Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2026 Aug 11;15(9):e00661-26. doi: 10.1128/mra.00661-26

Complete genome sequence of Streptococcus vaginalis strain UMB8616 isolated from the bladder of a female with urge urinary incontinence

Brian I Choi 1, Helen Appleberry 2, Melline Fontes Noronha 1, Catherine Putonti 1,2, Alan J Wolfe 1,✉
Editor: Atmika Paudel3
PMCID: PMC13560716  PMID: 42578699

ABSTRACT

Streptococcus vaginalis is a recently identified bacterial species closely related to Streptococcus anginosus. It has been isolated from the human urogenital tract. We report the complete genome sequence of S. vaginalis UMB8616 (=ATCC TSD-371 = CCUG 77169 = DSM 115471) isolated from the bladder of a human female with urge urinary incontinence.

KEYWORDS: Streptococcus, Streptococcus vaginalis, urge urinary incontinence, human microbiome, urobiome, complete genome

ANNOUNCEMENT

Streptococcus vaginalis is a gram-positive, non-spore-forming, catalase-negative, facultative anaerobic cocci that was recently identified as a novel species most closely related to Streptococcus anginosus (1). S. vaginalis distinguishes itself from S. anginosus by its ability to ferment D-raffinose and mannitol (1). The species has not been formally recognized as a part of the Anginosus group consisting of S. anginosus, S. constellatus, and S. intermedius (2). However, S. vaginalis has been isolated from the same human urogenital niches as other Anginosus group members (1, 3, 4). A previous study analyzing urinary tract-derived S. anginosus strains that had the ability to acidify raffinose characterized a unique gliding-type motility phenotype (5). Such studies indicate that strains previously identified as S. anginosus may require reanalysis with this new species identification.

In this study, we present a S. vaginalis strain UMB8616 (=ATCC TSD-371 = CCUG 77169 = DSM 115471) isolated from a female diagnosed with urge urinary incontinence (UUI) from bladder urine obtained via transurethral catheter from a female urogynecology patient at Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, United States as part of a prospective clinical study (NCT02495389) (IRB#: LU208983) (6). This method involved incubating urine on sheep blood agar plates for 48 h at 37°C with 5% supplemented CO2 gas, followed by single-colony isolation. The strain was originally identified as S. anginosus via matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF), as previously described (7). For isolation of DNA, a sample was cultured from cryopreservation using the same conditions and method as identification.

DNA for short-read Illumina sequences was extracted with the Qiagen UltraClean Microbial Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was conducted using the Nextera XT DNA Library Preparation Kit (Illumina) and the MiSeq Reagent Kit v2 run on the Illumina MiSeq platform. DNA extraction and sequencing for long-read Oxford Nanopore sequences was performed by SeqCenter using ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit and Oxford Nanopore Technology Ligation Sequencing Kit V14 with the NEBNext Companion Module. No additional DNA fragmentation or size selection was performed. Sequencing was conducted on R10.4.1 flowcells run on the MinION platform. Guppy v6.4.6 (Nanopore) was used for basecalling, demultiplexing, and adapter removal.

Hybrid assembly was performed by combining short and long sequence reads. Default parameters were used for all software, unless otherwise specified. Raw read quality was assessed using FastQC v0.11.9 (8). Low-quality Illumina and Oxford Nanopore reads were filtered using Cutadapt v3.7 (9) and NanoFilt v2.8.0 (10), respectively. Long reads were used for the initial genome assembly with Flye v2.9 (11). Illumina reads were subsequently used for polishing with Pilon v1.24 (12). Genome assembly quality was evaluated using QUAST v5.2.0 (13), and genome circularization and rotation to dnaA were performed with Circlator v1.5.5 (14). Genome completeness and contamination were assessed using CheckM v1.2.0 (15), applying the lineage-specific workflow (lineage_wf). Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v6.7 (16) was used for genome annotations. Species was confirmed via digital DNA:DNA hybridization (17); S. vaginalis UMB8616 and S. vaginalis P1L01T (GCF_017315345.1) have a d4 value of 94.7%, which exceeds the species threshold (18).

Table 1 presents the characteristics of the complete S. vaginalis UMB8616 chromosome and its plasmid pUMB8616_1. Availability of this complete genome is foundational for subsequent reanalysis of S. anginosus genomes.

TABLE 1.

Complete genome characteristics

Characteristic S. vaginalis UMB8616
Illumina sequencing
 Read length (nucleotides) 250
 No. of read pairs 851,883
Nanopore sequencing
 No. of reads 220,575
 Read N50 (bp) 8,170
Annotation statistics
    No. of contigs 2
    Structure 1 chromosome (circular), 1 plasmid (circular)
    Genome length (bp), chromosome (plasmid) 2,033,097 (9,612)
    GC content (%) 39.15
    Average coverage (×) 711
    Predicted no. of coding DNA sequences 1,938
    No. of rRNAs (5S, 16S, 23S) 4, 4, 4
    No. of tRNAs 60

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We wish to acknowledge members of the Department of Urogynecology and the Loyola Urinary Education and Research Collaborative who recruited the patients and collected and processed the specimens.

This work was supported by investigator-initiated funding from Pathnostics.

Contributor Information

Alan J. Wolfe, Email: awolfe@luc.edu.

Atmika Paudel, Fluxus Inc., Sunnyvale, California, USA.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The Illumina raw reads/Nanopore raw reads/assembly have been deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers: SRR10153371/SRR25068137/GCA_008726365.3. The complete genome of the chromosome sequence is deposited under GenBank accession number CP136160.1 and the complete plasmid sequence, pUMB8616_1, under GenBank accession number CP136161.1.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Chao A-S, Lin C-Y, Chao A, Lee Y-S, Chang Y-C, Wu H-C, Dai Y-J, Liao W-Q, Kao F-C, Chen Y-S. 2021. Streptococcus vaginalis sp. nov., a novel bacterial species isolated from vaginal swabs of a pregnant woman with diabetes. Arch Microbiol 203:5475–5482. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02532-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Whiley RA, Beighton D. 1991. Emended descriptions and recognition of Streptococcus constellatus, Streptococcus intermedius, and Streptococcus anginosus as distinct species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 41:1–5. doi: 10.1099/00207713-41-1-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Joyce C, Halverson T, Gonzalez C, Brubaker L, Wolfe AJ. 2022. The urobiomes of adult women with various lower urinary tract symptoms status differ: a re-analysis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:860408. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.860408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Prasad A, Ene A, Jablonska S, Du J, Wolfe AJ, Putonti C. 2023. Comparative genomic study of Streptococcus anginosus reveals distinct group of urinary strains. mSphere 8:e00687–22. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00687-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bergman S, Selig M, Collins MD, Farrow JAE, Baron EJ, Dickersin GR, Ruoff KL. 1995. “Streptococcus milleri” strains displaying a gliding type of motility. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45:235–239. doi: 10.1099/00207713-45-2-235 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Halverson T, Mueller ER, Brubaker L, Wolfe AJ. 2022. Symptom improvement with mirabegron treatment is associated with urobiome changes in adult women. Int Urogynecol J 33:1319–1328. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05190-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hilt EE, McKinley K, Pearce MM, Rosenfeld AB, Zilliox MJ, Mueller ER, Brubaker L, Gai X, Wolfe AJ, Schreckenberger PC. 2014. Urine is not sterile: use of enhanced urine culture techniques to detect resident bacterial flora in the adult female bladder. J Clin Microbiol 52:871–876. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02876-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Simon A, Pierre L, Brian H, Phil E. 2010. Babragam bioinformatics-FastQC a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available from: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
  • 9. Martin M. 2011. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet j 17:10. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. De Coster W, D’Hert S, Schultz DT, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. 2018. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 34:2666–2669. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lin Y, Yuan J, Kolmogorov M, Shen MW, Chaisson M, Pevzner PA. 2016. Assembly of long error-prone reads using de Bruijn graphs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:E8396–E8405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604560113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hunt M, Silva ND, Otto TD, Parkhill J, Keane JA, Harris SR. 2015. Circlator: automated circularization of genome assemblies using long sequencing reads. Genome Biol 16:294. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0849-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. 2019. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 10:2182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Riesco R, Trujillo ME. 2024. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 74:006300. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The Illumina raw reads/Nanopore raw reads/assembly have been deposited in GenBank under the following accession numbers: SRR10153371/SRR25068137/GCA_008726365.3. The complete genome of the chromosome sequence is deposited under GenBank accession number CP136160.1 and the complete plasmid sequence, pUMB8616_1, under GenBank accession number CP136161.1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES