Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2026 Jul 31;17(9):e01589-26. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01589-26

Differential pro-tumorigenic effects of Helicobacter pylori and Streptococcus anginosus on AGS cells: contact-dependent versus metabolite-driven mechanisms

Luan Luan 1,#, Xiuling Song 1,#, Yunfei Zeng 1,#, Yunyun Xie 2, Yongxuan Hong 1, Jiawei Tang 3, Cong Ma 4,✉, Bing Gu 1,✉, Liang Wang 1,2,3,4,5,6,✉
Editor: Neha Garg7
PMCID: PMC13556261  PMID: 42535843

ABSTRACT

Gastric cancer remains a major global health burden, ranking fifth worldwide in both incidence and mortality. While Helicobacter pylori is a well-established Group I carcinogen, increasing evidence suggests that non-H. pylori bacteria, including Streptococcus anginosus, may also contribute to gastric carcinogenesis. However, their comparative pathogenic roles and interactions remain poorly defined. In this study, public databases showed stage-dependent abundance changes of H. pylori and S. anginosus but no significant correlation during gastric cancer progression. We further quantified both bacteria in gastric fluid samples collected from 500 individuals using a non-invasive gastric string test and in fecal samples from an independent cohort of 500 individuals by qPCR. In the two cohorts, no significant correlations were observed between the two bacterial pathogens, suggesting distinct colonization and pathogenic patterns. To evaluate functional differences, AGS cell co-culture models were established to explore their pro-tumorigenic effects. H. pylori predominantly exerted tumor-promoting effects through bacterial cell-associated mechanisms, whereas S. anginosus exerted stronger pro-tumorigenic effects via its metabolites. In particular, transcriptomic analysis revealed that proliferation-associated genes, including DEK and RTF1, were significantly upregulated by 21.9-fold and 19.2-fold, respectively, in cells treated with Streptococcus anginosus metabolite (SAM). Metabolomic profiling of SAM identified increased levels of spermidine and polyamine-related metabolites. Among these, N-acetylcadaverine, N-acetyltyrosine, N-acetyltryptophan, and urocanic acid were experimentally validated to significantly promote AGS cell proliferation. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that H. pylori and S. anginosus drive gastric tumorigenesis through contact-dependent and metabolite-mediated mechanisms, respectively, highlighting bacterial metabolites as emerging contributors to gastric cancer progression.

IMPORTANCE

The gastric microbiota plays a critical role in gastrointestinal health and disease. However, the ecological interactions between Helicobacter pylori and non-H. pylori bacteria remain poorly understood. Among established bacterial pathogens linked to gastric carcinogenesis, H. pylori and Streptococcus anginosus are recognized as major contributors. In this study, we systematically evaluated infection patterns and potential associations between these two pathogens using public metagenomic data sets and qPCR analysis of clinical samples (feces and gastric fluid) from multicenter cohorts. We found no significant association between their infection statuses (P > 0.05), indicating independent colonization patterns and likely differences in their pathogenic mechanisms within the human host. Complementary in vitro and cellular analyses further showed that H. pylori primarily acts through direct mucosal colonization and virulence factors, whereas S. anginosus influences host responses mainly via its metabolic products. These findings demonstrate that H. pylori and S. anginosus operate through distinct colonization strategies and pathogenic pathways. They underscore the importance of accounting for mechanistic heterogeneity in gastric microbiome research and provide a conceptual framework for future investigations into microbe-driven pathogenesis of gastric disease.

KEYWORDS: gastric cancer, Helicobacter pylori, Streptococcus anginosus, AGS cells, transcriptomics, metabolomics

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer (GC) is a major malignancy of the digestive tract, accounting for approximately 4.9% of global cancer incidence and 6.8% of cancer-related deaths, which makes GC rank the fifth worldwide (1). Currently, H. pylori is the best-established etiological agent for gastric cancer, which persistently colonizes the human stomach through flagella and virulence factors such as VacA and CagA, disrupting epithelial integrity, inducing chronic inflammation, and promoting abnormal proliferation (2–4). China is a high-risk region of H. pylori prevalence and a high-burden area of GC, contributing nearly half of the newly diagnosed cases and deaths globally (5). Although H. pylori infection has been substantially reduced globally in recent years due to improved hygiene and public awareness, the burden of gastric cancer continues high (6, 7), indicating that additional microbial species may contribute to gastric cancer development (8).

The Correa model systematically describes the classical pathological process of gastric carcinogenesis, mainly encompassing the cascade progression from chronic non-atrophic gastritis, atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, to gastric cancer. This model proposes that long-term infection with H. pylori is a primary initiating factor of gastric cancer. H. pylori infection induces chronic inflammatory responses, disrupts the gastric mucosal barrier, causes mucosal injury, promotes genetic alterations in epithelial cells, and thereby accelerates malignant transformation and gastric cancer development. Although the Correa model plays an important role in explaining mechanisms of gastric carcinogenesis, it primarily emphasizes the role of H. pylori and does not fully account for contributions from other components of the gastric microbiota (9, 10). In recent years, with the advancement of high-throughput sequencing technologies, increasing evidence has demonstrated that the stomach is not a sterile environment but harbors a complex and dynamic microbial community. Studies have shown that during H. pylori infection and gastric mucosal pathological progression, the gastric microbiome undergoes significant compositional changes (11, 12). In particular, non-H. pylori microorganisms originating from the oral cavity or intestinal tract may become enriched and potentially act synergistically in the process of gastric carcinogenesis. These microorganisms may contribute to carcinogenesis not only by producing metabolites, such as nitrosamine-related compounds and short-chain fatty acids, that promote the formation of carcinogenic substances, but also by modulating local inflammatory responses and host immune regulation (13, 14). Among these bacterial pathogens, Streptococcus anginosus is significantly enriched in gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric cancer (15, 16). Recent studies confirm that S. anginosus promotes gastric tumorigenesis by activating pro-inflammatory and pro-tumorigenic signaling pathways, enhancing tumor growth and metastasis, and modulating the tumor immune microenvironment (17, 18). However, the relationship between H. pylori and S. anginosus infections and their distinct pro-tumorigenic mechanisms remains unclear.

In this study, we first integrated gastric mucosal 16S rRNA gene sequencing data from public databases to characterize the dynamic distribution patterns and potential associations between H. pylori and S. anginosus across different stages of Correa’s cascade. To further validate these observations in clinical settings, we analyzed H. pylori and S. anginosus in gastric fluid samples (n = 500) collected through a non-invasive string test, as well as in an independent fecal cohort (n = 500), thereby evaluating their co-infection characteristics in different biological niches. Furthermore, by combining functional assays with transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses, we systematically investigated the distinct pro-tumorigenic effects mediated by bacterial cells and their secreted metabolites in AGS cells. These findings provide a more comprehensive understanding of bacteria-associated gastric carcinogenesis and suggest that H. pylori and S. anginosus may contribute to intestinal-type gastric cancer progression through distinct mechanisms.

RESULTS

Relative abundance and correlation of H. pylori and S. anginosus across different stages of gastric cancer via public data set analysis

To investigate the relative abundance and correlation between H. pylori and S. anginosus, gastric mucosal 16S rRNA sequencing data (n = 806) were retrieved from public database-derived gastric mucosal microbiome data covering different stages of gastric cancer progression via Correa’s cascade, including non-atrophic gastritis (n = 168), atrophic gastritis (n = 125), intestinal metaplasia (n = 101), precancerous lesions (n = 75), and gastric cancer (n = 337). Detailed methods for collecting and analyzing public database data are provided in Methods S1. Computational analysis revealed that the correlation coefficients between the relative abundances of H. pylori and S. anginosus were consistently negative across all disease stages, although none reached statistical significance (P-value > 0.05), indicating a lack of evidence for coordinated enrichment or depletion along the Correa’s Cascade (Fig. 1A). Notably, the relative abundance of H. pylori increased significantly during the intestinal metaplasia stage, followed by a marked reduction in gastric cancer samples (Fig. 1B). In contrast, although S. anginosus exhibited a low overall abundance, its relative abundance was significantly elevated in gastric cancer (Fig. 1C). Taken together, these findings indicate that H. pylori and S. anginosus contribute to gastric carcinogenesis in a stage-specific and temporally distinct manner, rather than through direct synergistic or antagonistic interactions at the mucosal microbial level.

Fig 1.

Scatter plots and bar charts show H. pylori peaks at the IM stage and S. anginosus spikes sharply at the GC stage, with weak negative correlations between the relative abundances of H. pylori and S. anginosus across NAG, AG, IM, DYS, and GC stages.

Relative abundance and correlation of H. pylori and S. anginosus across different stages of Correa’s Cascade from non-atrophic gastritis to gastric cancer. (A) Relative abundance correlation between the two bacterial species at different stages of Correa’s cascade. (B) Relative abundance of H. pylori across gastric cancer stages. (C) Relative abundance of S. anginosus across gastric cancer stages. Non-atrophic gastritis (NAG), atrophic gastritis (AG), intestinal metaplasia (IM), dysplasia (DYS), and finally gastric cancer (GC). The letters above the bars, a, b, and c, indicate statistically significant differences between groups at P < 0.05. Groups sharing the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05).

Correlation of H. pylori and S. anginosus infection rates in gastric fluid and fecal samples across two independent cohorts

In this study, qPCR was performed on 500 gastric fluid samples collected using a disposable capsule device to evaluate the infection status of H. pylori (Hp) and S. anginosus (Sa), and logistic regression was used to assess their association. Detailed methods for clinical sample collection and detection analysis are provided in Methods S2. Based on infection status, samples were categorized into four groups: Hp+/Sa+ (112, 22.4%), Hp+/Sa− (72, 14.4%), Hp−/Sa+ (192, 38.4%), and Hp−/Sa− (124, 24.8%). The highest proportion was observed in the Hp−/Sa+ group. The overall positivity rates were 36.8% for Hp and 60.8% for Sa, indicating a higher detection rate of Sa in gastric fluid. Logistic regression analysis showed no significant association between Hp and Sa infection (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.69–1.46, P = 1.00), suggesting that Hp status did not influence Sa infection risk in gastric fluid samples. Stratified analyses by sex and age were further performed. In males (n = 184), the OR was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.44–1.52, P = 0.63). In females (n = 316), the OR was 1.12 (95% CI: 0.70–1.79, P = 0.72). No significant association was observed in either subgroup. For age stratification, subjects were divided into ≤45 years (n = 251) and >45 years (n = 249). The OR were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.47–1.31, P = 0.43) and 1.34 (95% CI: 0.77–2.33, P = 0.36), respectively, with no significant associations observed (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Infection rates of H. pylori and S. anginosus in gastric fluid

Characteristic Hp+/Sa+ Hp+/Sa− Hp−/Sa+ Hp−/Sa− Total OR 95% CI P-value
Total 112 (22.4%) 72 (14.4%) 192 (38.4%) 124 (24.8%) 500 1 (0.69, 1.46) 1
Sex
    Male 43 (23.4%) 26 (14.1%) 77 (41.8%) 38 (20.7%) 184 0.82 (0.44, 1.52) 0.63
    Female 69 (21.8%) 46 (14.6%) 115 (36.4%) 86 (27.2%) 316 1.12 (0.70, 1.79) 0.72
Age
    ≤45 51 (20.3%) 44 (17.5%) 93 (37.1%) 63 (25.1%) 251 0.79 (0.47, 1.31) 0.43
    >45 61 (24.5%) 28 (11.2%) 99 (39.8%) 61 (24.5%) 249 1.34 (0.77, 2.33) 0.36

In fecal samples (n = 500), Hp+/Sa+ accounted for 28 cases (5.6%), Hp+/Sa− for 119 cases (23.8%), Hp−/Sa+ for 48 cases (9.6%), and Hp−/Sa− for 305 cases (61.0%). The overall positivity rates were 29.4% for Hp and 15.2% for Sa. Logistic regression showed no significant association between Hp and Sa infection (OR = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.87–2.38, P = 0.16). To further evaluate whether sex and age influence the association between H. pylori and S. anginosus infection, stratified logistic regression analyses were performed. In gastric fluid samples, within the male subgroup (n = 184), 43 cases (23.4%) were Hp+/Sa+, 26 cases (14.1%) were Hp+/Sa−, 77 cases (41.8%) were Hp−/Sa+, and 38 cases (20.7%) were Hp−/Sa−. Logistic regression analysis yielded an OR = 0.82 (95% CI: 0.44–1.52; P = 0.63), indicating no statistically significant association. In the female subgroup (n =316), 69 cases (21.8%) were Hp+/Sa+, 46 cases (14.6%) were Hp+/Sa−, 115 cases (36.4%) were Hp−/Sa+, and 86 cases (27.2%) were Hp−/Sa−. The corresponding OR was 1.12 (95% CI: 0.70–1.79; P = 0.72), which was not statistically significant. These results suggest that no significant association between Hp and Sa infection was observed across sex subgroups. Age-stratified analysis was performed using a cutoff of ≤45 years and >45 years. In the ≤45-year group (n = 251), 51 cases (20.3%) were Hp+/Sa+, 44 cases (17.5%) were Hp+/Sa−, 93 cases (37.1%) were Hp−/Sa+, and 63 cases (25.1%) were Hp−/Sa−. Logistic regression analysis showed an OR of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.47–1.31; P = 0.43). In the >45-year group (n = 249), 61 cases (24.5%) were Hp+/Sa+, 28 cases (11.2%) were Hp+/Sa−, 99 cases (39.8%) were Hp−/Sa+, and 61 cases (24.5%) were Hp−/Sa−, with an OR of 1.34 (95% CI: 0.77–2.33; P = 0.36). No statistically significant association was observed in either age group, suggesting that age does not modify the relationship between Hp and Sa infection. In fecal samples, sex-stratified analysis showed no significant association, with an OR of 1.16 (95% CI: 0.52–2.61; P = 0.72) in males and 1.71 (95% CI: 0.84–3.49; P = 0.13) in females. Similarly, age-stratified analysis revealed no statistically significant association in either subgroup, with an OR of 1.32 (95% CI: 0.64–2.70; P = 0.46) in the ≤45-year group and 1.58 (95% CI: 0.71–3.50; P = 0.25) in the >45-year group (Table 2). Overall, no significant association between H. pylori and S. anginosus infection was observed across all stratified analyses. Overall, no significant correlation between Hp and Sa infection was observed in either gastric fluid or fecal samples, suggesting that their colonization patterns may be relatively independent. Differences in detection rates between gastric fluid and fecal samples may reflect distinct microbial niches, sampling sites, and bacterial colonization characteristics within the gastrointestinal tract.

TABLE 2.

Infection rates of H. pylori and S. anginosus in fecal samples

Characteristic Hp+/Sa+ Hp+/Sa− Hp−/Sa+ Hp−/Sa− Total OR 95% CI P-value
Total 28 (5.6%) 119 (23.8%) 48 (9.6%) 305 (61.0%) 500 1.44 (0.87, 2.38) 0.16
Sex                
 Male 11 (4.8%) 61 (26.6%) 21 (9.2%) 136 (59.4%) 229 1.16 (0.52, 2.61) 0.72
 Female 17 (6.3%) 58 (21.6%) 27 (10.0%) 167 (62.1%) 269 1.71 (0.84, 3.49) 0.13
Age                
 ≤45 13 (4.0%) 72 (22.2%) 29 (8.9%) 211 (64.9%) 325 1.32 (0.64, 2.70) 0.46
 >45 15 (8.6%) 47 (26.9%) 19 (10.9%) 94 (53.7%) 175 1.58 (0.71, 3.50) 0.25

Differential effects of H. pylori and S. anginosus on AGS cell functions in co-culture

To investigate the differential effects of H. pylori and S. anginosus on gastric epithelial cell function, we cultured and identified the bacteria, established bacterial-cell co-culture models, and further evaluated the effects of bacterial metabolites. The methods for bacterial culture and identification are provided in Methods S3 and S4. H. pylori is a Gram-negative curved bacterium, whereas S. anginosus is a Gram-positive coccus (Fig. S1). S. anginosus exhibited rapid aerobic growth, whereas H. pylori displayed slow growth under microaerophilic conditions (Fig. S2). TEM and SEM analyses demonstrated that, after bacterial infection, a large number of bacteria adhered to and aggregated on the surface of AGS cells. In AGS cells, microvilli were reduced or disorganized, and irregular changes in cell margins were observed, suggesting that bacterial adhesion may disrupt membrane structure. In addition, a marked increase in vacuole-like structures in the cytoplasm was observed, indicating that bacterial infection may induce cellular stress responses or structural damage (Fig. 2A and B).

Fig 2.

TEM & SEM micrographs show AGS cells infected with S. anginosus and H. pylori. Boxed regions are enlarged at 500 nm and 5 μm, with arrows showing bacteria. SEM magnifications reveal spherical Sa and curved rod-shaped Hp attached to damaged cell surfaces.

Ultrastructural changes in AGS cells following infection with H. pylori and S. anginosus. (A) TEM. TEM images were acquired at scales of 2 μm and 500 nm. Arrows indicate bacteria. (B) SEM. SEM images were acquired at scales of 10 μm and 5 μm. Purple spherical structures represent S. anginosus and green curved structures represent H. pylori.

Given the distinct bacterial presence patterns in gastric cancer tissues (19), we next examined whether bacterial cells and their metabolites differentially modulate the malignant phenotypes of AGS cells. CCK-8 results showed that at 24 h, both bacterial cells and their metabolites promoted AGS cell proliferation, with no significant difference between the SA and HP groups (Fig. 3A). At 48 h, SA cells showed no significant effect on AGS cell proliferation, whereas HP cells significantly inhibited cell proliferation. In contrast, both SAM (Streptococcus anginosus metabolite) and HPM (Helicobacter pylori metabolite) significantly promoted cell proliferation (Fig. 3B). At 72 h, both SA and HP cells significantly inhibited AGS cell proliferation, with a stronger inhibitory effect observed in the HP group. SAM significantly promoted cell proliferation, whereas HPM showed no significant difference compared with the control (Fig. 3C). Overall, the SAM Group promoted AGS cell proliferation, while bacterial cells exhibited time-dependent inhibitory effects. Colony formation assays demonstrated that, compared with the control group, SA, HP, SAM, and HPM groups exhibited an increased number of AGS cell colonies to varying degrees (Fig. 4A). In the bacterial cell groups, the HP group showed a significantly stronger promoting effect than the SA group (Fig. 4B through E). Overall, both bacterial cells and their metabolites promoted colony formation, with HP bacterial cells exerting a more pronounced effect than SA cells. Wound-healing assays showed that H. pylori and its metabolites significantly promoted AGS cell migration, whereas S. anginosus and its metabolites had no significant effect (Fig. 5). Transwell invasion assays similarly demonstrated that both bacterial suspensions and their metabolites promoted cell invasion, with HP Group showing a significantly stronger effect than SA Group in the bacterial suspension group (Fig. 6). Flow cytometric analysis indicated that H. pylori and its metabolites significantly inhibited apoptosis, with a more pronounced effect observed for metabolites (Fig. 7). Cell cycle analysis showed that H. pylori, its metabolites, and S. anginosus metabolites reduced the proportion of cells in the G0/G1 phase and increased the proportion of S-phase cells, which was further confirmed by EdU incorporation assays (Fig. 8 and Fig. 9). Inflammatory responses were further assessed by qPCR and ELISA. HP markedly increased IL-8 mRNA expression and protein levels, whereas SA primarily elevated TNF-α expression. No significant changes in IL-6 expression were observed among the SA, HP, SAM, and HPM groups (Fig. S3 to S6).

Fig 3.

Twelve violin plots show AGS cell relative proliferation across bacterial cell, metabolite, S. anginosus, and H. pylori treatment groups at 24h, 48h, and 72h. SA metabolites consistently produce high proliferation while HP generally lowers proliferation.

Effects of different treatments on AGS cell proliferation at different time points measured by the CCK-8 assay: (A) 24 h, (B) 48 h, (C) 72 h. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, and ns indicates no statistically significant difference. From left to right in each row, panels represent the bacterial cell groups, the metabolite groups, the S. anginosus treatment groups, and the H. pylori treatment groups.

Fig 4.

Colony formation assay images and bar charts show AGS cells treated with SA, HP, SAM, and HPM have significantly more colonies than control AGS cells, with all treatment groups showing p values below 0.001.

Effects of different treatments on the colony-forming ability of AGS cells. (A) Representative images of colony formation assays. (B–E) Quantitative analysis of colony formation. (B) Bacterial cell groups; (C) metabolite groups; (D) S. anginosus treatment groups; (E) H. pylori treatment groups. ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001.

Fig 5.

Wound healing scratch assay showing AGS cell migration under control, SA, HP, SAM, and HPM treatments at 0, 24, and 48 hours. Bar charts show AGS+HP and AGS+HPM significantly increased migration at 48 hours.

Effects of different treatments on the migration ability of AGS cells. (A) Representative images of the wound healing assay at 0 h, 24 h, and 48 h. Scale bar: 100 μm. (B) Quantitative analysis at 24 h. (C) Quantitative analysis at 48 h. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ns indicates no statistically significant difference.

Fig 6.

Transwell assay microscopy of AGS cells treated with SA, HP, SAM, and HPM shows increased invasion compared to control. Bar charts confirm significantly higher migration cell numbers in HP and SAM treated groups versus AGS alone.

Effects of different treatments on the invasive ability of AGS cells assessed by Transwell assay. (A) Representative images of Transwell assay. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B–E) Quantitative analysis of invasive ability. (B) Bacterial cell groups; (C) Metabolite groups; (D) S. anginosus treatment groups; (E) H. pylori treatment groups. ****P < 0.0001.

Fig 7.

Flow cytometry dot plots and bar charts show AGS cell apoptotic rates for control, SA, HP, SAM, and HPM treatments. HPM reduces apoptosis most significantly compared to AGS alone.

Effects of different bacteria and their metabolites on the apoptosis rate of AGS cells. (A) Representative dot plots of apoptosis detected by Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining using flow cytometry. (B–E) Quantitative analysis of apoptosis rate of AGS cells. (B) Bacterial cell groups; (C) metabolite groups; (D) S. anginosus treatment groups; (E) H. pylori treatment groups. ****P < 0.0001, and ns indicates no statistically significant difference.

Fig 8.

Flow cytometry histograms and stacked bar charts show AGS cell cycle shifts across G0G1, S, and G2M phases for Control, SA, HP, SAM, and HPM treatments, with SAM notably reducing G0G1 to 48.12%.

Effects of different bacteria and their metabolites on the cell cycle distribution of AGS cells. (A) Representative histograms of cell cycle distribution (G0/G1 phase, S phase, and G2/M phase) analyzed by PI single staining using flow cytometry. (B–E) Quantitative analysis of the cell cycle distribution of AGS cells. (B) Bacterial cell groups; (C) metabolite groups; (D) S. anginosus treatment groups; (E) H. pylori treatment groups. The letters above the bars, a, b, and c, indicate statistically significant differences between groups at P < 0.05. Groups sharing the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, and ns indicates no statistically significant difference.

Fig 9.

Fluorescence microscopy and bar charts show EDU proliferation rates in AGS cells treated with SA, HP, SAM, and HPM. Metabolite groups show significant increases in S-phase cells, while bacterial groups show no significant change.

EdU assay for assessing the proportion of S-phase cells in AGS cells under different treatments. (A) Representative fluorescence microscopy images of the EdU incorporation assay. Green fluorescence indicates EdU-positive cells (S-phase cells), and blue fluorescence indicates DAPI-stained nuclei (total cells). Scale bar: 100 μm. (B–E) Quantitative analysis of the proportion of S-phase cells. (B) Bacterial cell groups; (C) metabolite groups; (D) S. anginosus treatment groups; (E) H. pylori treatment groups. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, and ns indicates no statistically significant difference.

Transcriptomic analysis of AGS cells under different treatments

We performed transcriptomic profiling of AGS cells subjected to H. pylori, S. anginosus, and their metabolites to assess host gene expression changes. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed good intra-group consistency, with the first two principal components explaining 30.24% of the total variance (R² = 0.3024). Although a trend toward group separation was observed, it did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.121) (Fig. 10A). Compared with untreated controls, S. anginosus treatment resulted in 43 upregulated and 30 downregulated genes, while H. pylori treatment induced 46 upregulated and 16 downregulated genes. In metabolite-treated groups, S. anginosus metabolites altered 82 genes (47 upregulated, 35 downregulated), whereas H. pylori metabolites affected 62 genes (35 upregulated, 27 downregulated) (Fig. 10B). Fifteen genes were consistently upregulated across all treatment groups, predominantly associated with transcription and protein synthesis. Among these, DEK and RTF1 were most strongly induced in the SAM group, showing 21.9-fold and 19.2-fold increases, respectively (P < 0.05), consistent with the enhanced proliferative phenotypes observed in functional assays. GO enrichment analysis revealed that DEGs were mainly enriched in cytoplasmic translation (biological process), ribosome-related components (cellular component), and ribosomal structural constituents and enzyme regulatory activities (molecular function) (Fig. 10C). KEGG pathway analysis further identified ribosome as the most significantly enriched pathway. These findings indicate that S. anginosus metabolites preferentially upregulate ribosome-associated gene expression, which may be associated with the increased proliferation observed in AGS cells.

Fig 10.

PCA plot, GO enrichment bubble chart, and volcano plots show AGS cell transcriptomics across SA, HP, SAM, and HPM treatments, highlighting cytoplasmic translation and ribosomal pathways with DEK and FAMBA1 as key genes.

Transcriptomic analysis of AGS cells under different treatments. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) showing the distribution of samples based on the first two principal components (PCA1, 15.17%; PCA2, 15.07%). Each point represents an individual sample. (B) GO enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes. Bubble size indicates the number of enriched genes, and color represents the adjusted P-value. (C) Volcano plot of differential gene expression between treatment and control groups. The x-axis represents log₂(fold change), and the y-axis represents −log₁₀(P-value). The horizontal dashed line indicates the significance threshold. Red and blue dots denote significantly upregulated and downregulated genes, respectively, while gray dots indicate non-significant genes.

Metabolomic analysis of H. pylori and S. anginosus metabolites

H. pylori predominantly exerted tumor-promoting effects through bacterial cell-associated mechanisms, whereas S. anginosus exerted stronger pro-tumorigenic effects via its metabolites. Functional assays showed that S. anginosus metabolites significantly promoted AGS cell proliferation. The confidence levels of metabolite annotations were evaluated according to the Metabolomics Standards Initiative (MSI) guidelines. Based on evidence from authentic reference standards, MS/MS spectral matching, and database comparison, identified metabolites were classified into different confidence levels. In total, 477 metabolites were confidently identified using authentic reference standards (MSI level 1), supported by consistent accurate mass (MS1), MS/MS fragmentation patterns, and chromatographic retention time (RT). A total of 1,817 metabolites were annotated based on MS/MS spectral matching against public databases, including HMDB, METLIN, and metDNA2, and were classified as MSI level 2 putative identifications. Additionally, 165 metabolites were assigned as MSI level 3 putative candidates based on accurate mass matching and theoretical database annotation, while 93,552 detected features lacked sufficient evidence for reliable annotation and were reported as unknown compounds. To further investigate metabolic differences between H. pylori and S. anginosus, untargeted metabolomic profiling was performed based on the annotated data set. Principal component analysis (PCA) demonstrated clear separation between the two groups along PC1 (53.42%) and PC2 (21.49%), indicating distinct global metabolic profiles (Fig. 11A). Hierarchical clustering analysis of significantly differential metabolites further revealed clear segregation between the two bacterial groups, suggesting substantial metabolic heterogeneity. Most metabolites exhibited opposite abundance patterns between groups, with metabolites enriched in H. pylori showing relatively lower abundance in S. anginosus, and vice versa (Fig. 11B). Volcano plot analysis identified 554 significantly differential metabolites (VIP > 1, P < 0.05), including 322 metabolites that were significantly higher in H. pylori and 232 metabolites that were significantly higher in S. anginosus (Fig. 11C). Metabolite classification based on log2(fold change) revealed that H. pylori-associated metabolites were mainly enriched in phospholipids, amino acid derivatives, and fatty acid-related compounds, whereas S. anginosus metabolites were enriched in nucleoside- and amino acid-related derivatives (Fig. 11D). Notably, spermidine and other polyamine-related metabolites were significantly increased in the S. anginosus supernatant.

Fig 11.

PCA, heatmap, volcano plot, and dot plot reveal distinct metabolite profiles between H. pylori and S. anginosus, with 322 upregulated and 232 downregulated metabolites, including LPC and SM lipid species.

Metabolomic profiling of H. pylori and S. anginosus. (A) PCA score plot showing the separation of metabolite profiles between H. pylori (red) and S. anginosus (blue) along the first principal component (PC1; 53.42%) and second principal component (PC2; 24.19%). (B) Heatmap showing the relative abundance patterns and correlations of metabolites across samples. (C) Volcano plot of differential metabolites based on variable importance in projection (VIP > 1) and statistical significance (P < 0.05). Red dots indicate metabolites with higher abundance in H. pylori relative to S. anginosus (Up, n = 322), while blue dots indicate metabolites with lower abundance in H. pylori compared with S. anginosus (Down, n = 232). (D) Representative examples of the top 10 metabolites enriched in H. pylori and S. anginosus.

Previous studies have reported that the pro-tumorigenic effects of S. anginosus are associated with arginine-derived metabolites involved in amino acid metabolism (18, 20). Consistently, our metabolomic analysis also revealed significant enrichment of arginine derivatives and polyamine-related metabolites in S. anginosus. Based on these findings, four amino acid-related metabolites were selected for functional validation (21–23). AGS cells were treated with each metabolite at multiple concentrations (0.1–10 μM). This concentration range was selected based on previously reported in vitro studies of amino acid-derived metabolites and polyamines in cancer cell models, where biologically active effects are commonly observed within low- to mid-micromolar ranges, as well as consideration of physiologically relevant levels reported in tumor-associated metabolic environments (23–25). In addition, a preliminary dose-range screening was performed to exclude concentrations that induce non-specific cytotoxicity and to ensure that the selected range covers biologically responsive but non-lethal conditions. AGS cells were then subjected to metabolite treatment, and cell proliferation was subsequently assessed. N-acetyltyrosine significantly promoted AGS cell proliferation at 0.5 μM and 2 μM (Fig. 12A), while N-acetylcadaverine exhibited promotive effects at 0.1, 0.5, 2, and 5 μM (Fig. 12B). N-acetyltryptophan enhanced proliferation at 0.1 μM and 10 μM (Fig. 12C), and urocanic acid promoted proliferation at 0.5 μM (Fig. 12D). Notably, the proliferative effects of these metabolites were not strictly dose-dependent, with growth-promoting activity observed across multiple concentration ranges.

Fig 12.

Bar charts show AGS cell relative proliferation after treatment with N-acetyltyrosine, N-acetylcadaverine, N-acetyltryptophan, and urocanic acid across concentrations from 0.1 to 10 micromolar versus control.

Effects of different concentrations of compounds on AGS cell proliferation. (A) Relative proliferation of AGS cells following treatment with N-acetyltyrosine at concentrations of 10, 5, 2, 1, 0.5, and 0.1 μM. (B) Relative proliferation of AGS cells following treatment with N-acetylcadaverine at concentrations of 10, 5, 2, 1, 0.5, and 0.1 μM. (C) Relative proliferation of AGS cells following treatment with N-acetyltryptophan at concentrations of 10, 5, 2, 1, 0.5, and 0.1 μM. (D) Relative proliferation of AGS cells following treatment with Urocanic acid at concentrations of 10, 5, 2, 1, 0.5, and 0.1 μM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001.

DISCUSSION

Gastric carcinogenesis is a multistep process shaped by complex host-microbe interactions. Although H. pylori is a well-established carcinogen and a key initiator of the Correa’s cascade, its presence alone cannot fully explain the heterogeneity of gastric cancer outcomes. By integrating public database-derived gastric mucosal microbiome data, clinical infection analysis, functional assays, transcriptomics, and metabolomics, this study delineates stage-specific and mechanistically distinct roles of H. pylori and S. anginosus during intestinal-type gastric cancer progression. Analysis of gastric mucosal 16S rRNA sequencing data across Correa’s cascade showed that H. pylori and S. anginosus exhibited distinct abundance patterns without significant correlation, suggesting that they do not act synergistically or antagonistically but instead occupy different ecological niches. H. pylori abundance peaked at the intestinal metaplasia stage and declined markedly in gastric cancer, whereas S. anginosus remained scarce throughout the NAG, AG, IM, and DYS stages of Correa’s Cascade but was significantly enriched in cancer tissues. Collectively, these results are consistent with a two-stage model of gastric carcinogenesis in which H. pylori predominantly contributes to tumor initiation, while S. anginosus becomes increasingly relevant as tumor development and progression progress (14, 26). This shift likely reflects progressive alterations in the gastric microenvironment. Chronic H. pylori infection disrupts acid secretion and mucosal integrity, leading to elevated gastric pH and loss of acid-mediated ecological control (27). These changes permit colonization by microbes from the oral and upper gastrointestinal tracts. The enrichment of S. anginosus, a common oral commensal, in gastric cancer tissues is consistent with this ecological transition (12).

Comparison of infection status in gastric fluid and fecal samples revealed substantially higher detection rates of both bacteria in gastric fluid. H. pylori is highly adapted to the gastric niche and survives poorly in the distal intestine, explaining its reduced fecal detectability (28, 29). Similarly, S. anginosus was more frequently detected in gastric fluid collected using a capsule-based sampling device, which captures the upper gastrointestinal environment in situ and minimizes downstream contamination (30, 31). These observations highlight the importance of sampling strategy when investigating gastric microbiota associated with gastric diseases.

Using AGS cells, we systematically compared the functional effects of H. pylori and S. anginosus, as well as their metabolites. H. pylori exerted strong effects through direct bacterium-cell interactions, promoting migration and invasion, inhibiting apoptosis, altering cell cycle distribution, and inducing a pronounced inflammatory response characterized by elevated IL-8 expression. These findings are consistent with the established role of H. pylori-driven inflammation in early gastric tumorigenesis. Previous studies have demonstrated that H. pylori infection activates inflammatory signaling pathways and induces pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-8, thereby promoting a tumor-supportive gastric microenvironment and contributing to gastric carcinogenesis (32, 33). In contrast, S. anginosus primarily influenced AGS cell behavior through its secreted metabolites. While bacterial cells had limited effects on migration, S. anginosus supernatant significantly promoted cell proliferation, enhanced clonogenic capacity, and increased the proportion of S-phase cells. Inflammatory responses induced by S. anginosus differed from those triggered by H. pylori, with TNF-α rather than IL-8 predominantly upregulated. These results indicate that S. anginosus employs a metabolite-dependent mechanism to facilitate tumor-promoting cellular phenotypes.

Transcriptomic analysis revealed that treatment with S. anginosus metabolites upregulated genes involved in transcriptional regulation and protein synthesis, including DEK and RTF1, accompanied by enrichment of ribosome- and polysome-associated pathways. Both genes are well-established regulators of transcriptional elongation and proliferative gene expression programs and have been implicated in gastric cancer progression (34–36). Metabolomic profiling further demonstrated enrichment of arginine- and polyamine-related metabolites, including spermidine, in the S. anginosus supernatant. Polyamines play essential roles in maintaining nucleic acid structural stability, regulating cell cycle progression, and promoting cell growth (23). N-acetylcadaverine is a derivative of the polyamine metabolic pathway, and polyamine-related molecules play important roles in maintaining nucleic acid structural stability, regulating cell cycle progression, and promoting cell growth (23). N-acetyltyrosine and N-acetyltryptophan reflect enhanced tyrosine and tryptophan metabolic activity, respectively. Abnormal amino acid metabolism is considered a key component of metabolic reprogramming in tumor cells (37, 38). Urocanic acid, as an intermediate in histidine catabolism, suggests active bacterial histidine metabolism. Its accumulation may indirectly regulate cell survival and proliferation by influencing the local metabolic microenvironment or cellular energy metabolism state (39). Functional validation of selected amino acid-related metabolites confirmed their ability to promote AGS cell proliferation. The non-linear dose responses observed in this study are characteristic of microbiota-derived metabolites that act through context-dependent mechanisms (21, 22). These transcriptomic and metabolomic findings support a model in which S. anginosus promotes gastric cancer progression by enhancing host transcriptional and translational capacity through secreted metabolites rather than direct inflammatory stimulation. Collectively, our results support a stage-specific model of gastric carcinogenesis in which H. pylori predominantly drives tumor initiation through inflammation and epithelial injury, whereas S. anginosus and its metabolites facilitate later-stage progression by sustaining proliferative and biosynthetic programs. This transition coincides with gastric microbial dysbiosis and enrichment of oral-derived taxa in advanced disease.

Although the present study provides important insights, it is not without limitations. First, this study was primarily based on in vitro models and a single gastric cancer cell line, further validation in animal models is required to confirm its physiological relevance. Second, in the untargeted metabolomics analysis of bacterial culture supernatants, some annotated compounds were typically reported as diet-related chemicals, plant-derived metabolites, and serum-derived small molecules, which are likely attributable to background components of the culture medium. Last but not least, the selected differential metabolites for downstream analysis were prioritized based on statistical significance and previously reported biological relevance. This highlights the inherent limitations of untargeted metabolomics and the need for cautious interpretation in culture-based systems.

Collectively, these findings support a stage-specific model of microbial contributions to gastric carcinogenesis, in which H. pylori primarily drives tumor initiation through direct, contact-dependent mechanisms, whereas S. anginosus assumes a progressively more prominent role during tumor progression via metabolite-mediated pathways. This study thereby underscores the critical importance of bacterial metabolites as emerging key contributors to gastric cancer development and progression, revealing a dynamic, temporally regulated interplay between distinct microbial species and host tumorigenesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

AGS cell culture and co-culture with bacteria

A human adenocarcinoma gastric cell (AGS) line, purchased from Wuhan Pricella Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (China), was authenticated by short tandem repeat (STR) profiling and maintained in complete AGS growth medium (Procell Life Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China), which consisted of Ham’s F-12 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin solution. Using the previously described procedure with liquid culture medium, when the culture reached an OD₆₀₀ of 0.5, it was centrifuged at 6,000 rpm for 10 min to collect the supernatant, which was then filtered through a 0.22 μm filter (Biosharp, China) to obtain the clarified supernatant. The bacterial pellet obtained after centrifugation was resuspended in sterile PBS, and the bacterial concentration was adjusted to 10⁸ CFU/mL using a McFarland turbidity standard, yielding a standardized bacterial suspension. AGS cells were cultured following standard subculture procedures until reaching an appropriate cell density. After trypsinization, the cell concentration was adjusted to 106 cells/mL. According to previous studies, the multiplicity of infection (MOI) was set at 100, and the co-culture duration was 24 h (17, 18). For the experiment, 1 mL of cell suspension was seeded into each well of a six-well plate. When the cells reached 70%–80% confluence, the medium containing penicillin and streptomycin was replaced with antibiotic-free medium, and 1 mL of the prepared bacterial suspension was added. The experimental groups included SA, HP, SAM, HPM, and a PBS-treated control group.

Transmission electron microscopy

Approximately 1 × 10⁶ AGS cells were seeded into six-well plates (Zhenxuan Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) and co-cultured with bacterial suspension for 24 h. Cells were harvested and fixed overnight with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Wuhan Servicebio Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China). After three PBS washes for 15 min each, cells were post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide (Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) for 2 h, dehydrated through a graded ethanol series (30%, 50%, 70%, and 90%), and embedded. Ultrathin sections at 50–70 nm were prepared, stained with 2% uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and imaged using a Hitachi HT7700 transmission electron microscope at 80 kV.

Scanning electron microscopy

AGS cells were seeded onto coverslips and treated as described above. After graded ethanol dehydration, the samples were dried in a critical-point dryer. Specimens were mounted on sample stubs using conductive carbon tape and sputter-coated with platinum for approximately 120 s. Images were acquired using a Hitachi Regulus 8100 scanning electron microscope.

Functional assays

CCK-8 proliferation assay

Cell proliferation was assessed using a CCK-8 kit (NCM Biotech, China). AGS cells were seeded at a density of 5,000 cells per well in 96-well plates. After treatment with H. pylori, S. anginosus, and their metabolites for 24, 48, and 72 h, the medium was removed, cells were gently washed with PBS, and AGS complete medium (Wuhan Pricella Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China) containing 10 μL CCK-8 reagent was added to each well. Plates were incubated for 2 h, and absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Cell viability was calculated relative to the control group.

Colony formation

To evaluate clonogenic ability, 400 treated AGS cells were seeded into six-well plates. The medium was replaced every 3 days. After approximately 2 weeks, colonies were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Servicebio, China) and stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Servicebio, China). Photos of the plates were taken using a smartphone The experiment was repeated six times.

Wound healing assay

AGS cells were seeded into six-well plates and grown to full confluence. A linear scratch was created using a 200 μL pipette tip, and the medium was replaced with serum-free medium. Images of the wound area were taken at 0, 24, and 48 h at the same location.

Transwell invasion

After 24 h of treatment, AGS cells were harvested, resuspended in serum-free medium, and counted. A total of 3 × 10⁵ cells were seeded into the upper chamber of 24-well Transwell inserts with 8 μm pores coated with Matrigel (Biosharp, China). The lower chamber was filled with 600 μL of medium containing 10% FBS. After 24 h, invaded cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, stained with 0.1% crystal violet, and imaged using a Leica DMI1 microscope at 20× magnification.

EdU assay

Cell proliferation at the S phase was evaluated using an EdU-488 Cell Proliferation Detection Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, China). EdU working solution was added to the culture medium in 24-well plates, and cells were incubated for 2 h. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 3% BSA and 0.3% Triton X-100, and subjected to Click reaction solution for 30 min in the dark. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI, and images were captured using a Leica DMI1 microscope.

qPCR for inflammatory cytokines

Total RNA was extracted from treated AGS cells using TRIzol reagent (Takara, Japan) and reverse-transcribed into cDNA using a reverse transcription kit (Takara, Japan). qPCR was performed on a ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Each reaction was run in triplicate, and relative gene expression was calculated using the 2⁻ΔΔCt method with β-actin as the internal control. All primer sequences are provided in Tables S5 and S6.

ELISA for inflammatory cytokines

AGS cells were treated as described above, and culture supernatants were collected and centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 20 min. Supernatants were diluted 10-fold prior to analysis. ELISA kits (MultiSciences Biotech Co., Ltd., China) were equilibrated to room temperature for 10 min before use. Standard curves were prepared at concentrations of 500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.2, 15.6, 7.8, and 0 pg/mL. Samples and standards (100 μL per well) were added to the plates and incubated at 37°C for 60 min. After washing, 100 μL biotinylated detection antibody was added and incubated at 37°C for 60 min, followed by washing and incubation with enzyme conjugate for 30 min. After five washes, 90 μL substrate solution was added and incubated at 37°C for 15 min. The reaction was terminated with 50 μL stop solution, and absorbance was immediately measured at 450 nm.

Statistical analysis and data visualization

Statistical analyses were performed according to the experimental system grouping:

  1. Bacterial groups: control, SA group, and HP group. Differences among groups within the same system were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s post hoc multiple comparison test.

  2. Metabolite groups: control, SAM group, and HPM group. Due to differences in culture media between HP- and SA-derived supernatants, each treatment group was independently compared with the PBS control using Student’s t-test, without cross-system comparisons.

  3. S. anginosus treatment groups: control, SA group, and SAM group. Because bacterial suspension and supernatant belong to different experimental systems, statistical comparisons were performed only between each treatment group and the PBS control using t-tests, and no direct comparison between bacterial cells and supernatant was conducted.

  4. H. pylori treatment groups: control, HP group, and HPM group. The statistical approach was the same as in reference 3.

All statistical analyses and data visualization were performed using GraphPad Prism (version 10). The letters above the bars, a, b, and c, indicate statistically significant differences between groups at P < 0.05. Groups sharing the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05). Asterisks indicate statistical significance as follows: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, and ns indicates no statistically significant difference.

RNA sequencing and transcriptomic analysis

Total RNA was extracted from AGS cells subjected to different treatments using an RNA extraction kit. RNA libraries were constructed using the NEBNext Ultra II RNA Library Prep Kit and sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 2500 platform. Differentially expressed genes were identified through rigorous bioinformatic analysis using DESeq2. Pathway enrichment analyses were performed using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) databases to elucidate molecular pathways and biological functions affected by co-culture with H. pylori and S. anginosus and their metabolites.

Metabolomics analysis

Metabolites from H. pylori and S. anginosus supernatants were collected as described above and stored at −80°C until analysis. Samples were thawed on ice prior to extraction. Metabolite extraction was performed by mixing 100 μL of sample with 400 μL of pre-chilled extraction solvent (methanol:acetonitrile = 1:1, vol/vol) containing isotopically labeled internal standards. After vortexing, samples were processed using a standardized protein precipitation workflow, and the resulting supernatants were collected for LC–MS analysis. Three biological replicates were included for each group. Chromatographic separation and mass spectrometry analysis were performed using an UHPLC–HRMS system. All detailed instrument settings, chromatographic conditions, and acquisition parameters are provided in Methods S5. Raw data were converted to mzXML format using ProteoWizard software. Feature detection, alignment, and extraction were performed using a standardized data processing pipeline, as described in Methods S5. Metabolite annotation was carried out by matching MS1 accurate mass and MS/MS spectra against the DB 3.0 database. The processed data were subsequently subjected to statistical analysis and visualization for downstream metabolomic interpretation.

Functional validation of differential metabolites

To investigate the functional effects of differential metabolites on AGS cells, metabolites associated with amino acid metabolism were selected. Stock solutions (100 mM) were prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and stored at −20°C. Working solutions were freshly prepared by serial dilution in complete culture medium. AGS cells were seeded at 5 × 10³ cells per well in 96-well plates with 100 μL complete medium. To minimize evaporation, 200 μL PBS was added to the outer wells, and plates were incubated overnight at 37°C in a 5% CO₂ incubator. After cell attachment, the medium was replaced with fresh medium containing different concentrations of metabolites (0, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, and 10 μM). Each concentration was tested in six technical replicates. After 24 h treatment, cell viability was assessed using a CCK-8 assay. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader, and cell viability was normalized accordingly. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors declared that financial support was received for this work. This study was financially supported by the Research Foundation for Advanced Talents of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (grant no. KY012023293, recipient: L.W.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 82372258, recipient: L.W.), and the Young Top-Talent in Science and Technology Innovation of Guangdong Special Support Program (grant no. 2025TQ09A269, recipient: L.W.).

The authors declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Contributor Information

Cong Ma, Email: cong.ma@polyu.edu.hk.

Bing Gu, Email: gubing@gdph.org.cn.

Liang Wang, Email: healthscience@foxmail.com.

Neha Garg, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

ETHICS APPROVAL

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (KY2026-111-01). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The transcriptomic data generated in this study have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA1404416. The metabolomics data have been deposited in the National Genomics Data Center (NGDC, CNCB) under project accession number PRJCA056157.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01589-26.

Supplemental figures. mbio.01589-26-s0001.docx.

Fig. S1-S6.

mbio.01589-26-s0001.docx (1.4MB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01589-26.SuF1
Supplemental text. mbio.01589-26-s0002.docx.

Supplemental methods.

mbio.01589-26-s0002.docx (38.4KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01589-26.SuF2
Supplemental tables. mbio.01589-26-s0003.docx.

Tables S1-S6.

mbio.01589-26-s0003.docx (17.9KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01589-26.SuF3
Table S7. mbio.01589-26-s0004.xlsx.

Differential metabolites between the supernatants of H. pylori and S. anginosus.

mbio.01589-26-s0004.xlsx (85.4KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01589-26.SuF4

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. 2024. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 74:229–263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Kao CY, Sheu BS, Wu JJ. 2016. Helicobacter pylori infection: an overview of bacterial virulence factors and pathogenesis. Biomed J 39:14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.bj.2015.06.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Duan Y, Xu Y, Dou Y, Xu D. 2025. Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer: mechanisms and new perspectives. J Hematol Oncol 18:10. doi: 10.1186/s13045-024-01654-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Baj J, Forma A, Sitarz M, Portincasa P, Garruti G, Krasowska D, Maciejewski R. 2020. Helicobacter pylori virulence factors-mechanisms of bacterial pathogenicity in the gastric microenvironment. Cells 10:27. doi: 10.3390/cells10010027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. He F, Wang S, Zheng R, Gu J, Zeng H, Sun K, Chen R, Li L, Han B, Li X, Wei W, He J. 2024. Trends of gastric cancer burdens attributable to risk factors in China from 2000 to 2050. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 44:101003. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.101003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Arnold M, Park JY, Camargo MC, Lunet N, Forman D, Soerjomataram I. 2020. Is gastric cancer becoming a rare disease? A global assessment of predicted incidence trends to 2035. Gut 69:823–829. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Anderson WF, Rabkin CS, Turner N, Fraumeni JF, Rosenberg PS, Camargo MC. 2018. The changing face of noncardia gastric cancer incidence among US non-Hispanic whites. J Natl Cancer Inst 110:608–615. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx262 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Bessède E, Mégraud F. 2022. Microbiota and gastric cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 86:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Liu Q, Tang J, Chen S, Hu S, Shen C, Xiang J, Chen N, Wang J, Ma X, Zhang Y, Zeng J. 2022. Berberine for gastric cancer prevention and treatment: multi-step actions on the correa’s cascade underlie its therapeutic effects. Pharmacol Res 184:106440. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zhou J, Li J, Chen J, Lan X, Ai Y, Liu P, Peng J, Pan X, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Li X, Wen Y, Jiang W, Zeng J. 2025. Decoding inflammatory mediators in the correa’s cascade: from chronic gastritis to carcinogenesis and targeted therapies. Int Immunopharmacol 162:115191. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2025.115191 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Mannion A, Sheh A, Shen Z, Dzink-Fox J, Piazuelo MB, Wilson KT, Peek R, Fox JG. 2023. Shotgun metagenomics of gastric biopsies reveals compositional and functional microbiome shifts in high- and low-gastric-cancer-risk populations from Colombia, South America. Gut Microbes 15:2186677. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2186677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Jeong S, Liao YT, Tsai MH, Wang YK, Wu IC, Liu CJ, Wu MS, Chan TS, Chen MY, Hu PJ, Kao WY, Liu HC, Tsai MJ, Liu CY, Chang CC, Wu DC, Hsu YH. 2024. Microbiome signatures associated with clinical stages of gastric cancer: whole metagenome shotgun sequencing study. BMC Microbiol 24:139. doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03219-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Dias-Jácome E, Libânio D, Borges-Canha M, Galaghar A, Pimentel-Nunes P. 2016. Gastric microbiota and carcinogenesis: the role of non-Helicobacter pylori bacteria - a systematic review. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 108:530–540. doi: 10.17235/reed.2016.4261/2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Guo Y, Cao XS, Guo GY, Zhou MG, Yu B. 2022. Effect of Helicobacter Pylori eradication on human gastric microbiota: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:899248. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.899248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Zhou C-B, Pan S-Y, Jin P, Deng J-W, Xue J-H, Ma X-Y, Xie Y-H, Cao H, Liu Q, Xie W-F, et al. 2022. Fecal signatures of Streptococcus anginosus and Streptococcus constellatus for noninvasive screening and early warning of gastric cancer. Gastroenterology 162:1933–1947. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Coker OO, Dai Z, Nie Y, Zhao G, Cao L, Nakatsu G, Wu WK, Wong SH, Chen Z, Sung JJY, Yu J. 2018. Mucosal microbiome dysbiosis in gastric carcinogenesis. Gut 67:1024–1032. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Fu K, Cheung AHK, Wong CC, Liu W, Zhou Y, Wang F, Huang P, Yuan K, Coker OO, Pan Y, Chen D, Lam NM, Gao M, Zhang X, Huang H, To KF, Sung JJY, Yu J. 2024. Streptococcus anginosus promotes gastric inflammation, atrophy, and tumorigenesis in mice. Cell 187:882–896. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Yuan L, Pan L, Wang Y, Zhao J, Fang L, Zhou Y, Xia R, Ma Y, Jiang Z, Xu Z, Hu C, Wang Y, Zhang S, Zhang B, Ding H, Chen M, Cheng H, Goel A, Zhang Z, Cheng X. 2024. Characterization of the landscape of the intratumoral microbiota reveals that Streptococcus anginosus increases the risk of gastric cancer initiation and progression. Cell Discov 10:117. doi: 10.1038/s41421-024-00746-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Lei L, Zhao LY, Cheng R, Zhang H, Xia M, Chen XL, Kudriashov V, Liu K, Zhang WH, Jiang H, Chen Y, Zhu L, Zhou H, Yang K, Hu T, Hu JK. 2024. Distinct oral-associated gastric microbiota and Helicobacter pylori communities for spatial microbial heterogeneity in gastric cancer. mSystems 9:e00089-24. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00089-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Zhou C-B, Zhao L-C, Qin Y, Yu J, Li W, Feng Q, Tong X, Abuduaini R, Lu S-Y, Tang H, et al. 2026. Streptococcus anginosus-derived methionine promotes gastric cancer progression. Gut 75:1279–1296. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2025-336966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Liu X, Ren B, Ren J, Gu M, You L, Zhao Y. 2024. The significant role of amino acid metabolic reprogramming in cancer. Cell Commun Signal 22:380. doi: 10.1186/s12964-024-01760-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Lieu EL, Nguyen T, Rhyne S, Kim J. 2020. Amino acids in cancer. Exp Mol Med 52:15–30. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0375-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Holbert CE, Cullen MT, Casero RA, Stewart TM. 2022. Polyamines in cancer: integrating organismal metabolism and antitumour immunity. Nat Rev Cancer 22:467–480. doi: 10.1038/s41568-022-00473-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Pavlova NN, Thompson CB. 2016. The emerging hallmarks of cancer metabolism. Cell Metab 23:27–47. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.12.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Schibalski RS, Shulha AS, Tsao BP, Palygin O, Ilatovskaya DV. 2024. The role of polyamine metabolism in cellular function and physiology. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 327:C341–C356. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00074.2024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Fiorani M, Tohumcu E, Del Vecchio LE, Porcari S, Cammarota G, Gasbarrini A, Ianiro G. 2023. The Influence of Helicobacter pylori on human gastric and gut microbiota. Antibiotics (Basel) 12:765. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12040765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Li Y, Hu Y, Zhan X, Song Y, Xu M, Wang S, Huang X, Xu ZZ. 2023. Meta-analysis reveals Helicobacter pylori mutual exclusivity and reproducible gastric microbiome alterations during gastric carcinoma progression. Gut Microbes 15:2197835. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2023.2197835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Frost F, Kacprowski T, Rühlemann M, Bang C, Franke A, Zimmermann K, Nauck M, Völker U, Völzke H, Biffar R, Schulz C, Mayerle J, Weiss FU, Homuth G, Lerch MM. 2019. Helicobacter pylori infection associates with fecal microbiota composition and diversity. Sci Rep 9:20100. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56631-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Chen CC, Liou JM, Lee YC, Hong TC, El-Omar EM, Wu MS. 2021. The interplay between Helicobacter pylori and gastrointestinal microbiota. Gut Microbes 13:1–22. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1909459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Wang L, Li Z, Tay CY, Marshall BJ, Gu B, Tian Y, Dai X, Du H, Dai Q, Feng C. 2024. Multicentre, cross-sectional surveillance of Helicobacter pylori prevalence and antibiotic resistance to clarithromycin and levofloxacin in urban China using the string test coupled with quantitative PCR. Lancet Microbe 5:e512–e513. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00027-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wang SW, Yu FJ, Lo YC, Yang YC, Wu MT, Wu IC, Lee YC, Jan CM, Wang WM, Wu DC. 2003. The clinical utility of string-PCR test in diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection. Hepatogastroenterology 50:1208–1213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Hu Z, Zhang Y, Li Z, Yu Y, Kang W, Han Y, Geng X, Ge S, Sun Y. 2016. Effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on chronic periodontitis by the change of microecology and inflammation. Oncotarget 7:66700–66712. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11449 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Gao Q, Ma Y, Liu H, Wang S. 2025. A potential anti-Helicobacter pylori strategy: exploring the antibacterial mechanism of organic acids in sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.). Microbiol Res 296:128133. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2025.128133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Hacker KE, Bolland DE, Tan L, Saha AK, Niknafs YS, Markovitz DM, McLean K. 2018. The DEK oncoprotein functions in ovarian cancer growth and survival. Neoplasia 20:1209–1218. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2018.10.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Xie Y, Zheng M, Chu X, Chen Y, Xu H, Wang J, Zhou H, Long J. 2018. Paf1 and Ctr9 subcomplex formation is essential for Paf1 complex assembly and functional regulation. Nat Commun 9:3795. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06237-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Tripplehorn SA, Lardo SM, Shirra MK, Marvil HG, Hainer SJ, Arndt KM. 2025. A direct interaction between the Chd1 CHCT domain and Rtf1 controls Chd1 distribution and nucleosome positioning on active genes. Nucleic Acids Res 53:gkaf816. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Zhu R, Chen M, Luo Y, Cheng H, Zhao Z, Zhang M. 2024. The role of N-acetyltransferases in cancers. Gene 892:147866. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2023.147866 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Seo SK, Kwon B. 2023. Immune regulation through tryptophan metabolism. Exp Mol Med 55:1371–1379. doi: 10.1038/s12276-023-01028-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Hart PH, Norval M. 2021. The multiple roles of urocanic acid in health and disease. J Invest Dermatol 141:496–502. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.07.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental figures. mbio.01589-26-s0001.docx.

Fig. S1-S6.

mbio.01589-26-s0001.docx (1.4MB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01589-26.SuF1
Supplemental text. mbio.01589-26-s0002.docx.

Supplemental methods.

mbio.01589-26-s0002.docx (38.4KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01589-26.SuF2
Supplemental tables. mbio.01589-26-s0003.docx.

Tables S1-S6.

mbio.01589-26-s0003.docx (17.9KB, docx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01589-26.SuF3
Table S7. mbio.01589-26-s0004.xlsx.

Differential metabolites between the supernatants of H. pylori and S. anginosus.

mbio.01589-26-s0004.xlsx (85.4KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01589-26.SuF4

Data Availability Statement

The transcriptomic data generated in this study have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under BioProject accession number PRJNA1404416. The metabolomics data have been deposited in the National Genomics Data Center (NGDC, CNCB) under project accession number PRJCA056157.


Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES