Abstract
Background
Shigella causes severe bacterial diarrhea, especially in children in low- and middle-income countries. Rising antimicrobial resistance (AMR), including multidrug-resistant (MDR) and ESBL-producing strains, threatens empirical treatment, particularly cephalosporins.
Methods
We conducted a structured narrative review of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and WHO GLASS. Included studies comprised randomized trials, cohorts, case series, and relevant in vitro studies. Quality was appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute checklists; findings were synthesized narratively.
Results
Third-generation cephalosporins (ceftriaxone, cefotaxime) remain highly effective for severe Shigella infections in hospitalized and pediatric patients when isolates are susceptible. Resistance varies regionally, with higher ESBL prevalence in East and South Asia. Resistance mechanisms include ESBLs, efflux pumps, PBP mutations, and altered membrane permeability. Susceptibility-guided therapy yields favorable outcomes, but ESBL/XDR strains cause treatment failures, longer hospital stays, and carbapenem use.
Conclusion
Cephalosporins are critical for severe shigellosis but are increasingly compromised by AMR. Structured surveillance, susceptibility-guided therapy, and stewardship are essential. Complementary strategies (vaccines, probiotics, phage therapy, novel antibiotics) are urgently needed.
Keywords: Shigella, Antimicrobial resistance, Cephalosporins, Extended-spectrum β-lactamases, Multidrug resistance, Vaccines, Phage therapy
Highlights
-
•
Ceftriaxone and cefotaxime are key for severe, drug-resistant Shigella in children.
-
•
ESBL production increasingly compromises cephalosporin efficacy in many regions.
-
•
Resistance arises via enzymes, efflux pumps, PBP mutations, and mobile genetic elements.
-
•
Future strategies include phage therapy, vaccines, and improved antimicrobial stewardship.
1. Introduction
Shigella is a genus of Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic bacteria that stands as a leading cause of acute diarrheal disease globally, posing a substantial public health challenge [1,2]. The genus includes four major species including Shigella dysenteriae, Shigella flexneri, Shigella boydii, and Shigella sonnei [2,3], all of which are highly infectious and capable of causing shigellosis through a remarkably low infectious dose. Transmission occurs predominantly via the fecal-oral route through contaminated food, water, and direct person-to-person contact, making it particularly prevalent in areas with poor sanitation [4,5].
Children under five years of age bear the greatest burden, accounting for the majority of the estimated 164.7 million cases reported annually [6,7]. Shigella remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [4,8,9], with approximately 60,000 child deaths annually attributable to infection [1]. In LMICs, 2.0–7.0 per 100 children experience clinically significant Shigella infection during childhood, compared with 0.02 cases per child-year in high-income countries, underscoring the disproportionate burden in resource-limited settings [10].
Epidemiological patterns vary by region and over time. Historically, S. sonnei predominated in many LMICs; however, recent data indicate that S. flexneri has become the dominant species in these regions, while S. sonnei remains prevalent in high-income settings [4,6]. S. dysenteriae type 1 remains a significant cause of epidemic dysentery due to its Shiga toxin production [11]. Clinically, shigellosis presents with symptoms ranging from mild diarrhea to severe dysentery with bloody stools, fever, and abdominal pain [4,[11], [12], [13]]. Severe complications include hemolytic uremic syndrome, toxic megacolon, and septicemia [13,14].
The therapeutic landscape has been profoundly affected by the rapid emergence of AMR [15]. Misuse and overuse of antibiotics have facilitated the proliferation of resistant strains [16], with global estimates indicating that around 30% of antibiotic use is inappropriate, particularly in LMICs [17]. Resistance to traditional first-line antibiotics such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and ampicillin is widespread [18]. For instance, Shigella resistance to ampicillin reached 60% in the Tehran and Qazvin region [19], and 75% in China, while trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance reached 55% in China and up to 100% in Iran [19,20]. Resistance rates exceeding 50% have rendered these agents unreliable for empirical therapy. Resistance to fluoroquinolones and macrolides, including azithromycin, is also increasing [21,22]. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Shigella strains, resistant to three or more antibiotic classes, are increasingly prevalent [23], and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains resistant to nearly all oral antibiotics pose a looming global threat [22,24].
Third-generation cephalosporins, including ceftriaxone and cefotaxime, have emerged as key alternatives, especially for severe infections in pediatric and hospitalized populations [25]. However, their effectiveness is threatened by rising resistance [21,[25], [26], [27], [28]], highlighting the need for updated evidence on clinical outcomes, regional susceptibility patterns, and strategies to guide antimicrobial stewardship. This review aims to critically synthesize current evidence on cephalosporin use for Shigella infections, assess regional AMR disparities, and identify knowledge gaps to inform future research, clinical practice, and public health interventions.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Literature search strategy and study selection
This narrative review was conducted using a structured literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and the WHO Global Antimicrobial Resistance and Use Surveillance System (GLASS) database. Search terms included “Shigella,” “shigellosis,” “bacillary dysentery,” “cephalosporin,” “ceftriaxone,” “cefotaxime,” “third-generation cephalosporin,” “antimicrobial resistance,” “AMR,” “ESBL,” “multidrug-resistant,” “MDR,” and “extensively drug-resistant,” “XDR.” The search covered the period from 1986 to 2025, as third-generation cephalosporins were introduced in the early 1980s and the earliest relevant clinical data on cephalosporin use in shigellosis began to appear from 1986 onwards. Reference lists of key articles and systematic reviews were manually screened to identify additional studies.
The initial database search yielded 4059 records. 1163 records were screened by title and abstract. Of these, 178 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 105 studies met the inclusion criteria.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria were adapted post-search, based on the nature and scope of the retrieved literature, which is consistent with the flexible approach of a narrative review. Inclusion criteria encompassed original research studies (including clinical trials, observational studies, case series, and case reports) reporting clinical outcomes of Shigella infections treated with cephalosporins, providing antimicrobial susceptibility data, or describing resistance mechanisms in human populations, including pediatric and hospitalized patients. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were also included for contextual background and cross-referencing of primary studies. Exclusion criteria included editorials, opinion pieces without primary data, narrative reviews that did not present original data or systematic methods, studies lacking clinical outcomes or susceptibility data, and non-human studies or in vitro studies without direct clinical relevance. Only English-language publications were included. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were independently screened by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer.
2.2. Critical appraisal and evidence synthesis
All included studies underwent quality assessment using Joanna Briggs Institute checklists appropriate for their design. Studies were evaluated for methodological rigor, risk of bias, and internal validity, and classified as high, moderate, or low quality.
Data extraction captured study characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, resistance mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and reported treatment failures. Extracted data were synthesized descriptively. Characteristics of included studies are summarized in Table S1. Resistance proportions, treatment success rates, and prevalence of ESBL- and XDR-producing strains were summarized. No formal meta-analysis was performed due to heterogeneity in study designs, populations, and outcome measures. Data were further analyzed by geographic region and Shigella species to identify epidemiological trends, highlight areas with high ESBL or XDR prevalence, and compare pediatric and general hospitalized populations. The narrative synthesis prioritized high-quality evidence while integrating observational and in vitro studies to contextualize resistance mechanisms.
3. Overview of Shigella infections
3.1. Pathogenesis and transmission
Shigellosis results from Shigella invasion of colonic epithelial cells, causing severe inflammation and tissue damage [4,29]. The bacterium utilized a Type III Secretion System (T3SS), encoded on the large virulence plasmid pINV, to inject effector proteins into host cells. Structurally, T3SS comprises a cytosolic sorting platform, a basal body spanning the inner and outer membranes, and an extracellular needle. Upon host cell contact, the needle tip senses the interaction and recruits the translocon proteins IpaB and IpaC, which are secreted to form a pore in the host membrane [30]. Through this pore, T3SS injects effectors that trigger cytoskeletal remodeling and facilitate M cell-mediated internalization. Following entry, the bacteria escape the phagosome, replicate intracellularly, and spread laterally via actin-based motility [31,32]. This process causes extensive epithelial injury (Fig. 1) manifesting as bloody diarrhea. S. dysenteriae type 1 produces Shiga toxin, potentially causing Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS) [33]. The inflammatory response contributes to abdominal pain, fever, and mucoid stools [34].
Fig. 1.

Shigella pathogenesis through M-cell mediated invasion and enterocyte colonization. Set: Shigella Enterotoxin; Sen: Shigella Effector Protein M cells: Microfold cells. Shigella employs Sen and Set virulence factors to facilitate endocytosis by M cells and subsequent translocation across the intestinal epithelial barrier into the lamina propria. Following transcytosis, the bacteria target the basolateral surface of colonic epithelial cells, where the Type III Secretion System (T3SS) delivers specialized virulence factors that induce bacterial internalization. Once established intracellularly, Shigella undergoes rapid cytoplasmic replication and hijacks the host cell's actin polymerization machinery to generate propulsive actin tails, enabling directed motility and lateral spread to neighboring epithelial cells. This invasive process results in progressive tissue damage, inflammatory cell infiltration, and epithelial necrosis characteristic of shigellosis pathogenesis.
Transmission occurs via the fecal-oral route through contaminated water, food, or direct contact, particularly affecting regions with poor sanitation [35,36]. Children under five, immunocompromised individuals, and traveler are most susceptible [3]. A low infectious dose of 10-100 organisms enables rapid spread in epidemic settings [3,4,37]. Prevention relies on improved water access, sanitation, and hygiene education [38,39].
3.2. Current treatment guidelines
Management of shigellosis is guided by disease severity. Mild cases typically require only oral rehydration therapy, whereas moderate to severe infections necessitate antibiotics to shorten symptom duration, prevent complications, and limit transmission [18,25,40,41]. Choice of therapy depends on local resistance patterns, patient age, and comorbidities. Rising global AMR emphasizes the importance of evidence-based protocols and stewardship [18].
Fluoroquinolones, particularly ciprofloxacin, have historically been first-line therapy in adults due to rapid bactericidal activity and tissue penetration [42,43]. However, resistance has increased dramatically, particularly in South and Southeast Asia [[44], [45], [46]]. WHO 2025 reports indicate global ciprofloxacin resistance at 29.7% and levofloxacin at 32.7%, with Southeast Asia reaching 75.5% for ciprofloxacin [45]. A longitudinal study in Bangladesh confirmed this trend, rising from 0% in 2004 to 43% in 2012 [40]. Consequently, fluoroquinolone-resistant Shigella is now classified as high-priority on the WHO list (ranked 8th in 2024) [47].
Second-line options include azithromycin and third-generation cephalosporins (ceftriaxone, cefotaxime) [48,49]. Azithromycin is preferred for pediatric patients, pregnant women, and individuals with fluoroquinolone contraindications [50], b, but emerging resistance has been reported [44,51]. Cephalosporins remain essential for severe, hospitalized, or pediatric cases, particularly when fluoroquinolone or macrolide resistance is suspected [18]. However, ESBL-producing strains (e.g., CTX-M, TEM, SHV) hydrolyze third-generation cephalosporins, threatening their efficacy [52,53]. Lack of effective oral cephalosporins constrains outpatient therapy, especially in resource-limited settings [25].
Resistance impacts are evident even in high-income countries. For example, Israel reported ∼600 cases per 100,000 children aged 1-4 years [54]. In 2000, a 3-day intramuscular ceftriaxone regimen achieved 99% clinical cure in acute invasive diarrhea [55]. By 2026, only 36% of isolates remained susceptible to ceftriaxone, compared with 77% to azithromycin and 76% to ciprofloxacin [54]. These trends highlight the urgent need for antimicrobial stewardship, structured surveillance, and alternative strategies, including vaccines and phage therapy [47,54].
4. Antimicrobial resistance in Shigella
4.1. Cephalosporins and their mechanism of action
Cephalosporins are β-lactam antibiotics that disrupt bacterial cell wall synthesis by binding to penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), leading to bacterial cell lysis [56], Advanced generations show improved effectiveness against Gram-negative pathogens like Shigella through enhanced resistance to β-lactamase hydrolysis [21,57] (Fig. 2). Third generation cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone and cefotaxime are most important for treating shigellosis due to their strong Gram-negative activity.
Fig. 2.

Mechanism of cephalosporin-mediated growth inhibition in Shigella. Cephalosporins (exemplified by cefotaxime) exert bactericidal activity by inhibiting peptidoglycan synthesis, the essential structural polymer that maintains bacterial cell wall integrity. The peptidoglycan layer provides critical osmotic protection by counteracting the influx of water molecules that would otherwise cause cellular swelling in hypotonic environments. When cephalosporins disrupt peptidoglycan cross-linking through inhibition of penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), the compromised cell wall loses its structural integrity and osmotic resistance. Consequently, Shigella bacteria become vulnerable to osmotic stress and undergo cell lysis due to uncontrolled water influx and cytoplasmic swelling, resulting in bacterial death and therapeutic efficacy in the host environment.
The role of Cephalosporin in Shigella treatment has evolved with changing resistance patterns. Initially, trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole and ampicillin were commonly used, but rapid resistance emergence led to the use of third generation cephalosporins for severe cases [58,59]. Ceftriaxone and cefotaxime are now widely used in hospitalized patients, especially children, and preferred when fluoroquinolones or macrolides are not effective [25]. However, the rising prevalence of ESBL-producing Shigella strains presents a significant challenge. Globally, CTX-M type ESBL is the most common as shown in Table 1 [60]. These enzymes hydrolyze the β-lactam ring of cephalosporins, making the drugs ineffective and sometimes requiring alternative therapies such as carbapenems in severe cases [52]. (For detailed molecular regulation of blaCTX-M expression, see Section 4.3.1.)
Table 1.
Extended spectrum beta lactamase types identified in Shigella, with corresponding cephalosporin resistance patterns, prevalence rates, and primary species.
| Author | Antibiotic class(s) | Prevalence (%) | Primary species | Regions | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liu et al., 2018 [1] | Cefotaxime | 34.4 | S. flexneri | Jiangsu, China | From 2013 to 2015 |
| Ceftazidime | 24.1 | ||||
| Li et al., 2015 [2] | Ciprofloxacin | 10.3 |
S. flexneri S. sonnei |
Shanghai, China | 2007 |
| Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole | 71.8 | ||||
| Zhang et al., 2025 [3] | Ceftriaxone | 30.49 |
S. sonnei S. flexneri |
China | From 2004 to 2016 |
| Cefoperazone | 27.11 | ||||
| Cefazolin | 30.70 | ||||
| Sabour et al., 2022 [4] | NF | NF |
S. flexneri S. dysenteriae S. sonnei |
Ardabil, northwest Iran | From January 2019 to December 2020 |
| Khosravi et al., 2024 [5] | Ampicillin | 88.2 |
S. sonnei S. flexneri |
Northeastern Iran | From January 2017 |
| Cotrimoxazole | 84.5 | to December 2019 | |||
| Aminshahidi et al., 2017 [6] | Ampicillin | 95.1 |
S. flexneri S. sonnei |
Shiraz, Iran | From August 2014 |
| Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole | 73.2 | to February 2015 | |||
| Azithromycin | 21.9 | ||||
| Ciprofloxacin | 14.6 | ||||
| Choia et al., 2023 [7] | Ceftriaxone | NF | S. sonnei | Temple, Texas, | January 2023 |
| Ciprofloxacin | USA | ||||
| Beeri et al., 2026 [8] | Ceftriaxone | 64% | S. sonnei | Negev, southern | January 2020 to |
| Azithromycin | 23% | Israel | July 2024 | ||
| Ciprofloxacin | 24% | ||||
| Shahi et al., 2026 [9] | Azithromycin | 56.47% | S. sonnei | Ahvaz, | NF |
| 40.00% | S. flexneri | southwestern Iran |
1. Liu G, Qian H, Tang B, Chen Y, Kang H, Jiang F et al. Prevalence and characterisation of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Shigella flexneri isolates from Jiangsu Province, China, 2013-2015. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2018, 15:283-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2018.08.012.
2. Li J, Li B, Ni Y, Sun J. Molecular characterization of the extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Shigella spp. in Shanghai. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2015, 34(3):447-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2244-2.
3. Zhang H, He S, Pang X, He X, Liu X, Qiu S et al. Regulatory role of ISEcp1 and spacer sequences in bla(CTX-M)-mediated cephalosporin resistance in Shigella. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2025, 44:127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2025.06.005.
4. Sabour S, Teimourpour A, Mohammadshahi J, Peeridogaheh H, Teimourpour R, Azimi T et al. Molecular detection and characterization of Shigella spp. harboring extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes in children with diarrhea in northwest Iran. Mol Cell Pediatr 2022, 9(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40348-022-00152-0.
5. Khosravi M, Khosravi F, Pouresmaeil O, Aryan E, Meshkat Z, Safdari H et al. High prevalence of CTX-M-15 producing Shigella spp. isolated from patients with gastroenteritis in Northeast Iran. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 2024, 71(4):299-307. https://doi.org/10.1556/030.2024.02455.
6. Aminshahidi M, Arastehfar A, Pouladfar G, Arman E, Fani F. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and Shigella with High Rate of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Production: Two Predominant Etiological Agents of Acute Diarrhea in Shiraz, Iran. Microb Drug Resist 2017, 23(8):1037-1044. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2017.0204.
7. Choia H, Navarathnaa DH, Harstona BL, Hwanga M, Coronaa B, San Juana MR et al. Case of Extensively Drug-Resistant Shigella sonnei Infection, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2023, 29(8). https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2908.230411.
8. Beeri Y, Ben Shitrit I, Hazan G, Beniacar H, Sagi O, Soyonov E et al. Shigella PCR-positive Gastroenteritis in Children: Insights From a Comparison Between Culture-positive and Culture-negative Cases. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2026, 45(1):61-67. https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000004965.
9. Shahi F, Abbasi Montazeri E, Khaghani S, Moradi M, Ahmad Khosravi N, Saki M. Investigation of the azithromycin resistance rate and related genes involved in this resistance in clinical Shigella species collected from children with diarrhea in Ahvaz, Southwest Iran. Mol Biol Rep 2026, 53(1):353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-025-11420-3.
Although cephalosporins remain essential for severe shigellosis treatment, their effectiveness is threatened by resistance, particularly in areas with high ESBL prevalence [60]. The limited availability of oral formulations creates challenges for outpatient management [25]. Therefore, cephalosporin use should be guided by susceptibility testing and integrated into antimicrobial stewardship programs to preserve their clinical utility.
4.2. Antimicrobial resistance trends and dissemination pathways
Antimicrobial resistance in Shigella represents a growing public health crisis. Historically effective first line antibiotics such as trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole and ampicillin became widely ineffective by the late 20th century [61], leading to the use of fluoroquinolones and macrolides. In recent decades, multidrug resistant strains have emerged rapidly, particularly in South Asia, sub Saharan Africa, and Latin America [62]. Current surveillance reveals alarming trends. In some regions, fluoroquinolone resistance exceeds 90% [6], azithromycin resistance surpasses 60% in endemic areas [63], and ESBL-producing Shigella threatens third-generation cephalosporins [21,25]. Regional differences emphasize the need for localized surveillance. South Asia reports high fluoroquinolone resistance, whereas parts of Africa show lower rates [61,64]. In Africa, the pooled prevalence of ESBL and carbapenem-resistant Shigella is estimated at 41.2%, with S. flexneri being the most prevalent species (34.5%). The most common ESBL genes are blaTEM (25.9%), blaOXA-1 (25.7%), and blaCTX-M (10.8%), while carbapenemase genes such as blaNDM, blaKPC, and blaIMP are rare (<1.5%) [65]. In one Chinese study of S. flexneri, CTX-M-1 group enzymes accounted for 43.8%, CTX-M-9 group for 42.5%, TEM-1 and TEM-1b for 34.2%, and SHV-12 for 1.4% of ESBL isolates [66].
These geographic disparities are driven, in part, by the rapid dissemination of plasmid-mediated resistance mechanisms [67]. Plasmids carry multiple resistance genes and facilitate horizontal gene transfer through conjugation, transformation, and transduction [68,69]. In Shigella, plasmid-mediated resistance genes encode β-lactamases, quinolone resistance determinants [46], macrolide resistance genes [70], and aminoglycosides, resulting in multidrug-resistant phenotypes [21,71]. Global dissemination of plasmids carrying blaCTX-M genes has been extensively documented in isolates from South Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and the Middle East [72]. In South African Shigella strains, plasmids with replicon types such as IncFIA and IncFIB are commonly associated with the carriage of resistance genes like tet(A) and floR, highlighting the role of conjugative plasmids in regional resistance spread [73]. The spread of plasmid-mediated resistance is exacerbated by antibiotic misuse [21,69], poor sanitation [4,74], and global travel patterns [72]. Addressing the crisis requires comprehensive surveillance [12], antimicrobial stewardship, and novel therapeutic strategies [21].
4.3. Mechanisms of drug resistance
4.3.1. Enzymatic resistance through extended-spectrum β-lactamases
Plasmid-mediated ESBLs (such as CTX-M, TEM) hydrolyze the beta-lactam ring, preventing antibiotic binding to target PBPs and thereby inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis [21]. The emergence of ESBL-producing Shigella strains has significantly compromised the effectiveness of cephalosporins [75] and limited their use in heavily managed or MDR infections [25]. Common ESBL types, including CTX-M, TEM, and SHV variants, are frequently identified in S. flexneri and S. sonnei isolates [69], with higher prevalence observed in areas characterized by extensive antibiotic use and inadequate surveillance systems [46,60]. The insertion sequence ISEcp1, frequently located upstream of blaCTX-M, acts as a strong promoter and enables high-level expression of the resistance gene. Spacer sequences between ISEcp1 and blaCTX-M (e.g., 42, 48, 127 bp) further fine-tune expression levels, contributing to varied resistance phenotypes among clinical isolates [76]. Table 2 details on common drug resistance patterns, corresponding genetic determinants, primary circulating species, and prevalence rates [66,[76], [77], [78], [79], [80], [81]].
Table 2.
Resistance mechanisms in Shigella, their associated resistance genes, and the species in which they have been reported.
| Author | Resistance gene | Carriage rate (%) | Resistance mechanism | Primary species |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liu et al., 2018 [1] | blaTEM | 16.4 | Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) |
S. flexneri |
| blaCTX-M-1 | 32.9 | |||
| blaCTX-M-9 | 28.8 | |||
| Li et al., 2015 [2] | CTX-M-14 | 69.2 | Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) |
S. flexneri S. sonnei |
| CTX-M-15 | 15.4 | |||
| CTX-M-3 | 10.3 | |||
| CTX-M-55 | 5.1 | |||
| Zhang et al., 2025 [3] | ISEcp1 | 90.09 | Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) |
S. sonnei S. flexneri |
| ISEcp1-CTX-M | 67.19 | |||
| Sabour et al., 2022 [4] | blaCTX | 65.3 | Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) |
S. flexneri S. dysenteriae S. sonnei |
| blaTEM | 61.2 | |||
| Khosravi et al., 2024 [5] | sen | 72.7 | Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) |
S. sonnei S. flexneri |
| blaCTX-M-15 | 100 | |||
| blaTEM | 100 | |||
| Aminshahidi et al., 2017 [6] | CTX | 53.7 | Extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) |
S. flexeneri S. sonnei |
| SXT | 73.2 | |||
| AMP | 95.1 | |||
| CTR | 56.1 | |||
| Choia et al., 2023 [7] | blaCTX-M-27(Putative) | NF | NF | S. sonnei |
| qnrB19, gyrA (p.S83L) (Putative) |
NF: not found.
References.
1. Liu G, Qian H, Tang B, Chen Y, Kang H, Jiang F et al. Prevalence and characterisation of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Shigella flexneri isolates from Jiangsu Province, China, 2013-2015. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2018, 15:283-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2018.08.012.
2. Li J, Li B, Ni Y, Sun J. Molecular characterization of the extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Shigella spp. in Shanghai. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2015, 34(3):447-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2244-2.
3. Zhang H, He S, Pang X, He X, Liu X, Qiu S et al. Regulatory role of ISEcp1 and spacer sequences in bla(CTX-M)-mediated cephalosporin resistance in Shigella. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2025, 44:127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2025.06.005.
4. Sabour S, Teimourpour A, Mohammadshahi J, Peeridogaheh H, Teimourpour R, Azimi T et al. Molecular detection and characterization of Shigella spp. harboring extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes in children with diarrhea in northwest Iran. Mol Cell Pediatr 2022, 9(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40348-022-00152-0.
5. Khosravi M, Khosravi F, Pouresmaeil O, Aryan E, Meshkat Z, Safdari H et al. High prevalence of CTX-M-15 producing Shigella spp. isolated from patients with gastroenteritis in Northeast Iran. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 2024, 71(4):299-307. https://doi.org/10.1556/030.2024.02455.
6. Aminshahidi M, Arastehfar A, Pouladfar G, Arman E, Fani F. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and Shigella with High Rate of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Production: Two Predominant Etiological Agents of Acute Diarrhea in Shiraz, Iran. Microb Drug Resist 2017, 23(8):1037-1044. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2017.0204.
7. Choia H, Navarathnaa DH, Harstona BL, Hwanga M, Coronaa B, San Juana MR et al. Case of Extensively Drug-Resistant Shigella sonnei Infection, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2023, 29(8). https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2908.230411.
4.3.2. Efflux pump systems
Efflux pumps are membrane-embedded protein complexes that actively expel antimicrobial agents from bacterial cells, thereby lowering intracellular drug concentrations and reducing antibacterial activity [82]. Six major efflux pump families have been described in Gram-negative bacteria: the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily, the major facilitator superfamily (MFS), the resistance–nodulation–division (RND) family, the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) family, the small multidrug resistance (SMR) family, and the Proteobacterial antimicrobial compound efflux (PACE) family [74,83]. In Shigella, the AcrAB-TolC system contributes to multidrug resistance by reducing intracellular concentrations of β-lactams, particularly when combined with outer-membrane permeability defects [84,85]. In S. flexneri, AcrAB-TolC also promotes epithelial cell invasion [85]. Members of the SMR family, including YnfA and EmrE, function as H+/drug antiporters; YnfA has been functionally confirmed as a multidrug efflux transporter in Shigella [83]. Genomic surveillance shows that efflux determinants are widespread. In South African S. flexneri strains, the multidrug efflux gene mdfA is present in nearly all sequenced genomes [73]. Together, efflux pump systems limit antibiotic accumulation and contribute to cephalosporin resistance [82,83].
4.3.3. Penicillin-binding protein (PBP) mutations
PBP mutations involve chromosomal alterations in the genes encoding these essential enzymes responsible for bacterial cell wall synthesis in Shigella. These genetic modifications alter the 3D structure of PBPs and reduce binding affinity, thereby preventing β-lactam antibiotics from efficiently binding to their intended molecular targets [86]. Structural changes in PBPs reduce the formation of stable antibiotic-enzyme complexes, thereby impairing the inhibition of peptidoglycan cross-linking processes essential for cell wall integrity. As result, these mutations lead to loss of bacterial growth inhibition and drive the development of the β-lactam resistance pattern observed in clinical Shigella isolates [46].
4.3.4. Altered cell membrane permeability
Altered cell membrane permeability constitutes a significant resistance mechanism through which Shigella modifies antibiotic accessibility by reducing the expression of essential outer membrane porins, particularly OmpF and OmpC [87,88]. These porins facilitate passive diffusion of antibiotics. By reducing porin expression, Shigella diminishes membrane permeability, restricts antibiotic penetration (Fig. 3), and maintains subtherapeutic intracellular concentrations, ultimately contributing to treatment failure.
Fig. 3.

Multifaceted mechanisms of cephalosporin resistance in Shigella. This diagram illustrates four distinct resistance mechanisms employed by Shigella to counteract cephalosporin activity: β-lactamase production, altered membrane permeability, penicillin-binding protein mutations, and enhanced efflux pump activity. β-lactamases enzymatically hydrolyze the β-lactam ring structure of cephalosporins, rendering them inactive through cleavage into non-functional fragments. Downregulation of outer membrane porins (OmpF/OmpC) reduces antibiotic permeability, leading to extracellular drug accumulation and insufficient intracellular concentrations. Structural mutations in penicillin-binding proteins diminish antibiotic binding affinity, compromising the inhibition of peptidoglycan synthesis and cell wall formation. Enhanced efflux pump systems actively transport cephalosporins out of the bacterial cell, maintaining subtherapeutic intracellular drug concentrations and preventing effective antimicrobial action. These complementary resistance mechanisms can operate simultaneously, creating multidrug-resistant phenotypes that significantly challenge therapeutic interventions.
4.4. Regional comparative synthesis of antimicrobial resistance
Substantial geographic heterogeneity in Shigella AMR patterns exists, yet direct comparison across regions is constrained by uneven data availability. In East Asia, data from China indicate well-established resistance to third-generation cephalosporins. In Jiangsu Province (2013–2015), cefotaxime resistance in S. flexneri was 34.4% and ceftazidime resistance 24.1% [66]. Li et al. reported that 18.1% of Shigella isolates in Shanghai (2007) produced ESBLs; among these ESBL-producers, ciprofloxacin resistance was 10.3% and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance was 71.8% [77]. A long-term Chinese study (2004–2016) analyzing 1393 cephalosporin-resistant Shigella strains reported ISEcp1 and ISEcp1-CTX-M element carriage rates of 90.09% and 67.19%, respectively [76]. These findings suggest that although fluoroquinolone resistance was historically lower in East Asia than in South Asia, cephalosporin resistance is now well entrenched.
In the Middle East, multiple studies from Iran show very high resistance to older antibiotics, with more variable resistance to cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. In northwest Iran (2019–2020), Sabour et al. reported that although 65.3% of Shigella isolates carried blaCTX-M and 61.2% carried blaTEM, phenotypic ESBL production was only 10.2%; specific cephalosporin resistance rates were not reported [80]. In northeastern Iran (2017–2019), ampicillin resistance reached 88.2% and cotrimoxazole 84.5% [79]. In Shiraz (2014–2015), ampicillin resistance was 95.1% and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 73.2%, while ciprofloxacin resistance was only 14.6% and azithromycin 21.9% [81]. A recent study from southwestern Iran (2026) found that among azithromycin-resistant Shigella isolates, 56.5% were S. sonnei and 40.0% were S. flexneri, with overall azithromycin resistance of 67.5% [51]. Thus, in Iran, fluoroquinolone and cephalosporin susceptibility remain partially preserved in some regions, but resistance to macrolides and older agents is alarmingly high.
In high-income countries (HICs) such as Israel and the USA, the picture is different. In southern Israel (2020–2024), ceftriaxone resistance reached 64%, ciprofloxacin resistance 24%, and azithromycin resistance 23% [54]. This represents a dramatic erosion of cephalosporin efficacy even in a high-resource setting that historically enjoyed high cure rates with ceftriaxone [55]. In the USA, an extensively drug-resistant S. sonnei case from Texas (2023) showed resistance to both ceftriaxone and ciprofloxacin [78]. Canadian data have documented ceftriaxone-resistant S. sonnei clusters linked to international travel [43]. HICs therefore face imported and locally transmitted resistant strains, but they benefit from better genomic surveillance and greater access to second-line agents such as carbapenems.
Limited peer-reviewed studies from South Asia reporting comparable cephalosporin resistance metrics, and from Africa only a meta-analysis of ESBL prevalence (41.2%) without study-level detail for direct comparison [65]. Consequently, a robust three-region (South Asia, Africa, HICs) comparative synthesis is not possible from the retrieved literature. This gap underscores an urgent need for standardized surveillance in under-represented regions. Overall, available data indicate that cephalosporin resistance in Shigella is widespread across East Asia, the Middle East, and HICs, though prevalence varies. South Asia is known from other reports to have the highest fluoroquinolone resistance globally, but direct inclusion in this synthesis was not possible due to insufficient data meeting our inclusion criteria. Future research should prioritize harmonized susceptibility testing and reporting from South Asia and Africa to enable true global comparisons.
5. Efficacy of cephalosporins in Shigella infections
Clinical studies included in this review were categorized according to the JBI hierarchy of evidence. Randomized controlled trials and large cohort studies were considered high quality evidence, whereas smaller cohort studies and outbreak investigations were classified as moderate quality evidence. Case reports and small case series were regarded as low quality evidence and were included primarily for illustrative purposes. Because this study was conducted as a narrative review rather than a formal systematic review, no quantitative risk of bias assessment or meta-analysis was performed.
5.1. Clinical studies and evidence
Historically, cephalosporins were secondary to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and ampicillin, but rapid resistance to those agents has elevated third-generation cephalosporins to important therapeutic options for severe Shigella infections [58,59]. Third-generation cephalosporins, particularly ceftriaxone and cefotaxime, have emerged as a mainstay of therapy for severe and MDR Shigella infections, especially in pediatric populations. [25,43]. Multicenter studies conducted in South Asia and Africa, classified as high quality evidence, demonstrated ceftriaxone's superior efficacy in severe dysentery caused by multidrug resistant Shigella strains, with high clinical cure rates, shorter hospitalization duration, and reduced mortality compared with conventional treatments [89]. Cefotaxime has proven particularly valuable for systemic infections, including Shigella bacteraemia, and remains effective in regions with high fluoroquinolone and azithromycin resistance rates [90]. However, ESBL-mediated resistance (Section 4.3.1) compromises cephalosporin utility, making pre-treatment susceptibility testing essential [91]. Emergence of ESBL resistance can occur within days during hospital treatment, so repeat testing may be required if rapid clinical improvement is not observed.
5.2. Clinical evidence and treatment outcomes
5.2.1. Successful outcomes
A randomized controlled trial in Bangladesh demonstrated complete clinical cure in 20 children with severe dysentery caused by ciprofloxacin-resistant S. flexneri using intravenous ceftriaxone (50 mg/kg/day for 5 days) [92]. All patients achieved symptom resolution within 48-72 h, with negative stool cultures by day 3 and no relapses during follow-up, supporting WHO guidelines for empirical therapy [22]. Additional form low quality case reports from India documented successful treatment of resistant S. flexneri with cefoperazone-sulbactam [58], while 2024 data from British Columbia confirmed ceftriaxone susceptibility in dominant MDR S. sonnei clones [93]. During a 2019 Belgian outbreak involving 163 S. sonnei cases linked to Central American travel, intravenous cefotaxime achieved 90% clinical cure rates in severely affected children, despite strain resistance to ciprofloxacin and azithromycin [94]. Conversely, a 2005 Taiwan outbreak revealed ceftriaxone-resistant S. sonnei producing CMY-2 β-lactamase, highlighting the critical importance of susceptibility testing [95].
5.2.2. Challenges and failures
A 2017 case from Nepal involved a 5-year-old child with bacteremia caused by CTX-M-15 ESBL-producing S. flexneri presenting with septic shock and disseminated intravascular coagulation [96]. Empirical ceftriaxone failed, but meropenem (10 mg/kg every 8 h) achieved clinical improvement within 48 h, reflecting regional ESBL prevalence driven by plasmid-mediated blaCTX-M genes. This case demonstrates severe systemic complications from ESBL-producing Shigella, particularly in pediatric populations. In 2023, a 33-year-old immunocompromised traveler from Southeast Asia with XDR S. sonnei (sequence type 152) harboring blaCTX-M-27 and gyrA mutations was described [78]. Despite combination therapy with aztreonam and tigecycline, clinical response was delayed and symptoms persisted for 14 days. This case highlights the growing challenge of multidrug resistant Shigella in international travelers, where ESBL production combined with fluoroquinolone resistance severely limits therapeutic options.
Third-generation cephalosporins remain cornerstone therapy for severe Shigella infections, particularly in pediatric and hospitalized populations. However, escalating ESBL-mediated resistance increasingly compromises their efficacy, forcing reliance on carbapenems and raising treatment failure risks. Addressing these challenges requires coordinated global efforts encompassing enhanced resistance surveillance, antimicrobial stewardship, and development of novel therapeutics and vaccines [97,98]. Without such interventions, rising resistance threatens to render current treatments obsolete, substantially increasing the public health burden of shigellosis.
6. Knowledge gaps, limitations, and forward-looking priorities
Current evidence indicates that third-generation cephalosporins (ceftriaxone, cefotaxime) remain critical for severe Shigella infections, particularly in pediatric and hospitalized populations. Clinical trials and multicenter studies report high cure rates and reduced hospitalization duration [89,90], while case reports illustrate challenges posed by ESBL-producing and XDR strains [78,96]. Despite these findings, several critical knowledge gaps persist. High-quality prospective trials, particularly randomized controlled trials comparing cephalosporins with alternative agents in MDR Shigella, are scarce. Geographic coverage is uneven, with most studies concentrate in South Asia and Africa, leaving resistance trends in other regions under-characterized. The relationship between molecular resistance mechanisms (ESBL genes, PBP mutations, efflux pumps) and clinical outcomes is not fully understood. Vulnerable populations (pediatric, immunocompromised, travelers) are underrepresented, and evidence for outpatient oral cephalosporin use remains minimal.
Limitations of the current literature include heterogeneity in study designs, populations, outcome measures, and reporting standards, which precludes quantitative synthesis. Most studies are observational or case-based, representing low-quality evidence, and resistance patterns evolve rapidly; older data (e.g., pre-2010) may not accurately reflect current epidemiology. These factors limit generalizability and underscore the need for prospective studies, standardized surveillance, and well-designed clinical trials.
Forward-looking recommendations are directly linked to these gaps. The escalating AMR in Shigella infections necessitates urgent development of innovative therapeutic strategies and enhanced surveillance systems. Next-generation antibiotics targeting resistant Shigella strains are a critical research priority. β-lactamase inhibitors that restore cephalosporin efficacy [99] and broad-spectrum siderophore-conjugated antibiotics that exploit bacterial iron uptake pathways [100], offer promising avenues for overcoming MDR and XDR Shigella [101]. Non-antibiotic strategies are emerging as valuable complementary approaches. Probiotics, particularly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains, have demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials by restoring gut microbiota balance and inhibiting pathogen colonization. Vaccine development, including live-attenuated, conjugate, and subunit candidates [8,98,102], aims to provide long-lasting immunity while reducing antibiotic dependence. Phage therapy offers a precision approach using bacteriophages to selectively target resistant bacteria [100,103], sparing beneficial microbiota and minimizing selective pressure for resistance [104,105]. Enhanced surveillance systems and robust antimicrobial stewardship programs are essential to monitor resistance trends, guide empiric therapy, and preserve the efficacy of cephalosporins and other critical antibiotics.
Conceptually, cephalosporin efficacy is influenced by pathogen resistance mechanisms, patient characteristics, and treatment context (hospitalized vs. outpatient). Recognizing these relationships clarifies where evidence is insufficient and informs future research, clinical decision-making, and public health strategies. A coordinated global effort combining novel therapeutics, enhanced surveillance, rigorous stewardship, and vaccine deployment is essential to overcome the challenges posed by AMR in Shigella and ensure effective, sustainable management of shigellosis.
7. Conclusion
Future strategies for managing Shigella infections should integrate novel therapeutic approaches with strengthened antimicrobial stewardship and comprehensive surveillance systems. The development of new antimicrobials, vaccines, probiotics, and phage therapy offers potential solutions to current treatment limitations. Concurrently, robust stewardship programs and enhanced surveillance are essential to preserve the efficacy of existing antibiotics and limit the spread of resistant strains. A coordinated, global effort that combines these measures is critical to addressing AMR in Shigella and ensuring sustainable, effective management of shigellosis.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Wenqing Wang: Writing – original draft. Yutian Qin: Data curation. Yiqiong Wang: Data curation. Xinyi Li: Data curation. Dai Kuang: Funding acquisition. Mamy Jayne Nelly Rajaofera: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Supervision.
Data availability statement
This article is a narrative review and does not include any original datasets. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
Ethical approval
Not required.
Generative AI statement
Generative AI tools were used only to assist with language polishing and improving clarity of expression. No AI tools were used to generate, analyze, or interpret scientific content. All scientific judgments, conclusions, and revisions were made by the authors.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Dai Kuang reports financial support was provided by Hainan Medical University. Dai Kuang reports a relationship with Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China that includes: funding grants 825RC764. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgement
This study was supported by Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (825RC764). and the by Hainan Medical University College Student's Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (Grant No. X202011810037). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmni.2026.101837.
Contributor Information
Dai Kuang, Email: kuangdai1989@163.com.
Mamy Jayne Nelly Rajaofera, Email: 1967821818@qq.com.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is the Supplementary data to this article:
References
- 1.Khalil I.A., Troeger C., Blacker B.F., Rao P.C., Brown A., Atherly D.E., et al. Morbidity and mortality due to Shigella and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli diarrhoea: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2016. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(11):1229–1240. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30475-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Anderson M., Sansonetti P.J., Marteyn B.S. Shigella diversity and changing landscape: insights for the twenty-first century. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016;6:45. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schnupf P., Sansonetti P.J. Shigella pathogenesis: new insights through advanced methodologies. Microbiol Spectr. 2019;7(2) doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.BAI-0023-2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kotloff K.L., Riddle M.S., Platts-Mills J.A., Pavlinac P., Zaidi A.K.M. Shigellosis. Lancet. 2018;391(10122):801–812. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33296-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Arnold S.L.M. Target product profile and development path for shigellosis treatment with antibacterials. ACS Infect Dis. 2021;7(5):948–958. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.0c00889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Muzembo B.A., Kitahara K., Mitra D., Ohno A., Khatiwada J., Dutta S., et al. Burden of Shigella in South Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Travel Med. 2023;30(1) doi: 10.1093/jtm/taac132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yang C., Wang H., Ma H., Bao R., Liu H., Yang L., et al. Characterization and genomic analysis of SFPH2, a novel T7virus infecting shigella. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:3027. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Anderson JDt, Bagamian K.H., Muhib F., Baral R., Laytner L.A., Amaya M., et al. Potential impact and cost-effectiveness of future ETEC and Shigella vaccines in 79 low- and lower middle-income countries. Vaccine X. 2019;2 doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2019.100024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zaidi M.B., Estrada-Garcia T. Shigella: a highly virulent and elusive pathogen. Curr Trop Med Rep. 2014;1(2):81–87. doi: 10.1007/s40475-014-0019-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ahmed N., Yousafzai M.T., Naz Qamar F. The Enterics for Global Health (EFGH) shigella surveillance study in Pakistan. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024;11(Suppl 1):S113–S120. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kirkland M.E., Patfield S., Hughes A.C., Hernlem B., He X. A novel Shiga toxin 2a neutralizing antibody therapeutic with low immunogenicity and high efficacy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024;68(1) doi: 10.1128/aac.00598-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tansarli G.S., Long D.R., Waalkes A., Bourassa L.A., Libby S.J., Penewit K., et al. Genomic reconstruction and directed interventions in a multidrug-resistant Shigellosis outbreak in Seattle, WA, USA: a genomic surveillance study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23(6):740–750. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00879-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.van den Beld M.J.C., Warmelink E., Friedrich A.W., Reubsaet F.A.G., Schipper M., de Boer R.F., et al. Incidence, clinical implications and impact on public health of infections with Shigella spp. and entero-invasive Escherichia coli (EIEC): results of a multicenter cross-sectional study in the Netherlands during 2016-2017. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):1037. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4659-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chandani Y., Ghosh V., Suresh V., Singh V., Asumah M.N., Padhi B.K. An outbreak of shigellosis in European travellers returning from Cape Verde. New Microbes New Infect. 2023;52 doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2023.101091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tacconelli E., Carrara E., Savoldi A., Harbarth S., Mendelson M., Monnet D.L., et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(3):318–327. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(17)30753-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lampel K.A., Formal S.B., Maurelli A.T. A brief history of shigella. EcoSal Plus. 2018;8(1) doi: 10.1128/ecosalplus.ESP-0006-2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mulchandani R., Tiseo K., Nandi A., Klein E., Gandra S., Laxminarayan R., et al. Global trends in inappropriate use of antibiotics, 2000-2021: scoping review and prevalence estimates. BMJ Public Health. 2025;3(1) doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-002411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Williams P.C.M., Berkley J.A. Guidelines for the treatment of dysentery (shigellosis): a systematic review of the evidence. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2018;38(sup1):S50–s65. doi: 10.1080/20469047.2017.1409454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Raoufian T., Pakbin B., Tabatabaee Bafroee A.S. Antibiotic resistance and molecular characterization of clinical Shigella spp. isolated from hospitals located in Tehran and Qazvin cities, Iran. BMC Res Notes. 2025;18(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13104-025-07113-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Deng S., Li C., Zhang H., Xie Y., Wang X., Luo W., et al. Analyzing Shigella in Wuhan: serotypes, antimicrobial resistance, and public health implications. Infect Drug Resist. 2025;18:3745–3760. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S522808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ranjbar R., Farahani A. Shigella: Antibiotic-resistance mechanisms and new Horizons for treatment. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:3137–3167. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S219755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shad A.A., Shad W.A. Shigella sonnei: virulence and antibiotic resistance. Arch Microbiol. 2021;203(1):45–58. doi: 10.1007/s00203-020-02034-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gonzalez-Torralba A., Garcia-Esteban C., Alos J.I. Enteropathogens and antibiotics. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clín. 2018;36(1):47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2015.06.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Baker K.S., Dallman T.J., Field N., Childs T., Mitchell H., Day M., et al. Horizontal antimicrobial resistance transfer drives epidemics of multiple Shigella species. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1462. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03949-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Collins J.P., Friedman C.R., Birhane M.G., Karp B.E., Osinski A., Montgomery M.W., et al. Evidence of failure of oral third-generation cephalosporin treatment for Shigella sonnei infection. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7(4) doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa113. ofaa113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Livermore D.M., Mushtaq S., Nguyen T., Warner M. Strategies to overcome extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and AmpC β-lactamases in shigellae. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;37(5):405–409. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chiu C.H., Lee J.J., Wang M.H., Chu C. Genetic analysis and plasmid-mediated bla(CMY-2) in Salmonella and Shigella and the Ceftriaxone Susceptibility regulated by the ISEcp-1 tnpA-bla(CMY-2)-blc-sugE. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2021;54(4):649–657. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Spellerberg B., Rabsch W., Pietsch M., Denzer C., Posovszky C., Essig A., et al. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase acquisition in patients receiving systemic cephalosporin treatment for Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp. infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;70(4):714–716. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ashida H., Suzuki T., Sasakawa C. Shigella infection and host cell death: a double-edged sword for the host and pathogen survival. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2021;59:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2020.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Matanza X.M., Clements A. Pathogenicity and virulence of Shigella sonnei: a highly drug-resistant pathogen of increasing prevalence. Virulence. 2023;14(1) doi: 10.1080/21505594.2023.2280838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Muthuramalingam M., Whittier S.K., Picking W.L., Picking W.D. The shigella type III secretion system: an overview from top to bottom. Microorganisms. 2021;9(2) doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9020451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mattock E., Blocker A.J. How do the virulence factors of shigella work together to cause disease? Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:64. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kim J.J., Keir Marks. Shigatoxin-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: current molecular mechanisms and future therapies. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2012 doi: 10.2147/dddt.S25757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xu D., Liao C., Zhang B., Tolbert W.D., He W., Dai Z., et al. Human enteric alpha-Defensin 5 promotes shigella infection by enhancing bacterial adhesion and invasion. Immunity. 2018;48(6):1233–1244 e1236. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nicolas X., Granier H., Le Guen P. Shigellosis or bacillary dysentery. Presse Med. 2007;36(11 Pt 2):1606–1618. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2007.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sjölund Karlsson M., Bowen A., Reporter R., Folster J.P., Grass J.E., Howie R.L., et al. Outbreak of infections caused by Shigella sonnei with reduced susceptibility to azithromycin in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(3):1559–1560. doi: 10.1128/aac.02360-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Porter C.K., Thura N., Ranallo R.T., Riddle M.S. The Shigella human challenge model. Epidemiol Infect. 2012;141(2):223–232. doi: 10.1017/s0950268812001677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Blacksell S.D., Dhawan S., Kusumoto M., Le K.K., Davis B.J., Summermatter K., et al. The biosafety research road map: the search for evidence to support practices in the laboratory-shigella spp. Appl Biosaf. 2023;28(2):96–101. doi: 10.1089/apb.2022.0046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Anderson J.D., Bagamian K.H., Muhib F., Amaya M.P., Laytner L.A., Wierzba T., et al. Burden of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and shigella non-fatal diarrhoeal infections in 79 low-income and lower middle-income countries: a modelling analysis. Lancet Global Health. 2019;7(3):e321–e330. doi: 10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30483-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Klontz K.C., Singh N. Treatment of drug-resistant Shigella infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015;13(1):69–80. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2015.983902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Christopher P.R., David K.V., John S.M., Sankarapandian V. Antibiotic therapy for Shigella dysentery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;2010(8):CD006784. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006784.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.World Health Organization . WHO; Geneva: 2005. Guidelines for the control of shigellosis, including epidemics due to Shigella dysenteriae type 1.https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241592330 [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gaudreau C., Bernaquez I., Pilon P.A., Goyette A., Yared N., Bekal S. Clinical and genomic investigation of an international Ceftriaxone- and Azithromycin-resistant Shigella sonnei cluster among men who have sex with men, Montreal, Canada 2017-2019. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(3) doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02337-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chung The H., Bodhidatta L., Pham D.T., Mason C.J., Ha Thanh T., Voong Vinh P., et al. Evolutionary histories and antimicrobial resistance in Shigella flexneri and Shigella sonnei in Southeast Asia. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):353. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01905-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.World Health Organization . WHO; Geneva: 2025. Global antibiotic resistance surveillance report 2025.https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240116337 [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nuesch-Inderbinen M., Heini N., Zurfluh K., Althaus D., Hachler H., Stephan R. Shigella antimicrobial drug resistance mechanisms, 2004-2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(6):1083–1085. doi: 10.3201/eid2206.152088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sati H., Carrara E., Savoldi A., Hansen P., Garlasco J., Campagnaro E., et al. The WHO bacterial priority pathogens list 2024: a prioritisation study to guide research, development, and public health strategies against antimicrobial resistance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2025;25(9):1033–1043. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00118-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Houpt E.R., Ferdous T., Ara R., Ibrahim M., Alam M.M., Kabir M., et al. Clinical outcomes of drug-resistant shigellosis treated with Azithromycin in Bangladesh. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(10):1793–1798. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lefevre S., Njamkepo E., Feldman S., Ruckly C., Carle I., Lejay-Collin M., et al. Rapid emergence of extensively drug-resistant Shigella sonnei in France. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):462. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36222-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Brown J.D., Willcox S.J., Franklin N., Hazelton B., Howard P., Reinten T., et al. Shigella species epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility: the implications of emerging azithromycin resistance for guiding treatment, guidelines and breakpoints. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(11):3181–3186. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shahi F., Abbasi Montazeri E., Khaghani S., Moradi M., Ahmad Khosravi N., Saki M. Investigation of the azithromycin resistance rate and related genes involved in this resistance in clinical Shigella species collected from children with diarrhea in Ahvaz, Southwest Iran. Mol Biol Rep. 2026;53(1):353. doi: 10.1007/s11033-025-11420-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Rahman M., Shoma S., Rashid H., Siddique A.K., Nair G.B., Sack D.A. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-mediated third-generation cephalosporin resistance in Shigella isolates in Bangladesh. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;54(4):846–847. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkh413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Taneja N., Mewara A., Kumar A., Verma G., Sharma M. Cephalosporin-resistant Shigella flexneri over 9 years (2001-09) in India. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(6):1347–1353. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Beeri Y., Ben Shitrit I., Hazan G., Beniacar H., Sagi O., Soyonov E., et al. Shigella PCR-positive gastroenteritis in children: insights from a comparison between culture-positive and culture-negative cases. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2026;45(1):61–67. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000004965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Leibovitz E., Janco J., Piglansky L., Press J., Yagupsky P., Reinhart H., et al. Oral ciprofloxacin vs. intramuscular ceftriaxone as empiric treatment of acute invasive diarrhea in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19(11):1060–1067. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200011000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wong F., Wilson S., Helbig R., Hegde S., Aftenieva O., Zheng H., et al. Understanding beta-lactam-induced lysis at the single-cell level. Front Microbiol. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.712007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sharma B., Chalikwar R., Bhalerao S., Gondane A.A., Pawar D., Sharma A. Cefotaxime versus ceftriaxone: a comprehensive comparative review. Cureus. 2024;16(9) doi: 10.7759/cureus.69146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mandal J., Mondal N., Mahadevan S., Parija S.C. Emergence of resistance to third-generation cephalosporin in Shigella--A case report. J Trop Pediatr. 2009;56(4):278–279. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmp118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Radice M., Gonzealez C., Power P., Vidal M.C., Gutkind G. Third-generation cephalosporin resistance in Shigella sonnei, Argentina. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(3):442–443. doi: 10.3201/eid0703.010313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sriyapai T., Pulsrikarn C., Chansiri K., Sriyapai P. Molecular characterization of extended-spectrum cephalosporin and fluoroquinolone resistance genes in Salmonella and Shigella isolated from clinical specimens in Thailand. Heliyon. 2022;8(12) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tauxe R.V., Puhr N.D., Wells J.G., Hargrett-Bean N., Blake P.A. Antimicrobial resistance of Shigella isolates in the USA: the importance of international travelers. J Infect Dis. 1990;162(5):1107–1111. doi: 10.1093/infdis/162.5.1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.von Seidlein L., Chung The H., Rabaa M.A., Pham Thanh D., De Lappe N., Cormican M., et al. South Asia as a reservoir for the global spread of ciprofloxacin-resistant shigella sonnei: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Med. 2016;13(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.van den Beld M., Pijnacker R., van Dam A., Bovée L., Kwa D., Linde I., et al. Whole-genome sequencing of Shigella for surveillance purposes shows (inter)national relatedness and multidrug resistance in isolates from men who have sex with men. Microb Genom. 2023;9(4) doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Stenhouse G.E., Jere K.C., Peno C., Bengtsson R.J., Chinyama E., Mandolo J., et al. Whole genome sequence analysis of Shigella from Malawi identifies fluoroquinolone resistance. Microb Genom. 2021;7(5) doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Somda N.S., Nyarkoh R., Tankoano A., Bonkoungou O.J.I., Tetteh-Quarcoo P.B., Donkor E.S. Molecular epidemiology of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and carbapenemases-producing Shigella in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2025;25(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10266-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Liu G., Qian H., Tang B., Chen Y., Kang H., Jiang F., et al. Prevalence and characterisation of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Shigella flexneri isolates from Jiangsu Province, China, 2013-2015. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2018;15:283–287. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Rashid H., Rahman M. Possible transfer of plasmid mediated third generation cephalosporin resistance between Escherichia coli and Shigella sonnei in the human gut. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;30:15–18. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hata M., Suzuki M., Matsumoto M., Takahashi M., Sato K., Ibe S., et al. Cloning of a novel gene for quinolone resistance from a transferable plasmid in Shigella flexneri 2b. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(2):801–803. doi: 10.1128/aac.49.2.801-803.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Yang C., Xiang Y., Qiu S. Resistance in Enteric Shigella and nontyphoidal Salmonella: emerging concepts. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2023;36(5):360–365. doi: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Yang X., Liu X., Yang C., Chan E.W.-C., Zhang R., Chen S., et al. A conjugative IncI1 plasmid carrying erm (B) and blaCTX-M-104 that mediates resistance to azithromycin and cephalosporins. Microbiol Spectr. 2021;9(2) doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00286-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Haidar-Ahmad N., Manigat F.O., Silué N., Pontier S.M., Campbell-Valois F.-X. A tale about shigella: Evolution, plasmid, and virulence. Microorganisms. 2023;11(7) doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11071709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hrabák J., Empel J., Gniadkowski M., Halbhuber Zk, Rébl K., Urbášková P. CTX-M-15-Producing Shigella sonnei strain from a Czech patient who traveled in Asia. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(6):2147–2148. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00427-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Motlhaping T., Ramatla T., Thekisoe O., Khasapane N.G., Lekota K.E. Genomic insights into Shigella species isolated from small ruminants and manure in the North West Province, South Africa. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2025;109(1):238. doi: 10.1007/s00253-025-13632-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Thakur V., Uniyal A., Tiwari V. A comprehensive review on pharmacology of efflux pumps and their inhibitors in antibiotic resistance. Eur J Pharmacol. 2021;903 doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Jacqueline C., Carrascoso G.R., Gutiérrez-Fernández J., Rangel T.V., Goterris L., Valdes F.V., et al. Genetic characterization of extensively drug-resistant Shigella sonnei infections, Spain, 2021–2022. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29(11) doi: 10.3201/eid2911.221746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zhang H., He S., Pang X., He X., Liu X., Qiu S., et al. Regulatory role of ISEcp1 and spacer sequences in bla(CTX-M)-mediated cephalosporin resistance in Shigella. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2025;44:127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2025.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Li J., Li B., Ni Y., Sun J. Molecular characterization of the extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Shigella spp. in Shanghai. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34(3):447–451. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2244-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Choia H., Navarathnaa D.H., Harstona B.L., Hwanga M., Coronaa B., San Juana M.R., et al. Case of extensively drug-resistant Shigella sonnei infection, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29(8) doi: 10.3201/eid2908.230411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Khosravi M., Khosravi F., Pouresmaeil O., Aryan E., Meshkat Z., Safdari H., et al. High prevalence of CTX-M-15 producing Shigella spp. isolated from patients with gastroenteritis in Northeast Iran. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2024;71(4):299–307. doi: 10.1556/030.2024.02455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sabour S., Teimourpour A., Mohammadshahi J., Peeridogaheh H., Teimourpour R., Azimi T., et al. Molecular detection and characterization of Shigella spp. harboring extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes in children with diarrhea in northwest Iran. Mol Cell Pediatr. 2022;9(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40348-022-00152-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Aminshahidi M., Arastehfar A., Pouladfar G., Arman E., Fani F. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and Shigella with high rate of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production: two predominant etiological agents of acute diarrhea in Shiraz, Iran. Microb Drug Resist. 2017;23(8):1037–1044. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2017.0204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Pasqua M., Grossi M., Scinicariello S., Aussel L., Barras F., Colonna B., et al. The MFS efflux pump EmrKY contributes to the survival of Shigella within macrophages. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1) doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39749-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Sen T., Verma N.K. Functional role of YnfA, an efflux transporter in resistance to antimicrobial agents in Shigella flexneri. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66(7) doi: 10.1128/aac.00293-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Li X.Z., Plesiat P., Nikaido H. The challenge of efflux-mediated antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(2):337–418. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00117-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Coluccia M., Beranger A., Trirocco R., Fanelli G., Zanzi F., Colonna B., et al. Role of the MDR efflux pump AcrAB in epithelial cell invasion by Shigella flexneri. Biomolecules. 2023;13(5) doi: 10.3390/biom13050823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Behmard E., Najafi A., Ahmadi A. Understanding the resistance mechanism of penicillin binding protein 1a mutant against cefotaxime using molecular dynamic simulation. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2018;37(3):741–749. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2018.1439404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Tinney K.R., Dover J.A., Doore S.M., Parent K.N. Shigella viruses Sf22 and KRT47 require outer membrane protein C for infection. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr. 2022;1864(7) doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2022.183920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Langevin A.M., El Meouche I., Dunlop M.J. Mapping the role of AcrAB-TolC efflux pumps in the evolution of antibiotic resistance reveals Near-MIC treatments facilitate resistance acquisition. mSphere. 2020;5(6) doi: 10.1128/mSphere.01056-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Oommen S., Pillai P.M., Sushamabai S., Paul P.J. Cefotaximase and AmpC-producing Shigella flexneri in case of dysentery from southern India. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2013;31(1):77–79. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.108734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Jeon Y.L., Nam Y.S., Lim G., Cho S.Y., Kim Y.T., Jang J.H., et al. Quinolone-resistant Shigella flexneri isolated in a patient who travelled to India. Ann Lab Med. 2012;32(5):366–369. doi: 10.3343/alm.2012.32.5.366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Moreno-Mingorance A., Mir-Cros A., Goterris L., Rodriguez-Garrido V., Sulleiro E., Barbera M.J., et al. Increasing trend of antimicrobial resistance in Shigella associated with MSM transmission in Barcelona, 2020-21: outbreak of XRD Shigella sonnei and dissemination of ESBL-producing Shigella flexneri. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2023;78(4):975–982. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kabir I., Butler T., Khanam A. Comparative efficacies of single intravenous doses of ceftriaxone and ampicillin for shigellosis in a placebo-controlled trial. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986;29(4):645–648. doi: 10.1128/AAC.29.4.645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Stefanovic A., Alam M.E., Matic N., Larnder A., Ritchie G., Gowland L., et al. Increased severity of multidrug-resistant Shigella sonnei infections in people experiencing homelessness. Clin Infect Dis. 2025;80(2):339–346. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Van den Bossche A., Ceyssens P.-J., Denayer S., Hammami N., van den Beld M., Dallman T.J., et al. Outbreak of Central American born Shigella sonnei in two youth camps in Belgium in the summer of 2019. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;40(7):1573–1577. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04164-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Huang I.F., Chiu C.-H., Wang M.-H., Wu C.-Y., Hsieh K.-S., Chiou C.C. Outbreak of dysentery associated with ceftriaxone-resistant shigella sonnei: first report of plasmid-mediated CMY-2-Type AmpC β-Lactamase resistance in S. sonnei. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(6):2608–2612. doi: 10.1128/jcm.43.6.2608-2612.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Parajuli N.P., Joshi G., Pardhe B.D., Shakya J., Bhetwal A., Shakya S., et al. Shigellosis caused by CTX-M type ESBL producing Shigella flexneri in two siblings of rural Nepal: first case report from the country. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2017;2017:1–5. doi: 10.1155/2017/1862320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.MacLennan C.A., Steele A.D. Frontiers in shigella vaccine development. Vaccines (Basel) 2022;10(9) doi: 10.3390/vaccines10091536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Micoli F., Nakakana U.N., Berlanda Scorza F. Towards a four-component GMMA-Based vaccine against shigella. Vaccines (Basel) 2022;10(2) doi: 10.3390/vaccines10020328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Karakonstantis S., Rousaki M., Kritsotakis E.I. Cefiderocol: systematic review of mechanisms of resistance, heteroresistance and in vivo emergence of resistance. Antibiotics. 2022;11(6) doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11060723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Shahin K., Bouzari M., Komijani M., Wang R. A new phage cocktail against multidrug, ESBL-producer isolates of Shigella sonnei and Shigella flexneri with highly efficient bacteriolytic activity. Microb Drug Resist. 2020;26(7):831–841. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2019.0235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Wang C., Yang D., Wang Y., Ni W. Cefiderocol for the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria: a systematic review of currently available evidence. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.896971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Martin P., Alaimo C. The ongoing journey of a shigella bioconjugate vaccine. Vaccines (Basel) 2022;10(2) doi: 10.3390/vaccines10020212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Zhao J., Chen B., Wang W., Kang Y., Hu E., Zhang Y., et al. Synergistic efficacy of phage Henu10 with antibiotics against Shigella dysenteriae with insight into phage resistance and fitness trade-offs. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024;14 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1499325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Ahamed S.K.T., Rai S., Guin C., Jameela R.M., Dam S., Muthuirulandi Sethuvel D.P., et al. Characterizations of novel broad-spectrum lytic bacteriophages Sfin-2 and Sfin-6 infecting MDR Shigella spp. with their application on raw chicken to reduce the Shigella load. Front Microbiol. 2023;14 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1240570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Mason L.C.E., Greig D.R., Cowley L.A., Partridge S.R., Martinez E., Blackwell G.A., et al. The evolution and international spread of extensively drug resistant Shigella sonnei. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):1983. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37672-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
This article is a narrative review and does not include any original datasets. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.
