Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2026 Sep 9;83(11):559. doi: 10.1007/s00284-026-05144-1

Curtobacterium uvaldense sp. nov., Falsirhodobacter allii sp. nov., Pseudomonas texasensis sp. nov., Three Novel Species Isolated from Onions in Texas, USA

Manzeal Khanal 1,2,3, Bed Prakash Bhatta 1,2,4, Lakhvir Kaur 1,2, Subas Malla 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC13558446  PMID: 42714586

Abstract

Bacterial strains 20TX0008T and 20TX0035T were isolated from the symptomatic onion foliage in 2020, and a bacterial strain 21TX0197T was isolated from the symptomatic onion bulb in 2021. Pathogenicity assays confirmed the two strains isolated from foliage to be non-pathogenic, while the strain 21TX0197T was found to be pathogenic. Phylogenetic analysis using the 16 S rRNA gene revealed the closest resemblance of 20TX0008T, 20TX0035T, and 21TX0197T to the genera Curtobacterium, Falsirhodobacter, and Pseudomonas, respectively. For the respective genus, strains 20TX0008T showed the greatest 16 S rRNA sequence similarity with Curtobacterium caesinilyticum GDMCC 1.2667T (99.7%), 20TX0035T with Falsirhodobacter deserti W402T (99.1%), and 21TX0197T with Pseudomonas uvaldensis 20TX0172T (99.4%). In the phylogenetic trees based on whole genome sequences, all three strains formed a distinct, well-supported branch that separated them from their closely related species within the same genus. The genomic similarity, based on average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH), revealed that the novel strains had values below the species delineation thresholds (ANI < 95% and dDDH < 70%), confirming the novelty of all these strains. Based on genomic and phenotypic characteristics, we propose three novel species, Curtobacterium uvaldense sp. nov. (type strain 20TX0008T =LMG 33207T =NCIMB 15480T), Falsirhodobacter allii sp. nov. (type strain 20TX0035T =LMG 33208T =NCIMB 15477T), and Pseudomonas texasensis sp. nov. (type strain 21TX0197T =LMG 33210T =NCIMB 15479T).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-026-05144-1.

Introduction

Bacteria are among the most diverse and rapidly evolving organisms, constantly adapting to changing environments and developing new traits that allow them to survive and thrive [1]. This adaptability drives the emergence of new species that have a substantial impact on agriculture, human health, and various ecosystems. The identification and characterization of these rapidly evolving species are essential for environmental sustainability and the development of effective disease management practices. Breakthrough advancements in nucleic acid sequencing technologies have made the identification and characterization of novel species easier, faster, and cost-effective [2]. Genomic analyses such as average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) consider the entire genome and are highly effective in differentiating closely related species [3, 4].

Curtobacterium is a genus of bacteria belonging to the phylum Actinomycetota (class–Actinomycetia, order–Micrococcales), and bacteria in this genus are Gram-positive, obligately aerobic, non-spore-forming, and catalase-positive [5]. As of December 2025, it comprises a total of 14 species (LPSN, https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/curtobacterium) with nomenclature recognized as validly published and correct under the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP) [6]. Of these, only two species, Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens and C. allii are known to be plant pathogenic [7, 8]. While some species such as C. albidum, C. citreum, and C. luteum were isolated from rice plants, C. allii was isolated from an onion bulb [9].

Falsirhodobacter is a genus of bacteria belonging to the phylum Pseudomonadota (class–Alphaproteobacteria, order–Rhodobacterales), and bacteria in this genus are Gram-negative, obligately aerobic, non-spore-forming, and catalase-positive. As of December 2025, it comprises a total of 4 species (LPSN) with nomenclature recognized as validly published and correct under the ICNP [6]. Of these, one was isolated from a dry soil sample [10], one from a rhizosphere soil sample [11], one from a seawater sample [12, 13], and one from red algae [14]. Until now, no species of this genus had been isolated from plant tissue.

Pseudomonas is a genus of bacteria belonging to the phylum Pseudomonadota (class–Gammaproteobacteria, order–Pseudomonadales), and bacteria in this genus are Gram-negative, obligately aerobic, non-spore-forming, and catalase-positive. As of December 2025, it comprises a total of 362 species (LPSN) with nomenclature recognized as validly published and correct under the ICNP [6]. Until now, there are at least 8 species of this genus that are pathogenic to onion, including Pseudomonas uvaldensis, which was isolated recently from Texas, USA [15].

The current study aimed to isolate, identify, and characterize novel bacterial species associated with onions, focusing on their physical and physiological properties to expand the growing database of bacterial diversity as well as to support the development of effective disease management practices in onions. A polyphasic approach combining phenotypic and genotypic analyses of bacterial strains collected during the onion disease survey led to the identification of three novel species [16], as described below.

Materials and Methods

Isolation and Ecology

Two strains, 20TX0008T and 20TX0035T, were isolated from symptomatic onion foliage tissue in 2020, and strain 21TX0197T was isolated from the symptomatic onion bulb tissue in 2021, from onion cultivated in Texas, USA. Bacterial isolation along the margin of the symptomatic tissue of foliage or bulb was done on nutrient agar (NA) medium as previously described [16]. Briefly, a 5 mm piece of symptomatic tissue was removed, washed, and macerated in 100 µl of sterile water. Following the streaking of the resulting suspension on nutrient agar (NA) medium, a single colony was purified on NA and incubated at 25 °C. The isolated single colonies were further sub-cultured at the same temperature until a pure culture was obtained and then stored in sterile 15% aqueous glycerol at − 80 °C. Pathogenicity of the purified bacterial isolates was confirmed via a red scale necrosis assay, a bulb assay, and a foliar assay with the positive (Pantoea ananatis strain PNA 97-1R) and negative (phosphate-buffered saline) controls, as previously described [16]. The scale assay used wounded scales (~ 3 × 4 cm) of fleshy red onion bulbs for the inoculation of 10 µl bacterium suspension of the isolated species, which was then incubated at 25 °C for 4 days. For the bulb assay, a bacterial suspension of the isolated species (0.5 ml) was injected into the upper shoulder of the yellow onion bulb, followed by incubation at 25 °C for 12 days. For the foliar assay, leaves of 5-week-old plants were cut 7 cm from the tip and inoculated at the top using a 20 µl bacterium suspension of the isolated species, followed by incubation at 25 °C for 5 days. Each assay was conducted three times, and the whole experiment was repeated twice.

16 S rRNA Gene Phylogeny

Genomic DNA of strains 20TX0008T, 20TX0035T, and 21TX0197T was extracted using DNeasy PowerSoil Kit (Qiagen) and Sanger sequenced using universal primers 27F and 1492R to determine the sequence of the 16S rRNA gene [16, 17]. Sequences derived from two primers were trimmed and assembled to make a consensus sequence using Geneious Prime 2020 (https://www.geneious.com/). The partial 16S rRNA sequences of 20TX0008T, 20TX0035T, and 21TX0197T were deposited in GenBank with accession numbers ON255719, ON255745, and OP325568, respectively. These sequences were compared with the closely related species (Reference Sequence) using the NCBI Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) [18]. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic trees based on the closely matching type strains were constructed using MEGA 12 [19], with 1000 bootstrap replicates and the Tamura-Nei model [20].

Genomic Analysis and Functional Annotation

The genomic DNA of the isolated strains was sent for whole-genome sequencing and assembly to SeqCenter (SeqCenter LLC, PA, USA). The sample libraries were prepared and sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq 2000 platform with an average sequencing depth of 100X, resulting in 2 × 151 bp paired-end reads. The raw fastq files were demultiplexed, quality controlled, and adapter trimmed using bcl-convert v.3.9.3 [21]. The trimmed reads were then assembled using SPAdes v.3.13.0 [22]. Finally, the genome quality of assembled reads was estimated by checkM2 (Galaxy Version 1.1.0 + galaxy0), and they were deposited in GenBank with genome accession numbers: JAQMHU000000000 (20TX0008T), JAQMHV000000000, (20TX0035T), and JAQMHS000000000 (21TX0197T).

Genome relatedness with the closely related species was calculated using average nucleotide identity (ANI) and digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH) values (Table 1). The orthologous ANI (orthoANIu) algorithm (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/ani) and ANIblast (ANIb) were used to calculate ANI values [23, 24], and dDDH values [25] were computed using Type Strain Genome Server (TYGS, https://tygs.dsmz.de/). Strains were designated as a novel species if ANI and dDDH values were < 95% and < 70%, respectively [26].

Table 1.

Genomic similarities between each strain (Curtobacterium uvaldense 20TX0008ᵀ, Falsirhodobacter allii 20TX0035ᵀ, and Pseudomonas texasensis 21TX0197ᵀ) and their closely related species

Novel strain and closely related species dDDH
(d4, %)
OrthoANIu (%) ANIb
(%)
16 S rRNA (%)
Curtobacterium uvaldense 20TX0008 T
Curtobacterium citri GDMCC 1.2668T 40 86.9 86.8 99.4
Curtobacterium caseinilyticum GDMCC 1.2667T 34 87.6 87.7 99.7
Curtobacterium subtropicum GDMCC 1.2669T 32.1 90.1 90.2 99.4
Falsirhodobacter allii 20TX0035T
Falsirhodobacter deserti W402T 23.3 80.9 79.8 99.1
Falsirhodobacter algicola PG104T 22.7 80.4 79.2 98.1
Falsirhodobacter halotolerans KCTC32158T 21.4 79.3 77.5 98.4
Pseudomonas texasensis 21TX0197T
Pseudomonas uvaldensis 20TX0172T 35.7 88.4 87.9 99.4
Pseudomonas mediterranea CFBP 5447T 32.6 86.8 86.2 98.6

Phylogenetic trees were generated using a manually curated pipeline incorporating Prodigal, HMMER, and IQ‑TREE to identify single‑copy core genes, align and concatenate marker sequences, and infer the final tree. Protein coding sequences were predicted from the genomes of closely related strains using Prodigal v2.6.3 with default parameters. Predicted proteomes were searched against the Pfam-A profile hidden Markov model (HMM) database using HMMER v3.3.2 (hmmsearch) to identify conserved protein domains across genomes. For each genome, HMMER tabular output was parsed to quantify the presence and copy number of each Pfam domain. Pfam entries that were (i) detected in all genomes and (ii) present as a single copy per genome were retained as putative single copy core markers. For each such Pfam domain, the best scoring hit per genome was extracted from the corresponding proteome FASTA file and used to construct per marker multiple sequence alignments with MAFFT v7. Individual marker alignments were then concatenated into a supermatrix, which was used to infer a concatenated protein phylogeny with IQ-TREE v3.0.1 under a model selected by ModelFinder, and node support was assessed with ultrafast bootstrap resampling (1000 replicates). Additionally, phylogenetic trees were constructed based on the whole-genome sequences through TYGS web server, where intergenomic distances were calculated based on Genome Blast Distance Phylogeny method (GBDP). For each calculation, d5 formula and 100 bootstrap replications were conducted [27].

Genome annotation of the strains was done using the Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) server (https://rast.nmpdr.org/) [28] and SEED Viewer (https://www.theseed.org/wiki/Home_of_the_SEED) [29]. RAST annotations provided functional roles for predicted genes, grouped into subsystems. For simplicity, we refer to these functional roles as ‘genes’ throughout the manuscript, unless otherwise specified.

Physiological Features

Physiological and chemotaxonomic studies of the bacterial strains were carried out following the established laboratory protocols [30, 31]. The 24-h-old cultures of 20TX0008T, 20TX0035T, and 21TX0197T were used to test for the Gram reaction and KOH test [32]. The endospore-forming ability, oxidase activity, catalase activity, and the KB fluorescence tests were performed using malachite green, 3% hydrogen peroxide, Oxistrips (Hardy Diagnostics, CA, USA), and King’s B medium (to test whether a strain produces green fluorescence visible upon UV exposure of 360–380 nm), respectively. Oxygen requirements were determined using thioglycollate medium (Hardy Diagnostics, CA. USA) [33]. A single, well-isolated colony of each strain was stab-inoculated to the bottom of the tube using a sterile inoculating needle, and tubes were incubated at 30 °C for 24–48 h. Motility was assessed by culturing the bacterium in a semi solid growth motility test medium containing tryptone, sodium chloride, and agar. The tobacco hypersensitive test of the isolated bacterial strains was conducted using three tobacco plants together with positive and negative controls. To check for the bacterial strains’ ability to produce pectolytic enzymes that cause potato soft rot, a pectolytic assay was done on flame-sterilized, peeled potato slices (3 replicates). Additionally, levan production was assessed in Pseudomonas strain 21TX0197T, using nutrient agar supplemented with 5% sucrose. Imaging was performed using cultures that were grown for 24 h at 30 °C in nutrient broth (per l, beef extract 3 g, peptone 5 g, sodium chloride 5 g) and visualized using calibrated magnification with a 15 C CCD camera on a JEOL 1200Ex transmission electron microscope (TEM) operated at 100 kV at the Texas A&M Microscopy and Imaging Centre following previously described protocols on negative staining [34].

For all three novel strains, physiological profiling was done using Biolog GEN III microplates. The Biolog GEN III assay relies on tetrazolium dye reduction to assess metabolic activity rather than direct growth. Therefore, stressed or dying cells may still generate positive reactions, potentially leading to false-positive interpretations of substrate utilization or growth capability. Hence, optimum growth conditions for the bacterial strains were ascertained via NaCl tolerance, pH tolerance, and optimum temperature tests. All three tolerance tests were conducted in triplicates using nutrient agar media with variable values for salt (0–10%), pH (4–10), and temperature (4–41 °C) [15]. Also, various API strips (bioMérieux) were utilized for selected strains and tested using manufacturer’s guidelines. API 20NE was used to characterize both the novel Pseudomonas and Curtobacterium strains. API ZYM was used to characterize both the novel Curtobacterium and Falsirhodobacter strains. While API 20E, API Coryne, and API 50CH were exclusively used for the novel Curtobacterium strain. For Biolog analysis, bacterial strains were cultured for 24-h-old in NA medium, suspended into inoculating fluid, adjusted for optical density (OD600) of 0.022, dispensed onto microplates according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and incubated at 30 °C to determine substrate utilization by bacteria [8]. The microplates were observed, and data were recorded after 24, 48, and 72 h. While some closely related strains were tested side by side in the lab, some data were used from previous studies, considering the similarity of the tested conditions.

Results and Discussion

Pathogenicity

Strain 21TX0197T, isolated from a rotting bulb, produced necrosis on scale, bulb, and foliage tissues (Fig. S1), whereas the other two strains—20TX0008T and 20TX0035T—isolated from necrotic foliage were asymptomatic. On onion scales, after incubation for 4 days, necrotic lesions (~ 5 to 10 mm in width) with a pale-yellow appearance developed at the inoculation sites. While on onion bulbs, dark brown colored necrosis developed around the inoculated sites affecting over 30% of the bulb area at the dissected surface. Similarly, leaf showed dieback (~ 5–10 cm long) from the point of inoculation towards the bottom. Three strains with similar morphology across the tested pathogenicity assays were re-isolated for the symptomatic strain (GenBank accession of 16 S rRNA sequence: PV800730–PV800732). These daughter strains produced identical lesions during assays, thereby satisfying Koch’s postulates.

16 S rRNA Gene and Whole Genome Phylogeny

The strains 20TX0008T, 20TX0035T, and 21TX0197T showed the highest 16S rRNA sequence similarities with Curtobacterium caesinilyticum GDMCC 1.2667T (99.7%), Falsirhodobacter deserti W402T (99.1%), and Pseudomonas uvaldensis 20TX0172T (99.4%), respectively (Table 1). Although 16S rRNA gene similarity is often used for bacterial identification, even sequences with > 99.9% identity may belong to different species, and 16S-based species assignment should therefore be interpreted cautiously and be verified with the genome level analysis [32, 33]. In the phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA sequences, all three strains formed a distinct, well-supported branch that separated them from their closely related species within the same genus (Figures S2-S4).

The whole genome analysis revealed that all isolated strains shared ANI values below 95% and dDDH values below 70% with their closest related species (Table 1), confirming their status as members of a distinct species. The in-silico dDDH values of strains 20TX0008T, 20TX0035T, and 21TX0197T with their phylogenetically closest type strains — Curtobacterium citri GDMCC 1.2668T, Falsirhodobacter deserti W402T, and Pseudomonas uvaldensis 20TX0172T — were estimated to be 40.0%, 23.3%, and 35.7%, respectively. The estimated ANIb values between strains 20TX0008ᵀ, 20TX0035ᵀ, and 21TX0197ᵀ and their respective closest type strains mentioned above were 86.8%, 79.8%, and 87.9%, respectively. The phylogenetic trees generated from concatenated single‑copy core gene markers (Figs. 1, 2 and 3) and from whole‑genome analyses using TYGS (Figures S5–S7) showed highly congruent topologies. In both approaches, the three strains consistently formed a distinct, well‑supported clade clearly separated from their closest described species within the genus, supporting their recognition as novel species.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree inferred from 442 concatenated single‑copy core genes identified across the whole genome sequences of Curtobacterium uvaldense 20TX0008T and closely related Curtobacterium species

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic tree inferred from 207 concatenated single‑copy core genes identified across the whole genome sequences of Falsirhodobacter allii 20TX0035T and closely related Falsirhodobacter species

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Phylogenetic tree inferred from 741 concatenated single‑copy core genes identified across the whole genome sequences of Pseudomonas texasensis 21TX0197T and closely related Pseudomonas species

Genome Features and Functional Annotations

Among the three novel species, 21TX0197T has the largest genome size (6.3 Mb, 100% completeness and 0.2% contamination), followed by 20TX0008T (3.6 Mb, 100% completeness and 0.1% contamination) and 20TX0035T (3.2 Mb, 98.8% completeness and 0.3% contamination). The estimated contig number in 20TX0008T was 81 (N50 = 110.1 kb, L50 = 11 and G + C = 71.8%), in 20TX0035T was 54 (N50 = 195 kb, L50 = 5 and G + C = 66.5%), and in 21TX0197T was 130 (N50 = 198.5 kb, L50 = 8 and G + C = 61.5%). A total of 3,388 genes (3,314 protein-coding, 48 tRNA, and 3 rRNA) were found to be present in 20TX0008T, 3,276 genes (3,199 protein-coding, 45 tRNA, and 3 rRNA) in 20TX0035T, and 5,610 genes (5,475 protein-coding, 54 tRNA, and 4 rRNA) in 21TX0197T.

A comprehensive analysis of functional genomic annotations between the novel strains and the type strains of closely related species is provided in the Online Resource ESM_2 (Tables S1-S3). Also, a summary of the total, unique and shared gene roles across the strains is provided (Tables S4-S5). It is important to note that genome annotations reflect predicted gene content, and the presence of a gene does not guarantee its expression or functional activity. Likewise, genes not detected in the annotation may still be present but unrecognized due to limitations in current databases and prediction algorithms. The unique functional genomic potential of each novel strain is summarized below.

Curtobacterium Strain 20TX0008T

Compared to nine closely related species, a total of four genes were uniquely identified in the novel strain 20TX0008T (Table S1). These unique genes are each related to proline utilization, Type III restriction modification system, phase DNA synthesis, and beta-lactamase. Notably, the gene associated with class C beta-lactamase and penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) was identified exclusively in this novel strain, with no homologous genes detected in any other strains analyzed. PBPs, essential for bacterial cell wall synthesis, also play significant roles in beta-lactam resistance mechanisms [35, 36]. Beta-lactamases, including Class C (AmpC) enzymes, are critical mediators of β-lactam antibiotic resistance [37, 38] and play a significant role in resistance to novel cephalosporins, with some species capable of inducible expression [39]. AmpC β-lactamases are typically chromosomally encoded in Gram-negative bacteria of the Enterobacteriaceae group, where their expression is often inducible or hyper-expressed due to promoter mutations. The “SPACE” organisms (Serratia, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Citrobacter, Enterobacter) are clinically significant due to their chromosomal AmpC production [40]. While class C beta-lactamases are traditionally associated with Gram-negative bacteria, efficient class D beta-lactamases have been discovered in Gram-positive organisms (Bacillaceae, Clostridiaceae, and Eubacteriaceae), revealing a new reservoir of resistance enzymes [41]. The presence of this gene in the novel strain—a Gram-positive bacterium belonging to Microbacteriaceae—is particularly notable and unusual.

Falsirhodobacter Strain 20TX0035T

Compared to six closely related species, a total of 18 genes were uniquely identified in the novel strain 20TX0035T, including seven associated with fructose utilization (Table S2). Notably, genes related to fructose utilization were absent in all other studied strains. Given that onion is a fructose-rich substrate [42, 43], the presence of multiple fructose utilization genes in the novel strain highlights a key adaptive trait for efficient nutrient acquisition and survival in its native environment. Although, the exact role of this gene is not identified in this strain, but, the ability to utilize D-fructose in Biolog assay could be linked to the presence of this gene. Similarly, only the novel strain possessed two genes, each involved in lignin degradation and orphan regulatory proteins—capabilities not detected in the related strains. A total of five genes related to niacin-choline transport and metabolism were identified. Of these, two were exclusively present in the novel strain, while the remaining three were shared only between F. deserti and the novel strain and were absent in all other studied strains.

Pseudomonas Strain 21TX0197T

Compared to nine closely related species, a total of eight genes were uniquely identified in the novel strain 21TX0197T (Table S3). Two genes involved in teichuronic acid biosynthesis—a component typically associated with Gram-positive cell walls—were uniquely identified in the novel strain, while such genes were absent in all other strains analyzed, making this an intriguing and unexpected finding. Teichuronic acids are important components of cell walls in some Gram-positive bacteria [44, 45]. While teichuronic acid biosynthesis genes are well-characterized in Bacillus subtilis [46, 47], their presence in the novel Pseudomonas strain, a Gram-negative species, highlights their exclusivity. The presence of these genes may endow the novel strain with the ability to synthesize teichuronic acid, potentially impacting its cell wall composition, environmental adaptability, or interactions with phosphate availability [45, 48].

Under subsystem “Toxin-antitoxin replicon stabilization systems”, two genes (YefM protein- antitoxin to YoeB, YoeB toxin protein) were found only in the novel strain 21TX0197T. The yefM-yoeB toxin-antitoxin (TA) system is often associated with plasmid and replicon stabilization, and plays important roles in cellular stress responses and biofilm formation [49]. In Streptococcus, deletion of yefM-yoeB reduces oxidative stress resistance and biofilm formation ability [50]. Two genes, Chromosome initiation inhibitor under subsystem LysR-family proteins in Escherichia coli and Universal stress protein family 4, under the stress response category, were found only in the novel strain. LysR-family proteins are among the most abundant transcriptional regulators in bacteria and play roles in metabolism, stress responses, and regulation of various cellular processes [51, 52]. The universal stress protein (USP) family is a superfamily of conserved proteins that are upregulated in response to diverse environmental stresses, including nutrient starvation, oxidative stress, and exposure to antibiotics or metals [53]. Under the Virulence, Disease, and Defense category, the cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance pathway comprised a total of eight genes. Of these, seven were common to all strains, while the remaining one gene was uniquely present in the novel strain. Similarly, in the same category, a total of 15 genes were associated with copper homeostasis. Fourteen of these genes were shared across all strains, whereas one gene, linked to copper tolerance, was found exclusively in the novel strain. The presence of several unique stress-response genes underscores the novelty of the strain and suggests enhanced adaptability for survival.

An interesting pattern was observed in sulfur metabolism across nine Pseudomonas strains, comprising a total of 29 genes—17 associated with inorganic sulfur assimilation, eight with organic sulfur assimilation, and four with thioredoxin–disulfide reductase activity. All four thioredoxin–disulfide reductase genes were conserved across all strains. The novel strain, along with six others, contained only inorganic sulfur assimilation genes, lacking those for organic sulfur metabolism. In contrast, P. mediterranea exhibited the opposite trend—retaining genes solely for organic sulfur assimilation and lacking those for inorganic pathways. Notably, P. uvaldensis, the closest relative to the novel strain, was the only strain lacking both organic and inorganic sulfur assimilation genes. P. bijieensis was the only strain harboring genes for both pathways. Onions are known to accumulate inorganic sulfur compounds (e.g., sulfate, thiosulfate) as part of their defense and metabolic processes [54, 55]. The ability to efficiently assimilate inorganic sulfur could provide the novel strain with a competitive advantage in colonizing and infecting onion tissues.

Physiological Features

The novel strain 20TX0008T was Gram-stain positive, while the other two strains, 20TX0035T and 21TX0197T, were Gram-stain negative. All the novel strains produced catalase and were non-endospore-forming, obligately aerobic, and non-pectolytic. The strain 20TX0008T was non-motile, while the other two strains, 20TX0035T and 21TX0197T, were motile with the presence of one or more flagella. For oxidase (production of cytochrome c oxidase), KB fluorescence, and tobacco hypersensitivity tests, all the strains responded negatively except 21TX0197T. The strain 21TX0197T produced mucoid, dome-shaped colonies after 24 h at 25 °C on nutrient agar medium supplemented with 5% sucrose, which confirmed the production of levan, a fructan polysaccharide. TEM images showed that bacterial cells of all three novel strains were rod-shaped (Fig. S8). Cells of 20TX0008T measured 1.15–2.10 μm long × 0.59–0.91 μm wide (mean ± SD, 1.55 ± 0.29 × 0.71 ± 0.09 μm; n = 10), cells of 20TX0035T measured 1.47–2.39 μm long × 0.91–1.34 μm wide (mean ± SD, 1.93 ± 0.31 × 1.10 ± 0.14 μm; n = 10), and cells of 21TX0197T measured 1.97–2.70 μm long × 0.78–0.99 μm wide (mean ± SD, 2.34 ± 0.25 × 0.90 ± 0.06 μm; n = 10). The growth conditions findings for all strains are presented in Tables 2, 3 and 4. Among Curtobacterium species, strain 20TX0008T growth showed the highest tolerance to NaCl (up to 6%), alkaline conditions (up to pH 9), and the highest minimum temperature (15 °C) (Table 2). In contrast, among Falsirhodobacter species, strain 20TX0035T exhibited the lowest NaCl tolerance (up to 3%) (Table 3). Similarly, within Pseudomonas species, strain 21TX0197T displayed lower NaCl tolerance (up to 3%), compared to P. uvaldensis, which tolerated up to 4% NaCl (Table 4). An overview of the Biolog and API assays for each novel strain, highlighting the key reactions that distinguished the novel strains from the type strains of closely related species, is provided in Tables 2, 3 and 4. The comprehensive results of the Biolog and various API assays for the three novel strains are provided in Supplementary 2 (Tables S6-S9).

Table 2.

Differential phenotypic characteristics of Curtobacterium uvaldense 20TX0008T and closely related type strains of genus Curtobacterium. Strains: 1, 20TX0008T; 2, C. subtropicum RHCJP20T; 3, C. citri RHCKG23T; 4, C. caesinilyticum RHCKG28T. Data are from: λ, this study; ϕ, strains 2–4 from previous study [56]. −, negative reaction; +, positive reaction; w, weakly positive reaction

Characteristics 1 λ 2 ϕ 3 ϕ 4 ϕ
Growth characteristics
NaCl tolerance (% w/v) 0–6 0–1 0–1 0–2
pH range 5–9 (optimum 6) 5–7 (optimum 6)

4–8

(optimum 6)

4–7

(optimum 6)

Temperature (°C) range 15–37 (optimum 30) 10–37 (optimum 28–30) 10–37 (optimum 28–30)

10–37

(optimum 28–30)

Physiological characteristics
Motility ‒ + + +
Sources utilization (Biolog Gen III)*
Carbon sources
3-Methyl glucose ‒ + ‒ +
D-Arabitol + + ‒ +
D-Fucose ‒ ‒ ‒ +
D-Glucuronate + + ‒ +
D-Raffinose + + ‒ ‒
D-Sorbitol + + ‒ +
Glucuronamide w + ‒ +
L-Fucose ‒ ‒ ‒ +
L-Galactonate lactone ‒ + ‒ +
L-Malate w + ‒ ‒
L-Rhamnose ‒ ‒ + ‒
Enzyme activities (API ZYM)
Amino peptidase
Cystine arylamidase + ‒ + w
Leucine arylamidase + ‒ + +
Valine arylamidase + ‒ + w
Glycosyl hydrolase
N-Acetyl-β-glucosaminidase + + + ‒
α-Galactosidase + w + +

*Substrate utilization was determined using Biolog GEN III microplates and indicates the ability to utilize compounds as sole carbon sources

Table 3.

Differential phenotypic characteristics of Falsirhodobacter allii 20TX0035T and closely related type strains of genus Falsirhodobacter. Strains: 1, 20TX0035T; 2, F. deserti strain W402T; 3, F. algicola PG 104T; 4, F. halotolerans KCTC 32158T. Data are from: λ, this study; ϕ, strains 2–4 from previous study [14]. −, negative reaction; +, positive reaction; w, weakly positive reaction

Characteristics 1 λ 2 ϕ 3 ϕ 4 ϕ
Growth characteristics
NaCl tolerance (% w/v) 0–3 0–10 0–8 0–7
pH range

6–9

(optimum 7)

5.5–10 (optimum 7) 6–10 (optimum 7.5) 6-8.5 (optimum 7)
Temperature (°C) range 15–35 (optimum 30) 10–40 (optimum 30) 15–35 (optimum 30) 10–30 (optimum 30)
Physiological characteristics
Motility + ‒ + +
Sources utilization (Biolog Gen III)*
Carbon sources
Bromo-succinate + + + ‒
Citrate ‒ + ‒ +
D-Aspartate ‒ ‒ ‒ +
D-Cellobiose ‒ ‒ + ‒
D-Fucose w + ‒ ‒
D-Galacturonate ‒ + ‒ ‒
D-Glucose-6-Phosphate ‒ ‒ + ‒
D-Glucuronate ‒ + ‒ +
D-Maltose ‒ ‒ + ‒
D-Mannose + + ‒ ‒
D-Salicin ‒ ‒ + ‒
D-Sorbitol + ‒ ‒ +
D-Trehalose w ‒ + ‒
D-Turanose ‒ ‒ + ‒
Glucuronamide ‒ + ‒ ‒
L-Aspartate + ‒ + +
L-Pyroglutamate + + ‒ +
L-Rhamnose ‒ + ‒ ‒
L-Serine w ‒ ‒ +
Methyl Pyruvate + ‒ + +
Tween 40 w ‒ + ‒
α-D-Glucose + + ‒ ‒
Chemical sensitivity (Biolog Gen III)
Lincomycin + + ‒ +
Nalidixic acid + + + ‒
Rifamycin SV ‒ + ‒ +
Enzyme activities (API ZYM)
Amino peptidase
Valine arylamidase + ‒ w ‒
Esterase
Esterase (C4) + + ‒ ‒
Glycosyl hydrolase
N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase ‒ ‒ ‒ +
β-galactosidase ‒ ‒ w ‒
β-glucosidase ‒ ‒ + +
β-glucuronidase ‒ ‒ + ‒
Phosphatase
Acid phosphatase + w + ‒
Naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase + ‒ w ‒

*Substrate utilization was determined using Biolog GEN III microplates and indicates the ability to utilize compounds as sole carbon sources

Table 4.

Differential phenotypic characteristics of Pseudomonas texasensis 21TX0197T and closely related type strains of genus Pseudomonas. Strains: 1, 21TX0197T; 2, P. uvaldensis 20TX0172T; 3, P. mediterranea DSM 16733T. Data are from: λ, this study; ϕ, strains 2–3 from previous study [15]. −, negative reaction; +, positive reaction; w, weakly positive reaction; ND, no data available

Characteristics 1 λ 2 ϕ 3 ϕ
Growth characteristics
NaCl tolerance (% w/v) 0–3 0–4 ND
pH range

5–9

(optimum 7)

5–10

(optimum 6–7)

ND
Temperature (°C) range

4–41

(optimum 30)

4–41

(optimum 25–30)

ND
Sources utilization (Biolog Gen III)*
Carbon sources
D-Fructose-6-Phosphate ‒ w ‒
D-Fucose w + +
D-Galacturonate w ‒ +
D-Saccharate ‒ + +
D-Trehalose ‒ + +
Formate w ‒ +
Glucuronamide w + +
Inosine w + +
L-Fucose ‒ w w
L-Galactonate lactone w ‒ +
L-Histidine w + +
p-Hydroxy-phenyl-acetate ‒ ‒ +
Sucrose ‒ + +
Tween 40 w ‒ ‒
α-Hydroxy-butyric acid w w +
Chemical sensitivity (Biolog Gen III)
Sodium bromate + + ‒
Enzyme activity (API 20NE)
Amino peptidase
Arginine dihydrolase + + ‒

*Substrate utilization was determined using Biolog GEN III microplates and indicates the ability to utilize compounds as sole carbon sources

Conclusion

Taken together, the phylogenetic placement, genome‑wide relatedness indices (ANI < 91%, dDDH < 41%), and distinct physiological and functional characteristics clearly demonstrate that strains 20TX0008ᵀ, 20TX0035ᵀ, and 21TX0197ᵀ each represent well‑separated, previously uncharacterized species within their respective genera. Their unique genomic features, combined with diagnostic phenotypic traits that differentiate them from the closest type strains, provide strong and consistent evidence supporting the establishment of three novel species.

Description of Curtobacterium uvaldense sp. nov

Curtobacterium uvaldense (u.val.denʹse. N.L. neut. adj. uvaldense, pertaining to Uvalde, Texas, USA, where the type strain was isolated).

Cells are Gram-stain-positive, obligate aerobe, rod-shaped, 1.1–2.1 μm long × 0.6–0.9 μm wide, non-spore-forming and non-motile. Produce catalase but not cytochrome c oxidase. Colonies on nutrient agar are pale yellow, circular, entire, smooth, raised and 0.5–1.0 mm in diameter after 24 h at 25 °C. Growth occurs at 15–37 °C, with an optimum at 30 °C, and at pH 5.0–9.0, with an optimum at pH 6.0. Growth occurs on nutrient agar medium in the presence of 0–6% (w/v) NaCl, with an optimum at 0% (w/v). Does not assimilate 3-methyl glucose, D-aspartate, D-fructose 6-phosphate, D-fucose, D-galacturonate, D-glucose 6-phosphate, D-lactate methyl ester, D-saccharate, D-serine, formate, γ-aminobutyrate, L-fucose, L-galactonate lactone, L-histidine, L-lactate, L-pyroglutamate, L-rhamnose, methyl pyruvate, mucate, N-acetyl-β-D-mannosamine, N-acetyl neuraminate, p-hydroxyphenylacetate, propionate, quinate, α-hydroxybutyrate, α-ketobutyrate, α-ketoglutarate or β-hydroxy-DL-butyrate as carbon sources. Weakly assimilates bromo‑succinate, citrate, D‑malate, glucuronamide or L‑malate as carbon sources.

The type strain 20TX0008T (= LMG 33207T=NCIMB 15480T) was isolated from symptomatic onion foliage collected in Texas, USA. The genome size of the type strain is 3.6 Mbp and its DNA G + C content is 71.8%. The GenBank accession numbers for the genome sequence and 16 S rRNA sequence are JAQMHU000000000 and ON255719, respectively. The type strain does not grow in the presence of D‑serine, fusidic acid, lincomycin, minocycline, niaproof 4, rifamycin SV, tetrazolium blue, tetrazolium violet, troleandomycin, and vancomycin. And it exhibits weak sensitivity to guanidine HCl and sodium bromate. Under the conditions tested, the type strain does not cause necrosis in inoculated onion tissues, does not produce a hypersensitive response in tobacco leaves, and has no pectolytic activity on potato slices.

Description of Falsirhodobacter allii sp. nov

Falsirhodobacter allii (alʹli.i. L. gen. n. allii, of onion, Allium cepa, referring to the source from which the type strain was isolated).

Cells are Gram-stain-negative, obligate aerobe, rod-shaped, 1.5–2.4 μm long × 0.9–1.3 μm wide, non-spore-forming and motile. Produce catalase but not cytochrome c oxidase. Colonies on nutrient agar are yellow, circular, entire, smooth, flat and 0.5–1.0 mm in diameter after 24 h at 25 °C. Growth occurs at 15–35 °C, with an optimum at 30 °C, and at pH 6.0 to 9.0, with an optimum at pH 7.0. Growth occurs on nutrient agar medium in the presence of 0–3% (w/v) NaCl, with an optimum at 0% (w/v). Assimilates acetate, acetoacetate, bromo-succinate, D-arabitol, D-fructose, D-galactose, D-malate, D-mannitol, D-mannose, D-sorbitol, glycerol, L-alanine, L-aspartate, L-glutamate, L-malate, L-pyroglutamate, methyl pyruvate, α-D-glucose, α-hydroxybutyrate and α-ketoglutarate as sole carbon sources. Weakly assimilates D-fucose, D-lactic acid methyl ester, D-saccharic acid, D-trehalose, glycyl-L-proline, L-serine or Tween 40 as carbon sources.

The type strain 20TX0035T (= LMG 33208T=NCIMB 15477T) was isolated from symptomatic onion foliage collected in Texas, USA. The genome size of the type strain is 3.2 Mbp and its DNA G + C content is 66.5%. The GenBank accession numbers for the genome sequence and 16 S rRNA gene sequence are JAQMHV000000000 and ON255745, respectively. The type strain grows in the presence of lincomycin, lithium chloride, nalidixic acid, and 1% sodium lactate. Under the conditions tested, the type strain does not cause necrosis in inoculated onion tissues, does not produce a hypersensitive response in tobacco leaves, and has no pectolytic activity on potato slices.

Description of Pseudomonas texasensis sp. nov

Pseudomonas texasensis (tex.as.enʹsis. N.L. fem. adj. texasensis, pertaining to Texas, USA, where the type strain was isolated).

Cells are Gram-stain-negative, obligate aerobe, rod-shaped, 2.0–2.7 μm long × 0.8–1.0 μm wide, non-spore-forming and motile. Produce catalase and cytochrome c oxidase. Colonies on nutrient agar are cream-coloured, circular, entire, smooth, raised, glossy and 0.5–1.0 mm in diameter after 24 h at 25 °C. Produce a light green diffusible pigment on King’s B agar and fluoresce green under near-ultraviolet illumination at 360–380 nm. Produce levan on nutrient agar supplemented with 5% sucrose. Growth occurs at 4–41 °C, with an optimum at 30 °C, and at pH 5.0 to 9.0, with an optimum at pH 7.0. Growth occurs on nutrient agar medium in the presence of 0–3% (w/v) NaCl, with an optimum at 0% (w/v). Does not assimilate 3-methyl glucose, acetoacetate, bromo-succinate, D-aspartate, D-cellobiose, D-fructose 6-phosphate, D-glucose 6-phosphate, D-glucuronate, D-lactate methyl ester, D-malate, D-maltose, D-melibiose, D-raffinose, D-saccharate, D-salicin, D-serine, D-sorbitol, D-trehalose, D-turanose, dextrin, gelatin, gentiobiose, glycyl-L-proline, L-fucose, L-rhamnose, N-acetyl-D-galactosamine, N-acetyl-β-D-mannosamine, N-acetylneuraminate, pectin, p-hydroxyphenylacetate, stachyose, sucrose, α-D-lactose or β-methyl-D-glucoside as carbon sources. Weakly assimilates D-fucose, D-galacturonate, formate, glucuronamide, inosine, L-galactonate lactone, L-histidine, tween 40, α-hydroxybutyrate or α-ketobutyrate as carbon sources.

The type strain 21TX0197T (= LMG 33210T=NCIMB 15479T) was isolated from a symptomatic onion bulb collected in Texas, USA. The genome size of the type strain is 6.3 Mbp and its DNA G + C is 61.5%. The GenBank accession numbers for the genome sequence and 16 S rRNA gene sequence are JAQMHS000000000 and OP325568, respectively. The type strain does not grow in the presence of D‑serine, and sodium butyrate. Under the conditions tested, the type strain causes necrosis in inoculated onion tissues, produces a hypersensitive response in tobacco leaves, but has no pectolytic activity on potato slices.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 2 (296.9KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Christopher S. Cramer of New Mexico State University for reviewing the manuscript and providing valuable feedback. We acknowledge the Microscopy and Imaging Centre, Texas A&M University, for electron microscopy images. We would like to thank Filomena Hernandez, Nathalia Figueroa-Silva, and Bignya Chandra Khanal at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research & Extension, Uvalde for valuable assistance during the research.

Abbreviations

ANI

Average nucleotide identity

dDDH

digital DNA-DNA hybridization

ICNP

International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes

LPSN

List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature

NA

Nutrient agar

BLAST

basic local alignment search tool

NCBI

National Center for Biotechnology Information

orthoANIu

orthologous ANI

ANIb

ANI based on BLAST

TYGS

Type Strain Genome Server

OD

optical density

RAST

Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology

Author contributions

Conceptualization, M.K., and S.M.; data curation, M.K., B.P.B., and S.M.; formal analysis, M.K. and B.P.B., funding acquisition, S.M.; investigation, M.K. and B.P.B.; methodology, M.K. and B.P.B.; software, M.K., B.P.B., and L.K.; supervision, S.M.; validation, S.M.; writing—original draft, M.K., B.P.B., and L.K.; writing—review and editing, S.M., and M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the Specialty Crops Research Initiative Award 2019-51181-30013 from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy. The research was also supported by Texas A&M AgriLife Research (Vegetable Seed Grant, Research Strategic Initiative Assistantship, and Capacity Support) and the USDA Hatch Multistate (TEX0-1-3008).

Data Availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information.Genome sequence data were deposited into the GenBank database. The GenBank accession numbers for the genomes of strains 20TX0008T, 20TX0035T, and 21TX0197T are NZ_JAQMHU000000000 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_JAQMHU000000000), NZ_JAQMHV000000000 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_JAQMHV000000000), and NZ_JAQMHS000000000 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_JAQMHS000000000), respectively.

Declarations

Authors’ statements

The authors used AI tools, including ChatGPT (OpenAI, GPT-5), Microsoft Copilot, Elicit, and Perplexity, to support manuscript preparation and literature review. These tools were employed for writing refinement, figure formatting, and rapid summarization of relevant studies. All scientific claims and interpretations were independently verified against primary sources, and full responsibility for the content rests solely with the authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Repositories

The GenBank accession numbers for the genomes of strains 20TX0008T, 20TX0035T, and 21TX0197T are JAQMHU000000000, JAQMHV000000000, and JAQMHS000000000, respectively. The GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA sequences of strains 20TX0008T, 20TX0035T, and 21TX0197T are ON255719, ON255745, and OP325568, respectively.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Shi A, Fan F, Broach JR (2022) Microbial adaptive evolution. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 49(2):kuab076. 10.1093/jimb/kuab076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bianconi I, Aschbacher R, Pagani E (2023) Current uses and future perspectives of genomic technologies in clinical microbiology. Antibiotics 12(11):1580. 10.3390/antibiotics12111580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ciufo S, Kannan S, Sharma S, Badretdin A, Clark K, Turner S, Brover S, Schoch CL, Kimchi A, DiCuccio M (2018) Using average nucleotide identity to improve taxonomic assignments in prokaryotic genomes at the NCBI. Int J Syst Evol MicroBiol 68(7):2386. 10.1099/ijsem.0.002809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M (2010) Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genom Sci 2(1):117–134. 10.4056/sigs.531120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Evtushenko LI, Takeuchi M (2006) The family microbacteriaceae. prokaryotes 3:1020–1098. 10.1007/0-387-30743-5_43 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M (2020) List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol MicroBiol 70(11):5607–5612. 10.1099/ijsem.0.004332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sammer UF, Reiher K (2012) Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens pv. flaccumfaciens on soybean in Germany–a threat for farming. J Phytopathol 160(6):314–316. 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2012.01902.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Khanal M, Bhatta BP, Timilsina S, Ghimire S, Cochran K, Malla S (2022) Curtobacterium allii sp. nov., the actinobacterial pathogen causing onion bulb rot. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 116:83–96. 10.1007/s10482-022-01775-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aizawa T, Ve NB, Kimoto KI, Iwabuchi N, Sumida H, Hasegawa I, Sasaki S, Tamura T, Kudo T, Suzuki KI (2007) Curtobacterium ammoniigenes sp. nov., an ammonia-producing bacterium isolated from plants inhabiting acidic swamps in actual acid sulfate soil areas of Vietnam. Int J Syst Evol MicroBiol 57:1447–1452. 10.1099/ijs.0.64731-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Subhash Y, Tushar L, Sasikala C, Ramana CV (2013) Falsirhodobacter halotolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from dry soils of a solar saltern. Int J Syst Evol MicroBiol 63(Pt6):2132–2137. 10.1099/ijs.0.044107-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang L, Zhou Z, Wu G, Chen M, Lin M, Zhang W, Chen W (2015) Falsirhodobacter deserti sp. nov., isolated from sandy soil. Int J Syst Evol MicroBiol 65:650–655. 10.1099/ijs.0.068262-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Huang Z, Li M, Oren A, Lai Q (2024) Genome-based analysis of the family Paracoccaceae and description of Ostreiculturibacter nitratireducens gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from an oyster farm on a tidal flat. Front Microbiol 15:1376777. 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1376777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu W-L, Yang Z-W, Guo D-Y, Deng Q-Q, Li J-L, Wang P-D, Chen S-H, Liu L, Nie G-X, Li W-J (2023) Cereibacter flavus sp. nov., a novel member of the family Rhodobacteraceae isolated from seawater of the South China Sea and reclassification of Rhodobacter alkalitolerans as Cereibacter alkalitolerans comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol MicroBiol 73(9):006051. 10.1099/ijsem.0.006051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cho E-S, An CW, Bae SS, Chung D, Yu W-J, Kim JYH, Choi G, Kwon YM (2023) Falsirhodobacter algicola sp. nov., a member of the Rhodobacteraceae isolated from the marine red algae Grateloupia sp. Int J Syst Evol MicroBiol 73(9):006056. 10.1099/ijsem.0.006056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Khanal M, Timilsina S, Bhatta BP, Bophela K, Coutinho T, Cochran K, Malla S (2022) Pseudomonas uvaldensis sp. nov., a bacterial pathogen causing onion bulb rot. Int J Syst Evol MicroBiol 72(4):005311. 10.1099/ijsem.0.005311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Khanal MB, Malla BP, Subas (2023) Isolation and Characterization of Bacteria Associated with Onion and First Report of Onion Diseases Caused by Five Bacterial Pathogens in Texas, USA. Plant Dis 107(6):1721–1729. 10.1094/PDIS-09-22-2206-SR [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ (1991) 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173(2):697–703. 10.1128/jb.173.2.697-703.1991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215(3):403–410. 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S (2021) MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 38(7):3022–3027. 10.1093/molbev/msab120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tamura K, Nei M (1993) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10(3):512–526. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Illumina (2021) BCL Convert: a proprietary Illumina software for the conversion of BCL files to basecalls
  • 22.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD (2012) SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19(5):455–477. 10.1089/cmb.2012.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yoon S-H, Ha S-m, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J (2017) A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 110(10):1281–1286. 10.1007/s10482-017-0844-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J (2016) JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 32(6):929–931. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M (2019) TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 10(1):1–10. 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR, da Costa MS, Rooney AP, Yi H, Xu X-W, De Meyer S (2018) Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Micro Biol 68(1):461–466. 10.1099/ijsem.0.002516 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 27.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M (2013) Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14(1):1–14. 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M (2008) The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9(1):1–15. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Parrello B, Shukla M (2014) The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42(D1):D206–D214. 10.1093/nar/gkt1226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lelliott R, Billing E, Hayward A (1966) A determinative scheme for the fluorescent plant pathogenic pseudomonads. J Appl Microbiol 29(3):470–489. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1966.tb03499.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Schaad NW, Jones JB, Chun W (2001) Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. APS, St. Paul, MN, USA. 10.1046/j.1365-3059.2001.00635.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Suslow TV (1982) Application of a Rapid Method for Gram Differentiation of Plant Pathogenic and Saprophytic Bacteria Without Staining. Phytopathology 72(7):917–918. 10.1094/phyto-77-917 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ellis JC, Thomas MS, Lawson PA, Patel NB, Faircloth W, Hayes SE, Linton EE, Norden DM, Severenchuk IS, West CH (2019) Kistimonas alittae sp. nov., a gammaproteobacterium isolated from the marine annelid Alitta succinea. Int J Syst Evol MicroBiol 69(1):235–240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Scarff CA, Fuller MJ, Thompson RF, Iadanza MG (2018) Variations on negative stain electron microscopy methods: tools for tackling challenging systems. JoVE (Journal Visualized Experiments)(132) :e57199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 35.Macheboeuf P, Contreras-Martel C, Job V, Dideberg O, Dessen A (2006) Penicillin binding proteins: key players in bacterial cell cycle and drug resistance processes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 30(5):673–691. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2006.00024.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ealand CS, Machowski EE, Kana BD (2018) β-lactam resistance: The role of low molecular weight penicillin binding proteins, β‐lactamases and ld‐transpeptidases in bacteria associated with respiratory tract infections. IUBMB Life 70(9):855–868. 10.1002/iub.1761 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Jacoby GA (2009) AmpC β-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev 22(1):161–182. 10.1128/cmr.00036-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Philippon A, Arlet G, Labia R, Iorga BI (2022) Class C β-lactamases: molecular characteristics. Clin Microbiol Rev 35(3):e00150–e00121. 10.1128/cmr.00150-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lindberg F, Normark S (1986) Contribution of chromosomal β-lactamases to β-lactam resistance in enterobacteria. Rev Infect Dis 8(Supplement3):S292–S304. 10.1093/clinids/8.Supplement_3.S292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tamma PD, Doi Y, Bonomo RA, Johnson JK, Simner PJ (2019) A primer on AmpC β-lactamases: necessary knowledge for an increasingly multidrug-resistant world. Clin Infect Dis 69(8):1446–1455. 10.1093/cid/ciz173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Toth M, Antunes NT, Stewart NK, Frase H, Bhattacharya M, Smith CA, Vakulenko SB (2016) Class D β-lactamases do exist in Gram-positive bacteria. Nat Chem Biol 12(1):9–14. 10.1038/nchembio.1950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Terry LA, Law KA, Hipwood KJ, Bellamy PH (2005) Non-structural carbohydrate profiles in onion bulbs influence taste preference. Frutic 5:12–16 [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Darbyshire B, Henry R (1978) The distribution of fructans in onions. New Phytol 81(1):29–34. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1978.tb01600.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lahooti M, Harwood CR (1999) Transcriptional analysis of the Bacillus subtilis teichuronic acid operon. Microbiology 145(12):3409–3417. 10.1099/00221287-145-12-3409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Deng LL, Alexander AA, Lei S, Anderson JS (2010) The cell wall teichuronic acid synthetase (tuas) is an enzyme complex located in the cytoplasmic membrane of Micrococcus luteus. Biochem Res Int 2010(1):395758. 10.1155/2010/395758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Qi Y, Hulett FM (1998) Role of PhoP∼ P in transcriptional regulation of genes involved in cell wall anionic polymer biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 180(15):4007–4010. 10.1128/jb.180.15.4007-4010.1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Soldo B, Lazarevic V, Pagni M, Karamata D (1999) Teichuronic acid operon of Bacillus subtilis 168. Mol Microbiol 31(3):795–805. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01218.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bhavsar AP, Erdman LK, Schertzer JW, Brown ED (2004) Teichoic acid is an essential polymer in Bacillus subtilis that is functionally distinct from teichuronic acid. J Bacteriol 186(23):7865–7873. 10.1128/jb.186.23.7865-7873.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zheng C, Xu J, Ren S, Li J, Xia M, Chen H, Bei W (2015) Identification and characterization of the chromosomal yefM-yoeB toxin-antitoxin system of Streptococcus suis. Sci Rep 5(1):13125. 10.1038/srep13125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chan WT, Domenech M, Moreno-Córdoba I, Navarro-Martínez V, Nieto C, Moscoso M, García E, Espinosa M (2018) The Streptococcus pneumoniae yefM-yoeB and relBE toxin-antitoxin operons participate in oxidative stress and biofilm formation. Toxins 10(9):378. 10.3390/toxins10090378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Baugh AC, Momany C, Neidle EL (2023) Versatility and complexity: common and uncommon facets of LysR-type transcriptional regulators. Annu Rev Microbiol 77(1):317–339. 10.1146/annurev-micro-050323-040543 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Modrzejewska M, Kawalek A, Bartosik AA (2021) The LysR-type transcriptional regulator BsrA (PA2121) controls vital metabolic pathways in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Msystems 6(4):00015–00021. 10.1128/msystems [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jia Q, Hu X, Shi D, Zhang Y, Sun M, Wang J, Mi K, Zhu G (2016) Universal stress protein Rv2624c alters abundance of arginine and enhances intracellular survival by ATP binding in mycobacteria. Sci Rep 6(1):35462. 10.1038/srep35462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Boyhan GE (2008) Sulfur, its role in onion production and related alliums. Sulfur: A missing link between soils. crops Nutr 50:183–196. 10.2134/agronmonogr50.c12 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.González-Morales S, Pérez-Labrada F, García-Enciso EL, Leija-Martínez P, Medrano-Macías J, Dávila-Rangel IE, Juárez-Maldonado A, Rivas-Martínez EN, Benavides-Mendoza A (2017) Selenium and sulfur to produce Allium functional crops. Molecules 22(4):558. 10.3390/molecules22040558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Feng G-D, Li J, Yang S, Zhang J, Zhu H (2023) Curtobacterium caseinilyticum sp. nov., Curtobacterium subtropicum sp. nov. and Curtobacterium citri sp. nov., isolated from citrus phyllosphere. Int J Syst Evol MicroBiol 73(11):006152. 10.1099/ijsem.0.006152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 2 (296.9KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information.Genome sequence data were deposited into the GenBank database. The GenBank accession numbers for the genomes of strains 20TX0008T, 20TX0035T, and 21TX0197T are NZ_JAQMHU000000000 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_JAQMHU000000000), NZ_JAQMHV000000000 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_JAQMHV000000000), and NZ_JAQMHS000000000 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_JAQMHS000000000), respectively.


Articles from Current Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES