ABSTRACT
Mango productivity is threatened by dieback and fruit rot from Lasiodiplodia spp. (Botryosphaeriaceae fungal family). We report high-quality genomes of Lasiodiplodia theobromae, Lasiodiplodia euphorbiaceicola, and Lasiodiplodia brasiliensis from Côte d’Ivoire, enhancing genomic resources for comparative and pathogenicity studies of these fungal plant pathogens.
KEYWORDS: Lasiodiplodia spp., Mangifera indica, mango dieback, mango stem-end rot, genomic resources, phylogenetic analysis
ANNOUNCEMENT
Mango (Mangifera indica L.) productivity is severely constrained by Mango Dieback (MD), a vascular disease characterized by chlorosis, dieback of twigs and branches, gommosis, and tree mortality (1, 2). In addition, mangoes may suffer post-harvest stem-end rot (SER) marked by necrotic lesions at the fruit stem end, leading to over 20% of fruit losses (3, 4). Members of the Botryosphaeriaceae fungal family, particularly Lasiodiplodia spp., have been consistently responsible for MD and SER outbreaks in mango production (4, 5). Whole-genome sequences were produced for Lasiodiplodia theobromae strains isolated from grapevine (6), cacao (7), citrus (8), and peach (9), for Lasiodiplodia citricola from Populus (10), and for Lasiodiplodia iranensis from peanut (11). However, no genome is yet published for Lasiodiplodia spp. isolates from mango MD or SER.
In this study, we sequenced and assembled the genomes of three Lasiodiplodia spp. isolates 01FSyA8 (9°31′16.40″N, 7°36′15.93″W), 30BrSyA5 (9°32′45″N, 5°25′55″W), and LaRA1 (9°22′08″N, 5°42′59″W), collected from symptomatic mango trees in Côte d’Ivoire in 2020 as described in reference 12. Genomic DNA was extracted from mycelia of 5-day-old fungal cultures grown on potato dextrose agar as described in a previous study (13). Prior to genome sequencing, species-level identification of the isolates was conducted using the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1-α) markers. BLASTn analyses revealed 100% sequence identity with L. theobromae (01FSyA8), Lasiodiplodia euphorbiaceicola (30BrSyA5), and Lasiodiplodia brasiliensis (LaRA1), respectively. The ITS and tef1-α sequences were deposited in the NCBI GenBank under the following accession numbers: OR264287 (ITS) and OR271546 (tef1-α) for 01FSyA8; OR264288 (ITS) and OR271548 (tef1-α) for 30BrSyA5; and OR264286 (ITS) and OR271540 (tef1-α) for LaRA1.
Sequencing libraries were prepared via the Illumina TruSeq Nano DNA Kit and sequenced on the NovaSeq 6000 platform using 150 bp paired-end reads with 50× coverage. Raw reads were quality-filtered with fastp (14), and genome sizes were estimated by 15-mer analysis. Assembly was performed using Assembly Abyss V2.2.1 (15), with subsequent gap closure via TGS-GapCloser v1.12 (16). Contigs shorter than 500 bp were excluded.
Resulting assemblies comprised between 109 and 176 scaffolds per isolate, with N50 values ranging from 1,150,946 bp (30BrSyA5) to 1,682,829 bp (LaRA1) and a GC content of 54.31%–54.81% (Table 1). Assembly completeness, assessed using BUSCO v5.3.2 (17) against fungi_odb10lineages (758 genes), exceeded 99% for all genomes. Phylogenetic relationships were assessed among publicly available genomes of the genus Lasiodiplodia and the three newly sequenced genomes. A core genome SNP alignment was generated using Parsnp (18), with L. theobromae GCA_012971845.1 as the reference. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic inference was performed using RAxML (19) under the GTRCATX model. An average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis was also performed using fastANI software (20). These indicated that the 01FSyA8 (L. theobromae) genome closely grouped with L. theobromae genomes in the same clade with LaRA1 (L. brasiliensis) (Fig. 1). In contrast, the 30BrSyA5 (L. euphorbiaceicola) genome grouped in another clade, close to L. citricola. These genome drafts of L. theobromae, L. euphorbiaceicola, and L. brasiliensis enrich the genomic resources for Lasiodiplodia spp. and provide a valuable foundation for future comparative genomics, pathogenicity studies, and fungal disease management strategies in mango.
TABLE 1.
Genome statistics of three Lasiodiplodia species isolated from mango in Côte d’Ivoire
| Species names | Isolate | Reads number | Coverage depth (×) | Assembly | % of complete | BUSCOa analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total length of sequence (Mb) | Contigs ≥ 500 bp | N50 (Mb) | GC content (%) | % of complete and single copy | % of complete and duplicated | % of fragmented | % of missing | |||||
| L. theobromae | 01FSyA8 | 15,158,241 | 50 | 43.59 | 116 | 1.67 | 54.81 | 99.2 | 98.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| L. euphorbiaceicola | 30BrSyA5 | 13,326,857 | 40 | 43.7 | 176 | 1.15 | 54.31 | 99.3 | 98.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
| L. brasiliensis | LaRA1 | 15,158,241 | 42 | 43.41 | 109 | 1.68 | 54.64 | 99.2 | 98.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
BUSCO here is based on ”fungi_odb10” set of 758 common fungal genes.
Fig 1.

Phylogenetic and nucleotide similarity analysis of three newly sequenced genomes within the genus Lasiodiplodia. (A) SNP-based phylogenetic relationships among publicly available genomes of the genus Lasiodiplodia and three newly sequenced genomes. A core genome SNP alignment was generated using Parsnp (18), with L. theobromae GCA_012971845.1 as the reference. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic inference was performed using RAxML (19) under the GTRCATX model. Branch support values correspond to 100 bootstrap replicates. The tree was edited with iTOL 7.3 (21). Newly sequenced genomes are highlighted in red. (B) ANI analysis was performed using fastANI software (20) between publicly available genomes of the genus Lasiodiplodia and three newly sequenced genomes.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was funded by the Partnership for Skills in Applied Sciences, Engineering, and Technology—Regional Scholarship and Innovation Fund (PASET-RSIF), the French Research Institute for Development (IRD, France), and the Fondation Louis Omer DECUGIS (OMER-DECUGIS & CIE - 94538 Rungis, France).
Y.S.Y., Conceptualization, Data collection and curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing original draft, and Funding acquisition. A.D., Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Validation, and Writing original draft. D.K. Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Funding acquisition, and Supervision. D.F., Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition, and Supervision.
Contributor Information
Yéfoungnigui S. Yeo, Email: souleymaneyeo2@gmail.com.
Jason E. Stajich, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
This Whole-Genome project has been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under the study: PRJEB101385 with accession numbers SAMEA120420990 (01FSyA8-1), SAMEA120420991 (30BrSyA5), and SAMEA120420992 (LaRA1). Assembly names are GCA_977013645.2 (01FSyA8-1), GCA_977013655.2 (30BrSyA5), and GCA_977013665.2 (LaRA1). Data needed to reconstruct the tree are archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18878086.
REFERENCES
- 1. Ismail AM, Cirvilleri G, Polizzi G, Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Lombard L. 2012. Lasiodiplodia species associated with dieback disease of mango (Mangifera indica) in Egypt. Australasian Plant Pathol 41:649–660. doi: 10.1007/s13313-012-0163-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Saeed E, Sham A, AbuZarqa A, A. Al Shurafa K, S. Al Naqbi T, Iratni R, El-Tarabily K, AbuQamar SF. 2017. Detection and management of mango dieback disease in the United Arab Emirates. IJMS 18:2086. doi: 10.3390/ijms18102086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Alam MW, Rehman A, Malik AU, Ahmad S, Haider MS, Amin M, Gleason ML. 2020. Dynamics of stem end rot disease of mango fruit and its management. Pak J Agri Sci 57:63–71. 10.21162/PAKJAS/19.8336. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Lomavatu MF, Coates LM, Cooke AW, Mitchell RW, Underhill SJR. 2024. Postharvest diseases of mangoes in Fiji. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 52:421–440. doi: 10.1080/01140671.2024.2320868 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Marques MW, Lima NB, de Morais MA Jr, Barbosa MAG, Souza BO, Michereff SJ, Phillips AJL, Câmara MPS. 2013. Species of Lasiodiplodia associated with mango in Brazil. Fungal Divers 61:181–193. doi: 10.1007/s13225-013-0231-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Félix C, Meneses R, Gonçalves MFM, Tilleman L, Duarte AS, Jorrín-Novo JV, Van de Peer Y, Deforce D, Van Nieuwerburgh F, Esteves AC, Alves A. 2019. A multi-omics analysis of the grapevine pathogen Lasiodiplodia theobromae reveals that temperature affects the expression of virulence-and pathogenicity-related genes. Sci Rep 9:13144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49551-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ali SS, Asman A, Shao J, Balidion JF, Strem MD, Puig AS, Meinhardt LW, Bailey BA. 2020. Genome and transcriptome analysis of the latent pathogen Lasiodiplodia theobromae, an emerging threat to the cacao industry. Genome 63:37–52. doi: 10.1139/gen-2019-0112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Zheng Q, Ozbudak E, Liu G, Hosmani PS, Saha S, Flores-Gonzalez M, Mueller LA, Rodrigues-Stuart K, Dewdney MM, Lin Y, Zhang J, Tarazona YC, Liu B, Oliva R, Ritenour MA, Cano LM. 2021. Draft genome sequence resource of the citrus stem-end rot fungal pathogen Lasiodiplodia theobromae CITRA15. Phytopathology 111:761–764. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-08-20-0349-A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Meng J, Zhang D, Pan J, Wang X, Zeng C, Zhu K, Li G. 2022. High-quality genome sequence resource of Lasiodiplodia theobromae JMB122, a fungal pathogen causing peach gummosis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 35:938–940. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-01-22-0013-A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Yu C, Diao Y, Lu Q, Zhao J, Cui S, Xiong X, Lu A, Zhang X, Liu H. 2022. Comparative genomics reveals evolutionary traits, mating strategies, and pathogenicity-related genes variation of Botryosphaeriaceae. Front Microbiol 13:800981. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.800981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Li R, Zheng P, Sun X, Dong W, Shen Z, Chen P, Wu D. 2023. Genome sequencing and analysis reveal potential high-valued metabolites synthesized by Lasiodiplodia iranensis DWH-2. J Fungi (Basel) 9:522. doi: 10.3390/jof9050522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Yeo YS, Kone Y, Dembele DD, Amari EL-NDG, Rey J-Y, Del Ponte EM, Fernandez D, Kone D. 2024. Prevalence of mango stem-end rot disease in Côte d’Ivoire and identification of associated fungal pathogens. Trop plant pathol 49:367–383. doi: 10.1007/s40858-024-00636-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL, Rose JK. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull 19:11–15. [Google Scholar]
- 14. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Jackman SD, Vandervalk BP, Mohamadi H, Chu J, Yeo S, Hammond SA, Jahesh G, Khan H, Coombe L, Warren RL, et al. 2017. ABySS 2.0: resource-efficient assembly of large genomes using a bloom filter. Genome Res 27:768–777. doi: 10.1101/gr.214346.116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Xu M, Guo L, Gu S, Wang O, Zhang R, Peters BA, Fan G, Liu X, Xu X, Deng L, et al. 2020. TGS-GapCloser: a fast and accurate gap closer for large genomes with low coverage of error-prone long reads. Gigascience 9:giaa094. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giaa094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, Simão FA, Zdobnov EM. 2021. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol 38:4647–4654. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Treangen TJ, Ondov BD, Koren S, Phillippy AM. 2014. The harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes. Genome Biol 15:524. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0524-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A. 2019. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 35:4453–4455. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. 2018. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Letunic I, Bork P. 2024. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res 52:W78–W82. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
This Whole-Genome project has been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under the study: PRJEB101385 with accession numbers SAMEA120420990 (01FSyA8-1), SAMEA120420991 (30BrSyA5), and SAMEA120420992 (LaRA1). Assembly names are GCA_977013645.2 (01FSyA8-1), GCA_977013655.2 (30BrSyA5), and GCA_977013665.2 (LaRA1). Data needed to reconstruct the tree are archived at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18878086.
