Abstract
Mumps is a vaccine-preventable viral disease that typically presents with parotid gland swelling and constitutional symptoms. Although widespread immunization has substantially reduced disease incidence, outbreaks continue to occur among vaccinated populations, raising concerns regarding waning immunity and vaccine failure. Recurrent mumps following both prior natural infection and complete vaccination is uncommon and remains infrequently reported.
We describe a 21-year-old woman who presented with a four-day history of fever, malaise, myalgia, and progressive painful swelling of the left parotid gland associated with difficulty chewing and speaking. She had received two doses of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine according to the national immunization schedule and had a documented history of mumps infection at nine years of age, occurring after she had already completed her two-dose MMR series (vaccine-breakthrough infection).
Physical examination revealed tender unilateral parotid enlargement, cervical lymphadenopathy, and evidence of undernutrition with a body mass index of 16.7 kg/m². Laboratory evaluation demonstrated iron deficiency anemia. Further evaluation, including positive mumps RT-PCR and positive anti-mumps IgM serology, confirmed acute mumps infection, while investigations excluded alternative causes of parotid enlargement.
The patient was managed conservatively with isolation, supportive care, nutritional supplementation, and symptomatic treatment, resulting in complete clinical recovery without complications. This case highlights that recurrent mumps can occur despite prior natural infection and complete MMR vaccination. Although waning immunity and host factors such as undernutrition may have contributed to susceptibility, a causal relationship cannot be established from a single case. Continued surveillance and awareness of breakthrough infections remain important, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Keywords: breakthrough infection, mmr vaccination, mumps, parotitis, recurrent mumps, waning immunity
Introduction
Mumps is an acute viral illness caused by the mumps virus and is characterized primarily by parotid gland swelling, fever, and constitutional symptoms [1]. The widespread use of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine has substantially reduced the global burden of disease; however, mumps outbreaks continue to occur in both vaccinated and unvaccinated populations [2]. Increasing reports of breakthrough infections among adolescents and young adults have raised concerns regarding waning immunity, secondary vaccine failure, and antigenic differences between vaccine and circulating viral strains [3]. Although natural infection is generally believed to confer long-lasting immunity, recurrent mumps following both previous infection and complete vaccination remains uncommon. We report a case of recurrent mumps in a 21-year-old woman with a history of childhood mumps and complete MMR vaccination, highlighting the possibility of breakthrough infection despite presumed hybrid immunity and emphasizing the need for continued clinical vigilance.
Case presentation
A 21-year-old previously healthy woman presented during the post-monsoon season with a four-day history of progressive painful swelling over the left cheek extending to the upper cervical region. The swelling was associated with fever, headache, malaise, myalgia, and fatigue. She reported a maximum recorded temperature of 102.2°F on the first day of illness, followed by progressive enlargement of the left parotid region and worsening pain during mastication and speech, resulting in difficulty eating and speaking. The patient denied recent travel or contact with individuals with similar symptoms. She had previously received measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination according to the national immunization schedule. Notably, she had a documented history of mumps infection at nine years of age, from which she recovered without complications. She had completed both doses of her MMR vaccination series in early childhood, several years before this episode; the infection occurring at the age of nine therefore represented a vaccine-breakthrough infection rather than mumps occurring prior to, or in the absence of, vaccination. She also reported an unintentional weight loss of approximately 9 kg over the two weeks preceding presentation. Although no specific underlying medical cause was identified during evaluation, the patient was clinically undernourished (BMI 16.7 kg/m²) with laboratory evidence of iron deficiency anemia, findings that were considered potentially relevant to her overall nutritional status. There was no history of chronic illness, immunodeficiency, surgery, medication use, or allergies.
On examination, the patient was febrile (101°F) with pallor and cervical lymphadenopathy. Examination revealed diffuse enlargement of the left parotid gland with obliteration of the angle of the mandible and elevation of the ipsilateral ear lobule. The swelling was tender, particularly in the retroauricular region, and neck movements were mildly restricted because of pain. No purulent discharge was observed from Stensen’s duct. Examination of the respiratory, cardiovascular, abdominal, neurological, and genitourinary systems was unremarkable. The chronological sequence of key clinical events is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1. Clinical timeline of the patient .
| Timeline | Event |
| ~15 months of age | First dose of MMR vaccine |
| 4–6 years of age | Second dose of MMR vaccine — vaccination series completed |
| Age 9 years | Previous mumps infection (occurring after completion of the two-dose MMR series, i.e., a vaccine-breakthrough infection) |
| 2 weeks before illness | Significant weight loss (9 kg) |
| Day 1 | Fever and constitutional symptoms |
| Day 3 | Development of painful parotid swelling |
| Day 4 | Clinical evaluation and diagnostic confirmation |
| Day 4 | Supportive treatment and isolation |
| Follow-up | Complete recovery |
Laboratory investigations demonstrated mild anemia (hemoglobin 10.4 g/dL) with microcytic hypochromic indices and low serum iron levels (23 μg/dL), consistent with iron deficiency anemia. The total leukocyte count was 4.15 × 10⁹/L with relative lymphopenia (883.95 cells/mm³). Monocyte and eosinophil percentages were mildly elevated (10.2% and 6.1%, respectively). Thyroid function tests, fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid profile, serum calcium, urinalysis, and most renal and liver function parameters were within normal limits (Table 2).
Table 2. Summary of key investigations.
Abbreviations: RT-PCR, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; IgM, immunoglobulin M; IgG, immunoglobulin G; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; CMV, cytomegalovirus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin.
| Investigation | Result | Interpretation | Reference Range |
| Hemoglobin | 10.4 g/dL | Mild anemia | 12.0–15.0 g/dL |
| Peripheral smear | Microcytic hypochromic | Iron deficiency pattern | Normocytic, normochromic RBCs |
| Serum iron | 23 μg/dL | Reduced | 50–170 μg/dL |
| Total leukocyte count | 4.15 × 10⁹/L | Mild leukopenia | 4.0–11.0 × 10⁹/L |
| Absolute lymphocyte count | 883 cells/mm³ | Relative lymphopenia | 1,000–4,800 cells/mm³ |
| Monocyte percentage | 10.2% | Mildly elevated | 2–8% |
| Eosinophil percentage | 6.1% | Mildly elevated | 1–6% |
| Mumps RT-PCR | Positive | Confirmatory | Negative |
| Anti-mumps IgM | Positive | Acute infection | Negative |
| Anti-mumps IgG | Positive | Previous immunity | Negative |
| Parotid ultrasonography | Acute parotitis | Supportive | Normal salivary gland architecture |
| EBV serology | Negative | Excluded | Negative |
| CMV serology | Negative | Excluded | Negative |
| HIV test | Negative | Excluded | Negative |
| HbA1c | Normal | Diabetes excluded | <5.7% |
A buccal mucosal swab and nasopharyngeal swab were obtained for virological evaluation. Based on the characteristic clinical presentation, laboratory findings, and confirmatory diagnostic testing, a diagnosis of recurrent mumps infection was established despite prior natural infection and complete MMR vaccination. The patient was advised to isolate for 7-10 days and was managed with supportive treatment, including hydration, antipyretics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glandular massage, and nutritional supplementation. Oral iron therapy was initiated for iron deficiency anemia. The patient showed progressive clinical improvement with complete resolution of symptoms and no complications during follow-up.
Discussion
Mumps is an acute viral illness caused by the mumps virus, a member of the family Paramyxoviridae [1]. Although the widespread introduction of the MMR vaccine has markedly reduced disease incidence, mumps outbreaks continue to occur globally, including among highly vaccinated populations [1,2]. Recent outbreaks in North America, Europe, and Asia have highlighted the persistence of mumps despite high vaccination coverage and have raised concerns regarding waning immunity and secondary vaccine failure [3-6].
The present case is noteworthy because the patient developed recurrent mumps despite both prior natural infection during childhood and complete MMR vaccination. Natural infection has traditionally been considered to confer long-lasting immunity, while two-dose MMR vaccination provides approximately 88% protection against mumps [4]. Nevertheless, breakthrough infections have been increasingly reported among adolescents and young adults, particularly many years after completion of the vaccination schedule [6,7]. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain mumps infection in previously vaccinated individuals. Waning immunity is considered one of the principal mechanisms proposed to explain breakthrough infections in vaccinated populations [3,8]. In addition, antigenic differences between vaccine strains and circulating wild-type strains may reduce vaccine effectiveness in certain settings. Several studies reported mumps vaccine effectiveness and evidence of declining protection with increasing time since vaccination, supporting waning immunity as a major factor underlying recent outbreaks [3,9,10].
Modeling of vaccine-derived protection suggests a mean duration of only about 27 years, considerably shorter than the durable immunity generally attributed to natural infection, which may help explain why breakthrough disease clusters among adolescents and young adults occur several years after completion of the primary series [9]. In outbreak settings, an additional (third) MMR dose has been shown to transiently reduce mumps risk by 60-78%, and is recommended by the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for persons at increased risk during defined outbreaks, although this protective boost appears to wane again within one to three years and has not been adopted as a routine, population-wide strategy [11,12].
Reports of recurrent mumps following both vaccination and previous natural infection are uncommon but have been described in the literature. The occurrence of mumps in previously vaccinated individuals has become increasingly recognized, and accumulating evidence suggests that waning immunity is the primary driver of breakthrough infections and outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations [2,3,5,6]. Our case adds to the limited literature describing recurrent mumps following prior natural infection and complete vaccination and illustrates that reinfection may occur even in individuals presumed to possess immunity acquired through both natural infection and vaccination. Malnutrition remains one of the leading causes of secondary immunodeficiency worldwide and is associated with impaired humoral and cell-mediated immune responses. Although a causal relationship cannot be established from a single case, the patient's low body mass index and nutritional deficiencies may have contributed to reduced immune protection and increased susceptibility to reinfection [13].
This case highlights the importance of considering mumps in the differential diagnosis of parotid swelling even among fully vaccinated adults and those with a prior history of infection. Although recurrent infection appears uncommon, clinicians should remain aware that breakthrough infections can occur and should pursue appropriate diagnostic evaluation when clinically indicated. Continued surveillance and further research are needed to better understand the duration of protective immunity following both natural infection and vaccination and to identify factors associated with recurrent disease.
Conclusions
This case demonstrates that recurrent mumps may occur despite prior natural infection and complete MMR vaccination, suggesting that neither natural infection nor vaccination invariably provides lifelong protection. Waning immunity, together with host factors such as undernutrition and iron deficiency, may contribute to susceptibility in certain individuals. Clinicians should therefore maintain a high index of suspicion for mumps in patients presenting with parotitis, irrespective of vaccination status or previous infection history. Continued surveillance, prompt diagnostic evaluation, and further research into the duration and determinants of protective immunity are essential to better understand and prevent breakthrough and recurrent mumps infections.
Acknowledgments
Sincere thanks to the Infectious Disease Research Group (IDRG) and Squad Medicine and Research (SMR) for their encouragement and guidance.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Venkataramana Kandi, Rithika Ramadugu, Chandra Varshini Pidikiti, Alesha Cordero Peña, Angelis Almonte, Iliana Garrido Flores, Abigail Almonte, Jose L. Gonzalez
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Venkataramana Kandi, Rithika Ramadugu, Chandra Varshini Pidikiti, Alesha Cordero Peña, Angelis Almonte, Iliana Garrido Flores, Abigail Almonte, Jose L. Gonzalez
Drafting of the manuscript: Venkataramana Kandi, Rithika Ramadugu, Chandra Varshini Pidikiti, Alesha Cordero Peña, Angelis Almonte, Iliana Garrido Flores, Abigail Almonte, Jose L. Gonzalez
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Venkataramana Kandi, Rithika Ramadugu
Supervision: Venkataramana Kandi, Rithika Ramadugu
References
- 1.Mumps. Hviid A, Rubin S, Mühlemann K. Lancet. 2008;371:932–944. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60419-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mumps outbreaks in vaccinated populations: are available mumps vaccines effective enough to prevent outbreaks? Dayan GH, Rubin S. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:1458–1467. doi: 10.1086/591196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Recent mumps outbreaks in vaccinated populations: no evidence of immune escape. Rubin SA, Link MA, Sauder CJ, Zhang C, Ngo L, Rima BK, Duprex WP. J Virol. 2012;86:615–620. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06125-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mumps: An update on outbreaks, vaccine efficacy, and genomic diversity. Lam E, Rosen JB, Zucker JR. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2020;33:0–19. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00151-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mumps in the vaccination age: global epidemiology and the situation in Germany. Beleni AI, Borgmann S. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:1618. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Epidemiological trends and determinants of mumps outbreaks: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Agrawal R, Rehman T, Sinha D, et al. Front Public Health. 2025;13:1711759. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1711759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mumps: Resurgence of a once-dormant disease. Balbi AM, Van Sant AA, Bean EW, Jacoby JL. JAAPA. 2018;31:19–22. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000532112.90755.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Current status of mumps virus infection: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and vaccine. Su SB, Chang HL, Chen AK. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1686. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vaccine waning and mumps re-emergence in the United States. Lewnard JA, Grad YH. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aao5945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Effectiveness and safety of a mumps containing vaccine in preventing laboratory-confirmed mumps cases from 2002 to 2017: A meta-analysis. Gao BG, Huang LF, Xie P. Open Life Sci. 2024;19:20220820. doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for use of a third dose of mumps virus-containing vaccine in persons at increased risk for mumps during an outbreak. Marin M, Marlow M, Moore KL, Patel M. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67:33–38. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6701a7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Effectiveness of a third dose of MMR vaccine for mumps outbreak control. Cardemil CV, Dahl RM, James L, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:947–956. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Malnutrition and infection: complex mechanisms and global impacts. Schaible UE, Kaufmann SH. PLoS Med. 2007;4:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
