Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2026 Jul 31;15(9):e00466-25. doi: 10.1128/mra.00466-25

Isolation and genomic characterization of bacteriophage Vanta, a lytic Yuavirus infecting clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Aaryan Harshith 1, Zachary N Flamholz 1, Paul L Bollyky 1, Jessica C Sacher 1,✉
Editor: Simon Roux2
PMCID: PMC13560740  PMID: 42535858

ABSTRACT

We report the genome of Vanta, a lytic bacteriophage isolated from wastewater using Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. Phage Vanta is a Yuavirus with a circularly permuted, 61,663-bp, 64.5% guanine-cytosine, dsDNA genome. Head width is 56 ± 2 nm, and tail length is 133 ± 5 nm. Vanta plaques on two drug-resistant clinical P. aeruginosa isolates.

KEYWORDS: Pseudomonas, phage, AMR, novel, antimicrobial, cystic fibrosis

ANNOUNCEMENT

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic gram-negative pathogen causing skin, lung, and bone infections worldwide (1, 2). Antimicrobial resistance has made it a target for bacteriophage therapy (3, 4). Here, we report the genome of Vanta, a lytic, tailed P. aeruginosa phage.

Vanta was isolated from wastewater collected on 11 July 2024 from Stanford University’s Codiga Resource Recovery Center. Wastewater was diluted in saline magnesium (SM) buffer (100 mM NaCl, 8 mM MgSO₄, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 0.01% gelatin), sterile-filtered (0.2-µm polyethersulfone), and enriched for phages using early-log Pa PA14 grown in LB Miller broth (200 µL wastewater, 5 mL culture, 37°C, 250 rpm). After 4 h, the culture was centrifuged twice (15 min, 5,000× g, 4°C). Sterile-filtered supernatant was applied to a PA14 lawn. A round, transparent, 2-mm plaque was transferred into 1 mL SM buffer using a P1000 pipette tip. To ensure an isolated phage, plaque picking was repeated 5× sequentially before propagating (Fig. 1A).

Fig 1.

Plaques of phage Vanta on P. aeruginosa PA14, TEM showing tailless phage particles at 100 nm scale, and a circular genome map of Vanta annotated with replication, structure and assembly, lysis, and hypothetical protein genes.

(A) Plaques formed by Vanta on P. aeruginosa PA14. (B) TEM of Vanta. (C) Predicted circularized genome map generated using Proksee 2023 (5).

Vanta plaqued on Pa mPAO1Δpf4Δpf6 (6), Pa Li010, and two multidrug-resistant Pa strains from rectal and bronchial infections (CDC AR Isolate Bank AR_0231, AR_0238) (7).

Vanta was negatively stained (1% uranyl acetate) and visualized at 120 kV using a JEM1400 transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), which showed a flexible, non-contractile tail typical of siphoviruses. Mean head width and tail length were 56 ± 2 and 133 ± 5 nm, respectively (n = 10, mean ± standard deviation [SD], Fig. 1B).

Filtered lysate was treated with DNAse (2 U/mL), RNAse A (10 µg/mL), and proteinase K (30 µg/mL) (NEB, Ipswich, USA), and DNA was extracted using a DNeasy kit (Qiagen, Germantown, USA). Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) libraries were prepared (Novogene Standard Microbial WGS PCR+ Kit) and sequenced (Illumina NovaSeq X Plus Series PE150, Novogene, Sacramento, USA). Next, 1.1 × 107 paired-end reads (150 bp) were verified with FastQC (v0.12.1) (8). Adaptors and low-quality reads (≤100 bp, FastQ ≤20) were removed with BBDuk (v39.08) (9). Reads were subsampled to 80× with Seqtk v1.4 (10) and assembled using MEGAHIT (v1.2.9) (11). Contigs were visualized using Bandage (v0.8.1) (12) and validated using BBMap (v38.84) with 100% read coverage (31,851 mapped reads) (13). A single 61,663-bp contig (64.5% guanine-cytosine [GC]) was extracted (Fig. 1C) and polished using Pilon (v1.24) (14). PhageTerm (v1.0.12) suggested the genome was circularly permuted and complete (15, 16).

The genome was oriented to the terminase large subunit gene using Geneious Prime (v.2026.0.2) (5, 17) and annotated using Pharokka (v1.8.2) (18), with Prodigal (v2.6.3) for gene prediction (19), PHROGs for functional annotation (20), and tRNAscan (v2.0.12) for tRNA identification (21). Next, 86 coding sequences and 0 tRNAs were identified. BACPHLIP (v0.9.6) predicted Vanta was lytic (98% confidence) (22).

Phylogeny.fr (v2.0) classified Vanta into the genus Yuavirus using FastTree (v2.2.0) (23, 24), which was confirmed with VIPTree (v4.0) using phage AAT1 as an outgroup (25).

All tools were run with default parameters unless specified.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Sebastien Tilmans and Bill Li at Stanford’s Codiga Resource Recovery Center for their help with wastewater sampling. We also thank the Gao Lab for sequencing help and Dr. John Perrino and Dr. Maryam Hajfathalian for their support with electron microscopy.

Contributor Information

Jessica C. Sacher, Email: jsacher@stanford.edu.

Simon Roux, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The annotated genome of Vanta is accessible through NCBI GenBank (PQ628237). Raw reads are also available (BioProject PRJNA1267729, SRA SRR36199512).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Bodey GP, Bolivar R, Fainstein V, Jadeja L. 1983. Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Rev Infect Dis 5:279–313. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.2.279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Reynolds D, Kollef M. 2021. The epidemiology and pathogenesis and treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: an update. Drugs 81:2117–2131. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01635-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kim MK, Chen Q, Echterhof A, Pennetzdorfer N, McBride RC, Banaei N, Burgener EB, Milla CE, Bollyky PL. 2024. A blueprint for broadly effective bacteriophage-antibiotic cocktails against bacterial infections. Nat Commun 15:9987. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53994-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Waters EM, Neill DR, Kaman B, Sahota JS, Clokie MRJ, Winstanley C, Kadioglu A. 2017. Phage therapy is highly effective against chronic lung infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Thorax 72:666–667. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Grant JR, Enns E, Marinier E, Mandal A, Herman EK, Chen C, Graham M, Van Domselaar G, Stothard P. 2023. Proksee: in-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 51:W484–W492. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad326 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Schmidt AK, Schwartzkopf CM, Pourtois JD, Burgener EB, Faith DR, Joyce A, Lamma T, Kumar G, Bollyky PL, Secor PR. 2024. Targeted deletion of Pf prophages from diverse Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates has differential impacts on quorum sensing and virulence traits. J Bacteriol 206:e0040223. doi: 10.1128/jb.00402-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. CDC & FDA Antimicrobial Resistance Isolate Bank . 2026. CDC public health strategy for antimicrobial resistance. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/antimicrobial-resistance/php/public-health-strategy/index.html
  • 8. Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Institute. Available from: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
  • 9. Bushnell B. 2014. BBDuk guide. BBTools suite. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. https://archive.jgi.doe.gov/data-and-tools/software-tools/bbtools/bb-tools-user-guide/bbduk-guide/. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Li H. 2012. Seqtk: a fast and lightweight tool for processing sequences in FASTA/Q formats. GitHub repository. https://github.com/lh3/seqtk. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. 2015. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31:1674–1676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. 2015. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 31:3350–3352. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Bushnell B. 2014. BBMap: a fast, accurate, splice-aware aligner. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Available from: https://sourceforge.net/projects/bbmap [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Garneau JR, Depardieu F, Fortier L-C, Bikard D, Monot M. 2017. PhageTerm: a tool for fast and accurate determination of phage termini and packaging mechanism using next-generation sequencing data. Sci Rep 7:8292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07910-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. The Galaxy Community . 2024. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible, and collaborative data analyses: 2024 update. Nucleic Acids Res 52:W83–W94. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Shen A, Millard A. 2021. Phage genome annotation: where to begin and end. Phage (New Rochelle) 2:183–193. doi: 10.1089/phage.2021.0015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Bouras G, Nepal R, Houtak G, Psaltis AJ, Wormald PJ, Vreugde S. 2023. Pharokka: a fast scalable bacteriophage annotation tool. Bioinformatics 39:btac776. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. 2010. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Terzian P, Olo Ndela E, Galiez C, Lossouarn J, Pérez Bucio RE, Mom R, Toussaint A, Petit M-A, Enault F. 2021. PHROG: families of prokaryotic virus proteins clustered using remote homology. NAR Genom Bioinform 3:lqab067. doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqab067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Chan PP, Lowe TM. 2019. tRNAscan-SE: searching for tRNA genes in genomic sequences. Methods Mol Biol 1962:1–14. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Hockenberry AJ, Wilke CO. 2021. BACPHLIP: predicting bacteriophage lifestyle from conserved protein domains. PeerJ 9:e11396. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11396 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Dereeper A, Guignon V, Blanc G, Audic S, Buffet S, Chevenet F, Dufayard JF, Guindon S, Lefort V, Lescot M, Claverie JM, Gascuel O. 2008. Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res 36:W465–9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2010. FastTree 2–approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5:e9490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Nishimura Y, Yoshida T, Kuronishi M, Uehara H, Ogata H, Goto S. 2017. ViPTree: the viral proteomic tree server. Bioinformatics 33:2379–2380. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The annotated genome of Vanta is accessible through NCBI GenBank (PQ628237). Raw reads are also available (BioProject PRJNA1267729, SRA SRR36199512).


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES