Skip to main content
Lippincott Open Access logoLink to Lippincott Open Access
. 2026 Sep 1;10(9):e2600409. doi: 10.1200/PO-26-00409

Multiomic Characterization of a Rare Case of Pediatric Acute Leukemia With a Novel ANGPT1::HOXA10-AS Fusion

Haley Newman 1,2, Derek Wong 3,4, Jeffrey Schubert 3, Jinhua Wu 3, Juan Santana 3, Ariel Long 3, Zirui Zhou 3, Feng Xu 3, Jiani Chen 3, Moe Takeda 3,4, Lisa Eidenschink Brodersen 3,4, Kathrin M Bernt 1,2, Minjie Luo 3,4, Sarah K Tasian 1,2, Marilyn M Li 2,3,4, Yiming Zhong 3,4,✉
PMCID: PMC13557481  PMID: 42679329

Introduction

Recent advances in genomic testing have led to refinement of genomic-based risk stratification and designation of low- and high-risk patients with pediatric AML.1 However, not all genomic alterations with diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic implications can be identified on routine molecular testing.

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) represent transcripts of over 200 base pairs that cannot be translated into functional proteins because of the absence of open reading frames and have recently been identified as important contributors to AML pathogenesis.2 However, lncRNAs are often poorly characterized on clinical DNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) and targeted RNA-based fusion panel analyses. Although untranslated, lncRNAs can affect genomic expression via four primary mechanisms via signaling, decoy, guide, or scaffold.3 Signal lncRNAs represent developmental stages; decoys bind regulatory proteins and thus repress transcription/translation; guide lncRNAs direct regulatory protein complexes/chromatin modifiers/transcription factors to target sites; and scaffold lncRNAs serve as a location for assemblage and interaction of protein complexes. Herein, we describe a young child with acute leukemia and her clinical case of a previously undescribed AML-associated oncogenic fusion involving lncRNA that was not identified via our standard institutional molecular testing and required whole-transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) for identification.

Patient Case

A 13-month-old previously healthy female was referred to hematology for isolated thrombocytopenia noted on routine CBC screening at her 1-year well-child visit. At the time, she was noted to have experienced progressive weight loss over a period of 2 months, falling from the 63rd to 17th percentile. She was closely monitored by hematology with serial CBCs over the next 6 months, demonstrating persistent isolated thrombocytopenia. Her follow-up CBC at age 19 months was subsequently notable for WBC 16,600/uL, hemoglobin 8.6 g/dL, platelets 13,000/uL, and the presence of 17.4% blasts. Assessments of bone marrow aspirate smears and biopsy were performed (Fig 1A), demonstrating sheets of blasts with irregular nuclei, speckled chromatin, indistinct nucleoli, and scant cytoplasm, accounting for approximately 50% of cellularity. The aspirate smears demonstrated variably sized blasts with round to ovoid nuclei, fine dispersed chromatin, occasional 1-3 small nucleoli, and scant to moderate amounts of azurophilic cytoplasm, whereas the bone marrow trephine cores demonstrated sheets of medium-sized to large blasts with irregular to ovoid nuclei, speckled chromatin, indistinct nucleoli, and scant cytoplasm, accounting for approximately 50% of cellularity. Flow cytometric analyses of the peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate demonstrated a blast population positive for CD58, CD33, CD4(dim), CD71, and HLA-DR. The blasts lacked expression of cCD3, CD7, CD19, CD13, CD117, MPO, CD15, and other B-cell and T-cell markers. Immunohistochemical staining of the bone marrow biopsy demonstrated CD33 and CD4 positivity of leukemia blasts, whereas GATA1, MPO, and CD117 were negative. CD42b highlighted a minor subset of blasts, found in small clusters, with a membranous and perinuclear dot-like Golgi pattern. Reticulin stain demonstrated grade 1 fibrosis. While the expression of CD41, CD42b, and CD61 was negative on the majority of cells, approximately 40% of cells demonstrated heterogeneous expression of these megakaryoblast-related markers (Fig 1B). Interpretation of expression of these markers is technically challenging as they often exhibit nonspecific staining on maturing monocytes and myeloid cells. Overall, the immunophenotype was suggestive of an acute myeloid lineage leukemia, but precluded definitive classification, leading to a pathologic diagnosis of acute undifferentiated leukemia.

FIG 1.

FIG 1.

(A) Bone marrow biopsy and aspirate smear. Bone marrow trephine core demonstrated sheets of medium to large, atypical cells, accounting for approximately 50% of cellularity. The neoplastic cells were positive for CD33 and CD4. CD42b highlighted a minor subset of blasts found in small clusters, with a membranous and perinuclear dot-like Golgi pattern. The cells were negative for GATA1, MPO, and CD117 (not shown). Bone marrow aspirate (box insert) smears demonstrated variably sized blasts with round to ovoid nuclei, fine dispersed chromatin, occasional 1-3 small nucleoli, and scant to moderate amounts of azurophilic cytoplasm. (B) Flow cytometry data from the bone marrow aspirate. Abnormal progenitor cells are shown in pink, and mature lymphocytes in green (as an internal normal reference). These abnormal progenitor cells express CD33, CD4, CD58, heterogeneous HLA-DR, and heterogeneous CD34. All other lymphoid and myeloid cell surface antigens were negative (below 20% expression). Heterogeneous expression of CD41, CD42b, and CD61 was observed. CD235a was negative as was myeloperoxidase, along with other cytoplasmic antigens tested.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis using PML/RARA and TP53/RARA probe sets detected gain of RARA (one to two additional copies) and normal signal patterns for PML and TP53 in approximately 65% of cells examined with no evidence of a PML::RARA rearrangement. Metaphase FISH also demonstrated extra signals for RARA on an apparent ring chromosome 17. All other probes, including RUNX1/RUNX1T1, KMT2A, NUP98, MYH11/CBFB, and CEP7/7q31, were negative for copy number alterations or rearrangements. On chromosome analysis, 10 of 17 metaphases contained trisomy of chromosome 2, a complex 4-way translocation involving chromosomes X, 8, both copies of chromosome 7, and a ring chromosome 17 with one intact copy of TP53 and three intact copies of RARA. DNA-based paired tumor/normal NGS panel analysis of 118 genes was performed on bone marrow and skin biopsy (germline) tissues to assess for sequence and copy number variants, and RNA-based fusion panel analysis of 117 genes was also performed on the bone marrow (somatic testing only).4,5 Somatic KRAS (NM_033360.4: c.35G>C, p.Gly12Ala, VAF = 9%) and CTCF (NM_006565.4: c.420_432dup, p.Glu145*, VAF = 10%) sequence variants and copy number alterations consistent with the karyotype (gain of whole chromosome 2, loss of partial 17p, complex gains and losses on 17q) were detected via this testing. However, no clear leukemia molecular driver was identified. Whole-transcriptome sequencing was thus performed and subsequently identified an ANGPT1::HOXA10-AS fusion (Fig 2A), which was confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Fig 2B). Increased gene expression of HOX family members and transcriptional cofactors as compared with the bone marrow control cohort, including HOXA10, HOXA-AS, HOXB-AS1, MEIS1, and MEIS2, was also identified (Appendix Table A1). Nanopore long-read sequencing was performed on a research basis for further characterization of the leukemia. The MARLIN classifier, a machine learning–based algorithm to determine acute leukemia classification based on methylation signatures, was implemented based on the nanopore results. For this sample, MARLIN predicted AML lineage with subtype classification as acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL; Fig 3).6 This specific methylation class (AMKL-mixed) encompasses leukemias that exhibit megakaryoblastic differentiation and are driven by various alterations, but excludes the CBF2AT3::GLIS2 fusion prevalent in young children with AMKL and associated with chemoresistance and poor long-term survival.7

FIG 2.

FIG 2.

(A) Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) screenshots of each breakpoint and the mismatched bases (red and black boxes) which highlight the fused sequences. (B) Sanger sequencing of the fusion gene with the black box and text representing ANGPT1 DNA and protein sequence, and HOXA10-AS DNA and protein sequence is given in red. Alamut screenshots highlight the location of the breakpoints (ANGPT1 NM_001146.5 exon 8 on 8q23.1and HOXA10-AS NR_046609.1 exon 3 on 7p15.2).

FIG 3.

FIG 3.

(A) Bar plot showing the lineage prediction by MARLIN. The X-axis represents probability score with 1 = 100% probability. (B) Dot and line plot showing the top 5 leukemia subtype predictions by MARLIN at each minute of sequencing. The dotted line at 0.8 denotes the score at which a classification is deemed confident. The x-axis represents minutes of MARLIN algorithmic sequencing.

The child initiated induction 1 chemotherapy with daunorubicin, cytarabine, and gemtuzumab as per the Children's Oncology Group AALL1831/arm A clinical trial regimen and achieved flow cytometric measurable residual disease (MRD)–negative remission (<0.02%).8 Given her favorable induction response, hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in first complete remission was not indicated and the patient was planned to receive a total of five chemotherapy cycles.9 Because of severe aspergillus pneumonia infection in induction 1, she received a cycle of less-myelosuppressive azacytidine and venetoclax before resuming cytarabine and anthracycline–based induction and intensification chemotherapy on improvement of infectious complications.

Ethic Statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP; IRB#17-014759). The requirement for written informed consent was waived by the IRB.

Discussion

ANGPT1::HOXA10-AS is a fusion involving the 5′ region of ANGPT1 and the lncRNA HOXA10-AS4. To our knowledge, the ANGPT1::HOXA10-AS fusion detected in our patient is novel and is predicted to activate intracellular HOX/MEIS programs. Fusion genes involving the HOX gene cluster (often with upregulation of adjacent HOX family genes) have been reported in approximately 15% of cases of non–Down syndrome-related AMKL (ML-DS).10 In one report, most fusions were predicted to lead to an in-frame functional protein. Other fusions involve noncoding HOX antisense genes and may promote leukemogenesis by disrupting regulatory transcripts leading to increased expression of neighboring HOXA genes.11 ANGPT1 is normally expressed in endothelial cells and has strong promoter/enhancer activity. HOXA-AS4 is a lncRNA which functions in cis regulation of HOXA expression. This fusion likely results in deregulated expression of HOXA cluster regulatory elements. Although this fusion was not covered by our institutional fusion panel, it was identified along with increased HOXA expression via whole-transcriptome sequencing. In one review examining drivers of non–Down syndrome-associated AMKL, diverse rearrangements in the HOX loci sharing gene expression profiles had relatively favorable prognosis as compared with other subgroups (60-month overall survival 77%), although limited by small numbers.10

Knowledge of this alteration might have therapeutic implications. Aberrant expression of HOX family genes and MEIS1 leads to arrested differentiation and interaction between KMT2A and menin. Menin inhibitors block this interaction and have demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with KMT2A-rearranged, NUP98-rearranged, MN1-rearranged,12 NPM1-mutant, or UBTF tandem duplication.13,14 Addition of the menin inhibitors revumenib or ziftomenib to chemotherapy was considered for this child given her leukemia-associated genetic alterations, but was ultimately not pursued given her favorable response to standard-of-care induction chemotherapy. Menin inhibitor–based salvage therapy certainly would be considered were the child to experience leukemia relapse, with the goal of achieving deep MRD-negative pretransplant remission. Additional nanopore sequencing of our patient's case provided methylation classification of her leukemia as AML with AMKL features, consistent with RNA-seq genomic findings. Although nanopore sequencing is currently only available on a research basis, such testing may be helpful for future clinical use in cases in which pathology and immunohistochemistry are nondefinitive for leukemia subtype classification.

In summary, this case illustrates the utility of whole-transcriptome sequencing for identification of genomic drivers and prognostic and therapeutic potential for future implementation of a methylation-based classification for rapid identification of leukemia subtypes.

APPENDIX

TABLE A1.

Gene Expression Changes Compared With the Bone Marrow Control Cohort

Gene TPM Fold Change Log2 Fold Change
MEIS2 20.07 238.76 7.90
MEIS1 80.47 59.44 5.89
HOXB-AS1 1.25 71.75 6.16
HOXA10 50.46 73.67 6.20
HOXA-AS4 6.54 108.65 6.76

Abbreviation: TPM, transcripts per million.

Derek Wong

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Novo Nordisk, GenDx

Feng Xu

Employment: Regeneron (I)

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Regeneron (I)

Moe Takeda

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Tempus AI

Kathrin M. Bernt

Employment: Merck (I), AstraZeneca (I)

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Merck (I), AstraZeneca (I)

Research Funding: Syndax, Merck

Sarah K. Tasian

Consulting or Advisory Role: Aleta Biotherapeutics, Syndax, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Kura Oncology, Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Research Funding: Incyte, Kura Oncology

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen

Marilyn M. Li

Honoraria: TD TD Security. March 4, 2025 Panelist, $1,000

Research Funding: Bayer

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: TD TD Security

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

SUPPORT

Supported by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Frontier 2026 APTPS; M.M.L.), NIH/NCI (1R01CA293587; S.K.T.), Hyundai Hope on Wheels Young Investigator Award (H.N.), NIH/NCI (1U01CA243072; S.K.T.), and the Pennsylvania Department of Health CURE award (S.K.T.).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conception and design: Haley Newman, Moe Takeda, Kathrin M. Bernt, Sarah K. Tasian, Marilyn M. Li, Yiming Zhong

Financial support: Marilyn M. Li

Administrative support: Sarah K. Tasian

Provision of study materials or patients: Sarah K. Tasian

Collection and assembly of data: Haley Newman, Jeffrey Schubert, Juan Santana, Ariel Long, Zirui Zhou, Feng Xu, Jiani Chen, Moe Takeda, Lisa Eidenschink Brodersen, Marilyn M. Li, Yiming Zhong

Data analysis and interpretation: Haley Newman, Derek Wong, Jeffrey Schubert, Jinhua Wu, Zirui Zhou, Feng Xu, Moe Takeda, Lisa Eidenschink Brodersen, Kathrin M. Bernt, Minjie Luo, Sarah K. Tasian, Marilyn M. Li, Yiming Zhong

Manuscript writing: All authors

Final approval of manuscript: All authors

Accountable for all aspects of the work: All authors

AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/po/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

Derek Wong

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Novo Nordisk, GenDx

Feng Xu

Employment: Regeneron (I)

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Regeneron (I)

Moe Takeda

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Tempus AI

Kathrin M. Bernt

Employment: Merck (I), AstraZeneca (I)

Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Merck (I), AstraZeneca (I)

Research Funding: Syndax, Merck

Sarah K. Tasian

Consulting or Advisory Role: Aleta Biotherapeutics, Syndax, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Kura Oncology, Jazz Pharmaceuticals

Research Funding: Incyte, Kura Oncology

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen

Marilyn M. Li

Honoraria: TD TD Security. March 4, 2025 Panelist, $1,000

Research Funding: Bayer

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: TD TD Security

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Cooper TM, Alonzo TA, Tasian SK, et al. Children's Oncology Group's 2023 blueprint for research: Myeloid neoplasms. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023;70(suppl 6):e30584. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ren Z, De Moerloose B, Lammens T. Prime-time for LncRNA signatures in acute myeloid leukemia? Ann Hematol. 2025;104:4333–4345. doi: 10.1007/s00277-025-06616-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Wang KC, Chang HY. Molecular mechanisms of long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell. 2011;43:904–914. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Surrey LF, MacFarland SP, Chang F, et al. Clinical utility of custom-designed NGS panel testing in pediatric tumors. Genome Med. 2019;11:32. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0644-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Newman H, Wong D, Wu J, et al. Leveraging genomic diagnostics for prognostics and therapeutics in pediatric acute leukemia. Hemasphere. 2025;9:e70269. doi: 10.1002/hem3.70269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Steinicke TL, Benfatto S, Capilla-Guerra MR, et al. Rapid epigenomic classification of acute leukemia. Nat Genet. 2025;57:2456–2467. doi: 10.1038/s41588-025-02321-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Egan G, Tasian SK. Precision medicine for high-risk gene fusions in pediatric AML: A focus on KMT2A, NUP98, and GLIS2 rearrangements. Blood. 2025;145:2574–2586. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024026598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Pollard JA, Alonzo TA, Gerbing R, et al. A Phase 3 Randomized Trial for Patients with De Novo AML Comparing Standard Therapy Including Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) to CPX-351 with GO - a Report from the Children's Oncology Group. Blood. 2024;144:967. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zwaan CM, Tasian SK, Aplenc R, et al. Diagnosis and management of AML in pediatric patients: Consensus recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2026;147:1532–1561. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024027904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. de Rooij JD, Branstetter C, Ma J, et al. Pediatric non-down syndrome acute megakaryoblastic leukemia is characterized by distinct genomic subsets with varying outcomes. Nat Genet. 2017;49:451–456. doi: 10.1038/ng.3772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Adriaanse FRS, Sakurada SM, Pruett-Miller SM, et al. Non-coding HOX fusions in pediatric non-down syndrome acute megakaryoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2019;134:533. [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Libbrecht C, Xie HM, Kingsley MC, et al. Menin is necessary for long term maintenance of meningioma-1 driven leukemia. Leukemia. 2021;35:1405–1417. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01146-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Cuglievan B, Kantarjian H, Rubnitz JE, et al. Menin inhibitors in pediatric acute leukemia: A comprehensive review and recommendations to accelerate progress in collaboration with adult leukemia and the international community. Leukemia. 2024;38:2073–2084. doi: 10.1038/s41375-024-02368-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wenge DV, Armstrong SA. Menin inhibition for the treatment of acute leukemia. Semin Hematol. 2025;62:187–195. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2025.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JCO Precision Oncology are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES