ABSTRACT
We report the genome of Luminis, a lytic bacteriophage isolated from wastewater using Pseudomonas aeruginosa mPAO1Δpf4Δpf6. Phage Luminis is a Yuavirus with 61,617 bp of circularly permuted dsDNA and 64.4% GC content. In addition to reference strains, Luminis plaques on two drug-resistant clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa.
KEYWORDS: bacteriophages, bacteriophage therapy, Pseudomonas aeruginosa
ANNOUNCEMENT
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic gram-negative bacterium causing skin, lung, and bone infections worldwide (1, 2). Mounting antimicrobial resistance has made it a target for bacteriophage therapy (3, 4). Here, we report the genome of Luminis, a lytic, tailed P. aeruginosa phage.
Luminis was isolated from wastewater collected 11 July 2024 at Stanford University’s Codiga Resource Recovery Center. Wastewater was diluted in SM buffer (100 mM NaCl, 8 mM MgSO₄, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 0.01% gelatin), sterile-filtered (0.2 µm polyethersulfone), and enriched for phages using early-log P. aeruginosa mPAO1Δpf4Δpf6 (5) grown in LB Miller broth (6) (200 µL wastewater, 5 mL culture, 37°C, 250 rpm). After 4 h, the culture was centrifuged twice (15 min, 5,000× g, 4°C). Supernatant (“lysate”) was sterile-filtered and applied to a double-layer mPAO1Δpf4Δpf6 lawn (5). Using a P1000 pipette tip, a round, transparent, 2 mm plaque was transferred into 1 mL SM buffer. To isolate clonal phages, plaque picking was repeated 5× sequentially before propagation (Fig. 1A).
Fig 1.

(A) Plaques formed by Luminis on P. aeruginosa mPAO1Δpf4Δpf6. (B) Transmission electron microscopy of Luminis. (C) Circularized genome map generated using Proksee 2023 (7). Gene products were categorized by predicted function using Pharokka.
Luminis formed plaques on Pa Li010 (8) and two multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pa strains from rectal and bronchial infections (CDC AR Isolate Bank AR_0231, AR_0238) (9).
Luminis was negatively stained (1% uranyl acetate) and visualized at 120 kV using a JEM-1400 transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), which showed a flexible, non-contractile tail. Head width, head length, and tail length were 59 ± 2, 81 ± 2, and 139 ± 5 nm, respectively (n = 10, mean ± SD, Fig. 1B).
Filtered lysate was treated with DNase (2 U/mL) and RNase A (10 µg/mL) (60 min, 37°C), followed by proteinase K (30 µg/mL, 2 h, 53°C) (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, USA). DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, USA). Short-insert Microbial WGS libraries (VAHTS Universal DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina V3) were prepared and sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq X Plus Series (PE150) (Novogene, Sacramento, USA).
FastQC (v0.12.1) was used to verify the 9.8 × 106 paired-end reads (150 bp) that were collected (10). Adaptors and low-quality reads (≤100 bp, FastQ ≤20) were extracted with BBDuk (v39.08) (11). Reads were subsampled to 80× with Seqtk (v1.4) (12) and assembled using MEGAHIT (v1.2.9) (13). Contigs were visualized using Bandage (v0.8.1) (14) and validated using BBMap (v38.84) with 100% read coverage (31,912 mapped reads) (15). A single 61,617-bp contig (64.4% GC) was extracted (Fig. 1C) and polished using Pilon (v1.24) (16). PhageTerm (v1.0.12) suggested the genome was circularly permuted and complete (17, 18).
The genome was oriented to the terminase large subunit gene in Geneious Prime (v.2026.0.2) (7, 19) and annotated with Pharokka (v1.8.2) (20). Prodigal (v2.6.3) was used for gene prediction (21), PHROGs for functional annotation (22), and tRNAscan (v2.0.12) for tRNA identification (23). A total of 85 coding sequences were identified, with no tRNAs (Fig. 1C). BACPHLIP (v0.9.6) predicted Luminis was lytic (91% confidence), and Phylogeny.fr (v2.0) classified Luminis into the genus Yuavirus (24–26). All tools were run with default parameters unless specified.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Sebastien Tilmans and Bill Li at Stanford’s Codiga Resource Recovery Center for their help with wastewater sampling. We also thank the Gao Lab for sequencing help and Dr. John Perrino and Dr. Maryam Hajfathalian for their support with electron microscopy.
Contributor Information
Jessica C. Sacher, Email: jsacher@stanford.edu.
Kenneth M. Stedman, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
The annotated genome of Luminis is accessible through National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank (PQ632788). Raw reads are also available (BioProject PRJNA1267730, Sequence Read Archive SRR36204708).
REFERENCES
- 1. Bodey GP, Bolivar R, Fainstein V, Jadeja L. 1983. Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Rev Infect Dis 5:279–313. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.2.279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Reynolds D, Kollef M. 2021. The epidemiology and pathogenesis and treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: an update. Drugs 81:2117–2131. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01635-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kim MK, Chen Q, Echterhof A, Pennetzdorfer N, McBride RC, Banaei N, Burgener EB, Milla CE, Bollyky PL. 2024. A blueprint for broadly effective bacteriophage-antibiotic cocktails against bacterial infections. Nat Commun 15:9987. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53994-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Waters EM, Neill DR, Kaman B, Sahota JS, Clokie MRJ, Winstanley C, Kadioglu A. 2017. Phage therapy is highly effective against chronic lung infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Thorax 72:666–667. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Schmidt AK, Schwartzkopf CM, Pourtois JD, Burgener EB, Faith DR, Joyce A, Lamma T, Kumar G, Bollyky PL, Secor PR. 2024. Targeted deletion of Pf prophages from diverse Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates has differential impacts on quorum sensing and virulence traits. J Bacteriol 206:e0040223. doi: 10.1128/jb.00402-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. MacWilliams MP, Liao M. 2006. Luria broth (LB) and Luria agar (LA) media and their uses protocol. American Society for Microbiology. https://asm.org/getattachment/5d82aa34-b514-4d85-8af3-aeabe6402874/lb-luria-agar-protocol-3031.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Grant JR, Enns E, Marinier E, Mandal A, Herman EK, Chen C, Graham M, Van Domselaar G, Stothard P. 2023. Proksee: in-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 51:W484–W492. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Pirnay J-P, De Vos D, Cochez C, Bilocq F, Vanderkelen A, Zizi M, Ghysels B, Cornelis P. 2002. Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays an epidemic population structure. Environ Microbiol 4:898–911. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00321.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. CDC & FDA Antimicrobial Resistance Isolate Bank . 2026. CDC public health strategy for antimicrobial resistance. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/antimicrobial-resistance/php/public-health-strategy/index.html
- 10. Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Bushnell B. 2014. BBDuk guide. BBTools suite. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Available from: https://archive.jgi.doe.gov/data-and-tools/software-tools/bbtools/bb-tools-user-guide/bbduk-guide/ [Google Scholar]
- 12. Li H. 2012. Seqtk: a fast and lightweight tool for processing sequences in FASTA/Q formats. GitHub repository. https://github.com/lh3/seqtk. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. 2015. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31:1674–1676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. 2015. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 31:3350–3352. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Bushnell B. 2014. BBMap: a fast, accurate, splice-aware aligner. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Available from: https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap [Google Scholar]
- 16. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Garneau JR, Depardieu F, Fortier L-C, Bikard D, Monot M. 2017. PhageTerm: a tool for fast and accurate determination of phage termini and packaging mechanism using next-generation sequencing data. Sci Rep 7:8292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07910-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Abueg LAL, Afgan E, Allart O, Awan AH, Bacon WA, Baker D, Bassetti M, Batut B, Bernt M, Blankenberg D, et al. 2024. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible, and collaborative data analyses: 2024 update. Nucleic Acids Res 52:W83–W94. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Shen A, Millard A. 2021. Phage genome annotation: where to begin and end. Phage (New Rochelle) 2:183–193. doi: 10.1089/phage.2021.0015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Bouras G, Nepal R, Houtak G, Psaltis AJ, Wormald PJ, Vreugde S. 2023. Pharokka: a fast scalable bacteriophage annotation tool. Bioinformatics 39:btac776. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Terzian P, Olo Ndela E, Galiez C, Lossouarn J, Pérez Bucio RE, Mom R, Toussaint A, Petit M-A, Enault F. 2021. PHROG: families of prokaryotic virus proteins clustered using remote homology. NAR Genom Bioinform 3:lqab067. doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqab067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Chan PP, Lowe TM. 2019. tRNAscan-SE: searching for tRNA genes in genomic sequences. Methods Mol Biol 1962:1–14. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Hockenberry AJ, Wilke CO. 2021. BACPHLIP: predicting bacteriophage lifestyle from conserved protein domains. PeerJ 9:e11396. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Dereeper A, Guignon V, Blanc G, Audic S, Buffet S, Chevenet F, Dufayard JF, Guindon S, Lefort V, Lescot M, Claverie JM, Gascuel O. 2008. Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res 36:W465–W469. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2010. FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5:e9490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The annotated genome of Luminis is accessible through National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank (PQ632788). Raw reads are also available (BioProject PRJNA1267730, Sequence Read Archive SRR36204708).
