect of polypropylene fiber content on the fresh and hardened properties of the mortar.”

  1. Microstructural Analysis (SEM): The inclusion of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images is essential to support the macroscopic observations. Specifically, SEM images taken after exposure to high temperatures would provide visual evidence of the "melt-out" effect of the PP fibers and the resulting micro-channels/voids that influence the residual strength.

Response to reviewer comment: The authors agree that microstructural observations using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) would provide direct evidence of the microstructural changes occurring in polypropylene fiber-reinforced mortar after exposure to elevated temperatures. However, SEM analysis was not performed in the present experimental program due to laboratory limitations.

To address the reviewer’s concern, the discussion section has been expanded to include a mechanistic explanation supported by previous SEM-based studies, which reported that polypropylene fibers melt at approximately 160–170°C, leaving behind micro-channels and voids within the cementitious matrix. These micro-channels facilitate the release of internal vapor pressure during heating, thereby reducing pore pressure buildup and mitigating explosive spalling. This mechanism contributes to the improved residual strength and toughness observed in fiber-reinforced specimens compared with the control mixture.

In addition, it has been noted in the manuscript that future work will include detailed microstructural characterization (SEM and porosity analysis) to further investigate the internal morphology of the heated mortar and the role of fiber melting in modifying the pore structure.

  1. Porosity and NDT Analysis: To better quantify the internal damage caused by thermal stress, the authors are encouraged to perform Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) tests or Mercury Intrusion Porosity (MIP) analysis. These methods would provide a more scientific explanation for the void formation and structural degradation observed after high-temperature exposure.

Response to reviewer comment: The authors sincerely thank the reviewer for this valuable suggestion. In response to this comment, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) tests were conducted and incorporated into the revised manuscript to provide additional insight into the internal damage and microstructural degradation caused by elevated temperatures.

A new subsection entitled “3.7 Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV) Analysis” has been added to the Results and Discussion section. The UPV measurements were performed on all mortar mixtures after exposure to 0, 200, 400, and 600°C, and the results are presented in Table 7.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    The datasets supporting the finding of this study are openly available in Zenodo: Data Manuscript: Performance of Polypropylene Fiber-Reinforced Mortar Exposed to Elevated Temperatures repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18056598. 48

    This project contains the following data:

    Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES