Abstract
Photocatalysis has emerged as a promising strategy for converting solar energy into chemical fuels, offering a sustainable route for hydrogen production through water splitting. While solar energy has been successfully utilized for electricity generation via photovoltaic technologies, extending its use to direct chemical fuel production, analogous to natural photosynthesis, remains a major challenge. A significant breakthrough was recently reported by Takata et al., who demonstrated that Al-doped SrTiO3 loaded with Rh/Cr2O3 & CoOOH cocatalysts can achieve near-unity quantum efficiency for photocatalytic water splitting under ultraviolet irradiation at wavelengths around 350 nm. Motivated by this progress, this review surveys perovskite-based photocatalysts for water splitting with the aim of identifying materials beyond SrTiO3 having the potential to exhibit similar or improved performance. The fundamentals of photocatalytic water splitting and the properties of SrTiO3 and other perovskite families, including oxide, oxynitride, Aurivillius, Dion–Jacobson, and Ruddlesden–Popper perovskites, are discussed. Notably promising perovskite materials with potential for achieving high efficiencies and improved solar-light utilization are highlighted.
Keywords: perovskites, photocatalysis, water splitting, SrTiO3
1. Introduction
Photocatalysis has emerged as a powerful strategy for utilizing solar energy to drive chemical transformations, offering promising opportunities for renewable fuel production, environmental remediation, and sustainable chemical synthesis [1]. Among these applications, the conversion of solar energy into chemical fuels is particularly attractive because it enables the storage of intermittent solar energy in the form of stable energy carriers. Hydrogen produced from water using sunlight represents one of the most compelling examples of this concept and is widely regarded as a key component of future carbon-neutral energy systems [2]. Over the past decades, substantial progress has been achieved in harnessing solar energy for electricity generation through photovoltaic technologies. The rapid deployment of large-scale solar power plants worldwide demonstrates the technological maturity and scalability of solar electricity production. Notable examples include the 550 MW Topaz Solar Farm (USA), 800 MW Copper Mountain Solar Facility (USA) [3], 605 MW Witznitz Solar Farm (Germany), 1500 MW Tengger Desert Solar Park (China) [4], 1650 MW Benban Solar Park (Egypt) [5], 1300 MW Karapınar Solar Power Plant (Turkey) [6], 1100 MW Noor Abu Dhabi (United Arab Emirates), 1000 MW Kurnool Ultra Mega Solar Park (India), and the 2000 MW Pavagada Solar Park (India) [7,8,9]. These installations highlight the enormous potential of solar energy as a large-scale and sustainable electricity source. In contrast, the direct conversion of solar energy into chemical fuels remains far less developed. Achieving efficient solar-driven chemical production presents significant challenges due to the complexity of the underlying photophysical and catalytic processes. Photocatalysis offers a promising pathway to address these challenges by enabling light-driven chemical reactions that convert solar energy directly into chemical bonds.
The modern field of photocatalysis originated from the pioneering discovery of photoelectrochemical water splitting on TiO2 electrode by Fujishima and Honda in 1972, which demonstrated that light irradiation could drive the splitting of water into hydrogen and oxygen [10]. This landmark discovery initiated extensive research into semiconductor photocatalysis, leading to a wide range of applications including pollutant degradation [11], methane activation [12], alkane functionalization [13], CO2 reduction [14,15], N2 fixation [16], decarboxylation reactions [17], and hydrodeoxygenation processes [18]. Among these reactions, photocatalytic water splitting has attracted particular attention because it directly links solar energy conversion with sustainable hydrogen production. Hydrogen is a clean and energy-dense fuel whose combustion produces only water, making it an attractive alternative to fossil fuels. In addition to its technological relevance, water splitting also serves as a benchmark reaction for evaluating photocatalytic materials, as it allows systematic investigation of fundamental parameters such as light absorption, charge carrier generation and separation, and surface reaction kinetics [19].
Despite significant research efforts, the efficiency of photocatalytic water splitting remains considerably lower than that achieved by alternative hydrogen production technologies. For practical solar hydrogen generation, a solar-to-hydrogen (STH) efficiency of approximately 10% is generally considered the minimum threshold for economic viability. However, most particulate photocatalyst systems currently exhibit STH efficiencies below 1%, with typical values ranging from 0.01–0.5% under simulated solar irradiation [20]. Only a limited number of highly optimized systems, such as modified Al-doped SrTiO3 photocatalysts combined with cocatalysts, have approached efficiencies of 1–2% [9,21,22,23]. In contrast, photovoltaic-powered electrolyzers can achieve overall STH efficiencies of approximately 15–20%, while advanced photoelectrochemical tandem systems have reported efficiencies exceeding 10–19% under laboratory conditions [24]. This disparity highlights the key limitations of current photocatalytic systems, including insufficient visible-light absorption, rapid recombination of photogenerated charge carriers, and sluggish surface reaction kinetics. An efficient photocatalyst for overall water splitting must therefore satisfy several critical physicochemical requirements.
A major breakthrough in this field was recently reported by Takata et al. [21], who demonstrated nearly unity quantum efficiency for overall photocatalytic water splitting using an Al-doped SrTiO3 photocatalyst. In this system, aluminum was incorporated into the SrTiO3 lattice at concentrations below 1 atom% relative to Ti. Furthermore, cocatalyst nanoparticles were selectively deposited on different crystallographic facets via photodeposition, with Ru/Cr2O3 clusters deposited on electron-collecting {100} facets and CoOOH deposited on hole-collecting {110} facets. This facet-engineered architecture enabled highly efficient spatial separation of photogenerated charge carriers, resulting in an external quantum efficiency of up to 96% at wavelengths between 350 and 360 nm. These results highlight the potential of carefully engineered perovskite photocatalysts to achieve extremely high efficiencies in photocatalytic water splitting. Motivated by this finding, perovskite materials have the potential to be one of the most promising classes of photocatalysts for solar-driven water splitting. The structural flexibility of perovskites allows extensive tuning of their electronic structure, optical absorption properties, and charge transport characteristics through compositional modification, doping, and structural engineering [25].
In this review, we focus on perovskite-based photocatalysts for water splitting, with the goal of identifying the potential materials that may achieve higher efficiencies and improved solar-light utilization. The concept underlying this review originated from the observation in the pioneering work of Takata et al. on SrTiO3. As mentioned before, Takata and co-workers demonstrated that exceptional photocatalytic performance can be achieved not through the discovery of a new material, but through the rational modification of an existing one. Their strategy combined three key elements: low-level Al substitution (≈1 at.%) at the Ti site, molten-salt synthesis to produce highly crystalline particles with minimal defects, and photodeposition of optimized cocatalysts. The synergy between these modifications enabled SrTiO3 to exhibit photocatalytic water splitting with an apparent quantum efficiency approaching unity under ultraviolet irradiation. Motivated by this success, we first discuss the fundamental principles of photocatalysis, including band-gap engineering, band-edge alignment, cocatalysts, doping effects and the role of sacrificial agents. Subsequently, the structural characteristics and classifications of perovskite materials are introduced. The extensively studied SrTiO3 system is then examined as a benchmark perovskite photocatalyst. Finally, we explore other perovskite families including simple & double oxide perovskites, oxynitrides, Dion–Jacobson, Aurivillius, and Ruddlesden–Popper phases, to evaluate whether they could benefit from the same materials-engineering strategy that enabled the exceptional performance of SrTiO3. This review seeks to answer the following question: Are there perovskite photocatalysts beyond SrTiO3 with electronic structures intrinsically suitable for overall water splitting that, through the application of similar materials-engineering principles (including simultaneously improved crystallinity, optimized doping strategies and rational cocatalyst deposition), could achieve photocatalytic performances comparable to the near-unity quantum efficiency demonstrated by SrTiO3 system? By addressing this question, the review suggests that, rather than focusing on the discovery of new perovskite compositions, research should concentrate on engineering the already proven and promised perovskites. The novelty of this review lies in its exclusive focus on photocatalytic water splitting and its approach of evaluating perovskite photocatalysts from the same perspective as the SrTiO3-based benchmark [21]. Many existing reviews [26,27,28] focus on visible-light-active photocatalysts covering all applications including environmental applications, which are generally less challenging than water splitting and require less stringent material engineering. Other reviews primarily address perovskites for semiconductor and electronic applications [29,30]. Although a few reviews [31,32] focus only on water splitting, they typically cover both photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical systems rather than concentrating solely on photocatalytic water splitting.
2. Fundamental Principles of Photocatalysis
For photocatalytic water splitting to occur, a minimum thermodynamic potential of 1.23 V is required, corresponding to a Gibbs free energy change of 237.13 kJ mol−1 for water splitting reaction as shown in Equation (1).
| (1) |
In photocatalysis, this driving force is generated by photoexcitation of electrons across the band gap of the photocatalyst, producing electron–hole pairs capable of driving reduction and oxidation reactions. In principle, a semiconductor with a band gap larger than 1.23 eV could provide the minimum energy required for water splitting. However, practical systems require additional overpotential to overcome kinetic barriers associated with the multielectron hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions. Consequently, photocatalysts for solar-driven water splitting must typically exhibit band gaps in the range of 1.8–2.4 eV, allowing visible-light absorption while maintaining sufficient redox driving force. Although an appropriate band gap (typically 1.8–2.4 eV) enables visible-light absorption, it is only one of several essential requirements for efficient overall photocatalytic water splitting. Many promising photocatalysts still exhibit poor overall water-splitting performance because multiple thermodynamic, kinetic, and structural factors must be simultaneously optimized. First, a suitable band gap does not necessarily ensure proper band-edge alignment. The conduction band minimum (CBM) must be more negative than the / reduction potential (0 V vs. NHE), while the valence band maximum (VBM) must be more positive than the / oxidation potential (1.23 V vs. NHE). Many perovskites possess favorable band gaps but insufficient redox driving force for either hydrogen or oxygen evolution, making overall water splitting thermodynamically infeasible [15,33]. These perovskites have demonstrated only hydrogen or oxygen evolution in the presence of sacrificial reagents rather than unbiased overall water splitting, indicating that efficient charge separation and balanced surface redox reactions have not yet been achieved simultaneously [33]. Moreover, rapid recombination of photogenerated electron–hole pairs remains one of the primary causes of efficiency loss. Bulk defects, surface trap states, and limited carrier mobility significantly shorten charge-carrier lifetimes, preventing electrons and holes from reaching active surface sites before recombination [34]. Consequently, defect engineering, heterojunction construction, and cocatalyst loading have become essential strategies to promote charge separation and suppress recombination. Surface reaction kinetics also represent a major limitation. While the hydrogen evolution reaction involves a two-electron process, oxygen evolution is a kinetically demanding four-electron reaction requiring multiple reaction intermediates and high activation energy. Therefore, even photocatalysts with suitable electronic structures still require cocatalysts such as Pt, Rh/Cr2O3, CoOx, or RuO2 to accelerate interfacial charge transfer and reduce reaction overpotentials [35]. Furthermore, many visible-light-responsive perovskites suffer from photocorrosion, structural instability, or defect accumulation under prolonged irradiation, resulting in gradual activity loss. Although oxide perovskites generally exhibit better chemical stability than halide perovskites, long-term durability under practical operating conditions remains an important challenge [15,36]. Therefore, the only major challenge is no longer just the suitable band gaps, but the development of integrated material-design strategies that simultaneously optimize band-edge alignment, defect chemistry, charge-carrier dynamics, cocatalyst architecture, surface reaction kinetics, and long-term stability.
The electronic structure of photocatalysts is typically determined using a combination of spectroscopic, electrochemical, and theoretical methods. The band gap energy is commonly estimated using UV–Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS). Then it is analyzed using Tauc plots, which enable determination of direct or indirect band gaps [37]. The valence band position can be measured using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) or ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS). UPS provides particularly accurate information regarding the valence band maximum relative to the Fermi level, whereas XPS valence-band spectra can also be used to estimate the energy difference between the valence band edge and the Fermi level [38,39]. The conduction band position is often estimated using Mott–Schottky analysis derived from electrochemical impedance measurements. From the Mott–Schottky plot, the flat-band potential can be obtained, which is commonly approximated as the conduction band edge for n-type semiconductors. Combining this value with the experimentally determined band gap enables estimation of the valence band edge [40,41].
In addition to experimental techniques, density functional theory (DFT) calculations are widely used to investigate electronic structures. DFT enables prediction of band structures, density of states (DOS), and band-edge positions, while also providing insight into orbital contributions, charge distribution, and the effects of doping or defects. When needed, the description of the electronic structure and band gaps can be further improved using methods such as hybrid functionals (e.g., HSE06) or many-body perturbation methods (e.g., GW) [42]. In some cases, band-edge positions can also be estimated using empirical electronegativity-based models:
| ECB = x − Ee − 1/2 Eg, | (2) |
| EVB = ECB + Eg, | (3) |
where x is the absolute electronegativity of the semiconductor, represents the free-electron energy on the hydrogen scale (≈4.5 eV), and is the band gap energy. Although this method provides approximate values, it is frequently used for preliminary evaluation of photocatalyst suitability [43].
Beyond thermodynamic considerations, charge separation efficiency represents a major challenge in photocatalysis. Following photoexcitation, electrons and holes must migrate to the catalyst surface before recombining. However, recombination often occurs on ultrafast timescales. For instance, studies on TiO2 have shown that nearly 60% of photogenerated electron–hole pairs recombine within ~25 ns, while only a small fraction of carriers survive long enough (microsecond timescales) to participate in surface reactions [44]. The efficiency of photocatalytic systems is strongly influenced by the dynamics of charge-carrier generation, transport, and recombination. Understanding these processes requires different and a variety of time-resolved spectroscopic techniques capable of probing carrier lifetimes across multiple timescales [45]. While UV–Vis absorption spectroscopy is used to determine the spectral region in which a material absorbs light, photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy provides insight into recombination pathways. PL emission arises from radiative recombination of electrons and holes; therefore, strong PL intensity typically indicates high recombination rates, whereas suppressed PL signals suggest more efficient charge separation [46]. Carrier lifetimes are frequently measured using time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL). In TRPL experiments, short laser pulses (picosecond or nanosecond duration) excite the sample, and the decay of luminescence intensity is monitored over time [47]. Analysis of the decay profile provides quantitative information about recombination kinetics. For ultrafast carrier dynamics, transient absorption spectroscopy (TA) is widely employed. In this pump–probe technique, an ultrafast pump pulse excites the sample, and a delayed probe pulse monitors changes in absorption. By varying the delay time from femtoseconds to nanoseconds, the evolution of excited-state populations and carrier relaxation processes can be resolved [48]. For longer-lived excited states, photoinduced absorption (PIA) spectroscopy is commonly used. PIA measurements operate on microsecond to millisecond timescales and are particularly suitable for detecting long-lived charge carriers [49]. Related pump–probe approaches include diffuse reflectance transient spectroscopy (DRTS) [50,51], which measures transient reflectance changes in strongly scattering materials such as powdered photocatalysts [52]. Carrier transport properties can also be studied using microwave photoconductivity decay (µ-PCD) [53]. In this technique, photoexcited charge carriers temporarily increase the electrical conductivity of the semiconductor, and the decay of photoconductivity is monitored via microwave absorption. Another highly sensitive method is time-correlated single-photon counting (TCSPC), which records photon arrival times with picosecond resolution and enables precise determination of recombination lifetimes [54]. Longer carrier lifetimes are generally favorable for photocatalysis because they increase the probability that photogenerated electrons and holes reach the catalyst surface and participate in redox reactions before recombination. However, a longer lifetime does not necessarily translate into higher photocatalytic activity, as the measured lifetime may also reflect carrier trapping in defect states rather than efficient charge transport. Therefore, lifetime measurements should be interpreted together with complementary techniques such as photocurrent response, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, etc., to establish the relationship between charge dynamics and photocatalytic performance. These electrochemical techniques further provide valuable information on charge-transfer resistance, carrier transport, and interfacial recombination kinetics. Lower charge-transfer resistance, together with stronger transient photocurrent responses, generally indicates more efficient separation and migration of photogenerated charge carriers [55].
Cocatalysts also play a critical role in photocatalytic water splitting because the photocatalyst alone is often unable to efficiently catalyze multielectron redox reactions. In bare photocatalysts, photogenerated electrons and holes frequently recombine before participating in surface reactions. Depositing cocatalysts on the photocatalyst surface provides active reaction sites and charge-separation centers, facilitating efficient transfer of electrons or holes to reactants. This spatial separation of reduction and oxidation sites significantly suppresses recombination and improves quantum efficiency [56]. For hydrogen evolution, noble metals such as Pt, Rh, and Ru are the widely used cocatalysts. Earth-abundant alternatives including Ni-based catalysts and NiO have also been investigated as HER cocatalysts, particularly for alkaline systems. For oxygen evolution, transition-metal oxides and oxyhydroxides such as RuO2, IrO2, and RhOOH are commonly employed. These materials efficiently accept photogenerated holes and catalyze water oxidation through multistep proton-coupled electron-transfer processes. Thus, efficient photocatalytic systems rely on the synergistic interaction between the photocatalyst and cocatalysts, which control surface reaction kinetics and improve charge separation [56].
The influence of doping concentration on photocatalytic performance is a critical factor in perovskite design, as it dictates the delicate balance between beneficial charge carrier dynamics, thermodynamic band alignment, and detrimental defect-mediated recombination. It has a non-monotonic (volcano-type) trend, depending on the specific nature of the dopant, the host material and its interaction with the host lattice. The vast majority of doped perovskite systems exhibit a classic non-monotonic, volcano-type relationship where an optimal exists. Chen et al. and Wang et al. demonstrated this for Rh-doped and Ce/N-codoped SrTiO3, showing that excessive dopants severely degrade the internal quantum yield [50,51]. This pattern extends to aliovalent codoping systems designed for charge compensation, such as La/Al-codoped, Rh/Sb-codoped, and Cr/Ta-codoped SrTiO3 [57,58,59], where an exact stoichiometric balance is required. Deviating from the optimum ratio (e.g., >0.6 mol% La [57], or Sb/Rh ≠ 1.0 [58]) fails to fully suppress undesirable high-valent states (like Rh4+ or Cr6+) or induces lattice distortion, thereby regenerating recombination centers. Additionally, this non-universal, material-specific optimization extends to perovskite families beyond SrTiO3. For example, Jiang et al. showed that Na+ doping in SrTiO3 exhibits a volcano-type relationship peaking at 4–5 mol% and excessive doping causes severe lattice contraction and defect accumulation [60]. In oxynitride perovskites, Pan et al. and Yang et al. investigated the band engineering of LaTaON2 and BaNbO2N via Mg2+ solid solutions [61,62]. In both systems, increasing the Mg content shifted the valence band maximum to provide a thermodynamic driving force for water oxidation and suppressed intrinsic defects; however, the activity exhibited distinct volcano-type relationships. Beyond these optima, excessive Mg incorporation widened the bandgap and diminished the density of states at the band edges, severely reducing visible light absorption and carrier mobility. Consequently, optimal dopant concentrations are strictly material- and dopant-specific rather than universal. The ideal concentration is governed by a complex interplay of factors, including ionic radii mismatch, the valence state of the dopant, the specific energy position of dopant states, and the host lattice’s tolerance factor and intrinsic defect chemistry. Even within the same oxynitride family, the distinct Mg-doping optima for Ta-based LaTaON2 versus Nb-based BaNbO2N suggest that the B-site cation’s electronic structure governs how much dopant a lattice can accommodate before defect passivation gives way to band-edge degradation. Therefore, rationalizing doping strategies across oxide, oxynitride, and layered perovskites requires systematic, material-specific optimization.
Sacrificial agents are also widely used in half-reaction photocatalysis to simplify mechanistic studies of water splitting. Because many photocatalysts cannot efficiently drive both HER and OER simultaneously, sacrificial reagents are introduced to selectively consume one type of charge carrier. In hydrogen evolution experiments, organic molecules such as methanol, ethanol, or triethanolamine act as hole scavengers, rapidly reacting with photogenerated holes and suppressing recombination. This process increases the availability of conduction-band electrons for proton reduction. For oxygen evolution studies, oxidizing agents such as AgNO3 or FeCl3 serve as electron scavengers, enabling photogenerated holes to accumulate and oxidize water. Unlike redox mediators, sacrificial agents are irreversibly consumed during the reaction and are not regenerated. Although these systems do not represent true overall water splitting, they are widely used for catalyst screening and mechanistic investigations [63,64,65,66].
Enhancing photocatalytic performance requires simultaneous improvement of light absorption, charge separation, and surface reaction kinetics. Band-structure engineering through doping, defect engineering, and band-gap tuning can extend visible-light absorption and improve charge transport. Heterojunction architectures, including type-II, Z-scheme, S-scheme, and p–n junctions, introduce internal electric fields that promote spatial separation of electrons and holes. Schottky junctions formed with noble metals act as electron sinks, while plasmonic metals can enhance light harvesting through localized surface plasmon resonance [67,68]. Structural engineering strategies also play a key role. Nanostructured architectures, two-dimensional materials, and mesoporous frameworks reduce carrier diffusion distances and expose highly active surfaces. Conductive carbon materials such as graphene, carbon nanotubes, and MXenes further facilitate rapid electron transport. Other emerging approaches including single-atom catalysis, vacancy engineering, ferroelectric polarization, dye sensitization, and advanced heterostructure design continue to expand the toolbox for achieving efficient solar-driven photocatalysis [69,70,71,72].
3. Fundamentals of Perovskite Materials
Perovskites have attracted significant attention for a broad range of applications, including photovoltaic solar cells [73], light-emitting diodes (LEDs), lasers, photodetectors [74], photocatalytic chemical reactions [15,72], photothermal conversion [75], optical sensors [76], photocatalytic environmental remediation [77], and other optical and electronical technologies [78,79]. These diverse applications primarily arise from their outstanding crystal structure and unique optical and electronic properties. These structures constitute a large family of crystalline materials generally described by the typical formula ABX3, where A is a relatively large cation occupying a 12-fold coordinated cuboctahedral site, B is a smaller cation in octahedral coordination, and X is an anion. Depending on the anion chemistry, perovskites are commonly categorized into oxide, halide, and chalcogenide systems. Among these, oxide perovskites are the most extensively investigated due to their stability and remarkable diversity of functional properties, including ferroelectricity, magnetism, ionic conductivity, and catalytic activity. The archetypal perovskite structure is derived from the mineral CaTiO3. In the ideal cubic configuration, the B-site cation resides at the center of a BX6 octahedron, while the A-site cation occupies the cuboctahedral cavity formed by the surrounding anions. In oxide perovskites, the B-site is typically occupied by transition metal cations, whereas the A-site generally hosts alkaline-earth or rare-earth ions. Because the B–O bonds form the rigid octahedral framework, they largely determine the structural stability and electronic properties of the material [80]. At elevated temperatures, many perovskites adopt the ideal cubic structure; however, deviations from this configuration are common. Differences in ionic radii, electronegativity, or bonding preferences often induce octahedral tilting and lattice distortions, lowering the symmetry to tetragonal, orthorhombic, rhombohedral, or monoclinic phases. The structural stability of perovskites can be rationalized using geometric descriptors such as the Goldschmidt tolerance factor and the octahedral factor, while modern density functional theory and data-driven approaches are increasingly used to predict new stable compositions. The perovskite lattice is remarkably flexible and can accommodate a wide variety of elements across the periodic table [81]. Substitution of two different cations at the B-site leads to double perovskites with the formula A2BB′X6, in which the B-site cations often adopt an ordered rock-salt arrangement [82]. Additionally, interruption of the three-dimensional network by interlayer species gives rise to layered perovskite derivatives, further expanding the structural diversity of this material’s family. From an electronic structure perspective, the valence band in oxide perovskites is primarily composed of hybridized O 2p orbitals with contributions from B-site d orbitals, whereas the conduction band is largely derived from unoccupied B-site d states. This orbital configuration plays a central role in determining optical absorption, charge transport, and photocatalytic behavior [83].
Perovskites can be classified according to cation ordering, dimensionality, crystallographic symmetry, and anion chemistry. From a compositional standpoint, single perovskites contain one type of A-site and B-site cation, whereas double perovskites (A2BB′O6) feature two distinct B-site cations arranged in an ordered configuration. Such ordering can significantly modify the electronic structure, magnetic interactions, and optical properties through changes in orbital overlap and charge distribution [84]. Another related class is vacancy-ordered perovskites, in which partial B-site vacancies stabilize the structure and influence carrier transport [85]. Dimensionality provides another key classification criterion [86]. Three-dimensional perovskites consist of a continuous network of corner-sharing BX6 octahedra extending in all directions. When connectivity is interrupted by interlayer species, layered perovskite structures are formed [87]. Important subclasses include Ruddlesden–Popper (RP), Dion–Jacobson (DJ), and Aurivillius phases, which differ primarily in the nature and charge of the interlayer layers. Ruddlesden–Popper phases typically follow the formula An+1BnO3n+1 and consist of perovskite slabs separated by rock-salt-type AO layers. In contrast, Dion–Jacobson phases adopt the formula A′An−1BnO3n+1, in which a single interlayer cation separates adjacent perovskite slabs, resulting in stronger interlayer coupling. Aurivillius phases comprise perovskite-like slabs interleaved with fluorite-like [Bi2O2]2+ layers, giving rise to strong structural anisotropy and frequently stabilizing ferroelectric properties. Another important classification involves anion substitution [88]. Although most perovskites are oxides, partial substitution of oxygen with nitrogen produces perovskite oxynitrides, which retain the structural framework but exhibit stronger covalent bonding, narrower band gaps, and enhanced visible-light absorption. These characteristics make oxynitride perovskites particularly attractive for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical applications. Representative examples of perovskites from different structural classes are illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Representative crystal structures of different perovskite families, including simple ABO3 perovskites, double perovskites, oxynitrides, Aurivillius phases, Dion–Jacobson phases, and Ruddlesden–Popper layered perovskites. The corresponding CIF files were obtained from the Materials Project database [89,90] and visualized using VESTA software (Version 3.90.3a) [91].
Oxide perovskites can be synthesized through a variety of solid-state and solution-based methods, each offering different levels of control over crystallinity, particle size, morphology, and compositional homogeneity. The solid-state reaction method remains one of the most widely used techniques for preparing bulk perovskites. In this approach, precursor oxides or carbonates are mixed and calcined at high temperatures to promote diffusion and formation of the perovskite phase. Although simple and scalable, this method often yields relatively large particles and limited compositional uniformity [92]. To improve homogeneity and control over particle size, several wet-chemical synthesis routes have been developed. Methods such as sol–gel, citrate, and Pechini synthesis enable molecular-level mixing of metal precursors through chelating agents and polymeric networks, producing highly uniform nanoscale perovskites after calcination. Co-precipitation techniques similarly achieve excellent compositional control by simultaneously precipitating all cations from solution [93]. Other synthesis strategies include hydrothermal and solvothermal methods, which produce well-crystallized nanoparticles under moderate temperatures and elevated pressures with precise control over morphology [94]. Combustion synthesis, based on exothermic reactions between metal salts and organic fuels, enables rapid formation of porous, high-surface-area perovskites that are particularly suitable for catalytic applications [95]. Additional approaches, such as molten-salt synthesis [96], flame spray pyrolysis [97], mechanochemical milling [98] and microwave-assisted synthesis [99] further expand the ability to tailor morphology, crystallinity, and defect concentration.
These synthesis methods also provide versatile platforms for cation doping, a key strategy for tuning the electronic structure, defect chemistry, and catalytic performance of perovskites [100]. In solid-state synthesis, dopants are incorporated during high-temperature diffusion, whereas wet-chemical approaches generally yield more homogeneous dopant distributions due to molecular-level mixing [101]. Hydrothermal and co-precipitation methods allow dopants to enter the lattice during crystal growth, while combustion synthesis often promotes the formation of oxygen vacancies, which can significantly influence catalytic activity. Other techniques, including molten-salt synthesis, mechanochemical doping, ion exchange, and thin-film deposition methods such as pulsed laser deposition, magnetron sputtering, and chemical vapor deposition, allow controlled dopant incorporation during or after perovskite formation. Overall, the wide range of synthesis and doping strategies enables precise control over composition, morphology, defect chemistry, and electronic structure, underpinning the broad applicability of perovskite materials in photocatalysis, electrocatalysis, solid oxide fuel cells, and multifunctional oxide electronics [102].
4. Simple ABO3 Perovskites
Many perovskites are oxide materials with the general chemical formula ABO3, where A is typically an alkaline-earth or rare-earth cation and B is a transition-metal cation. In the ideal cubic structure (space group Pm3m), the B cation is located at the center of the cube and is coordinated by six oxygen atoms forming a BO6 octahedron, while the A cation occupies the corners of the cube and is surrounded by twelve oxygen atoms in a cuboctahedral coordination. The structure consists of a three-dimensional framework of corner-sharing BO6 octahedra, which creates a highly symmetric lattice with straight B–O–B bond angles of approximately 180°. This high structural symmetry facilitates efficient electronic coupling through the metal–oxygen network and plays an important role in determining the optical and electronic properties of these materials [103].
Because of their structural flexibility, chemical stability, and tunable electronic structure, ABO3 perovskites have been widely investigated as photocatalysts for water splitting [28]. Among them, SrTiO3 is one of the most extensively studied materials and has served as a model system for understanding photocatalytic water-splitting mechanisms [104,105,106]. Early studies demonstrated that SrTiO3, particularly when modified with dopants or suitable cocatalysts, can exhibit high photocatalytic activity and even near-unity quantum efficiency under ultraviolet irradiation. Following this progress, many other oxide perovskites, including BiFeO3, LaFeO3, and related compounds, have been explored in search of improved visible-light absorption and catalytic performance [107,108]. However, not all oxide perovskites are suitable for photocatalytic water splitting, since the positions of the conduction and valence band must straddle the redox potentials for hydrogen and oxygen evolution. In many cases, the conduction band is not sufficiently negative for hydrogen evolution or the valence band is not positive enough for oxygen evolution, which limits the photocatalytic efficiency despite the favorable crystal structure [109]. Figure 2 demonstrates the conduction and valence band positions of various simple ABO3 perovskites, compiled from experimental Mott–Schottky measurements reported in the literature.
Figure 2.

Conduction and valence band edge positions of selected simple ABO3-based perovskite oxides relative to the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE), illustrating their suitability for photocatalytic water splitting. The red dashed lines indicate the thermodynamic potentials for hydrogen evolution (/, 0 V) and oxygen evolution (/, 1.23 V) [110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136].
Other classes of perovskites lacking reported conduction and valence band positions have also been investigated in the literature. Despite exhibiting band gaps within the visible-light range, these materials have been studied predominantly for environmental applications, such as pollutant degradation, rather than for photocatalytic water splitting. This focus may suggest that their electronic structures or band-edge alignments are not well suited for driving the overall water-splitting reaction. These materials are summarized in Table 1, not as prospective water-splitting candidates, but to provide readers with a comprehensive overview of the current state of the field. Their inclusion is intended to guide future research toward perovskite materials that have already demonstrated water-splitting activity and therefore can be a basis for further optimization through doping, cocatalyst engineering, and other materials-design strategies.
Table 1.
Simple ABO3-based perovskites reported in organic and pollutant photocatalytic decomposition.
| Perovskite | Bad Gap [eV] | Organic Decomposition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MFeO3 | Ce | 2 | methylene blue [137], pesticides [138], tetracycline and dye [139], gentian violet [140] |
| Nd | 2.4 | organic dye and antibiotic [141], tetracycline [142], methyl orange [143] | |
| Sm | 2.3 | rhodamine-B [144], orange II dye and the tetracycline hydrochloride [145] | |
| Pr | 2.1 | methyl orange [146], erythrosine and green malachite [147], tetracycline [148] | |
| Eu | 2.3 | methyl orange [149], congo red [150], various organic dyes and fuchsine [151] | |
| Gd | 2.3 | methylene blue [152], rhodamine B [153], norfloxacin [154] | |
| Y | 2 | methyl orange and 4-chlorophenol [155], Rhodamine B [156] | |
| Sr | 1.8 | acid red B [157], nitrobenzene [158], chloramphenicol and crystal violet [159] | |
| Ga | 2.1 | methyl violet and methylene blue [160], rhodamine B [161] | |
| MCrO3 | La | 3.3 | methylene blue [162], crystal violet (CV) dye [163] |
| Ce | 1.3 | fast green dye [164] | |
| Gd | 2.7 | congo red dye [165] | |
| Sm | 2.7 | rhodamine 6G dye [166] | |
| Bi | 2.5 | tetracycline hydrochloride, metronidazole, azithromycin, and cephalexin [167] | |
| MBiO3 | Ba | 2 | malachite Green dye [168], phenol [169], benzene [170] |
| Ca | 2.7 | ciprofloxacin and tetracycline [171] | |
| K | 2.1 | rhodamine B, crystal violet, methylene blue and phenol [172] | |
| Li | 1.8 | methylene blue [173], rhodamine B [174] | |
| MVO3 | La | 3.3 | methylene blue [175] |
| Bi | 2.2 | amaranth dye [176] | |
| MCeO3 | Sr | 2.8 | methylene blue [177], titan yellow dye [178] |
| MNbO3 | Ag | 2.8 | sulfamethoxazole [179], rhodamine B [180], methylene blue (MB) [181] |
| MCoO3 | La | 1.3 | indigo carmine dye, methyl orange, Congo Red, methylene blue, Rhodamine B [182] |
| MNiO3 | Ce | 2 | rhodamine B, oxytetracycline [183], orange-G (OG) dye [184] |
| La | 2.6 | methyl orange [185], tetracycline [186], bisphenol A & reduction of Cr(VI) [187] | |
| MMnO3 | Ce | 1.9 | methylene blue & methylene orange [188], tetracycline hydrochloride & methylene blue [189] |
| La | 1.4 | methyl orange [190], tetracycline [191], acid red A [192] | |
| Gd | 1.2 | methyl orange [193], rhodamine B [194] | |
Based on the reported photocatalytic performances (Table 1) and band-edge positions (Figure 2), PbTiO3, among the ABO3-type perovskites, possesses a narrower band gap than SrTiO3 and therefore appears to be a promising candidate for efficient solar water splitting. Given its narrower band gap, PbTiO3 seems to have the potential to extend light absorption closer to the visible region, making it an attractive material for further investigation. To evaluate this possibility, we first focus on SrTiO3 as a benchmark system to understand the origins of its exceptional photocatalytic performance and subsequently assess whether PbTiO3 can be engineered to achieve similar behavior.
Al-doped SrTiO3 with cocatalyst has been widely recognized as one of the most efficient photocatalysts for overall water splitting, with reports demonstrating quantum efficiencies approaching unity under ultraviolet irradiation when appropriate cocatalysts and dopants are employed [21]. This remarkable performance has made this photocatalyst a benchmark material in the field of photocatalytic hydrogen production and a model system for understanding the fundamental processes governing charge generation, separation, and surface redox reactions in oxide photocatalysts. In particular, strategies such as Al doping and surface cocatalyst loading (e.g., Rh/Cr2O3 and CoOOH) have been shown to significantly suppress charge recombination and enhance the efficiency of water-splitting reactions. A detailed understanding of the mechanisms underlying the high activity of modified SrTiO3 provides essential design principles for the development of next-generation photocatalysts. Following this detailed analysis of SrTiO3, this review then investigates PbTiO3, which, among the ABO3-type perovskites, has been shown to possess suitable band-edge positions for overall water splitting. PbTiO3 is then critically analyzed to evaluate its potential for overall water splitting and to assess whether, after appropriate material-specific modifications, including optimized doping and cocatalyst deposition, it could become a promising candidate for achieving a near-unity quantum efficiency. It must be emphasized that, in this context, approaching the high quantum efficiency demonstrated for optimized SrTiO3 represents a hypothetical research objective rather than an expected outcome based on the currently available evidence. Although ABO3-type perovskites have been used widely for photocatalysis, their principal limitation is the wide band gap, which restricts light absorption predominantly to the ultraviolet region and significantly limits solar energy utilization [27]. While extensive efforts involving elemental doping, defect engineering, and cocatalyst deposition have substantially improved charge separation and reaction kinetics, these strategies cannot fundamentally overcome the intrinsic limitation of insufficient visible-light absorption [86,104,195]. Among all the reported perovskites, PbTiO3 is a relative exception because it combines visible-light absorption with suitable band-edge positions for overall water splitting.
4.1. SrTiO3
SrTiO3 crystallizes in an ideal cubic perovskite structure with a lattice constant of approximately 3.905 Å. According to Shannon ionic radii, Sr2+ (1.44 Å, coordination number 12), Ti4+ (0.605 Å, coordination number 6), and O2− (1.40 Å) yield a Goldschmidt tolerance factor close to unity, indicating minimal lattice distortion and a highly symmetric crystal structure. This structural stability, combined with favorable band-edge positions relative to the water redox potentials and excellent resistance to photocorrosion, has made SrTiO3 suitable for water-splitting photocatalysis. A major breakthrough in the field was reported by Takata and co-workers [21], who demonstrated that Al-doped SrTiO3 loaded with suitable cocatalysts can achieve nearly unity apparent quantum efficiency for overall water splitting under ultraviolet irradiation around 350 nm. In this system, highly crystalline SrTiO3 particles were synthesized through a molten-salt method with approximately 1 at.% Al substitution at the Ti site and calcined at 1150 °C. Sequential photodeposition of cocatalysts Rh, Cr2O3, and CoOOH resulted in spatially separated reduction and oxidation sites on different crystal facets. Microscopic analyses revealed that Rh/Cr2O3 nanoparticles preferentially deposited on {100} facets, whereas CoOOH accumulated on {110} facets. This anisotropic distribution originates from internal electric fields generated by work-function differences between facets, which drive directional charge migration within individual particles. Electrons preferentially accumulate on the {100} facets while holes migrate to {110} facets, effectively separating hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions. Simulations suggest that a work-function difference of approximately 0.2 eV between facets is sufficient to induce strong anisotropic charge separation. This facet-dependent charge rectification suppresses recombination and enables nearly complete utilization of photogenerated carriers, leading to apparent quantum efficiencies approaching 100% [21]. Surface reconstruction induced by facet engineering has also been shown to play a decisive role in improving the photocatalytic performance of SrTiO3. Sokolov et al. demonstrated that introducing nano step-shaped facets parallel to the (100) and (110) planes significantly enhanced overall water-splitting performance compared with conventional octadecahedral SrTiO3. The reconstructed step-shaped surfaces were enriched with Sr and contained abundant oxygen vacancies and Ti deficiencies, leading to a modified surface electronic structure. The coexistence of (100) and (110) facets promoted directional charge separation through facet-dependent band bending, where photogenerated electrons and holes preferentially migrated to different crystal facets, thereby suppressing charge recombination. Moreover, the high density of oxygen vacancies and Ti3+ species increased the availability of active reaction sites, strengthened reactant adsorption, and facilitated interfacial charge transfer. Consequently, the synergistic effects of facet engineering, surface atomic reconstruction, and defect formation resulted in substantially improved photocatalytic hydrogen evolution [196]. The spatial arrangement of exposed crystal facets can also govern charge-carrier dynamics in SrTiO3 photocatalysts. Wang et al. demonstrated that decahedral SrTiO3 crystals enclosed by {100} and {111} facets exhibited superior photocatalytic hydrogen evolution compared with cubic particles exposing predominantly {100} facets. The enhanced activity originated from the anisotropic distribution of photogenerated charge carriers, where electrons preferentially accumulated on the {100} facets while holes migrated to the {111} facets, thereby suppressing electron–hole recombination. In addition, selective photodeposition experiments confirmed that reduction and oxidation cocatalysts were preferentially deposited on different facets, providing spatially separated active sites for the hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions. This facet-dependent charge separation, together with the optimized surface atomic configuration of the decahedral morphology, significantly accelerated interfacial redox reactions and improved the overall efficiency of photocatalytic water splitting [197]. A computational investigation of SrTiO3 revealed that photocatalytic activity is highly sensitive to surface atomic configuration, particularly the presence of stepped structures rather than ideal flat facets. The study compared flat {001} surfaces with stepped surfaces representing multifaceted SrTiO3 nanocrystals containing ridge, slope, and gully regions. The stepped morphology, particularly the ridge sites, exhibited significantly stronger water adsorption than the flat {001} surface, favouring only dissociative adsorption with spontaneous oxygen vacancy formation. Moreover, adsorption energies of key OER intermediates (HO*, O*, and HOO*) were generally more favourable on the ridge region, indicating enhanced catalytic activity. In contrast, the slope region behaved similarly to the flat {001} facet, where both molecular and dissociative water adsorption were possible. These findings suggest that the superior photocatalytic performance of multifaceted SrTiO3 originates not merely from exposing additional facets but from the creation of stepped atomic configurations that modify the local electronic environment, promote oxygen-vacancy formation, strengthen adsorption of reactants and intermediates, and facilitate charge separation across surfaces with different orientations [196].
Extensive studies have revealed that the enhanced photocatalytic activity of SrTiO3 is closely related to defect chemistry and surface structure, and facet engineering. A primary mechanism of surface reconstruction involves the thermodynamic stabilization of low-valence cations and oxygen vacancies (VO) under reducing or photoexcited conditions. Thermal treatments in the presence of reducing agents such as NaBH4 induce the formation of a disordered, defect-rich overlayer on SrTiO3 nanocrystals [195]. Liu et al. demonstrated that this surface reconstruction introduces abundant VO and Ti3+/Ti2+ sites, which act as electron donors, upshift the Fermi level, and induce downward band bending, thereby enhancing interfacial charge transfer and extending light absorption into the visible/infrared regions, while simultaneously tuning the H2:O2 evolution ratio [195]. Notably, this benefit is non-monotonic with respect to defect concentration: as the hydrogenation temperature and correspondingly the oxygen-vacancy concentration were increased from 320 to 350 °C, the H2 evolution rate peaked at 202.8 μmol h−1 (~1.5× that of pristine SrTiO3), coinciding with the lowest photo-luminescence (PL) intensity and thus the most efficient charge separation. However, further increasing the treatment temperature to 380 °C (11.7% VO concentration) caused the H2 evolution rate to fall back to 182.1 μmol h−1, accompanied by a marked increase in PL intensity. This decline indicates that once the vacancy concentration exceeds an optimal threshold, the excess VO sites switch from acting as beneficial electron donors to acting as charge-recombination centers on the surface, annihilating photogenerated electron–hole pairs rather than facilitating their separation. This establishes that surface defect engineering carries an intrinsic volcano-type optimum rather than a monotonic more defects, better performance relationship. Complementing these bulk-defect studies, Lehner et al. highlighted the environmental stability of the p(6 × 2) surface reconstruction on SrTiO3 {001}, where pyramidal-coordinated Ti3+ and square-planar Ti3+ configurations form stable, metallic quasi-particle states at the Fermi level that persist even under near-ambient pressures of water vapor [198]. This defect-mediated reconstruction is not limited to intrinsic host cations; heteroatom doping also triggers dynamic surface relaxation. Gherca et al. revealed that in monophasic Rh-doped SrTiO3, a reversible Rh3+/Rh4+ redox interplay, coupled with the spontaneous VO formation to preserve charge neutrality, induces downward band bending near the dopant sites. This dynamic aliovalent reconstruction promotes the accumulation of photogenerated holes at the surface, critically enabling the OER [199]. The concept of surface reconstruction must also encompass the dynamic evolution of the cocatalyst semiconductor interface under illumination, since the active phase often diverges from the as-synthesized state due to continuous redox cycling. Abudukade et al. used in situ XAS to reveal the deactivation mechanism of Ni–SrTiO3 photocatalysts, first establishing that continuous X-ray exposure itself suppresses the Ni oxidation being measured (likely via X-ray-induced water photolysis generating electrons that quench SrTiO3 photoholes), a caution that operando characterization can itself perturb the process it aims to capture [200]. With this artifact minimized, they showed that under UV illumination the as-prepared Ni(0)/Ni(II) core–shell cocatalyst (initially ~4:1 Ni(0):Ni(II)) undergoes progressive hole-driven oxidation, collapsing to a ratio of 0.25 after 10 h, as valence-band holes convert metallic Ni(0) to NiO/Ni(OH)2 rather than driving water oxidation, consistent with the substoichiometric H2:O2 ratio observed [200]. This was confirmed as a purely solid-state restructuring (not dissolution/redeposition) via ICP-MS, XPS, and NiSO4 control experiments, and morphologically manifests as flake-like Ni(OH)2 growth replacing the smooth core–shell particles. Adding a hole scavenger largely restored stable H2 evolution, confirming Ni(0)—not NiO, as some earlier literature proposed as the true active phase [201]. This underscores that active sites are transient and highly sensitive to the local photonic environment, requiring surfaces engineered to either resist photo-oxidation or undergo self-healing reconstruction, analogous to the reversible Rh3+/Rh4+ couple discussed above [201].
Chemical etching with EDTA enables controlled particle size reduction while maintaining high crystallinity, shortening carrier diffusion lengths and facilitating rapid transport of photogenerated electrons and holes to surface reaction sites. This treatment also produces nano-step surface morphologies that act as catalytically active centers and enhance interactions with adsorbed water molecules [202]. This phenomenon can also be observed for photoelectrochemical water oxidation activity, where nano-cubes of SrTiO3 particles in the 10–30 nm range, the water oxidation activity is strongly size-dependent. The specific activity decreases with decreasing particle size and drops exponentially for particles smaller than 20 nm, indicating a trade-off between increased surface area and reduced effectiveness of charge separation or increased defect- related recombination in the smallest crystallites [203]. Similarly, both particle size and crystal shape of Al-doped SrTiO3 influence the rate of photocatalytic hydrogen production. In the size range of 250–450 nm, larger crystals generate hydrogen at higher rates (up to ~400 µmol h−1 g−1) than smaller ones (~200 µmol h−1 g−1). This is attributed to reduced electron–hole recombination or back-reaction rates in larger particles, where the widths of the space-charge regions become comparable to the particle radius, enabling more effective band bending and charge separation [204].
Dopant engineering plays a crucial role in controlling the photocatalytic performance of SrTiO3 by modifying its electronic structure, defect chemistry, and charge-transfer dynamics. The catalytic behavior is strongly dopant-dependent. Al-doped SrTiO3 enables overall water splitting (OWS), whereas Rh-doped SrTiO3 primarily supports hydrogen evolution. Although both dopants introduce mid-gap states, their functions differ markedly. Al-induced states act as effective hole acceptors, facilitating oxygen evolution by localizing photogenerated holes on surface oxygen species and lowering reaction barriers. In contrast, Rh-induced states remain localized on Rh atoms and do not effectively participate in oxygen evolution [205]. At the bulk level, Al doping introduces hole-trapping states near the valence band that suppress electron–hole recombination without significantly altering the band gap [206], while structural defects such as stacking faults generate internal electric fields that further enhance charge separation and extend carrier lifetimes [207]. Atomistic calculations and spectroscopic studies also show that Al substitution suppresses Ti3+ defect states and regulates oxygen vacancy formation, thereby improving carrier migration and surface reaction kinetics [208,209]. Importantly, the positive role of doping is further enhanced by cocatalyst deposition. Rh, Cr2O3 and CoOOH cocatalysts facilitate rapid electron extraction and favorable energetic realignment at the interface when combined with Al doping [110,210]. Time-resolved spectroscopic analyses confirm that Al doping significantly prolongs carrier lifetimes and reduces recombination centers [211], while operando studies reveal that the combined effects of Al doping and cocatalyst deposition increase the population of long-lived holes and stabilize spatial charge separation. This synergistic defect–cocatalyst engineering is considered a key factor underlying the near-unity apparent quantum yield reported for optimized Al-doped SrTiO3 photocatalysts [212].
In addition to Al doping, a wide range of elements have been investigated to tune the photocatalytic properties of SrTiO3. Alkali metal doping (Na+, K+, and Cs+) has shown that K-doped SrTiO3 exhibits higher Ti3+ concentrations and superior intrinsic photocatalytic activity, whereas Na- and Cs-doped systems tend to form deep defect states that act as recombination centers and reduce activity. Density functional theory and synchrotron-based analyses attribute this behavior to differences in A-site ionic polarization, which can localize defect charges and induce uneven structural relaxation, leading to deep-level defects [50,213]. Co-doping strategies have also been explored to optimize defect chemistry [57,214]. For example, La and Al co-doping can reduce detrimental defect states by regulating oxygen vacancies and Ti3+ concentrations while promoting lattice stabilization through controlled surface and bulk defect redistribution. Optimized La–Al co-doped SrTiO3 loaded with Rh/Cr2O3/CoOOH cocatalysts has demonstrated enhanced activity and stability for water splitting [57]. Other multi-element doping systems, such as Ir and Sb codoped Al:SrTiO3, reveal that photocatalytic performance can be sensitive to operating conditions. Elevated temperatures may accelerate carrier recombination and induce cocatalyst degradation, thereby reducing activity [215]. Overall, these studies highlight that careful control of dopant type, concentration, and defect chemistry is essential for optimizing the photocatalytic performance of SrTiO3, and comprehensive reviews on doping strategies have been reported in the literature [106].
Cocatalysts play a crucial role in enhancing the efficiency of SrTiO3-based photocatalysts by promoting charge separation and facilitating surface redox reactions. In Rh/CoOOH/SrTiO3 systems, Rh is preferentially deposited at the center of crystal facets while CoOOH accumulates near the edges, indicating spatial separation of photogenerated electrons and holes. This intrafacet charge separation significantly improves overall water-splitting activity, leading to a 2.7-fold increase in efficiency compared with SrTiO3 containing randomly distributed cocatalysts [216]. In Pt/SrTiO3 systems, advanced spectroscopic and microscopic analyses reveal that photogenerated holes preferentially accumulate at the Pt–SrTiO3 interface rather than on the oxide surface, identifying this interface as the primary site for water oxidation and highlighting its lower overpotential for the oxygen evolution reaction [217]. However, a single cocatalyst is often insufficient for efficient overall water splitting. For example, the combination of Pt with oxide cocatalysts such as CrOx markedly improves activity by forming a selective layer that suppresses the reverse recombination of H2 and O2 while facilitating proton transport [218]. Similar stabilization effects are observed in Ni/NiO-based systems, where CrOx deposition enhances catalyst stability and suppresses Ni dissolution during photocatalysis [219]. To reduce reliance on precious metals, alternative cocatalyst systems have also been explored. Pt–Ni alloy nanoparticles combined with CrOx and CoOOH on K-doped SrTiO3 have demonstrated photocatalytic performance exceeding that of Rh-based systems due to improved charge transfer through interfacial K–O–Pt bridges [220]. In addition, noble-metal-free cocatalysts such as CoP have shown promising activity by accelerating charge separation and lowering the overpotential for hydrogen evolution. Further deposition of Cr2O3 effectively suppresses reverse reactions and enhances overall water-splitting efficiency [221].
In addition to compositional modifications, geometric and structural engineering strategies have also been explored to enhance the photocatalytic performance of SrTiO3. For instance, hollow SrTiO3 architectures with spatially separated cocatalysts have been designed to segregate hydrogen and oxygen evolution sites on the outer and inner surfaces, respectively. Such spatially distributed Pt/SrTiO3/CoOx systems promote efficient charge separation and exhibit approximately threefold higher overall water-splitting activity compared with conventional Pt/SrTiO3 catalysts [222]. Hierarchical hollow multi-shelled structures have also been developed using La- and Rh-co-doped SrTiO3, which extend light absorption to ~520 nm while improving light harvesting and charge separation due to their thin shells and hierarchical morphology. When integrated into a Z-scheme system with BiVO4 nanosheets and Pt cocatalysts, these structures demonstrate enhanced solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency [223]. Furthermore, one-dimensional SrTiO3 nanofibers produced by electrospinning and controlled annealing have shown improved photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Their porous nanofibrous architecture and optimized oxygen vacancy concentration increase the surface area and suppress charge recombination, thereby providing abundant active sites and facilitating efficient charge transport [224].
In addition to single-component photocatalysts, SrTiO3 has been widely integrated into heterojunction and Z-scheme systems to enhance photocatalytic performance through improved charge separation and extended light absorption [225,226,227]. For example, a three-dimensional Au/SrTiO3/TiO2 hollow nanosphere photocatalyst has been developed through in situ growth of cubic SrTiO3 on anatase TiO2 hollow structures followed by decoration with plasmonic Au nanoparticles. The synergistic interaction between the plasmon-induced electric field of Au, the internal electric field at the SrTiO3/TiO2 interface, and the three-dimensional electron transport pathways significantly enhances interfacial charge separation and enables efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution without the need for Pt cocatalysts [228]. Similarly, g-C3N4/SrTiO3 type-II heterojunctions decorated with metallic Bi have demonstrated substantially enhanced hydrogen evolution under simulated solar irradiation, where photoreduced Bi0 acts as an effective non-noble metal cocatalyst, leading to markedly improved activity and good cycling stability [229]. Other approaches include the use of Ti3C2 MXene-derived templates to construct TiO2/SrTiO3 heterostructures, which exhibit efficient charge separation and favorable kinetics for overall water splitting. These studies highlight the potential of heterojunction engineering to further improve the photocatalytic efficiency of SrTiO3-based systems [230].
So far, the modification strategies responsible for the exceptional performance of SrTiO3-based photocatalysts, particularly CoOOH–Rh/Cr2O3@SrTiO3:Al, have been presented. In principle, these approaches could also be applied to other perovskite photocatalysts. Most reported studies as presented in the following sections have used either pristine perovskites without any modifications or materials modified only with cocatalysts, while low-level Al doping combined with the same cocatalyst engineering strategy has rarely been explored. Only a few studies have adopted parts of this approach. For example, Zhu et al. [231] reported Al-doped SrTaO2N, but without employing the same cocatalyst system, whereas other studies on PbTiO3 [232,233] applied similar cocatalyst deposition methods without the corresponding doping strategy. These studies demonstrate the feasibility of transferring individual modification strategies to other perovskites; however, the complete modification protocol that proved successful for SrTiO3 or even similar ones has not yet been tested for other perovskite families. Therefore, applying this strategy should currently be regarded as a potential research direction rather than an established conclusion.
4.2. PbTiO3
The photocatalytic behavior of lead titanate (PbTiO3) has recently attracted increasing attention, as it lies at the intersection of photocatalysis, ferroelectric materials, and nanotechnology [234]. PbTiO3 is a perovskite-type oxide widely known for its ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties; however, it has also emerged as a promising photocatalyst for water splitting. Compared with SrTiO3, PbTiO3 possesses a smaller band gap, which enhances its ability to harvest visible light while maintaining conduction and valence band positions suitable for both HER and OER reactions.
Optical characterization (Figure 3) shows that pristine PbTiO3 begins absorbing light at approximately 460 nm, corresponding to a band gap of about 2.7 eV. In contrast, SrTiO3 absorbs primarily below ~370 nm. Consequently, PbTiO3 can utilize a portion of the visible spectrum, enabling significantly greater solar-energy harvesting. In practical terms, SrTiO3 is capable of absorbing less than approximately 5% of the solar spectrum, whereas PbTiO3 can theoretically absorb more than 10%. This enhanced light absorption increases the probability of photogenerated electron–hole pair formation and improves the potential for effective charge separation. Electrochemical characterization using Mott–Schottky analysis indicates that PbTiO3 behaves as an n-type semiconductor with a flat-band potential of approximately −0.6 V vs. RHE. This corresponds to a conduction band minimum near −0.4 V vs. RHE and a valence band maximum around +2.3 V vs. RHE. As a result, both the hydrogen evolution potential (0 V vs. RHE) and the oxygen evolution potential (1.23 V vs. RHE) lie within the band gap, indicating that PbTiO3 possesses sufficient thermodynamic driving force for overall water splitting [235]. Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy measurements further reveal a work function of approximately 3.7 eV for PbTiO3, which is slightly lower than that of SrTiO3 (~4 eV), suggesting that photoexcited electrons will be emitted more readily [236]. Additionally experimental studies have confirmed the capability of PbTiO3 to drive photocatalytic water splitting under both ultraviolet and visible irradiation. Wan et al. [235]. demonstrated overall water splitting in pure water without the use of sacrificial agents by loading Rh/Cr2O3 as a reduction cocatalyst onto PbTiO3. Under irradiation from a 300 W xenon lamp, hydrogen and oxygen evolution rates of 33 and 17 μmol g−1 h−1, respectively, were obtained. In another study [233], overall water splitting was achieved under visible-light irradiation using a 300 W xenon lamp equipped with a 420 nm cutoff filter. In this system, 0.001 M FeCl3 was dissolved in water and a mixed photocatalyst consisting of RuO2/Na,Mo-doped PbTiO3 and RhCrOx/PbTiO3 was employed, resulting in hydrogen and oxygen evolution rates of 36 and 18 μmol g−1 h−1, respectively. In addition to overall water splitting, the photocatalytic activity of PbTiO3 has also been investigated for half-reactions. Under visible-light irradiation, Pt-loaded PbTiO3 using methanol as a sacrificial electron donor produced hydrogen at a rate of 27.4 μmol g−1 h−1, while RuO2-loaded PbTiO3 in the presence of AgNO3 as a sacrificial electron acceptor yielded oxygen at a rate of 183 μmol g−1 h−1 [237]. These studies collectively highlight the potential of PbTiO3 as a promising photocatalyst for overall photocatalytic water splitting.
Figure 3.

(a) UV–vis absorption spectrum of PbTiO3; (b) Mott–Schottky plot of PbTiO3, (c) UPS spectrum of PbTiO3; (d) photocatalytic overall water-splitting performance of PbTiO3/Rh/Cr2O3 under simulated solar irradiation; (e) cross-sectional view of PbTiO3 prepared by focused ion beam (FIB) cutting; (f) atomic-resolution cross-sectional HAADF-STEM image of PbTiO3, where red spheres denote Pb atoms, blue spheres represent Ti atoms, and the arrow indicates the polarization direction, Reprinted with permission from [235,238]. Copyright 2022 American Chemical Society.
Numerous studies have been conducted to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the photocatalytic activity and charge-carrier (electron–hole) separation [239,240,241]. PbTiO3 is a ferroelectric perovskite that possesses intrinsic internal electric fields due to spontaneous polarization in its ferroelectric phase, which arises from the off-center displacement of Ti4+ within the TiO6 octahedra and the relative shift in Pb2+ ions along the crystallographic c-axis when the structure becomes tetragonal below the Curie temperature. These ionic displacements generate a permanent dipole moment in each unit cell, leading to very strong microscopic (local) internal electric fields that stabilize the ferroelectric distortion; however, in an ideal bulk crystal at equilibrium, these do not result in a net macroscopic internal electric field because the bound surface charges associated with polarization are compensated by ferroelectric domain formation, free charge screening, or surface and interface reconstruction. The polarization direction defines the electrical nature of the crystal facets. Only the surfaces perpendicular to the c-axis are intrinsically polar, with the (001) surface being positively polarized (P+) and the (00-1) surface being negatively polarized (P−) for a given polarization orientation, while side facets such as (100), (010), and (110) are non-polar because the polarization lies parallel to them; importantly, the sign of the surface polarization can be reversed by switching the ferroelectric polarization direction. When PbTiO3 is irradiated with light of energy equal to or greater than its band gap, electron–hole pairs are generated, and the intrinsic polarization field immediately separates these carriers without any external bias, driving electrons toward the P+ surface and holes toward the P− surface, thereby strongly suppressing recombination. This polarization-driven charge separation under illumination gives rise to the ferroelectric (bulk) photovoltaic effect, which can produce photovoltages exceeding the band gap and leads to pronounced facet-dependent photoactivity. These effects are further enhanced in thin films, single-domain crystals, poorly screened surfaces, and at domain walls, where local electric fields are especially strong, making ferroelectric PbTiO3 a uniquely powerful material for light-driven charge separation, surface chemistry, and photo-catalytic applications [242,243,244,245]. With the help of spatially resolved surface photovoltage spectroscopy, it is clearly demonstrated that the depolarization field in single-domain ferroelectric PbTiO3 nanoplate is the main driving force for charge separation and it can effectively drive photogenerated electrons and holes to the positive and negative polarization facets, respectively. Moreover, the charge separation ability of PbTiO3 nanoplates increases with increasing particle size along the polarization direction, due to the increasing potential difference between the opposite polarization facets. Consequently, this driving force for charge separation directly contributes to the enhancement of the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction activity in ferroelectrics [239]. More recently, in ferroelectric SrTiO3/PbTiO3 nanoplate heterostructures, increasing the average thickness of the single-domain PbTiO3 nanoplates from 30 to 107 nm enhanced the overall water-splitting performance by up to 22 times. The larger thickness increases the spontaneous polarization strength, resulting in a stronger incompletely compensated depolarization field that more effectively drives the separation of photogenerated carriers. Concurrently, the concentration of oxygen vacancies (which promote the oxygen evolution reaction) also increases with thickness [246].
In addition to the internal polarization field that promotes charge separation in PbTiO3, surface defects, particularly oxygen vacancies, play a crucial role in determining photocatalytic activity. The concentration of oxygen vacancies can be tuned through thermal annealing, and both experimental and theoretical studies indicate that these defects act as active sites for water oxidation to O2, while vacancy-free surface sites tend to favor H2O2 formation. The magnitude of ferroelectric polarization also strongly influences the photocatalytic performance [235]. To further exploit these effects, heteroepitaxial SrTiO3 layers have been grown on polarized PbTiO3 nanoplates (Figure 4). Driven by electrostatic interactions with the polarized surfaces, this structure promotes a redistribution of defects, enriching Ti3+ species near the positively polarized surface and oxygen vacancies near the negatively polarized surface. In the resulting PbTiO3/SrTiO3 heterostructure, the vacancy-rich negatively polarized surface acts as an efficient water oxidation site, while the positively polarized surface facilitates cocatalyst dispersion and lowers the Schottky barrier, enabling more efficient charge extraction. Consequently, the optimized heteroepitaxial structure exhibits significantly enhanced and stable overall water-splitting activity, reaching approximately fifteen times higher performance than pristine PbTiO3 nanoplates [247]. Furthermore, the growth of SrTiO3 nanolayers on polarized facets has been shown to suppress interfacial Ti defects and establish efficient electron-transfer pathways, extending electron lifetimes from tens of microseconds to the millisecond range and thereby increasing the participation of photogenerated electrons in water-splitting reactions [232]. The role of surface oxygen vacancies in water splitting on PbTiO3 has also been investigated through theoretical studies. Calculations indicate that both the concentration and spatial arrangement of oxygen vacancies are critical for water-splitting reactions on the PbTiO3 (001) surface. Neighboring oxygen vacancies can act as active sites that stabilize adsorbed water molecules and facilitate O–H bond dissociation. For TiO2-terminated surfaces, multiple adjacent vacancies are required to enable water dissociation, but excessive vacancy formation can trap hydrogen atoms and hinder H2 evolution. In contrast, PbO-terminated PbTiO3 surfaces more readily support hydrogen formation due to weaker Pb–O bonding, although the generated H2 molecules remain weakly bound near the surface. These studies suggest that both entropic constraints, stemming from the requirement of clustered vacancies, and enthalpic barriers associated with vacancy formation or H2 desorption can limit overall reaction efficiency [248]. Complementary first-principles calculations and ab initio molecular dynamics simulations further show that water preferentially undergoes dissociative adsorption on the PbTiO3 (001) surface, and that the presence of oxygen vacancies significantly enhances this process. Vacancies stabilize hydroxyl intermediates and increase surface OH coverage, thereby improving the reactivity of defective PbTiO3 surfaces for water-splitting reactions [249].
Figure 4.

Structural characterization of the PbTiO3/SrTiO3 heteroepitaxial architecture. (a) Schematic illustration of the heteroepitaxial growth process governed by polarization screening. (b–f) Cross-sectional HAADF-STEM images of the PbTiO3/SrTiO3 heterostructure; green spheres represent Pb atoms, red spheres denote Ti atoms, and the arrow indicates the polarization direction [247].
In addition to pristine PbTiO3, several modification strategies, including elemental doping, have been investigated to enhance its photocatalytic performance. For example, Ta-doped PbTiO3 exhibits improved charge separation and significantly enhanced photocatalytic overall water-splitting activity when combined with suitable cocatalysts [250]. Furthermore, PbTiO3 has been widely integrated with other materials to form Z-scheme systems and heterojunction structures. A summary of the materials reported in combination with PbTiO3 is presented in Table 2. As an illustrative example, the selective growth of TiO2 nano-islands on specific facets of PbTiO3 has been shown to dramatically enhance photocatalytic performance, increasing hydrogen production rates by more than an order of magnitude. This improvement is primarily attributed to improved interfacial charge separation and more efficient utilization of photogenerated carriers [251,252].
Table 2.
Summary of PbTiO3-based photocatalytic systems for water splitting.
| Catalyst | Incident Light | Solution | Cocatalyst | H2 1 | O2 1 | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PbTiO3 | 1000 W Xe lamp, λ > 420 nm | 20 vol.% methanol | 1 wt.% Pt | 27 | [237] | |
| “ | 0.1 M AgNO3 | 1 wt.% RuO2 | 180 | |||
| PbTiO3 | Visible light | 10 vol.% glycerol | 0.8 wt.% Pt | 380 | [253] | |
| PbTiO3 | 300 W Xe lamp | 10 vol.% triethanolamine | 1 wt.% Pt, Au, Ag/MnOx | 75 | [254] | |
| PbTiO3 | 300 W Xe lamp | 20 vol.% methanol | Pt(Au), MnOx | 160 | [255] | |
| Cu-Doped PbTiO3 | 125 W Hg lamp, λ > 400 nm | 10 vol.% methanol | - | 900 | - | [256] |
| Na/Mo co-doped PbTiO3 | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 2 mM FeCl3 | 1 wt.% RuO2 or RhCrOx | 36 | 18 | [233] |
| PbTiO3 modulated by oxygen vacancy | 300 W Xe lamp | - | Rh/Cr2O3 or Au/MnOx | 33 | 16 | [235] |
| B-rGO/PbTiO3 | 125 W medium pressure Hg, λ > 420 nm | 10 vol.% methanol | - | 150 | - | [257] |
| PbTiO3-TiO2 | 500 W high-pressure mercury lamp | 20 vol.% methanol | 1 wt.% Pt | 210 | [251] | |
| rGO/PbTiO3 | 500 W Xe lamp | 10 vol.% triethanolamine | - | 5 | [258] | |
| MoS2/PbTiO3 | 300 W Xe lamp, λ > 420 nm | 0.05 g L−1, tetracycline | 1 wt.% Pt | 45 | [236] | |
| TiO2/PbTiO3 | 300 W Xe lamp | 10 vol.% triethanolamine | Pt | 410 | [252] | |
| “ | AgNO3 | MnOx | 16 | |||
| 300 W Xe lamp, λ > 420 nm | 10 vol.% triethanolamine | Pt | 40 | |||
| “ | AgNO3 | MnOx | 5 | |||
| g-C3N4/PbTiO3 | 300 W Xe lamp, λ > 420 nm | 10 vol % triethanolamine | 2 wt.% Pt | 340 | [259] | |
| g-C3N4/PbTiO3 | 300 W Xe lamp | 50 vol.% ethanol | 2 wt.% Pt | 1580 | [260] | |
| SiO2(ALD)/PbTiO3 | 300 W Xe lamp | 20 vol.% methanol | Pt | 450 | [239] | |
| SrTiO3/PbTiO3 | 300 W Xe lamp, λ > 300 nm | - | 0.25 wt.% Rh/Cr2O3 | 800 | 360 | [247] |
| SrTiO3/PbTiO3 | 300 W Xe lamp | - | Rh, CrOx, CoOOH | 1100 | 600 | [232] |
| Cu@PbTiO3/g-C3N4 | 350 W metal halid lamp | 5 vol.% triethanolamine | Pt | 550 | [240] | |
| LaCrO3/PbTiO3 | 150 W Xe lamp, λ > 420 nm | 10 vol.% methanol | Pt, Au/MnOx | 170 | [261] | |
| CdS/PbTiO3/TiO2 | 300 W Xe lamp, λ > 420 nm | Na2S & Na2SO3 | Pt, Au/MnOx | 1800 | [262] | |
| CuP/PbTiO3 | 300 W Xe lamp, λ > 420 nm | 10 vol.% methanol | - | 90 | [263] |
1 The units are [μmol g−1 h−1].
From an environmental perspective, despite its promising photocatalytic properties, the practical application of PbTiO3 raises concerns due to the presence of lead. Although PbTiO3 generally exhibits good chemical stability during photocatalytic water splitting [241], the potential release of Pb2+ ions under long-term operation has not been systematically investigated. Therefore, future studies should evaluate Pb leaching and develop strategies to minimize any potential environmental impact while maintaining high photocatalytic performance.
Overall, as evident from Table 2 and the literature reviewed, the modification strategy that has proven highly effective for Al-doped SrTiO3 has not yet been extended to PbTiO3. Studies considering both doping and appropriate cocatalyst deposition remain very limited. As summarized in Table 2, only one study investigated the doping effect using Na and Mo [233]. However, a total doping level of 15% was employed, which is considerably higher than the approximately 1% doping level used by Takata et al. Analogous to silicon solar cells, where excessive dopant concentrations can alter the internal electric field of the crystal, such a high doping level in PbTiO3 may substantially modify the parent material and its intrinsic crystal and electronic structure. Therefore, this highly doped system cannot be directly compared with the low-level doping strategy applied to SrTiO3. Moreover, other dopants, particularly in combination with optimized cocatalyst deposition, have not yet been systematically investigated for PbTiO3. This represents a clear gap in the current literature. Considering that PbTiO3 possesses a narrower band gap than SrTiO3, exhibits intrinsic spontaneous polarization that can promote charge separation, and has suitable band-edge positions for overall water splitting, it can be a candidate for benefiting from the same modification strategy that has proven effective for SrTiO3. Therefore, investigating the doped, cocatalyst-modified PbTiO3 further is both scientifically justified and potentially valuable for developing more efficient visible-light-driven photocatalysts.
5. Double Perovskites
Double perovskites constitute an important subclass of perovskite materials with the general chemical formula A2BB′X6, where A is typically a monovalent or divalent cation (commonly an alkali or alkaline-earth metal), B and B′ are two different metal cations occupying alternating positions in the octahedral framework, and X is usually an oxide or halide anion [264]. Structurally, double perovskites derive from the classical ABX3 perovskite lattice, but with an ordered arrangement of two distinct B-site cations in a rock-salt configuration. This ordering doubles the unit cell and introduces additional structural and electronic degrees of freedom that allow fine-tuning of the material’s electronic, optical, and catalytic properties. The crystal structure of double perovskites consists of a three-dimensional framework of corner-sharing BX6 and B′X6 octahedra. The A-site cations occupy the cuboctahedral cavities formed by the octahedral network and primarily stabilize the structure through ionic interactions [265]. Structural stability is commonly described using the extended Goldschmidt tolerance factor, which depends on the ionic radii of the A, B, B′, and X ions. Differences in ionic size, charge, and electronegativity between the B and B′ cations can induce structural distortions such as octahedral tilting or lattice strain, which in turn strongly influence the electronic band structure and charge transport properties [266].
One of the major advantages of double perovskites is the tunability of their electronic structure. In many systems, the valence band is primarily derived from hybridized anion p orbitals and the d orbitals of one B-site cation, while the conduction band mainly originates from the d orbitals of the second B′ cation. Because the B and B′ cations typically differ in oxidation state and electronic configuration, their orbitals contribute asymmetrically to the band edges [267]. This orbital differentiation is beneficial for photocatalysis, as it promotes spatial separation of photogenerated charge carriers. Upon light absorption, electrons are excited to the conduction band associated with the B′ cation, while holes remain localized near the B-centered octahedra. Such intrinsic separation suppresses electron–hole recombination and extends carrier lifetimes. In addition, the ordered B/B′ arrangement can create internal electric fields or asymmetric charge distributions that further facilitate directional charge transport. In some cases, double perovskites may also exhibit type-II–like band alignment between different atomic sublattices, further enhancing charge separation efficiency [268].
Ability to independently vary the A-site cation, the B/B′ cation combination, and the anion composition enables precise control over key material properties such as band gap, carrier mobility, defect tolerance, and chemical stability. This compositional flexibility has made some of the double perovskites suitable for photocatalytic water splitting. For instance, La2FeTiO6 and Sr2CoTaO6 have been reported to act as photoactive catalysts for water splitting in the presence of sacrificial agents, even without the addition of cocatalysts [269,270]. As an illustration, Sr2CoTaO6 behaves as an n-type semiconductor with a band gap of approximately 2.7 eV, while the conduction band minimum and valence band maximum are located at −0.87 V and +1.83 V versus the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE, pH = 7), respectively. These band positions provide sufficient thermodynamic driving force for photocatalytic water splitting. Nevertheless, the introduction of cocatalysts such as RuO2 or Rh can significantly enhance the photocatalytic activity by improving charge separation and accelerating surface redox reactions [271]. Beyond cocatalyst loading, cation doping represents an effective strategy for improving the photocatalytic performance of double perovskites. For example, tungsten doping in Sr2FeNbO6 has been reported to increase hydrogen production by nearly threefold. A relatively small substitution level, such as Sr2FeNb0.99W0.01O6, can substantially enhance activity and selectivity while preserving the structural integrity of the perovskite lattice. Importantly, this low doping concentration does not significantly distort the crystal structure, allowing the material to retain its favorable electronic and structural characteristics [272].
In addition to composition and doping, the synthesis method can strongly influence the photocatalytic performance of double perovskites. For example, studies on Sr2FeTaO6 have shown that high-temperature synthesis can introduce defects associated with high oxidation-state Fe species, which negatively affect photocatalytic activity [269]. However, a simple post-synthetic thermal treatment in the presence of ethylene glycol can effectively remove these defect states and improve catalytic performance [273]. Similarly, the preparation route has been shown to influence the activity of Sr2CoTaO6. A sample synthesized via a low-temperature flux method exhibited bifunctional photocatalytic activity for both the HER and OER reactions under visible-light irradiation, even in the absence of cocatalysts. In contrast, samples prepared through conventional high-temperature solid-state synthesis showed significantly lower photocatalytic activity [271]. Double perovskites also benefit from morphology-dependent photocatalytic behaviour through the synergistic effects of cation ordering and surface structure. Kumar et al. demonstrated that CaLaScRuO6+δ functions as an efficient and stable photocatalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction under visible-light irradiation (λ = 420 nm) at neutral pH. FESEM analysis revealed agglomerated polycrystalline particles with a broad size distribution, providing abundant accessible surface area for water adsorption while exposing mixed-valence Ru active sites. Together with B-site disorder, the particle morphology and structural homogeneity promoted efficient charge transfer and facilitated visible-light-driven oxygen evolution [274].
To conclude, double perovskites offer greater compositional flexibility than simple ABO3 perovskites because two different cations occupy the B-site, allowing independent tuning of the electronic structure, band gap, and band-edge positions. This structural versatility has enabled the development of several visible-light-responsive photocatalysts with improved charge separation through ordered B-site cation arrangements. Furthermore, the large compositional space provides opportunities to tailor defect chemistry and optimize catalytic active sites. However, despite these advantages, most reported double perovskites still exhibit photocatalytic activities that are insufficient for efficient overall water splitting. Many require sacrificial reagents and only demonstrate hydrogen or oxygen evolution half-reactions [271,271,275]. In addition, achieving a high degree of B-site ordering is synthetically challenging, and cation disorder can introduce recombination centers that reduce charge-carrier lifetimes. Table 3 summarizes the majority of double perovskites so far have been reported for photocatalytic water-splitting applications. As obvious their photocatalytic activities have predominantly been evaluated only in the presence of sacrificial agents and mainly for half-reactions such as HER or OER. This suggests that many of these materials may not be intrinsically active for overall water splitting.
Table 3.
Reported double perovskite photocatalysts for water splitting.
| Perovskite (Band Gap, [eV]) | Catalyst | Incident Light | Solution | Cocatalyst | H2 1 | O2 1 | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ba2FeNbO6 (2.3) | SrTiO3-Ba2FeNbO6 | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 25 vol.% methanol | 1 wt.% Pt | 5 | [275] | |
| Sr2NiWO6 (2.9) | Sr2NiWO6 | “ | 0.02 M Na2S2O8 | 1 wt.% Pt, RuO2 | 420 | [276] | |
| Sr2CoWO6 (1.7) | Sr2CoWO6 | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | Fe (NO3)3, FeCl3, AgNO3 | Pt, Rh | 188 | [277] | |
| “ | 0.02 M Na2S + Na2SO3 | - | 30 | “ | |||
| Sr2FeNbO6 (2.1) | Sr2FeNbO6 | 450 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 20 vol.% methanol | 0.2 wt% Pt | 135 | [278] | |
| W-doped Sr2FeNbO6 | “ | “ | “. | 110 | [272] | ||
| La2FeTiO6 (2) | La2FeTiO6 | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 0.1 M Na2S + Na2SO3 | 0.5 wt.% Pt, 1 wt.% RuO2 | 7 | [269] | |
| “ | 0.02 M AgNO3 | “ | 60 | “ | |||
| Sr2FeTaO6 (2.3) | Sr2FeTaO6 | 500 W Hg lamp λ > 400 nm | 0.05 M Na2SO3 | 1 wt.% Pt | 100 | [270] | |
| “ | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 15 vol.% TEOA | 0.5 wt.% Pt | 700 | [273] | ||
| Sr2FeTaO6/NaTaO3 | “ | “ | “ | 1300 | “ | ||
| Sr2FeTaO6 | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 20 vol.% TEOA | 2 wt.% Pt/NiO | 2500 | [279] | ||
| Sr2CoTaO6 (2.7) | Sr2CoTaO6 | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | AgNO3 + La2O3 | 0.5 wt.% RuO2 | 60 | [271] | |
| “ | “ | Na2S + Na2SO3 | “ | 4 | “ |
1 The units are [μmol g−1 h−1].
6. Oxynitride Perovskites
Oxynitride perovskites have emerged as an important class of materials for visible-light-driven photocatalysis, particularly in applications such as photocatalytic water splitting and solar fuel production [280]. These materials generally adopt a perovskite-derived crystal structure with the formula ABO2N or ABON2, where A is typically an alkaline-earth or rare-earth cation (e.g., La, Ba, Sr), B is a transition metal cation (e.g., Ta, Nb, Ti), and the anion lattice contains both oxygen and nitrogen. Structurally, they consist of a three-dimensional network of corner-sharing BO6−xNx octahedra, with the A-site cations occupying the larger cuboctahedral cavities of the lattice. The incorporation of nitrogen into the oxide lattice plays a key role in determining the electronic structure of these materials [281]. Perovskite oxides generally possess wide band gaps that restrict light absorption to the ultraviolet region. Typical examples include SrTiO3 with a band gap of approximately 3.2 eV (absorption edge < 380 nm) and NaTaO3 with a band gap of approximately 4.1 eV [282]. In these materials, the valence band is primarily composed of O 2p orbitals, which lie relatively low in energy. In contrast, the incorporation of nitrogen into perovskite oxynitrides introduces N 2p orbitals that hybridize with O 2p orbitals, raising the valence-band maximum while leaving the conduction-band minimum largely unchanged, thereby narrowing the band gap. Consequently, perovskite oxynitrides typically exhibit band gaps in the range of 1.8–2.5 eV and absorb a much larger portion of the visible spectrum [283]. Representative absorption edges include approximately 560 nm for SrTaO2N, 620 nm for LaTiO2N (Eg ≈ 2.1 eV), 660 nm for BaTaO2N, 680 nm for SrNbO2N, and up to 740 nm for BaNbO2N [281,284]. This band-gap reduction enables oxynitride perovskites to harvest a substantially larger fraction of solar energy than oxide perovskites, making them more promising candidates for visible-light-driven overall water splitting. Furthermore, the band-gap energy decreases with increasing effective electronegativity of the B-site cation (Nb > Ta) and decreasing A-site cation size [282]. Importantly, despite their narrower band gaps, the band-edge positions of most perovskite oxynitrides still straddle the water redox potentials, satisfying the thermodynamic requirements for overall water splitting under visible-light irradiation. However, this enhanced visible-light absorption is accompanied by trade-offs. The upward shift in the valence band reduces the oxidation driving force, while the incorporation of nitrogen can introduce defect states that promote charge-carrier recombination. Therefore, although oxynitride perovskites offer advantages over oxide perovskites in solar-light utilization, achieving high photocatalytic efficiencies still requires careful control of defects, crystallinity, and cocatalyst engineering.
From the stability point, perovskite oxides exhibit excellent chemical stability and strong resistance to photocorrosion. For example, Al-doped SrTiO3 has been reported to sustain overall water splitting for more than 1000 h under continuous illumination [285]. Perovskite oxynitrides are typically synthesized at high temperatures under flowing ammonia, which generally results in highly crystalline materials with good structural stability. They also exhibit excellent chemical inertness in aqueous electrolytes over a wide pH range, including strongly alkaline conditions (pH ≥ 13), can withstand aggressive acids such as boiling aqua regia, and remain thermally stable in air up to several hundred degrees Celsius [1,3]. The main stability challenge of oxynitride perovskites is not their chemical stability but their potential susceptibility to photocorrosion. Under illumination, photogenerated holes may oxidize N3− to N2, creating nitrogen vacancies that can subsequently be occupied by oxygen atoms, thereby modifying the surface chemistry and photocatalytic activity [285]. However, this behavior is not universal and strongly depends on the oxynitride composition, crystal quality, reaction conditions, and cocatalyst. While some oxynitrides exhibit continuous nitrogen loss and gradual deactivation [286], others release only a small amount of N2 during the initial stages before reaching a stable state [287], and some show negligible nitrogen evolution under operating conditions [288,289]. Therefore, the evolution of N2 should be routinely monitored when evaluating the long-term stability of oxynitride photocatalysts, rather than assuming that all oxynitrides undergo severe photocorrosion. Also some materials such as LaTiO2N, SrTaO2N, and BaTaO2N employ cocatalysts (e.g., CoOx) to suppress self-oxidation and further improve stability [282,285].
Oxynitride perovskites have been widely investigated as photocatalysts [280,290,291,292,293]. These materials have demonstrated promising activity for photocatalytic water splitting, where they can drive the HER, OER, or both under visible-light irradiation. Figure 5 illustrates the conduction and valence band positions of various perovskites relative to the water redox potentials. As shown, most oxynitride perovskites exhibit more favorable band edge alignment for both HER and OER reactions compared with their oxide counterparts. This improved band positioning, together with their narrower band gaps, makes oxynitride perovskites more suitable for visible-light-driven photocatalytic water splitting. Concerns regarding possible nitrogen loss during photocatalysis have also been investigated, and experimental studies generally show that these materials maintain structural stability without significant evolution of N2 [294,295,296].
Figure 5.

Conduction and valence band edge positions of oxynitride perovskite relative to the normal hydrogen electrode (NHE) [62,288,297,298,299,300,301].
The electronic band structure of oxynitrides also contributes to efficient charge separation. The valence band is mainly composed of hybridized N 2p and O 2p orbitals, while the conduction band is dominated by transition-metal d orbitals such as Ta 5d or Ti 3d. This difference in orbital character can reduce electron–hole recombination and facilitate charge transport [283,284]. In addition, lattice distortions and polarization effects may generate internal electric fields that further promote charge separation. Surface facet-dependent charge distribution can also occur, allowing reduction and oxidation reactions to take place at different sites on the photocatalyst surface. The use of cocatalysts is often necessary to enhance charge separation and reaction kinetics. Noble metals such as Pt can act as electron sinks and promote hydrogen evolution, while metal oxides such as RuO2 or NiO facilitate oxygen evolution [35,302]. Selective deposition of these cocatalysts improves the extraction of photogenerated carriers and suppresses recombination.
Various strategies have been explored to further improve the performance of oxynitride photocatalysts, including defect engineering, surface modification, nanostructuring, and elemental doping. Among these, Mg doping has been one of the most widely studied approaches [61,303,304]. Mg has been introduced into several oxynitride perovskites, including LaTiO2N [304], BaTaO2N [294], SrTaO2N [303], and CaTaO2N [294], often resulting in enhanced photocatalytic activity. In many cases, Mg2+ substitutes the B-site transition-metal cation (e.g., Ti4+ or Ta5+), creating charge imbalance that modifies carrier concentration and suppresses electron–hole recombination. Other dopants such as Ca, Ta, and Nb have also been explored to tailor the electronic structure and defect chemistry of these materials. For example, Ca substitution can influence lattice distortion and local coordination environments, while variations in Ta content can modify the conduction band structure [305,306]. Through careful control of dopant type and concentration, the band structure and carrier dynamics of oxynitride perovskites can be optimized to improve photocatalytic efficiency. In addition to compositional tuning, the reaction conditions used to evaluate photocatalytic performance are important. Many studies use sacrificial reagents, such as methanol for HER or AgNO3 for OER, to study individual half-reactions [307,308]. However, these systems do not represent true overall water-splitting conditions. To better mimic practical operation, redox shuttle mediators such as Fe2+/Fe3+, I−/IO3−, and Fe(CN)64−/Fe(CN)63− have been employed, often in combination with buffer solutions such as sodium phosphate [287,304,309].
Efficient overall water splitting is frequently achieved using a two-photocatalytic system, in which two different photocatalysts are used for HER and OER. In many reported systems, SrTiO3-based photocatalysts modified with noble metals such as Rh, Ru, or Pt serve as the hydrogen-evolving photocatalyst, while oxynitride perovskites act as the oxygen-evolving component. A representative example is the system combining Mg-doped LaTiO2N with Ru/Rh-loaded SrTiO3, using the Fe2+/Fe3+ redox couple as an electron mediator. Under simulated solar irradiation (AM 1.5 G), this configuration achieved overall water splitting with hydrogen and oxygen evolution rates of approximately 60 μmol g−1 h−1 and 30 μmol g−1 h−1, respectively, representing one of the highest reported activities for oxynitride-based systems [304]. Furthermore, the synthesis and post-treatment conditions of oxynitride perovskites can strongly influence their photocatalytic properties. For instance, post-treatment of BaTaO2N with NH3 at elevated temperatures has been shown to enhance photocatalytic activity by improving nitrogen incorporation, crystallinity, and anion ordering while reducing surface defects. These structural improvements reduce recombination centers and facilitate more efficient charge transport to catalytic sites [310].
For perovskite-type oxynitride BaNbO2N, reducing the particle size (derived from starting oxide particles ranging from ~1.05 to 6.92 μm) significantly increases the specific surface area and shortens the diffusion distance of photogenerated charges. This enhances the efficiencies of charge generation, separation, and collection, leading to higher photocurrent densities; the smallest particles produced the highest photocurrent of 2.20 mA cm−2 at 1.23 VRHE under simulated sunlight [311]. Evidence from oxynitride perovskites further highlights the importance of crystallographic orientation in determining photocatalytic activity. In LaTiOxNγ thin-film model systems, crystallographic surface orientation strongly influences photocatalytic water-splitting performance after surface stabilization: the absorbed photon-to-current conversion efficiency (APCE) of epitaxial films differs by ~50% between orientations and reaches values up to five times higher than polycrystalline samples, with the (001) surface delivering the highest APCE (nearly three times that of the predominant (112) orientation). This enhancement arises because higher crystalline quality reduces bulk recombination centres, while the (001) facet preferentially exposes a low-energy LaN termination that is more resistant to oxidation and places nitrogen-derived valence-band states at higher energy. The resulting favourable energetic landscape promotes downhill migration of photogenerated holes to the solid–liquid interface, thereby accelerating the oxygen-evolution reaction relative to mixed-cation (112) surfaces that contain a lower accessible N:O ratio [312].
Compared with oxide perovskites, oxynitrides offer a significant advantage by extending light absorption into the visible region through nitrogen incorporation, making them considerably more suitable for solar-driven photocatalysis. Several oxynitride perovskites, including LaTiO2N, LaTaON2, BaTaO2N, and CaTaO2N, have proven to satisfy the fundamental thermodynamic requirements for overall water splitting [61,294,313,314]. However, this improved optical performance may be accompanied by increased synthetic complexity and reduced stability, although the extent of this limitation is strongly material dependent. Therefore, the stability of each material should be carefully evaluated under photocatalytic operating conditions. Table 4 shows the photocatalytic activity of oxynitride perovskites.
Table 4.
Reported oxynitrides photocatalysts for water splitting.
| Perovskite (Band Gap [eV]) |
Catalyst | Incident Light | Solution | Cocatalyst | H2 1 | O2 1 | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BaNbO2N (1.7) | Mg-doped BaNbO2N | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 0.05 M AgNO3 + 2 gL−1 La2O3 | 2 wt.% CoOx | 200 | [62] | |
| Mg-doped BaNbO2N + Ru/SrTiO3:Rh | solar insolation (AM 1.5 G) | 0.002 M FeCl3 | 1 wt.% CoOx | 9 | 4 | “ | |
| BaNbO2N | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 410 nm | 0.05 M AgNO3 + 1 gL−1 La2O3 | 2 wt.% CoOx | 300 | [315] | ||
| “ | “ | 80 vol.% CH3OH | 1 wt.% Pt | 0.2 | “ | ||
| Ca-doped BaNbO2N | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 0.05 M AgNO3 + 1 gL−1 La2O3 | 2 wt.% CoOx | 90 | [305] | ||
| BaNbO2N | “ | 0.05 M AgNO3 + 2 gL−1 La2O3 | 1 wt.% CoOx | 850 | [316] | ||
| SrNbO2N (2.2) | SrNbO2N | “ | 0.05 M AgNO3 | 2 wt.% CoOx | 730 | [307] | |
| With 2nd photocatalyst 0.5% wt Ru/SrTiO3:Rh | simulated sunlight (AM 1.5 G filter) | 0.002 M Fe2+/Fe3+ redox shuttle | 2 wt.% CoOx | 34 | 17 | “ | |
| Ta-doped SrNbO2N | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 20 vol.% TEOA | 1 wt.% Pt | 88 | [306] | ||
| Mg-doped SrNbO2N | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 400 nm | 0.05 M AgNO3 + 2 gL−1 La2O3 | 1 wt.% CoOx | 650 | [301] | ||
| CaNbO2N (2) |
Mg-doped CaNbO2N | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 0.05 M AgNO3 + 2 gL−1 La2O3 | 2 wt.% CoOx | 1000 | [300] | |
| CaNbO2N | “ | 10 vol.% Methanol | 1 wt.% Pt | 10 | [308] | ||
| “ | “ | 0.01 M AgNO3 + 2 gL−1 La2O3 | - | 22.5 | “ | ||
| LaNbON2 (1.7) | g-C3N4/LaNbON2 | 300 W Xe lamp (AM 1.5 G filter) | 0.05 M AgNO3 | - | 37 | [317] | |
| “ | “ | - | 1 wt.% Pt, 0.1 wt.% CoOx | 100 | 50 | “ | |
| LaNbON2 | 300 W Xe lamp (AM 1.5 G filter) | 0.02 M AgNO3 +2 gL−1 La2O3 | 2 wt.% CoOx | 34 | [318] | ||
| LaTaON2 (2) |
LaTaON2 | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 0.05 M AgNO3 | CoOx | 240 | [319] | |
| With 2nd photocatalyst SrTiO3:Rh | “ | 0.002 M Fe2+/Fe3+ redox shuttle | CoOx | 40 | 20 | “ | |
| LaTaON2 | “ | 20 vol.% ethanol | 0.15 wt.% Pt, 0.25 wt.% Ru | 125 | [320] | ||
| TiO2/Mg-doped LaTaON2 | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 300 nm | - | 3 wt.% CoOx/RhCrOx | 7 | 1.8 | [61] | |
| LaTaON2 | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 0.05 M AgNO3 + 2 gL−1 La2O3 | 2 wt.% CoOx | 1466 | [313] | ||
| “ | “ | 0.2 M acid ascorbic | 1 wt.% Pt | 270 | “ | ||
| “ | Simulated AM 1.5 G illumination (100 mW cm−2) | - | 0.1 wt.% Rh/CrOx,0.05 wt.% CoOOH | 13 | 6.5 | “ | |
| LaTaON2-SrZrO3 | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 0.05 M AgNO3 + 2 gL−1 La2O3 | 2 wt.% CoOx | 132 | [299] | ||
| LaTaON2-SrZrO3 with 2nd photocatalyst Rh:SrTiO3 | “ | 0.002 M FeCl3 | 2 wt.% CoOx | 21 | 10 | “ | |
| Al-doped LaTaON2 | “ | 0.05 M Na2SO3 | 1 wt.% Pt | [321] | |||
| “ | “ | 0.05 M AgNO3 | 2 wt.% CoOx | 160 | “ | ||
| With 2nd photocatalyst Rh:SrTiO3 | 300 W Xe lamp with AM 1.5 G | 0.002 M FeCl3 | 2 wt.% CoOx | 18 | 10 | “ | |
| BaTaO2N (1.8) | Mg-doped BaTaO2N | 300 W Xe lamp 800 > λ > 420 nm | - | 2 wt.% Rh/2 wt.% Cr2O3, 0.3 wt.% IrO2 | 44 | 20 | [294] |
| “ | 300 W Xe lamp, AM 1.5 G | - | “ | 4.2 | 2 | “ | |
| BaTaO2N-BaZrO3 | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 0.004 M NaI | 0.3 wt.% Pt | 18.75 | [287] | ||
| BaTaO2N-BaZrO3 With 2nd photocatalyst Pt/WO3 | “ | 0.001 M NaI | “ | 13.75 | 6.25 | “ | |
| BaTaO2N | “ | - | 2 wt.% Rh, 1 wt.% Cr2O3 and 0.3 wt% IrO2 | 8 | 3.5 | [296] | |
| “ | 300 W Xe lamp AM 1.5 G solar | - | “ | 1.3 | 0.6 | “ | |
| “ | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 20 vol.% methanol | 0.3 wt.% Pt | 410 | [322] | ||
| NH3-BaTaO2N | “ | 0.05 M AgNO3 + 2 gL−1 La2O3 | 2 wt.% CoOx | 800 | [310] | ||
| With 2nd photocatalyst Pt/CoOx/SrTaO2N | “ | 0.025 M Na3PO4 buffer (pH 8), 0.005 M K3[Fe(CN)6]. | 0.3 wt.% Pt/0.9 wt.% Cr2O3 | 30 | 15 | [295] | |
| “ | “ | 0.025 M Na3PO4 buffer (pH 8), 0.001 M [Co(bpy)3]3+/2+ | “ | 20 | 10 | “ | |
| SrTaO2N (2) | SrTaO2N | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm, with a water filter | 20 vol.% methanol | 0.3 wt.% Pt | 400 | [322] | |
| “ | “ | 0.005 M NaI | “ | 1.4 | 0 | “ | |
| SrTaO2N with 2nd photocatalyst Ir-CoFeOx/BiVO4 | solar simulator (AM 1.5 G) | 0.025 M Na3PO4 + 0.005 M K4[Fe(CN)6] | Cr2O3/Pt/Ir | 120 | 50 | [309] | |
| SrTaO2N | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 13 vol.% methanol | “ | 1600 | “ | ||
| “ | “ | 0.02 M AgNO3 + 0.6 gL−1 La2O3 | CoOx | 1142 | “ | ||
| SrTaO2N | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 0.05 M AgNO3 + 2 gL−1 La2O3 | CoOx | 600 | [288] | ||
| With 2nd photocatalyst SrTiO3:Rh | “ | 0.02 M Fe2+/Fe3+ redox couple | 2 wt.% CoOx | 11.7 | 5.7 | “ | |
| Mg-doped SrTaO2N | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 0.025 M phosphate buffer (pH = 6) + 0.01 K4[Fe(CN)6] | 0.7 wt.% Pt/1.05 wt.% Cr2O3 | 3500 | [303] | ||
| Mg-SrTaO2N With 2nd photocatalyst Au-CoFeOx/BiVO4 | “ | 0.025 M sodium potassium phosphate buffer (pH = 6.0) + 0.01 M K4[Fe(CN)6] | “ | 275 | 125 | “ | |
| SrO- SrTaO2N | “ | 0.025 M AgNO3 + 5 gL−1 La2O3 | 2 wt.% CoOx | 80 | [323] | ||
| CaTaO2N (2.2) | CaTaO2N | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 300 nm | - | RhCrOy | 5.5 | 2.75 | [314] |
| “ | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | - | “ | 0.7 | 0.35 | “ | |
| CaTaO2N–CaZrO3 | “ | 11 vol.% formic acid | 1 wt.% Pt | 52.4 | [324] | ||
| “ | “ | “ | “ | 23.1 | “ | ||
| Ta3N5/CaTaO2N | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 20 vol.% methanol | 0.3 wt.% Pt | 51.3 | [325] | ||
| “ | “ | 0.001 M NaI | “ | 34 | 16.7 | “ | |
| Ta3N5/CaTaO2N with 2nd photocatalyst PtOx/WO3 | “ | 20 vol.% methanol | “ | 5.3 | “ | ||
| “ | “ | 0.001 M NaI | “ | 3 | 1.4 | “ | |
| Ta3N5/Bi/CaTaO2N | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 20 vol.% Methanol | 1 wt.% Pt | 290 | [298] | ||
| “ | “ | 0.005 M AgNO3 + 1 gL−1 La2O3 | 2 wt.% CoOx | 3600 | “ | ||
| Ta3N5/Bi/CaTaO2N | “ | - | 1 wt.% RhCrOx | 44 | 21 | “ | |
| CaTaO2N | “ | - | “ | 3.5 | 1.75 | “ | |
| LaTiO2N (2.1) | LaTiO2N | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 0.05 M AgNO3 | 2 wt.% CoOx | 1670 | [313] | |
| “ | Simulated AM 1.5 G illumination | - | 0.1 wt.% RhCrOy, 0.05 wt.% CoOOH | 13.3 | 6.7 | “ | |
| LaTiO2N nanosheets | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | - | 0.5 wt.% RhCrOy 1 wt.% Ti oxyhydroxide layer | 13.6 | 6.7 | [289] | |
| Mg-doped LaTiO2N | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 0.05 M AgNO3 + 2 gL−1 La2O3 | 2 wt.% CoOx | 1400 | [304] | ||
| Mg/LaTiO2N with 2nd photocatalyst Ru/Rh-SrTiO3 | Simulated AM 1.5 G | 0.002 M FeCl3 | “ | 60.8 | 29.2 | “ | |
1 The units are [μmol g−1 h−1].
7. Ruddlesden–Popper (RP) Perovskites
Ruddlesden–Popper (RP) perovskites constitute an important family of layered oxide materials that have attracted considerable attention in photocatalysis, particularly for photocatalytic water splitting. These compounds follow the general formula An+1BnO3n+1, where A is typically an alkali or alkaline-earth metal (e.g., Na, K, Ca, Sr, Ba), B is a transition metal such as Ti, Nb, or Ta, and n denotes the number of perovskite layers in the structure. Structurally, RP phases consist of perovskite-like slabs (ABO3) composed of corner-sharing BO6 octahedra, separated by rock-salt AO layers along the crystallographic c-axis. This layered architecture introduces structural anisotropy and forms interlayer regions that can facilitate ion transport and provide accessible sites for surface reactions [326,327].
The valence band in RP-type perovskites is primarily composed of O 2p orbitals, whereas the conduction band is mainly derived from the d orbitals of transition metals such as Nb 4d or Ta 5d. Several layered tantalates and niobates, including KCa2Nb3O10, NaCa2Ta3O10, and Sr2Ta2O7, exhibit band gaps in the range of approximately 3.0 and 3.8 eV, making them mainly active under ultraviolet irradiation [328,329,330]. Despite their relatively wide band gaps, these materials often demonstrate photocatalytic activity due to their charge transport properties and high chemical stability. Upon photoexcitation, electrons are promoted from the valence band to the conduction band, generating electron–hole pairs. The layered structure facilitates charge separation through anisotropic charge transport within the perovskite slabs and spatial separation across the interlayer regions. In addition, structural distortions and differences between the perovskite blocks and rock-salt layers can generate internal electric fields that further suppress electron–hole recombination [47,331,332,333].
In photocatalytic water splitting, RP perovskites are most employed and reported for hydrogen evolution reactions under UV irradiation, typically in the presence of cocatalysts such as Pt, NiO, or RuO2, which enhance surface reaction kinetics and facilitate proton reduction [334,335,336]. Various strategies have been explored to improve their photocatalytic performance, among which elemental doping is one of the most widely applied approaches. For example, Ga doping in K2LaTa2O6N has been reported to significantly enhance photocatalytic activity. In Ga-doped K2LaTa2O6N, a trade-off between Ga concentration and photocatalytic performance was observed. Ga incorporation reduced particle size and suppressed charge recombination, but excessive doping led to band gap widening, which is unfavorable for visible-light absorption [337]. Other dopants, including Pd, Cr, and Rh, have also been investigated to modify the electronic structure and improve photocatalytic efficiency [334,338]. In addition, co-doping strategies, such as La/Rh [339] and La/Fe [340] substitution, have been reported to further enhance photocatalytic activity for water splitting. The synthesis method also plays a critical role in determining photocatalytic performance. For instance, Sr3Ti2O7 prepared via the polymerized complex method exhibits higher photocatalytic activity compared with samples synthesized by conventional solid-state reactions, primarily due to improved crystallinity, smaller particle size, and better control of defect distribution [335]. Furthermore, heterostructure engineering, including Z-scheme systems and type-II heterojunctions, has been explored to enhance charge separation and extend light absorption. For example, a heterostructure composed of La2CuO4 and Cu2O has been reported to exhibit enhanced photocatalytic activity, where La2CuO4 mainly contributes to water reduction while Cu2O promotes efficient electron–hole separation under light irradiation.
Recent advances in layered perovskites further demonstrate that morphology engineering plays a crucial role in enhancing photocatalytic performance. As summarized by Hu et al., modified layered perovskites, particularly exfoliated nanosheets, exhibit hydrogen evolution rates several times higher than those of their bulk counterparts under visible-light irradiation. Exfoliation into ultrathin nanosheets substantially increases the specific surface area while eliminating long bulk carrier-diffusion pathways. In addition, the interlayer galleries and exposed nanosheet surfaces provide spatially separated reduction and oxidation sites, thereby suppressing electron–hole recombination. Restacking and hybrid assembly strategies further optimize the electronic band structure and light-harvesting capability. Consequently, nanosheet-based layered perovskites achieve superior charge separation and enhanced photocatalytic water-splitting activity owing to their high surface area and shortened carrier-migration distances [341]. Layered perovskites, such as La2Ti2O7, have demonstrated considerable potential for photocatalytic water splitting due to their anisotropic crystal structure and favourable charge-transport properties. Kim et al. reported that, under UV irradiation, the best NiO-loaded La2Ti2O7 sample prepared using TiO2-P25 achieved a hydrogen evolution rate of 788 µmol g−1 h−1. The photocatalytic activity depended strongly on the synthesis route, with wet-ground precursors yielding a significantly higher H2 evolution rate (473 µmol g−1 h−1) than dry-ground precursors (150 µmol g−1 h−1). Wet grinding produced uniform 1–2 µm particles with higher crystallinity and phase purity, whereas dry grinding resulted in irregular 1–5 µm particles containing residual La2O3. The morphology of the La2O3 precursor largely determined the final microstructure, with finer precursor particles promoting higher crystallinity and larger surface area. Likewise, the use of fine TiO2 precursors, particularly P25, facilitated the solid-state reaction and enhanced phase purity. These structural and morphological improvements directly translated into superior photocatalytic water-splitting performance [342].
Ruddlesden–Popper perovskites possess highly tunable layered structures that can facilitate charge separation and provide numerous opportunities for compositional engineering. However, despite these attractive structural characteristics, their application in photocatalytic overall water splitting remains at an early stage. Most reported studies have focused on improving individual photocatalytic half-reactions or investigating fundamental charge-transfer mechanisms rather than achieving efficient overall water splitting [333]. Compared with oxide and oxynitride perovskites, their photocatalytic efficiencies remain relatively modest, highlighting the need for improved band-gap engineering, cocatalyst optimization, and long-term stability studies before their full potential can be assessed [343]. Table 5 summarizes the majority of Ruddlesden–Popper perovskite photocatalysts that have been reported and investigated for photocatalytic water splitting [344].
Table 5.
Reported Ruddlesden–popper perovskites photocatalysts for water splitting.
| Perovskite (Band Gap [eV]) | Catalyst | Incident Light | Solution | Cocatalyst | H2 1 | O2 1 | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| La2NiO4 (1.5) | Xe lamp and a 1.5 AM filter. | 0.02 M Na2SO3 + 0.02 M Na2S | Pd | 16 | [345] | ||
| Sr2TiO4 (3.5) | Cr-doped Sr2TiO4 | 500 W Hg lamp, λ > 420 nm | 0.05 M Na2SO3 | 1 wt.% Pt | 180 | [334] | |
| “ | 500 W Hg lamp | “ | “ | 430 | “ | ||
| La/Rh co-doped Sr2TiO4 | 500 W Hg lamp, λ > 420 nm | 0.05 M Na2SO3 | 1 wt.% Pt | 400 | [339] | ||
| La/Fe co-doped Sr2TiO4 | “ | “ | “ | 180 | [340] | ||
| La2CuO4 (1.3) | Cu2O/La2CuO4 | 125 W Hg lamp | 10 vol.% methanol | - | 83 | [344] | |
| Sr3Ti2O7 (3.2) | Sr3Ti2O7 | 400 W Hg lamp | - | 1 wt.% NiO | 80 | 42 | [335] |
| Ca3Ti2O7 (3.3) | Rh-doped Ca3Ti2O7 | 300 W Xe lamp, λ > 420 nm | 10 vol.% methanol | 0.1 wt.% Pt | 3.4 | [338] | |
| Sr4Ti3O10 (3.3) | Sr4Ti3O10 | 400 W Hg lamp | - | NiOx | 170 | [346] | |
| H2CaNaNb3O10 (3.5) | H2CaNaNb3O10 | 300 W Xe lamp, λ ≥ 300 nm) | 0.005 M Fe(NO3)3 + HNO3, (pH = 2) | 32 | [336] | ||
| “ | “ | 10 vol.% methanol | 0.1 wt.% Pt | 660 | “ | ||
| HCa2Nb3O10 (3.5) | HCa2Nb3O10 | “ | 0.005 M Fe(NO3)3 + HNO3, (pH = 2) | 100 | “ | ||
| K2CaNaNb3O10 (3.3) | K2CaNaNb3O10 | “ | 0.01 M NaIO3 | 0.1 wt.% RuO2 | 110 | “ | |
| KCa2Nb3O10 (3.5) | KCa2Nb3O10 | “ | 0.01 M NaIO3 | “ | 30 | “ | |
| Sr3FeTaO7 (2.3) | Sr3FeTaO7 | 500 W Hg lamp, λ > 400 nm | 0.05 M Na2SO3 | 1 wt.% Pt | 150 | [270] | |
| “ | 500 W Hg lamp | “ | “ | 1050 | “ | ||
| LaSrFeO4 (2.2) | LaSrFeO4 | 500 W Hg lamp, λ > 400 nm | “ | 1 wt.% Pt | 158 | [347] | |
| La2SrFe2O7 (2.1) | La2SrFe2O7 | “ | “ | “ | 103.2 | “ | |
| K2LaTa2O6N (2.2) | Ga-doped K2LaTa2O6N | 300 W Xe lamp, λ > 420 nm | 0.005 M NaI | 1 wt.% Pt | 92 | [337] |
1 The units are [μmol g−1 h−1].
Overall, as discussed above, most of these materials have primarily been investigated for photocatalytic half-reactions rather than overall water splitting. This observation may indicate that their band edge positions are not suitably aligned to simultaneously drive both HER and the OER reactions. Consequently, RP perovskites as candidates to achieve photocatalytic performances comparable to those reported for SrTiO3 in the study by Takata and co-workers [21] may not be the most appropriate strategy.
8. Aurivillius Perovskite
Aurivillius-type perovskites constitute an important class of layered oxide materials that have attracted considerable attention for photocatalytic applications, including photocatalytic water splitting. These compounds generally follow the chemical formula Bi2An−1BnO3n+3, where A represents a large cation (such as Ca, Sr, Ba, or Na), B is typically a transition metal cation (e.g., Ti, Nb, Ta, or W), and n denotes the number of perovskite-like octahedral layers within the structure. Structurally, Aurivillius phases consist of alternating layers of (Bi2O2)2+ sheets and perovskite-like slabs (An−1BnO3n+1)2− stacked along the crystallographic c-axis. The perovskite blocks are composed of corner-sharing BO6 octahedra, similar to conventional perovskites, while the bismuth oxide layers act as structural separators. This layered architecture results in strong structural anisotropy and plays a crucial role in determining the electronic and photocatalytic properties of these materials [348,349].
Aurivillius oxides have attracted attention as photocatalysts for water splitting owing to their favorable electronic structure and layered architecture. In these materials, the conduction band is typically derived from transition-metal d orbitals (e.g., Nb5+, Ta5+, or W6+), while the valence band mainly consists of O 2p orbitals hybridized with Bi 6s/6p states. The presence of Bi raises the valence-band energy through orbital hybridization, which can enhance visible-light absorption compared with conventional oxide perovskites. A key advantage of Aurivillius phases is their intrinsic charge-separation capability arising from their layered structure. Electrons preferentially migrate through the perovskite slabs containing BO6 octahedra, whereas holes tend to accumulate in the (Bi2O2) layers. This spatial separation suppresses electron–hole recombination and promotes surface redox reactions, with electrons driving hydrogen evolution and holes facilitating water oxidation [350,351]. Additionally, internal electric fields generated by the asymmetric layered structure can further enhance directional charge transport. The two-dimensional nature of Aurivillius compounds also favors anisotropic morphologies, such as nanosheets, which shorten carrier diffusion paths and increase the density of active surface sites [352,353].
Strategies have been developed to further enhance the photocatalytic performance of Aurivillius-type materials. For example, triclinic Bi2CrO6 exhibits a broad light absorption range up to approximately 650 nm with a direct band gap of about 1.86 eV. Theoretical studies indicate that this material possesses a relatively large charge-carrier effective mass and can exhibit enhanced photocatalytic performance when coupled with a second photocatalyst such as SrTiO3, enabling overall water splitting in a heterostructured system [354]. Doping strategies have also been explored to improve photocatalytic activity [355]. For instance, Cr/Nb co-doping of Bi3TiNbO9 has been reported to significantly enhance hydrogen production, yielding approximately twice the hydrogen evolution compared with the undoped material [356]. Similarly, gradient tungsten doping in Bi3TiNbO9 can improve photocatalytic activity by introducing an additional built-in electric field along the c-axis and simultaneously enhancing the depolarization field within the layers along the a-axis due to strengthened structural distortion [357]. Surface engineering represents another effective approach for improving photocatalytic performance. For example, the surface layer of Bi3TiNbO9 can be selectively modified through an acid-etching strategy, which improves its resistance to photocorrosion. In this system, efficient electron transfer occurs via surface trapping states, while effective hole transfer is promoted by a surface electric field, leading to spatial separation of photogenerated charge carriers. Moreover, Bi3TiNbO9 forms a relatively small Schottky barrier when interfaced with cocatalysts, facilitating electron transfer to the cocatalyst and enabling efficient and stable overall water splitting [358]. Crystal facet engineering has also been shown to influence photocatalytic performance. In particular, the ratio of exposed {001} and {110} facets in Bi3TiNbO9 can play an important role in determining the activity toward HER and OER reactions. Additionally, anion-induced surface structure transformation has been employed to tailor the interface between Bi3TiNbO9 and cocatalysts [357]. For example, an ultrathin Bi2MoO6 heterolayer can be grown in situ on Bi3TiNbO9 nanosheets, creating a favorable interface with Rh cocatalysts. This engineered interface lowers the interfacial energy barrier and promotes the transfer of photogenerated electrons from Bi3TiNbO9 to Bi2MoO6 and subsequently to the Rh cocatalyst, thereby enhancing photocatalytic efficiency [359].
Aurivillius perovskites benefit from their layered crystal structure and spontaneous polarization, which can promote charge separation and suppress electron–hole recombination [360]. These characteristics make them attractive candidates for photocatalytic applications. Nevertheless, despite these intrinsic advantages, their photocatalytic activity remains relatively limited, and convincing demonstrations of efficient overall water splitting are still lacking [343]. Their electronic structures often require further optimization through elemental substitution or heterostructure engineering to achieve suitable band gaps and band-edge positions. Table 6 shows the reported Aurivillius-type perovskite for photocatalytic water-splitting application.
Table 6.
Summary of Aurivillius photocatalytic systems for water splitting.
| Perovskite (Band Gap [eV]) | Catalyst | Incident Light | Solution | Cocatalyst | H2 1 | O2 1 | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bi2WO6 (2.9) | Bi2WO6/BiFeWO6 | 250 W Xe lamp | 25 vol.% methanol | - | 65 | [354] | |
| Bi2MoO6 (2.6) | Bi2MoO6 with 2nd photocatalyst Pt/ZnIn2S4 | 200 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | - | 0.5 wt.% CoOx | 30.8 | 15.7 | [361] |
| Bi2CrO6 (1.9) | Bi2CrO6 | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 0.02 M Na2SO3, 0.02 M Na2S | IrO2 | 14 | [362] | |
| “ | “ | 0.005 M AgNO3 | IrOx | 200 | “ | ||
| Bi2CrO6 with 2nd photocatalyst Ru/SrTiO3:Rh | “ | 0.002 M FeCl2 (pH 2.5) | 0.3 wt.% IrO2 | 3.5 | 1.8 | “ | |
| Bi3TiNbO9 (3.2) | Cr/Nb co-doped Bi3TiNbO9 | 500 W Hg lamp, λ > 250 nm | 0.05 M Na2SO3 | 1 wt.% Pt | 170 | [356] | |
| W-doped Bi3TiNbO9 | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 300 nm | - | Rh, CrOx | 2000 | 800 | [357] | |
| Bi3TiNbO9 | “ | - | Rh, CrOx | 140 | 100 | “ | |
| “ | 300 W Xe lamp | 10 vol.% methanol | 0.6 wt.% Rh/Cr2O3 | 400 | 200 | [358] | |
| “ | “ | 20 vol.% methanol | Pt | 309 | [363] | ||
| “ | “ | 2 gL−1 AgNO3 | - | 161 | “ | ||
| Bi3TiNbO9-Bi2MoO6 | “ | - | Rh/CrOx | 600 | 300 | [359] | |
| Bi6Fe2Ti3O18 (2.6) | Bi6Fe2Ti3O18/BiOBr | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 400 nm | 2 gL−1 AgNO3 | - | 50 | [364] |
1 The units are [μmol g−1 h−1].
9. Dion–Jacobson Perovskite
Dion–Jacobson (DJ) perovskites represent an important class of layered perovskite oxides that have attracted increasing attention in photocatalysis, particularly for photocatalytic water splitting. These materials typically follow the general formula A′An−1BnO3n+1, where A′ is a large interlayer cation (commonly an alkali or alkaline-earth metal such as Cs, Rb, or K), A is typically an alkaline-earth or rare-earth metal, B is a transition metal (e.g., Ti, Nb, or Ta), and n denotes the number of perovskite layers in the structure. Structurally, Dion–Jacobson phases consist of perovskite-like slabs composed of corner-sharing BO6 octahedra, separated by a single layer of interlayer cations [365]. Unlike Ruddlesden–Popper phases, which contain rock-salt layers, DJ structures feature direct bonding between adjacent perovskite slabs through the interlayer cations, resulting in stronger interlayer interactions. This structural configuration provides several advantages for photocatalytic applications. The absence of rock-salt layers leads to shorter interlayer distances and stronger electrostatic interactions, which can improve charge transport between the perovskite slabs [366]. In addition, the interlayer space can accommodate ion exchange and structural modifications, enabling tunability of the electronic structure and catalytic properties. These features make Dion–Jacobson perovskites particularly attractive platforms for designing layered photocatalysts [367].
From an electronic perspective, the band structure of Dion–Jacobson oxides is similar to that of many oxide perovskites. The valence band is mainly composed of O 2p orbitals, while the conduction band originates primarily from the d orbitals of the transition metal cations (e.g., Nb 4d, Ta 5d, or Ti 3d) [368]. Consequently, many DJ-type oxides exhibit wide band gaps, typically in the range of 3.0–3.7 eV and are mainly active under ultraviolet irradiation. This trend is clearly reflected in the band gap values summarized in Table 7. Representative photocatalysts include layered niobates and tantalates such as CsCa2Nb3O10, RbLaNb2O7, and KCa2Nb3O10, which have been investigated for hydrogen evolution reactions in photocatalytic systems [369,370,371]. In water-splitting systems, Dion–Jacobson perovskites are most used for HER reactions in the presence of suitable cocatalysts such as Pt, Rh, or NiO, which facilitate proton reduction and suppress charge recombination [372,373].
Dion–Jacobson perovskites provide additional flexibility through their layered architecture and tunable interlayer chemistry, offering opportunities to tailor charge transport and surface reaction pathways [374]. However, research on these materials for photocatalytic overall water splitting remains relatively limited compared with conventional oxide and oxynitride perovskites. To date, all reported photocatalysts belonging to this family possess relatively large band gaps, preventing efficient utilization of the visible region of the solar spectrum. Moreover, although their structural tunability represents a clear advantage, relatively few studies have demonstrated high photocatalytic efficiencies, making it difficult to establish general structure–property relationships [375]. Table 7 illustrates a summary of reported Dion-Jacobson photocatalysts.
Table 7.
Summary of Dion–Jacobson perovskite photocatalytic systems for water splitting.
| Perovskite, (Band Gap [eV]) | Incident Light | Solution | Cocatalyst | H2 1 | O2 1 | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCa2Nb3O10 (3.4) | 125 W Hg lamp λ > 220 nm | 1 mol.% aqueous solutions of D-glucose and D-xylose | 1 wt.% Pt | 2000 | [376] | |
| H2LaNb2O7 (3.4) | 100 W Hg lamp | 10 vol.% methanol | Pt | 1628 | [372] | |
| KCa2Nb3O10 (3.6) | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 300 nm | 0.01 M NaI | 1.3 wt.% Pt | 220 | 82 | [371] |
| RbLaNb2O7 (3.3) | UV lamp, λ > 230 nm | 20 vol.% methanol | 1 wt.% Pt | 373 | [370] | |
| AgLaNb2O7 (3) | UV lamp, λ > 230 nm | “ | “ | 1806 | “ | |
| 500 W halogen lamp | 16 vol.% methanol | NiOx | 144 | [373] | ||
| HCa2Nb3O10 (3.5) | 125 W Hg lamp λ > 220 nm | 1 mol.% methanol | 1 wt.% Pt | 2083 | [377] | |
| KCa2Nb3O10 (3.5) | “ | “ | “ | 250 | “ | |
| KCa2Ta3O10 (3.4) | 300 W Xe lamp λ > 420 nm | 20 vol.% methanol | 1 wt.% Pt | 0 | [378] | |
| “ | “ | 1 wt.% Pt/gC3N4 | 215 | “ | ||
| LiCa2Ta3O10 (4.2) | 400 W Hg lamp | - | NiOx | 1780 | 970 | [369] |
| NaCa2Ta3O10 (4.3) | “ | - | “ | 1465 | 810 | “ |
| “ | - | 0.5 wt.% NiOx | 1406 | 703 | [379] | |
| KCa2Ta3O10 (4.2) | “ | - | “ | 870 | 400 | [369,380] |
| RbCa2Ta3O10 (3.9) | “ | - | “ | 900 | 455 | [369] |
| CsCa2Ta3O10 (4.1) | “ | - | “ | 445 | 202 | “ |
| “ | - | “ | 1062 | 531 | [379] | |
| HCa2Ta3O10 (4.2) | “ | - | “ | 937 | 468 | “ |
1 The units are [μmol g−1 h−1].
10. Roadmap for the Development of High-Performance Perovskite Photocatalysts
The studies discussed throughout this review indicate that several perovskite materials already possess the fundamental characteristics required for photocatalytic water splitting. Successful UV-driven overall water splitting, half-reaction activity, suitable band gap and Mott–Schottky analysis demonstrate that these materials have the intrinsic potential for overall water splitting. Therefore, future research should focus less on discovering entirely new perovskite compositions and more on engineering promising existing materials.
Among the investigated materials, PbTiO3 from the ABO3 perovskite family and several oxynitride perovskites possess narrower band gaps than SrTiO3 while maintaining suitable band positions for water splitting. In particular, LaTaON2, BaTaO2N, CaTaO2N, and LaTiO2N, with band gaps of approximately 2.0, 1.8, 2.2, and 2.1 eV, respectively, have been reported to perform overall water splitting without sacrificial agents, as well as half water-splitting reactions in the presence of sacrificial agents (Table 4).
For example, Qi et al. [233] reported overall water splitting using Na/Mo-codoped PbTiO3 in a Z-scheme system combined with RhCrOx/PbTiO3. However, the dopant type, doping level, and cocatalyst deposition method differ from those reported by Takata et al. For LaTiO2N, Wang et al. [313] employed the same cocatalyst deposition strategy as Takata et al. and achieved remarkable overall water-splitting activity under simulated AM 1.5 G irradiation using pure water, although no doping was introduced. For BaTaO2N, Li et al. [294] employed a similar high-temperature synthesis method but used different cocatalysts and deposition methods, together with a different dopant concentration that was approximately five times higher than that reported by Takata et al. Nevertheless, this photocatalyst successfully performed visible-light-driven overall water splitting in pure water. Similarly, Xu et al. [314] synthesized CaTaO2N using a high-temperature method but without doping, while the cocatalysts were deposited by impregnation rather than photodeposition, which can affect cocatalyst dispersion. Likewise, Pan et al. [61] investigated LaTaON2 using different dopant concentrations and cocatalyst deposition methods, yet still demonstrated overall water splitting in pure water.
Based on these observations, the following roadmap is proposed. Starting with the most promising candidates, namely PbTiO3, LaTaON2, BaTaO2N, CaTaO2N, and LaTiO2N, the first step should be the synthesis of highly crystalline materials using high-temperature synthesis methods. During the synthesis, these materials can be modified by introducing very low concentrations of common dopants such as Al or Mg, or less commonly investigated dopants such as Ta, La, Fe, or W. This low-level doping strategy is well established in semiconductor engineering, where small amounts of dopants can significantly improve charge carrier mobility without altering the crystal structure. In contrast, excessive doping may result in the formation of new phases, reduce crystallinity, or even change the perovskite structure. Cocatalyst deposition is another critical factor, and it is recommended to employ the same photodeposition strategy reported by Takata et al., which has demonstrated exceptional performance for SrTiO3.
Several other oxynitride perovskites despite their smaller band gap have also been reported to perform half water-splitting reactions; however, they have either never been evaluated for overall water splitting or have only been investigated as part of Z-scheme systems. These materials should also be systematically evaluated. As a first step, the undoped perovskites decorated with cocatalyst should be tested for overall water splitting under UV irradiation. If measurable activity is observed, systematic optimization of the dopant type, dopant concentration, and cocatalyst deposition strategy can then be carried out and tried with visible light. Following this approach, it may be possible to achieve significantly higher photocatalytic activities for overall water splitting.
11. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
The first major challenge in achieving practical solar water splitting is the identification of a photocatalyst that simultaneously exhibits efficient visible-light absorption, appropriate conduction- and valence-band positions for overall water splitting, and long-term stability. Most reported photocatalysts either possess suitable band-edge positions but absorb predominantly ultraviolet light or exhibit visible-light absorption at the expense of insufficient redox potential. Once an appropriate photocatalyst has been identified, the remaining bottlenecks involve maximizing the utilization of photogenerated charge carriers. These include suppressing electron–hole recombination, extending charge-carrier lifetimes through defect engineering and improved crystallinity, and optimizing surface reaction kinetics through rational cocatalyst deposition. Efficient cocatalysts are essential for accelerating the sluggish multielectron oxygen and hydrogen evolution reactions while minimizing interfacial recombination losses. Simultaneously, maintaining long-term structural and photochemical stability under operating conditions remains a prerequisite for practical application.
The development of Al-doped SrTiO3 modified with Rh/Cr2O3 and CoOOH cocatalysts demonstrated that these challenges can be largely overcome through an integrated materials-design strategy, resulting in an apparent quantum efficiency approaching unity under ultraviolet irradiation. This achievement indicates that the fundamental limitations associated with charge separation and surface reaction kinetics can be addressed when the semiconductor, dopant concentration, crystallinity, and cocatalyst architecture are simultaneously optimized. However, the major limitation of this system is no longer charge utilization but its wide band gap, which restricts light absorption to the ultraviolet region.
In this review, by presenting the perovskites used in photocatalytic water splitting, we sought to answer the following question: Are there any perovskites other than SrTiO3 that are capable of absorbing a broader range of the solar spectrum so that, if the same engineering strategy is applied, they could potentially achieve quantum efficiencies comparable to those of SrTiO3. Different classes of perovskites, including simple ABO3 oxides, double oxides, oxynitrides, Aurivillius, Dion–Jacobson, and Ruddlesden–Popper perovskites, were reviewed. Among the oxide-based perovskites, only PbTiO3 has been reported in the literature to achieve overall water splitting. The remaining oxide perovskites either possess excessively wide band gaps or unfavorable band-edge positions, allowing only one of the half-reactions to occur, and therefore no overall water splitting has been reported. However, the situation is considerably more promising for oxynitride perovskites. Several oxynitride compounds, including LaTaON2, BaTaO2N, CaTaO2N, and LaTiO2N, have been reported to achieve overall water splitting under visible-light irradiation. To date, the design strategy that enabled SrTiO3 to achieve near-unity quantum efficiency has not yet been systematically applied to these materials. Most published studies investigate these perovskites either in their pristine form or employ relatively high dopant concentrations, different synthesis protocols, or cocatalyst deposition methods that differ substantially from the optimized approach established for SrTiO3. Consequently, it remains unclear whether the remarkable performance achieved with SrTiO3 can be replicated in visible-light-responsive perovskites.
Therefore, future research should move beyond the continued discovery of new perovskite compositions and instead focus on systematically transferring and validating the successful design principles established for SrTiO3 to the most promising visible-light-responsive perovskites. Such studies are essential to determine whether PbTiO3 and oxynitride perovskites can combine broad solar-light harvesting with the near-unity charge-utilization efficiency already demonstrated for SrTiO3, thereby providing a realistic pathway toward practical solar hydrogen production.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, F.T.; writing—review and editing, visualization, M.H.F., H.A.R. and M.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Melchionna M., Fornasiero P. Updates on the Roadmap for Photocatalysis. ACS Catal. 2020;10:5493–5501. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c01204. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nishioka S., Osterloh F.E., Wang X., Mallouk T.E., Maeda K. Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers. 2023;3:42. doi: 10.1038/s43586-023-00226-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boretti A., Castelletto S. Cost and Performance of CSP and PV Plants of Capacity above 100 MW Operating in the United States of America. Renew. Energy Focus. 2021;39:90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ref.2021.07.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Qin J., Fang F., Tian X. Optimization Configuration of Hybrid Energy Storage Capacities for Large-Scale Renewable Energy Bases in Desert: A Case Study of Tennger, China. Energy. 2025;332:136791. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136791. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mohamed A.S.A., Maghrabie H.M. Techno-Economic Feasibility Analysis of Benban Solar Park. Alex. Eng. J. 2022;61:12593–12607. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2022.06.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Karaman Ö.A. Performance Evaluation of Seasonal Solar Irradiation Models—Case Study: Karapınar Town, Turkey. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 2023;49:103228. doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2023.103228. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Boddapati V., Daniel S.A. Performance Analysis and Investigations of Grid-Connected Solar Power Park in Kurnool, South India. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2020;55:161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2020.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Purcell T.F., Loftus A., March H. Value-Rent-Finance in Spain’s Solar Transition. Environ. Plan. E Nat. Space. 2025;8:1233–1255. doi: 10.1177/25148486251338617. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kumar K., Shukla M.M., Pandey B., Bajaj K.S. Perovskite Solar Cells. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2025. Solar Energy to Sustainable Development Goals; pp. 358–369. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fujishima A., Honda K. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature. 1972;238:37–38. doi: 10.1038/238037a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rajaitha P.M., Hajra S., Sahu M., Mistewicz K., Toroń B., Abolhassani R., Panda S., Mishra Y.K., Kim H.J. Unraveling Highly Efficient Nanomaterial Photocatalyst for Pollutant Removal: A Comprehensive Review and Future Progress. Mater. Today Chem. 2022;23:100692. doi: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100692. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Li X., Wang C., Tang J. Methane Transformation by Photocatalysis. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2022;7:617–632. doi: 10.1038/s41578-022-00422-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bellotti P., Huang H.-M., Faber T., Glorius F. Photocatalytic Late-Stage C–H Functionalization. Chem. Rev. 2023;123:4237–4352. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fang S., Rahaman M., Bharti J., Reisner E., Robert M., Ozin G.A., Hu Y.H. Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers. 2023;3:61. doi: 10.1038/s43586-023-00243-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Faghani M.H., Zokaeian M., Talebkeikhah F., Iranshahi D. Design Principles and Mechanistic Advances in CO2-to-CO Conversion across Electrochemical, Photochemical, and Photoelectrochemical Catalysis. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2026;14:120952. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2025.120952. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vu M.-H., Sakar M., Do T.-O. Insights into the Recent Progress and Advanced Materials for Photocatalytic Nitrogen Fixation for Ammonia (NH3) Production. Catalysts. 2018;8:621. doi: 10.3390/catal8120621. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Foubelo F., Nájera C., Retamosa M.G., Sansano J.M., Sirvent A., Yus M. Decarboxylative Photocatalytic Transformations. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2025;54:11856–12042. doi: 10.1039/D4CS01051E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dou Z., Zhang Z., Zhou H., Wang M. Photocatalytic Upgrading of Lignin Oil to Diesel Precursors and Hydrogen. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021;60:16399–16403. doi: 10.1002/anie.202105692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Acar C., Dincer I., Naterer G.F. Review of Photocatalytic Water-Splitting Methods for Sustainable Hydrogen Production: Review: Photocatalysis for Sustainable Hydrogen. Int. J. Energy Res. 2016;40:1449–1473. doi: 10.1002/er.3549. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gunawan D., Zhang J., Li Q., Toe C.Y., Scott J., Antonietti M., Guo J., Amal R. Materials Advances in Photocatalytic Solar Hydrogen Production: Integrating Systems and Economics for a Sustainable Future. Adv. Mater. 2024;36:2404618. doi: 10.1002/adma.202404618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Takata T., Jiang J., Sakata Y., Nakabayashi M., Shibata N., Nandal V., Seki K., Hisatomi T., Domen K. Photocatalytic Water Splitting with a Quantum Efficiency of Almost Unity. Nature. 2020;581:411–414. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2278-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Fu H., Wu Y., Guo Y., Sakurai T., Zhang Q., Liu Y., Zheng Z., Cheng H., Wang Z., Huang B., et al. A Scalable Solar-Driven Photocatalytic System for Separated H2 and O2 Production from Water. Nat. Commun. 2025;16:990. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56314-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nishiyama H., Yamada T., Nakabayashi M., Maehara Y., Yamaguchi M., Kuromiya Y., Nagatsuma Y., Tokudome H., Akiyama S., Watanabe T., et al. Photocatalytic Solar Hydrogen Production from Water on a 100-M2 Scale. Nature. 2021;598:304–307. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03907-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cheng W.-H., Richter M.H., May M.M., Ohlmann J., Lackner D., Dimroth F., Hannappel T., Atwater H.A., Lewerenz H.-J. Monolithic Photoelectrochemical Device for Direct Water Splitting with 19% Efficiency. ACS Energy Lett. 2018;3:1795–1800. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b00920. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mai H., Chen D., Tachibana Y., Suzuki H., Abe R., Caruso R.A. Developing Sustainable, High-Performance Perovskites in Photocatalysis: Design Strategies and Applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021;50:13692–13729. doi: 10.1039/D1CS00684C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kumar A., Kumar A., Krishnan V. Perovskite Oxide Based Materials for Energy and Environment-Oriented Photocatalysis. ACS Catal. 2020;10:10253–10315. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c02947. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kanhere P., Chen Z. A Review on Visible Light Active Perovskite-Based Photocatalysts. Molecules. 2014;19:19995–20022. doi: 10.3390/molecules191219995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang G., Liu G., Wang L., Irvine J.T.S. Inorganic Perovskite Photocatalysts for Solar Energy Utilization. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016;45:5951–5984. doi: 10.1039/C5CS00769K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schanze K.S., Kamat P.V., Yang P., Bisquert J. Progress in Perovskite Photocatalysis. ACS Energy Lett. 2020;5:2602–2604. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01480. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Temerov F., Baghdadi Y., Rattner E., Eslava S. A Review on Halide Perovskite-Based Photocatalysts: Key Factors and Challenges. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2022;5:14605–14637. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.2c02680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Si C., Zhang W., Lu Q., Guo E., Yang Z., Chen J., He X., Luo J. Recent Advances in Perovskite Catalysts for Efficient Overall Water Splitting. Catalysts. 2022;12:601. doi: 10.3390/catal12060601. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Huang Y., Liu J., Deng Y., Qian Y., Jia X., Ma M., Yang C., Liu K., Wang Z., Qu S., et al. The Application of Perovskite Materials in Solar Water Splitting. J. Semicond. 2020;41:011701. doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/41/1/011701. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hisatomi T., Kubota J., Domen K. Recent Advances in Semiconductors for Photocatalytic and Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014;43:7520–7535. doi: 10.1039/C3CS60378D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kudo A., Miseki Y. Heterogeneous Photocatalyst Materials for Water Splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009;38:253–278. doi: 10.1039/B800489G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Maeda K., Domen K. Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Recent Progress and Future Challenges. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010;1:2655–2661. doi: 10.1021/jz1007966. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hisatomi T., Domen K. Reaction Systems for Solar Hydrogen Production via Water Splitting with Particulate Semiconductor Photocatalysts. Nat. Catal. 2019;2:387–399. doi: 10.1038/s41929-019-0242-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Berger T., Trunschke A. Optical Properties: UV/Vis Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy and Photoluminescence. In: Diwald O., Berger T., editors. Metal Oxide Nanoparticles. Wiley; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2021. pp. 435–482. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Maheu C., Cardenas L., Puzenat E., Afanasiev P., Geantet C. UPS and UV Spectroscopies Combined to Position the Energy Levels of TiO2 Anatase and Rutile Nanopowders. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018;20:25629–25637. doi: 10.1039/C8CP04614J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Abdel-wahab M.S., Jilani A., Yahia I.S., Al-Ghamdi A.A. Enhanced the Photocatalytic Activity of Ni-Doped ZnO Thin Films: Morphological, Optical and XPS Analysis. Superlattices Microstruct. 2016;94:108–118. doi: 10.1016/j.spmi.2016.03.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lee S.F., Jimenez-Relinque E., Martinez I., Castellote M. Effects of Mott–Schottky Frequency Selection and Other Controlling Factors on Flat-Band Potential and Band-Edge Position Determination of TiO2. Catalysts. 2023;13:1000. doi: 10.3390/catal13061000. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gelderman K., Lee L., Donne S.W. Flat-Band Potential of a Semiconductor: Using the Mott–Schottky Equation. J. Chem. Educ. 2007;84:685. doi: 10.1021/ed084p685. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ghose K.K., Brown J.J., Frankcombe T.J., Page A., Bayon A. Density Functional Theory Modeling of Critical Properties of Perovskite Oxides for Water Splitting Applications. WIREs Energy Environ. 2023;12:e476. doi: 10.1002/wene.476. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Su X., Wang S., Liu J., Zhang D., Pu X., Cai P. S-Scheme Heterojunction of Hollow Corncob-like ZnIn2S4/LaFeO3 for Water Splitting and Tetracycline Degradation. Chemosphere. 2023;340:139777. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.139777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Leytner S., Hupp J.T. Evaluation of the Energetics of Electron Trap States at the Nanocrystalline Titanium Dioxide/Aqueous Solution Interface via Time-Resolved Photoacoustic Spectroscopy. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2000;330:231–236. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(00)01112-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Appavoo K., Liu M., Black C.T., Sfeir M.Y. Quantifying Bulk and Surface Recombination Processes in Nanostructured Water Splitting Photocatalysts via In Situ Ultrafast Spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 2015;15:1076–1082. doi: 10.1021/nl504035j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Li Q., Anpo M., Wang X. Application of Photoluminescence Spectroscopy to Elucidate Photocatalytic Reactions at the Molecular Level. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2020;46:4325–4344. doi: 10.1007/s11164-020-04209-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ma J., Miao T.J., Tang J. Charge Carrier Dynamics and Reaction Intermediates in Heterogeneous Photocatalysis by Time-Resolved Spectroscopies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022;51:5777–5794. doi: 10.1039/D1CS01164B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Li N., Ma Y., Sun W. Exploring the Dynamics of Charge Transfer in Photocatalysis: Applications of Femtosecond Transient Absorption Spectroscopy. Molecules. 2024;29:3995. doi: 10.3390/molecules29173995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Johnston J., O’Rourke C., Mills A. Photo-Induced Absorption Spectroscopy (PIAS) Study of the Kinetics of Water Oxidation by P25 TiO2 Using Periodate as an Electron Acceptor. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2022;644:118817. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2022.118817. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Wang L., Wang L., Zhao K., Cheng D., Yu W., Li J., Wang J., Shi F. Hydrogen Production Performance of Active Ce/N Co-Doped SrTiO3 for Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2022;47:39047–39057. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chen H.-C., Huang C.-W., Wu J.C.S., Lin S.-T. Theoretical Investigation of the Metal-Doped SrTiO3 Photocatalysts for Water Splitting. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012;116:7897–7903. doi: 10.1021/jp300910e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Paz Y. Transient IR Spectroscopy as a Tool for Studying Photocatalytic Materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2019;31:503004. doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/ab3eda. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nakajima S., Katoh R. Time-Resolved Microwave Conductivity Study of Charge Carrier Dynamics in Commercially Available TiO2 Photocatalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015;3:15466–15472. doi: 10.1039/C5TA02110C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gao Y., Nie W., Wang X., Fan F., Li C. Advanced Space- and Time-Resolved Techniques for Photocatalyst Studies. Chem. Commun. 2020;56:1007–1021. doi: 10.1039/C9CC07128H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chen S., Takata T., Domen K. Particulate Photocatalysts for Overall Water Splitting. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017;2:17050. doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.50. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yang J., Wang D., Han H., Li C. Roles of Cocatalysts in Photocatalysis and Photoelectrocatalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013;46:1900–1909. doi: 10.1021/ar300227e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Qin Y., Fang F., Xie Z., Lin H., Zhang K., Yu X., Chang K. La,Al-Codoped SrTiO3 as a Photocatalyst in Overall Water Splitting: Significant Surface Engineering Effects on Defect Engineering. ACS Catal. 2021;11:11429–11439. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c02874. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Niishiro R., Tanaka S., Kudo A. Hydrothermal-Synthesized SrTiO3 Photocatalyst Codoped with Rhodium and Antimony with Visible-Light Response for Sacrificial H2 and O2 Evolution and Application to Overall Water Splitting. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014;150–151:187–196. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.12.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chen W., Liu H., Li X., Liu S., Gao L., Mao L., Fan Z., Shangguan W., Fang W., Liu Y. Polymerizable Complex Synthesis of SrTiO3:(Cr/Ta) Photocatalysts to Improve Photocatalytic Water Splitting Activity under Visible Light. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016;192:145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.03.057. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Jiang J., Kato K., Fujimori H., Yamakata A., Sakata Y. Investigation on the Highly Active SrTiO3 Photocatalyst toward Overall H2O Splitting by Doping Na Ion. J. Catal. 2020;390:81–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2020.07.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yang L., Li Z., Xu X. Realizing Efficient Photocatalytic Water Splitting over Mg-Modified BaNbO2N under Visible Light Illumination. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2024;340:123221. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123221. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Pan C., Takata T., Kumamoto K., Khine Ma S.S., Ueda K., Minegishi T., Nakabayashi M., Matsumoto T., Shibata N., Ikuhara Y., et al. Band Engineering of Perovskite-Type Transition Metal Oxynitrides for Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016;4:4544–4552. doi: 10.1039/C5TA10612E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Galińska A., Walendziewski J. Photocatalytic Water Splitting over Pt−TiO2 in the Presence of Sacrificial Reagents. Energy Fuels. 2005;19:1143–1147. doi: 10.1021/ef0400619. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kumaravel V., Imam M., Badreldin A., Chava R., Do J., Kang M., Abdel-Wahab A. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production: Role of Sacrificial Reagents on the Activity of Oxide, Carbon, and Sulfide Catalysts. Catalysts. 2019;9:276. doi: 10.3390/catal9030276. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ganapathy M., Mani S., Alagan V., Chang C.T. The Role of Sacrificial Agents in Water Splitting. In: Mangalaraja R.V., Arulraj A., Aepuru R.V.N., Siew Hwa C., editors. Materials Technology for the Energy and Environmental Nexus, Volume 2. IOP Publishing; Bristol, UK: 2023. pp. 7-1–7-20. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Schneider J., Bahnemann D.W. Undesired Role of Sacrificial Reagents in Photocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013;4:3479–3483. doi: 10.1021/jz4018199. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Jeon J., Kweon D.H., Jang B.J., Ju M.J., Baek J. Enhancing the Photocatalytic Activity of TiO2 Catalysts. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2020;4:2000197. doi: 10.1002/adsu.202000197. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hufschmidt D., Bahnemann D., Testa J.J., Emilio C.A., Litter M.I. Enhancement of the Photocatalytic Activity of Various TiO2 Materials by Platinisation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2002;148:223–231. doi: 10.1016/S1010-6030(02)00048-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Huang R., Wu J., Zhang M., Liu B., Zheng Z., Luo D. Strategies to Enhance Photocatalytic Activity of Graphite Carbon Nitride-Based Photocatalysts. Mater. Des. 2021;210:110040. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Guo Y., Li H., Ma W., Shi W., Zhu Y., Choi W. Photocatalytic Activity Enhanced via Surface Hybridization. Carbon. Energy. 2020;2:308–349. doi: 10.1002/cey2.66. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Yu J., Yu H., Cheng B., Zhou M., Zhao X. Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of TiO2 Powder (P25) by Hydrothermal Treatment. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2006;253:112–118. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2006.03.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Talebkeikhah F., Rad H.A., Erfanipour Z., Khodadadi A.A., Mortazavi Y. Site Engineering of MIL-100(Fe) via Atomic Layer Deposition of TiO2 for Photocatalytic Water Splitting. ChemCatChem. 2026;18:e01705. doi: 10.1002/cctc.202501705. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bisquert J. Hysteresis, Impedance, and Transients Effects in Halide Perovskite Solar Cells and Memory Devices Analysis by Neuron-Style Models. Adv. Energy Mater. 2024;14:2400442. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202400442. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Bisquert J., Gonzales C., Guerrero A. Transient On/Off Photocurrent Response of Halide Perovskite Photodetectors. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2023;127:21338–21350. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c04672. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Wang Y., Ji Y., Yang Y., Chen Z., Sun H., Wang X., Zou Z., Huang H. Narrow-Bandgap Halide Perovskite Cs4CuSb2Cl12 with Full-Spectrum Photothermal Conversion. ACS Energy Lett. 2024;9:336–345. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c02218. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Li Y., Ding Y., Sun J., Tan S., Li Y., Wang X., Cai J., Bai J., Lv X., Guo W., et al. Design Strategies and Emerging Applications of Perovskite-Based Sensors. SmartMat. 2025;6:e70022. doi: 10.1002/smm2.70022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Esmaeilnejad-Ahranjani P., Khodadadi A.A., Mortazavi Y. Self-Regenerative Function of Cu in LaMnCu0.1O3 Catalyst: Towards Noble Metal-Free Intelligent Perovskites for Automotive Exhaust Gas Treatment. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2020;602:117702. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2020.117702. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Shooshtari M., Kim S.-Y., Pahlavan S., Serrano-Gotarredona T., Bisquert J., Linares-Barranco B. Bio-Inspired Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity Learning with Metal Halide Perovskites: Toward Artificial Synaptic Functionality. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2026;18:7103–7114. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5c21545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Shooshtari M., Kim S., Pahlavan S., Rivera-Sierra G., Través M.J., Serrano-Gotarredona T., Bisquert J., Linares-Barranco B. Advancing Logic Circuits with Halide Perovskite Memristors for Next-Generation Digital Systems. SmartMat. 2025;6:e70032. doi: 10.1002/smm2.70032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Attfield J.P., Lightfoot P., Morris R.E. Perovskites. Dalton Trans. 2015;44:10541–10542. doi: 10.1039/C5DT90083B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Travis W., Glover E.N.K., Bronstein H., Scanlon D.O., Palgrave R.G. On the Application of the Tolerance Factor to Inorganic and Hybrid Halide Perovskites: A Revised System. Chem. Sci. 2016;7:4548–4556. doi: 10.1039/C5SC04845A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Knapp M.C., Woodward P.M. A-Site Cation Ordering in AA′BB′O6 Perovskites. J. Solid State Chem. 2006;179:1076–1085. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2006.01.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Eng H.W., Barnes P.W., Auer B.M., Woodward P.M. Investigations of the Electronic Structure of D0 Transition Metal Oxides Belonging to the Perovskite Family. J. Solid State Chem. 2003;175:94–109. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4596(03)00289-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Mitchell R.H., Welch M.D., Chakhmouradian A.R. Nomenclature of the Perovskite Supergroup: A Hierarchical System of Classification Based on Crystal Structure and Composition. Mineral. Mag. 2017;81:411–461. doi: 10.1180/minmag.2016.080.156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Maughan A.E., Ganose A.M., Candia A.M., Granger J.T., Scanlon D.O., Neilson J.R. Anharmonicity and Octahedral Tilting in Hybrid Vacancy-Ordered Double Perovskites. Chem. Mater. 2018;30:472–483. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04516. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Azmi R., Utomo D.S., Liu Y., Zhumagali S., De Wolf S. Dimensionality Engineering of Perovskites for Stable Heterojunction-Based Photovoltaics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2025;11:136–155. doi: 10.1038/s41578-025-00847-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Benedek N.A., Rondinelli J.M., Djani H., Ghosez P., Lightfoot P. Understanding Ferroelectricity in Layered Perovskites: New Ideas and Insights from Theory and Experiments. Dalton Trans. 2015;44:10543–10558. doi: 10.1039/C5DT00010F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Wang Z., Shi Z., Li T., Chen Y., Huang W. Stability of Perovskite Solar Cells: A Prospective on the Substitution of the A Cation and X Anion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017;56:1190–1212. doi: 10.1002/anie.201603694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Jain A., Ong S.P., Hautier G., Chen W., Richards W.D., Dacek S., Cholia S., Gunter D., Skinner D., Ceder G., et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: A Materials Genome Approach to Accelerating Materials Innovation. APL Mater. 2013;1:011002. doi: 10.1063/1.4812323. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Horton M.K., Huck P., Yang R.X., Munro J.M., Dwaraknath S., Ganose A.M., Kingsbury R.S., Wen M., Shen J.X., Mathis T.S., et al. Accelerated Data-Driven Materials Science with the Materials Project. Nat. Mater. 2025;24:1522–1532. doi: 10.1038/s41563-025-02272-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Momma K., Izumi F. VESTA 3 for Three-Dimensional Visualization of Crystal, Volumetric and Morphology Data. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2011;44:1272–1276. doi: 10.1107/S0021889811038970. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Schaak R.E., Mallouk T.E. Perovskites by Design: A Toolbox of Solid-State Reactions. Chem. Mater. 2002;14:1455–1471. doi: 10.1021/cm010689m. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Wang S., Yousefi Amin A.A., Wu L., Cao M., Zhang Q., Ameri T. Perovskite Nanocrystals: Synthesis, Stability, and Optoelectronic Applications. Small Struct. 2021;2:2000124. doi: 10.1002/sstr.202000124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Walton R.I. Perovskite Oxides Prepared by Hydrothermal and Solvothermal Synthesis: A Review of Crystallisation, Chemistry, and Compositions. Chem. A Eur. J. 2020;26:9041–9069. doi: 10.1002/chem.202000707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Civera A., Pavese M., Saracco G., Specchia V. Combustion Synthesis of Perovskite-Type Catalysts for Natural Gas Combustion. Catal. Today. 2003;83:199–211. doi: 10.1016/S0920-5861(03)00220-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Li H., Tan L., Jiang C., Li M., Zhou J., Ye Y., Liu Y., Yi C. Molten Salt Strategy for Reproducible Evaporation of Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023;33:2211232. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202211232. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Chiarello G., Rossetti I., Forni L. Flame-Spray Pyrolysis Preparation of Perovskites for Methane Catalytic Combustion. J. Catal. 2005;236:251–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2005.10.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Stojanovic B.D. Mechanochemical Synthesis of Ceramic Powders with Perovskite Structure. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2003;143–144:78–81. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00323-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Prado-Gonjal J., Arévalo-López Á.M., Morán E. Microwave-Assisted Synthesis: A Fast and Efficient Route to Produce LaMO3 (M=Al, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co) Perovskite Materials. Mater. Res. Bull. 2011;46:222–230. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2010.11.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Wang J.T.-W., Wang Z., Pathak S., Zhang W., deQuilettes D.W., Wisnivesky-Rocca-Rivarola F., Huang J., Nayak P.K., Patel J.B., Mohd Yusof H.A., et al. Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells by Metal Ion Doping. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016;9:2892–2901. doi: 10.1039/C6EE01969B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Zhang X., Li L., Sun Z., Luo J. Rational Chemical Doping of Metal Halide Perovskites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019;48:517–539. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00563J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Zhong F., He Y., Sun Y., Dong F., Sheng J. Metal-Doping of Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals for Energy and Environmental Photocatalysis: Challenges and Prospects. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2022;10:22915–22928. doi: 10.1039/D2TA06851F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Feng L.M., Jiang L.Q., Zhu M., Liu H.B., Zhou X., Li C.H. Formability of ABO3 Cubic Perovskites. J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 2008;69:967–974. doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2007.11.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Tan H., Zhao Z., Zhu W., Coker E.N., Li B., Zheng M., Yu W., Fan H., Sun Z. Oxygen Vacancy Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of Pervoskite SrTiO3. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2014;6:19184–19190. doi: 10.1021/am5051907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Deshmukh V.V., Ravikumar C.R., Kumar M.R.A., Ghotekar S., Kumar A.N., Jahagirdar A.A., Murthy H.C.A. Structure, Morphology and Electrochemical Properties of SrTiO3 Perovskite: Photocatalytic and Supercapacitor Applications. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol. 2021;3:241–248. doi: 10.1016/j.enceco.2021.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Xu Y., Liang Y., He Q., Xu R., Chen D., Xu X., Hu H. Review of Doping SrTiO3 for Photocatalytic Applications. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2022;46:6. doi: 10.1007/s12034-022-02826-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Tijare S.N., Joshi M.V., Padole P.S., Mangrulkar P.A., Rayalu S.S., Labhsetwar N.K. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation through Water Splitting on Nano-Crystalline LaFeO3 Perovskite. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2012;37:10451–10456. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.120. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Lam S.-M., Sin J.-C., Mohamed A.R. A Newly Emerging Visible Light-Responsive BiFeO 3 Perovskite for Photocatalytic Applications: A Mini Review. Mater. Res. Bull. 2017;90:15–30. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2016.12.052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Abdullah E.A. Band Edge Positions as a Key Parameter to a Systematic Design of Heterogeneous Photocatalyst. Eur. J. Chem. 2019;10:82–94. doi: 10.5155/eurjchem.10.1.82-94.1809. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Zhumabay N., Bau J.A., Ahmad R., Braic L., Zhang H., Cavallo L., Rueping M. Tracking Water Splitting Activity by Cocatalyst Identity in SrTiO3. Small Struct. 2025;6:2400283. doi: 10.1002/sstr.202400283. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Zhou X., Yan F., Lyubartsev A., Shen B., Zhai J., Conesa J.C., Hedin N. Efficient Production of Solar Hydrogen Peroxide Using Piezoelectric Polarization and Photoinduced Charge Transfer of Nanopiezoelectrics Sensitized by Carbon Quantum Dots. Adv. Sci. 2022;9:2105792. doi: 10.1002/advs.202105792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Li J., Yin Y., Li J., Zhu Z., Meng F., Liu Y., Wang Z., Liu B., Li Z. II-Type Heterojunction of FeTiO3@PCN-223(Zn) with Oxygen Vacancies Established by Ball Milling for Visible-Light-Driven Photo-Fenton Degradation of Tetracycline Hydrochloride. Environ. Res. 2025;285:122648. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2025.122648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Paramanik L., Sultana S., Parida K.M. Photocatalytic and Photo-Electrochemical Ammonia Synthesis over Dimensional Oriented Cobalt Titanate/Nitrogen-Doped Reduced Graphene Oxide Junction Interface Catalyst. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;625:83–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Xing C., Liu Y., Zhang Y., Liu J., Zhang T., Tang P., Arbiol J., Soler L., Sivula K., Guijarro N., et al. Porous NiTiO3 /TiO2 Nanostructures for Photocatatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019;7:17053–17059. doi: 10.1039/C9TA04763H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Ahn C.W., Borse P.H., Kim J.H., Kim J.Y., Jang J.S., Cho C.-R., Yoon J.-H., Lee B., Bae J.-S., Kim H.G., et al. Effective Charge Separation in Site-Isolated Pt-Nanodot Deposited PbTiO3 Nanotube Arrays for Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018;224:804–809. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.11.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Li F., Xie S., Zhou Y., Wu Z., Wang Q., Wu P., Huang H., He Q., Li F., Zhao K., et al. Fabrication of Directly 2D Z-Scheme CuTiO3/g-C3N4 with High Photocatalytic Activities for CO2 Reduction and Hydrogen Production. J. Solid State Chem. 2024;329:124399. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2023.124399. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Koop-Santa C., Sanchez-Martinez A., López-Mena E.R., Ponce-Ruiz J.L.A., Orozco-Guareño E., Ceballos-Sanchez O. Physicochemical Properties of MnTiO3 Powders Obtained by Molten Salt Method. Ceram. Int. 2021;47:33315–33321. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.08.234. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Yan Y., Yang H., Yi Z., Xian T., Li R., Wang X. Construction of Ag2S@CaTiO3 Heterostructure Photocatalysts for Enhanced Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes. Desalin. Water Treat. 2019;170:349–360. doi: 10.5004/dwt.2019.24747. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Albalawi K.M. Engineered MgTiO3/Sm3+–Bi2S3 Heterojunctions as ROS-Active Antiproliferative Agents against HeLa Cells and Degradation of Acid Red-95 Dye. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2026;30:39. doi: 10.1007/s44442-026-00090-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Gao Z., Qu X. Construction of ZnTiO3/Bi4NbO8Cl Heterojunction with Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2020;15:64. doi: 10.1186/s11671-020-3292-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Moniz S.J.A., Quesada-Cabrera R., Blackman C.S., Tang J., Southern P., Weaver P.M., Carmalt C.J. A Simple, Low-Cost CVD Route to Thin Films of BiFeO3 for Efficient Water Photo-Oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2014;2:2922. doi: 10.1039/c3ta14824f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Ismael M., Wark M. Perovskite-Type LaFeO3: Photoelectrochemical Properties and Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants Under Visible Light Irradiation. Catalysts. 2019;9:342. doi: 10.3390/catal9040342. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Farooq U., Chaudhary P., Ingole P.P., Kalam A., Ahmad T. Development of Cuboidal KNbO3@α-Fe2O3 Hybrid Nanostructures for Improved Photocatalytic and Photoelectrocatalytic Applications. ACS Omega. 2020;5:20491–20505. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c02646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Xu J., Feng B., Wang Y., Qi Y., Niu J., Chen M. BiOCl Decorated NaNbO3 Nanocubes: A Novel p-n Heterojunction Photocatalyst with Improved Activity for Ofloxacin Degradation. Front. Chem. 2018;6:393. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Honorio L.M.C., Oliveira A.L.M.D., Silva Filho E.C.D., Osajima J.A., Hakki A., Macphee D.E., Santos I.M.G.D. Supporting the Photocatalysts on ZrO2: An Effective Way to Enhance the Photocatalytic Activity of SrSnO3. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020;528:146991. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146991. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Zhang M., Dong Y., Yin H., Chen X. Construction of CdS/CdSnO3 Direct Z-Scheme Heterostructure for Efficient Tetracycline Hydrochloride Photodegradation. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2022;152:107044. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2022.107044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Wang J., Huang C., Chen X., Zhang H., Li Z., Zou Z. Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction of BaCeO3 with 4f Configuration Electrons. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015;358:463–467. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Khan S., Ali S.A., Khatoon A., Rawat B., Kailasam K., Ahmad T. Facile Synthesis of BaCeO3@g-C3N4 n-Type Semiconductor Heterojunctions for Green Hydrogen Production via Multimodal Photo and Electro-Catalytic Pathways. Dalton Trans. 2026;55:7554–7565. doi: 10.1039/D6DT00530F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Ahadi A., Ghobadifard M., Mohebbi S. The Impressive Photocatalytic Performance of TiO2/CeCoO3/PMO-IL Nanohybrid toward the Selective Generation of Aldehydes under a Visible-LED Light Source. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2024;449:115391. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2023.115391. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Mishra N.S., Kuila A., Saravanan P., Bahnemann D., Jang M., Routu S. Simultaneous S-Scheme Promoted Ag@AgVO3/g-C3N4/CeVO4 Heterojunction with Enhanced Charge Separation and Photo Redox Ability towards Solar Photocatalysis. Chemosphere. 2023;326:138496. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Wang X., Jin Z., Li X. Monoclinic β-AgVO3 Coupled with CdS Formed a 1D/1D p–n Heterojunction for Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Rare Met. 2023;42:1494–1507. doi: 10.1007/s12598-022-02183-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Pei T., Mao X., Fu Y., Liu X., Deng L., Wen L., Liu L., Yuan Q., Xu H. Constructing an Amorphous Potassium Tantalate-Ta3 N5 Heterojunction Interface for Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity in Overall Water Splitting. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2025;13:19145–19153. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c07796. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Tang L., Feng C., Deng Y., Zeng G., Wang J., Liu Y., Feng H., Wang J. Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of Ternary Ag/g-C3N4/NaTaO3 Photocatalysts under Wide Spectrum Light Radiation: The High Potential Band Protection Mechanism. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018;230:102–114. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.02.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Shirazi-Amin A., Toloueinia P., Wu Y., Meguerdichian A.G., Kerns P., Suib S.L. Effect of Lithium Incorporation on Tweaking the Electrocatalytic Behavior of Tantalum-Based Oxides. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020;8:23413–23426. doi: 10.1039/D0TA08043H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Edalati K., Fujiwara K., Takechi S., Wang Q., Arita M., Watanabe M., Sauvage X., Ishihara T., Horita Z. Improved Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution on Tantalate Perovskites CsTaO3 and LiTaO3 by Strain-Induced Vacancies. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020;3:1710–1718. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.9b02197. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Vega-Reyes C., Medina-Ramírez I.E., Díaz-Torres L.A., Coutiño-González E., Olmos-Moya P.M., Pineda-Arellano C.A. Tunable Copper-Doped BaZrO3 for Generation of Hydrogen through Photocatalytic Water Splitting. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2026;103:102386. doi: 10.1016/j.jics.2025.102386. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Anajafi Z., Naseri M., Hashemi A., Neri G. Structural and Photocatalytic Properties of CeFeO3 and CeFeO3/GO Nanostructures. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2023;105:116–126. doi: 10.1007/s10971-022-05967-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Alshehri R.F. Bandgap Engineering of CeFeO3 Photocatalyst for Enhanced Photocatalytic Degradation of Pesticides. Ceram. Int. 2025;52:5603–5616. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.12.322. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Andish-Lifshagerd F., Habibi-Yangjeh A., Habibi M., Akinay Y. Facile Synthesis of ZnO/CeO2/CeFeO3 Photocatalysts Sensitive to Visible Light with Tandem n-n Heterojunctions and Improved Performance towards Tetracycline and Dye Effluent Removals. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2024;448:115351. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2023.115351. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Ameta J., Kumar A., Ameta R., Sharma V.K., Ameta S.C. Synthesis and Characterization of CeFeO3 Photocatalyst Used in Photocatalytic Bleaching of Gentian Violet. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2009;6:293–299. doi: 10.1007/BF03245837. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Hosakote Shankara A., Samuel Prabagar J., Tenzin T., Yadav S., Anil Kumar K.M., Shivaraju H.P. Facile Synthesis of NdFeO3 Perovskite for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Dye and Antibiotic. Mater. Today Proc. 2023;75:15–23. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.10.230. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Rana G., Kalaichelvan S., Chauhan A., Ali S.K., Jawhari A.H., Ismail K.S., Imran M., Alid S.K. NdFeO3 Anchored on Co-MOF as Nano-Photocatalyst for Efficient Photo-Degradation of TC Drug from Water. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 2025;35:6327–6343. doi: 10.1007/s10904-025-03658-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Nakhaei M., Khoshnoud D.S., Bremholm M., Nobre M.A.L., Khonakdar H.A. Effects of Al Doping on Physical Properties and Photocatalytic Activity of Neodymium Orthoferrite. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2023;105:246–265. doi: 10.1007/s10971-022-05956-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Behzadifard Z., Shariatinia Z., Jourshabani M. Novel Visible Light Driven CuO/SmFeO3 Nanocomposite Photocatalysts with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activities for Degradation of Organic Pollutants. J. Mol. Liq. 2018;262:533–548. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.04.126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Chouchene B., Gries T., Balan L., Medjahdi G., Schneider R. Graphitic Carbon Nitride/SmFeO3 Composite Z-Scheme Photocatalyst with High Visible Light Activity. Nanotechnology. 2020;31:465704. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/abadc7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Tang P., Xie X., Chen H., Lv C., Ding Y. Synthesis of Nanoparticulate PrFeO3 by Sol–Gel Method and Its Visible-Light Photocatalytic Activity. Ferroelectrics. 2019;546:181–187. doi: 10.1080/00150193.2019.1592470. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Karimi Anjiraki M., Ghiyasiyan-Arani M., Baladi M., Alsultany F.H., Shabani-Nooshabadi M., Salavati-Niasari M. Magnetically Recyclable PrFeO3/g-C3N4 Nano-Photocatalyst with Z-Scheme Structure: Synthesis and Characterization and Its Application for Enhanced Degradation of Malachite Green as Contaminated Water under Sunlight. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2024;170:113184. doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2024.113184. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Chebanenko M.I., Lebedev L.A., Seroglazova A.S., Lobinsky A.A., Gerasimov E.Y., Stovpiaga E.Y., Popkov V.I. Novel G-C3N4/PrFeO3 Nanocomposites with Z-Scheme Structure and Superior Photocatalytic Activity toward Visible-Light-Driven Removal of Tetracycline Antibiotics. Heliyon. 2023;9:e22038. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Tang P., Chen H., Lv C., Wang K., Wang Y. Microwave Synthesis of Nanoparticulate EuFeO3 and Its Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity. Integr. Ferroelectr. 2017;181:49–54. doi: 10.1080/10584587.2017.1352312. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Sarikhani F., Zabardasti A., Soleymani A.R., Naseri M. Enhanced Visible Light Activity of EuFeO3/TiO2 Nanocomposites Prepared by Thermal Treatment–Hydrolysis Precipitation Method. Appl. Phys. A. 2020;126:476. doi: 10.1007/s00339-020-03593-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Balaiah B., Vijayalakshmi R.P. Exploration of the Structural, Magnetic, Optical, and Photocatalytic Properties of Bi and Mn Modified Rare-Earth Orthoferrite EuFeO3 Nanoparticles Synthesized by the Sol–Gel Method. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2025;116:2054–2063. doi: 10.1007/s10971-025-06952-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Subramanian Y., Ramasamy V., Karthikeyan R.J., Srinivasan G.R., Arulmozhi D., Gubendiran R.K., Sriramalu M. Investigations on the Enhanced Dye Degradation Activity of Heterogeneous BiFeO3–GdFeO3 Nanocomposite Photocatalyst. Heliyon. 2019;5:e01831. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Li L., Wang F., Feng J., Guo S., Xu M., Wang L., Quan G. Step-Scheme GdFeO3/g-C3N4 Heterostructures with Outstanding Photocatalytic Activity. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021;32:16400–16410. doi: 10.1007/s10854-021-06193-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Zhang M., Zhu P., Li X., Chen Y., Chen X. Preparation of AgBr/Ag3PO4/GdFeO3 Composite Photocatalyst and Its High-Efficiency Photocatalytic Performance in Degradation of Norfloxacin. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2026;472:116759. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2025.116759. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Ismael M., Elhaddad E., Taffa D., Wark M. Synthesis of Phase Pure Hexagonal YFeO3 Perovskite as Efficient Visible Light Active Photocatalyst. Catalysts. 2017;7:326. doi: 10.3390/catal7110326. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Tang P., Chen H., Cao F., Pan G. Magnetically Recoverable and Visible-Light-Driven Nanocrystalline YFeO3 Photocatalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2011;1:1145. doi: 10.1039/c1cy00199j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Hu S., Yuan J., Tang S., Luo D., Shen Q., Qin Y., Zhou J., Tang Q., Chen S., Luo X., et al. Perovskite-Type SrFeO3/g-C3N4 S-Scheme Photocatalyst for Enhanced Degradation of Acid Red B. Opt. Mater. 2022;132:112760. doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2022.112760. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Srilakshmi C., Saraf R., Shivakumara C. Effective Degradation of Aqueous Nitrobenzene Using the SrFeO3−δ Photocatalyst under UV Illumination and Its Kinetics and Mechanistic Studies. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015;54:7800–7810. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b01474. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Lin H.-P., Chen C.-C., Lee W.W., Lai Y.-Y., Chen J.-Y., Chen Y.-Q., Fu J.-Y. Synthesis of a SrFeO3−x/g-C3N4 Heterojunction with Improved Visible-Light Photocatalytic Activities in Chloramphenicol and Crystal Violet Degradation. RSC Adv. 2016;6:2323–2336. doi: 10.1039/C5RA21339H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Kujur V.S., Dhiman T.K., Singh S. Room Temperature Multiferroic Nanostructured Gallium Ferrite Based Visible Light Driven Photocatalyst for Degradation of Azine Dyes. Chem. Inorg. Mater. 2025;5:100091. doi: 10.1016/j.cinorg.2025.100091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Kujur V.S., Singh S. Structural, Magnetic, Optical and Photocatalytic Properties of GaFeO3 Nanoparticles Synthesized via Non-Aqueous Solvent-Based Sol–Gel Route. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020;31:17633–17646. doi: 10.1007/s10854-020-04318-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Alazmi A. Advanced Perovskite Photocatalysts: Synthesis, Characterization, and Performance of Sm & Fe-Doped LaCrO3@r-GO for Water Purification. Ceram. Int. 2025;51:28986–28998. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.04.106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Aamir M., Bibi I., Ata S., Jilani K., Majid F., Kamal S., Alwadai N., Raza M.A.S., Bashir M., Iqbal S., et al. Ferroelectric, Dielectric, Magnetic, Structural and Photocatalytic Properties of Co and Fe Doped LaCrO3 Perovskite Synthesized via Micro-Emulsion Route. Ceram. Int. 2021;47:16696–16707. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.02.240. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Bhati I., Punjabi P.B., Ameta S.C. Photocatalytic Degradation of Fast Green Using Nanosized CeCrO3. Maced. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. 2010;29:195. doi: 10.20450/mjcce.2010.166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Qahtan A.A.A., Husain S., Somvanshi A., Khan W., Manea Y.K. Influence of Mn Doping on Dielectric Properties, Conduction Mechanism and Photocatalytic Nature of Gadolinium-Based Orthochromites. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2020;31:9335–9351. doi: 10.1007/s10854-020-03474-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Nashim A., Parida K.M. Novel Sm2Ti2O7/SmCrO3 Heterojunction Based Composite Photocatalyst for Degradation of Rhodamine 6G Dye. Chem. Eng. J. 2013;215–216:608–615. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Habibi M., Habibi-Yangjeh A., Khataee A. Synthesis of Visible-Light-Activated CeO2-x/BiCrO3 Photocatalysts with S-Scheme Mechanism: Effectual Performances in Detoxification of Various Antibiotics and Organic Pollutants. J. Environ. Manag. 2024;366:121890. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Sharma K., Jain S., Chandrawat U. BaBiO3 Assisted Photodegradation of Malachite Green Dye Under Visible Light Irradiation: Adsorption and Degradation Kinetics. Iran. J. Energy Environ. 2016;7:274–281. doi: 10.5829/idosi.ijee.2016.07.03.10. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Shtarev D.S., Shtareva A.V., Kevorkyants R., Molokeev M.S., Serpone N. Revisiting the BaBiO3 Semiconductor Photocatalyst: Synthesis, Characterization, Electronic Structure, and Photocatalytic Activity. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2021;20:1147–1160. doi: 10.1007/s43630-021-00086-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Zeng J., Zhong J., Li J., Huang S., Li M., Hu W. Photocatalytic Activity of TiO2 Loaded on BaBiO3 Toward Degradation of Gaseous Benzene. Synth. React. Inorg. Met.-Org. Nano-Met. Chem. 2015;45:1116–1120. doi: 10.1080/15533174.2013.862675. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Rokesh K., Sakar M., Do T. Calcium Bismuthate (CaBiO3): A Potential Sunlight-Driven Perovskite Photocatalyst for the Degradation of Emerging Pharmaceutical Contaminants. ChemPhotoChem. 2020;4:373–380. doi: 10.1002/cptc.201900265. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Zheng H., Zhang T., Zhu Y., Liang B., Jiang W. KBiO3 as an Effective Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalyst: Degradation Mechanism for Different Organic Pollutants. ChemPhotoChem. 2018;2:442–449. doi: 10.1002/cptc.201700211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Kikugawa N., Yang L., Matsumoto T., Ye J. Photoinduced Degradation of Organic Dye over LiBiO3 under Illumination of White Fluorescent Light. J. Mater. Res. 2010;25:177–181. doi: 10.1557/JMR.2010.0006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Wang Y., Jung D. Synthesis of Novel BiOCl/LiBiO3 p-n Heterojunction Photocatalysts and Their Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance. Solid. State Sci. 2019;91:42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2019.03.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Lotfi S., El Ouardi M., Ait Ahsaine H., Madigou V., BaQais A., Assani A., Saadi M., Arab M. Low-Temperature Synthesis, Characterization and Photocatalytic Properties of Lanthanum Vanadate LaVO4. Heliyon. 2023;9:e17255. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Benaissa M., Abbas N., Al Arni S., Elboughdiri N., Moumen A., Hamdy M.S., Abd-Rabboh H.S.M., Galal A.H., Al-Metwaly M.G., Ahmed M.A. BiVO3/g-C3N4 S-Scheme Heterojunction Nanocomposite Photocatalyst for Hydrogen Production and Amaranth Dye Removal. Opt. Mater. 2021;118:111237. doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2021.111237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Chen Y., Jihad A., Hussam F., Al-Abdeen S.H.Z., Hussein J.M., Adhab Z.H., Alzahraa Z.H.A., Ahmad I., Fatolahi L., Janani B.J. A Facile Preparation Method for Efficiency a Novel LaNiO3/SrCeO3 (p-n Type) Heterojunction Catalyst in Photocatalytic Activities, Bactericidal Assessment and Dopamine Detection. Surf. Interfaces. 2023;38:102830. doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2023.102830. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Majani S.S., Basavaraj R.B., Iqbal M., Shivamallu C., Amachawadi R.G., Venkatachalaiah K.N., Kollur S.P. Enhanced Photocatalytic Degradation Activity of SrCeO3 Nanophosphors: Aloe Vera Gel-Mediated Synthesis and UV Light-Driven Eradication of Titan Yellow Dye. Opt. Mater. 2025;162:116900. doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2025.116900. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Lu C.-S., Tsai H.-Y., Shaya J., Golovko V.B., Wang S.-Y., Liu W.-J., Chen C.-C. Degradation of Sulfamethoxazole in Water by AgNbO3 Photocatalyst Mediated by Persulfate. RSC Adv. 2022;12:29709–29718. doi: 10.1039/D2RA03408E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Jiang L., Huang X., Zhou Y., Huang S., Wang Y., Wang Z., Sun D., Lin H., Cheng Z. High Photocatalytic Performance of Ferroelectric AgNbO3 in a Doping State. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023;11:110402. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2023.110402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Shu H., Xie J., Xu H., Li H., Gu Z., Sun G., Xu Y. Structural Characterization and Photocatalytic Activity of NiO/AgNbO3. J. Alloys Compd. 2010;496:633–637. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.02.148. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Jayapandi S., Aditya D.S., Mahadevaprasad K.N., Santhosh K.N., Yoon H., Nataraj S.K. LaCoO3 Photocatalyst for Environmental Remediation and Energy Conversion Applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025;213:115464. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115464. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Noureen S., Sultana J., Rani M., Ahmad I., Shah W.A., Khan M.M., Waseem A. CeNiO3 /rGO Composite as an Efficient Photocatalyst for the Removal of Environmental Pollutants. Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon. Nanostruct. 2025;33:209–223. doi: 10.1080/1536383X.2024.2399243. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Maridevaru M.C., Aljafari B., Anandan S., Ashokkumar M. Synergistic Impacts of Sonolysis Aided Photocatalytic Degradation of Water Pollutant over Perovskite-Type CeNiO3 Nanospheres. New J. Chem. 2022;46:10117–10127. doi: 10.1039/D2NJ01127A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Chen C., Zhou J., Geng J., Bao R., Wang Z., Xia J., Li H. Perovskite LaNiO3/TiO2 Step-Scheme Heterojunction with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020;503:144287. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144287. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Zhou X., Chen Y., Li C., Zhang L., Zhang X., Ning X., Zhan L., Luo J. Construction of LaNiO3 Nanoparticles Modified G-C3N4 Nanosheets for Enhancing Visible Light Photocatalytic Activity towards Tetracycline Degradation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019;211:179–188. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.09.075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Sultana J., Noureen S., Rani M., Ahmad I., Wang C., Li C., Alhodaib A., Waseem A. Visible-Light-Driven Perovskite Carbonaceous Photocatalyst Using LaNiO3/rGO Composite for Environmental Remediation. Catal. Today. 2025;451:115238. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2025.115238. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Munisha B., Patra L., Nanda J., Pandey R., Brahma S.S. CeMnO3 Nanoparticle-Decorated g-C3N4 Nanosheets as Z-Scheme Heterostructures for Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2023;6:20539–20555. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.3c02156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Anusha H.S., Yadav S., Tenzin T., Prabagar J.S., Anilkumar K.M., Kitirote W., Shivaraju H.P. Improved CeMnO3 Perovskite Framework for Visible-Light-Aided Degradation of Tetracycline Hydrochloride Antibiotic Residue and Methylene Blue Dye. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023;20:13519–13534. doi: 10.1007/s13762-022-04742-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Shaterian M., Enhessari M., Rabbani D., Asghari M., Salavati-Niasari M. Synthesis, Characterization and Photocatalytic Activity of LaMnO3 Nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014;318:213–217. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.03.087. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Luo J., Chen J., Guo R., Qiu Y., Li W., Zhou X., Ning X., Zhan L. Rational Construction of Direct Z-Scheme LaMnO3/g-C3N4 Hybrid for Improved Visible-Light Photocatalytic Tetracycline Degradation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019;211:882–894. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.10.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Hu J., Ma J., Wang L., Huang H. Synthesis and Photocatalytic Properties of LaMnO3–Graphene Nanocomposites. J. Alloys Compd. 2014;583:539–545. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Sun D., Xie X., Tang P., Xu Y., Chen H., Yu L., Yang J. Characterization and Photocatalytic Activity of Nanoparticulate GdMnO3 Prepared by Sol-Gel Method. Ferroelectrics. 2017;521:38–43. doi: 10.1080/00150193.2017.1391008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Maity R., Dutta A., Halder S., Shannigrahi S., Mandal K., Sinha T.P. Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity, Transport Properties and Electronic Structure of Mn Doped GdFeO3 Synthesized Using the Sol–Gel Process. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021;23:16060–16076. doi: 10.1039/D1CP00621E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Liu J., Wei Z., Shangguan W. Enhanced Photocatalytic Water Splitting with Surface Defective SrTiO3 Nanocrystals. Front. Energy. 2021;15:700–709. doi: 10.1007/s11708-021-0735-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Sokolov M., Mastrikov Y.A., Zvejnieks G., Bocharov D., Kotomin E.A., Krasnenko V. Water Splitting on Multifaceted SrTiO3 Nanocrystals: Computational Study. Catalysts. 2021;11:1326. doi: 10.3390/catal11111326. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Wang X., Sui X., Wang M., Zheng Z., Yuan H., Yang S., Yang H.G., Peng Y., Hou Y. Facet Junction of Two-Dimensional Metal Halide Perovskite for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy. 2025;365:124937. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124937. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Lehner J.M., Ramírez L.P., Kubsky S., Gallet J.-J., Bournel F., Dudy L. Environmentally Stable p (6 × 2) SrTiO3 (001) Surface Reconstruction with Low-Valent Ti for Photocatalytic Water Splitting. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2023;127:17285–17289. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c04514. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Ghercă D., Borhan A.-I., Popescu D.-G., Husanu M.-A., Borca C.N., Stoian G., Chiriac H., Ababei G., Lupu N. Monophasic Titanate-Based Photocatalyst with Heteroatom Mixed Iso-Aliovalency Enabling Water Oxidation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2025;17:30910–30923. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5c03417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Abudukade M., Pinna M., Spanu D., De Amicis G., Minguzzi A., Vertova A., Recchia S., Ghigna P., Mul G., Altomare M. In Situ X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy Study of the Deactivation Mechanism of a Ni-SrTiO3 Photocatalyst Slurry Active in Water Splitting. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2024;128:16020–16031. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c04688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Vadai M., Angell D.K., Hayee F., Sytwu K., Dionne J.A. In-Situ Observation of Plasmon-Controlled Photocatalytic Dehydrogenation of Individual Palladium Nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:4658. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07108-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Ruan J., Zhong T., Guo Y. Enhanced Water Splitting over Ethylenediaminetetraacetate Treated SrTiO3 Photocatalysts with High Crystallinity, Reduced Size, and Surface Nanostructure. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023;650:1424–1433. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.07.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Klusáčková M., Nebel R., Macounová K.M., Klementová M., Krtil P. Size Control of the Photo-Electrochemical Water Splitting Activity of SrTiO3 Nano-Cubes. Electrochim. Acta. 2019;297:215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.185. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Zhang M., Salvador P.A., Rohrer G.S. Influence of Particle Size and Shape on the Rate of Hydrogen Produced by Al-doped SrTiO3 Photocatalysts. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2022;105:5336–5346. doi: 10.1111/jace.18488. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Jiang Y., Zhang J., Zhang X., Ma Y. Mechanistic Insights into the Role of Empty Mid-Gap States in Al- and Rh-Doped SrTiO3 for Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2025;694:162832. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.162832. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Rusevich L.L., Kotomin E.A., Zvejnieks G., Kržmanc M.M., Gupta S., Daneu N., Wu J.C.S., Lee Y.-G., Yu W.-Y. Effects of Al Doping on Hydrogen Production Efficiency upon Photostimulated Water Splitting on SrTiO3 Nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2022;126:21223–21233. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05993. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Wei Z., Yan J., Zhang Y., Chi J., Huang H., Liu J., Mi J., Ma L., Fang W., Shangguan W., et al. Unveiling the Enhanced Carrier Dynamics of Nanoscale Stacking Fault Effect in Al: SrTiO3 for Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy. 2025;378:125569. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125569. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Zhang Y., Wang Z., Li W., Ding P.C., Wang M.M., Tang Y.Y., Lin H.Y., Peng Y., Wang M.Y., Zheng Z., et al. Al3+-Dependent Anisotropic Facet Tailoring on SrTiO3 Single Crystal for Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting. Angew. Chem. 2025;137:e202508114. doi: 10.1002/ange.202508114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Su Z., Fang F., Li X., Han W., Liu X., Chang K. Synergistic Surface Oxygen Defect and Bulk Ti3+ Defect Engineering on SrTiO3 for Enhancing Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;626:662–673. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.06.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Li R., Takata T., Zhang B., Feng C., Wu Q., Cui C., Zhang Z., Domen K., Li Y. Criteria for Efficient Photocatalytic Water Splitting Revealed by Studying Carrier Dynamics in a Model Al-doped SrTiO3 Photocatalyst. Angew. Chem. 2023;135:e202313537. doi: 10.1002/ange.202313537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Murthy D.H.K., Nandal V., Furube A., Seki K., Katoh R., Lyu H., Hisatomi T., Domen K., Matsuzaki H. Origin of Enhanced Overall Water Splitting Efficiency in Aluminum-Doped SrTiO3 Photocatalyst. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023;13:2302064. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202302064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Wilson A.A., Moss B., Riaz A.A., Kalha C., Thakur P.K., Lee T.-L., Regoutz A., Takata T., Hisatomi T., Domen K., et al. Long-Lived Hole Accumulation in Al:SrTiO3 /Rh–Cr Photocatalyst Systems under Continuous Irradiation and Its Correlation with Overall Water Splitting Efficiency. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025;147:34438–34448. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5c07521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Fang F., Xu F., Su Z., Li X., Han W., Qin Y., Ye J., Chang K. Understanding Targeted Modulation Mechanism in SrTiO3 Using K+ for Solar Water Splitting. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2022;316:121613. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121613. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Fang F., Zhang J., Su Z., Xu F., Li J., Chang K. Boost of Solar Water Splitting on SrTiO3 by Designing V-Ions Center for Localizing Defect Charge to Suppress Deep Trap. J. Catal. 2023;425:422–431. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2023.06.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Kikuchi E., Saito N., Yamaguchi Y., Kudo A. Temperature Dependence of Photocatalytic Water Splitting under Visible Light Irradiation over Ir- and Sb-Codoped SrTiO3:Al. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2025;129:2381–2390. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c07699. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Luo Y., Ni C., Zhao J., Cui J., Zhang J., Zhu Q., Fan F., Li C. Intrafacet Charge Separation toward Efficient Overall Water Splitting on SrTiO3 Single Crystal Photocatalysts. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2025;16:2981–2986. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Zhang X., Li Z., Liu T., Li M., Zeng C., Matsumoto H., Han H. Water Oxidation Sites Located at the Interface of Pt/SrTiO3 for Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting. Chin. J. Catal. 2022;43:2223–2230. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(21)64048-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Bi R., Han B., Shen Y., Liu J., Wang Z. Enhancing Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting Activity of SrTiO3 Nanoparticles by a Synergetic Pt/CrOx Dual Cocatalyst System. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2023;6:10600–10609. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.3c01767. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Han K., Haiber D.M., Knöppel J., Lievens C., Cherevko S., Crozier P., Mul G., Mei B. CrOx -Mediated Performance Enhancement of Ni/NiO-Mg:SrTiO3 in Photocatalytic Water Splitting. ACS Catal. 2021;11:11049–11058. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c03104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Zhu X., Ding L., Sun R., Li J., Li W., Xu R., Xiang L., Fang F., Chang K. Interfacial Charge Transfer Bridge on SrTiO3 Crystal Boosts Solar Water Splitting. J. Catal. 2025;448:116160. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2025.116160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Zong S., Tian L., Guan X., Cheng C., Shi J., Guo L. Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting without Noble-Metal: Decorating CoP on Al-Doped SrTiO3. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;606:491–499. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.08.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Odabasi Lee S., Moon H.S., Hong I., Lakhera S.K., Yong K. Hollow SrTiO3 Photocatalyst with Spatially Separated OER and HER Cocatalysts for Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2024;665:160298. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2024.160298. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Wei Y., Wan J., Wang J., Zhang X., Yu R., Yang N., Wang D. Hollow Multishelled Structured SrTiO3 with La/Rh Co-Doping for Enhanced Photocatalytic Water Splitting under Visible Light. Small. 2021;17:2005345. doi: 10.1002/smll.202005345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Chen L., Wang C., Wang Z., Li G. Pivotal Role of Water Vapor–Mediated Defect Engineering on SrTiO3 Nanofiber toward Efficient Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Mater. Today Energy. 2024;44:101622. doi: 10.1016/j.mtener.2024.101622. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Cheng H., Bai Z., Cong R., Zhou Z., Zhang Z. SrTiO3:Al/Cd0.6Zn0.4S Type-II Heterojunction Photocatalysts for Efficient Solar Water Splitting. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2024;128:12427–12436. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c02827. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Pan J., Chen Z., Wang P., Wang P., Yu Q., Zhao W., Wang J., Zhu M., Zheng Y., Li C. The Overall Water Splitting of CdS/Ti3+-SrTiO3 Core–Shell Heterojunction via OER Enhancement of MnOx Nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 2021;424:130357. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130357. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Deng Y., Shu S., Fang N., Wang R., Chu Y., Liu Z., Cen W. One-Pot Synthesis of SrTiO3-SrCO3 Heterojunction with Strong Interfacial Electronic Interaction as a Novel Photocatalyst for Water Splitting to Generate H2. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2023;34:107323. doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.03.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Hu C., Tai C., Zhang W., Lu Q., Wei M., Si C., Guo E., Pang Y. Plasmonic Au Functionalized 3D SrTiO3/TiO2 Hollow Nanosphere Enables Efficient Solar Water Splitting. J. Alloys Compd. 2023;930:167449. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167449. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Le Y.T.H., Wu J.C.S., Yu W.-Y., Yeh C.-L., Maček Kržmanc M. Photocatalytic Whole H2O Splitting Using Bi0-Decorated g-C3N4/SrTiO3 Sheet-like Catalyst under Simulated Sunlight. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2025;130:390–401. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.04.302. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Zhuo Z., Wang X., Shen C., Cai M., Jiang Y., Xue Z., Fu Z., Wang Q., Wei Y., Sun S. Construction of TiO2 /SrTiO3 Heterojunction Derived from Monolayer Ti3C2 MXene for Efficient Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting. Chem. A Eur. J. 2023;29:e202203450. doi: 10.1002/chem.202203450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Zhu Y., Li N., Li D., Zou H., Dong B., Qi Y., Gong L. Aluminum-Doped Mesoporous Single-Crystalline SrTaO2N for Boosted Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. J. Catal. 2026;459:116929. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2026.116929. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Zhang J., Liu Y., Dittrich T., Wang Z., Ji P., Li M., Ta N., Zhang H., Zhen C., Xu Y., et al. Unveiling Charge Utilization Mechanisms in Ferroelectric for Water Splitting. Nat. Commun. 2025;16:1515. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56359-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Qi H., Kang Y., Qiu J., Zhang W., Ma S., Wang L., Liu G. Na/Mo Co-Doped PbTiO3 for Photocatalytic Water Oxidation and Z-Scheme Overall Water Splitting under Visible Light. Chem. Commun. 2024;60:6198–6201. doi: 10.1039/D4CC01761G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Zhao S., Shen S., Han L., Tian B., Li N., Chen W., Li X. Ferroelectric Perovskite PbTiO3 for Advanced Photocatalysis. Rare Met. 2024;43:4038–4055. doi: 10.1007/s12598-024-02847-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Wan G., Yin L., Chen X., Xu X., Huang J., Zhen C., Zhu H., Huang B., Hu W., Ren Z., et al. Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting over PbTiO3 Modulated by Oxygen Vacancy and Ferroelectric Polarization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:20342–20350. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c08177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Dong Z., Wang Z., Yang T., Feng H., Li L., Ullah I., Xue S. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production and Simultaneous Tetracycline Degradation by Selectively Depositing Growth of MoS2 on the PbTiO3 (001) Surface. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024;683:133096. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.133096. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Arney D., Watkins T., Maggard P.A. Effects of Particle Surface Areas and Microstructures on Photocatalytic H2 and O2 Production over PbTiO3. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2011;94:1483–1489. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04262.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Schafranek R., Li S., Chen F., Wu W., Klein A. PbTiO3/SrTiO3 Interface: Energy Band Alignment and Its Relation to the Limits of Fermi Level Variation. Phys. Rev. B. 2011;84:045317. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.045317. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Liu Y., Ye S., Xie H., Zhu J., Shi Q., Ta N., Chen R., Gao Y., An H., Nie W., et al. Internal-Field-Enhanced Charge Separation in a Single-Domain Ferroelectric PbTiO3 Photocatalyst. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:1906513. doi: 10.1002/adma.201906513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Patra R., Huang S.-H., Hu C., Yang P.-C. Modulating Interfacial Charge Transfer through Surface-Deposited Cu in PbTiO3/g-C3N4 for Enhanced Photocatalytic Pollutant Degradation and H2 Production. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2025;156:885–899. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2025.09.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Zhen C., Ren Z., Kang Y., Wang L., Liu G. PbTiO3 Based Single-Domain Ferroelectric Photocatalysts for Water Splitting. Acc. Mater. Res. 2023;4:591–603. doi: 10.1021/accountsmr.3c00042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Lim K.-G., Chew K.-H. Dynamics of Ferroelectric Polarization and Internal Electric Field in PbTiO3 /SrTiO3 Superlattices. Ferroelectrics. 2022;586:109–120. doi: 10.1080/00150193.2021.2014264. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Cohen R.E. Origin of Ferroelectricity in Perovskite Oxides. Nature. 1992;358:136–138. doi: 10.1038/358136a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Ma W., Hao A. Electric Field-Induced Polarization Rotation and Ultrahigh Piezoelectricity in PbTiO3. J. Appl. Phys. 2014;115:104105. doi: 10.1063/1.4868320. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Kakekhani A., Ismail-Beigi S. Polarization-Driven Catalysis via Ferroelectric Oxide Surfaces. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016;18:19676–19695. doi: 10.1039/C6CP03170F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Ye Z., Yu D., Zhang R., Qin F., Sun Y., Huang J., Zhou Z., Tian H., Han G., Ren Z., et al. Regulating Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting of Ferroelectric Heterostructures by Size Effect. Nano Res. 2024;17:8000–8006. doi: 10.1007/s12274-024-6819-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Du P., Huang J., Ye Z., Zhen C., Liu J., Yang Y., Ren Z., Yin L., Wang L., Liu G. Reconstructing Ferroelectric Polarization Screening of PbTiO3 by Epitaxial SrTiO3 for Efficient Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024;34:2312888. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202312888. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Mete E., Ellialtıoğlu Ş., Gulseren O., Uner D. Elucidating the Barriers on Direct Water Splitting: Key Role of Oxygen Vacancy Density and Coordination over PbTiO3 and TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2021;125:1874–1880. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c09685. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Ali I., Liu J.-A., Yin L.-C., Wang L., Liu G. Water Adsorption on Ferroelectric PbTiO3 (0 0 1) Surface: A Density Functional Theory Study. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2025;678:984–991. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2024.09.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Qi H., Kang Y., Liu J.-A., Yin L., Zhang W., Ma S., Qiu J., Li L., Hu W., Wang L., et al. Reducing the Vacancies Associated with Ferroelectric Polarization to Promote Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting. Sci. China Chem. 2024;67:3258–3264. doi: 10.1007/s11426-024-2152-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Yin S., Liu S., Yuan Y., Guo S., Ren Z. Octahedral Shaped PbTiO3-TiO2 Nanocomposites for High-Efficiency Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. Nanomaterials. 2021;11:2295. doi: 10.3390/nano11092295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Liu G., Ma L., Yin L.-C., Wan G., Zhu H., Zhen C., Yang Y., Liang Y., Tan J., Cheng H.-M. Selective Chemical Epitaxial Growth of TiO2 Islands on Ferroelectric PbTiO3 Crystals to Boost Photocatalytic Activity. Joule. 2018;2:1095–1107. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.03.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Kadi M.W., Mohamed R.M. One-Step Sol-Gel Synthesis of PbTiO3 Nanosheets and Photocatalytic Enhancement through Decoration by Platinum. J. Nanopart. Res. 2020;22:266. doi: 10.1007/s11051-020-04989-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Zhen C., Yu J.C., Liu G., Cheng H.-M. Selective Deposition of Redox Co-Catalyst(s) to Improve the Photocatalytic Activity of Single-Domain Ferroelectric PbTiO3 Nanoplates. Chem. Commun. 2014;50:10416. doi: 10.1039/C4CC04999C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Li R., Zhao Y., Li C. Spatial Distribution of Active Sites on a Ferroelectric PbTiO3 Photocatalyst for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. Faraday Discuss. 2017;198:463–472. doi: 10.1039/C6FD00199H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Reddy K.H., Parida K. Fabrication, Characterization, and Photoelectrochemical Properties of Cu-Doped PbTiO3 and Its Hydrogen Production Activity. ChemCatChem. 2013;5:3812–3820. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201300462. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Paramanik L., Reddy K.H., Parida K.M. An Energy Band Compactable B-rGO/PbTiO3 p–n Junction: A Highly Dynamic and Durable Photocatalyst for Enhanced Photocatalytic H2 Evolution. Nanoscale. 2019;11:22328–22342. doi: 10.1039/C9NR06378A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Wang C., Shan L., Song D., Xiao Y., Suriyaprakash J. Hydrothermal Synthesis of rGO/PbTiO3 Photocatalyst and Its Photocatalytic H2 Evolution Activity. J. Nanomater. 2019;2019:4869728. doi: 10.1155/2019/4869728. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Xu T., Niu P., Wang S., Li L. High Visible Light Photocatalytic Activities Obtained by Integrating G-C3N4 with Ferroelectric PbTiO3. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021;74:128–135. doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.10.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Patra R., Panda P.K., Lin T.-H., Wu M.-C., Yang P.-C. Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanosheet and Ferroelectric PbTiO3 Nanoplates S-Scheme Heterostructure for Enhancing Hydrogen Production and Textile Dye Degradation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2024;295:120133. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2024.120133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Paramanik L., Reddy K.H., Sultana S., Parida K. Architecture of Biperovskite-Based LaCrO3 /PbTiO3 p–n Heterojunction with a Strong Interface for Enhanced Charge Anti-Recombination Process and Visible Light-Induced Photocatalytic Reactions. Inorg. Chem. 2018;57:15133–15148. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b02364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Wan G., Yang Y., Zhu H., Zhen C., Xu X., Wang L., Liu G. Selectively Constructing Sandwich-like Heterostructure of CdS/PbTiO3/TiO2 to Improve Visible-Light Photocatalytic H2 Evolution. Sci. China Mater. 2022;65:3428–3434. doi: 10.1007/s40843-022-2067-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Paramanik L., Sultana S., Parida K. Energy Band Modulation in CuxP(X=3,1/2)/PbTiO3 via Heterogeneous Erection Induced Benign Junction Interface for Enhanced Photocatalytic H2 Evolution. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2022;47:3893–3905. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Anderson M., Greenwood K., Taylor G., Poeppelmeier K. B-Cation Arrangements in Double Perovskites. Prog. Solid State Chem. 1993;22:197–233. doi: 10.1016/0079-6786(93)90004-B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Mishra S., Parida S.K. Perovskite Metal Oxides. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2023. An Overview and Recent Progress of Single and Double Perovskite Metal Oxides; pp. 55–80. [Google Scholar]
- 266.Albrecht E.K., Karttunen A.J. Investigation on the Predictive Power of Tolerance Factor τ for A-Site Double Perovskite Oxides. Dalton Trans. 2023;52:12461–12469. doi: 10.1039/D3DT01990J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Gupta M., Jana S., Nanda B.R.K. Electronic Structure and Optoelectronic Properties of Halide Double Perovskites: Fundamental Insights and Design of a Theoretical Workflow. Chem. Mater. 2024;36:132–145. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c01048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Ghorui S., Kangsabanik J., Aslam M., Alam A. Optoelectronic and Transport Properties of Vacancy-Ordered Double-Perovskite Halides: A First-Principles Study. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2024;21:024036. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.024036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Chen B., Idris A.M., Lu P., Shou Q., Khan K., Jiang G., Li Z. Flux-Assisted Synthesis of a Visible-Light-Active La2 FeTiO6 Double Perovskite with Intrinsic Bifunctional Activity for Photocatalytic Water Reduction and Oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2026;14:5742–5750. doi: 10.1039/D5TA08696E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Chen H., Xu X. Ruddlesden-Popper Compounds in the Double-Perovskite Family Sr2FeTaO6(SrO)n (n = 0, 1 and 2) and Their Photocatalytic Properties. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017;206:35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.01.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Idris A.M., Liu T., Shah J.H., Han H., Li C. Sr2CoTaO6 Double Perovskite Oxide as a Novel Visible-Light-Absorbing Bifunctional Photocatalyst for Photocatalytic Oxygen and Hydrogen Evolution Reactions. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020;8:14190–14197. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c05237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Borse P.H., Lim K.T., Yoon J.-H., Bae J.S., Ha M.G., Chung E.H., Jeong E.D., Kim H.G. Investigation of the Physico-Chemical Properties of Sr2FeNb1−xWxO6 (0.0 ≤ x ≤ 0.1) for Visible-Light Photocatalytic Water-Splitting Applications. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2014;64:295–300. doi: 10.3938/jkps.64.295. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Cui E., Hou G., Chen X., Zhang F., Deng Y., Yu G., Li B., Wu Y. In-Situ Hydrothermal Fabrication of Sr2FeTaO6/NaTaO3 Heterojunction Photocatalyst Aimed at the Effective Promotion of Electron-Hole Separation and Visible-Light Absorption. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019;241:52–65. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Kumar N., Rom T., Mallick B., Kaushik R., Ghosh A., Babu P.D., Panda S.K., Paul A.K. Antiferromagnetically Coupled Double Perovskite as an Efficient and Robust Catalyst for Visible Light Driven Water Splitting at Neutral pH. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022;24:5083–5093. doi: 10.1039/D1CP04082K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Zhang G., Sun S., Jiang W., Miao X., Zhao Z., Zhang X., Qu D., Zhang D., Li D., Sun Z. A Novel Perovskite SrTiO3 -Ba2 FeNbO6 Solid Solution for Visible Light Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017;7:1600932. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201600932. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Idris A.M., Liu T., Hussain Shah J., Malik A.S., Zhao D., Han H., Li C. Sr2 NiWO6 Double Perovskite Oxide as a Novel Visible-Light-Responsive Water Oxidation Photocatalyst. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12:25938–25948. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c05576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Idris A.M., Liu T., Shah J.H., Zhang X., Ma C., Malik A.S., Jin A., Rasheed S., Sun Y., Li C., et al. A Novel Double Perovskite Oxide Semiconductor Sr2 CoWO6 as Bifunctional Photocatalyst for Photocatalytic Oxygen and Hydrogen Evolution Reactions from Water under Visible Light Irradiation. Sol. RRL. 2020;4:1900456. doi: 10.1002/solr.201900456. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Cha Y.J., Bae J.S., Hong T.E., Yoon J.-H., Chung E.H., Jeong E.D., Kim H.G., Borse P.H., Lim K.T. Structural, Optical and Visible-Light Photocatalytic Properties of Sr3FeNb2O9 Oxide. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2014;65:520–525. doi: 10.3938/jkps.65.520. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Yu G., Hu J., Xiao W., Zhu Y., Dai Y. Fabrication of Black NiO/Sr2FeTaO6 Heterojunctions with Rapid Interface Charge Transfer for Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Front. Chem. 2023;10:1118540. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.1118540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Ahmed M., Xinxin G. A Review of Metal Oxynitrides for Photocatalysis. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2016;3:578–590. doi: 10.1039/C5QI00202H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 281.Fuertes A. Chemistry and Applications of Oxynitride Perovskites. J. Mater. Chem. 2012;22:3293. doi: 10.1039/c2jm13182j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 282.Seo J., Domen K. Perovskite and Layered Perovskite Oxynitrides for Efficient Sunlight-Driven Artificial Synthesis. Mater. Chem. Front. 2024;8:1451–1479. doi: 10.1039/D3QM01019H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 283.Umezawa N., Janotti A. Controlling the Electronic Structures of Perovskite Oxynitrides and Their Solid Solutions for Photocatalysis. ChemSusChem. 2016;9:1027–1031. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201600040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284.Balaz S., Porter S.H., Woodward P.M., Brillson L.J. Electronic Structure of Tantalum Oxynitride Perovskite Photocatalysts. Chem. Mater. 2013;25:3337–3343. doi: 10.1021/cm401815w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Werner V., Lora F.B., Chai Z., Hörndl J., Praxmair J., Luber S., Haussener S., Pokrant S. Stability and Degradation of (Oxy)Nitride Photocatalysts for Solar Water Splitting. RSC Sustain. 2024;2:1738–1752. doi: 10.1039/D4SU00096J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286.Jiang S., Liu Y., Xu J. Rare Earth Oxynitrides: Promising Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalysts for Water Splitting. Mater. Adv. 2021;2:1190–1203. doi: 10.1039/D0MA00867B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 287.Matoba T., Maeda K., Domen K. Activation of BaTaO2N Photocatalyst for Enhanced Non-Sacrificial Hydrogen Evolution from Water under Visible Light by Forming a Solid Solution with BaZrO3. Chem. A Eur. J. 2011;17:14731–14735. doi: 10.1002/chem.201102970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288.Yang L., Fu Q., Wang L., Yu J., Xu X. Liberating Photocarriers in Mesoporous Single-Crystalline SrTaO2N for Efficient Solar Water Splitting. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2022;304:120934. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120934. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 289.Yu J., Shi L., Li R., Huang J., Wang R., Li Z., Shen C., Liu G., Li Y., Xu X. Single-Crystalline LaTiO2N Nanosheets with Regulated Defects for Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting under Visible Light up to 600 Nm. ACS Catal. 2024;14:608–618. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c04743. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 290.Shi R., Waterhouse G.I.N., Zhang T. Recent Progress in Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction Over Perovskite Oxides. Sol. RRL. 2017;1:1700126. doi: 10.1002/solr.201700126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 291.Fuertes A. Metal Oxynitrides as Emerging Materials with Photocatalytic and Electronic Properties. Mater. Horiz. 2015;2:453–461. doi: 10.1039/C5MH00046G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 292.Takata T., Pan C., Domen K. Design and Development of Oxynitride Photocatalysts for Overall Water Splitting under Visible Light Irradiation. ChemElectroChem. 2016;3:31–37. doi: 10.1002/celc.201500324. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 293.Takata T., Pan C., Domen K. Recent Progress in Oxynitride Photocatalysts for Visible-Light-Driven Water Splitting. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2015;16:033506. doi: 10.1088/1468-6996/16/3/033506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 294.Li H., Xiao J., Vequizo J.J.M., Hisatomi T., Nakabayashi M., Pan Z., Shibata N., Yamakata A., Takata T., Domen K. One-Step Excitation Overall Water Splitting over a Modified Mg-Doped BaTaO2N Photocatalyst. ACS Catal. 2022;12:10179–10185. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.2c02394. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 295.Li W., Hirako A., Sekimori S., Galvão R.A., Nakabayashi M., Wang F., Hisatomi T., Domen K. Solar Hydrogen Production via a Z-Scheme Water Splitting System Based Solely on Perovskite-Type Tantalum Oxynitrides. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2025;13:3444–3451. doi: 10.1039/D4TA07592G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 296.Nishimae S., Vequizo J.J.M., Inoue Y., Yamakata A., Nakabayashi M., Higashi T., Domen K. Active BaTaO2N Photocatalysts Prepared from an Amorphous Ta2 O5 Precursor for Overall Water Splitting under Visible Light. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2023;11:6299–6310. doi: 10.1039/D2TA10010J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 297.Wu F., Liu G., Xu X. Efficient Photocatalytic Oxygen Production over Ca-Modified LaTiO2N. J. Catal. 2017;346:10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2016.11.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 298.Jia X., Wang C., Li Y., Zhang R., Shi Z., Liu X., Yu X., Zhang M., Xing Y. All-Solid-State Z-Scheme Ta3N5/Bi/CaTaO2N Photocatalyst Transformed from Perovskite CaBi2Ta2O9 for Efficient Overall Water Splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 2022;431:134041. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.134041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 299.Wang R., Wang Y., Chang S., Jin S., Shao Y., Xu X. LaTaON2-SrZrO3 Solid Solutions with Tunable Band Gap for Photocatalytic Water Oxidation under Visible Light Illumination. J. Catal. 2020;390:57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2020.07.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 300.Wang Y., Jin S., Sun X., Wei S., Chen L., Xu X. Switching on Efficient Photocatalytic Water Oxidation Reactions over CaNbO2N by Mg Modifications under Visible Light Illumination. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019;245:10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.12.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 301.Sun X., Liu G., Xu X. Defect Management and Efficient Photocatalytic Water Oxidation Reaction over Mg Modified SrNbO2 N. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2018;6:10947–10957. doi: 10.1039/C8TA00767E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 302.Takata T., Domen K. Particulate Photocatalysts for Water Splitting: Recent Advances and Future Prospects. ACS Energy Lett. 2019;4:542–549. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b02209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 303.Xu J., Luo Y., Guo Q., Sun W., Chen S., Wang Z., He H. Mg-Doped SrTaO2N as a Visible-Light-Driven H2-Evolution Photocatalyst for Accelerated Z-Scheme Overall Water Splitting. Chin. J. Catal. 2024;65:70–78. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(24)60082-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 304.Lin G., Sun X., Xu X. Mg Modified LaTiO2N with Ameliorated Photocarrier Separation for Solar Water Splitting. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2023;324:122258. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.122258. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 305.Wei S., Jin S., Pan G., Li Z., Liu G., Xu X. Triggering Efficient Photocatalytic Water Oxidation Reactions over BaNbO2N by Incorporating Ca at B Site. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019;102:6194–6201. doi: 10.1111/jace.16485. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 306.Zhang X., Zhang H., Zhang H., Peng L., Shi D., Huang S. The Substitution Effect of Tantalum on the Visible-Light-Driven Water Reduction Activity of SrNbO2N Photocatalyst. J. Nanopart. Res. 2024;26:16. doi: 10.1007/s11051-024-05927-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 307.Yu J., Huang J., Wang R., Konysheva E.Y., Liu G., Xu X. Fluorine Passivated Perovskite SrNbO2N Photocatalyst for Robust Sunlight-Driven Water Splitting. Adv. Energy Mater. 2025;15:2404811. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202404811. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 308.Siritanaratkul B., Maeda K., Hisatomi T., Domen K. Synthesis and Photocatalytic Activity of Perovskite Niobium Oxynitrides with Wide Visible-Light Absorption Bands. ChemSusChem. 2011;4:74–78. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201000207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 309.Xiao J., Nakabayashi M., Hisatomi T., Vequizo J.J.M., Li W., Chen K., Tao X., Yamakata A., Shibata N., Takata T., et al. Sub-50 nm Perovskite-Type Tantalum-Based Oxynitride Single Crystals with Enhanced Photoactivity for Water Splitting. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:8030. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43838-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 310.Salmanion M., Wang L., Kandel R., Najaf Z., Rao G., Hahn W., Van Benthem K., Britt R.D., Osterloh F.E. Ammonolysis with N2 -Diluted NH3 Suppresses Ta(iv) Defects in BaTaO2N and Enhances Photocatalytic Water Oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2026;14:6963–6974. doi: 10.1039/D5TA09305H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 311.Tran T.T.T., Kim S., Seo J. Size Dependence of Perovskite-Type BaNbO2N Particles on Sunlight-Driven Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. J. Catal. 2022;406:157–164. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2022.01.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 312.Pichler M., Si W., Haydous F., Téllez H., Druce J., Fabbri E., Kazzi M.E., Döbeli M., Ninova S., Aschauer U., et al. LaTiOx Ny Thin Film Model Systems for Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Physicochemical Evolution of the Solid–Liquid Interface and the Role of the Crystallographic Orientation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017;27:1605690. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201605690. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 313.Wang R., He H., Shi L., Du D., Lin G., Zhang C., Xu X. Unleashing Photocarrier Transport in Mesoporous Single-Crystalline LaTiO2N for High-Efficiency Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Adv. Energy Mater. 2024;14:2302996. doi: 10.1002/aenm.202302996. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 314.Xu J., Pan C., Takata T., Domen K. Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting on the Perovskite-Type Transition Metal Oxynitride CaTaO2N under Visible Light Irradiation. Chem. Commun. 2015;51:7191–7194. doi: 10.1039/C5CC01728A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 315.Hisatomi T., Katayama C., Moriya Y., Minegishi T., Katayama M., Nishiyama H., Yamada T., Domen K. Photocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Using BaNbO2N Modified with Cobalt Oxide under Photoexcitation up to 740 Nm. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013;6:3595. doi: 10.1039/c3ee42951b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 316.Yamada T., Teshima K. Crystallographic Controls of Polycrystalline BaNbO2 n Particles Using Flux Method and Their Photocatalytic Water Oxidation Ability. Meet. Abstr. 2018;MA2018-02:1939. doi: 10.1149/MA2018-02/54/1939. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 317.Gao J., Xu G., Liang Q., Xu X., Wang H., Liu S., Ren J., Fang Z., Wei S. Solar-Driven Overall Water Splitting over a S-Scheme Semiconductor Heterojunction of 2D g-C3N4/1D LaNbON2. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2023;666:119420. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2023.119420. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 318.Seo J. Size Control of LaNbON2 Particles for Enhanced Photocatalytic Water Oxidation Under Visible Light Irradiation. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2021;42:571–576. doi: 10.1002/bkcs.12224. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 319.Chang S., Yu J., Wang R., Fu Q., Xu X. LaTaON2 Mesoporous Single Crystals for Efficient Photocatalytic Water Oxidation and Z-Scheme Overall Water Splitting. ACS Nano. 2021;15:18153–18162. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c06871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 320.Liu M., You W., Lei Z., Takata T., Domen K., Li C. Photocatalytic Water Splitting to Hydrogen over a Visible Light-Driven LaTaON2 Catalyst. Chin. J. Catal. 2006;27:556–558. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(06)60032-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 321.Yang L., Yu J., Chang S., Xu X. Boosting Visible-Light-Driven Water Splitting over LaTaON2via Al Doping. Sci. China Mater. 2022;65:3452–3461. doi: 10.1007/s40843-022-2085-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 322.Higashi M., Abe R., Takata T., Domen K. Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting under Visible Light Using ATaO2N (A = Ca, Sr, Ba) and WO3 in a IO3−/I− Shuttle Redox Mediated System. Chem. Mater. 2009;21:1543–1549. doi: 10.1021/cm803145n. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 323.Wei S., Xu X. Boosting Photocatalytic Water Oxidation Reactions over Strontium Tantalum Oxynitride by Structural Laminations. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018;228:10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.01.071. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 324.Wu P., Shi J., Zhou Z., Tang W., Guo L. CaTaO2N–CaZrO3 Solid Solution: Band-Structure Engineering and Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2012;37:13704–13710. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 325.Luo Y., Li H., Luo Y., Li Z., Qi Y., Zhang F., Li C. Heterostructure of Ta3N5 Nanorods and CaTaO2N Nanosheets Fabricated Using a Precursor Template to Boost Water Splitting under Visible Light. J. Energy Chem. 2022;67:27–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jechem.2021.09.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 326.Liang C., Zhao D., Li Y., Li X., Peng S., Shao G., Xing G. Ruddlesden–Popper Perovskite for Stable Solar Cells. Energy Environ. Mater. 2018;1:221–231. doi: 10.1002/eem2.12022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 327.Beznosikov B.V., Aleksandrov K.S. Perovskite-like Crystals of the Ruddlesden-Popper Series. Crystallogr. Rep. 2000;45:792–798. doi: 10.1134/1.1312923. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 328.Liu P., Nisar J., Ahuja R., Pathak B. Layered Perovskite Sr2Ta2O7 for Visible Light Photocatalysis: A First Principles Study. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2013;117:5043–5050. doi: 10.1021/jp310945e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 329.Virdi K.S., Kauffmann Y., Ziegler C., Ganter P., Lotsch B.V., Kaplan W.D., Blaha P., Scheu C. Electronic Structure of KCa2Nb3O10 as Envisaged by Density Functional Theory and Valence Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B. 2013;87:115108. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.115108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 330.Toda K. Structural Chemistry of New Ion-Exchangeable Tantalates with Layered Perovskite Structure: New Reduced Ruddlesden–Popper Phase, Na2Ca2Ta3O10. Solid State Ion. 1998;113–115:501–508. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2738(98)00316-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 331.Zheng K., Chen Y., Sun Y., Chen J., Chábera P., Schaller R., Al-Marri M.J., Canton S.E., Liang Z., Pullerits T. Inter-Phase Charge and Energy Transfer in Ruddlesden–Popper 2D Perovskites: Critical Role of the Spacing Cations. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2018;6:6244–6250. doi: 10.1039/C8TA01518J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 332.Righetto M., Giovanni D., Lim S.S., Sum T.C. The Photophysics of Ruddlesden-Popper Perovskites: A Tale of Energy, Charges, and Spins. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2021;8:011318. doi: 10.1063/5.0031821. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 333.Xiao H., Liu P., Wang W., Ran R., Zhou W., Shao Z. Ruddlesden–Popper Perovskite Oxides for Photocatalysis-Based Water Splitting and Wastewater Treatment. Energy Fuels. 2020;34:9208–9221. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 334.Sun X., Xie Y., Wu F., Chen H., Lv M., Ni S., Liu G., Xu X. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production over Chromium Doped Layered Perovskite Sr2TiO4. Inorg. Chem. 2015;54:7445–7453. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 335.Jeong H., Kim T., Kim D., Kim K. Hydrogen Production by the Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting on NiO/Sr3Ti2O7NiO/Sr3Ti2O7: Effect of Preparation Method. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2006;31:1142–1146. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.10.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 336.Oshima T., Yokoi T., Eguchi M., Maeda K. Synthesis and Photocatalytic Activity of K2CaNaNb3O10, a New Ruddlesden–Popper Phase Layered Perovskite. Dalton Trans. 2017;46:10594–10601. doi: 10.1039/C6DT04872B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 337.Tsuchikado H., Anabuki S., Cretu O., Kinoshita Y., Hattori M., Shiroma Y., Fan D., Okazaki M., Soma T., Ishiwari F., et al. Effects of Metal-Cation Doping on Photocatalytic H2 Evolution Activity of Layered Perovskite Oxynitride K2LaTa2O6N. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2025;8:3541–3552. doi: 10.1021/acsaem.4c03131. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 338.Okazaki Y., Mishima T., Nishimoto S., Matsuda M., Miyake M. Photocatalytic Activity of Ca3Ti2O7 Layered-Perovskite Doped with Rh under Visible Light Irradiation. Mater. Lett. 2008;62:3337–3340. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.02.052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 339.Sun X., Xu X. Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production over La/Rh Co-Doped Ruddlesden-Popper Compound Sr2TiO4. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017;210:149–159. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.03.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 340.Zhang H., Ni S., Mi Y., Xu X. Ruddlesden-Popper Compound Sr2TiO4 Co-Doped with La and Fe for Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. J. Catal. 2018;359:112–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2017.12.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 341.Hu Y., Mao L., Guan X., Tucker K.A., Xie H., Wu X., Shi J. Layered Perovskite Oxides and Their Derivative Nanosheets Adopting Different Modification Strategies towards Better Photocatalytic Performance of Water Splitting. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020;119:109527. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109527. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 342.Kim J., Hwang D.W., Bae S.W., Kim Y.G., Lee J.S. Effect of Precursors on the Morphology and the Photocatalytic Water-Splitting Activity of Layered Perovskite La2Ti2O7. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2001;18:941–947. doi: 10.1007/BF02705623. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 343.Hisatomi T., Yamada T., Nishiyama H., Takata T., Domen K. Materials and Systems for Large-Scale Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2025;10:769–782. doi: 10.1038/s41578-025-00823-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 344.Zhang Z., Chen X., Zhang X., Lin H., Lin H., Zhou Y., Wang X. Synthesis of Cu2O/La2CuO4 Nanocomposite as an Effective Heterostructure Photocatalyst for H2 Production. Catal. Commun. 2013;36:20–24. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2013.03.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 345.Pamu S.H., Bhaskaran A., Roy S., Sankar Ganesh P., Singh S.A. Palladium Doping in LaNiO3 and La2NiO4 for Improved Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Insights into Structure–Property Relationships. In: Singh S.A., Dutta A., Murthy Z.V.P., editors. Novel Materials and Technologies for Energy and Environment Applications, Volume 1. Volume 77. Springer Nature; Singapore: 2025. pp. 117–138. Springer Proceedings in Materials. [Google Scholar]
- 346.Ko Y.-G., Lee W.Y. Effects of Nickel-Loading Method on the Water-Splitting Activity of a Layered NiOx/Sr4Ti3O10 Photocatalyst. Catal. Lett. 2002;83:157–160. doi: 10.1023/A:1021021627635. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 347.Chen H., Sun X., Xu X. Ruddlesden-Popper Compounds (SrO)(LaFeO3)n (n = 1 and 2) as p-Type Semiconductors for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. Electrochim. Acta. 2017;252:138–146. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.186. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 348.Vijatovic Petrovic M.M., Bobic J.D. Magnetic, Ferroelectric, and Multiferroic Metal Oxides. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2018. Perovskite and Aurivillius; pp. 35–49. [Google Scholar]
- 349.Wachsmuth B., Zschech E., Thomas N.W., Brodie S.G., Gurman S.J., Baker S., Bayliss S.C. Structure Model of Aurivillius Compounds. An EXAFS Study. Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 1993;135:59–71. doi: 10.1002/pssa.2211350103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 350.Malik J., Kumar S., Srivastava P., Bag M., Mandal T.K. Cation Disorder and Octahedral Distortion Control of Internal Electric Field, Band Bending and Carrier Lifetime in Aurivillius Perovskite Solid Solutions for Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity. Mater. Adv. 2021;2:4832–4842. doi: 10.1039/D1MA00304F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 351.Supriya S. Tailoring Layered Structure of Bismuth-Based Aurivillius Perovskites: Recent Advances and Future Aspects. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023;479:215010. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.215010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 352.Jiamprasertboon A., Promkamat P., Kafizas A., Eknapakul T., Kongpatpanich K., Sailuam W., Siritanon T., Yoskamtorn T., Sotho K., Cheacharoen R., et al. Porous Nanosheets and Excellent Charge Carrier Dynamics in Ag+ -Doped Na0.5Bi2.5Nb2O9 Aurivillius-Phase Layered Perovskite for Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic Activity. Chem. Asian J. 2025;20:e202500151. doi: 10.1002/asia.202500151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 353.Wu Q., Chen X., Zhao L., Zhao Y., Zhou Y., Zhao S. The Relaxor Properties and Energy Storage Performance of Aurivillius Compounds with Different Number of Perovskite-like Layers. J. Alloys Compd. 2022;911:165081. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165081. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 354.Ghosh S., Bera S., Singh A., Basu S., Basu R.N. Hierarchical Bi2WO6/BiFeWO6 n-n Heterojunction as an Efficient Photocatalyst for Water Splitting under Visible Light. J. Alloys Compd. 2022;919:165700. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165700. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 355.Supriya S. Effect of Doping and Enhanced Microstructures of Bismuth Titanates as Aurivillius Perovskites. Micron. 2022;162:103344. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2022.103344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 356.Jiang L., Ni S., Liu G., Xu X. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production over Aurivillius Compound Bi3TiNbO9 and Its Modifications by Cr/Nb Co-Doping. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017;217:342–352. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 357.Huang J., Kang Y., Liu J., Yao T., Qiu J., Du P., Huang B., Hu W., Liang Y., Xie T., et al. Gradient Tungsten-Doped Bi3TiNbO9 Ferroelectric Photocatalysts with Additional Built-in Electric Field for Efficient Overall Water Splitting. Nat. Commun. 2023;14:7948. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43837-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 358.Huang J., Kang Y., Liu J., Chen R., Xie T., Liu Z., Xu X., Tian H., Yin L., Fan F., et al. Selective Exposure of Robust Perovskite Layer of Aurivillius-Type Compounds for Stable Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting. Adv. Sci. 2023;10:2302206. doi: 10.1002/advs.202302206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 359.Huang J., Qiu J., Yang Y., Li B., Wang L., Cheng H., Liu G. Interface Regulation of Bi3TiNbO9/Rh Photocatalysts by Introducing Ultrathin Heterolayer to Enhance Overall Water Splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024;34:2402711. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202402711. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 360.Wang Y., Zhang M., Wu J., Hu Z., Zhang H., Yan H. Ferroelectric and Photocatalytic Properties of Aurivillius Phase Ca2Bi4Ti5O18. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2021;104:322–328. doi: 10.1111/jace.17466. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 361.Wan S., Ou M., Zhong Q., Zhang S., Song F. Construction of Z-Scheme Photocatalytic Systems Using ZnIn2S4, CoO -Loaded Bi2MoO6 and Reduced Graphene Oxide Electron Mediator and Its Efficient Nonsacrificial Water Splitting under Visible Light. Chem. Eng. J. 2017;325:690–699. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.05.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 362.Tao X., Zhou H., Zhang C., Ta N., Li R., Li C. Triclinic-Phase Bismuth Chromate: A Promising Candidate for Photocatalytic Water Splitting with Broad Spectrum Ranges. Adv. Mater. 2023;35:2211182. doi: 10.1002/adma.202211182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 363.Yin X., Li X., Liu H., Gu W., Zou W., Zhu L., Fu Z., Lu Y. Realizing Selective Water Splitting Hydrogen/Oxygen Evolution on Ferroelectric Bi3TiNbO9 Nanosheets. Nano Energy. 2018;49:489–497. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 364.Gu W., Li X., Zhang W., Wang J., Yin X., Zhu L., Chen Z., Zou W., Fu Z., Lu Y. Self-Limited Ion-Exchange Grown Bi6Fe2Ti3O18-BiOBr Ferroelectric Heterostructure and the Enhanced Photocatalytic Oxygen Evolution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019;479:137–147. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 365.Do K.D., Nguyen T.T., Nguyen T.T., Le L.K., Doan T.L.H., Nguyen H.H., Tran C.K.T., Phan T.B., Hoang H.C., Truong T.T., et al. Synthesis and Characterization of a Dion–Jacobson Two-Dimensional Perovskite. J. Mater. Sci. 2024;59:7273–7282. doi: 10.1007/s10853-024-09648-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 366.Ghosh D., Acharya D., Pedesseau L., Katan C., Even J., Tretiak S., Neukirch A.J. Charge Carrier Dynamics in Two-Dimensional Hybrid Perovskites: Dion–Jacobson vs. Ruddlesden–Popper Phases. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020;8:22009–22022. doi: 10.1039/D0TA07205B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 367.Kim B., Park J., Kang D., Jung N.E., Kim K., Ryu H., Jang J.I., Park S., Yi Y. Tuning Electronic Structure and Carrier Transport Properties through Crystal Orientation Control in Two-Dimensional Dion-Jacobson Phase Perovskites. Nano Converg. 2025;12:1. doi: 10.1186/s40580-024-00473-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 368.Gan Y., Qiu G., Yan C., Zeng Z., Qin B., Bi X., Liu Y. Numerical Analysis on the Effect of the Conduction Band Offset in Dion–Jacobson Perovskite Solar Cells. Energies. 2023;16:7889. doi: 10.3390/en16237889. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 369.Ikeue K., Mitsuyama T., Arayama K., Tsutsumi A., Machida M. Effect of Heat Treatment on Local Structure and Photocatalytic Water Splitting Activity of Ni-Loaded LiCa2Ta3O10. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2009;117:1161–1165. doi: 10.2109/jcersj2.117.1161. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 370.Arney D., Maggard P.A. Effect of Platelet-Shaped Surfaces and Silver-Cation Exchange on the Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production of RbLaNb2O7. ACS Catal. 2012;2:1711–1717. doi: 10.1021/cs200643h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 371.Oshima T., Lu D., Maeda K. Preparation of Pt-Intercalated KCa2Nb3O10 Nanosheets and Their Photocatalytic Activity for Overall Water Splitting. ChemNanoMat. 2016;2:748–755. doi: 10.1002/cnma.201600072. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 372.Wei Y., Li J., Huang Y., Huang M., Lin J., Wu J. Photocatalytic Water Splitting with In-Doped H2LaNb2O7 Composite Oxide Semiconductors. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 2009;93:1176–1181. doi: 10.1016/j.solmat.2009.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 373.Lin H.-Y., Lee T.-H., Sie C.-Y. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production with Nickel Oxide Intercalated K4Nb6O17 under Visible Light Irradiation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2008;33:4055–4063. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 374.Chen T., Jia P., Zhang X., Wang C., Yu W., Huang H. Layered Perovskite Photocatalysts: Classification, Synthesis, Theoretical Analysis and Solar Fuel Production. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2026;549:217265. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2025.217265. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 375.Li N., Cheng C., Wang Y., Robertson A.W., Sun Z. Layered Perovskite Materials for Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting: Recent Advances, Enhanced Strategies, and Future Challenges. EcoEnergy. 2025;3:e70023. doi: 10.1002/ece2.70023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 376.Kurnosenko S.A., Silyukov O.I., Rodionov I.A., Minich I.A., Ustinova A.I., Zvereva I.A. Reassembled Nanosheets of Layered Perovskite-Like Niobate HCa2Nb3O10 as Photocatalysts for Hydrogen Production from Aqueous Solutions of Plant Biomass Processing Products. Kinet. Catal. 2024;65:586–596. doi: 10.1134/S0023158424601943. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 377.Voytovich V., Kurnosenko S., Silyukov O., Rodionov I., Bugrov A., Minich I., Malygina E., Zvereva I. Synthesis of N-Alkoxy Derivatives of Layered Perovskite-Like Niobate HCa2Nb3O10 and Study of Their Photocatalytic Activity for Hydrogen Production from an Aqueous Solution of Methanol. Catalysts. 2021;11:897. doi: 10.3390/catal11080897. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 378.Jiang D., Ma W., Yao Y., Xiao P., Wen B., Li D., Chen M. Dion–Jacobson-Type Perovskite KCa2Ta3O10 Nanosheets Hybridized with g-C3N4 Nanosheets for Photocatalytic H2 Production. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2018;8:3767–3773. doi: 10.1039/C8CY00930A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 379.Machida M., Mitsuyama T., Ikeue K., Matsushima S., Arai M. Photocatalytic Property and Electronic Structure of Triple-Layered Perovskite Tantalates, MCa2Ta3O10 (M = Cs, Na, H, and C6H13NH3) J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005;109:7801–7806. doi: 10.1021/jp044833d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 380.Brito A.S., Bouquet V., Demange V., Cheviré F., Guilloux-Viry M., Marinho T.D., Souza J.K.D., Lima L.C., Pinheiro N.A., Santos I.M.G., et al. Theoretical-Experimental Evaluation of the Photocatalytic Activity of KCa2Ta3−xNbxO10. Mater. Lett. 2019;253:392–395. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2019.07.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
