ABSTRACT
Endophytic fungi are recognized as prolific sources of structurally diverse secondary metabolites with significant pharmaceutical potential. In the present study, endophytic fungi were isolated from healthy tissues of Atalantia racemosa (Rutaceae), an ethnomedicinal plant traditionally used for respiratory disorders and blood purification. A total of three fungal isolates were obtained and identified as Aspergillus flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp. based on morphological and molecular (ITS sequencing) analyses. Crude extracts of the isolates were subjected to phytochemical characterization using GC–MS, FTIR, and LC–MS techniques. GC–MS profiling revealed the presence of fatty acids, sterols, phenolics, and terpenoids, while FTIR analysis confirmed key functional groups such as hydroxyl, carbonyl, and aromatic moieties. Importantly, LC–MS analysis provided high‐resolution metabolite profiling, identifying diverse bioactive compounds including alkaloids, flavonoids, quinic acid derivatives, xanthones (mangostin derivatives), phenolic amides (N‐feruloyl‐octopamine), diterpenoids, chalcones, macrolides, and terpene lactones in both positive and negative ionization modes. Biological evaluation demonstrated notable antioxidant, antibacterial, anti‐inflammatory, anticancer, and wound healing activities, with Endothia sp. showing superior anticancer activity (IC50: 19.37 µg/mL) and significant wound healing potential. The integration of LC–MS data highlights the metabolic diversity and pharmacological relevance of these fungal isolates. Overall, the study confirms that endophytic fungi associated with A. racemosa are promising sources of bioactive metabolites with potential applications in drug discovery.
Keywords: anticancer activity, Atalantia racemosa, endophytic fungi, GC–MS, FTIR, LC–MS, wound healing
1. Introduction
Endophytes are microorganisms that penetrate plant tissue beneath the epidermal cell layers, without causing any symptomatic infection to their host [1]. The term endophytes was coined by the German scientist Heinrich Anton de Bary in 1866. The word endophyte means “in the plant” (endon = within, phyton = plant). Endophytes are ubiquitous, colonizing all plants, and are isolated from most endophytic fungi. Fungi live inside their host available tissue, including the leaves, petioles, stems, twigs, bark, roots, fruit, flowers, and seeds. Fungal endophytes and their host plants range from being symbiotic to antagonistic or opportunistic pathogens [2, 3]. Plants limit endophyte growth but use various mechanisms to adapt to living environments [4, 5, 6]. Endophytic fungi are broadly classified into clavicipitaceous (Class I) and nonclavicipitaceous (Classes II and III) endophytes. Class I endophytes (family Clavicipitaceae) are predominantly associated with grasses, especially members of the Poaceae family, and are typically transmitted vertically through seeds. In contrast, nonclavicipitaceous endophytes (Classes II and III) comprise a diverse group of fungi that colonize a wide range of plant species, including both monocots and dicots. These endophytes are generally transmitted horizontally and exhibit varied ecological roles, including stress tolerance, growth promotion, and protection against pathogens [7]. Class II endophytes are diverse, ranging from pezizomycotina (Ascomycota), agaricomycotina, and pucciniomycotina (Basidiomycota) [8]. To maintain healthy symbiosis, endophytes produce many compounds that promote plant development and help them to adapt to environmental factors like temperature, humidity, geography location, and surrounding vegetation [9]. Endophytes protect host plant from pathogens and parasites, enhancing their resistance and tolerance to biotic and abiotic factors. Fungal endophytes have also been shown to be an important source of bioactive antimicrobial compounds such as alkaloids, peptides, steroids, and phenol, which have a wide range of applications in the medical field [10, 11]. Endophytic fungi produce secondary metabolites such as hypericin, which have been used to reduce depression and anxiety [12].
Atalantia racemosa, a plant belonging to the Rutaceae family, is known as Kattu naragam in Tamil. It is often found in Peninsular India and the Western Ghats, including the regions of South, Central, and Maharashtra, particularly the Sahyadri mountain range. The decoction of A. racemosa leaves is used to treat bronchitis, asthma, and cough, as well as to purify the blood [13]. The plant A. racemosa is commonly utilized by tribes in Tamil Nadu for the treatment of various diseases [14, 15]. A. racemosa (family Rutaceae) is an ethnomedicinally important plant known for its therapeutic applications and rich phytochemical composition, including alkaloids, flavonoids, and phenolic compounds. Medicinal plants are well recognized as reservoirs of endophytic microorganisms capable of producing diverse bioactive secondary metabolites, often similar to those of their host plants [16]. These endophytes play a significant role in enhancing plant fitness by improving stress tolerance and providing protection against pathogens through the production of biologically active compounds [17].
Despite its medicinal relevance, the endophytic microbiota of A. racemosa remains largely unexplored. This highlights the need to investigate its endophytes as potential sources of novel natural products. Endophytic fungi have been widely reported as promising candidates in drug discovery due to their metabolic diversity and ability to synthesize pharmacologically important compounds [18]. Studies on related members of the Rutaceae family further support this rationale. For instance, endophytes isolated from Citrus species have demonstrated notable antimicrobial and bioactive potential, suggesting that plants within this family harbor metabolically active endophytes of significant therapeutic interest [19]. Furthermore, previous studies on endophytes from Rutaceae and related species strengthen this rationale. For instance, endophytic fungi isolated from Aegle marmelos (Rutaceae) have shown significant antimicrobial and bioactive properties [20]. Similarly, endophytes from Citrus species have been reported to produce a wide range of secondary metabolites with antibacterial and antifungal activities [21]. Despite these advances, there are very limited or no detailed reports on endophytes associated with A. racemosa, underscoring the novelty of the present investigation and its importance in filling a critical gap in the existing literature.
Therefore, the selection of A. racemosa is justified based on its ethnomedicinal importance and the likelihood of discovering novel bioactive compounds from its associated endophytes. With this background the present study aimed to isolate and identify endophytic fungi from A. racemosa and screen for bioactive compounds using GC‐MS and FTIR analysis for biomedical applications.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Collection of Plant Sample
Healthy and mature plants were collected in March 2024 from Jamboti, Khanapur Taluk, Belgaum District, Karnataka. The plant was given for authentication. The material was processed in a laboratory within 24 h, and fresh material was used for isolation to reduce contamination.
2.2. Isolation of Endophytic Fungi
The plant material was thoroughly washed and cut into small pieces under aseptic conditions. The isolation of endophytic fungi was performed using a method described by Schulz et al. [16]. The samples were surface sterilized with sodium hypochlorite and ethanol, then rinsed three times with sterile distilled water. The samples were then plated on PDA media supplemented with streptomycin, sealed with parafilm, and incubated at 27°C. Fungi were subculture on PDA medium, and their colonies were characterized through microscopic observation and isolated fungi were molecularly identified using 18S rRNA internal transcribed spacer sequencing techniques. Genomic DNA was extracted from fungal isolates and amplified using universal primers ITS1 and ITS4. The PCR amplification process involved denaturation, annealing, extension, and extension at 95°C for 5 min. PCR amplicons were analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis and purified using a commercial DNA purification kit. The purified ITS sequences were submitted to the NCBI GenBank database and aligned using Clustal W. Phylogenetic analysis was performed in MEGA 11 using the Neighbor‐Joining method with 1000 bootstrap replicates to assess branch reliability. The purified ITS sequences were then submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank database and aligned using Clustal W. The Neighbor‐Joining method was used to assess branch reliability.
2.3. Preparation of Fungal Crude Extract
The selected fungi were used for the extraction of secondary metabolites. Mycelia were inoculated with 100 mL of PDB and 5% molasses in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask, then the starter culture was transferred to a 100 mL Erlenmeyer flask for mass culture to the required biomass. After incubation, the culture broth was filtered with a muslin cloth. The fungal biomass was dried and crushed with a mortar and pestle and soaked in 75% ethanol and subjected to maceration for 24 h. The suspension was filtered using muslin cloth and evaporated at 60°C until a residue was obtained, which was then used as a crude extract.
2.4. FTIR Analysis
The Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (FTIR) is a highly useful tool to identify functional groups present in compounds. The extracts of endophytic fungi of various species were used for FTIR analysis. The extracts are mixed with a homogenized powder and placed in a sample container, and then the powdered extract is loaded into an FTIR spectrophotometer. To identify functional groups in metabolites with distinct peaks ranging from 400 to 4000 cm−1.
2.5. Estimation of Total Flavonoid Content
The 10% aluminum chloride (AlCl3) and 1 M sodium acetate were mixed with a known quantity of fungal extract (1 mg/mL) with respective solvents. Then, incubated in the dark for 45 min, and the absorbance was measured at 415 nm. The quantity was determined using the quercetin calibration curve. The findings were expressed as quercetin equivalent (QE) mg/100 mL of a sample [17]. The experiment was conducted in triplicate, and the results were presented as mean ± SD.
2.6. GCMS Analysis
The ethanolic extract of endophytic fungi was dissolved in methanol and subjected to GC‐MS to determine its phytochemical constituents. The GC‐MS‐QP 2010 Plus instrument was used for sample analysis, with an ionization voltage of 70 eV, injector temperature of 250°C, and split injector mode of 36.5 cm/s and pressure of 57.5 kPa. A sample of 1 µL was injected into a mobile phase of helium at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The oven temperature was adjusted to 100°C, then 280°C for 9 min, resulting in a total run time of 34 min. The compounds were identified by comparing unknown and known spectrums and specifying their names, molecular weights, molecular formulas, retention times, peak areas, and compound nature. The identification of chemical constituents was carried out by comparing the obtained mass spectra and retention indices with reference spectra from the NIST and Wiley Mass Spectral Libraries.
2.7. LCMS Analysis
LC–MS analysis of fungal crude extracts was carried out using an Acquity UPLC system coupled with an Acquity SQD mass spectrometer (Waters, USA). Metabolite separation was achieved on a BEH C18 reversed‐phase column (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm) using a gradient elution system consisting of 0.1% formic acid in water (mobile phase A) and acetonitrile (mobile phase B). A 10 µL sample was injected, and the flow rate was maintained at 0.50 mL min− 1. The gradient program started with 95% A and 5% B, which was gradually shifted to 5% A and 95% B by 3 min, held until 4 min for elution of nonpolar compounds, and then returned to initial conditions at 5 min, followed by equilibration until 6 min. Detection was performed at wavelengths of 210, 254, 280, and 320 nm to capture a broad range of secondary metabolites. Mass spectrometric analysis was conducted using electrospray ionization (ESI) in both positive and negative modes, with a capillary voltage of 2.8 kV and cone voltage of 30 V. The ion source temperature was set at 140°C, and desolvation was carried out at 400°C with a gas flow of 600 L h− 1. Data acquisition and processing were performed using MassLynx software (version 4.1). Metabolite identification was based on retention time, m/z values, isotopic distribution, and comparison with spectral libraries and literature reports. LC–MS is a highly sensitive and selective technique widely used for rapid characterization of fungal secondary metabolites such as alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, and phenolics.
2.8. Antioxidant Activity
2.8.1. DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity
The DPPH radical's scavenging ability was used to assess the antioxidant activity. The DPPH test is conducted using the method described by Rice–Evans et al. [18]. The endophytic fungal extract was tested at 100 µg and combined in various concentrations with 100 µL of freshly prepared DPPH solution (40 mM). The samples were thoroughly mixed and stored for 30 min at room temperature and in the dark to get the desired color. The mixtures were analyzed for their DPPH radical‐scavenging activity using a UV–vis spectrophotometer, observing their absorbance at 517 nm. The antioxidant activity was calculated using the formula:
Ac is the absorbance of the control reaction
Ae is of the test extract
2.9. Antibacterial Activity
The antimicrobial activity of the fungal extracts was screened using the agar well diffusion method [19] using Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus as test organisms. The inoculum was spread evenly over the sterile agar plates. The extract was added to the sterile agar plates at different concentrations (30, 60, 90, and 120 µL/well). In addition to the control drug Ciprofloxacin (30 µg), and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The inhibition zones were measured in millimeters.
2.10. Cytotoxicity and Anticancer Activity
2.10.1. Cell Line
A375 skin cancer cell line, and L929 fibroblast cell lines where grown in DMEM (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium) media with 10% FBS provided by the National Centre for Cell Science in Pune, India. The cells were maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2.
2.10.2. MTT Cell Viability Assay
The cytotoxicity of the compound was assessed through an MTT assay. A375 and L929 cells were seeded in 96 microtiter plates at 1.4 × 104 cells/well and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. 200 µL of different test concentrations (50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 µg/mL from stock) of test drugs were added to the well and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 atmosphere for 24 h. After 24 h of treatment, 0.5 mg/mL MTT reagent was added to the medium and incubated for 3 h. After removing the MTT solution, 100 µL of DMSO was added to each well to dissolve the formazan crystals [20]. After complete solubilization, the absorbance at 570 and 630 nm was measured. IC50 was determined to be 50% inhibition of viability, and the sample's impact on A375 and L929 cell proliferation was expressed as a percentage of cell viability.
2.11. Anti‐Inflammatory
The protein denaturation method by the standard methodology to evaluate the anti‐inflammatory activity of the ethanolic extract of the Aspergillus flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp., [21]. The reaction mixture was with phosphate‐buffered saline (1 mL) and 50 µL of bovine serum albumin (BSA). Aspirin is used as a standard drug. The sample and aspirin were incubated for 15 min at room temperature. Denaturation was induced by maintaining the mixture at 70°C in a hot water bath for 15 min. Absorbance was measured at 660 nm using a Labman UV‐vis spectrophotometer, and the percentage inhibition of protein denaturation was calculated.
where, Ac = absorbance of control; At = absorbance of test samples.
2.12. Wound Healing
The study used a wound‐healing technique to examine cell migration and proliferation in samples. The cells were seeded in 12‐well plates and grown for 24 h at 37°C in a humidified environment, resulting in a confluent cell monolayer. After adhesion, the media was removed, and the monolayer was scraped with a micropipette, and reference points were marked. Cellular debris was removed from the wells by washing with PBS. Ascorbic acid was used as a positive control, and untreated cells were used as a negative control and incubated at 37°C with a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Cell migration, wound closure, and morphological changes in the cells were observed by capturing images using an inverted microscope equipped with a digital camera at different time intervals (12 and 24 h). The width of the scratch and wound closure was examined quantitatively at 4X resolution with Mag Vision Software. The migration rate and % wound closure were calculated using the formula, respectively [22, 23].
where A 0 = area of the wound at time zero, A t = area after time t, W i = early wound width, W f = closing wound width measured in µm, and T = time taken for migration in hours.
2.13. Statistical Analysis
All the results (triplicates) were represented as mean ± standard deviation. One‐way ANOVA was carried out to check the variation between the samples using IBM SPSS Statistics 20, Ink, India.
3. Results
3.1. Isolation and Molecular Identification of Endophytic Fungi
The three endophytes were isolated from leaves and identified based on their characteristics, reproductive structure, and molecular basis. The isolates were slow‐growing, exhibiting dark, round‐shaped colonies with mycelia on PDA medium. The 7‐day‐old fungal culture was observed, and the mycelia were stained with lactophenol cotton blue, showing the presence of conidiophores and spores. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the ITS sequence. The fungal isolates were identified as A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp. The accession numbers of the isolates were PV569472, PV569473, and PV569474 (Figures 1 and 2).
FIGURE 1.

Isolated endophytic fungal colony and its microscopic structure of (A) Aspergillus flavus, (B) Pleosporales sp., and (C) Endothia sp.
FIGURE 2.

Phylogenetic tree of endophytic fungi isolated from Aspergillus flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp. based on the internal transcribed spacer.
3.2. Crude Extraction
The phytochemical study of the ethanolic fungal extract showed a significant amount of plant secondary metabolites. The total yield of the ethanolic extract of A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp., was determined by 31.26%, 40.41%, and 11.66% (w/w), respectively.
3.3. FTIR Analysis
The FTIR spectrum was used to identify the functional groups of active components present in the fungal extract based on their IR radiation peaks. The result of the FTIR analysis revealed the presence of alcohol, Alkene, Amine, Alkane, Vinyl ether, Sulfonyl chloride, and secondary amine (Tables 1, 2, 3).
TABLE 1.
FTIR interpretation of the ethanolic extract of Aspergillus flavus.
| Frequency | Functional group | Bond strength | Nature of the bond |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3287.85 | Alcohol | O─H stretching | Covalent bond |
| 2925.14 | Alkane | C─H stretching | Nonpolar |
| 1621.66 | Conjugated alkene | C═C stretching | Nonpolar |
| 1456.53 | Alkane | C─H bending | Covalent bond |
| 1083.13 | Primary alcohol | C─O stretching | Polar covalent bond |
TABLE 2.
FTIR interpretation of the ethanolic extract of Pleosporales sp.
| Frequency | Functional group | Bond strength | Nature of the bond |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3353.3 | Secondary amine | N─H stretching | Nonpolar |
| 2924.35 | Amine salt | N─H stretching | Nonpolar |
| 1629.15 | Alkene | C═C stretching | Nonpolar |
| 1405.28 | Sulfonyl chloride | S═O stretching | Covalent bond |
TABLE 3.
FTIR interpretation of the ethanolic extract of Endothia sp.
| Frequency | Functional group | Bond strength | Nature of the bond |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2925.97 | Alkane | C─H stretching | Covalent bond |
| 1625.36 | Conjugated alkene | C═C stretching | Nonpolar |
| 1406.71 | Sulfonyl Chloride | S═O stretching | Covalent bond |
| 1085.41 | Primary alcohol | C─O stretching | Polar covalent bond |
| 1026.23 | Amine | C─N stretching | Basic |
| 931.70 | Alkene | C═C bending | Nonpolar |
3.4. Total Flavonoid Content
The total flavonoid content was estimated using the AlCl3 method, with Quercetin as the standard drug. The total flavonoid content in the crude extract of A. flavus (23.32%), Pleosporales sp. (35.32%), and Endothia sp. (31.72%).
3.5. GC‐MS Analysis
The ethanolic fungal extracts of GC‐MS analysis revealed the phytoconstituent that may contribute to its therapeutic effects. The phytochemical compounds were identified based on their peak area, molecular formula, molecular weight, and retention time. The major compounds of various ethanolic extracts of A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp. Arbiraterone and Ergosterol was found to be major compounds in the A. flavus. Hexadeconoic acid, ethyl ester and (E)‐9‐Octadecenoic acid, ethyl ester was found to be a major compounds in the Pleosporales, Sorbitol and Carbamic acid, N‐[10,11‐dihydro‐5‐(2‐methylamino‐1‐oxoethyl)‐3‐5H‐dibenzo[b,f]azepinyl]‐, ethyl ester was found to be a major compound in Endothia sp., overall, the GC‐MS results of the ethanolic extract showed the presence of 30, 30, and 30 phytocompounds, respectively and the results are shown in (Tables 4, 5, 6).
TABLE 4.
GC‐MS analysis of phytochemical compounds in the ethanolic extract of Aspergillus flavus.
| Compound name | Molecular formula | Molecular weight | Retention time | Peak area in % | Nature of the compound | Uses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hydrazine, (2‐methyl‐1‐propenyl)‐ | C4H10N2 | 86 | 2.710 | 1.63 | Alkene | Anticancer, antimicrobial, and antifungal |
| Cyclooctasiloxane, hexadecamethyl‐ | C16H48O8Si8 | 592 | 14.042 | 4.12 | Alkaloids | Antibacterial, wound healing |
| .alpha.‐D‐Galactopyranoside, methyl | C7H14O6 | 194 | 15.747 | 3.48 | Glycosides | Anticancer, anti‐inflammatory |
| Cyclononasiloxane, octadecamethyl‐ | C18H54O9Si9 | 666 | 17.238 | 3.28 | Fatty acid | Antibacterial |
| Octasiloxane, 1,1,3,3,5,5,7,7,9,9,11,11,13,13,15,15‐hexadecamethyl | C16H50O7Si8 | 578 | 19.685 | 1.36 | Fatty acid ester | Supporting metabolic and heart health |
| n‐Hexadecanoic acid | C16H32O2 | 256 | 20.331 | 1.67 | Palmitric acid (saturated fatty acid) | Antioxidant, hypocholesterolemic, nematicide, pesticide, lubricant |
| Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester | C18H36O2 | 284 | 20.919 | 2.19 | Palmitic acid ester | Antioxidant, hemolytic, hypocholesterolemic, flavor, nematicide, antiandrogenic. |
| Cyclononasiloxane, octadecamethyl‐ | C18H54O9Si9 | 666 | 22.194 | 1.53 | Fatty acids |
Antibacterial |
| 9‐octadecenoic acid, 2,2,2‐trifluoroethyl ester | C20H35F3O2 | 364 | 23.307 | 1.97 | Fatty acid ester | Antimicrobial |
| 9,12‐Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)‐ | C18H32O2 | 280 | 23.718 | 3.22 | Linoleic acid | Anticoronary, antialopecic, antiarteriosclerotic, antieczemic, cancer preventive, |
| (E)‐9‐Octadecenoic acid ethyl ester | C20H38O2 | 310 | 23.837 | 4.19 |
Ester |
Antimicrobial, antiparasitic, cosmetic |
| Octadecanoic acid, ethyl ester | C20H40O2 | 312 | 24.295 | 1.35 | Ester | Inflammatory, anticancer, insectifuge |
| Cyclononasiloxane, octadecamethyl‐ | C18H54O9Si9 | 666 | 32.942 | 1.06 | Essential oil | Cosmetics and personal care products due to its desirable properties |
| Squalene | C30H50 | 410 | 33.886 | 1.09 | Triterpene | Neutralize different xenobiotics, anti‐ inflammatory, antiatherosclerotic |
| Cyclodecasiloxane, eicosamethyl‐ | C20H60O10Si10 | 740 | 34.740 | 1.18 | Cyclic methyl siloxane | Cosmetic formulations |
| 5‐Cholesten‐3beta‐yl isobutyl carbonate | C32H54O3 | 486 | 34.921 | 1.57 | Sterol | Antimicrobial, drug delivery |
| Ergosterol | C28H44O | 396 | 38.943 | 8.05 | Sterol | Anticancer |
| 4‐Hydroxy‐2‐methylbenzoic acid, TMS | C14H24O3Si2 | 296 | 39.575 | 1.73 | Phenol | Antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory and antimicrobial |
| Murolan‐3,9(11)‐diene‐10‐peroxy | C15H24O2 | 236 | 40.436 | 1.03 | Terpene |
Antioxidant, antimicrobial |
| Anthraergostatetraenol | C28H42O | 394 | 40.729 | 2.59 | Steroid | Anticancer, antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory and antimicrobial |
| Heptasiloxane, hexadecamethyl‐ | C16H48O6Si7 | 532 | 41.246 | 1.02 | Organosilicon |
Antibacterial |
| 4‐[1‐(1‐Hydroxyethyl)‐1H‐indol‐4‐yl]‐2‐methylbut‐2‐en‐1‐ | C15H19NO2 | 245 | 42.218 | 4.38 | Alkaloid | Neuroactive, anti‐inflammatory and anticancer |
| Abiraterone | C24H31NO | 349 | 42.461 | 33.08 | Sterol | Anticancer |
| 3‐(4,7‐Dimethylocta‐3,7‐dienyl)‐1H‐indole | C18H23N | 253 | 42.784 | 3.79 | Antioxidant, anti‐inflammattory, anticancer |
TABLE 5.
GC‐MS analysis of compounds in the ethanolic extract of Pleosporales sp.
| Compound name | Molecular formula | Molecular weight | Retention time | Peak area in % | Nature of the compound | Uses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Argon | Ar | 40 | 2.877 | 1.18 | Anti‐inflammatory, wound healing, | |
| Allene | C3H4 | 40 | 3.092 | 1.32 | Alkene | Anticancer, anti‐inflammatory |
| 2‐(Aminomethyl)‐4‐methylpentanoic acid, N‐methyl‐, methyl | C9H19NO2 | 173 | 15.269 | 1.77 | Amino acids | Drug delivery, enzyme inhibitor |
| Acetamide, N‐methyl‐N‐heptyl‐ | C10H21NO | 171 | 15.411 | 1.24 | Amide | Anti‐inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antifungal |
| .alpha.‐D‐Galactopyranoside, methyl | C7H14O6 | 194 | 15.746 | 2.38 | Glycoside | Antimicrobial, antidiabetic |
| Diimidotricarbonic diamide | C3H6N4O3 | 146 | 15.896 | 1.19 | Amide | Antimicrobial, antidiabetic, anti‐inflammatory, anticancer |
| 3‐(Prop‐2‐en‐1‐yloxy)propan‐1‐ol, TMS | C9H20O2Si | 188 | 16.225 | 1.43 | Alcohol | Tissue engineering, anticancer, antimicrobial |
| d‐Glycero‐d‐galacto‐heptose | C7H14O7 | 210 | 18.041 | 2.22 | Antimicrobial, anti ‐inflammatory | |
| n‐Hexadecanoic acid | C16H32O2 | 256 | 20.355 | 7.77 | Fatty acid | Antioxidant, hypocholesterolemic, nematicide, pesticide, lubricant, antiandrogenic, hemolytic |
| Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester | C18H36O2 | 284 | 20.925 | 18.76 | Palmitic acid ester | Antioxidant, hemolytic, hypocholesterolemic, flavor, nematicide, antiandrogenic. |
| 9,12‐Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)‐ | C18H32O2 | 280 | 23.214 | 3.64 | Fatty Acid | Anti‐inflammatory, hypocholesterolemic, cancer preventive, insectifuge, |
| Oleic Acid | C18H34O2 | 282 | 23.327 | 4.67 | Fatty acid | allergenic, anti‐inflammatory, anticancer, insectifuge |
| trans, trans‐9, 12‐Octadecadienoic acid, propyl ester | C21H38O2 | 322 | 23.724 | 8.06 | Ester | Anti‐inflammatory, anticancer, antioxidant. |
| (E)‐9‐Octadecenoic acid ethyl ester | C20H38O2 | 310 | 23.841 | 12.00 | Ester | Anti‐inflammatory, antimicrobial |
| Octadecanoic acid, ethyl ester | C20H40O2 | 312 | 24.300 | 3.71 | Ester | Inflammatory, anticancer, insectifuge |
| 9,12‐Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)‐, 2,3‐dihydroxypropyl ester | C21H38O4 | 354 | 32.037 | 1.50 | Ester | Anti‐inflammatory, antioxidant. |
| Oleoyl chloride | C18H33ClO | 300 | 32.113 | 1.94 | Anticancer, wound healing, | |
| 5,7,9(11)‐Androstatriene, 3‐hydroxy‐17‐oxo‐ | C19H24O2 | 284 | 35.801 | 0.98 | steroid. | Anticancer, anti‐inflammatory |
| Mannonic acid (Et‐TFA) | C18H11F15O12 | 704 | 36.175 | 1.03 | Carboxylic acid | Anti‐inflammatory, anticancer |
| Dehydroergosterol 3,5‐dinitrobenzoate | C35H44N2O6 | 588 | 38.433 | 1.30 | Sterol | Antifungal, Anti‐inflammatory, membrane interaction study |
| 4 15‐nor‐Prezizaan‐7‐one | 38.515 | 1.73 | Steroid | Anti‐inflammatory, anticancer | ||
| 2‐(4‐(1‐Hydroxyethyl)‐2,5‐dimethoxyphenyl)ethylamine, N | C17H25NO5 | 323 | 38.667 | 1.52 | Amine | Neuropharmacology, Antioxidant |
| Ergosterol | C28H44O | 396 | 38.940 | 7.21 | Sterol | Antifungal, antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, anticancer |
| 6‐Dimethyl(chloromethyl)silyloxytetradecane | C17H37ClOSi | 320 | 39.233 | 1.96 | Silicon | Wound healing, anticancer, antibacterial |
| 3‐Hydroxypiperidin‐2‐one | C5H9NO2 | 115 | 39.390 | 1.34 | Lactam | Antimicrobial, enzyme inhibitors |
| 2‐Methyl‐N‐(4‐methylphenyl)benzene‐1‐carboximidic acid, | C18H23NOSi | 297 | 39.475 | 1.07 | Carboximidic acid | Antimicrobial, anticancer |
| 2,4,6‐Cycloheptatrien‐1‐one, 3,5‐bis‐trimethylsilyl‐ | C13H22OSi2 | 250 | 39.570 | 2.34 | Ketone | Antimicrobial, anticancer, anti‐inflammatory, antioxidant |
| 1‐Pentene, 1,3‐diphenyl‐1‐(trimethylsilyloxy)‐ | C20H26OSi | 310 | 39.733 | 1.84 | Alkene | Drug delivery, anticancer, anti‐inflammatory |
| 4‐Chloro‐8‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyl‐5‐nitroquinolin‐2‐amine | C12H12ClN3O3 | 281 | 40.498 | 1.01 | Antimalaria, antibacterial, anticancer, anti‐inflammatory | |
| Ergosta‐4,6,8(14),22‐tetraen‐3‐one | C28H40O | 392 | 41.315 | 1.89 | Steroid | Antifungal, anticancer, antioxidant, cosmetic |
TABLE 6.
GC‐MS analysis of compounds in the ethanolic extract of Endothia sp.
| Compound name | Molecular formula | Molecular weight | Retention time | Peak area in % | Nature of the compound | Uses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Propyne | C3H4 | 40 | 3.051 | 1.63 | Anticancer, antiviral | |
| Glycerin | C3H8O3 | 92 | 6.176 | 2.50 | Alcohol | Flavor |
| Methyl[(1‐methyl‐2,3‐dihydropyrrol‐3‐yl)methyl]amine | C7H14N2 | 126 | 10.117 | 2.37 | Alkaloid | Antimicrobial, anticancer, neurodegenerative, anti‐inflammatory |
| Methyl[(1‐methyl‐2,3‐dihydropyrrol‐3‐yl)methyl]amine | C14H22O | 206 | 14.490 | 2.40 | Phenol | Antioxidant, Anti‐inflammatory, anticancer |
| 2R,3S‐9‐[1,3,4‐Trihydroxy‐2‐butoxymethyl]guanine | C10H15N5O5 | 285 | 14.685 | 4.28 | Antiviral, anticancer | |
| Pentane‐1,2,3,4,5‐pentaol | C5H12O5 | 152 | 14.756 | 4.09 | Alcohols | Antidiabetic, wound healing |
| .alpha.‐D‐Galactopyranoside, methyl | C7H14O6 | 194 | 15.679 | 1.15 | Glycosides | Anticancer, anti‐inflammatory |
| .alpha.‐L‐Galactopyranoside, methyl 6‐deoxy‐2‐O‐(trimethylsilyl) | C11H23BO5Si | 274 | 15.890 | 1.59 | Glycoside | Antimicrobial, Anticancer |
| 3‐Deoxy‐d‐mannitol | C6H14O5 | 166 | 16.399 | 1.41 | Alcohol | Drug delivery |
| Octadecanoic acid | C18H36O2 | 284 | 17.390 | 1.37 | Stearic acid | Antifungal, antitumor, antibacterial, cosmetic |
| Heptadecanoic acid, heptadecyl ester | C34H68O2 | 508 | 17.870 | 2.05 | Fatty acid ester | Wound healing, anti‐inflammatory, antioxidant |
| 4‐Diisopropylsilyloxytridecane | C19H42OSi | 314 | 18.070 | 3.33 | Anticancer | |
| Ethyl 2‐hexenoate, trans‐ | C8H14O2 | 142 | 18.150 | 1.74 | Ester | Antimicrobial, flavour |
| 1,1‐Cyclopropanedicarboxamide | C5H8N2O2 | 128 | 18.330 | 5.00 | Amide | Anticancer, antimicrobial, enzyme inhibition |
| Sorbitol | C6H14O6 | 182 | 18.683 | 19.81 | Alcohol | Antidiabetic, wound healing |
| n‐Hexadecanoic acid | C16H32O2 | 256 | 20.344 | 2.41 | Fatty acid | Antioxidant, hypocholesterolemic, nematicide, pesticide, lubricant, antiandrogenic, hemolytic |
| Oleyl alcohol, trifluoroacetate | C20H35F3O2 | 364 | 23.316 | 2.53 | Ester | Anticancer, anti‐inflammatory |
| 9,12‐Octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)‐ | C18H32O2 | 280 | 23.727 | 3.19 | Linoleic acid | Anticoronary, antialopecic, antiarteriosclerotic, |
| Octadecanoic acid, ethyl ester | C20H40O2 | 312 | 24.298 | 1.76 | Ester | Anti‐inflammatory, anticancer, insectifuge |
| 4‐Piperidinone, 1,2,5‐trimethyl‐, o‐(4‐nitrophenyl)oxime | C14H19N3O3 | 277 | 25.053 | 2.26 | Oxime | Anticancer, antimicrobial, enzyme inihibition |
| 5‐Bromo‐N,N‐dimethyl‐2H‐1,2,4‐triazole‐3‐carboxamide | C5H7BrN4O | 218 | 26.124 | 2.20 | Amide | Antimicrobial, anticancer, |
| Pentasiloxane, dodecamethyl‐ | C12H36O4Si5 | 384 | 36.380 | 1.95 | Silicon | Wound healing, cosmetics, |
| 3‐(2‐Benzyl‐benzoimidazol‐1‐yl)‐propane‐1,2‐diol | C17H18N2O2 | 282 | 38.455 | 1.56 | Antimicrobial, anticancer, anti‐inflammmatory | |
| Ergosterol | C28H44O | 396 | 38.951 | 3.57 | Sterol | Antifungal, anticancer. |
| Methyl 2‐oxo‐5,6,7,8‐tetrahydro‐1H‐quinoline‐3‐carboxylate | C11H13NO3 | 207 | 39.155 | 1.68 | Antimicrobial, anticancer, anti‐inflammmatory | |
| 1‐(3,4‐Dihydroxyphenyl)‐2‐(methylamino)ethan‐1‐one, 2TM | C15H27NO3Si2 | 325 | 39.705 | 5.87 | ketone | Antioxidant, anticancer, neurological |
| 3‐Methyl‐7‐(4‐methyl‐piperazin‐1‐yl)‐3H‐thiazolo[4,5‐d]pyrimidine‐2‐thione | C11H15N5S2 | 281 | 39.930 | 2.19 | Antimicrobial, anticancer, antioxidant | |
| Carbamic acid, N‐[10,11‐dihydro‐5‐(2‐methylamino‐1‐oxoeth | C20H23N3O3 | 353 | 40.205 | 6.75 | Amide | Antimicrobial, anticancer, anti‐inflammatory |
| 5 Trimethylsilyl‐di(timethylsiloxy)‐silane | C9H27O2Si4 | 279 | 41.353 | 2.73 | Silane | Wound healing, antimicrobial, cosmetic |
3.6. LCMS Analysis
The LC–MS analysis of ethanolic extract of A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp. revealed the presence of a wide range of secondary metabolites with varying chemical characteristics. Chromatographic detection at multiple wavelengths (210, 254, 280, and 320 nm) showed multiple peaks corresponding to compounds with different polarities and structural classes. The total ion chromatograms obtained in both positive and negative ionization modes confirmed the presence of both polar and non‐polar metabolites distributed across different retention times. Early eluting peaks represented polar compounds, whereas later retention times corresponded to relatively hydrophobic metabolites.
In the ethanolic extract of A. flavus, several compounds were detected including 4‐methyl‐5‐thiazoleethanol, exemestane derivatives, nomegestrol acetate derivatives, mangostin trimethyl ether, N‐feruloyl‐octopamine, flavonol derivatives, and quinic acid derivatives. Additional metabolites such as pomiferin, voacristine, honokiol, and 4‐methylabyssinone V were observed in negative ion mode. These findings indicate that extract contains a mixture of phenolics, flavonoids, alkaloids, and steroid‐like compounds. The results are shown in Table 7.
TABLE 7.
LCMS analysis of ethanol extract of Aspergillus flavus.
| RT (min) | Compound | m/z (approx.) | Mode | Nature (Class) | Reported biological activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.312 | 4‐Methyl‐5‐thiazoleethanol | ∼144 [M + H]+ | Positive | Thiazole derivative | Antimicrobial, antioxidant |
| 0.642 | Exemestane | ∼297 [M + H]+ | Positive | Steroidal compound | Anticancer |
| 0.888 | Nomegestrol acetate | ∼413 [M + H]+ | Positive | Steroid hormone | Hormonal activity |
| 0.972 | Quassinoid derivative | ∼400+ [M + H]+ | Positive | Quassinoids | Antimalarial, anticancer |
| 1.042 | 7‐beta‐Hydroxylathyrol | ∼345 [M + Na]+ | Positive | Diterpenoid | Anti‐inflammatory |
| 1.077 | Mangostin trimethyl ether | ∼425 [M + H]+ | Positive | Xanthone | Antioxidant, anticancer |
| 1.615 | Isoquinoline derivative | ∼350 [M + H]+ | Positive | Alkaloid | Neuroactive |
| 2.518 | N‐feruloyl‐octopamine | ∼332 [M + Na]+ | Positive | Phenolic amide | Antioxidant |
| 2.640 | Aporphine derivative | ∼342 [M + H]+ | Positive | Alkaloid | Antimicrobial |
| 2.761 | Flavonol derivative | ∼600+ [M + H]+ | Positive | Flavonoid | Anti‐inflammatory |
| 2.970 | Valine derivative | ∼500+ [M + H]+ | Positive | Amino acid derivative | Metabolic role |
| 3.178 | Urapidil | ∼387 [M + H]+ | Positive | Phenylpiperazine | Antihypertensive |
| 3.838 | Hydroxybenzaldehyde derivative | ∼300+ [M + Na]+ | Positive | Phenolic aldehyde | Antioxidant |
| 4.585 | 1,3,5‐Tricaffeoylquinic acid | ∼515 [M + H]+ | Positive | Quinic acid | Hepatoprotective |
| 5.557 | 10‐Hydroxyusambarine | ∼350+ [M + H]+ | Positive | Harmala alkaloid | Neuroactive |
| 0.286 | 4‐O‐Methylphloracetophenone | ∼180 [M‐H]‐ | Negative | Phenolic ketone | Antioxidant |
| 1.971 | Lagochilin | ∼350 [M − H]− | Negative | Diterpenoid | Anti‐inflammatory |
| 2.527 | Alpha‐guaiaconic acid | ∼300 [M − H]− | Negative | Phenolic compound | Antioxidant |
| 2.961 | Valine derivative | ∼500+ [M − H]− | Negative | Amino acid derivative | Metabolic role |
| 3.048 | Calopocarpin | ∼350 [M − H]− | Negative | Pterocarpan | Antimicrobial |
| 3.291 | Dofetilide | ∼440 [M − H]− | Negative | Sulfanilide | Cardiac drug |
| 3.360 | Voacristine | ∼368 [M − H]− | Negative | Indole alkaloid | Anticancer |
| 3.794 | Pomiferin | ∼453 [M − H]− | Negative | Isoflavone | Anti‐inflammatory |
| 4.420 | 4‐Methylabyssinone V | ∼435 [M − H]− | Negative | Flavanone | Antioxidant |
Ethanolic extract of Pleosporales sp. exhibited a comparatively moderate number of metabolites. The major compounds identified included mangostin trimethyl ether, alibendol, N‐feruloyl‐octopamine, hydroxybenzaldehyde derivatives, and quinic acid derivatives. In addition, isosakuranetin, linoleic acid, elaidic acid, and honokiol were detected in negative ion mode. These results suggest that extract mainly consists of phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and fatty acids (Table 8).
TABLE 8.
LCMS analysis of ethanol extract of Pleosporales sp.
| RT (min) | Compound | m/z (approx.) | Mode | Nature (Class) | Reported biological activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.077 | Mangostin trimethyl ether | ∼425 [M + H]+ | Positive | Xanthone | Anticancer |
| 1.632 | Alibendol | ∼239 [M + H]+ | Positive | Salicylamide | Anti‐inflammatory |
| 2.518 | N‐feruloyl‐octopamine | ∼332 [M + Na]+ | Positive | Phenolic amide | Antioxidant |
| 3.855 | Hydroxybenzaldehyde derivative | ∼300+ [M + Na]+ | Positive | Phenolic aldehyde | Antimicrobial |
| 4.567 | 1,3,5‐Tricaffeoylquinic acid | ∼515 [M + H]+ | Positive | Quinic acid | Hepatoprotective |
| 0.321 | Obscurolide A1 | ∼250 [M − H]− | Negative | Aminobenzoic acid | Antimicrobial |
| 0.842 | Methoxychromone derivative | ∼260 [M − H]− | Negative | Chromone | Antioxidant |
| 1.624 | Methoxybenzoic acid derivative | ∼300 [M − H]− | Negative | Phenolic acid | Antioxidant |
| 2.336 | Pyranocoumarin | ∼350 [M − H]− | Negative | Coumarin | Anticancer |
| 2.648 | Coumarin derivative | ∼320 [M − H]− | Negative | Coumarin | Anti‐inflammatory |
| 3.030 | Isosakuranetin | ∼285 [M − H]− | Negative | Flavonoid | Antioxidant |
| 3.169 | Linoleic acid | ∼279 [M − H]− | Negative | Fatty acid | Anti‐inflammatory |
| 3.360 | Elaidic acid | ∼281 [M − H]− | Negative | Fatty acid | Lipid metabolism |
| 3.829 | Coumarin glycoside | ∼500+ [M − H]− | Negative | Glycoside | Antioxidant |
| 4.263 | Honokiol | ∼265 [M − H]− | Negative | Biphenyl | Anticancer |
Ethanolic extract of Endothia showed a higher number of metabolites distributed across the chromatographic gradient. Identified compounds included 4‐methyl‐5‐thiazoleethanol, mangostin trimethyl ether, N‐feruloyl‐octopamine, (‐)‐eburnamonine, saliniketal A, Mexicanolide derivatives, quinic acid derivatives, aphidicolin, trimethoxychalcone, linoleic acid, macrolide derivatives, and terpene lactones. These findings indicate that extract contains a diverse group of metabolites including alkaloids, terpenoids, chalcones, macrolides, and fatty acids (Table 9).
TABLE 9.
LCMS analysis of ethanol extract of Endothia sp.
| RT (min) | Compound | m/z (approx.) | Mode | Nature (Class) | Reported biological activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.312 | 4‐Methyl‐5‐thiazoleethanol | ∼144 [M + H]+ | Positive | Thiazole | Antimicrobial |
| 1.077 | Mangostin trimethyl ether | ∼425 [M + H]+ | Positive | Xanthone | Antioxidant |
| 1.754 | Terpene glycoside | ∼600+ [M + H]+ | Positive | Glycoside | Antioxidant |
| 2.518 | N‐feruloyl‐octopamine | ∼332 [M + Na]+ | Positive | Phenolic amide | Neuroprotective |
| 2.622 | (‐)‐Eburnamonine | ∼352 [M + Na]+ | Positive | Alkaloid | Neuroprotective |
| 2.778 | Triazole derivative | ∼350 [M + H]+ | Positive | Heterocycle | Antifungal |
| 3.022 | Terpene glycoside | ∼600+ [M + Na]+ | Positive | Glycoside | Antioxidant |
| 3.456 | Aporphine derivative | ∼342 [M + H]+ | Positive | Alkaloid | Neuroactive |
| 3.508 | Saliniketal A | ∼400 [M + Na]+ | Positive | Sesquiterpenoid | Cytotoxic |
| 3.612 | Mexicanolide derivative | ∼500 [M + Na]+ | Positive | Terpenoid | Anticancer |
| 3.873 | Hydroxybenzaldehyde derivative | ∼300+ [M + Na]+ | Positive | Phenolic | Antioxidant |
| 4.567 | 1,3,5‐Tricaffeoylquinic acid | ∼515 [M + H]+ | Positive | Quinic acid | Anti‐inflammatory |
| 0.321 | Obscurolide A1 | ∼250 [M − H]− | Negative | Aminobenzoic acid | Antimicrobial |
| 1.641 | Aphidicolin | ∼337 [M − H]− | Negative | Diterpenoid | Antiviral |
| 1.693 | Trimethoxychalcone | ∼330 [M − H]− | Negative | Chalcone | Anticancer |
| 2.110 | Linoleic acid | ∼279 [M − H]− | Negative | Fatty acid | Anti‐inflammatory |
| 2.370 | Indole‐3‐acetyl‐L‐phenylalanine | ∼350 [M − H]− | Negative | Amino acid derivative | Growth regulator |
| 2.544 | Dihydropyranone derivative | ∼300 [M − H]− | Negative | Lactone | Antimicrobial |
| 2.631 | Aspartame | ∼293 [M − H]− | Negative | Peptide | Metabolic relevance |
| 3.169 | Macrolide derivative | ∼400 + [M − H]− | Negative | Macrolide | Antibacterial |
| 3.360 | Sesquiterpenoid derivative | ∼300 [M − H]− | Negative | Terpenoid | Anti‐inflammatory |
| 4.350 | Terpene lactone | ∼300 [M − H]− | Negative | Terpenoid | Anti‐inflammatory |
| 4.454 | 4‐Methylabyssinone V | ∼435 [M − H]− | Negative | Flavanone | Antioxidant |
3.7. Antioxidant Activity
3.7.1. Radical Scavenging Assay Using 2,2‐diphenyl‐2‐picrylhydrazyl (DPPH)
In case of the DPPH assay, the ethanol extract of A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp. using the DPPH free radical scavenging assay. The three fungal extracts exhibited good scavenging activity, but the inhibition percentage was less compared to the standard ascorbic acid. The percentage inhibition of the A. flavus was (58.01 ± 0.386); Pleosporales sp. (50.66 ± 0.18); Endothia sp. (43.23 ± 0.23 and the standard ascorbic acid showed around 81.59 ± 0.5 (Table 10 and Figure 3).
TABLE 10.
DPPH assay of different ethanolic fungal extracts.
| Concentration (µg/mL) | Ascorbic acid | Aspergillus flavus | Pleosporales sp. | Endothia sp. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 34.13 ± 0.19 | 6.64 ± 0.22 | 10.05 ± 0.21 | 4.56 ± 0.23 |
| 100 | 49.86 ± 0.91 | 13.87 ± 0.31 | 15.77 ± 0.29 | 18.45 ± 0.14 |
| 150 | 63.46 ± 0.41 | 29.93 ± 0.29 | 26.06 ± 0.30 | 29.53 ± 0.14 |
| 200 | 76.84 ± 0.44 | 42.53 ± 0.23 | 37.97 ± 0.19 | 35.24 ± 0.26 |
| 250 | 81.59 ± 0.52 | 58.01 ± 0.38 | 50.66 ± 0.18 | 43.23 ± 0.23 |
| IC50 (µg/mL) | 104 | 225 | 255 | 276 |
The results are expressed as mean ± standard error.
FIGURE 3.

DPPH scavenging assay for the std Ascorbic acid and funal extract.
3.8. Antibacterial Activity
Ethanol extract of the A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp., had the greatest zone of inhibition against E. coli and S. aureus of all the fungal extracts tested for antibacterial activity. With a maximum inhibitory zone of 19 mm in A. flavus extract was found to be more effective against S. aureus than the Pleosporales sp. (14 mm), and Endothia sp. (12 mm). A maximum inhibitory zone of 16 mm in A. flavus was found to be more sensitive to E. coli than the Pleosporales sp. (12 mm), and Endothia sp. (5 mm) (Table 11 and Figure 4).
TABLE 11.
Zone of inhibition (in mm) for different ethanolic fungal extracts.
| Types of fungi | Inhibition zone (mm) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Staphylococcus aureus | Escherichia coli | |||||||
| 30 µg | 60 µg | 90 µg | 120 µg | 30 µg | 60 µg | 90 µg | 120 µg | |
| Aspergillus flavus | 14 | 16 | 14 | 19 | 10 | 11 | 13 | 16 |
| Pleosporales sp. | 3 | 4 | 12 | 14 | 9 | 12 | 13 | 12 |
| Endothia sp. | 10 | 15 | 20 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Control | 30 | 28 | ||||||
FIGURE 4.

Antibacterial activity of the fungal extract against S. aureus and E. coli.
3.9. Cytotoxicity and Anticancer Activity
The ethanol extract of A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp., was used to treat the A375 (skin melanoma) cell line and L929 (noncancerous cell line) along with standard drug cisplatin as a positive and untreated cells as a negative control. The percentage of cell viability in the non‐cancerous (L929) cells decreased as the concentration of the extract increased. All the tested extracts showed cytotoxic nature at higher concentrations. At higher concentration, the ethanol extracts of A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp. showed cell viability as 32.70 ± 2.82, 28.63 ± 0.62, and 31.66 ± 1.14, respectively. The results are shown in Table 12 and Figures 5 and 6.
TABLE 12.
Growth inhibitory activity of different ethanolic fungal extracts against the L929 cell line.
| Concentration (µg/mL) | Percentage of cell viability | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspergillus flavus | Pleosporales sp. | Endothia sp. | |
| 50 | 91.43 ± 1.77 | 86.20 ± 1.35 | 90.38 ± 0.94 |
| 100 | 78.16 ± 1.25 | 70.42 ± 0.83 | 78.78 ± 1.46 |
| 150 | 72.62 ± 0.52 | 58.20 ± 1.56 | 64.36 ± 1.88 |
| 200 | 59.14 ± 1.88 | 45.24 ± 1.77 | 53.39± 1.56 |
| 250 | 32.064 ± 2.82 | 28.63 ± 0.62 | 31.66 ± 1.14 |
| Cisplatin | 10.44 ± 0.62 | ||
The results are represented as mean ± standard error.
FIGURE 5.

Percentage inhibition of cell viability of different ethanolic fungal extracts in the non‐cancerous (L929) cell line.
FIGURE 6.

Morphological changes in the L929 cell line after treatment with the different ethanolic fungal extracts.
After the toxicity study, the extract was subjected to anticancer activity against the skin cancer (A375) cell line using cisplatin as a standard drug for comparison. In the tested cell line the fungal extract showed a significant activity by suppressing the cells growth through a decrease in the cell viability. At the initial concentration of A. flavus was observed to be 88.40 ± 1.01; Pleosporales sp. was observed to be 81.75 ± 1.35, and Endothia sp. was observed to be 91.10 ± 0.78. The standard drug cisplatin at a given concentration of 15 µg/mL significantly affects the cancer cell line with a lower percentage of cell viability of 8.67 ± 0.03. The results are shown in Table 13 and Figures 7 and 8.
TABLE 13.
Growth inhibitory activity of different ethanolic fungal extracts against A375 cell line.
| Concentration (µg/mL) | Percentage of cell viability | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspergillus flavus | Pleosporales sp. | Endothia sp. | |
| 50 | 88.40 | 81.75 | 91.10 |
| 100 | 77.36 | 64.52 | 73.64 |
| 150 | 65.76 | 54.84 | 61.14 |
| 200 | 55.63 | 31.64 | 50.45 |
| 250 | 36.93 | 20.38 | 31.30 |
| Cisplatin | 8.67 | ||
The results are represented as mean ± standard error.
FIGURE 7.

Percentage of inhibition of cell viability of the different ethanolic fungal extracts in skin cancer (A375) cell line.
FIGURE 8.

Morphological changes in the A375 cell line after treatment with different ethanolic fungal extracts.
The cellular morphology differed when untreated A375 cells were compared to treated cells. The untreated cells’ morphology was clear without any intercellular spaces. In case of the treated test samples, the number of cells gradually decreased as the concentration increased, and intercellular gaps were observed between the cells.
The IC50 value was determined using the standardized calibration curve for the fungal extract. For the A375 cell line, the IC50 value of the A. flavus was 209.46 µg/mL, whereas in the Pleosporales sp. results were 152 µg/mL, and the IC50 value of the Endothia sp. was 19.37 µg/mL.
3.10. Anti‐Inflammatory
The study evaluated the anti‐inflammatory activity of the ethanolic extract of A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp. were subjected to an anti‐inflammatory activity through protein denaturation assay. The in vitro anti‐inflammatory activity of the extracts was comparable to that of Aspirin, a reference drug. The results revealed that the standard drug, aspirin, exhibited significant anti‐inflammatory activity with a percentage of inhibition of 85.81% compared to other fungal extracts. Whereas the A. flavus showed 49.26%, Pleosporales sp. showed 67.25% and Endothia sp. showed 58.61%. The results are shown in Table 14 and Figure 9.
TABLE 14.
The anti‐inflammatory activity of ethanolic fungal extracts by protein denaturation assay.
| Concentration (µg/mL) | Percentage of protein inhibition | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard aspirin | Aspergillus flavus | Pleosporales sp. | Endothia sp. | |
| 50 | 34.72 ± 0.88 | 10.99 ± 0.84 | 34.32 ± 1.29 | 15.03 ± 1.41 |
| 100 | 54.25 ± 1.27 | 18.18 ± 0.61 | 42.64 ± 0.98 | 27.21 ± 1.14 |
| 150 | 65.28 ± 0.69 | 32.83 ± 1.33 | 48.57 ± 1.36 | 37.78 ± 1.11 |
| 200 | 74.07 ± 0.64 | 40.57 ± 0.97 | 58.29 ± 1.10 | 46.39 ± 1.02 |
| 250 | 85.81 ± 0.70 | 49.26 ± 1.46 | 67.25 ± 0.72 | 58.61 ± 1.11 |
The results are represented as mean ± standard error.
FIGURE 9.

Anti‐inflammatory activity of ethanolic fungal extracts.
3.11. Wound Healing Activity
Wound healing activity for the ethanolic extract of A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp., was studied in two ways by studying cell migration and the percentage of wound closure. In comparison, the standard drug ascorbic acid showed higher cell migration activity, followed by the fungal extract and the untreated group. For the standard ascorbic acid at 12, 24 h, the cell migration was found to be 27.70 and 19.44 µm, respectively. Similarly, the fungal extract of A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp., at 12 h was found to be 7.8, 9.27, and 14.94 µm, whereas in the 24 h the cell migration was found to be 14.25, 14.11, and 12.59 µm, respectively. In case of wound closure at 12, 24 h, the standard ascorbic acid showed a value of 68.09% and 95.17%. In contrast, the ethanolic extract of A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp. at 12 h showed 19.89%, 23.96%, and 44.54% and whereas in the 24 h the wound closure shown to be 72.74%, 72.95% and 75.10%, respectively, and for the untreated group, it was found to be 7.50% at 12 h and 17.17% for 24 h (Tables 15 and 16 and Figure 10).
TABLE 15.
Cell Migration of different fungal extracts at different durations.
| S no. | Test samples | Duration | Cell migration in µm |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Untreated | 12 h | 3.21 |
| 24 h | 3.66 | ||
| 2 | Standard | 12 h | 27.70 |
| 24 h | 19.44 | ||
| 3 | Aspergillus flavus | 12 h | 7.8 |
| 24 h | 14.25 | ||
| 4 | Pleosporales sp. | 12 h | 9.27 |
| 24 h | 14.11 | ||
| 5 | Endothia sp. | 12 h | 14.94 |
| 24 h | 12.59 |
TABLE 16.
Percentage of wound closure of the different fungal extract at different duration.
| S no. | Test samples | Duration | Percentage of wound closure |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Untreated | 12 h | 7.50 |
| 24 h | 17.17 | ||
| 2 | Standard | 12 h | 68.09 |
| 24 h | 95.17 | ||
| 3 | Aspergillus flavus | 12 h | 19.89 |
| 24 h | 72.74 | ||
| 4 | Pleosporales sp. | 12 h | 23.96 |
| 24 h | 72.95 | ||
| 5 | Endothia sp. | 12 h | 44.54 |
| 24 h | 75.10 |
FIGURE 10.

The morphological wound healing of the ethanolic fungal extract using the scratch assay.
4. Discussion
Endophytes, comprising a diverse group of microorganisms residing asymptomatically within plant tissues, significantly contribute to the host plant's biochemical repertoire, thereby influencing its medicinal properties [24, 25]. Indeed, approximately 80% of populations in Africa, Asia, and Latin America still rely on traditional medicine, underscoring the enduring significance of these botanical resources [26]. This reliance highlights the urgent need for comprehensive research into these plants, particularly concerning the bioactive compounds produced by their associated endophytes, which offer a promising avenue for drug discovery and development [27, 28]. These microorganisms are prolific producers of secondary metabolites, many of which exhibit potent biological activities relevant to pharmaceutical applications [29]. This symbiotic relationship allows plants to produce a diverse array of biologically active chemicals [30]. Historically, various herbal medicines have been integral to traditional medical systems globally, with their unique secondary metabolites providing potential candidates for novel drug development [31].
Endophytic fungi, often known as plant hidden fungi, live naturally in plant tissues and do not cause any harm to the host. Endophytic microorganisms are those that live within the tissues of plants. Endophytic fungi are microorganisms often found in plants [32]. Endophytic fungi isolated from the leaves, stems, flowers, and seeds [33]. According to Selim et al. [34] and Zuber [35] the identification of fungi was also done by using the standard protocol of Barnett and Hunter [36]. Identification is based on the morphological characteristics of a fungus growing on PDA media. Microscopic characterization was done by observing the shape and size of conidia and hyphae. According to Anita and Sridar [37] they obtained 36 isolates of endophytic fungi from the Canavalia carthatica. The internal transcribed spacer region of nuclear ribosomal DNA is widely recognized as the primary genetic barcode for the precise identification and taxonomic classification of fungal species, including endophytic fungi [38, 39]. This region, commonly referred to as ITS, is comprised of ITS1, 5.8S rRNA, and ITS2 subunits, with ITS1 and ITS2 serving as particularly valuable targets for sequencing due to their variability and phylogenetic signal [40, 41]. This characteristic variability, coupled with conserved flanking regions, facilitates the design of universal primers suitable for broad‐range fungal amplification, making ITS sequencing an indispensable tool for characterizing fungal endophyte communities [42]. In the present study, three isolates of Endophytic fungi from the Atlantia racemosa. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the ITS sequence. The fungal isolates were identified as A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp.
This investigation aims to identify and characterize the diverse array of secondary metabolites produced by endophytic fungi, which are recognized for their significant pharmaceutical potential [43]. Endophytic fungi, known for their enhanced metabolic capabilities compared to soil fungi, are prolific producers of a wide spectrum of bioactive compounds, including steroids, alkaloids, phenols, and terpenoids [44]. These compounds frequently exhibit a range of biological activities such as anticancer, antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anti‐inflammatory properties, making them valuable candidates for drug discovery and development [31, 45]. Specifically, techniques such as gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry are employed to profile the volatile organic metabolites present in these extracts, enabling a comprehensive understanding of their chemical composition [46]. This detailed analysis allows for the elucidation of both known and novel compounds, providing insights into the biosynthetic pathways and potential therapeutic applications of these fungal endophytes [46]. According to Khattab et al. [47] GC‐MS analysis of the A. flavus showed eight major compounds namely, tributylacetylcitrate (22.955), hexadecane (7.87%), pentadecane (7.81%), 1,2‐benzene dicarboxylic acid, diisoctyl ester (6.43%), 2‐methyl benzyl amine, N‐heptylN‐octyl (5.23%) benzene, (1‐methyl undecyl) (4.81%), heptadecane (4.56%) and 1,2‐benzene dicarboxylic acid, buty (4.05%). According to Samy et al. (2024) secondary metabolites produced by the endophytic fungus Pleosporales sp. isolated from the Artemisia annua were identified by using GC‐MS analysis revealed the presence of 5 compounds 13‐octadecenoic acid (19.36%), methyl palmitate (18.72%), ethyl palmitate (12.60%), and methyl linoleate (11.92%) were the major compounds and they six compounds in the methanol extracts of which methyl oleate (26.90%), methyl palmitate (25.48%), and methyl linoleate (23.39%) were the major compounds. In the present study the ethanol extract of A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp. Arbiraterone and Ergosterol were found to be major compounds in A. flavus. Hexadeconoic acid, ethyl ester, and (E)‐9‐Octadecenoic acid, ethyl ester were found to be major compounds in the Pleosporales sp., Sorbitol and Carbamic acid, N‐[10,11‐dihydro‐5‐(2‐methylamino‐1‐oxoethyl)‐3‐5H‐dibenzo[b,f]azepinyl]‐, ethyl ester was found to be a major compound in Endothia sp.
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy offers a distinctive fingerprint of biomarkers, enabling the discrimination of individual components and mixtures [48, 49]. High‐performance liquid chromatography further complements these techniques by enabling the separation and quantification of specific polyphenolic compounds, such as rutin and catechin equivalents, alongside other phenolic and flavonoid constituents within the extracts [50, 51]. This multipronged analytical strategy is critical for unravelling the chemical diversity of fungal metabolites, which encompass a wide array of bioactive compounds with significant biotechnological and pharmaceutical potential [52]. This is particularly relevant for the characterization of fungal biomass ethanol extracts, where the interplay of various compounds contributes to their overall bioactivity and warrants detailed structural elucidation and purity assessment. Furthermore, the application of chemometric tools to these spectroscopic and chromatographic data facilitates the descriptive analysis of process trends and the identification of key molecular features indicative of specific compound classes [53, 54]. Ultraviolet‐visible spectroscopy, for instance, serves as a common analytical tool to detect chromophores and conjugated systems in compounds, providing spectral information crucial for identifying complex mixtures typical in food samples and fungal extracts [55]. Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy, conversely, provides characteristic absorption bands indicative of functional groups such as hydroxyls and double bonds present in polygenic compounds, which is critical for structural identification and can be used to assess lipid extraction efficiency from fungal biomass [56, 57]. Meanwhile, high‐performance liquid chromatography is invaluable for isolating and quantifying individual components, even in intricate samples, offering high sensitivity and resolution for complex matrices like fungal extracts [58].
The LC–MS profiling of the ethanol extract of A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp. demonstrates the ability of the fungal isolate to produce structurally diverse secondary metabolites belonging to multiple biosynthetic classes. The detection of both polar and nonpolar compounds across retention times suggests the presence of complex metabolic pathways operating within the fungal system.
The identification of thiazole‐containing metabolites such as 4‐methyl‐5‐thiazoleethanol indicates active microbial biosynthesis involving sulfur‐containing intermediates. Such compounds are commonly associated with microbial metabolism and are known to exhibit biological activities, including antimicrobial and antioxidant properties [59]. Their presence in multiple extracts suggests a conserved metabolic feature of the fungal strain.
Mangostin trimethyl ether, a prenylated xanthone detected in all extracts, indicates the involvement of polyketide biosynthetic pathways. Xanthones are well documented for their diverse pharmacological activities including antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anticancer effects [60]. The repeated detection of this compound across extracts suggests that it may represent a core metabolite produced by the fungal isolate under the given culture conditions.
The occurrence of N‐feruloyl‐octopamine highlights the role of phenolic amide biosynthesis in the fungal system. Phenolic amides are known to be associated with defense‐related mechanisms and antioxidant activity and are often linked to phenylpropanoid metabolism [61]. This indicates possible metabolic interactions between fungal pathways and plant‐derived precursors, particularly in endophytic fungi.
The detection of quinic acid derivatives such as 1,3,5‐tricaffeoylquinic acid suggests that the fungal strain may mimic plant‐like metabolic pathways. Such compounds are widely reported for their antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and hepatoprotective activities [62]. This phenomenon is commonly observed in endophytic fungi, which can produce host‐like bioactive metabolites [63].
Flavonoids such as pomiferin and isosakuranetin detected in the extracts are known for their antioxidant and anti‐inflammatory activities, while alkaloids such as voacristine and (‐)‐eburnamonine are associated with significant pharmacological properties, particularly in neurological applications [64]. The presence of these compounds supports the potential therapeutic relevance of the fungal extracts.
Additionally, the detection of fatty acids such as linoleic acid and elaidic acid indicates the contribution of lipid‐derived metabolites to the overall bioactivity profile. Fatty acids are known to exhibit antimicrobial and anti‐inflammatory properties and may act synergistically with other secondary metabolites [65].
The presence of diterpenoids such as aphidicolin and sesquiterpenoids such as saliniketal A further highlights the metabolic versatility of the fungal strain. These compounds are widely reported for their bioactive properties, including cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities, suggesting potential applications in pharmaceutical research.
According to Prabavathy and Nachiyar [66], UV–vis spectroscopic analysis of ethyl acetate extract of Aspergillus sp. isolated from Ficus carica showed a peak at 260 nm. The FTIR spectrum of the Aspergillus sp. peak in the origin 2929.46 may be due to the stretching vibration of C─H group and the peak in the region 1715.36 may be due to the stretching vibration of the C─O. The peaks at 1042.64 and 813.83 indicate the presence of C─O stretch and the phenyl ring, respectively. In the present study, UV–vis spectroscopic analysis of A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp., profiles showed the sharp peak at 290, 212, and 291. FTIR analysis of the ethanolic extract of A. flavus, 3287.85 due to the stretching vibration of O─H stretching, Pleosporales sp., 3553.3 due to the stretching vibration N─H stretching and Endothia sp., 2925.97 due to the stretching vibration C─H stretching. FTIR analysis revealed the presence of alcohol, Alkene, Amine, Alkane, Vinyl ether, Sulfonyl chloride, and secondary amine.
This study investigates the multifaceted therapeutic potential of an ethanol extract derived from fungal biomass, encompassing its antioxidant, anti‐inflammatory, and cytotoxic effects against L929 and A375 skin cancer cell lines, alongside an assessment of its wound healing capabilities via scratch assay. Mushrooms have long been recognized for their medicinal properties, serving as a rich source of bioactive compounds applicable to pharmaceuticals, cosmeceuticals, and nutricosmetics, with traditional uses often extending to skin conditions [67]. Specifically, numerous macrofungi have been explored for their antiaging, antioxidant, photoprotective, and anti‐inflammatory properties, attributed to their diverse biochemical constituents such as polysaccharides, phenolic compounds, and triterpenes [68]. This growing interest stems from their ability to inhibit key enzymes implicated in skin aging and hyperpigmentation, such as elastase, tyrosinase, and collagenase [69]. The cosmetic industry increasingly seeks natural compounds with significant bioactive properties for cosmeceutical formulations, highlighting the potential of mushroom extracts in this area [70]. The varied chemical structures of compounds such as terpenes and terpenoids found in fungi contribute to a wide array of biological activities, including anticancer, anti‐inflammatory, and antimicrobial effects, underscoring their therapeutic applicability in dermatological contexts [71].
The crude fungal extracts showed varying levels of antioxidant efficacy for DPPH radical scavenging. The antioxidant activity of the fungal extracts was assessed by discoloration to yellow following formation of the nonradical (2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐hydrazine) molecule [72]. According to Mazumdar [73] reported that the ethyl acetate extract of Diaporthe sp. exhibited a high scavenging activity of 12.91 ± 10.32. The ethanolic fungal extract of A. flavus showed the percentage inhibition of (58.01 ± 0.386); Pleosporales sp. (50.66 ± 0.18); Endothia sp. (43.23 ± 0.23 and the standard ascorbic acid showed around 81.59 ± 0.5.
According to Al‐Fakih and Almaqtri [74] the antibacterial activity of the ethyl acetate extract of A. flavus showed a zone of inhibition against S. aureus (5.6 mm) and no zone of inhibition in E. coli. In the present study, the ethanol extract of A. flavus showed the largest zone of inhibition against S. aureus (19 mm) than the Pleosporales sp. (14 mm), and Endothia sp. (12 mm). With a maximum inhibitory zone of 16 mm in A. flavus was found to be more sensitive to E. coli than the Pleosporales sp. (12 mm), and Endothia (5 mm).
According to Lowenthal et al. [75] the MTT test was used to examine the ethanol extract of Trametes versicolor fruting body and mycelium towards malignant melanoma cells. The IC50 value of the fruiting body and mycelium toward malignant melanoma cells. The IC50 value of the fruiting body extract towards both A375 (IC50 = 114.5 and 663.3 µg/mL, respectively) and SK‐MEL‐5 (IC50 = 88.6 and 358.4 µg/mL, respectively) cell lines. In the present study, the cytotoxic activity of the ethanol extract of the A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp., showed IC50 values of non‐cancerous L929 cell line was 211.61 µg/mL, 177.56 µg/mL, and 198 µg/mL. The IC50 value of the A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp. extracts against A375 cell line was 209.46 µg/mL, 152.00 µg/mL, and 190.37 µg/mL.
According to Moharram et al. [76] reported that the Emericella nidulans, Pleospora tarda, and Penicillium funiculosum extracts showed higher activities, with percentage inhibition of protein denaturation reaching 83%, 82.5% and 81.4%. In our study, the anti‐inflammatory activity of the ethanolic extract of A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp. showed the percentage inhibition of 49.26 ± 1.46, 67.25 ± 0.72, and 58.61 ± 1.11. whereas the standard aspirin exhibited significant anti‐inflammatory activity with a percentage inhibition of 85.81%.
According to Ameen et al. [77] the wound healing activity of the crude extract had a cell migration rate of 42.6% for 48 h, whereas the control nitrofurazone had 30% of cell migration. Beetroot extract at a minimum concentration 25 µg with a maximum wound closure of 78% after 24 h [78]. According to Al et al. [79] Aspergillus terreus extract was tested for wound healing activities using in vitro cell migration with HSF cell line. Wound healing activity of the A. terreus extract had a cell migration rate of 0.84 ± 0.0006 for 24 h and for 48 h 0.82 ± 0.0006. In the present study, the ethanolic extract of A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp. was studied in two ways by studying cell migration and the percentage of wound closure. Compared to the ethanol extract, the standard ascorbic acid showed good results. The cell migration of the standard ascorbic acid at 12, 24 h was found to be 27.70 and 19.44 µm, respectively. Similarly, the fungal extract of A. flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp., at 12 h was found to be 7.8, 9.27, and 14.94 µm, whereas in the 24 h the cell migration was found to be 14.25, 14.11, and 12.59 µm, respectively. In case of wound closure at 12, 24 h, the standard ascorbic acid showed a value of 68.09% and 95.17%. In contrast, the ethanolic extract of A flavus, Pleosporales sp., and Endothia sp. at 12 h showed 19.89%, 23.96%, and 44.54% and whereas in the 24 h the wound closure shown to be 72.74%, 72.95%, and 75.10%, respectively, and for the untreated group, it was found to be 7.50% at 12 h and 17.17% for 24 h.
5. Conclusion
The present study successfully demonstrated that endophytic fungi isolated from Atalantia racemosa represents a rich and underexplored source of pharmacologically important secondary metabolites. Comprehensive phytochemical profiling using GC–MS, FTIR, and LC–MS confirmed the presence of diverse bioactive compounds, including fatty acids, sterols, phenolics, flavonoids, alkaloids, quinic acid derivatives, and terpenoids. Notably, LC–MS analysis revealed a broader spectrum of metabolites such as mangostin derivatives, N‐feruloyl‐octopamine, eburnamonine, aphidicolin, chalcones, and terpene lactones, highlighting the metabolic versatility of the fungal isolates. Among the isolates, Endothia sp. exhibited the highest chemical diversity and significant biological activities, particularly in anticancer and wound healing assays.
The biological evaluations further supported the chemical findings, demonstrating appreciable antioxidant, antibacterial, anti‐inflammatory, cytotoxic, and wound healing properties of the fungal extracts. The presence of multiple classes of bioactive compounds suggests possible synergistic effects contributing to these activities. Overall, the integration of LC–MS data strengthens the evidence that these endophytic fungi possess significant therapeutic potential. Future studies should focus on the isolation, purification, structural elucidation, and mechanistic evaluation of individual compounds, along with in vivo validation, to advance their application in pharmaceutical development.
Author Contribution
S.M. conducted the experiment and drafted the data. A.S. has helped in making methodology standardize and execution of the work. J.H. helped in the correction and V.A.B. has completed the drafting with corrections and made upload.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding
The present research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies, either public or commercial.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the Department of Biotechnology and Microbiology, Karnatak University, Dharwad for providing the basic facility to conduct the research experiments and thankful to the USIC, Karnatak University, Dharwad for helping in the analytical instruments to conduct the experiments.
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.
References
- 1. Strobel G. and Daisy B., “Bioprospecting for Microbial Endophytes and Their Natural Products,” Microbiology and molecular biology reviews 67 (2003): 491–502, 10.1128/mmbr.67.4.491-502.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Schulz B. and Boyle C., “The Endophytic Continuum,” Mycological research 109 (2005): 661–686, 10.1017/S095375620500273X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Arnold A. E., “Understanding the Diversity of Foliar Endophytic Fungi: Progress, Challenges, and Frontiers,” Fungal biology reviews 21 (2007): 51–66, 10.1016/j.fbr.2007.05.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Wilson D., “Endophyte: The evolution of a Term, and Clarification of its Use and Definition,” Oikos 73 (1995): 274–276, 10.2307/3545919. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Clay K., “Fungal Endophytes of Grasses: A Defensive Mutualism Between Plants and Fungi,” Ecology 69 (1988): 10–16, 10.2307/1943155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Clay K., “Fungal Endophytes of Grasses,” Annual review of Ecology and Systematics 21 (1990): 275–297, 10.5958/J.0975-6892.5.2.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Saikkonen K., Ion D., and Gyllenberg M., “The Persistence of Vertically Transmitted Fungi in Grass Metapopulations,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 269 (2002): 1397–1403, 10.1098/rspb.2002.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Rodriguez R. J., White Jr J. F., Arnold A. E., and Redman R. S., “Fungal Endophytes: Diversity and Functional Roles,” NewPhytologist 182 (2009): 314–330, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02773.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Gomes R. R., Glienke C., Videira S. I. R., Lombard L., Groenewald J. Z., and Crous P. W., “Diaporthe: A Genus of Endophytic, Saprobic and Plant Pathogenic Fungi,” Persoonia—Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi 31 (2013): 1–41, 10.3767/003158513X666844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Strobel G., Daisy B., Castillo U., and Harper J., “Natural Products From Endophytic Microorganisms,” Journal of Natural products 67 (2004): 257–268, 10.1021/np030397v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Joseph B. and Priya R. M., “Bioactive Compounds From Endophytes and their Potential in Pharmaceutical Effect: A Review,” American Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 1 (2011): 291–309, 10.3923/ajbmb.2011.291.309. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kusari S., Lamshöft M., Zühlke S., and Spiteller M., “An Endophytic Fungus From Hypericum Perforatum That Produces Hypericin,” Journal of Natural Products 71 (2008): 159–162, 10.1021/np070669k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Pullaiah T., Encyclopaedia of World Medicinal Plants ,(Daya Books, 2006). [Google Scholar]
- 14. Devi Prasad A. G., Shyma T. B., and Raghavendra M. P., “Plants Used by the Tribes for the Treatment of Digestive System Disorders in Wayanad District, Kerala,” Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science 3 (2013): 171–175, 10.7324/JAPS.2013.3830. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Arinathan V., Mohan V. R., and de Britto A. J., “Ethno‐medicinal Survey Among Palliyar Tribals of Srivilliputhur Grizzled Giant Squirrel Wildlife Sanctuary, Tamil Nadu,” Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany 27 (2003): 707–710. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Tan R. X. and Zou W. X., “Endophytes: A Rich Source of Functional Metabolites (1987 to 2000),” Natural Product Reports 18, no. 4 (2001): 448–459, 10.1039/b100918o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Aly A. H., Debbab A., and Proksch P., “Fungal Endophytes: Unique Plant Inhabitants With Great Promises,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 90 (2011): 1829–1845, 10.1007/s00253-011-3270-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Strobel G. and Daisy B., “Bioprospecting for Microbial Endophytes and Their Natural Products,” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 67, no. 4 (2003): 491–502, 10.1128/MMBR.67.4.491-502.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kumar S., Kaushik N., and Edrada‐Ebel R., “Endophytic Fungi From Citrus Species and Their Bioactivity,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 29 (2013): 1239–1247. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Suryanarayanan T. S., Thirunavukkarasu N., Govindarajulu M. B., Sasse F., Jansen R., and Murali T. S., “Endophytic Fungi From Medicinal Plants: Diversity and Bioactivity,” Fungal Diversity 33 (2009): 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kumari M., Taritla S., Sharma A., and Jayabaskaran C., “Endophytic Fungi From Citrus Species and Their Antimicrobial Potential,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research 6, no. 3 (2013): 43–47. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Schulz B., Wanke U., Draeger S., and Aust H.‐J., “Endophytes From Herbaceous Plants and Shrubs: Effectiveness of Surface Sterilization Methods,” Mycological research 97 (1993): 1447–1450, 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80215-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Chang C., Yang M., H W., and J C., “Estimation of Total Flavonoid Content in Propolis by Two Complementary Colorimetric Methods,” Journal of Food and Drug Analysis 10 (2002): 178–182, 10.38212/2224-6614.2748. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Rice‐Evans C., Miller N., and Paganga G., “Antioxidant Properties of Phenolic Compounds,” Trends in Plant Science 2 (1997): 152–159, 10.1016/S1360-1385(97)01018-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Gupta D., Dubey J., and Kumar M., “Phytochemical Analysis and Antimicrobial Activity of Some Medicinal Plants Against Selected Common Human Pathogenic Microorganisms,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease 6 (2016): 15–20, 10.1016/S2222-1808(15)60978-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Alley M. C., Scudiere D. A., Monks A., Czerwinski M., et al., “Validation of an Automated Microculture Tetrazolium Assay (MTA) to Assess Growth and Drug Sensitivity of Human Tumor Cell Lines,” Proceedings of American Association for Cancer Research 27 (1986): 389–389. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Padmanabhan P. and Jangle S. N., “Evaluation of In‐Vitro Anti‐Inflammatory Activity of Herbal Preparation, a Combination of Four Medicinal Plants,” International Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences 2 (2012): 109–116. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Felician F. F., Yu R.‐H., and Li M.‐Z., “The Wound Healing Potential of Collagen Peptides Derived From the Jellyfish Rhopilema Esculentum,” Chinese Journal of Traumatology 22 (2019): 12–20, 10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Liang C., Park A. Y., and Guan J., “In Vitro Scratch Assay: A Convenient and Inexpensive Method for Analysis of Cell Migration In Vitro,” Nature Protocols 2 (2007): 329–333, 10.1038/nprot.2007.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Golinska P., Wypij M., Agarkar G., Rathod D., Dahm H., and Rai M., “Endophytic Actinobacteria of Medicinal Plants: Diversity and Bioactivity,” Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 108 (2015): 267–289, 10.1007/s10482-015-0502-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Prajapati C., Rai S. N., and Singh A. K., “An Update of Fungal Endophyte Diversity and Strategies for Augmenting Therapeutic Potential of Their Potent Metabolites: Recent Advancement,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 197 (2025): 2799–2866, 10.1007/s12010-024-05098-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Kayode A. J., Igwaran A., and Banji‐Onisile F., “Unveiling the Hidden Allies in the Fight Against Antimicrobial Resistance—Medicinal Plant Endophytes,” Bacteria 4, no. 2 (2025): 26, 10.3390/bacteria4020026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Eshboev F., Mamadalieva N., and Nazarov P., “Antimicrobial Action Mechanisms of Natural Compounds Isolated From Endophytic Microorganisms,” Antibiotics 13 (2024): 271, 10.3390/antibiotics13030271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Oladipo A., Enwemiwe V., Ejeromedoghene O., Adebayo A., Ogunyemi O., and Fu F., “Production and Functionalities of Specialized Metabolites From Different Organic Sources,” Metabolites 12 (2022): 534, 10.3390/metabo12060534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Aiping Y., Hong Y., Zhou F., Zhang L., Zhu Y., et al., “Endophytic Microbes From Medicinal Plants in Fenghuang Mountain as a Source of Antibiotics,” Molecules 28 (2023): 6301, 10.3390/molecules28176301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Adhikari D. and Rangra N. K., “Antimicrobial Activities of Acacia Genus,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 13 (2023): 45–59, 10.4103/2221-1691.369609. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Tanaka N. and Kashiwada Y., “Phytochemical Studies on Traditional Herbal Medicines Based on the Ethnopharmacological Information Obtained by Field Studies,” Journal of natural medicines 75 (2021): 762–783, 10.1007/s11418-021-01545-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Petrini O., “Fungal Endophytes of Tree Leaves,” in Microbial ecology of Leaves Springer; (1991), 179–197, 10.1007/978-1-4612-3168-4_9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Roze L. V., Chanda A., and Linz J. E., “Compartmentalization and Molecular Traffic in Secondary Metabolism: A New Understanding of Established Cellular Processes,” Fungal Genetics and Biology 48 (2011): 35–48, 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Selim E. I., Basheer A. A., Elqady G., and Hafez M. A., “Shallow Seismic Refraction, Two‐Dimensional Electrical Resistivity Imaging, and Ground Penetrating Radar for Imaging the Ancient Monuments at the Western Shore of Old Luxor City, Egypt,” Archaeological Discovery 02 (2014): 31–43, 10.5943/cream/2/1/3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Zuber A., Kowalczyk M., Sekuła A., Mleczko P., and Kupiec T., “Methods Used in Species Identification of Hallucinogenic and Other Poisonous Mushrooms in Forensic Investigations,” Probl Forensic Sci 86 (2011): 151–161. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Barnett H. L. and Hunter B. B., Illustred Genera of Imperfect Fungi, Minneapolis 214p (Burges, Public CO, 1972). [Google Scholar]
- 43. Anita D. D. and Sridhar R. K., “Assemblage and Diversity of Fungi Associated With Mangrove Wild Legume Canavalia cathartica ,” Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 10 (2009): 225–235. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Winand R., D'hooge E., and Van Uffelen A., “Investigating Fungal Diversity Through Metabarcoding for Environmental Samples: Assessment of ITS1 and ITS2 Illumina Sequencing Using Multiple Defined Mock Communities With Different Classification Methods and Reference Databases,” BMC Genomics 26 (2025): 729, 10.1186/s12864-025-11917-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Montero‐Vargas M., Escudero‐Leyva E., Díaz‐Valerio S., and Chaverri P., “Step‐by‐Step Pipeline for the Ecological Analysis of Endophytic Fungi using ITS nrDNA Data,” Current Protocols in Microbiology 56 (2020): e96, 10.1002/cpmc.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Ohta A., Nishi K., Hirota K., and Matsuo Y., “Using Nanopore Sequencing to identify fungi From clinical samples With high phylogenetic resolution,” Scientific Reports 13 (2023): 9785, 10.1038/s41598-023-37016-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Wang X., Liu C., and Huang L., “ITS 1: A DNA Barcode Better Than ITS 2 in Eukaryotes?,” Molecular Ecology Resources 15 (2015): 573–586, 10.1111/1755-0998.12325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Kauserud H., “ITS alchemy: On the Use of ITS as a DNA Marker in Fungal Ecology,” Fungal Ecology 65 (2023): 101274, 10.1016/j.funeco.2023.101274. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Abo E., Sayed M. S., Dawoud M. A., Ibrahim M., and Soliman M. M., “Investigating Endophytic Fungi of Calotropis procera for Novel Bioactive Compounds: Molecular Docking and Bioactivity Insights,” Microbial Cell Factories 24 (2025): 101, 10.1186/s12934-025-02710-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Hashem A. H., Attia M. S., and Kandil E. K., “Bioactive Compounds and Biomedical Applications of Endophytic Fungi: A Recent Review,” Microbial cell factories 22 (2023): 107, 10.1186/s12934-023-02118-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Mohamed AbdelRazek M. M., Elissawy A. H., Mostafa N. M., Moussa A. Y., et al., “Bioactive Secondary Metabolites From Fungal Endophytes, Penicillium Oxalicum and Phoma herbarum, Associated With Morus nigra and Ficus Sycomorus: An In Silico Study,” RSC Advances 14 (2024): 36451–36460, 10.1039/d4ra06840h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Lakhdari W., Benyahia I., and Bouhenna M. M., “Exploration and Evaluation of Secondary Metabolites From Trichoderma harzianum: GC‐MS Analysis, Phytochemical Profiling, Antifungal and Antioxidant Activity Assessment,” Molecules 28 (2023): 5025, 10.3390/molecules28135025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Khattab O. K. H., El‐Safey A. A. E.‐N., Elaasser M. M., and Bakry W. S., “GCMS Separation of the Bioactive Fraction Obtained From Aspergillus flavus Isolated From El‐Qussair Marine Environments,” Egyptian Journal of Botany 62 (2022): 747–762, 10.21608/ejbo.2022.122564.1916. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Baciu A., Ranga F., Fetea F., Zavoi S., and Socaciu C., “Fingerprinting Food Supplements and their Botanical Ingredients by Coupled UV/Vis/FTIR Spectrometry,” Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj‐Napoca Food Science and Technology 70 (2013): 8, 10.15835/buasvmcn-fst:9246. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Pedro S. I., Rosado T., and Barroca C., “Characterisation of the Phenolic Profile of Acacia retinodes and Acacia mearnsii Flowers' Extracts,” Plants 11 (2022): 1442, 10.3390/plants11111442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Thakur D., Ranjan Lal U., Kapoor D. N., and Kumar D., “Identification and Quantification of Polyphenolic Secondary Metabolites in Stem Bark of Ficus Religiosa (Moraceae) Using UPLC‐HRMS and RP‐HPLC‐PDA,” Separations 10 (2023): 338, 10.3390/separations10060338. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Krsmanović N., Rašeta M., and Mišković J., “Effects of UV Stress in Promoting Antioxidant Activities in Fungal Species Тrametes versicolor (L.) Lloyd and Flammulina velutipes (Curtis) Singer,” Antioxidants 12 (2023): 302, 10.3390/antiox12020302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Shankar A. and Sharma K. K., “Fungal Secondary Metabolites in Food and Pharmaceuticals in the Era of Multi‐Omics,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 106 (2022): 3465–3488, 10.1007/s00253-022-11945-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Bérdy J., “Thoughts and facts About antibiotics: Where we are Now and Where we are Heading,” The Journal of Antibiotics 65, no. 8 (2012): 385–395, 10.1038/ja.2012.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Obolskiy D., Pischel I., and Siriwatanametanon N., “ Garcinia mangostana L.: A Phytochemical and Pharmacological Review,” Phytotherapy Research 23, no. 8 (2009): 1047–1065, 10.1002/ptr.2730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Heleno S. A., Martins A., Queiroz M. J. R. P., and Ferreira I. C. F. R., “Bioactivity of Phenolic Acids: Metabolites Versus Parent Compounds: A Review,” Food Chemistry 173 (2015): 501–513, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.10.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Clifford M. N., Jaganath I. B., Ludwig I. A., and Crozier A., “Chlorogenic Acids and the Acyl‐Quinic Acids: Discovery, Biosynthesis, Bioavailability and Bioactivity,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 65, no. 26 (2017): 5179–5190, 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Kusari S., Hertweck C., and Spiteller M., “Chemical Ecology of Endophytic Fungi: Origins of Secondary Metabolites,” Natural Product Reports 29, no. 10 (2012): 120–134, 10.1039/c2np20055a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Zhang L., An R., Wang J., et al., “Exploring Novel Bioactive Compounds From Marine Microbes,” Natural Product Reports 35, no. 9 (2018): 103–129, 10.1039/C7NP00054F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Panche A. N., Diwan A. D., and Chandra S. R., “Flavonoids: An Overview,” Journal of Nutritional Science 5 (2016): e47, 10.1017/jns.2016.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Prabavathy D. and Nachiyar C. V., “Screening and Characterisation of Antimicrobial Compound From Endophytic Aspergillus sp. Isolated From Ficus carica,” Journal of Pharmacy Research 4 (2011): 1935–1936. [Google Scholar]
- 67. Anil Kumar V. N., Quispe C., and Herrera‐Bravo J., “Potential of Mushrooms Bioactive for the Treatment of Skin Diseases and Disorders,” Journal of food biochemistry 2023, no. 1 (2023): 5915769, 10.1155/2023/5915769. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Paterska M., Czerny B., and Cielecka‐Piontek J., “Macrofungal Extracts as a Source of Bioactive Compounds for Cosmetical Anti‐Aging Therapy: A Comprehensive Review,” Nutrients 16 (2024): 2810, 10.3390/nu16162810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Rukhsar S., Usman M., Yousaf N., Murtaza G., Aamir Manzoor M., and Azam M., “Mushrooms in Modern Cosmetics: Unlocking Anti‐Aging, Antioxidant, and Therapeutic Potential,” Archives of Dermatological Research 317 (2025): 542, 10.1007/s00403-025-04048-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Taofiq O., Heleno S., and Calhelha R., “Development of Mushroom‐Based Cosmeceutical Formulations With Anti‐Inflammatory, Anti‐Tyrosinase, Antioxidant, and Antibacterial Properties,” Molecules 21 (2016): 1372, 10.3390/molecules21101372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Trepa M., Sułkowska‐Ziaja K., Kała K., and Muszyńska B., “Therapeutic Potential of Fungal Terpenes and Terpenoids: Application in Skin Diseases,” Molecules 29 (2024): 1183, 10.3390/molecules29051183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Gunasekaran S., Sathiavelu M., and Arunachalam S., “In Vitro Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activity of Endophytic Fungi Isolated From Mussaenda luteola ,” Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science 7 (2017): 234–238, 10.7324/JAPS.2017.70832. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Mazumdar T. C., “Isolation and Characterization of Marker Compounds From the Leaves of Allium Cepa Linn. and Study of Their Biological Activities,” (2019).
- 74. Al‐Fakih A. A. and Almaqtri W. Q. A., “Overview on Antibacterial Metabolites From Terrestrial Aspergillus spp,” Mycology 10 (2019): 191–209, 10.1080/21501203.2019.1604576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Lowenthal R., Taylor M., and Gidden J. A., “The Mycelium of the Trametes versicolor synn. Coriolus versicolor (Turkey tail mushroom) Exhibit Anti‐Melanoma Activity In Vitro,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 161 (2023): 114424, 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Moharram A. M., Zohri A. A., Omar H. M., and Abd El‐Ghani O. A., “In vitro Assessment of Antimicrobial and Anti‐Inflammatory Potential of Endophytic Fungal Metabolites Extracts,” European Journal of Biological Research 7 (2017): 234–244, 10.5281/zenodo.839696. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Ameen F., Stephenson S. L., AlNadhari S., and Yassin M. A., “Isolation, Identification and Bioactivity Analysis of an Endophytic Fungus Isolated From Aloe vera Collected From Asir desert, Saudi Arabia,” Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering 44 (2021): 1063–1070, 10.1007/s00449-020-02507-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Udayakumar G. P., Gurumallesh P., and Ramakrishnan B., “Evaluation of Wound Healing Capacity of Selected leaf Extracts Using In vitro Scratch Assay With L929 Fibroblas,” Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications 13 (2020): 66–69, 10.21786/bbrc/13.11/15. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Al Mousa A. A., Abouelela M. E., Mansour A., Nasr M., et al., “Wound Healing, Metabolite Profiling, and In Silico Studies of Aspergillus terreus ,” Current Issues in Molecular Biology 46, no. 10 (2024): 11681–11699, 10.3390/cimb46100694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data will be made available on request.
